Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake V3N0M001L (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company founder, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
fully copyrighted, thus bogous license here ("first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1929") Mateus2019 (talk) 04:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
{{speedy|commons licence incorrect}} A018018673 (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake V3N0M001L (talk) 11:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikogiro ll (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, images taken from pornographic websites
- File:Peta Jensen 7.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 9.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 99.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 8.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 87.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 6.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 5.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 3.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 2.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen 1.jpg
- File:Peta Jensen.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 14:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 15:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
File:"Portrait of an African" - an oil painting attributed to Allan Ramsay, created c. 1757–1760.jpg
[edit]This is a public domain painting, not the uploader's own work and not CC licensable. We have the real version already at File:Portrait of an African.jpg. Fences and windows (talk) 00:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- no reason to delete, I changed the license to PD. A reason for deletion could be the low resolution and bad quality of the file, which I renamed--Oursana (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: problems fixed; nothing wrong with having more than one different photo of notable PD artwork. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
erroneous name and file OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request. (Note: "erroneous name" by itself is not a reason for deletion, as files can be renamed.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons does not need you to drop your pants and grab a camera. If you want to, try to fill a real gap in our collection. — regards, Revi 11:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Commons does not need you to drop your pants and grab a camera. If you want to, try to fill a real gap in our collection. — regards, Revi 13:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Delete. Is there something special about this? Why did it come back?.. --E4024 (talk) 14:04, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know, but the image here is same as the deleted above. Final warning is given at their talk page - in English and (as I believe he speaks Korean) Korean. — regards, Revi 14:24, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
No COM:EDUSE due to poor quality. 2003:DC:F70D:AB00:EC26:EA36:5695:7C8F 18:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –Davey2010Talk 13:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Yet another penis, like we needed another. HadesTTW (talk)
- Delete delete and maybe salt? WikiVirusC(talk) 18:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; midling quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- An image with this name has been deleted numerous times. I wonder why the name is so popular. Maybe this just means "Penis" in Japanese and is therefore an easy find for people from Japan? PaterMcFly (talk) 07:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, below midling quality image of very common object we have many better photos of. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Taken from cockselfie.com, not own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fallnlllunlnlml7l (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: nonsense. (These images look superficially like Arabic text, but don't appear to convey any meaning.)
Omphalographer (talk) 18:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fallnlllunlnlml7l (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: additional nonsensical images similar to those previously deleted.
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat100008-20231223.pdf
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat080415-20240104.pdf
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat081850-20240104.pdf
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat082443-20240104.pdf
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat095005-20231223.pdf
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat100805-20231223.pdf
- File:AnaMuhtarifAlKhat100121-20231223.pdf
- File:YdrAnaMuhtarifAlKhat070405-20230924.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 02:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & previous; clear case. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted art. There is no indication that both Lui Antonio and Raymund Lee permitted the uploader to apply commercial Creative Commons license over his image of their artwork. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Seen in reverse image search; Simple copyright violation with false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted drawing from w:en:Pintura (Philippine comics). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
DW - looks like a photo of a photo. Not own work Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; per reverse image search Tribune pk file photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted colorization of a black and white original with no source indicated. — Racconish 💬 10:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's any kind of colorization. The characters have no individual color, and the film is a solid color throughout. It's just a poor quality copy, probably downloaded from a TV. And only this version circulates on the Internet, among others like Youtube and archive.org. OGPawlis (talk) 14:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep per OGPawlis - this not "colorization", this is simple yellowing from aged period film stock. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fralambert as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 - In use on Wikidata, and I don't know if/how that project handles spam anymore. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy It's no longer in use, the item was deleted on Wikidata. Fralambert (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Better quality image (and with the right licensing info) is already available at File:"85 Million Americans Hold War Bonds" - NARA - 514205.jpg. Günther Frager (talk) 01:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F8 - Recreated as redir. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Put it into National War Bonds.jpg, see metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 01:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F8 - Recreated as redir. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Downscaled duplicate of File:Und Ihr Zeichnet 7 Kriegsanleihe Crisco restoration and colours.jpg, see metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 01:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F8 - Created redir. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Downscaled duplicated of File:The British Sovereign Will Win Invest in the War Loan To-Day poster stamp.JPG see metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F8 - created redir. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Logo of the school in question, not the property of the uploader. 12 year old upload by a user whose sole upload was this file. Lack of understanding of copyright. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Unsure... The eagle is very common in signs in the US, so PD-Inelligible could apply. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Apparent false license claim; the artwork looks well over TOO to me (stylistically not copy of old PD eagle artwork) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Make another Kaka Derabassi Wala (talk) 07:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per F10. --Achim55 (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Achim55; unused personal photo; request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boxershineabraham (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Boxing Brilliance- Shine Abraham's Precision in Every Punch.jpg
- File:The Art of Combat-Shine's Awe-Inspiring Gym Display.jpg
- File:Athletic Poise-Shine Abraham's Dual Discipline Dominance.jpg
- File:Handstand Elegance-Shine's Unique Gymnastic Flourish.jpg
- File:Boxer's Ballet-Wushu-inspired Moves by Shine.jpg
- File:A Symphony of Strikes - Shine's Impactful Boxing Performance.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 10:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: All deleted F10, user page deleted U3. Commons is not a resume platform. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Mistakenly read the Israeli copyright law Galfridus16 (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1 - Uploader is correct that PD-IsraelGov does not apply. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Somalia, copyright expires 30 years after the death of the author. Government works are not automatically in the public domain. There is no indication that this work is in the public domain in Somalia or in the United States. discospinster (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering (F6) - Uploader uploaded this image as File:Brigadier General Ibrahim Sheikh.jpg claiming this source. When deleted as a COM:NETCOPYVIO, uploader recreated as File:Brigadier General Ibrahim Sheikh Muhyadin Addow.jpg claiming themselves to be the author. When deleted as a NETCOPYVIO, uploader created this Flickr account to launder the image. --Эlcobbola talk 20:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Downscaled duplicate of File:LibertyBond-WinsorMcCay.jpg, see metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 01:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy as duplicate - redir created. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep Unusually, this one does seem in scope; one of our few illustrations of orchiectomy, single testicle. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I miss the description. Single testicle is definitely special and have medical value. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Diese Datei ist von uns selber erstellt und ein Duplikat der Datei Absorption coefficient of water.svg bis auf den Rechtschreibfehler in der x-Achse Toshiyouri (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Grund: Bild wird entgegen mdl. Zusage nicht freigegeben, wg. gewerblicher Nutzungsmöglichkeit
Gisbert K (talk) 13:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Freigabe verweigert Gisbert K (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
My full name is tagged to this file without my permission Pellolin (talk) 02:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: for all we know, your name is "Pellolin". If it's problematic, please ask for file rename. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because it is unused despite being uploaded in 2006. Pellolin (talk) 23:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Struck over below, as it might be a copyright ©️ violation. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: probable copyright violation of Aphex Twin's "Come to Daddy"; it is unlikely that a bunch of students received authorization from the copyright holder to remix and publish the track under a CC BY-SA license. Note that this deletion discussion has been linked to from Reddit, which provides more context: [1]. ArcticSeeress (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for copyright. Arguably fair use under US law but according to COM:FU it has to go. Bnuuy (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: probable copyright violation of Aphex Twin's "Come to Daddy";. Raymond (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of a musician, F10, The model is marked as the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, F10 would have worked. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
emigsville band recruiting flyer Michaelkirk7 (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TheImaCow as Speedy (db-advert) and the most recent rationale was: |help=off Jmabel ! talk 20:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as spam, oos, without specifically identified photographer. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Close discussion as moot: this has already been deleted. - Jmabel ! talk 18:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
used to test vct - video cut tool Gopavasanth (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
vct testing Reputation22 (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tarabcollective (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlike to be own work: low resolution images without EXIF. Also the user uploaded other obvious copyvious (watermarked photos, and images from Instagram).
- File:Amie Sultan in a live performance at Marassi, North Coast Egypt 09.jpg
- File:Amie Sultan in a live performance at Marassi, North Coast Egypt 08.jpg
- File:Amie Sultan in a live performance at Marassi, North Coast Egypt 05.jpg
- File:Amie Sultan in a live performance at Marassi, North Coast Egypt 04.jpg
- File:Amie Sultan in a live performance at Marassi, North Coast Egypt 03.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The Uploader Tarab Collective is the institute of Amie Sultan. I will contact her, so that she cares about the copyright questions. BellydanceGoesWiki (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Request of Noa Bacchetta, portraited in the picture iopensa (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Request of Noa Bacchetta, portraited in the picture iopensa (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Request of Noa Bacchetta, portraited in the picture iopensa (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation - versions of the image are present at http://archives1.dailynews.lk/2018/05/09/features/150344/gentleman-politicians-yore and https://www.ft.lk/columns/A-new-path-/4-638757, among others. Redtree21 (talk) 13:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeitgeistu (talk · contribs)
[edit]"Self" uploads by sockpuppet of Marginataen; presumption is that these are copyright violations, as all of Marginataen's uploads are.
