Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/06/19
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
copyright vio Actplus.student Outlook Stu Fan (talk) 07:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept, vandalistic nomination, nominator is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright vio Actplus.student Outlook Stu Fan (talk) 07:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept, vandalistic nomination, nominator is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
just test for deletion A1816586 (talk) 10:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: COM:INUSE. Used in many pages. Also, the photo have an educational value. TentingZones1 (talk) 10:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Test request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
test deletion A1816586 (talk) 10:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Test request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake A1816586 (talk) 10:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe diese Datei hochgeladen, um zu testen wie das geht. Ich habe jetzt im Nachhinein leider festgestellt, dass ich es nicht mehr löschen kann und ich übersehen habe, dass ich in der Spiegelung vom Bildschirm zu sehen ist, was ich nicht möchte. Ich bitte deshalb darum, dass diese Datei gelöscht wird. Eli-Dworak (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Omar parapaino (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake KOLLEPARARUTVIK (talk) 07:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Extremely low quality Kritzolina (talk) 08:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Das Löschen dieser Datei ist ganz in meinem Interesse. Ich habe leider vor dem Hochladen nicht gesehen, dass sie schon auf meinem Rechner so klein als Ausgabe aus meinem Bildverwaltungsprogramm Capture One generiert worden war.
- Ist es bitte möglich, der nachfolgenden Datei mit der Nummer 12 die nach dem Löschen dann fehlende Nummer 11 zu geben? Wenn das nicht geht, ist das auch ok.
- Andreas Huth Huth, Andreas (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload (photo 12 moved to 11 as requested). --Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrong info I Ryan Ka (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
due to the documented error after reuploading, "Failed to initialize OpenSeadragon, no image found", images cannot be extracted from PDF in Wikisource – after deletion I would try anew Funkhauser (talk) 12:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Frong info I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded I Ryan Ka (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Made this by mistake. Indopug (talk) 13:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong format Kunakawan.ID (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong format Kunakawan.ID (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
File:14 Aniversario de EFE Chile.png Lenudia (talk) 17:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Esta Imagen sera borrada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenudia (talk • contribs) 17:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism only file, poor quality 42.200.150.208 03:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
FOP Mong Kok? 181.43.3.228 16:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep What? That would be COM:FOP Hong Kong. And yes, it has FoP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- A request for removal of an image simply because it is a permanently blocked user-created image does not constitute a condition for removal (WMF Global ban is another matter). Whether the first picture constitutes infringement or fair use, whether the second picture is used for obvious vandalism, and whether the third picture violates the things prohibited by the laws of the Wikimedia Foundation's location, such as child pornography, etc. The picture does not have the second and third problems, and the only thing that needs to be checked is whether the picture is a fair use or a copyright infringement. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- The only thing that needs to check if an image is a fair use image is that Wikimedia Commons does not use fair use images. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- A request for removal of an image simply because it is a permanently blocked user-created image does not constitute a condition for removal (WMF Global ban is another matter). Whether the first picture constitutes infringement or fair use, whether the second picture is used for obvious vandalism, and whether the third picture violates the things prohibited by the laws of the Wikimedia Foundation's location, such as child pornography, etc. The picture does not have the second and third problems, and the only thing that needs to be checked is whether the picture is a fair use or a copyright infringement. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- It was uploaded by User:MOHLEAOSONDWN 2300, who is not blocked. Don't be confused by this crazy troll. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- That would be "AXXXXK" with 4 instances of "X", rather than "AXXXXXK" with 5. I added to m:srg#Global lock for AXXXXK socks. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- No comment on the OP, but the IP 14.0.226.5 is checkuserblocked on enwiki (I am not a Commons CU). I did not check User:Ikan Kekek as there is absolutely no evidence and the report is clearly retaliatory, as usual for this LTA. Ivanvector (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Yann and Ikan. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- You're really bad at this, IP, and your false reports aren't fooling anybody. Ivanvector (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Move IP disruptive editing and troll.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Vandalism only 219.76.15.4 06:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per nomination. IP is globally blocked. --Achim55 (talk) 08:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright vio Actplus.student Outlook Stu Fan (talk) 06:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept, obvious new sock was blocked. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Infringement: (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8618153,137.0211758,3a,62.318874y,241.997131h,85.262810t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s28-J3i-RZJonYLFQp2m_iw!2e0?lucs=,47071704,47069508&g_ep=CAISBjYuNzAuMRgBIIGBASoSLDQ3MDcxNzA0LDQ3MDY5NTA4QgJKUA%3D%3D&g_st=ic&g_st=ic) Iphone3GS2009 (talk) 23:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mustafa alanzi (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable works, or not own work. take a look at that: https://x.com/khalidadelzo3bi/status/1394709461546192897
- File:PUSWP LOGO.jpg
- File:Samir mansour library after the destruction.jpg
- File:Hammed mansour bookshop.jpg
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 12:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mustafa alanzi (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyvio images
- File:Hīt waterwheels.jpg
- File:Hit city corniche.jpg
- File:Hīt city corniche.jpg
- File:Euprates river Hīt city.jpg
- File:Hīt city corniche 2024.jpg
- File:Street in Hīt.jpg
- File:Hīt city corniche 2024 01.jpg
- File:Corniche, the city of Hīt, on the Euphrates River with the Waterwheels.jpg
- File:Corniche, the city of Hīt, on the Euphrates River.jpg
- File:Corniche, the city of Hīt, on the Euphrates River with the Waterwheels 2024.jpg
- File:Hit city watch is during sunset 2024.jpg
- File:Hit city watch during sunset.jpg
- File:Hīt city watch during sunset 2024.jpg
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Author request (Special:permalink/886178558). --Alaa :)..! 10:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by VauTee as Copyvio (logo) and the most recent rationale was: history - This may be or may not be PD-textlogo, but would be borderline. Converting speedy to regular DR. Jcb (talk) 06:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I think the logo meets the criteria for c:TOO as the text is displayed in a more original way than just an "AzTV" mention. Luchoxtrab (talk) 15:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The logo is very simple. There is no guideline on the threshold of originality in Azerbaijan, but I'm inclined to keep this one as it is just three letters and some simple coloured stripes. It would certainly not be copyrighted in the US. --Bedivere (talk) 16:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Files: all pages in Category:Files supported by Wikimedia France - Elix - obsolete.
- Reasons :
- Those files have been superseded by superior .webm versions.
All Wikimedia usages have been migrated to the news.webm
file.
I'm part of the team (Wikimedia France's Meta:Lingua Libre/SignIt) who uploaded these files and are now replacing them.
Please delete all files within Category:Files supported by Wikimedia France - Elix - obsolete.
Once done, please message to User:Dragons Bot's bot master User:Yug : User:Dragons Bot is ready to create#REDIRECT
to the new filenames, to ensure complete migration fallback.
- Those files have been superseded by superior .webm versions.
--Yug (talk) 12:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thank to Gbawden. Yug (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Done as requested. --Gbawden (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clown a historian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Slightly garbled AI-generated images of historical events (headless soldiers, a six-legged elephant, etc). Out of COM:SCOPE.
Belbury (talk) 08:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, not useful, major misgeneration issues. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmad hussein annan 1966 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-notable person. A google search returned only this post: [1] which also means COM:COPYVIO
Quick-ease2020 (talk) 08:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmad hussein annan 1966 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PERSONAL, out of scope, unused
Quick-ease2020 (talk) 08:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmad hussein annan 1966 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PERSONAL, out of scope, unused
Quick-ease2020 (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
More alternate history/future history crap Dronebogus (talk) 08:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
More alternate/speculative history crap, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
THE FLAG OF WARS. More alternate/speculative history crap, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
More alternate/speculative history crap, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
non-notable person. Google search of the name returned no results Quick-ease2020 (talk) 08:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO taken from facebook [2]. Not listed under license Quick-ease2020 (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO taken from Twitter(X): [3] Quick-ease2020 (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
source is 404, image seems lower res than at source, false title "global" when it only shows a part of the world Prototyperspective (talk) 09:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. The title is from the source, and the Internet Archive has numerous captures of the same resolution version up through last year (e.g. [4]). I've uploaded a higher resolution (and more global!) version from https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA02991. Omphalographer (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for uploading the original and adding the source. More or less fixes the issues. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Almost duplicated with File:Neuilly - Porte Maillot RER E 2024 21.jpg Remontees (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Almost duplicated with File:Neuilly - Porte Maillot RER E 2024 29.jpg Remontees (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Alt history map, fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 02:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Unless this is part of a notable work of fiction, Delete --Enyavar (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Last time I looked, Belfast, Maine is in the USA, not UK! Bidgee (talk) 04:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't change much though; per COM:FOP US artworks and sculptures are Not OK. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I know that FOP in the US is a little more strict than the UK but this is just another sloppy DR by User:A1Cafel who is yet to fix it! Bidgee (talk) 11:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't change much though; per COM:FOP US artworks and sculptures are Not OK. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No educational use, out of scope. 0x0a (talk) 05:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deletion failed. 186.172.69.112 11:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused videogame screenshots uploaded for enwiki draft en:Draft:^Wii-Horror deleted as hoax/vandalism. Out of COM:SCOPE if it's a small personal game project, and even if the uploader created the environments pictured, they may have done so within a game (such as Roblox of Minecraft) which doesn't allow free use of its screenshots.
- File:Jail of the cheaters.jpg
- File:Chillrooms ikd.jpg
- File:Bkrooms.jpg
- File:Creepy stuff.jpg
- File:Cool level.jpg
- File:9qqriyuwt4pjgi.jpg
- File:Abandoned CM.jpg
- File:Nostalgic But Uncanny Location.jpg
Belbury (talk) 07:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Poor quality, low resolution image. Many better quality images of subject matter already on Commons. Unused. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file outside of COM:SCOPE (same for all files from the uploader). Marbletan (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by U don't ask (talk · contribs)
[edit]Second image has Facebook EXIF, first image has minimal EXIF and is low resolution. User's previous upload of File:Ys sharmilamma.jpg was also claimed as own work, but was an official image published on social media months previously.
