Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 14th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate picture - No longer a Wikipedia page since Wikipedia decided to remove it Ggmatrix (talk) 02:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two other pictures are smaller; duplicates. No reason for deletion. In use. Hystrix (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GGMATRIX is not original owner - should not have been put on wikimedia 159.63.51.242 16:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Modernrocker4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Modernrocker4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely own work, small resolution and missing EXIF data. User has been warned about copyright violations.

NinjaStrikers «» 02:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer a Wikipedia page since Wikipedia decided to remove it. Wikimedia does not have the right to keep these pictures Ggmatrix (talk) 02:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 03:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of probably copyrighted book. Mr. Smart LION 06:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The hotel has been built and is open for buidness 65.114.195.186 08:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept – disruptive nonsense nomination. No valid reason for deletion. (Speedy non-admin closure.) LX (talk, contribs) 10:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate picture - No longer a Wikipedia page since Wikipedia decided to remove it Ggmatrix (talk) 02:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann: Author requested deletion of page

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly this page was created by me L Manju (talk) 06:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this stamps fails section E of the {{PD-Australia}} template - the stamp is copyright for 50 years, so will be freely licenced in 2032. Ww2censor (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (re-uploaded). --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Commons screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: WP0 abuser upload. Daphne Lantier 23:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo he subido por error. AVRTM2 (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Lo subí por error

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyrighted per source SanAnMan (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: copyrighted per https://www.sanantonio.gov/mayor

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo he subido por error Luigi Leroux (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: broken file. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted tv screenshot from this video on YouTube (minute 1:33). Image has been transferred on it.wiki with the right license tag, after discussion on Commons:Bar_italiano#Immagini_di_Zucchero_Fornaciari Holapaco77 (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: fair use. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo; uploaded via panoramio bot Prburley (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo; uploaded via panoramio bot Prburley (talk) 13:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo; uploaded via Panoramio bot Prburley (talk) 13:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo; uploaded by Panoramio bot Prburley (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo; uploaded by Panoramio bot Prburley (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo; uploaded by Panoramio bot Prburley (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dinostepanyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these small and variably sized images were created by uploader, they look instead to be taken from various source (see borders, fading, etc) and claimed as own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dinostepanyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. Small/middle sizes without EXIFs. The uploader already uploaded copyvios.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Lizenzangaben Stadt Esslingen (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hier wurden die falschen Lizenzangaben hinterlegt und das Logo ist mit korrekten Angaben bei Wikipedia hochgeladen worden. Stadt Esslingen (talk) 07:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ziliningrad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Architectural renderings (not photographs - look at the people, shadows, etc.) of modern architecture, but with no indication where they came from, or who the actual designers are.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ziliningrad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Фото скопированы из интернета, например [1][2], или же сделаны как скриншоты. + есть текст без разрешения на публикацию.

Mitte27 (talk) 22:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from a published source, but claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Անի Թոփալեան (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Utterly no indication of own work on any of these headshots of men.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo appears on https://www.povertyactionlab.org/palfrey labelled ""Quentin Palfrey" by Amanda Kohn, ©MIT | CC BY-NC-SA 4.0". CC-BY-NC-SA is not acceptable on Commons because it forbids commercial use. bjh21 (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want Wikipedia Ggmatrix (talk) 02:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate picture - No longer a Wikipedia page since Wikipedia decided to remove it Ggmatrix (talk) 02:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 15:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liberal Humanist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The user is claiming now that they are the ones who took the image and are part of the party who gave it to the news media (for the rally) and created the poster (SBP Clean India) but yesterday the user said they have no connection to the party. Eitherways, no proof that these images belong to them (I'd tagged as copyvio with a source yesterday, which the user removed and posted the "I'm the one who took it for the party and gave it to news media" on the talk page. I think it should be deleted as the real owner isn't listed and/or release provided.

SpacemanSpiff 04:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am an OCI who lives outside India. But I'm also a libertarian who's involved in liberty issues globally. I am not a member of Swarna Bharat Party, as I'm not an Indian citizen. I visited India last year and participated in the rally (which was coincidental), which is where I took the photo. Then I also contributed a little by creating an advertisement for it. I can also get the email from newsgram admitting that the image belongs to the party. Furthermore I have provided the sources for both images. So it should be obvious to people that the images belong to the party.

Furthermore Spacemanspiff has no proof that the first image doesn't belong to me. My word should be taken in good faith. Since he claims that it is copy-vio, the onus is on him to prove that the image doesn't belong to me. "I don't feel like it" is not a valid rationale. How does he know? Where is the source? Proof? I can get the party to send permission for the image, given that it is party property.

So I'll do the following:

  • Get Swarna Bharat Party's email granting permission for the first image to be used. It's their advertisement after all.
  • Get newsgram's email stating that the second image belongs to the Swarna Bharat Party and was taken from them.

No biggie! Liberal Humanist Holla at me! 04:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've just contacted both Rahul Pandit (President of Swarna Bharat Party) and Munish Kumar Raizada (Editor-in chief of newsgram). OTRS shall receive permission and clarification from both groups. Liberal Humanist Holla at me! 05:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Munish Kumar Raizada didn't respond to my email, but refer the caption for the rally image - Swarna Bharat Party Members in a street protest, Facebook. You can verify it from the newsgram article which SpacemanSpiff claims it is stolen from. The newsgram article clearly states that it was taken from facebook, which validates my assertion that it was taken from Swarna Bharat Party's facebook page -

Liberal Humanist Holla at me! 03:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Compare the dates on which the images were published:

Along with the caption in the newsgram article specifying the source as facebook and the original source as the facebook album, the fact that the newsgram article came months after the original image was published by the party clearly shows that newsgram took the image from Swarna Bharat Party's facebook page. Liberal Humanist Holla at me! 05:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received email from newsgram stating that the rally image doesn't belong to them. Refer here Liberal Humanist Holla at me! 11:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission tag was added by User:4nn1l2. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope: selfie/photo album, and its low quality and unclear location means it probably would not be used even if it was available in a category like "People of Cartagena" or "Shirtless men" seb26 (talk) 00:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esteban Ascencio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scope: selfie style photographs, but not sure who took them, if we did have permission, there would be no place for them because Esteban Ascencio has no Wikipedia coverage and the photos aren't great enough for People categories

seb26 (talk) 01:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My mistake: I yet uploaded a better imagen Leonprimer (talk) 01:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my second mistake: I yet uploaded a better imagen Leonprimer (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope: (a) low quality image of a person with no Wikipedia coverage and (b) a user image not currently used on a Wikimedia project user page for purposes of discussing Wikimedia projects (as indicated by file's description which elaborates on the person's career and occupations in an promotional manner) seb26 (talk) 02:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright doubt: no attribution to map source, looks like Bing, if so it's non free. the town now has its coordinates in Wikidata so there is no significant loss in removing this map seb26 (talk) 02:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a photo of a poster or screen: map lacks source and copyright details. --ghouston (talk) 02:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requesting this picture to be deleted from wikimedia as there is no Wikipedia page to link it to. Ggmatrix (talk) 02:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright doubt: This source link is probably where the photo was saved from, but this logo was produced by UNESCO and a similar version appears here and UNESCO's copyright terms are listed here do not permit commercial use; uploader has copyvio history seb26 (talk) 02:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is "simple" enough to be considered plain text and shapes, because in combination with the background elements, it forms an original enough graphic design, according to my viewing of the image. This design is not just words and a white background like other logos. seb26 (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright; see COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a copyrighted coat of arms Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright as claimed. For comparable local law, see COM:TOO#France and COM:TOO#Netherlands.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look about what the Belgian legislation says about it. Regards. Vascer (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IgnacioS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Small/middle size without EXIFs. Other uploads were copyvios.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some sort of personal post mr.choppers (talk)-en- 06:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musharaf.king786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos. Out of scope. --Mr. Smart LION 06:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a derivative work of that picture on the board, whose copyright is unknown, same as Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Free_Liu_Xiaobo_and_Liu_Xia,_Hong_Kong.jpg Kegns (talk) 06:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject of photo is copyrighted 3D sculpture without permission of creator. Also no freedom of panorama in Greece czar 06:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So basically, any picture I ever take of a statue or something similar is gonna be copyright infringement? Even if they creators allowed me to do so? --PanagiotisZois (talk) 10:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily. If the sculpture's author permits the relicense (not just the photo but using the photo under the license), then it's fine. And some countries have laws where permanent, public sculptures can be photographed. It depends on how the region handles artist copyright. czar 22:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyrighted. User may have copied from somewhere and posted on commons. Greenbörg (talk) 06:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright material may have been copied from somewhere on the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cute adolescent uploaded her pics, even that of her teddy bear. I don't know how to make "mass deletion request"s. All her files are OoS, dear admins. Perdoname Chicachisp. E4024 (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not uploaders own work but a photo by Calle Huth / Miljøpartiet De Grønne. (cropped version). I have uploaded the photo from Flickr with correct info and credit; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aust-Agder_Eivind_Tr%C3%A6dal.jpg Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zero quality, no permission, del on DE Nolispanmo 07:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of cc license that I can see Victuallers (talk) 08:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sources say they are copyright - pity Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone's terrace. I see no real educational value in this pic. E4024 (talk) 08:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is Ulucanlar Prison Museum. --Insider (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does the rooftop gather any importance then? If I wrote an article about any museum, the picture of its roof would be the last file I would like to add to the text. For me we can prescind this file; if you think otherwise admins may prescind my deletion nomination. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 11:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Insider, if you know it's a museum, why did you add only the prison cat? Never mind, I did it already. --E4024 (talk) 06:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Insider. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of compatible license Яй (talk) 08:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of free license. Sealle (talk) 08:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of free license. Sealle (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of free license. Sealle (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of free license. Sealle (talk) 08:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be copyright download from somewhere on the web. Greenbörg (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the evidence that this image is a copyvio? It was uploaded already 4 years ago and exactly 1 day after it had been shot (per time-stamp). --Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Túrelio. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably license laundering. However, possibly PD-old. Proper author / date of publication needed to clear the copyright status. Sealle (talk) 08:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a free license. Sealle (talk) 08:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, see watermark. Sealle (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a free license (for both versions uploaded). Sealle (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reason as the other images deleted previously. Some of these images are in a high-security setting which would mean that Narendra Modi's personally-employed photographer (if such a person exists) might not be allowed access to them. Other images have logos in prominence whose copyrights rest with either the Government of India or Bharatiya Janata Party. The images of Anandiben Patel are again cropped from images in which the Prime Minister is himself present.

Rahul Bott (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claimed author is part of the photographs:

Suspicious or no metadata available for

Most of these files have unbelievably low resolutions to be a 21st century original image.

Files like

are either official Indian government events where the Prime Minister is unlikely to be sitting as a mere photographer while the Finance Minister presides or an international event like the East Asia Summit where his personal photographer will hardly be allowed. These can at best be Government of India works which cannot be in public domain so soon as per Template:PD-India. Also

has a clear Indian Government art work (the calendar) in prominence which is certainly not copyfree.

Other images in this category have been previously deleted by sysops User:Jcb and User:Daphne Lantier. In summary, we need a thorough review of files coming from this Flickr user and should immediately suspend further uploads from this account pending the completion of such a review.

