User talk:Kerim44

Image Tagging Image:1_Pułk_Ułanów_Krechowieckich.JPG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1_Pułk_Ułanów_Krechowieckich.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 17:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:1_CKOP.PNG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1_CKOP.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Pplk_Anatol_Wasiluk.JPG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pplk_Anatol_Wasiluk.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 19:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the object that you downloaded really an order of knighthood?

Hallo Kerim!

I have noticed some beautifull new pictures in the category "orders". One of the states "Odznaka pamiątkowa 8 Dywizji Obrony Wybrzeża wykonana w pracowni Panasiu". I haven't got a clue what it means but I have a question.
Is the object on page [1] really an order of knighthood? I know of Polonia Restituta, Virtuti Militari and the Orde of the White Eagle. In fact I wrote the articles on Polish orders on the Dutch Wikipedia. I suspect that your badges are the insignia of schools and military academies.If so, they are not orders. I would like to hear from you. I speak German, French and English.And Dutch off course!

Faithfully yours,

Robert Prummel, The Netherlands

Robert Prummel 13:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:5ppDz.JPG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:5ppDz.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. UberHalogen 15:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kgar_s-n.JPG

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Koszary 27 pcz.JPG

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 13:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drobna uwaga

Do dodawanych odznak dodawaj kategorię Military insignia of Poland. Po za tym wszystko OK. Widzę, że Anatola usunęli. Ciekawe dlaczego? Pozdrawiam Marcin

Nie od razu, ale zadziałam.

Garnizon Gubin - wszystko OK. Joymaster 20:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Koszary kołobrzeskie

Jak się da i czas mi pozwoli, to nie omieszkam zrobić tych budowli... Grzexs 21:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Kerim44!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Synoradzki.jpg is uncategorized since 24 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Szpital wojskowy.jpg is uncategorized since 12 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bgraniczny sn.jpg is uncategorized since 14 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Wku sn2.jpg is uncategorized since 2 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Wku sn1.jpg is uncategorized since 2 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Danuta Janiczak.jpg is uncategorized since 18 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tablica 7 Brygada AK.jpg is uncategorized since 10 April 2009.
Image:Tablica 2 Brygada AK.jpg is uncategorized since 10 April 2009.
Image:Tablica 3 Brygada AK.jpg is uncategorized since 10 April 2009.
Image:Tablica 6 Brygada AK.jpg is uncategorized since 10 April 2009.
Image:Husarzy smierci.jpg is uncategorized since 14 June 2009.
Image:WOP Gubin 2.JPG is uncategorized since 7 July 2009.
Image:Plakietka 16 bpdes.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Specjalista wojskowy1.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Wzorowy szef.jpg was uncategorized on 7 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WOP

Niestetty mam na razie problemy z siecią i wrzucanie zdjęć to katorga (kilka godzin prób żeby jedną fotkę wrzucić). Dopóki mi magicy z ŚTK nie naprawią łącza zdjęcia zostaną na dysku :( Nemo5576 (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WOP

Niestety mam na razie problemy z siecią i wrzucanie zdjęć to katorga (kilka godzin prób żeby jedną fotkę wrzucić). Dopóki mi magicy z ŚTK nie naprawią łącza zdjęcia zostaną na dysku :( Nemo5576 (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grafiki

Hmmm. TKS moge stuknac w sumie bo jest tylko jedna porzadna fotka (chociaz mala) tego wrogiego pojazdu :D To bedzie mila odmiana bo juz mi te nazistowskie wehikuly snia sie po nocach :D. Robie tez jeszcze kilka ruskich autek w stylu Russo ale kiepsko z planami/zrodlami i wychodza topornie bez detali wiec nie pokazuje. Te SdKfz 250 przydadza mi sie do arta a i podobaja sie bo zamierzam zrobic wszystkie kilkanascie wersji (+252 i 253) z widoczkami na roznice ("gole" i z wersjami "z podpisami" tego co widac" no i obrotowe podstawowe wersje do infoboxow) do wyboru. Poza tym mialem ulatwiona sprawe z 251 bo duzo elementow powtarza sie. Nie zauwazylem zeby takie grafiki byly juz na commons. Sa fotki ale nic na nich nie widac albo fotki z muzeow z poprzerabianymi pojazdami. No chyba ze przeoczylem cos. Chodzi mi co taki VIS - set grafik pokazujacy podobienstwa i roznice w wersjach. Te poprzednie grafy tez poprawiam i przerenderuje bo faktycznie oswietlenie bylo kiepskie. Na User:Spike78 bede wrzucal i przerzucal to co teraz robie wiec jak komus sie bedzie chcialo poszukac bykow to mozna tam zerknac. Btw. Moze Ty wiesz co bylo napisane na burtach bocznych zasobnikow na tych 250-tkach? Wszystkie zdjecia i plany poazuja tylko ze cos jest tam napisane ;) Zerkne co tam o TKS mam w pdfach. Wydaje sie proste do zrobienia. Spike78 (talk) 05:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC) PS. Mam nadzieje ze serio mowiles o TKS. Spike78 (talk) 07:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kategoryzacja

