Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![33 File:Keith Martin, "Portrait of Lorraine Kuse".jpg](#File:Keith_Martin,_"Portrait_of_Lorraine_Kuse".jpg){kind=link}
![34 File:Keith Martin, "Untitled (Woman in Costume)".jpg](#File:Keith_Martin,_"Untitled_(Woman_in_Costume)".jpg){kind=link}
![35 File:Keith Martin, "Interior with Ghost".jpg](#File:Keith_Martin,_"Interior_with_Ghost".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![94 File:"run, run, run, future is waiting for you" (48453053946).jpg](#File:"run,_run,_run,_future_is_waiting_for_you"_(48453053946).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(49178097668).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Baltimore,_MD_21224_(46829048354).jpg){kind=link}
,_Ashland_Avenue_and_N._Washington_Street_(northeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21205_(49031494543).jpg){kind=link}
,_Ashland_Avenue_and_N._Washington_Street_(northeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21205_(49031998006).jpg){kind=link}
,_N._Carey_Street_and_Mosher_Street_(southeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21217_(47362468941).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_1320_N._Spring_Street,_Baltimore,_MD_21213_(46375193514).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_49.jpg){kind=link}
_57.jpg){kind=link}
_25.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(1).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It is an advertisement, clearly lying outside of COM:OOS. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 06:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nominator. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 07:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Correct me if i'm Wrong but how is this Public Domain? just because a ton of people make variants of it does not mean the artist wanted it in the PD, also why does it have a PD License and a Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International one at the same time? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the file is actually not in PD. The license "ineligible for copyright" is simply wrong and must be removed. But CC-BY-SA license is valid, because it has OTRS license. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a user's self-described "close redraw" of a single frame from a two-frame animated Twitter meme at https://twitter.com/strayrogue/status/992994454058381312. The paws are a bit more purple and the lines wobbled around a bit, but it's otherwise the same, to the point where all current Wikipedia usage of this image assumes it to be simply be that original meme.
As such it's either a COM:DERIVATIVE work of that meme or (if considered to be "lacking substantial new creative content") just a copy of it. Whichever it is, it would require the permission of the original Twitter artist @strayrogue.
I wondered if the artist had given permission so asked about the VRT permission on this file, which was enough for the image to be kept in the previous discussion above, and was told; It is not confirmed in the ticket the uploader is the same person as the creator of the twitter image. They appeared just using it to create this image. It was thought the image just consists of simple geomatric shapes.
I disagree that this drawing of a cat would meet the "no original authorship" requirement of {{PD-shape}} for simple geometry. Belbury (talk) 16:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Belbury, you asked the person who originally handled the ticket? They did not confirm the ticket initiator created the image used on twitter? You are (both) assuming that the twitter use is the first use of this image, or one like it?
- The ticket includes the email address, or other contact information for the ticket initiator, correct? Couldn't someone contact them, again, and explicitly ask if they were the artist who first provided the twitter image?
- If they say they are the artist of the original twitter image, and we believe them, then the image is kept, correct?
- If they say they are the artist of the original twitter image, and we DON'T believe them, then shouldn't we ask them to take further steps, to confirm the image is being used properly? Geo Swan (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think this discussion requires the origin of the image to be confirmed. The uploader is explicitly describing it as a "redraw". To keep it on Commons we need confirmation that the art being redrawn was freely licenced, whether it's a redraw of art by @strayrogue or a redraw of somebody else's meme merely shared by @strayrogue.
- Is GiraffeWorld the same person as @strayrogue? It doesn't sound like it; GiraffeWorld describes their upload as A close redraw of the original Bongo Cat internet phenomenon [...] Own work based on https://twitter.com/strayrogue/status/992994454058381312. @strayrogue's Twitter profile says Do not use/reupload/use media without permission. If GiraffeWorld is @strayrogue, releasing their own cartoon under a free licence and an unrelated username would be an odd thing to do (thanks to Commons it's now possible to buy Etsy T-shirts with this image on it crediting GiraffeWorld instead of @strayrogue).
- Is GiraffeWorld secretly the original meme artist, with @strayrogue merely reposting it - and GiraffeWorld choosing to make a "close redraw" of their own work for Commons and credit @strayrogue's tweet as its source, rather than uploading their own original? This is even less likely. Belbury (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
..هبااقاثاتیت King.wikipd (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
آقا من می خوام این عکس رو حذف کنم King.wikipd (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
https://tineye.com/search/23bad23e2ca022ea9dddcbef567abe7e3ca14b90?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Bremps... 00:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, elsewhere online 5 years prior to uploader's claimed date of creation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
https://tineye.com/search/23bad23e2ca022ea9dddcbef567abe7e3ca14b90?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Bremps... 00:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, elsewhere online 5 years prior to uploader's claimed date of creation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not at all. 186.175.203.225 02:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Very poor quality (blurry). --Achim55 (talk) 15:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out-of-focus poorly lit snapshot of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect determination Elena Regina (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fatima17321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, and no evidence of a free license.
- File:IMG N6077.png
- File:IMG N6093.jpg
- File:IMG N6292.jpg
- File:IMG N6425.jpg
- File:IMG N6628.png
- File:IMG N6639.png
- File:IMG N6633.png
- File:IMG N6664.png
- File:IMG N6773.png
- File:IMG N6776.png
- File:IMG N6930.jpg
- File:IMG N7314.png
- File:IMG N7334.jpg
- File:IMG N7355.jpg
- File:IMG N7383.jpg
- File:IMG N7791.jpg
- File:IMG N7793.jpg
- File:IMG N7897.jpg
- File:IMG N7992.jpg
- File:IMG N8052.jpg
- File:IMG N8275.jpg
- File:Photo-output N.jpg
- File:IMG N8649.jpg
Yann (talk) 12:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; spot checks & reverse image searches show multiple blatant copyright violations with false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deepfake BSthird (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by club; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal files, no realistic educational use
Nutshinou Talk! 20:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manjeet singh katare (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, self promotional images; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ishver Tech (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
low quality personal mspaint drawing, out of scape Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benojir 2003 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, self-promotional logos; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dogfresh500 (talk · contribs)
[edit]com:OOS nonsense
Nutshinou Talk! 21:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
no i love wikimedia all those mania ilove its interesting thank u 200.7.90.131 21:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept - nonsense nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Image taken from internet [1] Librero2109 (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot per Metadata, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's a screenshot of a video I recorded. I still have the full video. How can I prove that this is my work?
