User talk:Avalokitesvara

Welcome to the Commons, Avalokitesvara!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 22:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Charzew.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mirabelki Hufcowa.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wierzba Hufcowa.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brzoza na Lublinku.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bielice.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herb gminy Bełchatów

Witam! To nie jest czepialstwo, to dbałość o szczegóły. Jednak wzór jaki miałem do dyspozycji to grafika wielkości znaczka pocztowego więc tych szczegółów musiałem się domyślać. W najbliższym czasie, jeśli znajdę lepszy wzór, postaram się poprawić te elementy. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 16:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lutomiersk poprawiony. Te przekłamania kolorów wynikają z protej przyczyny. Najczęściej korzystam z narzędzia "pobierz kolor" co powoduje, że niezbyt czyste barwy oryginału sa przenoszone na kopię wektorową. Jak chcesz jeszcze się "poczepiać" to na mojej stronie znajdziesz linki do wszystkich moich herbów, jak coś jeszcze znajdziesz to śmiało pisz. Herb gminy Rogów postaram się zrobić w najbliższym czasie i oczywiście bełchatowski też poprawię. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 07:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Witam. Jest już nowa, wektorowa wersja herbu gminy Rogów. Również herb gminy Bełchatów jest już poprawiony. Sprawdź i ewentualnie daj znać, czy wszystko jest w porządku. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:POL COA Andruszkiewicz 1.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 01:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:POL COA Bejnart.svg

Skąd brałeś informacje dot. tego herbu? Bo nie jestem do końca pewien ich poprawności.

D@wid 16:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herby

Widzę że na poważnie zająłeś się grafikami herbów na Wikipedii. Mam tylko jedną prośbę - zanim zajmiesz się jakimś wizerunkiem, sprawdź, czy nie ma go już na Commons. Inaczej tworzysz duplikaty, a lepiej włożyć tan wysiłek w nowe grafiki. Tak zrobiłeś np., z herbem Achinger. Ja wcześniej zrobiłem ten herb i go załadowałem, a Ty niepotrzebnie go zduplikowałeś. Przecież to bez sensu. Podobnie jak zamiana na stronie. Dlaczego dokonałeś tej zamiany?

D@wid 10:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teraz rzuciło mi się w oczy, że ten Twój herb także ma błąd - labry powinny być w odwrotnych barwach (metalem się "podbija" labry - sprawdź tu.

Zwracam honor ;) Dodałem do artykułu uzupełnienie o labrach. Pozdrawiam!D@wid 17:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sprawdziłem dokładnie i... nie wiem skąd tak daleko idące wnioski. U Jurzaka herb jest w ogóle bez labrów, a u Orgelbranda rysunek sprawia wrażenie odręcznego, nie widzę na nim wyraźnego szrafirunku. Ale jeśli Znamierowski tak uważa, cóż to on jest zawodowcem... A herb rzeczywiście wygląda ładniej gdy jest podbity czerwienią

File:POL COA Alant.svg

Why is the most recently-uploaded version of that file so absolutely huge? I bet there's a lot of extraneous junk in it... AnonMoos (talk) 14:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I could see the SVG source of the file, I could probably tell the specific problem, but it would take me a while to download an 8 meg file... I was just commenting that an 8 meg long SVG file for such a relatively visually simple image almost certainly means that there is something strange going on in the source code. AnonMoos (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not with my ability to download, it's that it might take almost half-an-hour to do it at my current connection speeds, and that I'm not sure I have a text editor that could handle an eight-meg file if I did download it. E-mailing really wouldn't help, but thanks. AnonMoos (talk) 07:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charzew jest w Łodzi?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charzew.JPG Jeśli nie, to czemu nadałeś mu taką kategorię?

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Avalokitesvara!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:POL ulica Popioły w Łodzi willa 1.JPG is uncategorized since 21 April 2009.
Image:Kot morski piekosiński.JPG was uncategorized on 20 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Nalecz okolski.JPG was uncategorized on 20 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kot morski stemmata.JPG was uncategorized on 20 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:POL COA Baumgart gmerk.svg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reason?

Hello Avalokitesvara, just out of curiosity: is there a special reason why you don't remove the convert tags from the images? Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, just curious. Keep up the nice work. Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 16:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Herb gminy Bielice

Witam. Jasne, zrobię ten nowy herb i zamienię go w artykule. Zrobię to jeszcze dzisiaj wieczorem. Dziękuję za podpowiedź, bo sam pewnie nigdy bym tego nie zauważył. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dla mnie zawsze źródłem grafik do wektoryzacji były te strony. Po prostu ściągałem herb i go rysowałem a potem zamieszczałem w artykule, do którego był przypisany. Herb gminy Bielice był na tej stronie w wersji PNG ale ponieważ był na polskiej wiki to został usunięty. Ja mam całą kolekcję wersji rastrowych więc nie ma mowy o pomyłce. Nie zastanawiałem się nigdy nad innymi źródłami. No i dzisiaj już nie zrobię tego herbu. Jest już dość późno a ja jestem po całym dniu mocno zmęczony. Zrobię go jutro najwcześniej jak się da. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herb w wersji PNG był tutaj jeszcze pod koniec grudnia 2007 roku.Bastianow (talk) 18:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Tym też się zajmę. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 19:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gmina Bejsce

Witam. Herb gotowy. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gnojno

Witam. Herb gotowy. Zrobiłem go jako nową wersję, nie nadpisywałem starego. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No cóż, lata doświadczeń. Jestem grafikiem od wielu lat a komputer do wykonywania grafik wykorzystuję niemal od samego początku. Poza tym często wykorzystuję elementy wykonane już wcześniej do innych grafik a jak wiesz mam z czego (ponad 1000 herbów) wybierać. W tym konkretnym przypadku wykorzystałem, po drobnych modyfikacjach, wszystkie elementy starego herbu, musiałem dorysować tylko tego dzika, co zajęło mi niecałą minutę. Często szukam podobnych grafik i czasem się udaje znaleźć coś lepszego. Czasem wzory są jeszcze gorsze, np. ten herb zrobiłem na podstawie tego zdjęcia. Jedynym problemem są dla mnie twarze ludzi i dlatego unikam takich grafik, natomiast sylwetki zwierząt mogę robić bez wzorów. Jednym słowem podstawą jest doświadczenie. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 14:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Szablon

Witaj. Na ten temat była już gorąca dyskusja i zostało w końcu przyjęte, że to co robimy jest legalne. Wielkość ograniczona do 150 pixeli w wersjach wektorowych jest bez znaczenia, ponieważ grafiki te można dowolnie skalować bez utraty jakości. W wersjach rastrowych nie było tak prosto, bo z grafiki 150 x 150 niewiele można było uzyskać. Przy większych powiększeniach grafika się rozmywała i wyraźnie widać było pixele. Wersje wektorowe też można byłoby ładować w tej wielkości, ale co to zmieni? To tylko kwestia skalowania i nic poza tym. Można z takich miniaturek uzyskać dowolnej wielkości grafiki przy doskonałej jakości. Poza tym ja zawsze zamieszczam informację o tym, na czym wzorowałem się tworząc elektroniczną, wektorową wersję danej grafiki. Zamieszczam też oryginalne {{Polish coats of arms by Tadeusz Gajl}} szablon licencyjny Gajla. Ten wzorzec zrobił WarX z mojej grafiki Ostoja, podobnie jak wiele innych moich grafik stało się wzorami, np. ten. Dlatego graficy wykorzystujący te wzory podają, obok Gajla, również mnie, jako autora wersji wektorowej. Licencja GFDL mówi o tym by wykorzystując czyjąś pracę lub nawet jej fragmenty podawać autora lub źródło pliku, co czynię zawsze kiedy wykorzystuję jako wzór czyjąś pracę. Uważam, że to uczciwe bo nie przypisuję sobie autorstwa (samego pomysłu, wizji) danej grafiki a tylko autorstwo wersji elektronicznej. W końcu musiałem włożyć w to sporo wysiłku i czasu, bo swoje wszystkie grafiki tworzę rysując każdą od podstaw. Nigdy nie wykorzystuję do wektoryzacji żadnych programów trasujących grafiki rastrowe. Spróbuj porozmawiać z WarXem, bo to właśnie z nim poczyniliśmy takie ustalenia.

W drugiej sprawie niewiele mogę teraz pomóc, ponieważ od roku mam poważne problemy ze zdrowiem, więc różnie bywa z siłami i z czasem. Jestem po dwóch radioterapiach, więc nękają mnie objawy choroby popromiennej. W najbliższym czasie czeka mnie sporo badań poza miejscem zamieszkania, więc sporo wyjazdów. Spróbuję jednak coś z tego wyciągnąć, choć przyznam, że nie będzie to łatwe i nie ręczę za efekty. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 20:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nie przejmuj się moją chorobą. Mnie to dobrze robi, bo mogę robić to, co lubię i jeśli tylko ból nie dokucza zbyt mocno, to te grafiki dają mi sporo przyjemności. Mam w związku z tym jeszcze jedną sprawę. Szukam dobrej jakości grafiki lub zdjęcia herbu Komprachcic. Sam herb jest dość czytelny i mam już cały zrobiony, ale jest drobne "ale". Chodzi o grafiki w małych tarczach herbowych umieszczonych na dole herbu. Jest ich w sumie 10, z czego pierwsza jest pusta, brakuje mi drugiej od lewej, siódmej i ostatniej. Gdybyś natknął się na coś na ten temat byłoby świetnie. Rozmawiałem o tym z Poznaniakiem ale nie był w stanie mi pomóc. Pisałem dwukrotnie do urzędu gminy ale bez odzewu. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tak, zgadza się i pozostałe graficzki mam już zrobione. Są maleńkie ale świetnie wyglądają, Właśnie pozbierałem wszystkie stare herby (pieczęcie) ale tych trzech ani znaleźć, ani domyślić się co zawierają, nie mogę. Szukam tego już ponad rok ale z marnym skutkiem. Próbowałem nawet na jakichś forach znaleźć kogoś z Komprachcic ale tez nie wyszło. Pewnie zamieszczę ten herb bez tych trzech obrazków, może wtedy ktoś to zobaczy i problem się rozwiąże. Dzięki, na dzisiaj kończę i idę spać, bo już pleców nie czuję. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dzierżoniów

