Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2846617176).jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
![218 File:Dessin d'un coq perché sur le symbole astrologique chinois pour "coq".jpg](#File:Dessin_d'un_coq_perché_sur_le_symbole_astrologique_chinois_pour_"coq".jpg){kind=link}
![232 File:Kraneo "La Oveja Negra".jpg](#File:Kraneo_"La_Oveja_Negra".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
![336 File:"Haus zur Goldenen Kette", Ecke Am Salzhaus 6 - Roßmarkt 17 in Frankfurt am Main um 1910.jpg](#File:"Haus_zur_Goldenen_Kette",_Ecke_Am_Salzhaus_6_-_Roßmarkt_17_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_um_1910.jpg){kind=link}
![337 File:"Haus zur Goldenen Kette", Ecke Am Salzhaus 6 - Roßmarkt 17 in Frankfurt am Main um 1911.png](#File:"Haus_zur_Goldenen_Kette",_Ecke_Am_Salzhaus_6_-_Roßmarkt_17_in_Frankfurt_am_Main_um_1911.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_image.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![387 File:"İstikrarın Yüzyılı" Pano, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.jpg](#File:"İstikrarın_Yüzyılı"_Pano,_Recep_Tayyip_Erdoğan.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Territorial_Claims.jpg){kind=link}
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
When I made this I wasn't knowledgeable; this isn't free I'll upload it under non-free images Chacabangaso (talk) 13:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Private snapshot of a minor and completely out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Raymond (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of deleted file. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of deleted file. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fake. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Josadjiijsd (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: just an empty file page (apparently no file with this name existed). --Rosenzweig τ 03:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
I found another logo. 4BOTOX (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 03:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2024 Roger-Viollet. All rights reserved. https://www.roger-viollet.fr/image-photo/anne-zelensky-born-in-1935-president-of-the-1383502 ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted F1 along with their other uploads; uploader blocked for repeat copyvios. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake TCY (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request within time window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DERIV photograph of giant promotional posters. Belbury (talk) 18:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio. credit: PixaBay. article: https://radio.ognjisce.si/sl/230/oddaje/32033/najprej-pravijo-da-smo-zabavni-potem-pa-nas-zavrzejo.htm ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1 (Pixbay is a non-commerical license). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Logo of w:Gazipur Cantonment College, not the property of the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Source is as indicated, but there is no indication at the source that the image is available under the stipulated cc-by-4.0 license, nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Logo for Gazipur Cantonment Public School & College, not the work of the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 21:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
non free - scene from the movie ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle UND Autor können nicht unbekannt sein. Woher kommt das? Xocolatl (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Wie konnte das hochgeladen werden, wenn der Ursprung unbekannt war? Wo kommt das her? Xocolatl (talk) 21:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle UND Urheber können nicht unbekannt sein bzw. wenn der Uploader die Urheberschaft für sich beansprucht, muss er ungefähr 100 sein... Xocolatl (talk) 21:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung? Was soll das heißen, Quelle und Autor unbekannt? So hätte es ja gar nicht hochgeladen werden können. Xocolatl (talk) 21:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Es können nicht Quelle und Ursprung unbekannt sein, sonst wäre das Bild ja gar nicht hochladbar gewesen. Wo kommt es her? Xocolatl (talk) 21:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle UND Urheber können nicht unbekannt sein, sonst hätte man das ja nicht hochladen können. Xocolatl (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quellenangabe fehlt, miserable Qualität. Xocolatl (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung? Es können nicht sowohl Quelle als auch Urheber unbekannt sein. Xocolatl (talk) 21:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Es können nicht sowohl Quelle als auch Autor als auch Alter unbekannt sein. Xocolatl (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Es können nicht sowohl Quelle als auch Autor unbekannt sein. Woher kommt das? Xocolatl (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ohne Quellen- und Urheberangabe hochgeladen. Woher kommt das? Xocolatl (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ohne Quellenangabe hochgeladen, woher kommt das? Xocolatl (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ohne Quellenangabe hochgeladen, woher hat der Hochlader das? Xocolatl (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle und Urheber unbekannt? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle und Urheber unbekannt? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle unbekannt, aber Urheber soll der Uploader sein? Sonst noch Ideen? Xocolatl (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt Bockenheim, Ginnheimer Straße 2, RLB Reichsluftschutzbund Landesgruppe Hessen Rheinland-Süd, Kameradschaftssaal.jpg
[edit]
Eigenes Werk von 1938? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Eigenes Werk von 1930? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eigenes Werk von 1950 und Ursprung unbekannt? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Eigenes Werk von 1903? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eigenes Werk von 1913? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Eigenes Werk von 1900? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eigenes Werk von 1930? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
sicher kein eigenes Werk... Xocolatl (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Woher stammt das Datum und woher kommt das Bild? Es wäre ja nicht hochladbar gewesen, wenn der Ursprung nicht bekannt wäre. Xocolatl (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle unbekannt - das ist Unsinn! Xocolatl (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
die Quelle MUSS doch bekannt sein, wenn man sowas hochladen kann. Xocolatl (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle muss bekannt sein, sonst hätte der Uploader das ja nicht scannen können. Xocolatl (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Source = unknown???? Xocolatl (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle unbekannt? Unsinn. Wo kommt das her? Xocolatl (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eigenes Werk von 1902? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Nie und nimmer ein eigenes Werk. Wo kommt das her? Xocolatl (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
alte Ansichtskarte - woher kommt die? Sicher kein eigenes Werk des Uploaders. Xocolatl (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ursprung unbekannt, aber eigenes Werk? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ursprung unbekannt, aber eigenes Werk? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ursprung unbekannt, aber eigenes Werk? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eigenes Werk von 1910? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eigenes Werk von 1934? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
sicher kein eigenes Werk Xocolatl (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Wo kommt das her? Quelle unbekannt kann ja nicht sein. Xocolatl (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
"Quelle unbekannt" ist nicht möglich. Wo kommt das her? Xocolatl (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein. Woher kommt das? Xocolatl (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Muss doch eine Quelle haben. Und der Uploader ist garantiert nicht der Urheber. Xocolatl (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Muss doch eine Quelle haben. Der Uploader ist jedenfalls garantiert nicht der Urheber. Xocolatl (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein und Uploader ist mit ziemlicher Sicherheit nicht der Urheber. Xocolatl (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Wo kommt das her? Die Quelle kann ja nicht unbekannt sein. Xocolatl (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein. Xocolatl (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein, wo wurde das rausgescannt? Xocolatl (talk) 22:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Wo wurde das rausgescannt? Quelle fehlt. Xocolatl (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle unbekannt kann nicht sein, Lizenz ist falsch. Xocolatl (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
schlechter Scan - aber woher? Die Quelle kann ja nicht unbekannt sein. Xocolatl (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Quelle, kein Autor, aber laut Lizenz ist der Uploader der Urheber? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle, Datum, Urheber - alles unbekannt und trotzdem hochgeladen? Und laut Lizenz soll der Hochlader der Urheber sein? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
sämtliche Angaben fehlen, aber der Hochlader will der Urheber sein? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein, sonst wäre ja kein Upload möglich gewesen. Und der Uploader beansprucht laut Lizenz Rechte, die er nicht hat. Xocolatl (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Scan - woher? Der Uploader ist garantiert nicht der Urheber. Xocolatl (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle muss doch bekannt sein. Woher kommt das? Xocolatl (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keinerlei Angaben, aber der Uploader behauptet laut Lizenz der Urheber zu sein. Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploader ist ganz sicher nicht der Urheber. Und wo kommt das her? Xocolatl (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Herkunftsangaben, aber Uploader behauptet Urheberrechte zu haben. Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Quelle kann nicht unbekannt sein! Xocolatl (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
schlechter Scan ohne Herkunftsangabe, dafür behauptet der Hochlader der Urheber zu sein. Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Herkunftsangabe, aber Uploader behauptet Urheber zu sein. Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keinerlei Angaben, aber Uploader behauptet laut Lizenz, der Urheber zu sein. Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Herkunftsangaben, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Herkunftsangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Herkunftsangaben, aber Hochlader behauptet per Lizenz Urheber zu sein? Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keinerlei Angaben, aber Hochlader behauptet, der Urheber zu sein. Unsinn. Xocolatl (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keine Herkunftsangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
keinerlei Herkunftsangaben, obwohl der Verlag sogar aufgedruckt ist. Falsche Lizenz. Xocolatl (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Angaben zur Herkunft, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt-Bockenheim, Leipziger Straße 59, Fabrikgebäude Baldur Pianofortefabrik AG 02.jpg
[edit]
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt-Bockenheim, Philipps & Söhne AG, Frankfurter Musikwerke-Fabrik, Ohmstraße 68, 01.jpg
[edit]
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
eher kein eigenes Werk... Xocolatl (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
fehlende Quellenangabe, falsche Lizenz Xocolatl (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 02:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Über den Lkw DONAR der FMA Frankfurter Maschinenbaufabrik vormals Pokorny & Wittekind, Frankfurt-Bockenheim, Solmsstraße -B.jpg
[edit]
Certainly not the uploader's "own work", but a page from some West German magazine, ca. 1989 per the text and therefore still copyrighted. Rosenzweig τ 23:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Not the uploader's "own work", but a German advertisement ca. 2000 and therefore still copyrighted. Rosenzweig τ 23:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Not the uploader's "own work", but a West German advertising sticker ca. mid-1980s and therefore still copyrighted. Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by A.Savin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) VectorVoyager (talk) 23:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, invalid public domain claim for a recent photograph (warning: NSFW) Verbcatcher (talk) 06:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 23:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
instagram photo, not uploader's own work. article: https://www.portaldoholanda.com.br/amazonas/sao-sebastiao-do-uatuma-gasta-r-335-mil-com-shows-em-festa-de-aniversario ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeitgeistu (talk · contribs)
[edit]"Self" uploads by sockpuppet of Marginataen; presumption is that these are copyright violations, as all of Marginataen's uploads are.
- File:Zelenskij i Danmark, 2023.png
- File:Liberal Alliance, pressemøde 2023.jpg
- File:Brown og Vanopslagh, sommergruppemøde 2023.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - User admited yet again to have stolen images. KnudW (talk) 09:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeitgeistu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Potential Flickrwashing/license laundering by this now-indefinitely blocked user. Flickr account was created October 2023 and has no followers.
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (8).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (7).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (4).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (5).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (6).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (9).png
- File:DF's årsmøde 2023.jpg
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (1).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (10).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (3).png
- File:DF's folketingsgruppe 2023–2026 (2).png
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Abzeronow (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep - I've been in contact with the SoMe team at Dansk Folkeparti, as I had exactly the same thought. The timing of the creation of that Flickr-account was awfully fishy.- But it's their official account and they have uploaded those images them selves. I have a confirmation email from an named individual with an email adress at the Danish parliament. Regards KnudW (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @KnudW Can you then please forward that mail to COM:VRT? That should document that fact for future reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- I’ll do that asap. Regards KnudW (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with keeping this open until VRT processes confirmation from Danish Parliament. Abzeronow (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's in the queue as Ticket#2024011010003127. Regards KnudW (talk) 08:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @KnudW Can you then please forward that mail to COM:VRT? That should document that fact for future reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 11:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore FMD219 (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already on 6 January. --Achim55 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Gif made with copyrighted mataerial CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, unsourced image Omphalographer (talk) 20:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 20:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2013 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The metadata mentions a Copyright, Already on the internet in 2008 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, probably wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Seems to have been made with a stock picture from Adobe CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2010 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: the monkey gif is on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possilbe copyvio: Already on the internet in 2016 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
windows xp wallpaper "Wind" https://archive.org/details/windows-xp_20220726/Wind.jpg ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low-quality chemical structure with thin bonds, opaque (grey) background & not drawn according to MoS guidelines, but instead just copied from PubChem. Replaced by File:2-Chloropropan-1-ol-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Promotional image, added by the uploader in the course of their promo/spam editing on en-wiki. Below acceptable quality, and so of no reasonable use. — kashmīrī TALK 21:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
from Facebook, not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Not copyright holder. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
- File:Peeter Ora.jpg
- File:The Dune.jpg
- File:The Library Beyond.jpg
- File:Dog God.jpg
- File:The Ghostships.jpg
- File:The Studio Cavaillon.png
- File:The Autumn Stuck in Your Ear Rings.png
- File:Say Farewell Don't Follow.jpg
- File:Pour Ma Marie.png
Estopedist1 (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Batch speedy delete: All image description pages contain spam links (upon creation, removed now), and can be found elsewhere with higher quality. Unlikely own work
- File:Le hoi hang po.jpg
- File:Le hoi dua thuyen phichit.jpg
- File:Le hoi kieu quay.jpg
- File:Le hoi chua but thap.jpg
94rain Talk 22:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Malcolm Turnbull. photo by Getty. article: https://www.politico.eu/article/new-australian-prime-minister-climate-policies-europe-diplomacy-trade/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hotel Waiter Waitress Uniform advertisement. not uploader's own work. see google lens results fro aliexpress ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Black&White #set1 Model: Uka /international model/. by: March Nine Media source: https://www.facebook.com/march9media/posts/blackwhite-set1model-uka-international-modelby-march-nine-media/1954250424846024/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nothing on source page indicates supported license, page does have copyright notice at bottom. Ravensfire (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy delete under COM:F1 -- DaxServer (talk) 10:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I don’t believe this is the user’s own work. There’s no explanation given, such as the uploader being the photographer. Furthermore, if it was the user’s photo it doesn’t make sense why he would use a heavily cropped wide version when a taller version exists. And a reverse image shows it has been on numerous pages so I doubt it has no copyright. DrBat (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploads by sockpuppet of Marginataen; presumption is that these are copyright violations, as all of Marginataen's uploads are.
