Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 22nd, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As mentioned in this article, where it was originally used, the picture is scanned from a known Israeli newspaper/website. It has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


SpeedyDeleted: Copyvio. -- Geagea (talk) 04:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - no educational value Lymantria (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely poor quality, no educational value Lymantria (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - no educational value Lymantria (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality cloud picture - many better alternatives available. Lymantria (talk) 07:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limmat River - panoramio.jpg, almost the same image. --Lymantria (talk) 07:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deldkdlddodhd- 2001:E68:442E:58E:8DBE:81C4:9626:2554 03:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jean-Fred (talk) 09:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT NinjaStrikers «» 05:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme: Out of project scope: promotional content

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - no educational value Lymantria (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The original image was deleted per nomination by Shizhao. --Lymantria (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insignificant image of female genitalia, also not a quality work. — T. 14:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It was a copyright violations, so CSD applies. — T. 15:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant Flickr washing; uploaded to Flickr March 2011; appeared numerous places on web before then (e.g. here January 2011; here April 2010); credited to Jonathan Mannion by Billboard.com (i.e., reputable source). Эlcobbola talk 17:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Elcobbola: Sorry, I didn't know that. I will request a speedy delete. — Sincerely Issimo 15 17:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, no worries. Freely licensed, professional quality images of celebrities are often "too good to be true." Эlcobbola talk 18:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Taivo after conversion to speedy per above. --Эlcobbola talk 18:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by XXN as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hesitated which tag to apply. Possibly is copyvio, compare watermarks and uploader's username. But also this image is of poor quality - main focus in it is on that document and it is absolutely unclear. --XXN, 23:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Right. I didn't notice the difference between the watermark and the username. --Yann (talk) 23:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; unused and unusable blurry picture. Many better ones in its category. P 1 9 9   18:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description, no date, no source, no author, only LOL (Laugh Out Loud), probably stolen ErikvanB (talk) 09:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sort of family album shot (unknown but identifiable person), out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sort of family album shot (unknown but identifiable person), out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sort of family album shot (unknown but identifiable person), out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sort of family album shot (unknown but identifiable person), out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 18:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sort of family album shot (unknown but identifiable person), out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 18:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange license. What relation has NASA to this file? Dmitry89 (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 15:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from here without any indication the image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stub article probably in the wrong namespace Stoffdelphin (talk) 18:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - my bad. Early edit change note I created page as mistake, I suspect omitted 'Category:' prefix in a para elsewhere. This was in a period when I and a few others were busily reorganizing and relocating (recatting) maps far and wide, with the current map category scheme. In between, I simply lost track of the the potential to make this page a middle ages atlas, so by all means kill it! Good catch! // FrankB 04:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homework or something, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pdf.pdf

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pdf.pdf

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of the uploader out of scope. This is one of about 50 photos uploaded today as a self-aggrandizing holiday snaps album... all these are liable to be out of scope. See: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Harpal1909 Acabashi (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Harpal1909

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not meet wikimedia commons project scope Jonnymoon96 (talk) 00:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not meet wikimedia commons project scope Jonnymoon96 (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused sketch from sock, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resume, out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay, out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:VZOR Smlouvy o pristupu k dluhu.jpg

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SouthamptonFan123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be a screenshot from TV, see COM:DW.

Poké95 03:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, photo of a non-notable person. Poké95 03:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Explicit as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper claim of ownership. Scanning a document doesn't make it "own work" that you can release from copyright Niteshift36 (talk) 04:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license claim Niteshift36 (talk) 04:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a record that can be obtained from the State of Texas Secretary of State, and is within the public domain. It is a legal record and therefore there are no copyright claims that can be made against it being used in any manner whatsoever. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 05:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: also out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal artwork. --ghouston (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a random Twitter conversation does not likely qualify as free under Creative Commons licence Whats new? (talk) 04:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube screenshots by User:Itfc-commons

[edit]

These are some files by User:Itfc-commons, the rest of this topic are at Category:Screenshots of YouTube (not created) but maybe those don't show copyrighted material. User needs to prove that YouTube allows the free use of his website, with a compatible license. --UAwiki (talk) 05:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamlech (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ads, promotional content, out of scope. Achim (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)  Delete as per copyvio. --~AntanO4task (talk) 03:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gearhead1215 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial signs. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brysonab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puddinator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dark, unused, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franco L (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only this image from his dog is his own work. The rest, unlikely. 10+ files already identified today as copyvio. File:Juventud2001.jpg may come from http://cajuventuduu.blog.terra.com.ar/2008/03/ = http://cajuventuduu.blog.terra.com.ar/files/2009/06/juventus.jpg (both: connect problems). IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (missing exif etc.) so this one can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Gente de Montecaseros.jpg, eventually grabbed somewhere from Facebook = https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/165777_130447303688246_4374865_n.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franco L (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering +5 today detected copyvios, User talk:Franco L (tons of copyvios) + block log.

Gunnex (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franco L (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos (also are above COM:TOO).

--XXN, 17:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eab D. Seeman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, probably.

--XXN, 17:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused text in arab, with copyright down Pippobuono (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused & useless PDF. --XXN, 20:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused cartoon, with copyright up left Pippobuono (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused text in arab, with copyright down Pippobuono (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused page in arab, with copyright down Pippobuono (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JenWilliamsEdu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT.

--XXN, 21:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nasir supardi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One unused personal photo - out of scope; + 2 non-free & mislicensed logos.

--XXN, 21:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rribal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book or magazine covers and logos.

MKFI (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rribal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO of robotic products nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. All appear elsewhere on web.

Эlcobbola talk 22:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rribal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Despite bogus self authorship claim, both sourced to ros.org, which states "the ros.org web pages are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0" This is too vague to be acceptable per COM:EVID/COM:PRP. "Web pages" are distinct from, say, "content" (i.e. images), and the language does not include, for example "the ros.org web pages and all content thereon", which is vastly more typical for such notices. Essentially, there exists a reasonable interpretation that the disclaimer applies solely to text. Indeed, the interpretation that the notice applies to images as well also exists, but policies and common sense require explicit articulation.

Эlcobbola talk 23:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is sexual content Worldflicks (talk) 16:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew Wright26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SCOPE: images related to non-notable secondary school swim team; uploaded by sock account apparently for use in a draft vanity article (note that images are not currently used there or any other article) that has been declined at least three times (!) for lack of notability. At least two also likely copyvios (File:Hummersknott School Swimming English Schools eam Champions 1975.jpg and File:English Schools Swimming Team.jpg) as they presumably contain the uploader as a subject (i.e. uploader cannot be author and thus cannot license images).

Эlcobbola talk 16:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate sexual material Worldflicks (talk) 16:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first proposed deletion "rationale" is bad, as already said. But I fully  Support a deletion based on quality grounds: the image is badly framed, noisy and has not much of educational usefulness. It's more of an archetypical example of a "Don't" concerning sexual images. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate sexual content Worldflicks (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate sexual content Worldflicks (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 17:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus photo of no stated notability Malcolma (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sort of family album shot (unknown but identifiable person), out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: looks looks like an uploader's personal photo-album... there are a few more of these from the uploader. Acabashi (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HUNELOCK2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT.

--XXN, 19:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope --XXN, 21:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly scans (COM:DW) of photographs. Per author/source, work of "Michael Danielov" (whereas uploader is Christopher Mark Pattinson). Evidence of permission from Michael Danielov is required (i.e. COM:OTRS)

Эlcobbola talk 19:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low res, no EXIF, all other user uploads have been copyvios of these actresses with clear misrepresentation of authorship. Duck copyvios.

Эlcobbola talk 15:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to disappoint you but the 2 pictures were taken by me using an iPhone they are my pictures and the fact you are deleting them does not change the facts I will get Sheridan Smith and Emily Hawgood who both friends of mine to confirm this. You can view them your self on my personal Facebook https://m.facebook.com/chris.m.pattinson____


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some low res, different camera models (e.g. iPhone 6s, NIKON D300S), uploader is purportedly subject in three, so, by definition, cannot be the author and thus cannot license images. Uploader is also a sock (see Category:Sockpuppets of Chris M Pattinson) with history of taking images from social media (see socks' deleted contribs and talk pages) and making blatantly untrue authorship claims ([1]). Duck copyvios.

Эlcobbola talk 19:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Who do you you all think is in the picture with James Corden and Sheridan Smith and the picture with Sheridan Smith outside the Cambridge theatre London, it would interesting if anyone can identify the person in the pictures because as you say it not Chris M Pattinson. As for the Twinnie Lee Moore picture who do you think took that? The one of Dancing with the Stars I don't think it's Chris M Pattinson as someone told me he is much better looking?–––––[reply]

DWs of documents/book page, also per COM:SCOPE. Same general issue as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Andrew Wright26, a sock of this uploader (see Category:Sockpuppets of Chris M Pattinson); images of degree for non-notable person presumably for use in w:Draft:Michael Danielov, a draft that has been declined five times by five different editors (!!!) for lack of notability.

Эlcobbola talk 19:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. --XXN, 20:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jose tv Intelectual (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mislicensed non-free logo. Also most probably is above COM:TOO.

--XXN, 21:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional upload. --XXN, 21:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 21:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. The uploader is the subject and it does not look like a selfie, so the subject probably does not have the right to license it. Also, there is no EXIF. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, See these too Yann: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Harpal1909 Acabashi (talk) 00:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, out of scope, article fr:Cronos (Hacker) deleted twice. Achim (talk) 13:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work - book covers are copyrighted by their authors. --XXN, 13:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT - promotional upload (see file description). --XXN, 13:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster with original content - Derivative work. --XXN, 13:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signature of uploader, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 14:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marina Carla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

--XXN, 14:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 14:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED jdx Re: 15:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image for living person --Alaa Najjar :)..! 15:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private shot, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small, private shot, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious creative work with no associated permission Discasto talk 16:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST/COM:SELFIE: unused, low quality images of non-notable person

Эlcobbola talk 17:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. --XXN, 17:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. Matiia (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: looks looks like an uploader's personal photo-album selfie portrait. Acabashi (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: looks looks like an uploader's personal photo-album selfie portrait. Acabashi (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; unused and unusable grainy low-quality image, many better ones in Category:Jeepneys. P 1 9 9   18:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: and image text unreadable; description inadequate; and as it look a screenshot, might be copyvio too. Acabashi (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book covers are usually protected with copyright. Who is cover artist and when the book was published? Taivo (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is probably copyright infringement. Photos from Facebook. Author photo is different than the depositor. Flickr unconfirmed. Romanzazvorka (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality Jklamo (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster. --XXN, 20:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a broadcast, not enough source information verify license Ytoyoda (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is tumblr Ebyabe (talk) 06:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daejung Kim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Product promotion, unused and out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 08:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Avatar, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 08:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 10:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:VAGINA Dronebogus (talk) 22:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable as a BSicon due to wrong extension; functionally duplicate of File:BSicon exhBS2+l.svg. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
11:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 11:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gr8bAnD1t0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stalin jordy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal poor-quality photo, no educational purpose, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 11:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 12:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, photo of a non-notable person. Poké95 12:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privat shot, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privat shot, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No sé cómo eliminarlo. Gracias Mored96 (talk) 13:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT, out of scope. --XXN, 13:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elcobbola as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: DW of COM:NETCOPYVIO; for example, top right is here. Converting to DR per comment on talk page (upper right image sourced to Commons). Per COM:L and Commons:Collages, all images must be sourced and attributed. Even "free" licenses can be copyright violations by virtue of failing the attribution requirement, which is legally no different than violating rights of "unfree" licenses. Эlcobbola talk 00:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is most likely proprietary software unless proven otherwise Jonnymoon96 (talk) 00:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am the one that has uploaded this accordingly i request its deletion Jonnymoon96 (talk) 00:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads copyvios of this person. Duck copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 03:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm AJ Gibson's Personal Assistant. I was at the American Music Awards where this picture was taken and took this photo with my iPhone. He has approved the photo to be posted on this wikipedia page. Please don't delete it. What do you need from me so I can prove I took the photo. --Ennisjr31 (talk) 04:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Unused private holiday snaps taken at unidentified locations. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 01:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused private holiday snaps taken at unidentified locations. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 07:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Re-creation by automated bot of files previously deleted following DR as out-of-scope (private holiday snaps). File names need to be salted to prevent repeated automated re-creation by the same bot.

DAJF (talk) 05:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Images with only private character, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   16:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping closure - already deleted by Shizhao. --Storkk (talk) 15:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Panoramio images with private character or no educational content.

GeorgHHtalk   20:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep at least procedurally. These images are all very different from each other, and many of those that have not yet been deleted actually do show what some geographical location looks like, which is no less educational than most panoramio images. Some of them do seem out of scope, others do not. Batch COM:SCOPE nominations for images as wildly different as these aren't useful. I came here from File:Luca - Gianna - Paolo - panoramio.jpg, which I just put some geographical and topical categories on – I wouldn't call it out of scope merely because there are also people posing on the photo, especially as it could be used to illustrate the touristic significance of the subjects behind these three tourists. darkweasel94 00:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Unused personal files. As it is uploaded by a bot, I can't tell who is the one responsible for that, but they all seem to be uploaded by the same person.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

COM:DW of painting(s). No FoP in US.

Эlcobbola talk 22:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 7

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted statue; no FoP in US. The replica Statue of Liberty in Las Vegas has it's own copyright, separate from the original (see Registration Nos. VAu 1-090-876 and VA 1-882-070 at copyright.gov and the infamous w:Statue of Liberty Forever stamp case).

Эlcobbola talk 00:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Promotional content have no suitable use. Possibly out of scope‎.

~ Moheen (keep talking) 04:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 9

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern models

Daphne Lantier 08:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 10

[edit]

Selfie images

Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Depicted person isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in nl.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --Sealle (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaron.Demarest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No file info

ErikvanB (talk) 09:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 07:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ямполь Юрій (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt very much that these three works are "own work" as claimed. In order to keep them on Commons we will need a free license from the publisher using OTRS. The photograph does not appear on Google, but it does appear on one of the book pages, so its source is also questionable.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 08:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Данная фотография является собственностью компании Кокшетауминералвотерс, на которой производят ТМ Хаома. Для продвижения марки была сделана эта фотосессия. Ни о каких нарушениях авторских прав речи не идет.


Deleted: out of project scope. --Sealle (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 08:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=209227170 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not own work, just as File:KonstantinChenenko.jpg, File:Viktoria Brezhneva.jpg , File:Galina Brezhneva.jpg and File:Yuri Brezhnev.jpg. Dont know his sources for the russian pics, but i just sent a dozen of files of brazilian politicians uploaded by him to deletion for obvious copyright infringement from local newspapers. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 21:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small blurry and not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows is non-free, so the CC0 license here won't apply. See COM:SCREENSHOT. Poké95 12:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlosluna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Art work by en:Carlos Luna (artist). Permission is required to store this files on Commons.

GeorgHHtalk   12:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 12:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Norway (building and structures excepted). 4ing (talk) 12:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is located in a public place, Selvaagparken. F Lunden.

  • Norwegian law is quite clear on this: «Works of art and photographic works may also be depicted when they are permanently located in or near a public place or thoroughfare. However, this shall not apply when the work is clearly the main motif and the reproduction is exploited commercially. Buildings may be freely depicted.» The bust is clearly the main motif, and Commons only accepts "free material", ie. material that also can be exploited commercially. - 4ing (talk) 22:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. Delete. F Lunden (talk) 22:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sisyphostic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, no permission.

--XXN, 13:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 14:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted product images Эlcobbola talk 23:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es ist vollkommen unklar, wann der Urheber gestorben ist. Xocolatl (talk) 23:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Joseph Niemann ist 1957 gestorben, das Foto ist ca 1920 entstanden und das Bild ist in meinem Privatbesitz (als Erbe)


Deleted: Franz Joseph Niemann is nicht der Urheber. Wir wissen nicht, wann der Fotograf gestorben ist. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for educational purposes. 49.228.123.10 07:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for educational purposes. 49.228.123.10 07:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for educational purposes. 49.228.123.10 07:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete not per nom (this is could be useful as a guide for beginners in Visual Studio), but because Microsoft Visual Studio is non-free software, and the video's focus is on Microsoft Visual Studio. So the CC-BY-3.0 license on YouTube won't apply here and this whole video is non-free and copyrighted. See COM:DW for more details. -- Poké95 08:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for anyone else, not educative Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho personal file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 12:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 13:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [2] MCMLXXXIX 14:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfonsonoviercas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://photos.eltiempo.es.s3.amazonaws.com/19/92/4af33ba81787d7f5fd300e7ec98d17db_720x560.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographers' feet spoil the picture. Out of project scope due to bad composition. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small, bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subido por error Drummfer (talk) 16:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading Trash Lazyboytommy (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mislicensed non-free logos. Also is above COM:TOO. --XXN, 21:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.bridgetchristie.co.uk/hi-res-photos/ JMiall (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non libre : https://fr.linkedin.com/company/corys Habertix (talk) 00:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence à vérifier : affiche pour une campagne publicitaire, une autorisation explicite est nécessaire pour confirmer une licence libre Hab'rtix (talk) 00:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Nickel nitride (talk) 02:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission at the provided source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Nickel nitride (talk) 02:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission at source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Nickel nitride (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Nickel nitride (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people; used in vandalism. Out of scope; no focus. Regards Ganímedes (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also: File:Reciclador de oficio y albañil 02.jpg

Low quality unused personal image, out of scope UAwiki (talk) 06:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file. Must delete Lazyboytommy (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope and copyvio promo. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why this useless file is still on wiki? Please delete quickly. Also missing detail information. Lazyboytommy (talk) 20:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    20:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work - low resolution, no Exif. Looks like a image from a book. --XXN, 21:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright statut, the image looks also a bit to a painting. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused essential dup of File:Fmoc-2D-skeletal.png, but slightly smaller and more jagged bonds DMacks (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 23:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not useful for education. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small, bad quality, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 14:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike the other uploads from this contributor, this photo doesn’t seem to be a fan shot taken with a notable person; the photo is not otherwise in scope. -- Tuválkin 12:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn Krd 09:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre de droit ! 90.19.24.2 21:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Rationale not very clear, une licence CC est non libre de droit par définition, no URL provided, no proof, can't find anything on a reverse search, very likely to be own work. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Droit à l'image ! 89.156.211.75 02:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, j'apparais clairement sur cette photo et souhaite qu'elle soit supprimée. Mon droit à l'image n'est pas respecté. 89.2.198.190 13:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Il y a deux personnes sur ce foto. Qui est vous?
Any minimally serious request would, especially when presented for the 4th time (!), include the needed clarification: «I’m the guy on the left/right.» Presuming that our cryptic, repeated interlocutor is (or purports to be) Léolo Victor-Pujebet (on the viewer’s right hand side of the photo) — then the request’s authenticity is dubious, as this photo is part of a collection of disparate fan selfies all uploaded in 2012 by what seems to be the real Léolo: Why would someone who hunted for celebrity fan selfies want them off line? Please note that other repeated DRs were filed on other images of the same collection, and that Léolo Victor-Pujebet is himself notable.
The only good reason to have all these deleted is if Utilisateurimage00 and the insistent IP are not the same person (and presuming that the IP is Léolo himself), but seems unlikely that a 3rd party would have access to such a disparate collection of images (different dates and cameras) that seem to be nowhere online upon upload to Commons. If, as it seems, Utilisateurimage00 and the insistent IP are the same person and both are Léolo Victor-Pujebet, then a courtesy deletion could be considered, but these were licensed back in 2012 (to illustrate a meanwhile deleted vanity page in fr:wp?) and their contents is too notable (Gilberto Gil!) and not in the least unflattering for such a courtesy deletion to be granted.
-- Tuválkin 13:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: still no valid reason for deletion, you should probably contact legal@wikimedia.org instead. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that this would come from the NOAA. Jcb (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no information, including in the original upload log and the history. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata and the fact that the uploader also claimed to be the author of other photos created by two different authors. LX (talk, contribs) 00:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP as there is significant doubt that this is the own work by the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i the author request deletion and also it does not meet wikipedia progect scope Jonnymoon96 (talk) 00:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep – This file is in use, and no valid reason has been given for deletion. KSFT (talk) 05:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This file is within COM:SCOPE as it is currently used. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i the author of this request deletion and i do not belive that it meets wikipeda project scope Jonnymoon96 (talk) 00:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some guy driving. Not useful. See COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep but at the middle of the film, there is an accident: two women are hit by a car, and then get up again; could be better, but not out of scope for the dangers of road crossing out of the marks... Pippobuono (talk) 09:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This appears to be me out of COM:SCOPE as no description, no categories etc. have been added. The accident appears to be very minor. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is on the photo, so unlikely that they are the copyright holder of the image. If the photographer, the copyright holder of this image, is still alive, then they have to send an email to the OTRS. If dead, we need to know where this image has been taken and published and when the photographer died. If not in the public domain, then the heir of the photographer must send an email to the OTRS. If the copyright is transferred by the photographer to Margaret Wigley, then she must send an email to the OTRS and explain there how she got the copyright of this image. Poké95 03:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. The photographer and the copyright status need to be determined and a written permission has to be sent to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PD flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. Besides, Commons already has this photo already which passed flickrreview with an Attribution license. Leoboudv (talk) 03:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please close this DR as the nominator and as a courtesy. I made a mistake and intend to file a DR on another image of this person in the next DR below. This particular image is correctly licensed. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License conforms to that at Flickr: CC-BY-2.0. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PD flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. Besides, Commons already has this photo already which passed flickrreview with an Attribution license. Leoboudv (talk) 03:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, this is not out of copyright as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper claim of being "own work". Obviously the editor didn't create the document and merely scanning something doesn't make you a creator able to release copyright Niteshift36 (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasonanaggie: No, there are no copyrights on 'edicts of government', a distinctly different concept. A copy of every work ever registered with the US Copyright Office has become part of the public record. Reventtalk 00:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Documents like this would fall below the threshold of originality according to US law as it consists of an unoriginal listing of names and a signature only. However, the Bahamas appear to be the country of origin whose legal system appears to follow that of the United Kingdom in many aspects where the threshold is extremely low and where even signatures can be copyrighted, see COM:SIG#United Kingdom. As long as we do not know more about the case law of the Bahamas, we should be careful here per COM:PRP. Please also note that copyright exceptions for special purposes are not relevant for Commons which is a general media archive. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

where is the authorisation ? easy to write "Photo de la fanfare bigophonique du Luc (Var) reproduite avec l'autorisation de son chef Claude Viglione qui l'a communiqué à Basili." Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The permission needs to be passed to our support team in writing. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Raymond as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The images in this plaket are copyrighted by the photographers Raymond 08:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploaded User:Jjirka disputed my speedy deletion request on File talk:Fahndungsplakat Amri.png. As far as I know the German police has special rights to publish images of wanted persons but this does not mean that the images itself are free to use. Raymond 08:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And isnt it this license? --Palu (talk) 10:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so because the images itself were not made the German Goverment. Raymond 11:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According to §45 UrhG (the German copyright act), police and prosecution can use any photo for their purposes if necessary. This of course does not put the pictures used in the public domain. This file must be deleted, speedied if possible. --h-stt !? 12:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So maybe is sufficient to blur photos on the poster? --Palu (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Finally I've found the right license. Let me some time to correct it, please. This file should be used under this license: {{PD-GermanGov}} --Jjirka (talk) 19:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for inconvenience and thanks to Raymond for notice. I hereby request to delete the template Copyvio (copyvio). --Jjirka (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Raymond and h-stt: {{PD-GermanGov}} does not apply for the photographs, § 45 UrhG does not apply to us. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was recently the focus of a bit of a kerfuffle and as such I've taken a bit of a look at the image. I'm in contact with Richards himself, who says that the image is incorrect, which I'll ask him to elaborate on. What concerns me, other than the picture potentially not being representative of Richards, is that the image states that this picture was taken from the University of Connecticut, meaning that it could possibly have been taken from a staff bio or other official page. The author's name is given as Dan Buttrey, which doesn't match with the editor name (Daver68), which implies that their name is Dave or David. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Basically, there's more here to imply that this photograph does not fall under fair use, as the uploader is most likely not the person who holds the picture's copyright (ie, didn't take the picture or own the rights) and they state that it was procured through the UoC in some form or fashion, likely from a staff or class page. Most of what I'm finding are Wikipedia mirrors or places that look like they've taken the image from Wikipedia, but I did find this page that seems to have been written in 2011 and has a portion of the image. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Based on en:Special:Contributions/Daver68's edits on English Wikipedia and the user name, it's a safe bet that Daver68 is David "Dave" Richards (who is apparently also using Richardsdl!!). I guess Dave just changed his mind about his autobiography and the photo he had chosen for himself.
Since there is no evidence to support that the legitimate copyright holder of the photo approved publication under the stated license, it should be  deleted. (It doesn't appear to be a selfie, so it's unlikely that Dave is the copyright holder.) LX (talk, contribs) 11:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Dan Buttrey has several photos on the UConn website. On the UConn website this photo is credited "Dan Buttrey/UConn photo" [3]. Although the photo on that webpage is a cropped version and published four years after the Commons file, it tends to confirm the statement by the Commons uploader that the photographer is Dan Buttrey and that the photo was taken for UConn. By using the username Daver68, the uploader, who also created two en.wp articles related to the subject, seems to imply (truly or falsely) that they are the subject of the photo or somehow related to the subject. Based on the available information, the license mentioned by the uploader would need evidence of permission from UConn. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

School logos are not own work. Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely copyrighted by Netflix. This doesn't seem to be the uploader's own work. It is probably promotional content or a still image from the special by Netflix. It is in black and white, like the Netflix special. Uncle Alf (talk) 10:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, also possible spam (considering the promotional text on the file description page). Poké95 12:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work - copyrighted poster. --XXN, 14:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? [4] MCMLXXXIX 14:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.aluminum-supplier.com/img/aluminum-circle/44.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Christian Ferrer as no permission (No permission since). The uplader has changed to "own work", however, in cases of photomontages, we need a permission for each images. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small/pixellated size, watermarked "Tomado de: lamcolombia.com" - likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This badly-catted and non-linked image looks like self- or group-aggrandizing by nonentities, with no evidence that it has anything to do with a particular school; and it's certainly not a logo. Suggest not scope. Acabashi (talk) 20:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark in corner indicates this is a press photo, not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Lazyboytommy (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/2014/07/channel-4-commissions-true-north-for-charlie-luxtons-shore-thing/ JMiall (talk) 20:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake licence (use Google Image Search). Al-Douri (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screengrab from a (presumably) copyrighted television broadcast, as shown in the original upload MarkTraceur (talk) 20:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking for courtesy deletion. Which is more, the file is out of scope, low qual, not in use. Zubule (talk) 21:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Owning a physical copy of a picture does not make you the copyright holder. No evidence that this would e.g. be a work from the federal US government. Jcb (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a much higher resolution, if differently cropped, version of this same image at http://www.ikkosports.com.mx/Lista-Yanelli-Caballero-para-competir-en-Moscu.html, specifically http://www.ikkosports.com.mx/Atletismo/imagen-atletismo/Yanelli-Caballero-1.jpg. So they clearly didn't get it from here. GRuban (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, here we go, the same image resolution and crop, published 12 August 2013, before this image was uploaded here 25 August 2013: http://www.pitlane.mx/otrosdeportes/yanelli-caballero-debuta-en-el-mundial/. --GRuban (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nameof photograph ? authorization ? this is not a self-portrait (auto-portrait) this is autopromo copyvio Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obviously not a selfie, yet uploader was shown in image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 18:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

authorization of Bernard ? this is autopromo copyvio Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 18:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong information included, probably by the same troll who adds it to openstreetmap.org to support his prank (naming a summit after himself). Stefantauner (talk) 07:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file, but it is of poor quality and useless. Please delete. Priyadasi (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded into Commons in October 2014, but found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WLHuArozlA at 15.00 from March 2013. Own work is in doubt, maybe copyright violation. But maybe the work is very old? Taivo (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no indication of great age on the image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, can be found in various place in the internet, including Facebook. Possibly copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing information about the original artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Copyright status unknown. Tekstman (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Copyright status unknown. Tekstman (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (small pixelated GIF) and unused. Have File:9-Methylene-fluorene.png DMacks (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of the photograph asked via an OTRS ticket (ticket:2016112310019931) to remove this image of him. It is an old image, where he doesn't appear at his best. He kindly sent us a more recent photograph, and plans to send another one in the same pose as the one in discussion here. Ruthven (msg) 18:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from http://www.gringostar.net/site/templates/img/band.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan as other cases:
*Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Hachiko (Shibuya)
*Commons:Deletion requests/File:安全運動実施中 2016 (29576808300).jpg
Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Tokorokoko (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info it says re-uploading on local jawp as
屋外美術
within the restricted resolution
and proper tags may be safe, may be not (under disccussion)--Tokorokoko (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Factual correctness not given: (a) not 4 protons are generated during first step, but 2 hydrids (2 NADH, NOT 4 NADH)); (b) 2 formula is wrong (CH3 and O-). 2) very bad quality of image (we have far better ones like Ethanol_fermentation-1.svg). 155.91.64.15 10:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Bad chem structures. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Poké95 12:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to assess whether it could be covered under {{PD-text}}. I personally think it can't Discasto talk 12:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is 1997 text from Brazil. Author pt:Carmen Portinho died 2001. The text is copyrighted until 2072 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 14:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in Norway Mangoe (talk) 19:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in Norway Mangoe (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no camera EXIF, appears to be photoshopped from a Google street view or a similar type of virtualization/digitization (see, for example, the figure/bikes in the lower left and the smoothing artifacts on the elephant, etc.) User has history of copyvios and photoshopping images and claiming own authorship (see File:Diplocaulus with dorsal skin shell.jpg and File:Pr. Francois Terrasson.jpg). Notion also supported by user retiring upon learning, among others, "it's forbidden to draw with Photoshop an image derivative since other images" [7] (implying it was something of which uploader was not previously aware) Quack? Эlcobbola talk 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More exactly, I claimed some derivative images, I cited my sources and now I'm retired out from Commons because in an inappropriate way, scientific works is submitted to the same rules as the artistic creations :
  • it's forbidden to draw with Photoshop an image derivative since other images ;
  • a collective palaeontological model in a public and free entrance scientific Museum, is considered as an art work concerned by the copyright rules ;
  • a palaeontological anonymous drawing in a scientific book, is considered as an art work concerned by the copyright rules.

Since this rules, all the museologic illustrators or model-builders who works anonymously in the scientific public domain, are "quacks" (thank you, that's cute) because the art work merchandising rules must apply indiscriminately to all images without exception. However the major part of the the palaeontological, archaeological or naval reconstitutions aren't generally art works but often anonymous scientific and collective works. So nobody can find on the web another image identic with mine, but only some others more or less similar : my sources, because reconstitution or model is in order to stay within the limits of what is allowed by researchers at the time it is made, and must necessarily be inspired by other pictures already scientifically proved, for example in the specialized magazines. In the other hand, any reconstitution or a model is, by definition, in great part conjectural, because even in the rare cases of preservation in amber, tar, peat or ice, the organic material is damaged, particularly concerning its colors. If one does not understand this process of « conjecturally reconstituted being » (whose most impressive examples are the « real size Dinosaurs » sitting proeminently in the gardens or in the front square of various Museums, or else prehistorical Hominidae presented in dioramas by many Museums), this one will consider as « inaccurate » and/or as a « copyviol », the whole of the computer-generated images and volumic reconstitutions, and Paleontology, Archaeology or Naval history will be deprived of all its iconography intended for general public, apart from the scientific pictures in specialized magazines, that will evade this iconographical « cleaning », possibly concerning even some great masters as Mauricio Antón, Dimitri Bogdanov, Zdeněk Burian, Heinrich Harder or Charles R. Knight. Too bad. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is no evidence of a copyvio here IMO. The building itself is old enough. The pic could have been taken by a telephone camera. And the "elephant" is a mammouth.--Jebulon (talk) 16:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
For the records, this Google View looks very similar. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per nom. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

l'opera non sembra essere di Dandini ma piuttosto di Furini... Come opera di Furini la stessa fonto è già su Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Artemisia_Prepares_to_Drink_the_Ashes_of_her_Husband,_Mausolus.jpg) quindi direi che è tutto più chiaro se questo file è cancellato (thank you and sorry for the italian) Never covered (talk) 09:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has the wrong image. Redblak7 (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=User talk:Redblak7]]


Kept: We don't delete user talk pages -- and there is no image there. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of: File:Robin and Lucienne Day in their studio, 1980s.jpg Laymoon 55 (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:EURO Triplecaña (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:EURO states: "Copyright of the national side of the coin is determined by the individual Member States in accordance with national legislation." Thus the deletion based on COM:EURO would not be valid, country by country nominations with links to relevant country law (or explanation on Commons) should be provided. Next time you do a mass nomination please combine them in one DR not in a hundred. --Basvb (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete While there was a prior deletion discussion that kept this image, that deletion discussion was based on COM:EURO without addressing the national law. As of this writing, Commons:Currency#Austria indicates that the copyright status of national side of Austrian Euro coins is unknown. Unknown <> Free license. Until we know, we can not assert the national sides of Austrian Euro coins are available under a free license or public domain. Hammersoft (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not going to delete random files for as long as we have not decided what to do. Feel free to start a discussion at COM:VPC. If the conclusion would be 'not OK', then we should start a DR on all involved coin, not on a random selection. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:EURO Triplecaña (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyright, non-free license to their countries of origin with only a few exceptions. Belgium is not one of the exceptions. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Belgian Euro commemorative coins and coins at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of Belgium. Hammersoft (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

but for example german wiki has images of all coins, so why english not?--Viliam Furík (talk) 14:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:EURO Triplecaña (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyright, non-free license to their countries of origin with only a few exceptions. Belgium is not one of the exceptions. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Belgian Euro commemorative coins and coins at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of Belgium. Hammersoft (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in Latvia is only granted for non-commercial use. We cannot keep this derivative photo of a copyrighted sculpture. De728631 (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source mentioned Palnatoke (talk) 23:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cjp24 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source (Standard Hidraulica) as indicated, no permission. File has been here 9 years... I think a DR is appropriate given the uploader's username. Storkk (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Doc James as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Was not upload by who they say is the author? Missing OTRS. Was uploaded on enWiki by the purported photographer. I agree this needs OTRS-verification, but is probably not a speedy candidate. Storkk (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes apologies I missed that. It was moved here by a paid editor.
This editor has used a lot of socks including socks to upload photoes and has been active for years with various accounts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smartse as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: EXIF lists copyright holder as @Lugermad. A suspected Flickrwashing case probably deserves a DR rather than a speedy. This may be a case of Work for Hire or otherwise be correctly licensed. Storkk (talk) 14:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why don't you contact Photographer? Riccardo Lugermad +44(0)7507660395 info@lugermad.com [8]; [9]; file uploaded to corporate flickr account, and stable since July 26, 2015, which implies work for hire. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 17:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Russ Davies.jpg was deleted for the same reason, so I presumed it would also apply here. Smartse (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment there Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Russ_Davies.jpg, the facts are a little different, in that this is a corporate account. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 00:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
email sent. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: could be restored if a proper permission is established via OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PRP - "intimate" vantage point of notable person; all other user uploads have been copyvios of actresses (including this person) with clear misrepresentation of authorship. Camera model (Sony DSC-T77) is not the iphone uploader claims to use (e.g. [10][11]). Likely taken from social media (per repeated references to Facebook: [12][13]) Эlcobbola talk 15:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC) Yes that picture was taken with my Sony DSC-T77 and I still have the camera and the memory card. When the picture was taken there was only 3 people present in the Piccadilly hotel and they were Marilyn Smith Sheridan Smith Tim Pattinson and Chris Pattinson. It's therefore still my picture and I own the copyright. I have no problem you removing it but you need to stop accusing me of taking people's pictures. The picture was uploaded onto my Facebook and then downloaded onto my iPhone––––[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.yanmaresz.com/documents/photos. Source found by Lomita states "photos libres de droits par Alice Blangero (liens ci-dessous)". Storkk (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs OTRS from the photographer. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]