- I was there when the eclipse happened. TansoShoshen (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Switched photo for one of my actual photos instead of a frame from one of my videos. TansoShoshen (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- User has uploaded a version with full EXIF data, withdraw my nomination. (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Droit d'auteur ShanDaw (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Porque incluye cara de niños Thalassa16 (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Incluye caras de niños Fpipeotero (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Incluye caras de niños Fpipeotero (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Where is this? Depending on the country supporting freedom of panorama, it may or may not be allowed. Yann (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I would assume Norway. The same author also used both pictures with the name in his blog at time. Best --Enyavar (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, Gjøvik, Norway. Lekeland is a fun place for kids. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Norway doesn't have FOP for sculptures or 2D works. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The Operating System The File Uses Is No Longer Supported Support The Operating System Right Now Teksjag (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedily keep and snow close. No valid reason for deletion; nominator has been globally blocked from all Wikimedia projects for disruptive editing. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin-closure) Not a reason to delete. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
No Longer Supported Tyytthtyyyyuyj (talk) 15:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 07:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this painting is in the public domain. The painter, Keith Martin (artist), died in 1983 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
![00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-WomenArtistUpdates-20240409003500-File:Keith_Martin,_"Portrait_of_Lorraine_Kuse".jpg){kind=link}
- I received permission from the associate registrar at the Sheldon Museum, who had told me that the estate of the artist closed in 2012 and that the heirs had no interest in keeping up the copyright, putting the works "effectively in the public domain". I also used pictures which were taken by the associate registrar, with their permission, with the only instructions being to site the Sheldon Museum in the article they were used in. If you have questions about the copyright of these works, you can send an email to gellerbee2@unl.edu or contact the Sheldon Museum of Art. CompositionFox (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @CompositionFox Please send this information (together with any documents you have to support your case) to COM:VRT. They will then check whether what you have is sufficient and archive the documents for further reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, will do. Thanks. CompositionFox (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @CompositionFox Please send this information (together with any documents you have to support your case) to COM:VRT. They will then check whether what you have is sufficient and archive the documents for further reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024040910008709 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
![12:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-Krd-20240413120300-File:Keith_Martin,_"Portrait_of_Lorraine_Kuse".jpg){kind=link}
%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no evidence that this painting is in the public domain. The painter, Keith Martin (artist), died in 1983 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
![00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-WomenArtistUpdates-20240409003500-File:Keith_Martin,_"Untitled_(Woman_in_Costume)".jpg){kind=link}
- I received permission from the associate registrar at the Sheldon Museum, who had told me that the estate of the artist closed in 2012 and that the heirs had no interest in keeping up the copyright, putting the works "effectively in the public domain". I also used pictures which were taken by the associate registrar, with their permission, with the only instructions being to site the Sheldon Museum in the article they were used in. If you have questions about the copyright of these works, you can send an email to gellerbee2@unl.edu or contact the Sheldon Museum of Art. CompositionFox (talk) 00:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024040910008709 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
![12:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-Krd-20240413120300-File:Keith_Martin,_"Untitled_(Woman_in_Costume)".jpg){kind=link}
There is no evidence that this painting is in the public domain. The painter, Keith Martin (artist), died in 1983 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
![00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-WomenArtistUpdates-20240409003500-File:Keith_Martin,_"Interior_with_Ghost".jpg){kind=link}
- I received permission from the associate registrar at the Sheldon Museum, who had told me that the estate of the artist closed in 2012 and that the heirs had no interest in keeping up the copyright, putting the works "effectively in the public domain". I also used pictures which were taken by the associate registrar, with their permission, with the only instructions being to site the Sheldon Museum in the article they were used in. If you have questions about the copyright of these works, you can send an email to gellerbee2@unl.edu or contact the Sheldon Museum of Art. CompositionFox (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024040910008709 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
![12:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-Krd-20240413120200-File:Keith_Martin,_"Interior_with_Ghost".jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Medellinir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused images. Subjects don't seem notable. Uploader blocked on other wikis for spam and multiple account abuse.
- File:Shahameh jan.jpg
- File:Safa ahmadi.jpg
- File:Reza Sajedi.jpg
- File:Ghafoor Ghatali.jpg
- File:Ashkan Fattahi.jpg
- File:Alireza Naghizadeh2 - Copy.jpg
William Graham (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seonam Lake Park
[edit]Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for statues.
✗plicit 00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claims. These look like artist renditions of planned or future structures.
- File:Seonam Water Recycling Center(4).png
- File:Seonam Water Recycling Center(1).JPG
- File:Seonam Water Recycling Center(3).png
- File:Seonam Water Recycling Center(2).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
✗plicit 00:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded for a sandbox article on enWiki that won't ever go live because it's basically spam. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, image was posted to https://www.instagram.com/p/C30hWpyIs3I/ five weeks ago. Clearly AI-generated but may have been edited in post by the Instagram user. Belbury (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
More AI fake architecture from es.wiki users. Out of scope just like the other ones.
- File:Elevabloc Tower.jpg
- File:Skyline Madrid.png
- File:Plano de situación.png
- File:Propuesta de idea.jpg
- File:Juego de la Jenga.jpg
- File:Representación de la idea.jpg
- File:Croquis del edificio.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: The third one is a screencap taken from Google Maps; I converted it. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 07:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G3 as a hoax. Belbury (talk) 10:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio of a Dan Himbrechts/AAP photo. See https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/nov/24/china-human-rights-activist-drew-pavlou-escorted-from-parliament-house-but-federal-police-wont-say-why FOARP (talk) 12:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Although it is a screenshot of a government website, I doubt whether it is a copyright violation since {{GODL}} provides a royalty-free license for certain Indian government works. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Same as National Portal For Rooftop Scheme India - Ministry Of New And Renewable Energy.png. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Same as National Portal For Rooftop Scheme India - Ministry Of New And Renewable Energy.png. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dhksehdirn (talk · contribs)
[edit]low resolution, large watermark of other source, no EXIF, how could these be author's work??
Lemonaka (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GOTELNETWORK (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused "poster" collage artworks using what seem to be images found on the web (File:Poster 2024-03-22-062542.png uses an image which appears on TripAdvisor at https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/AttractionProductReview-g293797-d19402675-Accra_to_Cape_Coast_to_Elmina_Heritage_Tour-Accra_Greater_Accra.html#/media/19402675/-1:p/)
- File:Poster 2024-04-09-120823.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-30-122709.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-28-125035.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-28-124952.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-24-023816.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-24-122013.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-24-010648.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-24-012702.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-22-062542.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-13-055528.png
- File:Poster 2024-03-19-070708.png
Belbury (talk) 14:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Believe it or not, they are all out-of-scope and derivative of copyrighted (non-libre) portions taken from sources. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 02:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC); edited: 02:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Picture of a book : uploader does not have the copyright O Kolymbitès (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Book : uploader does not have the copyright O Kolymbitès (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Book : uploader does not have the copyright O Kolymbitès (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
BBC tv ident, seems clear nonfree use Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of context 2001:448A:11A3:1276:DD1E:3982:187A:ED98 14:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work Perumalism (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Perumalism (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 15:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Perumalism (talk) 15:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Photo of a non active contributor. Most probably self promotion of a non-notable musician. No permission Ignatus (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Yann. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot from a non-free video. Gumruch (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Selfie uploaded by non-contributor, clearly uploaded for spam. -- Nutshinou Talk! 16:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable, relevant article was salted on ru.wiki for being spam
- File:FIZULI T-Shirt.jpg
- File:FIZULI Rashguard.jpg
- File:FIZULI hoodie-fleece.jpg
- File:Спортивная линейка FIZULI.jpg
- File:FIZULI.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 16:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daisyhiley2023 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the project scope, COM:DW (Gacha Life)
Nutshinou Talk! 17:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wiki power of story (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the project scope, personal files of no notability
- File:17 agosto.jpg
- File:5 marzo.png
- File:L'inizio degli eventi.png
- File:Organizzazione della community gacha italiana.png
Nutshinou Talk! 17:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, video game screenshot (COM:DW) Nutshinou Talk! 18:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alhamedmoh (talk · contribs)
[edit]lacks notability: see ar:"جاده_إيران"
Nutshinou Talk! 18:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnfleet57 (talk · contribs)
[edit]appear to be self promotional logos; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Ⳑ (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I was expecting something very different when I saw "bdsm", but yes, out of scope
- Delete Bremps... 00:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect use of the pdf file format, was uploaded correctly as File:Albertini.jpg Nutshinou Talk! 19:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by POETA VENUS DE BONARES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused useless self-advertisement
- File:LA GALAXIA DEL POETA DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:MI ARBOL DE THATESSOS DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:PENSANDO EN VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:NACI EN BONARES CON MUCHO ORGULLO.jpg
- File:ANTOLOGIA DE POEMAS Y MISTERIOS.jpg
- File:NOCHES DE MARIA DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:YO VEO EL MAS ALLA DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:MI PRIMER LIBRO DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:JUEVES POEMARIO DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:PENSANDO EN MI BONARES DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:MI PASION ES DE VENUS DE BONARES.jpg
- File:PRIMER THARTESSICO DE BOVENUS DE BONARES.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 20:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by org; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
extremely low quality picture of phone we have other images of Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ditto. Bremps... 00:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
com:OOS nonsense, copyvio (dreamstime watermark)
Nutshinou Talk! 21:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ivancimut23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]com:OOS nonsense
Nutshinou Talk! 21:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 21:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope, probably copyvio Nutshinou Talk! 21:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 21:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FlameBringer07 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files uploaded by non-contributor, none of atleast passable quality, no realistic educational use
Nutshinou Talk! 21:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Unused render of an old version of File:European Union Enlargement.svg (07:25, 1 March 2022), pointless Nutshinou Talk! 21:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikafathan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: Photo manipulation, no encyclopedic use
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Music album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Sarujansn7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: Music album cover
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: News articles
- File:Khanh Ly Monaco 1-1969.jpg
- File:Khanh Ly 1971.jpg
- File:Khanh Ly luu dien chau Au 1969.jpg
- File:Tu Do 11-1969.jpg
- File:Cay Mua Xuan 1972.jpg
- File:Dem Tinh Thuong 11-05-1970.jpg
- File:Khanh Ly Dem VN cuu lut mien Trung.jpg
- File:Khanh Ly Tu Do 22-3-1971.jpg
- File:Khanh Ly Queen Bee 14-3-1970.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philipp Kral (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: From Facebook
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegoriveravergara47 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=626920489647908&set=pcb.626923699647587 Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 22:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Random low quality image, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 22:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 22:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
low quality personal drawing, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Habertix (talk) 23:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted work of architecture in Oman that does not provide FoP. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
![03:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-A1Cafel-20240409030200-File:"run,_run,_run,_future_is_waiting_for_you"_(48453053946).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
![04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/09#c-Krd-20240416043800-File:"run,_run,_run,_future_is_waiting_for_you"_(48453053946).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(49178097668).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(49178097668).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Mural with mosaic frame, N. Port Street and E. Fairmount Avenue (northwest corner), Baltimore, MD 21224 (46829048354).jpg
[edit],_Baltimore,_MD_21224_(46829048354).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Baltimore,_MD_21224_(46829048354).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mural of two rhinoceros (1988; Stephanie Garmey, artist), Ashland Avenue and N. Washington Street (northeast corner), Baltimore, MD 21205 (49031494543).jpg
[edit],_Ashland_Avenue_and_N._Washington_Street_(northeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21205_(49031494543).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Ashland_Avenue_and_N._Washington_Street_(northeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21205_(49031494543).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mural of two rhinoceros (1988; Stephanie Garmey, artist), Ashland Avenue and N. Washington Street (northeast corner), Baltimore, MD 21205 (49031998006).jpg
[edit],_Ashland_Avenue_and_N._Washington_Street_(northeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21205_(49031998006).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Ashland_Avenue_and_N._Washington_Street_(northeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21205_(49031998006).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mural depicting Miss Sandra, Justine Bonner, and Miss Hannah Trent (2018; Nether, artist), N. Carey Street and Mosher Street (southeast corner), Baltimore, MD 21217 (47362468941).jpg
[edit],_N._Carey_Street_and_Mosher_Street_(southeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21217_(47362468941).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_N._Carey_Street_and_Mosher_Street_(southeast_corner),_Baltimore,_MD_21217_(47362468941).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Signature, Calvin B. Scurggs Funeral Home mural (2013; Charles Lawrence), 1320 N. Spring Street, Baltimore, MD 21213 (46375193514).jpg
[edit],_1320_N._Spring_Street,_Baltimore,_MD_21213_(46375193514).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1320_N._Spring_Street,_Baltimore,_MD_21213_(46375193514).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mural and billboard next to vacant lot with chain link fence, 1322 Greenmount Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21202 (46046130004).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Rowhouse group and mural, 1105-1109 Brentwood Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21202 (25926276277).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The artist Elena Montenegro died in 1995 and this painting will not be free until 71 years after her death in 2066. Leoboudv (talk) 10:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The artist Elena Montenegro died in 1995 and this painting will not be free until 71 years after her death in 2066. Leoboudv (talk) 10:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
The head has been replaced. Fake without any doubt, see https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=2189e0547d0b27f4856a295d9a75c8aeb3877e09.180194. Achim55 (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
_49.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_49.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Minor are photographed, parent consent is needed Ezarateesteban 23:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
_49.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
_49.jpg){kind=link}
_57.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_57.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A minor is photographed, parent consent is needed Ezarateesteban 23:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
_57.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
_57.jpg){kind=link}
_25.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_25.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a minor is photographed, parent consent is needed Ezarateesteban 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
_25.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
_25.jpg){kind=link}
This image was reportedly taken with a Canon EOS 50D Digital camera but this is not a high quality image. It appears to be a picture of a picture...or a derivative image. It also comes from a flickrwashing account filled with images of LTTE fighters in Sri Lanka who committed major suicide bombings both in India and Sri Lanka and assassinated Rajiv Gandhi of India. Leoboudv (talk) 23:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI image (nonsense roads, etc.) of a fictional city The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: nonsense AI-generated timeline of hair styles, captioned "his[???]in historal ꚙf hairr stages" [sic]. AI image generators are not currently capable of performing the research and synthesis required for this type of infographic. Omphalographer (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Solo pongo imágenes que he creado yo, ya que no puedo utilizar imágenes de bancos ni de otros perfiles. 88.25.114.200 21:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- This image is nonsense. It is not suitable for educational use. If you need an image with a timeline of hair styles, you will need to do the research and make the image yourself. An AI-generated image is not an acceptable substitute. Omphalographer (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, totally out of scope nonsense with gibberish text. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jayu Park, Incheon
[edit]Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Photos of sculptures and complex literary works can not be hosted on Commons.
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 010.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 011.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 028.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 032.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 033.jpg
- File:맥아더동상 옆 부조.jpg
✗plicit 05:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad quality low res copy of File:Coat of arms of Volgograd city.svg Drakosh (talk) 10:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_(1).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad quality low res copy of File:Coat of arms of Volgograd city.svg Drakosh (talk) 10:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
_(1).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
_(1).png){kind=link}
Bad quality low res copy of Файл:Coat of Arms of Volgograd oblast.svg Drakosh (talk) 10:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
personality rights, minor are photographed and no parent consent is provided Ezarateesteban 10:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Mass request:
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza16.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza18.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza19.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza20.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza23.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza24.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza4.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza8.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza25.jpg
- File:Elijo-Crecer-2024-Medoza26.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality eclipse photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 11:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 11:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cateryn delosangeles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MartinG210110 (talk · contribs)
[edit]nonsense, no educational use, out of the project scope
Nutshinou Talk! 18:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of a white screen in a freely licensed video. I can't see what the educational use of this screenshot is. Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Any potential usage is beyond me as it isn't even a pure color. Bremps... 00:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Manicolas800 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Tiny pictures of a non-identifiable person, out of the project scope
Nutshinou Talk! 19:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
dubious own work claim, looks screenshotted from a video Nutshinou Talk! 19:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
not uploader's own work, taken from a youtube thumbnail Onegaming (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Ⳑ (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OverAWallOfMetaKnight (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality out of scope drawings
Nutshinou Talk! 19:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yusif amenzade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfortunately, the author being "His wife", "My Grandmother" and "My mother" means the uploader doesn't own the copyright to these pictures.