Witaj. Dzisiaj w nocy załadowałem nową wersję herbu gminy Dzierżoniów. Zrobiłem też herb gminy Miłkowice, ponieważ moja wcześniejsza wersja była nieco inna i z rozpędu zrobiłem jego drugą wersję. Jak widzisz nie lubię zwlekać i jeśli czegoś się podejmuję, staram się zrobić to najszybciej jak się da. Denerwują mnie szablony {{WWektoryzacji}} wiszące całymi miesiącami. Niektóre grafiki mogłyby być zrobione już dawno, gdyby nie te szablony. I tak nie wiadomo czy w końcu zostaną zrobione, czy ktoś o nich zapomniał. Pozdrawiam Bastianow (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nie widzę problemu, teraz są dwie wersje, obie mogą się przydać. Chyba nie do końca zrozumiałem Twój wpis, wczoraj byłem pod działaniem Technetu (^99mTc), więc mogłem być nieco oszołomiony. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of Wettin kings of Poland.svg

Hi, your coat of arms is wrong. It must wear in left part with swords not in white, but in black and white like within.

Gmina Słaboszów i powiat bialski

Witam i dziękuję za spostrzeżenia. Wysłałem maile do obu urzędów oraz usunąłem herb gminy z artykułu. Teraz pozostaje tylko czekać na odpowiedź. Pozdrawiam i pomyślności w Nowym Roku życzę. Bastianow (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gmina Rogów

Witam. Dziwne to, że herb wisi już od prawie dwóch lat a nie jest jeszcze zatwierdzony. Ponadto taki sam herb wisi na stronie gminy jak i na stronie BIP, czyli zamieszczony tam został za zgodą gminy. Drobiazgowe podejście? Przecież to elementarna uczciwość każe wskazać właściwego autora, ja jestem tylko marnym kopistą. Przypisywanie sobie autorstwa w tym przypadku byłoby skrajnie nieuczciwe. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chrzanów

Witam. Spróbuję, ale to potrwa tym razem. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licencje

Witam. No to masz okazję poinformować tego nowego, że łamie licencje i prawa autorskie, bo znów wycofał mój opis i w dodatku jest obrażony. Co do informacji o autorstwie to już Ci opisałem dość dokładnie w sekcji "Szablon" Twojej dyskusji, czyli kilka sekcji wyżej. Ja podaję autorstwo każdego, nawet niewielkiego, detalu jaki wykorzystuję w swoich grafikach. Czasem ta informacja mieści się w szablonie jak tutaj. W przypadku herbów gailowskich przyzwoitość nakazuje żeby podawać w pierwszej kolejności p. T. Gajla jako autora projektu graficznego, bo takie są fakty. Ja dodaję też jego licencje. W sumie to ja jestem tylko marnym kopistą ale musiałem poświęcić parę godzin na wykonanie wersji wektorowej, co daje mi prawo do przypisania sobie prawo do autorstwa tej wersji. To nie są grafiki robione jakimiś programami do wektoryzacji, tylko są rysowanie kreska po kresce, co kosztowało mnóstwo czasu i energii. Trzy pióra, czy pięć? Nieważne, te pióra (każde z nich) są kopią grafiki p. T. Gajla a ja je narysowałem w wersji wektorowej (elektronicznej), To nie jest przekonwertowanie ale rysunek od podstaw. Czyli jeśli ktoś wykorzystuje nawet jedno powinien wspomnieć, że jest pióro autorstwa Gajla a w wersji wektorowej moje. W przypadku herbu Tarnawa jest sytuacja, gdzie użytkownik, który przypisuje sobie autorstwo, nie ma w nim ani jednej własnej kreski. Cała grafika jest składanką moich elementów, bo tarcza, hełm, korona, labry są w szablonie, z którego on nie korzystał, bo łatwiej było wykorzystać gotową całą grafikę, np. herb Ostoja, w której ponadto jest gotowy klejnot (pióra). Godło natomiast jest elementem wziętym z mojego (niewłaściwego) herbu Tarnawa i jest tylko przeskalowane. Mam zbyt wiele doświadczenia, żeby tego nie poznać. Poza tym w moich grafikach są drobne błędy, o których wiem tylko ja, więc jestem w stanie udowodnić każdy plagiat. Tak więc mój opis mógłby być wzorem dla podobnych składanek. Poza tym dobry przykład przysłał mi Masur tutaj. Uważam, ze jest to uczciwe i przede wszystkim zgodne z licencją CC. Więc, jeśli bierzesz jakikolwiek gotowy element z czyjejś grafiki, to podaj to w źródle podając autora. To elementarna uczciwość, co jak sam wiesz docenił p. T. Gajl. Ja sam przejrzę swoje grafiki i w miarę możliwości pouzupełniam te źródła. W wielu przypadkach nie jestem w stanie określić autora projektu graficznego, więc w takim przypadku podaję źródło (np. strona gminy, czy miasta). W każdym przypadku, w którym rysuję (nigdy nie korzystam z programów do wektoryzacji - traserów) większość lub całą grafikę mam prawo podać siebie jako autora wersji wektorowej (vector version), podając jednak źródło, z którego korzystałem. Przecież to tak niewiele a dzięki temu mam spokojne sumienie. Mogę Ci pomóc w zmianach opisów Twoich grafik skoro tak bardzo nie lubisz tego zajęcia. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 08:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Więc raczej nie próbujmy z nim rozmawiać, bo on już ma wyrobione zdanie i jest przekonany, że to my na niego napadamy a on ma rację. Po raz kolejny zrewertował zmiany Masura i uznaje najprawdopodobniej, że to on jest ofiarą. W kwestii szablonu spróbuję dotrzeć do administratorów żeby mi go na parę minut odbezpieczyli umożliwiając dokonanie zmian. Musisz jednak uzgodnić to z p. Gajlem (podobno masz z ni kontakt) lub skontaktuj mnie z nim. Jak się okazuje to mamy wiele wspólnego, obaj byliśmy włókiennikami, no i chyba łączą nas koty. Jeśli uzgodnimy zakres zmian to wtedy ich dokonanie w szablonie nie powinno być trudne.

Co do opisu Leliwy to chyba nie ma sensu umieszczać miniaturek w szablonie, wystarczą same linki. Poza tym źródło w dwóch językach też jest chyba przesadą a jeśli już to na pewno bez miniaturek. Wydaje mi się, że p. Gajl jest autorem projektu graficznego, czyli pierwowzoru i można by wtedy wypunktować to w formie takiej:

Projekt graficzny – Tadeusz Gajl
Wersja wektorowa
- element, element, element – Xxxxx
- element, element, element – Yyyy
- element, element, element – Zzzz
- element, element i połączenie grafik Qqqq

To w polu "Autor", dodatkowo w polu "Źródło" - Tadeusz Gajl i ewentualnie link (bez miniatur) do grafiki, z której pochodzi większa część lub wszystkie elementy. Jako licencję podajemy wtedy tylko szablon gajlowski i nic więcej (muszę to poprawić u siebie). To oczywiście moje zdanie ale możesz zapytać jeszcze kogoś lub zobacz jak to robią inni "starzy" graficy. Oni na ogół robią to bardzo solidnie. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opis w Leliwie pozwoliłem sobie zmodyfikować i wydaje mi się, że jest bardziej przejrzysty. Zobacz i jeśli uznasz, że nie jest dobrze anuluj moją edycję. I przy okazji jeszcze jedno ten herb też jest autorstwa p. Gajla. Bastianow (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutnie się zgadzam, że ta licencja nie bardzo ma sens i ja stosowałem trochę asekurancko, ale również rozwiązuje ona problem licencji za jednym zamachem, bo udostępniam grafikę na dokładnie tej samej licencji co autor projektu graficznego. Przecież możemy zamieszczać wektory 150 x 150 px ale to niczego nie zmieni, bo każdy może sobie z tego zrobić dowolnie dużą grafikę bez utraty jakości. Możemy się umówić, że to ograniczenie dotyczy tylko zastosowań tych grafik pobranych z Wikipedii, w druku, dekoracjach, reklamach itp. Możemy o tym dyskutować, możemy w to włączyć najbardziej zainteresowanego, czyli p. Gaila, ale nie widzę problemu, to jest do uzgodnienia, tylko musimy, tak jak napisałeś, "wiedzieć czego chcemy". W przypadku rysowania "z głowy" podajemy tylko źródło, nie podając już żadnych autorów, bo jest to Twoja interpretacja danej grafiki. Tworzenie (nie rysowanie) grafiki na podstawie szablonu lub robienie składanki, wymaga podania autorów. Kiedy rysujemy ze skanu "na nakładkę" również musimy podać autora, bo grafiki są wówczas niemal identyczne a często o to właśnie chodzi. Nie pamiętam ile musi być (%) zmian, żeby można było pominąć autora źródła i przypisać sobie autorstwo, czyli takie rysowanie "z głowy" teoretycznie zwalnia z podawania autorów wzorów, tylko należy podać źródło, na którym się bazowało. A tak przy okazji, nowy dostał blok na tydzień. Bastianow (talk) 19:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zgadzam się z większością Twoich sugestii, zgadzam się również na te "negocjacje" ale tutaj mała uwaga. Nie możesz mi podać jego adresu mailowego zanim nie uzyskasz na to jego zgody. I jeszcze jedno. Zróbmy to może jutro, ponieważ dzisiaj jestem już mocno zmęczony i niezbyt jasne mam myśli. Życie z rakiem nie jest łatwe a jeszcze w dodatku parę godzin za kierownicą w taką pogodę... Odłóżmy to zatem do jutra. Bastianow (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raczej dajmy p. Gajlowi na razie spokój, tym bardziej, że i ja nie jestem za bardzo w formie. Zbyt częsta korespondencja może być potraktowana jako natręctwo. Przeglądałem dzisiaj ten szablon od środka, zmiany nie będą trudne, poza tym nie jest zabezpieczony. Ja widzę dwie sprawy do zmiany.

zamiast dwukrotnie wymienionej licencji {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} i {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} umiescić jedną {{cc-by-sa-all}} albo jeszcze lepiej podwójną w takim {{self|cc-by-sa-all|GFDL}} lub takim wydaniu {{cc-by-sa-all|GFDL}}. Osobiście uważam, że ostatnia jest najlepsza.
Natomiast w górnym szablonie stworzyć możliwość dodawania nowych wydań w formie parametru, ale to może się okazać za trudne dla wielu użytkowników. Jeśli chodzi o maksymalny rozmiar obrazka można by tylko wyłączyć ten parametr dla wektorów lub osunąć go całkowicie.

