This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete all. Self-promotional and out of COM:SCOPE. In addition, the uploader appears to be the subject of many of the photos that were likely taken by someone else, so the claims of "own work" (for the non-selfies) appear to be false. Marbletan (talk) 15:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete user’s only contributions to either Commons or Wikipedia are stupid edits/uploads/personal pages about breasts. I didn’t know it was possible to get sick of seeing breasts so quickly, but this user proved me wrong. Dronebogus (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep cropping larger images down to bust-length, or cropping an image down to a specific body part to illustrate that part, isn’t inherently disruptive irregardless of why it’s done. Dronebogus (talk) 04:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete as copyright violation. For live music performance video to be free licensed, the performance and underlying musical compositions must be free licensed or PD, not just the video shot. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete. Most of these images are unlikely to be usable for educational content. Notes on specific images follow:
File:Shoko-asahara courtroom sketch AI.png was in use across a number of wikis on articles about Shoko Asahara and should not be, as it is not a real image of that person. I've removed it from the Wikidata entry; hopefully that should propagate to the articles which used it.
Keep indiscriminate nomination. Most of these are easily in scope. They illustrate video game genres, social issues, tropes in LGBT manga and anime, etc. or are just unremarkable images of things like anime women in hijabs or JK Rowling. a few are out of scope or problematic but that’s an overwhelming minority. I think this should be closed as a bad mass nomination and the nominator can re-nominate ones they can actually think of a legitimate specific reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nominator has not provided specific rationale(s) for deletion. All indiscriminately listed images glanced over seem fine and various seem useful. File:Farm sim AI.jpg and File:Jk rowling sketch AI.png are good examples of an images to keep, regarding the latter drawings/artworks showing specific well-known people are not prohibited. However, some of these images are low-quality because they include AI misgeneration (without being educational in regards to AI misgeneration or an early stage of AI art). --Prototyperspective (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: most, some individual images Deleted per discussion. No consensus to delete all en mass; no prejudging relisting individual images or specific subgroups of images for more specific reasons. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Renominating a subset of images from the previous discussion.
Out of scope: These are all unused AI-generated images of women wearing head scarves (hijab). Commons has an adequate supply of real images of this subject, and these images are fairly low quality - all of the women in the pictures have doll-like faces and gigantic eyes. There's no foreseeable circumstance where these images would be preferable to a real image of the subject.
(I've left out one image - File:Hijab AI.png - which was in use on ckbwiki. I'm uncertain if the author actually intended to use an AI-generated image on that page, or if another image would be preferable.)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope as unusably low quality - nonsense jewelry and clothing, and it's supposed to be a named religious figure but it's just a blue-skinned generic anime guy
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Low quality AI images (everything looks too smooth and shiny, like plastic), which illustrate a concept for which a freely licensed photograph could easily be obtained.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unusable due to glare. Additionally possible COPYVIO as the site linked is “all rights reserved.” Alas possible advertising for saif tour operator. 178.24.248.5110:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment: There are probably hundreds of web pages which use this logo version, and I couldn't find one version with a copyright notice anywhere, and I also couldn't find anything in the copyright renewal logs. What would be a reliable "proof"? TheImaCow (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: Unused, unlabeled screenshots of photos from Facebook or Twitter, likely without permission. (See also previous files by User talk:Delluser911 that got deleted).
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This was an image of myself Mwelwa Nkuta that i uploaded when i was younger. it has no context and use on wikipedia and i am requesting that it be deleted. Mwelwa Nkuta (talk) 21:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Small web-resolution photo of person who died in 2020 with claim it is from 2022. Uploader seems to have a history of copyright violations and false claims of being the creator/copyright holder. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by FatalFit as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete supposed author Raphael.concorde has since been indef blocked on Commons and en:w for hoaxes, copyright violations, and dishonest photo manipulation. No evidence of actual free license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All of these images are noneductional fan art created by AI images. Plus most (if not all of them) lack information about what prompts were used to generate the images, which is a requirement for AI generated to be hosted on Commons. So the images should be deleted as OOS unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary, and by evidence I don't mean vague handwaving nonsense about the technology or anything else along those lines.
Delete some of the excessive cyberpunk girl images at the first half of this overly indiscriminate list as well as some of the Dream by WOMBO images in the middle but Keep those that were in use and the higher quality ones at the bottom in general
The user objects to AI images in general and I've never seen them vote for anything but indiscriminately for delete in DRs. Moreover, no valid deletion rationale has been provided but instead a provably false statement fan art created by AI images. The user still hasn't looked up definitions of fan art.
Image on the right is the nearly only if not only art image on WMC showing homelessness and is useful for modern cyberpunk digital art / subjects, in particular possibly the only cyberpunk image of the cyberpunk genre without neon lights which often as a misconception seems required in cyberpunk art. It's also one of the few dystopian modern digital art images. There are very few images of Cities in science fiction art despite that it is a notable subject. The same goes for social science fiction. The image can for example be useful in a visual illustration of cyberpunk being dystopia, not LED lights and it's one of the few images that have not just the prompt but also the parameters, negative prompt and so on.
Usefulness in brief: where this file is in use I wrote "Illustration of the cyberpunk genre, a street scene without e.g. neon lights which are present in most if not all comparable free media depicting the genre"
The second image on the right, also in use and even three times COM:INUSE, is the first art image on WMC about climate change if except for 3 images of one study that I uploaded earlier; Category:Climate fiction. It can help illustrate Climate change in fiction (possibly also 'cyberpunk and climate change') among other things.