- File:AMENZADE Yusif Amenovich.jpg
- File:Yusif (Asadi) grandfather at home.jpg
- File:Rafael Amenzade.jpg
_grandfather_at_home.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Nutshinou Talk! 20:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: similarly to Commons:Deletion requests/File:CUIDADOS WIKI PELUCAS.webp, these images of historical wig styles and wigmaking techniques are all AI-generated nonsense. While some of them may superficially resemble actual wigs / wigmaking, the resemblance is entirely on the surface level; they're full of image generation artifacts, gibberish "text", and likely historical anachronisms, and as such have no educational use.
- File:CUIDADOS ELABORA TECNICAS WIKI2.webp
- File:CUIDADOS ELABORA TECNICAS WIKI1.webp
- File:Cuidados TULLS WIKI.webp
- File:CUIDADOS MATERIAL ESTRUCTURA WIKI.webp
- File:Cuidados PELO Y FIBRAS WIKI.webp
- File:CUIDADOS SIGLO XX ACTUALIDAD WIKI.webp
- File:CUIDADOS Siglo XVIII y XIX wiki.webp
- File:CUIDADOS Siglo XVII WIKI.webp
- File:CUIDADOS GRECIA WIKI.webp
- File:CUIDADOS WIKI EGIOTO.webp
- File:CUIDADOS WIKI2.webp
Omphalographer (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No license Terabhaiseedhemaut4L (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep License added from the original source file. It is not a big deal @Terabhaiseedhemaut4L: . You could also put the license yourself after visiting the source file.--Junior Jumper (talk) 11:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Junior Jumper that's not the case. The user is removing license from images and then nominating them for no license. I have highlighted this in one more discussion started by him whether he did the same. I see u have started a discussion at ANI. Let's see how it goes. I am putting the differences there for some base. So that the admin doesn't have to search a lot. ShaanSenguptaTalk 11:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be de minimis; the tower is the only object that stands out here at dead center and all other structures became "accessory" or secondary. There is no Freedom of Panorama in Kuwait; see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kuwait Towers for past deletions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to some element in this picture, such as sharpness, it is impossible that this one was taken in 1920s. Wutkh (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why do you think it wasn't possible to create sharp images in 1920? This image is apparently scaled down significantly, so the original may not be as sharp as this low-res copy. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Of course large negative photos of the 1920s and earlier can be crystal clear sharp. If you see particular details that make the stated date "impossible", please explain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- As I cannot find any evidence to proof my though, I would like to withdraw my request. Thank you all for kind responses. Wutkh (talk) 18:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Post-closure comment: This was very obviously a sepia-colouring of a modern digital photo. The original photo is here: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1423509354580067&set=a.564795151725634 --Paul_012 (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment! Wutkh (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Not an old photo, as the uploader claims, just a sepia colored version of modern copyrighted one: [2]/[3] or [4], bogus PD rationale. Quick1984 (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
![[2]](https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/452861950_3649894125274901_6263537192356230504_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=a5f93a&_nc_ohc=_sKQNiDexVcQ7kNvgEuXI1g&_nc_ht=scontent.xx&oh=00_AYAOlVlxXV4BZh2lEgSbJ0pfdbC9dmAfvjWvhT80VPnrmA&oe=6700497B){kind=link}
- Delete, as original speedy tagger. User:Yann, this was very clear-cut and my tag shouldn't have been reverted without notice. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The original image, which I noted in the speedy request, is here. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Putting a ghost icon via photoshop into an eclipse photo is probably out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Putting a ghost icon via photoshop into an eclipse photo is probably out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Irrelevant picture uploaded for a vandalistic article Macetafest. A.piquerasm (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant picture uploaded for a vandalistic article Macetafest. A.piquerasm (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploader here. Per COM:JAPAN, the country does not have freedom of panorama. The work depicted in this image is not freely licensed, making this a copyright violation. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I don't check Commons very often, so please ping me if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software (contrary to what the company's name suggests). Ixfd64 (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The software is part of the Archive Center product OpenText develops and sells, I'm not sure why a deletion should be done? Aebian (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The screenshot is a derivative work of non-free software. You will need evidence of permission from the developer to publish a screenshot under a free license. See Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Screenshots. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader informed in 2022, but didn't edit since 2021. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Picture seems to be of not a notable person (as per this Google search) and hence can be said as an unused personal picture. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 06:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Mauvaise licence, aucune preuve que l'image soit libre de droit ou CC 2A01:CB19:8E94:3F00:B26A:8CD0:1B70:75E9 07:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation? I do not see a web link with permission, no VRT ticket, published in 2015, so not in the Public domain yet. JopkeB (talk) 07:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation (according to the file copied from https://tapeko.fr/catalogue-papiers-peints/papier-peint-foret/papier-peint-jungle/) + advertising. JopkeB (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No permission from given author Josh Cordeschi and this cannot be a selfie either as is claimed - no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 08:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
no permission from given author who is the person portrayed and it cannot b a selfie so no author no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 08:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Porque está mal hecho. Eduardo Jesus Martin Castillo Asencio (talk) 08:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: User's request, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Logo likely to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
несвободный файл, нарушение АП kosun (talk) 08:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission, not public domain. --Yann (talk) 11:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Considering the meta data and file size I highly doubt this to be own work as claimed by uploader. Ciell (talk) 12:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't really see anything wrong with the metadata and the file size is irrelevant. I searched for any duplicates online, but I can't find any. The photo also looks homemade (as in: non-professional) to me, so it does give me the impression that he's the one that took it. I'm leaning towards
Oppose removal. Mondo (talk) 17:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The author responded on the Dutch Wikipedia that the photo was taken in one of his classes and thus bears no copyright. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. Mondo (talk) 10:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims This image is for Editorial use purposes only. The Image can not be used for advertising or commercial use. in the Permission field and the source at https://www.flickr.com/photos/number10gov/52903089888/ is CC-BY-NC-ND. Non-commercial restriction is not compatible with Commons. Belbury (talk) 14:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - The license selected on Flickr is not relevant. The EXIF data on the photo clearly identifies that the image is OGL 3.0 which is an acceptable license for Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment It is a little confusing how 10 Downing Street's Flickr has licensed images. [[:This image is for Editorial use purposes only. The image has a CC-BY-NC-ND license on Flickr], which jibes with the "editorial use only" disclaimer in the metadata, while File:Boris Johnson and Liz Truss.jpg has a CC-BY-SA license on Flickr but has the same "no commercial use/modification" notice in the EXIF. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I would say that if this image has to be removed then all images with that clause in the EXIF have to be marked for deletion. Mewhen123 (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A lot of images from that flickr account are also on the National Archives, under their Flickr licence (either SA or NC) and can be used on commons with no contest (under the OGL that the national archives uses). The OGL terms are also compatible with commons, of which the EXIF data is assigned with. Mewhen123 (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is an example Mewhen123 (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Whpq. --Yann (talk) 11:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplikat von File:Karlsruhe tram 2017 1.jpg - unnötig gecropped Mkkagain (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The reason I cropped this photo is because I needed the subjects (two tramcars) to be more prominent. KatVanHuis (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Reupload of frequently deleted File:Ujawal Jha.jpg. Only use is faux article in a talk page on hiwiki. William Graham (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
https://www.ogu.ac.jp/news/2021/04/pdf/applause.pdf p27 eien20 (talk) 15:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio; artist died in 1984; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:6CA8:CD6F:8049:3059 16:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Metadata - "credit: ASML / Bart van Overbeeke" AMSL is not the Dutch Ministry.
