Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/12/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 30th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication that this person is notable and that the photograph is therefore within scope and educative  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

just identified that this is an f10 deletion  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

partecipazione al concorso scienze Luangiphoto (talk) 10:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request. --Yann (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation claimed by User:Glorious 93. Theklan (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I couldn't challenge the speedy deletion directly (there was an error) so I'm doing it by hand. User:Zaldibia uploaded this, that is the official coat of arms of Zaldibia municipality. We can discuss if this file is too simple to be copyrighted (actually is the silhouette of a horse, that could be made using svg files from other coats of arms on a blue background. I'm not going to discuss if this is simple or not, but I would like to note that this is a coat of arms, so it's described officially by Spanish laws and, therefore, it is under public domain. -Theklan (talk) 21:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Futhermore, I didn't even realize that the institution has a cc-by-sa-4.0 license stated in their web: https://zaldibia.eus/eu/orria/erabilera-baldintzak Theklan (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For me the page with copyright statement on the source website is difficult to understand. Can some spanish speaking admin, for instance User:Explicit, please look at this DR and the statement on the website: https://zaldibia.eus/eu/orria/lege-informazioa . Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Does one of the other Spanish speaking admins have a spare moment to read the copyright statement on the website and close this DR? I think the statement is unclear. @Cookie, Ezarate, Platonides, Poco a poco, Rastrojo, and Strakhov: thanks, Ellywa (talk) 10:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The content of the site is under the cc-by-sa-4.0 license, including the coat of arms. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since) Theklan (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The website claims that they publish it under cc-by-sa-4.0, so no extra license is needed.

Web orrian agertzen diren Udalaren markak, errotuluak eta logotipoak bereak dira edo haiek erabiltzeko baimena emana du. Erabilera hau cc-by-sa-4.0 Creative Commons Aitortu-PartekatuBerdin 4.0 Nazioartekoa Lizentzia Publikoaren baitan burutuko da.

Theklan (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Wim Schuhmacher ( 1894 – 1986) Vera (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photographs by Leni Mengelberg (1903-1984), undelete in 2055

Vera (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

work by Eva Besnyö (1910 - 2003), undelete in 2074 Vera (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware that an iNaturalist upload is not compatible with Wikipedia's copyright policies. I am sorry and from now on I will use Creative Commons images from other sources. Lord.of.the.Proterozoic (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panassko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those are photos taken of someone else's work with no information regarding them, such as license, year, authorship. Unlikely to be owned by photographer.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and speedy deleted at uploader request. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Swarnali Rajkhowa (talk) 12:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong format, it should be svg, the alternative is File:六安州位置图1820.svg, this file will never used. 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Tester051005 (talk) 18:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scam unlawful 2600:1702:5BC0:6590:4924:7435:B86C:7D03 20:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jakerta905 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files are fictional and out of scope --N Panama 84534 22:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Panassko (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 03:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paolo Basso Pbmatrics (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project Scope. Some files lack evidence.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Talk page without any discussions, just a ping with no content. -- Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WikiBayer as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: crosswiki spam Still in use. Can be deleted if the article is deleted. Yann (talk) 11:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: article was deleted - G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio, from this link Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio, from this link Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Below COM:TOO Philippines. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Magog the Ogre (mass del of LTA). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm guessing this could actually be {{Textlogo}}, but: if it is the user's own work, not the actual logo of an existing entity, how is it in scope? Jmabel ! talk 20:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Logo of a non-notable personal "game studio". Omphalographer (talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsoleto. Richardnsfg (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted per nomination by Túrelio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 12gokinmk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Uploader is globally blocked and has tons of deleted copyright violations. Some files use {{PD-Nepal}}, but obviously do not meet the required criteria.

Didym (talk) 21:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1govnvl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Uploader is globally blocked and has tons of deleted copyright violations. Some files use {{PD-Nepal}}, but obviously do not meet the required criteria.

Didym (talk) 21:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Fentriss (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

