Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 14th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neurosx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by a long term abuse MechQuester (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload of a long-term abuser jdx Re: 11:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Teemeah as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the licence on the website is NC-ND, therefore not suitable for Wikimedia I read "Todo o conteúdo deste site está publicado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Brasil" linked to [1], that's seems ok to me Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: , my bad, I think I was fooled by the NC-ND logo at the bottom of the page that is apparently only for the ResponsiveVoicetex to speech version. Sorry! Teemeah (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, mistake. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by しろの (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permissions

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E902:3711:DA32:6376 11:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 16:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category seemingly made by mistake Ies (talk) 09:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in palese copyviol (vedi metadati). Danyele (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: No permission since 8 August 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing. Just because the image was uploaded to Flickr under a free license does not mean that the original image is free or the own work of the uploader. DAJF (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted as a blatant copyvio. January (talk) 19:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: selfie used in deleted en:User:Danny Edge. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yahia nettari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of being free. It is a 1935 postcard with a named author (Gerald C. Hudson), who was active in the 1920s and into the 1930s. It is likely copyrighted in the U.S. until 2031. I could not find definitive life dates on Hudson, but we need them in order to claim PD status in the UK. I did find a Gerald Cedric Hudson on freebmd.org.uk who was born in 1894, married 1928, and died in 1966. Cannot be sure that is the same person, but the timings fit, and if so this is under UK copyright until 2037. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kirpichev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images from https://new.vk.com/club124178489

Cap1000 (talk) 01:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 03:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" doesn't seem to apply to the painting, so it needs a license from the artist. --ghouston (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a modern postcard.[2], by Golden Era (company founded 1989). Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope GY Fan 05:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Gardenparty (talk) 05:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a smaller version of the official logo that can be found here and which clearly states copyright. Even if this copy was made by the uploader it resembles the original work too much for it not to be copyright violation without proper permission. Mbch331 (talk) 06:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Late 1950s postcard would still be under copyright in the UK. No evidence for the free license. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the photos (third from left) has no source. Overall quality of the collage is also bad. Taivo (talk) 07:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1950s postcard would still be in copyright in the UK. Marked as a postcard on the Flickr source. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, bad quality, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been published previously, eg. http://drprem.com/healthyeating/probiotic-food-recommendations-better-intestine-health MKFI (talk) 07:38, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the file has bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Joel WILHELM is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axperotto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot verify the license. The source site has free license, but I cannot find the photo from the site. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a better picture of the same object. Cosal (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a better picture of the same object Cosal (talk) 09:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soham wala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not Flickr. Selfies by non-contributor, used in deleted self-promotional autobio en:User:Soham wala.

JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a better picture of the same object Cosal (talk) 09:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still image comes from ~12:38 in the video (please provide timestamps in the future...), but wait a few seconds and the clip is revealed to be via Reuters (international news org). The YT uploader doesn't own the rights to the fair use video to re-release the still as Creative Commons. czar 09:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for pointing this out. I completely missed that and just saw the dual image of the channel on both the youtube screen and the video so I thought they had filmed it. I'll remove this image from those pages where it was used and I'll tag all of the other images with the tag 2016 Ethiopian Protests with the same deletion request. Thanks again for spotting this.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just tagged all of the photos linked to that video for deletion and posted explanations on the deletion discussion pages.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Monopoly31121993. If there are files that would also fit under this deletion discussion, feel free to just list them here instead of separately (saves some time). czar 20:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, the files are File:Protesters 2016 Ethiopian protests1.png, File:Protesters 2016 Ethiopian protests2.png, File:Protesters 2016 Ethiopian protests3.png, File:Protesters 2016 Ethiopian protests4.png and File:Protesters 2016 Ethiopian protests5.png. They are all from the same youtube video.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 04:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Despairgames (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:1C74:E35F:581F:333A 09:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as an image from a calendar (google confirms and finds it all over the blog-world and fan-sites)...no evidence uploader owns the rights to release it DMacks (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny (160×160 pixels) unused personal photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:1C74:E35F:581F:333A 09:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is attributed to "Archivo" and not the website/company. So they do not appear to have the rights to re-license this image. That said, I don't see the mark for cc-by-sa-4.0 on the page either. Haven't checked Commons uploader's other uploads. czar 09:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teresa palmer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

According to en:User_talk:Teresa_palmer:... You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information....

