Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(18941409393).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![72 File:"WARld" Manu Invisible Bristol 2015.jpg](#File:"WARld"_Manu_Invisible_Bristol_2015.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![90 File:"The probationer who disagreed with the matron" Wellcome L0016608.jpg](#File:"The_probationer_who_disagreed_with_the_matron"_Wellcome_L0016608.jpg){kind=link}
_(2775946118).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![177 File:"Ricominciamo da qui" di Rosk&Loste a San Giorgio a Cremano.jpg](#File:"Ricominciamo_da_qui"_di_Rosk&Loste_a_San_Giorgio_a_Cremano.jpg){kind=link}
Author of the photo is fr:George Skrigin (1910–1997). The photo can be restored after copyright expiring in 2068 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 07:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept, my mistake. Point c of license applies: published in Serbia before 1973. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
porque no debí haberlo subido Del Rosario 2018 (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Alejandro Horowicz.pdf]]
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.summitclimb.com/page/high-altitude-climbing-sherpas-staff/, appears to be some leftover from the watermark Ytoyoda (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Benoit Rochon at 13:11, 16 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Larger file at www.summitclimb.com --Krdbot 19:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/JamesNewtonHowardOfficial/photos/a.1365667706780881.1073741827.1365559120125073/1365667713447547/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 12:59, 16 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Instagram pic Ytoyoda (talk) 17:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as copyvio, also found at https://www.prepostseo.com/tmp_imgs/929866131534469285.jpg. JGHowes talk 01:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Image comes from https://graylinespain.com/tours/barcelona/one-day-trip-to-costa-caribe-aquatic-park-from-barcelona-10160_161/ Ytoyoda (talk) 06:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion: clear copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThomasPA34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I strongly doubt these images are own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader.
- File:Index leslie grossman ahs.jpg
- File:4785.800 volpaiute port aventura park spain.jpg
- File:Wild buffalos02 port aventura.jpg
- File:Stampida port aventura overview.jpg
- File:Les Thrill Towers et Red Force vus de loin.jpg
- File:Maison enzo ferrari land.png
- File:Scala de milan ferrari land.png
- File:Ferrari land palazzo vecchio.png
- File:Colisée ferrari land 2018.png
- File:Panoramique shambhala et dragon khan port aventura.png
- File:Arche d'entrée pa zone mexicaine.jpg
- File:Hurakan-condor port aventura.jpg
- File:Red force et thrill towers.jpg
- File:Flying race.jpg
- File:Champions race.jpg
- File:Crazy pistons.jpg
- File:Kid's tower.jpg
- File:Junior red force.jpg
- File:FerrariLandGallery2.jpg
- File:FlyingDreams.jpg
- File:Racing legends ferrari land.jpg
- File:Ferrari-Land Ferrari-Experience-a.jpg
- File:Pit stop record ferrari land.jpg
- File:Crazy Barrels port aventura.jpg
- File:TAMI tami port aventura.jpg
- File:Portaventura entrée.png
BrightRaven (talk) 12:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: I have already deleted images that were obvious copyvios (found on Google Images). BrightRaven (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear authorship. BrightRaven (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThomasPA34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images all appear in Expedia hotel descriptions, see https://www.expedia.co.uk/Costa-Daurada-Hotels-PortAventura-Hotel-El-Paso-Theme-Park-Tickets-Included.h892513.Hotel-Information
Ytoyoda (talk) 06:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion: clear copyvio (several Google hits for each picture). --BrightRaven (talk) 09:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThomasPA34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, and the copyvio record of the uploader.
- File:Pa park 2018.png
- File:Ferrari land gallery.png
- File:Racing legends fl.png
- File:Junior rf.png
- File:Aire de jeux fl.png
- File:Pole position fl.png
- File:Attraction fl.png
- File:Maranello grand race.png
- File:Ferrari experience façade.png
BrightRaven (talk) 08:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
EXIF says “Ryan Wilkins assistant product manager” Ytoyoda (talk) 06:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion: clear copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Upload from now-blocked sock. If we actually need this, I'll make an svg, but.. I don't think we need this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Delete It's just a recolored version of File:Nyami character 2.svg, with a CC BY license instead of the required CC BY-SA. clpo13(talk) 15:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 09:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot, source for the image not provided Ytoyoda (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete – Redcommrade didn’t upload a single own work here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redcommrade (talk · contribs)
[edit]I don't know, but for me all this images doesn't look like "own work2 but a small size scans
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Avron (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Got a better one? Neither do I. Is nothing at all better? I don't think so.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redcommrade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:3C6B61D0-4425-4C10-B499-2A4Am6F86699.jpg
- File:2128F8D1-0B7F-42E2-87D7-8ZM0340E77BB.jpg
- File:6A7DBFCA-6904-4FCE-BB9F-E76B2EFD3ZZZ.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
keine freie Lizenz erklärbar, keine Freigabe Ralf Roleček 
15:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 00:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 00:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 00:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 00:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Product can't be identified and so file can't be use for educational purpose. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
The file is the tail of an aircraft of Nokscoot, which Incorporates the unfree trademark of the company per W:File:NokScoot Logo.png. As the tail is the focus and the key part of the file, the file may fulfill Commons:De minimis#Guidelines criteria 6 or 7, which exempts from COM:DM. 廣九直通車 (talk) 00:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
_(18941409393).jpg){kind=link}
_(18941409393).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I see no indication of having a release for the artist's work, or even who the artist is. Jmabel ! talk 00:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
_(18941409393).jpg){kind=link}
- Seems right, since the file wasn't in use I've overwritten it with a crop of just the artist. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- That seems fine. Remaining artwork is de minimis. Do you (or anyone) have any idea who this is? Description is just '"Remember the Time" Opening Reception'. I believe it is at the art gallery in the Seattle Municipal Tower. - Jmabel ! talk 04:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't. I believe Ser Amantio di Nicolao has uploaded a lot of this Seattle stuff (saw something similar before), unfortunately sorely lacking in terms of categorization (this image is categorized as "Seattle"..) and descriptions. It's a typical example of what sparked Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Restrict usage of Flickr2Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- That seems fine. Remaining artwork is de minimis. Do you (or anyone) have any idea who this is? Description is just '"Remember the Time" Opening Reception'. I believe it is at the art gallery in the Seattle Municipal Tower. - Jmabel ! talk 04:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Previous version deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
_(18941409393).jpg){kind=link}
Although I’ve restored the license removed by the uploader, the metadata suggests it is a Facebook image, combined with the small size and the filename, making it possibly not own work by the uploader. However, a cursory search of Facebook did not reveal a matching image but perhaps some light can be cast on the matter. Green Giant (talk) 01:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:49, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Taiwan B dash (talk) 02:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The photo unlikely has any educational use but one inferred from the papers. Each of papers could be photographed or scanned, but alas… all of them are likely copyrighted. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I searched for "flyers table" and this seems to be one of the better examples of a table filled with flyers. I cropped the stuff from the wall. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: thanks to Alexis Jazz. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted logo B dash (talk) 02:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- "Copyrighted logo"? More likely some COA, though it should be indicated in the file description. The tiny versions by the way (in the corners) are definitely French COAs. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that the fleurs-de-lys in the borders are conventional heraldic devices, and no more copyrightable IMO than letters of the alphabet, however drawn. Although the large central logo (monogram?) appears to be elaborated from a fleur-de-lys, it is not any traditional heraldry that I can recognize; I don’t know the game but I expect Clpo13 is right that it belongs to the publisher. It might just fail to meet the Japanese TOO, which seems fairly high, although probably not as high as the American.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: first, where is a logo? Commons have the image annotation tool to point to it. Second, who is its rights holder? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- The cosplay is based off the character Jeanne d'Arc in the video game Fate/Grand Order. It's hard to find a decent picture of her carrying this banner (since most of the GIS results are pretty much just softcore porn) but you can see the same design here and here. The design in the center of the banner is presumably copyrighted by the game publisher, though it might be a derivative of an older design. clpo13(talk) 16:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: I've uploaded a blurred version (yes, I'm experimenting) so if the logo can't be determined to be based on any existing PD emblem it can be reverted to the blurred version instead of deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- It could also be cropped to the cosplayer alone, if there are no copyright issues with her costume. clpo13(talk) 17:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: also possible, there is quite a lot going on though so I went with the blur. A crop in a new file, if needed, is always possible. As for her costume, apart from the face.. not-really-a-mask-thing, I'm not sure it will exceed TOO. And even if it does, I would argue her body armor could be considered utilitarian. Paintball guns seem to have utilitarian uses, and I think her body armor will protect her quite well from them. At least the parts that are actually covered by the armor. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- It could also be cropped to the cosplayer alone, if there are no copyright issues with her costume. clpo13(talk) 17:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: I've uploaded a blurred version (yes, I'm experimenting) so if the logo can't be determined to be based on any existing PD emblem it can be reverted to the blurred version instead of deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- The cosplay is based off the character Jeanne d'Arc in the video game Fate/Grand Order. It's hard to find a decent picture of her carrying this banner (since most of the GIS results are pretty much just softcore porn) but you can see the same design here and here. The design in the center of the banner is presumably copyrighted by the game publisher, though it might be a derivative of an older design. clpo13(talk) 16:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per nomination. I have hidden the versions with copyrighted logo. I have also created a cropped version of this picture File:Cosplayer of Jeanne d'Arc, Fate Grand Order at CWT48 20180304a (without flag).jpg, feel free to use. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of the copyrighted screenshot B dash (talk) 02:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Crop of already published image: https://www.sergepambo.com/cuisine/#3367-gallery/3117-backstage-2 Ytoyoda (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission need to be sent to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Not original work, from http://www.courts.ca.gov/chiefjustice.htm Ytoyoda (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