- File:Oral Shaw, 2023.jpg
- File:Christopher Arzrouni, 2023.jpg
- File:Imran Rashid, 2023.jpg
- File:Dennis Nørmark, 2023.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploads by sockpuppet of Marginataen; presumption is that these are copyright violations, as all of Marginataen's uploads are.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality, replaced by File:Beta-hexachlorocyclohexane.svg. Leyo 23:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. not uploader's work ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Olivia La Rouge teddy bear advertisement. sources: https://www.amerheritage.com/salespages/stuffed%20animals/boyds/boydsbears2.htm, https://theboydsbearsstore.com/products/olivia-larouge-boyds-bears-904715 ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
toy advertisement ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2013 - 2024 chelseakenna source: https://www.deviantart.com/chelseakenna/art/Flower-Cat-388552206 ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with thin bonds, opaque (grey) background & not drawn according to MoS guidelines, but instead just copied from PubChem. Replaced by File:1-Propoxypentane-2D-skeletal.svg and File:1-Propoxypentane-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector versions. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.230.152.9 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: reason=The icon is not used officially - Unofficial logo, so not realisticly useful for educational purposes The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- "Educational" is a requirement to upload something in commons?. Its in the category and could work like a alternative logo for a non fair use wikipedia like Spanish --Wilfredor (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- COM:SCOPE says it needs to be "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" and "The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"." - Basically I'm saying that since it's a fake logo, it shouldn't be used on projects, and therefore isn't in scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- "Educational" is a requirement to upload something in commons?. Its in the category and could work like a alternative logo for a non fair use wikipedia like Spanish --Wilfredor (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Veverve. 2603:7000:B8F0:960:CD15:D743:7CC6:380E 22:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Vevere. 2600:1017:B027:C884:C508:473A:3E17:AE89 19:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Veverve. 2603:7000:B8F0:960:F1C3:FEA4:D41E:6C36 23:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Veverve. 2603:7000:B8F0:960:3274:DAB1:DB2E:1198 03:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Mickey Mouse silhouette is clearly a post Steamboat Willie iteration of the character. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
unused. Creation by a child. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Clearly a derivative work of a non-free copyrighted design. oknazevad (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING Yasu (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, an album cover under copyright protection. A09 (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Unlike own work, it looks like a TV screenshot. Günther Frager (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely a newspaper founded in 2007 has the rights of an image taken in the 1990s. Günther Frager (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata, different from description: (c) 54OG (vietnamese talent agency?) ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Picture from Facebook, Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Benoît Prieur as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP in France
Converting to DR. Abzeronow (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Taken from here, or at least there has the same photo. Clearly not an AI work, as uploader claims. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
athletics mascot ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete more amateur porn Dronebogus (talk) 11:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- The educational value is the fact of showing external body images of the human male even in the geriatric state. The aging process is inevitable and images that depict body parts and how they function should not be solely reserved for the young. Older humans seem to be very much under represented in presenting and depicting the human genital region in Wikimedia Commons. CalusUse (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unremarkable blurry image Dronebogus (talk) 09:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Consensual and discussed to be deleted as a discussion. (There is a talk page. Consider reading it or adding your remarks.), https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/qw.html 211.197.54.36 02:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- For reference, the citation came from https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/bib-zig.html#zig94 regarding this flag. This is a publication I do not own or have access to. However, this source does dispute the flag existing and where the error might have come from. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously (in use!), and block the IP troll’s range. The discussion whether this flag design ever existed in the cloth doesn’t belong here. This design has been widely reported and an illustration of it is therefore obviously necessary. For that same reason we don’t delete the whole contents of Category:Pegasus, although every veterinarian and every ornithologist agree that horses with wings don’t exist. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep; Tuvalkin has some great points. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuvalkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
kitchenware advertisement ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In use and can be useful if renamed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality; missing permissions Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Reupload of previously deleted logo; see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:ARC_Seattle_(LQ).png Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I didn't even know it was uploaded before, my apologies. OWaunTon (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Re-Deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Iphone xr 111.125.106.57 04:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. © 2010 - 2024 Shourei. source: https://www.deviantart.com/shourei/art/Kawaii-Background-182519093 (Published: Oct 13, 2010) ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
not uploader's work, random facebook photo. examples: https://www.facebook.com/Tradition.ma/photos/a.353868124655519/365508260158172/?type=3, https://facebook.com/Mar2a.Maghribia/photos/a.133971660147062/180408295503398/?type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. I did a reverse search and found plenty of matches. Günther Frager (talk) 00:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio. source: https://www.possolutions.com.au/blog/politics-and-business (published 02/09/2017) ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination / DW. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
© 2024, TrainingMask. article: https://sports.yahoo.com/news/8-training-innovations-shaping-future-170024199.html?guccounter=1 ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Images courtesy of Dallas Contemporary. Photos by Kevin Todora. https://www.contemporaryartlibrary.org/project/paola-pivi-at-dallas-contemporary-dallas-9865 ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
stock image. Credit:bbbrrn. https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/senior-woman-listening-music-gm478815074-67597015 ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, not sure what the purpose of this image is —SpacemanSpiff 04:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Test image. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
I want not to Upload This and use other this image so I want to delete it. Lucifermalfoy (talk) 06:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
watermark: (c) san pyie photography ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Naver x dispatch watermark ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chang Dai-chien
[edit]Chang Dai-chien died in 1983. His works are still copyrighted in their countries of origin, Taiwan (50 years pma) and Mainland China (50 years pma).
- File:HK Admiralty 金鐘道 Queensway 太古廣場 One Pacific Place Bonhams Auction preview 古水墨畫 Chinese painting November 2022 Px3 45.jpg
- File:HK HKCEC Wan Chai 蘇富比 Sotheby's Preview 拍賣 預展 item October 2021 SS2 055.jpg
- File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 佳士得 Christie's 拍賣前 Auction 預展 preview exhibition November 2021 SS2 515.jpg
- File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會議展覽中心 HKCEC exhibition Poly Auction July 2022 Px3 46.jpg
- File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會議展覽中心 HKCEC 中國嘉德國際拍賣 China Guardian Auctions preview April 2021 SS2 04.jpg
- File:大風堂.png
- File:大風堂1.jpg
- File:大風堂10.jpg
- File:大風堂11.png
- File:大風堂18.jpg
- File:大風堂19.jpg
- File:大風堂19.png
- File:大風堂2.jpg
- File:大風堂20.jpg
- File:大風堂3.jpg
- File:大風堂4.png
- File:大風堂5.png
- File:大風堂6.png
- File:大風堂7.png
- File:大風堂9.jpg
- File:张大千与山田喜美子信件1956 年 6 月 6 日法国巴黎至日本东京（一通一页）.jpg
- File:张大千与山田喜美子信件1957 年 4 月 18 日巴西至日本（一通一页）.jpg
- File:张大千与山田喜美子信件1958 年 4 月 9 日巴西至日本福冈博多（一通四页）.jpg
- File:张大千与山田喜美子信件1961 年 2 月 23 日法国巴黎至日本东京（一通二页）.jpg
- File:张大千与山田喜美子信件1961 年 6 月 9 日法国巴黎至日本东京（一通二页）.jpg
- File:张大千为山田喜美子所画小像2.jpg
Files in Category:Art works by Chang Dai-chien
[edit]- File:HK Admiralty 金鐘道 Queensway 太古廣場 One Pacific Place Bonhams Auction preview 古水墨畫 Chinese painting November 2022 Px3 40.jpg
- File:HK Admiralty 金鐘道 Queensway 太古廣場 One Pacific Place Bonhams Auction preview 古水墨畫 Chinese painting November 2022 Px3 43.jpg
- File:HK Admiralty 金鐘道 Queensway 太古廣場 One Pacific Place Bonhams Auction preview 古水墨畫 Chinese painting November 2022 Px3 44.jpg
- File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山區 Nanshan 深南大道 Shennan Blvd 何香凝美術館 He Xiangning Art Museum August 2023 Px3 154.jpg
- File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山區 Nanshan 深南大道 Shennan Blvd 何香凝美術館 He Xiangning Art Museum August 2023 Px3 155.jpg
- File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山區 Nanshan 深南大道 Shennan Blvd 何香凝美術館 He Xiangning Art Museum August 2023 Px3 156.jpg
0x0a (talk) 13:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all in both sections per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possitble copyvio: Festival poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Nonfree, it isnt public domain my bad Chacabangaso (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
False "own work" claim. These photos can be searched via Google, but lack correct source and author information to determine their copyright status.