I'm not going to respond to every nonsensical, ill relevant thing you've said. Except I'll point out that i've told you multiple times now in more then a few discussions that I have zero issue with AI artwork in general. So you attacking for supposedly having that opinion is beyond ridiculous, if not bordering on bullying at this point. Secondly, I'd appreciate it if your going to comment DRs that I've started if you skip the walls of copy pasted text with multiple off-topic, vague bullet points and just say why you think the images should be kept in a concise way. Just doing rambling handwaving about art genres isn't really helpful. Nor is it an effective way to convince people the images should be kept. It certainly convince me of anything. Really, it's just useless noise. So please skip it and just make point next time. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adamant1, you are calling legitimate, civil criticism of your frequent bad arguments “bullying” yet hypocritically dismissing anything Proto has just said with insulting, condescending language like “I'm not going to respond to every nonsensical, ill relevant thing you've said.” rambling handwaving” “useless noise.” I get the feeling you don’t actually care about quality of arguments here and will w:wp:bludgeon your opposition to any votes that disagree with you. Dronebogus (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: Just to cite a few of the many comments Prototyperspective has made about me in regards to this "the user seems to be fed up with AI images", "The user is opposed to AI images", "that it can be useful is enough of a reason to not ban it based on your unsubstantiated assumptions and quite clear anti AI bias." Sorry, but repeatedly saying someone has a clear anti AI bias or anything else along those lines isn't "legitimate, civil criticism." Especially since I've told Prototyperspective many times now that I have zero issue problems with AI artwork. I'm also not really sure what your talking about in regards to me w:wp:bludgeon votes that disagree with me since there's plenty of DRs, including one's voted in, where I haven't responded to people I disagree with. Including Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hyju where you weirdly made the same sparious accusation even though I didn't respond to people who voted keep even though I though disagreed with their reasons. But if I tell someone to stop attacking me or writing walls of text in my own DR that must mean I just w:wp:bludgeon and any all votes I disagree with. Whatever. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming the arguments of everyone who disagrees with you are going to be “vague handwaving nonsense” isn’t particularly conducive to civil conversation. “Noneducational fan art” is also “vague handwaving nonsense”, given that they arguably are educational and are definitely not “fan art”. Dronebogus (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't assume that about "everyone who disagrees me." Just Prototyperspective because they've been making the same baseless arguments for weeks now. Prototyperspective isn't "everyone" though and I'd appreciate it if you didn't treat me like they are. As to the civility, it's a two street and Prototyperspective clearly started this off on an uncivil footing by making it about my supposed bais towards AI artwork from the onset. I'm not here to just get dragged every time I nominate an image generated by AI for deletion. Sorry. I know you have to get your digs in on me because of that one time on Wikipedia years ago though ;) --Adamant1 (talk) 18:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He literally wrote that Adamant1 objects to every AI generated image. It’s what he wrote, you don’t need to remember anything. - you can read the start of the thread. I feel I need to step in here and point out this fairly mild observation because what Adamant1 says is actually true. It would be best if the arguments could be made about the images and not about the editors who are voting. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 09:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
None of this is convincing. The image you claim depicts homelessness is a stretch, and it’s in the context of cyberpunk fantasy. It’s out of scope, so far as I’m concerned. With the image about climate fiction, I don’t see what specific work of fiction it is referring to. It just seems like a randomly generated image that took almost no effort and that has been uploaded to Commons with a very rubbery justification. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 09:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep indiscriminate mass nomination with bad arguments like “fan art”(?!) that includes in-use and in-scope images. Recently I just nominated a bunch of crappy OOS copyvios which were kept as “indiscriminate nomination” so if that gets a pass so should this. Dronebogus (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So to clarify, your partial reasoning for keeping this set of images is because of another bad deletion decision - and if that deletion discussion was a bad decision we should also make another bad decision and keep these images? If so, that’s an extraordinarily weak argument for keeping the images. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 09:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mass sweeping of AI-generated images with nonsense arguments like "fan art" (really for such a generic cyberpunk imagery?), also falsely claiming that some images (such as File:NightCitySphere (SDXL).jpg, also in-use to illustrate img2img process) lacking prompts (please read file description first, I've even included the negative prompts and parameters for completeness).--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere!22:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the couple of images that are in use. That was my bad. I thought I had checked them all. As to the images containing prompts, it's not really clear if sentences like "anime style girl in a cyberpunk world" in the description are the prompts or descriptions of the image that were added after the fact. Although I'm willing to take your word on it they were the prompts, but it's on the uploader to make it clear that's what they are and not just descriptions of the files that someone added later. As there's really no way to know with how they are currently written in the description. Admittedly it's clearer what the prompts are in your images, but then that was only one of multiple reasons I gave for why the images should be deleted. So it's not like this hinges on the files including prompts or not. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Full disclosure, I was brought here by this deletion notice on my talkpage. Rather than making a sweeping claim that all of these lack prompts and are non-educational, how about pointing out exactly which ones are lacking prompts, and which ones are non-educational? As an example, I created File:X-Y plot of algorithmically-generated AI art by different science-fiction subgenres.png, and I would like you to tell me with a straight face that it's non-educational, I don't understand why it's lumped in with the rest. Yes, there certainly is a problem with the excessive quantity of non-educational, poor quality AI-generated imagery on Commons, I don't disagree with that; my main issue with this nomination is that it's seemingly indiscriminate for all images within a particular category. I would not be opposed to deleting such images on a case-by-case basis. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs08:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Benlisquare: I said "most" of them don't have prompts. Not that all of them don't. I'd appreciate it if you didn't misconstrue what I said. The same goes for your claim that this involves "all" the images with a particular category. In fact there's about 120 images in the category and I nominated about 70 of them for deletion, which is isn't "all" of them. Regardless, there's no rule that someone can't nominate multiple files for deletion if they are all in the category and OOS. Also, I removed File:X-Y plot of algorithmically-generated AI art by different science-fiction subgenres.png from the deletion request earlier because it accidently added despite being in use. So I'm not really sure why your bringing it up. Except that you clearly couldn't be bothered to figured out what the facts or anything else where before commenting. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Calm down, I have the feeling that this is more likely than not some form of misunderstanding.
I removed File:X-Y plot of algorithmically-generated AI art by different science-fiction subgenres.png from the deletion request earlier because it accidently added despite being in use.
Then mention that? Nobody is going to comb through the edit history of every DR. The first thing I see after getting home from work is a notification that I have a new talkpage message, that's the first and only context I have available to me if you don't make it clear that you're removing specific items from the nomination.
Except that you clearly couldn't be bothered to figured out what the facts or anything else where before commenting.