Pozdrawiam Bastianow (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raczej nie stoi w sprzeczności ale trzeba by to przedyskutować zarówno z nim jak i z kimś kto zna się lepiej na licencjach i prawie autorskim niż ja. Wszystkie zmiany wewnątrz szablonu nie zmienią jego wywołania, bo nazwa pozostanie ta sama, więc śmiało możesz dodawać obecny szablon. Wszystkie poczynione w nim zmiany pojawią się automatycznie na wszystkich stronach, gdzie był wykorzystany. Ja też widzę takie ograniczenie (rozmiar) w publikacjach poza Wikipedią. W końcu Wikipedię można traktować jako medium edukacyjne stąd i restrykcje można byłoby złagodzić. Wydaje mi się, że w odniesieniu do takich mediów (podręczniki) stosuje się nieco inne kryteria ochrony praw autorskich. Przepraszam ale nie czuję się najlepiej, dlatego po prostu musiałem na jakiś czas odejść od komputera. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 16:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeszcze jedno. Sprawa sprzeczności między licencją a ograniczeniem stawianym w szablonie p. Gajla. To cytat z licencji cc-by-sa-all: "uznanie autorstwa - Utwór należy oznaczyć w sposób określony przez Twórcę lub Licencjodawcę." Czyli wstawianie szablonu to określony przez Twórcę sposób oznaczania kopii i jednocześnie warunek wykorzystania jego pracy. Bastianow (talk) 17:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hi, I guess that that specific design should came from a "historical" source that someone had vectorised and uploaded. I noticed it first here some years ago [1] but as you see, that file has been moved several times and we don't see the info about the original creator. I will came back to you if found more info about. Good luck, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eureka! [2]. Regards, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tarnawa raz jeszcze

Witaj. Czy o taki krzyż Ci chodziło? Zobacz na podane źródło. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tak, to wersja XIX-wieczna. Jeśli masz zamiar rozbudować ten artykuł to każda wersja się przyda do jego zilustrowania. Mogę się nim pobawić i zrobić kolejne. Poćwiczę rysowanie krzywych przy kolejnych wzorach labrów. To oczywiście żart. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dopisuje sie do tematu - odblokowany mam wreszcie prawo wypowiedzi (byc moze na nieszczescie, jesli nic istotnego nie wniose do dyskusji :) ...

Dziekuje Wam Avalokitesvara i Bastianow za sympatyczna korespondencje z nowicjuszem "na wygnaniu".

Nie bardzo dobrze znam zasady blazonowania po polsku - stad moje pytanie: w zachodnioeuropejskim rysowaniu herbow dodaje sie czesto drugi kolor godla jako dodatkowy element podbicia labr ...glownym podbiciem byloby tu srebro, ale z drobnym dodatkiem zlota z polksiezyca ...??

Avalokitesvara - à propos odmian w stylizacji herbu Tarnawa (widze, ze Cie to interesuje), znalazlem kiedys ciekawe stare rysunki Bistram Wappen Tarnawa.

pozdrawiam --macbulwa (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj, ten drugi kolor podbicia labr - widzialem kilkakrotnie zastosowanie w cieniu/najblizszym otoczeniu helmu ...

Rodzina Bistram - szlachta kurlandzka, ale do dzis znalezc mozna na Litwie ich dwory (nie pamietam dokladnie Bystramowice? - moze kiedys znow spotkam te nazwe)...

Rodzina Bystram herbu Tarnawa i rodzina Bistram, takze Tarnawa - wspolny jedynie herb ? (a moze dodatek "von" zmienia punkt widzenia :) ? Full text of "Miesie?cznik heraldyczny" :

"..Zagadnienie 31.

Jak powstalo nazwisko „Bystram? Czy bylo to imie staropolskie jak n. p. Imbram? Co w takim razie oznaczalo i jak powstala ta koncówka ,,am"? Niemiecka rodzina „B^ stram w swoich monografiach, chociai; jest takze herbu Tarnawa, nie wywodzi sie od polskiej rodziny Bystramów. W Krakowskiem istniala kiedys wies Bystramowice, u Dlugo- sza Bistramowice, parafia Czermin (vide Slo- wnik geogr., dodatek). Sl. K. (Warszawa). ..."

pozdrawiam --Macbulwa|macbulwa (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Post Scriptum: w artykule Tarnawa_(herb_szlachecki) zostal znow zmieniony rysunek herbu - tak jak chciales krzyz jest grecki :) I dostarczylo mi to argumentu do dyskusji - dlaczego od wiekow h.Tarnawa rysowany jest z krzyzem lapowym ? Bo jak widac na obecnym obrazku krzyz grecki jest w polaczeniu z polksiezycem po prostu brzydki (niewywazony, gruby, zle sie pozycjonuje) ...Uwazam, ze zmiana jest dla wizerunku herbu niekorzystna, ale ciekaw jestem Twojej opinii.

"...Tak na dobrą sprawę to nie ma chyba konsensusu, jakie przedstawienia herbu powinniśmy uważać na Wikipedii za "pierwszorzędne". Dlatego wydaje mi się, że przyjęcie propozycji współczesnych badaczy jest najlepszym rozwiązaniem...."

Wspolczesni usiluja stworzyc zunifikowane numeryczne bazy herbow - zwykle jest to mozliwe bez szwanku - herb Tarnawa jest chyba jednym z wyjatkow - graficznie potraktowanie jako zlepku oddzielnych figur geometrycznych sprawia trudnosci ...

"...Kwestia estetyki takiego przedstawienia to zupełnie inna sprawa, która dla mnie ma znaczenie drugorzędne;)..."

Twoje zdanie dotyczace krzyza greckiego najwidoczniej nie jest nowoscia, ale to wlasnie kwestie estetyki powodowaly zapewne rysowanie polksiezyca rogami do gory - bo jako zbior figur geometrycznych polksiezyc komponuje sie dobrze z krzyzem lapowym lub lacinskim - z greckim domaga sie raczej innego ksztaltu tarczy ...lub sie po prostu nie miesci.

pozdrawiam

macbulwa (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pozdrawiam ponownie, czy krzyz grecki w File:POL_COA_Tarnawa_alt1.svg zadowala Twoje potrzeby ? Od strony plastycznej Wikipedysta Steifer jest podobnego co i ja zdania ...pozostaje byc moze problem - krzyz nie jest szeroki jak opisujesz go w uprzedniej korespondencji ...

z powazaniem

--macbulwa (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Królestwo Kongresowe SVG

bonjour, je suis dunkerqueenflandre, pourriez vous s'il vous plait réaliser le blason du Royaume du congrès 1815-1916 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ru/9/99/%D0%A6%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1.png

Merci beaucoup bon week-end--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanck you good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Szablon