2003:45:5C6F:A801:1C74:E35F:581F:333A 09:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ümit çalışıcı (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets and some descriptions required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:1C74:E35F:581F:333A 09:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (small resolution, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:1C74:E35F:581F:333A 09:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a good memory for where the preacher Dahl used to sit. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a good memory for where the preacher Dahl used to sit. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 11:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a good memory for where the preacher Dahl used to sit. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 11:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a good memory for where the preacher Dahl used to sit. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 11:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a good memory for where the preacher Dahl used to sit. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish ... 2003:45:5C6F:A801:1C74:E35F:581F:333A 10:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. It was only used in his userpage at English Wikipedia. NgYShung (talk) 10:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Never used in other articles. NgYShung (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. No possible educational use. The "description" explains different ways of online communication, but not what the image is supposed to illustrate. Not in use anywhere. Probably also a copyvio, unlikely to be own work. Latebird (talk) 10:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. No possible educational use. The "description" explains different ways of online communication, but not what the image is supposed to illustrate. Not in use anywhere. We probably also already have sufficient screenshots of the windows console. Latebird (talk) 10:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samimaktardon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted autobio en:User:SadashivSharma1 JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted autobio en:User:SadashivSharma1 JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own" work ? http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/features/dups-guy-spence-on-his-special-relationships-31574978.html 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E902:3711:DA32:6376 10:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out or project scope. Private photo without any possible educational use. Latebird (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out or project scope. Private photo without any possible educational use. Latebird (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out or project scope. Private photo without any possible educational use. Latebird (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Unknown persons, out of COM:SCOPE as not useful for educational purpose. 90.191.109.9 11:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artistic lgo 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E902:3711:DA32:6376 11:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work ? (53 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:E902:3711:DA32:6376 11:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Yes. My photography, my original photo, and my pet. 2605:E000:1C02:826D:F0B6:BB04:16FF:B894LiselleEwing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akmphotoshop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused files with meaningless description and without category.

jdx Re: 11:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All but 3 deleted due to lock error. INeverCry 02:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 03:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akmphotoshop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

With watermarks. OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:E902:3711:DA32:6376 11:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All over the web. See as example: http://ministeriotalitacumi.com/ Ganímedes (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See http://www.josafat.com.ar/planetshackers-hear-the-sound-oir-el-sonido/ : "© 2012, History Maker Inc.. Todos los derechos reservados. Está prohibido la copia, modificación y/o republicación sin el consentimiento de Josafat" Ganímedes (talk) 11:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PSWEB1.jpg and http://ministeriotalitacumi.com/ and www.planetshakers.com .... All over the web Ganímedes (talk) 11:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JARDINS DE TUNIS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per watermark here. Likely a old copyvio. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this really in public domain gita press started in 1923. No painter name no author life time no published date Baddu676 (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry, better quality photos of subject have become available since it was uploaded. Buxtehude (talk) 11:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry, better quality photos of subject have become available since it was uploaded. Buxtehude (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you want to suppress this picture, anyhow I presume you have a very good reason; I would like to know witch one? ... Pano38 (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The map and the pictures on the sign are probably copyrighted. Regards. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
there are the owners logos on the map, I presume its enough, otherwise do what you think right. regards ... Pano38 (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photomontage : lacks of sources to determine the copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

photomontages : lacks of sources to determine copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, and since the uploader continues to upload out-of-scope photos instead of commenting here, you can add File:CYMERA 20160425 135523.jpg to the list. The uploader has made no useful contributions whatsoever to any Wikimedia project. Time to start considering a block. LX (talk, contribs) 12:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ratnammastermind (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims. The logo appears to be grabbed from http://www.ratnammasterminds.com/. And even if that site is the uploader's own work, the logo isn't. The wings part of the logo seem to be part of some commonly used stock graphics: https://tineye.com/search/3d9cde86d4d6f6ed732730653e89175f89d31e29/?sort=crawl_date&order=asc.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 12:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, completely black JPEG. We already have more solid black images than we're likely to need. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 12:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1994 and 1995 photos of Elitloppet horse race

[edit]

Photos from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, photos have been removed from the web site. Thuresson (talk) 12:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The images were at http://stallanette.se/fotoncopiad.htm as far back as 2009 per the IA, and probably longer from the style of the website. No indication of a license there, and these are better copies. Delete unless we get a license. Reventtalk 14:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heathnw77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: I agree, specifically the Courtney Rashon image where a virtually identical image, but cropped and reversed, appears on one of her website pages. Ww2censor (talk) 13:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Begench Bayramov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear if the uploader has the right to upload these paintings and photographs under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

Takeaway (talk) 12:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Begench Bayramov 2

[edit]

Not own work. Artist w:Durdy Bayramov died in 2014. Unclear if the uploader has the right to upload these paintings under Creative Commons license.