this is selfie Shaharukh Khan (talk) 03:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:SELFIE. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
There is a more accurate version of this flag at Flag of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.svg on Commons. The other file is directly from the official Sioux Falls Flag website. Note that this image proposed for deletion has a slightly thicker lower white zigzag line, which is inaccurate. Theodor Langhorne Franklin (talk) 03:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in March 2018 as non-notable. The contributor was blocked as a sockpuppet. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 04:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:09, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brandongunderson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was speedily deleted in September 2017 as spam. Out of project scope.
- File:Fashionable Inc Headquarters.jpg
- File:Fashionable Inc Headquarters in Largo Florida.jpg
- File:Fashionable Inc Logo.png
ℯxplicit 04:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:09, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation to http://winnipegtablehockeyleague.com/All%20Time%20Standings.html John from Idegon (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete unless the uploader can verify that this is their "own work" or has been released under a free license as explained in COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. If the uploader is not the copyright holder of the image, then permission of the original copyright holder is going to be needed per COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder. If OTRS verification is not possible for any reason, this file cannot be kept. In such a case, consider uploading the file as non-free content for local use on English Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please provide permission to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
File:I ❤️when we support things. -BeKP @kpthrive @nmaahc -lovealwayswins -EqualityEqualsHealth -TransVisibility -KPpride -activetransportation (35366193846).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo, out of scope, even if it is free on flickr Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Eytan's work on public health, LGBT+ activism and their well published photography collection is all of sufficient interest to ensure a couple of portraits of themselves have educational value. --Fæ (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Fæ: where the file description page (or filename) indicates that one Eytan is depicted? Commons should not depend on social networks and twitters. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- The source profile. --Fæ (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Although in use on a user sandbox, this user hasn't edited WP since Nov 2017 and only to post this pic Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
wrong PD, sculptor David Moroder died in 1997 Goesseln (talk) 13:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vareth African News (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not in scope of Commons; accidentally included in batch Flickr upload Mindmatrix 13:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marzianhouse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pageant photos taken from the web
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2018 Nunzia Amato.png
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2017 Conny Notarstefano.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2015 Greta Galassi.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2014 Silvia Cataldi.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2013 Sarah Baderna.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2011 Tania Bambaci.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2009 Alice Taticchi.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2005 Sofia Bruscoli.jpg
- File:Miss Mondo Italia 2007 Giada Wiltshire.jpg
- File:50 finalists with stefano de martino.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Looks like spam or other out of scope content
- File:Sangam4 page 7.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 8.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 4.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 6.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 5.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 3.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 1.jpg
- File:Sangam4 page 2.jpg
- File:SANGAM4.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:22, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Screenshots.
- File:علي العزازي.png
- File:حياة تك 6.png
- File:Hayatech Question.png
- File:Hayatech Set.png
- File:حي حياة تك.png
- File:Hayatech-Logo-7.0.png
- File:Shashalak show season 2.png
- File:Aly Azzazy Shashalak 2010 H.jpg
- File:Aly Azzazy - Shashalak 2010.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
uploaded by LTA, out of scope. Chrissymad (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file in use. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
it does not look good Skilla1st (talk) 21:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
it does not look good Skilla1st (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
it does not look good Skilla1st (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agree, it's crappy compressed, low resolution and is not work of the uploader.
- 37.47.76.168 08:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image] MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Vanity. Self-promotion. Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 23:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Blurry version of File:Canada Day at Mel Lastman Square in Toronto - 2013.jpg // sikander { talk } 23:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
This appear to be a derivative work of various photos, but there are no sources or copyright information regardinging its components. ℯxplicit 23:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; +private photos and out of scope (unused). --Wdwd (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No source, taken from the internet. 8.3.123.144 07:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
No source, images taken from the internet to make an artist's illustration. 8.3.123.144 07:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Promotional images
- File:American-football-11.jpg
- File:American-football-10.jpg
- File:American-football-09.jpg
- File:American-football-08.jpg
- File:American-football-07.jpg
- File:American-football-06.jpg
- File:American-football-05.jpg
- File:American-football-04.jpg
- File:American-football-02.jpg
- File:American-football-03.jpg
- File:American-football-01.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 06:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Authorship information does not allow to assert copyright status
- File:NANCY OCAMPO Argentine singer and songwriter (6).jpg
- File:NANCY OCAMPO Argentine singer and songwriter (5).jpg
- File:NANCY OCAMPO Argentine singer and songwriter (4).jpg
- File:NANCY OCAMPO Argentine singer and songwriter (3).jpg
- File:NANCY OCAMPO Argentine singer and songwriter (1).jpg
- File:NANCY OCAMPO Argentine singer and songwriter (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 10:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benyamin-ln (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non free images from copyrighted websites. Fake license added of being in Public Domain. No permission. Pure copyright violations
- File:Seyyed Yahya Safavi 1980s.jpg
- File:Mosen Rezaei portrait 1980s.jpg
- File:Morteza Rezaei 1980.jpg
- File:Ali Shamkhani in 1980s.jpg
- File:Mohammad-Ali Nazaran.jpg
- File:Hassan Rouhani in 1985.jpg
- File:Mahdi Chamran in 1981.jpg
- File:Yousef Kolahdouz.jpg
- File:Seddigh.jpg
- File:Seyyed Hassan Firouzabadi.jpg
- File:Ali Shahbazi in late 1980s.jpg
- File:Mansour Sattari in 1987.jpg
- File:Malekzadegan in 1987.jpg
- File:Esmaeil Sohrabi in 1987.jpg
- File:Hossein Hasani Sa'di in 1987.jpg
- File:Shapour Bakhtiar early 1980's.jpg
- File:Mahdavi-Kani early 1980's.jpg
- File:Jamshid Amouzegar Portrait.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Fake license?! Assume good faith for me, please! The sources of these pictures are given. They're on public domain rule of Iran. Benyamin-ln (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Benyamin-ln: Are you saying that press images are in Public Domain?. It would be great if you read COM:CB#Press photos --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Press images? I accept Press images rule only for this, but how you prove that the others are press images? The burden of proof is up to yourself.COM:CB#Copyright-ineligible images: Images that are not of sufficient originality to attract copyright protection can be copied and uploaded.There isn't any copyright protection for the pictures that I uploaded. Regards. Benyamin-ln (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Benyamin-ln: Are you saying that press images are in Public Domain?. It would be great if you read COM:CB#Press photos --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G., 4nn1l2, and T Cells: Your advise needed. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. These photos have sufficient originality to attract copyright in Iran, thus we cannot host them. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Also, they were probably not published in the US until they were uploaded here, thus they are way too young to be PD in the US. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Iranian images are protected for only 30 years after publication, so these image may be in the public domain in Iran, but we need a date of first publication and the onus is on you, Benyamin, as the uploader. Granted, these images have all been taken more than 30 years ago, but we do not know if they have been published or not. They may have been published just recently like Commons:Deletion requests/File:RohaniKhatami1stMajlis.jpg [1]. Unfortunately, most of {{PD-Iran}} images on Commons lack a date of first publication, and that is a problem. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing to add to this discussion as 4nn1l2 already sum it up. All the best. T Cells (talk · contribs · email)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - you cannot revoke your contributions. --Jcb (talk) 13:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 12:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - You cannot revoke your contributions. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Иван Безбородых (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the Russian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in August 2015 as non-notable. Out of project scope.
- File:Иван Безбородых (3).jpg
- File:Иван Безбородых (1).jpg
- File:Иван Безбородых (2).jpg
- File:Иван Безбородых.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ℯxplicit 05:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M.imran345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
While some of this users photos could be used, these look pretty much like out of scope photo album type photos
- File:Blue Beach.jpg
- File:Team-dynamics.jpg
- File:Team dynamics.jpg
- File:Leisure-and-work.jpg
- File:Entrepreneurship.jpg
- File:Makeup-artiste.jpg
- File:Post wedding blues-01.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RameshKumarPIn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/file storage album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RameshKumarPIn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Used in self-promotion draft.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RameshKumarPIn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, user blocked, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
As 2D street art in New Zealand, the terms of FOP in this case are debatable, and might make this image unsuitable for hosting on Commons. At least it needs a discussion, I feel. Courcelles 03:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Seems a bit ambiguous. Doesn't specifically mention graffiti either. FunkMonk (talk) 03:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, it is, which brings the COM:PCP into play. Courcelles 04:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Do we have any precedents? FunkMonk (talk) 04:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree that the guidelines are "ambiguous"; rather, they are silent on the matter of graffiti painted on building walls. In the absence of any clear provision for graffiti art within the scope of ROP in New Zealand (or the UK, on whose ROP provisions NZ's are apparently based) surely we must err on the side of caution and assume that the work is not freely reproducible. Under the interpretation similar photographs hosted on Commons for which we don't have permission of the graffiti artist should be deleted as well—this would include the photographs on en:Banksy, for example. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not sure if that's the right conclusion, considering these diverse exceptions: "In Hensher -v- Restawhile, some examples were given of typical articles that might be considered works of artistic craftsmanship, including hand-painted tiles, stained glass, wrought iron gates, and the products of high-class printing, bookbinding, cutlery, needlework and cabinet-making. Copinger and Skoane James suggests that original jewellery is another candidate." We really need some precedents. FunkMonk (talk) 08:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Of course we need precedents. What I am arguing is that if we do not find any, then we cannot simply assume that photographs of graffiti are freely redistributable, because nothing in the list of exceptions states or even clearly implies that they are. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- True. None of the Banksy images seem to have been deleted though, would probably be a better place to start, as it would attract more attention and intensive efforts to solve it. FunkMonk (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banksy in London. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Nice, I see it has already received replies from more people than this one. FunkMonk (talk) 19:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banksy in London. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- True. None of the Banksy images seem to have been deleted though, would probably be a better place to start, as it would attract more attention and intensive efforts to solve it. FunkMonk (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Of course we need precedents. What I am arguing is that if we do not find any, then we cannot simply assume that photographs of graffiti are freely redistributable, because nothing in the list of exceptions states or even clearly implies that they are. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not sure if that's the right conclusion, considering these diverse exceptions: "In Hensher -v- Restawhile, some examples were given of typical articles that might be considered works of artistic craftsmanship, including hand-painted tiles, stained glass, wrought iron gates, and the products of high-class printing, bookbinding, cutlery, needlework and cabinet-making. Copinger and Skoane James suggests that original jewellery is another candidate." We really need some precedents. FunkMonk (talk) 08:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, it is, which brings the COM:PCP into play. Courcelles 04:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- So the Banksy images were kept. Shouldn't that be precedent enough for this file? FunkMonk (talk) 03:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: keep? FASTILY (TALK) 06:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic work in New Zealand B dash (talk) 08:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment We have {{Non-free graffiti}} and it's not a deletion template. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- IMO not occasional graffiti. --B dash (talk) 04:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{Non-free graffiti}} covers this. --Yann (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
taken from https://goldenblacksa.co.za/ - no permission Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Афиша рок - концерта, проводимого на Урале с известными исполнителями отечественной рок - сцены.jpg
[edit]
Picture of a non-free poster, an unacceptable derivative work. ℯxplicit 05:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- С чего бы удалять фото 2017 года? Удаляйте что хотите, хоть всю мою страницу с загруженными фотографиями, мне всё равно — Preceding unsigned comment added by Андрюша Романов (talk • contribs) 09:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC) (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic work in UK B dash (talk) 06:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
![06:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/16#c-B_dash-2018-08-16T06:50:00.000Z-File:"WARld"_Manu_Invisible_Bristol_2015.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
![08:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/16#c-Well-Informed_Optimist-2018-09-03T08:46:00.000Z-File:"WARld"_Manu_Invisible_Bristol_2015.jpg){kind=link}
movie screenshot, 邵氏電影“小樓殘夢”劇照 [2] shizhao (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Vicente Costales is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Sudexpert by
[edit]- File:Здание центрального аппарат ГКСЭ.jpg
- File:Геральдика ГКСЭ РБ.png (and a redirect to it File:Геральдика ГКСЭ.png)
- File:Знамя ГКСЭ РБ.png
- File:Флаг ГКСЭ РБ.png
The files were previously published under a copyright [3] and [4] --Jarash (talk) 16:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep If these are state symbols and come from a government source (as they appear to), PD-BY-exempt would apply. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- File:Здание центрального аппарат ГКСЭ.jpg is a photo of the agency building. It is also licensed under PD-exempt? --Jarash (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File:Здание центрального аппарат ГКСЭ.jpg deleted because NoFoP. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark B dash (talk) 06:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image apparently taken from facebook. No indication why this should be a work of a Federal Gov empoloyee. GMGtalk 15:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Look's like it came from the city's website. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 23.30.159.134 (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This is not a work of the federal government, but of a city government. There is no indication that works by the city of Torrington are released under a free license. ℯxplicit 12:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Seriously? IKhitron (talk) 12:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Seriously? Tm (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Why exactly does anyone need this picture in Commons? For which article? Legs in cinema festivals? You even can't see in the picture it's really her. IKhitron (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Why exactly open this DR? Waste of time or nothing better to do? This file is in scope, as it happened to be taken in the premiere of the movie Don Jon in the 2013 Toronto International Film Festival and it shows Scarlett Johansson, also it is in scope of High-heeled shoes on legs, Women with bare legs, it shows the fashion in use in 2016 in Hollywood, etc. First Commons doesnt exist only to illustrate Wikipedias articles as it scope is much larger. Second looking at this image and only seeing a pair of legs and open a DR is really objectifying an woman. Funny that you are the single person to find the image as out of scope as User:~riley, User:Djiboun, User:Jacopo Werther and User:SunOfErat have edited, and never opened a DR. Tm (talk) 13:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm just the first feminist that saw this picture. IKhitron (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Why exactly does anyone need this picture in Commons? For which article? Legs in cinema festivals? You even can't see in the picture it's really her. IKhitron (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Neutral While I’m usually a keep-voter in DRs like this, this seems to me, frankly, to be needlessly creepy (not the first not the worst instance of creepiness aimed at her from adoring fans, either). This image is essentially a crop of File:Don Jon 06 (9728955240).jpg (or of any of the other two such images), and if this detail is ever needed framed as such it would/will be trivial to crop one of those complete photos. So, while I am not voting for deletion, I wont be sad to see this go. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As Tuvalkin said above, if this detail is ever needed, it can be cropped from the above mentioned images. ~riley (talk) 07:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Already decided to delete, see request in logs IKhitron (talk) 12:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per Riley. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Demande de l'auteur, des photos de meilleure qualité sont ailleurs disponibles. Dldwg (talk) 06:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Author request. Dldwg (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 06:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Demande de l'auteur, des photos de meilleure qualité sont ailleurs disponibles. Dldwg (talk) 06:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Author request. Dldwg (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
SVG version available and wrong constellation name Giorgio136 (talk) 22:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Demande de l'auteur, des photos de meilleure qualité sont ailleurs disponibles. Dldwg (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Author request. Dldwg (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: author's request. Ruthven (msg) 06:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bot download from Panoramio. There is no indication of what this photo is about. Malcolma (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, still no indication of what the photo is about. Taivo (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Outta scope Jarash (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Согласен. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
