Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 17th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tom and Jerry The Magic Ring (2001).webm

[edit]

Because it doesn't have a thumbnail. Jayden Jordan (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: The reason above is invalid, but it's copyright infringement. Plus, I couldn't hear entirely because the audio on it wasn't present anyway. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 00:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 01:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Javier Milei junto a su hermana Karina.jpg

[edit]

Taken from Yahoo! A1Cafel (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poslední obálka časopisu Ladění.jpg

[edit]

I want to add this file again with the proper copyright designation Kiskařka Zuzka (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roland Rother 001.jpg

[edit]

permission denied Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roland Rother 002.jpg

[edit]

permission denied Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roland Rother 003.jpg

[edit]

permission denied Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 Chrysler 300 (LX MY13) SRT-8 sedan (2015-08-07) 01.jpg

[edit]

Although it looks great, this picture is an incorrect representation of the vehicle. The wheels aren't stock. 123.253.86.58 03:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, not a valid reason for deletion. You could add a note about the wheels to the file description, Verbcatcher (talk) 06:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 12:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:荷亭奕钓仕女图轴.旧传五代南唐周文矩绘.绢本设色.台北故宫博物院藏.png

[edit]

Duplicate with File:荷亭奕钓仕女图轴.旧传五代南唐.周文矩绘.绢本设色.台北故宫博物院藏.jpg, please delete it. Kcx36 (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And please delete File:唐人春郊游骑图轴.绢本设色.台北故宫博物院藏.jpg as it's a duplicate of another I uploaded earlier. Apologize for my oversight. Kcx36 (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by User:Túrelio. Kcx36 (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Veluwana College Logo.jpg

[edit]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Navodya1980 (talk) 13:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request, 2nd deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chí Thanh Đẹp Trai.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Chithanhj55 (talk) 14:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Binod Sethi.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 2409:4066:295:DE80:98E2:62FF:8372:D717 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <privacy and security issue> Probably not own work, but... Yann (talk) 15:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: https://twitter.com/binod_sethi. --Yann (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nelukulamflag.png

[edit]

It is not own work and it is a logo of an institute/organization. ~AntanO4task (talk) 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vavuniya masjid.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by ~AntanO4task as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/easter-sunday-attacks-commemorated-north-east ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These files seem different evidently. There exists another version here. However, a closer look at the central dome structure reveals that the file here is different from the rest of the two. Our files appears to have a little bent, whilst the other two external files have it just straight. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Yann (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Konstantin Kuhle im Bundestag 2023.jpg

[edit]

copyvio. source: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/keine-einigung-bei-migrationspolitik-interview-mit-konstantin-kuhle-mdb-fdp-dlf-b136c583-100.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matte mit Hütten.jpg

[edit]

Doppelt vorhanden. Daniel Reust (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marcin Lis.jpg

[edit]

low quality selfie by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, f10. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sankebetsu incident newspaper.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Nanafuji as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The article is from 1915, but this is only a recent photo of a part of that old journal. Yann (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's a Japanese photo around 2000 and not before 1956, it must be deleted for copyvio. Nanafuji (talk) 16:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it. Nanafuji (talk) 08:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by Túrelio yesterday. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mehmet Ali Akpınar.jpg

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0015526/mediaviewer/rm3700491008/?ref_=nm_ov_ph ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: f1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uwe Richardsen.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as no permission Amrei-Marie (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Ticket#2024011710010062] Unter diesem Ticket liegt das Foto bei Permissions zur Freigabe. - Amrei-Marie (talk) 18:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion request removed!--Amrei-Marie (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 09:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2022 jansin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As with this user's previous uploads, many of these images are unverifiable and potentially fake, or appear to be autotraced SVGs from unidentified and/or non-free sources. For example:

Given that a number of these flags are clearly fake, and that others may be copyright violations, I feel that we're better off deleting the whole lot and restoring (or recreating) individual images if we're able to verify their accuracy and license status. There's simply too much wrong with these images to assume good faith.

Full list of files:

Omphalographer (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2022 jansin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These US city flags that contain logos, seals and hoaxes

Alexphangia Talk 16:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Between the historical improbability of many of these flags, the lack of sources, and my comments in the previous deletion nomination, I'm not inclined to trust any flag uploads by this user. Omphalographer (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. I don't know why he wasn't actioned prior for the absurdity of the sheer levels of vandalism committed here. --NorthTension (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also he's *still* continuing to upload even with the deletion request in, he's never responded to a single message about it. NorthTension (talk) 06:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I think all of their uploads are suspicious. The user should also be checked as a potential sockpuppet of User:Jurisdrew. Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I want to mention that Jansin has made an alt and has continued a mass spam upload while still spam uploading on the Jansin account. NorthTension (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Socking, DENY. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2022 jansin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All the sock of this user Uploading lots of hoax flags, nearly all of them should be checked

Lemonaka (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all as before. I've opened Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SenvinCanvin2009 to address similar uploads by a related user. Omphalographer (talk) 06:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4-oxoisophorone.jpg

[edit]

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:4-oxoisophorone.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, {{BadJPG}}. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 13:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 23:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CM Rio and Binod Sethi.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 2409:4066:295:DE80:98E2:62FF:8372:D717 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <security and copyright and privacy issue> Yann (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no hits on image search. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tạp chí.jpg

[edit]

Derivative works of copyrighted materials. -- Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vigil (7048102473).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meer Mukry.jpg

[edit]

Personal logo of nonnotable user, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leopard davidraju 80.jpg

[edit]

The photo is blurry. We have 175 photos in category:Panthera pardus in Satpura National Park. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:James Blainey Hall.jpg

[edit]

This appears to be a photograph of a photograph. Out of an abundance of caution, I think this might be a copyvio. Denniscabrams (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saviom.svg

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep (see userpage), no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Md TahurulIslam Shuvo.png

[edit]

Signature of non-notable individual, out of scope/SD:F10 may apply Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mobilyadiyari.png

[edit]

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Túrelio g10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abu Jandal al-Kuwaiti.png

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://www.cnn.gr/kosmos/story/60316/syria-skotothike-anoteros-dioikitis-toy-isis ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AFEAU BRAVO ARC2.png

[edit]

© América Militar 2024 ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Splm logo barn.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. There is not licensed under CC. Takumiboo (talk) 19:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bakugan 2023 Logo.png

[edit]

Complex logo Trade (talk) 19:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Double Braids.jpg

[edit]

stock image ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: https://m.facebook.com/JoyeFowlerHair/photos/a.507162705961780/4703952879616054/?type=3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Honda-cbr1200XX-motorbike.jpg

[edit]

source: https://www.thebikespecialists.com/vehicle/honda-cbr-1100-xx-super-blackbird-no-1-of-50-ltd-edition-in-sheffield-e6bd3842-1f79-4bfa-8216-a92f00ec61fa ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Honda-CBR1200xx-motorbike.jpg

[edit]

source: https://www.thebikespecialists.com/vehicle/honda-cbr-1100-xx-super-blackbird-no-1-of-50-ltd-edition-in-sheffield-e6bd3842-1f79-4bfa-8216-a92f00ec61fa ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:REGFE 1 EJC.png

[edit]

© América Militar 2024 ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FnZ 2022.jpg

[edit]

unused personal image, out of scope Fastily 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omar esau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jayden Jordan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation: no evidence that any of these videos (or the associated image) were released under a Creative Commons license.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete the first three: 🤦‍♂️ ugh! - THV | ♂ | U | T - 04:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gorillaz in Miami (cropped).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the US for artworks, such as the one in this image. Bedivere (talk) 03:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gorillaz in Miami.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the US for artworks, such as the one in this image. Bedivere (talk) 03:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Apartheid Museum Posters.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shutdown movie theater at new-coronavirus.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roppongi Hills TOHO 2019c.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suntory Beer Ball Logo Banner.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Holo AD Board.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kids blanket.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Betkili shukvani.png

[edit]

screenshot, International Judo Federation logo ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Butyric-acid-2D-skeletal.png

[edit]

Unused duplicate of File:Butanoic acid.png, which has been superseded by SVG version anyway. Alhadis (talk) 06:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Butanoic acid.png is of lower quality and should be deleted instead. --Leyo 00:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and the other one deleted per Leyo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BewhY 비와이.jpg

[edit]

courtesy of his label Dejavu https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021071319290002297?dtype=1&dtypecode=b8b1f049-cdb5-40cb-92a2-0f0de58ed5e1&did=DA&prnewsid=A2021071313500002295 ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mike2k23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Look like album covers, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awalker2055 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No context, unused, probably Out of scope. Unusable without context

Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnsalzbrunn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope: these are not maps, just building(?) outlines

Enyavar (talk) 08:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2007 12 08 Wien 003 (51135248796).jpg

[edit]

Bad quality. Linie29 (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Animal Farm - 1st edition.jpg

[edit]

This cover is public domain in the UK, but not the US because which is not public domain per COM:URAA. Ferret-o-meter (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Below COM:TOO US. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Rosenzweig. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Animal Farm - 1st edition.jpg

[edit]

Cover still under copyright in the US, the use of {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} aren't eligible for upload after 1 March 2012. 49.150.12.134 14:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As before: Below COM:TOO US. Should also be below COM:TOO UK. --Rosenzweig τ 07:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Rosenzweig. URAA cannot restore copyright on something which is not copyrightable in the US. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boykisser song.wav

[edit]

not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See about the internet meme Boykisser.
 Keep because:
  • the source (archive: 1, 2) has a CC-BY licence, which is okay, excluding the video depicting a copyrighted (non-libre) character of a cat drawn and owned by Mauzymice.
  • the quality of the original song about it is probably tolerable to be in-scope.
THV | ♂ | U | T - 23:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 00:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, "Boykisser" is not a notable meme, it will be forgotten in 2-3 years like "Animan" or "E" Kelly The Angel (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dude. It's Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 04:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 04:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And? Wikimedia Commons is not a personal free web host Kelly The Angel (talk) 04:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely not. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 05:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The video has half a million views so there's a solid arguement that it's notable. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Semcon Logo.svg

[edit]

Old version of logotype. Current version here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PNG_Logo_Semcon_Red-Large-230815.png Semcon (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RGB semcon logo red NY.jpg

[edit]

Old logotype, there is newer version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PNG_Logo_Semcon_Red-Large-230815.png Semcon (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Walcker-Orgel, St. Marien Labbeck.jpg

[edit]

copyright violation; stained glass windows are contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Studio p6 thema 1.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, no permission visible, copy from: https://www.bluewin.ch/de/newsregional/nord/baselmedia-enttaeuscht-ueber-nichtvergabe-der-konzession-fuer-baerntv-2037752.html Alabasterstein (talk) 14:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Balón de Oro 2019.jpg