From the Wikipedia article [[5]] "ASML Holding N.V. (commonly shortened to ASML, originally standing for Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography) is a Dutch multinational corporation ...
-- Ooligan (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
słaba jakość Errorek (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
this picture is not for this acount and this pic have some copyright license Dr.elhaamfakhari (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
this picture is not for this acount and this pic have some copyright license Dr.elhaamfakhari (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Completely fictional flag, no sources cited. Centralismo (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not in PD, Max Pollak died 1970 Goesseln (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
erroneous object Сарапулов (talk) 18:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Can the title or description just be changed to correct? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a photo of the fence around the property. The locomotive depot is not in the photo Сарапулов (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment By itself that does not seem like a reason for deletion. Should the description and categories be changed? Should the file be renamed, and if so, to what? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Somain - Forum des associations au foyer culturel Henri-Martel avec le géant Jean le Messager et son créateur Kévin Danjou, le 11 septembre 2021 (4).JPG
[edit].JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Il utilise mon image sans mon accord. 2001:861:205F:6880:9E19:F042:88A7:EFAF 19:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Accord donné en date du 11 septembre 2021. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 11:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. The metadata shows the copyright holder is Collin Nixon. The uploader is "Val.holden" and she claims it is her own work. This is her only upload. Her only edit to the English Wikipedia was to add this image to an article. There are articles which use other images from this shoot and credit them to Nixon. Nixon's website shows at least one other photo from this shoot. Valerie Holden of Nashville, suspiciously, works in marketing. Denniscabrams (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
family doesn't support this image Sidney Hiele (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Imho this is not a reason to delete the image. But it can be replaced on the Wikipedia article by uploading a better photo. If some family member has a selfmade photo they can upload it through the Wikiportret website. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 08:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Ellywa. Mondo (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete There are two licenses present here. The first, {{PD-US-no notice}}, indicates the image was published no later than 1977. This is rather impossible; the subject would have been 21 in 1977, and the subject is clearly older than 21 in this image. The second image, {{PD-USGov-ED}}, is making the claim the image is the work of the U.S. Department of Education. This is false. The image is the work of Southern Illinois University. The image is taken from this source which does not show any license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! I created this file as part of a personal project to update Southern Illinois University Carbondale's Wikipedia page. Thank you for creating this deletion request; I've clearly used incorrect licenses. I do have written permission from SIU's legal affairs department to publish this photo on Wikipedia (and that of other SIU Chancellors/Presidents), and did not see any obvious copyright issues with uploading them. At the time I uploaded these photos, I was not (and still am not) fully familiar with the process of license citation on Wikipedia. I would be happy if there could be a way for the correct copyright licenses to be added, if applicable. If this photo is to be removed for the above reasons, then it should be noted that there are likely other photos (specifically those of the Chancellors/Presidents) on the Southern Illinois University Carbondale Wikipedia page. Rywlkr (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Rywlkr: Permission to use on Wikipedia is not the same thing as a free license. If you want to try to get SIU to release these images under a free license, follow the instructions at Commons:Email templates. As is, we can not use these images on Commons, because they are not compatible with Commons licensing requirements. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploader/user GoldenbookofLuxury may be not the author/copyrightholder C. Robert Rotter as mentioned in metadata/description (missing permission) BlankeVla (talk) 21:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploader/user GoldenbookofLuxury may be not the author/copyrightholder C. Robert Rotter as mentioned in metadata/description (missing permission) BlankeVla (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[6] Image taken from Internet Librero2109 (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the image is the logo of an organisation, hence why i took it from its Website. GenericUsername69 (talk) 21:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This image is a copyrighted image and has not been freely licensed. The source cited doesn't prove that the image is in the public domain. Versace1608 (talk) 22:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Its a free file from somebody else. Willybonty95 (talk) 15:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This photo was published in Facebook https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=897238635742756&set=a.897247305741889 and needs permission from photographer via VRTS. Htm (talk) 23:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Commons copy is of higher resolution, and has EXIF data. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
UNlikely to be own work (suspicious exif, high resolution photo on Internet: https://israelnoticias.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/%D7%99%D7%A2%D7%A7%D7%91-%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%94-il.jpg the same exif exist on official embassy page https://embassies.gov.il/warsaw-en/Pages/default.aspx ) 178.37.205.142 23:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Explicit copyvio, published on this webpage before Commons upload: https://www.dakaractu.com/Conflit-au-Proche-Orient-l-Ambassadeur-d-Israel-au-Senegal-S-E-M-Roi-Rosenblit-charge-le-Hamas-et-defend-la-position_a203711.html 178.37.205.142 23:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot 186.173.202.52 23:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- used this photo for the wiki page on Cameron Shahbazi Fazels2 (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- So? 186.173.202.52 00:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think the implication of the "screenshot" in the EXIF is that uploader may not own the video the screenshot came from. Most videos, like most photos, are copyrighted by default, so unless we know the video this came from has been released under a free license, we should assume it hasn't been. If we're wrong, we'll be only too happy, but please specify where this screenshot came from, and why that video was free licensed. --GRuban (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- So? 186.173.202.52 00:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This looks like a sefie, so permission from Cameron Shahbazi is needed. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Stephenson College images
[edit]- File:Stephenson_College_accommodation_blocks.jpg
- File:Front_of_Stephenson_College_Durham_University.jpg
- File:Stephenson_College_Accommodation.jpg
- File:Platform_1,_Stephenson_College.jpg
- File:Platform_2,_Stephenson_College.jpg
These files were uploaded by Stephensoncollegedu and Kstobbs (which evidence from editing patterns and various discussions on Wikipedia indicate are the same person). They are pretty clearly all official Durham University marketing photos from the same photoshoot - two of them appear in an official university publication, and at least one photo also obviously from the same photoshoot appears on the university website (labelled 'Our Unique College System' and featuring many of the same models in the same clothing).
As the uploader appears to be a representative of the college, it's possible they do have permission to release these, but it seems reasonably unlikely - they are marked as 'own work' rather than evidencing release by the copyright owner - and a query on the user's talk page on Wikipedia went unanswered.
