Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/10/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![101 File:Анна Сенік на пресконференції батальйону "Азов", 2014 р.jpg](#File:Анна_Сенік_на_пресконференції_батальйону_"Азов",_2014_р.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of sci-fi robots. Omphalographer (talk) 00:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Who is him? 186.173.54.103 03:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
The file and a few similar others have recently been used to vandalize the page Butch Hartman on the main Wikipedia website. HotDogsforDays (talk) 03:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
This film is co-written by Emil Rameau (1878–1957), so it remains under copyright in Germany until 2028. hinnk (talk) 05:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Animal_cell_structure_et.svg ArtjomJemeljanovNERG (talk) 08:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
wrong file quality Scoopdeville1 (talk) 09:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Businessplancompetition2011.png Mozuku12345 (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate Bradinator33 (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version of this file Francescoscarfone (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
False source Naufal Abrar (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Heraldry of the firstborn son of the d'Êwraux family. The original family from which the de Evre and Evrényi families arose.jpg
[edit]
Osobní důvody tvůrce Arevrenyi (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Heraldry of the second-born son of the d'Êwraux family. The original family from which the de Evre and Evrényi families arose.jpg
[edit]
Osobní důvody tvůrce Arevrenyi (talk) 15:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Heraldry of the third son of the d'Êwraux family. The original family from which the de Evre and Evrényi families arose.jpg
[edit]
Osobní důvody tvůrce Arevrenyi (talk) 15:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Heraldry of the firstborn son of the d'Ivre family. Minor branches of the d'Êwraux family. Relatives of the families de Evre and Evrényi.jpg
[edit]
Osobní důvody tvůrce Arevrenyi (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Heraldry of the second-born son of the d'Ivre family. Minor branches of the d'Êwraux family. Relatives of the families de Evre and Evrényi.jpg
[edit]
Osobní důvody tvůrce Arevrenyi (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate file by mistake Saumya2808 (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Possibly dupe of File:Mapping Global Faiths.svg. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Name error Konjiki1 (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ankry as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not PD in country of origin (Poland); it will be PD in 2041 URAA issues should get a proper DR. Yann (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Yann: This is not a URAA issue: the image is PD in US, but not in the country of origin. The author died in 1970 and 70pma expires in 2041. Ankry (talk) 06:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image; no clear factual basis. Omphalographer (talk) 19:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete along with File:Dublin Castle 1944.jpg, both uploaded for a hoax/fiction en:Draft:Dublin Castle under Nazi occupation article on enwiki. Belbury (talk) 11:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate file. Sria-72 (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate file of 13L 2024 path.png, and uses fake information Sria-72 (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees with deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Taken from Instagram. Likely not own work. Link Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative of copyrighted packaging and instructions. Yann (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- It should be possible to crop out the copyrighted content. Yann (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'd have to see that. The Donkeykong Hockey figure is certainly above COM:TOO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but now it is de minimis. Yann (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Might be, yeah. I see you deleted most of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep, per Yann. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Might be, yeah. I see you deleted most of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but now it is de minimis. Yann (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'd have to see that. The Donkeykong Hockey figure is certainly above COM:TOO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
images taken by the host institution require permissions from the participants, and Columbia did not request permission from Cameron 66.108.48.178 16:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This was as I understand it, an event open to the public, and Rowland had no expectations of privacy. What you state is a non-copyright restriction, and the image is tagged with personality rights so Rowland can prevent reusers from commercially reusing his image. Rowland is notable, and it's good to have a freely-licensed photograph of him. Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep: Unfortunately I believe Columbia staff/students are stuck in the middle between the law and an artist's practice. Legally, there was no expectation of privacy at this event, and whomever at Columbia is associated with the GSAPPstudent account irrevocably freely licensed the images taken at the public event. But Rowland, in the spirit of artists like Stanley Brouwn and Cady Noland, has purposely refused to allow images of themself to circulate. The only known public image of Rowland other than those hosted on Commons is a photocopy of their driver's license photo. I have a feeling that someone connected to Columbia promised Rowland that photos would not be made at the event, but that was not communicated to the photographer or the attendees (it certainly wasn't included on Columbia's page promoting the event). A photographer made and uploaded the photos, Rowland found out, and they are now asking Columbia to delete the images. But because Columbia does not run Commons, they cannot just take back the choice made by the photographer to make and upload the images.- I really don't pretend to know what the "right" thing to do is here. But as far as I can tell, unless someone can prove that photos were not allowed at the event, these images should not be deleted according to Commons policy. 19h00s (talk) 19:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Image is properly labeled with personality rights, there are no copyright issues and Commons cannot dictate policy at Columbia University policy does not dictate Commons policy. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 20:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 06:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Shall it be reverted to the original uncropped version? JeyReydar97 (talk) 07:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The original version is still not a panorama whereby the copyrighted buildings would be COM:De minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The sculpture was inaugurated in 2006.
- File:0138jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 14.jpg
- File:0138jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 15.jpg
- File:0138jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 18.jpg
- File:0138jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 19.jpg
- File:0173jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 14.jpg
- File:0173jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 15.jpg
- File:0173jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 16.jpg
- File:0173jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 17.jpg
- File:0173jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 22.jpg
- File:0196jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 01.jpg
- File:0196jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 04.jpg
- File:0196jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Central School MacArthur Highwayfvf 05.jpg
- File:0212jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 04.jpg
- File:0212jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 18.jpg
- File:0212jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 19.jpg
- File:0212jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 20.jpg
- File:0212jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 22.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 03.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 10.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 11.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 12.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 13.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 14.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 15.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 16.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 17.jpg
- File:0237jfPedestrian Overpass Guiguinto Bulacan Clock Hall MacArthur Highwayfvf 18.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Battle of San Jose del Monte, Bulacan (Gerilyerong San Joseño, April 7. 1945 War memorial)
[edit]The monument was inaugurated in 2012. As the Philippines does not have Freedom of Panorama, these images are infringing sculptural copyrights.