According to http://catalogue.wellcomelibrary.org/record=b1165726: "Copyright © H M Bateman Designs. Not to be reproduced without prior permission from the copyright holder through the website www.hmbateman.com". That seems not compatible with the current license. Jarekt (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
![18:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/16#c-Jarekt-2018-08-16T18:57:00.000Z-File:"The_probationer_who_disagreed_with_the_matron"_Wellcome_L0016608.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
![20:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/16#c-Taivo-2018-09-30T20:16:00.000Z-File:"The_probationer_who_disagreed_with_the_matron"_Wellcome_L0016608.jpg){kind=link}
Category raviole. Own work claim... 141.196.203.62 10:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC) Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif cette œuvre.
Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0.
Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence.
Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées.
Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc.
Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.
LE 16 AOÛT 2018, GREGORY MANOUKIAN, 4 RUE DES ALPES 26540 MOURS (Drôme - France) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregm26 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS ticket received. Ruthven (msg) 12:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a work of art, with artistic choices of the placement of the triangle shapes within the frame and the colors. It recently sold for over $1M [5]. The claim that as being made of geometric forms it should be PD is nonsensical; every bitmap image is made of geometric forms (squares) so the same claim would in principle apply to all bitmap images of all subjects. David Eppstein (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete there is no way a court would allow this work to be distributed without the author's permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep An important work of art by an important artist; this must be kept...Modernist 01:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modernist (talk • contribs) 01:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- This type of boilerplate "work by an important artist" argument wasn't effective in en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 27#File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg, and it's not going to be effective here. Commons is not concerned with such things and Commons doesn't accept fair use; so, you're going to have to specifically address the issues raised by the nominator (i.e., whether this file should be licensed as {{PD-simple}}) if you hope to convince others that this file should be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, of course, per Modernist, and this was recently kept in another discussion. Please read the Kenneth Noland page, and if need be someone should start a Wikipedia page on the painting. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- The other discussion you're referring to is en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 27#File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg. That was a discussion about whether use of the file on English Wikipedia complied with relevant Wikipedia policy. This file is on Commons and what is being discussed here is whether the file's licensing complies with relevant Commons policy. Although both sites are run by the WMF, their respective policies are different and it would be best not to mix them up. The primary reason this file has been nominated for deletion is because the nominator seems to feels that it's too complex to be below c:COM:TOO#United States. The nomination has nothing to do with how important the painting may be or whether someone should write an article about the painting on Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, barring a relevant justification for keeping. Qwirkle (talk) 01:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep; Simple geometry consisting of triangles that are common property. Coldcreation (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete When something is considered a work of art, then the simple geometry argument cannot apply, because the very reason it is considered art is that its conception and execution are considered special enough by art experts, be it its arrangement, colour or any other properties, creating a work that can be considered art. It is no longer a simple collection of geometric shapes but one that elicit an artistic response in the viewer. There is no way in any court of law the simple geometric shape argument will be accepted for a work of art that would allow the rights of the artist to be infringed. Hzh (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Threshold of originality is clear on this issue: This work is too simple to be protected by copyright law and is below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Coldcreation (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, it isn’t; your interpretation of it is; unless you are willing to indemnify Wiki, or show some reason why your interpretation is better than the next yuts, you need to add a couple disclaimers.
- Next, and, I think more important, the standards for trademarks do not neatly jibe with those for other author’s rights. Qwirkle (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry "keepers", Magog the Ogre has already provided the decisive argument at the beginning of this discussion. As a work of art — which it is as long as it can successfully claim to represent 'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964 — it is sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection. This is one of the rules that Commons must follow in order to function, and that applies equally to all comparable images of works of art that are supposedly lacking in threshold of originality. --Jotzet (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per delete arguments. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect presentation of the image. Prince of Fred (talk) 08:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: failed upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
It's difficult to describe, what is depicted. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Source country United Kingdom has low threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom unless it can be OTRS verified since this seems too complex to be {{PD-textlogo}} due to the two shopping carts. Also going to add that this might be a re-upload of a file previously deleted as File:MySupermarketLogoSmall2016.png. — Marchjuly (talk) 20:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
see categories, no repository, no educational purpose, unique upload of new user Triplecaña (talk) 09:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work. Focused on copyrighted material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- I own this thing and I took the picture myself. As far as I know, this falls well within fair use. Flagging this as copyright infringement is ridiculous. Especially when you take into consideration how long this thing is online by now. I uploaded it 10 years ago! Another point is that this is a collectors item that you cannot buy anymore. It's a piece of history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariourk~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 10:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mariourk~commonswiki: Fair use is NOT ALLOWED on Commons! See Commons:Fair use. Moreover the fact that you own an object doesn't mean that you own the right to use its image in that kind of case. And the fact that you uploaded it 10 years ago is not a valid argument : it seems that no-one has realized there may be a problem with that photograph, but that doesn't mean there is no problem with it. You seem unaware of rules about licences and authors' rights. You should read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative works for instance, it may help you to understand. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
_(2775946118).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2775946118).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo; I accidentally uploaded this as part of a batch Flickr upload Mindmatrix 12:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
_(2775946118).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
_(2775946118).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low quality personal pic; accidentally uploaded as part of batch Flickr2Commons upload Mindmatrix 13:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low quality night pic that was accidentally included in a batch Flickr2Commons upload task I executed Mindmatrix 13:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Shrine for an image vandal
[edit]
It possibly was situationally appropriate when uploaded, but may we rid Commons of this now and forever? The former image is eligible under Commons:CSD #G3, hence don’t object against early deletion for this one image of two. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no encyclopedic use possible. L293D (talk) 13:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
replaced by Porträtfoto von Amalie Baisch, 1902.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: an redirected the other one. --JuTa 03:48, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Venezuelan State TV. YouTube video quoted as asource used this image without permission. Warko (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
InfoIf so, the YouTube channel should also be listed as a bad author. As I am in China, I cannot access to YouTube, therefore cannot give any stances.廣九直通車 (talk) 15:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)- Which is the license this was published with? Prensa Presidencial has released several videos in YouTube with a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- The YouTube account might have used it with permission, since it is a minister. In any case, there is no information of licensing that indicates this is released under Creative Commons. --MarioGom (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- The account that posted it is the source. Reverol's videos, when public, are released under 3.0. Kingsif (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed. Sorry, I missed the CC-BY notice at the YouTube video. Thanks. --MarioGom (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Are the Venezuelan State TV images released under a free license? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not in general. Some videos by the government are. In this case, it has an explicit CC-by notice in an official YouTube channel of a member of the cabinet. --MarioGom (talk) 09:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Does he has authority to release this video under a free license? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not in general. Some videos by the government are. In this case, it has an explicit CC-by notice in an official YouTube channel of a member of the cabinet. --MarioGom (talk) 09:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Are the Venezuelan State TV images released under a free license? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 06:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed. Sorry, I missed the CC-BY notice at the YouTube video. Thanks. --MarioGom (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- The account that posted it is the source. Reverol's videos, when public, are released under 3.0. Kingsif (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Kingsif. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