list of artworks that are personal and out of scope for Commons  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marginataen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marginataen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Marginataen (photo taken from Facebook), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vermund m.fl. i Kalundborg.jpg (photo credited to Bjarne Robdrup), and their numerous previous copyvio deletions on this project (example 1, example 2 (admins only), look at the description, their numerous copyvio warnings on da.wiki (where they are indef blocked) I think it's time we assume that all of their claims of own work are false and need to be deleted per COM:PCP.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 12:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This should include the files uploaded as "own work" by Zeitgeistu, an alternate account of Marginataen. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I regret that @The Squirrel Conspiracy couldn't wait the 48 hours of response time I asked for to explain myself before making deletion requests all over the place. To properly respond, I need to know what has changed since the last time this was discussed in May? Marginataen (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, you don't. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should have linked to that disccuion in question. And yes, it would actually help the discussion if you would briefly outline what has changed since that took place. Marginataen (talk) 10:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:Vermund & Edberg.jpg is apparently a selfie of Vermund with someone else. This is a clear violation of Vermund's copyright, and it's hilarious to claim ownership of someone else's selfie. 0x0a (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Worth noting that we now have "own work" uploads by this user credited to both Bjarne Robdrup (this DR) and Jennifer Krames (see above). Were there only one photographer, it'd be possible to say that that person was this user, but that's not possible with two different people credited. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @0x0a. No, it's not a selfie. I hope you will me more clearly able to see that in this diffrently cropped version of the same image :) File:Vermund & Edberg (2).jpg Marginataen (talk) 10:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For completeness of the list under discussion, I'll mention that the two user accounts Bubfernr and LatteDK, both having also uploaded "own work" files, have both been verified on the Danish Wikipedia as additional socks of Marginataen. --Økonom (talk) 08:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have added oe that seemed to have been missed (File:Nye Borgerlige-stifterne, oktober 2015.jpg). It is from Facebook. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - File:Pernille_Vermund,_oktober_2021.jpg is from this photo session https://www.liebhaverboligen.dk/forskelligt/2021/10/08/pernille-vermund-dameben-i-naesen/ and http://publikationer.mhh.dk/252liebhaverboligenoktplus/?page=92 - I don't know if the uploader is commercial photographer Dan Møller , https://danphotography.dk/, but i have my doubts. Regards KnudW (talk) 09:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 멕스코로가야 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads by this user appear to be about personal fiction and/or patent nonsense; much of it has been identified as fantasy maps by Koreans already.
Reviewer should be able to read Korean, to verify.