- File:6164Battle San Jose del Monte Bulacankjfvf 01.JPG
- File:6164Battle San Jose del Monte Bulacankjfvf 02.JPG
- File:6164Battle San Jose del Monte Bulacankjfvf 03.JPG
- File:6164Battle San Jose del Monte Bulacankjfvf 04.JPG
- File:6164Battle San Jose del Monte Bulacankjfvf 05.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 01.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 02.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 03.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 04.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 05.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 07.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 08.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 09.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 10.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 11.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 12.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 13.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 14.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 15.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 16.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 17.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 18.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 19.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 20.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 21.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 22.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 23.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 24.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 25.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 26.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 28.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 29.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 30.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 31.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 32.JPG
- File:Jf0080Battle San Jose Bulacanfvf 33.JPG
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 08.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 09.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 10.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 11.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 12.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 13.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 15.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 16.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 17.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 18.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 19.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 38.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 39.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 40.jpg
- File:Poblacion San Jose del Monte City 41.jpg
- File:Sanjosejf256.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnVuong1222004 (9) (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of screen content
Эlcobbola talk 14:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Opoku Akaadom Sympathy (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DWs of book covers - no evidence of free license
- File:Afrakoma.jpg
- File:Brako.jpg
- File:Owuo Apakan.jpg
- File:Sɛ Ɛbɛwie.jpg
- File:In the Chest of A Woman.jpg
- File:Women of Owu.jpg
- File:Ɛhia Wo A Nwu.jpg
- File:The Beggars’ Strike.jpg
- File:Etire Nni Safoa.jpg
- File:Me Ne M’akyinkyiniakyinkyini Yi.jpg
- File:Mese Wo Amen.jpg
- File:Wosum Borɔdeɛ A Sum Kwadu Bi.jpg
- File:Death On Trial.jpg
- File:The Kaya Girl.jpg
- File:The Boy Who Cried Wolf.jpg
- File:Why the Hawk Catches Chicks.jpg
- File:Tutu the Friendly Cat.jpg
- File:Nii Noi The Sanitation Officer.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Anything that might have education value (the road, the building, the crossing itself) is only partially visible. I cannot think of how this image would provide knowledge. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep On scope for the traffic lights, Ponsonby Road road sign and crossing, etc. Darwin Ahoy! 00:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The crossing isn't even fully captured. What would this ever be used for? If someone wanted an image of the Ponsonby Road sign there are 6 files of better quality File:Sign, street (AM 1998.81.133-1).jpg Traumnovelle (talk) 00:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep are you under the impression that we need to save HD space at the Commons? There are several reasons why this photograph is relevant. It shows typical clothing, traffic lights, and even some details of the building on the back. There are over 100 million images on the Commons and if there can be only one that depicts a given feature, we could probably make do with 1% of that or less. Rkieferbaum (talk) 10:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, I'm under the impression Commons is supposed to be for finding useful images for educational purposes and is not some sort of Library of Alexandria. Traumnovelle (talk) 10:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Just Traumnovelle again. No policy-based reason for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Practically identical to File:500px photo (26024349).jpeg with no potential knowledge in this image compared to the other one. I don't have an opinion as to which one should be kept Traumnovelle (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep Obviously on scope for the LGBT pride of Ponsonby, New Zealand. You have not the right of choosing the settings for the potencial reusers, if the drag is waving or pointing to the people. Darwin Ahoy! 00:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Waving versus pointing is a difference that warrants two otherwise identical files? Traumnovelle (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it certainly is. The very fact that you think you have to "choose" photos to delete hints that your current attitude probably is not constructive nor aligned with this project. Darwin Ahoy! 00:29, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:EDUSE dictates what is the project's aims. Which is for realistically useful images, this casuistry that a wave versus a point from a random non-notable individual is educationally value is what is not aligned with the project's scope. When you have dozens of identical images flooding a category for example all it does is make it harder to find images one may be looking for. And the COM:DELETIONPOLICY writes 'Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.' These images have nothing distinct from each other that would serve someone. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it certainly is. The very fact that you think you have to "choose" photos to delete hints that your current attitude probably is not constructive nor aligned with this project. Darwin Ahoy! 00:29, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Waving versus pointing is a difference that warrants two otherwise identical files? Traumnovelle (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep there's no part of our policies that say that similar images aren't allowed. There are several different reasons why both of these images are different enough that both could be kept. If they're crowding your category browsing, maybe you should find a different system of finding what you're looking for, but that's certainly not a reason to take it upon us to curate content on that level. Rkieferbaum (talk) 00:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The policy states files must have a realistic educational use and that images that add nothing distinct should not be included. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- And have a realistic educational use, since I may prefer one gesture or the other. I really don't get what your point is. If you are in some sort of "cleaning cruzade", I suggest probably it will not end well for you. Darwin Ahoy! 00:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- So what is the educational use of this image? Traumnovelle (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Illustrating New Zealander drags, or the Ponsonby pride, or even segway riders. Darwin Ahoy! 00:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- So what is the educational use of this image? Traumnovelle (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- And have a realistic educational use, since I may prefer one gesture or the other. I really don't get what your point is. If you are in some sort of "cleaning cruzade", I suggest probably it will not end well for you. Darwin Ahoy! 00:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The policy states files must have a realistic educational use and that images that add nothing distinct should not be included. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep They are not the same. Which is more suitable is entirely a matter for the context of the user. It's not Commons' role to select such choices or, as would happen if we deleted one, to force them. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor example Jimnva (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep It's perfectly fine and COM:INUSE. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep INUSE, and as above, we almost never delete as 'poor example'.
- Although there have been some very strange edits in the past history of this file. @Jimnva: , is this your photo? Or Bull-doser's ? Was it in Canada or the US? Andy Dingley (talk) 09:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment Yes- What exactly is the deal with (for example) this change of attribution? Ubcule (talk) 15:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No masterpiece but no reason for deletion. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep As per other The Squirrel Conspiracy, Andy Dingley, Herbert Ortner, plus unless- and until- the odd edits from @Jimnva: listed above can be explained, they cast the motives for this deletion in a suspicious and unclear light. Ubcule (talk) 15:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING. The packaging is a central focus of the work, it can hardly be called de minimis. And the packaging itself is likely complex enough for copyright protection in the United Kingdom per COM:TOO United Kingdom. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aishik Rehman as Speedy (db-advert) and the most recent rationale was: |2=related page(s) deleted from bnwiki as spam/advertisement|help=off
pls diskuss it first 7 days before we delete it. Sanandros (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sohailshahrukhkhan786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sohailshahrukhkhan786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely copyvios/out of scope
- File:Mohammed sohail sheesha riyahd.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail ooty.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail nagarjuna sagar.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail logistics team.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail mysore palace.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail jabal al tuwiaq riyadh.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail dirab club.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail at red sand.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail at red san riyadh.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail at farm.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail at golconda fort.jpg
- File:Khalil ur rahman.jpg
- File:Red sand visitors.jpg
- File:Red sand (2).jpg
- File:Dr zakir and ilyas bhai.jpg
- File:Manali snow point.jpg
- File:Manali in summer.jpg
- File:Kings colony shastri puram123.jpg
- File:Mohammed sohail (sonu1).jpg
- File:Mohammed mahmood ali.jpg
- File:Br.imran iref.jpg
- File:IREF Islamic research and educational foundation.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
/St1995 10:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sohailshahrukhkhan786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable persons and event, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine or Russia for sculptures and this one was created in 2004. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Balaklava Lesya Ukrainka monument.JPG
- File:Lesia Ukrainka Balaklava.jpg
- File:Łesia Ukrainka-pomnik w Białakławie.jpg
- File:Балаклава, май 2022, 31.jpg
- File:Будівля міської управи.JPG
- File:Севастополь, 2019 год, 24.jpg
- File:Севастополь, 2019 год, 25.jpg
- File:Севастополь, 2019 год, 26.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and there's zero evidence the artist of this bust has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:5. Колодяжне Пам’ятник Лесі Українці.jpg
- File:Ukraine-Volun oblast-Kovelskuj raion-Colodjagne village.jpg
- File:Садиба Лесі Українки (1).JPG
- File:Садиба Лесі Українки (2).JPG
- File:Садиба поетеси і громадської діячки Лесі Українки.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 21:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AMS MALAGON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hace falta que el artista que creó estas obras de arte (Gloria Merino), o un apoderado suyo, envíe permiso explícito a COM:VRT para poder almacenarlos en Wikimedia Commons. (COM:VRT permission from copyright owner needed).