No proof this is a free work. Tekstman (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
I wrongly selected the outdated license. I couldn't update it. should I remove this and upload again? ShweWunMahi (talk) 06:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
I wrongly selected the outdated license. I couldn't update it. should I remove this and upload again? ShweWunMahi (talk) 06:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
horrible green and flat light Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 07:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Forgot to delete the Exif Metadata so everyone can see the serial number of the camera Prince of Fred (talk) 07:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Request from the person photographed. There are other photos of me and this one is very bad. Thanks. iopensa (talk) 08:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
File:JPA Health Communications Hires Stephen Piotrowski as Boston’s First Managing Director.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arjola Cela.TR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The photo is a scan or photograph of another photo. We don't have any copyright information on the original photo. Ninja Diannaa (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Mauvais nom de fichier, sera réuploadée Organ FR (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The little mermaid is still protected by copyright Pugilist (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.172.241.184 (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm nominating this photo as the uploader for being out of scope. Not educationally useful in its current form! Meisam (talk) 18:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm nominating this photo as the uploader for being out of scope. Not educationally useful in its current form! Meisam (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded by LTA, corrupt photo, unlikely to be used in Wikimedia projects -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 20:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor-quality useless photo uploaded solely to vandalize multiple EnWiki articles ([6],[7], [8]) . TJRC (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I see absolutely no encyclopedic value to this image. Aspening (talk) 22:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus professionnelle Demba NGOM (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus Demba NGOM (talk) 12:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus Demba NGOM (talk) 12:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre Demba NGOM (talk) 12:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: 03:13, 22 August 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus professionnelle Demba NGOM (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus professionnelle Demba NGOM (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus Demba NGOM (talk) 12:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre Demba NGOM (talk) 12:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre Demba NGOM (talk) 12:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: 03:13, 22 August 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
As discussed on the English Wikipedia, this image is pure fantasy. The picture is not based on any official source on what happened to Pan Am 103. Funplussmart (talk) 23:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is far from the only problematic picture this user has made. Almost all of this user's renderings of aircraft accidents are inaccurate and have no educational value. It upsets me that his images are used so many wikis. Funplussmart (talk) 23:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
erreur de phpto Langdom86 (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Image qualifies for courtesy deletion as recent upload, but uploader him/herself added it to an article, so now it is in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus professionnelle Demba NGOM (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
J'ai téléchargé cette photos car je voulais supprimer l'ancienne photo que j'avais téléchargé par erreur: Supprimez cette photo s'il vous plait je vais ajouter une autre plus professionnelle Demba1986 (talk) 21:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Je confirme que vous supprimez la photo s'il vous plait, c'est mon compte personnel.
Photos ajoutées par erreur supprimez les moi s'il vous plait? Demba NGOM (talk) 12:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: 03:12, 22 August 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete version of the document (pages missing; complete version loaded here: File:Taleoftomkitten00pottuoft.djvu). References deleted from enWS, so unused in favor of complete file. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 02:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mukkakukaku: Are you sure? The file you nominated for deletion has actually more pages than Taleoftomkitten00pottuoft.djvu (I admit I didn't review each page). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- @P199: -- Pages 21-22 and 27-28 are missing from this scan. (content pages, that is). It came up while we were doing the proofread on enWS and we ended up using the other file instead because it was complete. Not sure about the page count, but my money would be on blanks. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 01:47, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by complete version. Confirmed that the extra pages are blank. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Taken from https://m.facebook.com/唐山美食-151454645460515/posts Ytoyoda (talk) 07:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Камчадал.jpg. Ivan Pozdeev (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Probably not own work, no EXIF, user with history of copyvio Frodar (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not found elsewhere, using Google Images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipe andres brichetto pino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:EL 7 , Siempre Chilling.jpg
- File:CARATULA EL 7 ft DE LEVE.jpg
- File:El 7 - Mode Up Connection.jpg
- File:EL 7.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 07:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Probably not own work, no EXIF, user with history of copyvio Frodar (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic work in New Zealand B dash (talk) 08:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment If that is so, I'm aware of there being heaps of other New Zealand murals on Commons (mostly Christchurch and Dunedin) that are not categorised 'Graffiti in New Zealand'. Some of them were uploaded by myself. Schwede66 09:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic work in New Zealand B dash (talk) 08:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic work in New Zealand B dash (talk) 08:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic work in New Zealand B dash (talk) 08:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 09:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cuentos y crónicas
[edit](Lack of) source of the background image makes it difficult to assert copyright status
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 10:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader is not the author (Delmer Membreño) Discasto talk 10:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:PRP. Unlikely to be own work, given that all the uploads by this user related to the subject have been found to be a copyvio Discasto talk 10:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
small photo without metadata Mitte27 (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10|2=username matches upload name, unused, only upload, likely spam, no cat Jan batch. The YouTube channel is mentioned in en:Beka, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, maybe it is notable. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unused. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Everest8850 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published at http://www.everestnews.com/2006expeditions/everest006252006.htm
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Benoit Rochon. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Looks like Flickr washing. FunkMonk (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Morteza Avini
[edit]Copyrighted murals.
Hanooz 12:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Author is Henk Steyn Photography as per exif, not own work, no permission Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Not own work - ©2015 Mike Morones/Military Times as per exif and not a military person so not PD Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
All rights reserved - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Although this was marked as free on Flickr, the author credits the photo to Photo: P.Dubois on flickr as the image shows. Thus not taken by Bob Adams and no permission so not suitable for Commons Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- also file:Nexus projeto oculus rift..JPG
Seems like screenshots of copyrighted software. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
File:16. Посвідчення М. Литвиненка до почесного звання Заслуженого діяча мистецтв України (2002 р.).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio. Appears to be a promotional photo; found also at [9] and [10], for example. —Angr 13:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a photograph of a poster, thus a derived work of a copyrighted work. —Angr 13:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Il est décentré, une meilleure version va être uploadée. Organ FR (talk) 13:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Crop of published photo: https://iwao-breeze.com/profile/ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The only source I could find for this was Andrew Pollack's Twitter, not a White House channel: https://twitter.com/AndrewPollackFL/status/988140320637497345. If this came from the White House, please provide the source. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination Appears to be from the White House Facebook page. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Outlet scritto male Chiara saffioti (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio of http://www.texascourthousetrail.com/tomgreen/Tom-Green-County-Courthouse-001.htm SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- It appears to have been cropped right below the watermark - you can see some artefacts in the upper left that match where the watermark is in the larger photo. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Uploader seems to have had similar issues in the past. Station1 (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook download, also previously published at http://www.d-laboweb.jp/event/170330.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wonjun0513 (talk · contribs)
[edit]They seem to be captures of works made by Korea Institute of Local Finance. Probably copyright violations.