P 1 9 9   17:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Begench Bayramov (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Same as before: Artist died in 2014, works still under copyright. All images taken from website, but no proof that uploader is owner of the original works. OTRS ticket needed at a minimum.

P 1 9 9   13:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 10:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK Government photo dated 14 May 1969. Apparent source is [3] which states a non-commercial licence. No evidence that the photo has been released under the OGL as claimed here, and the previous pdUK-gov licence is inappropriate because it cannot have been published prior to 1966. Nigel Ish (talk) 13:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK Government photo dated 1 January 1973. Apparent source is [4] and NOT the source listed, which points to an entirely different photo of a different ship. The Imperial War Museum claims a non-commercial licence for this photo. No evidence that the photo has been released under the OGL as claimed here, and the previous pdUK-gov licence is inappropriate because it cannot have been published prior to 1966. Nigel Ish (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted It is now 2024. Abzeronow (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK government photo dated 1974, which has a pduk-gov tag. This licence requires the photo to have been taken prior to 1 June 1957, or published commercially prior to 1966, neither of which is possible for this photo. Stated as having a non-commercial licence on the source website [5] which is unsuitable for Commons. No evidence that the photo has been released under the OGL is is often claimed by the uploader. Nigel Ish (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebonheart 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the files are freely licensed.

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professionally taken photo of a man who died in 1971. It's unlikely that this is the user's own work as stated. Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. kovox90      13:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: File must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Stang 13:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela (talk) 00:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, fair use COM:FU kovox90      13:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anne mcivor 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnkcWsmWcAApOLX.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Private picture without any educational use. Latebird (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:12, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Only use was at deleted Wikipedia article w:Coreo Jujutacular (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: http://todaytv.vn/su-kien/dong-dao-ban-tre-tham-gia-casting-phim-cali-mua-hoa-vang-1165.imc DHN (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source says © 2016 Nautilus Data Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. GeorgHHtalk   22:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. English Wikipedia article was deleted as not notable. Josve05a (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has complex shapes, is original enough. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 27 November 2014 20:49 (UTC) 20:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tell me one,This image only consists of simple geometric shapes,color,etc, too simple,sorry u'r wrong.--EEIM (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 22:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, fair use COM:FU kovox90      13:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple. --INeverCry 00:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Felviper (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, fair use COM:FU kovox90      13:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple. --INeverCry 00:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not look like PD-simple to me. Complex enough in my opinion. --ZooFari 21:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you say it is complex? It's only simple shapes. You mean the whole arrangement? -- Darwin Ahoy! 22:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just my opinion, yes. But because the threshold is set by our own opinions, might as well nominate for deletion something I'm not too sure on. Our own logo is simpler than this but we have not opened our eyes to this controversy yet, so I'm just asking for others' input. --ZooFari 23:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing it, then, I do it all the time when I have a doubt about some logo. Unfortunately the DRs I opened don't seem to be much concurred until now. I also hope to see more comments on this logo, it's a good case for discussion since it's all simple shapes but the whole arrangement may have some creativity.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep as PD-Old. As can be seen here, this emblem dates from 1904 and represents the football balls which were used at the time. In 1963 the text in the emblem was changed, but the drawing remained the same.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn per Darwin. --ZooFari 18:05, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, fair use COM:FU kovox90      13:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per first DR close. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://bibliotecafeevale.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/untitled.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons:nudity; Yet another penis. Obviously the uploader's only interest. Zinnmann (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نقض حق تکثیر (copy right) Mahdi28 (talk) 14:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نقض حق تکثیر (copy right) Mahdi28 (talk) 14:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نقض حق تکثیر (copy right) Mahdi28 (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romeo delaye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.wixstatic.com/media/277be8_eda9bcc0046d4a0789276038b8bc7706.jpg_srz_600_329_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_jpg_srz.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نقض حق تکثیر (copy right) Mahdi28 (talk) 14:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! i woud like to keep only * File:ผังสาแหรก - ธนศักดิ์ ปฏิมาประกร.jpg since it is linked to "ธนศักดิ์ ปฏิมาประกร" wiki page for better information. ณ ราชสีมา (talk) 02:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Thanks! i woud like to keep only * File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 003.jpg since it is linked to "คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์" wiki page for better information. ณ ราชสีมา (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Three unused and uncategorized copies of the same family tree, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, fair use COM:FU kovox90      14:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower image quality than many photos in Category:Zootoca vivipara, low contrast to background, not sharp. With all this good photos of Zootoca vivipara this is probably useless for Wikimedia projects. (Uploader request) Biodehio (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower image quality than many photos in Category:Zootoca vivipara, low contrast to background, not sharp. With all this good photos of Zootoca vivipara this is probably useless for Wikimedia projects. (Uploader request) Biodehio (talk) 15:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower image quality than many photos in Category:Zootoca vivipara, disturbing shadows, not sharp. With all this good photos of Zootoca vivipara this is probably useless for Wikimedia projects. (Uploader request) Biodehio (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image with insufficient description and abusive title (slinta = slobberer). Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 17:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this flash photo snap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlos Troya Palacios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these two variously sized copies of the same photo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walter.spz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two images which appear to be taken from Google street view, see curved perspective, etc. No indication of user's own work, no meta, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishnuverma791 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

