Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This photo is not in the public domain. This photo is a form of harassment Crispybcritters (talk) 00:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- No, the image was not placed in the public domain. Rather it was released under a creative commons license. Crispybcritters, are you familiar with how the {{Flickrreview}} robot confirms images are properly licensed?
As to images that are forms of harrassment... Well, I don't think there would be much sympathy for retaining images that everyone agreed were unambiguously regarded as harrassment. But how is this image harrassing? It looks like a pretty ordinary image, to me.
Sometimes we agree to remove properly licensed images, as a courtesy. When the image is in use that is a harder. This image IS in use.
Crispybcritters, if you know Ms Barber, or you know someone who knows her, so you are very confident that she regards it as harrassment, then would you please ask her to confidentially establish her identity through the OTRS committee? One thing that really bugs me is when someone says. "I am Joe Bloe, and I demand the article on Joe Bloe, or the image of Joe Bloe, be deleted!" When material is properly licensed, and otherwise policy compliant, deletion is a courtesy. If Joe Blow, or Ms Barber, want material related to them deleted the first thing they should do is use our confidential tools for them to establish they are really who they say they are.
There have been lots of times when we get this kind of request, and it is coming from a prankster, not from Joe Blow at all.
If you don't have a reliable way to know that Ms Barber has an objection to this image, then please don't waste everyone's time by acting as if the harassment you claim is too obvious to require explanation, okay? Geo Swan (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
@Geo Swan: After you were notified on your talk page of this deletion request, you made File:Lesley Barber at the Nappily Ever After Premiere (cropped).jpg. Was that prompted by the request to delete this image? It seems like an odd thing to do given the circumstances. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan: You have removed my comment here (twice) with the summary "offtopic harassment". Someone has asked for an image to be deleted, saying that they feel the image is a "form of harassment". It seems likely that they will feel the same way about the new image that you have uploaded. However this deletion discussion is closed will apply to that image as well. If you still can't understand why my comment is neither offtopic nor harassment, start a discussion on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; Original has CC license. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a CFC (Canadian Film Centre) photo and it is not in the public domain as the poster has claimed. This photo along with several others from the event are publicly accessible, but not public domain. The CFC has consulted legal counsel to clarify this matter. Therefore this photo needs to be taken down. 194.35.233.4 21:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:The 2017 Slaight Music Residency Showcase (34730771094).jpg. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
This photo is not permissible by the copyright owner - please delete Crispybcritters (talk) 01:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep nominator has already been advised this was released on Flickr under Creative Commons licensing. They have been reported to COMMONS:ANU. Can someone close this down? - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 03:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 05:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Model in white lingerie at Western Canada Fashion Week 2016 Spring - Edmonton (cropped).jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Hamwal as Speedy (Db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7 In use. Yann (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. @Yann: , I am the uploader (cropper) myself is saying to have this photo to be kept. Please keep this photo speedily. Hamwal (talk) 11:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Hamwal: We don't delete images in use without a valid rationale. Yann (talk) 11:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: , Please keep the photo, now I don't want to have this photo to be deleted. Hamwal (talk) 11:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
falsche Bezeichnung Ernst Heim (talk) 13:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Because its incorrect ImoteSokoli (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Person is non-notable, file only being used for promotional reasons by blocked users (e.g. English Wikipedia User:Stylox Vai Twist) and is inevitably reverted. Also, is this is a speedy delete situation can someone change it, I am so used to using Twinkle I'm not 100% sure how to do a speedy deletion nomination without it. Thebirdlover (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Magog the Ogre. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, random penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CV, artwork yoinked from another site, no indication of actual free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
non-free screenshot. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 06:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Potential COM:NETCOPYVIO: low resolution and reverse image search indicate this image has been around all over the internet before being uploaded here. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CV, false claims by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
self-promo. Out of scope. Once used at wikidata:User:Mayjorent Estopedist1 (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted per CSD#F10. ─ Aafī (talk) 22:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Source is problematic Mindsrate89 (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Closed: Already covered by Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ImoteSokoli also from today, no need for a second DR for the same reason. --Rosenzweig τ 21:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution, 2 better files File:Cotton Merchants in New Orleans by Edgar Degas 1873.jpeg, File:Cotton Merchants in New Orleans, by Hilaire-Germain-Edgar Degas, 1873, oil on linen - Fogg Museum - Harvard University - DSC01689.jpg Oursana (talk) 22:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment from uploader: It was the highest res copy I found online back in January 2008. I'm glad we now have better copies. As the file name has been on Commons 16 years and there may be 3rd party links, I suggest deleting then immediately creating a redirect from this file name to File:Cotton Merchants in New Orleans by Edgar Degas 1873.jpeg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted and file name redirected per above. As file is no longer in use on Wikimedia, I saw no reason to delay. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This incorrectly dated file above is the exact same (drawing) as this below file:
File:Young_Christian_Lady_Photographer_Drowns.jpg
which is fortunately correctly labelled and sourced.
Therefore, please delete this file below:
File:Filey_Brigg_Drowning_May_1900.jpg
Thank you in advance 175.38.37.197 05:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 19:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JohnCWiesenthal as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|Doubtful own work. Yann (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep The EXIF metadata shows that this was taken by an actual camera, which most-certainly implies that the uploader took the photo. I failed to look at this metadata prior to nominating this file, thinking that it might have been derived from a non-free website or online video. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Darkened 200.39.139.14 21:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
What? The reason is baseless, this image doesn't have a non-darkened version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titan2456 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Chemical structure in wrong file format (PDF), replaced by File:Benzpyrene Structural Formulae.svg by the same uploader. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete, per @Chem Sim 2001. The PDF also has an opaque white background when rasterised, presumably due to its embedded colour profile. The SVG version is clearly superior. Alhadis (talk) 05:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The Panoramio import may be freely-licensed, but the building is not. Building is not incidental (not COM:DM) here. Same no-FoP issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jumeirah Hotel.