Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/06/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 9th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Roosevelt dam, not Coolidge dam 50.107.11.210 15:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then we should rename the file, not delete it. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: renamed, no reason to delete. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Thesupermat (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate content Kaizer445 (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Daphne Lantier 19:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a constructive content Kaizer445 (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied per nomination, as deletion was requested by uploader on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:La Pobla de Benifassà, 12599, Castellón, Spain - panoramio (4).jpg Joanbanjo (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and replaced with a redirect. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Sant Francesc, València, Valencia, Spain - panoramio (4).jpg Joanbanjo (talk) 23:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and replaced. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request is now useless. JIP (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to delete this request page as well so I don't have to keep creating recursive deletion requests? JIP (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: clsed the other DR as kept. --JuTa 07:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity use only Andy Mabbett (talk) 23:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nyttend: Cross-wiki spamming and sockpuppetry

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image Joanbanjo (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Your opinions are asked : personality rights isusses and/or 'posing', as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Nyttend blocked the James ville (talk · contribs) indefinitely and deleted all his contributions. He is a sockpuppeteer. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent clone of another user page; not a bot Andy Mabbett (talk) 23:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted and blocked. Spammer, plus a sockpuppet of another user; go to en:wp and see the discussion closed by this edit. Nyttend (talk) 10:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Nyttend. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bárbara Maria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope Pdf file

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bárbara Maria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mRtOt2BKSGg/TincfIdSDAI/AAAAAAAAJUE/mUoh1Uuj_VM/s1600/imagem71469.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billu4muhazzin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Billu4muhazzin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, small size without EXIFs+ "FBMD" in the metadata

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Billu4muhazzin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image/self promotion : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are old-built, and the copyright has expired.
According to Article 16 of the Iranian copyright law, works owned by legal personalities last for 30 years from publication copyright.
Rye-96 (talk) 14:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The rights belong to the architect. Is he/she alive? 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep A silly amount of Iranian-related pictures are getting removed for no proper reason. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's because of COM:FOP. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran

4nn1l2 (talk) 00:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — The complex is old enough to pass. The copyright has expired.
According to Article 16, works owned by legal personalities last for 30 years from publication copyright.
Rye-96 (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please identify the architect. The original rights belong to him/her. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep A silly amount of Iranian-related pictures are getting removed for no proper reason. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is because of COM:FOP 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The complex has been nationalized and is owned by the country's Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
Rye-96 (talk) 23:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - per Rye-96. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The copyright on architecture is 50 years pma, which is very unlikely to have expired on these clearly modern buildings. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of the non-free photograph found here: http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/dokument/varlden-hyllar-tess-asplunds-hojda-nave/ . Sjö (talk) 06:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A full (not cropped) version of the image was recently deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tess Asplund vs neo-Nazis in Sweden.jpg. But the same problems remain with this cropped version: The clothes, the gesture etc show that it is clearly made with the above mentioned photograph as a model, and so not free. /NH 06:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In the Bridgeman case it was argued that an exact copy of a picture could not create a copyright. This is because there is no new interpretation - this is what copyright protects. This crop is an image based on the same moment in time and of the same person in the same clothes..... but this is a water colour, its not traced, its a new way, a new interpretation of the event. If the original photo represents the way one woman stood up against some protesters - then this one does not. This appeared to be the crux of your previous objection. Would you please crop it so that you are happy that it no longer represents the picture and lets move on. Victuallers (talk) 23:26, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If the picture is still going to serve as a portrait of the depicted person, I dont think it can be cropped so that it is not also a derivative work of the photograph. This is because the sketch was so obviously made from the photograph. /NH 14:26, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clearly DW od the photo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD before 2018.

— Racconish ☎ 09:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some of this paints are older then 100 years, so it's necessary to check witch ones need to be deleted. --Codas (talk) 09:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If mathematics is not opinable, Bonnard died in 1947, so in 2017 it's been 70 years. PD is after 70 years from the death, not 70+1, so it's in PD since Jan. 01st 2017. --Sailko (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The calculation of 70 years starts from January 1, 1948 per article L. 123-1 of French copyright code: "Au décès de l'auteur, ce droit persiste au bénéfice de ses ayants droit pendant l'année civile en cours et les soixante-dix années qui suivent". On the death of the author, that right shall subsist for his successors in title during the current calendar year and the 70 years thereafter [1]. — Racconish ☎ 09:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many of these paintings are in private collections... are we sure we cannot postpone this discussion of only 6 months?? --Sailko (talk) 10:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painting, created in France in 1946, is in the public domain in its country of origin, France, but remains copyrighted in the U.S. It won't enter the public domain in the U.S. until at least 2042.