bad quality unused personal photos/derivative works. Probably out of scope.

/St1995 18:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Sandro Botticelli - Portrait of a Man with a Medal of Cosimo the Elder.jpg the file is no longer in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 18:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. It's not clear how this is uploader's own work considering the fact that the image has been published elsewhere such as here. Wikicology (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope, unused personal image Julo (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be same as from [6] which does not mention the subject of the image.Also would not appear to be useful as image to describe with the subject. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this photograph is the own work of this user. It was uploaded days after the author depicted had passed away, so the date on which it was taken isn't accurate. EXIF data is missing. It was also used in this newsarticle about her death, so it's more likely that the photo was taken from there than the other way around. Vera (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of low quality. Not used. Not educationally useful. No other contributions from uploader. DavidIvar (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:nudity and probable copyvio, see http://alegratka.pl/ogloszenie/ken-nagi-25703577.html Pippobuono (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If administrators wish I can provide a copy of this photo as a broader crop that proves it is mine, as there are zero mods. I do not wish to post it however.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing stereochemistry at two locations, small size, and inconsistent geometric details. Have tons of PNG and SVG in Category:Lysergic acid diethylamide DMacks (talk) 21:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inconsisent geometry in the 5-membered ring, have better-aligned SVG in Category:Lysergic acid diethylamide DMacks (talk) 21:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tangled geometry (key uses of this chemical generally relate to the chiral/geometric nature, so this is is COM:EDUSE issue), and N–S bond missing. Have File:Oppolzer sultam.svg DMacks (talk) 21:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect or missing stereochemistry for how N attaches to ring C. It should be "up" (see File:Oppolzer sultam.svg) DMacks (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just Testing Didn't Work Cmills924 (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was previously deleted and seems to have appeared again... the source is en:wiki... but there is no source at wiki! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/All images by sxc.hu user brokenarts. There is no source at all for this image other than en:wiki, and the system is showing it was previously deleted. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --King of 01:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is said to be Walcott Studios Columbus Wisconsin. It is unclear if the uploader has authority to release the work of a studio as CC-SA-4. Needs c:OTRS from studio / copyright holder. -- Dual Freq (talk) 00:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image was given to me by my photography partner Walcott Studios — Preceding unsigned comment added by Downspec (talk • contribs) 17:19, August 14, 2016‎ (UTC)

Commons has no way to verify this is true unless you follow the steps at Commons:OTRS. --Dual Freq (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Have the photography studio email a license to COM:OTRS. --King of 01:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hate to do this, but see Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures of the Louvre Pyramid and Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests: The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I.M. Pei (still alive). France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is the main subject of the image, so unfortunately there's no exception like De minimis. There may be more problematic images in this category, I just picked the ones that seemed to be more or less clear cases for now.

El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion of File:P1030568 (5015328803).jpg. The main object is the old Louvre, seen through some glas. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No Fop in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, except those where the pyramid is not the main object. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}}.

* File:Louvre at dusk.JPG * File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG already kept in previous DR --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg per comment below --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons 2.jpg not main object --Denniss (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josve05a (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most are not DM. The pyramid is to prominent, captured intentionally or the images was even used to illustrate the pyramid. Doesn't fit DM. According to the Frech FOP-template "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pyramid is still covered by copyright (the architect, Ieoh Ming Pei, is alive), there is no FOP in France and COM:De minimis is not applicable for these files. Per archives, see Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} Some of these (~3-5) may have already been kept in an earlier DR, but under a false premise, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre at dusk.JPG. I feellike it would be benificial to have a new and 'clean' disussion about these files.

Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As two pictures of mine are affected - with one even serving as the prime example for alleged false premises - I'd like to maintain that the principle of de minimis should be applied at least to File:Louvre at dusk.JPG and File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG. They are in fact very similar to the images used to illustrate De Minimis in France --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore  Keep, also per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Same for my picture which was not even nominated for deletion in the last round where 5 others were removed. I find this repeated request is itself under false premises and object strongly. Dfg13 (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg, as I already wrote in March: the pyramid is an "accessory to the main handled subject" - the entrance. It also has been discussed and excepted here and obove. --Euku: 07:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after consulting Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests/kept I decided to delete all the photos. Object under construction can also be protected with copyright, if enough copyrightable details are seen. General views about museum can also be protected with copyright, if the museum is protected with copyright, that means, if enough copyrightable details are seen. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} As earlier DRs (above).

Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: but kept one. From the perspeĉtive it becomes quite clear that the pyramid is there intentional and is indeed one of the main subjects. Natuur12 (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blacked-out version kept, others deleted: none of these images complies with de minimis. For re-upload, please black out or crop. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been designed by Ieoh Ming Pei (b. 1917), an architect who is still alive. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, this picture should be removed from Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I deleted all files where the pyramid is the central element. For the rest, it could be argued that the pyramid is unavoidable (cf. the Terreaux case), or a secondary element. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, but some are  kept, because not enough copyrightable details can be seen. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I. M. Pei. France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis.

Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator Ras67, the rationale for deletion you placed on ALL these images was "the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis."
Frankly, I have found the closures of discussions that revolve around FOP and de minimis, in France, to be pretty inconsistent, and unpredictable. Some discussions where I thought the images were sure to be deleted ended up being kept because the closing administrator concluded the questionable element was merely "one of" the elements of those images.
I uploaded one of these images, one that shows the square in front of the Louvre, including the pyramid. The Pyramid takes up less than ten percent of that image's real estate, less than one third of the horizontal span of the image.
Did you intend everyone weighing in here to take a meaningful look at all two dozen images? Do you think it might have made sense for you to have further broken them down, separating the few where most of the image was of the pyramid, from those where the image was really of the square in front of the Louvre?
How about going back and adding your estimate of how much of each images' real estate is taken up the pyramid?
In my opinion, these two dozen images should not have been the subject of a single nomination, because they are not sufficiently alike. Geo Swan (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You want a nomination for each picture alone? IMHO all pictures have the same problem. The question is, where is de minimis exceeded and where not. May the closing admin decide, therefor is this discusion. But you have right, this procedure is inconsistent and unpredictable like the whole subject. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have a guideline, but how tight is the commentary. The pyramid as central element of the place is in almost every image unavoidable. To "freeing" a picture you have to photograph the whole place? Where is the threshold? To my nomination i've included the pyramid's space and in relation the space of all other (non copyrighted) elements. I don't know if this proceeding is correct.--Ras67 (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IANA, but I think our interpretation of French is too strict. As it is said on the FOP page, a picture is not a derivative work if the work of art is a mere element blended into an architectural ensemble. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, apparently nobody wants to close the request and I must close it again. I keep all the photos previously kept or undeleted. File:January Mon Dieu Palais Louvre Paris - Master Earth Photography 2014 - series France saphir pictures - panoramio.jpg is de minimis.

I explain keeping file:Parisienne2002-1.jpg. Pyramid is simple geometrical figure and not copyrightable. Louvre Pyramid is not a simple geometrical figure and it is copyrightable. It's not allowed to use non-trivial details of copyrighted objects. But under some circumstances the photo has no copyrightable details, only simple geometrical figure, which isn't copyrightable. These photos can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Thesupermat (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat: Half of these are already nominated. There is no need to do it again. Then images are acceptable if the pyramid is an unavoidable element in the whole composition (decision of the Cour de Cassation regarding the Terreaux case). Regards, Yann (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: are you sure? "Paris Musée du Louvre - panoramio - Nikolai Karaneschev.jpg" is the only file I see already nominated (nothing on this page and nothing on the talk page of these file). I've put a gallery to show that in most of these photos the Pyramid is the main subject and not really an unavoidable element.
At least for the Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 09 to 16 and for Paris, France (Unsplash QrpX-2tPmNY), I would say  Delete.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am sure. I nominated them myself. I think File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 03.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 04.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 05.jpg and File:Louvre Palace (5986775507).jpg could be kept. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most of them. Kept the four mentioned by Yann and one additional that has already been deemed fine in two previous DRs on this page. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP France

Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Even the last one has the pyramid as a very prominent feature. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru: pd ineligible is possible, but only if the object is really simple, like a flagpole or an obelisk.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: And what is so special about a simple tetrahedron / pyramid? The general shape is ineligible for copyriht in my opinion. Close up images of the roof construction may be not. --D-Kuru (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Automatic window cleaner, Louvre 11 December 2007.jpg.  Delete everything else since the pyramid is the primary subject.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, except those Darwin pointed out. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear cases. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ahmadtalk 18:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

 Keep --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader. OK for suppression of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg. But for File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the main subjects of the photo are the strike and the Louvre. Not the pyramid. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I cropped the file above to remove most of the pyramid. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? On File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the pyramid is not totally visible. The bottom of the pyramid is hidden by people. It shows that the pyramid is not the main subject. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: Are you willing to crop out the top of each photo, down to the top of the head of the tallest depicted person? I would accept that.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I uploaded a new version. I hope it will please you. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: I think you did not crop enough from 1, and you didn't crop 2 at all. Pinging @Minorax as nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I said OK to delete the #1 picture. I cropped again File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg to preserve and save my photo. But I disagree, the precedent cropping was enough. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: Did you mean  Keep #1 and  Delete #2? I share your view. IMO image #1 is cropped enough to make the Louvre Pyramid in de minimis. Admins should delete the first two verson of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg if you keep it. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Oops... I meant  Keep #1 (cropped with the pyramid in de minimis) and  Delete #2 (with the whole pyramid). --Tangopaso (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep First and  Delete second per above, the copyrighted parts should be cropped as like the first one to avoid FOP problems. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Yann (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk 11:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yann (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed by architect I. M. Pei (1917–2019) in 1989. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2090.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Palais du Louvre 003.jpg due to de minimis.
 Delete for all other --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, above sections.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pyramid too big (main subject of the photo) to be a FoP exception

— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)--[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in France. COM:FOP France. Creator was Ieoh Ming Pei. He died 2019. The files can be restored in 2090.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Beck, I think that before you propose this massive request, you should at least check if it was kept as File talk:South facade of the Richelieu Wing (162242079).jpg or if broke any rule...
All that I opened should be kept as the protected monument is not the main object or occupy a significant area of the photo.
Read the previous discussion before this propostions. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 23:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for all, see quotation below. --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Dennis Rodman's official poster: http://www.imgrum.net/media/1232001176188174225_43320974 (@dennisrodman) Russian Rocky (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment,這張圖片已經裁減成金正恩,File:Jin Zheng-en.jpgFile:Jin Zheng-en.jpg)--S099001 (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derived from unfree images of both Kim Jong-un and Dennis Rodman. --King of 01:37, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Max Koot Studio usually retains copyright. What does the OTRS ticket say? If it is just the uploader who released the image, it possibly is still copyrighted. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I have checked the ticket. It contains a vaild permission sent by Max Koot. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dette bildet er ikke verdig emissær M.J. Dahl fra Spydeberg, også kalt Totenåsens apostel. Bildet bør tas på nytt etter rydding og/eller oppussing. Evt. kan bildet tegnes/males slik det var, til et godt minne fra Dahls liv. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leith Paxton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Proper author/date/country of creation information is already shown in respect of all images. What more is necessary?

In addition, every single one of these pictures is in use and of value, in many cases irreplaceable. - André Kritzinger (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not an assumption, a fact. All the pictures bar the couple of book-scans are scans by Paxton himself of his original pictures, many of them uploaded at my request and some (all the tenders, for example) of his own accord. He's a retired railwayman, a couple of years older than me (must be early 70s now) and also lives here in Cape Town. - André Kritzinger (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The contents of an email from Paxton to me in April, when he dug up the latest bunch of tender pictures:

From: The Paxtons Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:07 PM To: 'André Kritzinger' Subject: RE: [sar-L] SAR Tender types
Hello André,
I spent the afternoon combing through my stuff. At least I was able to find what I was looking for, so my material is not in that big a mess.
I am sending all the photos I have of individual tenders. I am sorry I never kept a note of their numbers, so some might be difficult to identify. Hopefully, as you become familiar with them you can add their types. I also used Richard’s notes to pick out the ‘L’ drawings which are attached and should help with the tank rebuilds.
By the way, the only photo I scanned was one of Frank’s, the JV tender. On the back of the print, in his own hand, is written, ‘N.B.G. 2-8-2 Abortion’. I presume the NBG stands for ‘No Bloody Good’! I never got the full story of it, but belief it was for 60lb track. Maybe you will unearth the answer.
When I was a youngster, I would follow the tracks in my area on my bicycle and note the engine numbers as well as the tender number of locos I came across. I kick myself for throwing that note book away.
Of course the SAR was hot on rebuilding their stock whether they were wagons, coaches or locos, and the way we saw them in the 1960’s, 70’s as a far cry from how they started off.
Regards,
Leith
Frank is the late D.F. Holland, another author of books on SAR locomotives.-- André Kritzinger (talk) 17:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion - works by uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por Que Não quero mais utilizar Jeferson da Silva Flores Ramos (talk) 15:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, out of project scope. GY Fan 15:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

这是我自己的作品没错啊。平天下的小曹2015 (talk) 15:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@: ,范桑,copyright violation不用提删直接挂那个模板啊。#ForeverLove凡人丶 你一定要好好的 16:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, Out of project scope: Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills. But for the copyright problem, maybe it's not a big deal: author can put a note in the original places or via OTRS. --Stang 14:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If we knew this was not a copyvio, it would possibly be okay as a {{User page image}}, if it wasn't that the uploader has barely edited zhwiki outside of their own user page. See contributions there. Looks like simply using zhwiki as a free webhost, tbh. Reventtalk 04:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from Tasnim News Agency

[edit]

Unclear copright status. Per established guidelines via Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Tasnim News Agency the following files are most likely NOT works by "Tasnim News Agency" considering:


Gunnex (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - The image I reviewed was back when we didn't know that all images from that site was not free (bar the ones with name tags at the bottom), I figured someone would have found out and reported it by now...--Stemoc 21:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yup,  Keep File:Judge Salavati.jpg --> my (incomprehensible: the case is quite obvious...) fail... Gunnex (talk) 07:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete--These are loan pictures.Saman-1984 (talk) 16:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Please note that جبار محسن (talk · contributions · Statistics) is license reviewing some related images (even being not a license reviewer), including removing DR etc. --> example. Gunnex (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Note discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Tasnim News Agency. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة محفوظة الحقوق، لم تنتهي مدة حمايتها في العراق «izoozo» talk 17:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

affected: File:Creative wedding invitation card kerala 2.jpg and File:Creative wedding invitation card kerala.jpg: "jerrylovesbinny" and facebook tag, imho rather family-album-like uploads and hence ouf of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

affected: File:Creative wedding invitation card kerala 2.jpg and File:Creative wedding invitation card kerala.jpg: "jerrylovesbinny" and facebook tag, imho rather family-album-like uploads and hence ouf of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 21:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 21:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 21:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Tasnim is sent to Brazil correspondent, The News text should be in English translation --Kasir (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 21:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited INeverCry 21:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either copyvio or unused promotion with sketchy licensing Voxii (talk) 06:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok, there's a ton of similar pictures of CDs in Category:AG Sinnwerke. I don't know the story here. Maybe legit. Voxii (talk) 06:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the key thing here is what the template on the category says "Please do not upload photographs or scans of works by this artist, unless they meet one of the following exceptions: [...] The work was released by the author or their heirs via E-mail confirmed authorisation" Voxii (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of these are, as far as I can tell, 'real'. They are apparently duplicate copies of proposed flags, overwritten with more duplicate copies of other proposed flags. I know the deletion of such things seems to often turn into a battle, but these are all (as far as I can tell) useless cruft, at least as they currently stand. I can't really say they 'should' be deleted... there might be something useful here, but can we figure out something sane enough to not just get repeatedly overwritten with other random 'proposed' flags?

At least some of these appear to have been (mistakenly) used by other projects as if they were real. File:Flag of Nuevo Leon.svg is the real flag, according to FOTW.

There seems to be a whole category tree of 'my proposed flag' images for all of the various states of Mexico, and the majority seem to have no provenance other than an account name, and nothing to tell a reuser (other than the category) that they are not real.