- File:张大千与山田喜美子合影（1956 年于日本东京）.jpg
- File:张大千为山田喜美子所画小像.jpg
- File:张大千与山田喜美子、徐雯波等人.jpg
- File:张大千与友人合影后排从左到右：黄金树、陈国兴；前排有郎静山、张大千、山田喜美子。.jpg
- File:1955 年东京壶中居张大千画展。左一：王之一；左二：张大千；右一：山田喜美子.jpg
- File:郎静山与张大千、山田喜美子.jpg
0x0a (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Self spam on Spanish wiki's userpage
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez 6.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez 5.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez 4.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez 3.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez 2.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez 1.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argáez.jpg
- File:Emmanuel Rivera.jpg
- File:Emmanuel Rivera Argaez.jpg
- File:Emmanuel David Rivera Argaez.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
GSP Logo.png Кингзјевонњикимен (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused File Кингзјевонњикимен (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Natsukikun 27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 11.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 10.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 8.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 9.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 7.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 5.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 6.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 4.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 3.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 2.jpg
- File:GARA-GARA HUJAN PART 1.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not educationally useful Conan Wolff (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not educationally useful Conan Wolff (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is not educationally useful Conan Wolff (talk) 19:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not educationally useful Conan Wolff (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is not educationally useful Conan Wolff (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
_(2846617176).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2846617176).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't believe this image is educationally useful Conan Wolff (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
_(2846617176).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
_(2846617176).jpg){kind=link}
non free - FAIRY TAIL anime ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jivan soni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures already on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye
RO.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2018 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
This is likely not a creation by the uploader. SDudley (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Thank you for fixing. SDudley (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
This image must have been taken in the 1940. Sorry, I don't belive the uploader, that he was the photographer. Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no source, wrong claim on license and authorship. --Polarlys (talk) 12:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy of Moondog Labs. source: https://www.businessinsider.com/tangerine-shot-on-iphone-2015-7 (Jul 7, 2015) ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
User's other uploads in this vein are all copyvios; tineye does not have a hit for this, but it most likely is too since it is in the same style as other copyvios. Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. credit: Ismail Ali. (c) all rights reserved. source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/149914739@N02/35082910246/ (Uploaded on June 5, 2017) ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; almost all other uploads by users in this set/style have been found online as early as 2008, and while tineye retrieves no earlier hits for this image that may be linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
likely copyvio; user's other images in this set have largely been copyvios dating to 2008 at least, so this likely is as well (despite earliest tineye hit being 2013) Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; other uploads by this user in this set have been found online as early as 2008; tineye turns up no hits before 2013 for this particular image but that is likely linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. credit: Ismail Ali. (c) All rights reserved. source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/149914739@N02/34338090740/ (Uploaded on May 17, 2017) ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; other uploads by this user in this set have been found online as early as 2008; tineye turns up no hits before 2012 for this particular image but that is likely linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; other uploads by this user in this Zodiac set have been found online as early as 2008; tineye turns up no hits before 2013 for this particular image but that is likely linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; other uploads by this user in this Zodiac set have been found online as early as 2008; tineye turns up no hits for this particular image but that is likely linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; other uploads by this user in this Zodiac set have been found online as early as 2008; tineye turns up no hits before 2012 for this particular image but that is likely linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyvio; other uploads by this user in this Zodiac set have been found online as early as 2008; tineye turns up no hits before 2013 for this particular image but that is likely linkrot Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
![01:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/06#c-Gnomingstuff-20240106015700-File:Dessin_d'un_coq_perché_sur_le_symbole_astrologique_chinois_pour_"coq".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
![12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/06#c-Polarlys-20240113125900-File:Dessin_d'un_coq_perché_sur_le_symbole_astrologique_chinois_pour_"coq".jpg){kind=link}
metadata different from description: (c) Photographer Andrea Brusa 2016 ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata different from description: photo by OSCAR SEPULVEDA ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
A better SVG image has been uploaded: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KFSF-DT_(2021).svg OWaunTon (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
2009 movie poster https://www.filmaffinity.com/en/filmimages.php?movie_id=646342 ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
File was copied from airline's website on https://www.cityjet.com/fleet/ without stating a license to do so. 2001:A61:12A6:501:A1F8:2984:7418:14B3 09:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BJCHOUDHARY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Taken from website, likely above licensing threshold. Also abysmal upload quality. 2001:A61:12A6:501:A1F8:2984:7418:14B3 09:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The sources indicate a copyright
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 04.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 22.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 21.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 20.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 19.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 18.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 17.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 16.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 15.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 14.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 13.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 08.png
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 12.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 11.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 10.png
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 09.png
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 07.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 06.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 05.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 02.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 01.jpg
- File:Hossein babaeiii tarkami 03.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an association CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
![14:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/06#c-CoffeeEngineer-20240106140300-File:Kraneo_"La_Oveja_Negra".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
![13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/06#c-Polarlys-20240113130300-File:Kraneo_"La_Oveja_Negra".jpg){kind=link}
Unidentifiable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, Usage for a pomotional page on the encyclopedy CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from facebook, Watermark on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LadyBardot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: logo of a musician
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an orchestra CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Unlike own work, metadata points to Facebook. Günther Frager (talk) 14:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreas Platzer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: Magazines, books, and newspapers
- File:Luna y Sol Zeitungsartikel 2000.jpg
- File:Luna y Sol bei den Volksschauspilen Telfs 1998.jpg
- File:Luna y Sol in Huben beim Straßenmusiker Festival 1998.jpg
- File:Luna y Sol beim Halleiner Folkfestival 1999.jpg
- File:Luna y Sol Zeitungsartikel mein Monat.jpg
- File:Luna y Sol Zeitungsartikel.jpg
- File:Luna y Sol im Fondo nacional de las artes.jpg
- File:Guatemala Regenbogenland 2020.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Transportes RIVER.jpg
- File:Transporte River 2 Pisos.jpg
- File:Autobuses Tlajomulco Mercedes.jpg
- File:R-187-B.jpg
- File:Autobuses Tlajomulco MASA.jpg
- File:Transporte Tlajomulco Servicio Villegas.jpg
- File:R-187 Tlajomulco.jpg
- File:Telediario Guadalajara Logo.jpg
- File:Leonardo Schwebel.jpg
- File:Miguel Karcz Disfrazado.jpg
- File:Scarlett Salazar.jpg
Didym (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The metadata of several files point to Facebook. The user also uploaded plenty of netcopyvios (I marked several for SD). Günther Frager (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EricEgo2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unsourced photo's, several of them obviously copyrighted posters. Unlikely the uploader made these photo's / designs by himself.
- File:Undertheinfluencetourposter.jpg
- File:Benblacknallalabama.jpg
- File:MaryWilsonSupremesStar.jpg
- File:Chris brown heartbreak on a full moon tour flyer.jpg
- File:Chris Brown Indigoat Poster.jpg
- File:Divadiana vh1 2000.jpg
- File:Dianaross name flashmob superbowl.jpg
- File:1140-diana-ross-super-bowl.jpg
- File:Diana-ross-super-bowl-2.jpg
Ellywa (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Previously published at https://rmgo.org/, please send permission to email address at COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Metadata credits Billy Edwards, no evidence of permission Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files by Heavenandhell
[edit]Dubious own work claims. These look like web scrapes instead.
- From https://allabout.co.jp/gm/gc/193579/2/ (terrible quality too)
- Can't find this one exactly (some similar ones around, https://www.wsupercars.com/regularwallpapers/2004-ferrari-612-scaglietti-wallpaper-008/) but given the rest, I don't trust it. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
This is asserted to be a PD-textlogo, but I have to think that stylized microphone, at least, may put this above TOO. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. © 2024 Teesnow - Cheapest T-Shirt Printing in Melbourne, Australia source: https://www.teesnow.com.au/blog/guide-to-screen-printing-tshirts-at-home-diy-ghetto-style-with-pictures/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. © 2024 Teesnow - Cheapest T-Shirt Printing in Melbourne, Australia source: https://www.teesnow.com.au/blog/guide-to-screen-printing-tshirts-at-home-diy-ghetto-style-with-pictures/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio. © 2024 Teesnow - Cheapest T-Shirt Printing in Melbourne, Australia source: https://www.teesnow.com.au/blog/guide-to-screen-printing-tshirts-at-home-diy-ghetto-style-with-pictures/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. source: Twitter/adelucia35. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/mets-mascot-caught-camera-giving-125612174.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation. Photograph is identified as a work of Emma Hartland-Mahon, who is a public relations professional. Unless the user who uploaded the image is Emma Hartland-Mahon, they have not shown they have rights to the photograph Babakathy (talk) 05:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Blatant copyvio Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Foto: Anja Glitsch ©ARD-Glitsch ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be promotional. Also claims to be own work, and uploader is almost certainly the subject, but doesn't look like a selfie and has some sort of watermark at lower left. Jmabel ! talk 08:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata: photo by Stephane Caron ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Credit: RichVintage. https://www.gettyimages.ae/detail/photo/yer-outta-here-royalty-free-image/175594471 ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. metadata: ViktorHanacek.cz. Source: PicJumbo. article: https://medium.com/@_danielstrauss/facebook-was-never-just-a-digital-town-square-2b3ef248a3f5 ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal file collection, unused, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 18:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to Samuil, Sofia
[edit]Sculpture by bg:Александър Хайтов, who is still living. No FoP in Bulgaria.
- File:Samuil Sofia 1.jpg
- File:Samuil Sofia 2.jpg
- File:Sofia Center, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria - panoramio (33).jpg
- File:Sophia Monument Samuel of Bulgaria.jpg
- File:Spomenik u Sofiji.jpg
- File:Tsar Samuil of Bulgaria 01.jpg
- File:Tsar Samuil of Bulgaria 02.jpg
- File:Tzar-Samuil-Monument-Sofia-Bulgaria.jpg
- File:Паметник на Цар Самуил в София.jpg
- File:Уики обича паметниците 1.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
this should be jpg 4BOTOX (talk) 12:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Above TOO. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of a festival CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2020 GRÖMO GmbH & Co. KG ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2020 GRÖMO GmbH & Co. KG ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/2013 - Atlantis, The Palm
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 50 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 01.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 04.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 08.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 07.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 06.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 02.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 03.jpg
- File:2013 - Atlantis, The Palm, Palm Jumeirah, Dubai, UAE ( Ank Kumar ) 05.jpg
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Skyline image not focused on any particular building. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- The buildings in front is too prominent that differs from a general skyline. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio. © 2024, ENJOY Puzzle 1000 Pieces Jigsaw Puzzle - Spring Blooms Romance (1434) art https://enjoy-puzzle.com/de/products/puzzle-1000-piese-enjoy-spring-blooms-romance-enjoy-1434 ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete We don't know which was the original, and it's no proof that a product is offered for sale today when it could be based on a Commons image from some years ago.
- That said, this one appears to be an uncredited (but signed) work by Karen Tarlton and is far from the single-edit uploader's claimed own work. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
External source and author, obviously wrong license, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for temporary 2D works in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 17:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1971. [1]
- File:Momotaro39.JPG
- File:Okayama st01s3200.jpg
- File:Okayama station momotaro.jpg
- File:Statue of Momotaro.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The statue of Momotaro was created by 岡本錦朋 (OKAMOTO Kimpo) [2]. The year of his death is 1999 [3]. No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Per above, COM:FOP Japan.
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Chef d'État Major algérien Saïd Chengriha en visite d'État à Paris le 23 janvier 2023 2023-01-29-16.00.09.jpg
[edit]
Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:ECD1:916:F3D1:E596 00:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The permission of the photographer Thibault Camus (Pool/EPA) is unclear. DarkVador79-UA (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
metadata different from description: photo by Benjamin Enos ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Per https://www.lamalledugouverneur.com/boutique/artistes-du-pacifique-fran%C3%A7ais/jean-charles-bouloc/ ("le Service des Postes de Polynésie édite un timbre d'après un de ses portraits d'enfants"), this stamp depicts a painting by the deceased artist Jean Charles Bouloc, so it cannot be the work of the uploader. And stamps are copyrightable in French Polynesia per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/French Polynesia. SilverLocust (talk) 03:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and move to enwiki as one non-free example of his work that should be acceptable under the strict non-free policy guidelines. Ww2censor (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
it loks like cropped screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, cropped from eg [4]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
TOO MUCH LOW RESOLUTION 111.125.106.57 04:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @111.125.106.57: - Keep - Evan after sharpening and brightening the original upload (which wasn't mine), I'll certainly agree that this isn't a great picture.