Enyavar (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for the same reason, uploaded on the 16th and 19th February:
--Enyavar (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated for the same reason, uploaded on the 21st February:
--Enyavar (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
--Enyavar (talk) 20:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Enyavar (talk) 08:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Enyavar (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Enyavar (talk) 00:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Enyavar (talk) 11:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
newest uploads, same reasoning. --Enyavar (talk) 15:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also File:Teamount.png --Enyavar (talk) 06:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep at least for File:삼포시 태극휘장.jpg since it seems to be a legitimate recreation of the circle in the Korean flag. I have no opinion one way or another on the other images though, but I will say that if a couple of the images aren't "personal fiction and/or patent nonsense" as the nominator claims then it kind of puts the rest of the deletion request in question. Also, there's no rule in Commons that people can't upload fictional maps. So the DR is already a little based on that alone. Although again, I'm not going to take a stance one or another, but it is something worth considering since there's zero consensus that "fictional" images should be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    • We have better files for the Taegeuk, including several .svg versions, so it's redundant. This particular Taegeuk with its wrong sbade of blue is labelled to be a "badge" (seal?) for the fictional city of Sampo(n?). Now, personal fiction and private fantasy maps are generally considered OoS, so yes there is a rule that people can't upload just any fictional map, flag, coat of arms, graphic or statistic they just invented in a free minute out of thin air (well... they can, and do, and get DRs). In case of Category:NationStates, we even explicitly warn against it in a label, and hundreds of successful DRs suggested to me so far that admins are generally consenting in this matter, too.
      You could still help to identify whether or not the uploader may have been referring in all uploads to some established fiction, preferably already having a WP article. Fantasy maps of Middleearth or OnePiece still fall within the project's educational scope, after all. Enyavar (talk) 02:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We have better files for the Taegeuk, including several .svg versions, so it's redundant. I had thought of that, but then I've nominated redundant files for deletion myself before and it always ended in said images being kept. So there's no consensus to delete images purely because of their redundancy. At least not in my experience. Although it probably depends on the closing admin, but I'm still going to vote in the direction that I've been told is correct in the meantime. As to the rest of what you said, sure people can't just upload "any fictional maps", but I haven't seen any evidence that these are just "any fictional maps." My guess is that if took the time to look into it that at least a few, if not all of them, are partially based on reality and your claims to the contrary are more about your personal opinions then anything else.
Either way though, your claim that admins are generally consenting to deleting fictional images is bullocks since then multiple DRs for supposedly fictional coats of arms in the last year or two that were kept. Again though, it probably comes down to whoever closes this. It not like I even took a stance one or another on it either. So it's kind of ridiculous your trying to argue with me about it in the first place. Maybe just skip it next time huh? I'm sure we all have better things to do then argue back and forth about something no one in this DR has even voted keep because of. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Multiple were kept" - oh probably: show me which ones and I probably can point out to you why they were kept, in contrast to the vast majority of the fantasy maps that I found and nominated for deletion. I don't DR just any fictional map willy-nilly, but check on multiple factors first. In this case we find: a brand new contributor uploads a bunch of maps and symbols, at first crudely drawn, without proper descriptions. The better of these uploads find usage in draft pages by the user, that grow into a huge array of linkless statistics and names, for example about the city of 명경시, 1.2 million inhabitants, nowhere to be found on the web. The most prominent mentions of that word combination in ko-WP bring to my attention that "인명경시" is not a city name, and the web gives me similarly confusing results. I tried this with several "big cities" from the lists, with similar results. Korean user @Sawol: in the meantime seemed to be as unable as me to identify the locations and moved the maps into "maps of fiction". The most recent additions to the user's upload list doesn't give me confidence that he switched from made-up stuff towards legit encyclopedic things: The state of Teoneu is found 0 times by Qwant and 0 times by Google. Among the 49 uploads I cannot identify a single one within scope, including the miscolored Taegeuk that is supposed to be a fictional city seal. --Enyavar (talk) 12:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Show me which ones I'm good. I already told you why they were kept. Be my guest and like I'm making it up, but it's not really something I feel the need to prove or get in a debate about. It's on you to provide evidence that Commons doesn't fictional images anyway since your the one who is using that as a reason to delete the files. Again though for like the 4th time now it's not something I'm going to waste my energy arguing about.
a brand new contributor uploads a bunch of maps and symbols Wow a new user uploaded images? Oh my gosh. That's totally suspicious and justifies us mass deleting their uploads. /s
The most prominent mentions of that word combination in ko-WP bring to my attention that "인명경시" is not a city name I looked into 풍성시 시내동지구. "풍성시 시내동지구" translates into English as "Downtown Dong District, Poongseong City." While I'll grant I couldn't find any "Poongseong City" there is a subdivision in downtown Seoul called "Poongsung". So probably the edition of the word "city" is either a mistake on the uploaders part, like they were using the term "city" in general to mean a "city center" or something (like if someone says "I'm going to the city tomorrow" if they are visiting a busy downtown area of a larger community, or it's just a miss-translation. Either way, "Poongsung" clearly isn't just made up. If your argument was that the maps should be deleted because they are inaccurate, cool. I wouldn't have an issue with that, because it's possible they are. The problem is that your justification for deleting the maps is that they are "personal fiction and/or patent nonsense" and an inaccurate map that's otherwise based a real place clearly isn't "personal fiction and/or patent nonsense."