Ave Myśle że da się cos zrobić, ale należy do tego podejść w sposób "wojskowy". Na początek trzeba sprawdzić jak kategoryzuje sie odznaki innych formacji i jednostek wojskowych w okresie II owjny światowej. Niestety, jak się połapałem, wiki commons w 100% opiera sie na kategoryzacji angielskiej. Dlatego też nie możemy tworzyć własnych kategorii a jedynie podpiąć się od juz istniejące. Poza tym, zauważyłem, że sporo plików ci odrzuciło. Chyba trzeba ujednolicić licencje. Ja tez jestem w tym zielony, ale mam kilku naprawde ciekawych ludzi, którzy moga nam w tym pomóc. Na razie napisz, najlepiej na mojego maila domel (małpa) zatobi.com.pl jakie sa odznaki i jak wyglada sprawa praw autorskich. Ja spytam się swoich "źródeł", potem sprawdzimy angielska kategoryzacje i do dzieła. Może nam sie uda :-) --Danilas (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging Image:Commw1.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Commw1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Commw1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Zolnierze_8_DZ_z_gen..Głódziem.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Zolnierze_8_DZ_z_gen..Głódziem.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gluszczyk w 29 BZ.jpg

Hello! The date (year, etc.) is missing. Please add it. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 06:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

witam w komentarzu do zdjecia niby sztabu 5 paplot-sprostowanie pozdrawiam:))-weteran 5 paplot

Duplicate Category

Hi Kerim44, for all intents and purposes Category:CSWLąd im. Czarnieckiego appears to be a duplicate of Category:Muzeum Uzbrojenia w Poznaniu. I don't read Polish so I don't know how great the differences are, but it seems to me possible to migrate the files from Category:CSWLąd im. Czarnieckiego to [[:Category:Muzeum Uzbrojenia w Poznaniu] or if there is an internal demarcation within the museum to make Category:CSWLąd im. Czarnieckiego a sub category of Category:Muzeum Uzbrojenia w Poznaniu.

halo!Kerim44, Niestety nie próbuje zapisać się w polskiej. Ja jestem za pomocą tłumaczenia maszynowego, jeśli nie jest to napisane dobrze. Patrząc na swoje pliki, to była moja obserwacja, że pliki przekazane byłyby równo w domu w tej kategorii. Dziękujemy za kategoryzacji ponownie Twoich zdjęć, myślę, że jest silniejsza z kategorii posiadające zdjęcia razem w tym samym miejscu.KTo288 (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Armata

Wspaniale, dobra robota! Halibutt (talk) 07:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grób Kazimierza Sabbata

Zrobiłeś fotografię grobu prezydenta RP na uchodźstwie, Kazimierza Sabbata i podpisałeś fotografię nie podając nazwy cmentarza w Londynie, na którym grób się znajduje. Czy mógłbyś podać nazwę cmentarza?

Pozdrowienia, Kiejstut9 (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grób Kazimierza Sabbata

Super! Dzięki.