Witaj. Jest jeszcze angielska wersja tego szablonu, która wydaje mi się najbardziej odpowiednia do przeróbek. Chodzi o to by rozdzielić ten szablon od licencji. Taki przerobiony szablon (bez licencji) mógłby być wstawiany w polu "źródło". Co do szczegółów musisz nawiązać kontakt z którymś z administratorów na Commons, ja nie czuję się na siłach decydować o tym. Ktoś znów rozgrzebał szablon {{inkscape}}. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 07:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No tak, o tym nie pomyślałem, ja też we wszystkich herbach gajlowskich usunąłem licencje. U mnie nie było tego zbyt wiele, bo poza wykonaniem pierwszych kilku herbów nie specjalizowałem się w nich. Bardziej pociągało mnie robienie czegoś nowego, zamiast powielać raz zrobiony szablon. Jeśli zamierzasz wykorzystać okładkę jako grafikę w szablonie, to uważaj, bo możesz spotkać się z zarzutem plagiatu. Tę okładkę ktoś projektował i na pewno prawa autorskie są zastrzeżone. Może się okazać, ze taka gruntowna przeróbka tego szablonu pociągnie za sobą uzyskanie kilku zezwoleń być może na OTRS. Powodzenia życzę. Bastianow (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesz, ja po prostu robię tylko wektorowe wersje tego co już jest w Wikipedii w wersji rastrowej. Po prostu zamieniam pliki. Przy moim kręgosłupie nie za bardzo mam siły na siedzenie i szukanie wersji najnowszych. Dzięki zatem za linki, postaram się to poprawić. Jeśli autorem okładki jest również p. Gajl to wystarczy że skan opiszesz podobnie jak herby, podając jego autorstwo, nie musisz niczego obcinać. Bastianow (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jakoś to przeżyję, mam nadzieję. A te wersje poprawię jeszcze dzisiaj, ale nieco później. Bastianow (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jak widzisz to? Bastianow (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tak, wiem, ale ja to zrobiłem celowo. Nic trudnego żeby to zmienić. Piszesz, że ładny ten szablon. Zgadzam się, mnie też się on podoba ale kosztowało mnie to cały dzień pracy a potem jeszcze rozmowa z autorem (herbowny) samej grafiki, który zarzucił mi plagiat. Po dokładnym wskazaniu, że jest podany jako pierwszoplanowy autor zaakceptował te licencje. Nawet robiłem mu kilka herbów na bazie tego szablonu. Chodziło o wersje elektroniczne. Przed chwilą załadowałem herb Kopacz zrobiony na tym szablonie. Bastianow (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ten szablon jest dość trudny i w stosowaniu przez innych mogą się zdarzać różne dziwne przekłamania. Na temat tych ograniczeń 150 x 150 już była dyskusja przy okazji głosowania wyróżnienia dla mojej Ostoi i wtedy nie zostało rozstrzygnięte co z tym zrobić. No, sam jestem ciekaw wyniku tych pertraktacji. W razie czego przerobimy wszystkie na inny szablon. Mogę zrobić jeszcze parę, Myslę nawet o własnym, nie ściąganym z innych. Będziemy się powoływać jedynie na herbarz, co chyba nie leży w interesie samego autora. Powodzenia. Bastianow (talk) 19:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Rzuć proszę okiem na to, bo coś się tu nie zgadza. Bastianow (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Co do opisu, zgadzam się, że powinien być zmieniony. Jednak licencje wpisuję tak celowo. Wyświetla się inaczej ale dobrze, po prostu są to połączone licencje w jednym szablonie. Jest to licencja Cc-by-sa z uznaniem autorstwa GFDL, więc wszystko jest w porządku. Podobnie ten czerwony kolor występuje w każdym herbie. To element hełmu nie labry, takie założenie zrobiłem rysując go. Wiedziałem że ze stosowaniem tego szablonu będą kłopoty, bo są tu pewne subtelne możliwości zmian, ale trzeba mieć wyczucie. Obejrzyj i porównaj kilka moich herbów to zauważysz te modyfikacje. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 20:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Herby

Witaj. W sprawie odmian herbu Zawadzki, skontaktuj się proszę Wikipedystą Generosus, to dla niego robiłem te herby już dość dawno temu i dopiero teraz zdecydowałem się załadować je na Commons. Takie podał mi wzory z takimi właśnie opisami. To jego przyjaciel jest autorem tej grafiki, którą obecnie wykorzystuję i to z nim wymieniałem korespondencję na temat użycia jej w Wikipedii. To również heraldyk, więc może nawiążecie owocną współpracę. Być może coś pomyliłem, więc może z nim wyjaśnisz wątpliwości. O rozbudowie faktycznie musisz rozmawiać z kimś innym. Przy okazji drobna rada. Dzisiaj szukałem hełmów i chciałem wykorzystać jeden (boczne) z Twoich. Okazało się, że używasz za dużo punktów kontrolnych. To problem, bo wtedy trudno uzyskać płynność krzywych a poza tym plik staje się "cięższy". Ja używam minimalnej liczby punktów, np. okrąg opieram na trzech punktach nie na czterech, a jeśli nie musi być idealny to nawet tylko na dwóch, poza tym wszystkie punkty na krzywiznach nie mogą być ostre, bo wtedy na krzywych pojawiają się ostre załamania. Tak więc musiałem całą grafikę stworzyć niejako od nowa. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zrobione. Przyznam, że o tym nie pomyślałem. A co do klejnotu, to nieco utrudnia zadanie. Mam ochotę wykonać grafikę trójwymiarową, którą można obracać pod dowolnym kątem i dopiero na jej podstawie robić wektory, tylko to ponad trzykrotnie więcej pracy. Dzięki za uwagę. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Załadowałem hełm po małych modyfikacjach. Podsunąłeś mi pewien pomysł. Zacznę robić elementy stosowane w herbach (hełmy, labry, pióropusze, korony w wersji wektorowej, w taki sposób żeby dowolnie wybrane elementy dały się bez trudu poskładać. Nawet założyłem sobie taką sekcję w jednej ze swoich galerii. Może wtedy ktoś wykorzystując te elementy przypomni sobie o podaniu autora. Co prawda ograniczy to inwencję przyszłych "autorów" ale to niewielki problem. Przecież i teraz wszyscy wykorzystują te gotowe elementy dając licencję "self". Nikt nie martwi się tym, że narysował czasem tylko kilka prostych kresek. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hełm świetny, korona również, ale labry do poprawki a pióropusz nadal pozostał gajlowski. Labry mają tę wadę, ze przejścia między stronami są nienaturalne, tworzą jakby ostre załamania, postaram się to poprawić, zobaczysz o co chodzi. Po poprawkach muszę nadpisać Twój plik (???). Nie wiem tylko kiedy to zrobię, ponieważ w najbliższym czasie czekają mnie znów wyjazdy na kolejne badania a chciałem dokończyć jeszcze swoich parę prac. A pomysł już dawno kiełkował, tyle tylko, że choroba wyłączyła mnie nieco z tych prac i przez pewien czas w ogóle nic nie robiłem. i jeszcze jedno. Zmniejsz nieco koronę i pióropusz, bo są nieco nieproporcjonalne. Spróbuj "ukoronować" sam hełm, wtedy łatwiej będzie Ci dobrać proporcje. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Oczywiście, jest znacznie lepiej. Pokusiłem się i ja na mowy hełm. Zobacz łańcuch... Jest to wzorowane na herbach Ostrowskiego. Pozwoliłem sobie "pożyczyć" Twoją koronę. Oczywiście informuje o tym w opisie. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wydaje mi się, że te prześwity to sprawa zupełnie nieistotna, ale to tylko moje zdanie. Zobacz przy okazji mój wpis tutaj. Zauważyłem to jucz dość dawno ale myślałem ze zapis z formacie czystym to eliminuje. Okazało się jednak, ze nie. Bastianow (talk) 11:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Już je widziałem i domyśliłem się powodów dla których ten herb ładowany był kilkakrotnie. Zdecydowanie lepsze niż w wersji pierwotnej. \właściwie są już dobre ale proponuję popracować jeszcze nad przechodzeniem jednej strony w drugą i finezją krzywizn. Ja też uważam, że robienie czegoś nowego od początku jest trochę trudne ze względu na to, że już wszystko wymyślono. Ja tez zrobiłem kilka nowych wzorów, które opierają się na starych herbach, często są zlepkiem kilku elementów, lub rozwinięciem jakichś niewielkich form. Tak powstały te i te labry. Tak w sumie jest łatwiej. Ostatnio musiałem nieco zwolnić bo znów miałem serię różnych badań co wiązało się również z wyjazdami. Chyba widziałeś ostatni mój herb. Wykorzystałem w nim pracę Sodacana ale nie oznaczało to wcale mniej pracy. Zamiana wszystkich kolorów, modyfikowanie paru warstw, całkowite usunięcie kilku dało całkiem dobry efekt i mocno odchudziło płaszcz. Poza tym mam obsesję związaną ze zmniejszaniem liczby punktów, co oczywiście zmienia też nieco kształt. Mam przy tym satysfakcję, że nie korzystam bezceremonialnie z czyjejś pracy i modyfikując ją wkładam w to sporo własnej. Muszę przyznać, ze te jego prace są świetne, ale chyba robione przez jakiś tracer. Muszę jeszcze popracować nad postaciami ludzi i nieco je odchudzić. Można je będzie wykorzystać w wielu pracach. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za miłe słowa, co do wzorów daję Ci wolną rękę. Wiesz, Wikipedia mocno mnie już zmęczyła i nie chce mi się tam nic robić. Atmosfera stała się tam dość nieznośna, wolę zdecydowanie grzebać sobie przy grafikach i nie widzieć tych czczych dyskusji, cwaniactwa i dziwacznej manii wstawiania szablonu "źródła". Rozumiem, że ma on sens w wielu przypadkach ale wstawianie tego szablonu przy opisie technologii, czy praw fizycznych to już lekka przesada. Taki szablon w tym przypadku wstawia ktoś kto nie ma elementarnej wiedzy ogólnej. Rzadko tam zaglądam i tylko czasem zrobię jakiś revert po wandalu, no pilnuję swoich paru artykułów. Te wzory też mi się podobają ale ciągle je jeszcze poprawiam. Zauważ, że jest to zwielokrotnienie jednego motywu. Czasem jest lekko obrócony, czasem nieco przeskalowany a czasem lekko zmodyfikowany. Ale efekt końcowy wyszedł niezły. Wzór oczywiście zaczerpnąłem z Ostrowskiego, choć trudno będzie znaleźć duże podobieństwo. W Twoich labrach też można dodać to tzw. żyłkowanie liści. Sporo zyskają na tym drobnym zabiegu. Niemal w każdym herbie coś niewielkiego zmieniam. Podobnie zadowolony jestem z tego hełmu, choć ciągle czegoś mi w nim brakuje. Co do postaci Sodacana można je mocno odchudzić usuwając kilka warstw, które są w rysunku zupełnie niewidoczne i czyszcząc nadmiar punktów. Dlatego sądzę, że te grafiki są robione przez jakiś tracer, bo zawierają zbędne warstwy i nadmiar punktów. Postaram się to zrobić ale nieco później. W ostatnim herbie wstawiłem je bez żadnej obróbki, czyszczeniu poddałem tylko płaszcz ale grafika straciła prawie 3/4 objętości. Bastianow (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zmieniłem wyrównywanie w szablonie {{Inkscape}} bo to centralne wyrównywanie wyglądało głupio. Teraz można w szablonie wpisać źródła i wszystko wygląda przyzwoicie. Ciekaw jestem czy znów ktoś nie wpadnie na pomysł żeby to upiększyć. Bastianow (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Labry w porządku, zobacz jak dodanie paru kresek poprawia wygląd, ale czy nie lepszy byłby hełm prosty. Ten półprofil łamie porządek, tak mi się wydaje. Szablon od początku miał wyrównywanie do lewej, aż komuś przestały się podobać kolor i wyrównywanie. Mam drobną prośbę. Zobacz ten herb, bo zrobiłem go tylko w oparciu o opis. Sprawdź czy czegoś nie namieszałem. Miłego wieczoru. Bastianow (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zgoda, że jest u Ostrowskiego ale czarno-biały. Podparłem się szrafowaniem ale nie miałem pełnej pewności dlatego prosiłem o sprawdzenie. Z tym kierunkiem hełmu i klejnotu to chyba nie wszyscy tego przestrzegają, bo u Gajla tego nie zauważyłem. Dzięki za pomoc. Bastianow (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zrobione. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zgoda...

