Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 20th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

that's not helicopter and this photo were 2 years old https://www.isna.ir/news/99020302604/%D8%B3%D9%82%D9%88%D8%B7-%D9%87%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%BE%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%B4%DB%8C-%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%A7-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1 Wisang17 (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 08:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio: Originalpics and rights by Reuters. Similar pic: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/haniyeh-says-hamas-has-delivered-its-position-qatar-egypt-2024-01-02/ איז「Ysa」 05:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://english.khamenei.ir/photo/10659/Imam-Khamenei-met-with-Mr-Ismail-Haniyeh MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 07:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I finally noticed the difference in the pictures. In the more recent photo he is wearing a pin with the Palestinian flag. I replace the link to the image and stop the deletion request. Admins: Please do not delete, correct license added in the pic איז「Ysa」 10:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept איז「Ysa」 11:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtsverletzung. Das Bild stammt von der website https://www.spandauer-hochsprungmeeting.de/ und ist laut https://www.spandauer-hochsprungmeeting.de/kontaktimpressum urheberrechtlich geschützt 2A01:5241:70A:7600:0:0:0:3CA6 06:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems more like promotional and contains no metadata so needs permissions to be retained  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; foiund more that were even more overtly promotional; not here to contribute to project's scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright not checked enough, might be a copyright Notthemainredactor (talk) 13:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Jyncarecat (talk) 18:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Content intended as vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 19:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo Jyncarecat (talk) 18:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Content intended as vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 19:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

slechte kopieën niet geschikt voor Wikipedia Verloren16 (talk) 07:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 13:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 13:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

repeated TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai reposté la même photo mieux cadrée sous un autre nom, celle-ci ne sert donc plus Atilium (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeated TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeated TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeated TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeated TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeated TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload; appears to be out of project scope as well. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: @Geo Swan: FYI, you did not add PDMark-owner. --King of ♥ 00:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article, totally blurry Jyncarecat (talk) 15:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Jyncarecat (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Jyncarecat (talk) 15:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Jyncarecat (talk) 15:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI generated content. Jyncarecat (talk) 18:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI generated content Jyncarecat (talk) 18:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 21:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy Natelee2003 (talk) 21:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photograph, out of scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7 PD, in use. Yann (talk) 09:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann, I forgot to cover up the drawing on the back, that's why I want to reupload. I have a new file. I have chosen Speedydelete's G7 instead of Copyvio, because, according to my observations, it deletes faster. Gleb Leo (talk) 15:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just upload over this file, then I will delete the old version. Yann (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann, Okey, I have done it. I didn't know, that you can simply delete the previous version Gleb Leo (talk) 19:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: First version hidden. --Yann (talk) 10:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shalom! Hay uno con título en español y otro con título en inglés. 191.125.21.194 23:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Jyncarecat (talk) 18:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. This looks like vandalism. User blocked. Yann (talk) 10:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Jyncarecat (talk) 18:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. This looks like vandalism. User blocked. Yann (talk) 10:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Анонім78 (talk) 20:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but COM:INUSE at uk:Анти and uk:Антський союз. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment no longer in use now, also looks like a self-researched (dubious) map about history. Ahohim, please upload history maps together with your sources. --Enyavar (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ossip Zadkine died in 1967, so his depicted artwork is not free until 2038 (70+1). Alas, there is no freedom of panorama in France (confer COM:FOP France), so this file has unfortunately to be deleted. Speravir 00:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Senegal. This commercially-licensed image infringes sculptor's copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See both Commons:Deletion requests/Bonifacio Shrine in Manila and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kartilya ng Katipunan “The Life and Heroism of Gat Andres Bonifacio” Monument and Mural (Mehan Garden, Ermita, Manila). Undelete this image if the law now allows commercial uses and free sharing and distributions of images of copyrighted public monuments of the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture honors w:en:Nelson Mandela, who died in 2013. As there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Guinea, this commercially-licensed image infringes the sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The resolution for these images are too poor for the Common's project sadly. The images are not usable. Leoboudv (talk) 07:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata and would appear to be copyright  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified group photo. Out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Korean photograph created in 1910. Would be public domain if first published in Korea or Japan, this was probably published on a postcard, but we'd need the uploader to give us more information to verify that. Abzeronow (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature looks like "B. Blache" to me, cannot find a death date for the artist. 1912 French work so too young for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 21:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 07:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hatem104 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 07:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotional logo, unused, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of HarmoryOS メイド理世 (talk) 03:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 04:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diego617377 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 05:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorhuopazbustios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 05:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dosseman (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 08:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information. Lymantria (talk) 08:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Krd. --Kadı Message 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete this i dont need this Moghimiarash (talk) 09:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --Kadı Message 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont need this pic Moghimiarash (talk) 09:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i dont need this pic Moghimiarash (talk) 09:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --Kadı Message 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleEarth CopyVio (the right side); the left side may also be a CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected CopyVio: Uploader claims a satellite map as "Own work" Enyavar (talk) 10:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover  —Andreitalk 11:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eu sunt autor cărții. Imaginea îmi aparține. Dragobete89 (talk) 18:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted trading card game artwork, violation of COM:De minimis. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Kadı Message 08:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 08:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope * Pppery * it has begun... 19:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 08:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook? 191.125.21.194 23:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: possibly copyvio, from Facebook. --Kadı Message 08:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:Basic lead carbonate.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad typography (the negative charge of O- covered its bond), replaced by File:Basic lead carbonate.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 07:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France