Najlepsze pozdrowienia, Kiejstut9 (talk) 12:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

w:WP:Zamówienia na obrazki/województwo zachodniopomorskie#Szczecin

Trochę Ty, trochę Kapitel, trochę Mateusz War. i pójdzie do przodu :) Zwiadowca ²¹ 17:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pozwoliłem sobie dodać kategorie do Twojej strony użytkownika. Nie wiem czy kojarzysz audycje radiową Migawka w Radiu Szczecin. "Migawka to... audycja radiowa stworzona przez miłośników fotografii dla tych, którzy chcieliby poznać jej arkana i czerpać przyjemność z tworzenia fascynujących obrazów. W programie Andrzej Kutys, dziennikarz Polskiego Radia Szczecin i Artur Magdziarz, fotograf, członek Fotoklubu RP i Fotoklubu Szczecin, rozmawiają zarówno na temat technicznych aspektów robienia zdjęć, jak i praktycznej wiedzy przydatnej każdemu fotoamatorowi". W każdą ostatnią niedzielę miesiąca organizowany jest plener fotograficznych dla chętnych zarówno amatorów jak i zawodowców. Ja na takim plenerze byłem dwukrotnie: na festiwalu Słowian i Wikingów oraz w Stargardzie. Juz od jakiegoś czasu zamierzam się do tego by spotkać się z Panem Kutysem i porozmawiać o tym - i zachęcić na antenie - do wrzucania fot na CC na commonsa. Na razie nie mogę się niestety zebrać.
PS. Widziałeś to: n:pl:W Szczecinie promowano wolną kulturę? Zwiadowca ²¹ 17:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wielkosc zdjecia

Im większe tym lepsze. Zwiadowca ²¹ 13:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dokładnie - najlepiej ładować zdjęcie w oryginalnej rozdzielczości aparatu i bez zwiększania kompresji jpeg. Wyjściowa wielkość zdjęcia nie ma żadnego wpływu na szybkość pokazywania jego miniatury w artykułach, bo oprogramowanie MediaWiki automatycznie zmniejsza rozmiary obrazka przed wysłaniem go do przeglądarki czytelnika, a dla serwerów Wikimedia przetworzenie obrazka o rozmiarach rzędu nawet 10 MB to pestka. Może jakby zdjęcie miało 100 MB dałoby się zauważyć zmniejszenie tempa jego wyświetlania. Warto też pamiętać, że rozdzielczości ekranu stale się zwiększają i miniatura zdjęcia, która współcześnie dobrze wygląda w artykule może za parę lat być już niewystarczająca - dlatego lepiej ładować jest obecnie w jak największej rozdzielczości, to zdjęcie przyda się też za ładnych parę lat. Polimerek (talk) 01:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrze wyczułem, żeby przekierować pytanie do Polimerka. :) Zwiadowca ²¹ 16:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Romanesco

Czy o niego chodzi? Zwiadowca ²¹ 09:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dawne koszary

Witaj. Nie wiem, czy dobrze zrobiłem, ale utworzyłem kategorię Category:Former barracks in Poland, czyli Dawne/byłe koszary w Polsce. Coraz ich więcej, więc trzeba rozróżnić między funkcjonującymi a pozostałościami – tak mi się przynajmniej wydaje. Ponieważ jesteś dobry w tym temacie prosiłbym Cię o przeanalizowanie grafik pod tym kątem. Pozdrawiam, Grzexs (talk) 07:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kerim44