Witaj. Przypadkiem znalazłem taką stronę. Ciekaw jestem, czy ten wzór został wykorzystany za zgodą p. Gajla a sądzę, że robione są również inne. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wielkie Księstwo

Czekam, aż herb poddasz pod głosowanie na pl-wiki. Gratuluję (choć jestem laikiem) Albertus teolog (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Nałęcz Bielski.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File:POL COA Półkozic Bielski.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File:POL COA Jastrzebiec Bielski.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

West prussia

Hello, you drew the coat of arms of Grand Duchy of Poznań is beautiful, could you please draw the West Prussia is virtually identical thank you very much good day thank you in advance--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

ok, thank you good evening--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Grand Coat of Arms of Grand Duchy of Poznań.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Coat of Arms of Grand Duchy of Poznań.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kubin

Witam. Nie bardzo rozumiem co masz na myśli mówiąc o opisie herbu. Jest zrobiony w oparciu o wzór Gajla. U Ostrowskiego jest zresztą tak samo a za pomyłkę przepraszam, już poprawiłem. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 23:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grerat Coat of Arms of Congress Poland

HELLO, sorry to bother you do not think that this coat of arms is prettier than this one good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello is it true you are right eagle modern Russia good luck and thank you for your work heartily--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem

Witam. Moim zdaniem musisz popracować nad orłem. Ta jedna figura ma ponad 8 MB a powtarza się wielokrotnie, Razem wszystkie mają ok 18 MB. Zdjąłem ten plik i po przejrzeniu widzę tylko takie wyjście. Orła musisz uprościć (zmniejszyć liczbę punktów), przynajmniej tego, który jest wielokrotnie wykorzystany. Pliki mogą mieć do 10 MB ale pliki rastrowe. Wieloelementowe pliki wektorowe muzą być renderowane do bitmapy i z tym prawdopodobnie nie radzą sobie serwery. Ja mam bardzo szybki komputer ale z tym plikiem widać wyraźnie zwalnianie pracy. Powodzenia. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zgadza się, tyle tylko, że wówczas obiekty są z sobą ściśle powiązane i operacja ma jednym powoduje identyczne zmiany w klonach. To oczywiście czasem jest bardzo przydatne. Funkcja ta ma zastosowanie w takim przypadku kiedy trzeba rozmnożyć gotowy już obiekt (jak ten orzeł). No to cieszę się, ze się udało. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grerat Coat of Arms of Congress Poland

hello, congratulation, what a beautiful job, it's great good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have asked the coat of arms of West Prussia, but it is not urgent in place could you please make the Grand Duchy of Finland in advance thank you good afternoon--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, you're right, you should use the crown of the image the Greater coat of arms of the Russian empire, I had not seen good evening and thank you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That superb, thank you again--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbarz polski by Tadeusz Gajl - front page.jpg

To napewno nie jest wolne. Chocby dlatego, ze prawa naleza tez do wydawcy, a i nawet gdy czesci skladowe sa wolne, to ich miks moze wnosic dodatkowe znamiona oryginalnosci, stad pochodna taka wolna byc nie musi. Zalatwiles, swoja droga, zgody od Gajla - ktore by nie budzily zastrzezen? Masur (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tarnawa - odmiany

Witaj. Herby gotowe: Petrykowski, Łopatacki, Bystram. W mojej galerii jest chyba 6 odmian. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poprawione ale chyba to już zauważyłeś. To tak bardzo istotne? Ja nawet nie zwróciłem na to uwagi. Bastianow (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Newlin

Witam. Jest. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 10:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ksiestwo warszawskie

czy oistniała flaga ksiestwa warszawskiego? zamierzam wykorzystac ją w infoboxie Jednostki wojskowe. Jesli nie - wykorzystam "Twój" herb--keriM (talk) 20:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

coat of arms of kingdom of Napoli

hello, I hope you are well I need once more your talent please do I need to shield the Kingdom of Naples

I can give you sources if you want thank you in advance good day

(it's not complete it's lacks the checkered red and white under the crown)

(without medal)

the horse is black For sirens can you make them in color please do as http://armorial-du-souvenir.fr/archives/img/muratroi.PNG

Again thank you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you first of all, the problem is that there were two King of Naples under Napoleon Joseph (the picture I gave you) and Joachim Murat I can give you the source, but they are not always just looking for J. Murat best are:

http://www.heraldique-europeenne.org/Accueil.htm Section OCCID Mediterranean. Kingdom of Naples and the Two Sicilies

http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://armorial-du-souvenir.fr/archives/img/muratroi.PNG&imgrefurl=http://armorial-du-souvenir.fr/archives/archives.html&usg=__0QoPeSvXI_HyAgodDt-mocJRqbk=&h=841&w=1190&sz=577&hl=fr&start=10&tbnid=9Gz_4rTDaLXW-M:&tbnh=106&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dblason%2BJOACHIM%2BMURAT%26hl%3Dfr%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1

Thank you again good evening--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hope you are well, if the coat of arms is too difficult, could you please make these few changes, which I will be very useful for the coat of arms for the House of Bonaparte.

you could, put the eagle and the dolphin Sodocan please do instead

and reduce the horn of plenty because I think it hides the crown of please do

could you do the same for Murat (the eagle) please do thank you

Thank you again for your help, good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 05:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much good night and thank you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I do not know what to say .... so beautiful thank you so much it really Great work again thank you good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I hope you are well, I just noticed something looking at this larger picture I think the mermaid's tail is green and scaly what do you thank you good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Stemma_Regno_di_Napoli_Giuseppe_Bonaparte.jpg

hello, I hope you're well, you're right it's gray because I have another source and the tail is gray looks good day thank you in advance--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://empire.histofig.com/IMG/jpg/naples09.jpg&imgrefurl=http://empire.histofig.com/1806-1810,785.html&usg=__S27pvW8JpwQ_495YojJodNklcnM=&h=880&w=1024&sz=277&hl=fr&start=23&zoom=1&tbnid=R1lzdQ4oDX42eM:&tbnh=129&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddrapeau%2Broyaume%2Bde%2BNaples%26start%3D20%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dfr%26sa%3DN%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1

coat of arms of kingdom of Napoli two

Hello, I hope you are well, thank you again for the coat of arms of the Kingdom of Naples, can I ask you one last service please.http://armorial-du-souvenir.fr/archives/img/muratroi.PNG

I would need to complete the armorial successor of Joseph Bonaparte and Joachim Murat, the blazon does not differ much from the preceding.

You can take the one you have drawn only the exchange center has two anchor watch and the legion of honor, against the two rings have disappeared to make room for a helmet. and the right has a siren horn of plenty.

For the sceptres

To the left is the scepter of triquestre complexion and left the horse

The only problem is the order of the two Sicilies, the only image I have is the following http://www.musee-legiondhonneur.fr/mlh/galerie/1024/249_collier-murat-detail.jpg

Thank you for your help once more after we had finished.

Again thank you good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you first of all, thank you take over the second coat of arms. The only problem is that the central shield is not correct according to the information and research from our Italian friend GJo is that there which is correct for Joseph Bonaparte for Joachim Murat. But with this necklace

Another thank you for your help good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello, our Italian friend gave me an example, it can be will help you a little thank you again for your help good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC) http://cid-16c9f4f69987240b.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Stemma%5E_Gioacchino%5E_Murat%5E_2.jpg#[reply]

File:Grandes_armes_du_Royaume_de_Naples2.svg

Were the "little corrections" errors introduced by me / my optimisation process or were the already present? If the latter, I might re-optimise. Jarry1250 (talk) 11:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I hope you're well, it's wonderful what a great job I'm super happy thank you again you have talent

again thank you good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

coat of arms of kingdom of Napoli

Hey, I hope you're well, you made some time ago the arms of Joseph Bonaparte , could you give me the coat of arms without the simple exterior decorations please do

and could you make the small arms of Joseph Bonaparte the coat of arms are already realized , it is simply the sirens and the crown looks http://ventesuroffres.free.fr/images/monnaies/vso/v05/v05_1623.jpg

Thank you in advance good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I need quite the shiel alone without the ornaments and thank you for the second it is perfect ... as always it is beautiful

The arms is almost finished thanks to you good Sunday--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 07:22, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Clary Outdoor ornaments

hello i hope you're well, could you please put the exterior ornamentation of these two coats if you like

mantle and crown only

and the mantle only and this crown

Once again thank you very much good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for these coats of arms is superb as always ... I ask you one last thing to complete the King and Queen of Spain please.

could you change the ring and put the medal and those below and if you could get the same yellow for scepters please do

Again thank you for your work good Sunday to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello and thank you ... it's beautiful as always a good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taczała

Witam. Masz obie wersje: poprawioną i nową. Bastianow (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jérôme Bonaparte

Hello, I hope you're well, my friend Spedona can not finish the coat of arms of Jerome Bonaparte what he can not do is the grouping of medals could you please take thee and me to change the crown thank you.

or http://www.photo.rmn.fr/LowRes2/TR1/Q8OZ4U/07-529775.jpg

Thank you again good day to --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening I hope you are well, a big thank you is great, your work is always beautiful

Thank you for your help good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Avalokitesvara, I’ve seen you finished the coat of arms of Jerome Bonaparte – good job! But, sorry there’s a little error in left coat of arms, that symbolize the Hessian Countries. The star above (Counts of Ziegenhain) has six edges and they are peaker, the stars on the right side (Counts of Nidda) have eight edges and are also peaky. The panels are half black and half yellow. I give you an example beneath as the coat of arms of house of Hesse-Kassel. I hope you can correct this errors. I wish you all the best for X-mas and a Happy New Year. Yours sincerly Ziegelbrenner (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Argent on argent

Were some Polish coats of arms really white-on-white? AnonMoos (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it might be nice to create a category like Category:Coats of arms with unknown tinctures to avoid confusion... AnonMoos (talk) 12:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Armorial de la Maison Bonaparte

hello, i hope you're well, I just returned from a long wikibreak (since November 24 last).

could you please do three things for me

1) could you remove the scepters on this one

2) you could remove the crown and replace it with this on

3)Could you do the little small coat of arms of Joachim Murat http://napoleon-monuments.eu/Napoleon1er/images/MuratArmoiries.jpg

starting on the big coat of arms that you have made

Thank you in advance for your help Good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and first of all thank you very much, the arms of J. Murat is magnificent.