Rahul Bott (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reasons as the previous nominations. Some of the files have very suspicious metadata and low file sizes.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For similar reasons as in previous nominations from the category (all deleted). Also, File:Indian medal winners at the Special Olympic World Summer Games 2015.jpg has image credits to "Special Olympics Bharat Facebook page" while File:Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi in Rajya Sabha.jpg is a grab of official television recordings of Rajya Sabha.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before! Cannot agree more. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- acct blacklisted as well. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as for previous nominations. Many files have suspicious metadata and very low filesizes. Some others are derivative works with no proper attribution/reference to the original work and their copyright status.

Rahul Bott (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as before. Few files are screen grabs of Lok Sabha Television footage while others are screenshots of private apps like Instagram, Weibo etc.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep majority of them. Most of their previous images were low-res screenshots or instagram pics but a majority have exif information which means they were taken by actual cameras and thus they should be kept, delete the low res ones that don't look like they were taken with a camera or lack exif information, keep the rest.--Stemoc 22:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stemoc: With due respect, the mere presence of EXIF data itself does not make the copyright ownership clear. More so, if these happen to be works of a Government of India employee(s) in which case the Prime Minister himself/herself does not have the power to release the files into public domain without bringing necessary changes in Indian laws. There is also the issue of false claim of authorship with most of these files. Best Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More. Many are rightly unused with just some text and an uncredited portrait photograph as substantial part. Some are crops from already deleted files.

Rahul Bott (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files have no evidence of their copyright owner as Narendra Modi (Prime minister-India). There is clear Flickr washing. Most of the images have been deleted before for the same reason. Another set of deletion can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bharatiya29 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Except for files like File:Constituent Assembly of India logo.jpg which are clearly PD-India. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR since we now have {{GODL-India}}. Please feel free to re-nominate any file if GODL-India does not apply. I have left all the files in the GODL-India review category. Jcb (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goo3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright of the authors of the film

Максим Підліснюк (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Copyvio.--Andriy.v (talk) 13:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goo3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photographs, unlikely to be own works, probably copyright violations.

Sealle (talk) 09:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

courtesy deletion Esby (talk) 09:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC) The subject of the photograph asked me if this particuliar photo could be deleted. There are other photographs in the category so there is no real loss. (the photo is being seen on google request and is not very good technically speaking). Esby (talk) 09:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Uploaded as "own work" but possibly copied from https://www.jazztour.ru/blog/articles/15026 Takeaway (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no more used

FFA P-16 (talk) 16:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No more used. FFA P-16 (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No more used FFA P-16 (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no more used FFA P-16 (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is tagged at Europeana as NC [6]. Moreover, no evidence this license was provided by the photographer, who died in 2015. Hence, the photograph will enter the public domain at earliest in 2031. — Racconish ☎ 10:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as NC at Europeana [7]. Not clear the license was given by the author. — Racconish ☎ 10:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Europeana page claims that they've taken the photo from "The National Archives of Norway" (the original source of uploaded file to the commons). They don't have the legal right to enforce any restrictions or limitations on its usage as they are not the owner. Also, they are not doing so as the NoC-NC mentioned there is not a license. -- Meisam (talk) 10:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I remind you the rights assessment at Europeana is provided by The National Archives of Norway. I don't see any reason to consider this image has fallen in the public domain. — Racconish ☎ 11:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlirezaKhorshidi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope. commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arjun Vox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope. commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image don't have source and there are problems with the rights it should be deleted. 5.156.35.182 11:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomarzig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright notice on source says

All images copyright © Gerry van Apeldoorn. Images may be downloaded only for private, non-commercial use

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violations Atsypja (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bollywood Hungama photos of non-Indian events are not free. No IIFA event has ever happened in India. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in 1962, with renewal in 1990 [8] [9]. — Racconish ☎ 13:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question - is the Ronald Reagan library now the copyright holder of this work? If not that the above seems to apply, if yes then they have released it under cc-by Victorgrigas (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
NARA arc 5957975 indicates copyright restrictions. — Racconish ☎ 08:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moved from speedy. No evidence of a free license. Politechnika Gdańska is credited in the description, while KRZYSZTOF KRZEMPEK is credited in the EXIF. Yann (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HerrAdams as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/72M6E4N4OINHYCTAQ2LMDGOU4BQ2ME5UCC BY-NC-SA 3.0 DE not commons compatible Yann (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of Commons: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. (private image of uploader) Zhangj1079 (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Carpet Museum of Iran, Tehran, Prayer Room. After deletion, I will upload correct file. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 13:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Carpet Museum of Iran, Tehran, Prayer Room. After deletion, I will upload correct file. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 13:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olivier Rodriguez.jpg is credited to Juan Louzao, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of Commons: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. (private image of uploader) Zhangj1079 (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of Commons: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. (private image of uploader) Zhangj1079 (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to en:wiki "S. D. Jouhar (1901 – 1963) was an influential amateur Fine Art photographer, active in the period 1935 to 1963." So it's very hard for me to see how this can be "own work" and "self-portrait" of a man who passed away in 1963. Also that is not sufficient time for this image to become public domain. If the uploader is the heir of the creator, please file the form at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim of "own work" on this image license is not likely as this appears to be an official portrait - although very blurry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the metadata, Misael Valtierra (a known mexican photographer from Cuartoscuro) is the author. Probably the image doesn't have the proper license. Luisalvaz (talk) 14:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, tiny blurry file of an "S". Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, not in COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be promotionalism and the image is copied from an external source without permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was unable to verify the license with the information given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es ist mein haus und ich möchte nicht das dieses Foto im Internet gezeigt wird ! 88.75.126.224 14:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO MANY ERROES, SORRY!!!! 慎獨木鐸 (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TOO MANY ERRORS, SORRY!!!! 慎獨木鐸 (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image and it's description do not seem to be educational in nature. Appears to be self-promotional. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, doesn't appear to be educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Paro Maestros 2017.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of some kind of shirt with words and number. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on page http://www.biuletyn.agh.edu.pl/archiwum_bip/_2005/_146/02_146.html with other professors in images of this same type, but less blurry at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this complex logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.Kathisma (talk) 00:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Object depicted does not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaik Mydeen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotionalism or self-promotionalism is not within the COM:SCOPE of Commons. All these images have one Person the same throughout, "Shaik Mydeen", however none are selfies so even if they were uploaded by "Shaik Mydeen" account name, they're all COM:COPYVIOs. Also notice they're in use in a sandbox article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shaik_Mydeen/Sandbox1, of dubious notability.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree with the nominator. Since the uploader is himself in the pictures, we sadly cannot rescue the notable personalities in some of the images either which could otherwise have been kept after cropping Shaik Mydeen out. The copyright status of all the files is suspicious. --Rahul Bott (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by End.szucs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilaflow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric ottawa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