- File:Minister Konda surekha.jpg
- File:తేది- 15.06.2024, హైదరాబాద్హైదరాబాద్ ...జ్స్ ...ర్యంలో ఉన్నతస్థాయి సమావేశం నిర్వహించడం జరిగింద.jpg
Belbury (talk) 08:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete user has another copyvio image. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia メイド理世 (talk) 09:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia メイド理世 (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia メイド理世 (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
If the flags are fictional then how can they possibly be within scope of Commons?
- File:Afghan Tribal Flag - Dilaazak.jpg
- File:Afghan Tribal Flag - Yusufzai.jpg
- File:Afridi tribe flag.png
- File:Bandera Paixtunistan2.png
- File:Bangash Tribe Flag.png
- File:Khattak Flag.jpg
- File:Pashtunistan Flag.png
- File:Screenshot 20201128-111223 Pinterest.jpg
- File:Turi Tribe Flag.png
- File:Yusufzai Tribe flag.jpg
Trade (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EXIF says "© CRS / Marine nationale / Défense" Belbury (talk) 14:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 14:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CommunionJake (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE as nothing educational other than raw text.
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-19.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-18.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-17.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-16.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-15.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-14.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-13.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-12.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-11.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-10.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-30.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-0.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-29.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-28.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-27.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-26.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-25.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-24.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-23.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-22.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-21.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-20.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-1.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-2.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-40.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-41.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-39.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-37.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-38.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-36.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-35.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-34.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-33.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-31.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-32.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-4.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-9.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-8.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-3.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-7.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-5.jpg
- File:1b641025ab8d5d2994fe7f70032dd582-6.jpg
Belbury (talk) 14:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted to @AOFAPPSTUDIO in the EXIF. Belbury (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Azad Kashmir.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clinkfbotz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, one with FB code in EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Bogus PD-US claims. These a COM:DW photographs of a June 2024 newspaper (and German, not US)
- File:Rheingau Taunus; Spirituelle Schüler auf dem Weg zu Gott.jpg
- File:Rheingau Taunus; Völlig unterschierdliche Vorstellungen.jpg
- File:Rheingau Taunus; Der Ashram in Springen gefällt nicht jedem.jpg
- File:Rheingau Taunus; Mit Chai-Tee unterm Kirschbaum.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable bookcover, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Newton sarker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional corporate images or business marketing infographics, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused diagram without context or clear purpose, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This photo is sourced to tumblr, but there is no evidence that this is freely licensed. 0x0a (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nam Trung Dung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data.
- File:CQT 12.jpg
- File:Olympia 2010.jpg
- File:Đội bóng tỉnh Bình Phước.jpg
- File:Bơi lội trẻ em.jpg
- File:Quốc lộ 14 123.jpg
- File:Quốc lộ 14 12.jpg
- File:Hội chợ nông sản trái cây Bình Phước.jpg
- File:Cao su mùa thay lá.jpg
- File:Rừng cao su mùa thay lá.jpg
- File:Hồ Suối Cam, thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Olympia THCS Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:THPT Dân tộc nội trú tỉnh Bình Phước.jpg
- File:Thi đấu bóng đá tại trường THPT chuyên Quang Trung.jpg
- File:Đêm trại Chuyên Quang Trung.jpg
- File:Học sinh tiểu học Tân Đồng tham gia thi mâm cổ đẹp tại “Đêm hội trăng rằm” năm 2013.jpg
- File:Các em thiếu nhi cùng nhau tranh tài trong phần thi vẽ tranh.jpg
- File:Các bạn trẻ đến từ xứ sở mặt trời mọc dạy học sinh Việt vẽ tranh thể hiện tình hữu nghị Việt – Nhật.jpg
- File:Học sinh thị xã tham gia tập luyện võ thuật tại trung tâm hoạt động thanh thiếu niên tỉnh.jpg
- File:Học sinh THPT Hùng Vương tham gia “phiền tòa giả định”.jpg
- File:THPT Hùng Vương kéo co.jpg
- File:Đội tình nguyện trong buổi đón học sinh khóa XI nhập học.jpg
- File:Học vui cùng Khoa học xã hội.jpg
- File:Câu lạc bộ (CLB) Tiếng Anh trực thuộc Đoàn trường THPT chuyên Quang Trung tổ chức vòng chung kết cuộc thi English Eloquence Contest - hùng biện tiếng Anh..jpg
- File:Trao giải cho các thí sinh lọt vào Vòng chung kết Hội thi hùng biện tiếng Anh lần I năm 2014.jpg
- File:Học sinh khối THCS thị xã Đồng Xoài tham gia thi giải toán trên mạng.jpg
- File:Rò chơi đi cầu khỉ trong buổi sinh hoạt hè của học sinh Trường THCS Tân Phú (Đồng Xoài).jpg
- File:Ngày hội Thư viện xanh tại trường tiểu học Tân Phú năm 2017.jpg
- File:Thư viện Bình Phước tổ chức phục vụ xe thư viện lưu động tại các trường..jpg
- File:Thị xã Đồng Xoài chạy Olympic.jpg
- File:THCS Tân Xuân đạt chuẩn quốc gia.jpg
- File:HS thi nghi thức đội.jpg
- File:THPT Hùng Vương tiếp sức mùa thi.jpg
- File:Lễ kỷ niệm 5 năm tại AIE.jpg
- File:Học sinh chuyên Quang Trung tham gia các trò chơi tại Lễ hội kỷ niệm 10 năm thành lập trường.jpg
- File:THPT Hùng Vương lế khai giảng.jpg
- File:Chủ tịch nước Nguyễn Minh Triết thăm trường chuyên Quang Trung năm 2010.jpg
- File:Lễ kỷ niệm 10 năm chuyên Qung Trung.jpg
- File:Lể Tổng kết năm học 2016-2017 tại trường phổ thông Dân tộc Nội trú tỉnh Bình Phước.jpg
- File:Các bạn học sinh trường THPT Hùng Vương thị xã Đồng Xoài tham gia tiếp sức mùa thi năm học 2016-2017.jpg
- File:Cổng trường Cao đẳng Công nghiệp Cao su trên đường Phu Riếng Đỏ, thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Trường Cao đẳng Sư phạm Bình Phước.jpg
- File:Trường tiểu hoc Tân Đồng, thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Nghi thức đón học sinh đầu cấp tại một Lễ Khai giảng của trường THCS Tân Phú, thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Khách sạn Bombo tại thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Quả điều.jpg
- File:Trung tâm hành chính tỉnh Bình Phước đặt tại thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Một góc ngã tư Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Chùa Quang Minh - Thị xã Đồng Xoài - Tỉnh Bình Phước.jpg
- File:Siêu thị Co.op mart Đồng Xoài .jpg
- File:Một góc dân cư thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Một tuyến đường chính của thị xã Đồng Xoài.jpg
- File:Tượng đài Chiến thắng Đồng Xoài tại thị xã Đồng Xoài, Bình Phước.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused text diagrams, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.
- File:企業Xのバランスシート.jpg
- File:民間銀行Aのバランスシート.jpg
- File:Cc BS0001.jpg
- File:Cc BS2.jpg
- File:Credit creation BS03.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manisha Domun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: visual characteristics suggest screengrab.
- File:Critere de l'Aspect visuel dans les ressources numeriques.png
- File:Codl1.png
- File:Resourcecodl2.png
- File:Resourcecodl1.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Articulos artisticos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with FB or transmission code in EXIF data.
- File:MPS CROKER.jpg
- File:Mps croker.jpg
- File:CROKER MPS.jpg
- File:Mps croker en el teatro sor juana.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only, Non-commercial use" A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only, Non-commercial use" A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only, Non-commercial use" A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only, Non-commercial use" A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only, Non-commercial use" A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kjkylejenkins (talk · contribs)
[edit]Made up parliament - Out of Scope
- File:Svgfiles-2017-10-29-04-08-37-295690-12646944420325172305.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2017-10-11-01-31-14-199771-18160254989188571734.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2017-10-10-03-22-48-954318-10531609387451445186.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2017-09-27-00-22-31-680657-11096732889708007122.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2017-05-28-01-19-35-092228-1497628116301861736.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2017-05-05-15-50-45-135145-9921871649032645681.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2017-04-28-23-38-06-176974-11697254090954679650.svg
- File:PA 4188.svg
- File:4186palayout.svg
- File:4186layout.svg
- File:4183pa.svg
Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kjkylejenkins (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-res diagrams without context or clear purpose, little educational use, unusable, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- The last file references Rutania and some calendar date that doesn't match the commonly used ones, so it's likely fictional. Abzeronow (talk) 01:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in use, SVG replacement available Ђидо (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The art exhibited inside the premises of a Museum is from Richard Serra who died in 2023 and Spain has a standard of life + 70 years. FoP in Spain only applies to works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public tracks and passes. A museum is not permanently open to the public as it closes in the night Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:PCP, maybe probably fully not OK, still, waiting for another discussion regarding COM:FOP Spain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only" A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only" A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only" A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only" A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only" A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
per COM:PERSONAL, this is just a random street somewhere. No detail on where it even is, not in use anywhere. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Extremely poor quality image (out of focus, partially obstructed) of an unidentified model of school bus. Not in use anywhere, because it is not a useful image. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture, not own work https://prowrestling.fandom.com/wiki/Joe_Gacy?file=Joe_Gacy_2023.png HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a copyrighted picture...it is a picture that is free use as it is a promo picture, but you are correct, not own work. There is no picture of him up on his page and there should be, especially with his edition into the Wyatt Sicks SynfulHavok (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- addition* sorry. SynfulHavok (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There are no "free use" "promo pictures" as far as Wikimedia Commons is concerned. Only images in the public domain or under a free license are accepted (Commons:Licensing), and "fair use" media files are not allowed (Commons:Fair use). --Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
False flag that has never existed. HoosierMan1816 (talk) 19:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
False flag that has never existed. HoosierMan1816 (talk) 19:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I, the photographer and uploader of this file, do not wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons anymore. HoosierMan1816 (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This file is a lower quality PNG version of a different file and thus has been replaced by the other file. HoosierMan1816 (talk) 19:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: alternate history flags and maps.