- However, in the absence of any better-quality images of this model, the resolution and quality is still usable/acceptable by Commons' standards, so we wouldn't normally delete in a case like this. Ubcule (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use in multiple projects. Fee free to take a higher quality photo of this same historic phone. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope, Biden was not the Democratic Party nominee in 1988 N Panama 84534 04:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: non-notable modern depiction of a 16th-century missionary. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
created by Mabi Revuelta. https://catalogo.artium.eus/book/export/html/10860 ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploader of the YouTube video seems to be a fan channel of the Red Hot Chili Peppers and does not have copyright of the video. Another video uploaded by them with a YouTube CC license takes different sources of live shows. reppoptalk 07:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. by Mauro DeVereaux. source: https://pixelsmerch.com/featured/soft-fish-mauro-devereaux.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://wbckfm.com/heritage-tower-remains-on-schedule-for-2019-reopening/. Date and claim of "own work" are, of course, nonsense, but 1931 is old enough to quite possibly be public domain, and I'd like to give the uploader (or anyone else) time to identify actual source and provenance. This appears to be U.S., so if this was published at the time with no notice, or (more likely) copyright was not renewed, it would now be PD. Jmabel ! talk 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: still lacking any factual source info; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like an old picture, probably not "own work". Xocolatl (talk) 08:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: No actual source info; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like an old picture, probably not "own work" Xocolatl (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; lacking source info, looks late 20th century but not old enough to be assumed to be PD without info. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
looks like an old picture, probably wrong date and not "own work" Xocolatl (talk) 08:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no actual source; not so old as to be certain to be PD without info. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
this is a scan - source?? copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 08:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I will cite it. The periodical says "They may be freely distributed electronically provided that they include the following notice:"This article originally appeared in The Tech, issue ## volume ##. It cannot be reprinted without the express written permission of MIT Tech." 2601:19C:5280:A8B0:C16A:53BD:DFC7:61C2 11:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- DELETE The text noted "cannot be reproduced..." explicitly claims that the image may not be reproduced without explicit permission. Does the uploader have this explicit permission? Doubtful. And even if they do, this restriction is not compatible with Commons licensing requirements. WikiDan61 (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Strong artifacting, low resolution, higher quality alternatives such as File:Krabbenbrötchen.jpg available. RudolfSchreier (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This photo is currently in use at de:Fischbrötchen and has to be kept per COM:INUSE as long as this fact doesn't change. The low quality of this photo is well-known. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Strong artifacting & low resolution, no longer in use. RudolfSchreier (talk) 10:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I support this as COM:INUSE no longer applies and as there are better alternatives like File:Krabbenbrötchen.jpg. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; poor quality photo of fairly common subject we have multiple better photos of. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SL SOHAYEB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 10:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo of photo. Permission needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
сеищ жютемо 77.222.110.190 10:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Google Translate gives me a wide variety of possible translations of this, none of which seems to be a valid rationale for deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio from [5]. Tamago915 (talk) 10:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
No permission found for this image at source shizhao (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is from 1912; any copyright has certainly expired. Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: out of copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Poster for a music album CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, prank joke of insult image; OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
The resolution of this image is so extremely tiny, that it is unusable. Conan Wolff (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very tiny image without evident compensating value. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
The resolution of this image is so extremely tiny, that it is unusable. Conan Wolff (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very tiny image without evident compensating value. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
The resolution of this image is so extremely tiny, that it is unusable. Conan Wolff (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very tiny image without evident compensating value. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Flickrwashing - account only has this photo, 0 followers etc Gbawden (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Recep Tayyip Erdoğan with Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia at the event of Extraordinary Islamic Summit of OIC, 2023.jpg
[edit]
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankitmogli1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. One has FB MD, the other states random picture of Ankit Bhardwa - PCP
Gbawden (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı © Tüm hakları saklıdır. ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata: © Bruno Charoy ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work
Uploader's name somewhat matches the name in the metadata. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Out of scope promotional material for a non-notable band. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
CV with possible copyrighted elements CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
non free - 2014 book cover https://www.amazon.com/Dopage/dp/2875570722 ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
EXIF copyrights the image to © Andrew Klaver photography 2021 © Curling Canada, no evidence of permission for upload to Commons under a CC-BY licence. Belbury (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture already on the internet in 2018 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, late 20th century US broadcast cartoon character. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Based on an image deleted for copyright violation (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:شعار رئاسة الحرمين.jpg). Rubýñ (Talk) 22:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:"Haus zur Goldenen Kette", Ecke Am Salzhaus 6 - Roßmarkt 17 in Frankfurt am Main um 1910.jpg
[edit]
Quelle UND Urheber können nicht unbekannt sein, sonst hätte der Uploader die Datei nicht zur Verfügung gehabt. Und woher kommt das Datum? Uploader = User:Messina (global ban) Xocolatl (talk) 21:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 23:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:"Haus zur Goldenen Kette", Ecke Am Salzhaus 6 - Roßmarkt 17 in Frankfurt am Main um 1911.png
[edit]
Quelle UND Autor unbekannt, aber Datum bekannt? Unsinn. Upload von User:Messina Xocolatl (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Banned user. --A.Savin 23:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
No agreement to distribute the image, while alone in the image and identifiable. Pas d'accord donné pour distribuer l'image, alors que je suis isolé dans l'image et identifiable. Fabien BP (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Krd 13:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
No agreement to distribute the image, while alone in the image and identifiable. Pas d'accord donné pour distribuer l'image, alors que je suis isolé dans l'image et identifiable. Fabien BP (talk) 09:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Monsieur Fabien bievre perrin était en conférence publique, étant une personne publique don l'image est visible ici : https://www.imaginales.fr/invites/bievre-perrin-fabien/ , ou là https://endirectdulabo.wordpress.com/2017/11/12/fabienbievreperrin/ dans le cadre d'une manifestation publique : fr:Les Imaginales. Merci. Gérald Garitan (talk) 12:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Gérald Garitan. Comme le spécifie la loi, "Dans le cas d'une image prise dans un lieu public, votre autorisation est nécessaire si vous êtes isolé et reconnaissable." (https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F32103). Si l'on considère que je suis une personne publique, mon image peut être diffusée dans le but d'informer. Ici cela n'est pas le cas, l'image n'ayant servi qu'à illustrer Wikidata et n'informant en rien sur la raison pour laquelle je m'exprime en public. Mon but n'est pas d’empêcher toute image de moi-même en ligne, comme le montrent les photographies en ligne que vous citez : cette photographie me mets mal à l'aise pour plusieurs raisons, notamment liée à un état de santé, or elle apparait désormais en tête des recherches sur mon nom, et je vous donc serais reconnaissant de respecter ma demande au droit à l'image en l'occurrence, je peux uploader une autre photographie ici si cela peut vous convaincre. Fabien BP (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ex. de photographie pouvant être importée à la place : https://www.flickr.com/photos/22454435@N08/53226778669/in/album-72177720311605762/ Fabien BP (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Usage manifestement non autorisé de l'image d'une personne vivante ayant demandé le retrait, pour un usage absent sur Wikipédia, sans preuve de notoriété (etc.). Favorable au retrait immédiat de la photo + à la suppression de la catégorie dédiée, on ne sait pourquoi, à ce chercheur.
- --
- Clearly unauthorised use of the image of a living person who has requested removal ; unused image on Wikipedia, without proof of notoriety (etc.). In favour of immediate removal of the photo + removal of the category dedicated, for some reason, to this researcher. C.Salviani (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Fabien BP: I cannot access your Flickr link above. Why don't you upload a picture of yourself that you want? Thank you. —holly {chat} 01:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ex. de photographie pouvant être importée à la place : https://www.flickr.com/photos/22454435@N08/53226778669/in/album-72177720311605762/ Fabien BP (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Krd 13:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joepdeumes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader request of new user on NL Wikipedia.. Delete per COM:COURTESY. Request on NL Helpdesk
- File:20130621-160Ellen ten Damme.jpg
- File:Level 42141101-059.jpg
- File:Bingelrade,kerk-2016januari06-001.jpg
- File:Houses-2018juni07-256.jpg
- File:Gulpen,Beversbergweg-2016januari17-074.jpg
- File:29 maart 2013-078Alan Parsons.jpg
- File:Salt 'n Pepa-1988november15-114.jpg
- File:T'Pau-1987november15-102.jpg
- File:T'Pau-1987november15-042.jpg
- File:Orbison, Roy141028-007.jpg
- File:Zorgcentrum-2017augustus04-008.jpg
- File:Noord-20150629-111.jpg
- File:Brikke Oave-20151006-307.jpg
- File:1stewolk.krab20131023-026.jpg
- File:Klinikum-20150607-028.jpg
- File:Rambla-2023oktober03-5679.jpg
- File:Kermis bij avond.jpg
Ellywa (talk) 07:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted the photos. After all they are mine, and I do not agree with the commons. Fair use is ok, but allow people to change my photographs is one step too far Joepdeumes (talk) 08:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- You already agreed with our license when you uploaded the photos. Although most photos were uploaded recently, your first upload was in 2020. Some of these photos are a great addition to Commons and in my eyes deleting them would be a loss for this project. Mbch331 (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Joepdeumes: People can not change your photos, the licence only allows them to make their own versions (afgeleid werk). Moreover, they are obliged to credit you, without implying you approve or like their versions → bertux 09:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Does it make a difference that those photo's contain the text "©Joep Deumes"? FredTC (talk) 09:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete JoepDeumes is in his right to ask for deletion for all but one photograph, as he could have placed {{Dbself}} with the photographs. (He asked deletion of his own photographs within a week). If they would not be removed, people would be allowed to change his photographs and upload them in different versions without the copyright sign, as separate files on Commons, see this photograph from a different photographer. A copyright sign doesn't change a bit, as he doesn't end his copyright but just gives anyone the right to change and re-use the photograph notwithstanding his copyright (through the CC-BY-SA-license). Vysotsky (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Keep one photograph, Funfair at Brunssum, uploaded in 2020, ñice photograph and in use until this morning. Vysotsky (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe when someone else uploaded his pictures and pretented them to be his own work. But this is the photographer himself. He knew what he was doing. Thieu1972 (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- See Courtesy deletions on Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 10:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, that page links to G7: "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content." We should check whether other users had used the pictures in articles, which may have been removed by Joep. Wikiwerner (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment The user uploaded 17 files, of which 16 files are eligible for deletion. Of these 16 files, 13 files are currently in use (all in Wiki-NL only). They were all placed in articles in Wikimedia-NL by the user himself on 30 & 31 Dec. and 1 Jan. (and removed by him after his deletion request -subsequently uploaded again after that by others). From his own motivation it is clear that he didn't understand the consequences of Creative Commons licenses. His request is too late for the photo he uploaded in 2020, but right in time for the other 16 photographs. Requests for courtesy deletions should be honoured if they are made in good faith. Vysotsky (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- However, his request was also based on an exaggerated view of those consequences. Now that it has been pointed out that the situation is not as bad as he believed, Joepdeumes should come back to clarify if he still requests the deletion. I have given him a heads up at nlwiki.
- Desgewenst vertaal ik de discussie in het Nederlands.
- → bertux 16:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Exaggerated? Not at all. People can crop, colourize, remove watermarks or change photographs with a CC-BY-license in any other way. And they do that, because they are entitled to do it. I do it myself, because it's helpful. Others treat my photographs in the same way, and I think that's fine. Within Commons, we need photographers who don't object to that. We should treat photographers who ask for removal within the courtesy period in a helpful way, not by putting up barriers. Vysotsky (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Joepdeumes implied that the licence allowed people to change the original image flie. That of course is strictly forbidden, which is what I tried to explain → bertux 20:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Exaggerated? Not at all. People can crop, colourize, remove watermarks or change photographs with a CC-BY-license in any other way. And they do that, because they are entitled to do it. I do it myself, because it's helpful. Others treat my photographs in the same way, and I think that's fine. Within Commons, we need photographers who don't object to that. We should treat photographers who ask for removal within the courtesy period in a helpful way, not by putting up barriers. Vysotsky (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- However, his request was also based on an exaggerated view of those consequences. Now that it has been pointed out that the situation is not as bad as he believed, Joepdeumes should come back to clarify if he still requests the deletion. I have given him a heads up at nlwiki.
- Indeed, that page links to G7: "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content." We should check whether other users had used the pictures in articles, which may have been removed by Joep. Wikiwerner (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- See Courtesy deletions on Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 10:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe when someone else uploaded his pictures and pretented them to be his own work. But this is the photographer himself. He knew what he was doing. Thieu1972 (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Does it make a difference that those photo's contain the text "©Joep Deumes"? FredTC (talk) 09:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete Actually, the 16 recent files can be speedy deleted per Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. I will act accordingly on monday evening. I wasn't aware as I usually am handling (very) old requests to reduce backlog Ellywa (talk) 23:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I took the time to explain the ideal of Wikimedia to the uploader, User_talk:Joepdeumes#Het_ideaal_van_Wikipedia_en_de_foto's_die_daar_te_zien_zijn, perhaps he will reconsider his request. Ellywa (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree with you on your decision, i think this request which Ellywa did herself (see first post) shouldn't be handled by herself to come to a decision. (This is what we call in the Netherlands "een slager die zijn eigen vlees keurt"). Furthermore the uploader Joepdeumes is not knew to Commons/Wikipedia since he uploaded his first file quite a long time ago. Some of these files would be dearly missed; 13 files are currently in use (all in Wiki-NL only). Furthermore the reason for deletion sounds a bit strange (as more people noticed). Kind regards Saschaporsche (talk) 13:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete See this discussion on Commons talk:Project scope. Current policy requires a file be "legitimately in use." Adding an image to a sister project in the course of a deletion discussion is not legitimate. Ellywa should have deleted the files without creating this DR as Commons:CSD#G7 applies to the files which were uploaded less than 7 days earlier. So there is no conflict of interest. The uploader is not required to explain why the files have to be deleted in this case. --Wimmel (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Partly deleted. As confirmed by Wimmel and Vysotski, I made a mistake to create a deletion request for 16 of the 17 photo’s listed above, because the uploader asked for deletion within 7 days from uploading, as can be seen here on the Helpdesk of NL Wikipedia. The request translated in English:
- would like to delete my recently added photos Joepdeumes (talk) Jan 6, 2024 02:07 (CET)
Uploader is not aware of the procedures and the difference between Commons and NL Wikipedia, being a user with a small number of edits. The uploader has recently uploaded 16 files, which I have speedy deleted just now, per {{SD}} G7 (= uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content). I consider the images unused because the uploader first installed the photos on several articles on NL Wikipedia, but removed the foto's from the articles at the time of his request for deletion. They were not in use when I filed this DR. The images were however relocated on the articles by one or more other editors on NL Wikipedia, but seem not used on other projects.
My reason to delete the images is in addition based on COM:COURTESY.
If you do not agree with my decision to delete the files, please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why these images should be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.