I have a small thing to ask you for the coat of arms hortense could you please both interiors as they were please.

and the shield of C. Wurtemberg could you reduce a little the 2 coats interior.

Thank you again for your help Good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening and thank you again for your help, good evening to you thank you has soon --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armorial des Princes de l'Empire et des Ducs de l'Empire

hello, i hope you're well, I still need you please.

From this coat of arms could you please do those two and

From these two coat of arms could you please do this one (There is an error on this one there are seven, not five feathers) and this coat of arms is and could you do me a copy with the green mantle for dukes Italian if you like

A thousand times thank you again for your help my friend

Good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armorial des Princes de l'Empire et des Ducs de l'Empire 2

Good evening, I hope you're well, will I like the coat of arms of Count of the French Empire and Count of the Kingdom of Italy (they are identical blue and green for France to Italy)

could you please do this one (There is an error on this one there are seven, not five feathers) and this coat of arms is and could you do me a copy with the green mantle for dukes Italian if you like

Thank you very much good evening to you --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 21:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I hope you are well, thank you for the shield but there's a small error, please do look at the cap http://erwan.gil.free.fr/modules/freepages/outils/duc-empire.gif

could you do me a copy with the green jacket if you like the Dukes of Italy

thank you in advance good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me I forgot to tell you that there is no Legion of Honour on the crest thank you again good day to you --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you that's fine, I'll explain why the coat of arms is empty it is a model, like on this page http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9raldique_napol%C3%A9onienne

For the green mantle, there are only five feathers on cap

Thank you again good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you very much for the coat of arms of italy, then I ask one more thing please.

here is the coat of arms of the Prince Grand Dignitaries , could you repeat this model with two coats.

Good evening thank you in advance--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you is fine as always, happy Sunday to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Józef ks Poniatowski

hello, could you tell me if pleases you which of these two is correct coat of arms for Marshal Józef ks Poniatowski

or http://www.armorial-du-souvenir.fr/archives/img/marechaux/poniatowski.PNG

Thank you for your information a good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Polish_Crown.svg

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Polish_Crown.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Kpalion^(talk) 19:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malo les bains

hello, I hope you are well, our friend began Adelbrecht the coat of arms of my city (Malo les Bains) unfortunately he can not finish the exterior ornaments could you please try to finish them. File:Blason malo les bains.PNG

for the banner should use this if you like blue

Thank you again for your help Good day to you

hello, excuse me I forgot to sign my demand good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 03:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO AND THANK YOU C IS BEAUTIFUL THEN I NEED A LAST THING YOU LIKE S IT COULD YOU CHANGE THE LION TO THE SAME PLACE YOU LIKE IT S

HAND ON THE ORNAMENTS THAT YOU JUST DO (sides, bottom and top) are money (grey).

THANK YOU GOOD DAY GOOD DAY--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes it is, I wanted to tell you, look at the version of the shield in black and white, the dark areas are yellow and bright areas are gray thank you again--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you and thank you is wonderful, I'm happy, large arms of my cities are doing.

Good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

brugge

Hello, I hope you are, could you please make a coat of arms, the coat of arms of the city of Brugge : , this lion could you use this File:European Lion Supporter (Or).svg

thank you in advance good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, excuse me, I was wondering if you had forgotten my request of August 4 thank you again good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC) hello, no problem, good day to you thank you again--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are well, thank you for the coat of arms, but there would be little things to correct please.

1) for the lion and the banner is not purple but blue

2) In the coat of arms is a white band, a red band,

3) For the gold (yellow) I will like you if you want this one ulises File:Middle CoA of the Netherlands.svg

4) To the lions you could use this one File:European Lion Supporter (Or).svg

5) for the banner can you it can be used this one in blue and white File:Middle CoA of the Netherlands.svg

Thank you once more, excuse me, I know you soon.

Good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ok I understand, but it can work for the central lion thank you again--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello, there is no official representation, to show the small coat of arms was made

Good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just saw the coat of arms, great as always, thank you again for your help good night to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eugène de Beauharnais

Hello, I hope you are well, thank you again for the coat of arms Brugge.

I need your help (again) for the different coats of arms of Eugene de Beauharnais please.

Here are the simple coat of Eugene de Beauharnais and could you please put the same blue as on the crest of Bernadotte to be coherence in the armorial

Could you repeat please! Ornaments with this coat for coat , , this crown and

and make a version of the Viceroy of Italy , taking the mantle to the green with small white roses with (exemple green and rose , the crown , and the Legion of Honor

Thank you very much for your help once more good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you it's perfect as always a good day to you-- User:Dunkerqueenflandre|Dunkerqueenflandre]] (talk) 13:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I had not seen it lacked the coat of arms but also with the imperial mantle (red and bees) I need both French and iltalienne

Hello, I hope you are well, thank you so it's perfect I have a last request to ask you:

there would be little change to make in your coat of arms please :

Could you please! To the same crown as the coat of arms of Murat

Coat of arms for the central dolphin returned to the right and silver

could not you make the central shield as the shield of our friend Heralder

Thank you again for your help--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please reduce the size of the crown on

thank you

and I if you will the eagle colors and the blue background colors as the coat of arms of Heralder

Thank you very much good afternoon--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, this is beautiful thank you, thank you very much

I could ask you two things please

to the same ring (red cap) to your coat of arms

And you could be the wife of Murat as Julie Clary (same coat, same crown) but with two coats

and

Thank you again for your help good day cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is beautiful as always ... but the name of the coat of arms is not Julie Clary but Caroline Murat Bonaparte.

1) It was a error for the first (red cap crown) I m sorry.

As you can against the same person, when her husband was Grand Duke of Grand Duke of Berg and Cleves

with this coat of arms and this crown and imperial mantle please thanck you in advance--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, please! could use this new imperial mantle thank you in advance good afternoon--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 13:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joachim Murat

Hello, I hope you are well, I have a big error on the crest of Joachim Murat , he had not the Legion of Honor, but the Grand Cross of the Legion of Honour could you make the change s' Do you like because there's really a big error.

Can you use this great cross please ,

Our friend Nanin 7 has make his successor , may be you could take the same base.

Thank you for your help again excuse me for this work--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is beautiful ... as always, thank you again for all the help that you can give me.

Thank you again good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello, it was not important for now could you please repeat these coats of arms with the new coat and new crown please

with this eagle, the coat and the crown

The same goes for the Empress Eugenie please

Good day to you --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, first of all thank you for the two coats are perfect but there would have to change two small things please!

1) Can you please make a copy of this coat of arms and let the version of November 6, our friend Spedonna.

2) you can use for two coats if you like the blue of the coat to standardize the armorial.

Thank you very much for your help--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 21:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you it's perfect good day to you if you have time look at the armorial is perfect thank you thank you thank you again--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

color matching and coats

Good evening excuse me to ask you for help again but I have too much difference in color and coat in the armorial can you help me again please.

I)For all three coats, the color of the cross and the world is like that

For the blue behind the eagle (coat of arms central) that is

II)For these two coats can you please put this mantle and this crown if technically possible and the Legion of Honor

Thank you again for your help good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

..Hello and thank you it's perfect as always, Merry Christmas to you too thank you again for your work good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elisa Bonaparte mother and daughter Elisa Bonaparte

would like us to finish if you will obviously Baciocchi family / Bonaparte please.

For the mother Elisa Bonaparte Grand Duchess of Tuscany :

Can you give me a copy of this file, put the same lion on the shield and the eagle and blue , for the part at the top left (lilies and red ball) to do the same thing on the crest , and finally you can put this all black eagle , the mantle and the crown

For his daughter Napoleone Elisa Baciocchi, princesse de Piombino

Can you give me a copy of this file , put the same Lion that his mother and finish with the central shield with the eagle.

the mantle and the crown

Thank you very much I know it's a lot of work but thanks to you we will complete a major chapter in the armorial thank you again to you good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you goes well, I just saw the shield are two great

Just two little things to please! this one the eagle is upside looks

and you could reduce some of the two coats to as you can against by doing the same to this one

example for the reduction

Thank you again we finished this part thank you to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello, if you have five minutes, I saw that you had done two coats you can put this one File:Grand coat of arms of Élisa Bonaparte (1777-1820).svg

to the right size against it you could go down a little and enlarge as the other

thank you again please! Merry Christmas--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Princess of Leuchtenberg

Hello, I hope you are well ... before the long night of celebrations.

I need your services again please!