0x0a (talk) 12:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

published in "Galerie Louis Carré, Paris (sale: Ader Picard Tajan, Palais d'Orsay, Paris, 27th April 1978, lot 29C)" no copyright notice, no registration, therefore public domain in the US. --Arnoseven (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This does not apply to a work first published outside the U.S. 0x0a (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"If published, was the work published in an eligible country (Berne/WTO, excluding the US; use this table) and not published in the United States during the 30-day period following publication in such eligible country?" Commons:URAA-restored_copyrights#Main_tests. --Arnoseven (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that means that it is URAA-restored. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, are you sure? I think we're looking at the COM:Hirtle chart case for Works Published Abroad After 1 January 1978: "Published either with or without copyright notice, and not in the public domain in its home country as of URAA date", where the instruction is to use the US publication chart. Since this was a 1978 publication, that would require registration within 5 years, otherwise {{PD-US-1978-1989}}. holly {chat} 21:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. It's fall under {{PD-US-1978-1989}} according to the Hirtle chart. In addition, the wording of the template needs to be modified to indicate that it applicable to works published outside the U.S.. However, I'd recommend deleting the second image because its color looks distorted due to format conversion. The original image is at [2]. 0x0a (talk) 08:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you could upload a webp version, but file type is not a rationale for deletion. Commons:Deletion_policy and "On Wikimedia Commons, the file types we recommend are: SVG, PNG, and JPEG." Commons:File types. --Arnoseven (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: I'm counting these as PD-US-no notice. as they were probably exhibited before 1978. holly {chat} 22:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD before 2018

— Racconish ☎ 09:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jelle Nauta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, book page, music sheet. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • 3A was clearly written by Chanah Milner (who died in 2000, which is less than 70 years ago)
  • 2A seems to be the same handwriting so that also means the author died less than 70 years ago
  • 6A someone already discovered it was designed by Kees Nieuwenhuijsen who is still alive as far as we know.
  • Kie Mikréh seems to be written by Hans Krieg, who died in 1961

So they all are copyright violations unless User:Jelle Nauta can proof to OTRS he has the consent from the current copyright holders to publish those files under a Creative Commons license. Mbch331 (talk) 19:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jelle Nauta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maharaj muhammadtanveer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images only. Commons is not a private image host - all out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   15:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahesh Dhami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images only. Commons is not a private image host - all out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   15:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete it's unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder which belongs to the group or their record company. Move to enwiki as a non-free image. Ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be original photo from poster Articseahorse (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picasso died in 1973. — Racconish ☎ 16:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picasso died in 1973 — Racconish ☎ 16:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picasso died in 1973. — Racconish ☎ 16:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picasso died in 1973. — Racconish ☎ 16:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picasso died in 1973 — Racconish ☎ 16:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran

4nn1l2 (talk) 00:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akash M. Deshmukh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:NOTUSED: Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills

Takeaway (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Akash M. Deshmukh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless images uploaded by bot

Stolbovsky (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Themccoy502 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per Commons:Nudity -- these add nothing to what we already have

Daphne Lantier 21:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Opera2021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://usbnoticias.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Andres-V.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebas12903 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Category:Microphones --Frze > talk 01:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maintaining deletion request: Many better pictures of microphones available, main subject is the person and not the microphone. See also the other uploads of this account. -- Gauss (talk) 09:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sebas12903 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal pictures out of scope

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo may be out of scope 185.73.237.229 19:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be out of scope 185.73.237.229 19:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be out of scope 185.73.237.229 19:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underlying music piece unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agabo Bermudez Obando (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubiоus copyright status/out of scope

