User talk:Lantuszka
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Zgoda dla Zachęty
[edit]Na OTRS nadeszła zgoda na objęcie licencjami GFDL (wszystkie wersje) i CC-BY-SA (wszystkie wersje) dzieł do których prawa autorskie posiada Zachęta, a które załadujesz na Commons. Proszę dodawaj w szablonie każdego dzieła:
Permission={{OTRS|2010032810007532}}
Zwróć też proszę uwagę na użyte licencje powinny to być CC-BY-SA-ALL oraz GFDL. Sp5uhe (talk) 09:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Grzeszykowska A. Smaga J. YMCA.JPG was uncategorized on 28 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Piotr_Cywinski_with_order_received_for_contribution_to_the_developement_of_polish-jewish_dialogue.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Piotr_Cywinski_with_order_received_for_contribution_to_the_developement_of_polish-jewish_dialogue.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 23:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1) the GFDL, you said it yourself, is not {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Be careful what license template you select, cc-by-sa-3.0 is something completely different and has nothing to do with GFDL.
2) Please provide a deeplink to the website and the image. --Martin H. (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
This (http://www.prezydent.pl/gfx/prezydent/pl/defaultaktualnosci/48/778/1/2015621653.jpg) is a deeplink to the graphic. the one i've uploaded is a derivative of this one. On that web it's only requested to mention that basic link (www.prezydent.pl) on a derivative work - and this is what i've done. Please suggest any further solutions if I may do something better. --Lantuszka (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
cathegory: Zachęta National Gallery of Art
[edit]It's better not to categorise it and wait till there will be 200 or more files in one category? If you know it better wouldn't be better to simply correct it!!!
i had already corrected, just thought it would've been kind to leave you a note cause you were the one who cathegorised. See in modern art it's a very flexible division between what is sculpture and what instalation etc. plus the object on commons might be a still of a movie - while you had cathegorised it as "instalation" (see "Film" by Althamer) or a painting that you cathegorised as "instalation" (see Sasnal).
p.s. and please sign your comments in user's discussion like here above. thank you
--Lantuszka (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
GLAM
[edit]Julia, Boston9 mówi ze możesz być zainteresowana ta dyskusja --Jarekt (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Lantuszka,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Tworzyjanki
[edit]Jak byś coś tutaj dodawała z trwającego zlotu, to jest kategoria: Category:Zlot Zimowy 2017 Julo (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Day 0
[edit]Przecież czwartek był dniem zero... [1]. Yarl 💭 21:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Tak, dzięki... wpisuję tu dla archiwum komentarz, że już się porozumieliśmy w tej sprawie i pracujemy nad tematem... --Lantuszka (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
HELLO 👍 Ramiiiiiiiii 08:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC) |
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Lantuszka,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Yehonatan Indursky (2013).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Yehonatan Indursky (2013).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Yehonatan Indursky (2013).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
@Patrick Patrick Rogel, see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Yehonatan_Indursky_(2013).jpg
File:Memorial to Omelan and Tatiana Antonovych in Dolyna, Ukraine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Микола Василечко (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -43.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -44.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -46.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -47.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -61.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -70.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -71.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -72.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -97.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -98.jpg
- File:WikiCEE Meeting2017 day0 -99.jpg
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rekord Guinessa 1.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Rekord Guinessa 1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Rekord Guinessa 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting! it was an error of mass-upload by Sunflower. I've just corrected file's metadata. Once again for spotting and leaving me this message! Lantuszka (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
File:EthnoCarpathians 22082017DolynaUA-40.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |