User talk:Amélie Pataud

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Amélie Pataud!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About scientific works

[edit]

I'm retired out from Commons because I'm not an artist : in an inappropriate way, scientific work is submitted to the same rules as the artistic creations (the art work merchandisig rules must apply indiscriminately to all images without exception : down with the derivative works, the PD and the FoP, see the notice lower) :

  • it's forbidden to draw with Photoshop an image derivative since other images ;
  • a collective palaeontological model in a public and free entrance scientific Museum, is considered as an art work concerned by the copyright rules ;
  • a palaeontological anonymous drawing in a scientific book, is considered as an art work concerned by the copyright rules.

Notice : in the artistic hand, Commons rules not understand the fact that the major part of palaeontological, archaeological or naval reconstitutions which are generally not art works, but often anonymous scientific and collective works. However nobody can find on the web another image identic with mine, but only some others more or less similar : my sources, because any reconstitution or model must stay within the limits allowed by researchers at the time it is made, and must necessarily be inspired by other pictures already scientifically proved, for example in the specialized magazines. In the scientific other hand, many scientists not understand the fact that any reconstitution or a model is necessarly in great part conjectural, because even in the rare cases of preservation in amber, tar, peat or ice, the organic material is damaged, particularly concerning its colors. If one does not understand this process of « conjecturally reconstituted being » (whose most impressive examples are the « real size Dinosaurs » sitting proeminently in the gardens or in the front square of various Museums, or else prehistorical Hominidae presented in dioramas by many Museums), this one will consider as « inaccurate » and/or as a « copyviol », the whole of the computer-generated images and volumic reconstitutions, and Paleontology, Archaeology or Naval history will be deprived of all its iconography intended for general public, apart from the scientific pictures in specialized magazines, that will evade this iconographical « cleaning », possibly concerning even some great masters as Mauricio Antón, Dimitri Bogdanov, Zdeněk Burian, Heinrich Harder or Charles R. Knight. Too bad. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 19:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pr. Francois Terrasson.jpg

[edit]
File:Pr. Francois Terrasson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 04:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative since two photographies, partially redesigned and recolored, with the agreement of Terrasson family, but not sended to OTRS. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomognathus gigeri.jpg

[edit]
File:Tomognathus gigeri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 04:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photography taken 2016, partially redesigned and recolored. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aegirocassis benmoulae by Marianne Collins.png

[edit]
File:Aegirocassis benmoulae by Marianne Collins.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 04:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marianne Collins's drawing, clearly cited. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diplocaulus with dorsal skin shell.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Diplocaulus with dorsal skin shell.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 04:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative drawing since A.R.I. Cruickshank et B.W. Skews, The functional signifiance of Nectridean tabular horns (Amphibia: Lepospondyli) in « Proceedings of the Royal Society » B: Biological Sciences, vol. n° 209 - 1177, 1980, p. 513 - 537, differently redesigned and recolored. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chriacus (Condylarthra, Mammals).jpg

[edit]
File:Chriacus (Condylarthra, Mammals).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 05:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative drawing since Giles Ternan McIntyre, « The Miacidae (Mammalia, Carnivora) », Part 1 : « The systematics of Ictidopappus and Protictis », bulletin of the AMNH 1966 ; v. 131, on [1], differently redesigned and recolored. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palaeoentoma hypothetica.jpg

[edit]
File:Palaeoentoma hypothetica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 05:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of [2] (Stenodycta lobata Brogniart enlarged and cropped). --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galerie de paléontologie et d'anatomie comparée du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle.png

[edit]
File:Galerie de paléontologie et d'anatomie comparée du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola talk 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of some of my photos taken 2010 & 2015, differently redesigned and recolored. --Amélie Pataud (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrait de "Commons"

[edit]

Bonjour Amélie Pataud,

Je viens par hasard de lire ton message sur la page de Yann à propos de ton poisson préhistorique reconstitué. Et je vois ci-dessus que tu es harcelée.

Je soutiens à 100% tes remarques, qui me paraissent frappées au coin du bon sens. A mon tour, je m'élève contre cette dictature indifférenciée du "No FoP in France", bien souvent maniée par des étrangers qui n'y comprennent que pouic. La catégorie des demandes de destruction concernant simplement "Paris" est navrante. Et stupide.

J'ai subi en son temps le même type de destruction stupide, alors que j'avais l'autorisation du site (mais pas sous forme d'OTRS), cela concernait la reconstitution d'une grotte préhistorique sur la Vézère avec des personnages, pas très loin de ton... Abri Pataud ! C'était une image de ça.

Puisque je vois que tu fréquentes assidûment le Muséum de Paris (nous sommes donc voisins), je m'interroge: peut-on conserver des images d'animaux de la Grande Galerie ? Après tout, ils sont naturalisés, et donc, FoP, ou pas FoP ? C'est à devenir fou.

Pour autant, je pense que tu ne devrais pas abandonner le terrain, et ne pas cesser de contribuer à "Commons".

D'abord, tu es détentrice d'un savoir et de connaissances sérieuses et sourcées dont nous avons besoin. En tous cas moi, j'en ai besoin. Ensuite, pratiquer la politique de la chaise vide, c'est laisser vaincre les "autres" et leur confirmer la justesse de leur combat. Et enfin, pardon pour cette remarque, mais "Commons" est trop masculin, et perdre une contributrice, c'est éminemment regrettable, de ce point de vue aussi.

Voilà. Je vais de ce pas m'opposer aux demandes de suppressions dont tes images font l'objet.

Bien amicalement, en espérant te voir revenir sur ta cessation de participation.

(sur la féminisation des titres dans ton infobox, je pense que tu fais erreur...Mon épouse est "avocat", elle y tient, et ne va pas lui mettre un "e" à la fin, tu te ferais engueuler).

Au plaisir, --Jebulon (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Féminisation des titres

[edit]

Bon, allons au débat.

Je n'ai pas été clair.

Je ne suis pas "par principe" contre la féminisation des titres, pour autant qu'un féminin existe, et/ou qu'une forme féminine d'un titre ne veuille pas dire autre chose.

Je m'explique: ma résistance n'est pas technique, elle est grammaticale, ou plutôt lexicale.

"Enseignante-chercheuse" me va très bien. "Avocate", ou "pharmacienne", moins: ces personnes sont titulaires d'un diplôme de "pharmacien", ou d'"avocat".

Même si ce n'est pas très joli, le féminin de "docteur" existe, c'est "doctoresse", et sûrement pas "docteure", ce qui est une abomination lexicale, comme "procureure" ou "professeure". Depuis quand le seul ajout d'un "e" est-il la marque exclusive du féminin ? Pourquoi pas "procureuse" ou "procuresse", ou professeuse ?

Dans l'armée (pas au théâtre!), la colonelle, la générale, sont les épouses des colonels, des généraux. Jusqu'à sa mort relativement récente, on a parlé de "la maréchale Leclerc", et elle n'était pas "Maréchal de France", mais l'épouse (méritante !) de son baroudeur de mari...

Une "préfète", c'est l'épouse d'un préfet. Comme une ambassadrice. Préfet, ambassadeur, c'est une fonction, c'est neutre, ni masculin, ni féminin. Comme "magistrat". Je ne suis pas choqué par "une magistrat", alors que je le suis par "une magistrate". Va comprendre...

A suivre.

Amitiés, et bonne année.--Jebulon (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geia sas Amélie Pataud, merci pour ta réponse.--Jebulon (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address, IP range, or account has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

Users: You may request {{unblock}} through the normal channels, however a CheckUser will review the block.

magyar ∙ español ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ Simple English ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Bustul-R.Jeannel.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amélie_Pataud&oldid=808839573"