- File:Vista de Malagón..jpg
- File:La Merienda..jpg
- File:Contraste, 1962..jpg
- File:Cabeza en blancos, 1977..jpg
- File:Pareja tomando el sol..jpg
- File:Vieja cosiendo..jpg
Strakhov (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Blurry unused photograph. Not sure what educational use this has. Abzeronow (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ZERO educational value. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ooligan (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Summerry2024 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Several of the images uploaded by this user are YouTube and TikTok videos that have been cropped and edited.
- File:Avila Jr - Antigua GFC 2024.png
- File:Titiman Ávila Jr.png
- File:Sam Sunderland.jpg
- File:GrimaldoSC.png
- File:GrimaPeru.png
- File:H. Espinoza.png
- File:Marvin Á. Jr - Campeón del Torneo Uncaf Sub-20.png
- File:Marvin Ávila Jr - Antigua Guatemala.png
- File:Ávila Jr - Guatemala U15.png
- File:Grimaldo after the match.jpg
- File:Gonzalez preacher 2018.jpg
- File:Grimaldo Liga 1 2023.jpg
Ovruni (talk) 06:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darflo Art (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal artwork, unused outside an enwiki user page.
- File:Heliconia In Melancholy.png
- File:Darflo Logo.jpg
- File:Delirium - Darflo.jpg
- File:Euphorbia Pulcherrima In The Darkness - Darflo.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal non-educational use 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{speedydelete| Subject of the photo has requested this photo to be removed and did not directly consent for the photo to be published.}} GSAPPstudent (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no rule on Commons that stipulates people must consent to photographs of themselves taken in public. If you uploaded this work to Commons and it is indeed your own work, you have released it under an irrevocable free license. Unless you were breaking local laws by making this photograph, I don't see a clear reason to delete it. Per the website for the event this photograph was made at, the event was free and open to the public. Rowland, by agreeing to attend this public event, could not reasonably assume privacy, and their permission is not required to publish this image. I welcome other insights, but I don't think this photo should be deleted under the justification that the person in the image was entitled to privacy at a free public event. 19h00s (talk) 01:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The subject was speaking in a place open to the public to the US. Will add personality rights to file. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Removing speedy delete request made by GSAPPstudent, re-listing as normal deletion request. This image was kept after a deletion request that was closed within the past week. Subject does not need to consent to this photograph being published as it was made at a free, public event. See documentation in previous deletion request (above). Image has been released under an irrevocable free license by the uploader, if it is indeed their own work. --19h00s (talk) 20:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Also COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
This is usage was not authorized by Cameron Rowland and violates an explicit request to not have any images taken and/or reposted from this lecture. 66.108.48.178 13:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This has been litigated multiple times -- if you have proof that photos weren't allowed at the event, then you are welcome to submit a ticket with VRT. Otherwise, this photo is freely licensed and was made at a free event open to the public, which means there is no valid reason for deletion. --19h00s (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete images taken by the host institution require permissions from the participants, and Columbia did not request permission from Cameron 66.108.48.178 16:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is a non-copyright restriction and as stated above, you are welcome to submit a VRT ticket. Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, is GSAPPstudent the "host institution?" As far as I can tell, it is a current or former student at GSAPP who attends lectures and uploads images they make at those lectures. Unless that account is actually somehow a formal representative of Columbia, I don't know how any agreement made between Rowland and Columbia would impact the photographer's right to make and upload the image.--19h00s (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion and comments by User:19h00s. --Wdwd (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, nonsensical AI-generated image of a cowboy riding an elephant through a forest. Omphalographer (talk) 00:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 23:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo. --✗plicit 23:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G3, vandalism.. Vandalism is not obvious. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per com:Penis All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Big size, acceptable quality, good description. Maybe we can keep it. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Taivo. Our list of images showing actual penetration isn't that large yet. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep this is actually a quality image Dronebogus (talk) 12:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ✗plicit 23:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo look like it was brought somewhere else..? YeBoy371 (talk) 07:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
(1).jpg){kind=link}
- Source of photo below: https://x.com/Vliveofficial/status/1036820522409967616 YeBoy371 (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
(1).jpg){kind=link}
This image looks like screenshot or crop from an unknown source. MKFI (talk) 10:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated nonsense diagram full of garbled text. AI image models are, as a whole, not very good at diagrams. Omphalographer (talk) 04:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as gibberish. Belbury (talk) 11:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Not {{PD-US}} as claimed. Source give is "I was given it to use by the owner to use for their Wikipedia article i have created". VRT permission from the photographer is needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
This logo looks too complex to be free Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Absolutely, unless the copyright holder gives permission. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I sourced this image from the U.S. Marshals website. However, it was pointed out on the English Wikipedia that this appears to be a wedding photo (and therefore not a U.S. government work). Therefore, it should probably be deleted out of an abundance of caution. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
AI images with no apparent basis in reality masquerading as accurate depictions of an identifiable person. Out of scope - should never be used.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Second file looks like it was based on the photo seen at [1]. That photo is almost certainly in the public domain - it'd make a much better illustration than these AI-generated images. Omphalographer (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Alleged license could not be verified under the given source, Copyright violation Squasher (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This file was created solely using public domain material (File:Coat of arms of Montenegro.svg, File:Olympic rings with white rims.svg), so it does not constitute a copyright violation. It is not a valid nomination for deletion. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are right, my bad. The file should be kept. Sorry. - Squasher (talk) 08:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 14:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
File:DALL·E 2024-10-02 17.16.22 - An illustration depicting the concept of online product selling. The image should feature a laptop or smartphone screen displaying an e-commerce platf.webp
[edit]
Out of scope: typically horrific AI-generated diagram; only use was in out-of-place AI-generated English nonsense inserted in scwiki. Omphalographer (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rubin16 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 04:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo, not old enough to be in the public domain. --✗plicit 00:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Falsely claimed as own work without evidence of permission to suggest otherwise - source image: https://x.com/zak_nelson22/status/1770803736002060551 Hullian111 (talk) 12:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g, File:Amalaa.jpg is here; File:Masaa.jpg is here; File:Agwaluma.jpg is here; File:Umaru musa yar adua conference center Kaduna.jpg is here; etc.)