Omphalographer (talk) 19:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete +1 --Enyavar (talk) 11:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
this looks like personal artwork and conclusions and not an evidence base — billinghurst sDrewth 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused and useless redirect due to my initial upload with an incorrect filename, which has been fixed via moving. Consigned (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Blank picture Rathfelder (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PedroAmorim877 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SELFIE images, could be advertising, including links.
- File:Equipe Estação Indoor.jpg
- File:Estação Indoor Agência de Marketing Digital.jpg
- File:Primeira Equipe da Estação Indoor.jpg
- File:O Inicio da Estação Indoor.jpg
- File:Equipe Estação Indoor (Agosto de 2023).jpg
- File:Leonado Rocha Toddynho.jpg
- File:Chagas Lima.jpg
- File:Pedro Amorim.jpg
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 22:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, they are all outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- To the list above, I've added a couple more files from the same user which should be deleted for the same reason. Marbletan (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this useful? The only instance of use is at wikidata:User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/Commons brothers help him, which does not seem related to the scope of Wikidata project and only serves as a repository of screenshots of past discussions. Any references to discussions are best linked than using screenshots. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This image was not passed by flickr review bot and the image is unused. The flickr account owner has made his images private. Leoboudv (talk) 11:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work as claimed. No exif, etc. Other upload by user deleted Gbawden (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Pre-1929 PD license does not apply. Original source of the map is a book published in 1980 by the Princeton University Press [5] HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
File:The tank of the imperial army is going to Azerbaijan to fight against the Democratic Party.jpg
[edit]According to the information, this is a screenshot taken from a documentary film. Many footage from Cold War era Iran are still protected, because they are created by Western companies, including British Pathé and Universal. We have had similar cases of copyvio in the past. Unless the original source and its creator are not exactly known COM:PCP rules that PD-Iran should not be a default assumption. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Original source and creator unknown. PD-Iran license questionable, just like Commons:Deletion requests/File:The tank of the imperial army is going to Azerbaijan to fight against the Democratic Party.jpg HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a YouTube video being broadcasted on screen. Effectively COM:SCREENSHOT. Description claims "Being a YouTuber hasn’t been easy but worth it." Unless the underlying YT video is under an acceptable Creative Commons license, this image should be deleted aa a derivative of an unfree YouTube video. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Three Dikgosi monument, Gaborone. As Botswanan copyright law does not grant Freedom of Panorama, this image under commercial Creative Commons licensing infringes the monument sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statua di Giulietta (Verona)
[edit]As far as I understand, and provided that there is no freedom of panorama in Italia (moreover, the statue is in a courtyard, not always accessible), it's not possible to upload these pictures
- File:Casa di Giulietta - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Casa di Giulietta din Verona6.jpg
- File:Estatua de Giulietta, Verona - panoramio.jpg
- File:IT Verona House Of Giulietta 1.JPG
- File:Julia in Verona.JPG
- File:Romeaoandjulietbalconyphoto.JPG
- File:Statua di Giulietta.JPG
- File:Statua giulietta casa Verona.jpg
- File:Statue of Juliet.JPG
- File:Verona 014.JPG
- File:Verona 015.JPG
- File:Verona 1998.jpg
- File:Verona 4.jpg
Discasto talk 23:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
KeepThis courtyard is open to public visitation at all times. Only the interior of the so-called "Juliet's House" is restricted to paying visitors. The house is medieval (File:Plaque - House of Juliet - Verona 2016.jpg), so I don't think there is any property rights being violated in this case. José Luiz disc 02:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)- @Jbribeiro1: The problem does not actualy relate to how much you have to pay to go in the courtyard (the courtyard is not permanently opened and, if FoP existed in Italy, exceptions could be restricted to artworks permanently exhibited in open places). However, the problem is much simpler. There's no Freedom of Panorama in Italy (see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Italy). --Discasto talk 09:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- OK. The proposal is restricted to the statue itself and so I agree. Keep Verona 1998.jpg and IT Verona House Of Giulietta 1.JPG (possibly De Minimis); Delete the rest. José Luiz disc 20:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. I can agree to your proposal and leave outside the images you mention. --Discasto talk 21:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- OK. The proposal is restricted to the statue itself and so I agree. Keep Verona 1998.jpg and IT Verona House Of Giulietta 1.JPG (possibly De Minimis); Delete the rest. José Luiz disc 20:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jbribeiro1: The problem does not actualy relate to how much you have to pay to go in the courtyard (the courtyard is not permanently opened and, if FoP existed in Italy, exceptions could be restricted to artworks permanently exhibited in open places). However, the problem is much simpler. There's no Freedom of Panorama in Italy (see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Italy). --Discasto talk 09:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statua di Giulietta (Verona)
[edit]No FoP in Italy, missing permission from italian sculptor Nereo Costantini (1905-1969) for his work. Can be undeleted in 2040.
- File:Casa di Giulietta (4).jpg
- File:Casa Giulietta- MG 0136a.jpg
- File:Casa Giulietta- MG 2368a.jpg
- File:La statua di Giulietta con alcuni turisti.jpg
- File:La statua di Giulietta vista dal balcone.jpg
- File:Monumento a Giulietta Capuleti 2.jpg
- File:Monumento a Giulietta Capuleti 3.jpg
- File:Monumento a Giulietta Capuleti, Verona.jpg
- File:Monumento a Giulietta.jpg
- File:Statua di Giulietta (atrio esterno) - 2018.jpg
- File:Statua di Giulietta (interno museo Casa di Giulietta).jpg
- File:Statua di Giulietta nella Casa di Giulietta - Verona.jpg
- File:Statue of Juliet (10570064784).jpg
- File:Ջուլիետի արձանն իր տան մոտ.jpg
Wdwd (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of the Reichstag dome
[edit]No freedom of panorama for interior views in Germany.
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-104.jpg
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-105.jpg
- File:Interior of Reichstag dome.jpg
- File:Mitte, Berlin, Germany - panoramio (170).jpg
- File:Germany, Berlin - Reichstag - panoramio.jpg
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-110.jpg
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-106.jpg
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-107.jpg
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-108.jpg
- File:14-09-09-Bundestag-RalfR-109.jpg
- File:2009-06-28 Reichstag 04.jpg
- File:2009-06-28 Reichstag 05.jpg
- File:2009-06-28 Reichstag 06.jpg
- File:2019-05-05 Reichstag 26.jpg
- File:2019-05-05 Reichstag 27.jpg
- File:2019-05-05 Reichstag 28.jpg
- File:2019-05-05 Reichstag 29.jpg
- File:2020-02-13 Deutscher Bundestag IMG 3493 by Stepro.jpg
- File:2020-02-13 Deutscher Bundestag IMG 3495 by Stepro.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2723.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2724.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2725.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2726.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2727.jpg
- File:Berliin-riigipäevahoone2.jpg
- File:Berliin-riigipäevahoone3.jpg
- File:Berliin-riigipäevahoone4.jpg
- File:Berliin-riigipäevahoone5.jpg
- File:Berlin - Reichstag Dome (17034641758).jpg
- File:Berlin - Reichstag Dome (17222403515).jpg
- File:Berlin 2012 (016).jpg
- File:Berlin 2012 (017).jpg
- File:Berlin 2012 (020).jpg
- File:Berlin 2012 (025).jpg
- File:Berlin 2012 (035).jpg
- File:Berlin kopula Reichstagu 1.jpg
- File:Berlin kopula Reichstagu 3.jpg
- File:Berlin Reichstag Kuppel Innenansicht.jpg
- File:Berlin Reichstagskuppel,Spiegel + Plenarsaal von oben.jpg
- File:Berlin, Reichstagsgebäude, Kuppel, innen 2014-07 (1).jpg
- File:Berlin, Reichstagsgebäude, Kuppel, innen 2014-07 (2).jpg
- File:Berlin, Reichstagskuppel SW.jpg
- File:Berlino dicembre 2009.jpg
- File:BerlinRT.jpg
- File:Bundestag (236987481).jpeg
- File:Bundestag Blick von Tribuene durch Kuppel.png
- File:Bundestag, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 04.jpg
- File:Bundestag, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 05.jpg
- File:Bundestag-kypol.jpg
- File:Bundestagskuppel Berlin.jpg
- File:Center Of The Dome (196860387).jpeg
- File:Deutscher Bundestag, 2020.jpg
- File:Die Kuppel (Reichstag dome) - geo.hlipp.de - 1829.jpg
- File:Die Kuppel (Reichstag dome) - geo.hlipp.de - 1852.jpg
- File:Die Kuppel (Reichstag dome) - geo.hlipp.de - 5891.jpg
- File:Die Kuppel (Reichstag dome) - geo.hlipp.de - 5892.jpg
- File:Ein beliebtes foto - Berlin - geo.hlipp.de - 5890.jpg
- File:Glass Dome Berliner Reichstag Hochformat 2007.jpg
- File:Greiferspiegel - geo.hlipp.de - 1740.jpg
- File:Im Bundestag Berlin.jpg
- File:In der Reichstagskuppel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Inner-cone-of-the-reichstag berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Interior de la cúpula del Reichstag - panoramio.jpg
- File:Interior of Reichstag dome (2003).jpg
- File:Interior of Reichstag Dome.jpg
- File:Interior of the Reichstag dome 2015.jpg
- File:Mirrors Bundestag Berlin (184375923).jpeg
- File:Mitte, Berlin, Germany - panoramio (171).jpg
- File:Norman Foster Dome (7731132696).jpg
- File:Norman Foster Dome (7731150652).jpg
- File:Norman Foster Dome (7731154832).jpg
- File:Norman Foster Dome (7731158858).jpg
- File:One more of the Reichstag dome (11993087484).jpg
- File:Parlament - parliament (3161768806).jpg
- File:Plenarsaal Bundestag und Spiegeltrichter Kuppel.jpg
- File:Reflections-on-the-cone berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Reichstag (26163019).jpeg
- File:Reichstag (3874806327).jpg
- File:Reichstag (3875592142).jpg
- File:Reichstag (3875594472).jpg
- File:Reichstag 2 - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg
- File:Reichstag 3 - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg
- File:Reichstag Berlin (65828751).jpeg
- File:Reichstag Building Berlin tunliweb 04.jpg
- File:Reichstag Building Berlin tunliweb 05.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome designed by the architect Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 02.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 1.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 2.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 3.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 4.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 5.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 6.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome interior 7.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome Interior.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys Ltd) 01.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys Ltd) 02.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys Ltd) 03.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys Ltd) 04.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys Ltd) 05.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 02.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 04.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 05.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 06.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 07.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 08.jpg
- File:Reichstag Done, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 09.jpg
- File:Reichstag Glass Dome.jpg
- File:Reichstag interno cupola.jpg
- File:Reichstag Kuppel Innen.jpg
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 14.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 15.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 17.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 18.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 19.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 20.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 21.JPG
- File:Reichstag-year-2000 berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Reichstags-Kuppel.jpg
- File:Reichstagsgebäude 003.jpg
- File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlín (març 2013) - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlín (març 2013) - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlín (març 2013) - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel - panoramio - Immanuel Giel.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel - panoramio.jpg
- File:REICHSTAGSKUPPEL - panoramio.jpg
- File:REICHSTAGSKUPPEL 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel innen im Reichstagsgebäude 2H1A0621WI.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel innen im Reichstagsgebäude 2H1A0629WI.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel innen im Reichstagsgebäude 2H1A0756WI.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel innen im Reichstagsgebäude 2H1A0819WI.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel innen. Berlin. PIC 1239BerlinWI.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel innen. Berlin. PIC 1315BerlWI.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel von Innen.jpg
- File:Reichtag Dome designed by Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 01.jpg
- File:Reichtag Dome designed by Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 02.jpg
- File:Reichtag Dome designed by Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 03.jpg
- File:Reichtag Dome designed by Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 04.jpg
- File:Reichtag Dome designed by Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 09.jpg
- File:Reichtag Dome designed by Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 10.jpg
- File:Sunset at the Reichstag - panoramio.jpg
- File:The Interior of Reichstag Dome.jpg
- File:The Reichstag dome (11928573986).jpg
- File:Tiergarten, Berlin, Germany - panoramio (64).jpg
- File:Tiergarten, Berlin, Germany - panoramio (65).jpg
- File:Two little red dots (11868403256).jpg
- File:Unsetting Mirrors (146251391).jpeg
- File:View In The Dome (196413549).jpeg
Lukas Beck (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep wir hatten eine Fotogenehmigung für alle Bereiche des Rechtags durch die Bundestagsverwaltung. --Ralf Roletschek 08:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Die Bundestagsverwaltung hat sicherlich das Hausrecht. Gilt das auch für das hier relevante Urheberecht? Lukas Beck (talk) 08:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment (in English) unless proven, we should not assume that the German government holds the copyright of the work of architecture. Assume that architect Norman Foster still holds the economic rights, not the government as Ralf Roletschek wants to claim. We have nominated dozens of good quality images of the dome for deletion because German FoP does not extend to views of landmarks or structures from indoors (therefore, architects or artists can enforce copyright to interior views and can restrict any commercial Creative Commons licenses that Wikimedians/Flickr users apply to their images). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Exterior of the Reichstag dome, for external views of the dome that are not taken from the street level. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- There is a Template FoP-USonly, which says :
- Although this image is free under US copyright law and thus acceptable on the English Wikipedia, it is believed to be non-free in its home country. This image should not be transferred to Wikimedia Commons unless it can be proven that depictions of the architectural work are free in the country where the work is located, as Commons requires that images be free in the source country and in the United States.
- If somebody knows how to use it, one could perhaps keep some of the best photos, which of course will not appear in Wikimedia Commons?! Olga Ernst (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I always wonder on things like this: if we are confident that Norman Foster holds the relevant copyright, has anyone considered trying to get hold of him and get the relevant permission? I would think he'd be fine with these images being out there. - Jmabel ! talk 19:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I second this idea Victorgrigas (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Probably most of the artists would be happy and proud having their works shown and shared all over the world Olga Ernst (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- To obtain his permission, you'll have to: a) find direct contact to Foster; b) convince him to release the work; c) convince him to take necessary bureaucratic steps especially the permission e-mail to COM:VRT. I guess for most of us a) is the hardest part, but I can imagine that c) can also be quite difficult. --A.Savin 11:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'd guess that unless someone has a back channel, the easiest way to apprise the firm of the issue (I don't really know whether the copyrights are in his personal name or that of the firm, but they would know) is to go to https://www.fosterandpartners.com/contact and use the "Press" channel to make initial contact. But, really, we ought to do this sort of thing broadly: there ought to be a cooridintated campaign reaching out via various architects' organizations to try to get large numbers of architects and firms to make such releases. I suspect many, if not most, architects would wish to do so. - Jmabel ! talk 20:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ping @Rkieferbaum. Darwin Ahoy! 14:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think the first question is whether Foster + Partners still holds the economic rights. Many countries make it obligatory that these be transferred to the state in public contracts. I'll try to check this when I can. In any case, there's no harm in reaching out to Foster and any other architecture firms to ask for permission (which, with Foster and many other firms, would be useful since they have projects all around the world). This could even be a generalized campaign, with banners, social media and such. I'll gladly help if you all think that makes sense. Rkieferbaum (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: or turn several of architects into FoP allies. I'll elaborate this in the ongoing discussion at Commons talk:Freedom of panorama, which involved a heated debate between me and two other users concerning possible forced application of U.S. FoP here and abandonment of local FoP laws (this may be favorable for Reichstag dome actually but may raise German authorities' eyebrows towards Wikimedia Commons for trying to use more lenient U.S. law instead of German law for free uses of architecture). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ping @Rkieferbaum. Darwin Ahoy! 14:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'd guess that unless someone has a back channel, the easiest way to apprise the firm of the issue (I don't really know whether the copyrights are in his personal name or that of the firm, but they would know) is to go to https://www.fosterandpartners.com/contact and use the "Press" channel to make initial contact. But, really, we ought to do this sort of thing broadly: there ought to be a cooridintated campaign reaching out via various architects' organizations to try to get large numbers of architects and firms to make such releases. I suspect many, if not most, architects would wish to do so. - Jmabel ! talk 20:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Olga Ernst Evidence says that often they are not that happy when commercial use is involved. Darwin Ahoy! 09:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well, like in many other cases, also artists differ in opinion ;-) Olga Ernst (talk) 12:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Olga Ernst it depends, but we are not sure if Architect Norman Foster desires for his buildings to be freely exploited by netizens and content creators as well as postcard/tourism souvenir makers, or not. Even if he agrees, the German jurisprudence (in the case of German FoP) is a final stumbling block. Applying German case law on FoP, photographers can only distribute their inages of the dome under commercial Creative Commons licensing if the dome is depicted from the street level. Good shots of the dome, especially from the balcony of the Reichstag building, are not OK. That may not be a good view of the dome, but there is nothing we can do for the heavily-regulated German FoP with limitations imposed by German courts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: how would FoP come into play if we got a waiver from the architect? - Jmabel ! talk 00:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel first of all, we still do not have that waiver that must be through COM:VRTS authorization. So FoP restriction comes into play. What I meant in the comment above is that if Foster did indeed wants to allow the general public to freely use his buildings in an expressed indication manner (something like a desire). But that is just an assumption of mine. Note that an express desire is not equivalent to an automatic waiver; his firm should still confirm that desire (if ever he has such that desire) send a correspondence to Wikimedia through COM:VRTS allowing the public to freely use images of his dome even for commercial purposes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: which is why I suggested above that those who want to salvage these photos should contact his firm and try to get such a waiver. And I'd bet ten to one that no one has followed up on it, because as usual it seems people would rather complain than seek an actual solution. - Jmabel ! talk 00:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: how would FoP come into play if we got a waiver from the architect? - Jmabel ! talk 00:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Olga Ernst it depends, but we are not sure if Architect Norman Foster desires for his buildings to be freely exploited by netizens and content creators as well as postcard/tourism souvenir makers, or not. Even if he agrees, the German jurisprudence (in the case of German FoP) is a final stumbling block. Applying German case law on FoP, photographers can only distribute their inages of the dome under commercial Creative Commons licensing if the dome is depicted from the street level. Good shots of the dome, especially from the balcony of the Reichstag building, are not OK. That may not be a good view of the dome, but there is nothing we can do for the heavily-regulated German FoP with limitations imposed by German courts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well, like in many other cases, also artists differ in opinion ;-) Olga Ernst (talk) 12:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- To obtain his permission, you'll have to: a) find direct contact to Foster; b) convince him to release the work; c) convince him to take necessary bureaucratic steps especially the permission e-mail to COM:VRT. I guess for most of us a) is the hardest part, but I can imagine that c) can also be quite difficult. --A.Savin 11:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Probably most of the artists would be happy and proud having their works shown and shared all over the world Olga Ernst (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I second this idea Victorgrigas (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I always wonder on things like this: if we are confident that Norman Foster holds the relevant copyright, has anyone considered trying to get hold of him and get the relevant permission? I would think he'd be fine with these images being out there. - Jmabel ! talk 19:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I think there was enough time to try to obtain permisison. If nobody is willing to give it a try, the images have to be deleted. --Krd 12:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and per Krd. --A.Savin 18:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of the Reichstag dome
[edit]No FoP in Germany for interior views. The buildings architect is Norman Foster who is still alive. Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.
- File:190930 Blick auf die Kuppel aus dem Plenarsaal.jpg
- File:2007-04-28 in Berlin 16.jpg
- File:2007-04-28 in Berlin 18.jpg
- File:2007-04-28 in Berlin 19.jpg
- File:2020-02-13 Deutscher Bundestag IMG 3489 by Stepro.jpg
- File:2020-02-13 Deutscher Bundestag IMG 3490 by Stepro.jpg
- File:2020-02-13 Deutscher Bundestag IMG 3491 by Stepro.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2709.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2710.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2711.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2712.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2713.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2715.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2718.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2720.jpg
- File:2020-07-02 Deutscher Bundestag by OlafKosinsky 2721.jpg
- File:2inner-cone-of-the-reichstag berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:9442609993 Jpg (165453529).jpeg
- File:Berlin - Interior of the Reichstag dome.jpg
- File:Berlin - on top of Reichstag (15845555546).jpg
- File:Berlin - Reichstagkuppel (Reichstag Dome) - geo.hlipp.de - 31286.jpg
- File:Berlin 2012 - Day Two (4) (18354721339).jpg
- File:Berlin Reichstag Innenaufnahme.jpg
- File:Berlin Reichstag Kuppel von innen.jpg
- File:Berlin Reichstagdome.JPG
- File:Berlin Reistagskuppel,Dachöffnung.JPG
- File:Berlin Reistagskuppel,Empore innen.JPG
- File:Berlin, Reichstagsgebäude, Kuppel, Lüftungsloch 2014-07.jpg
- File:Berlin-seen-thru-the-glaas-of-the-reichstag-cupola berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Blick von Glass-Dome in Plenarsaal 2007.jpg
- File:Cupola Reichstag Foster.jpg
- File:Details-of-the-reichstag-cupola berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Die Kuppel (Reichstag dome) - geo.hlipp.de - 1823.jpg
- File:Die Reichstagskuppel ist ja oben offen - panoramio.jpg
- File:Dscn0009 berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Dscn0013 berlin-year-2000.jpg
- File:Interior of Reichstag dome (1).jpg
- File:Interior of Reichstag dome (4).jpg
- File:Norman Foster Dome (7731147670).jpg
- File:Norman Foster Dome (7731151368).jpg
- File:Pasarelas de la cúpula - panoramio.jpg
- File:Reichstag (3875596916).jpg
- File:Reichstag Berlin rooftop IMG 7794.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dom.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome designed by the architect Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 03.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome designed by the architect Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 04.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome designed by the architect Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 05.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome designed by the architect Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 06.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome designed by the architect Norman Foster, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 07.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome Spires.jpg
- File:Reichstag dome, Berlin (2) (8012700016).jpg
- File:Reichstag dome, Berlin (8010523640).jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 03.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 05.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 06.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar) 07.jpg
- File:Reichstag Dome, Berlin (Ank Kumar, Infosys Ltd) 06.jpg
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 06.JPG
- File:Reichstag, Berlin (2015) - 16.JPG
- File:Reichstagsgebäude 004.jpg
- File:Reichstagskuppel - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Sonnenblende in der Reichstagskuppel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Unter der Glaskupppel des Deutschen Bundestages.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Frederick McCaskey Home, Toledo, Ohio, 1907 - DPLA - bf5db2cebb798356abf8a0cffbd9601c.jpg
[edit]Pointlessly bad quality. Someone could easily get a better copy of the postcard from eBay or something. Adamant1 (talk) 00:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- When they do, it would be reasonable to delete this, but if it's the best image we have of this, then we should keep it for now. -Jmabel ! talk 18:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Jmabel. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work created from images of different individuals on banners. No FoP in India for 2D works. — doclys (❀) 05:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Source doesn't indicate that the photo is released under cc licence. COM:COPYVIO Quick-ease2020 (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
削除依頼は File:Wide Chinese milk vetch field- Japan.png 。意図しないファイル名となり、新規に File:Wide Astragalus sinicus field- Japan.png を設けました。 Namazu-tron (talk) 10:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Pls. delete Unintentionally named File:Wide Chinese milk vetch field- Japan.png. New file named File:Wide Astragalus sinicus field- Japan.png up loaded.--Namazu-tron (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep not delete for user talk page. メイド理世 (talk) 10:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The user talk page should be kept. This appears to be a mistaken and mis-targeted Deletion request 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This is my own picture. I don't need this picture anymore. Humayunkober (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope personal image. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Mickaël en résidence (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I would think the artwork at the center of this photo was copyrighted. Is there any reason to think that it is not? Jmabel ! talk 00:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codc as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of project scope. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- It was a picture of an self-presentiation-person article but not user now for any project scope. --Codc (talk) 02:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This image looks downloaded and stolen directly from internet or blog. The user doesnt look like a regular uploader or copyright holder of this image. Where is the copyright for this image? This image needs to be deleted. Please provide proof for copyright and ownership purposes for Wikipedia rules and regulations. i- Thanks. 122.171.18.241 04:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from a textbook, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Great Mosque, Daloa
[edit]The mosque was inaugurated in 1987. As there is no usable Freedom of Panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, these images under commercial Creative Commons licensing infringe on the architect's copyright. Also nominated are two images showing interior architecture.
- File:GRANDE MOSQUEE DE DALOA.jpg
- File:Grande mosquée de Daloa 1.jpg
- File:Grande mosquée de Daloa 2.jpg
- File:Grande mosquée de Daloa 3.jpg
- File:Grande mosquée de Daloa.jpg
- File:La grande mosquée de daloa 01.jpg
- File:La grande mosquée de daloa 02.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 2003, so the date is wrong, so needs some proof of license. PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Mr Космодемьянский died in 1988, so the date is wrong, it looks like the image was scanned without license from the author. PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I am the owner of this photo and I'd like to remove this as the person appeared in the photo has requested me to delete it TanoDano (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I am the owner of this photo and I'd like to remove this as the person appeared in the photo has requested me to delete it TanoDano (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I dont see any valid PD justification. Masur (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Low res press photo, source information obviously incorrect. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, permission from the architect is needed. Nurtenge (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio von Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. https://www.dokumentationszentrum-schwerin.de/ausstellungen/dauerausstellung/1933-1945
Das Foto ist von 1939 von einem unbekannten Fotografen. Es ist nicht bekannt, ob er seit 70 Jahren tot ist also seit 1954. Fotos unbekannter Fotografen sind in der Regel nach 100 Jahren gemeinfrei, also vor 1924. AxelHH (talk) 18:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Der unbekannte Fotograf dürfte, da es sich offensichtlich um einen professionellen Fotografen handelt, zum Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme mindestens 18 Jahre gewesen, also vor 1924 geboren sein. Meines Ermessens spricht daher nichts gegen das Beibehalten des Bildes; aber ich bin kein Experte, daher mögen das berufenerer Administratoren entscheiden. Dirk-Franz (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ob es ein Amateurfotograf oder ein professioneller Fotograf war spielt keine Rolle beim Urheberrecht. Der Unbekannte ist auf jeden Fall der Urheber mit Urheberrechten. Wenn er vor 1924 geboren wurde heißt das nicht, dass er schon seit 70 Jahren tot ist. Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass er schon 1954 mit 30 Jahren gestorben ist. Gemeinfrei sind Bilder 100 Jahre nach Aufnahmezeitpunkt und der hätte vor 1924 sein müssen. --AxelHH (talk) 21:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine the copyright status of this photograph. The file can be restored after 120 (+ 1) years, in 2060, with {{PD-old-assumed}}, assuming the 1939 date is correct (don't know where that came from, probably the Bundesarchiv file that is mentioned). --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
the photo might be open licensed, but the material in this image is not SDudley (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, significant DW by Flickr photograher, allowed on Flickr, not here. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploads by User:ZidaneHartono
[edit]- File:Transperth Mercedes-Benz OC500LE (Volgren CR228L) TP1635-"The House Of Wellness" Advertisement.jpg
- File:Transperth Volvo B7RLE (Volgren CR228L) TP1697 @ Kenwick Rd After Wanaping Rd,Kenwick.jpg
- File:Transperth's Mandurah Shuttle Logo.png
- File:The Rear Of Transperth's Volvo B7RLE (Volgren CR228L) TP1682.jpg
- File:Transperth Trains Moquette Seat Covering (A-Series).jpg
- File:PTA WA Moquette Seat Covering On Buses.jpg
- File:Transperth Mercedes-Benz OC500LE (Volgren CR228L) TP1633-"98five Sonshine FM Perth" Rear Advertisement.jpg
- File:Rail Safety Advert On A Transperth A-Series (2018).jpg
- File:Transperth Mercedes-Benz OC500LE (Volgren CR228L) TP2014 @ Gosnells Station With Nine News Rear Ad.jpg
- File:Horizons West Austral Allstar CVL2818-Moquette Seat Covering.jpg
- File:Horizons West Higer T-series 1GNQ969-Moquette Seat Covering.jpg
- File:Transperth Mercedes-Benz OC500LE (Volgren CR228L) TP1427 "Nine News" Rear Ad.jpg
- File:PTA WA TransRegional Logo.jpg
- File:WA Police Hyundai Genesis 1GGX389-Meeandip Derbarlmarra Painting On Rear Windscreen.jpg
- File:Horizons West Mercedes-Benz O305G (PMCSA Commuter) 1GLV542-Adelaide Metro Fare Chart.jpg
- File:BPSWA Mercedes-Benz O305 (JW Bolton) MTT339-Vehicle Information & History.jpg
- File:Transperth MAN A24 NG313F (Custom Coaches CB60) TP3001-Tommy Hilfiger Advertisement (Rear Nearside).jpg
- File:Transperth Volvo B7RLE (Volgren CR228L Futurebus) TP1683-The Pigeon Project Advertisement (Rear Offside).jpg
- File:Rottnest Express Mercedes-Benz O405NH (Volgren CR225L) 1GRX420-Rear Exterior Shell.jpg
- File:Rottnest Express Mercede-Benz O405NH (Volgren CR225L) 1GSI111-Rear Exterior Shell.jpg