Commons is a volunteer effort, by volunteers in their own personal time. Like most people, I work a 9 to 5, I'm not going to spend my own personal time combing through edit histories to make sure I understand every facet of what the nomination is all about, it's your job to make your intentions clear in the nomination itself. Because you've told me on my user talkpage that you intend to delete one of the files I've uploaded, you clearly have not made your intentions clear. The miscommunication is probably on you, but at least we've cleared things up now. Striking my original keep vote. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs08:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then mention that? Nobody is going to comb through the edit history of every DR. I just did in the comment your replying to. Nobody expects anyone to comb through the edit history of ever DR. I know I don't, which is why I let you know that the file isn't included in the DR anymore to begin with ;)
it's your job to make your intentions clear in the nomination itself. I think I did that adequately enough when I said all of the files should be deleted because they are noneducational fan art" and that some of them don't include the prompts, which is a requirement. If something about that wasn't clear to you or if you thought I didn't explain something good enough, cool. Just say so. I'm more then happy to explain anything that needs explaining. It seemed clear enough to me at the time though and I'm not a mind reader. Deletion requests aren't suppose to be in-depth essays about every facet of the files histories or guidelines. I have other stuff to do myself. It's not my job, nor do I have the time, to explain everything in minor detail just so people won't claim the nomination is indiscriminate (when it isn't) just because they can't be bothered to read the guidelines or ask me about something that they aren't clear on. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Go upload your AI artwork to Flickr or something if you can't handle a couple of your images being deleted. That's not my problem though and I don't deserve to be insulted just because other people thought your uploads weren't educational. There's plenty of AI generated images that I didn't and probably will ever nominate for deletion. So in no way does this have anything to do with hostility towards AI. Whatever helps you cope though. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete contributors are uploading these AI generated images with very rubbery justifications. If they want to upload interesting AI art, I do agree with Adamant1 that they should use a file upload service like Flickr. I’m sure there are some cases where AI generated art might be useful, but I am not at all convinced that the ones above have been done with enough care or understanding about the purpose of Commons. They are absolutely out of scope and IMO, should be deleted. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
before I forget - I’d like to know what the images of the cyberpunk girls were based on. These are almost certainly derivative works of existing artwork - we don’t know the original training data the images were generated from, but I’ll bet your bottom dollar they weren’t free images! It seeems antithetical to Commons we would let this stand! Similar to how we don’t allow Fair Use images, despite the fact they may be transformative, I can see that we could get legitimate objections from artists that these generated images are derived from copyrighted material! - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 09:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple of them were not merely "interesting AI art". I'd like to know if your vote also applies to the cyberpunk city without neon lights / dystopia illustration image File:Toxic acidic rain in the city, cyberpunk.png if you read my first bullet point on why it would be useful above. I also think the cyberpunk girl images that don't have a prompt attached should be deleted (imo just not all but multiple), but pls be aware that you voted to delete all. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That info is in the file description. I created this using Imagine where I continuously adjusted the prompt over ~40 generations to then use the resulting image as input along with the second prompt there. The caption clarifies it's Stable Diffusion. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: No consensus to delete all en-masse. (I note 4 images in this listing have already been deleted for separate deletion requests elsewhere.) No prejudging relisting individual images or more carefully grouped subsets of images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete. I am not sure where the copyright statement you are referring to is, but this photograph is a derivative work of the painting in any case. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Likely license laundering. The Flickr album with only 5 images (the ones here) that are uploaded to Commons in less than 24 hours after they are uploaded to Flickr by 3 different Commons accounts that are blocked in eswiki for being sock puppets.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete. YouTube user may have free licensed this video, but no reason to think they have authority to license the live music the band is seen and heard performing. (Scope may be arguable, but seems clear copyright violation.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Agree with Oxyman to keep that one; mundane but documentary of street fashion of time and place. (Description and file name can be changed, not deletion issues.) -- 16:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infrogmation (talk • contribs)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Maybe, but that’s no reason to delete the image, just a reason to rename the image to a more descriptive name which is less liable to be misunderstood. Also the description could be expanded. --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No verifiable source provided to determine the date of creation, no evidence of publication 70 or more years ago, unknown author and anonymous one are not the same. Komarof (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Marbletan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see [3], same picture:
Metadata suggests the author as "Atelier Oi". 0x0a (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Uploader looks like an account representing and promoting the company Atelier Oï, so rather than my initial tagging as "copyvio" this is probably better handled as "permission needed" from the individual photographer or the copyright holder. Same applies to other uploads from this account. Marbletan (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). Circa 1920 German postcard. Could be public domain, but without knowing what the back side looks like, it's difficult to tell if truly anonymous. Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We have over 1,000 postcards from Germany with no attributed photographer. The few we have that are attributed are not this style and not this era. --RAN (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unbedint behalten, die Löschung ist nicht gerecht. DIe Postkarte ist ungelaufen, ein Fotograf ist nicht erkennbar!E s ist noch nicht bei Wikipedia verwendet ,dien Karte ist "gemeinfrei, ich habe keinen Rechte daran,sie ist Bestandteil meiner Sammlung.Gueson@ Gueson (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translate of Gueson's comment says "Keep it unconditionally, deletion is not fair. The postcard is unused, a photographer cannot be identified! It has not yet been used on Wikipedia, the card is in the public domain, I have no rights to it, it is part of my collection. Gueson" Abzeronow (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep It is a crop from an image with three people, it identifies the correct person. If we get a higher resolution version we can upload over it. --RAN (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The author is not Anton Bakov (who is depicted), but Mikhail Filippov (see EXIF). No evidence that photographer's permission has been received and reviewed by VRT agents (see talk page). Komarof (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
EXIF is not an evidence. But you are correct that Anton Bakov is not the author and this should be corrected. Anton Bakov is the holder of rights, and not author. There was no possibility to see EXIF while uploading. If you are trying to say that I stole the photo from the Internet, this is wrong. The photo's permissions is normal, but there are surely errors in attribution, thanks for pointing that out. We will try to clarify it. in any way, OTRS agents should see the details. OTRS permission is valid. --ssr (talk) 06:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As a VRT agent that added the permission, I am also curious to see the ticket. Unfortunatelly I no longer have access to VRT. --Jarekt (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The ticket relates to {{Photos by Anton Bakov}} and @Ssr appears to have been authorised to subsequently use the given permissions for future additions in Category:Photos by Anton Bakov. The images that were then in this category and those that were populated into it by Ssr are finely under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International according to ticket. This is an old ticket nonetheless, from 2014. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any evidence on how Anton Bakov became the copyrights holder as claimed. Perhaps things were not this much complicated over a decade ago as they are now. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Aafī, this is an example of a fairly common situation when PR teams of certain individuals or users involved in undisclosed paid editing, after uploading couple of images followed by creation of a template with VRT permission, subsequently add this template without any supervision to a lot of later uploaded images. There is practically no control over the tag Ticket permission added by non-VRT member (see the first edit in the file history); no one on COM:VRTN is in a hurry to check the legality of such uploads, even after requests for verification (at least my efforts went to no avail). This is why such uploaders often behave defiantly when caught in the act - they know full well that they are violating the Commons' rules and they try to silence those who draw the attention of the community to their deliberate violations. Perhaps VRT agents should discuss this in their private chat. --Komarof (talk) 12:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Komarof and Jarekt. Files in the category should have been taken by Bakov. The holder of copyright is generally the photographer, not the subject. We need permission for this file from Mikhail Filippov. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Based on EXIF? If you base permissions on EXIF, why not "need permission for this file from" NIKON D4S, or from "1.6 APEX (f/1.74)", or from "3C7037C5FB92D1431602EC991DB604D3"? "Perhaps VRT agents should discuss this in their private chat"? -- ssr (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ssr: The EXIF metadata specifies that the "Author" is "MIKHAIL FILIPPOV". You specified that "author=Anton Bakov" and that rubin16 approved the permission for this photo in Ticket:2014122310000729 06:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC) in your edit special:diff/570244846 20:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC), almost seven years later. None of your specifications appear to be true. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