[edit]

If I'm understanding COM:FOP Argentina correctly, there's no freedom of panorama for sculptures (and trophies) in Argentina, and images of trophies are considered copyrighted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Leartmerxhani

[edit]

Out of scope fictional flags and coats of arms portrayed as official symbols with no sources citing them being used in real life. [Officially Kriaunos https://www.kriaunos.lt/naujienos/kriaunu-herbas/] uses different kind of flag. Berisso's official site doesn't mention anything about the flag or coat of arms uploaded here. Photos from Karakurt only depict the original coat of arms. Uploading made-up symbols to wikimedia can cause confusion, especially when the user has seemingly included them in Wikipedia articles. Further more File:Flag of Sanxhak.jpg was directly uploaded from deviantart with unfitting license, this is likely the case for File:Kida Foto.jpg as well. --Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As per too nomination. Xlicer1 (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As per nomination. —VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:가수 강소리.jpg

[edit]

해당 아티스트의 더 좋은 이미지의 사진이 등록되어 있습니다 Bada0333 (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Showroom Qatar.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seine River in Paris at night (5986761297).jpg

[edit]

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musems of the future.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A night at the Dubai Marina.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Is the Dubai Marina Skyline copyrighted? If so, please do delete this image. Thanks very much, I'm new to Wikipedia. GenerousExistence (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair with Honda RR.png

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair with Meritus Gp Team Practice.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair with Meritus Gp Team.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair with Petronas GP Team.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair Petronas GP Team.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair Kart Mania.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair by Petronas Team.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamza Khair.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image, thank you Hamzakhair (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Burj Al Arab from iPhone.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Full View.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Reflection.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Bridge

[edit]

The bridge was completed by architect Zaha Hadid (1950–2016) in 2010. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates. The copyright term in the country lasted for 50 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2067.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Bridge

[edit]

The bridge was completed in 2010 by Zaha Hadid (1950–2016). There is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. The copyright term of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2067.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. No evidence provided that bridges, primarily a work of engineering and not architecture, are protected works in UAE. No mention of this on COM:FOP UAE. Precautionary principle does not mean that we should delete on mere speculation. There needs to be some statutory evidence or case law. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. @IronGargoyle: not every country follows U.S. definition of architecture. You may want to air your opposition to current consensus on most foreign bridges (like this, Millau Bridge et cetera) at COM:VPC. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the bridge author was the renowned Zaha Hadid. Most of her firm's works are in no-FoP countries, so I am sure there are potential lawsuits if someone exploits her works using any of these five images we currently host. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Telebasel TV Studio 2.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, see: https://de.linkedin.com/posts/cyliane-howald_bald-gibt-es-die-lokalen-und-brandaktuellen-activity-7052146172953604096-ay2j no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ambassador Jack Lew Speaks at the 100 Days Memorial for hostages at Hostage Square in Tel Aviv, Israel on January 13, 2024 - 6.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted posters A1Cafel (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I will ask that permission be sent to VRT. Meanwhile, I have uploaded a censored version of this Public Domain photo from the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem. The remaining work is below the threshold of originality per COM:TOO. -- Ooligan (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Posters have been pixelated. Not 100% convinced this is in scope though. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cid6BnkUkAA8Muh.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted book cover A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Firmarel.jpg

[edit]

Signature of non-notable individual, out of scope/SD:F10 may apply Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yel Değirmeni Cunda Rahmi Koç Kütüphanesi 04.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Webphotos.png

[edit]

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 17:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Koreanjacoblee.jpg

[edit]

very low resolution, useless description. unlikely to be own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street artist. (52318792385).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street artist. (52318792385).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

̈fair enough... let's remove it. Acabashi (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dragoogla sign in Montevideo.jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nintendo Game Front.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Creadora de tecnologia musical.jpg

[edit]

I can't verify the source or license claim Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M2rv2nn0djj21.jpg

[edit]

Hoax image. DrKay (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Serret 1X2-2007 - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albordedelhombre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Picture from Tumblr anf Facebook

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giuliana performing at the FotoFilm Festival in Tijuana.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GIULIA ESIB RHO 2016.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Seems to be a capture of this YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0XfIOGNrok CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grian Chatten.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Instagram CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:توربین.jpg

[edit]

Hello I checked the source, and I realized this is not in public domain. W7070 (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Copyright © 2024 piksell.ir. --Kadı Message 10:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hanoi-spring.jpg

[edit]

stock image, many google lens search results ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lau-xanh-logo.png

[edit]

image used only by promotional userpage deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nayla 2023.jpg

[edit]

source: https://www.instagram.com/naylaalkhaja/p/CpfbXm4JhXX/?img_index=3 (official account) ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nayla 2023-293.jpg

[edit]

source: https://www.instagram.com/naylaalkhaja/p/CpfbXm4JhXX/?img_index=3 (official account) ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mareva Grabowski.jpg

[edit]

Self promotion by uploader, low quality. William Graham (talk) 23:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ALL ABOUT SCIENCE.jpg

[edit]

Very low resolution astronomy photograph. Uncat since 2017, no description, only contribution of uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Low-resolution duplicate of File:Artist Concept Planetary System.jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 03:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ماشین سنکرون.jpg

[edit]

Hello I checked the source, and I realized this is not in public domain. W7070 (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1تصویر ژنراتور.jpg

[edit]

Hello I checked the source, and I realized this is not in public domain. W7070 (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ouga bouga.png

[edit]

dumb and useless Loaridsy (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kenkousiki77.jpg

[edit]

very low resolution. unlikely to be own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chiesa di Santa Maria Goretti

[edit]

I am afraid but because this is a building designed by a living architect, we have to delete these (beautiful!) images. For the exterior shots, please note that there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. We can of course always undelete these images later if we receive a permission from the architect. --Gnom (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Überträgst du die Außenaufnahmen nach .de? Dort kann man sie problemlos verwenden. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo @Herbert Ortner, gibt es dafür eine technische Lösung? Gnom (talk) 09:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ist mir leider nichts bekannt. Ich selbst habe das nur einmal vor längerer Zeit händisch gemacht. Also Bild drüben hochgeladen und Informationen aus Commons übertragen. Herbert Ortner (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Newark Skyline.png

[edit]

photo, circulating in social media. ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo that is circulating on social media is free to use. I’ve tried to upload the photo and give the proper credit where credit is due. I believe I did if I am not mistaken. But the photo is free to use, and I know the creator Newarkblognj has no problem with his picture being on Newark wiki page. He represents our city and shows the bright aspects of it so why shouldn’t it be allowed to stay so people who visit the page can see our skyline updated. Not the same pictures from an era many Newarkers would love to forget. Kalebrocks318 (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalebrocks318: you have not given proper credit, you have specified "Source Own work, Author Kalebrocks318", which is a claim that you are the photographer. The photographer having "no problem with his picture being on Newark wiki page" does not authorize you to assign the cc-zero declaration; only the copyright holder can do this.  Delete. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Kalebrocks318, for the remaining files from this uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giuliano Dottori in uno scatto di Nicola Cordì.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hb2ht (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of a label

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Timothy OlyphantPeabody.png

[edit]

low-res PNG duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Timothy_Olyphant_Peabody_Awards_2011_(8166714309)_(cropped).jpg FMSky (talk) 00:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GrooveLine .jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renan mr92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Photos from Fabrizio Toniolo

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scarlightarg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Pictures either from Javier Morales, from Facebook, or album cover

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HasanMalik.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Picture from Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hasan Malik performing in Dubai..jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hasan Malik at RedFest DXB, 2018.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JFRmusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Josef bardanashvili.jpg

[edit]

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, IMDb profile photo,[1] archive.org copy shows that this was on IMDb before the upload to Commons.[2]] Verbcatcher (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joshua kargbo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Label logo, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:José Daniel Martínez enjoying the vacation as a rock musician.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jotaefemusic12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jotaika Bops en Latino Power, Noviembre 2017.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jotta Maciell.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Instagram CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karl Huttenmeister.png

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokoffinfo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikal S.A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Metadata, non-free images (derived from search engine, social media, etc).

Christian Advs Sltg (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Risu09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: low quality videos of no discernible subject.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LAS NORMAS INTERNACIONALES DE VALUACIÓN Y LA AUDITORIA FORENSE.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by InvictusCalix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with unclear sources/vague claims of "own work".

Spinixster (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

aaa I get it now, my fault, delete them. InvictusCalix (talk) 09:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2014- Statue of Charles IV (Socha Karla IV or Karol quarto), Prague, Czech Republic ( Ank Kumar ) 05.jpg

[edit]

Blurry, there are other almost identical images by the same author [3] Joanbanjo (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NeuroRights (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files with vague claims of own work, some of which are definitely copyrighted.

Spinixster (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galit levi.png restored per VRT. -- Geagea (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhadhay16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official type photos with no exif, unlikely to be own work. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:大千葉帝国国旗.jpg

[edit]

Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Breakdance in Lederhosen (credit romanovskij.de) (2).jpg

[edit]

possible copyvio (c) FILIPP-ROMANOVSKIJ M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:В роли Отелло..jpg

[edit]

Fake license, not own work. Pessimist (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Депутат Верховного Совета СССР.jpg

[edit]

Fake license, not own work. Pessimist (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Q37.tif

[edit]

Fake license, not own work. Pessimist (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:074550717-d1d543e9-b1aa-46bb-affe-e0becbd3fee5.jpg

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. low resolution, published in 2017: https://www.lastampa.it/cultura/2017/11/02/news/un-sarcofago-egizio-al-cimitero-monumentale-per-il-re-degli-ebanisti-1.34378243/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ACERAWSAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files uploaded in 2009 as own works but consistent of material like watermarked photos from websites, old historical photos of Yemen that are probably public domain but don't have verifiable source information, and low resolution photographs of dubious origin.

Abzeronow (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Car electricity.jpg

[edit]

Photo: Doc. Hyundai. https://voi.id/fr/otoinfo/276428 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeus2107 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked for copyvios. Last remaining files after deletions of obvious copyvios, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination? --AntanO 07:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all, no own work here. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Macedonian National-Socialist Flag.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictitious flag. No evidence this was ever used historically. Omphalographer (talk) 20:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PASTEUR PIERRE NGANDU.jpg

[edit]

unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, no cat, etc, etc F (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DearImeldaPoster.jpg

[edit]

2024 short movie poster https://www.imdb.com/title/tt28519131/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guze chetcuti.jpg

[edit]

Photo transferred by me from the Maltese Wikipedia 9 years ago when I was a beginner. However, I don't remember why there is the 3.0 licence as on the mt.wiki there is no information about it. Also, the metadata show "Adobe Photoshop" which suggests that in fact the Maltese uploader might have no rights to the file. Żyrafał (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:El otro tom.jpg

[edit]

2021 mexican movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fleet Admiral Kanchai.jpg

[edit]

copy of uploaders images, already nominated for deletion ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FADM LEE.jpg

[edit]

copy of images, nominated for deletion ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikal S.A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Metadata, non-free images (derived from search engine, social media, etc).