- File:Zelenskij i Danmark, 2023.png
- File:Liberal Alliance, pressemøde 2023.jpg
- File:Brown og Vanopslagh, sommergruppemøde 2023.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - User admited yet again to have stolen images. KnudW (talk) 09:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeitgeistu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Potential Flickrwashing/license laundering by this now-indefinitely blocked user. Flickr account was created October 2023 and has no followers.
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (8).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (7).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (4).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (5).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (6).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (9).png
- File:DF's årsmøde 2023.jpg
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (1).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (10).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (3).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (2).png
Abzeronow (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I've been in contact with the SoMe team at Dansk Folkeparti, as I had exactly the same thought. The timing of the creation of that Flickr-account was awfully fishy.
- But it's their official account and they have uploaded those images them selves. I have a confirmation email from an named individual with an email adress at the Danish parliament. Regards KnudW (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @KnudW Can you then please forward that mail to COM:VRT? That should document that fact for future reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- I’ll do that asap. Regards KnudW (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with keeping this open until VRT processes confirmation from Danish Parliament. Abzeronow (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's in the queue as Ticket#2024011010003127. Regards KnudW (talk) 08:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @KnudW Can you then please forward that mail to COM:VRT? That should document that fact for future reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 11:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Downscaled duplicate of File:Austrian War Bond, item 1.jpg, see metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted and rediirected. --Rosenzweig τ 08:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Downscaled duplicate of File:News. First Victory Bond in N.D.G BAnQ P48S1P09334.jpg, see metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. You can just mark such resized images with {{Dupe}}. Belbury (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I was not aware of that template. I will use in the future, to avoid creating uneeded DRs. Günther Frager (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Official poster of a movie - no reason to believe it's free. Esprit Fugace (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo used for self-promotion. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo, used for self-promotion. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation: Vodafone Enabler Italia S.r.l., company part of the Vodafone Group Plc 2A01:E11:1A:990:2837:E596:E009:95CE 09:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I see it as unlikely to be a copyright violation. It's a simple PD-textlogo, there was already discussion about the Omnitel logo but it was too difficult to have copyright rights. Giov.c (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
File:CITY BIO-DIVERSITY (PAINT-A-BOX STREET ART BY MARIANNE O'DWYER)-159396 - Flickr - infomatique.jpg
[edit]Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
non free - 2007 book cover. Alicia's Happy Day/ El Dia Mas Feliz De Alicia Hardcover – Import, 15 October 2007 ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Music album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted character A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo, no articles as far as I can find - out of scope The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo, no articles as far as I can find - out of scope The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I fail to see how a work published in 1969 can be PD-old-70. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This work is copyrighted, in the US and probably also Uganda, for multiple reasons:
- The work was published in 1968, and 1968+50=2018, so it is impossible for the work not to have been URAA'd. Uganda is PMA 50 (not 70), which is shorter still than what was claimed, but not short enough for the work to be public domain in Uganda by 1996 (the URAA join date for Uganda and most everywhere else), unless there's some circumstance in Uganda I'm not aware of.
- Even if URAA was possible, that'd require a lack of following US copyright formalities. The only possibility in 1968 here would be a lack of a copyright notice, or a defective one. But the back cover of the book has a full copyright notice, as you can see on the scan itself and on IA. (Granted this is a 1969 reprint, so it's possible the original print missed a notice, but I doubt it, and this extremely scant possibility shouldn't be grounds for keeping it, unless proven to be true.)
- @Micheal Kaluba: (the uploader) So there seems to be some confusion here. PD-old-70 should only apply if it's also in the public domain in the United States. And the US copyright is the first thing to consider, since Wikimedia servers are located in the US. @Micheal Kaluba: Is there a reason you think this work is in the public domain in the United States, that I haven't considered here? PseudoSkull (talk) 01:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted. copyrighted! Micheal Kaluba (talk) 07:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unsupported license claim; sourced only to a blog which lacks info on original source. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I wondered if this might possibly be a US Government photo. I was unable to find it on LOC.gov nor nps.gov, but while looking I found better quality photos of the building on nps, and replaced usage on en:w with one of them. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unsupported license claim Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Notes: Archive org copy of now gone source link [2] has no such free license. I wondered if this might possibly be a US Gov photo, but I have been unable to find it at loc.gov nor nps.gov. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unsupported license claim; "sourced" only to blog lacking specific info Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork. Needs commercial Creative Commons license authorization from artist John Becaro. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Scan of passport photo - not own work Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Photomontage with unclear copyright status, a source should be given for each photos Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Violation of architectural copyright. Photos of this copyrighted work have been deleted before; uploaders should be careful when publishing Morocco photos here under commercial Creative Commons licensing, if the photos show works of architecture and monuments authored by architects, sculptors, or muralists who have not yet died for more than 70 years. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Violation of architectural copyright. Photos of this copyrighted work have been deleted before; uploaders should be careful when publishing Morocco photos here under commercial Creative Commons licensing, if the photos show works of architecture and monuments authored by architects, sculptors, or muralists who have not yet died for more than 70 years. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with |VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no CC license in the source provided. 1989 (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The restoration is not accurate due to reasons mentioned in inaccuracy template. In addition, it's better to do two different images, one for each species, not one image for two species. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Challengermode is not mentioned in en.wiki. Maybe the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Georgia, there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia. Probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Questionable source and license. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused but educationally useful photograph that the uploader had blanked the page of. Abzeronow (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
stock image. google lens search returns many results ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
looks like drawing from history book. google lens search returns many results. ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I've also zapped the uploader's other upload for the same reason. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused outside a sandbox, redundant to numerous other national flags of El Salvador, e.g. File:El salvador flag 300.png, File:Flag of El Salvador.png, File:Flag of El Salvador.svg, etc. Omphalographer (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm the photographer and I was reached out by a third party to delete the image on the grounds of copyright infringement Epicsunwarrior (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:DW of a logo above COM:TOO. I'm also deleting two other images of this logo in the category per this. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm the photographer and I was reached out by a third party to delete the image on the grounds of copyright infringement Epicsunwarrior (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see other convo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Two pages of Hindi text from a book. Possibly in scope but is the text out of copyright? Abzeronow (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution photograph from Facebook per metadata. Abzeronow (talk) 22:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOYS + COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Violation of architectural copyright. Photos of this copyrighted work have been deleted before; uploaders should be careful when publishing Morocco photos here under commercial Creative Commons licensing, if the photos show works of architecture and monuments authored by architects, sculptors, or muralists who have not yet died for more than 70 years. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless shop window snap, COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as COM:DW; most of photo seems to be of temporary sign with significant photo elements -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Chinese FoP does not appear to be lenient to uses of 2D art per successive court rulings there (see COM:FOP China). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless shop window snap, COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 14:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looks to have significant COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:红蜻蜓商店 余华峰 - panoramio - 余华峰.jpg. Removing that banner leaves an image that is indeed out of scope. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
And also
- File:Карпатська столиця.JPG
- File:Karpatska stolytsia.jpg
- File:Готель "Карпатська Столиця" у Трускавці.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 2005. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 2003. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 2003. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1986. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
File:W3C® Icon.svg appears to be the correct color scheme. I removed the one use of this file on a Wikidata project page, leaving this unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Reverse image search shows downstream use, but also use which predates the upload. That leads me to think that this was a historical color scheme and should probably be kept. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 18:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Not in use. Out of SCOPE. We don't need pictures of this church with posing people, we already have hundreds it's pictures much better. Shakko (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Poor resolution/quality; better alternatives in Category:Phloroglucinol. Leyo 20:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete, low quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promotional images uploaded by presumed organization rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promotional images uploaded by presumed organization rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promotional images uploaded by presumed organization rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company ("OE"); no use, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, upload of user with no other contributions Tine (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, upload of user with no other contributions Tine (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
unsupported license claim; "sourced" only to blog image link Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (cf. ar:دولة لومبان - apartment "micronation"). Omphalographer (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded for promotional articles on Wikipedia. I doubt the files are actually free.
Spinixster (talk) 06:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete G10, personal photos, no use TheImaCow (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
no valor license, source is Instagram 2804:14D:5C32:4673:29EF:50A8:67AD:7B92 08:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F1 clear copyvio TheImaCow (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Todos los Santos Lake
[edit]personal photos out of the scope
- File:Overland from Bariloche, Argentina to Puerto Varas - crossing Lago de Todos los Santos - Carlye & Doryse - (25184755345).jpg
- File:Overland from Bariloche, Argentina to Puerto Varas - crossing Lago de Todos los Santos - Carlye - (24557851193).jpg
- File:Wladimir Soto Cárcamo, sur de Chile, enero 2014.JPG
— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per G10, personal photos with no educational value TheImaCow (talk) 20:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a photo of me used without my permission. Please can it be removed? Thank you. Camilla Coates (talk) 09:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'd be inclined to support a courtesy deletion; this appears to have been taken in a relatively private setting, and the source photo has now been removed from Flickr. @Camilla Coates: it would probably be useful if you would drop an email to the team at COM:VRT to prove you are who you say you are, so that this could become a "verified account". Otherwise, this really could be anyone using your name. (I'm inclined to presume this account is really the person in question, but someone else might have doubts.) - Jmabel ! talk 19:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused photo, we had lots of photos illustrating protests in Panama A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, Blurry and unused image. --Javidd (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, Blurry and unused image. --Javidd (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hassan Alsinan1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of them are own work, taken from various websites without permission
- File:Agricultural Development Fund - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:National Award for Voluntary Work - National Volunteer Portal - Human Resources and Social Development - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:SAUDI CONVENTIONS & EXHIBITIONS GENERAL AUTHORITY.png
- File:Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:The identity of the 92nd Saudi National Day - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Saudi Chemical - Saudi Arabia.webp
- File:Ministry of Culture - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:General Presidency of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:The General Authority of Meteorology and Environmental Protection - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:National Energy Services Company - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Public Prosecution - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Control and Anti-Corruption Authority - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:The Ministry of Investment - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:Royal Saudi Naval Forces - Ministry of Defense - Saudi Arabia.png
- File:Saudi Energy Efficiency Center - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:National Center for Personalization & PPP - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:General Directorate of Traffic - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Ministry of Justice - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:General Authority for Competition - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Council of Health Insurance - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:National Center for Monitoring Environmental Compliance - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:National Center for Wildlife Development - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:National Center for the Development of Vegetation Cover and Combating Desertification - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Ministry of Communications and Information Technology - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:The official logo of the Ministry of Industry and Mineral Resources - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:The official logo of the Ministry of Sports - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:This is the official logo of Saudi Council of Engineers.svg
- File:Ministry OF Energy - Saudi Arabia.svg
- File:Transport General Authority (TGA).svg
- File:الشعار الرسمي لوزارة الموارد البشرية والتنمية الاجتماعية في المملكة العربية السعودية.svg
- File:شعار وزارة الحج والعمرة.svg
- File:شعار وزارة الحرس الوطني السعودية.svg
- File:شعار وزارة السياحة في المملكة العربية السعودية.jpg
- File:Facade of KFIA.jpg
- File:أمين بن حسن الناصر.jpg
- File:شعار بلدية محافظة القطيف.jpg
- File:نظمي النصر.jpg
- File:الأمير سعود بن نايف.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 00:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hassan Alsinan1 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Might be PD but these files are certainly not CC files.
- File:Saudi games Logo.svg
- File:Saudi Electricity Company Logo.svg
- File:Saudi Red Crescent Authority Logo.svg
- File:Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University Logo.svg
- File:King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Logo.svg
- File:Royal Commission for AlUla Logo.svg
- File:General Directorate of Narcotics Control Logo.svg
- File:General Directorate of Passports Logo.svg
- File:General Directorate of Border Guard Logo.svg
- File:Ministry of Municipal Rural Affairs & Housing Logo.svg
- File:Ministry of Tourism Logo.svg
- File:Ministry of Defense Logo.svg
- File:Ministry of Communications and Information Technology Logo.svg
- File:Ministry of Investment Logo.svg
- File:MEP Logo.svg
- File:SDA Official Logo.svg
- File:General Authority for Statistics Official Logo.svg
- File:King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre Logo.svg
- File:Saudi Pro League Official Logo.png
- File:Presidency of State Security - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.svg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all - Claimed license is not true. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Saudi Arabia provides no guidance on threshold of originality but if we assume a conservative approach of "sweat of brow", these would all be copyrightable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subramaniantdr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work as claimed. May be free but needs a source
Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kastyan1337 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless shop window snap, COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Low-midling but adequate quality snapshot photo of shops at location in 2010; mundane but in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless shop window snap, COM:SCOPE, blurry Qualitätssicherung (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Adequate quality snapshot photo of shops at location in 2010; mundane but in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless shop window snap, COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 14:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep OK quality photo of shops at location in 2009; can also illustrate damaged sign missing letters; mundane but in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless shop window snap, COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No evident problem, mundane but in scope subjects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cade Pittman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used in a promotional sandbox about an art major, this is modern art which will require permission from the artist, if any of this is in scope
- File:Onion charcoal.jpg
- File:Kaleidoscope creation.jpg
- File:Guatemala City Street.jpg
- File:Floral Focus.jpg
- File:Kathryn Welch.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright? This is a photo of a photo. Percy M. Young died in 2004. It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom unless original is properly sourced and shown to be free licensed. Uploader's date is clearly false; other claims may be no better. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michaelkirk7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: Logo of a band
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 17:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per (slightly delayed) uploader request; not used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Michalg95 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All rights reserved
Converting to DR because there is no link showing it's that. It does look sus though. Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete This link shows licence"All rights reserved". Michalg95 (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Metadata from Flickr points to Facebook publication, but yeah Delete. Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Michalg95 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All rights reserved
Converting to DR because no link that shows it is "all rights reserved." Abzeronow (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete This link shows licence "All rights reserved". Michalg95 (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, definitely should be deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo from Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No indication why this frame should not be copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Its a example of macrovision in its raw fourm in the context of peice of consumer media, I digitsed and decoded to be presented so this exact decoded image is a reconstion of source media thus fair use applys, if the copyright of origin of content is in question it should be appended not deleted. Harry munday (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Fair use is not allowed on Commons, only on Wikipedia itself. The source image itself is copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 08:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Thomas Paal M2k~dewiki (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There is not freedom of panorama for artwork in Russia (see: COM:FOP Russia). — Redboston 09:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
With a watermark "World Chinese Pool Masters" on the top-left, I doubt this is uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Also nominating File:Daiki_Parliament_as_June_2023.svg. Daiki or Daiky does not exist. Fantasy diagrams or test files, out of project scope. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pugliesepugliese MartinPoulter (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
See th This is not CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationit It's All Right Reserved 2A01:5EC0:E807:280D:1:0:C840:E675 13:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - google maps. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1970. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1970. No Permission from the sculptor / architect Олег Радомський, Анатолій Консулов, Борис Кузнєцов. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This image is essentially a duplicate of this image. However, unlike the latter image, this image has a mistake with the distributions of Inuvialuktun and Inuktitut. Seeing as the only other difference between the two images is that this one doesn't label the smaller Eskaleut varieties, and it is already not in use on any Wikimedia projects, I see no reason why it should not just be deleted instead of corrected. – Treetoes023 (talk) 14:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable to me. Turn this into a redirect, also fix the incoming redirect. - Jmabel ! talk 19:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: They now have significant labeling differences and are both in use. user:Treetoes023 if you depreciate the file, feel free to come back and renominate it, but we can't get rid of it while it's in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This image is no longer in use, the reasons are the same as the previous deletion request. – Treetoes023 (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio as pr Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marginataen KnudW (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Can only be presumed to be yet another copyvio, as pr the discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marginataen . KnudW (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP - no exif and unlikely to be own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
same as G7 - as a author i want delete this unused image KrzysztofPoplawski (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G7, unused low/medium quality TheImaCow (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Wrong name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramsch (talk • contribs) 10:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:CATRED. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Low quality image, no exif data. Unlikely own work. Syrus257 (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Not PD in France, country of origin, until next year. Yann (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with thin bonds, opaque (grey) background & not drawn according to MoS guidelines, but instead just copied from PubChem. Replaced by File:4-Ethyl-2-methylnonane-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 00:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, Music album cover
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be de minimis. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely not de minimis. Multiple copyrighted books shown. SuperFeral (talk) 21:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
(c) GinoLuurssenPhotography. https://www.mundusnijmegen.nl/bestuur ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/Bhagawan.Yogi.Ramsuratkumar/photos/a.268793656476041/443196109035794/?type=3 (published: 21 July 2012) ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F1 clear copyvio TheImaCow (talk) 20:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yeliena Shvets (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. There is a mixture of high and low resolution images, some with odd EXIF (date on the future). More importantly, Yeliena Shvets cannot be the depicted person and the photographer at the same time as they are clearly professionally taken. We cannot keep them without a COM:VRT ticket.