I raised this at Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2023/01#Stephenson_College,_Durham_images at the time and the only reply recommended deletion, but I didn't get round to pursuing this at the time; I've just been reminded by Padgriffin (who has been doing a great job creating freely-licenced alternatives). I'd suggest they need to go. --TSP (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 24.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of a copyrighted newspaper A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think that this type of propaganda against the dictatorship of Venezuela is one of the few documentary contents of what is happening in a lawless country. I find it absurd that the copyright of a historical event is claimed in a country where the most fundamental human rights do not exist. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, even if unfortunately. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Logo likely to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 11:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I work with the artist who made this, and we are happy to make changes to ensure it is in line with any commons rules. Dopetruffles (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please send permission as per COM:VRT. Bedivere (talk) 04:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Same thing here. Where do I submit proof of consent to upload this photo? TansoShoshen (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TansoShoshen: see COM:VRT, thanks -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
| If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | → |
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for sculptures. This statue of Douglas MacArthur was completed in 1957 by Kim Kyung-soong (김경승, 1915–1992). It is protected by copyright until 2063
- File:Incheon Statue of MacArthur.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 025.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 026.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 027.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 029.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 030.jpg
- File:Jayu Park 20230430 031.jpg
- File:Jayumacarthur.jpg
- File:MacArthur statue in Jayu Park.jpg
- File:Monument to General MacArthur in Inch'ŏn.jpg
- File:맥아더동상.jpg
- File:맥아더동상과 부조.jpg
- File:인천 자유공원 맥아더 장군상.jpg
✗plicit 03:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not opposing deletion if required under the FoP rules. Deanlaw (talk) 13:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC) (OP)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per COM:GRAFFITI obvious case of paste up graffiti Oxyman (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is a poster, not graffiti. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is both see Street_poster_art and Glossary_of_graffiti #paste-up Oxyman (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- The graffiti (or poster or artwork - what have you) might be COM:DW of other copyrightable artworks. COM:PRP-leaning to Delete here. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- The graffiti (or poster or artwork - what have you) might be COM:DW of other copyrightable artworks. COM:PRP-leaning to
- It is both see Street_poster_art and Glossary_of_graffiti #paste-up Oxyman (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Elbphilharmonie
[edit]There is no FoP for interior views in Germany. Quote of FoP Germany. In the case of architectural works, the freedom of panorama provision is applicable only to the external appearance.[74] Therefore, pictures of interior staircases and interior courtyards cannot be used under § 59(1) even if all of the above-described conditions are met.[75]
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- If I see well, all these watercolors by Marie-Claire Lefébure have been uploaded by User:Marie-Claire, who according to what she said about herself is a Belgian lady in her seventies. I suppose she's actually the author of the watercolors, so the license is correct. The point is if we need or not these paintings on Commons. Is she a relevant artist or is it self-promotion? --Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 09:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- According to what she says in her website, she's an amateur artist [7]. The files should be deleted for out of Commons:Project scope.--Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 09:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 06:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of VitraHaus
[edit]There is FoP for interior views in Germany. The architects of the VitraHaus are still alive.
- File:500px photo (185256079).jpeg
- File:500px photo (199405275).jpeg
- File:Baden-Württemberg Weil am Rhein Vitra Haus Innenraum 06.jpg
- File:Baden-Württemberg Weil am Rhein Vitra Haus Innenraum 07.jpg
- File:Baden-Württemberg Weil am Rhein Vitra Haus Innenraum 08.jpg
- File:Baden-Württemberg Weil am Rhein Vitra Haus Innenraum 10.jpg
- File:In vitra 1 - Flickr - Magdalena Roeseler.jpg
- File:Vitra Haus - interior detail.jpg
- File:VitraHaus in Weil am Rhein 10.JPG
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of VitraHaus
[edit]Same as above
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Agree. --Marsupium (talk) 13:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of the Kirchner Museum
[edit]There is no FoP for interior views in Switzerland, its architect is sill alive.
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4248.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4250.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4252.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4253.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4254.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4255.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4256.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4257.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht 1K4A4258.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3922.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3924.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3925.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3926.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3931.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3932.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3933.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3934.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3935.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3936.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3937.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3938.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3939.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3940.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3941.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3942.jpg
- File:Davos Kirchner Museum Innenansicht P6A3945.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep how are the individual work? Not all interior views in Switzerland are protected by copyright! It muss be a individual Work. It is a good, diffused, illuminated museum show room a individual work? I say no. And this photos are take at during a official GLAM event with a permission of the museum. --Bobo11 (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The artworks are, for the most part, de minimis. The rooms are quite simple and uncreative. They represent a de minimis portion of the larger architectural work. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Here the link to FoP Switzerland, where you see that no interior views are permitted. The architects are Annette Gigon and Mike Guyer who are both still alive. In Switzerland there exists a standard of life + 70 years. Under the Swiss copyright law art. 2 works of architecture are protected by copyright. @IronGargoyle It's not about the artwork, which if it's from Kirchner is anyway in the Public Domain, but about the architecture and the interior views. Exterior appearances are permitted by FoP, interiors not. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- How part interior are copyright? Only individual work can became a Copyright. Not all part of a building also a part of individual architecture. No FoP say not no Fotos from inside of a new constructed house. No FoP say only, no Photos from copyright Interior ore Photos from a copyrighted part of architecture. So you can give en exemplar what the copyrighted part of this withe rooms are. You can't? Then it the „no FoP inside“ also not a Problem. When you can't see a copyrighted architecture part on the Pictures, than there are no reason to deleted this photos. Bobo11 (talk) 19:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Bobo11 Mit deinem Englisch kann es zu einigen Missverständnissen kommen. Kannst deine Argumente auch gerne auch Deutsch kommunizieren. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- How part interior are copyright? Only individual work can became a Copyright. Not all part of a building also a part of individual architecture. No FoP say not no Fotos from inside of a new constructed house. No FoP say only, no Photos from copyright Interior ore Photos from a copyrighted part of architecture. So you can give en exemplar what the copyrighted part of this withe rooms are. You can't? Then it the „no FoP inside“ also not a Problem. When you can't see a copyrighted architecture part on the Pictures, than there are no reason to deleted this photos. Bobo11 (talk) 19:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- FoP Switzerland, Paradise Chronicle, is in my opinion already perfectly clear. When it comes to threshold of originality questions, there is always some subjectivity in the discussion which no update of a FoP page can prevent. I know of some people here who would almost never see creativity in simple modern interior architecture, and others who do. This is not a matter of the rules, but of individual interpretation of the rules. For this kind of discussion, we have no hard and fast "if given A, then B". Allow me to comment on the examples you cited, as I took a look at the deleted pictures:
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:LAC Lugano: Quite striking, characteristic interior architecture, deletion was right.
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Basel Tinguely museum interior ramp.JPG: Another striking picture that shows architecture typical for the architect Mario Botta. Rightly deleted as well.
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:GLADIATOR. THE TRUE STORY - Exhibition at Basel Museum of Ancient Art and Ludwig Collection (Ank Kumar) 07.jpg: Shown are postcards with, apparently, mostly ancient art, but in modern photographs of 3D objects. I agree with deletion.
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition au MCBA 04.jpg: Modern art in the exhibition. I wouldn't have deleted for the interior architecture (too plain), but for the artworks visible.
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:FIFA museum, Zurich 08.jpg: Copyrighted trophy (deletion is OK), not about architecture.