- File:한국지방세연구원 법령정보.jpg
- File:지방세연구원 연도별 과제수행 현황.jpg
- File:한국지방세연구원 연도별 과제수행 현황.jpg
- File:한국지방세연구원 조직도.jpg
- File:한국지방세연구원 미션 및 비전.jpg
– Kwj2772 (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Scanned historical photographs uploaded as own works.
Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Duartelima01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User appears to be claiming web photos by other people as own
- File:A528 Three Cultural Buildings and One Bookmall 9.jpg
- File:National Kaohsiung Center for the Arts 21.jpg
- File:Hilton Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Connected to terminal via traverse 2.jpg
- File:Palace of Justice .jpg
- File:Keukenhof offices by Mecanoo Architecten .jpg
- File:Namdaemun Tower.jpg
- File:Mecanoo HQ Delft.jpg
- File:Mecanoo Office .jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mucha Treble (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abderrahmanalaraby (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Tinejdad nimrou.jpg
- File:Palm trees sunset.jpg
- File:Tinejdad.jpg
- File:Itzersnowing.jpg
- File:Itzersnow.jpg
- File:مدينة ايتزر في الصيف.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
No permission from Teepoi Jcb (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have written permission for its use Cyktic
- Please contact OTRS. Jcb (talk) 11:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 06:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
![06:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/16#c-B_dash-2018-08-16T06:52:00.000Z-File:"Ricominciamo_da_qui"_di_Rosk&Loste_a_San_Giorgio_a_Cremano.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
![14:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/16#c-Ruthven-2018-11-07T14:21:00.000Z-File:"Ricominciamo_da_qui"_di_Rosk&Loste_a_San_Giorgio_a_Cremano.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 07:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment We have {{Non-free graffiti}} and it's not a deletion template. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Öffenticher Platz, in Italien keine Panoramafreiheit? Cantakukuruz (talk) 09:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Palladino's work. Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Öffentlicher Platz, aber in Italien keine Panoramafreiheit? Cantakukuruz (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Palladino's work. Artist still alive. Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Öffentlicher Platz, aber in Italien keine Panoramafreiheit? Cantakukuruz (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Mimmo Palladino's work. Ruthven (msg) 14:24, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Newspaper Headings - not "simple shapes"
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep einfache Schrift hat keine Schöpfungshöhe. --Ralf Roleček
11:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC) - Keep These are unoriginal texts made from simple fonts that cannot be copyrighted. Not any original works. De728631 (talk) 13:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as uploader of these files one remark: before uploading the scans I consulted this problem with some users and after that I gave up my idea to upload the full title pages (which would have suit very good my article) and I cropped the scan like this - just letters of the title/logo only; these is any threshold of originality as far as I can see. Keep. -jkb- (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
DW of this photograph. Cannot be published under a free licence without the persmission of the original photographer. BrightRaven (talk) 15:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
EXIF credits two people who are likely not the uploader Ytoyoda (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
archivo incompleto, foto a medias Jrbc93 (talk) 15:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Found at higher resolution at https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/steve-kmak Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrightable original graphic; uploader claimed authorship only for the photograph but not the original graphic Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is a message I had from Leonard (the author of the pic) in 2016. --Io Herodotus (talk) 04:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Is this the image you reference?
- This is mis-attributed, likely being a cropped camera image that I took of interpretive materials publicly presented at the site or a nearby museum. My PD release is for that image and not the original text. I believe that the credit for the original image should be attributed to the Hellenic Ministry of Culture.
- This was quite some time ago and I do not have the supporting detail.
- Regarding the color scheme, the bottoms of the columns reflect the standing portions prior to reconstruction. The mixed assembly above illustrates the 1923-1930 re-stacking of fallen pieces. Accurate measurements enabled by modern technology enable the original source of the column drums to be identified. A proper modern reconstruction will involve the disassembly and re-stacking (after insertion of new stone cuttings into the earlier restoration's cement-filled cavities in the drums).
- The source image's descriptive text:
- The north collonade of the Parthenon was restored for the first time during the years 1923-1930.
- Restoration work was focused on the area between the 4th and the 11th columns from the east.
: - The purpose of the current restoration project, in process since the year 2000, is to correct
- the inadequacies of the previous intervention.
- for this purpose, the monument;s architectural members are dismantled and conserved. The cement
- fillings are replaced with new ones of Pentelic marble and the restored members are reinstalled in
- their original positions. Titanium clamps are used for joining the architectural members.
- Completion of the work, with all previous misplacements of architectural members corrected, will
- give the north side of the monument the appearance it had before the explosion of 1687
- - Leonard.
- Also this image can be found on this site [11] or this blog [12]
- I don't know what the rights are. --Io Herodotus (talk) 15:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above - COM:DW/unknown status - no FoP in Greece. --Эlcobbola talk 17:23, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be empty Discasto talk 10:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:SCOPE issue (unintelligible, no realistic educational use). --Эlcobbola talk 17:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
it's a printscreen and it also includes logo of several copyright protected logo types. it should not be included in the Commons repository. Lantuszka (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
It's indeed a printscreen, albeit a harmless one. Academica is a publicly avaiable website and logotypes listed at its bottom inform mostly about the source of funding and responsible entities. It might be a better idea to include a printscreen showing some more hands-on experience, although the most important advantage of this system is the fact that it makes available copyrighted publications, a picture of which could not be made and uploaded to the Commons. Perphaps choosing a different licence would be a better idea than removing this printscreen altogether. Template:Leodeamicis
Deleted: per nomination - COM:DW/screenshot – publicly available (mere access) is not the same as public domain (a statement about intellectual property rights). --Эlcobbola talk 17:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Appears {{PD-textlogo}}. Image is not unambiguously above TOO and rationale does not articulate why this image is above and beyond examples at COM:TOO. --Эlcobbola talk 17:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Per the previous deletion request, “Antal Kotnyek (who died in 1990) cannot donate his photos to Fortepan, because it was founded later”. Ping @Taivo. Bencemac (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Support (as per background) --grin ✎ 13:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)- Support This is justifiable. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support Fauvirt (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Pallerti (talk) 08:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Well, but the heirs of the photographer could have donated the photos and given permission. But I see (per background linked to by Grin) that Fortepan seems to be a rather problematic source where, apparently, it can't be always assumed that they have the proper permission by the rights holders. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per consensus above and precedent at previous DR - COM:OTRS required that heirs both received copyright from Antal and then transfered that copyright to Fortepan. --Эlcobbola talk 17:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: We missed 296 files, see Special:Search/insource:Antal Kotnyek. Bencemac (talk) 08:30, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Bencemac:
Done Thanks for letting me know. Эlcobbola talk 17:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Bencemac:
Dies ist ein altes Logo der Kantonsschule am Brühl in St. Gallen. Kantiambruehl (talk) 13:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep zur Dokumentation weiterhin sinnvoll --1-Byte (talk) 13:39, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Эlcobbola talk 18:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
What is copyrights status of Mauritania currency? Will be good idea to update Commons:Currency. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:DW of currency; per COM:EVID, burden would be on uploader to demonstrate Mauritania currency is free. --Эlcobbola talk 18:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Australia for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think this may be a misinterpretation of the Australian Copyright Act. According to the Australian Copyright Council, see page 7 of their document "Exceptions to Copyright", downloadable from here, you will see that Section 65 of the Copyright Act, it covers 2D works such as paintings, drawings, etc. If you look at section 65 of the Copyright Act itself, I can see why people may think it is only an exception for 3D as it appears to be talking about sculpture but if you follow through to Section 10 and scroll down (the definitions are in alphabetic order), we find that for the purposes of Section 65 of the act, the meaning of artistic work is "a painting, sculpture, drawing, engraving or photograph, whether the work is of artistic quality or not;" so 2D would appear to be in scope. Certainly this is what it says in en:Freedom of panorama#Australia. And I think being affixed to a rock makes it clear it is not "temporarily" in a public place (when the exception of Section 65 would not apply). Kerry Raymond (talk) 00:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Please see the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Australia#Freedom of panorama with 2D. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The COM:FOP interpretation is correct. Section 65 of the Copyright Act of 1968 sets forth "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship." The Section 10 definitions referenced above set forth that artistic work means:
- (a) painting, sculpture, drawing, engraving or photograph, whether the work is of artistic quality or not;
- (b) [...];
- (c) a work of artistic craftsmanship […]”
This segmentation clearly implies that "painting, sculpture, drawing, engraving or photograph" are works separate and distinct from "works of artistic craftsmanship." Section 65 applies to "works of artistic craftsmanship", not to "artistic works". Note, further, the explicit reference to sculpture. If FoP was meant also to include paintings, photographs, etc., Section 65 would surely reference them, or all of paragraph (a). Verily, that sculpture is singularly selected is telling; the non-inclusion of paintings, photographs, etc. is deliberate. Additionally, more specific to the instant case, works of artistic craftsmanship must demonstrate both artistry and craftsmanship, where craftsmanship, for example, “demands that the work reflects pride in sound workmanship and displays an exercise of skill by its creator in using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work”. This placard does not appear to reflect those traits. It seems clear from the legislative and legal history that "works of artistic craftsmanship" is meant to cover items like pottery, stained glass windows, weavings, etc. – crafted, generally industrial/utilitarian items that involve artistry not captured by the descriptors of “painting, drawing, etc.”. --Эlcobbola talk 19:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Previously published at https://archinect.com/mecanoo/project/delft-municipal-office-and-train-station Ytoyoda (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 04:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 04:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
wrong PD sculptor Ludwig Moroder died in 1953 Goesseln (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted Now 2024 Abzeronow (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
André Abbal died in 1953. No freedom of panorama in France. 83.204.180.170 19:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted It is now 2024. Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. I don't think this qualifies as a simple picture that would only be protected for 20 years. Jcb (talk) 22:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Aufnahme in einem Innenraum, keine Panoramafreiheit? Cantakukuruz (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Leider nein, auch nicht in Deutschland. Damit wäre die Datei auch lokal auf :de nicht o.k.
- Warum fragst du nicht mal den Künstler Heinz Hindorf um Erlaubnis? (auch wenn die Wikipedia-Nutzung der Anlaß ist, müsste er die freie Lizenz, unter die du das Foto gestellt hast, für diese Darstellung seines Werks bestätigen) --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No FOP inside buildings in Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pont de Térénez (2011) 1
[edit]No FOP in France.
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (10).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (11).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (12).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (13).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (14).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (15).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (16).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (2).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (4).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (5).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (6).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (7).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (8).jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez.jpg
- File:Pont de Térénez - Pylône 3.jpg
- File:Pont de Térénez - Vue rive gauche.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez 2013-08-28 2019.jpg
- File:Pont de Térénez 53.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez vue ouest brume.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Thesupermat (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Commentaires
Ces photos présentent pour la plupart soit le pont vu de très loin (pour l'une ; éléments dans le paysage).. soit des éléments techniques et structurels (pas une sculpture ou une peinture décorative ou artistique, ni des photos prises de près montrant les boulons ou secrets de fabrication..) qui pourraient illustrer les articles de Wikipédia y afférents, et/ou le sujet de la photo est clairement un "chantier de construction" (ce n'est pas une oeuvre d'art terminée). Je pense que ces photos là (de loin et visiblement de chantier) peuvent être conservées.
Il n'y a pas de vue complète du pont, ou d'une partie de l'oeuvre achevée... (telle que voulue par l'architecte)...
Mais on pourrait juger que quelques photos sont trop proches de l'oeuvre finale imaginée par l'architecte, elles pourraient être supprimées ou conservées en attendant 70 ans après la mort de l'architecte (si commons existe encore alors) :
- Pont de Térénez.JPG
- Pont de Térénez 2013-08-28 2019.jpg
Sinon.. si l'on veut être plus royaliste que le roi.. tout supprimer, mais à ce compte, on va vider Wikipédia de ses illustrations être obligé - pour protéger le droit des designers et d'autres plasticiens créateurs - de supprimer toutes les photos de navires, avions, fusées, voitures et camions dont les dessinateurs/designers ne sont pas morts depuis plus de 70 ans (exemple : File:Festival automobile international 2011 - Mercedes CLS 350 - 02.jpg ou File:Festival automobile international 2011 - BMW Mille Miglia - 01.jpg et des dizaines ou centaines de milliers d'autres).
--F. Lamiot (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Effectivement, le manque de liberté de panorama est un problème en France. En attendant, ce type de fichier est régulièrement supprimé de Commons. Bonne fin de journée. --Thesupermat (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pont de Térénez (2011) 2
[edit]No FOP in France. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau for the eligibility of French bridges to be objects of French copyright. Also included are two images of the bridge during its final construction phases but have shown significant details (e.g. the towers).
- File:010 Térénez.jpg
- File:20110822 Pont de Térénez (9).jpg
- File:France Bretagne 29 PONT DE TERENEZ 01.jpg
- File:France Bretagne 29 PONT DE TERENEZ 02.jpg
- File:France Bretagne 29 PONT DE TERENEZ 03.jpg
- File:Pont de Térénez - Fnistère - France.jpg
- File:Pont de Térénez vue en hauteur.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pont de Térénez (2011)
[edit]The bridge was completed in 2011 by Charles Lavigne (1944–2005). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2076.
- File:Pont de Térénez 54.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez 56.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez vue courbure.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez vue est brume.JPG
- File:Pont de Térénez vue nord-est.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Pont de Térénez 56.JPG as de minimis, Delete the others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright issues: Screenshot from copyrighted Material / non cc-licenced youtube-movie 89.204.155.102 06:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
{{Vote speedykeep}}Trolling IP.The video is licensed on YouTube with CC license, and has already been license-reviewed. --Ruthven (msg) 07:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep Just uploaded a better screenshot from the same video. It's on Youtube with CC license and has already been verified--Daolr (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete came from a YouTube channel that is full of stolen content, also includes two different videos of the same event. @Wdwd: as reviewer please comment.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per arguments by user BevinKacon. -Mardus /talk 17:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see any proof that the video is part of "stolen content" (stolen from who?), and since it has been published under Creative Commons I really don't see the point--Daolr (talk) 05:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Daolr: Well, the uploads of that account are for advertising. If it would have been a TV channel, it would have been completely different… Maybe Wdwd that reviewed the license can double check it and he/we can try to find the original video (if it exists). --Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- You mean license laundering? 84.250.17.211 08:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- checked the CC-license status on YT -> cc license. I have no indications for license laundering and in my opinion it seems to be okay. If there is some information about some kind of license laundering like other sources of this video, with different/incompatible license, please specify more details.--Wdwd (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As the work doesn't exist anymore, there is no copyright to be defended. Italian law makes the difference from the architectural work itself (for which copyright expires once the building is destroyed) and the blueprints (for which copyright holds for 70 years after the author's death). Besides, from comment above, the video seems to be fine wrt free licensing.--Ruthven (msg) 14:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP - author unclear. — Racconish 💬 10:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Sousa Mendes Aide-Mémoire from the British Embassy.jpg
- File:Letter by Sousa Mendes (says persecutes refugees).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko, thanks for raising your concerns with this scan. To your satisfaction this image is no more than a simple scanned version of a old Portuguese public domain document, that can be scanned by anyone ithe Arquivo do Ministerio dos Negócios Estrangeiros in Lisbon Portugal. IF the original document scanned is in the public domain, all scans of it are in the public domain. No one will be able to claim copyright over this scanned image, not even me, because work can only be original if it is the result of independent creative effort. It will not be original if it has been copied from something that already exists. Only original works are protected by copyright and the original is public domain.