Reventtalk 09:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

State of Nuevo León hasn't got official state flag, may be in the future, but in this moment no state flag. All flags is a Category:Proposal flags of Nuevo León. is very specific; no problem, only change a White flag with coat of arms of Nuevo León in other Wikipedia projects.--Marrovi (talk) 15:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment All articles on other projects are now using the 'official' unofficial flag, as used by the national government, File:Flag of Nuevo Leon.svg. Only uses left are either user page galleries, crosslinks between these, and an afd on eswiki. Reventtalk 16:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Only four Mexican states have got official State Flag, Jalisco, Quintana Roo, Querétaro and Durango, other states use a domestic flag in protocol state events and has mention in their laws as Mexico State, Chiapas, Tamaulipas and Tlaxcala, others is the Mexican National flag by separatist movements as Campeche and Baja California. The last states no state flags, no white flags and no domestic flags; may be in the future others states adopted a state flag.--Marrovi (talk) 16:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The concern being that people will search for 'flag of wherever', and when they find an image named 'flag of wherever', and described 'flag of wherever', they will assume is actually 'is' what they are looking for, and use it ~40 pages on Russian wikipedia without knowing that it's a proposal invented by some random editor.. and then 20 other wikis will also use it as 'real'. And yes, there are multiple imaginary flags of Mexican states used in articles across 20+ wikis. Reventtalk 04:42, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think that putting the warning sign (This flag, as well as other fictitious flags, is fictitious or proposed but not adopted.) is enough. Is not neccesary to delete the flags. When I put the word (Proposal) it means that is an unnoficial flag. Do what Marrovi says.--Julius C (talk) 19:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Julius C: The question is... is an unsolicited 'proposed' flag that appears to have never existed outside of WMF projects in scope? I have, actually, added the {{Fictitious flag}} template to all the members of Category:Proposed flags of Mexico (none of which was marked) and have been working on cleaning up the hundreds of places where they were mistakenly used as the real flag. I'm fine with it if it's decided to keep these, if marked as not real, but I don't personally think WMF projects are an appropriate place for galleries of unsolicited proposals by random people. Reventtalk 13:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - If there is some kind of formal process going on, where the state of Nuevo Leon is considering and publishing proposals for a flag, then those proposals might be worth keeping here for documentation. If this is just the private initiative of someone saying "I wish the state would adopt this flag", then they have no possible educational purpose and should be deleted. --Latebird (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image of Frank Henry Mason © IWM (HU 118031) was obtained from this page on the Imperial War Museum's web site at: http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205385311 This page explicitly says 'This item is available to be shared and re-used under the terms of the IWM Non Commercial Licence'. Your task is to decide whether Wikipedia meets the requirements of IWM's non-commercial license.
Stuffed cat (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not exactly the problem. You tagged the work as offered under a CC-by-sa 4.0 license. There is no evidence of it at the source provided. Please provide evidence for the statement or remove the tag. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:46, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: incompatible license from a party that's probably not even the copyright holder. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This distribution was never real. This was just a proposed distribution and the real distribution is on File:Congreso de los Diputados de la XI legislatura de España.svg. Therefore this image holds has no purpose, and is not used in any article. IngenieroLoco (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the real distribution of seats in the Congreso de los Diputados. The real distribution is available on File:Congreso de los Diputados de la IX legislatura de España.svg. IngenieroLoco (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an application to OTRS tag here, but the number is XXXXXXX.... user's other uploads were lacking in source, nominating this one for help with the OTRS assignment. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC) František Horenský zemřel již velmi dávno, jeho fotografie je zveřejněna se souhlasem ředitele Slováckého muzea v Uherském Hradišti, pokud nevíte kde to je, podívejte se na mapu. S Výslovným souhlasem pana ředitele!!! Mail jsem již dávno poslal tam kam jsem podle vašich směrnic poslat měl !!! --Zdeněk Horenský (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a request for assistance with the OTRS tag which currently has no number. I'm not an OTRS volunteer, so I cannot research it. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We have received some kind of a permission but it was for Wikipedia only. I asked for the CC-BY-SA permission and now we're waiting for the answer. The XXX template is {{OTRS pending}}. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image only in use on a user page, claimed to be from USDOJ, but link goes to Table of Contents page, not image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The "table of contents" is just the DOJ's 404 "page not found" page. That page used to have this image on it, but doesn't anymore. It's a DOJ image... but it's really poor quality. No opinion on whether it's useful or not.– Quadell (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is image is showing Jammu & Kashmir of India in Pakistan, This is an crime as per Indian Pinal Code..Please remove 49.32.33.157 18:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: WTF?. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]