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I added an F10 tag to this out-of-scope man's image. The uploader removed the tag. (I wish to attract attention to this edit summary while removing the F10 tag.) They went to open a draft to prove that this file is "used". Do I have to accept now that the image of this OoS person was "useful"? If other colleagues find EDUSE in this file it may stay, I do not. So simple. Ah, BTW there are other suitable images for the said draft, there was no need to hurry that we could stay out of images to illustrate the topic... E4024 (talk) 23:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is textbook battle-grounding it has a clear use for articles like shirtless man, or on primitive lifestyle, or survivalism or like. Why not delete this image or this. Seriously what is so special to this image of a shirtless man that you find qualifies it for deletion? I also want to point that this user has put up the speedily delete tag after I reported him for POV nationalistic DR's. This text is incomprehensible. Des Vallee (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- In Turkish we say if you call someone mad 40 times he/she will get mad; but I will neither get mad nor become a POV editor, and less a vandal as many times as you call me names. Please stop that and speak "only" about files in DR. --E4024 (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Look, Des Vallee, I will be kind and patient with you, as all of us must be towards each other. (I learned my lessons from blocks in WP, FYI :) Have a look at the history of File:Sakarya 2004 -Ceylan Journey 025.jpg: This is also about a topless man. I DR'ed this image too (He is a Turk, BTW :) because the file was not in use, and did not have a good categorization and I thought it was an OoS person. Later I found out that he was a footballer with articles in several WPs and asked an admin to close the DR. Why am I making this talk? I see no need to defend my edits, but neither do I want anyone to have a wrong impression about me. Neither of these files were asked to delete because the men are topless, indeed because I thought they both were "scopeless". When I discovered the scope of the other gentleman, I withdrew my DR. If you show me this guy is a body builder or a porn actor or a banker whatsoever that is notable enough for Commons, I can also withdraw this DR. Not before. --E4024 (talk) 23:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- What on absolute earth are you talking about. This patent battle-grounding after I reported you. Please stop pinging me. None of the files I linked have any well known people, they are just pictures of toppless men, it's not a policy to only keep pictures of toppless men when you feel like it. Des Vallee (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging you? You filled my TP with stuff, and I am patiently not removing them, waiting for you to stop it and then I will remove them all at once. E4024 (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- What on absolute earth are you talking about. This patent battle-grounding after I reported you. Please stop pinging me. None of the files I linked have any well known people, they are just pictures of toppless men, it's not a policy to only keep pictures of toppless men when you feel like it. Des Vallee (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Okay, this is getting really boring now. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Tuválkin. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
The uploader never ordered a {{Flickrreview}} at upload for this image and its license was never verified to show if it was ever free. Now the flickr link is deleted and the Internet Wayback did not archive the flickrlink. Leoboudv (talk) 03:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Tuválkin and the first section above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This is the Only Image on Commons from this now deleted flickr account. If images from this account was free, why are there not two or three images at least? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: This image was 100% released under creative commons universal license. The image itself is from a video released under CC0 that I screenshotted, this image had numerous reviews by admins and the flickr file said it was CC0, if it wasn't it would have been deleted in the above deletion request, and the file history shows this. It's unfortunate that the image was deleted but the image was under CC0, and the numerous reviews this file underwent is proof of that. It's a fairly minor image but it was released under CC0. Des Vallee (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination: per Des Vallee's comments. Perhaps someone could pass this image...please? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Please mark your withdrawl properly, with {{Withdraw}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Done per Tuválkin's suggestion. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination withdrawn. --Strakhov (talk) 09:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Blurry photo of an unidentified men, possibly out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, poor quality photo without evident compensating value. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Infrogmation. --Strakhov (talk) 09:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
clearly out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 10:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope fantasy flag (from something called NationStates, apparently) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 10:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Such lecture slides are out of Common's scope A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. These sorts of diagrams aren't categorically out of scope, but they're almost never useful without a textual context, and these ones are unusably blurry anyway. Omphalographer (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Omphalographer. --Strakhov (talk) 10:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Such lecture slides are out of Common's scope A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope & terrible quality. --Strakhov (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Such lecture slides are out of Common's scope A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope & terrible quality. --Strakhov (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not a personal photo, it could've illustrated en:Prabhunath Singh, but it is a copyvio as the image comes from http://www.bihartimes.in/Newsbihar/2017/May/newsbihar23May5.html, so Delete. Nutshinou Talk! 07:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Nutshinou. --Strakhov (talk) 10:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am skeptical of the uploader's claim to be photographer and copyright holder. User's only other upload deleted as copyright violation seen on social media; I did not find this in a reverse image search but doubt claims are more accurate. Note black bars at top & bottom, suggestive screenshot. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Infrogmation. --81.0.35.156 10:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Image features a huge watermark and is therefore pretty much unusable 2001:A61:1273:A101:55D0:3ACF:1992:7031 18:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the watermark could be cropped or painted out. Has VRT permission. If there was an incident involving this aircraft then it would be very useful. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, and make a cropped version. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, agree with the prior two. - Jmabel ! talk 02:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not unusable. --81.0.35.156 10:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fantasy? Only contribution by uploader; shows Russia and Western Europe as "allied countries" and China and India as "sourcing offices". No explanation given besides "A.R.E.N.A worldwide" and unused. Enyavar (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: fantasy map, out of scope. --81.0.35.156 10:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
From the source flickr owner's statement it is unclear if this image copyright is even owned by the flickr owner who has now conveniently deleted this image on flickr. Since thsi image is unused, it is safer to delete this image. Leoboudv (talk) 03:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No description, no metadata, not in use - F10? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
See EXIF: Publisher: TimeLifeUsage: For personal non-commercial use onlyProvider: LIFEPhotographer: Howard SochurekOriginal ID: TimeLife_image_113012965Credits: Life MagazineCopyright:© Time Yann (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
French digital art from 2009. Source site has a copyright notice and no indication of a free license. Abzeronow (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted model A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted ticket A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
- File:REF Logo IKare.png
- File:REF Logo SOC.png
- File:REF LOGO-REVEELIUM-RVB.png
- File:REF Logo ITrust cybersecurity.jpg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP! Contemporary historical document of general political interest, questions of copyright are subordinated. Im Fokus (talk) 22:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No longer needed Shaylin98 (talk) 04:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Maybe you received treatment for exhibitionism but this picture shows how you were before that. We don't delete images because they belong to the past. 45.250.252.168 17:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope AI image used as a vehicle for a personal essay in the file description. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, may also be a copyvio rather than AI (same image appears in https://emsp.org/news/empowering-people-with-ms-through-transparent-health-communication/ from 2022, and a few other places). Belbury (talk) 10:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by seeming company rep; no usage outside old sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Wrong caption. Ought to be "Jan Zamoyski" instead of "Włodzimierz Bartoszewicz". Capion switch is appreciated as well. Oleo (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報が漏洩する可能性が大きいため スサゾー (talk) 07:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image of a bus seat which is currently in use. No idea how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報が漏洩しているため。Because it violates my privacy. スサゾー (talk) 07:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image of a commercial bus interior which is currently in use. No idea how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報が漏洩している危険大。Because it violates privacy スサゾー (talk) 07:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image of a bus which is currently in use. No idea how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報の漏洩の危険大。Because it violates privacy スサゾー (talk) 07:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Interior of a commercial bus. Image is currently in use and I do not see how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Komplexes Wappen mit Schöpfungshöhe (TOO). Hier kommt es darauf an, ob es ein überliefertes Familienwappen ist oder erst vor kurzer Zeit entworfen wurde. Falls letzteres der Fall ist, steht es unter Urheberrecht. Ob der Hochlader identisch mit dem Erfinder des Wappens ist, wäre zu beweisen. GerritR (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für die Nachfrage! Ich bin der "Inhaber/Urheber", der auch in der Wappenrolle des Münchener Wappenlöwen benannt ist. Zeichner der recht neuen Grafik ist Hr. Steiz.
- (siehe Der Wappen-Löwe, Heraldische Gesellschaft e.V. (Hrsg.): . Band 22. Starke, ISSN 0931-5667) Jackelsberger (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wenn Herr Stelz die Grafik gezeichnet hat, dann ist Herr Stelz der Urheber.--GerritR (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Does this building actually still exist in this condition or has it completely fallen into ruin like so many other Olympic sites in and around Athens? --2A02:AA17:217C:C580:25F3:504D:B1E6:C425 17:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Random AI images, unlikely to be within scope.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. The second one is clearly botched anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, filled with artifacts. Palemeditation (talk) 11:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 11:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JanFayette (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense images supposedly depicting historical figures.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 11:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of an exhibition A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Temporary posters don't qualify for FOP in Germany. So this image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 10:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP for sculptures in the United States. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Ai WeiWei Phoenix Art Museum Exhibition 01.jpg
- File:Ai WeiWei Phoenix Art Museum Exhibition 02.jpg
- File:Ai WeiWei Phoenix Art Museum Exhibition 03.jpg
- File:Ai WeiWei Phoenix Art Museum Exhibition 04.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The photographer owns the copyright for this image and has requested that I take it down. Davidlc1 (talk) 11:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adhil xavier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and screenshots.
- File:Build CAL.png
- File:Publisher ros.png
- File:Subscribe.png
- File:Docker commit.png
- File:Docker run.png
- File:Humble docker 1.png
- File:CALclassDiagramlatest.png
- File:ROS environment setup.png
- File:Design2.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 11:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Stupidity or nonsense 45.250.252.168 17:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. & F10. fi:Taikasana has already been deleted. --Achim55 (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
mistaked image in description The Little Chinese Engine
Remove the image. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 08:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If there is mistake in description or file name, that can be changed without deleting the photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- delete the photo. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- delete the photo. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Mistake the illustraiton The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the image. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion offered. (If there is a reason this needs deletion, you can say in your language, someone can translate.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Image was be deleted The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the image. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Image was be deleted The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Delete the image. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
@The Little Chinese Engine: WHY? --Rosenzweig τ 14:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete Delete the image. The Little Chinese Engine (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Germany Pavilion at EXPO 2020
[edit]As alerted by @A1Cafel, there's no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Sorry for this...
- File:Pavilhão Alemanha - Expo Dubai 2020 (51611719437).jpg
- File:Pavilhão Alemanha - Expo Dubai 2020 (51611806152).jpg
- File:Pavilhão Alemanha - Expo Dubai 2020 (51612546571).jpg
- File:Pavilhão Alemanha - Expo Dubai 2020 (51613293364).jpg
- File:Pavilhão Alemanha - Expo Dubai 2020 (51613342684).jpg
- File:Pavilhão Alemanha - Expo Dubai 2020 (51613427055).jpg
Sintegrity (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Swiss Pavilion at EXPO 2020
[edit]As alerted by @A1Cafel, there's no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Sorry for this...
- File:Expo Dubai - Pavilhão Suiça (51629388167).jpg
- File:Expo Dubai - Pavilhão Suiça (51629401547).jpg
- File:Expo Dubai - Pavilhão Suiça (51630437098).jpg
- File:Expo Dubai - Pavilhão Suiça (51630859174).jpg
- File:Expo Dubai - Pavilhão Suiça (51630860224).jpg
Sintegrity (talk) 22:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Swedish Pavilion at EXPO 2020
[edit]As alerted by @A1Cafel, there's no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Sorry for this...
- File:"The Forest"..jpg
- File:Pavilhão Suécia - Expo Dubai 2020 (51669410597).jpg
- File:Paviljongen i kvällsbelysning.jpg
- File:Paviljongen nattbild.jpg
- File:Sveriges paviljong.jpg
Sintegrity (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nur Ghasyr mosque
[edit]There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. As commercial use of copyrighted public landmarks is not allowed, these commercially-licensed images of the mosque, completed in 2008, infringe the building architect or designer's copyright.
- File:Nur Ghasyr mosque 4.jpg
- File:Nur Ghasyr mosque interior 1.jpg
- File:Nur Ghasyr mosque interior 2.jpg
- File:Мечеть Нур Гасыр.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gilmore IT Center
[edit]Unlikely to be a pre-1972 building from the Philippines. w:en:Gilmore Avenue (Quezon City) tells us that the I.T. stores and shops here began to be opened in the 1990s, so this building likely dates to this decade or later. Therefore, the designer or architect is not yet dead for more than 50 years and the building is unfree for commercial licensing distribution on the Internet: see COM:FOP Philippines.
- File:0491jfN. Domingo Street Kaunlaran Valencia Gilmore San Juan Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 03.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 05.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 06.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 07.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 08.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 09.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 10.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 11.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 12.JPG
- File:CarmelGilmoreChapeljf9650 13.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This file seems to be self-promotion the file is not used anywhere and it is the only contribution by the user. EntityFacts (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
no permission no author no metadata used for promotional purposes on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
no permission no author no metadata used for promotional purposes on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報漏洩。Because it violates privacy. スサゾー (talk) 07:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This is an image of a commercial bus which is currently in use. I cannot see how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報漏洩の危険大。Because it violates privacy. スサゾー (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image of a bus seat which is currently in use. No idea how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
個人情報漏洩の危険が考えられるため。Because it violates privacy スサゾー (talk) 07:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image of a bus seat which is currently in use. No idea how this could possibly violate privacy. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Not educational (COM:EDUSE), not in-use. Veverve (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This is the cover of a book that was first published in March 2024. So the illustrator (Maaike de Groot) cannot be dead for at least 70 years and I do not see a VRT ticket either. JopkeB (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Maaike de Groot has given permission to publish the book cover on Wikimedia Commons. If you want I can send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with her email address included? Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024040610003246 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Outcome
[edit]@S. Perquin: Yes, an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org is the correct procedure. And apparently you already did.
@Krdbot: Thanks for your quick reaction.
I withdraw my nomination because I trust this will end well.
--JopkeB (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: permission received and ticket added to the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The idea that the photo is in the Public Domain is pure assumption. Just because a 1918 photo was confirmed to be Public Domain does not necessarily mean this one is. We do not know who took the photo, was it Ron Moody or did he merely upload it to Find A Grave? We do not know when it was taken other than the lifespan of the actor, I would assume sometime in the 1980s. We do not know why it is Public Domain... was it published without notice? Dedicated to the Public Domain? There are too many unknown factors here, it should be deleted under COM:PRP. PascalHD (talk) 00:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded the wrong coat of arms by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded the wrong coat of arms by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
schlechtes Format Ernst Heim (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Nonsense image supposedly depicting historical figure. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Copied from India Today link - https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/nitish-kumar-promise-to-pm-modi-not-going-anywhere-will-stay-with-you-after-flip-flops-2509582-2024-03-02 Terabhaiseedhemaut4L (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Man I literally don't know what to say. The nominator should first learn the rules and licensing. The source this file is taken from is mentioned on the page. Would request the nominator to please check it. This file is cropped from the main image which is also uploaded and can be easily found. Also learn GODL-India. ShaanSenguptaTalk 07:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Unclear, the nomination is misconceived. Firstly, I can't see it in the India Today link provided by the nominator. Also, deletion nominations for cropped images should normally target the uncropped version, in this case File:Prime Minister of India Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Chief Minister of Bihar Shri Nitish Kumar.jpg. That file has a reliable source in the Press Information Bureau of the Government of India. This crop and the original file are tagged with {{GODL-India}}, but it is unclear whether this is valid as this licence may not apply to all works of the Indian Government. There is an extended discussion on this in Template talk:GODL-India. The copyright policy page on the source website has restriction that appear to be incompatible with Commons.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- That restriction is solely for the works published by PIB that are from third party holders. If that restriction applies to every file then all the images with GODL will have to be deleted which is clearly not the case as many of them are reviewed by admins. ShaanSenguptaTalk 03:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook post of Samrat Chaudhary sahab link - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=376975697776786&id=100063930751502&set=a.376975614443461 Terabhaiseedhemaut4L (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The file has the metadata which might help to take a decision. But the reason given by the nominator is wrong. The given link has a cropped version of this image. So it can't be established that this is taken from that post by the uploader. Also the quality of the image we have on commons is much better than what is uploaded on Facebook. So it is not just another screengrab that way too. ShaanSenguptaTalk 07:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, insufficient reasons to suspect a copyright violation. The linked Facebook page is dated after than the upload to Commons, so it may have been copied from Commons. The image is widely available online, but this may reflect its presence on Commons since 2019 and its use of multiple Wikipedia pages. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This version of the image was published by centroriau.id in 2020 and has also been utilized by several other platforms after that, albeit with changes to the background color. Therefore, it is unlikely KPU hold the copyrights. GSS (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Arjayay as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears in multiple earlier sources eg http://www.enterpix.in/pix-post/what-colour-is-the-chair-the-untold-story-of-a-photograph/sanatombi/ from 2018
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Joofjoof (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This subject of this photo died in 1906, so this may fall under Template:PD-India-photo-1958.Joofjoof (talk) 00:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: with license corrected per comment. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I made a newer version of it and I'm the author here 2001:448A:6090:CABD:CCB1:DA09:2AE5:2383 01:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If you are the creator/uploader, please log in to comment so it can be seen that this request is from the uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no verification that anon request is the author/uploader; "newer version" unidentified. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Recommend deletion as a poor-quality, badly-photoshopped image. Eureka Lott 01:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Concur with the nomination. Clearly the uploader didn't know how to properly upload a flickr file as the file is a png instead of the source jpg. It's essentially a poor quality duplicate of File:Marcus Morris 2018 (50120671663) (cropped).jpg.
- Diddykong1130 (talk) 23:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Dlehman35
[edit]- File:Nelson Velazquez Royals 2023.jpg
- File:GreinkeRoyals2022.jpg
- File:Zack Greinke Full Powder Blues.jpg
These are all blatant copyvios stolen from Getty Images as follows: 1, 2 and 3. --Denniscabrams (talk) 02:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Clearly intentionally blurred for the effect, so it probably makes sense to keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unlikely to be useful. Krd 12:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; does not depict anything recognizable other than blurring, and we have better images illustrating that. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently the Portland Art Museums requires that we request permission before using their images,. I have not done that Footpathandstile (talk) 06:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. That would clearly be a non-copyright restriction. This is definitely {{PD-art}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Probably not own work but taken from [2][3]
Antti T. Leppänen (talk) 08:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Historical photo, likely to be a derivative work, thus a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. False license claim. May or may not be PD for some reason, but without actual source and date info that cannot be determined. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Description said this photo is taken from the subject's social media, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Historical photo, likely to be a derivative work, thus a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Image as a watermark (bottom left) that does not match the uploader claiming its public domain. 2001:A61:1273:A101:94C6:BF5F:C6F2:5B66 10:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Description says these photos are taken from the subject's social media, not uploader's own work
- File:Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn(1).jpg
- File:B. Palkee.jpg
- File:Palkee.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 13:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Spacebaby1030 (talk · contribs)
[edit]clearly out of scope
- File:Qrcode 71207822 9e45591f6fc2119463d5955541814805.png
- File:Bryan controls my mind in the future except not.png
- File:Fbitip-relbqt+8 7 23.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted mosaic artwork by Mark Kennedy A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Found on Instagram based on the watermark, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Parece mangera... 45.250.252.182 18:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense listing by since blocked anon. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
experiments, out of scope Gampe (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
wrong attribution; copyright violation: https://imena.onf.ru/placements/yaroslavskaya-oblast/pamyatnik-zashchitnikam-otechestva-1 Olksolo (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Images of Murals uploaded by User:Will Patrol Tonight
[edit]- File:Mural of sea life, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural of tessellated moose, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural of robotics, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural of jays, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural of desert flowers, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural Beehive Distilling south wall, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural with crystal seer, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural of cranes, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural Commonwealth east wall, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg
- File:Mural 'New Day Rising'.jpg
- [[:File:September 2023 Mural. Crystal Avenue, South Salt Lake, Utah.jpg]]
Reasons for deletion request I uploaded images of all these murals before I knew about FOP. --Will Patrol Tonight (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
likely copyright of https://cairogossip.com/gossip/life-style/introducing-rahma-zein-the-initiator-of-global-change/ Shewasafairy (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Fbook metadata. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: image contains copyright watermark of Роман Смирнов Olksolo (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: image contains copyright watermark of Роман Смирнов Olksolo (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: image contains copyright watermark of Роман Смирнов Olksolo (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: image contains copyright watermark of Роман Смирнов Olksolo (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: image contains copyright watermark of Роман Смирнов Olksolo (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: image contains copyright watermark of Роман Смирнов Olksolo (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: https://fotobus.msk.ru/photo/890609/ (image attributed to Михаил Кузнецов) Olksolo (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation: https://nkdc.yar.muzkult.ru/dk_shestihino Olksolo (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
unused corporate logo, only use was now-deleted spam on en.wp. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The license tag used for this file, {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}, does not apply because the photograph was not "published before 1966 by a German legal entity under public law without indicating an author" (or in the very unlikely case that it was, there is no evidence at all to support it).
The uploader also claims that The original author of this work is the pseudonymous "K.A.", when in fact k. A. (lowercase k, not uppercase as erroneously used by the uploader) is just the German abbreviation for keine Angabe, not indicated. So it's not a pseudonym, the author is simply not stated. The author not being stated in an archive somewhere does not necessarily mean that a work is anonymous in a legal sense. Per German copyright law, it is enough that the author is known in some way for their works to be protected for 70 years pma (70 years after their death). So even if the photographer died in the same year the photo was taken, it was still protected in Germany until the end of 2003. If the photographer lived beyond 1953 (entirely possible), the photograph is still protected in Germany today. So without further details about a possible publication etc., we cannot really determine the copyright status of this photograph in Germany.
The photo was definitely still protected in Germany on January 1, 1996, which means the URAA restored its US copyright, which lasts for 95 years from first publication. Assuming the photo was published in some form (by US definitions) in 1933, that would mean it is still protected in the US until the end of 2028. The file should therefore be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 19:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- As the original uploader, agree with the deletion request. Misunderstood the requirements on upload. Wasianpower (talk) 21:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Hideous quality even for such a notable subject (who has just passed away, by the way). RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Essa fotografia do Ziraldo eu tirei muitos anos atrás, na época que a minha filha era criança pequena. Hoje a minha filha já é uma mulher adulta. Essa fotografia do Ziraldo é muito velha. Ontem eu li que ele faleceu. O Ziraldo era desenhista e autor de livros infantis de crianças pequenas. A resolução está ruim porque naque lá época esse era o padrão, foi logo no início das câmeras digitais no Brasil. Eu acho que essa foto foi tirada com câmera fotográfica, não foi com celular. Essa fotografia é muito velha. Ana Mercedes Gauna (talk) 03:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; we have a good number of other photos of him, including multiple of very good quality. This adds nothing. Uploader - thank you for your sincere upload, but tiny blurry photo is not useful, and photo from 2009 is not "very old". --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; reverse image search shows it elsewhere online years before supposed creation date. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Image in copyright, 'Sara gets undressed (lenticular)' is a 2004 work by Julian Opie 14GTR (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW of work by living artist. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Only edit of this Dutch author, made when he was 21, in 1984. This person must be 60-61 now, if this is really their picture? Uploaded in 2009. They probably don't even know that this still exists here. Because it is the only edit, we can't figure out if it was really him and if he ('they') did realize this would stay here all these years. Another reason is 'out of scope' (enough nudes on Commons) Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Nude photos aren't categorically out of scope, but, just like all images on Commons, they still need an educational purpose to be in scope. I don't see that being present here. Omphalographer (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I mean, thanks, it has no educational value, just a black and white photo, from a nude young man in 1984. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 18:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep Reverse image search shows no earlier versions (only 1 use elsewhere that postdates upload here by more than a decade and likely derives from here). That the uploader "probably don't even know that this still exists here" is random and irrelevant speculation. Not a bad photo, though I'd probably agree to deletion of a similar recent snapshot - but per categorization is one of only 2 photos we have of nude men in the 1980s. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the 80s human anatomy was not different from today, at all. The photo is dark, ugly and will not serve any educational purpose. 200.39.139.14 21:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Kept, photo is 40 years old. It's like 51 against 49% :-). If someone doesn't agree, start a new DR, please. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Controversial close by ordinary user. (Maybe they should say I withdraw my nomination.) See previous discussion and please add your opinions. 200.39.139.14 16:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - "Controversial close by ordinary user". Who tf are you? - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you open this DR again? I said "if someone doesn't agree, start a new DR, please", but I mean with a good reason, not because I started it and closed it. A (very) experienced registered user may close a DR, even if they started it themselves. If your only reason is that I closed it myself, that's not a good argument to open this again. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nobody, except I and the nominator, reacted, so this can be closed again in a couple of hours. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 22:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- No other reactions after 7, even 10 days. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Kept, - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) (do not nominate this again within a month)
What do you mean with "tf"? Who TF are you to treat others like this! Thanks for bringing me down to your level. If you had noticed my reference to "the previous discussion" you could see that I have a valid and well-expressed deletion argument. Therefore I will not wait for a month to open a new thread. You can kindly stay out and leave the discussion to others. 200.39.139.14 21:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Done
As I said before, the photo is dark and ugly (not good enough for an area where there are hundreds of better images) . It won't serve any educational objective. It would better fit amateur porn sites. Please let the community discuss and decide. Thanks. 200.39.139.14 16:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Kept
Done - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Now stop with nominating this. Nobody objected in 10 days, while normally it's 7 days. I will see it as vandalism now, if you nominate it again! - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 737-200fan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibly above threshold of originality
- File:Lauda air Italy logo.jpg
- File:Airbus industrie aeromaritime.jpg
- File:British Asia Airways logo.jpg
- File:British-midland-commuter logo.png
- File:Logo GrandAir.jpg
- File:Air centrafrique (Higher resolution).jpg
- File:Logo Air Centrafrique (Really Low Resolution).jpg
- File:Logo Abaco Air limited.jpg
- File:Logo Caribbean Star airlines 2.jpg
- File:Logo Caribbean Star Airlines.png
- File:Logo Australia Asia Airlines.png
- File:Air south Wales airline logo.jpg
- File:Logo of Airline of Northern Australia.jpg
- File:Logo Al Anwa Aviation.jpg
Trade (talk) 22:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've done some digging:
- File:Airbus industrie aeromaritime.jpg is almost an extraction of (free) File:F-BTGV Boeing Super Guppy Airbus-Aeromaritime 1 MAN 10MAR72 (6928127795).jpg, but the angles don't quite match up and it seems to not have the JPEG artifacting. Likely from another unknown source (which may be non-free).
- Others (esp. File:Logo Air Centrafrique (Really Low Resolution).jpg) are just too low resolution to really be discernable or have any educational value.
- WhoAteMyButter (talk) 06:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Variously above-TOO/non-free, EDUSE-fail, etc. --DMacks (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 737-200fan (talk · contribs)
[edit]As with the previous batch, too small to be EDUSE, non-free/above-TOO, unsource/non-free source
- File:P80 Air Logo.png
- File:Queen`s Express inc.LOGO.png
- File:Dallah Avco Logo2.jpg
- File:Dallah Avcol ogo on 727.jpg
- File:Alpeflyet logo.jpg
- File:Air commuter Logo.jpg
- File:Air commuter Logo 1.jpg
- File:FOA Fly with confidence.jpg
DMacks (talk) 16:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
صورة مخالفة Mohammed Qays (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Mohammed Qays: Why do you say it's illegal? —holly {chat} 18:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng The photo is copyrighted. Mohammed Qays (talk) 08:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, by whom? Is it online somewhere? —holly {chat} 18:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I couldn't find a similar photo on the web, but the photo is likely to be Photoshopped. -- Karim (talk) 07:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, by whom? Is it online somewhere? —holly {chat} 18:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng The photo is copyrighted. Mohammed Qays (talk) 08:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, appears photoshopped, screenshot exif. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. -- Karim (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're right. See Exif. 200.39.139.14 21:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Published previously in 2023 @ https://alnorasnews.com/news/5348/. --Achim55 (talk) 21:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- If all admins followed my advice there would be less copyvios in Commons. 200.39.139.14 22:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
As alerted by @A1Cafel, there's no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Sorry for this...
- File:Czech pavilion EXPO 2020 © JinJan, WeAreConted(s) 1.jpg
- File:Czech pavilion EXPO 2020 © JinJan, WeAreConted(s) 2.jpg
- File:Czech pavilion EXPO 2020 © JinJan, WeAreConted(s) 3.jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51742449187).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51742449562).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51743274116).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51743511998).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51743512688).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51743513738).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51743914399).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51743916014).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51744161135).jpg
- File:Dubai 2020 Third Visit (51744162200).jpg
- File:Evening Two at the Expo (51732784377).jpg
- File:Evening Two at the Expo (51732784632).jpg
- File:Evening Two at the Expo (51733613051).jpg
- File:Evening Two at the Expo (51733845983).jpg
- File:Evening Two at the Expo (51734259639).jpg
- File:EXPO 2020 Bhutan pavilion Mike Krüger 220301 1.jpg
- File:First Afternoon at Expo 2020 (51730548136).jpg
- File:First Afternoon at Expo 2020 (51731200849).jpg
- File:First Afternoon at Expo 2020 (51731435080).jpg
- File:First Afternoon at Expo 2020 (51731436380).jpg
- File:Governador João Doria durante visita à Expo Dubai (51634704902).jpg
- File:Visita institucional a la “Expo Dubái 2020” (51684538270).jpg
Sintegrity (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1621118652050.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=339150910&oldid=339150466){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=339297633&oldid=339154529){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1621118652050.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1621118652050.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_1621118652050.jpg){kind=link}
_1621118652050.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep File:Governador João Doria durante visita à Expo Dubai (51634704902).jpg, nothing copyrightable there RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pseudomonas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source on https://www.flickr.com/photos/41332466@N04/3810393729/ says "All rights reserved"
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. If the original image is indeed from 14th century, it is no longer copyrighted and a true reproduction would be o.k. per PD-Art. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not a centuries old work, but modern work including collage of old and imitation old-style elements, not free licensed by author. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep its passable Dronebogus (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Para qué se necesitan "pasables" si ya hay un montón? 186.173.206.133 00:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept. This is the uploader's only contribution, so I thank A1Cafel for this nomination, but in my opinion the photo is enough good for keeping. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Re-opened. I don't think this one is a good one because it was blurry and grainy. Definitely we had lots of better options to replace it, and I don't think we lost much even this image was deleted A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It sucks, but I don't approve of reopening closed DRs a week later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete it, it sucks. 186.172.86.170 09:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Therefore opening a new discussion one week later is not a problem. 186.172.86.170 14:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I support deletion based on the low quality of the photo, but I oppose reopening DRs repeatedly at short time intervals without new deletion reasons or evidence on principle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with both of Ikan Kekek's comments, but don't think the second point overides legitimate reasons for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Therefore opening a new discussion one week later is not a problem. 186.172.86.170 14:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Out of focus photo of very common object when have many much better photos of. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Formalities aside, this is a low quality image for which Commons has hundreds of better ones. --Wutsje 02:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Small version of File:MYOB Logo.png, not in use Nutshinou Talk! 12:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|Doubtful own work.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided.-- Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:Túrelio, well, in fact evidence was provided, Kind of. User Johnj1995 apologised and said he had not seen the metadata information about the camera.
- On the other hand my comment was as follows:
- Hello, I am the author of this picture. Tillie Walden was in Barcelona in 2018, invited to the International Comic Festival from Barcelona. I have been attending this event for years and I have done hundred of pictures of comic authors, if you have a look at my uploaded pictures. Why user User:JohnCWiesenthal asked for a fast deletion because of copyright issues, is not understadable to me. By the way, that year I borrowed a Canon camera belonging to Wikimedia Deutschland. If you have questions, just ask to me. Thanks.
- --Ferran Cornellà (talk) Ferran Cornellà (talk) 08:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Evidence meant to support deletion, which had been requested by another user. I also wonder why then you tagged it (incompletely) for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:Túrelio, I did not want to tag it for deletion. Unfortunatelly, it seems to be that according to the policy, if I wanted to cancel the Speed Deletion request, the only way was to change it for a regular deletion request, according to the message I got, which I found very strange, cause anyway I was always against the deletion. Maybe the warning was a bad translation from the english original text, as I read it in catalan, or maybe the text was obsolete, it is possible, don't know. But it seemed that once there is a deletion request from a user -even if by mistake- you cannot just undo it and cannot avoid the discusion procedure. If there was some mistake, I apologize. The procedure remains unclear to me. Thanks
- Ferran Cornellà (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Evidence meant to support deletion, which had been requested by another user. I also wonder why then you tagged it (incompletely) for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- As the initial speedy-tagger seems to have retracted (see User talk:JohnCWiesenthal) his suspicion, and as no copyvio-supporting evidence has been presented, I vote Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ─ Aafī (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, she is not Indira Gandhi. 200.39.139.14 21:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be screenshot of own work Trade (talk) 23:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see source link Yann (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Vietnam.
- File:Bờ sông công viên chân cầu Nguyễn Trãi ở Phường 3, Thành phố Mỹ Tho..jpg
- File:Biển thông báo Khu vực bị phong tỏa trong lúc diễn ra Covid-19 ở Việt Nam.jpg
- File:Biển thông báo Giữ khoảng cách 2 mét trong lúc diễn ra Covid-19 ở Việt Nam.jpg
- File:Biểu ngữ tuyên truyền.jpg
- File:Nhà hát Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh năm 2019.jpg
- File:Điểm nhìn thành phố từ Trường Đại học Sư phạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.jpg
- File:Đường An Dương Vương nhìn từ cổng chính của Trường Đại học Sư phạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.jpg
- File:Cầu bộ hành trên đường Hoàng Minh Giám, Phường 9, Quận Phú Nhuận.jpg
- File:Hoàng hôn nhìn từ cầu Thủ Thiêm, Phường 22, Quận Bình Thạnh.jpg
- File:Nhà cao tầng trên đường Ngô Tất Tố, Phường 22, Quận Bình Thạnh.jpg
- File:Nhà cao tầng tại Phường 19, Quận Bình Thạnh.jpg
- File:Sở Giao thông Vận tải Long An tại Phường 2, Thành phố Tân An.jpg
- File:Rạp Long An ở Phường 2, Thành phố Tân An.jpg
- File:Hoàng hôn tím nhìn từ Bến du thuyền Mỹ Tho.jpg
- File:Đường Yersin và Công viên Tết Mậu Thân ở Phường 4, Thành phố Mỹ Tho.jpg
- File:Công viên Tết Mậu Thân (Giếng Nước nhỏ) ở Phường 4, Thành phố Mỹ Tho.jpg
- File:Một nhà máy cũ ở Phường 18, Quận 4..jpg
- File:Bên dưới cầu Tân Thuận, Quận 4..jpg
- File:A woman exercises in Tôn Thất Thuyết Park, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.jpg
- File:A woman rides a bicycle in District 4, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.jpg
- File:Vũng Tàu sunset.jpg
- File:Scorpius above Mỹ Tho city, Tiền Giang province, Việt Nam.jpg
_%E1%BB%9F_Ph%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Dng_4,_Th%C3%A0nh_ph%E1%BB%91_M%E1%BB%B9_Tho.jpg){kind=link}
Phương Linh (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Tôi không quan tâm. Cứ tiếp tục như những gì mà bạn muốn. Tôi hiểu Wikipedia có rất nhiều điều luật để đảm bảo tôn trọng quyền và lợi ích tối đa của các bên, nên nếu các bạn thấy việc này là đúng thì cứ xóa. Tôi không có ý kiến và tôi không quan tâm (như đã nói ở trên). Kwozyn (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Has to be decided case by case. Not all of them are FOP issues. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep most. Most of these are not freedom of panorama issues. There are some allowable skyline images and a bunch of others things here which really don't have anything to do with freedom of panorama. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The constellation scorpion as in File:Scorpius above Mỹ Tho city, Tiền Giang province, Việt Nam.jpg has nothing to do with FOP Vietnam. Wouter (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per Iron and Wouter. Please nominate for deletion only those that could actually be infringing the local law. --Bedivere (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tharindu Dias Official (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unless the uploader has drawn these logos from scratch, the copyright belongs to the original creators.
See COM:SEAL.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Almaz Zaripov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of software of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Identical to File:Discord colour textlogo (2021).svg, not in use Nutshinou Talk! 17:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cahit.obruk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files
- File:CahitObruk7.jpg
- File:CahitObruk5.jpg
- File:CahitObruk6.jpg
- File:CahitObruk4.jpg
- File:CahitObruk1.jpg
- File:CahitObruk3.jpg
- File:CahitObrukSoyAgaci.jpg
- File:CahitObruk.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 17:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. There are lingering licensing questions, but are these images of tr:Cahit Obruk? IronGargoyle (talk) 11:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: licensing very dubious, even if it corresponds to the person of the Turkish biography. --Bedivere (talk) 03:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused render from a 1200px thumbnail of File:Lurasidone.svg, no use Nutshinou Talk! 17:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Templates start with Template:Adm.nnov.ru
[edit]Template deleted in 2018. Should the subpages be deleted?
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/ru
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/en
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/pl
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/hi
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/fr
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/fi
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/mk
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/pt
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/de
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/nl
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/hu
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/id
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/uk
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/es
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/ar
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/i18n/ml
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/id
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/layout
- Template:Adm.nnov.ru/lang
Phương Linh (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Does VOA have the copyright of this painting?! 200.39.139.14 21:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello? Anyone there? 200.39.139.14 21:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Admins, the previous deletion request was removed by the uploader in an act of vandalism. Please apply him a sanction. 181.203.54.85 13:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Not speedy closed 200.39 raises a valid COM:DW concern. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:DW. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
per COM:NOT Riad Salih (talk) 03:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Ketoconazole STADA©.jpg AnVuong1222004 (8) (talk) 10:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
-20240406100500-File:Ketoconazole_STADA©.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Fbodø havn 2001:464D:7919:0:12E:AFED:EA30:D9C0 10:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I'm not convinced that this is the uploaders own work, as it looks like a selfie by Kern. Additionally I've been able to find this image used several years before the given date (e.g. 29 Mar 2020), and while I can't find the original source it surgests that the uploader doesn't have this data. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 10:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible/probable copyvio.
Similar in style to professionally shot and modified commercial image. Google shows numerous different language versions of this with otherwise near-identical setup (i.e. battery positioning and fake shading), something that would be unlikely if uploader had created this themselves. Also, this is uploader's only image, which tends to fit in with the "one-off copyvio uploader" pattern.
Also quite possibly derivative copyvio due to rabbit on pack. Ubcule (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope screenshots of personal project.
- File:WikiData on Wikimedia.png
- File:WikiData on Wikipedia.png
- File:Foyer Entrance- Notability, Relevance- Establishment of States, Value- Period of time.png
- File:WikiProject WikiData Create Kioske, Directional signs, Library Rooms (Label), Shelves Structure (First and Second levels Shelves Labels.png
- File:WikiData Notability.png
- File:Descriptive of Fixed Points in Maritime waters with shifting alluvials.png
- File:WikiData selfie & Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 3.16.33 PM 01.png
- File:WikiData selfie & Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 3.16.33 PM 02.png
,_Shelves_Structure_(First_and_Second_levels_Shelves_Labels.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
William Graham (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band
- File:18132 logo(1).gif
- File:Logo-1248150034-1710401436-b434415cc0c7e8d767945ffa4361b64b1710401436-320-0(1).webp
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not seeing enough creative architectural elements here. The few bits you can see are de minimis. The diving boards are utilitarian objects and not works of creative architecture. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete What does the image depict? Krd 12:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: below ToO as it represents a swimming pool. Ruthven (msg) 11:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Really? :/ I've uploaded many pavillions
- Today I'm on a hurry, but tomorrow I can send them to deletion on a bacth.
- Sorry for this. Sintegrity (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Sintegrity no choice, copyrighted works of art and architecture found permanently in public spaces in U.A.E. cannot be hosted commercially; COM:FOP UAE states the law only permits commercial distributions through "broadcasts", not through photos. Delete the image here unless U.A.E. changes their obsolete law not fitting to Internet and I.T. age. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Sintegrity no choice, copyrighted works of art and architecture found permanently in public spaces in U.A.E. cannot be hosted commercially; COM:FOP UAE states the law only permits commercial distributions through "broadcasts", not through photos.
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The file is an image hosted on the website of 176th Air Control Squadron. Its EXIF documentation stated that it is photographed by Mark Farmer and provides a dead link to his personal website. According to his archived resume there, at 2005-05-09, he was a freelance photographer instead of an US Federal Government employee.
As only works of US Federal Government employees made for official duties are in U.S. public domain, it is likely that Mark Farmer still holds the copyright for his works. Unless we can reach out to him to obtain an explicit free license, the file is copyrightable and likely to be unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
this *seems* like a generic personal out of scope image, but given the stated subject matter am opening a deletion request on the slim chance this is actually a real organization Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is not an own work, to begin with... 200.39.139.14 17:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I don't know if this should be deleted, merged with FIle:Mereb Melash.png and used as a redirect or if there are any other options but the person who created this map made it believing the Medri Bahri was a separate polity from the Ethiopian Empire. I created my own version with it as a region of the larger state not realizing this. I don't think I can add my image from 8 days ago to this one and overwrite the article seeing as I didn't create it and would have to ask for permission, but that would mean I have to get that upload deleted otherwise there would be two, no? So this image is both mislabeled as the area is called Mereb Melash on English Wikipedia and it is not an actual historical kingdom so the image is false. The only time it could have been considered independent is during the Ottoman conquest of Eritrea when the leader Bahr Negus Yishaq sided with the ottomans but they had already set up a base in Massawa and taken control of surrounding environs so that makes this map's territory false, along with that it's supposed to be based on the regions extent in the 1520s (on the eve of the Ethiopian-Adal war, which according to most sources, the Medri Bahri either remained a part of the Ethiopian Empire or assisted their Muslim foes during. MotorolaBoy (talk) 23:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Not only is this image not in use, which I have informed disqualified files from being put under the criteria of speedy deletion, but every aspect of it is patently false. First, the Dervish state was never referred to as the "Huwan,' nor was it split in two. that name belongs to the arid region in between Ethiopia and the De-facto independent state of Somaliland, which is only one part of the territory controlled by the Dervish althugh this is due to edits by another user and wasn't on the original map. Second, it was never as large as this, nomadic in nature and centered in the deep interior of the Somali peninsula, they were able to threaten Ethiopian controlled Jijiga to the east and British controlled Berbera to the north but took neither. The rebellion was strictly centered in a landlocked region and didn't border Dire Dawa or Harar to the was, nor did it have a perfectly straight border to the north as is shown.. A more accurate map of the Somali Dervishes would be something such as File:Somali Dervish Map.png, File:Mullah.PNG, or File:Beesha Daraawiish (Dhulbahante).png which were created by User:Axnooqabonooh, who seems to have exclusively uploaded content related to the Dervish in the past. On top of all that, the map is misnamed as "Somali Flag," when the veracity of the other flag upload is debatable. Much like other images by creator User:Joshuamatt20 such as File:Oromo migration.png, File:Dervish Somali flag.png, and File:Ajuran Empire map.jpg, this map should be deleted as it isn't based on historical evidence but rather personal research and has multiple flaws. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MotorolaBoy (talk • contribs) 23:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Not only is this image not in use, which I have informed disqualified files from being put under the criteria of speedy deletion, but every aspect of it is patently false. First, Ajuran was never referred to as the "Ajuuran Empire,' which is why that name was removed from the Ajuran Empire's English Wikipedia page. Second, it was never spelled "Ajuuran," just "Ajuran" or the Somali spelling of "Ajuuraan." Third, many of the cities shown on the map do not date back to the Ajuran state at it's peak. Finally, the Ajuran state never extended that far north along the Somali coast and this image has it's western border as far as harage or Bale in Ethiopia, which conflicts with all historical sources in regards to Ethiopia or Adal. That is a mistake on the map of the polity on the wikipedia page too. A map such as File:Ajuuraan & Adal map.png which was previously in use would be more accurate. Much like other images by creator User:Joshuamatt20 such as File:Oromo migration.png, File:Dervish Somali flag.png, and File:Dervish somali flag.webp, this map should be deleted as it isn't based on historical evidence but rather personal research and has multiple flaws. MotorolaBoy (talk) 23:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This is just the Turkish version of File:Ajuran Empire map.jpg, which is already not in use (what I have informed disqualifies files from being put under the criteria of speedy deletion) but every aspect of it is also patently false. First, Ajuran was never referred to as the "Ajuuran Empire,' which is why that name was removed from the Ajuran Empire's English Wikipedia page. Second, it was never spelled "Ajuuran," just "Ajuran" or the Somali spelling of "Ajuuraan." Third, many of the cities shown on the map do not date back to the Ajuran state at it's peak. Finally, the Ajuran state never extended that far north along the Somali coast and this image has it's western border as far as harage or Bale in Ethiopia, which conflicts with all historical sources in regards to Ethiopia or Adal. That is a mistake on the map of the polity on the wikipedia page too. A map such as File:Ajuuraan & Adal map.png which was previously in use would be more accurate. Much like other images by creator User:Joshuamatt20 such as File:Oromo migration.png, File:Dervish Somali flag.png, and File:Dervish somali flag.webp, this map should be deleted as it isn't based on historical evidence but rather personal research and has multiple flaws. MotorolaBoy (talk) 23:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality cropped screenshot of letters. It has no value, especially since we have much better images covering the topic. Filipny (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: User is a significant contributor on Czech Wikipedia, allowable personal file (used only on their talkpage). --Abzeronow (talk) 16:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Dieses Bild habe ich versehentlich ein zweites Mal auf Wikimedia geladen. Es ist bereits vorhanden unter File:Pow-Wow Wendake Canada 2016.jpg Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader says it's a duplicate, but it's still COM:INUSE at en:Dance in Canada as well as some Commons pages. --Rosenzweig τ 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Rosenzweig, yes I know. But I will replace thé crurent image with the duplicate - File:Pow-Wow Wendake Canada 2016.jpg Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Better do it now, or the file will probably be not deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 19:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Rosenzweig, yes I know. But I will replace thé crurent image with the duplicate - File:Pow-Wow Wendake Canada 2016.jpg Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Seems suspectly close to its picture on the Sony website https://www.sonymusic.ch/eifachben-veroffentlicht-seine-neue-single-ozean/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ImoteSokoli (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files, showing drawings of Croatian kings and dukes, were apparently taken from a web site named as njuškalo.com, which is probably [4], a Croatian web site where stuff is sold. Something like Ebay or Amazon Marketplace perhaps. So they're probably taken from some book, map or print sold there, but that book/print/whatever is not named, so there is no proper source for the images.
They're said to be from 1925 and were uploaded with {{PD-US}} tags. While they most likely are in the PD in the US if published in 1925, they don't look like they are from a US publication, so that is not enough, they also must be in the public domain in their source country, presumably Croatia. If the artist who created these died after 1953 (entirely possible), they are still protected by copyright in their source country.
The files should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle unless we get proper and satisfacory information about the actual source and author and it is demonstated that they are in the public domain in their source country (or under a free license).
- File:King Stjepan II of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Svetoslav of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Stjepan of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Gojslav of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Krešimir III of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Stjepan Držislav of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Mihajlo Krešimir II of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Miroslav of Croatia.jpg
- File:King Krešimir I of Croatia.jpg
- File:Duke Muncimir.jpg
- File:Duke Trpimir.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 19:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2046. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Pictures for music albums
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Die Fotos sind beide von mir persönlich und dem Ensemble IOCULATORES aufgenommen worden. Kaykrause (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Aber haben Sie die Rechte? Wenn Ja, könnten Sie ein OTSR Request öffnen bitte: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator]? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
In retrospect, the image does not add any encyclopedic value Psubhashish (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Stavros Tzovaras M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Then the author is not Moderate Party of Sweden. Delete. 200.39.139.14 21:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
This map has a bad projection, a wrong title, and is an unused file. Damouns இ 12:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Twitter post has no indication of CC-BY-SA license for this photo. Borrell works for the European Union but cannot assume EC-Audiovisual Center CC-BY license applies
- File:Abdourahmane Aboubacar Touraoua 2023.jpg
- File:Oumarou Ibrahim Oumarou 2023.jpg
- File:Sadou Soloké 2023.jpg
// sikander { talk } 🦖 03:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Thanks for the alert @Sikander: . The photo was posted by the official twitter account of Borrell, and is reported as owned by the Commission also by other reputable media, e.g. Politico. The media advisory about the visit states that "Audiovisual footage of the visit will be provided by Europe by Satellite". The EbS website features the original picture, and to its right the link "copyright" points to CC BY-SA 4.0. I am thus fully confident that the EC license CC-BY does apply. --Dans (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Dans: Ah OK, it's good that the same photo is on AudioVisual website. However the copyright section on the page states "Scopes: Information and education only" and EC staff has confirmed that files with that restriction cannot be licensed as CC-BY-SA. Unfortunately this file and cropped images will have to be deleted. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- thanks @Sikander: ; are you saying that that "scope" implies an additional NC condition, incompatible with Wikicommons? I find it legally flimsy that an additional sentence on the website would be enough to derogate the overall EU copyright regime of CC BY-SA and the Commission's reuse policy. I cannot access the VTRS ticket you mention on the other page. --Dans (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Dans: Yes, that is my understanding of the the legal notice which states: "Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under CC BY 4.0."
- I don't have VTRS access either (maybe someday I will apply :)) and the email response from ec.europa.eu (with VTRS team cc'd) stated, "if the scope information remains at it is, the image is in deed disqualified for a publication in Wikimedia, which requires a free license such as cc-by-sa-4.0." Regards. // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- thanks @Sikander: ; are you saying that that "scope" implies an additional NC condition, incompatible with Wikicommons? I find it legally flimsy that an additional sentence on the website would be enough to derogate the overall EU copyright regime of CC BY-SA and the Commission's reuse policy. I cannot access the VTRS ticket you mention on the other page. --Dans (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Dans: Ah OK, it's good that the same photo is on AudioVisual website. However the copyright section on the page states "Scopes: Information and education only" and EC staff has confirmed that files with that restriction cannot be licensed as CC-BY-SA. Unfortunately this file and cropped images will have to be deleted. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per copyright notice, https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/copyright, the file is licenced CCBYSA. The text "Scopes information and education only" refers to the source page. The news item is intended for that scope. This does not mean the photo is not licenced with CCBYSA. So therefore the photo can be maintained including all cropped versions. --Ellywa (talk) 09:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Scan of an official document, not own work. |source= No copyright, but why is this useful for Wikimedia projects? Yann (talk) 11:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per Yann, personal document, not in use and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 09:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