Christian Advs Sltg (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused and unlikely to be used because they contain AI gobbledygook text.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep a few – Too indiscriminate. Many of those are low-quality where I may favor a delete outcome. However, AI gobbledygook text being included somewhere is (usually) not a valid rationale for deletion since it can be easily removed (and replaced if needed). It just takes a minute or so using any of the three methods explained here and the uploader should have done this before uploading. I suggest the uploader does that now for some of the images. I don't know why people upload such low-quality AI art when there is and can be much higher-quality useful images of that kind. I think File:Female barbarian from space vs giant ant.jpg and File:Ai-generated tarzanide.jpg should be kept (especially if uploader fixes the text), the rest seems deletable.
Prototyperspective (talk) 11:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The updater fixed the first images and the second one does not have "gobbledygook text" (which is the deletion rationale) and is in use so by definition educationally valuable according to Wikimedia Commons policy. Not sure if policies matter here anymore though, this place is turning into a totalitarianism of unilateral decisions by admins supported by one or or three refuted opinions. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all. No obvious educational use for these images, even if the text were corrected or cropped out. AI images should be generated "on demand" to satisfy specific project needs, not "on spec" or to demonstrate capability. Omphalographer (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & Omphalographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader is apparently confusing Commons with a web space provider. Massively AI-created images, some of them clear violations of copyrights on characters, some of them pure fantasy passed off as historical reality, some of them even just plain racist. Not one of the images can be usefully used in an educational sense. On the contrary, a large proportion of the images are problematic in the opposite direction and spread the opposite of secure education, fantasy and speculation. Here you can see once again that AI-generated images are currently simply a problem and are in no way even close to solving problems.

Extended content

Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really didn't understand the arguments, I can even agree that some old arts are not of good quality, but I think they are all useless, I also didn't understand the supposed racism, as soon as I discovered that you can generate arts that simulate comics, I thought about putting characters blacks and Asians like black cowboys that have been rediscovered by history and are even used in fiction.Hyju (talk) 00:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Specially these files, I don't understand, too:
Both are mythological entities in afro-brazilian Candomblé. André Koehne TALK TO ME 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, I only generated these two after seeing one of Oshun. Hyju (talk) 09:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an explanation and you stated that you vote (and nothing more than voting has been done) delete for all AI images, saying Due to both the copyright and ethical concerns, I am always in favor of deleting AI art, especially when we have any non-AI generated images that don't have those concerns. I've never seen you vote anything but for delete in AI-related DRs. The listed files are too indiscriminate and are often one very few relevant to a subject, many of them are in use, and a more discriminate subset may be worth deleting even though I don't see why these clearly AI-labeled images would be such a problem. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep indiscriminate, weird arguments— most or all of them are marked as “AI” so they’re obviously not supposed to be hoaxes, none of them I’ve seen obviously violate any copyrights, there’s no obvious “racism” whatsoever, and most importantly some are in legitimate use or are clearly in scope as illustrations of less well-known genres like cyberfunk or simply usable quality illustrations of things like anime art. The nominator is seemingly just indiscriminately targeting AI art out of personal prejudice. I wouldn’t oppose nominating some of the low quality, actually OOS or redundant images but we can’t just randomly cull dozens of images based mainly on how they were made. Dronebogus (talk) 06:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep – Indiscriminate, per Dronebogus, multiple of these are in use, and invalid false deletion rationale. some of them clear violations of copyrights on characters these should be deleted but you didn't name them and just made up a claim which I think is false. some of them pure fantasy passed off as historical reality none of these are claimed to be historical reality and they are clearly marked as AI-generated some of them even just plain racist very strange accusation that is not true at all. Not one of the images can be usefully used in an educational sense very false, many of them are the only or nearly one images that can help illustrate a concept (not necessarily on Wikipedia and with info that it's AI-made) such as an art style, are the only artistic depictions of archaic humans, illustrate how some kinds of comics or their subjects roughly looked like, or how to use AI. problematic in the opposite direction and spread the opposite of secure education again just a claim with no link to any policy or supporting explanation or even just referring to specific images fantasy and speculation is that meant to be an argument? Despite that WMC seems to have a bias against anything that aren't photographs, there very large amounts of fantasy-related images this image by NASA is also speculation File:Artistic depiction of a NASA lunar base.jpg or widely-used File:GAX-447.jpg. Fantasy and speculation are major aspects of human culture plus can be used to illustrate concepts (e.g. major subjects of fiction) and so on. A very small number of these images may be low quality out of scope but this is a strong keep for this indiscriminate unfounded nomination of a few files among over 100 million where these images are overall probably more useful than 90%. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree with the comments of Omphalographer in the previous discussion. There is no need to store everyone's AI-generated images when they can be created on an as-needed basis. The images themselves are quite nice, but there is nothing unique or special about them and no clear educational purpose. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 04:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some of them are the only images we have of topics like clockpunk— how is that not “unique or special”? More importantly, many of them are COM:INUSE! Nobody says “I think we should delete almost all pictures of grass and trees, they can be taken on an as-needed basis”. Dronebogus (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus You misunderstood me. I meant that they were not unique or special as AI-generated images. Hyju (or anyone else) could make similar images by the thousands whenever they desired. I suspect that if everyone suddenly decided to upload their pictures of grass and trees we would having a discussion about deleting those. You've seen COM:PENIS, right? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. They do and so far we don't. 2. Many of them are useful regardless of how difficult you hypothesize it to be to create them. While some may be worthy of deleting, the list is indiscriminate and includes many very useful ones. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Although I'd say I'm on the weak side due to how indiscriminate this is. Although you could maybe argue the few images of "clockpunk" (whatever that is) could be kept. I'm not really convinced that every image of "X art style" is worth having though simply because we don't have other images of it. There's at least nothing in Commons:Project scope saying anything about how images related to a certain subject become more in scope the less we have of them. Otherwise people could upload random nonsense, call it "whatever art style", and we'd be forced to keep the images purely due to their novelty.
Plus these images are extremely easy to re-create anyway. Has anyone bothered to look online to see if there's free licensed images of "clockpunk" by actually notable artists that they can upload? If not, then that should really be the default option here or really anywhere that has a gap in coverage. Not just to upload OOS amateur artwork and then act like it's the only option out there when it probably isn't. We should really be encouraging people adding "notable" artwork related to a specific genre to Commons though. Not whatever chicken scratch that's even slightly related to it that can easily be generated by AI. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why is everyone so prejudiced against an artwork because an AI made it? The general assumption is that AI, unlike literally any other medium or mode of creating artwork, needs to be kept to the absolute bare minimum. Why? Dronebogus (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: for reference, the following files are legitimately COM:INUSE and should be kept regardless of whether anyone thinks the others are in scope:
File:Nibiru entering a collision course with Earth.jpg
File:Hercolubus entering a collision course with Earth.jpg
File:Ai-generated sword and planet hero.jpg
File:Clockpunk Leonardo Da Vinci.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More than these are in-use – File:AI wuxia tabletop role-playing game book.jpg for example is as well regardless of how much people think is fine to discriminate against me which I'm pretty sure it a violation of WMC policy as it's currently written. It's the only for image for an example of a major application of AI art which is art for tabletop games. Also File:Boy in cyberpunk city.jpg is in use as well as is File:Vintage space opera comic cover.jpg and probably a number more. Hopefully at least WMC policy can survive the anti-AI discrimination. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus Can you explain how it is helpful to readers to have an AI generated cartoon image of events that did not happen included in an article? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To illustrate a risk or a subject of fiction to name just two. Stop assuming WMC images are just for Wikipedia and must be included somewhere to be useful; WMC isn't just for Wikipedia. Also most of these images are not about "events that did not happen". Prototyperspective (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My question was for Dronebogus, about some of the specific images that they listed. A Grizzly bear might somehow get into the lobby of the Empire State Building and attack tourists. Should I ask Bing to create an image to illustrate that possibility and add it to the article on Wikipedia for Grizzly bears and the Empire State Building, or just upload it here in case it is ever needed? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You’re arguing apples to oranges. You’re using a made up, non-notable nonsense example to argue against illustrating a notable purported event that didn’t happen with a hypothetical image of it happening, which nobody would object to if a human made it. Dronebogus (talk) 07:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You think my example is nonsense? One of the images you want to keep is of a fictional planet crashing into the Earth. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A notable fictional planet. Stop strawmanning my arguments. Dronebogus (talk) 13:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which other images are there to illustrate the concept of rogue planets crashing into planets? That is or may be a notable subject of science and science fiction. Just because in your narrow preconceived notions you couldn't think of ways it could be valuable/useful doesn't mean that it isn't. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no need to be insulting. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