- File:Amalaa.jpg
- File:Masaa.jpg
- File:Jallof.jpg
- File:Naman Rago.jpg
- File:Tsire nama.jpg
- File:Wainan Arish da Kwai.jpg
- File:Wanka.jpg
- File:Fulani dress.jpg
- File:Kanuri.jpg
- File:Nama Balango.jpg
- File:Shinkafa da Mai da Yaji.jpg
- File:Agwaluma.jpg
- File:Umaru musa yar adua conference center Kaduna.jpg
- File:Yola city.jpg
- File:Hockey field in kaduna.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - 1) more complete and higher resolution version was here more than a year before Flickr upload and 2) Flickr uploader purports to be the subject (Matthew Hoffman). Copyright, however, initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject, and does not transfer but through writing. VRT evidence of permission is needed. Эlcobbola talk 19:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
in scope? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The work was completed in 1978 and authored by architects Regelio Villarosa and Lor Calma. Image may be imported to enwiki, which does not need to respect the restrictive copyright law of the Philippines and only respects U.S. law that allows commercial exploitations of buildings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Modern building, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. Ymblanter (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
watermark name does not match uploader's name nor uploader's other uploads; small but professional quality photo without exif data, strongly suspect copyvio. MPF (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photograph of an 11 year child that was uploaded in 2015; uploader had gotten rid of the license info (I restored it) so it's possible they want deletion. Also low quality so potential educational use is likely slim. Abzeronow (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
unused logo, maybe Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 21:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
small file size, low resolution, missing EXIF -> unlikely to be own work Polarlys (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative of copyrighted packaging and instructions.
Contains non-copyrightable portion, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep 01; Delete 02. The drawings are de minimis in the first photo, just as they are in File:Commodore TV Game 2000K.jpg (which we use as an example in COM:DM!). The closeup of those drawings in the second photo is not DM. Omphalographer (talk) 01:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion: kept #01 (DM), deleted #02 (not DM). --Wdwd (talk) 18:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
It was Uploaded for an article which was denied. Since there is no article it is not necessary to have the picture uploaded. Please delete KrsitinaB (talk) 05:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 23:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Small image, no exif data. The other images from this user were copyvio. Ovruni (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 23:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. Low resolution and lack of EXIF data. COM:VRT is necessary. S8321414 (talk) 09:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 23:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States. This cenotaph was created no earlier than 2000 and is too new to be in public domain due to age. Evidence of permission from sculptor is needed. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 23:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Just migrated this from enwiki, but given source is http://www.finglasashbourne.ie/progress_images/progress_rd4.jpg. The URL is dead now, but likely copyvio. Rschen7754 01:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCREENSHOT DanielPenfield (talk) 03:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Blurry, low-quality, out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Blurry, low-quality, out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by I dream of horses as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Also here. Yann (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by I dream of horses as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Hit on ancestory.com Yann (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
out of scope: unused fictional election apportionment diagram, wrong numbers (neither true for 2019 as the filename states, nor for the upload date 2020-10-11), maybe based on early projections or preliminary election results (file was uploaded on election day). 2003:E5:3748:4200:6856:8DB7:B95E:102A 23:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Este artículo de prensa es de mi autoría. La fotografía de la portada la saqué de Google. Oscar Seidel (talk) 13:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
out of scope: unused fictional election apportionment diagram, wrong number of seats, a correct image is at File:2021 Upper Austrian state election - composition chart.svg. 2003:E5:373E:7600:2919:3557:6D20:AB7 00:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kharkivian as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The person who is on photo and uploader's nickname are the same. So, it looks like a copyright violation. --Kharkivian (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Marked as {{PD-old-50}}, but without explanation why that should be true (the photo's given date is 1969, and the source provided doesn't say it is public domain). Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Let me look into this and come back. Whizz40 (talk) 14:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, I haven't had a chance to look into this yet as busy with work so will need more time. The image is used as a thumbnail on one article on English Wikipedia, in which the subject of the photograph features prominently. The source of the image is from a short biography in a paper published by the subject himself and that paper also features prominently in the article. On the face of it, I think this is fair use of a thumbnail image. What is the correct category for this? Whizz40 (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing this context. Commons does not allow fair use (see Commons:Fair use), so the image will need to be deleted here. The English Wikipedia allows fair use images under a set of narrowly defined exceptions. But I doubt that these would apply to the use of this image in en:Protocol Wars, for example because Commons already has various freely licensed photos at Category:Robert E. Kahn.
- Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from https://doughie.be/shop/?_gl=1*e71nve*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTA4OTA0NjA4LjE3Mjc4NDkyNDM.*_ga_T2T9XGPCQC*MTcyNzg0OTI0MC4xLjAuMTcyNzg0OTI0MC4wLjAuMTE4OTAwNTYyNw.. - used for advertising content spam article on nl-wiki as well Hoyanova (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Blogger Selfi more usefule for Instagram Wikitarisch (talk) 06:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. --2001:4652:FBAF:0:81BA:5C6:F555:F8E4 19:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: In use on 6 projects. --Achim55 (talk) 19:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose:
- - Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on.
- - Advertising or self-promotion.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#in_use Wikitarisch (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem like the image is being used in a promotional manner. It may have been intended as promo, but it looks like the blogger is unnotable enough that Wikipedians are just treating the photo like a nice stockphoto to depict activities of climbers on the depicted mountain. I'd agree with how it's used. It's an interesting photo and looks good enough to be used as a generic stockphoto. The promo part failed anyway. Keep Nakonana (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem like the image is being used in a promotional manner. It may have been intended as promo, but it looks like the blogger is unnotable enough that Wikipedians are just treating the photo like a nice stockphoto to depict activities of climbers on the depicted mountain. I'd agree with how it's used. It's an interesting photo and looks good enough to be used as a generic stockphoto. The promo part failed anyway.