None of your statements appear to be true. EXIF metadata indicate that someone put that symbols within the camera once upon a time. We can not know what happened with the camera since then, and who and when used it while EXIF stayed the same. We can trust or not trust people that say something about conditions of making a particular photo work. EXIF may contain anything. -- ssr (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anton Bakov could be the copyright holder, but we need more than a vague statement. We need to know how he acquired the copyright of these images. Yann (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is pretty much my observation. Anton Bakov could be the copyright holder, but we need more than a vague statement. I do not find such a supportive statement in entire ticket. @Komarof, I take your note that VRT agents need to show more vigilance. I lean towards Delete. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fake magazine cover created by an AI generator. I don't think it should be kept even if it's being used because it intentionally miss-represents the subject and there's no reason images that don't do so can't be added to where it's being used instead. Adamant1 (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While COM:INUSE seems to be increasingly dismissed or marginalized, the policy is clear in this case. It does not misrepresent anything and no valid deletion nomination has been provided which also seems to be of little importance when it comes to AI images in particular. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be interested to know how exactly it's not misrepresenting anything when it's being used in the kk.wikipedia article for Cosmopolitan magazine as if it's a real magazine cover when it isn't one. That's clearly misrepresenting things. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That it's misrepresenting something is a good point but not a good point pro deletion but pro changing the file title, categories, and description. The notable magazine made this image to illustrate AI usage for magazine covers and there's even media coverage of this particular image. Moreover, it's COM:INUSE and not just on kk.wikipedia. The use on the Kazakh WP indeed seems misleading so I'll post on the talk page of where it's used and ask for it to be removed from the article. After that is done and/or assuming that it will be removed, doesn't change that the image is in use even more than once (and also clearly notable as just explained). Prototyperspective (talk) 11:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an example image which was used as an illustration in an online-only article; it is not an actual magazine cover. Actual covers for this date range can be seen at [4]; there was never an "AI issue". Omphalographer (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just an FYI, but pinging people who you know will probably side with you in a deletion request really isn't a good faithed, appropriate way to do things. Really you should know that considering how you criticized another users lake of competence in a separate DR. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This not being a hardline vote doesn't make your behavior appropriate. And I'm going to interact with you as long as you keep disrespecting me or process in deletion requests that I initiated. Otherwise be my guest and go participate in another area. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: Not at all. Its your prerogative how you want to vote, but people don't tend to ping people in DRs who disagree with them. That's a general thing to, which has nothing to do with you or how you vote. I probably could have written the comment clearer though. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7: It was being used on the Kazakh language Wikipedia article for Cosmopolitan and if I'm reading things right, the image was apparently removed by a random editor on their end. Not surprising really. There's no reason Wikipedia editors would want misleading AI artwork to be in articles anymore then (I assume) we would. Although I guess there's way less to justification for keeping the image now that it's not being used anywhere. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By going to the archived page of the image, and checking the revision history of the pages where it was in use. It was in use four times. One time was Kazakh WP article where the use was misleading so I asked on the talk page to have it removed which was promptly done. Three more uses on hebrew WP remained and I don't know who and why they were removed.
The image is clearly notable and educationally useful, it was even covered by media reports. Lots of images on WMC can be used in misleading ways, that doesn't make them intrinsically misleading; I suggest moving the file to a title like "Fake magazine cover made using AI by Cosmopolitan magazine". WP:RS news reports about this historically relevant and illustrative image: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Most policy evasions start small and result in the decay of establishes rules and order. INUSE does not specify that only uses that match which uses WMC users had in mind when they briefly thought about the image are legitimate or anything of that sort. It was objectively not a "hoax image" as claimed but a demonstration that is notable. To the law everybody is equal and I think policies are similar when they don't specify otherwise. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the fact that there's a full article from Cosmopolitan about how they worked to create this image, at a very specific point in the technology's history. There is educational scope in that. If the current file description is misleading and we believe it was never literally printed as a cover (not even as a wraparound), the description can be corrected. Belbury (talk) 15:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
If you ever had a public domain view of Stavropol in the 50s or 60s on hand, it would be very useful to illustrate Mikhail Gorbachev's article. Off chance. thanks Penastal (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid, I can't. My parents arrived to Stavropol in early 80-s, my more distant ancestors didn't visit Stavropol after 1917. Tucvbif (talk) 18:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete Since it can be replaced with svg files without copyright problems, it would be safe to delete the files that may be infringed on copyright. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 09:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A quick search on Commons wikimedia reveals a number of other photos of exactly the same features which have been uploaded since 2015 by at least four different users. e.g. GL-Qaqortoq-Relief-02.jpg, GL-Qaqortoq-Relief-03.jpg, GL-Qaqortoq-Relief-04.jpg, Sculpture, Qaqortoq.jpg, Statue and House Qarqortoq Greenland.jpg, Sculpture de femme inuit.jpg Do you intend to nominate these for deletion too? Brwynog (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From a quick look, I see no need to nominate these for deletion. Was that sarcasm? The issue is not taking photos of Qaqortoq carvings. The issue is that you uploaded a number of photos that were other people's work and falsely claiming them as your own and licensing them as if you were the copyright holder when you weren't. That's why I spot checked some of your other uploads, wondering if there were more similar problems. Please just be honest and accurate in the information of anything you upload. Do not upload other people's work unless they have explicitly free licensed it and then be sure to give them proper credit. If you took all 4 of the photographs in the collage, great, you can make and license a collage of your own work as you like. (While it's not required, perhaps you'd be good enough to upload those 4 photos you took individually and in full resolution? I'm sure they'd be useful here. By the way, when correcting the information in your uploads please pay attention to accurate dates as well - if you took all 4 of those photos on 14 July 2022, good, you have correct information; if not, I suggest you fix the information.) In case you weren't being sarcastic - if you see someone else's photo you suspect of being a copyright violation, please list it here on deletion requests explaining why you think they are copyright problems. Thanks for your attention. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keltia Rok is the LP that I arranged and released through an arrangement with Recordiau Sain. I was responsible for the collation and publishing of the cover. This is not a derivative work as I was the creator.Brwynog (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All these images are un-used personal fan art created by AI generators. So they should be deleted as OOS unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. And by "evidence" I don't mean vague handwaving about how the DR is indiscriminate, weird, that the images are educational because of some unclear assertion that they can be used on random users personal blog, or any other nonsense along those lines. So I'd appreciate if people didn't waste mine or anyone else's time with it.
Keep – This is an indiscriminate nomination of lots of images that could be some of the highest-quality AI images on WMC. And that without any deletion rationale. The user seems to be fed up with AI images in general as shown in other debates and now indiscriminately nominates lots of images of categories at once despite lots if not all or most of them being useful to illustrate various subjects. The user is opposed to AI images in general and I've never seen them vote anything other than delete. The best most useful AI images are to be deleted so what's left gives misleading impressions, and seems useless. Instead of providing a proper deletion rationale, the user did nothing but handwaving, marginalizing, and dismissing in advance.