: Delete Unused, out of scope personal fan art by a non-notable artist. Commons isn't here to be a personal file host, and no I'm not open to changing my vote. So it would be cool if the people who think the images should be kept skipped the argumentative, strawman nonsense. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You indiscriminately vote Delete either so it's impossible to convince you – you don't need to clarify that. Clear arguments for keeping have been made such as listing specific use-cases, clarifying that lots of these are in-use, and pointing out that this indiscriminate list and the vote users don't even provide explanations for deletion or make provably false statements such as pure fantasy passed off as historical reality. Truth, policies, and arguments don't matter here; what matters is the opinions of the voters by headcount it seems. Nothing of it is fan art but you still don't seem to have even read definitions of fan art. It's not a personal file host if useful images are kept and image creators don't need to be notable for useful media to be kept. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop responding to everyone you disagree with. Especially if it's me. I could really care less about your opinion. Especially when it comes to my voting habits or the arguments I make in DRs. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I could say the same of you. Dronebogus (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could, but I think the evidence shows that's not what I'm doing though. So maybe go find someone else to make up accusations about. I don't think Prototyperspective needs you playing defense for them anyway. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve struck this vote since Adamant1 has already voted. I want to assume good faith but at this point, between the incivility and bludgeoning and now this, Adamant1 is really skirting a trip to the user problems board. Dronebogus (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. I didn't notice I had voted already. That can happen when a DR is mostly a wall of by a single user. Regardless, I appreciate that you struck out the redudent vote. Your free to leave me a message on my talk page if I make a mistake like that in the future and I'll fix it. I'm not really sure what your talking about in regardless to the incivility, bludgeoning, or responding to everyone who disagrees with me though. Since I didn't respond to either you or Prototyperspective when either one you voted keep even though I disagree with your reasons. It's rather hard to "respond to everyone who disagrees with me" when I'm not actually responding to people I disagree with ;) --Adamant1 (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/question: it's not that these are badly done. I'm just trying to understand why they would be in scope. They seem to me like (AI-generated) fan art. I could imagine a reason to keep a few images of AI-generated fan art as such, but normally we consider most fan art out of scope. Why, exactly, are these different? (Obviously, any that are in use should be kept.) - Jmabel ! talk 23:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The overwhelming majority are not “fan art”. I’m not sure where this notion is coming from. There are too many files to go through why each of them may or may not be in scope but since we can’t reassess deleted files I think erring in the side of “in scope” is fair in these situations. Dronebogus (talk) 04:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: let me take three, more or less at random (as random as a human can be): File:AI Fighting game.jpg, File:Man licking breast in erotic comic.jpg, File:AI manga boy.jpg. Can you explain to me why any of these three would be in scope? - Jmabel ! talk 08:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are several images, not just drawings, but erotic photos of all kinds and even lolicon (and other comics with girls in panties, clearly they are children) on Commons, I've never seen any questions about them, I don't generate art with randomness , I know that many may not even be used, but the ones already mentioned about Hercolobus and Nibiru were to illustrate entries in Portuguese, even though they are pseudoscience, I thought they needed illustrations, there are already fanarts of Marvel characters, Elvis Presley and others deleted, but there are others types of fanarts that are there, I generated some of Nikola Tesla and even orishas, I've seen several AI fanarts and gods from all types of mythology, then I saw one of Oshun and thought there could be others. If you were to use these arguments here, a lot would have to be deleted.Hyju (talk) 10:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen a ton of questions about them. They often come up in DRs and a fair number are deleted. But the fact that there are other images of questionable value on Commons is neaither here nor there. My question, since I was told things were two broad, was how any of these three images are in scope. You have not answered that. And, yes, for the record, I would like to see a lot more of this sort of thing deleted. No problem with it being on the Internet somewhere else, but in Commons' terms it strikes me as sludge. - Jmabel ! talk 18:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The first image could illustrate fighting games. The second image could illustrate W:femdom or muscle fetishism. The third could illustrate manga or superheroes in anime and manga. Dronebogus (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe COM:SCOPE's "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" can be reduced to "could illustrate something." Any reasonably representational image could theoretically illustrate something, but presumably not every reasonably representational image is in scope, or we would have to accept all user-drawn art, maps of nonexistent places, porn, etc. - Jmabel ! talk 21:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably too many rather different images in one DR (on that I agree with Dronebogus) and they should probably be brought back and DR'd in batches that have more in common. However, so far my inclination would be to delete any that are not in use, and that's how I'd expect to vote on the smaller batches, although I remain ready to be shown why some particular image(s) here is (are) in scope on their merits. - Jmabel ! talk 21:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I've begun doing that, below. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should this DR not then be procedurally closed as redundant and confusing? Dronebogus (talk) 01:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close, as this has now been broken down to sets of more closely related cases. - Jmabel ! talk 22:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per the discussion above, breaking this out into a group of smaller DRs. This group is prehistoric people: Out of scope - unused and unlikely to be used - these are purportedly prehistoric African people, but are in fact fantasy illustrations in a modern aesthetic, and have no encyclopedic purpose.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid deletion rationale was given and nothing suggests these images are anyhow "inaccurate". In addition there's lots of other images that may be inaccurate and a template like Template:Inaccurate paleoart could be added if it was. "prehistoric people" are not out of scope and nothing requires all illustrations to not have a modern digital art look but a 70+ years outdated barely usable "aesthetic". Instead, absurd claims pro deletion like nationalist sentimentality which is fully and entirely unrelated to these images. How do you even associate that? If it's anything it would be anti-nationalist since it illustrates African prehistoric people humans worldwide share ancestry with. Reasons and arguments don't matter anymore, it's the censorship-tyranny of unjustified subjective opinions of whatever most have voted for by very small headcount. These images should be kept since they are somewhat useful and more or less the only images of ancient and archaic humans in art when not including neanderthals.
While we keep quite tons of bizarre images as apparently educationally valuable, few of the only images depicting ancient humans apparently isn't. Explain that to somebody. Nothing in these images is very false despite that you allege they are inaccurate and they don't have to be used. Same goes for out of scope fan art – really? You still have not looked up fan art and spam deletion nominations with these provably wrong accusations? fantasy illustrations in a modern aesthetic is not a valid deletion rationale, rather it's a point pro realistic educational value. Other paintings of neanderthals or nearly anything are also fantasy illustrations and may be wrong, just not high-resolution modern digital art. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Prototyperspective: You seem to miss my point. What I was saying was that we do accept historically inaccurate images based on nationalist sentimentalilty if they are, themselves, representative of what some notable artist has painted. This ranges from File:Washington Crossing the Delaware by Emanuel Leutze, MMA-NYC, 1851.jpg (surely Washington would have had the sense to sit down when crossing a near-freezing river in a small boat) to File:Horace Vernet Napoleon Rising Out of His Tomb copy.jpg (basically a fantasy image of Napoleon) or for that matter File:Tag von Potsdam. Painting by Carl Langhorst. Hitler and Reich President Hindenburg shake hands in church interior, propagandistic depiction of Hitler's 1933 appointment as Reich Chancellor. Private auction collection. No known copyright.jpg (presumably no comment necessary). But it doesn't mean that fan art or AI art equivalents are in scope. We accept the images because they are notable either as art, or as a significant part of history, not because of what they (mis-)represent.
Similarly, insofar as Pan-Africanist or specific African nationalist images by established artists are available in PD or free-licensed versions, they are in scope. (And I agree with something you seem to be implying here, that we should have a lot more of that from an African perspective.) But things that are generated on the fly by a user or by an AI are not an acceptable substitute, any more than if I were to draw my own fantasia of, say, Rosa Luxemburg. - Jmabel ! talk 22:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This addresses one point of many I made which is one that addressed your rationale. These images are more or less the first works depicting nonneanderthal Category:Ancient and archaic humans in art on WMC and are of high-quality with no known inaccuracies.
Even when you dismiss laboriously skillfully created AI images as "generated on the fly" that does not reduce the educational realistic usefulness of these fairly unique images. There are so few artworks and illustrations on WMC because we miss illustrators and because artists nearly never license them this way, not any of the reasons you may think of. You seem to only consider who made which artwork but that is secondary, most images on WMC are not produced by established notable people and COM:SCOPE nowhere suggests illustrations have to be either. We're overflowing with thousands of photos of the same subject but when Hyju uploads what could be the first art on Earth depicting archaic nonneanderthal archaic humans in the Commons that is out of scope fan art on a site that keeps who knows what. The only other image on WMC depicting that is the low-resolution one on the right. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"No known inaccuracies"? So we are to believe that prehistoric Africans had hairstyles from the 1960s (the two at left in File:AI African prehistoric tribe.jpg) or later (File:AI cavewoman.jpg) and adornments comparable to various African tribes in relatively recent centuries (all except possibly File:AI cavewoman.jpg)? "More or less the first": well, we do have File:Homo erectus pekinensis - facial reconstruction.png which appears to be based on the actual shape of a known Homo erectus skull; File:Homo antecessor statue.jpg which appears to be similarly based on actual research; File:Homo naledi facial reconstruction.jpg, File:Homo floresiensis - facial approximation - color 1.jpg and other similar images by Cicero Moraes et. al. which also appear to be rather serious efforts at facial reconstruction, etc. I will admit that I'm surprised we don't have (or I can't find) more scientifically-based images of early humans; I've certainly seen plenty of such images elsewhere, and I'd be surprised if none of them are either in the public domain or free-licensed, but I remain of the opinion that substituting fantasy images like this in contexts where such an image would be desired is the opposite of educational. - Jmabel ! talk 04:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why would they not have these hairstyles except for the one at the left in the first pic? And even that is possible and in addition could be solved by adding a note about this there such as the mentioned template. Why would they not have these adornments? 120 k years ago they already used marine shells for personal decoration. So nothing is inaccurate except for likely the hairstyle of one person which could be fixed in a new version of the image.
Computational facial reconstructions are not visual arts of the type paintings belong to and photos of statues and models in museum are also sth else – it's more or less the first when excluding the image above in that sense. Whatever you call this major part of art is not the issue, maybe call it creative art. Again, that it's on WMC doesn't mean that it has to be used. Hyju was helping close a major gap in WMC and even if that is only by enabling people to become aware of what is missing and providing rough outline of what could be seen. These images are very useful and clearly in scope. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the most part, I've said my piece, and don't plan on replying further on this thread. However I really do object to you making substantive edits, with no markup indicating an edit, to a comment that has already been replied to. It can make the context of someone else's remarks unclear. Also, you say "Computational facial reconstructions are not visual arts of the type paintings belong to and photos of statues and models in museum are also sth else". Yes, and those things, unlike these illustrations, are clearly in scope. - Jmabel ! talk 23:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The keywords used to generate these include “ historical art comic vintage 1940s”. That’s extremely concerning - basing these on 1940s comic books is one of the most bizarre rationales for historical accuracy I’ve ever heard being used! - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 09:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per the discussion above, breaking this out into a group of smaller DRs. This group is Cyberpunk fan art: Out of scope - unused and unlikely to be used - it just seems to be a collection of images the uploader made and thought were cool. (Note, there is one file in this series that's being used in the Afrofuturism article on pt.wiki, which I did not nominate).

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don't see how these could be useful; there's lots of similar/better images showing the same; these have some misgeneration issues. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Closing this small subset (originally nominated 27 December), seems clear that even often staunch AI advocates are not offering defense of these. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per the discussion above, breaking this out into a group of smaller DRs. This group is Western-style comic characters: Out of scope - unused and unlikely to be used - it just seems to be a collection of images the uploader made and thought were cool. (Note, there are a few this series that are currently used in the mainspaces of sister projects, which I did not nominate).