Regarding the oldest photo, File:Kermis bij avond.jpg, uploaded in 2020 this can be deleted as well imho, based on the fact that the uploader only recently came to the conclusion he does not agree with the terms of CCBYSA. However, this has to be decided by another admin. This photo is not in use today. In addition the photo is showing copyrighted artwork on the righthand side (imho not De minimis), which should be cropped anyway when it is decided to keep it. Ellywa (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close; files already deleted by Ellywa 8 January. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm sure, this photo of some k pop band isn't uploader own work, but i can't find the source. ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, Tineye shows multiple results. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Metadata clearly shows the image is copyrighted, all rights reserved, to Samuel Schumacher, SteelStringPhotography.com. Clear copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 02:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maritzaida purchased this image from photographer in November 2023. She has rights to use the image. Receipt of transaction can be provided. MaritzaidaMusic (talk) 02:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, unless otherwise agreed, paying a photographer to take a photo only gives you the rights to use the photo, not the copyright. In this case, you don't have the right to re-license the photo. The copyright holder is the photographer normally, rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) unless transferred by contract. We need you to provide a contract to prove that the photographer has transferred the copyright to Maritzaida, or ask the photographer direcly to send us a permission via VRT procudure. 0x0a (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discusion; still no indication of permission from copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio and dumb description. Daniel Averanga junto a su hijo Santiago. Foto: Daniel Averanga- Facebook. info: https://rutinasdecamaleon.blogspot.com/2019/04/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Not free picture 77.95.57.63 13:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
This colored image is definitely not a photo made before 1937, but the artwork of unnamed painter (see image structure), scanned from the book, issued in 1995. It's very likely that the author is still living and no evidence to the contrary has been presented. Moreover, when comparing this image with others, it is likely to conclude that this is a fantasy image creatively made by the artist on the basis of the subject's later photographs.188.123.231.16 07:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: file doesn't seem to be free. While the claim of "own work" and the recent date are nonsense, this looks old enough to be likely to be in the public domain, if someone can actually track down authorship. Jmabel ! talk 08:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photo of part of a painting unidentified, might be modern, uploader doesn't have rights to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://gilsongraphics.com/preserving-heritage/. Date and claim of "own work" are, of course, nonsense, but it looks old enough to quite possibly be public domain, and I'd like to give the uploader (or anyone else) time to identify actual source and provenance. Jmabel ! talk 08:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. False license claim. *Might* be pd for reasons, but lacking info needed to make determination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://gilsongraphics.com/preserving-heritage/x. Date and claim of "own work" are, of course, nonsense, but it looks old enough to quite possibly be public domain, and I'd like to give the uploader (or anyone else) time to identify actual source and provenance. Jmabel ! talk 08:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking factual info needed to determine true license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://wbckfm.com/irving-battle-creek-pet-adoption/. Date and claim of "own work" are, of course, nonsense, but if it was functioning as the Hamblin Opera House at the time of the photo, this pretty much has to be public domain, and I'd like to give the uploader (or anyone else) time to identify actual source and provenance. Spinixster, do you have any reason to think this picture is later than 1928? Jmabel ! talk 08:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think the source may be https://dspace.willardlibrary.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/16921?show=full. I'm not sure which date it was in, though. Spinixster (talk) 07:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Spinixster: Again, do you have any reason to think this picture is later than 1928? To my eye, and based on what we know about the history of the building, it looks considerably earlier. - Jmabel ! talk 16:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I guess not. But there's no clear date in the source I provided, so I don't know. Spinixster (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it has the same signage and the same building next to it as the first picture at https://wbckfm.com/new-years-eve-1869-a-great-day-for-battle-creek/, which is unfortunately undated but looks to me to be 19th Century. Given the number of times the building changed owners and uses (and the unlikelihood of that building on the left survived into the late 1920s) I'd be pretty comfortable guessing this is way before 1928. I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be as early as the 1870s. - Jmabel ! talk 07:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- @MacintoshlovesToriel: you uploaded this, and you appear to be focused on Battle Creek. Can you either put a firmer date on this, or do you know someone there who could? - Jmabel ! talk 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I guess not. But there's no clear date in the source I provided, so I don't know. Spinixster (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Spinixster: Again, do you have any reason to think this picture is later than 1928? To my eye, and based on what we know about the history of the building, it looks considerably earlier. - Jmabel ! talk 16:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Fashion hard to see, but looks pre WWI, and from text this would seem to be from before it was remodeled as a cinema in the early 1920s. License and text edited accordingly. (More precise information welcome.) --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Logo. License is nonsense, but it is not at all clear that this is above the threshold of originality for copyright. Jmabel ! talk 08:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, UK TOO is quite strict. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is attempting to copy an already-existing design, see [6]. Veverve (talk) 10:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused uncat fictional variation of existing design, looking to include uncredited derivative elements. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio; contemp. artworks (f.e.; artist of crucifixes died in 2010); no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 11:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
_image.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_image.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
_image.jpg){kind=link}
- @Mr. James Dimsey you uploaded this image, did you colorized it? Günther Frager (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 19th century original is PD, but this colorized derivate of uncertain origin. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
_image.jpg){kind=link}
Possible cpyvio: Logo of a label CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Below TOO —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: and license changed per Matrix. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no info to verify the license. Search shows a colored crop widely exists. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Tineye confirms a version online a year before uploader's claimed creation date. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Festival poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems over TOO France. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The bqnd is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Scan of a sheet music "per un pugno di dollari " from Ennio Moricone, dead for less than 70 years CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, according to the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goncalomeira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, profesional photos on low resolution and without any metadata. Several of the user uploads where taken directly from Getty Images and newspapers.
- File:Fernando Meira no Guimarães.jpg
- File:Fernando Meira no Galatasaray.jpg
- File:Siux padel.jpg
- File:Fernando Meira no pós carreira do futebol.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I have no idea what this represents, how it should be interpreted, and how this can be reusable. The original photo cannot be found anymore in the database (I guess for the same reason). JopkeB (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it is about the same stone. Then my proposal is to keep File:Opschrift steen onderste laag fundering - Zweeloo - 20228180 - RCE.jpg because this one is much better and clearer and is indeed reusable, and still delete the other one, because it is vague and does not show at a glance what it is about. JopkeB (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Even better idea: keep both. I uploaded a version in higher resolution for the other file. Because this file can't be found at RCE anymore, it's even more important to keep it here at Commons. This file might be interesting for people interested in the Church of Zweeloo~. Now we have established what it depicts, there is no more reason for deletion. Vysotsky (talk) 11:11, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot imagine why people/researchers would like to have a bad photograph when there is a good one as well, depicting the same. But that might be my lack of imagination. JopkeB (talk) 05:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are completely right. I worked too quickly. I hope you liked the highres version. Vysotsky (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I did like the the highres version and I think this one is enough. Do you now agree that File:STEEN 30 5 X 15 X 8 5 CM F 153-22 PMVD - Unknown - 20484669 - RCE.jpg can be deleted? JopkeB (talk) 06:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- I do. Vysotsky (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I did like the the highres version and I think this one is enough. Do you now agree that File:STEEN 30 5 X 15 X 8 5 CM F 153-22 PMVD - Unknown - 20484669 - RCE.jpg can be deleted? JopkeB (talk) 06:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are completely right. I worked too quickly. I hope you liked the highres version. Vysotsky (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot imagine why people/researchers would like to have a bad photograph when there is a good one as well, depicting the same. But that might be my lack of imagination. JopkeB (talk) 05:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it is about the same stone. Then my proposal is to keep File:Opschrift steen onderste laag fundering - Zweeloo - 20228180 - RCE.jpg because this one is much better and clearer and is indeed reusable, and still delete the other one, because it is vague and does not show at a glance what it is about. JopkeB (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Unlike own work. Photo taken by a professional photographer, the metadata points to Facebook. Günther Frager (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Unfree. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files containing Scratch trademarks --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Cropped from https://twitter.com/hornby/status/1253957052457771008 - needs permission - not own work Gbawden (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot from a Youtube video that either doesn't exists or it is private. Thus, it is not possible to verity it was published under a free license. Günther Frager (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
PHOTO: Facebook/Abdul Hamid Bador. article: https://www.asiaone.com/malaysia/malaysias-police-chief-causes-ripples-claims-corruption-among-senior-ranks-force ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted material. Use on w:Joe McLaughlin (sportswriter) has been replaced with a proper citation. Jfire (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by R Prazeres as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not uploader's own work and clearly taken from the web. No evidence provided of compatible license.|source= [7] (or other like this)
This is a late 1930s or early 1940s photograph. It could be public domain but we'd to know when it was published and where to properly determine its copyright status. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking info needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Late 1930s or early 1940s photograph, CC0 license is highly dubious. It could be public domain but we'd need to know where and when it was first published to determine that. Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Idem. Matpib (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking info needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netpartizán as Fair use (Non-free use rationale) and the most recent rationale was: Description= Mug shot of Ted Bundy taken on March 10, 1975 by the Sheriff Salt Lake County.|Article=Ted Bundy|Source=[8]|Portion=|Purpose=Illustrates the subject of the article, Ted Bundy|Resolution=|Replaceability=No. Person depicted is deceased.|other_information=
This mug shot could be public domain as {{PD-US-no notice}}. Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking info needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted from English Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Partidodelpueblodepanama.png#mw-jump-to-license CubanoBoi (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Also these other files also created by me should be deleted for copyright
- File:Coat of arms of Camajuani.png a retrace of https://www.flickr.com/photos/14020964@N02/27981778392 which’s copyright tag isn’t allowed on commons
- File:Petoria flag.png, unused file that’s also likely too similar to the Family Guy version
- File:Coat of Arms of Arroyo Naranjo.png, trace of copyrighted image
- Files found on EcuRed without copyright info:
- File:Seal of Nuevitas.png
- File:Seal of Cifuentes.png
- File:Coat of Arms of Corralillo.png
- File:Shield of Manicaragua.png
- File:Shield of Quemado de Güines.png
- File:Shield of Ranchuelo.png (which includes the files of File:Flag of Ranchuelo.png and File:Bandera de Ranchuelo.svg
- File:Escudo de Jiguaní.png
- File:Escudo de Matantí.png
- File:Escudo de Limonar.png
- File:Shield of Guanajay.png
- File:Coat of Arms of Santo Domingo, Cuba.png
- File:Seal of Remedios.png
- CubanoBoi (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to include
- CubanoBoi (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - dies ist aber schlecht möglich, da Urheber und abgebildete Person identisch sein sollen. Es handelt sich aber zweifelsfrei nicht um ein Selfie
Obvious mislicensing as "own work" - but this is hardly possible, as the author and the person depicted are supposed to be identical. There is no doubt, however, that this is not a selfie Lutheraner (talk) 00:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, profesional (press)-photo; Used also on different web pages; COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Picture by Sabri Ben-Meftah per metadata, not the same as the uploader. Uploader whose user name includes "SBM" seems perfectly likely to be Sabri Ben-Meftah. Unless there is evidence of prior publication that would seem perfectly plausible. Jmabel ! talk 08:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: This picture (part of the picture) was used on different web-pages, years ago, like here: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/apr/07/vietnam-hat-palm-lanonia-centralis ) - copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spinixster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://archiv.experimentaltheater.com/index.php-id%3D19&L%3D1.html Given that the account name matches the name of the subject of the photo, I'd like to give time to sort this out. @User:Eebrenner: this doesn't look like a selfie, so the permission needs to come from the photgrapher. Please see COM:VRT. (Das sieht nicht wie ein Selfie aus, daher muss die Erlaubnis des Fotografen eingeholt werden. Bitte beachten Sie COM:VRT/de.) Jmabel ! talk 09:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (used on different web pages, like https://augustin.or.at/ueberlebenstheater-findet-stadt/ ). --Wdwd (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation? In the top right corner is a watermark: "JBPhotographyFW", I guess the copyright holder of the photos. But the uploader is Jbranch89 and I do not see a VRT ticket. So please send an email to VRT to confirm that JBPhotographyFW agrees with uploading these photographs on Commons, otherwise these photos will be deleted.
- File:Prince Anthony at a photo shoot. (2022).jpg
- File:Prince Anthony of Savoy.jpg
- File:HRH Prince Anthony of Savoy.jpg
- File:HRH Prince Anthony in Royal colors..jpg
- File:Prince Anthony.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JopkeB (talk) 10:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission via VRTS. --Wdwd (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The metadata on [9] indicate a copyright.
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foto_Promo_Actuaci%C3%B3n_En_Compa%C3%B1%C3%ADa_cuadrada.jpg){kind=link}
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm new in Wikipedia and English is not my mother language so I don't understand why it's indicated that the picture has a copywrite if I took the picture myself and gave permission to use it. Please let me know what I have to do to fix the problem. Thank you Fattablop (talk) 15:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, As I do not speak Spanish, I will publish a text in English and make it translate by an automated translator:
- I can see in the metadata, that the copyright holder is 156 PRODUCCIONES SL. If it is you, who took the picture, you should clarify the situation by following the instructions on this page and open an OTSR request: [10]
- Hola, Como no hablo español, voy a publicar un texto en inglés y hacerlo traducir por un traductor automático:
- Puedo ver en los metadatos, que el titular de los derechos de autor es 156 PRODUCCIONES SL. Si eres tú, quien tomó la foto, deberías aclarar la situación siguiendo las instrucciones de esta página y abrir una solicitud OTSR: [11] CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I already sent an email to permissions-es@wikipedia.org from the corporate email account of 156 Producciones. I hope everything is ok now. Let me know whatever.
- Thank yoy Fattablop (talk) 06:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024010810001802 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Foto Promo Actuación En Compañía cuadrada.jpg” under ticket:2024010810001802. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep for File:Foto Promo Actuación En Compañía cuadrada.jpg. Permission comes from an official email address of the rights holder. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: permission via VRTS. --Wdwd (talk) 11:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Same picture as File:Ca Sĩ - Phi Nhung.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by De Crescenzo Gennaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author
- File:48f7d5 ea64a028054b43d1b03d94ed0b6a8f2e mv2.jpg
- File:GENNARO DE CRESCENZO.jpg
- File:Gennaro de crescenzo.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by De Crescenzo Gennaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]{{No permission since|month=August|day=24|year=2024}}
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 23:05, August 31, 2024, by Aafi (No permission since 24 August 2024). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The models are marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No metadata, user has no other uploads, unlikely they would have taken a photo that was probably part of a team photoshoot. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Ffbk logo 12mm 1600-1.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected Estopedist1 (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the info from et:Paul_Sillaste; original image dates back to 1940 with unknown photographer. -> copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: At 17k file size simply a web grab from where? I see no potential sources with TinEye or Google Images. This looks like a crop from a much wider shot. In use, but no EXIF. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Crop from image located at https://www.broadwayworld.com/people/galleryphoto.php?photoid=2400127&personid=10177, titled "Emily Skinner, Clyde Alves and Robyn Hurder Photo (2023-04-28)", photo created by Bruce Glikas. --Wimmel (talk) 22:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Wimmel. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Claimed as own work but some labelled press stills in exif, others have author name in exif. I think they all need permission to keep. PCP
- File:Ninnila Ninnila Movie Press Meet with cast.jpg
- File:Ninnila Ninnila Movie Press Meet.jpg
- File:Director Priyadharshan, Ani I V Sasi and other Assistant Directors.jpg
- File:Pranav Mohanlal, Ani Sasi and others.jpg
- File:Ani I V Sasi.jpg
- File:Pranav Mohanlal and Ani I V Sasi.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
![16:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/06#c-A1Cafel-20240106161400-File:"İstikrarın_Yüzyılı"_Pano,_Recep_Tayyip_Erdoğan.jpg){kind=link}
- This bilboard image is public. "Public domain objects are not protected by copyright, so objects of this kind can be freely photographed and the pictures can be published both royalty free and commercially, at least so far as copyright law is concerned (there may be contractual or other restrictions on picture-taking, though, especially on private property). Moreover, pictures of public domain objects can be freely modified and derivative works can be freely developed." Bjelica (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
![12:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/01/06#c-Wdwd-20240123122900-File:"İstikrarın_Yüzyılı"_Pano,_Recep_Tayyip_Erdoğan.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Eric_"slowhand"_Clapton.jpg Günther Frager (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 06:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata: @takdare, different from description ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 06:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 06:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
no commons tag ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced POV user created map, I do not think accuarately reflect internationally recognized borders or territorial disputes.[12],[13] See [14] and [15] on English Wikpedia for additional information. // Timothy :: talk 19:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- this user is trying to censor the Surinamese border dispute issue by requesting deletion. Wikimedia commons is not wikipedia, and you don't have the right to censor the content based on your own biases. SurinameCentral (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the official borders of Suriname, on the website of the Government. how can you say it is unsourced?
- [16]https://gov.sr/suriname/ SurinameCentral (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- en:Borders of Suriname: Yes, this is a POV map, but it is conforms to the official Suriname position. Commons does not require all uploaded media to adhere to Wikipedia's NPOV. It is educational within scope, Keep.
- On another note, maps of Hungary placed by the nationalist government on public monuments depict Category:Greater Hungary despite them having no official territorial disputes. --Enyavar (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Enyavar, i suspect this is an attempt to censorship by a user or possible a group. Wikipedia should be a neutral platform yet the Surinamese POV is censored out and the Guyanese/French biased pushed. I am. Not going to fight it out here, just know what this deletion attempt is and that it will possibly continue. SurinameCentral (talk) 11:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- en:Borders of Suriname: Yes, this is a POV map, but it is conforms to the official Suriname position. Commons does not require all uploaded media to adhere to Wikipedia's NPOV. It is educational within scope,
- Comment: Creator has been blocked on English Wikipedia as NOTHERE over this issue Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Spamming extremist maps and edit warring, BLock log: [17]. I think all of their contributions will be reviewed eventually for POV issues. // Timothy :: talk 09:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- And yet another user who uses words like extremists map, it's our official map and you should stop insuling it. I'm not walking I'm another trap of, because the moment I say something, some editor jumps on me about good faith and personal attack. Yet your accusations of extremism is ignored. Long live "neutrality" on wiki. SurinameCentral (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Don't delete: this map is the Surinamese version of the border and the particular uploader wasn't blocked because of his maps but because he got into editwars. The map here above and other work of this uploader are part of a project to avail the wiki's of neutral maps of Suriname, see here: User:Ymnes/Maps of Suriname. As a matter of fact, the area was Surinamese territory until Guyana invaded Suriname militarily in 1968, like Russia did with Crimea. These maps are needed for the wiki projects. Since science is not extremist, none of these maps are. The dispute does exist, see w:en:Tigri Area, and on Commons we don't hold a political stance. Ymnes (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep, no valid reason for deletion. If you don't like it, don't use it. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the map still shows the deletion tag. what needs to happen now in order to remove that? SurinameCentral (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- @SurinameCentral: An Admin needs to decide the outcome of this DR. See COM:DR and COM:DP. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the map still shows the deletion tag. what needs to happen now in order to remove that? SurinameCentral (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion/in scope and no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F10; unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Low quality version of / Schlechter aufgelöste Version von File:Ridder in de Orde van Verdienste van de Beierse Kroon.jpg Naronnas (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Fake license. An official paper with some parts wiped out can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Just some text with a bit of glow, below TOO. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Album covers need OTSR tickets, I think. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Matrix. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 22:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
No source to verify license for both the files. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
No source to verify license. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This was tagged with {{Fairuse}} but I don't see any claim of fair use here. I do see a probably bogus license tag, but as far as I can see there is nothing copyrightable here (might depend on what country we consider to be the country of origin). The few at all imaginably copyrighted icons look de minimis. Jmabel ! talk 08:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 22:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Apparently a scan from a printed leaflet (as the filename and category suggest). Text is highly likely copyrighted, thus a possible copyvio. Yasu (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Issued in 1966 (the 41st year of the Showa era), the text depicted is copyrighted. Thus the file makes an infringement of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kadı as no permission (No permission since). 2014 upload, should be discussed. Previous version before cropping had full EXIF (Nikon D3100). Please explain why you doubt this is own work. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts, The uploader uploaded a photo recently which was taken from Twitter, I deleted it because of copyright infringements. We discussed it here in trwiki, you can check via Google Translate. Kadı Message 08:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Found this photo on the subject's own website: http://oznurcalik.com.tr/gundem/149/recep_tayyip_erdogan_dunya_lideridir. VRT is needed to confirm permission. —holly {chat} 23:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kadı as no permission (No permission since)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2015 upload, should be discussed. Please explain why you doubt this is own work. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts, The uploader uploaded a photo recently which was taken from Twitter, I deleted it because of copyright infringements. We discussed it here in trwiki, you can check via Google Translate. Kadı Message 08:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: We assume good faith until the uploader gives us reason not to, which they now have. —holly {chat} 23:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
not cc-by-sa, maybe copyvio or no permission
- File:2006 MIT Integration Bee.jpg: no EXIF -- kept, no hits via Google Lens or TinEye except WP mirrors, so reason to doubt claim of own work
- File:Philippa Garrett Fawcett 1891 cropped.jpg -- kept, PD-old-assumed
- File:Callen-front-2nd-ed.jpg -- kept, PD-text/PD-chart
- File:QM-townsend-2nd-ed-front-cover.jpg -- deleted
- File:Goldstein-Classmech-2nd-ed-cover.jpg -- kept, PD-text/PD-shape
- File:Front cover of Griffiths' Electrodynamics.jpg -- kept: PD-text
shizhao (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Public domain
- From the 19th century.
- This book cover features Carnot's cycle in thermodynamics.
- This book cover features the Stern-Gerlach experiment in quantum mechanics.
- This is an illustration of a possible orbital trajectory.
- These are Poisson's equations in electricity and magnetism.
Nerd271 (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Philippa Garrett Fawcett 1891 cropped.jpg it is PD-UK. --RAN (talk) 00:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
See inline for individual decisions. —holly {chat} 23:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Random PD rationale, ridiculous 'own work' claim, photo is made in the Soviet Union, no any indication of publication in US. Komarof (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ByaduniaEspoir
[edit]User:ByaduniaEspoir has uploaded many pictures that I think are in copyright violation for various reasons:
- [UPDATE January 7] : turns out User:ByaduniaEspoir was a sockpuppet of User:EdwinAlden.1995, warned multiple times and blocked for copyright violation. ByaduniaEspoir is now blocked indefinitely:
-
List of files to delete because there's no freedom of panorama in DRC (COM:FOP DRC) and because they were often published on non-free websites before date of upload on Commons :
- File:Le Centre Financier Kinshasa a Gombe.jpg (+ uploaded on December 20, but published since December 18 here)
- File:Le nouveau Centre financier de Kinshasa.jpg (+ uploaded on December 20, but published since December 19 here or here)
- File:Le nouveau Centre financier de Kinshasa à Gombe.jpg (+ uploaded on December 20, but published since December 19 here)
- File:Bâtiment de l'Université Pédagogique Nationale.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 11 here)
- File:Une vue de I'Universite Pedagogique Nationale.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 10 here)
- File:Un bâtiment achevé construit à l'Université Pédagogique Nationale.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 10 here)
- File:Bâtiment construit à l'Université Pédagogique Nationale.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 10 here or here)
- File:Université Pédagogique Nationale a Kinshasa.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 11 here)
- File:Une vue extérieure du bâtiment de l'Université Pédagogique Nationale.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 10 here)
- File:Une vue exterieure de I'Universite Pedagogique Nationale.jpg (+ uploaded on December 16, but published since December 10 here)
- File:Le Mémorial du Soldat Congolais à Kinshasa.jpg inaugurated in 2017 so not in the Public Domain yet (+ uploaded on October 2023, but published since June 2022 here)
- File:Fleuve Congo Hotel, Kinshasa.jpg, made in the 1970S by French architect Olivier-Clément Cacoub, who died in 2008 according to this article (in French), so it isn't Public Domain according to COM:Democratic Republic of the Congo (Standard : Life + 50 years).