For example these images include the only ones that could be useful for…:
(most) illustrating AI tools for science fiction art & fiction purposes
(1–3, 10) helping illustrate cities in science fiction, for example reimagining cities for sustainable positive visions of the future and nearly the only images available for this subject
(2) nearly only image for public transport or transport infrastructure in scifi art or far future cities in scifi
(3) positive scifi art about cities as in solarpunk
(27) circa only image for neurotechnology in scifi art and climate change biopunk megacities
(28) only image to illustrate or help communicate the concept of potential technosignatures / artifacts on comets
some of images in between seem rather useless, that isn't a valid reason to indiscriminately delete all of these from the 100 million files of which most are not nearly as valuable as some of the only images available for whole genres on notable subjects
It is useful for illustrating subjects of art and fiction as well more broader concepts as explained above. Why would such not be valuable? We got enough photographs of the most mundane things a thousand times over by now. What's needed more are illustrations and you may have a different opinion on that but that's no reason to censor/marginalize contents you just subjectively don't like despite being educationally valuable. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Prototyperspective: Two points that I've already made in the ANU but will repeat here since you seem to have a listening problem 1. I've told you multiple times now that I don't have an issue with AI artwork in general. I just don't want images that are OOS being hosted on Commons. That's not exclusive to AI artwork though and could really care less about it outside of that. So I'd appreciate it if you stopped with the personal attacks and badgering about it. As it's just abusive.
2. I'd also appreciate it if at least DR that I've started if you don't respond to everyone who votes delete. Everyone knows what your opinion about AI artwork is and the images aren't going to be kept just because you bludgeon conversations by going off about the same vague, meaningless talking points over and over. It just makes your side look less creditable if nothing else. Same goes for the endless personal attacks. So please stop doing both of them. Otherwise just find other DRs to participate in. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay fine. I guess you reduce your volume too then in regards to number of replies (as well as of nominations)? I never made even just one personal attack but made arguments about the subject and there I was referring to AI images on WMC. I did things like asking why it would be out of scope when people just put an abbreviation there but not any explanation since I still believe at least asking for a reason would be due. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know there's no limit on how many DRs a particular user can have open at once. Although I think I've only opened like two or three having to do with AI artwork to begin with, which isn't that many. Although it wouldn't be an excuse to bludgeon discussions or personally attack me anyway. And yes you are attacking me with comments like "The user seems to be fed up with AI images" and "the user is opposed to AI images." Especially since I've repeatedly told you that's not my opinion. Although me and my personal preferences toward AI artwork aren't relevant to the DR anyway. Me and my personal opinions about it aren't "the subject" of the deletion request that your claiming is all your talking about. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then don't complain that I'm replying too much when you're commenting just as much and nominating giant numbers of files in addition. These are not personal attacks but relevant points regarding context; it can be relevant whether or not the user objects to AI images on WMC in general and votes delete in all AI-related DRs participated in. I'm not saying that is relevant or important, just that it could be so I'm very much allowed to mention this. I also thought users would provide deletion rationales not just votes so I asked for one and that's basically all I did above.
I'll stop replying to you here since all it does is distract from the clear and valid points I made for why the images should be kept and which have all been ignored so far. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it can be relevant whether or not the user objects to AI images Sure, it's relevant if a user has a history of spurious nominations related to the subject to mention that in a DR. but I don't object to AI images and that's how your treating me with the comments. It's not relevant to go off about how I object to AI images if I don't object to them in the first place! It's just a bad faithed attempt on your part to poison the well by acting like I'm just bias towards AI when that's not my position and I've told you it isn't multiple times now. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep indiscriminate mass-nomination. Most of these are in scope, illustrative of notable science-fiction subgenres and tropes just as well as human-made art. Nominator clearly doesn’t care about any arguments to the contrary and is just trying to overwhelm deletion voters with large numbers of files that superficially look like useless AI art. Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cabeza2000: , @Dronebogus: , or anyone else who thinks this is indiscriminate. I nominated these specific images for deletion for specific reasons that I've provided in my original messages and applies to all of the images and no rule saying people can't nominate multiple files for deletion at the same time. So what exactly makes this an "indiscriminate" nomination when it was done randomly and I choose specific images that my reasons for deletion all apply to? --Adamant1 (talk) 14:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have not only an issue with indiscriminate mass-nomination but also an issue with the reasons you gave for the DR, this: "un-used personal fan art created by AI generators".
Fan art? Personal fan art? The images you have listed have nothing to do with personal fan art. They are images created by AI, whenever they are art, or not, is subjective.
As for unused? Maybe they are unused at the time being but I do see value in these images, they could be used eventually, so I do not agree with the DR.
At last, the common denominator in your DR is that all images are AI generated and in that case then, IMO, you are taking the wrong approach by just raising an indiscriminate mass DR. You should instead be discussing this in the VP and propose policy changes. Then you may achieve what you want, or not, depending on what is the consensus. I actually just looked and you are already doing that, good for you. Cabeza2000 (talk) 22:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've said what these images have in common and why I nominated them for deletion several times now. Your personal opinion that the images aren't fan art doesn't make this random or mean that I didn't put judgment into what files I decided to include beforehand. And I'm not going to waste my arguing about if the images are fan-art or not since it isn't relevant to what I was asking. So does anyone else have an actual answer to my question or is the only reason it's "indiscriminate" because the people who disagree with my original reasons say it is? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: Closing as kept. Two were already deleted from other DRs, two were deleted as CSD G10 (advert), and I deleted a few as part of this closing that had especially bad generation errors, as recent DRs show a consensus for getting rid of those. The remaining files are kept, as there’s a consensus in this discussion that the nomination was too scattershot. This doesn’t prevent anyone from re-nominating the surviving files for deletion in smaller, more focused DRs with more specific arguments (and indeed this was done in the past as a way to resolve other bulk DRs). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Totally fake image of LHS 1140 b made by an AI generator. Although it's being used in a Russian language Wikipedia article, it should be deleted anyway since the usage is clearly not in good faith and the image isn't reasonably educational either. Both of which are required for any possible usage to matter. Adamant1 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the info from the uploader given below (who I think argues for a Keep too), I now think the file should be kept. This info means the image makes more sense and the many examples of comparable kept images (lots more in their categories) are quite clear in regards to whether or not this should be kept. (And whether or not it should be used is a different question.) Prototyperspective (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not "totally fake". File description clearly states that the image is AI-generated, and not "real" photo from the planet. As for the content, I'll cite the description of possible vegetation on this planet from a reliable source. «Plant life on LHS 1140b would be very different from what we know on Earth because of the radiation - if we assume plant life can exist on this planet; the radiation will completely change the photosynthesis process. “There is a lot of interesting work talking about how photosynthesis might work for plants on planets orbiting M-dwarfs,” explains Dittmann to All About Space. “Since there isn’t a lot of optical photons hitting the surface, chlorophyll might not work efficiently and maybe planets would need to find another way to get the job done.” So instead of the bright sky overlooking a nice green field on Earth, similar to the classic Microsoft Windows XP background picture, you would instead see a dimly-lit sky over a black field of grass, looking more like something out of a horror movie" (Cavendish L. Is this planet our new home? (англ.) // All About Space. — 2017. — Iss. 66. — P. 52-53). The image more or less accurately depicts "a dimly-lit sky over a black field of grass" and is not substantially different from other "artist impression" depictions of alien landscapes that are allovertheplacehereonCommons. --Agra (talk) 17:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All current speculations about possible life on exoplanets are too unreliable. Commons is for educational content, not for artwork. All the mentioned "artist impressions" should be deleted as well. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 14:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You know a bunch of those are by NASA or the IAU; also, based on your logic we should delete this and this as well. This too, because Commons is “not for artwork” and it’s just a crazy inaccurate vision of the night sky. Dronebogus (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An incorrect analogy. Photo of Van Gogh painting is entirely educational content, because it educates about a notable artwork. NASA and IAU are sufficiently reliable sources. At the same time, we have hundreds of totally fake images which just mislead readers and should be deleted. The image in question is partially based on an acceptable source, but, in my opinion, to a small degree, and doesn't contain information which is impossible to express in a short text. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to throw it out there, I don't really have an issue with the image that is sourced to ESO since it doesn't show details of the plants surface. So there isn't really anything potentially misleading about it per say. I don't think you can say that the planet probably looks like it does in this image simply because someone put some random words that sound extraterrestrial like "black unearthly vegetation" into a prompt though. We don't know what words the AI generator decided to ignore, over or under emphases, or what it's inspiration was. For all we know it could have generated the image based on only a couple of the words in the prompt and fan art of mars from DeviantArt.