/St1995 10:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo used for vanity article on EN Wikipedia, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo used for vanity article on EN Wikipedia, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo used for vanity article on EN Wikipedia, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo used for vanity article on EN Wikipedia, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Basvb (talk) 22:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tried to delete this as the image was taken only to get the information about the real painting, but the program would not let me AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 00:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from http://vickies.jp/category/photogallery/page/4/ STB-1 (talk) 06:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture. Not clear about the possibility to use it freely. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, no educational value A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don’t see what’s so great here Dronebogus (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is corrupt – no preview, its length reported by MediaWiki is over 5 min while actually it is about 12 s. jdx Re: 07:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of a non free portrait Benoît Prieur (d) 07:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted material Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. We have 270 photos in category:Sunsets of Venezuela . Taivo (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google translates file description as "Photo reflected in Kilovatico magazine in the 60s." That means: OTRS-permission from magazine representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image (backside), enough photos of category:Hunza Valley or category:Rakaposhi (the mountain on the left, no summit) available. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 09:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to be a collage made from copyrighted photos TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope banner Pibwl (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: depicts a skyline rather than a specific building. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran

4nn1l2 (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal work JULIOBELTRÁN (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hosting file, user reworked version of copyrighted official logo of Eurovision 2017 in Kyiv. ← Alex Great talkrus? 03:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steinschreiber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of packaging

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry. File:Bega Flats, October 2014.JPG is a better image of the same subject. Gareth (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It was taken with the timing incorrectly set.--Grahamec (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of deleted File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reason as the other images deleted previously. Some of these images are in a high-security setting which would mean that Narendra Modi's personally-employed photographer (if such a person exists) might not be allowed access to them. Other images have logos in prominence whose copyrights rest with either the Government of India or Bharatiya Janata Party. The images of Anandiben Patel are again cropped from images in which the Prime Minister is himself present.

Rahul Bott (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claimed author is part of the photographs:

Suspicious or no metadata available for

Most of these files have unbelievably low resolutions to be a 21st century original image.

Files like

are either official Indian government events where the Prime Minister is unlikely to be sitting as a mere photographer while the Finance Minister presides or an international event like the East Asia Summit where his personal photographer will hardly be allowed. These can at best be Government of India works which cannot be in public domain so soon as per Template:PD-India. Also

has a clear Indian Government art work (the calendar) in prominence which is certainly not copyfree.

Other images in this category have been previously deleted by sysops User:Jcb and User:Daphne Lantier. In summary, we need a thorough review of files coming from this Flickr user and should immediately suspend further uploads from this account pending the completion of such a review.

Rahul Bott (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reasons as the previous nominations. Some of the files have very suspicious metadata and low file sizes.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For similar reasons as in previous nominations from the category (all deleted). Also, File:Indian medal winners at the Special Olympic World Summer Games 2015.jpg has image credits to "Special Olympics Bharat Facebook page" while File:Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi in Rajya Sabha.jpg is a grab of official television recordings of Rajya Sabha.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before! Cannot agree more. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- acct blacklisted as well. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as for previous nominations. Many files have suspicious metadata and very low filesizes. Some others are derivative works with no proper attribution/reference to the original work and their copyright status.

Rahul Bott (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as before. Few files are screen grabs of Lok Sabha Television footage while others are screenshots of private apps like Instagram, Weibo etc.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep majority of them. Most of their previous images were low-res screenshots or instagram pics but a majority have exif information which means they were taken by actual cameras and thus they should be kept, delete the low res ones that don't look like they were taken with a camera or lack exif information, keep the rest.--Stemoc 22:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stemoc: With due respect, the mere presence of EXIF data itself does not make the copyright ownership clear. More so, if these happen to be works of a Government of India employee(s) in which case the Prime Minister himself/herself does not have the power to release the files into public domain without bringing necessary changes in Indian laws. There is also the issue of false claim of authorship with most of these files. Best Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More. Many are rightly unused with just some text and an uncredited portrait photograph as substantial part. Some are crops from already deleted files.