russavia (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleting as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, no FOP in France.

— Racconish ☎ 18:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fountain on Place Stravinski in Paris at Centre Pompidou was created by Jean Tinguely who died in 1991, and Niki de Saint Phalle, who died in 2002. As there is no freedom of panorama in France (confer COM:FOP France) this means, unfortunately, that most of the images in this category have to be deleted.

Speravir 00:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Karlsruhe - panoramio (20).jpg, but with unnecessary text Mkkagain (talk) 00:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rendered from File:Legion Honneur Chevalier ribbon.svg, redundant, useless Nutshinou Talk! 00:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

African Renaissance Monument images by Mooonswimmer

[edit]

Violation of sculptor's copyright, considering there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Senegal. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

African Renaissance Monument images by User:Barke11

[edit]

These nominated images show the copyrighted monument in a non-incidental manner (as the primary or main subject of the images). As there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Senegal, these commercially-licensed images infringe sculptor's copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Senegal. This commercially-licensed image infringes sculptor's copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly not in the public domain

Copyright © 2024 San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. All rights reserved.

Maungapohatu (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Senegal. The Voice of America has no ultimate right to release their images of the 2018 stadium commercially (PD licenses are inherently commercial); all licensing rights are still with the architect or designer of this stadium. Copyvio. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Guinea. The mosque dates to 1982 according to the enwiki article, so still under architect's copyright and is not free to be licensed commercially under commercial Creative Commons licensing. Some interior architecture is also included in this nomination.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dosseman (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, available elsewhere in a bigger version: [1] Quick1984 (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know if this AI generated or what, but it just looks wrong and the only image from the uploader is clearly out of scope COPYVIO. So it should be deleted as OOS unless someone can figure out where it came from and how it's licensed. Adamant1 (talk) 07:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, derivative photoshop image with no sources specified, reverse image search shows many copies of it online dating back to 2022. Belbury (talk) 11:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © АТ «НСТУ» 2024 Yann (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © АТ «НСТУ» 2024 Yann (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt the trailer was uploaded with a free license. The YouTube channel link leads to a channel that does not exist so cant confirm this myself. Gonnym (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The YouTube license was confirmed by the license reviewer User:Czar in 2016. Di (they-them) (talk) 11:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: Here is the original source video. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res photo that is said to be "own work" and that Mark Leibowitz gave permission. Ive asked Mark to make it clear of it is him giving permission. Victuallers (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Victuallers. I have evidence that Nicole Sahin has received permission to use this photo. I can also obtain a high-res version if needed. Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again @Victuallers. As per my message to you on Professor Marek Kowalkiewicz's image, Mark Leibowitz was the photographer who granted permission to Nicole Sahin to use this image. I incorrectly assumed that means she 'owns' the work. I have clearly stuffed up. Could you please tell me how to rectify it? Cheers, and thank you for your patience. KWriteReturn (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure thats right but Wikimedia needs a bit more than "I was told it was OK". If you say thats its "own work" .... then it has to be your own work. If it belongs to someonew else then they need to donate it. Obvs we don't take the word of anyone that "someone told me" I could use it - that diesbt make it your wirk. Finding a hi res version is good but it still doesnt make it "own work".

In my experience its much easier to get someone to take a photo of them selves and load it. The guy who is paying for the wiki article could pay someine to take and load a picture .... or load a selfie. Victuallers (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


.... even better they could take photos of everyone in the staff room and load all of them. It would be more selfless contribution to the project. Paying for just yourself to be added is IMO not in the spirit of the project. Please be sure to document that he paid for the initial draft of the article - I think its revealing. Victuallers (talk) 07:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt the trailer was uploaded with a free license. The YouTube channel link leads to a channel that does not exist so cant confirm this myself. Gonnym (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The YouTube license was confirmed by the license reviewer User:Czar in 2016. Di (they-them) (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt the trailer was uploaded with a free license. The YouTube channel link leads to a channel that does not exist so cant confirm this myself. Gonnym (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The YouTube license was confirmed by the license reviewer User:Czar in 2016. Di (they-them) (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, and taken around 1970s when Wilson Ferreira was a presidential candidate (he was in his early 50s at that time. The copyright protection in Uruguay, its country of origin, is 70 pma, thus still under protection. Protection in the US (Berne Convention) is even longer. Günther Frager (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jovana Radaljac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF.