  •  Keep File:삼포시 태극휘장.jpg seems to be based on the Korean Flag and I was able to find a place in "Poongsung" in Soul that roughly corresponds to 풍성시 시내동지구. I'm sure I could easily find information on the other images if I wanted to. While it's possible the images are inaccurate, the nominator started this DR based on the premise that the images are "personal fiction and/or patent nonsense." Which is clearly untrue. The nominators suggestion that the images should be deleted because they were uploaded by a new user is also extremely ridiculous. We should be encouraging new users to upload files, not doing the opposite by knee jerk nominating their images for deletion. Especially if those nominations are based on clearly fallacious reasoning like is the case here. And as a final point, even if the images were "personal fiction and/or patent nonsense" there is no consensus that "fictional" images should be deleted from Commons despite the nominators claims to the contrary. It's understandable that's the case to. Otherwise it would risk people starting these types of knee jerk DRs where the nominators will repeatedly insist that images be deleted as "fiction" just because they couldn't be bothered to do the proper research to find out if the images were based on actual places or not. That's not to say we should just allow for clearly fake images of real places to be uploaded to Commons, but that's not relevant here since File:삼포시 태극휘장.jpg, 풍성시 시내동지구, and likely other images that have been nominated for deletion are based on exiting subjects. I rest my case your honor ;) --Adamant1 (talk) 22:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is this guy serious? Why am I wasting hours to research maps only to be told that I deliberately didn't bother to do the research? All that can be proven so far based on the maps and tables, is that Korean is a language with words that can get recombined. The original DR had a notice that is is about stuff in Korean. All that Adamant (or me) can do here is looking at symbols, throw them into GTranslate and wonder if "Strawmountain City", "Contempt for Life" or "West One-Four East" are real towns or not. Nothing we did here added nor detracted credibility from the uploader, it all just muddied the waters.
I got to the point of suspicion that it is Adamant who never bothered seriously dealing with maps on commons. Or with new user uploads. Contrary to Adamants belief, there are is a certain fraction of new users who exclusively upload copyvios/nonsense/selfies. We don't need to coddle these uploaders. Adamant falls for a fallacy for himself, believing that the educational scope of Commons includes each and every fictional content. There is in fact no consensus for such a belief: Fictional stuff has instead a higher threshold to prove it can be used educationally. I wonder why Adamant is not arguing much closer to home, defending the idea that Powell beat Gephardt in the 2000 elections? We all remember President Powell, do we.
Now, let's stop this insanity of two blind people arguing the shape of the elephant: There is a reason why I stated at the original DR that the reviewing admin should be able to read and understand Korean to determine which maps might potentially be of real places. When I wrote that, I meant seriously that non-readers are non-understanders. Enyavar (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All that Adamant (or me) can do here is looking at symbols, throw them into GTranslate and wonder if "Strawmountain City" Sure, I don't disagree with that but the same goes for every single none English language file on here. The fact is that there's always going to be a certain amount of bias when searching for the origins of a none English language name or location because it's inherently harder to find information about none English language stuff on the internet. Like take any random podunk location outside of Europe or North America and it will be either extremely hard or impossible to find anything about it. That doesn't mean it's fictional or is it a legitimate reason to delete images of the location though. Even your saying we are both blind elephants. You can't have it both ways where your a blind elephant but also know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the maps are fictional. It's on you to prove that's the case and you haven't done it. At least with the images I found sources for. You can attack me personally all you want, but it doesn't negate the fact that the File:삼포시 태극휘장.jpg is based on the actual flag and there's a real location that match's with File:풍성시 시내동지구.png. But sure dude, lets mass delete every image out there that isn't in English just because we as people who don't speak the language the file names are in can't find the places. Sounds like a real reasonable way to do things. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can't prove something doesn't exist just because it's hard to find or about an obscure non-English topic either. non-English speaking topics are just inherently harder to find information on due to the nature of the internet. It would be completely ridiculous to have a standard where the only two options available are that we can either find something having to do with a non-English speaking culture the second we search it in English on Google or it's fictional nonsense. Get real. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You realize that Sawol can read Korean? Anyway, I just tacked the most recent upload by our friendly uploader to the list: A complete map of the Republic of Surtan, in order to complete the nice maps on the Teoneu Empire. This time, we have the official translation of each territory directly embedded into the linked document, from Romavia over Washington Wuth up to Tarikhand Terra. This can get only get more unreal if Adamant actually finds proof of Washington Wuth on the internet. --Enyavar (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cool for them? That's what categories like Category:Maps of fictional places or locations are for. I don't have find proof of the Republic of Surtan or whatever exiting because we have specific categories for images of fictional places, just put the image there and be done with it. Otherwise, if you think fictional maps should be deleted then do a CfD for that category or something. I could really care less, but categories for fictional maps exist for a reason and it's not because we just delete maps of fictional places. It's not me that you don't want to the actual work it would take into changing that in the meantime though. That said, I'm not even into the idea of Commons hosting images of fictional places. I just don't think targeting specific users over something that's clearly no consensus about isn't the way to deal with it. Especially if the person is new and DR is done in a bad faithed, insulting way like you did here. Be my guest and CfD for Category:Maps of fictional places or locations places though. I'll be more then happy to say it shouldn't exist if you do, but I'm not going to support mass deleting a single persons images just because you don't feel like doing one. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How can this be so hard to grok. Repeating the principle for the umpth time: "Sourced" fictional maps (Narnia, Cardassia, Westeros and even Lichtenbourg) are totally okay to have here. Personal fantasies, not. Enyavar (talk) 03:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where exactly is that the principle? All the it says at the top of Category:Maps of fictional places or locations is "Maps that are fictitious or too incorrect. Maps with "Fictitious map" are automatically included in this category." I see nothing there saying that the maps have to sourced to exiting franchises or whatever and what's the difference anyway? A fictional map from the 1400s hundreds or some obscure fantasy series isn't any less "personal fiction or patent nonsense then maps like these. There was never a landmass in the shape of a ferryman. Hell, I don't even think that map is sourced to anything. So what's the difference? --Adamant1 (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First, thanks for pointing out that Baltic Sea map in the shape of a man. I genuinely love its ingenious pictorial accuracy.