Author=unknown Date=1930 Country=Canada Location=Ottawa, Canada Information=View of the Ottawa river from Nepean point, Ottawa. Source=Facebook, Group "Lost Ottawa"

Author=unknown; possibly William James Topley Date=1910 Country=Canada Location=Ottawa, Canada Information=View of an Ottawa Rowing Club crew. Source=Copyrights released by the City of Ottawa. Picture provided to the Ottawa Rowing Club in 2017. File no. 025376

Author=unknown Date=1940 Country=Canada Location=Ottawa, Canada Information=View of the Ottawa Rowing Club. Source=Copyrights released by the City of Ottawa. Picture provided to the Ottawa Rowing Club in 2017. File no. 025374

Author=William James Topley Date=1910 Country=Canada Location=Ottawa, Canada Information=View of an Ottawa Rowing Club crew. Source=Credit: Topley Studio / Library and Archives Canada / PA-042694 Restrictions on use: Nil. Copyright: Expired

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license falsely claims it is a work of the U.S. Government. It's not. It's a work of the State of Colorado. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we have permissions for this book cover? I do not see its original English version here. Rahul Bott (talk) 14:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny animated gif, unlikely to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a lower resolution version of the actress's Twitter image https://twitter.com/nathaliekelley9?lang=en, also you can barely see a "something.com" watermark in the upper left corner ... if this isn't a copyright violation, I'll be very surprised. GRuban (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oil painting does not appear to be own work of uploader who has been given a last warning for uploading COM:COPYVIOs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zontal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of copyrighted images ([10] [11] [12] [13] [14] and so on), no original authors' permission.

Sealle (talk) 03:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination and kept one per Norden1990. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zontal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images do not appear to be own work of uploader, some are portraits, others photos apparently from other websites. Uploader user page has "last warning" on it.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's discussion on my talk page from the uploader who apparently paints from "old photos." Notice that two which were previously deleted were reuploaded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where did the base map come from? Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayaz.saeidzadeh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of photographs of rock climbers and rock climbing claimed to be own work, but probably not. Because all these photos, from at least two continents are said to be from July 2017. That is obviously impossible for any single person to have done this much traveling and photographing of climbers on big walls in July 2017, as we are only on the 14th day of the month. These photos are very small, I found two others which were direct copyright violations from other websites, and looking at these, they are a mix of professional shots of climbers, pictures of mountains, pictures of trekkers, and so on. It looks much more like a collected gallery than own work due to the singular nature, small file size and fourteen day window of "creation".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image without any attribution to the source of each image. The composite appears to have first come from this YouTube video (direct link to thumbnail) and had its 5th image replaced with another still (and you can still see the former picture's red borders around it). Some of the photos have been previously published by press outlets [15]. seb26 (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HoMen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no indication that any of these images was created by uploader. Some are historical, others from books, magazines or newspapers. At least one looks like a book cover, and several are attributed to others, then claimed as "own work".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused .pdf file which is from an external website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused .pdf file which is from an external website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos are out of the scope of Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images are out of scope on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manoukiand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contemporary art, but unknown if artist is notable and also no COM:OTRS permission.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotionalism and photos from various cameras.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.buzzativ.com/new-phenomenon-red-tika-challenge-taken-social-media-storm/ shows this image was in use long before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of uploader this appears to be from a source printed on textured paper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be promotional in nature due to the facebook, (c) twitter bird and Instagram logos in upper left corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thekazimasudrana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two copies of a blurry photo of a man in green sunglasses are not particularly educational.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was unable to verify the license at source. I see (c) mark there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to incorporate a Minecraft image in this collage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the flickr review occurred, it seems to have missed that what is shown is a collage of images including some from minecraft. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contains not only book spines, but an image from Minecraft. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And:

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of halloween pumpkins, minecraft, etc Milru (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's highly disruptive to nominate images for deletion because they're not used on Wikipedia. The scope of Wikimedia is far larger than to be a repository for the Wikipedia's. Also, in future, please try to keep DR's together instead of spreading them out like this. --Vera (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: disruptive DR. Please read com:SCOPE. The backlogg is long enough already... Natuur12 (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Merged with main DRVera (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Merged with main DRVera (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of Minecraft, halloween pumpkins, etc, etc, etc. Wikipedia isn't only served by Commons Milru (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Merged with main DRVera (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a Minecraft item, not own work of photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft (game) toys like the file name says. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft game imagery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft Toy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright unclear - not all instagram files are openly licensed WereSpielChequers (talk) 15:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

間違えて画像を投稿してしまった。 Akira kojima (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-own work photo from artist's website[16] maybe.--Batholith (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong File Meinkirchhain (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

eliminar redirección para poder nombrar un archivo con este título Yo, Ansunando (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope: self-made graphic advertising self, no encyclopedic purpose at this point seb26 (talk) 16:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joan Joan abc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images of unknown people