Smooth O (talk) 11:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotional logo, unused, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a still from a movie, and Norse13577 is almost certainly not the copyright owner here as they claim to be. MaybeitsMir (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Frank_Neidel M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiermit erkläre ich, Frank Neidel, dass das verwendete Foto von Michael Quell frei von Rechten ist. Explizit habe ich Herrn Thomas van de Scheck erlaubt, das von mir gemachte Foto für alle Publikationen zu verwenden.
Marburg, 22.05.2024 - Frank Neidel 2001:16B8:BF8A:5900:8832:791B:D53F:CA7A 16:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google CopyVio

Enyavar (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal symbol, half of the description text is about "All rights reserved, nobody may copy this", which doesn't mesh with the actual CC4 license Enyavar (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharkphann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Images are taken by profesional photographers and metadata of 2 of them points ot Facebook.

Günther Frager (talk) 12:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asadlike2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. If the uploader is really the copyright holder, I guess one could consider a cropped version without the obvious advertisement part, if that's allowed on Commons. Nakonana (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (fake, bullshit or even vandalism) GerritR (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheUnknownTruthToBeTold (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dozens of pages (out of apparently 895 in total) from some, probably self-authored, pamphlet which appears to be about a link between the Spanish Crown and terrorism (?) Text-only screenshots, out of COM:SCOPE.

Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I don't even see the connection to the title. Most of the pages I glanced at read like a rambling autobiography or novel. Anyways, this is clearly out of scope as plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 21:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete — and note that several more similar files have been uploaded by the same user today and yesterday. It looks like the number might eventually reach 895, but all of it appears to be out of scope. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If the outcome is delete, I'd ask the deciding admin to nuke those files as well so we don't need another DR. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Clearly not in scope and likely a copyright violation (they look like screenshots from a ereader) Günther Frager (talk) 23:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jyncarecat (talk) 19:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:DW of the logo is de minimis. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ver arriba. Dos iguales. 191.125.21.194 23:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by another admin. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidkumar23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed descriptions are "edits from collage" or "collage edits", so likely cropped from some montage or collage. But without verifiable sources, it is hard to believe these came from existing Commons collages or montages (or another case, collages from external Internet sources, which may lean to COM:NETCOPYVIO). Moreover, the images are of low-quality, so not usable. The originals (if do existing) should be preferred over these alleged crops of the montage or collage elements.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Wdwd (talk) 10:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by So categorical (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COIN: non-free photos of public domain 3D objects. Photographers' permissions missing.

Sealle (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

И что с ними не так? Это государственные награды, их рисунки утверждены соответствующими Указами. По знакам Российской Федерации в Указе Президента Российской Федерации от 30 декабря 1995 г. N 1341 типовой вариант (отличие только текстом). So categorical (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • So categorical, как Вы думаете, для чего выше размещена ссылка на правило и пояснение, что именно не так? Фото трёхмерных объектов, в том числе находящихся в общественном достоянии, создают новое авторское право фотографа. Без разрешений таковых размещать подобные фото нельзя. Вариант – сфотографировать награды самостоятельно. Sealle (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:14, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated images Kipula (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G10. --Wdwd (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio, any proof that this is own work 87.205.47.55 09:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then where do you think the original is?--Віщун (talk) 09:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, COM:DW. --Wdwd (talk) 10:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German artist Hermann Schiebel died in 1973, so these 1921 German emergency banknotes are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2044.

Rosenzweig τ 09:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Meines Wissens sind diese Abbildungen der über hundert Jahre alten Geldscheine gemeinfrei und ich bitte sehr, dem Massenlöschantrag nicht stattzugeben. -- Spurzem (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, sie sind nicht gemeinfrei. Der Urheber ist 1973 gestorben, seine Werke sind daher in Deutschland noch bis Ende 2043 geschützt. Und Wikimedia Commons will nur freie Medien (Commons:Licensing/de). --Rosenzweig τ 16:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrtümlich hochgeladen - bitte um Entschuldigung Schnöpf (talk) 10:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image published in 1986 by Panini, an Italian company. It is currently in the public domain in Italy (20 years after publication for simple photographs), but it was copyrighted in 1996 at URAA time. That is the usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect. We can undelete it in 2082. Günther Frager (talk) 11:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariaclara123 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These postcards clearly aren't the uploaders own work and at least a few of them are clearly modern since they can be found for sale here. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 11:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author photograph by Marvin Fox Photography according to https://www.blackincbooks.com.au/authors/marek-kowalkiewicz Victuallers (talk) 11:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is said to be "own work" and strangely the paid editor has also taken "own work" photos of the people who paid him/her to create articles about them. Dubious?