The difference is whether or not a file can be reasonably used in educational context. That may include fantasy artwork or even pretty strange allegories. But not crude drawings that only have significance to the person who drew them. You can bet that teenagers in all times doodled fantasies and created maps and logos for themselves. I certainly spent hours on end doing that as soon as I knew what a map is. One major difference is that professional-looking maps were much harder to publish and distribute in the olden times. If someone managed to get "their own personal fantasy maps" published a hundred years ago, it involved a bit more than just drawing some lines, placing a label and uploading one file after the other in a free webhosting service. --Enyavar (talk) 13:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, thanks for the history lesson. I didn't know it was hard to make professional-looking maps in the "olden times." Who would have thought? Anyway, your moving the bar. First you were claiming the images should be deleted because they were "personal fiction and/or patent nonsense." Then I pointed out other maps on here are fictional you said the images should be deleted because they aren't "Sourced." Now that I pointed out other maps aren't sourced either your rambling about how the images should be deleted because it was easier to make maps in the "olden times" or some nonsense. You really have no legitimate justification to delete the images do you? --Adamant1 (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't move the bar one bit. The files are all OoS because they are personal fantasy maps or patent nonsense, and that later uploads rather confirmed that initial review. "Personal fantasy" => "Out of Scope". That bit cannot be more obvious. It is something I can distinctly remember repeating throughout this discussion. It is YOU who tried to muddy the waters. First you needed adamant proof that the content is fictional, then you pointed out other fictional content on Commons and lamented that I have not (yet) advocated for its deletion - ergo it cannot be fair to delete stuff from this uploader either?
However, where I notice OoS content, I reserve my right to start a DR. Regardless of the existence or non-existence of other possible OoS content. When I say something is not sourced, I am referring to any basis in reality that something is of educational interest, thus within scope. Check it out: This is a fictional map naming the title of a verifiable published fantasy book as its source. The map can undoubtedly be useful in an article about that book. Whether or not it might possibly be a CopyVio is not a matter of it being WITHIN SCOPE. Should the Ga-Hoole map get deleted as CopyVio, it also may be undeleted or re-uploaded after the limit of the copyright has passed: Because it will still be within scope to illustrate articles about this children fantasy book in two hundred years from now. Meanwhile this is all unsourced personal OUT OF SCOPE fiction which I will now proceed to DR. --Enyavar (talk) 14:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The files are all OoS because they are personal fantasy maps or patent nonsense Except for the two or files that I showed were based on real places and objects. Comments like that are exactly why I changed my vote and this back and forth happened. You could have just met me halfway by admitting a few weren't completely fictional and crossed them out of the nomination. Then I would have gone on my way. You just couldn't do it though. That's why I think this is mostly a bad faithed fishing expedition and that you have zero ground to stand on, because you'll just plug your fingers in your ears and continue repeating that "all" the images are patent fantasy nonsense no matter what anyone else says or the evidence they provide to the contrary. There's literally zero point. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You claimed that ko:사용자:멕스코로가야/작업실11 these two files are depicting Seoul, because you found that the file name of one of them contains "풍성" (Pungseong, translation: abundance) and you did a Google search for the word "poongsung" in combination with "Seoul" and you found businesses and schools in Seoul which were named that way. (I can similarly prove to you that New York is located within London) Well, but does the map in question fit with Seoul in any way? No: You showed no compelling evidence that these two maps are even based on reality. And even maps based on reality can still be fictional. What I linked there is a completely made up map of the Netherlands from an alternate reality fiction. That is also OoS. Now, if someone shows up with actual proof that some maps show real locations, ideally with a map link, I'm still ready to be persuaded to exclude those from the DR. As it stands, I remain on the position that this is all OoS nonsense and I wait for a Korean-speaking admin to check the files.
And really, a 'bad faith fishing expedition'? Sigh, have you checked your mirrors? You went out of your way to be a total contrarian and to attempt poking holes into this whole DR, in order to possibly rescue a simple geometrical symbol we already host by the dozen. I remember that first claim of yours, it was that this "city badge" is based on the South Korean flag and thus should be kept. I argued that it has the wrong colors and is labelled to be the symbol of a fictional city, so it fits the whole topic of the DR. Would I have created a DR for this symbol alone? Certainly not. Would you make a huge fuss over it despite your initial claim that you „had thought of that, but then I've nominated redundant files for deletion myself before and it always ended in said images being kept.“, so this was your great chance to vote keep on a redundant file because such has been done by whomever, against your wishes in your DRs? Absolutely, you apparently would.
I think we found one thing we can agree on, and that's your closing sentence: There's literally zero point. EXACTLY. --Enyavar (talk) 11:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think we found one thing we can agree on, and that's your closing sentence. I'll accept that :) --Adamant1 (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remarks of community members of Korean Wikipedia