Threshold of originality in Australia is very low and De minimis is hard to accept due to the file names, the way it was photographed. -- Bidgee (talk) 03:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Just a version of the Sovereign Citizen “civil ensign” with black stars. No discernible use. Dronebogus (talk) 08:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of common subject in bad format Dronebogus (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. Original image [6] Quick-ease2020 (talk) 11:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation - illustration copied from a 2022 book (ISBN 9788394854126). Michał Sobkowski (talk) 11:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Please delete this photo College train (talk) 11:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
The map is under a NC ND license as per http://a3.kyiv.ua/projects/metromap/license/ thus is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. Base (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- sad but true, Delete. Also, the date says 2018, while the map itself has the timestamp of 2023. Undelete around ~2100? --Enyavar (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Copied from the airports construction website which contradicts the stated ownership. 2001:A61:12C8:701:10D0:A80B:39AB:E87 13:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Taken from the airport's website without stating so, clearly not "own work" 2001:A61:12C8:701:10D0:A80B:39AB:E87 13:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. Source link [7] (The one on the file page is broken) doesn't license the image under that license. Quick-ease2020 (talk) 13:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be digitally manipulated, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 13:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Mid version of the song "One" by Metallica. It's not the same song, but it's still a derivative version. Compare with the original here Cambalachero (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
obvious copyvio i believe. Speedy delete
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why make a deletion request if it's that obvious? Trade (talk) 13:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Trade because "i believe", i thought it was not worth to find a proof for that. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Album cover, already uploaded in enwiki under fair user, see en:W:File:Weezer - Blue Album.png. If this is not a copyvio, then the archive from enwiki should be transferred. Günther Frager (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
expectly capture the rooms in CordisHotel — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.75.86.158 (talk) 03:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright vio Actplus.student Outlook Stu Fan (talk) 06:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
User already globally locked 42.200.141.9 10:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. Taken from [8] Quick-ease2020 (talk) 11:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
extremely unlikely to be author's image. It has no EXIF data, of low quality, and can be found on the internet [9] and [10] and [11] Quick-ease2020 (talk) 11:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be author's work. It has no EXIF data, of low quality, and can be found on the internet: [12] and [13] and [14] Quick-ease2020 (talk) 11:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. Screenshot from interview [15] which is not licensed under creative commons
Quick-ease2020 (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Image créée pour ma page d'utilisateur Wikipedia. Aujourd'hui remplacée, je souhaite sa suppression, m'étant plus d'aucune utilité et n'ayant que peu d'intérêts encyclopédique. Merci. GommeMagique (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Uploading your own photo for your user page is self-promotion. FosforitoFernandez2001 (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
BearwalkCarpenter
[edit]- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_19.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_21.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_38.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_45.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_57.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_88.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_91.jpg
- File:Bearwalk-Broad-Anne_93.jpg
COM:NOTUSED COM:PERSONAL COM:COPYVIO I uploaded a few images of myself, and I think the simplest solution is to delete them, because (a) I received permission from the copyright owner to upload the file to Commons but I chose the wrong license: I only realized recently that I chose CC BY-SA 4.0 which is too permissive. I should have picked CC BY-ND which allows no derivatives or adaptations. (b) I had permission to upload a headshot but just reviewed the email from the copyright holder and I shouldn’t have uploaded the several other photos tagged here. (c) They are arguably outside of project scope (not used, not educational, and self-promotion). Note: I separately flagged the File:Anne_E._Carpenter_(2019).jpg which meets (a) and (c) above but not (b). --DrAnneCarpenter (talk) 18:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also adding File:Anne E. Carpenter (2019).jpg which is the derived headshot. If the licence is not accepted. I have relicenced that file to match the parent, as that is where it should be for the moment. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
фотография была ошибочно выложена мною несколько лет назад, фотография недействительная реальности. прошу удалить Гараев Талыб (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
similr https://rouren.jp/noda/archives/2089 eien20 (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
similr https://www.homemate-research-senmon.com/dtl/00000000000000141422/album/ eien20 (talk) 22:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
It is unknown if the author "Baselle" is an officer or employee of the government of the Philippines. Bluemask (talk) 03:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 09:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
uploader not photographer (Gerald von Foris), no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 11:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChickenAstronaut (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are photos of a product and product packaging that includes image of George HW Bush and a USAF airplane. If these images are copyrighted, then these photos include copyrighted material. It is possible that the photos are US government works and are public domain. In this case, the there is the question whether the presence and arrangement of the other elements of the trading card, and product packaging are sufficient to be copyrightable.
Whpq (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I dont see any valid PD justification. Masur (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
the exif states it is copyrighted "all rights reserved". Username does match with name in exif so clarification may be required? -- Deadstar (msg) 15:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: for now since credit in EXIF data matches uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
INRI...? 181.203.16.172 16:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Image créée pour ma page d'utilisateur Wikipedia. Aujourd'hui remplacée, je souhaite sa suppression, m'étant plus d'aucune utilité et n'ayant que peu d'intérêts encyclopédique. Merci. GommeMagique (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. It looks like a scan from a printed source. Ђидо (talk) 17:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Ђидо, prijatelju, ovu fotografiju sam ja lično snimio i to u mom stanu. Lično poznajem Dada Topića, a tada je bio sa suprugom Mirom kod mene, posle koncerta u Nišu. Ako pogledaš moje doprinose videćeš da imam mnogo fotografija nekadašnjih i sadašnjih filmskih i muzičkih zvezda. Većina ih je skenirana sa originala iz 80-ih godina, koje sam sačuvao. Zato te molim da povučeš ovaj predlog za brisanje, jer tvoja pretpostavka prosto nije tačna. Pozdrav! Miomir Magdevski (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weird texture is what triggered my tag. Is it a photo of a print on a canvas? Ђидо (talk) 18:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'll withdraw the nomination. Ђидо (talk) 18:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
lower quality of the same picture LeFnake (talk) 17:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Philippe Médard en 1989.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Blurry photo of an unidentified city, I think wrongly categorised as London. The City of Lskyline from London City Hall filename comes from a deprecated version of MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-filename which told users of blacklisted image titles that City of London skyline from London City Hall was a good title to use, so lots of people just used it (changing it up a bit when Commons said the filename was already in use). The Southwark categories seem to have been added in good faith 11 years later on the assumption that this is a photo taken from London City Hall, which is in Southwark. This does not look like anywhere in London to me. Belbury (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
This file is a lower quality PNG version of a different file and thus has been replaced by the other file. The file also has the wrong aspect ratio which does not follow Indiana state flag code. HoosierMan1816 (talk) 19:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Indiana State Flag Hung Vertically.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, probably re-upload of File:Robert Mleczko.jpg 159.205.181.252 20:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work - low res, exif data. 159.205.181.252 20:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Credit in EXIF data not matching uploader, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Explicit copyvio - no CC licence on source page (https://bartekkaczmarek.com/about/) 159.205.181.252 20:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamile de Castro (talk · contribs)
[edit]despite it is high resolution and has good perpective i doubt this image is in project scope. because people in it is not notable. i cant find wikipedia articles about them.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
These are images of assorted artworks, apparently exhibited at the "East African Regional Tourism Expo 2022" (as the uploader claimed). However, Burundi does not grant Freedom of Panorama; therefore, these images under commercial Creative Commons licensing are all infringing the copyrights of the artists who made these artworks.
- File:Tableau abstrait.jpg
- File:Uwicurikiye.jpg
- File:Bâton artisanal.jpg
- File:L'éleveur de bétail.jpg
- File:Danseuses traditionnelles.jpg
- File:Figurines de pays.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Dear collegue, Hope you are going well.
- It's shame on me, so are you going to delete them? Abkev (talk) 07:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Abkev you published images that show artworks that are not likely to have been made a long time ago, in which the artists have been dead for more than 50-70 years for the works to be in public domain. You or the organizer of the Wiki Loves Africa – Burundi edition must contact the artists (or their heirs) and should convince them to allow the publication of your images under commercial Creative Commons licensing. They must send an email to Wikimedia Foundation as stated on COM:VRTS. Artworks are copyrighted, and only artists themselves can commercially license images of the works they made or created. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello dear,
- Unfortunately i couldn't reach the artists. But at this expo, i have asked them if i can take the pictures of their works and publish it. They allowed me but i understand that an confirmation email is needed. If laws are again me you can delete it.