Question? Surely Professor Marek Kowalkiewicz knows how to publish a photo of himself with a modern license. Why would you ask a Wiki editor to take it?

Would there be any point in claiming to write articles about noted figures for money .... might it lead to real paid work? Just a theory. Victuallers (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victuallers. Professor Marek Kowalkiewicz sent me the photo to upload. It was taken by Marvin Fox Photography and Professor Kowalkiewicz 'owns' the photo. Therefore, I had selected "own work" as the photo category. Based on what you are saying, I assume this is incorrect? Apologies if I've gone about the things the wrong way, I'm new to Wikipedia and still finding my feet. Just to be clear, this is paid work and this has already been declared on my user page. Could you please tell me how to rectify this? Cheers, K. KWriteReturn (talk) 22:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Victuallers, I hope you don't me asking, but just so this doesn't happen again, could you please let me know how to upload photos to articles that have been sent to me to upload, where the subject of the article (who owns the photo) has permission to upload it to Wikimedia Commons? KWriteReturn (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission ticket received. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

was a test Sette-quattro (talk) 12:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Test page/G1, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a portrait shot by a professional (see the dentist stuff in the background?) — which is why I doubt this pic to be a selfie (which indicates "author: Neugebauerj"). KlausHeide (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is not a selfie and was made by a photographer, the background was chosen blurred Neugebauerj (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German artist Josef Dominicus died in 1973, so these 1921 German emergency banknotes are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2044.

Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Ein Löschgrund für die Abbildung eines über hundert Jahre alten Geldscheins ist nicht ersichtlich. Deshalb bitte ich sehr, dem Massenlöschantrag nicht stattzugeben. -- Spurzem (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doch, natürlich ist ein Löschgrund ersichtlich: Der Urheber ist 1973 gestorben, seine Werke sind daher in Deutschland noch bis Ende 2043 geschützt. Und Wikimedia Commons will nur freie Medien (Commons:Licensing/de). --Rosenzweig τ 16:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As before: German artist Josef Dominicus died in 1973, so these 1921 German emergency banknotes are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2044.

Rosenzweig τ 22:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Huawei wordmark.svg 大诺史 (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per discussion.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Мункач Варош (talk) 13:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think the dicussion can be closed. @Мункач Варош: It is not relevant if there is an optical difference, because the file-format is the difference. (1) For considering duplicate there are more criteria than just the optical difference, see posted link. (2) There are copyright-reasons why some duplicates need to be kept, see posted link. Please read the link posted on 20 June 2019. If you need further help or don't understand English, I can explain it to you on your or my talkpage.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: There is no other unadorned PNG logo there, this is it. Мункач Варош appears to think this is a duplicate of File:Huawei wordmark.svg; Admins here don't delete such.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moosoop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A number of other uploads by this user were already identified and deleted as copyvios from GoogleMaps, and one of these has Facebook tags in the metadata. So all of these are probably copyvios as well and should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 14:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giorgi55555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, missing EXIF, Facebook layout. Probably not own work by uploader with no other contributions.

Quick1984 (talk) 17:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appeared in this news website: [2] on Feb 2023, a month before upload on Commons Gpkp (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a lower-resolution, misattributed copy of File:Monographs (2943967835).jpg. Eureka Lott 17:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pyotr Richardovich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly not own work as claimed, since these photos are 80+ years old and have watermarks by the actual photographers.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Now corrected, no copyright registrations for either photographer. --RAN (talk) 05:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment in past years I suspected that a large fraction of US images that we deleted may not have been protected by copyright, because, well into the mid-20th Century US copyright worked differently than in the rest of the world.
  1. In particular, unlike the rest of the world, the IP owner had to explicitly assert their copyright, with a copyright symbol (c)
  2. I knew copyrights had to be renewed. The famous wild increase in the popularity of "It's a Wonderful Life" took place after the studio that produced it decided not to bother to file some paperwork, to renew its copyright, at the 28 year mark. That studio decided not to renew its copyrights on thousands of its films. Dumb now, but it must have made sense to someone then.
Now, is there a way of determining whether the IP rights owner did go through the onerous steps of maintaining their US copyright? That seems to be what RAN is implying. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes and yes! In the past people voting for delete were unaware of the complexities of the copyright renewal system. Automatic registration of copyright did not start until 1989, previously you had to comply with the copyright symbol on each "perceivable copy" and registration and renewal (up until 1964 for renewals). If you look through the renewals it is mostly books, magazines, and movies, very rarely a photographer has registered or renewed, I had a list of photographs that were actually registered and renewed but I can no long find it. I had it online with the image and the registration/renewal and the name of the photographer. We have links to both the copyright registration database and the copyright renewal database, as well as the database of magazine and newspaper renewals already linked to in each Wikidata entry for the The copyright renewal information also exists in images of the files pages of renewals organized by year. I have the links set up in my browser, let me see where we have them here. https://www.copyright.gov/public-records/ is the best place to start, it has links to the various scans and databases. If you are interested in uploading news articles from a newspaper such as The Jersey Journal (Q7743126) you scroll down to "Online Books Page publication ID" and click. it take you here: https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/cinfo/jerseyjnlnj and you can see "no issue renewals" which would take you up to 1964. One article was renewed that was published on February 9, 1929, it was a first hand account by Charles Lindburgh and his name appears in the byline, if I remember correctly. Several local newspapers never complied with a copyright notice in their mastheads or on the page listing the editor and contact information. For books less than 25% of all books published up to 1964 went through the expense of hiring a copyright lawyer for renewals, if you look through the lists it is mostly the big 3 publishers of the era. See: https://www.nypl.org/blog/2019/05/31/us-copyright-history-1923-1964 Also see here for what a copyright symbol looks like on an image, and even these are deficient because they do not contain the year: Category:Bain copyright notice --RAN (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion & fixes. --Wdwd (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is your own work? Are you a painter? 191.126.171.212 17:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Post from your real account, I know your intentions. Danmute (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What are they? 191.126.171.212 19:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i love to paint Danmute (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:DW, missing infos & permission for original work. --Wdwd (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this guy made a massacre were you not afraid to take his picture? Well, obviously your hand was not very steady... 😁 191.126.171.212 18:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me? is this some kind of threat? Danmute (talk) 18:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Treat or trick? :) 191.126.171.212 19:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Im not afraid Danmute (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio ( https://pbs.twimg.com/media/En7YrVlW8AAj2Jx?format=jpg ). --Wdwd (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.instagram.com/p/C5Vsb5BSwgs/ which is possibly the uploader's Instagram account, but it's presented as a photoshop of another person's social media image at https://www.instagram.com/therealprithvi/p/C4t9wtGPbU7/ - there is no public evidence that Prathviraj Sukumaran has licenced that original photo to the photoshopper in a way that would allow it to be released as CC-Attribution credited only to the photoshopper. Belbury (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not a real vector file but it is taken from the jpeg version (as you can see, for example, in the U and other small profile errors). I uploaded a real svg version Bruce The Deus (talk) 18:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (remark: feel free to fix/correct it and upload a correted version). --Wdwd (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erfindung eines Ortsvereins, demnach out of scope. Verwendung in der Wikipedia war wohl OR, daher aus selbigem entfernt. Die unheraldische Darstellung unterstützt die These, dass es sich um eine laienhafte Erfindung handelt. GerritR (talk) 18:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erfindung eines Vereins, somit out of scope. Die Verwendung in einem Artikel wurde als OR entfernt. Außerdem urheberrechtlich zweifelhaft. GerritR (talk) 18:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das Wappen wurde von dem örtlichen Verschönerungsverein erfunden und ist für die Nachbarschaft Krähenwinkel zu verwenden. Der Verein hat alle Wappen für gemeinfrei erklärt. Siehe dazu seine Wappenrolle. Mehlitz (talk) 20:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See comment/source: Uploader is not the author nor does the uploader owns the rights. KlausHeide (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio — uploader’s name does not match copyright holder, see file history. KlausHeide (talk) 20:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CommanderCaleb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fictional film posters: out of scope

TheImaCow (talk) 21:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no valid reason to request deletion for my uploads. Please remove them. CommanderCaleb (talk) 13:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artwork by S M Sultan (10 August 1923 - 10 October 1994) may not be in the public domain, because the artist has not been dead for at least 60 years as per Bangladesh Copyright Act 2000 (CHAPTER-5 Sec 24). ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я являюсь автором и владельцем данного кадра и хочу, а также тем кто его опубликовал. Хочу удалить все добавленные раннее файлы и вклады так как у меняя есть боллее удачные изображения Yaroslav Stanislavovich Komissarov (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope anyway. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Derivative art of a picture from 2014 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik vermoed dat dit geen origineel werk betreft, en een kopie (foto) is van een afbeelding uit het boek 'Een rondje vernieuwd Haarlem. Gemeente Haarlem (september 1984)'. Dit boek werd als referentie opgegeven na een bewerking in de Nederlandstalige wiki, even later volgde de foto. Om de bewering te checken heb ik het boek uit de bied geleend. En trof hierin precies dezelfde foto in aan. Ik heb de auteur en uploader gevraagd om opheldering, maar helaas geen reactie. Verder zijn andere foto’s uit het boek beschikbaar in het Noord-Hollands Archief, zoals deze foto die door een totaal andere auteur is vervaardigd. Melvinvk (talk) 01:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: I suspect this isn’t an original work of uploaded user. And that this is a copy made by photographing a picture from the book 'Een rondje vernieuwd Haarlem. Gemeente Haarlem (september 1984)'. This book was added as reference after an edit on the Dutch Wikipedia. Not so much time after this edit another edit added this image. To check this edit I lend the named book from the library. And in this book I found exactly the same picture. I asked the author and uploader for clarification, but unfortunately I haven’t gotten any reply. Other pictures from the book are digitally accessible through the Archive of North-Holland. These pictures are made by a totally different author. Melvinvk (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 01:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 02:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 03:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not good to apply rainbow colors to the name of the holy quran 41.235.181.76 11:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: can't see this being in scope. --P 1 9 9   23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from fotopolska.eu without providing the direct link to the original. Thus, the license and the author of the original are unknown. Moreover, it is doubtful if this is indeed Księcia Józefa street. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't think the logo satisfy COM:THRESHOLD particularly the logo mark (gold triangle) Hariboneagle927 (talk) 12:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear if the Flickr user actually owns the image. https://www.flickr.com/photos/200608747@N02/53700834708/ shows a phone screenshot, not an original photograph. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According til User:Saksak the license is genuine. I myself have no opinion. -Pugilist (talk) 16:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   23:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not freely licensed Brunnaiz (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry to be a useful image of Syria Krok6kola (talk) 15:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a machine-made reading of a Wikipedia article really useful? Trade (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope, and DW of uncredited video sources. --P 1 9 9   23:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because I made it when I was younger and I want it to be completely deleted, I dont want my picture or name be here Sophie.khachatryan (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

because I made it when I was younger and I want it to be completely deleted, I dont want my picture or name be here Sophie.khachatryan (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sacaste la foto de tu Facebook también? No sé porqué no la han borrado antes... 191.125.21.194 23:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   23:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was uploaded under as "Own work" under the CC0 license. Searching for the image with Google Lens is possible to find the image on Jasmine Rodgers website (https://jasminerodgers.com/photos), where it is credit to Adrian Boot. Adrian Boot is a famous british music photographer who licenses his work for commercial use through his company Urban Image (https://www.urbanimage.tv). Therefore, it seems unlikely he would upload this image under CC0 license. Beyond that, the uploader account, ArchRchive, is a new account which only contribution to the Wikimedia project was the upload of this image. Pfcab (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map does not refer to reliable sources. The Polyans and the Antes did not live at the same time. Other communities are also given anachronistically. Nikolay Omonov (talk) 17:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Weighing Carbon Dioxide Absorbers for Large Respiration Calorimeter - NARA - 5729289 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random date of creation, missing date of publication. Bogus license tag - pma 70 for an unknown author. Quick1984 (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Самуил Львович Ратнер был выдающимся дирижером и педагогом, воспитавшим плеяду советских дирижеров. Он был главным дирижером ряда оркестров в России и Белоруссии. Его имя надо сохранять для истории. Arak (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photos from '74. The photo was published in open sources. The photograph is available in the archives of the Axionova family, who studied with Ratner. The family of Ratner and Axionova have no claims. Григор Вар (talk) 15:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Licensing. Quick1984 (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jyncarecat (talk) 18:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   23:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in the public domain HistorianL (talk) 22:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, bogus license, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9   23:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Logo Ligue 1 2024.jpg H4stings (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused duplicate of File:Logo Ligue 1 2024.jpg H4stings (talk) 22:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joke, Out of Scope, The parts put together are from unidentified sources CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File contains copyrighted images:the men in the balloon and the men in the football shirts. Should have known those would be copyrightable. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maurice Oly: Those could be blurred so we don't have to delete the whole photograph. --Rosenzweig τ 09:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please blur it, as its impossible to get a photo of the building as of now without the copyrighted artwork in the photo. Maurice Oly (talk) 11:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep De minimis. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Herb. You're my favorite admin. Keep the file and the good work. 191.125.175.228 23:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I'm not an admin! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM. --P 1 9 9   23:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File contains copyrighted image:the men in the balloon. Should have known that would be copyrightable. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maurice Oly: That could be blurred so we don't have to delete the whole photograph. --Rosenzweig τ 09:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please blur it, as I would rather we not have to delete the photo. Maurice Oly (talk) 11:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep De minimis. Why would there even be a reason to blur that tiny detail?-- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is Herb the only reasonable person in this useless discussion? Keep. 191.125.175.228 23:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lets not insult people shall we. I was just concerned about copyrighted artwork was all. I feel it was reasonable to request blurring before the artwork was pointed out to be De Minimis. Maurice Oly (talk) 22:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My reason for asking for it to be blured was simple, its artwork and there is no proof the creator has been dead for 75 years.
I'm relived its De Minimis. Maurice Oly (talk) 22:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM. --P 1 9 9   23:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File contains copyrighted image:the two nutcrackers. As burly as the artwork is I feel it might be an issue Maurice Oly (talk) 23:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maurice Oly: You mean the poster on the grey door on the right? That could be blurred so we don't have to delete the whole photograph. --Rosenzweig τ 09:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the poster on the grey door is what I mean. I should have been clearer on that.
I did not know we could blur it, but if we could that would be great. Maurice Oly (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep De minimis. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Herb. Stop exaggerating. 191.125.175.228 23:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM. --P 1 9 9   23:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2022 artwork still protected by copyright--see statement at artist's website at [3] DanielPenfield (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:8484:44B9:9F2D:20C1 14:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, published at least since 2008 here. --P 1 9 9   23:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama of Text in Hong Kong SAR. メイド理世 (talk) 01:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama of Text in China. メイド理世 (talk) 03:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. The {{PDMark-owner}} I added means that, IMO, this flickr user is one of those who thinks they should use the public domain mark to mark their own images as public domain. They tagged ALL their images with a public domain mark. There is no indication that ANY of them were not their own work.

In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 14:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes on architect's copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Woman Measuring Broccoli - NARA - 5729287 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Pie Judging Contest with Dr. Louise Stanley and Mary Lindsay - NARA - 5729294 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear origin of the photo Rodm23 (talk) 21:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, possible VDA, because the wrong metadata table were used by the new assistant during the trainning activity.

SSoster (WMB) (talk) 22:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request The one who is in the photograph has expressed dissatisfaction with her image and likeness being represented this way. The owner claims the image does not represent how she looks. copyvio -Owula kpakpo (talk) 18:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - file is in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier me représente dans un cadre privé et je n'ai pas donné l'autorisation pour sa publication sur Internet. Slr3105 (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Est-ce que vous plaisantez? Vous l'avez chargé vous-même il y a 11 ans. --Achim55 (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Que rico escuchar frances con acento aleman, achtung! 191.125.21.194 21:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas à l'origine de ce changement, je vous assure. Je vous demande s'il vous plait de bien vouloir supprimer cette photo qui peut me porter de graves préjudices dans l'exercice de mes fonctions. je ne donne pas l'autorisation pour sa diffusion sur la plateforme. Vous remerciant de votre compréhension. Sayamelyay5 (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas à l'origine de ce changement, je vous assure. Je vous demande s'il vous plait de bien vouloir supprimer cette photo qui peut me porter de graves préjudices dans l'exercice de mes fonctions. je ne donne pas l'autorisation pour sa diffusion sur la plateforme. Vous remerciez de votre compréhension. Sayamelyay5 (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F10. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier me représente dans un cadre privé et je n'ai pas donné l'autorisation pour sa publication sur Internet. 86.242.136.74 15:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion duplicate DR. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier me représente dans un cadre privé et je n'ai pas donné l'autorisation pour sa publication sur Internet. Sayamelyay5 (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion duplicate DR. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already deleted (Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Logo_ENI_nuovo.svg) InterComMan (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per previous DR and COM:TOO Italy. Arrow303 (talk) 10:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license claim: playwright Arbuzov died in 1986, director Lobanov - in 1959, female lead Babanova - in 1983. Quick1984 (talk) 17:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Playwright have copyrights. Director and actors have no copyrights, but have neighbouring rights, which are protected lifetime or (not plus) 50(54) years after recording (choose the longest protection period). Alex Spade (talk) 13:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of film distribution company. Exceeds COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 04:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never at the request of a third party. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Subjects of a Digestion Study - NARA - 5729291 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Subject Reading in Respiration Calorimeter - NARA - 5729290 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find a death date for "Phototypie J. Bienaimé Reims", name possibly being Jean Bienaimé. 1910 postcard is too young for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je suis bien content que vous attribuiez cette carte postale à "Phototypie J. Bienaimé Reims". Quelle est votre source ? Sur l'image ? Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 06:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, sur l'image, dans le coin inférieur gauche. Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Une carte postale publié en France en 1910, trop jeune ? Une autre licence ou sous droit ? Merci
Yes, too young for our guidelines when there is a named author. File:1910 M Labouchère sur Antoinette 102187.jpg may be by the same photographer. Was definitely published in Reims. Abzeronow (talk) 23:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO Switzerland John123521 (talk) 14:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, out of scope.