1) could you do me the women's coats of arms (without external ornaments) to:File:Grandes armes d'Auguste de Beauharnais.svg

name of fichier : coat of arms of Princess of Leuchtenberg

2) two small creations Josephine de Beauharnais, Vicomtesse de Beauharnais (rounded crest example )

with these two coats of arms ) ; )that crown and the mantle ) ; File:Grandes armes d'Auguste de Beauharnais.svg)

2a) Augusta Amelia of Bavaria , Duchess of Leuchtenberg and Princess of Eichstätt (without external ornaments)

this coat and this one with the crown and the mantle File:Blason Eugène de Beauharnais (1781-1824)2.svg and

Thank you in advance for your help, happy new year, luck and health for 2012--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for a small) this is perfect

for small b) the little ducks are in reverse

for small c) rounded shields so these two shields this mantle, this crown.

File:Blason Eugène de Beauharnais (1781-1824)2.svg and

thank you very much--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wikibreak

Good evening, I just ask you not to complete my application I put in for some time wikibreak Thank you again for your help was soon--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Josephine de Beauharnais, Vicomtesse de Beauharnais.svg

The factual accuracy of this coat of arms or the file name is disputed.

Reason: Pourquoi un bonnet d'azur au dessus de la couronne : Alexandre de Beauharnais n'a jamais été pair de France ? Alexandre de Beauharnais wasn't peer of France : it shouldn't have a "hat" azure over the crown. It should be this crown :

--Jimmy44 (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I return briefly to tell you that Jimmy is right, I'm sorry for this mistake, if you could put against the martlets on the other side please! Thank you again very soon--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're right but for the other coats of arms we had left but good classic that's OK laissonsle coat as you did thank you again to you good day

you can give me the coat of Amelie of Bavaria please!

Thank you again --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 13:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK for me (wtihout the "bue hat"

Français : bonnet d'azur

)--Jimmy44 (talk) 10:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charles de Morny and Lucien-Louis Bonaparte

Hello, I hope you are well, could you please, make creations.

the first large coat of arms of Charles de Morny

I found some renseigments http://www.notrefamille.com/collection-privee/oeuvres/Armoiries+%3A+Armes+du+Duc+de+Morny/XDEI4/1F733D3C-8F0D-48FC-8781-44FCDDE62CB8/92-005024.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_Charles_de_Morny_(1811-1865).svg

for a uniformisation you put utilise this duck :

thank you in advance once more good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it would make the exterior ornaments please!

the only representation that I have exterior ornamentation is on his grave

and this drawing http://www.notrefamille.com/collection-privee/oeuvres/Armoiries+%3A+Armes+du+Duc+de+Morny/XDEI4/1F733D3C-8F0D-48FC-8781-44FCDDE62CB8/92-005024.jpg

I have nothing more, but I'll try again if you want

thank you --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL gmina Białowieża COA.svg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Amelia of Bavaria

Hello again, I saw that you've done the arms Amelia, on the crest of the left there is no central shield with the crown, the shield will be central to two years after the death of Auguste de Beauharnais to his son Auguste de Beuaharnais by King Ludwig I of Bavaria (his grandfather)

thank you again--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I couldn't help but notice your amazing SVG skills. I have a special request if you're willing to accept it. Would you be willing to make an SVG for Commons of this image? I can give you all the information you need, such as all the words (some of them are very small, so kinda hard to make out), and a description of the elements. If you accept, please let me know (I will watch your page for a reply), and I would be very very thankful. Fry1989 ^eh? 22:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I will of course wait while you complete your other requests. When you are ready, let me know, and I will provide you with all the information you need. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

standardization of the armorial

Hello, I hope you are well, first of all, congratulations and thank you for the coat of arms Amelia it's really beautiful.

Our friend Sanglier T just tell me that he had almost completed the image of Charles de Morny.

Thank you in advance good day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anatof Demidoff and Mathilde Bonaparte

Hello, I hope you are well, for once I need your help please! but for a true creation of the coat of arms Anatol Demidoff. should this great image.

but also that of his wife Mathilde Bonaparte's the same with the eagle and shield Bonaparte below.http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://www.demidoff.org/image003.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.demidoff.org/stemma.htm&usg=__d4H4es7O27qyU8llEYEnm3NVRkA=&h=453&w=498&sz=71&hl=fr&start=72&zoom=1&tbnid=jW0LE0GsO2H9sM:&tbnh=118&tbnw=130&ei=vHAiT5qJJ9HY8QPWiLy4Bw&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dwww.demidoff.org%26start%3D60%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dfr%26sa%3DN%26gbv%3D2%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1

can you operate but holds two coats Coat for Mathilde please :

Thank you in advance.--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, for the mantle they are stars for crowns there is a coronet and a crown of Russian Prince Italian (it was already in Europe at that time ... laughter)

I think I found a watch crown Jpg gives me in Italian and espagol svg

but I find not the Russian crown

I hope it'll be sorry--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for this beautiful coat of arms, I'll put it immediately in the article thank you again good evening--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Désirée Clary

http://www.heraldique.org/search/label/Su%C3%A8de%20%28Rois%20et%20Reines%20de%29

Hello I hope you're okay, could you please make the coat of arms Clary coat of arms Desire her husband is already done as we can have coats of arms uniforms. File:Coat of arms of Charles XIV.svg

I give you also the image of the sister of Desiree Clary (Julie)you've already done as you have the shield as well.

and also could you please do me out the family coat of arms clary lozenge please!

thank you in advance for your help good weekend--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Tarnowski hrabia.svg

Zgłoszono błąd [3] w pliku File:POL COA Tarnowski hrabia.svg: jest literówka w tekście dewizy (jest TENDITE ET ASTRA VIRE, powinno być TENDITE IN ASTRA VIRI). Szybkie googlanie i szczątkowa znajomość łaciny sugerują zasadność zgłoszenia. Rozumiem, że jesteś autorem tej wersji pliku — możesz sprawdzić i poprawić? Pozdrawiam, 83.28.145.236 09:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Świebodzice

Dzięki, za info. Jak tylko opublikują uchwałę zwektoryzuję. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 11:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Raczyński.svg

Please, make a right motto: vitam impEndere vero - exact phrase, see http://pl.wiktionary.org/wiki/vitam_impendere_vero --Arachno ^T 06:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Powiat otwocki

Witaj, masz na myśli tę wersję: http://www.powiat-otwocki.pl/powiat2/pliki/prezentacja/herb_powiatu_otw.jpg ? Nie znalazłem żadnej podstawy prawnej takiej zmiany i dopóki jej formalnie nie uchwalą nie będę poprawiał. Podobnie zrobił powiat legionowski, już jakieś dwa lata temu opracowali nową wersję herbu, którą zamieścili na stronie internetowej ale z formalnym jej przyjęciem czekają do nowelizacji statutu. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zrobione: File:POL Nowa Sarzyna COA (1973-2008).svg. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 14:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Działoszyn

Zrobione: File:POL Działoszyn COA.svg, File:POL Działoszyn flag.svg i File:POL Działoszyn COA (do 2008).svg. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 12:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dać radę pewnie bym dał, ale to chyba poza tym medalem nigdzie nie jest używane. Nie znalazłem żadnej podstawy prawnej. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 14:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mapa powiatu gryfickiego z herbami

A dzięki za news. Właśnie zauważyłem jak Bastian podmieniał flagę w art. pl:Rewal. JDavid (talk) 08:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Jakubowski - odmiana Topora II.svg

maybe, You'll add suppoters like this official? --Arachno ^T 10:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Kongresówki [4]

Tarcza herbowa miała barwę białą, jak widać na słupie granicznym guberni augustowskiej [5], pozdrawiam, Mathiasrex (talk) 10:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL witraż Szynwałd Zofia v. Konigseck.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

File:POL Stronie Śląskie COA.svg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:00, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

COA Kosiński

I check the sources and I find the french transcription of the COA Kosiński here on the french archive : [6] : Ecartelé ; au premier d'azur à trois grenades d'argent, éclatantes et enflammées, de gueules ; au deuxième des barons tirés de l'armée ; au troisième de sable au tube de canon en pal, d'or ; au quatrième d'azur à la forteresse donjonnée de trois tourelles d'or ; sur le tout parti de gueules et d'argent, le gueules à la corne de cerf en pal, d'argent ; l'argent à la corne de buffle en pal, de sable ; pour livrées les couleurs de l'écu. So it's different of my drawing and your drawing but it's the good description, because it's came from the original patent letters of the concession of title. I draw it and send you the result. Best regards Mathieu C. (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Except that the only Kosinski to receive a title of Baron of the Empire is the one I just mentioned! Mathieu C. (talk) 09:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 11/11/1813 the title of Baron was granted to Michel Kosinski, born the 03 november 1776 in Cracovie. And in the register of title granted by the french empire during the period of 1808 to 1815 he is the only Kosinski. This register was published by the french national archive and there is complete. I think your polish author made a mistake and a confusion between two different person. But I sure it's Michel and not Antoni Kosinski. Mathieu C. (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I going to draw the arms to change mine, because the drawing style of Bastianow I not accept by the french heraldic project. So you can continue to use Bastianow style for polish article but not for the french armorial. Mathieu C. (talk) 10:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Result of the drawing :

. Mathieu C. (talk) 10:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do it! Best regards. Mathieu C. (talk) 13:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orzeł Kazimierza Wielkiego

Czy mógłbyś narysować Orła Kazimierza Wielkiego? Najlepiej przedstawiony jest na pieczęci majestatycznej [7] i na Bramie Floriańskiej [8]. Korona, szpony, dziób i przepaska na ogonie i złączenia skrzydeł złote [9] pozdrawiam Mathiasrex (talk) 08:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Myszkowski.svg

Interesting! If You can trnslate from Russian, look http://gerboved.ru/t/january1913.html#3. It's about Wielopolski's arms, hovewer. 2 & 3 parts blasoned as stripped gold & black (like File:Blason famille it Gonzaga01.svg). For me, it would be right. Maybe, honorable T.Gayl was a small unexact?--Arachno ^T 08:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Collar

Hello I hope you are well,

Excuse me to bother you but I am unfortunately stopped in my research because I lack two Swedish collars the arms of Sweden, there has already been 3 on 5.