Keep in use so must be in scope
--Headlock0225 (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:330-ps-9224-usn-1036187 15052972403 o.jpg Gildir (talk) 06:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 13:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Same size of pixelmal but different junk metadata (no need to host stupid advertizing for stupid Adobe or stupid Apple at Commons anyway), and different pixelmap, one of them is brighter. No obvious verdict about which one is better. Taylor 49 (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Nice Selfi, but no information value Wikitarisch (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE, but unless User:Losepp is Franz Trimmel, this is copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use, and likely not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder AkiraMuto". VRT permission from Akira Muto needed. MKFI (talk) 10:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Previously published in https://miroux.band/pages/contact with no indication of a free license. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 10:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Previously published in https://miroux.band/pages/about with no indication of a free license. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook The tag was removed out of process by RZuo in special:diff/928483698. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- describe "process". RoyZuo (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @RZuo: "If anyone disagrees with the speedy deletion of a particular file, please convert to a regular deletion request" per Commons:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- i'll put down everything once and for all before you even reply.
- the deletion reason is bogus.
- it's not a selfie.
- there's no com:csd about "notability criteria".
- i added it to two categories, one of which Category:IMovie shows this is for now the only file showing a person using imovie. i dont expect a deletion request based on com:scope would even be plausible.
- i clicked one of the two buttons "remove this tag". rejection of bogus templates by any commons user is self explanatory. what process? i expect an explanation for the rash accusation.
- the deletion reason is bogus.
- RoyZuo (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Yann: did you just delete "the only file showing a person using imovie"?--RoyZuo (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: how do you argue that https://www.flickr.com/photos/fabola/23491654620/ is not someone using imovie on a mac and moving the mouse?
- even if you cannot see the software is imovie, there is only 1 other file File:Video Producer in Cape Town.jpg showing a person and cat:video editing software, which shows a man who's not using the software but instead looking at the camera.--RoyZuo (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- "someone using iMovie" is different than a picture that could illustrate that use. The screen is blurry, and since it is a free software, anyone can create a useful picture or video. This is not one of them. Yann (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Undeleted after request at COM:UDR in order to start a new request to delete. Previous deletion request was Commons:Deletion requests/File:A fabulous birthday (23491654620).jpg. The file was nominated for deletion for the following reason: "This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook" Thuresson (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ping to interested parties: @Belbury: , @Abzeronow: , @Yann: , @Jameslwoodward: , @Bastique: , @RoyZuo: . Thuresson (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep demonstrates the use of iMovie without violating copyright. The composition of the photograph is also good. The photograph is interesting. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Thuresson: the author of the picture is User:Fabrice Florin, an active Wikimedian who is also now an employee of the WMF. Should they be pinged as well? I do not believe that should influence one way or the other whether we keep it or not, particularly as they uploaded it to Flickr and not to Commons, but since it does involve their photo and a person that they know well, I wonder if they should be directed to this conversation? Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per my previous comment. Yann (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep for the reasons stated by Bastique. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep one of the few commons files that show a girl using video editing software.
- and i dont see how this flickr image is in any way inferior to commercial stock photos of the same motif https://www.gettyimages.de/search/2/image?phrase=girl%20edit%20video https://www.shutterstock.com/search/girl-edit-video .
- the background is what a natural, realistic bedroom/study looks like, unlike the fake setups that give a commercial stock photo vibe.
- on top of that, imovie is proprietary software by apple. the slightly blurry screen is just a perfect middle ground such that it cannot be considered a copyright violation of the proprietary software but still is recognisable enough as a girl editing videos.--RoyZuo (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, this looks to be the only image on Commons that could meaningfully illustrate the concept of home video editing, and it would be a good fit at en:Video editing#Home video editing. It's not really a selfie, it barely shows one side of the person's face. The focus is the video editing that they're doing. Belbury (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Roy and Belbury, I've now added the image. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: consensus for keep. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, blurry image that illustrates nothing. According to description, it's supposed to illustrate a village, but other than the fact that it may have been taken in the vicinity of said image, it has no connection with its alleged subject. —Andreitalk 12:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used meaningfully. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Diogo Cardoso, Getty Images - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
just look at it... legit made me laugh when I zoomed in a little bit 75.4.39.1 15:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks fine to me, and it's in use across numerous wikis. Omphalographer (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. A good laugh is not a legit reason for deletion. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why did it make you laugh? Did it look inaccurate to you?? 2600:1003:B473:87:0:2C:B64D:5801 13:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- The "laugh" is from the reason for deletion above. Not mine. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
EXIF reads copyrighted by LIBOR PAWLAS -- Deadstar (msg) 15:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Isn't this literally the flag of the Congo Free State? This is a lazy attempt at alternate history. TansoShoshen (talk) 21:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused flag of a non-notable fictional country 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, not very educationally useful. This is my own image, and I am not familiar with deletion discussions well, so I apologize in advance if I have done anything wrong. L'Mainerque (talk) 18:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle in my opinion, the image can be easily replaced by something of a higher quality. My intention is to clear out some of my older low quality works that could be replaced by better quality and more significant images. L'Mainerque (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Request by original uploader: blurred, uploaded by mistake Sciking (talk) 19:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: likely AI-generated hoax. (I'm following up on the article at ptwiki.) Omphalographer (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- pt:Turgan 36 has been speedily deleted as a hoax. Not actually AI-generated, my mistake; it's actually an edited photo of a toy truck: [2] Omphalographer (talk) 04:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
![[2]](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/Heb9f1d4a9d9641fb8c1bbc5b73e75d35s/Brinquedo-t-tico-para-crian-as-modelo-de-liga-ve-culo-de-transporte-militar-carro-blindado.jpg){kind=link}
The image has not been deleted yet?? Leweling (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo, talk page and INUSE suggest that it could be below threshhold of originality Sadads (talk) 00:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, background may be above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 01:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The file is a cropped version - limited to the title text - from the cover of italian DVD disc 2 (you can see the cover here: https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71yTDrEVebL._SL1164_.jpg); I don't think that the background - a grassy background - it's a violation of rules, but I will comply with the community's decision. --Bradipo Lento (talk) 07:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with @Bradipo Lento the little bit of the background visible to the user, isn't enough to depicth the originality inherent in the design, Sadads (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. The image size and quality is so very low that nothing is visible in the background. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be a professionally taken photo with no indication it was set to open access. It appears here [3]. DaffodilOcean (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-free image--Commons only accepts free-to-use media. Uploader is unlikely to have the original or its 18th century copies in his or her possession from which he or she could have produced a digital facimile--see Physical history of the United States Declaration of Independence. Google image search says this image is an exact duplicate of the one appearing at [4] DanielPenfield (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- While I agree that it's probably not the uploader's own work, and has a poor filename (since it's not the Constitution), and may not really add anything different to the existing files of the Declaration of Independence that Commons already has… wouldn't it be public domain due to just being a "mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original" (just like the featured image that Commons already has)? Or is there some sort of "creative" touching up or something that would make it a copyrightable work? PeterCooperJr (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Here's what we know for sure:
- As of this writing, the uploader has refused to write down the exact provenance of the image.