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 6.jpg
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 5.jpg
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 4.jpg
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 1.jpg
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 2.jpg
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 3.jpg
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 7.png
- File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer.png
Günther Frager (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I added File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer.png as a DW of File:Yeliena Shvets, ukrainian belly dancer 6.jpg. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. As a wanted poster created by a government agency, this should be {{PD-Japan-exempt}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per IronGargoyle--John123521 (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work. --Liftarn (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP for 2D according to COM:FOP#Israel (assuming Israeli copyright law is valid in the West Bank). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Again familiar all faces! What an irony to suggest that hamas poster is protected under Israel copyright low.--Mbz1 (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- The photo of Gilad might be protected. Then, the poster itself and also a reproduction of it is a derivative.--Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Mbz1 --Herby talk thyme 13:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Questions: Do Hollywood movie posters enjoy copyright protection under Israeli law? Does Israel support the theory of equality under the law? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pieter, I am afraid my English is not good enough to understand what is the connection between Hollywood movie posters ,Israeli law, hamas poster, Palestinian National Authority under which jurisdiction Nablus (where the image was taken) is.I am afraid I also do not understand what did you mean under "Does Israel support the theory of equality under the law?" If I were not afraid that you'll report me to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, I would have said that yes, Israel supports the theory of equality under the law, For example Palestinian women, who are the citizens of Israel, have much more civil rights than women in Arab countries, but because I am afraid that you will report me on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, may I please ask you to assume that I said nothing of the kind. (I retract my words right now :) ). Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Questions: Do Hollywood movie posters enjoy copyright protection under Israeli law? Does Israel support the theory of equality under the law? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'll say Keep for now since I am doubtful that Israel copyright law applies in territory governed by the w:Palestinian National Authority and I am not aware of what the copyright situation is in Palestine. Adambro (talk) 15:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, this IS covered under their FOP (assuming they use Israeli law), since it specifically allows "applied art". ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
![7 File:"Portrait of an African" - an oil painting attributed to Allan Ramsay, created c. 1757–1760.jpg](#File:"Portrait_of_an_African"_-_an_oil_painting_attributed_to_Allan_Ramsay,_created_c._1757–1760.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-159396_-_Flickr_-_infomatique.jpg){kind=link}
,_Géorgie_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(51573381173).jpg){kind=link}
![121 File:Готель "Карпатська Столиця", Трускавець.jpg](#File:Готель_"Карпатська_Столиця",_Трускавець.jpg){kind=link}
![122 File:Курортний комплекс "Ріксос-Прикарпаття" в Трускавці.jpg](#File:Курортний_комплекс_"Ріксос-Прикарпаття"_в_Трускавці.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
x_+_490.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![170 File:Санаторій "Дніпро" в Трускавці.jpg](#File:Санаторій_"Дніпро"_в_Трускавці.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_promotional_single_front_cover_artwork.jpg){kind=link}
![228 File:Godło "Teraz Polska".jpg](#File:Godło_"Teraz_Polska".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-159396_-_Flickr_-_infomatique.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-159396_-_Flickr_-_infomatique.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_G%C3%A9orgie_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_G%C3%A9orgie_3.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Géorgie_3.jpg){kind=link}
,_Géorgie_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(51573381173).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(51573381173).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(51573381173).jpg){kind=link}
_(51573381173).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
x_%2B_490.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
x_%2B_490.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
x_+_490.png){kind=link}
x_+_490.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![18:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/08#c-Микола_Василечко-20240108181300-File:Санаторій_"Дніпро"_в_Трускавці.jpg){kind=link}
![06:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/08#c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20240116063400-File:Санаторій_"Дніпро"_в_Трускавці.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_promotional_single_front_cover_artwork.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_promotional_single_front_cover_artwork.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_promotional_single_front_cover_artwork.jpg){kind=link}
_promotional_single_front_cover_artwork.jpg){kind=link}
- A 2D poster is not what is meant by en:Applied art. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Posters like these unfortunately seem to be of function and everyday use over there ;-). --Dschwen (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- A 2D poster is not what is meant by en:Applied art. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep until the copyright law under the Palestinian National Authority is investigated further. --Dschwen (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- comment - It would be a real shame to lose this one. WP needs more propaganda art. Suggest Mbz1 phones up Hamas and asks them nicely to release it under CC... Sean.hoyland (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- A good one, Sean.hoyland :) BTW I believe this deletion request should be closed. After all it has been discussed since January. Thank you. --Mbz1 (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I found a better-than-nothing master of law thesis A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES. Unfortunately I blacked out and banged my head on the desk shortly after starting reading it. Others may be able to get further through the document. Sean.hoyland (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- A good one, Sean.hoyland :) BTW I believe this deletion request should be closed. After all it has been discussed since January. Thank you. --Mbz1 (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, derivative work. Kameraad Pjotr 20:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I think it isn't possible to consider the poster as de minimis. Ralgistalk 02:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment No, not de minimis, and not under freedom of panorama either, from what I understand of the undeletion discussion. Some people in the previous deletion discussion seem to have made a different argument, similar to that for graffiti - that the author's actions are unlawful and so they would find it difficult to enforce any copyright they might hold over the image. --Avenue (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand why this image is a candidate for deletion. I believe everything stated above is as it stands. Keep. Dinkytown (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment various photos of West Bank posters uploaded by me had been deleted, such as File:Bethlehem-pflpmartyr.JPG, File:Qalqiliya-alfposter.JPG, File:Bethlehem-plfelectionposter.JPG, Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Bethlehem-fatahmartyr.JPG, Bethlehem-independentcandidates.JPG. If this poster could be undeleted, so should all of these. Or this one be deleted again. --Soman (talk) 11:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept Under Israeli law, per the interpretation of what appears to be Israel's top copyright lawyer, FOP covers both 2D and 3D artistic works in a public place as long as they are meant to provide information, and these posters comply. There does not seem to be an extant text of Palestinian copyright law which we can peruse for a ruling, and none of us are legal authorities in either area to make a precedent ruling as to what version of UK law may or may not apply. Further, whether Israeli law or Palestinian law (which in this case does not seem to exist( applies in these areas is a matter of both hideous political debate and confusion. As such, the clearest indications are that this image, and those like it, are acceptable, and should be kept until proven to be in violation of a specific statute. -- Avi (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep See above. Also, this doesn't look like it's intended to be temporary. Such posters are attached once and left there until they're destroyed. Nobody would assume they're removed after e.g. 2 weeks, like on billboards. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per comment and previous kept decision. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Complex logo exceeding COM:TOO China - TOO? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The logo has obtained the copyright registration in the National Copyright Administration (China). Screenshot of registration announcement. 0x0a (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. It seems to be used on a good-faith userspace draft, so I would be inclined to keep. My only concern is whether the lock graphic falls below the threshold of originality in Cyprus. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: False license claim; relevant TOO uncertain. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:DALL-E Haraway Cyborgs
[edit]All of these images seem to be unused fan-art created with DALL-E. Supposedly they are meant to illustrate the ideas in "Donna Haraway's essay "A Cyborg Manifesto." It's really clear how exactly they do that though. I assume any image of a female cyborg would. So the question needs to be answered as to how exactly these specific images serve an educational purpose. Especially within the context of what they supposedly represent and compared to the myriad of other amateur fan made images of female cyborgs out there, which aren't and can't be hosted on Commons.