Extended content

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm taking the liberty of creating a gallery here so I and others can eyeball these without needing to click into each file in this longish list. - Jmabel ! talk 00:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I'll admit these at least are fun, and the style is so simple that the AI can do it absolutely convincingly, but I still fail to see how they would be in scope. - Jmabel ! talk 00:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Overly simplistic and inaccurate dipections of what the AI thinks pulp art looks like. There's already many other images on here that serve the same purpose, weren't created by AI, and don't have the issues with accuracy that these ones do. So I fail to see how these serve an educational purpose. At least more then amateur depictions of the same subjects by a non-notable artist would. If people really wanted to educate people on the art style they should just do it by uploading historical magazines or actual artwork by notable artists to do it with. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Nibiru entering a collision course with Earth.jpg and File:Hercolubus entering a collision course with Earth.jpg; I’ve already established that these are in scope because they have been used constructively and illustrate notable topics. File:AI Jenny Everywhere fanart.jpg is also in scope as a unique AI-generated image of w:Jenny Everywhere. I also feel File:A scientist and an android female in a laboratory looking at a laptop.jpg is in scope because it could illustrate human-robot interaction.  Delete the others as having no discernible use. Dronebogus (talk) 01:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nibiru entering a collision course with Earth.jpg and File:Hercolubus entering a collision course with Earth.jpg were in use when this discussion started. I have since removed them from articles on the Portuguese Wikipedia. We don't need AI-generated cartoon depictions of things that haven't or can't happen. That doesn't help readers. I also removed File:Ai-generated sword and planet hero.jpg from an article that already had 3 images from real comics. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 03:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You keep emphasizing some imaginary policy that illustrations of things that aren’t and never will be real are OOS. I guess by that logic we should delete every image of bigfoot, ghosts, superheroes, Martians, conspiracy theories, myths and legends, fiction, notable hoaxes? Dronebogus (talk) 08:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: It really depends. Sometimes illustrations of "fake" things are deleted. If want a recent example there was the Flag of Paraduin, which was deleted as OOS because Paraduin is a non-exiting microstate and there's plenty of other examples. Although your correct that "illustrations of things that aren’t and never will be real" are never going to be deleted, but I suspect that's more to do with other reasons besides them being illustrations or not real. Of course anyone can pick a random subject on here and find OOS images that haven't been deleted yet related to it as if that's some kind of indicator of something, it really isn't though. Except that no one has nominated the images for deletion yet. Honestly, I'm kind of surprised you don't know that already though, what with the time you've on Wikipedia dealing with AfDs and all. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"illustrations of things that aren’t and never will be real" can be in scope if the artist is notable, or they formed part of a notable work, or even without those they are genuinely representative' of a cultural phenomenon of belief in or representation of that unreal thing (e.g., on that last, a conventional representation of Bigfoot/Sasquatch such as File:Sasquatch.svg is not by a notable artist, is not part of a notable work, but it an example typical of imagery with plenty of currency in the real world). But users or AI making stuff up out of nowhere? Not in scope. - Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The second is useful as one of the only images potentially useful for illustrating the subgenre "Dieselpunk"; the planet collision images are some of the only potentially useful for illustrating the concept of rogue planets colliding; some of the raygun images are potentially useful for illustrating at high-quality and without magazine-cover-text pulp scifi magazine tropes and so on; most of the other images there are probably not nearly as useful and I don't see a big problem with deleting those but also I don't see why that would be needed (given which images we keep, how few images those are, how unproblematic these images are since they're properly categorized and labelled as AI-made, and because there's 100 million images with lots of TBs so a few images aren't such a problem), especially since one would have a better range of options to choose from in illustrating AI images for comics. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, except for File:AI Jenny Everywhere fanart.jpg, per Dronebogus and contextualized by w:Jenny Everywhere. Whether or not these are visually appealing to look at is besides the point. They are visually distinct from the style of art they emulate, which makes them poor for representation. To include these as a representation of an existing art style is badly misrepresenting that style. This undermines the educational value of real examples by causing confusion and muddying the waters. It's also worth noting that these kinds of images are trivially easy to generate and so they have no value from scarcity. Grayfell (talk) 00:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: with exception of File:AI Jenny Everywhere fanart.jpg per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per the discussion above, breaking this out into a group of smaller DRs. This group is Japanese-style comic characters: Out of scope - unused and unlikely to be used - it just seems to be a collection of images the uploader made and thought were cool. (Note, there is one upload in this series which is used in the article for Magical girl on He.Wiki, which I did not nominate).

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:AI-generated walking girl.jpg is useful for illustrating scaling up low resolution images to high resolution reimagined images. Some of the other images could be useful for illustrating AI tools usefulness for anime and comics production, File:AI vintage manga superhero.jpg is good for that, and possibly other subjects. However most are not realistically likely useful so  Delete most or all of the others. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per the discussion above, breaking this out into a group of smaller DRs. This group is Misc. characters in modern styles: Out of scope - unused and unlikely to be used - it just seems to be a collection of images the uploader made and thought were cool.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again a lot of these, so I am creating a gallery to allow rapid eyeballing. - Jmabel ! talk 00:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. What is the argument for these being in scope? I sure don't see it. Most of these strike me as not even being very good for what they are (AI-generated work in genre styles), but it's not clear what would be the basis to keep them even if they constituted good work in these styles. - Jmabel ! talk 00:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete There's zero reason these images would be in scope and any claims to the contrary are just bad faithed gaming of the guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I don't see how these could be useful and some like the second have misgeneration issues. Thanks for creating the gallery for glancing over the images which is useful. File:AI-generated walking girl.jpg is also nominated in the DR above so it should be excluded here (and I think it's one of the ~two that should be kept there).  Weak keep for File:African American cyborg.jpg (sufficient quality etc) and  Keep File:Cyborg Frankenstein.jpg – a modern cyborg reimagination of / take on Frankenstein with no alternative image of that and sufficiently free of misgeneration.
Prototyperspective (talk) 10:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:70s funk band.jpg

[edit]

Missed listing, same criteria  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Upper St Clair Stadium - view from visitor section.webp

[edit]

This image, while permitted for use by the copyright holder, is unused and unproven. In order to avoid further conflict I believe that it ought to be deleted. For reference, I am the uploader and did not recognize the extent to which the copyright holder must specify release. Dionysius Miller (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Otto Graham Browns Statue.jpg

[edit]

This statue was dedicated in 2019, and there's no COM:FOP for works of art in the U.S. Eureka Lott 00:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seydi Ali reis.jpg

[edit]

No creation date nor the artist information. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; lacking information needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VIRREYES - EVA PERON.jpg

[edit]

Found elsewhere on the web. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Found elsewhere on the web" is an inadequate nomination. Please give one or more web addresses where the file is, and evidence that the file was elsewhere on the web before it was uploaded to Commons: Other websites often use files from Commons. However, in this case  Delete, because this file was used in a Facebook post that is dated before the upload to Commons.[4] Verbcatcher (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meet the Press with Tim Russert Logo 2005.png

[edit]

Not a CC0-licensed "own work"; this looks more like a cropped screenshot of a former Meet the Press title graphic. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep and change license tag to as {{Textlogo}}. This is below the threshold of originality in the US: It consists of text in a plain font and the NBC Peacock logo. We have numerous examples of the peacock logo in Category:NBC logos and its subcategories: If you think the peacock logo is non-free then please raise a mass-deletion request for these files. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: false source and license changed per Verbcatcher. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kobus Muller singing on his World Tour in 2023.png

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kobusmuller: , I nominated this picture for deletion because you are marked as the author. It seems to have been taken during a performance, thus, I have doubts regarding the authorship. Meanwhile, if you manage to get the authorization of the author, you can submit a VRT tcket by following the instructions on this page : [5]. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am the singer in the picture performing on my own performance. So I am not sure how to ask myself for a picture I asked someone to take during my performance. Kindly remove your deletion request. 2003:C0:DF46:3B00:3069:2D6C:7961:478C 23:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your more than welcome to contact me per email info@kobusmuller.de 2003:C0:DF46:3B00:3069:2D6C:7961:478C 23:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You do not own the rights, so you cannot license the photograph. --Achim55 (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of permission from creator/copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kemalreis.jpg

[edit]

No creation date nor the artist information. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; dubious license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Good Morning America 2022.png

[edit]

IP editors keep replacing the perfect fine and current SVG logo (File:Good Morning America 2021 logo.svg) on Good Morning America articles with this blurry image. This image is also uploaded by a user who is indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Licensing appears to be incorrect also. Limmidy (talk) 02:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AL headshot - lower res.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Image from this link and highly unlikely to be own work of uploader. Bookish Worm (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sam Sloan for Mayor Poster (In Chinese).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


STRONG  Keep The Flickr account strongly appears to belong to the creator of the work SecretName101 (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flickr user appears on the poster, that means the Flickr user is not the creator of the work. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. I don't quite follow A1Cafel's last statement, but looking at Flickr stream that user has many DW (eg copyrighted book covers) under false CC license, so Flickr user is not reliable for license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Twórczość Mostowicza na ekranie.jpg

[edit]

Dubious PD rationale, Marian Dąbrowski died in 1958. Komarof (talk) 05:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (and claiming something from less than 100 years ago is PD because the author died more than 100 years ago is "dubious" indeed). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bezirkschule Baden.png

[edit]

created by Atelier Brunecky, Zürich https://www.bp-baurealisation.ch/de/projekte/oberstufenzentrum-burghalde/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jaison.png

[edit]

USA Water Polo is not part of the US Federal Government, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mapa para governador do Espírito Santo em 1990.png

[edit]

Mapa errado Mateusfutebs (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paloman 10 Dinero.jpg

[edit]

Phantasy banknote of phantasy country. Zenwort (talk) 01:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fazlul Qadir.jpg

[edit]

probably not "own work" and wrong date. see metadata and othe uploads of this user Xocolatl (talk) 18:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per below nom. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fazlul Qadir.jpg

[edit]

Delete 

The page Fahimsifat (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request within window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Knoxartistenew.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ellisoknoweducation.gif

[edit]

Image allegedly from 1925 claimed to be "own work". This was most likely taken from some website which is no longer online, as neither Google Lens nor TinEye can find it. COM:PCP. —holly {chat} 02:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Holly. I own this photograph. It’s my great grandfather. I can find a link online or I can upload it to another site. But please do not delete it. I submit it to the public domain. It’s fine with me. 2603:8000:7E00:78C3:F44F:71A4:1D2E:40FE 03:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll take your word for it. Could you possibly scan it again at a larger size and save it as a JPG this time? An image this small and in GIF format is usually cause for suspicion. Thanks! 16:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: too poor quality to be useful. And out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bitcoin1.jpg

[edit]

unlikely to be own wor. low resolution, better quality on https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/equator-uganda-nov-1-sign-on-1286834200?consentChanged=true ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Author Rich Benjamin.png

[edit]

Probable copyright violation, attributed to Sharon Schuster in the description, which was added by the uploader. May be the photographer Sharon Schuster, who has a photo of this man on her homepage, which was probably taken in the same session because he is wearing the same coat and the background is similar.[6] Another upload by this uploader identifies a different photographer in the metadata, see File:Benjamin2020.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hentai-kanji.png

[edit]

Can't be speedied because it's a different file format, but unused and unlikely to be used because of file:Hentai-kanji-svg.svg. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benjamin2020.jpg

[edit]

Probable copyright violation, metadata identifies the photographer as Adam Schultz. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Author Rich Benjamin.png, which identifies Sharon Schuster as the photographer. The uploader is unlikely to be both Adam Schultz and Sharon Schuster. Verbcatcher (talk) 08:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmitry Berezin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable images from the non-reliable source: there were no photography in 18th century. The costumes also hardly match the era.