- According to the Court of Justice of the European Union which has effect in UK law, and also Portuguese law, copyright can only subsist in subject matter that is original in the sense that it is the author’s own ‘intellectual creation’.
- In the United States, this issue was decided in the case of Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., in which the court ruled that exact photographic copies of public-domain images could not be protected by copyright in the United States because the copies lack originality
- Last but not leas, Wikipedia's position on this matter seems to be quite clear. For more information see National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute. I hope Wikipedia will maintain the position.
- EugeneZelenko I trust that within the spirit of Wikipedia you will help me to preserve this important public domain document in Wikipedia. Your help and collaboration will be deeply appreciated by myself and all Wikipedia community --JPratas (talk) 19:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Please fix description (data, country/organization of origin) and license in files' descriptions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I already did. Let me know if it is ok now or if you need any additional information. In Portugal as in many other EU countries, and also the US, documents prepared by an officer or employee of the Portuguese Government as part of the person's official duties cannot be considered works of art and are not protected by copyright. Once official documents are made public they immediately become public domain. --JPratas (talk) 18:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- License tags and author fields were not fixed. Scanning doesn't make you an author. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Dear EugeneZelenko thanks a lot for your guidance and patience on this. I tried to do the fixes you've suggested, let me know if it is ok now, otherwise please advise me how to fix it, or help me by fixing it yourself based on the information I've already provided --JPratas (talk) 02:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- See Commons:Copyright rules by territory to find out what are correct license tags for these documents. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I did see the rules both for UK, Portugal and EU. Those rules are for works protected by copyright. As I have tried to explain these documents are not works, the documents were produced by public employees while doing there duties and therefore these documents have no authorship. So the originals are not protected by copyright. And since there isn't either any authorship in the scanning, then copyright also does not apply to scanning. Would it be fine with you if I would use the same tags used in similar situations, such as the visas issued by Sousa Mendes? See File:Life_saving_visa_issued_by_Dr._Aristides_de_Sousa_Mendes_in_June_19,_1940..jpg. Or you are also going to propose deletion of this visa picture ? --JPratas (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Some countries exempt government documents from copyrights (see Category:PD-exempt license tags), but you need to investigate particular coutry law. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I did see the rules both for UK, Portugal and EU. Those rules are for works protected by copyright. As I have tried to explain these documents are not works, the documents were produced by public employees while doing there duties and therefore these documents have no authorship. So the originals are not protected by copyright. And since there isn't either any authorship in the scanning, then copyright also does not apply to scanning. Would it be fine with you if I would use the same tags used in similar situations, such as the visas issued by Sousa Mendes? See File:Life_saving_visa_issued_by_Dr._Aristides_de_Sousa_Mendes_in_June_19,_1940..jpg. Or you are also going to propose deletion of this visa picture ? --JPratas (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Dear EugeneZelenko thanks a lot for your guidance and patience on this. I tried to do the fixes you've suggested, let me know if it is ok now, otherwise please advise me how to fix it, or help me by fixing it yourself based on the information I've already provided --JPratas (talk) 02:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I already did. Let me know if it is ok now or if you need any additional information. In Portugal as in many other EU countries, and also the US, documents prepared by an officer or employee of the Portuguese Government as part of the person's official duties cannot be considered works of art and are not protected by copyright. Once official documents are made public they immediately become public domain. --JPratas (talk) 18:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Dear EugeneZelenko Under Portuguese Law Works Protected by Copyright have the following definition "Works shall mean intellectual creations in the literary, scientific and artistic fields, in whatever form, and as such they shall be protected under the present Code, as shall the rights of their authors." These type of government documents are not works and therefore are not protected by copyright. Therefore we are left with the law that regulates the public archives. The "Decreto-Lei n.º 16/93" is the one that regulates the use of public archives. According to article 17.2 or the Law 16/93 one cannot publish documents with personal data of individuals that have died less than 50 years ago. In this case the individual died in 1954. So the document can be published. For your convenience I am copying the complete article in Portuguese. It should not be difficult to check it with Google translator: "Não são comunicáveis os documentos que contenham dados pessoais de carácter judicial, policial ou clínico, bem como os que contenham dados pessoais que não sejam públicos, ou de qualquer índole que possa afectar a segurança das pessoas, a sua honra ou a intimidade da sua vida privada e familiar e a sua própria imagem, salvo se os dados pessoais puderem ser expurgados do documento que os contém, sem perigo de fácil identificação, se houver consentimento unânime dos titulares dos interesses legítimos a salvaguardar ou desde que decorridos 50 anos sobre a data da morte da pessoa a que respeitam os documentos ou, não sendo esta data conhecida, decorridos 75 anos sobre a data dos documentos.". Please advise should you require any further information.--JPratas (talk) 04:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm not expert in Portugal/European Union copyrights laws. If government document are exempted from copyrights this should be included in relevant public domain or exempt tag. You could ask help on Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP - no evidence of prior publication. — Racconish 💬 10:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence it is an official symbol, but found on Facebook. — Racconish 💬 10:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
une autre version RachidSOSSO45 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - duplicate unspecified. — Racconish 💬 10:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be authors own work, described as "This is a test upload, I will delete this file asap". At english WP Their only other 5 uploads were all deleted as unfree, including File:Boy Girl.jpg (Just an animation.) BevinKacon (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Unknown copyright? Look @Jcb: … state symbols and signs… as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations… shall not be objects of copyright! As for authorship, after the overwrite with AnonMoos’s version the original uploader Andrei Olkov repudiated his authorship. Wouldn’t be an evident solution to assign they both (Andrei Olkov and AnonMoos) as authors? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Andrei Olkov removed their original own work claim. PD-RU-exempt can only apply if this depiction comes from the government, which is not demonstrated. Jcb (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Andrei Olkov removed it to avoid any blame for AnonMoos’s code optimizations… see timing of events. But he already released his original work into public domain and blanking doesn’t revoke it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- So the question is: Was the first version their own work, or was that claim a mistake? Jcb (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Andrei Olkov removed their original own work claim. PD-RU-exempt can only apply if this depiction comes from the government, which is not demonstrated. Jcb (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I really don't know what Andrei_Olkov was objecting to in my uploads, since the version of the file he uploaded had completely wrong margins, and the star and snowflake were transparent (not filled with white). All I did was make minor technical modifications which certainly don't amount to predominant image authorship... AnonMoos (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep One cannot revoke public domain dedication. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is unclear in this case whether the uploader was the author in the first place. One cannot dedicate something into the Public Domain if one is not the copyright holder. Jcb (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Either PD or CC0. — Racconish 💬 19:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I have found the source for the image, likely where it was copied from. The claim is that it is from 1819. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- The description may be from 1819, the copyright is on the depiction. Jcb (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Source now provided and {{PD-Vlaams-gemeentewapen/en}} applies. — Racconish 💬 19:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