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo of non-descript event, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of Commons: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. (private image of uploader) Zhangj1079 (talk) 17:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of Commons: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. (private image of uploader) Zhangj1079 (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, probably derivative work Didym (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nirmal Dulal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 18:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nirmal Dulal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation - False claim - Not an own work - Unlikely to be the author of the files - No permission - See EXIF and/or Metadata: Someone else is copyright holder - Speedy deletion would be appreciative - Not likely to exist here on Commons. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tulsi Bhagat, for your information these picture were taken with my personal camera and the name "Babin" in metadata of these picture is name of my nephew "Babin Dulal" which was set by myself in there and I think most of the participants on these event know that I was using that camera. Did you fined any matched photographs with other and did any other photographers claimed them as their contributions? What reason drags you here to looks for copyright after one years of upload? -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Nirmal Dulal, Thank you for the ping. I understand your concern. Let me explain, even if the pictures were taken with your camera, but you're not the photographer or copyright holder. Sorry, I may have mistaken but some of them are not your own work. As you told, no i didn't find any matched photographs with other and also any other photographers didn't claim them as their contributions but see COM:CARES: Commons cares about copyright even when a copyright owner does not. I noticed that you, the uploader is the subject of various picture and it doesn't look like selfie. I assume, you haven't clicked those photographs, and metadata either explain someone else as copyright holder. Please send permission via COM:OTRS. Being an image reviewer here on commons, my rights and duties drags me to check the files if it's okay for commons or not. I actively tagged dozens of files for deletion everyday. Xtools counted that i have over 4000 deleted edits. Feel free to ping me if you are still unclear. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The author is trusted and confirmed himself that he set the author name Babin in his camera (Maybe he loves his nephew). The above nominated images contains proper EXIF data and falls under the common scope. I saw him doing photography in many regional and international Wikimedia events, and I confirmed that he clicked the photos of WMCON in Berlin himself and very likely to be photographed the rest of the events. Thanks--Biplab Anand (Talk) 04:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some images now have OTRS permission, others are still pending. --Krd 12:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Krd, as per my conversation with copyright holder:Babin, he also sent permission to those images where I'm subject in photographs. Please review the permission clearly. Thanks and regards. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Making things simpler.  I withdraw my nomination. I apology for inconvenience. Let's keep these photographs. As it is from Wikimedia events, obviously free files. We can change the attributions to "Wikimedians of Nepal User Group" and "Wikimedia Conference" or "Babin Dulal" as it fits. Also, delete File:Metropolitan Police Office of Nepal.jpg: No FOP in Nepal and © Soul-bridge. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 18:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Johan, I think there is some misunderstanding. As I know, the author and copyright holder: Babin(as per meta data and nominator) sent COM:OTRS permission to all those images mentioned above but you deleted only those picture where I am subject in photographs (as per nominator). Is that mean I can't upload my images even there is permission from author and copyright holder? Can you please review the OTRS Ticket:2019081710004861 properly. thanks and regards. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nirmal Dulal: Sorry for the inconvenience. Restoring the files and closing the discussion ASAP. Thank you for your patience. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ticket:2019081710004861 and above discussion. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't look like self work Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't look like self work Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jglor96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. May also be out of scope.

Yann (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Urugya Bayrak.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover, unlikely to be available under a free license WereSpielChequers (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and meaningless map, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and meaningless map, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and meaningless map, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless map, only used on an inactive sandbox page with fantasy info, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and meaningless map, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and meaningless map, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal or promotional image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission "granted"? Where's the proof? — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says it's licensed under CC-Attribution, but the linked Flickr page says All Rights Reserved. Madg2011 (talk) 19:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work based on painting by Frédéric Fiebig (1885-1953), see http://www.fredericfiebig.com/visite/Autoportrait/1-4 Verbcatcher (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia a "...derivative work becomes a second, separate work independent in form from the first." I don't see how this violates any copyrights.

@Curtneyj: please see Commons:Derivative works, "if the underlying work is still copyright protected, the original copyright holder must also license the underlying work for reuse". You could ask about this at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case, then remove it.


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pkbwcgs as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from [17]. Out of scope and possibly copyvio. Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: I don't understand why does this image need to go through the regular deletion process. Can't this image be speedy deleted? Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can not open the link, it shows to me as an empty page. If the image is just out of scope (not copyvio), it has to go here.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a clear (c) ITV in the EXIF, see the bottom of the page. But honestly, even if it weren't there, this is clearly a posed, professional, cast image, found in many places on the internet. GRuban (talk) 20:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License à vérifier : cela ressemble à la photo d'un livre ou d'un panneau d'information (musée) : l'objet photographié est probablement protégé par le droit d'auteur. De plus il y a un marquage "Usage réservé A...." (probablement http://www.archeojurasites.org -- en biais à droite) donc la photo elle -même n'est pas libre. Habertix (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Saudi Arabia (rebuilt in 1986 and really different from the flat box structure and single minaret of old) and considering the uploader's history of copyvio, it seems likely this image comes from a (copyrighted) book. HyperGaruda (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality selfie Apocheir (talk) 20:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a cropped file. Família paixão (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata - seems to be a copyvio from http://asmbasket.org/photo/187/5198/, that indicates © Serge Haouzi / AS Monaco Basket - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 21:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong person; same image File:Theda-Bara-Cleopatra3.jpg already in commons and is correctly listed as being Theda Bara. Deanlaw (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Marino Fonović Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, appears to be a screen capture from the TV program w:en:Mock the Week. Unlikely that the uploader holds the rights Verbcatcher (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work: no EXIF, small resolution. Jcb (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, appears to be a still from 1969 BBC TV program "The Same Trade as Mozart", unlikely that Flickr uploader holds the rights, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwE0Zxu9iGk Verbcatcher (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A Flickr bot attempted to upload a video but only obtained the black rectangle before the video. I'm trying to put the actual video up in its place, but it will have to be a separate upload (it is a video file), so this jpeg can be deleted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright not free website Pitpisit (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Pitpisit (talk) 23:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 23:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 23:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 23:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License à vérifier : selon les informations de la page Commons, la photo est un "travail personnel" de mai 2009. Mais fr:Jean-Claude Roussel est mort en 1972. Le cadrage suggère plutôt la photo de la page d'un livre ou d'une plaquette de l'entreprise a peiori non libre. Habertix (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