- File:A cyborg philosopher standing in front of cyborg feminists.png
- File:AI generated image from Haraway's "A Cyborg Manifesto".png
- File:Cannibal Cyborgs.jpg
- File:Cyborg Thinker.png
- File:Cyborg woman with curly hair and flowers.png
- File:DALL-E generated using the phrase "a movement from an organic, industrial society to a polymorphous, information system" 2.png
- File:DALL-E generated using the phrase "a movement from an organic, industrial society to a polymorphous, information system—from all work to all play, a deadly game".png
- File:DALL-E Ironic Cyborg The Third.png
- File:DALL-E Ironic Cyborg Too.png
- File:DALL-E Ironic Cyborg.png
- File:DALL.E cyborg image generated using the phrase "a movement from an organic, industrial society to a polymorphous, information system—from all work to all play, a deadly game".png
- File:DALL.E representation of Donna Haraway's cyborg generated using the phrase "An ironic cyborg dream of a common language for women in the integrated circuit".png
- File:DALL·E - Electronic fundamentalst 'super-saver' preachers solemnizing the union of electronic capital and automatic gods, digital art.png
- File:DALL·E - modern machinery is an irreverant upstart god, mocking the Father's ubiquity and spirituality, Italian Futurism.png
- File:DALL·E - The blasphemy machine experiences overlapping mythic organisms, whole human responsibility, identity borders on reality.png
- File:DALL·E - The cyborg would not recognize the Garden of Eden; it is not made of mud and cannot dream of returning to dust, in the style of Hieronymus Bosch.png
- File:DALL·E - The relation between organism and machine has been a border war, cyberpunk.png
- File:DALL·E Earth Goddess-Cyborg.png
Adamant1 (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Adamant1,
- They were created in a classroom setting as part of an experiment of social annotation of the text. We were using DALL-E as an experimental tool to render images from text snippets in a graduate class on the history and theory of technology in higher education, in ways that were not attempting to depict a predetermined outcome (ie: an image of a cyborg). Rather, the idea was to play with the text and image generation to see what came out of it. So 'fan art' isn't quite the accurate descriptor, though it's interesting that is the genre they are allocated with.
- Does that answer your question?
- Ian Perlsdiver (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Perlsdiver's reply doesn't answer why they should be on Commons. Created as part of a class assignment ≠ within COM:SCOPE. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
no category, random picture with no encyclopedic value, no description, useless, etc F (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncategorized unused low quality photo without evident compensating value. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. “SJK 171 at UGA”, circa 1973Photo by Herbert Migdoll. article: https://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/35628/1/roger-gastman-how-graffiti-became-a-global-art-movement ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
J'irai dormir chez vous tv show screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
J'irai dormir chez vous tv show screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Gabriele Cena died in 1992, obviously not a 2024 photo; probably not own work. Thuresson (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Just fix noob errors, rather than nominate for deletion. PD-Italy. --RAN (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your good faith effort to free license, but I can't accept the "circa 1950" date - He was born in 1907, so would have been in his 40s in 1950, but in this photo he looks to be no younger than his 70s. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Lacking actual source; subject is clearly an old man in this photo, insufficent evidence to establish free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristoff Rynwalt
[edit]
Not own work, they seem to be paintings by Georges Steel that won't be in the public domain for another 56 years. --bdijkstra (overleg) 22:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
(c) All rights reserved. source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/144735285@N07/28037068851/ (Uploaded on July 6, 2016) ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Artwork created in 1995 by MATT (Charles Kerbs), unless the uploader is this famous artist, this is not copyright free. Found5dollar (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I own this artwork and took the photograph myself. OiYoiYoink (talk) 23:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it does not matter who owns the artwork, it matters who created it. Unless you purchased the copyright when you purchased the work, the artist still holds the copyright and it is not free to use.--Found5dollar (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Modern artist or heirs retain copyright of their works. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Historic image from the Leather Archives and Museum collection, including watermark. This building was open 1973-2018 so images of its interior are not out of copyright unless released as so by the photographer. Found5dollar (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I received permission from Leather Archives and Museum to upload this image. OiYoiYoink (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately just because something is in an archive does not mean it is free to use. The copyright to the image it is held by the person that took the photo. That person would have to release the image, not the archives.--Found5dollar (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- We recognize the legal right that archives can release images in their collections under "no known copyright restrictions", that is the whole legal basis for Flickr Commons. They can file a Commons:VRT form stating whether they release under CC or a "no known copyright restrictions" license. --RAN (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no proof of free license from copyright holder. (File can be undeleted if proper COM:VRT permission from copyright holder is recieved.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Historic image from the Leather Archives and Museum collection, including watermark. This building was open 1958-1988 so images of its interior are not out of copyright unless released as so by the photographer Found5dollar (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I received permission from Leather Archives and Museum to upload this image. OiYoiYoink (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately just because something is in an archive does not mean it is free to use. The copyright to the image it is held by the person that took the photo. That person would have to release the image, not the archives.--Found5dollar (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no proof of permission from copyright holder. (If specific permission from copyright holder can be submitted per COM:VRT, image can be undeleted.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Is it in public domain? Part of description reads: "July 29,1964 The Photo and certificate was received by RSC American Embassy Manila from the original owner. By the time passes by it was on the position of a Vintage Store & was bought by a collector. The Photo was Approx. 4x5 inches and comes with a certification by AP Associated Press." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The photo *might* be out of copyright for some reason, but the license, date, and author claims are all fraudulent. If research can fix all that and show the photo to be out of copyright within a reasonable short time, ok, if not Delete -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no progress in establishing any free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Doublon portant à confusion par le nom du fichier peinture d'Edgar Degas François Malo-Renault (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason for deletion; can be renamed if that would be clearer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- also file:Yılmaz Erbek Apart deformation during the construction of a new building near an existing one.jpg
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
No free license at source website, fails COM:LR. Could be speedily deleted, but since it was uploaded in 2011, I allow time to check if maybe the license changed in the meantime. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed Reza Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Look closely, look at all the person's face, hair, their cloth, photos background, all seems edited and not natural. I highly doubt it's uploader own work. (Also i am quite surprised to see that the uploader able to meet all of these famous people. I highly doubt but in case they did, the uploader should upload their original photo they took.)
File:Mohammad Zillur Rahman, Member of parliament, Moulvibazar-3.pngFile:Abhishek Bose Indian Bengali Actor 2.jpg- File:Abhishek Bose Indian Bengali actor.jpg
- File:B P Singh Indian director.jpg
- File:Ashneer Grover entrepreneur.jpg
- File:Anupam Mittal entrepreneur.jpg
- File:Shishir Sharma Actor.jpg
- File:নরেন্দ্র গুপ্ত অভিনেতা.jpg
- File:শাব্বির কুমার.jpg
File:KK Goswami.jpg- File:অভিনেতা লিলিপুট.jpg
- File:অনুপম মিত্তল এর চিত্র.jpg
- File:অনুপম মিত্তল.jpg
File:Actor Lilliput Photo.jpg- File:Mohammad Rahim Khan Photo.jpg
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- After some discussion with the uploader on bnwiki, uploader uploaed full version of File:Indian actor Lilliput with Rajeev Dhyani.jpg, File:Abhishek_Bose,_Indian_television_actor.jpg, File:Indian actor Dayanand Shetty with KK Goswami.jpg, File:Member of Parliament for Moulvibazar-3 Constituency Mohammad Zillur Rahman speaking at an event.jpg. Based on that, i am withdrawing deletion request for some files (see above). --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: most; some Kept, per nomination and discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Pil Xanax dan estazoalm 2001:D08:2001:47B6:2807:A5FF:FE77:B846 15:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Demande de suppression de la part de l'équipe de l'artiste car la photo n'est plus d'actualité et entache son image sur google image 83.144.33.170 15:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep "Not current" is not a reason to delete anything, as we also keep old images. And the file is COM:INUSE. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Si vous avez des photos plus récentes qui sont libres de droit vous pouvez les ajouter à Wikimedia mais ce n'est pas une raison pour supprimer les photos plus anciennes. Mirliz (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
https://tineye.com/search/e26f69acd23ad59042daa510e99c43d1ead83cc7?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 Syrus257 (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Wanted to report copyvio. But mistakenly made the deletion request. Syrus257 (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; reverse image search shows was online years before Commons upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- also File:EIASC.jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Some works in this volume are by British authors, and copyright in those works has not yet expired. Before file is deleted it should be localised to English Wikisource, as the 1916 publication date means it could be PD-US. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If appears to have been published in the USA and in UK according to the copyright page. US copyright law gives precedence to US as the copyright jurisdiction for simultaneous publication. --RAN (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: the "source country" in this case is the USA. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Xover as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: First published in the UK in 1916, and not published in the US until November 1919. As such any still non-expired pma. 70 copyrights in the UK makes this ineligible for hosting on Commons. A list of vitals for the included authors can be found on https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index_talk:Soldier_poets,_songs_of_the_fighting_men,_1916.djvu and includes at least one that lived until 1973.