- As of this writing, the uploader hasn't responded to this COM:DR which is 33 days old.
- The uploader's use of {{Own}} is at best a half-truth and, more than likely, completely false (in other words, he or she found it somewhere on the web, uploaded it, and is passing it off falsely as his or her own work).
- The uploader submitted it to COM:WLMUS2024 and the image both a) clearly doesn't match the submission criteria for that contest and b) clearly doesn't match the filename which is consistent with a "gag"-type submission.
- What we don't know:
- What is the exact provenance of this file? Is it, as User:Kevin Payravi claims, derived from File:United States Declaration of Independence.jpg? Does User:Kevin Payravi have firsthand knowledge or is he "making his best guess and a guess is as good as anything in determining whether an image is free to use without risk of intellectual property infringement"? --
- DanielPenfield (talk) 12:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm totally agreeing to Delete it. I just think it should be deleted for being "not educationally useful" and "redundant". I just don't see how it could be deleted for being a non-free image, when it's literally just a scan of the Declaration of Independence. PeterCooperJr (talk) 12:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- The "best guess" is that the files are the same dimensions and if you zoom in and look, they are, well, the same, down to the smallest details and artifacts. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 12:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm totally agreeing to
- Here's what we know for sure:
- Delete This appears to be the same exact photo as File:United States Declaration of Independence.jpg, just with slightly different coloration (either a result of editing or an artifact of re-saving). Not a non-free file, but a redundant unused file. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 08:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- First point:
- Per your user page, you're not a lawyer.
- Even if you were a lawyer, you're not a lawyer specializing in intellectual property law
- Even if you were a lawyer specializing in intellectual property law, you can't guarantee legal outcomes
- Even if you could guarantee legal outcomes (as in your confident proclamation "Not a non-free file"), a definitive determination of "no copyright infringement" would require a the conclusion of a lawsuit over the claim of copyright infringement plus all of the appeals of the judgment in that lawsuit to be exhausted.
- Second point:
- If your claim is true (namely that File:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSTITUTION.jpg is somehow derived from File:United States Declaration of Independence.jpg in all its vague "it looks to me"-level of detail), is a COM:Derivative work of another with a vague provenance ("Source" is given as "numerous", ZERO mention of exactly from which physical copy the digital image was scanned, who scanned it, where it was scanned, date of scanning, who gave the OK to put that scan out on Wikicommons) truly unencumbered? How exactly are you certain that nobody is going to emerge and claim "Our university scanned that as a .TIFF back in the 1990s, we want you to pay damages for hosting as if it were free to use for nearly 20 years"). Note that the original File:United States Declaration of Independence.jpg (as near as I can tell) was uploaded to English Wikipedia back in 2006--was there even a requirement for images to be free-to-use in the wild west era of English Wikipeda? --
- DanielPenfield (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- ...what in the world are you on about? Wikimedia Commons has hundreds of discussions per-day by non-lawyers to determine whether or not media is a copyright violation. We follow COMMONS:SCAN, which states that mere mechanical photos/scans of public domain documents do not carry copyright. The photo in question is very clearly a copy of File:United States Declaration of Independence.jpg, and the requirement to see that is not a law degree but eyes. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- First point:
Deleted: duplicate of File:United States Declaration of Independence.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Flickrwashing, new account with only this photo Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- in es:Adriana Corella there's an article about this woman. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
এটি পুরোপুরি মুক্ত সংস্করণের চিত্র নয়, Fair Use হিসেবে এর ব্যবহার সর্বোত্তম। NiloyBCPSC (talk) 12:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Falsely claimed as own work with no evidence of permission - source image: https://x.com/zak_nelson22/status/1771084049559277582 Hullian111 (talk) 12:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Author died in 1955, and the painting is from 1950, so it will be another 33 years until it is PD in the US Wiiformii (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Italian painter, undelete in 2026 should do it. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, work of Dwi Asih lintarti or campaign team https://www.instagram.com/p/C_UvJZJPKcK/?igsh=MXFoZG9ic2FxbGF5cg== Technetium 99m (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I am part of Mrs. Lintarti’s campaign team and I do have access to the source file. Raihandw (talk) 02:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can you send an email to the volunteer response team permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to verify that you are who you are and have the permission to release the files, thank you Technetium 99m (talk) 03:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Trolling 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- @Kelly The Angel, I support your statement. That flag is also a form of hate speech. Neo-Nazi and conservative social media accounts will use this.
- OMGShay 92 (talk) 10:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not clear if uploader/designer is a troll, they upload legit flags. If files like File:The Pink Swastika cover (5th ed).jpg exist, why not this? LGBTQ Nazis exist(ed). And flags like this are perfect to illustrate articles like en:Gay_Nazis_myth. Web-julio (talk) 21:10, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - obvious the flag is fictional and made to discriminate.
- OMGShay 92 (talk) 10:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I'm fairly certain that this or a similar flag was used in protest by some anti-LGBT group or groups. It could easily be used for educational purposes in Wikipedia articles about these groups or anti-LGBT sentiments in general. As for the claim that the flag is "hate speech", that's not a reason to remove it; we have plenty of images that are far more likely to be used to incite hatred, and no one is going to remove them. Removing a file depends on whether it has educational value, not whether it could be used to incite hatred. 5.142.178.40 21:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fictional nonsense. IMO fictional flags should be banned on Commons in general. --Achim55 (talk) 09:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Fictional, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Trolling 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom — OwenBlacker (talk) 10:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not clear if uploader/designer is a troll. If files like File:The Pink Swastika cover (5th ed).jpg exist, why not this? LGBTQ Nazis exist(ed). And flags like this are perfect to illustrate articles like en:Gay_Nazis_myth. Web-julio (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete.
- This is clearly hate speech. Wait until conservative troll accounts on Twitter use the flag to discriminate against LGBTQIA+ users.
- The flag appears to be fictional as it is not been flown in the real world, especially within the boundaries of Nazi Germany.