      • Cette photo n'est pas celle de la page d'un livre, ni d'une plaquette de l'entreprise "a peiori non libre". C'est une photo de mon oncle qui figure dans ma chambre et qui a été prise par un de ses collaborateurs.--Ciborum (talk) 13:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de confirmer que la licence "travail personnel" n'est pas correcte. Êtes-vous titulaire des droits associés ou avez-vous l'autorisation du photographe initial pour la publication sous licence libre ? -- Habertix (talk) 21:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
      • La licence "travail personnel" est correcte, dans la mesure où c'est moi-même qui ai photographié la photo, laquelle photo est la photo d'une photo issue d'un album familial. Je ne peux dire c'est un de ses employés qui a pris cette photo, et si cela a été fait dans le cadre de ses fonctions, mais je considère que j'en ai les droits de publication sous licence libre. De toute façon, vous pouvez supprimer la photo. J'ai pu observer que vous me poursuiviez personnellement par votre obsession de me détruire, et détruire tout ce que j'ai réalisé sur WP, raison pour laquelle d'ailleurs j'ai cessé de collaborer à Wikipédia, mais cela n'est pas grave, car il y a d'autres choses plus importantes dans la vie.....--Ciborum (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: it is not own work, the framing suggest a professional portrait from a book. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I transferred the file from the English WP in 2006 we still believed in the Good Faith. — Actually the file obviously was obtained by the USACE though the exact source page is unknown, maybe an EN:WP could look in the original log there if there was additional information.
However, this National Park Service document mentions on the top of page 2 that the map was originally created by w:Newton Horace Winchell who died in 1914, 103 years ago. Therefore, it can be assumed that the map was published firstly before 1923 and is therefore in the PD. (There might or mighht not have been some minor later additions, but that can't be decided on the cited PDF as at least that is edited for educational purposes.)
Perhaps another editor could verify my statement and add the information on the file description – as the original EN:WP-transferrer I feel a certain conflict of interest and would like a second pair of eyes doing the additions.
However, regardless, where the file originally was taken, we can assume, that Mr. Winchell is the author of the map, is long enough dead to declare the file PD and to keep it. --Matthiasb (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original description page:

== Summary ==
taken by William Wesen 09/13/06
==Caption==
Mississippi River at St. Anthony Falls
Showing the recession from 1680 to 1887.
Original image credit: US Army corp of engineers.
== Licensing ==
{{PD-USGov-Military-Army-USACE}}{{commons conflict}}
 [[Category:Images of Minneapolis, Minnesota]]
 {{db|duplicate on Commons can be used instead}}

Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, obvious OK, either by age, or PD-US gov. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: I found several uncategorized Minecraft related screenshots etc. which I categorized in this category after iniciating this DR. Please evaluate these files too. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)

Logos
Screenshots
Derivative works of Minecraft textures

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

All real buildings have copyrights, until they expire. In many countries, Commons photographs are permitted by laws which specifically exempt the photographs from being derivative works, see COM:FOP. However, that is a bad analogy. Think, instead, of drawings of real buildings, including both the architectural drawings used to construct them, renderings used to show them before construction, and post construction drawings. All of them have copyrights and you will not see them on Commons without a specific license from the creator.
The brick maker cannot sue because bricks aren't copyrighted, but the architect can sue a photographer in many countries (those with no FOP law) and can sue someone who copies his drawings in every country.
Copyright law is not stupid. If it were not for copyright laws, few people would go to the effort of writing books or creating sculptures, because they could not earn money for doing it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you are wrong. As I noted above, there are explicit exemptions in some countries for photographs of actual buildings. Minecraft is not buildings. Your Disney block creation would be a sculpture. In any event, with limited exceptions which don't apply here, every created work has a copyright. While there are exceptions for actual buildings (and other things) in some countries, any other copy of such a work is a copyvio. Since no exception applies to computer generated works anywhere, this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]



Let's start from scratch. There is nothing international about this -- it is all US law and Commons rules. One of two things is true. Either:
  • You drew these completely from your own mind with no reference to anything on Minecraft, or
  • These are derived from or use images or parts of images from Minecraft.
In the first case, they are your personal creations and we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists, see COM:SCOPE.
In the second case, your images are derivative works of the copyrighted work of other people and therefore must be deleted as copyvios.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.

Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Other stuff doesn't exist", do you have a policy-based reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:L. Screenshots of a non-free video game (COM:SS). Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of File:Discobeat Skin.png is Mojang's IP? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on that one, I would've said the background but it doesn't appear to be Mojang's textures. However, we still can't be sure whether the background is freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the personal player model skin used by the uploader. From the publicly available logs at de.wp it appears that this may have been used for a self-promotional article that was deleted speedily – which raises the additional question of COM:SCOPE. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment maybe a warning message equivalent to {{NoUploads}} might help to keep new uploads to the category down a little bit? --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Skin de Diamantum576.jpg has a watermark from novaskin.me/wallpapers, a page that seems to provide a functionality where you can place your own player skin into a pre-made wallpaper. They use CC-BY-SA-NC as a license for their stuff, so even if the background image was their own (which I'm tempted to doubt based on the other clearly non-free stuff they use) we can't keep it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:The Feed The Beast Launcher.png seems to show a separate software called Feed The Beast Launcher, which is licensed {{Apache}}. The screenshot shows logos for different Minecraft modpacks which might not be part of that license, however. Don't know if these might qualify for COM:De minimis/{{De minimis}}? --El Grafo (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the page to show the Apache license, rather than the CC-own work claim. Checking the Feed the Beast modpack list the modpacks included in the screenshot are All Rights Reserved, which I would assume includes the logo too. I'm not too sure about de minimis either, especially since one of the logos cover a decent amount of the image, but in the worst case the logos could be edited out in order to keep the image. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like to point out that the three which are struck out and stated to be "in use" are likely all COM:COPYVIOs as they are COM:DW of copyrighted game "Minecraft". A copyvio "in use" does not become ineligible to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The last one (File:Tinkers Construct smeltery.png) is fine, I think: It doesn't contain anything from the original game, everything displayed comes from the Tinkers Construct mod which has a free license. --El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (Edit conflict) Not all of these files were nominated as copyright violations, some were also nominated as out of scope.
-Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The head of the skin appears to me to be a derivative of the Pig that appears in Minecraft, and I'd also imagine there was some issue with the Spider-Man uniform too. Either way, out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.

Copyright violations
Out of scope

--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voglio farti notare che la dichiarazione sulla immagine File:Herobrine skin ver. mod.png, non è esatta, non risulta nessuna copyright della Mojang su questo personaggi perché il personaggio è stato creato dalla comunità di Minecraft, inoltre l’immagine non deriva dal videogioco e stata realizzata dall’autore che la pubblicata, soprattutto il personaggio è una creepy-pasta ispirato a Minecraft. Inoltre Notch ha più volte dichiarato che il personaggio non esiste nel videogioco. Per tanto Mojang non ha mai avuto copyright sul questo personaggio immaginario. Qualsiasi riferimento della Mojang su Herobrine e solamente uno scherzò che fa alla comunità. Inoltre dire che l’immagine e derivato della skin del giocatore predefinito di Minecraft, ti poso dire che è deriva solo dalle abilità del autore della immagine che la realizzato in SVG e poi la salvato su http://minecraft.gamepedia.com in formato PNG.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter whether Mojang claim ownership or acknowledge the character, as this representation of it was made by modifying Minecraft textres. The Herobrine skin is clearly a derivative work of the Steve skin. Making minor modifications by colouring the eyes white and adding a smile does not mean that the editor now owns rights to the skin, thus they are not able to release the image under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additonally, even if it were the sole authorship of the uploader on Gamepedia, the image is only licensed CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The source has no mention of the GDFL license that you claimed when uploading the file. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Su questo ti posso dare una spiegazione, essendo che non esiste il Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) o perché non sono riuscito a trovarlo (probabilmente e stato nominato sotto un altro nome). Ho caricato immagine sotto la licenza che l’autore mia detto che era adeguata. Se mi stai dicendo che l’immagine come il colore della pelle e legata al copyright, l’immagine e composta da geometria semplice e colori che formano l’immagine non possono essere considerati come materiale protetto da copyright perché comuni a tutti, Non supera quindi la soglia di originalità. Inoltre cito il trademark.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


As the creator of File:Flag of Satigris.svg I do not object to its deletion. I don't even remember why I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, to be honest. Bowwow828 (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations

Out of scope

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Herobrine.png

Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go.

This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none.  Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright as claimed. For comparable local law, see COM:TOO#France and COM:TOO#Netherlands. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Obviously simple enough. Fry1989 eh? 18:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion : only one colour, two letters and a highly stylized four-leaf clover. --VIGNERON (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake f SDFWEFCwef (talk) 05:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment @SDFWEFCwef: can you give more information? what is fake? I'm guessing it may be the logo on the shirt… Regardless, probably  Delete for copyvio, no EXIF, only import of Aefearfewf, similar photos can be found on some website with Google images (but not easily linkable… here for example). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: possibly copyvio; per Vigneron. Ruthven (msg) 08:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't obviously available elsewhere online, but saying (from what I can tell) that the source is simply a Photograph is not sufficient to establish that this was previously licensed as indicated, or that the uploader had permission to license it themselves. TimothyJosephWood 12:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Für die Datei "File: Brian Michaels-300dpi.jpg" liegt das Copyright bei Jakub Urbanski. Er hat der Veröffentlichung auf Wikipedia Commons zugestimmt. Eine entsprechende schriftliche Erlaubnis von J. Urbanski an mich, die Datei zu verwenden, zu bearbeiten und zu verbreiten liegt vor; ich weiß nur nicht, wem ich sie "in die Hand drücken" kann und vor allem wo. --Paläotechnologe (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: @Paläotechnologe: we need a written authorization from Jakub Urbanski. Please send it to COM:OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 08:49, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