It would appear the UK copyright takes precedence here. Converting to DR for easier undeletion. Abzeronow (talk) 17:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Por que está desatualizado Pedrogomesouza (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per belated uploader request; unused, questionable license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Artist died in 1984, copyright protected untul 2055 4ing (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Well above COM:TOO United Kingdom and possibly above the ToO in the U.S. as well. See discussion at en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 December 29#File:Utilico Emerging Markets logo.svg. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Research via a search engine tell me the picture was previously already online https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Aba+Diop&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.squarespace-cdn.com%2Fcontent%2Fv1%2F576734246a49633b4493c6c9%2F2cfe437e-11f6-4811-b065-a3ea3195369b%2FABA_SAINT_LOUIS_01.jpg&pn=1 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover, maybe related to VRT #2023012710012016 like the other uploads of the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
low resolution publicity photo. obviously not uploader's own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. h-stt !? 21:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anna Zhalovaga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, the depicted person is not the photographer of these images. We need a COM:VRT ticket to keep them.
- File:Anna Zhalovaha poland.jpg
- File:Anna Zhalovaha 2022.jpg
- File:Anna Zhalovaha hungary 2022.jpg
- File:Anna Zhalovaha Germany Championship.png
- File:Anna Zhalovaha Hungary.jpg
- File:Anna Zhalovaha aliah team show.jpg
- File:Anna Zhalovaha ukrainian Bellydancer.jpg
- File:Anna Zhalovaha Winner pro category.jpg
- File:Анна Жаловага Змагання м.Львів «Барви Лева» 1 місце UFOD 2023.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Everyone can see that is not a professional shooting, its made with a mobile for the girl / Anna Zhalovaga. We'll contact her, so that she gives her written permission. BellydanceGoesWiki (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Can be undeleted when we get the permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maritonisson (talk · contribs)
[edit]not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
Estopedist1 (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Israeli Carsharing Company Car2Go advertisement ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
new user. Unlike that own work. No EXIF-data. Suspicious file name, possibly related to UT = University of Tartu Estopedist1 (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- See pilt on avalikult kasutatav; Tartu Ülikooli poolt pildistatud. Ei ole põhjust kustutada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrTrKa (talk • contribs) 11:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- possible info in Estonian, https://ut.ee/et/sisu/andmekaitsetingimused Pinging also user:Kruusamägi Estopedist1 (talk) 12:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @GrTrKa: pildiinfo on selgelt eksitav ja asjaolu, et see on TÜ foto, ei tähenda, et see oleks tingimata lubatud CC BY-SA 4.0 litsentsi alla. Ikkagi on vaja fikseerida luba. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- possible info in Estonian, https://ut.ee/et/sisu/andmekaitsetingimused Pinging also user:Kruusamägi Estopedist1 (talk) 12:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
No free panorama in Russia Altenmann (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
![06:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/08#c-King_of_Hearts-20240108062700-File:Godło_"Teraz_Polska".jpg){kind=link}
- Keep looks too simple to me, should be retagged to PD-textlogo too. TheImaCow (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per above below TOO. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
![21:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/08#c-GPSLeo-20240216212600-File:Godło_"Teraz_Polska".jpg){kind=link}
Photo used on a copyrighted publication (https://collectiviteslocales.fr/podcast/orange/michele-lutz-maire-de-mulhouse-103-000-habitants-haut-rhin/) gpesenti (talk) 14:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not response of uploader. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Non medical setting, request deletion. 206.82.21.105 15:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with the photograph, as it clearly illustrates what stretch marks look like on an adult man. There is the visible male genitalia, but it isn't a gratuitously obscene display, and it ensures that the photo is definitely that of a male. My only concern is that it says 18 year old man. Is that legal age everywhere? I get confused between what is allowed for 18 year olds versus 21 year olds. If it is legal, then it is okay.
- I would note though that the image was uploaded many years ago, and is not used on any wikipedia articles or sister projects. That might be cause for deletion.--FeralOink (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP should have VRT permission. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. h-stt !? 21:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. h-stt !? 21:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. h-stt !? 21:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. h-stt !? 21:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I replaced the one place this was used with File:Forbes logo.svg, which appears to be the correct color for the logo. That leaves this unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; different color might be useful. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Insuranceman22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files with dubious claim of own work.
- File:Gladys Reese and Agnes Smith.jpg
- File:John and Garnet 2.png
- File:Kendra Fox Then and Now.png
- File:Ada England.png
- File:Kendra Fox Today.jpg
- File:Kendra Fox.jpg
- File:Blue Bird Boxes.png
- File:Maxine Marshall young.jpg
- File:Maxine Marshall with Students.jpg
- File:Rosie the Riveter Building.jpg
- File:Marker designed for park.png
- File:Dot Finn and Buddie Curnutte Design marker for park.jpg
- File:Veterans, Girl Scouts, and Rosies Plant Dog wood Tree.jpg
- File:Rosie the riveter Park.jpg
- File:“Thanks!” asked two allied nations - Belgium in 2009 and Britain in 2010 - to thank Rosies on American soil. The events set the stage for other nations to join in..png
- File:Crena Anderson, Rosie.jpg
- File:Magliano sisters, Vienna and Gilda, with their brother, Tony, who was to go to war. Vienna did metal work to convert commercial ships to war ships. Gilda died before “Thanks!” could interview her..jpg
- File:Garnett 2.jpg
- File:Garnet Kozielec, Rosie the Riveter.jpg
- File:John and Garnet.jpg
Spinixster (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The following: Garnet Kozielec, Rosie the Riveter.jpg and Maxine Marshall young.jpg No edit summary. --RAN (talk) 02:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Would like to point out that these files are by a single use account, and the files seem to be promotional. The uploader has uploaded more files, but I am not sure if I should nominate them now or later. Spinixster (talk) 06:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader making false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Insuranceman22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per the same reasons as the previous nomination, files with dubious claim of own work uploaded for promotional article.
- File:Pulling America to Shore.jpg
- File:Original Logo TPS.png
- File:CFC Philidelphia.png
- File:NW and WL.png
- File:Tim Wilson.png
- File:Hotel Artwork.jpg
- File:Artwork by EL.jpg
- File:Aunt Sam.jpg
- File:SASSY.png
- File:Gilmer Co MS HS.png
- File:McDougal.png
- File:Anna Hess.png
- File:Hilda McDougal.png
- File:June Robbins.png
- File:Maxine Marshall.png
- File:Buddie and Dot Designing Marker.png
Spinixster (talk) 04:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Xover as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Contributions from, among others, w:Ralph Vaughn Williams who died in 1958, and as such is still in copyright in the UK under pma. 70.
Converted to DR for easier undeletion. Not PD in the UK until at least 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 17:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Pornography/Harmful content 2001:861:8AC8:6450:14A6:FCB0:A78:E991 23:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason to delete (assuming the "19 year old" in the description is correct). PaterMcFly (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Disagree with the rationale from the nominator - although I am in favour of deletion as per COM:NOPENIS low-quality, unneeded. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not a legitimate reason but obviously qualifies for deletion per above Dronebogus (talk) 04:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It wasn't created by NASA, and Astobotic's works are not in PD Artem.G (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Спасибо за внимательность. Не верно указал описание файла при создании как логотип, а это скорее эмблема. Доказательство что это изображение создано Astrobotic по ссылке --Red1921 (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Даже если так, в пдф и на сайте Астроботик нет индикации что их изображения в public domain. Для таких эмблем есть fair use. Artem.G (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Спасибо, подскажите как изменить тип использования файла --Red1921 (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chescargot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Tagged for speedy deletion by user:ErikvanB "Marking as possible copyvio because The use of this image from Discogs is in violation of Discogs' Terms of Service" - I deleted them, but per the uploader's request, have restored them and am opening a regular DR.