List of files which are clearly COM:DW (pictures taken of paper photographs) and which I do not believe meet the criteria to be public domain in DRC. Indeed, COM:Democratic Republic of the Congo states that photos are public domain 25 years after publishing. Unfortunately, we don't have any information about : 1/ whether those pictures were indeed publicly published at the time they were taken (the fact it's COM:DW and there's no better quality versions, along with the fact it doesn't seem like professional / promotional pictures, makes me think these pictures were taken for a private use) and 2/ if they were indeed published, in which country that was (they were almost all taken in other countries than DRC) :
- File:Awilo Longomba, Jocelyn Brown, et Anita Ward, 2001.jpg (I have a hard time believing uploader is the original photographer as claimed here + 2001 is too early, it's not been 25 years)
- File:Papa Wemba et les membres de Viva La Musica, dont Awilo Longomba, au Japon en 1986.jpg
- File:Awilo Longomba et Viva La Musica en 1986, Japon.jpg
- File:Awilo Longomba et les membres de Viva La Musica lors de leurs performances à Tokyo, Japon.jpg
- File:King Kester Emeneya et Lidjo Kempa dans les annees 70.jpg
Some plain copyright violations :
- File:Youssoupha avec son groupe a Bruxelles.jpg, published since 2015 on the true photographer's website
- File:Fally Ipupa en visite dans un theatre a Kinshasa.jpg, published since 2020 on this Facebook page
- File:Francois Nsingi au Parc Reptilarium Serpents du dans la commune de Ngaliema a Kinshasa.jpg, published since 2015 on TripAdvisor
- File:L'artiste BM pendant son mariage.jpg, published since July 2022 on this artist's Facebook page
- File:Awilo Longomba, 2023.jpg, published since May 2023 on this artist's Facebook page (VOA noted in the file's description isn't Voice of America, but The Voice Africa, as indicated here)
- File:Bukavu, Place De L'independance.jpg, published since August 2023 on Instagram
- File:Fally Ipupa représentant son album certifié disque d'or.jpg, published since 2022 on Facebook
Other :
- File:L'importanteUniversitéPédagogiqueNationaleàKinshasa.jpg : this logo seems way too detailed, especially on the right side, to benefit from {{PD-textlogo}}
Thank you --Titlutin (talk) 22:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nk as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: rather (un)famous work of a known author, bg:Александър Хайтов
Yes, but the photograph does appear to be an own work so this is a FoP case. No FoP in Bulgaria and the sculptor as linked above is still living. Abzeronow (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is exactly what I had in mind. :) In fact the same argument can be applied to the whole Category:Monument to Samuil, Sofia. --Спас Колев (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Created a separate DR for the other files Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to Samuil, Sofia Abzeronow (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
The monument in question was only erected in 1995. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The file's usage was justified by Template:gov.pl, which does not apply here, as the photo was taken and uploaded after August 19, 2022. Additionally, on Flickr, the photo's license is set to "All rights reserved" [18]. Max19582 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
https://www.gov.pl/web/primeminister/donald-tusk (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanisław Krupiński (talk • contribs)
- @Stanisław Krupiński: While the source is indeed gov.pl, this usage is not justified here. Gov.pl works can only be used for media from August 19, 2022 and earlier: look at Template:Gov.pl. Max19582 (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- This should be applied to File:Donald Tusk KPRM.jpg and descendants, not just this single derivative crop of it. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
,,All content published on this website is covered by a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 PL license, unless stated otherwise." – https://web.archive.org/web/20240115221246/https://www.gov.pl/web/primeminister/donald-tusk (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanisław Krupiński (talk • contribs)
- Weird, the same text says something different when you view the website in Polish - https://www.gov.pl/web/premier/donald-tusk
- Wszystkie treści publikowane w serwisie są udostępniane na licencji Creative Commons: uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne - bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 PL), o ile nie jest to stwierdzone inaczej.
- Not quite sure which license is applicable here then. Max19582 (talk) 20:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- The Polish and English sides are two different things. the Polish website has a different license and many other things (different articles and sometimes photos). The English-language website has a different license and sometimes different content. This photo, like many others on commond, is from the English website and can be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanisław Krupiński (talk • contribs) 10:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Stanisław Krupiński: This needs to be clarified on the template, and you need to sign each of your posts properly in a way that the signature can visually "unambiguously identify the author of a comment" per Commons:Signatures Policy, as all I see is "(talk)" in the first two cases above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- The license description has now been changed to the correct one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanisław Krupiński (talk • contribs) 19:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC-BY license is clearly displayed on site. —holly {chat} 20:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Malarz pl as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted logo: https://emalia.eu/category/kontakt-o-firmie https://emalia.eu/uploads/collections/14/657f4b47b02fb-0.png . Stated license is presumably useless (barring COM:VRT approval of permission) but it might be below the threshold of originality. I believe this is for Poland, so that threshold is low, though. Jmabel ! talk 08:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; TOO in Poland is extremely low and this file is unused anyway. —holly {chat} 21:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: A architectural plant produced and delivered to an municipality to license constructions works is not a publication. Tm (talk) 07:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC) I don't think that is clearcut enough for a speedy deletion, and I'm converting to a DR to allow time for discussion. Jmabel ! talk 09:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, these plans by collective person "Sociedade Mercantil do Minho, Lda." were disclosed upon submission to the Municipal Council of Guimarães on April 30, 1923. The Cavalinho Spinning and Weaving Factory was then built according to these plans, further disclosing and effectively publishing these plans to the workers, vendors, and passers-by before expansion in 1934. They therefore qualify under this section of the third reason in {{PD-Portugal-URAA}}: "a work by a collective person whose authors were not individually identified, published or disclosed before 1946". — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, for the same reasons stated by Jeff G. V.B.Speranza (talk) 21:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Jeff G. —holly {chat} 22:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Screenshot. Not obvious to me (Jmabel) that there is anything here above the threshold of originality. Jmabel ! talk 09:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete While this is surely below TOO US (and that's Google Analytics, so it would be US laws), this is surely out of scope: the file is unused, en:Holimate was speedily deleted for being advertising, and their website is non-functional (hardly any of the links work). —holly {chat} 23:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
According to the file description, the photo was shot in early Showa era (circa 1930s). Uploader's own work claim is highly unlikely. Yasu (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
the original source of the file no longer exists Cambrinocambrino (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. That isn't a reason for deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
if you check the source you will find a page on flickr which does not exist. I am also in contact with the two people pictured as legal representatives. They do not agree to their faces being shared on Wikimedia commons. I ask you to remove the photo immediately. Otherwise we will consider legal action. 194.230.144.229 20:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- What were the circumstances of this photo? Were they in a public place with no expectation of privacy? If so, then per COM:Photographs of identifiable people, this is not a valid reason for deletion. Furthermore, making legal threats is prohibited on Commons. —holly {chat} 21:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No source, also unused. COM:PRP/. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no specific reason. --Krd 09:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The black-and-white source photo is public domain, and you did the colorization, didn't you (at least you said you did)? So what copyright problem do you think there is? —holly {chat} 22:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: licenses appear to be correct as this was a coat of arms created by a member of Philippines government. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
photo copiée sur un site, ne donne aucune indication qu'elle est libre de droits Pierrette13 (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep License corrected to "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 00:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: License has been corrected. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
A screenshot from some video. It's unclear, though, if it's really the user's / uploader's own work or just a screenshot from some third party video material for which no claim of ownership can really be made by the user / uploader. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
PS. Now that I'm thinking of it again, it could even be a screenshot from some printed material like a magazine (see the bluish lights around the middle of the photo and close to the terrain that don't match at all with the black or even white colours that caracterize PAOK and its fans). --🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment 2006 per uploader - Might it be from an inexpensive camera phone of the time? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Other photos by uploader, all of which are similarly low quality: File:Toumpa020208.JPG, File:PAOK-gavro.jpg, File:PAOKscores.JPG. It seems like this was just their camera phone at the time. —holly {chat} 19:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Mr. James Dimsey: Seems to fall under laws, which are generally not copyrighted. COM:Jamaica doesn't mention anything about laws being copyrighted or not though. Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 04:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
_Territorial_Claims.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Territorial_Claims.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There may be copyright issues. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
_Territorial_Claims.jpg){kind=link}
- @Mr. James Dimsey: Please explain further. What sources did you use in creating this map (and accompanying text)? Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
_Territorial_Claims.jpg){kind=link}
File:1 BILLO TIBERIO La Pentecôte 1565 ? Huile sur toile - 305 cm x 554 cm - Musée des Beaux Arts de Chartres.png
[edit]
demande externe Jmkaelin (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
28 fichiers différents avec le même nom ?
[edit]
Comment expliquer que les 28 fichiers de Category:Paintings by Tiberio Billò in the museum of Chartres peuvent avoir le même nom avec des contenus différents ? Au-delà de cette question probablement due à un bug, le fichier File:1 BILLO TIBERIO La Pentecôte 1565 ? Huile sur toile - 305 cm x 554 cm - Musée des Beaux Arts de Chartres.png est bien référencé, comme indiqué précédemment, donc à conserver. Bien cordialement, Le Passant (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a reference for this file !
[edit]
How to explain that 28 files of Category:Paintings by Tiberio Billò in the museum of Chartres got the same name with different contents ?
The file File:1 BILLO TIBERIO La Pentecôte 1565 ? Huile sur toile - 305 cm x 554 cm - Musée des Beaux Arts de Chartres.png has this reference : La Pentecôte, un tableau maniériste siennois and, therefore, must not be suppressed. The 27 others files have no reference and have to be suppressed. Le Passant (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmkaelin: Who made the request? —holly {chat} 22:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Krd 05:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Bogus CC licenses. Might be in the public domain but a source is needed for verification.
- File:Roberto F.W..jpg
- File:Calazans Cavalcante.jpg
- File:João Vitor.jpg
- File:Noêmia Wanderley.jpg
- File:Wladimir Wanderley.jpg
- File:Sebastião Batalha.jpg
- File:Letícia Cavalcante.jpg
- File:José Soares.jpg
- File:Robson Mendes.jpg
- File:João Vitor da Silva.jpg
- File:Renato Beinjoino Reis.jpg
- File:José Ferreira Albuquerque.jpg
- File:José Gonzaga Benjoino.jpg
- File:Simão José Januário.jpg
- File:Roberto Ferreira Wanderley.jpg
- File:Jorge Luiz Gonzaga Amorim.jpg
- File:Hugo Wanderley Cajú.jpg
- File:Clarindo Correia de Amorim.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
And:
- File:Humberto Mendes baleado..webp
- File:Robson Mendes, Muniz Falcão e Rubens Canuto.webp
- File:Robson Mendes cuidando-se após o atentado.webp
--0x0a (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed. {{PD-Brazil-Photo}} --RAN (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Where do we know from that PD-Brazil-Photo does apply where there is no information about creator and creation date? --Krd 05:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no way of knowing these actually were taken in Brazil. —holly {chat} 20:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2015112010003179
[edit]All these PDFs refer to ticket:2015112010003179 which was never successfully closed. Hence, we never got a written permission from the respective authors.