Komarof (talk) 08:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canton-santiago-de-mendez.jpg

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. low resolution. source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2341028626124868&set=ecnf.100070760952260 ZimskoSonce (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:П 2.jpg

[edit]

immagine molto sfocata, non si capisce nemmeno il soggetto, probabilmente presa da un monitor o da un televisore Threecharlie (talk) 10:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and unusable. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Capture d’écran 2019-03-26 à 16.01.07.png

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://medium.com/la-fregate/maison-gazelle-du-mariage-franco-marocain-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9ussite-dun-concept-f47c02b76781 ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ecran corne gazelle.png

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://medium.com/la-fregate/maison-gazelle-du-mariage-franco-marocain-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9ussite-dun-concept-f47c02b76781 ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prof. Dr.-Ing. Peter Pelz.jpg

[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Abdul Waheed M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kota Wharton Signature.png

[edit]

Irrelevant and unused. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:6011:b303:3e4b:a1c3:3619:ee32:9d73 (talk) 00:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1933 Chinese Soviet Republic banknote.jpg

[edit]

Small size. Watermarked as to be unusable. Replacemnt exists in File:3 Chuàn - Chinese Soviet Republic.jpg Zenwort (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abbas golro.jpg

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. check google lens search results. https://en.mehrnews.com/news/200681/Iran-Saudi-economic-diplomacy-should-be-strengthened-MP,... ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdelmalek Sayad à propos de l'immigration.webm

[edit]

copyvio. source: https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/video/i17327280/abdelmalek-sayad-a-propos-de-l-immigration Commissariat général à l'égalité des terriroires, France 3, Fonds d'Action Sociale, Information Culture et Immigration ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, How do I have to mention or quote this material to keep it at the Wikimedia commons? Could you help me, please? 2804:1B3:6F01:AA7:B4F2:6DDE:F71E:4232 20:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look. This is the site where the video can be freely accessed:
https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/video/i17327280/abdelmalek-sayad-a-propos-de-l-immigration 2804:1B3:6F01:AA7:B4F2:6DDE:F71E:4232 20:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Can be freely accessed" does not mean that there is no copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 08:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coat of Arms of the Archduchy of Austria (Black Griffins).svg

[edit]

Achievement without any historical ground. Misleading and not educative. 80.215.210.120 20:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coat of Arms of the Archduchy of Austria (Gold).svg

[edit]

Achievement without any historical ground. Misleading and not educative. 80.215.210.120 20:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angelina Krutikova ; Emmanuel Macron 01.jpg

[edit]

No autorization by the photographer. Image found on Linkedin. Besides, not notable people (all the pages using it were deleted on fr.wikinews and fr.wikipedia). Zetud (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Krutikova.jpg

[edit]

No autorization by the photographer. Image found on Linkedin. Besides, not notable people (all the pages using it were deleted on fr.wikinews and fr.wikipedia). Zetud (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kozorezenko Petr Petrovich.jpg

[edit]

© 2008-2024 «Российская академия художеств» ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Ursula Stalder

[edit]

copyright violation; works by living artist.

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unikis batam.jpg

[edit]

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Music of the Brazilian Army

[edit]

Ongoing editorial dispute over whether these files should have a separate category or stay in Category:Army of Brazil (presumably forever?). Nominated for speedy deletion by Tm, who wants it gone. I don't want it gone, but as I've already behaved poorly with reversions, I'm moving this into a deletion request for a third-party opinion. I believe the category is perfectly reasonable, it helps diffuse a category with a very wide scope, has a viable subcategory (Category:Military bands of the Brazilian Army) and has precedents such as Category:Music of the United States Army and Category:Music of the United States Navy. Serraria (talk) 03:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the subcategory with 44 files, the following files would be included in this category:

Several are overcategorized by their presence in Category:Army of Brazil, which also suffers from overcategorization in general. Serraria (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural keep. This is the wrong forum. You want Commons:Categories for discussion. However, I don't really know why anyone would object to this category. —holly {chat} 19:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:120513-U-Bahnhof-Schloßstraße-Treppenabgang.JPG

[edit]

Copyright protection! German freedom of panorama does not apply for interior shots. The station was built in 1971. It's unlikely to be old enough. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lucie Manet.jpg

[edit]

Volonté de ne plus apparaître dans les résultats Google 1984Lucie (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 19:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satyendrabosehomedale.jpg

[edit]

Edited version of File:SatyenBose1925.jpg, probably using AI. No encyclopedic merit. —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 11:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Regie Studio 2.jpg

[edit]

copyvio of https://telebasel.ch/volumes/files/regie.jpg?v=1686661841 no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Algiers.svg

[edit]

no source Tgbsww (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not in use I think. 170.235.203.18 16:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the coat of arms is in use, so  Weak keep. -- 170.235.203.18 17:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE in many locations and is just two colors plus File:Coat of arms of Algiers.svg, so easily below TOO. —holly {chat} 20:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Algiers.svg

[edit]

this file has no source Meandmybrix (talk) 20:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Why re-nominate for deletion when the coat of arms has a source and is COM:INUSE? 170.235.203.18 16:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the flag has no source and there is already a file for the coat of arms of Algiers in Commons, find a source using this hypothetical flag Tgbsww (talk) 08:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Flag has no source but the coat of arms has a source Tgbsww (talk) 11:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there is no source of this flag, this flag is fake and doesn't have a source and it just says, "Own Work" and fake flags representing cities without a source are not acceptable and examples of fake flags getting deleted: Bangui, Paramaribo, etc., Tgbsww (talk) 08:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per the last decision by User:Holly Cheng; COM:INUSE, it's widely used - if it's a "fake flag", the projects currently using the file should first remove it, we don't overrule these local decisions. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Algiers.svg

[edit]

where is the source of this flag, I know the coat of arms is real but the flag's source is from where, I SAID THE FLAG WITH A BLUE AND GREEN STRIPE Tgbsww (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see previous requests, COM:INUSE, could be nominated for deletion if not in use anymore. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milad5508 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Smallz size of professional images. i doubt that the uploader is the author

Avron (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Found File:Superconductor of magnitude.jpg at https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28058-warmest-ever-superconductor-works-at-antarctic-temperatures/, where it is credited to "David Parker/IMI/Univ. of Birmingham High TC Consortium/Science Photo Library". Deleted the rest per COM:PCP as we cannot assume good faith on the part of the uploader. —holly {chat} 21:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bettwanze Topcu.JPG

[edit]

Ich habe dieses Bild hochgeladen und möchte nicht mehr damit in Verbindung gebracht werden. Ich wäre auch damit einverstanden, Autor, User und Dateinamen zu ändern/löschen, damit es keine Hinweise mehr auf micht gibt. Cem (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Das ist kein Löschgrund. Das Bild liegt auch schon mehr als 10 Jahre hier. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dorothy Olsen on P-38 Lightning.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded this several years ago believing it was PD. Per the discussion at en:WT:FAC#Early image reivew for Dorothy Olsen? I am no longer confident in the PD status, so best to take this down. RoySmith (talk) 15:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per comment on file talk page, claiming that the photo is property of the Olsen family. —holly {chat} 21:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georges Braque, 1909-10, La guitare (Mandora, La Mandore), oil on canvas, 71.1 x 55.9 cm, Tate Modern, London.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: painter died only in 1963; works protected til end of 2033

Converting to DR for easier undeletion. No URAA issues. Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gookmoot.png

[edit]

hardly own work, this is 20+ times in the web (mostly without flag) https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gsbubu&hl=de&re=df&p=AbrfA8rK23-90vilfOVqfJzIndfv9zOYE0NgKyJSI-HcOK2llN03NaARGJc2k21t-9sWE1Cz0LectAOhxN_ZTh_t4iCFZ7UR6dd9AuSY3o4ICc4RyX-1W_rW01PyNDr8ugMpyqBO_F788Z7LT8el8c8oTwFgGJrGPCDSPw-gXyDHqQ4CVlComoK8p7d2SE05tsxHd9mW7qvFFfq12g%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKREF6T1ROa1pUTXlMV1prT0dZdE5ETTRZUzFpTm1aaUxUbG1Oams1TkdFeU56QTNOaElmY3paWWMzZFpPVWxDTUc5VFRVbG5SM0JuU1V4dVVERnZhMFpYU2pCU1p3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsW11dXQ== https://tineye.com/search/f1ca5ef5448471c8e2a5734b1be8733eef51c514?sort=score&order=desc&page=1, the only upload of this user in over 3 years and with weird file name and descr. and user name. supposed copyvio. Mateus2019 (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FNB MOVIE POSTER.jpg

[edit]

2023 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this poster was photographed and designed by me, the director and producer of the movie Friday Night Blind. I have rights to this image and poster 2603:6000:B800:1BB2:10E0:6251:F2D6:3F3B 21:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then please send a permission by e-mail to the address specified in COM:VRT. --Rosenzweig τ 08:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; can be restored if FridayNightBlind confirms identity with VRT. —holly {chat} 21:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mikelcoffee GreeceIMG20210.jpg

[edit]

Now this one seems to be quite an interesting case. Here we have a cup of a specific brand (Mikel) with its logo on it (not a simple or generic one) along with some art themed background, belonging to its respective owner, in this case the artist or designer behind it. Greece has no FOP and is considered to be pretty strict-tough in regards to copyrights protection. What applies here? 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 21:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please elaborate further as to why this photo is being nominated for deletion? I'm still uncertain about the reasoning. It would also be helpful to understand the parameters for future reference. Many thanks HermiK2207 (talk) 21:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PACKAGING. —holly {chat} 21:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Nicolas Greschny

[edit]

Delete, copurighted material. The painter Nicolas Greschny died in 1985.