- File:MomiMaiga 04 (cropped).jpg
- File:MomiMaiga 04.jpg
- File:MomiMaiga 03.jpg
- File:MomiMaiga 01.jpg
- File:MomiMaiga 02.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Relevant discussion copied from uploader's talk page:
- Hi Chescargot, ik had alleen deze pagina gelezen, waar staat "or content for which You are the rights holder" en "We grant You a limited license to access and make personal use of the Service and not to download (other than page caching) or modify it, or any portion of it, except with Our express written consent." Maar de extra link die je geeft schrijft weer: "By uploading images to Discogs you agree that the image meets one of the following requirements: ... You own the rights to the image and agree to make it available via a CC0 "No Rights Reserved" license; or (...) Fair Use." Dus nu weet ik het ook niet meer. "Fair use" is in elk geval iets dat we op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia niet gebruiken. Misschien kan je op de overlegpagina's van de foto's een verdediging geven zoals je hierboven hebt gedaan? Bedankt voor de info in elk geval! Hartelijke groet, ErikvanB (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Zal ik morgen doen dan, wanneer ik weer achter mn computer zit. Prettige avond! Chescargot (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ha Erik, ter info: ik heb mijn bezwaar hier ingediend. Bij de andere genomineerde afbeeldingen heb ik een link naar dit bezwaarschriftje gemaakt. Groet, Chescargot (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Zal ik morgen doen dan, wanneer ik weer achter mn computer zit. Prettige avond! Chescargot (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Chescargot, ik had alleen deze pagina gelezen, waar staat "or content for which You are the rights holder" en "We grant You a limited license to access and make personal use of the Service and not to download (other than page caching) or modify it, or any portion of it, except with Our express written consent." Maar de extra link die je geeft schrijft weer: "By uploading images to Discogs you agree that the image meets one of the following requirements: ... You own the rights to the image and agree to make it available via a CC0 "No Rights Reserved" license; or (...) Fair Use." Dus nu weet ik het ook niet meer. "Fair use" is in elk geval iets dat we op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia niet gebruiken. Misschien kan je op de overlegpagina's van de foto's een verdediging geven zoals je hierboven hebt gedaan? Bedankt voor de info in elk geval! Hartelijke groet, ErikvanB (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relevant discussion from one of the file talk pages:
- On this page is stated under Licensing of User Content: " You may only contribute content which is in the public domain (i.e., expired copyright or public from inception) or otherwise available through a CC0 “No Rights Reserved” license, or content for which You are the rights holder. Certain content may also be contributed if it complies with applicable fair use or quotation standards and/or represents an item You are listing for sale in the marketplace (i.e., images, specific item information)."
- And on this page is stated under Intellectual Property Rules: "1. Image is Public Domain (expired copyright or public from inception); or 2. You own the rights to the image and agree to make it available via a CC0 "No Rights Reserved" license; or 3. Image is already made available through a CC0 "No Rights Reserved" license; or 4. Fair Use – any image representing a physical or digital product in the Discogs Database for the purpose of critical commentary or for the purpose of reselling a physical product under the First Sale Doctrine.
Comment It's worth noting that the images can be found elsewhere on the web at higher resolutions, and if there's a way to see who uploaded images to Discogs and when, I couldn't find it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Info A Wayback Machine archive[3] shows they were uploaded to the site no later than April 2023. 0x0a (talk) 13:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Just because Discogs requires its users to upload content only with CC0 licenses, there's no way to guarantee that they are actively enforcing this. The likelihood of license laundering is extremely high. We need to know the actual copyright holder and make sure that they are the ones releasing the photos under a free license. —holly {chat} 00:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chescargot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very clearly not PD-ineligible
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 22:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Disputed date SunflowerYuri (talk) 08:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Even if we assumed that the 1953 date was correct and that the author was truly unknown, it would have become PD in the UK in 2004, which is past the URAA restoration date. The file talk page says the date is probably at least 1964. —holly {chat} 00:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Probable license laundering. It is unlikely that Mehra News has the authority to release the image under the given license, as it was released by Hezbollah Military Media: See AP News image credit. ArcticSeeress (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, the image is also hosted on (Raja News) which is also covered under creative commons 4.0, Template:Rajanews. Ecrusized (talk) 17:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Whether an image is hosted in one place under an illegitimate license or multiple has no bearing on the image itself. There needs to be explicit permission from the copyright holder, and the website you linked to does not have that. ArcticSeeress (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Raja and Mehra News can only release content that they own under a free license. —holly {chat} 00:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
unneeded, basically a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vivian_Schmitt_cropped2.jpg and not used in any articles--- FMSky (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The deletion requester originally claimed that this file (created in 2009) was a duplicate of File:Vivian_Schmitt_cropped.jpg (created in 2010). But the deletion requester changed the claim of duplication to this image being a duplicate of File:Vivian_Schmitt_cropped2.jpg (a version uploaded by me after the opening of this deletion request). Tm (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Basically we have too many versions that look exactly the same and should be deleted --FMSky (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- If, as you claim, there are "too many versions that look exactly the same" (i.e. you claim there are all the same) and given that most of this versions are versions that you originally overwrote in other files and then other users (like me) split to new filenames, then why did you.
- 1 - You cannot claim one thing at one time when you overwrite files and its contrary in the next time someone reverts you. Overwrote the original versions of several files, claiming that your versions were an improvement but now, after being reverted and having your versions moved to new filenames, you claim that there are "too many versions that look exactly the same" when you previously claimed that your versions were an improvement?
- 2 - Either they you claim that your versions are improvements or they are eactly the same as the originals. You cannot claim one thing at one time and its contrary in the next time. If your versions, keeping with the logic of your tought, look exactly the same as the original versions why you overwrote the original versions of several files in the first place if they "look exactly the same"? Tm (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Basically we have too many versions that look exactly the same and should be deleted --FMSky (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Deletion requester tried, today, to upload his version over this file and was reverted and that it is why this Dr was open. Being in use is not a reason to delete images. Also deletion requester "forgets" to mention that File:Vivian Schmitt cropped.jpg was uploaded in March 9 2010 and this file that he calls duplicate was uploaded in October 16 2009, i.e. a "duplicate" existed before the original. Tm (talk) 21:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You're extremely weird --FMSky (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are the one that is trying to overwrite this image since 2022 and for the third time and the weird is me?????? You were the one that opened this DR after being reverted and the weird is me?????? Tm (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- What we could also do is revert this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vivian_Schmitt_cropped.jpg to the ugly not-color-corrected version and upload the proper version under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vivian_Schmitt_02.jpg --FMSky (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are the one that is trying to overwrite this image since 2022 and for the third time and the weird is me?????? You were the one that opened this DR after being reverted and the weird is me?????? Tm (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also this file is not in use because deletion requester] forgot to mention that [he removed its uses, not once but more than once. Tm (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why do you want to keep worthless files? --FMSky (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- There are not worthless files, or you would not try to overwrite then several times. Also, why do you try to overwrite files that were uploaded for several years with your versions instead of uploading your versions under a new filename? Tm (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Cause they were clear improvements --FMSky (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- No they are not clear improvements. Read Commons:Overwriting existing files before you make any more "improvements" to other files. Tm (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- File:Monica Sweetheart, 2002 (cropped).png is another example were there was a close portrait and you uploaded a completly different crop that is nuch less tight image that is not an face portrait. And this an image in heavy use in several wikipedias, aspect that you seem to also overwrite images that are in heavy use in several wikipedias with images with completly different aspect ratios, crops, etc. Tm (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- That was a mistake by me in 2021 and i have since uploaded it under a new file --FMSky (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You overwrote File:Monica Sweetheart, 2002 (cropped).png three times on January 8 2024 (i.e. TODAY) and not in 2021. Tm (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- That was a mistake by me in 2021 and i have since uploaded it under a new file --FMSky (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- File:Monica Sweetheart, 2002 (cropped).png is another example were there was a close portrait and you uploaded a completly different crop that is nuch less tight image that is not an face portrait. And this an image in heavy use in several wikipedias, aspect that you seem to also overwrite images that are in heavy use in several wikipedias with images with completly different aspect ratios, crops, etc. Tm (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- No they are not clear improvements. Read Commons:Overwriting existing files before you make any more "improvements" to other files. Tm (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Cause they were clear improvements --FMSky (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- There are not worthless files, or you would not try to overwrite then several times. Also, why do you try to overwrite files that were uploaded for several years with your versions instead of uploading your versions under a new filename? Tm (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why do you want to keep worthless files? --FMSky (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You're extremely weird --FMSky (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It would be helpful if User:FMSky would stop making "improvements" on existing files which are nice files. It would be even better if he would stop replacing files all over Wiki on a large scale by his "improved" versions. These actions are generally considered uncivil. Vysotsky (talk) 00:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- You voted keep, but what is actually your reason for wanting to keep it? --FMSky (talk) 00:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- There are 5 versions of this file, dating from resp. 2006, 2009 (crop), 2010 (crop), 2018 (further crop) and 2024 (crop). It is strange to remove a 2009 crop with the argumentation that it duplicates the 2010 crop. Vysotsky (talk) 10:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- You voted keep, but what is actually your reason for wanting to keep it? --FMSky (talk) 00:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; it's perfectly fine for Commons to host several different crops of the same image, even if I agree it's pointless to have so many. —holly {chat} 19:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LeshchakViktoriya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlike to be own work, the depicted person is unlikely to be the photographer. We need a COM:VRT to keep these images.