- OMGShay 92 (talk) 18:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously, this flag is too complex for anyone to use for any purpose. 5.142.178.40 21:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fictional nonsense. --Achim55 (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Trolling 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom — OwenBlacker (talk) 10:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep why is it trolling? Just because the flag imagery is forbidden in some places doesn't mean it's a bait. There are hundred hybrids like this. Were/are some nations harmful? They exist anyways. And it's useful to illustrate an article on LGBT and Japan topics. Web-julio (talk) 21:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is absolutely not useful for that purpose. This image is based on the war flag of the Empire of Japan, which was abolished in 1947 at the close of WWII. Using this flag to represent modern Japan is considered extremely offensive, just as it would be to use a Nazi-era flag to represent modern Germany. Omphalographer (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not sure if this flag has ever been used by anyone. However, the problem seems to be with the whole Category:LGBT and regional/national hybrid flags: it's easy to find flags of rather forgotten historical entities that are unlikely to be used. I think this problem needs to be addressed somehow. 5.142.178.40 21:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fictional nonsense. --Achim55 (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Does not look like own work, but photo of photo. Who is author of original photo and when (s)he died? When and where the photo was first published? Taivo (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The person who scans and uploads the photo is not the orignal author. Thus, the licence and the author have been changed by now. The photo looks from a time around 1900, and thus the photographer has most likely died more than 70 years ago. Please keep- --NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- If it is made circa 1901, then it is in public domain due to age. But why do you think, that it is not made for example in 1931? Taivo (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Das Foto stammt aus einer Festschrift der Marie-Reinders Realschule aus dem Jahr 1961. Fotograf unbekannt. Leider ist das Original nicht mehr vorhanden. Susanne A. Meyer (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Changes by User:NearEMPTiness are mere assumptions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Hornstrandir1 as Speedy (speedy). I do not understand, why the image must be deleted. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Edit summary was "doublicate" [sic]. It's entirely possible that this is indeed a duplicate - images from government sources are often distributed through multiple channels and end up uploaded to Commons multiple times - but we'd need to know what other file it's a duplicate of before deleting it. Delete now that the duplicate has been identified. Omphalographer (talk) 17:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicate is File:Crowded boardwalk in the Lower Geyser Basin (70d45aa1-a30f-4f13-a7de-f74224a9b768).jpg and it has more comprehensive info. – BMacZero (🗩) 03:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Hornstrandir1 as Speedy (speedy). I do not understand, why the image must be deleted. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The same file is twice to be found within the Category:Lower Geyser Basin. See and compare to File:Crowded boardwalk in the Lower Geyser Basin (26804377716).jpg
- I thought one is superfluous.
- There are by the way, also some other dublicates within this category.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 18:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Hornstrandir1: {{Duplicate}} is the best template to use to tag duplicates for deletion. – BMacZero (🗩) 03:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @BMacZero I would suggest adding {{Duplicate}} as another option in the Tools menu to the left, to be activated via preferences, but only available to deserving users (i.e. sysops, license reviewers, and autopatrolled users). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is the somewhat newer upload, but at a quick glance has better info. I'd suggest redirecting File:Crowded boardwalk in the Lower Geyser Basin (26804377716).jpg to here; first copy any info that might be on that page and not this one.
- And in the future, please use {{Duplicate}}. - Jmabel ! talk 08:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @BMacZero I would suggest adding {{Duplicate}} as another option in the Tools menu to the left, to be activated via preferences, but only available to deserving users (i.e. sysops, license reviewers, and autopatrolled users). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Hornstrandir1: {{Duplicate}} is the best template to use to tag duplicates for deletion. – BMacZero (🗩) 03:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: this one, but deleted the other version, per User:Jmabel. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
AI modification of File:Caudillo liberal Morazan pintura casa presidencial El Salvador.jpg that introduces inaccuracies (eyes, icon on sash, etc.). Should not be used. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1. As original file author is Lolling, uploader is AnaLulu, redirect creator is Mateus2019 and nominator is Solomon203 (all different people), the redirect does not qualify for speedy deletion and I create a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needless redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Origine non renseignée, image ayant moins de 70 ans, probablement non libre de droit --Vanuatu (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Origine non renseignée, image ayant moins de 70 ans, probablement non libre de droit --Vanuatu (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Please keep "Tracey McKinney in Saudi Arabia teaching neonatal healthcare", although this file was temporarily tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nope, I changed my mind. Let's just stick with the 2-3 aspect ratio flag, it's most suitable for it. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, and duplicate anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Osobní duvody tvůrce Arevrenyi (talk) 15:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not a NRHP site Colette Eshleman (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: just a random puddle photo, no educational value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo of existing photo, missing original author, date, source, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Front view of Mireuk Daebul statue at Bongeunsa temple with reflection on floor at night in Seoul.jpg
[edit]
Own photograph, regretfully per COM:FOP South Korea. Apparently built between 1986 and 1996. Maybe the whole Category:Mireuk Daebul, Bongeunsa should be deleted (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Category:Mireuk Daebul, Bongeunsa) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unfortunate, but our hands are tied, and the non-commercial requirement in South Korea's FOP laws seems clear based on COM:FOP South Korea. I agree that the other images in the category will likely need to be deleted, as the statue isn't incidental in any of them. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Mural ("Art, Much More than Art") at art installation in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632997.tif
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 12:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Not a work by Tasnim, photographed by Amir Cohen for Reuters [5] HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Tasnim doesn't seem to be strict about copyright. I suggest not to approve uploading Pictures from this site Hanay (talk) 07:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Hanay Tasnim is actually an invaluable source of freely-licensed files, but it must be used with extra cautious. Please read this for more information. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan This picture was not taken by them. So they are probably not that reliable. This image should be deleted because it violates copyright Hanay (talk) 14:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Hanay I agree, that's exactly why I nominated this file for deletion. However, I disagree that Tasnim files should not be approved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan This picture was not taken by them. So they are probably not that reliable. This image should be deleted because it violates copyright Hanay (talk) 14:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Hanay Tasnim is actually an invaluable source of freely-licensed files, but it must be used with extra cautious. Please read this for more information. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this plaque was created in 2019. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO. Adamant1 (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
The image was uploaded from an NWS website.
I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source. They confirmed that they
- own the copyright on the image
- do not want to release it into the public domain
"This is definitely not Public Domain and I'm not planning to release it into the Public Domain at this time. [...] If there are any others that you suspect are my photos that may be being misused, please do not hesitate to reach out. "
I have forwarded the conversation to the VRT. (ticket:2024100210010288)
This is not a free image, so we can't host it here.
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Speedy delete: it is clear that this isn’t public domain; and that said copyright holder does NOT want it to be so. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
This particular photo was unattributed at the source,[6] but because it is unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties and looks more like a public submission, I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (New Orleans).
They confirmed that it is not an NWS image but contributed by a member of the public, whom they did not name:
"This image was shared to us by a member of the public, and they allowed us to use it for the web page. It's a still image from a video of the tornado they took from their home. "
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024100210010484).
Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Images from NWS La Crosse history page
[edit]- File:Downtown LaCrosse aerial.png
- File:La Crosse Regional Airport.jpeg
- File:La Crosse airport tower.jpeg
- File:La Crosse Center interior.png
These files are all sourced to a page of a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We generally rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
These images were all published without any attribution,[7] but because they are unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties, I reached out the to NWS office that published them (La Crosse). They told me:
- they do not know who took these photos and "don't have easy access to documentation of where/who the images are from"
- other images on that page appear to be a mixture of NWS photos and some that "appear to be acquired from other parties/resources: Chamber of Commerce, Partner Groups, Internet Sources"
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024100210010528).
Because we cannot verify that they are (or were ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If the NWS has lost track of their ownership and they are truly orphan images, they will enter the public domain 120 years after they were taken, probably somewhere around 2120.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Well, this image isn't the F5 Hudsonville tornado, it's the F4 Saugatuck tornado, and it isn't forming, it's dissipating, but that's all beside the point!
The uploader sourced this image from a National Weather Service history page. The photo was taken by Jarvin Kleiman, a resident of the area at the time, and provided to an NWS researcher by a member of the local historical society. Mr Kleiman passed away in 2002.[8]
Correspondence with the NWS researcher confirms:
- they have independent evidence confirming that Mr Kleiman took the photo from his home (meaning that it is not the work of the NWS or another US government agency)
- they are not specifically aware of any prior publication of this photo.
I have forwarded this conversation to the VRT (ticket:2024100210010644)
He did think that it might have appeared in newspapers of the time. However, searches of local newspapers on newspapers.com and newspaperarchive.com failed to turn up this specific image. I focused on The Grand Rapids Press, the Holland (Evening) Sentinel and The Holland City News for the weeks following the event, plus the 10-, 20-, 25-, and 30-year anniversaries of the disaster.
The Grand Rapids Press did run another photo by Mr Kleiman, taken within moments of this one, and I have uploaded it with the correct description here: File:Dissipation of the F4 Saugatuck, Michigan tornado 1956.jpg. It is definitely free of copyright and can be used in place of this image if we delete it.
As a photo taken in the United States prior to 1989, its copyright status rests on whether, when, and in what context it was first published.
In this particular case, there is no known publication before 2006, when the NWS published a series of articles to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the disaster.[9]
There is no evidence that Mr Kleiman ever released this image into the public domain, and there is no way to ask him now.
Therefore, per COM:ONUS unless anyone can provide evidence that:
- this particular image was published prior to 1989 without following copyright formalities (like the other one from this series was) OR
- Mr Kleiman ever released this into the public domain or under a free license OR
- his estate or heirs ever released this into the public domain or under a free license or would be willing to do so now
this image is presumably protected by copyright that will not expire until 2073, 70 years after Mr Kleiman's death, and we cannot host it on the Commons.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- I've been fooled! Delete because I'm pissed. LOL! XD ChessEric (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
This is not a file, and it should be deleted because it has no use. Chealer (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Tempaltes are perfectly in scope ("not a file" is not a valid reason for deletion). Still, this tempalte is redundant and useless, so strong support for deletion. There are also Template:Invalid SVG (to be deleted too, no interwiki) trans and Template:InvalidSVG d:Q15715403 trans. Taylor 49 (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Commons:License laundering. None of these files are works created by the sources mentioned. Iranian news agencies such as Tasnim, Mehr and Fars have a conventional way of publishing their own photographs (mentioning the photographer's name and using a watermark). While lack of these do not necessarily mean that the photos are not freely-licensed, lack any further indication that these works are owned by those sources and the fact that many of these photographs are found elsewhere on the internet or obviously seem like screenshots, means that we'd better delete them.
- File:وحید آقاپور بازیگر ایرانی.jpg
- File:Vahid Aghapoor.jpg
- File:نیما کرمی.jpg
- File:Nima Karami.jpg
- File:Amin Hayai and his son Dara Hayai.jpg
- File:Dara Hayai and his father.jpg
- File:Dara Hayai.jpg
- File:محمدحسین پویانفر مداح ایرانی.jpg
- File:محمدحسین پویانفر.jpg
- File:Mohammad Hossein Pouyanfar.jpg
- File:عباس موزون سازنده و مجری برنامه زندگی پس از زندگی.jpg
- File:عباس موزون مجری ایرانی.jpg
- File:Abbas Mowzoon.jpg
- File:حامد کاشانی کارشناس شیعه.jpg
- File:حامد کاشانی.jpg
- File:علی قلیچ.jpg
- File:Ali Ghelich.jpg
- File:احسان یاسین.jpg
- File:Ehsan Yasin.jpg
- File:Mozhdeh Lavasani 2023.jpg
- File:Peyman Yousefi.jpg
- File:Kamran Najafzadeh 2024.jpg
- File:Hossein Haghighi.jpg
- File:عباس موزون.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
non-notable
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello dear@HeminKurdistan 4ipid (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello dear @HeminKurdistan Please explain why you nominated this photo File:Javid Nasiri.jpg for removal under the title of not remarkable?
- This person is an Iranian pop singer and has pages on international platforms such as YouTube, Spotify, Apple Music, Instagram, isni, imdb, etc.
- If you check his wikidata item and his platforms, you will realize that this person has an acceptable reputation. This photo was taken by me and I am very careful in the photos I upload.
- Please review and remove this photo from the nomination. I am waiting for your reply. Thanks 4ipid (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @4ipid. Everyone can create accounts on social media. The Wikidata item has been deleted. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
No indication of being a work by SNN/Mehr (no photographer credit, no watermark), seems like a screenshot from the film
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
No indication of being a work by Mehr (no photographer credit, no watermark), seems like a screenshot from the film
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and these plaques were all created in the 2010s. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Армянск, 2019 год, 32.jpg
- File:Пам’ятна дошка Хілкову О.Д., с.Павлівка.jpg
- File:Табличка станции ворзель.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 19:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Sculpture at Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA), an art museum in Los Angeles, California LCCN2013632448.tif
[edit]No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Erected in 1974 without a copyright notice, so this is {{PD-US-no notice}} per COM:PACUSA. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Added {{PD-US-no notice}} tag to file licensing Nv8200p (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this plaque was created in 1992. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:18-110-0029 Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування у місті Т. Г. Шевченка.jpg
- File:46 Тарас Шевченко 1993.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування у місті Т. Г. Шевченка.,.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 20:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this gravestone was created in 1975. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO. Adamant1 (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this bust was created in 1971. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Будинок Лесі Українки в Новограді-Волинському.JPG
- File:Будинок, в якому народилася і жила Леся Українка.jpg
- File:Будинок, в якому народилася і жила поетеса та громадська діячка Леся Українка.jpg
- File:Національний музей ім. Лесі Українки. - panoramio (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)