Co ja dobrze zauważyłem, bo nie pamiętam? A może to inny zwiadowca? Zwiadowca ²¹ 23:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zbiorka3.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Zbiorka2.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Znak_pancerny.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Znak_pancerny.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dotyczy takze wszystkich innych zdjec z tego zrodla, do ktorych dostep masz ze swojej galerii, albo za pomoca tej strony wyszukiwania. Instrukcje postepowania masz w tym jednym, przykladowym szablonie powyzej, ale dotyczy on wszystkich plikow z tego zrodla. Jak cos to pytaj smialo. Masur (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- moge link prosic, gdzie jest napisane na stronie zrodlowej, ze grafiki zostaly udostepnione? Bo jedyne dwa, ktore sa na stronie opisu zdjec prowadza do ich strony glownej, a tam nie widze zadnych informacji o uwolnieniu ich zdjec. A zgoda, uzyskana, (np wg opisu z [2]), powinna byc przeslana do systemu OTRS, by takie grafiki moglybyc oznaczone. Szczegoly w szablonie Masur (talk) 05:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Mmm. To tak jak mowilem. Wyzej w szablonie jest opisane co nalezy zrobic, a w linku ktory ci dalem ([3]) sa szczegoly. Pamietaj, ze zgoda musi zawierac czego dotyczy i skad to pochodzi (akurat dosc oczywiste) oraz dokladne warunki na jakie zgadza sie "zgododawca" - np. konkretna wolna licencja, czy przekazanie do domeny publicznej. Zgody typu "zgadzam sie na wykorzystanie w Wikipedii" nie sa wiazace, bowiem nie reguluja sprawy prac pochodnych czy nieodplatnego wykorzystania bez dodatkowych zapytan, a ponadto nic z nich nie wynika (a napewno juz nie domena publiczna, ktorymi obecnie sa oznaczone pliki). Wszystkie te sprawy sa dosc istotne dla osob, ktore prowadza dzialalnosc zarobkowa swoimi pracami (a mowie tu konkretnie o tej pracowni), zeby wiedzialy na co musza sie (jesli praca ma byc wykorzystana w Wiki) zgodzic. Zgoda to takze potwierdzenie dla korzystajacych z pliku, ze w razie wykorzystania go, nie groza wykorzystujacemu zadne konsekwencje (przynajmniej jakis dowod). Pamietaj takze, ze obowiazek uzyskania zgody spoczywa na ladujacym zdjecia, coby mozna bylo utrzymac w tym wszystkim jakis porzadek. Jesli masz jakiekolwiek jeszcze watpliwosci - smialo pytaj. Masur (talk) 10:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Sluchaj - nie moge ja do nich pisac, bo nie ja zaczynalem i nie ja prowadzilem z nimi korespondencje. Czy ty jakąś z nimi prowadziles? Bo teraz wspominasz mi o jeszcze jakiejs osobie (adminie?: On natomiast był w kontakcie z jakimś "madrym" od commons.). Jesli ty prowadziles, to cie znaja - to po prostu popros zeby przeslali zgode na PD wg wzoru (bo samo oznaczenie grafik jest 100% korekt, potrzebujemy tylko zgody od nich, ze rzeczywiscie zgodzili sie na domene publiczna i co konkretnie? wszystkie grafiki? czesc? czy jakis system w tym jest?), a ze juz im mejlowales to szybko powinienes to ustalic. Bo jak teraz ja mialbym pisac, to musialbym zaczynac wszystko od nowa. Masur (talk) 16:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC) ps. sparwdzilem baze na wszelki wypadek - nie ma sladu po zgodzie, ani zadnej korespondencji. ps.2. oczywiscie mamy na uzyskanie tych zgod kazda rozsadna ilosc czasu, ale tzreba to zalatwic. Jak juz bedzie, to zamowie bota i sie raz dwa zrobi je "koszerne". pozdrawiam.[reply]
      - To nie, ze nie lubie pomagac :) Pomoge ze swojej strony, jak juz bedzie zgoda. Po prostu co do pozyskiwania zgod z praktyki wiem, ze bardziej skuteczne jest, gdy o zgode wystapi osoba, ktora zaczela sprawe. Kolejna musi po prostu zaczynac od nowa, tlumaczyc i to nie wiedzac co tam w szczegolach bylo ustalone. Pamietaj tylko, ze musza wyraznie okreslic ktorych zdjec zgoda dotyczy (wszystkich z serwisu? zaladowanych? wtedy podac adresy/nazwy - u gory masz wyszukiwarke podlinkowana, co ci dalem) oraz okreslic dokladnie jakie sa warunki udostepnienia (czy zrzekaja sie do dom. pub., a moze konkretna wolna licencja? jaka?). Nie zapomnij wspomniec o wolnosci tworzenia prac pochodnych i komercyjnych bez dodatkowych zgod. Jak juz wsio bedzie, ja smigne co trzeba botem i odpowiednio wszystko oznacze. Masur (talk) 05:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wtrace sie do dyskusji. Zaczne od tego ze bardzo bym chcial by te pliki tutaj zostaly. Sa one bardzo przydatne. Jednak nim zainwestojemy duzo czasu na ich kategoryzacje, czy sprowadzanie nowych plikow, najpierw potrzebujemy OTRS. Stworzylem Category:Military insignia of Poland by engraving shop of Andrzej Panasiuk i dodalem tam Template:No OTRS permission since. Takze prosil bym o kontynuowanie tej dyskusji tutaj na tej stronie. Jesli w czyms moge pomoc to chetnie. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 13:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dosłowna regułka jest tutaj a kopię pozwolenia przesłać na adres permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org. Moze powinnismy wspomniec ze kazdy plik ma i bedzie mial nazwe sklepu i adres ich strony. Takze strony Commons pojawiaja sie w Google przed innymi stronami, wiec jest to dla nich forma darmowej reklamy. --Jarekt (talk) 15:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wszystkie pliki z tego zaklady zostaly udostepnione jako {{PD-Self}}, ta licencja nie powinna byc zmieniona. --Jarekt (talk) 13:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

super, bede sparwdzac OTRS :) Masur (talk) 20:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Danuta Janiczak.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Danuta Janiczak.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Plushy (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: wojsko