[edit]

Note I wrote a request for comment on the Korean village pump, here. I propose to wait one week for their comments and decide then. Ellywa (talk) 16:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete I saw all pictures mentioned above. Those are about artificial cities, countries, or youtubers. I cannot find any Korean evidence supporting existence of them, both historically and currently. Delete opinion due to the "Out of project scope". --LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 07:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    About Taegeuk, I totally agree to @Enyavar: . There are already many Taegeuk pictures on Commons. No need for picture referring to "Sampo-si flag". There is no city named "Sampo-si". Why should Commons accept total fakes and jokes? LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 07:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Given that the images are hoax and has otherwise no editorial/educational value for Commons, deleted. — regards, Revi 09:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 멕스코로가야 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: More unused "artwork" and personal files and fiction.

Enyavar (talk) 13:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I've blocked the user for 2 weeks for adding out of scope content after warnings. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FoP in BiH, architect Ivan Štraus died in 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in BiH, architect Ivan Štraus died in 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, architect Jean Bourgon died in 1959 A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Wait, are you saying that no murals in the United States can be submitted to Wikimedia? Just want to clarify, as I will no longer bother submitting them if that's the case. Damn shame if true though. Salisburymistake (talk) 04:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment In this case, it seems to me as too broad use of COM:TOYS. Also, this toy (Mr Donut) is created after design of fin de siecle toy (with unknown author - how similary object it is, You can compare [1]), so this design is clearly Public Domain. In little likely situation, if we consider this case of reasonable to apply COM:TOYS as reason to delete, then I can add permission of holder of copyright of design (current recreation) of toy. But I have high doubts about sensibleness of this deletion request in general.
Ad.Rejha (talk) 22:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given as "Facebook" (no particular page), no indication of basis to claim free license. Jmabel ! talk 05:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim of own work may well be true, but it apparently dates from either 2013 (as stated by uploader) or 2016 (as stated where a smaller version can be found online at https://halkidiki-greece.com/de/culture/festivals-events/free-earth-festival.html, 7th of 9 pictures at Impressions of the Free Earth Festival 2016). I think we need to go through COM:VRT to validate authorship. https://halkidiki-greece.com gives no indication of a free license, and appears to have been up for several years. @User:PsychedelicMagazine, I'm not going to nominate all of your recent uploads for deletion at this time -- I think this is the second one I've seen that has possible issues -- but please, assuming you do own the rights on what you are uploading, read COM:VRT and go through the (confidential, not public) process with them to establish who you are and how you come to own the rights to these images (since they do not all appear to be one person's photographs, and at least some have been published before without a similar free license being offered). Jmabel ! talk 05:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMːDW of an encyclopedia Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai inséré le fichier trop rapidement : la date et la source indiquées ne sont pas valables! J'aimerais réintroduire l'image en corrigeant ces deux renseignements. Ignis ardens (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was published on Facebook by the Military Corps of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and transferred here on Commons as {{Italy-CAD-OBD}}. That would be fine if the Military Corps was a part of the Italian public administration, but I doubt that, since the he Corps is a body of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (that is obviously not a part of the Italian public administration) acting as an voluntary auxiliary body of the Italian Army on the basis of a convention that is renewed periodically. Jaqen (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent to File:Wasserstoff.svg but with larger white margins. DMacks (talk) 10:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly portrays one of the two H as being the one that is cationic and that the two H are different sizes. DMacks (talk) 10:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contradictory 3D lighting (as if edited together two separately-lighted objects rather than a single object). Have File:Dihydrogen-3D-vdW.png as a higher quality image. DMacks (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, wrong lighting, probably 2 separately lighted objects edited together. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent screengrab which is highly unlikely to be copyright friendly, see watermark on top right of image. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: unused personal file —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be PD for some reason, but certainly not a 2023 photo by the uploader. No real source information. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be PD for some reason, but no factual source information, false authorship license and date claims by uploader. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced, false claims. Uploader took multiple images from various websites and uploaded them with false claims of authorship. This one might be PD for some reason if factual information were given. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A linear 1,3,5...polyyne is alternating triple/single bonds therefore would be alternating short/long bond-lengths unless there is evidence of equal spread by resonance (in which case the systematic name is suspicious). en:Cyanopolyyne is silent on there being anything approaching equal bond-lengths. This image has equal bond-lengths, by an uploader known for making up chemistry and making chemical-nonsense look pretty. DMacks (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A pretty but ultimately made-up-by-uploader 3D diagram, who has a habit of such. It's unknown whether this hypothetical compound has equal bond-lengths, but if it is "triyne" it's misleading to assume it does. And if it does, no basis for these bond-lengths vs vdw radius. And there is evidence that if the bond-lengths are equal the angles might not be. DMacks (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Massimomonti10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded for it:Habitech - Distretto Tecnologico Trentino, no other use.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vadanagiri bhaskar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, varying quality, files such as File:ధర్మన్ షణ్ముగరత్నం.jpg are from elsewhere.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iranireza34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader claimed for all these uploads to be the author, i.e. photographer, of these pictures. This does not appear to be likely. All pictures appear to depict Amirreza Borzooei (see also this draft) or Hossein Samandar (see this draft). A wide range of cameras has been used:

In case of File:Japan karate1 img.jpg we see a watermark within the photo which attributes it to JKFan Karate Magazin.

AFBorchert (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete all Commons is not for promotion. The two accounts Iranireza34 and AmirRezaei2024 labelled similar photos that they uploaded as "own work". This is also a undisclosed COI case, as evident. Being close to someone and uploading their images "legitimately" is fine but it is not found here. Several of these images have been deleted. If there was no honesty in attributing these images rightly, I can't assume good faith on the images that fairly have metadata.─ The Aafī (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sqpjazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Disparate authors; File:DJD Stage Shot.jpg EXIF credits "Scott Reid" and File:DJD Dance Centre.jpg EXIF credits "David S. Troyer / dsTroyer photography" and additionally includes "NO RIGHTS TO REPRODUCE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, NO RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY, NO RIGHTS TO RESELL, DISTRIBUTE OR SHARE IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAVID S. TROYER / DSTROYER PHOTOGRAPHY" (capitalisation in original). Uploader cannot be both Reid and Troyer, and is likely neither (appears SPA for promotion of a non-notable dance studio). Evidence of permission from both authors needed.

Эlcobbola talk 15:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erika Bardales Lazcano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Essentially personal images that appear to have no relevace to Foundation projects

Herby talk thyme 15:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gibberish filename. It is also not useful at all. 2001:448A:11A1:1923:412B:8ADA:3012:7100 16:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with thin bonds, opaque (grey) background & not drawn according to MoS guidelines, but instead just copied from PubChem. Replaced by File:5-Phenylnonane-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, low quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are works of German photographer Hans Hildenbrand, who died in 1957, so they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2028 (no URAA problem).

Rosenzweig τ 16:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Balachon77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Што адбываецца?