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fondation Beyeler: In this case, I disagree with some of the deletions. For example, File:Riehen BS Fondation Beyeler Ausstellung Claude Monet 2017 IV.jpg shows only visitors viewing public domain paintings by Monet in a standard museum room. In this case, I agree with what IronGargoyle wrote there: "The building as a whole may be a creative architectural work, but simple individual gallery room walls are not". That is also my firm opinion: You don't look at these walls and say "Oh yes, that's a Renzo Piano". Every building, also by famous architects, contains plain rooms that have no artistic character. I feel reminded of the "perpetual" case of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Harpa (concert hall) - over time (you can expand the older discussions there) I have nominated many, many files of views of this concert hall in Iceland for deletion (also exterior views, as Iceland has no Commons-compatible FoP whatsoever), but notably, in the June 2023 request several images that contained mainly plain(ish) interiors were kept, and though I wouldn't have seen them all as plain enough, I can accept that. - As we're discussing Holly's recent Beyeler decision among others, a ping to User:Holly Cheng as well for information. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your time to double check the deleted files. For me there are still some things to clarify. First plain walls are not just plain walls if they are described to be the plain walls of a certain museum. Or categorized as such. Then also ToO Switzerland says Swiss copyright law defines works as "literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character, irrespective of their value or purpose". I understand from this that every artistic creation is copyrightable, also plain walls from a certain building. Architecture works a lot with the distribution of light, for which the Kirchner Museum was also famous for, specially for the ceiling, which is depicted on most of the files in the DR. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradise Chronicle: Thank you, too, for engaging in a level-headed and considerate discussion. - I think you're misunderstanding the situation a bit, and would like to emphasize the "individual character" wording from the copyright law. The originality and copyright protection of a work doesn't carry over to every individual part of the work; copyright protection is created by the work as a whole, and whether partial depictions still contain something copyrighted depends upon what is being shown. I'll try to explain what I mean by two non-architectural examples: Take a copyrighted novel. That novel contains the sentence "She opened the door". You are absolutely free to reproduce that sentence from the novel, because the isolated sentence has no individual character and the words "She opened the door" appear in many works. A whole paragraph from the novel that shows characteristics of the author's style, however, would be copyrighted. Or let's for a moment assume File:Julius Caesar (Museo del Prado E-378) 01.jpg were a still copyrighted work by a modern artist (it isn't, it's from the 16th century). You would be free to distribute depictions of only the pedestal, because it's a generic shape often seen in pedestals of busts, no creative work in itself. - Likewise, if you depict an absolutely standard boxy, white museum room that isn't really distinguishable from other museum rooms, there's nothing copyrighted in this picture, even if the museum building itself is protected by copyright. - Having said all that, I do not want to simply dismiss your argument that the ceiling's design / lighting might be copyrightable. Personally, I still think it's probably not, but given the "Im Zauberlicht" article you cite, I can see that one could assess this differently. If the admin processing this request comes to the conclusion that the special lighting is too much of a copyright problem, I certainly can live with that. But I would then strongly emphasize that this shouldn't be used as a precedent to delete images of public domain artworks hanging on nondescript modern museum walls. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no objection if someone wants to create a UDR for those files. —holly {chat} 17:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- As said above, except for some of the Fondation Beyeler images, I think the deletions were in order, but I don't feel strongly enough about it for a UDR. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, then I expand a bit on the light. That the ceiling is transparent in a museum became to be special in the 19th century. But since Davos has a snowy winter not the same solution was needed and therefore the light does not directly come vertically, but diagonally through windows in the walls. Also the transparent part would usually not reach the very end of the walls since it would have led the frames of the paintings to provide shade on to them. But Gigon/Guyer architects wanted the transparent part to reach the end of walls chose a special sort of glass that would allow enough light for the paintings but not for the shades of the frames and eventually also compelled the light specialist. (Im Zauberlicht, p.10, its the link of the phrase, in the same paragraph is also the other info) Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- You write „That the ceiling is transparent in a museum became to be special in the 19th century.“, You understood what this means? >The transparent ceiling can not decrease under copyright. The ceiling are not a new innovation, it is an old technology to illuminate rooms with soft daylight. Yes on the roof and in construction can give elements how can be covered by patents/copyright. But, can you sea one of this copyrighted element on this photo? No. When you cant sea a covered items on this photos, in succession no problem with “no FoP for interior views in Switzerland”. Bobo11 (talk) 22:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- To spin your phrase a bit further, do you want to suggest that transparent windows in a building are not anymore copyrightable? @Bobo11 answering to your question if I can see one of the copyrighted elements in this photo (I guess the plural form was meant here). Yes, for example that the transparent ceiling extends to the ends of the walls. Further specialities of the building are described in a monograph on the museum. Still I strongly believe we are not able and also not required to describe all the originalities/specialities of an artwork/building for which I believe in the Swiss Copy Right Law the phrase works are literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character, irrespective of their value or purpose exists. And straight underneath that phrase are the listed works which include works of architecture. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The transparent ceiling are not new and unique architecture elements, and hi gives a lot of Museums with of them (Google “Tageslichtdecke”). This is not the one characteristic detail from structure of the Kirchner Museum Davos or from creations of architecture firm Gigon / Guyer. It is aktuell more or less the standard design from art gallerys (if you can work with daylight). Why you means, standard design can protected by copyright? Standard is an the opposite of individual. But from a protected by copyright, is individual work the basic requirement. No individual work = no protection by copyright. And in the end, no protection by copyright = no requirement to must have a FoP Rule.-Bobo11 (talk) 10:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yet, none of the ceilings reach the end of the walls. And it is an individual work if the file is a recognizable part of an individual (a specified) work. And the files are categorized within the category Kirchner Museum, so the files are a recognizable part of a specific work. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The transparent ceiling are not new and unique architecture elements, and hi gives a lot of Museums with of them (Google “Tageslichtdecke”). This is not the one characteristic detail from structure of the Kirchner Museum Davos or from creations of architecture firm Gigon / Guyer. It is aktuell more or less the standard design from art gallerys (if you can work with daylight). Why you means, standard design can protected by copyright? Standard is an the opposite of individual. But from a protected by copyright, is individual work the basic requirement. No individual work = no protection by copyright. And in the end, no protection by copyright = no requirement to must have a FoP Rule.-Bobo11 (talk) 10:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- To spin your phrase a bit further, do you want to suggest that transparent windows in a building are not anymore copyrightable? @Bobo11 answering to your question if I can see one of the copyrighted elements in this photo (I guess the plural form was meant here). Yes, for example that the transparent ceiling extends to the ends of the walls. Further specialities of the building are described in a monograph on the museum. Still I strongly believe we are not able and also not required to describe all the originalities/specialities of an artwork/building for which I believe in the Swiss Copy Right Law the phrase works are literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character, irrespective of their value or purpose exists. And straight underneath that phrase are the listed works which include works of architecture. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- You write „That the ceiling is transparent in a museum became to be special in the 19th century.“, You understood what this means? >The transparent ceiling can not decrease under copyright. The ceiling are not a new innovation, it is an old technology to illuminate rooms with soft daylight. Yes on the roof and in construction can give elements how can be covered by patents/copyright. But, can you sea one of this copyrighted element on this photo? No. When you cant sea a covered items on this photos, in succession no problem with “no FoP for interior views in Switzerland”. Bobo11 (talk) 22:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your time to double check the deleted files. For me there are still some things to clarify. First plain walls are not just plain walls if they are described to be the plain walls of a certain museum. Or categorized as such. Then also ToO Switzerland says Swiss copyright law defines works as "literary and artistic intellectual creations with individual character, irrespective of their value or purpose". I understand from this that every artistic creation is copyrightable, also plain walls from a certain building. Architecture works a lot with the distribution of light, for which the Kirchner Museum was also famous for, specially for the ceiling, which is depicted on most of the files in the DR. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- FoP Switzerland, Paradise Chronicle, is in my opinion already perfectly clear. When it comes to threshold of originality questions, there is always some subjectivity in the discussion which no update of a FoP page can prevent. I know of some people here who would almost never see creativity in simple modern interior architecture, and others who do. This is not a matter of the rules, but of individual interpretation of the rules. For this kind of discussion, we have no hard and fast "if given A, then B". Allow me to comment on the examples you cited, as I took a look at the deleted pictures:
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The poster dates from 1978, so not in the Public domain yet. Posters are not permanent in the public space, so no FOP. I do not see a VRT ticket either. JopkeB (talk) 10:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Reformierte Kirche Birmenstorf
[edit]copyvio; contemp. artworks; no fop.