- File:Maja Bigyana Parakha.pdf
- File:Paribesha O Atmanirvarsilata.pdf
- File:Gijubhai Sikshanidhi.pdf
- File:Kanhiki Bhai Kanhiki.pdf
- File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf
- File:Surya Aama Bandhu.pdf
- File:Paribesh Pradusana.pdf
- File:Bigyana Ka'na.pdf
- File:Kagaja Bhangaru Jyamiti.pdf
- File:Atha Kuhuka.pdf
- File:Akashare Luchakali.pdf
- File:Kimiara Bigyana.pdf
- File:Kagajara Khela.pdf
- File:Ganita Kuhuka.pdf
- File:Biplaba Suare Padartha Bigyan.pdf
- File:Akarara Dunia.pdf
- File:Hatatiari Khelana.pdf
- File:Jibanara Piladina.pdf
- File:Bigyana Parakha.pdf
- File:Chhai Aluara Khela.pdf
- File:Paribesa, Bikasa O Alia.pdf
- File:The Story of Our Universe.pdf
- File:Kagaja Bhangara Maja.pdf
- File:Bikasha Pain Binasha.pdf
- File:Asha Tara Dekhiba.pdf
- File:Graha Sanchara.pdf
- File:Paraga Grahan O' Dhumaketu.pdf
- File:Kita O Tara Jatibhai.pdf
- File:Gachhabaida.pdf
- File:Baigyanika Drustikona.pdf
- File:Jahnadhara Baia.pdf
- File:Patraru Chitra.pdf
- File:Odishara Banyaprani- Stanyapayi.pdf
- File:Mo Bandhu Sri Leaky.pdf
- File:Chandra Abhijan.pdf
- File:Pade Chhande Paribesha.pdf
- File:Bigyana Pahali.pdf
- File:Kheli Kheli Sikhiba.pdf
- File:Biswara Rupa.pdf
- File:Paribesha Darpan.pdf
- File:Odisha Pain Gachha.pdf
- File:Chitra Pahachare Chidiakhana.pdf
- File:Divaswapna.pdf
- File:Rahasyamaya Mangala.pdf
- File:Prasna Kare Anarko.pdf
- File:Ama Manara Gita.pdf
- File:Akasha Bichitra 1996.pdf
- File:Prakruti Parakha.pdf
- File:Ama Ghara Ei Pruthibi.pdf
- File:Aliaru Maja Kama.pdf
- File:Kagajaru Akruti.pdf
- File:Hata Pa'ntare Bigyan.pdf
- File:Padartha Bigyanara Kahani.pdf
- File:Jala Sampada.pdf
AFBorchert (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: I don't understand. I don't have access to the ticket and cannot figure out what I need to do here. Tagging for deletion all these books that a tiny Wikimedia community has worked hard to negotiate with authors on the basis of something that is opaque to me or rest of the community members is probably not the best solution. What was the reason the ticket was not closed? What was really missing from the community and/or the authors? Psubhashish (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: It is quite simple, those who we were in contact with were never able or willing to obtain written permission for the release under a free license from the respective copyright owners of these books. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I was in touch with the Copyright Owner and I have in front of me an email to OTRS from the Owner on November 20th, 2015, containing all the titles tagged. Sorry to be blunt, but your response sounds like preaching to the choir, and indicates that the effort of small communities does not matter. It would be a collective harrassment to go back and ask the Owner to write to OTRS when the 2015 email is per the process, leaving any room for confusion. Please share your email so that I could forward you the original email. Psubhashish (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: I have read the entire conversation archived at VRT. None of this included the required permission from the individual authors of these books. It is neither the fault of the VRT member at that time handling the ticket nor mine that these permissions are still missing. The problem behind this is a significant misunderstanding of copyright. Under normal circumstances contracts between authors and publishers do not include the right to relicense the works under a free license. The publisher could neither present proof of such a right nor did we have permissions from any of the authors for such a release. I understand that this might be frustrating but we cannot keep these works at Commons without the necessary permissions. All this was patiently explained within the correspondence. No response came after the last email was sent by the VRT member on 8 January 2016. All these files were uploaded afterwards in March 2016 without the necessary confirmation from VRT. If you want to do something about it you have to contact all the individual authors asking them for permissions. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of the copyright issues when we're dealing with magazines with multiple authors. The 109 volumes of ବିଜ୍ଞାନ ତରଙ୍ଗ (Bigyan Taranga) magazine published during 1988-2007 would be the affected ones where different articles have different authors outside of Srujanika, and hence Puspashree Pattnaik's relicensing would not cover those specific articles. But, it's ridiculous when the book metadata page, for instance this one, mentions the author as Puspashree Pattnaik and the organisation Srujanika being the copyright holder, and her email to VRT clearly mentions that she as the representative of Srujanika is relicensing it under a Wiki Commons-compatible CC License. You yet chose to arbitrarily tag all such books by assuming that copyright migration was not successful, making our entire effort futile. Psubhashish (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: We do not need representatives or publishers, we need the permissions from all authors involved. Please take the time and get familiar with copyright law, in particular with the restrictions of an assignment of copyright according to chapter IV in Indian copyright law. Let me quote from Ishan Sambhar, India: Assignment and Licensing of Copyright: However, mere grant of right to publish and sell the copyrighted work amounts to publishing right and not assignment of copyright. The article refers to the decision Video Master v. Nishi where the Bombay High Court decided that an assignment of video rights did not include the right of satellite broadcast as well. In summary, if we do not have proof that the written contract regarding the assignment of copyright includes the unusual right of relicensing the work, it is still the reserved right of the respective owners as first owner of copyright to decide whether they want to relicense their works or not. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Of course. That said, Srujanika, the publisher in this case, owns the copyright. On the top of that, Puspashree Pattnaik herself is author of some of the books, as I shared in the last message here. The books you've flagged are Srujanika's own publications and they own the copyrights. Bigyan Taranga, the magazine they published, that are not yet uploaded to Commons, contain articles owned by multiple authors. Psubhashish (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: This does not cover books like File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf or File:Kimiara Bigyana.pdf that were written by other authors. All files need a confirmation through VRT. You do not get this through this deletion request, the conversation with VRT has to be re-opened for any files here you want to keep. Without VRT confirmation all files will be deleted. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you in that remove tags from books that Srujanika owns copyright of? It makes no sense when Puspashree Pattnaik is the author, and hence, copyright holder of File:Maja Bigyana Parakha.pdf, and has permitted through VRT, and yet that book is tagged for deletion. Who else is expected to provide permission? Psubhashish (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: This does not cover books like File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf or File:Kimiara Bigyana.pdf that were written by other authors. All files need a confirmation through VRT. You do not get this through this deletion request, the conversation with VRT has to be re-opened for any files here you want to keep. Without VRT confirmation all files will be deleted. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Of course. That said, Srujanika, the publisher in this case, owns the copyright. On the top of that, Puspashree Pattnaik herself is author of some of the books, as I shared in the last message here. The books you've flagged are Srujanika's own publications and they own the copyrights. Bigyan Taranga, the magazine they published, that are not yet uploaded to Commons, contain articles owned by multiple authors. Psubhashish (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: We do not need representatives or publishers, we need the permissions from all authors involved. Please take the time and get familiar with copyright law, in particular with the restrictions of an assignment of copyright according to chapter IV in Indian copyright law. Let me quote from Ishan Sambhar, India: Assignment and Licensing of Copyright: However, mere grant of right to publish and sell the copyrighted work amounts to publishing right and not assignment of copyright. The article refers to the decision Video Master v. Nishi where the Bombay High Court decided that an assignment of video rights did not include the right of satellite broadcast as well. In summary, if we do not have proof that the written contract regarding the assignment of copyright includes the unusual right of relicensing the work, it is still the reserved right of the respective owners as first owner of copyright to decide whether they want to relicense their works or not. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of the copyright issues when we're dealing with magazines with multiple authors. The 109 volumes of ବିଜ୍ଞାନ ତରଙ୍ଗ (Bigyan Taranga) magazine published during 1988-2007 would be the affected ones where different articles have different authors outside of Srujanika, and hence Puspashree Pattnaik's relicensing would not cover those specific articles. But, it's ridiculous when the book metadata page, for instance this one, mentions the author as Puspashree Pattnaik and the organisation Srujanika being the copyright holder, and her email to VRT clearly mentions that she as the representative of Srujanika is relicensing it under a Wiki Commons-compatible CC License. You yet chose to arbitrarily tag all such books by assuming that copyright migration was not successful, making our entire effort futile. Psubhashish (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: I have read the entire conversation archived at VRT. None of this included the required permission from the individual authors of these books. It is neither the fault of the VRT member at that time handling the ticket nor mine that these permissions are still missing. The problem behind this is a significant misunderstanding of copyright. Under normal circumstances contracts between authors and publishers do not include the right to relicense the works under a free license. The publisher could neither present proof of such a right nor did we have permissions from any of the authors for such a release. I understand that this might be frustrating but we cannot keep these works at Commons without the necessary permissions. All this was patiently explained within the correspondence. No response came after the last email was sent by the VRT member on 8 January 2016. All these files were uploaded afterwards in March 2016 without the necessary confirmation from VRT. If you want to do something about it you have to contact all the individual authors asking them for permissions. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I was in touch with the Copyright Owner and I have in front of me an email to OTRS from the Owner on November 20th, 2015, containing all the titles tagged. Sorry to be blunt, but your response sounds like preaching to the choir, and indicates that the effort of small communities does not matter. It would be a collective harrassment to go back and ask the Owner to write to OTRS when the 2015 email is per the process, leaving any room for confusion. Please share your email so that I could forward you the original email. Psubhashish (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: It is quite simple, those who we were in contact with were never able or willing to obtain written permission for the release under a free license from the respective copyright owners of these books. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024010810006889 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- This concerns File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf. However, the credits at p. 4 name Vijay Gupta as original author of the English text who remains unnamed in the file description. Jeeban Kumar Panda has apperently translated the book from English to the Odia language. We need permissions from both. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert can you please remove deletion tag from books like File:Maja Bigyana Parakha.pdf as she is the moral and copyright holder of a book like that, and has already provided permission? That way, it would be clearer which books actually would need further permission, like the example you've shared in your last message. I have very little mental and physical bandwidth and no other community member is available to trouble two seventy-year-olds who are busy archiving thousands of books, like machines. In worst case, books like File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf will vanish from Commons and Wikisource, and would continue to live elsewhere on the internet. Fuck copyright (sorry for my language but I an done at the moment seeing years of collective endeavour going in vain)! Psubhashish (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- This concerns File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf. However, the credits at p. 4 name Vijay Gupta as original author of the English text who remains unnamed in the file description. Jeeban Kumar Panda has apperently translated the book from English to the Odia language. We need permissions from both. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I suggest to put the on hold and re-elaborate the ticket(s). --Krd 05:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reading most of the Indian scripts is a difficult job. I believe this needs some patience and work but this requires a good collaboration from the uploader and others associated with permissions. These files should be handled one-on-one basis. Some of these might survive whilst many more will go. I see there has enough been said previously and @Psubhashish needs the understand the intricacies of copyright, and considers mere guidance as trouble. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Saileshpat & @Chinmayee Mishra, @Prateek Pattanaik I'd appreciate your help wrt to these pdfs. Thanks in advance. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Aafi: I guess we have never met and you assume that I am totally ignorant of copyright, despite being deeply involved in the Wikimedia and CC movement since 2011, who needs "guidance" on "intricacies of copyright". But that's okay. I am always open to learning and have grown a thick skin to this behaviour. It feels utterly frustrating to see collective labour of so many community members, as well as that of archivists that I love and care, going down the gutter for the sake of copyright. I treat humans above copyright and internet platforms. Don't take diverse social perspectives for ignorance. It's also a good idea to ask the other person if and how much they know about a topic instead of assuming that them to be ignorant jerks. One does get tired and frustrated, especially while volunteering. Labour, fatigue, being burnt out, anger and frustration are all human attributes. I'd loved to have a matured conversation where we acknowledge that humans don't operate like machines without emotion, and it's okay to share emotions. I have no time left to do much about these books and all I'd do is probably download a copy of each in the meantime. Do not patronize me and say anymore condescending words, please. Psubhashish (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I understand what it takes to create and make resources and what one feels when one sees them up in a deletion request. However, as always said, this should not been taken personal. The concerned ticket is from 2015 (9 years old) and this wasn't rightly handled, neither were appropriate responses received, and the ticket was never successfully closed. It was thus not right to use the ticket at the first hand. Please don't think "I am patronising you", I do not do. I would myself want these resources stay here and that's the reason I have pinged some Odia language users above. A straight-way forward would be to identify the books originally authored by Puspashree Pattnaik for example, and get an email by her sent to VRT that she releases these works authored by her under CC BY-SA 4.0 or so, and also those where she has contributed as a co-author. Similarly, we could deal with the works by other authors except translations. Translations would required a dual permission: one from the author of the original work, and the other from the translator. For instance, for File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf, we have permission from the translator only. A simple way ahead to cool down (I understand how one usually gets frustrated at such incidents but it doesn't help) and then collaboratively help in having the permissions secured. I am certain it won't be too much difficult to help VRT get a permissions release by some of these authors or at the least Puspashree Pattnaik for her books. Simply, as a author, than as a representative of some publisher. Best regards, ─ Aafī (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Aafi: I guess we have never met and you assume that I am totally ignorant of copyright, despite being deeply involved in the Wikimedia and CC movement since 2011, who needs "guidance" on "intricacies of copyright". But that's okay. I am always open to learning and have grown a thick skin to this behaviour. It feels utterly frustrating to see collective labour of so many community members, as well as that of archivists that I love and care, going down the gutter for the sake of copyright. I treat humans above copyright and internet platforms. Don't take diverse social perspectives for ignorance. It's also a good idea to ask the other person if and how much they know about a topic instead of assuming that them to be ignorant jerks. One does get tired and frustrated, especially while volunteering. Labour, fatigue, being burnt out, anger and frustration are all human attributes. I'd loved to have a matured conversation where we acknowledge that humans don't operate like machines without emotion, and it's okay to share emotions. I have no time left to do much about these books and all I'd do is probably download a copy of each in the meantime. Do not patronize me and say anymore condescending words, please. Psubhashish (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Saileshpat & @Chinmayee Mishra, @Prateek Pattanaik I'd appreciate your help wrt to these pdfs. Thanks in advance. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
After reading the previous discussion, I understood that uploaders should present some examples of books in this regard that were written by someone else and uploaded by the user in accordance with Wikimedia Commons and Wikisource guidelines. Also, if the author or publisher who owns the copyright has granted permission, examples of how this permission is implemented on the wiki platform in accordance with the guidelines should be provided. Obviously, instead of nominating so many painstakingly submitted books for deletion, uploaders should be told the simplest way possible, as it is obvious that they have not broken the copyright. Rather, it might be claimed that they did not deliver the copyright information accurately. In such a situation, decent gentlemen should try to work with them rather than simply telling them the rules. A person who has been using Wikipedia for many years may not be familiar with all of the terms and policies. Khaatir (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Having looked at the ticket again, I'm going to close this as deleted per nomination, as no valid permission has been achieved. --Krd 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2015112010003179
[edit]This is a follow-up to the previous deletion request. All three files refer likewise to the ticket which was never successful. (I do not know why these files did not turn up in my first request.)
AFBorchert (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No clear permission was ever achieved. ─ Aafī (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)