- File:Viktoriya Leshchak, ukrainian belly dancer 4.png
- File:Viktoriya Leshchak, ukrainian belly dancer 2.png
- File:Viktoriya Leshchak, ukrainian belly dancer 3.jpg
- File:Viktoriya Leshchak, ukrainian belly dancer 1.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024011110009745 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 18:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Krd for no permission. —holly {chat} 19:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Credit to "our special envoy". Possibly a credit to the writer/photographer is inside the periodical? Abzeronow (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Le magasine, modifié par la guerre donne un ours trés réduit et aucune mention des photographes, il fait même appel à toutes les images des amateurs et des combattants en promettant de les acheter et de les publier. Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Vous pouvez aussi consulté le site http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb40360453x/date1917 Gallica.fr.- I have searched the issue https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6524020z and found no credit for photographer. Keep Abzeronow (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have searched the issue https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6524020z and found no credit for photographer.
Kept: PD-EU-no author disclosure/PD-US-expired. —holly {chat} 19:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Image has insufficient credit and sourcing; taking an image of an image and releasing it under a free-to-use license does not nullify the commercial interests of the original image-taker. Bremps... 02:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete false source and credit; no evidence of free license. Person shown died in 1984 so this is clearly not a 2018 photo, and cannot be assumed to be old enough to be PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-not renewed}} Every noob uses the default settings. I have exhaustively looked through the copyright registration database for any images that have been registered for a copyright, or had their copyright renewed and there are no images listed under any variations of his name. This covers images up to 1989. He was in the news in 1950s and again in 1961. --RAN (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep old photo from the 1930s, no evidence of copyright registration. Moreover if copyright registration did exist, it has long expired.George Al-Shami (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete A lot of assumptions are being made in the above comments. Without a definite source, we cannot determine whether the copyrights have been renewed or not. For example, The New York Times has been diligent about renewing copyrights. —holly {chat} 23:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: actual details of publication would be needed to prove PD status. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
pointless .gif duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Malcolm_Fraser_1977.jpg , not used in any articles-- FMSky (talk) 04:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The original version, that the deletion requester overwrote in 2022, is not a duplicate. Tm (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was a duplicate until you reverted it to an extremely low quality version for no reason. May i ask you why you did this? --FMSky (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was a not duplicate until you overwrote it and then overwrote other file with the exact same file for no reason. May i ask you why you did this? Tm (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The original file was in the size 196 × 158, the new one 600 × 840. Why are you restoring the low-res file? --FMSky (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Until you overwrote it and then overwrote other file with the exact same file for no reason. May i ask you why you did this? Tm (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The original file was in the size 196 × 158, the new one 600 × 840. Why are you restoring the low-res file? --FMSky (talk) 22:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was a not duplicate until you overwrote it and then overwrote other file with the exact same file for no reason. Why did you did this and then opened this deletion request? Why overwriting a file and then open a deletion request to it? Tm (talk) 22:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The original file was in the size 196 × 158, the new one 600 × 840. A bigger size/quality means that an image has a better quality/looks better/is preferred, while a very low size/quality means that an image has worse quality/looks worse/is not preferred. Thats why i uploaded a higher res version --FMSky (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- And then you also uploaded a duplicate version overwriting other image. Why wasting other time then? Tm (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also image was a 923 × 831 version now extracted from the NARA tiff. Tm (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I dont understand any of your arguments or actions on this page --FMSky (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- 1 - Another user had overwroten File:John Malcolm Fraser 1977.jpg in 2017, originally uploaded in 2006 (my mistake before saying it was you that overwrote this image)
- 2 - You overwrote this image File:MalcolmFraserHeadshot.gif, originally uploaded in 2008 with a completly different crop and aspec rationin 2022 (as you usually do to images in heavy use)
- 3 - You then nominate this omage as duplicate.
- So, why if it was not duplicate until you overwrote it for no reason at all, why do you nominate this to deletion instead of uploading a hq version like i did? Tm (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Again, i dont understand you or your reasoning, so i am done with this discussion -- FMSky (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- And then you also uploaded a duplicate version overwriting other image. Why wasting other time then? Tm (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The original file was in the size 196 × 158, the new one 600 × 840. A bigger size/quality means that an image has a better quality/looks better/is preferred, while a very low size/quality means that an image has worse quality/looks worse/is not preferred. Thats why i uploaded a higher res version --FMSky (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was a not duplicate until you overwrote it and then overwrote other file with the exact same file for no reason. Why did you did this and then opened this deletion request? Why overwriting a file and then open a deletion request to it? Tm (talk) 22:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The original file was in the size 196 × 158, the new one 600 × 840. Why are you restoring the low-res file? --FMSky (talk) 22:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Until you overwrote it and then overwrote other file with the exact same file for no reason. May i ask you why you did this? Tm (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The original file was in the size 196 × 158, the new one 600 × 840. Why are you restoring the low-res file? --FMSky (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was a not duplicate until you overwrote it and then overwrote other file with the exact same file for no reason. May i ask you why you did this? Tm (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was a duplicate until you reverted it to an extremely low quality version for no reason. May i ask you why you did this? --FMSky (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: regardless of the order of events, at this point it's a lower-quality unused duplicate. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO logo Kelly The Angel (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Which one? The one behind him is PD-inelligible (just arabic text) and the one of the TV station is de minimis (and could be redacted, too). PaterMcFly (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- The PressTv one Kelly The Angel (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think this can be considered de minimis. It's clearly not the scope of the video, and it's quite small. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- The PressTv one Kelly The Angel (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Youtube channel "Iran Military" is clearly not the copyright owner, this is a footage from Press TV, courtesy of the Lebanese group Hezbollah, which exclusively airs all of its leader's speeches. Protected per Lebansese law. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. This is not in scope as a source document for Wikisource, as it is both an extract and a work of fiction from after 1928; please see s:Wikisource:What Wikisource includes for details. Omphalographer (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, the whole book is creative commons. But it includes the works of other quite a lot of other people, and i was reluctant to upload it without consulting them. Am I being deleted because it is an extract? If so, I understand. But I would be grateful if you could specify the reason further, so I can avoid repeating my mistake. Historyradio (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The long and the short of it is that:
- Wikisource only accepts documents which are from before 1929 (i.e. whose US copyright has expired due to age), or specific categories of newer documents. This content is modern, and is not one of the classes of newer documents which is allowed.
- On top of that, Wikisource only accepts complete, original documents. This is neither.
- Commons generally does not host plain text content, outside of scans of source documents for Wikisource or print-ready versions of content already hosted by other Wikimedia projects (e.g. print copies of content from Wikibooks). This is, again, neither.
- For details, please refer to Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats.
- Omphalographer (talk) 22:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The long and the short of it is that:
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Διπλη ιδια φωτογραφία Griffinsgr (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and the duplicate File:NIGRITA Center.jpg because they are Google Street View screenshots (you can see the map pin in this file, which has been blurred in the other file). Furthermore, @Griffinsgr: it's not cool to upload files like this and claim that you took them when you clearly copied them from Google. —holly {chat} 19:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. A scan of the original work would be in scope as a Wikisource source document, but this is a modern reproduction. Omphalographer (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- If it’s out of scope for Wikimedia then I can reupload it at Wikisource. But I don’t think it’s out of scope since we don’t have a copy of the original text, and the work is wholly in the public domain. A transcription of such a work is helpful to have when other options are not available. I would Keep until we have a more proper scan. SDudley (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per SDudley. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
FakeSVG. A defaked version already exists at File:Flag of Ali Ahmad Khan's rebellion against Habibullah Kalakani (defaked svg-version).svg. Not an exact duplicate, though, so it doesn't apply for F8. Rubýñ (Talk) 23:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- @Rubýñ and Mrmw: What does "defaked" mean? —holly {chat} 19:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's fixing a FakeSVG. You de-fake it; make it not fake anymore. I'm not actually sure if that's the term generally used, but it's the one that the non-fake file uses in its name, so I used it here. Sorry for any confusion.
- I would usually just overwrite a vectorized version of FakeSVGs like this, but this one has been vectorized already, yet uploaded as a separate file. It's against policy to delete superseded images only because they're superseded, but this one is apparently inaccurate. Fixing it would either keep it inaccurate or make it a duplicate of the defaked version, both of which are undesirable. Rubýñ (Talk) 20:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I have ordered a universal replace, but CommonsDelinker isn't running at the moment. I'll process the deletion after that's done. —holly {chat} 20:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