Quick1984 (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a Russian jazz singer who got some media coverage (e.g. in the renowned weekly newspaper Argumenty i Fakty [4] and others [5][6]) and is the sister of the musician Pierre Narcisse. Nakonana (talk) 21:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Deleted in 2020 as not notable. --Quick1984 (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, Commons' rules are less strict than Wikipedias'. The rule here is not notability but COM:Project scope. These can stay; no indication of images being used to advertise or promote the subject. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, meets Commons scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

拍攝者提到自己拍攝的新聞類照片均採CC BY-SA-NC 4.0--KOKUYO (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

我當日有向拍攝者徵詢同意,而他也於昨日向官方寄送授權信 Kanshui0943 (talk) 23:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
現在的問題是這張照片授權有NC,但你的上傳條款不合。-- Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 08:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
但是作者另外再給官方授權也不行嗎 Kanshui0943 (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
在提供授權後,會有VRT志工審查並儲存在許可檔案中,但到目前都沒有。在遲遲沒有授權的情況下,這張照片就應當被視為違反著作權,而應該刪除。 KOKUYO (talk) 06:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
請儘快確認著作權,並投遞至VRT隊列,以便志工審核。—— Eric LiuTalk 20:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fujifilmuser Taiwan Kanshui0943 (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
我作為相片拍攝者,願意提供所有授權給任何放上維基百科、由我拍攝的照片,採CC-BY-SA-NC條款主要是因為當時threads等平台不斷出現有人未經授權使用本人圖片與二創等,才下此宣告 2401:E180:8C30:4F6A:5155:5A34:EEA7:3F32 07:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
問題在於維基政策拒絕CC-BY-SA-NC條款。維基圖片庫允許其他人二創改圖--北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 04:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
若您不允許「二次創作」,則通常亦不適合投稿至維基共享資源。—— Eric LiuTalk 18:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: needs VRT since it has a NC license. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leyo as no source (No source since) Sandra Hanbo (talk) 22:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the file, adding the picture date to be before 1979 (time of death of this actress, thus her pictures are now in the Public domain). — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Sandra Hanbo (talk • contribs) 18:31, May 20, 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: still no source, looks like from a film. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Already in 2022 on the Internet according to TinEye, Ghost from Call of Duty CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Y si no fuera copyvio qué? Cuál es el "scope"? 191.125.21.194 23:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
¿Tiene derecho a publicar esta imagen? ¿Es usted el creador? Si es así, ¿podría rellenar este formulario? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Emblems and Flags of Palestinian Political Parties

[edit]

The files listed above could potentially violate copyright as they are representations of the emblems of the political parties, which may be protected by copyright under Palestinian law. This still applies even if they are represented in a different style, but still convey the same meaning. There is no indication that the emblems are under public domain in the country. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Hamas and the non-free symbol template on Wikipedia. --Bambobee (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly the Hamas ones but since the PLO/Fatah are considered the legitimate government of Palestine it's in public domain (in Palestine at least), read this PD template:
Public domain The work or image is in the public domain because the copyright term expired in the State of Palestine (Details). According to the Copyright Ordinance of 1924 where the Palestinian Copyright Act of 1911 applies too, the Arab Copyright Treaty of 1981, and the "Basic Law" of governmental Palestine which uses the old acts, all occupied territories of Palestine use Israeli copyright laws so it is also included, it states:
  • The copyright of anonymous and pseudonymous works shall be protected for 70 years after the date of their publication
  • It is a statute, regulation, Knesset protocol or court decision and therefore ineligible for copyright protection according to §6 of the Israel's copyright statute from 2007 (translation)
To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it.

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
State of Palestine
State of Palestine
RowanJ LP (talk) 00:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Fatah is a government organization recognized by the Palestinian government, while Hamas and PIJ are not recognized by the government, so the flags, emblems and logos used by the latter two are likely to be protected by Palestinian copyright law, although their copyright is in a "de facto seizure state". The Fatah logo can be retained, while the Hamas and PIJ logos should be removed and re-uploaded on other Wikimedia projects under fair use. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 23:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep with symbols, flags of Fatah. Per @Fumikas Sagisavas, Fatah is a Palestinian governmental organization, and led by Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas. There isn't proof that fair use is OK, so all files related to Fatah's symbols, flags and emblems should be kept under public domain. while others have copyrights seized under de facto. Kys5g talk! 12:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In heraldry the flag designs are mostly not copyrighted, but specific files depicting COAs might be, with the artist who created the file being the copyright owner. Most files in the above set, are SVG files claiming to be created by the uploaders. If that is true, than unless someone can show that the concept of given emblem or flag is copyrighted, than I think those are fine. Now if individual files, were copied from elsewhere or we have a reason to believe that the uploader did not created them than those individual files should be nominated. --Jarekt (talk) 23:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep peer nomination AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Le ragioni da te menzionate non stanno in piedi perché de facto la Striscia di Gaza, parte dei territori palestinesi, è governata da Hamas. 109.118.122.42 21:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]