Traumrune (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not agree for the deletion of files:
File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (12).jpg – the main object is the altar, the works of Nicolas Greschny are in the background
File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (13).jpg – the theme of this photo is the chancel as whole, the works of Nicolas Greschny are just a part of this theme
Thank you for your understanding, Tournasol7 (talk) 19:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except for the two mentioned by Tournasol7 as they appear to be de minimis. —holly {chat} 21:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1976 UT.png

[edit]

This file is unused and is replaced with a SVG file 2603:6010:F006:964B:1D11:4BE4:A8A8:E8E6 14:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see which file replaced it. We can still use png versions of files regardless. Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Abzeronow. --Ellywa (talk) 22:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1976 UT.png

[edit]

PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; this file is unusable with the state's shape being so wrong. The replacement file is File:Utah Presidential Election Results 1976.svg —holly {chat} 21:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Døving kapell minnestein.JPG

[edit]

Friend's photo used without permission. Erik den yngre (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik den yngre: Would it be possible for you to get your friend to release it under a free license? —holly {chat} 21:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Holly Cheng Sorry, no. Erik den yngre (talk) 21:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NM1996(3).jpg

[edit]

JPG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1996.svg GraydenCat (talk) 00:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NM1996(3).jpg

[edit]

The JPEG version has simplified many of the county borders and is replaced with File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1996.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & also not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NM1988(3).jpg

[edit]

JPG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1988.svg GraydenCat (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NM1988(3).jpg

[edit]

The JPEG version has simplified many of the county borders and is replaced with File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1988.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & also not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Døving kapell minnestein2.JPG

[edit]

Used without permission, realize that photo did not belong to me. Erik den yngre (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination at request of uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Koca husrev.jpg

[edit]

No creation date nor the artist information. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Changed licensing to PD-old-assumed. May be old enough. --Bedivere (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo panel of Makino Tomitaro 2023-05-25.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The copyright on the two photos used for the panel and the flag has apparently expired in Japan. The brief texts on the flag do not seem to be copyrightable. Therefore, there would be no copyright infringement concerning this picture. -- Asanagi (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the panel it reads 写真提供 牧野一浡氏 ("Photo provided by Mr Kazuoki Makino"): Given that Mr Makino, who is a grandson of Tomitaro Makino, serves as a curator at the Makino Memorial Garden, we need to prove the copyright of the photo is actually expired; otherwise, I would  vote delete per COM:PCP. Yasu (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and COM:PCP. --Bedivere (talk) 00:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New DesignSpark Mechanical logo.jpg

[edit]

Revisions can be uploaded to the existing file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DSM_logo.jpg This separate file is not needed. Rds10 (talk) 10:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment There's no reason why we can't keep historical versions of logos. —holly {chat} 19:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stefan-Kölbl.jpg

[edit]

Request by the author and the person depicted V72 (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please demonstrate the author and person depicted, as you state, have requested the deletion and then we may reconsider (if at all). --Bedivere (talk) 00:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Egypt 2020 parliamentary election 16.png

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original uploader of the file. The file is a screenshot of the YouTube video under a Creative Commons license. The screenshot contains a poster for one of the Egyptian Parliament’s election committees in 2020.

The poster bears:

▶ the electoral committee number (185) and other information for guidance to citizens. ▶ the logo of the National Elections Authority in Egypt ▶ the flag of the Arab Republic of Egypt. ▶ the logo of the Beheira Governorate is “one of the governorates of Egypt” ▶ a picture of the President of Egypt..

The file is used exclusively in the articles of the free encyclopedia on the Egyptian parliamentary elections for the purpose of clarifying indicative data that was hanging on the wall in one of the electoral committees in Egypt in 2020 in the Beheira Governorate in Egypt.

The file does NOT have any focus on one of the elements separately from the rest of the elements on the instructional poster.

--Masry1973 | مصري1973 (talk) 15:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 00:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spartan Daily Logo.jpg

[edit]

Per the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SammySpartan, I am re-nominating this logo for deletion. To sum up, the logo was not made in 1934, its first appearance was in 2018, and with the image I am not sure if this is below TOO. Spinixster (talk) 14:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The only copyrightable portion of the logo is the graphic of the tower, which actually made its debut on January 22, 2015 (compare previous issue -- they seem to change their logo every year), and that's definitely above TOO US. —holly {chat} 21:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It may be reuploaded without the tower graphic, which is above TOO in the US. --Bedivere (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prato dalla vetta della Retaia.jpg

[edit]

Author: mafaldi source: https://www.wikiloc.com/hiking-trails/dai-bifolchi-per-casa-bastone-fino-alla-vetta-della-retaia-e-del-cantagrilli-41939825/photo-27307316 ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Looney tunes careta.png

[edit]

Copyright infrigment (incorrectly spelled as growing pains) https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopyrig3281213li/page/154/mode/1up?view=theater Bacromisee (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC) Replace with this (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Looney_tune_cartoon.png) or this (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1962_Looney_Tunes_intro.jpg) on wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looney_Tunes#--Bacromisee (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also the others files in Category:Crowing Pains must be deleted. Andr€a (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bacromisee: Could there have been a cartoon called "Growing Pains"? —holly {chat} 22:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Title card of the work is "Crowing Pains", not "Growing Pains" as registered and stated by nominator. The request for deletion is invalid. --Bedivere (talk) 03:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Telebasel TV Studio 1.jpg

[edit]

no panorama of freedom, no permisson visible, beside of this: this image looks like a copyvio Alabasterstein (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


A Tom Wunderer (Tom Luigi Wunderer is the uploader) seems to an employee at Telebasel. But I am pretty sure a studio is not a public place, there fore no FoP in Switzerland. Leaning to delete.Paradise Chronicle (talk) Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tom Wunderer is uploader and a member of the managing board, it is not clear or evident that he is the photographer. Alabasterstein (talk) 12:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Besides the lack of metadata, I don't see what can be copyrightable in this photograph. The lack of FOP for interiors doesn't mean that any photo of an interior should be deleted. --Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The reason is not because of FOP, see above. This image is for sure a professionell image of an professionell photographer, and this was not mentioned by the uploader, which is a member of the managing board, and unlikely he was the photographer. Alabasterstein (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ruthven, I also think we can AGF here. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Huang Yongyu.png

[edit]

Although this image was extracted from a youtube video which was posted by China News Service and properly licensed under Creative Commons, there's no evidence to suggest that CNS is the one who created this image in the first place instead of just using it in their video announcing the death of Huang Yongyu. DS (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. If I see it correctly, the image was extracted somewhere around 0:21 of the video (I can't link it here due to the spam filter so here's a screenshot), which is a piece of 3D art sculpture (notice that the foot extendes out of the rectangle frame of the rest). This theory is likely (not 100% certainty but over 70%) supported by this article which uses "黄永玉像" (the word 像 refers to a sculpture or statue, for example 自由女神像 is Statue of Liberty). I'll note that unfortunately I cannot find the original author of the sculpture though. S5A-0043Talk 14:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per the article that S5A-0043 links to, this appears to be a large photo that was on display at the Huang Yongyu Art Museum of Jishou University. Thus, while CNS can release its own video under a CC-BY license, that cannot cover this photo, and we would need a release from the actual photographer. —holly {chat} 21:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LILU Rathaus1.jpg

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary, but non-permanent artwork, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramafrei aufgenommen
In der Schweiz dürfen Werke, die sich bleibend auf allgemein zugänglichem Grund befinden, frei abgebildet werden. Die Abbildung darf laut Gesetzestext «angeboten, veräussert, gesendet oder sonst wie verbreitet werden» (Art. 27 Abs. 1 URG – Werke auf allgemein zugänglichem Grund). Netpilots (talk) 03:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kriterium «bleibend» erfüllt?? Martin Sg. (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, denn wenn der Lebensdauer des Werkes nicht über die Ausstellungsdauer hinausgeht könnte man das so sagen. "Das Kunstwerk war während seiner gesamten Lebensdauer im öffentlichen Raum." Peli (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pelikana and Netpilots: Per COM:FOP Switzerland, it seems that there is some controversy about what is considered permanent, with the majority view that "the (objective) intent of the copyright holder is to indefinitely present the work in/at a publicly-accessible place". What Peli describes seems to be the minority view, where the work is there for the entire lifetime of a temporary exhibition. I don't think we can go with a minority view here. —holly {chat} 21:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I agree with Holly, I don't think we can go with the minority view that FOP is applicable to temporary displays such as this. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

[edit]

Architect is Max Dudler, how is still alive. Up today we don't have a permission from Max Dudler. Freedom of panorama does not apply to interior shots in Germany. See also previous discussions.

Lukas Beck (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The proposal to accept photos inside train stations in Germany has not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . It was finalized after this DR was started. So regrettably, these photos have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

[edit]

Copyright protection! German freedom of panorama does not apply for interior shots. The architect is Max Dudler, who is still alive.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, I revised my desicion, per this discussion on my talk page. , the ceiling it is not simple blue, it is a starry sky based on creative design. Ping User:IronGargoyle for courtesy. -- Ellywa (talk) 07:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

[edit]

Photo's of this starry ceiling are uploaded again and again. This is not allowed, the design is still copyrighted, and there is no FOP in Germany. Photos inside train stations in Germany have in addition not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . Therefore these images should be deleted imho.