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JOGOS Public Assets (talk · contribs)
[edit]No realistic educational use, random AI-generated shapes and images of that nature
- File:Green Box.png
- File:Green Sphere.png
- File:Green Book.png
- File:Cloud Cube.png
- File:Metal Sphere.png
- File:Thisflowerdoesnotexist.png
- File:Cardboard box with cyan background.png
- File:White Box with White Background.png
- File:White Box with Blue Background.png
- File:AI-Made Green Circle.png
- File:White Box.png
- File:Collage of AI-Made Designs.png
- File:White box on Orange Background.png
Nutshinou Talk! 22:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am in full support of the deletion of these files, they were of greater value when AI was in the developing stage. JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JOGOS Public Assets (talk · contribs)
[edit]Does not seem educationally useful
Nutshinou Talk! 22:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- These files are examples of organic corruption of these various file formats. They serve an educational use by providing insight into the results of the corruption of the files, and the inner workings of the file formats that lead to the results seen in the corruption. The JPEG's corruption provides knowledge on the means by which the image is subdivided, and how bit flips can lead to results that elucidate these subdivisions. The corruption of the two GIF files provide insight into the ways the animation system can break down when interacting with abnormal data. JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- There's a similar case at Commons:Undeletion_requests#File:Testxss.gif where a file was deleted because "Random demonstrations of tech stuff is not in Commons' scope." although the undeletion request hasn't reached consensus yet Nutshinou Talk! 08:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Sans utilité d'un point de vue éducatif 176.162.58.203 09:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Sans utilité d'un point de vue éducatif 176.162.58.203 09:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation: https://studyinternational.com/news/singaporean-steinway-artist/. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
I’m not seeing any evidence of a CC-Zero license at the source. There is a little note that the site is supported by the US Forestry Service, but as far as I can tell, it is not government work or otherwise in the public domain. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- It states "This image is the property of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., used under CC0 license" right underneath the image on the source page. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
This is a lower quality version of File:Louise Slaughter official portrait, 109th congress.jpg; it should be redirected to that image. They are the exact same resolution, but the other file has a larger file size, and zooming in on it reveals it has a bit more fine detail. The only remaining uses of this photo are automatically-generated pages based on Wikidata; now that I have replaced the photo on Wikidata, they should disappear soon. IagoQnsi (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect editing. Linestamp (talk) 02:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- What's wrong with it and why can't it be fixed? You can just upload a new version. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per PaterMcFly. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Where do I submit proof of consent to upload this photo? TansoShoshen (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Anonymous work from Cambodia has a copyright length of 75 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2055. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Anonymous work from Cambodia has a copyright length of 75 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2055. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Cade Stiles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation? All three photographs were not made by the uploader (they have different names), the source is unclear (red link) and I do not see a VRT ticket.
- File:2024 New Year's Times Square Ball lit up with Bowtie Design Pattern.jpg
- File:Bowtie Pattern of Times Square Ball 2024 Up Close.jpg
- File:Times Square Ball Drop Rehearsal For Countdown to 2024.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 05:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
this vidéo is protected by "droit d'auteur" - not free https://www.canal-u.tv/conditions-generales-utilisations Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Vous vous trompez. Cette photo a certes été prise le même jour que le tournage de la vidéo Canal-U (chaîne cultureGnum) https://www.canal-u.tv/chaines/culturegnum/temoignages-d-anne-et-pierre-joliot-institut-de-biologie-physico-chimique. Si les vidéos obéissent en effet en droit d'auteurs à l'URL que vous indiquez, les photos sont prises de manière tout à fait indépendante, dans le cadre de l'association que je préside, responsable de cette chaîne. Je suis moi-même indépendant de Canal-U, responsable de cette chaîne cultureGnum, et il se trouve que parfois, nous utilisons dans le cadre de Canal-U des photos que nous avons prises. Conformément à ce qui précède, j'ai mis cette photo moi-même sur WikiCommons en cc-by-sa. Merci de laisser cette photo, dont je me porte garant. Arrakis (talk) 08:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- [suite] ce que décrit très bien la phrase suivante, extraite des conditions générales d'utilisation que vous donnez ci-dessus (https://www.canal-u.tv/conditions-generales-utilisations) : "Par conséquent, elle [FMSH |Canal-U] n’est pas cessionnaire des droits sur les Contenus." Arrakis (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Arrakis: Bonjour, L'auteur mentionné est Quentin Censier. Merci de vérifier votre identité via COM:VRT/fr. Yann (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Il n'y a pas lieu de faire cela. J'ai indique l'auteur de la photo, parce qu'on indique toujours l'auteur, mais c'est dans le cadre de son contrat avec notre structure cultureGnum, propriétaire des images, que je préside et mets sur WikiCommons (facture QC et courriel du 23 octobre 2021). C'est exactement comme ici (Pete Souza) ou, plus près de nous, là. --Arrakis (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Arrakis: Bonjour, L'auteur mentionné est Quentin Censier. Merci de vérifier votre identité via COM:VRT/fr. Yann (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- [suite] ce que décrit très bien la phrase suivante, extraite des conditions générales d'utilisation que vous donnez ci-dessus (https://www.canal-u.tv/conditions-generales-utilisations) : "Par conséquent, elle [FMSH |Canal-U] n’est pas cessionnaire des droits sur les Contenus." Arrakis (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: needs VRT confirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Sorry my bad English... This file contain a draw from Christian Lütken (in public domain: file:Franciscodoras marmoratus - Lütken 1875.png) but... the photo was reuploaded in minor resolution! User made only this upload, with Portuguese errors in description. So, in doubt, I submit here. Tks. André Koehne TALK TO ME 19:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
no permission from given author in metadata which clearly states "Author Videographer: Aaron McMurtry Copyright holder Copyright: 2013" Hoyanova (talk) 12:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in contact with the artist/photographer of this picture and they have released this on CC CC0 1.0 Universal so it should be good to go? What should be done to make this allowed to stay? Definiteassembly117 (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am the author and photographed it together with my partner. The accurate credits should be:
- Author Videographer: Brenda Narvaez Copyright holder Copyright: 2024"
- I'll gladly change this if needed! Supertje123 (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Additionally, the Exif data about Aaron McMurtry 2013 was Exif data that apparently was tied to the camera that was used. It's incorrect and as I said, the correct data should be: Author Videographer: Brenda Narvaez Copyright holder, Copyright: 2024. Supertje123 (talk) 13:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Supertje123: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image or media file can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Di (they-them) as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 16:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This page claims to list "photo competitions and other upload campaigns" but in fact lists nothing. Perhaps it would do fine merging into the UploadWizard campaign functionality page? Bedivere (talk) 04:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. However, this file is used on several (talk)pages. I cannot oversee the consequences if it is deleted. Perhaps all relevant uses should be removed first. @Bedivere: Would you be willing to remove those links? Ellywa (talk) 13:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ellywa in fact I would not delete it but merge it Bedivere (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I do not object to that action in any way. So please do. Ellywa (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere: What is the status? --Krd 05:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. The page I proposed redirecting to is on MediaWiki.org. Perhaps redirecting to the Category:Photo scavenger hunts? Deleting altogether? Bedivere (talk) 05:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say if we want to delete it, which I'd support, we need a volunteer first who cleans up the links. --Krd 04:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. The page I proposed redirecting to is on MediaWiki.org. Perhaps redirecting to the Category:Photo scavenger hunts? Deleting altogether? Bedivere (talk) 05:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere: What is the status? --Krd 05:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I do not object to that action in any way. So please do. Ellywa (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ellywa in fact I would not delete it but merge it Bedivere (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: closing as kept for the moment, can be deleted when there is a plan how to sort things out. --Krd 13:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)