It's ludicrous to act like if someone puts a couple of words into a prompt having to do with an exoplanet (or really anything else) that the result is inherently accurate though. That's not how AI art generators work. At the end of the day AI generated images aren't even consistent from one image to the next. Let alone from one generator to the next. But images of the planet directly from ESO and NASA probably will be. Or if not at it will be because of a change in the scentific understand of said planet, not because someone pushed a button and the numbers went burr. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's ludicrous to think that if someone plugs some random values into Terragen, then the result is somehow accurate. It's equally ludicrous to think if someone uses software like Celestia, then the result is somehow accurate. The same with Photoshop or any other image editing software. ALL exoplanet images, including those from ESO and NASA, are software-generated. If the result fits the description in reliable sources, then it doesn't matter how it was generated. You don't get consistent results from AIs, that's true, but you don't get consistent results from people either. If you ask two persons to draw "a dimly-lit sky with a red star over a black field of grass" you'll probably get very different results. Agra (talk) 20:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there is a consensus to delete any "artistic impression" astronomical image that does not come from reliable source (or, at least, most of them), then I don't mind deleting this image as well. But if hundreds of images like this are acceptable, this one should be too. AI art is not in any way worse than pictures some random Joe gets by plugging some random values into en:Terragen. Agra (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Agra: Be my guest and nominate other "artistic impressions" of astronomical images for deletion. I could really care less and would probably vote to delete them myself, but their current existence on the project has nothing do with the merits of this particular image being hosted on Commons or not. It's not like people couldn't make the same argument in reverse if this image is deleted but the one you linked to is ever nominated for deletion either. So the whole thing is just a circular non-argument. And if your just going to chalk this up to bias against AI artwork or whatever, I happen to have an interest in the area and there's rule that people can't nominate images related to a particular subject that they have an interest in for deletion. So it would be good if you stopped with the strawmen. It gets super tiring having to counter the same baseless claims that people are just bias towards AI artwork ad nauseum every time it comes up. -Adamant1 (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I never made any claims about your or someone else's bias. That's irrelevant. The relevant thing is that if we have thousands of similar images that are used in many different wikis, then it's a POLICY question that must be discussed project-wide, not in a DR for a single image. Agra (talk) 20:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment that AI art is not in any way worse than pictures some random Joe or that I should be nominating similar artwork for deletion along with this image kind of insinuates this has something to do with bias against AI artwork. Regardless, the existence of similar images being used on other projects isn't relevant to the merits of keeping this image or not. Like I've said, be my guest and nominate the images for deletion or start a discussion about it on the relevant talk of the policy you think needs to be changed, but your that's not my issue and has nothing to do with this. The image isn't going to be kept just because there's similar images on here. I'm not going to retract this or start a project-wide discussion about it just because you don't think the deletion request is legitimate either. Especially since your reason for thinking that clearly isn't valid to begin with. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's one perfectly solid and valid reason for keeping this image: COM:INUSE. The policy explicitly states that "a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough". And "it should be stressed that Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope". You may participate in discussion in Russian Wikipedia, if it is decided that the image should not be used in article, your arguments here may be considered in favor of deletion. But you can't overrule that project decision to use the image by starting a DR here. Agra (talk) 21:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
COM:INUSE also says "any use that is not made in good faith does not count" and I've given plenty of reason's why I don't think the usage is valid. All of you which you seem to be ignoring in favoring of Wikilawyering. I said your free to start a project-wide discussion if you think there needs to be a better consensus about it. Again, I could really care less, but there's really nothing to debate here if your not going to ignore why I said I think the image should be deleted or treat me like I should be discussing something that your the one who thinks need clarification. You could probably argue that it would be worth getting what constitutes a "good faithed use" clarified, but there's already a conversation about it on the Village Pump that seems to be either inclusive or favor my interpretation of it. And I'm not going to start yet another conversation just because you can't be bothered to either participate in the one that already exists or start a new one yourself. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that conversation I see someone making the same point as me: "if something is in use on any major Wikipedia, we have to defer to that 100%". Russian Wikipedia is one of the major ones. So, if you think that usage is not valid, go there and argue there. There are also cases when file is used "for the sole purpose of preventing its deletion on Commons" or used "just to make a point", but this is clearly not the case here, as the image was already in use six months before this DR and not to make a point. Agra (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very much agree. Note that you didn't use {{vk}} in your comment above which may be necessary or important given the strain-to-dismissal that this clear policy is currently under. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's rather hyperbolic to act like the policy is somehow getting thrown out just because of a couple DRs. Especially since all of them have involved coherent reasons why the policy shouldn't apply in those particular cases. Your free to disagree with said reasons, but it's ridiculous to act like the nominations are somehow completely ignoring the policy or an attempt at getting rid of it when they aren't. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you are completely ignoring the policy on this DR (can't say anything about the others). You make ridiculous accusations of the image being used "clearly not in good faith". Do you have anything to prove that when I added this image to Russian Wikipedia article six months ago, along with a sizable amount of text, I was not acting in good faith? Do you think Russian Wikipedia community cannot decide whether they need the image in the article or not? Why do you think that this issue should be discussed on Commons and not on Russian Wikipedia? There's a big and active community with thousands of users. There are many active administrators and Arbitration Committee. There's a discussion open about this image on the talk page of relevant article. Go there and make your case. Just don't try to accuse me there of acting "clearly not in good faith", that's not going to end well. Agra (talk) 23:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a project-wide consensus for inadmissibility of such artworks? There are hundreds if not thousands of them, and they are widely used across multiple wikis. Agra (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Look to categories of «X in art» and you can found way more controverisal pieces of «art». This image, instead, displays, how landscape of this planet may be look like. Like reconstructions of Dinosaurus or ancient towns. If this image less-or-more accurate illustrates text of article, it's a good reason for existance of it. Tucvbif (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The source YouTube video is down, and the archived version show "Video Unavailable". Also, the video is a review of a TV-set, so it has little educational value. Günther Frager (talk) 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The source YouTube video is down and the archived versions show the video is unavailable. Thus, it is imposible to perform a license review to determine whether it was published under CC-BY or not. Günther Frager (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 50 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Africa.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Dear Gbawden (A), hope you are doing well. Thank you so much for recognizing that some of files I uploaded have dubious claim of own work. Firstly, after briefly reading and understanding Commons:But it's my own work!, I deeply apologize that there are some ignorant and unintentional copyright possibilities I created in the past. In way of correcting my mistakes I aim to do positive and constructive edits in updating the summaries of all corresponding files by declaring the correct ownership. See recent changes on File:Aimable_Bayingana.jpg, If this can make the situation any better, be kind enough to let me know. Thank you so much again
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images show photo's of Roel Oostra, and are uploaded by user Roel Oostra. These photos are not selfies. To publish these photos on Commons, permission would be needed from the photographers. Please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image or media file on Commons with a free license. If successful, the images can be undeleted. Regarding the film poster, this probably is copyrighted by the film company, therefore that image should be deleted as wel.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
suite à une operation de feminisation de mon visage, je ne souhaite plus que cette operation apparaisse sur la page et sur internet, car cela peu me porter prejudice ayant changer de genre. merci pour votre comprehension 2001:861:8C95:B8C0:8170:7733:46F8:5C2D11:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
suite à une operation de feminisation de mon visage, je ne souhaite plus que cette operation apparaisse sur la page et sur internet, car cela peu me porter prejudice ayant changer de genre. merci pour votre comprehension Liloulemaire (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Je ne vois pas comment et pourquoi une photo récente de cet immeuble classé et historiquement appelé la maison Dochain peut être une mauvaise publicité pour l'hôtel actuel. Eventuellement, on pourrait renommer la photo ː le Manoir - ancienne maison Dochain. Rebexho (talk) 14:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment. Why would it have EXIF data from a GoPro if it was taken from CNN? The uploader claims to be Chris Morrow (a CNN iReporter), and given the contribution history I am inclined to believe this. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia's article on iReport, copyrights were retained by the contributors (though I'm sure CNN obtained perpetual broadcast rights). It would be an easy mistake to make if you didn't know the ins and outs of the iReport system and just noticed the CNN logo in the corner. It would be easy to assume this was a blatant copyright violation. In the deleted file, I'm actually more concerned with the fact that she doesn't seem to be holding the camera in that particular image (though it could be a tripod I suppose). I would assume that she was the one holding the camera in most of the pictures though. It says on her website that she shoots most of her work. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Ma maman figure sur cette photo, elle est encore vivante et ne souhaite plus y figurer. C'est moi qui ai téléversé cette photo pa rerreur Philcotof (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment That a logo has since been changed is not a reason for deletion. Commons is for historic as well as current media. If it was in-scope at the time it was uploaded, it likely still is even if the logo is not currently used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
At least one of the underlying songs in this, Music Hath Charms, is still under copyright. I can't make assertions as to the other works, but this should be considered for full deletion until 2028 when all compositions being featured would also be free of copyright. Or we should mute those sections until 2028. SDudley (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Howdy, in regards to the Millvale seal and banner I sent in a request to use them to the copyright holder (Millvale borough council) and received permissions Dionysius Miller (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did they indicate that the seal is available under CC0? If they did, can you forward the reply to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org"? Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has not, I haven't had my call returned yet and haven't taken the time to drive over there and I'm not certain this issue is necessary enough for me to dedicate that time. My recommendation would be to delete for the reason of a non-verified license if only to avoid hassle. Dionysius Miller (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Hello Marcus, I have seen your alarms about intellectual property. I am writing to inform you that I am Heliodoro Ruiperez and my name on Wikipedia is "salawikiweb". I hope this clarification solves the problem.