Ellywa (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"there is no FOP in Germany". Wrong. 100% wrong. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No FOP for building interiors!!! Lukas Beck (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not what you wrote! Be clear in what you write! We talk about difficoult problems here, so there's no space for unclearness. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcus Cyron it seems clear in the law itself that German FoP does not apply to all interior architectures. From the law itself (in English translation): "(1) It is permitted to reproduce, distribute and make available to the public works located permanently on public paths, roads or open spaces. In the case of buildings, this authorisation only extends to the façade." Only building exteriors can be freely photographed and shared commercially on the Internet stock archives like Commons, Flickr, Unsplash etc. with legality from German law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you not willing to understand? "there is no FOP in Germany" was written. This is definetly wrong. Untrue. And again, also for you: We talk about difficoult problems here, so there's no space for unclearness! Marcus Cyron (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the wording makes buildings the exception, not the rule? Like: the rule is you can photograph everything that is in public space. The only thing that you can not photograph despite it being a permanent public space are interiors of buildings. But anything other than buildings can be photographed even if it's the interiors of that "something". Are train (or metro) stations/platforms "buildings"? They don't have a façade — does that mean that they are not buildings? They are also permanently publicly accessible and they serve (at least occasionally) as underpasses (or overpasses) and thus are "paths"? So, do they fall under the "rule" or do they fall under the "exception" that specifically only applies to "buildings"? I would call a metro station a "building". It's rather a "tunnel". And in Germany, metro stations usually aren't accessed through a building-like structure either. There are just stairs on the street that lead downstairs like to an underpass. The stations also often have an exit on both sides — just like "tunnels". The stations are also just platforms within a metro tunnel. It's like an underground road for a metro, where the station is not a "building" of its own but just a "pit stop" / parking space for metros. It's just a niche within a tunnel. And tunnel interiors would fall under FoP I'd think because they are basically just roads with a ceiling; they are not buildings. Nakonana (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to the building regulations (Musterbauordung) train stations are buildings through the permission process is different to other buildings. In the fee schedule (HOAI) they are not in the building category as they have their own category. But they are not public places like streets as they are owned by a public company and not directly by a public authority and they are not declared as public streets. GPSLeo (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The reversal above is clearly wrong. Sometimes we adhere too much to consistent decisions even when the past decisions were clearly wrong. Just having pinpoint lights in a ceiling is not sufficiently creative. Note that there is nothing artistic about their placement. It is a simple repeating pattern. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete -- I don't think it has to be a complex painting or the like. Sometimes it's also a simple but creative idea what counts, and in case of a "starry sky"-like ceiling of an underground station it's definitely a creative idea. And yes, according to German law interior shots, including public interiors, are not FoP-covered. @Marcus Cyron: does Wikimedia Deutschland do any effort to get German FoP laws amended in more liberal direction for us? --A.Savin 08:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think there are definitely efforts in the background. There was also the idea that we need to bring this question to the court in some way but in the past there was not a singe known case where the architect of a train or underground station tried to enforce the copyright on the building. GPSLeo (talk) 09:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How should I know? I don't have any ties to this club anymore. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand. --A.Savin 18:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I doubt this is over COM:TOO Germany. Is it more complex than this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There I see only a {{PD-textlogo}}. Yes definitely, architectural design is more complex anyway. --A.Savin 20:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @A.Savin perhaps Rosenzweig is still a member of Wikimedia Deutschland? I have to admit, while Germany is the birthplace of FoP and an antithesis of France which is against commercial FoP, the FoP law does seem outdated and only applicable to the era before the prevalence of information technology and digital media. In particular, German courts tend to not give FoP rights to photographers who use drones or helicopters to photograph works from air. The German FoP, by its essence, is almost the same as its incarnation during much of the 20th century (and was originally giving rights to painters who reproduce buildings and sculptures in their paintings and then to sell those paintings without permissions from architects or sculptors). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not a Wikimedia member. --Rosenzweig τ 08:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also wouldn't say that the ceiling is star-like. Those just round LED lamps in a blue-painted ceiling. They don't have a star-shape (in the way that stars are often represented in art 🌟 ). It's also not a starry sky because you can't see stars when the sky is blue; you can only see them at night when the star is nearly black; and stars have "random" placement, they don't come in lines and rows like here. Would you still say that it is a starry sky or a creative ceiling if the ceiling was painted light blue (like during day time) or even red/orange to represent sunset? Nakonana (talk) 12:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep A blue ceiling with small white dots in pretty much the most square/generic pattern possible, and as such far below the TOO. Weather the (obvious) intent is to depict a night sky or anything else is irrelevant, what matters is the work itself and that is too simple. If the copyright paranoia vigilance is too stong, we can also crop out the sky. ~TheImaCow (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Cropping the ceiling won't help at all. It is the design as a whole which matters in term of possible copyright. Including: the ceiling, the lighting, the walls, the columns... etc.pp. --A.Savin 21:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Per COM:UA, Germany has a higher threshold of originality for applied art, and this remains a VERY simple design. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gnom: would this be below the ToO? Abzeronow (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Abzeronow: I think we would have a hard time arguing that the design of the Museumsinsel station is below the threshold of originality under German copyright law, which is why photos of it have been regularly deleted for quite some time.
    While I am here, I should note that the statement quoted by @IronGargoyle is incorrect, Germany abandoned the special threshold of originality for applied art in 2013 (which did not include architecture in the first place). If you want to know more about this, you can read my PhD thesis which discusses this exact legal question... XD Gnom (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion, previous DRs were correct and the starry ceiling is copyrightable. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

[edit]

For the same reason as all other deletion requests before. There is no FoP for interior views in Germany.

Lukas Beck (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das verstehe ich nicht. Author von diesen Design braucht Geld um solche Fotos zu posten? Ich dachte es ist Ehre und Reklame für ihm.
Also, es gilt für alle U-Bahn Stationen in Deutschland? Penguin9 (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Deutschland haben wir diese Einschränkung betreffend Innenaufnahmen und, wie auch anderswo, wenn seit dem Tod des Autors (hier: des Architekten) noch keine 70 Jahre vergangen sind. Bedeutet: beispielsweise dieses U-Bahn-Foto ist für Commons unbedenklich, da es eine Außenaufnahme ist und für solche hierzulande in jedem Fall Panoramafreiheit gilt. Und bei Fotos von U-Bahnstationen, die von Alfred Grenander (gestorben 1931) entworfen sind, sind sowohl Außen- als auch Innenaufnahmen unbedenklich. --A.Savin 00:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and previous DRs. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yakutskoe-serebro 6.jpg

[edit]

Copyright photo. Pessimist (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure, but this might be a 1800s photo by en:Wacław Sieroszewski (1858 — 1945). Book: 
(Серошевский, Вацлав Леопольдович . Якуты : опыт этнографического исследования / В. Л. Серошевский .- 2-е изд. - Москва : [б. и.], 1993. - 713 с.)
I can not reach this book to look, but may be in PD already, first published in 1896. --Drakosh (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andy Merino.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4 Yann (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MiguelAlanCS: You tagged this for a G4 speedy. What was the previously deleted content? —holly {chat} 21:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete On the Spanish article es:Andy Merin there has been some edit warring about this image File:Andy Merino.png and Zein en una transmisión en twitch.jpg, which has been speedy deleted by User:Yann. Also File:El150.jpg has appeared on the page, which has another version with the same filename uploaded the same date. And which has been removed with the remark "No es una imagen del biografiado" (not an image of the person). So this is rather messy and I would be in favor of deleting all images. This is of no educational use, as it is uncertain who are depicted and who are the photographers of this youtuber. This persons wears glasses on their youtube channels (listed on the infobox on the Spanish article). Currently the article on Spanish Wikipedia has no photo and nobody commented, which could have helped. Ellywa (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Ellywa, out of scope for Commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IvanBarvinokOtamanOst.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photo violate painter copyright. There is no information on the dating or authorship of the original painting, so there is no confirmation whether this painting corresponds to PD-Art. Derivatives of work - photo non-free painting. Seva Seva (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. This is a 17th Century portrait, by an unknown painter, and is housed at the Barvinkove Museum of Regional Ethnography. It was discovered by Ukrainian ethnographer Ivan Plys in the Poltava region in the 1950s. See reference from the Kharkive Regional Library publication:[1] Note: I have updated the corrected information on the page. --Very trivial (talk) 01:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I also thought so at first. But I did not find any source that would date this particular image or something similar to the 17th century. The fact is that portraits of the 17th century in Ukraine are a great rarity. So I have doubts about the above for two reasons:
    1. there is no confirmation that the portrait is dated to the 17th century. Such portraits usually attract the attention of iconographers and this is a rather popular direction of Ukrainian historical science (see [7][8][9][10] and others). In addition, the portrait itself is not similar to the works of artists in the then Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Category:17th-century portrait paintings from Poland). This especially applies to clothes (see examples of baroque portraits in the "Sarmatism" style: Category:Sarmatian portraits);
    2. the founder and first director of the above-mentioned museum is the artist Ivan Plys (1906-1982), so this image may well be a reproduction (in the publication of the regional library you cited on pages 38-39 there is a biography of Plys, where it is said that he made many paintings of his hometown).
    In any case, these are all just hypotheses. That this image is a 17th century portrait is also a hypothesis. Have you found any dating of this image in authoritative sources? Seva Seva (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No, it is only your assertion that "this image is a 17th century portrait is a hypothesis" — an assertion is not a a fact. If your hypothesis is correct, at the very best, and with reservations, it might be said that "one academic/some academics" doubt the authenticity of this portrait as being from the 17th Century. And this would only be, after a similar scholarly paper to the ones you already referred to, was written specifically about this portrait.
    I would suggest that the statements made by the museum that houses the portrait, and the Kharkiv library is a higher standard of "proof" than what most of the images on Commons have... That these are not scholarly substantiated statements, that is true, but I don't believe that Commons requires such a high standard of proof (ie an academic paper discussing the actual image) for every image...
    Thanks for the links to the documents — they are certainly interesting, and this area of investigation is sadly neglected. Personally, I do wish that more people (especially with an academic background) would devote their knowledge and efforts to writing more articles about aspects of Ukrainian art - this subject is very poorly covered. --Very trivial (talk) 23:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have no doubt that Plys found a 17th century portrait. I doubt this photo is a photo of 17th century portrait. I meant that I couldn't find a portrait that resembled this file in the library edition mentioned above. It says simply, quote: "In the 1950s, I. Plys was find in Poltava, where he was on a business trip, an old portrait of the Cossack Ivan Barvinok by an unknown artist of the 17th century. Since then, the museum has had an image of the city's founder." (page 38). I specify my doubt:
    1. Museums often exhibit not the original, but a copy (in the link you provided to the museum’s Facebook page[2] there are:
      • copies of the works of Serhii Vasylkivskyi, the originals of which are obviously not in the local history museum of a small town[3];
      • a one of copy of Bohdan Khmelnytsky portrait, the original of which located in Moscow[4];
      • the painting "The Cossack Went to War", the original of which is kept in the National Art Museum of Ukraine[5], etc.
    2. Plys was an painter, so he could make a copy for a museum. Іn the aforementioned article it is written: "Plys as artist deserves special attention. In the work of Ivan Oleksiiovych, two themes prevailed. The first is the theme of the Cossack past of the Barvinkove region. The Zaporizhia antiquity beckoned, drew him like a magnet. Ivan Plys felt himself a guardian of history, created images of glorious ancestors, so that the descendants do not forget ancestors." (also page 38),
    3. I have not found a source where this image (File:IvanBarvinokOtamanOst.jpg) is signed "Portrait of the 17th century".
    Seva Seva (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I take your point. Perhaps it would be better to directly contact the museum for clarification, though, being a small regional one, they may not be in a position to offer an academic investigation. Are you are better placed to contact them? I don't live in Ukraine, though I could message them via FB. --Very trivial (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't have a FB account, I will try to find them in other social networks. Seva Seva (talk) 07:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Very trivial and Seva Seva: Any update on this? —holly {chat} 21:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I was unable to contact the museum. In addition, I managed to get access to the largest academic catalogs of ukrainian portraits of the 16th-18th centuries (Ucraina - Terra Cosacorum: an illustrated history of the Ukrainian Cossacks in 5175 illustrations and Ukrainian portrait of the 16th-18th centuries: catalog-album). There is no portrait in any of these books. Seva Seva (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ↑ http://old.region.library.kharkov.ua/Kalendar_2016.pdf
  2. ↑ https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid0xWhK8CXxiufmz76Vh7Sf3H6aNtaziAKB1YwLNZmusp5Bn4Z4qvudMM5cmjouqSavl&id=102422538430281
  3. ↑ see
  4. ↑ variations:
  5. ↑ Encyclopedia of the history of Ukraine

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I think we're safe with this. Yes, it might be recent, but that's true of most art works we keep. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/17&oldid=868804579"