- Have a nice day. Abkev (talk) 07:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abkev another way is the artists can write a letter – in a formal way – explicitly permitting you to distribute your images of their artworks under the commercial license you chosen (I believe it's CC-BY-SA-4.0), then the artists should sign the letter (signature). You must then scan the letter and attach it to your email to be sent to Wikimedia Foundation at the permissions address indicated at COM:VRTS. This is only possible if the artists do not have emails themselves. If they have, it is recommended to have them send email on the licensing authorization directly to Wikimedia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abkev you published images that show artworks that are not likely to have been made a long time ago, in which the artists have been dead for more than 50-70 years for the works to be in public domain. You or the organizer of the Wiki Loves Africa – Burundi edition must contact the artists (or their heirs) and should convince them to allow the publication of your images under commercial Creative Commons licensing. They must send an email to Wikimedia Foundation as stated on COM:VRTS. Artworks are copyrighted, and only artists themselves can commercially license images of the works they made or created. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
This seems like a copyrighted logotype. Kigsz (talk) 07:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- The source link is not longer available but it's very possible that it is correctly licensed. Napster, not really being copyright protection advocates, would unlikely copyright their logo. I guess we need proof of this however. Jonteemil (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Procedural close: Closing this and replacing by mass request instead. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
This seems like a copyrighted logotype. Kigsz (talk) 07:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Procedural close: Closing this and replacing by mass request instead. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
This seems like a copyrighted logotype. Kigsz (talk) 07:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Procedural close: Closing this and replacing by mass request instead. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
This seems like a copyrighted logotype. Kigsz (talk) 07:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Procedural close: Closing this and replacing by mass request instead. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
no author given, the picture is of about 1935 Goesseln (talk) 21:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" is the correct license. --RAN (talk) 13:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
useless, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
useless, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Decent enough image.
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Jon Davison performing at the Art Park in Lowiston, New York on July 17, 2012 cropped.jpg
[edit]unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
unused, incorrectly attributed Mewhen123 (talk) 13:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to your user page, the uploader 80s Sam (talk · contribs) is an old account of your own "but I dislike that user name so I'm changing some of the attribution on own work".
- If you want the attribution on your "incorrectly attributed" image (i.e. uploaded under your old name) changed, there are other ways of doing that.
- If you simply want the image deleted, we wouldn't normally do that so long after upload- whether it's in use or not- without a good reason. Ubcule (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't explain correctly. I didn't take this photo and it isn't needed on commons as it is not useful Mewhen123 (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
As per Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Vectorize_logo_file, not PD. Tbhotch™ 21:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
I dont see any valid PD justification. Masur (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
no FOP in Senegal Christian Pirkl (talk) 15:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see COM:TOO and Commons:Deletion requests/File:PBS Logo.svg 2603:7000:B800:3400:D46B:A80:5426:5DB2 20:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Partially Keep Per PD-Textlogo, because "PBS NEWS HOUR" text is ineligible for copyright. However, the PBS icon is copyrighted in the U.S., hence it above threshold of originality. So, this file needs to be removed at Commons, transferred this file locally to English Wikipedia (can retain the similar filename), and put the file without PBS icon (File:PBS News Hour 2024 (2).svg) in Commons instead. Yayan550 (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It's better as non-free I published today, and this contains PBS icon in it for copyright. Akandkur (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Jonteemil (talk) 23:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The design is likely above COM:TOO US however per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SergioCarino the file acually became free through formalities so therefore I'm boldly keeping this and relicensing to {{PD-US-1978-89}}. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:PBS 1971 id.svg which regards an older variant of PBS's logo, also resulting in keep. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 05:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: only hits on TinEye are years after Commons and Greek Wikipedia upload. Let's AGF. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unknown author, still copyrighted. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Bogus PD claim (70 pma for an unknown author), actually works of multiple authors, no evidence of PD. 188.123.231.76 08:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is a rather complex case, so let me explain why I think this front page of Je Suis Partout is in fact PD.
- First the authors:
- cartoons:
- - Philippe Larquier, who signed Phil, died May 20th 1940
- - Emmanuel Poiré, who signed Caran d’Ache or Caporal Poiré, died February 26th 1909
- text:
- - Robert Brasillach, died February 6th 1945
- - Lucien Rebatet, died August 24th 1972
- - Pierre-Antoine Cousteau, died December 17th 1958
- The magazine Je suis Partout stopped publishing with its last issue August 16th 1944.
- Looking only at those dates, this Je Suis Partout front page could look not PD since two of its authors died after 1953.
- However,
- - Brasillach, Rebatet and Cousteau were tried and sentenced to death. In the case of Rebatet and Cousteau, the sentence is for their collaboration with Je Suis Partout. They were also sentenced to be in state of National indignity ("état d’indignité nationale") and all their property were confiscated. Brasillach was executed in 1945 for treason ("intelligence avec l’ennemi"). It’s highly probable that all his property were also confiscated.
- - The company that owned Je Suis Partout was sentenced November 24th 1946 to be dissolved and all its property to be confiscated. In addition, the court forbid any future publication, under any form, of the magazine.
- It means to me that the copyright owners of these articles as presented in this Je Suis Partout front page are not the authors heirs or legatees. It is either the French state or public domain. Considering that this widely shown Je Suis Partout front page is freely accessible in some public librairies such as the BNF ("Bibliothèque Nationale de France") who does not claim any copyright on the content but just on the picture of it, being PD is by far the most probable.
- Just a last remark, this reasoning, specific to Je Suis Partout, should not apply to Rebatet or Cousteau other works such as their books. However, in November 1999, Rebatet legatee (Pierre Darrigrand at the time) and Cousteau legatee (Jean-Pierre Cousteau) lost in a French court when they tried to stop the publication of a dialogue between the two written when they were waiting for their trial.
- MelAntipam (talk) 22:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, still copyrighted, state of France owning copyright doesn't make it PD. No proof this was a collective work. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Logo clearly visible, not de minimis because of high resolution = copyvio. TentingZones1 (talk) 10:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FOP Singapore is doubtful: considered been 2D work. TentingZones1 (talk) 10:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Each bird is at a different level of depth, making this a 3D work allowable under COM:FOP Singapore. Even if considered 2D, it would clearly be an allowable work of artistic craftsmanship. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
The file is not in fact CC-BY licensed. It is downloaded from PID website and it is proprietary by default Miro Hrončok (talk) 10:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, the website itself has the license infroamtion in the footer and it is indeed CCY BY 4.0. Mea culpa. Miro Hrončok (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per license statement by PID. — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: CC-BY licensed. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Conscoreg
[edit]Reverse search shows that the vast majority of these images were already in use elsewhere years before the upload date or date claimed by the EXIF data.
I've no idea whether the alteration of EXIF data or the renaming with consistent (e.g.) "IMG 7053" suffixes- making it look more like someone had renamed some photos they'd taken with their camera- were a deliberate attempt to deceive.
User has already had a number of uploads deleted due to copyright violation.
With the exception of the "BBC Scotland" text (not copyrightable) and File:Morrisons Daily Aberdeen IMG 6745.jpg (*), I believe all uploads from this user should be deleted.
(*) Which I can quite believe was taken by the uploader due to the difference in quality (which makes even more likely that the others weren't).
All images have clear evidence of prior usage (via TinEye or Google Images) except where stated:-
- File:Bella Centre Dundee 2 IMG 7058.png
- File:Bella Centre Dundee IMG 7057.jpg
- File:HM YOI Polmont IMG 7053.jpg
- File:HMYOI Polmont IMG 7054.jpg - Particularly low resolution
- File:HMP & YOI Grampian IMG 7050.jpg
- File:HMP Grampian New IMG 7052.jpg
- File:HMP Grampian IMG 7049.jpg
- File:HM Prison Grampian IMG 7048.jpg
- File:HMP Cornton Vale IMG 7047.jpg
- File:Edinburgh Prison view IMG 7046.jpg
- File:HM Prison Edinburgh IMG 7041.jpg
- File:HMP Edinburgh entrance IMG 7043.jpg
- File:HMP Edinburgh aboveIMG 7042.jpg
- File:HMP Perth IMG 7040.jpg - This one still has the DC Thomson copyright EXIF information on it...! (Perhaps the uploader forgot to remove it here)
- File:Dundee City IMG 6712.jpg - Didn't find an exact match, but that's most likely because the search was drowned out with false positives for countless similar images. Regardless, it has the usual copyvio warning flag of low resolution and given that it's surrounded by more blatant copyvios, I'd apply the precautionary principle and delete this one anyway.
- File:Dundee City Council HQ IMG 6711.jpg
- File:Sainsbury’s Local img.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 11:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted Already deleted by Infrogmation. Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
no permission from given author - "Source Dieses Foto wurde mir von Ad Vanderveen geschickt. Author Han Ernest" Hoyanova (talk) 12:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I received a mail from Ad Vanderveen where he states: "The photo ... is definitely approved, courtesy of Han Ernest." So permission from given author is granted.