Якія прэтэнзіі да гэтых файлаў? Кожнае фота зроблена асбіста мной. Balachon77 (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

На гэтых здымках прысутнічаюць творы іншых аўтараў. Калі ласка, прачытайце Commons:Licensing i артыкул 32.7 Закону РБ аб аўтарскім праве і сумежных правах. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ясна. Божа, барані беларускую вікіпедыю. Balachon77 (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Падобныя абмежаваньні існуюць і ў іншых краінах. Глядзіце Commons:Freedom of panorama. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Bertram Quist

[edit]

All files appear to relate to a hoax article being written in user space at the Polish Wikipedia (see pl:Wikipedysta:Bertram Quist/brudnopis). The files include ones superimposing faces over unrelated images, suggesting a lack of authenticity on the unedited (or less obviously edited) ones. The user has 22 edits at Polish Wikipedia (21 of which are to the hoax article in user space) meaning that the discretion allowed by COM:INUSE for a "small number of images... for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project" does not apply as they are not an "active participant on that project." See also related (closed) deletion discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ja GW.jpg. --From Hill To Shore (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These reliefs inside a church in Germany are the work of German artist de:Max Kratz, who died in 2000. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2071. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany.

Rosenzweig τ 23:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Rosenzweig,
ich habe die Einverständnis von Thomas Kratz, dem Erben und Rechteinhaber der Werke von Max Kratz, dafür erhalten, Fotos von sämtlichen Werken von Max Kratz auf Wikimedia commons zu veröffentlichen. Er wird die Einverständniserklärung an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org senden. Bitte löschen Sie das Foto daher nicht, sondern warten Sie auf die Einverständniserklärung von Thomas Kratz. Jessica Kirstein (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 11:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jessica Kirstein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These stained glass windows inside a church in Germany are the work of German artist de:Rudolf Vombek, who died in 2008. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2079. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany.

Rosenzweig τ 23:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Rosenzweig,
I don't think that the rights holders of the windows in our church will worry about publishing photos of the work of Rudolf Vombek. Everybody who visits our church can see these windows. They are made for the parish and for everybody who visits the church. It`s not comparable to a painting in a museum. I think Rudolf Vombek and his heirs would be happy about spreading knowledge about his works of art. Could you help me to determine the right holders of Rudolf Vombek's works of art so that I can ask them to send a declaration of consent to wikimedia commons? I really thank you very much in advance. Yours sincerely, Jessica Kirstein Jessica Kirstein (talk) 10:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Our guidelines (Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle) are quite clear here: “[...] arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as the following, are against Commons' aims: [...] "The copyright owner will not mind/should be pleased that we have disseminated their work." [...]” And I don't have a clue who the heirs or rightholders of Mr Vombek are. His wife de:Roswitha Lüder is apparently still alive, maybe she is the one to ask. Or the de:Märkisches Museum Witten where he last exhibited in 2008 might know something. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 22:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Bâtiment récent par Auguste Perret (1874-1954), pas dans le domaine public avant 2025.
English: Recent building by Auguste Perret (1874-1954), not in public domain before 2025.

VIGNERON (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Panorama lh.JPG as de minimis (cityscape view).  Delete the rest per no FoP in France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, architect Auguste Perret died in 1954 and Jacques Tournant died in 2005

A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1928 German published photograph that will enter the U.S. public domain on Monday. May need to wait until 2049 as far as Germany goes. Abzeronow (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission, date is unclear (source states different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission, date is unclear (link does not work). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission, date is unclear (source states different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission, date is unclear (source states different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission, date is unclear (source states different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission, date is unclear (source states different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-lisence indicated, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-license indicated, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-license indicated, no permission, date is questionable (source states a different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no CC-license indicated, no permission, date is questionable (source states a different date). Druschba 4 (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Balash-Vologases (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Picture from Facebook, Also found in a better quality on this article without mentionning Bolivar Nivel https://www.20minutes.fr/elections/3232951-20220210-presidentielle-2022-serge-tinland-candidat-premiere-republique-citoyenne-ovnis-bien-etre-humanite CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://www.hawzahnews.com/news/862633/%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A2%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%88%DB%8C%DB%8C Luckie Luke (talk) 03:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 17:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability: out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Información genérica Jimmydiaz.es (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? 178.241.86.10 19:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing info Disjeaz (talk) 13:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poosible screenshot from video Zafer (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 17:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, anachronistic flag / coat of arms. The w:Kingdom of Dardania existed over a thousand years before heraldry came into existence. Omphalographer (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect to the new flag design now. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Speedy keep, simply move the new flag to this file name over the redirect. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 01:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see COM:RENAME. --Thibaut (talk) 03:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Latvia

Krd 16:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn, now obvious mistake. --Krd 06:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not own work copyright violation Luckie Luke (talk) 03:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unnecessary file uploaded by the deletion requester, It was asked to be speedy deleted with the following words: "The image is used to reveal the license plate of an incorrectly parked vehicle. Violation of privacy of personal data. Unused file. Should be deleted".


Description English: Parking problems exist everywhere. The other day I parked kind of too close to this car, without preventing its move. I took the pic, in case I found my car with some scratch at return. Luckily nothing, and I decided to use this pic for Commons, at the license plates category.


What did I say when I uploaded the file? That "I" parked my car too close to this one. Therefore, "The image is used to reveal the license plate of an incorrectly parked vehicle. Violation of privacy of personal data" was a false assertion. Based on that false assertion my original image was manipulated and altered unnecessarily.