Cześć. Chyba się pomyliłeś z tym wpisem w mojej dyskusji? :) pjahr @ 07:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ksiestwo warszawskie

Hej, wprawdzie barwami narodowymi były już w tym czasie biel i amarant, ale żadnej oficjalnej flagi nie było. Pozdrawiam. Avalokitesvara (talk) 18:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Odznaki Panasiuka

odznaki Panasiuka have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Masur (talk) 14:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

usuwajac wpis ze swojej dyskusji/rewertujac bota nie sprawisz, ze dyskusja przestanie sie toczyc. A oba dzialania nie sa zalecane, napewno nie jest zalecane sciaganie szablonow w plikach, jesli ich sprawa nie jest zakonczona. Za to zapraszam do wypowiedzi w dyskusji lub pozyskania zgody, co niestety mi sie nie udalo, bo po dluuugiiiim oczekiwaniu, nikt nigdy od Panasiuka do mnie nie odpisal. Masur (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blokada

Jako że nie zastosowałeś się do uwag kol. Masura, nałożyłem na Ciebie pięciodniową blokadę - to czas na przemyślenie sensu (a raczej braku) swoich szkodliwych edycji. Pozdrawiam --Szczepan talk  20:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strona użytkownika

Widzę, że zmieniła się troszkę strona użytkownika. Bardzo ładnie. Warto chwalić się swoimi zwierzętami :) Ja tez mam kilka:

Zwiadowca ²¹ 19:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niedźwiedź wojtek.jpg

File:Niedźwiedź wojtek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 12:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Głódź i LWP

Witam.

Po pierwsze ja nikogo nigdzie wstawiam. Przeglądałem po prostu kategorię Category:T-55AM Merida i szybko przyglądając się zdjęciu stwierdziłem, że mundury wyglądają jak te używane przez LWP. Chciałbym tutaj zaznaczyć, że wcale nie pomogłeś nie podając ŻADNEJ informacji o przedziale czasowym w jakim zdjęcie to zostało zrobione. A skoro najwyraźniej jesteś WŁAŚCICIELEM PRAW AUTORSKICH do tego zdjęcia to raczej powinieneś to wiedzieć.

Po drugie nie wiem o jaką "głupawą kategorię" ci chodzi. Kategorie do których wstawiłem zdjęcie File:Zolnierze 8 DZ z gen..Głódziem.jpg zostały stworzone przez innych wolontariuszy Wikimedia Commons.

Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Już jest źródło. Chciałbym przy tym zaznaczyć, że te "technikalia" wcale nie są trudne do zrozumienia. Dobra rada: Jak nie rozumiesz jak uzyskać jakiś efekt na Wikipedii albo Wikimedia Commons to zobacz stronę z interesującym cię efektem w trybie edycji. Jak dalej nie będziesz pewien jak coś działa to zawsze możesz użyć Piaskownicy czyli specjalnej strony stworzonej na potrzeby eksperymentowania bez "psucia" stron docelowych. O możliwości zadawania pytań innym użytkownikom Wikimedia Commons chyba nie muszę wspominać.

BTW Ciągle zastanawia mnie o jaką "głupawą kategorię" ci chodziło.

Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nie zgubiłem autora. Po prostu tabelkę zrobiłem na szybko wstawiając zamieszczone przez ciebie informacje i przez przypadek nie dołożyłem szablonu Template:Own.

Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 18:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tak przy okazji proponowałbym, żebyś doprecyzował kiedy to zdjęcie zostało zrobione ponieważ z tego co mi napisałeś podejrzewam iż byłbyś w stanie podać dokładniejszy przedział czasowy niż mój (1991).

Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pas i szalokominiarka

Wydawało mi się, że pas jest brązowy. Możliwe, że to efekt zniszczenia skóry i kiedyś był czarny. Zwróciłem teraz uwagę na szlufkę i rzeczywiście jest czarna. Co do szalokominiarki ta na zdjęciu jest ta zielona, zielony od czarnego jeszcze odróżniam ;-). To są zdjęcia wykonane przezemnie, rzeczy z moich zbiorów. A tak na marginesie to w tej chwili w domu mam osiem sztuk zielonych szalokominiarek - i wyraźnie różnią się między sobą odcieniem zieleni. MW na tą chwilę ma czarne. --MAx 92 (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nawet jedna z szalokominiarek ma wyraźnie inną fakturę tkaniny. Wymiarami też się nieznacznie różnią. Różni producenci i tak wychodzi. Mogą być z różnego czasu produkcji. Metek niestety nie mam. --MAx 92 (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zetpe0202

Witaj,

Staram się coś zrobić ale najgorsze jest to, że fotografuję miejsca w których w tej chwili jestem a nie to co chciałbym sfotografować. Brakuje trochę czasu, nawet żeby przesłać zdjęcia. Ale postaram się coś zrobić. Pozdrawiam i polecam się. Zetpe0202 (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj jeszcze raz

Tylko pytanie. Czy w infoboxie baza wojskowa można dołożyć takie elementy jak: współrzędne i mapa oraz zdjęcie. Jeśli nie jest to tajne spec. znaczenia. Pozdrawiam. Zetpe0202 (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koszary baonu KOP Sienkiewicze.jpg

File:Koszary baonu KOP Sienkiewicze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odznaka Korpusu Północ Wschód ze Szczecina.jpg

File:Odznaka Korpusu Północ Wschód ze Szczecina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

VileGecko (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Territorial Defence Force of Poland

Ta kategoria odnosi się do powstałego na początku 2017 roku rodzaju Sił Zbrojnych RP określonego jako Wojska Obrony Terytorialnej, "plakietki", które usunąłem odnoszą się do formacji funkcjonującej w czasie PRL tj. Wojsk Obrony Terytorialnej Kraju. Cedaros (talk) 16:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: NAC

Ok, będę działał.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:12 brS.JPG

File:12 brS.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:07, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:12 DZ.jpg

File:12 DZ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:32 batalion celny w 1921.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove {{Delete}} templates

Please do not remove {{Delete}} templates, like you did here. Leave this to the closing administrator. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rzekomy Kiszczak na zdjęciu z promocji w ASG

Nie jest to Kiszczak tylko gen. bryg. Janusz Gumuliński, zastępca komendanta Wydziału Wojsk Lądowych ASG. Gdyby Kiszczak uczesniczył w promocji to na pewno by siedział koło komendanta Akademii a nie z boku. Poza tym na tych zdjęciach zawsze występowali absolwenci i kadra dydaktyczna, a nie goście. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaplin2222 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odznaka Honorowa Zasłużony dla Choszczna.jpg

File tagging File:Odznaka Honorowa Zasłużony dla Choszczna.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Odznaka Honorowa Zasłużony dla Choszczna.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Odznaka Honorowa Zasłużony dla Choszczna.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Abraham (talk) 13:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Kerim44

Image Tagging Image:1_Pułk_Ułanów_Krechowieckich.JPG

Image Tagging Image:1_CKOP.PNG

Image Tagging Image:Pplk_Anatol_Wasiluk.JPG

Is the object that you downloaded really an order of knighthood?

Image Tagging Image:5ppDz.JPG

Drobna uwaga

Koszary kołobrzeskie

Please link images

WOP

WOP

Grafiki

Kategoryzacja

File tagging Image:Commw1.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Zolnierze_8_DZ_z_gen..Głódziem.jpg

Duplicate Category

Armata

Grób Kazimierza Sabbata

Grób Kazimierza Sabbata

wielkosc zdjecia

Dawne koszary

File tagging File:Znak_pancerny.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Danuta Janiczak.jpg

Re: wojsko

Re: ksiestwo warszawskie

Odznaki Panasiuka

Blokada

Strona użytkownika

Re:Głódź i LWP

Pas i szalokominiarka

Zetpe0202

Witaj jeszcze raz

Re:Territorial Defence Force of Poland

RE: NAC

Image without license

Do not remove {{Delete}} templates

File source is not properly indicated: File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg

Rzekomy Kiszczak na zdjęciu z promocji w ASG

File:Odznaka Honorowa Zasłużony dla Choszczna.jpg

File tagging File:Odznaka Honorowa Zasłużony dla Choszczna.jpg

Navigation menu

Search