- If you take a look at AVs electronic press kit under https://advanderveen.bandzoogle.com/press-kit, you will discover the same foto. And yes, this is not a hard argument, but it fits my plausible reasoning. Ten CatCars (talk) 14:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Fehllizenzierung - als Urheber wird SoMe-Stiftung2019 genannt, Urheber kann aber nur eien natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion (Ein Username wie unzählige andere hier, die auch keine Rückschlüsse auf die natürliche Person dahinter zulassen. Und eine juristische Person kann natürlich alle Rechte an einem Werk besitzen, einschließlich dem Recht, eine Lizenz zu erteilen.) Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nur der Urheber kann Bilder unter eien freie Lizenz stellen, die juristische Person mag die Nutzungsrechte haben, die Urheberrechte kann sie per rechtlicher Definition nicht haben. Lutheraner (talk) 08:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wer alle Rechte an einem Werk übertragen bekommt, darf das natürlich auch. Ist dir bewusst, dass wir hier eine gewaltige Zahl an Bildern haben, die von juristischen Personen zur Verfügung gestellt und unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht wurden? So ziemlich alles, was von Museen, Archiven und Bibliotheken kommt! Herbert Ortner (talk) 07:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nur der Urheber kann Bilder unter eien freie Lizenz stellen, die juristische Person mag die Nutzungsrechte haben, die Urheberrechte kann sie per rechtlicher Definition nicht haben. Lutheraner (talk) 08:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Die Urheber-Diskussion ist Unsinn, aber hier dennoch keine Freigabe, und vermutlich auch keine Panoramafreiheit anwendbar. --Krd 12:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Krd. No evidence that this was taken from a public view so no German FOP. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect version, correct version is file 2022 Zegel La Compagnie Durable.jpg of Dec 6, 14:30 Cnemo99 (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect version, correct version is file 2022 Zegel La Compagnie Durable.jpg of 14:30 Cnemo99 (talk) 13:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect version, correct version is file 2022 Zegel La Compagnie Durable.jpg of Dec 6, 14:30 Cnemo99 (talk) 13:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
way too much whitespace, File:Portret M.C. de Crane (1843) door Johann Heinrich Richter.jpg of May 3, 13:35 is better Cnemo99 (talk) 13:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You already cropped and overwrote the old image. --RAN (talk) 13:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Not completely round, File:Zegel L'Amitie sans Fin 1 cutout.jpg of April 8, 19:55 is better Cnemo99 (talk) 13:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Photo published in the Argentine newspaper Clarín in 1989. The exact date is not specified, but it is likely at the beginning of 1989 as it is about the album "Grito en el cielo" published in 1988. If it was published after March 1, 1989 it still protected in the US due to Berne Convention. If it was published before then, it had its US copyright restored in 1996. In both cases, the photo still copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
File contains regions which are not under the control of Khaatumo militia, all sources from the sool region article clearly shows that its only limited to a few sections of the region, for this reason this file should be deleted as its false and misinformation {1} https://www.crisisgroup.org/horizon-october-2023-march-2024 {2} https://africaportal.org/publication/overlapping-claims-somaliland-and-puntland-case-sool-and-sanaag/ {3} https://reliefweb.int/report/somalia/somalia-no-elections-disputed-regions-puntland-says {4} https://www.sadamire.com/somaliland-archaeology-in-a-breakaway-state/ Hawkers994 (talk) 18:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment As an aside, there are some very strange POV-pushing uploads related to SSC Khaatumo; see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Seidmusse44 for details. Omphalographer (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those files in that deletion request are common images of people places and buildings, this is a geopolitical map with no source or reference Hawkers994 (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Some of the images in the first request were in fact maps, and all of the ones in the second request have descriptions full of keywords calling them maps (even though that isn't what they are). Omphalographer (talk) 05:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly as you said “even though that isn’t what they are”. False maps and misinformation thats used in articles is against Wikipedia rules which is why i provided sources for this deletion. Hawkers994 (talk) 12:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Some of the images in the first request were in fact maps, and all of the ones in the second request have descriptions full of keywords calling them maps (even though that isn't what they are). Omphalographer (talk) 05:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those files in that deletion request are common images of people places and buildings, this is a geopolitical map with no source or reference Hawkers994 (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- misinformation is no deletion reason (yes it's outrageous but our collective policy!), as long as the file is in use in any project. Hawker, please take the steps to unlink its usage (check if the map was inserted as a replacement for maps which were correct) --> and then we can declare the file to be Out of Scope, for deletion. --Enyavar (talk) 11:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
no author given, the picture is of about 1930 Goesseln (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The license is correct PD-EU for anonymous images. --RAN (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: URAA applies. Undelete in 2026. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Three Dikgosi monument, Gaborone. As Botswanan copyright law does not grant Freedom of Panorama, this image under commercial Creative Commons licensing infringes the monument sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I just realized the Flickr import is under PD-mark. This makes it more infringing as any commercial exploitation is allowed by the Flickr photographer, without consideration of the underlying copyright of the sculpture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Botswana, not Botswanan.
Delete. Keep I am working on the enwiki article about this. I have an alternative though, pictures of the three men featured on the monument. 48JCL 21:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC) - Wait, hold on. Shouldn't there be an exception? The statue was posted on Botswana's official government facebook 3 years ago. 48JCL 23:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @48JCL there is no such exception in your country's copyright law that states it is not an infringement to the author's copyright (here, the author is the sculptor) the use/public display/communication to public of works of art and architecture that are permanently fixed in public places. An exception that does not restrict commercial uses of such images without needing licensing permission from the architects or sculptors of the said works in public places. If there had been such an exception, it would have been found anywhere within Sections 12 and 22. Here are three example countries with Commons-suitable FoP provisions: the United Kingdom (FoP is the Section 62 of their copyright law), Hungary (FoP is the Article 68(1) of their copyright law), and Pakistan (FoP is Section 57(r and s) of their copyright law). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Botswana, not Botswanan.
Deleted: per nomination, infringes copyright of sculptor. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Because there is already a picture of the latest version (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peta_Persebaran_Makam_-_Makam_di_Kabupaten_Banjar,_Kalimantan_Selatan.jpg) Ilham Mufti Laksono (talk) 08:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, Uploaders request, map appears to have been part of a personal project and would be out of scope if unused (which it is) ~TheImaCow (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Because there is already a picture of the latest version (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peta_Persebaran_Makam_-_Makam_di_Kabupaten_Banjar,_Kalimantan_Selatan.jpg) Ilham Mufti Laksono (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, Uploaders request, map appears to have been part of a personal project and would be out of scope if unused (which it is) ~TheImaCow (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Fehllizenzierung - als Urheber wird Hellstern medical genannt, Urheber kann aber nur eien natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 12:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader probably should contact VRT. Has camera EXIF data. Abzeronow (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete likely not notable, person's article has been deleted from dewiki ~TheImaCow (talk) 21:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per TheImaCow. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted video game on the screen Trade (talk) 14:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Certainly someone could cover that with a Gaussian blur. But do we even know that the visual is copyrighted, not created by a U.S. government employee? (Feel free to ping me to do a Gaussian blur if that is determined to be what is needed). - Jmabel ! talk 18:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- We need more information about this game. According to the description, it was specially developed for the US army, which could mean that it is developed by the US army, which would make it PD. PaterMcFly (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I think the software is misnamed here in the caption. This looks very much like Virtual Battlespace (VBS) from Bohemia Interactive Simulations, which seems to be copyrighted. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don’t think the screen is sufficiently high quality or prominent to be a violation of de minimis. It’s mostly a slightly fuzzy shot of a generic beach and a generic sky anyway. Dronebogus (talk) 23:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- the gun depiction would also be copyrighted. @Jmabel: I agree with IronGargoyle, Gaussian blur needed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: could you be specific on how much of this needs to be blurred, in your opinion? The whole screen? The screen except for the score box at upper left? Something else? - Jmabel ! talk 14:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think screen except score box would be enough. Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Done. Let me know whether you think anything further is needed (e.g. even more blur). - Jmabel ! talk 06:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think screen except score box would be enough. Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: could you be specific on how much of this needs to be blurred, in your opinion? The whole screen? The screen except for the score box at upper left? Something else? - Jmabel ! talk 14:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- the gun depiction would also be copyrighted. @Jmabel: I agree with IronGargoyle, Gaussian blur needed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Copyrighted content blurred. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Is the gramophone a simple shape? The 3D throphy is copyrighted and there have been multiple nominations related to the Academy Award's silhouette that resulted in their deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Academy Award Silhouette.svg) Tbhotch™ 21:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Photo was shot and published by the organization "Pride Winnipeg", IMO VRT permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 14:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Pridewinnipeg: would you be willing to verify your identity as the organization? Abzeronow (talk) 20:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Files about Marília Mendonça death
[edit]- File:Queda avião.png
- File:MARÍLIA MENDONÇA AERONAVE VAI PASSAR POR PERÍCIA DETALHADA (1).jpg
- File:MARÍLIA MENDONÇA AERONAVE VAI PASSAR POR PERÍCIA DETALHADA (2).jpg
- File:Retirada avião.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Luiz79. All images is based on scenes from an accident in another Brazilian state. In other words, it is a retransmission from another broadcaster or Record affiliate. In either case, these are images that do not belong to Record TV Goiás and cannot be considered Creative Commons. Fronteira (talk) 23:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Whoever did their searching didn't look very hard. This is from the July 1953 edition of the Redbook Magazine and that was renewed under RE0000102085 SDudley (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will add that this page seems to claim that Redbook gave the copyrights back to Seuss in 1956. It does appear that Comicmix did end up publishing some Seuss stories in 2022 including The Sneetches. Of course these versions are whatever existed before the changes were made for the book publications. Not entirely sure what to make of this all since I am not a copyright lawyer, and I don't have a better source for the Seuss copyright claim. SDudley (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there the copyright was never renewed the sneetches and zaks from redbook comix are public domain because comix released it to public domain https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/comicmix/the-zaks-and-other-stories?ref=project_link
- More evidence https://fanfilmfactor.com/2021/04/12/bombshell-in-the-star-trek-dr-seuss-mash-up-infringement-lawsuit-are-sneetches-and-zaks-in-the-public-domain/
- Dr. seuss never renewed the comix red book stories. here is proof. "The ComicMix edition of the stories was created with high-quality scans from the original Redbook stories, tracked down from collectors of the magazine. Redbook reverted the copyright to these stories to Geisel, but the copyright was not renewed, so the versions that appeared in the magazines are now in public domain." This also proof which the a quote from https://bleedingcool.com/comics/comicmix-to-publish-lost-dr-seuss-stories-out-of-copyright/
- and to give more proof that it is indeed public domain here is another quote, 'The publication of The Zaks is a byproduct of the suit. In discovery for the case, attorneys for Gerrold and ComicMix found that some of the Seuss stories published in Redbook were in the public domain." This further proves that the sneetches are public domain.
- Gilimaster69 ([[User talk:Gilimaster69|talk] Gilimaster28 (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: While Seuss's heirs may want to complain, there's evidence Sneetches is public domain!. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 18:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)