Could you please do the make, I can complete a large part of the armorial.

The order of the sword :, colors :http://www.arnell.cc/bilder/kmstkso.jpg

Order of Vasa :, colors :

http://www.arnell.cc/bilder/kmstkvo.jpg

Thank you very much good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bibikov & Demidov

HI! In ofiicial blazon that bird names "Турухтан" (TU-RU-KHTAN), it is pl: Batalion (ptak), I think --Arachno ^T 08:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Demidovs - it's more interesteng! it's device for pl:Radiestezja. Demidovs was owners of mines & a steel plants, don't forget! --Arachno ^T 10:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Starovs fess is just golden Latticework, black is horse's hobble --Arachno ^T 07:23, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Gustaf Adolf, Duke of Västerbotten

Hello, I hope you're okay, could you please do carry a shield please.

the arms of Gustavus Adolf of Sweden http://www.google.fr/imgres?sa=X&rlz=1C1CHNY_frFR367FR367&espv=210&es_sm=93&biw=1024&bih=673&tbm=isch&tbnid=Pxq2v6GXQ6lqmM:&imgrefurl=http://www.debatthuset.com/forums/showthread.php%3Fp%3D584861&docid=deeaRhvtwNw1kM&imgurl=http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9057/gustafadolf.jpg&w=238&h=320&ei=ZcpzUrivBIem0AX02YHwCA&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=194&page=2&tbnh=152&tbnw=108&start=31&ndsp=37&ved=1t:429,r:31,s:0,i:181&tx=53&ty=76

I can give you a basic

and the crest of the province at the forefront

thank you in advance good day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Łoś.svg

Sorry, crosses are gold. Another version - from Herbarz Krolewstwa Polskiego --Arachno ^T 10:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi. Change the settings in Commonits. You're uploading images on mediawiki.org, not Commons. -- Tegel (talk) 13:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herbarz

Hej,

Ten herbarz, o którym pisałeś do Masura wydało wydawnictwo "Dragon": [10]. Istnieją jakieś wiarygodne dowody, na to, że herby tam opublikowane pochodzącą z Commons/Wikipedii? Polimerek (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To trochę mało, żeby podjąć jakąś akcję. Po pierwsze, w samej książce licencje do herbów mogą być prawidłowo podane - nie wiemy tego nie mając tej książki w ręku, po drugie - historyczne herby rodowe - o ile są prawidłowo rysowane - z zasady mogą być do siebie podobne na pierwszy rzut oka - żeby stwierdzić, że to faktycznie jest kopia tych z Commons - trzeba by się przyjrzeć drobnym detalom rysunku i innych elementów świadczących o oryginalności lub że to są kopie od nas... Polimerek (talk) 00:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeśli nie spełnili warunków licencyjnych, no to Pan Gajl może ich pozwać. Stowarzyszyszenie Wikimedia Polska może ew. sfinansować koszty pomocy prawnej, jakby Pan Gajl się zdecydował coś z tym zrobić. Polimerek (talk) 00:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Stawiszyna

Witaj, napisałem do Urzędu Miasta (po raz kolejny) o udostępnienie herbu w przyzwoitej rozdzielczości, Jeśli w ciągu kilku dni nie otrzymam odpowiedzi wyślę oficjalny wniosek poleconym. Mam nadzieję, że już niedługo herb będzie poprawny :) Przepraszam, że tak późno, ale ostatnio jestem strasznie zawalony robotą. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herb poprawiony. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 21:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Avalokitesvara, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 15:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Myszyńca

Witaj, poprawiłem. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 19:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herb i flaga Sulejowa, Herb i flaga powiatu stargardzkiego

Witaj, symbole powiatu stargardzkiego zrobiłem. Dodam jeszcze stosowne informacje w artykule, gdy opublikują uchwałę. Herb Sulejowa poprawię w wolnej chwili. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 19:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC) P.S. Gratuluję herbu Sławatycz, na prawdę fajnie wyszedł :).[reply]

File:POL COA Lesieniewicz.svg

Salut! I find it in color, look http://heraldry.com.ua/index.php3?lang=E&id=1648 You may change Your pic --Arachno ^T 13:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Krosno Odrzańskie

Witaj, jasne, podsyłaj na: wikipedysta[kropeczka]poznaniak[małpeczka]wp[kropeczka]pl. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 10:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC) P.S. Przy okazji mogli by też poprawić herb na BIPie urzędu miasta ;).[reply]

Zrobione. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:POL Kcynia flag.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:POL Kcynia flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Avalokitesvara, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:POL Kcynia flag.svg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL powiat bielski (podlaski) COA new.svg

File:POL powiat bielski (podlaski) COA new.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

jdx ^Re: 01:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

coats of arms

Hello, I am interested in hiring an artist who knows heraldry. If you are interested, please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

File:POL COA Rzewuski.svg

Hello again! Look here: http://gerbovnik.ru/arms/1981.html. It's official Rzewuski COa in Russian Empire. Maybe, You wil change the motto or make another version ? --Arachn0 (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lewin Brzeski

Witaj, dzięki za informację. O nowym herbie wiedziałem ale dopiero teraz jak opublikowali na nowej wersji strony internetowej grafikę w przyzwoitej rozdzielczości to mogłem coś z tym zrobić. Niestety w Dz. Urz. jest jakaś straszna pikselioza. Herb już poprawiłem. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC) P.S. Na Wiki znacznie szybciej odpowiadam, tutaj zaglądam tylko jak mam coś przesłać.[reply]

Copyright status: File:POL Piechowice flag.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:POL Piechowice flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Kępic

Witaj, tak wiem. Od dłuższego czasu zabieram się do wektoryzacji. Nawet zdobyłem lepszej jakości rysunek niż ten koślawy skan w Dz. Urz. W wolnej chwili postaram się zrobić. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 11:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Coat of Arms of Grand Duchy of Poznań.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 04:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medium Coat of Arms of Congress Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Henri de Valois as lifelong king of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 18:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Stephen Bathory as king of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 18:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms of Vasa kings of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 18:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Michal Korybut Wisniowiecki as king of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Jan Sobieski as king of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Wettin kings of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Stanislaus Leszczynski as king of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Stanislaus Augustus as king of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small Coat of Arms of Congress Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Coat of Arms of Duchy of Warsaw.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The original from Sodacan (linked) is better and not blurred in places like this one. --Acabashi 12:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wrong, it's an adaptation, but the additions are blurred. --Acabashi 12:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO OK, considering the hard work required --Eatcha 06:34, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Coat of Arms of Congress Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Stanislaus Leszczynski as prince of Lorraine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality vector. KCVelaga 04:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms of Jadwiga of Poland.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crown of Russian Empress Anna Ivanowna.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Alexander Jagiellonczyk.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russian Imperial Crown.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ezarate 00:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:POL Grodków COA.svg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:POL Grodków COA.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL grodkow flag.svg

Hello. I have reversed the renaming and blanking of this file because it is used on numerous pages on other wikis. If you wish to replace it, please upload the new version under a new file name. --Green Giant (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:POL KS Stella Żabikowo COA.svg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:POL KS Stella Żabikowo COA.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:POL KS Stella Żabikowo COA.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Pajęczna

Witaj, wydaje mi się, że jakiś czas temu na stronie był taki jak na Wikipedii. Nie mogę niestety znaleźć żadnej uchwały w tej sprawie. Poprzednie statuty zawierały zapis, iż herbem gminy jest historyczny herb miasta i koniec. Nie było żadnego rysunku. W obecnym usunęli nawet to. Napisałem o udostępnienie stosownej uchwały. Jak otrzymam odpowiedź dokonam korekty, chociaż wygląda mi to na wykonanie liftingu bez jakiegokolwiek aktu prawnego. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tak się domyśliłem ;). Na razie wysłałem wniosek tylko mailem. Zobaczę czy odpowiedzą w ogóle. Połowa urzędów zupełnie ignoruje takie wnioski. Bardzo możliwe, że uchwała jest z okresu PRL, bo tak mi trochę wygląda po stylu a to by oznaczało, że jest w archiwum państwowym. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dawny herb Gorzowa Wlkp., Choszczna i Recza

Hej, nie chcę zawracać Ci głowy, ale czy miałbyś czas wykonać dawne herby Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego, Choszczna i Recza (link)? Zostały tylko one z tych z okresu PRL, a w ciągu dwóch ostatnich lat prosiłem m.in. użytkowników Geralt Riv i Poznaniak, ale nie mają czasu, więc postanowiłem, że poproszę Ciebie. Jak nie masz czasu, to w porządku, a jak tak, to dziękuję z góry :). Lechita talk 21:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse me. can make it?

Hello. I am not an English speaker. Please excuse me. But while I was walking around Wikimedia, I noticed a distorted flag, 2. "The Caliphate Ensemble of the Yacht Söttlü" and The Ensign of the Battlecruiser Hamidiye in "Naval Museum" and I think it's the exact flag that remains. Is there anyone who can make it?--고려 (talk) 08:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia of Regiments of Indian Army

Hello @Avalokitesvara:

I request you to please create SVG vector images of insignia of Indian Army's regiments. If you wish to do so here is the list of insignia -

Thanks and hope you will respond.

Regards Soap Boy 1 (talk) 10:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bodo komm.svg

File:Bodo komm.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jay1279 (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Topór Stemmata.JPG

File:POL COA Topór Stemmata.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Giltsbeach (talk) 12:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]