original file at enWiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/File:ASTRONAUT.jpg) had the template PD-USGov-Military-Badge Agathoclea (talk) 07:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But not a source to support such a license assumption? Jcb (talk) 16:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 06:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DenghiùComm as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: no encyclopedic interest Yann (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep No valid reason for deletion /St1995 16:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I think that if the scope of Commons is encyclopedic, we cannot became the location of hundreds of romantic pseudo-artistic pictures. In which category you will put this picture? It was taken in Ortigia: what shows this picture of Ortigia? Nothing. The rose: it is a good picture of this flower? Not. So the conclusion is that this photo is not useful at all. This is my opinion. And this is the reason because I asked its deletion.--DenghiùComm (talk) 09:06, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per St1995. --Insider (talk) 06:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion because people use Commons as a source for educational images and backgrounds, and this one is large size, ok quality, etc. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is broken. I tried to delete it, but could not, so I added {{Delbug}}. After that another admin decided that the file would somehow be not eligible for speedy deletion. Well, no problem, although the file is broken and therefore useless, deletion could wait a few days if desired. Jcb (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Jcb's nomination - this deletion will not prejudice a re-upload of the file, if functional. --Nick (talk) 11:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Der wilde bernd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images which are not created by the person who took the photo are called Derivative works, please see COM:DW. This looks like someone went through exhibit/s and photographed the displays, complete with light flares, etc, but unfortunately without any information which might help establish if any of these are freely licensed. But what is clear, is they are not "own work".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Die Fälle 1 bis 4 (von oben her durchgezählt) beruhen auf Fotokopien in einem öffentlich zugänglichen Archiv, das ausdrücklich das Anfertigen von Fotokopien oder Fotos des Akteninhalts erlaubt.
Fall 5: Ich habe die Quelle angegeben und ausdrücklich darauf hingewiesen, dass die University of Chicago den Download dieses Bildes (und damit auch dessen Verwendung) freigegeben hat. Es gehört zu einer Pressemitteilung der UoC.
Die Fälle 6, 7 und 8 sind "Fotozitate". Ich habe Aufnahmen im Jüdischen Museum in Berlin gemacht, was nicht verboten ist, und Ausschnitte dieser Fotos hochgeladen. Die Aufnahmen selber sind alle älter als 70 Jahre.
Die Fälle 9 und 10 bilden im Straßenraum von Frankfurt öffentlich zugängliche und von der Stadt errichtete Gedenktafeln ab.
Fall 11: hier handelt es sich um die von mir fotografierte öffentlich zugängliche Schautafel eines kommunalen Denkmals (ähnlich den Fällen 9 und 10).
Fall 12: Mir wurde ein Fläschchen Schnaps geschenkt, den ich nicht getrunken habe. Stattdessen habe ich das Etikett von der Flasche glöst und fotografiert.
Fälle 13 und 14: Analog den Fällen 6, 7 und 8.
Fall 15: Das ist ein von mir in Libre Office selbst gestalteter Button.
Fall 17 und 18: Auf dem einen Foto bin ich selber mit drauf. Ich war damals Geschäftsführer von ÖKO-Test, und diese Fotos sind von uns ohne jegliche Einschränkung an die Presse weitergegeben worden. Wir waren froh, wenn sie verwendet wurden.
Ich bin weder Jurist noch Urheberrechtsexperte, aber ich habe mir schon angewöhnt, mit Fotos in der WIKIPEDIA besonders vorsichtig umzugehen (siehe die Diskussion zu Minna Specht). In den hier diskutierten Fällen fehlt mir allerdings das Unrechtsbewußtsein.---- (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, ich ar gestern in Eile, weshalb ich nur die Anmerkungen zu den einzelnen Beanstandungen hinterlassen habe. Ich möchte meine Sicht jetzt noch einmal etwas ausführlicher darstellen. Vorweg: Alle beanstandeten Fotos wurden von mir selbst aufgenommen, sind damit also "mein Werk". Das Problem scheint demnach darin zu bestehen, dass das, was ich fotografiert habe, Inhalte enthält, die ich nicht hätte fotografieren oder hochladen dürfen. Das scheint mir jedoch in vielen der beanstandeten Fälle absurd zu sein. Wenn ein staatliches oder kommunales Archiv ausdrücklich erlaubt, dass die Akteninhalte fotokopiert oder fotografiert werden dürfen, weshalb sind dann so entstandene Aufnahmen in der WP nicht statthaft? Warum sind Aufnahmen von im öffetnlichen Raum installierten Gedenktafeln nicht zulässig? Dann müssten auch sämtliche Aufnahmen von Stolpersteinen, von denen ich auch einige hochgeladen habe, unzulässig sein. In einem anderen Fall habe ich ein Foto eingestellt, das die University von Chicago zumDownload freigegeben hat. Ich habe die Quelle und auch diesen Hinweis angegeben, aber dennoch soll das Bild gelöscht werden. Weshalb? Ich habe auch Fotos hochgeladen, die ich im Jüdischen Museum in Berlin gemacht habe. Das Fotografieren war dort erlaubt. Warum darf ich diese Bilder nicht verwenden? Der Betreiber der Webseite http://www.stmarystownandcountryschool.com/ hat mir gestern erlaubt, dass ich Bilder von der Seite mit Quellennennung in eigenen Wikipedia-Artikeln verwenden darf. Wie soll ich das tun, um nicht abermals in die Löschfalle zu geraten? Ich gestehe, dass ich mit dieser Diskussion grosse Schwierigkeiten habe. All diese Bilder waren für mich keine Selbstzwecke, sondern Elemente zur Illustration von WIKIPEDIA-Artikeln. Momentan sieht es für mich aber so aus, dass ich besser die Finger von Bildmaterial lasse und mich auf Texte beschränke. Schön finde ich das nicht (auch für die Nutzer der WP nicht), aber vielleicht können wir ja an Hand meiner "Fälle" noch zu einer gemeinsamen Regelung kommen. Viele Grüße ---- (talk) 13:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that insufficient information is given about source and author for these pictures. What is depicted is not the own work of the uploader and whether anyone allowed you to take photos or not is not the basis of the copyright discussion. The age and creator of each work needs to be known in order to assist you with retention. Also - in the case of photos which were "passed along" to you, I'm very sorry, but the actual creator needs to provide COM:OTRS permission to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, these are all likely copyright violations due to various principles. For background information, please see COM:DW, COM:PACKAGING, and note that the fact that something is distributed for free does not make it freely licensed. I am relisting two that may be ineligible due to {{PD-text}}. --Storkk (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: relisted here. Storkk (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And restored two that fall under {{FoP-Germany}}, I missed that they were in a public place. Storkk (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]