Rahul Bott (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files have no evidence of their copyright owner as Narendra Modi (Prime minister-India). There is clear Flickr washing. Most of the images have been deleted before for the same reason. Another set of deletion can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bharatiya29 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Except for files like File:Constituent Assembly of India logo.jpg which are clearly PD-India. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR since we now have {{GODL-India}}. Please feel free to re-nominate any file if GODL-India does not apply. I have left all the files in the GODL-India review category. Jcb (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a picture of the Band Heatwave that is described! These guys did not sing Boogie Nights, Always and Forever or Mind Blowing decisions. Someone made a mistake. 95.222.184.243 09:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Logo ist veraltet und wird nicht mehr verwendet, wir haben bereits das richtige Logo hochgeladen, leider zeiht Google immer noch diese Version. Viele Messe-Veranstalter nutzen das Logo, dass sie auf Google/Wikipedia finden und stellen es so aus. Das ist für uns leider nicht so toll und verstößt gegen unser Cooporate Design. Vielen Dank! Jinibini1992 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, logo may be outdated which is no reason for deletion. You might add to the description used from.... to... or something similar. -Pentachlorphenol (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence is "Own work" but can be found on http://pinoyonlines.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/D%E2%80%99-Originals.png Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complete RAP piece; somewhat unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do we really need this logo? also permission Tensilica (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do we really need this logo? also permission Tensilica (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload of copyrighted fashion photograph in error as part of good-faith mass uploads, error the source website's own rather than uploader's Mabalu (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See previous AFD at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal MET br.823.jpg - arguments still apply, this file should be blacklisted from automatic upload in future. Mabalu (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 11:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid rationale: Kwangmo blanked the page before. --Achim (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
it is duplicated with another gallery. thank you for pointing out. 최광모 (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted, no indication of CC BY-SA 4.0 licence Snowflake91 (talk) 11:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Slimsilu (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons, except userpage and uploading a selfie, which is used only on his userpage. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ashraf Elgamal (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in Commons (now deleted) and en.wiki, self-promotion in both (now deleted) and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simply because the FBI uses an image for an investigation poster, it doesn't mean they created it, or has the legal power to revoke the copyright of the photographer. EXIF claims and attribute the copyright to AFP and Getty Images. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Agostinho541 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox in pt.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vijay soni ramnagar (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in Commons (now deleted) and hi.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Asrulsyam12 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage and teahouse archive. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Madurai-Veeran-(1939).jpg Kailash29792 (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of scope. Enough from same location in category:Hunza Valley or category:Ganish Bridge. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works of Mykhailo Boychuk

[edit]

Mykhailo Boychuk (1882-1937) worked in the Austria-Hungary, the Russian Empire, the Soviet Russia (RSFSR), and in Ukraine (UkSSR). Depend on exact place and date of publication, his works are {{PD-old-70-1923}}, {{PD-RusEmpire}}, or copyrighted until Jan.1 2029 (for RSFSR and UkSSR) - because he was subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously (see note 1 in template:PD-Russia and point 6 of article 28 of Ukrainian Copyright Law). Alex Spade (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringment 185.73.237.229 19:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringment. 185.73.237.229 19:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (the large picture in the background) Basvb (talk) 22:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV: http://www.afd-schleswig-holstein.de/index.php/landesverband/fraktion Ralf Roleček 23:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EugeneZelenko this project is the final work of Wikimedia Argentina virtual course "Wikipuentes". We train teachers about how to use Wikipedia in classrooms. The document uploaded is a pedagogical project designed by teachers to use Wikimedia Projects in their subjects. They will upload their final work in Wikimedia Commons under Wikimedia Argentina category, if you have any suggestion please write me, thank you very much --Luisina Ferrante (WMAR) (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But why such documents could not be placed in relevant project or Wikimedia Argentina site? if they are not supposed to be changed, pages could be protected. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Seal_of_the_President_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Seal_of_the_President_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 16:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used in any articles. A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seal_of_the_President_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obtained from an academic journal which is copyright protected. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja1101213 Inappropriately claimed as Creative Commons. ChemNerd (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self created artwork? not usable, not used Avron (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self created performance? not usable, not used Avron (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France

russavia (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleting as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, no FOP in France.

— Racconish ☎ 18:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fountain on Place Stravinski in Paris at Centre Pompidou was created by Jean Tinguely who died in 1991, and Niki de Saint Phalle, who died in 2002. As there is no freedom of panorama in France (confer COM:FOP France) this means, unfortunately, that most of the images in this category have to be deleted.