Hello, could you please send a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org , so that we have this in our system? I will then da all the rest what's needed. I would be glad, if we would have those images here. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Markus, I just sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org indicating that Salawikiweb (on Wikipedia) = Heliodoro Ruipérez (in real life)
I've never received an answer from the author of the paper, so MHO this DR can be close now. When the appropriate permission arrives we can request undeletion. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Das Foto wurde von Anidaat hochgeladen, der für dieses Foto über keine Urheberrechte verfügt. Es stammt von Benjamin Müller und wurde auf das Bildarchiv der ETH-Bibliothek Zürich hochgeladen. Plutowiki (talk) 01:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per Rosenzweig. The source states a CC BY-SA license for the work by Benjamin Müller, so anyone is allowed to upload the file with this license. Anidaat isn't claiming to be the author, so I don't see what could be the problem. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by حاتم العتيبي as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: هذا الملف بحث أصيل يحوي معلومات مضللة، مثل وجود مدينة عرعر على الخريطة وعرعر حديثة الانشاء تم تاسيسها عام 1950، وكذالك تم وضع مدينة تبوك ضمن الخريطة، وهي مدينة تابعة للحجاز للدولة العثمانية حينها، وليس لإمارة آل رشيد، وأيضاً تم وضع جزء كبير من أقليم الأحساء داخل الخريطة، وأقليم الأحساء برمته كان تابع للدولة العثمانية من حدود الكويت حتى حدود قطر تحت مسمى ولاية البصرة عندما استحوذ عليها مدحت باشا عام 1870 في حملته المعروفة ووضع الكويت والأحساء وقطر تحت الحماية العثمانية، لذالك كيف تصل إمارة آل رشيد لجنوب وشمال الأحساء وقطر؟ وهو نفوذ عثماني بحت، حيث ان إمارة آل رشيد لم تطل يوماً على بحر الخليج العربي، ولم يكن لها منفذ أو ميناء عليه بحكم تبعيته للدولة العثمانية كاملاً، وكذالك جنوب نجد الأفلاج ووادي الدواسر لم يكن تابع للإمارة، وايضاً الخريطة تبين مجاورة حدود إمارة آل رشيد لأقليم عسير، وهذا خطأ فادح، حيث لم تشترك حدود الإمارة يوماً بحدود عسير ولايوجد مصدر واحد يذكر جميع الملاحظات التي ذكرتها بالأعلى، لذالك الخريطة فيها تضليل كبير جداً، حيث ضمت أراضي لم تكن تحت نفوذ الإمارة، ووضع مدن حديثة الانشاء على الخريطة، ولم تكن هذا المدن حينها موجودة، لذالك العمل كان شخصي لم يستند إلى أدلة وفيه أخطاء فادحة. Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is still in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
معلومات غير صحيحة ولايوجد لها سند او مصدر تاريخي مثل هذه الصفحات تقلل من موثوقية ويكيبيديا
ويصبح الموقع مصدر معلومات لايعتمد عليه
ولا يتوقف على ذلك بل يحمي المعلومات الخاطئة والمضللة من الحذف او التعديل استاذ مبارك (talk) 10:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the same rationale as last time, and the map is still in use at it:Ha'il. Deletion cannot take place until there is consensus to remove the image from the article. —holly {chat}18:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The person appearing in this image is not Joan Amades. This portrait was cropped from a group picture that does show Joan Amades typing in a typewriter while this unnamed man takes notes. 90.162.167.12417:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All these images are a series of lithographs (estampe) painted around 1990-1992 by the Creative and Production Association "Khudozhnyk" (Kyiv, Ukraine) for sale to schools, libraries, etc. All nominated images are widely distributed on the Internet and on various non-authoritative sites are often erroneously dated from the 16th to the 20th centuries. Probably because of this, different users downloaded them by mistake (I also downloaded 2 of them). Although obviously the style (frame, colors, technique) is the same, so it's a single series. Unfortunately, I did not find the authors and years of creation of these 5 images. However, due to the fact that none of the sources indicated in the images are authoritative, I suggest comparing the nominated images with similar portraits dated 1990-1992 on sites for the sale of used goods:
In addition, I found an image on the website Ukrinform (this is a state information agency in Ukraine), where there is a similar portrait and it is listed as "lithography, 1990, Vasyl Skakandii":
All this indicates that the images were created between 1990-1992 and their authors are either still alive or recently deceased, so the files cannot be placed under PD-Art. --Seva Seva (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep. I do not see a case for license laundering here. This looks like an abandoned official Flickr stream for the Open University in Scotland. Lesser-used social media platforms get abandoned by university PR departments all the time. The file has full EXIF data, so it seems less likely to have been stolen from Instagram, Facebook or the like. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That the university as a whole would have a larger, active Flickr stream is not surprising nor germane to the notion that a smaller subdivision of the university would have a smaller, abandoned Flickr stream. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Author=Unknown author. license PD-Israel. Israel starts the copyright clock from creation. You wrote: "in the US, where the span of copyright is measured off the death of the author". The US does not use post mortem auctoris copyright terms, the EU does, and most other copyright jurisdictions. --RAN (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Needs an accurate date. Israel gave 50 years to photos, so this is only PD in the US if created in 1945 or earlier. The date added by RAN is just a guess, and if it was actually 1946 or later, then URAA would apply. —holly {chat}18:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per Holly, we need an accurate date. This is not a 15 year old, this is a person in their early 20s. URAA restored. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This photograph and Leonard_muir 2.jpg were obtained from a family tree on Ancestry.com with the permission of the uploader there (Louise Koopman) whose personal photos they were from their family album. I have a message trail on Ancestry giving me permission to use them. How do I document that here? Brwynog (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of project scope, similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:EuroAlemania (1935-1945).svg: Germany never participated in the contest using one of these flags, only with the regular black-red-gold tricolor. As far as I saw, none of these are used in a project, except for Flag heart symbols of Eurovision here at Commons. Finally, while not as offensive as the swastika, simply replacing it with the Iron Cross and its military connotations is still in bad taste and out of scope.
Keep per COM:INUSE. I believe most files are not used outside of Commons. This is especially true for flags representing historical countries. But maybe that's reason enough to still keep them. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 02:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Soft Keep the images this user upload are mostly duplicate files (but with higher quality than those that had been previously uploaded) these image are "Kings Portraits" series that on display at the Eastern Corridor of Chakri Maha Prasat Throne Hall, otherwise know as the "Kings Gallery"
according to this article which I had used as an argument for the deletetion of File:Portrait of King Rama VIII.jpg and File:Portrait of King Rama IX.jpg stated that portraits of Rama I to Rama VII has been painted and on display there before 1960 (...เพื่อนำไปประดิษฐานร่วมกับพระสาทิสลักษณ์บรูพกษัตริย์รัชกาลที่ 1-7 ที่มีอยู่ก่อนแล้วในพระที่นั่งจักรีมหาปราสาท...) furthermore This facebook post by "Book of Depserin" an nonprofit organizations dedicate to preserving primary sources about Debsirin School stated that these portraits were originally commissioned by Rama V (r. 1868-1910) (...รัชกาลที่ 5 จึงทรงโปรดให้รวบรวมหาพระบรมฉายาลักษณ์ พระฉายาลักษณ์และภาพถ่ายส่งไปเขียนในยุโรป) it's not know who painted these portraits because there are no signature visble but it is presume that the painter(s) were Italian. (...เนื่องจากพระบรมสาทิสลักษณ์ และพระสาทิสลักษณ์เหล่านี้ไม่มีลายเซ็นของจิตรกร จึงไม่ทราบแน่ชัดว่าเป็นผลงานของใคร แต่สันนิษฐานว่าเป็นจิตรกรชาวอิตาเลียน...) portraits of monarchs who reigned after Rama V are presumably commissioned by themselves during their respective reign (with the exception of Rama VIII, whose portrait were commissioned posthumously by his successor in 1960)
Delete all. Self-promotional and out of COM:SCOPE. In addition, the uploader appears to be the subject of many of the photos that were likely taken by someone else, so the claims of "own work" (for the non-selfies) appear to be false. Marbletan (talk) 15:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete all; these are corrupted files created by a failed multipart upload. Omphalographer (talk) 23:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep cropping larger images down to bust-length, or cropping an image down to a specific body part to illustrate that part, isn’t inherently disruptive irregardless of why it’s done. Dronebogus (talk) 04:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment - I've deleted COM:NETCOPYVIO File:Downtown Amman - Abdali 08.jpg (e.g., here) per my comments here. Эlcobbola talk 20:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep, COM:INUSE. Inviting Trade. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Kopya.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
-20240116140100-File:Project_minuteman.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Kopya.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Kopya.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ticket:2024012810004549 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 18:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