Speravir 00:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No hay páginas que enlacen a esta imagen. En su lugar, File:Euskotren tranbia vitoriagasteiz.svg Laukatu (talk) 20:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually quite a few pages still using this image. I don't think it should be deleted while this has not been fixed. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:00, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 20:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, replaced by svg file Euskotren tranbia vitoriagasteiz.svg Laukatu (talk) 21:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No hay páginas que enlacen a esta imagen. En su lugar, File:Euskotren tranbia barakaldo.svg Laukatu (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, replaced by svg file Euskotren tranbia barakaldo.svg Laukatu (talk) 21:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No hay páginas que enlacen a esta imagen. En su lugar está File:Euskotren_tranbia_bilbo.svg Laukatu (talk) 23:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason to delete. We have many unused files. We do not delete old png files even after an svg has been created. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, replaced by svg file Euskotren tranbia bilbo.svg Laukatu (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own photo, unusable quality with inscription Pibwl (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneven font-size and bond positioning. Have File:Cis-1,2-difluoroethylene.svg that looks more even. DMacks (talk) 05:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%B7%D9%8A%D8%B7_%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%85_%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF.png BukhariSaeed (talk) 09:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same subject as File:ONWB XIVb 611.jpg, but much worse quality Schlosser67 (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep As it can be seen, this file is a part of a whole set of documents (on the level of archival unit), digitized within the collaboration of Wikimedians of Bulgaria User Group with the Bulgarian Archives State Agency. The fact that there is a presumably better version of the image, sourced from elsewhere, doesn't mean that we have to delete the image, and thus disrupt a complete set of documents from BASA, which might be interesting for certain audiences exactly in their entirity and in their authentic form as accessible from our Archives. Thank you for your understanding. Spiritia 20:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Spiritia. Daphne Lantier 20:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hystrix as no permission (No permission since) - any reason why the own work claim is doubted? Jcb (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Jcb -- high-res with metadata. Daphne Lantier 20:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, no permission. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Flag_of_the_President_of_the_Republic_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Presidential_flag_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 16:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some personal selfie, as well as File:141007International Fire Academy, Basel, Switzerland5.jpg Pibwl (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from a copyrighted journal article: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00527 ChemNerd (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a personal selfie from some conference(?), as well as File:141007International Fire Academy, Basel, Switzerland129.jpg Pibwl (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plain book cover - out of scope (besides, watermark and technically bad photo) Pibwl (talk) 17:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, unused, autopromo? As well as other 2 uploads: File:Imodelo.jpg, File:Ipopular.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is claimed to be own work, but most likely it isn't. The original image seems copied from this website. Take Mirrenberg (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber des Bildes erst 1981 gestorben. Deshalb Lizenz falsch. OTRS wäre notwendig. Artmax (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Danke für Hinweis. Brauche Hilfestellung: Urheberrechtlich begründet ist lediglich die Lizensierung zu ändern? (falls relevant: bin Eigentümer des Bildes) --Tom Tom (talk) 06:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Als Eigentümer hast Du nur das absolute Recht, das Bild auszustellen, zu verkaufen oder zu vernichten und sonst (leider) nichts. Das weitergehende Verwertungsrecht (öffentliche Abbildungen!) hat nur der Rechteinhaber (Erbe). Die Abbildung in Commons benötigt ein OTRS-Ticket von dem Rechteinhaber (Erbe), mit dem musst Du Dich in Verbindung setzen. Ob der allerdings alle Rechte an dem Bild aufgeben will, glaube ich nicht. Oder wie schrieb einmal ein Com-A: Owning a work of art does not give you the right to freely license it any more than owning a book gives you the right to make and sell copies of it. --Artmax (talk) 16:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Tom Oates. Jcb (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small-sized one-file-upload, obviously 'posing' and/or personality rights isusses, as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also out of scope. Jcb (talk) 20:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized and tagged one-file upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source link was include. With a reverse image search, I could not trace it back to http://ua.vlasenko.net/, so that it can't be verified whether the permission would apply. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe he removed the pic from his website. But I see no reason to doubt the copyright status.--Hic et nunc (talk) 11:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Since a specific link to this image at source was not added on upload, we cannot verify such a thing via archive.org. Jcb (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original toys and dolls of the Galeries Lafayette for Christmas. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original toys and dolls of the Galeries Lafayette for Christmas. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not connected with any article Espybarretto (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not connected with any article Espybarretto (talk) 21:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, sole upload, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the web, see source link in original upload log. Bogus license, this picture is definitely not PD-old. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Victoria Dare. Jcb (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

completely out of focus. enough pictures of the mountain in category:Rakaposhi Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]