Look at it now: Category:License plates of Ankara and Category:Automobiles in Ankara have been removed. They were the basic reason I uploaded this file! Now it is under Category:Number 0000 on vehicle registration plates, Category:Number 00 on vehicle registration plates and Category:Automobiles with license plates of Turkey with "altered plate numbers"! Now, how can the image be in the first two cats if the car does not -in reality- have those numbers invented by some editor? On the other hand, there are no 00 or 0000 number on vehicle registration plates in Turkey; the third cat is not correct either.


I returned here, temporarily, to ask you to delete this unused, altered, manipulated file. I do not even ask you to bring back the original file and its cats, simply delete it. I have worked here several years, making thousands of contributions. If I deserved a small favour, simply delete this stupidity, I do not want to see my username on a stupid file. E4024 (talk) 11:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No educational value. Guido den Broeder (talk) 08:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:Courtesy deletions. Uploader wishes to delete own upload which is unused and low-quality, fine, not worth discussion. --A.Savin 13:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Obviously. How can one upload such an image with both a fake license and own-work claim? We truly need an upload form that prevents this. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не скачивается Юлдашева Луиза (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No license. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proper source and no evidence it was published without notice in the US Prosfilaes (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear if this file is anonymous or not. The file is lacking the infos inside template:Information box, specially the file source. ZandDev (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Krd. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dian Kojec Ariyanto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not uploader's works, no evidence of permission.

--XXN, 00:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 20:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Identical to File:احمد تفضلی 1316 - 1375.jpg except for a crop of a few pixels. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD-F8Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 01:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily wanting deletion, but the status of this needs to be sorted out. If the main image here is created by an AI program, that should be stated (along with what prompt was given), and probably {{PD-algorithm}} applies, because I don't see anything else copyrightable here. If not, then I seriously doubt "own work" claim by user with no other Commons contributions. Jmabel ! talk 02:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems to be a photo of the screen rather than the image directly. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment if the image itself is uncopyrighted, it's fine (in copyright terms) that it's on a screen. - Jmabel ! talk 18:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but then the image itself should be uploaded, not the photo of it. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete low quality capture of random AI art Dronebogus (talk) 01:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Low quality screenshot. Fails COM:SCOPE. Nosferattus (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from DK Dreckz according to the description, also potentially out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Both the title and the Metadata suggested that this file was first published on Facebook, permission from the copyright holder is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User23021993 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derivative work issues

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted magazine cover A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination. The magazines covers cannot be considered as de minimis here. Günther Frager (talk) 19:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 09:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borrar por ser foto personal Jimmydiaz.es (talk) 10:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Photo of a picture on social medias CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This file is pd-ineligible. --Krd 10:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Ameride FCIC.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked for speedy deletion by Glorious 93 because it's a logo. However it is marked as published under a free licence on Seychelles News Agency website. Therefore, I think it should be discussed here. Can we trust Seychelles News Agency? Botev (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, licenses applied by the Seychelles News Agency are usually reliable, but not always. For example see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Seychelles National Assembly. I can see no free license on the Central Bank's website,[2] so this license is unsafe. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's a logo of a governmental institution which has decent educational value in its current usage on other wikis. Учхљёная (talk) 03:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As a governmental work it would only be copyright-free under {{PD-Seychelles}} if we can prove that it was published more than 25 years before the URAA date for Seychelles (26 April 2015). Can we do that? --Botev (talk) 08:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I found this design on a coin from 1988 issued on the 10th anniversary of the Central Bank [3]. That would suggest that this logo has indeed been in use at least since the 1980s. I would say {{PD-Seychelles}} and  Keep, then. --Botev (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user:Botev. --Wdwd (talk) 21:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Central Bank of Seychelles logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Replaced with File:Farmers Market 99 Indonesia (2018).svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Globalstar logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:OWFLogoTransparent (3).png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim of "author's life plus 70 years or fewer" public domain for a work by Milton Gendel, who died in 2018. Belbury (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete reason above. undelete in 2089. SDudley (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nubelfy14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photoshops of actor Nubel Feliz Yan's face onto photographs from unspecified sources. User's other uploads were some Netflix promotional photos of the same actor, not identified as such and claimed as own work.

Belbury (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nubelfy14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screengrab (note the icons at the bottom of File:Nubel Feliz Yan and Hwang Jung-min behind the camera during the production of Narcosantos.jpg). Unreliable uploader with previous copyvios.

P 1 9 9   16:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as edits of copyrighted images https://m.imdb.com/name/nm14025762/mediaviewer/rm3725001473 and https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14518692/mediaviewer/rm3192589569 Belbury (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilgarahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful own work. Varying sizes and quality. File:Farid Mammadov.jpg credits "Jeyhun Abdulla" as the copyright holder. Permission needed.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Porky Pig doesn't expire until 2031 and the character copyright for Daffy Duck doesn't expire until 2033. Nosferattus (talk) 16:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete agreed. I also added the undelete tag for 2033. SDudley (talk) 17:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo officielle. pas de preuve qu'elle est libre de droit Aréat (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lady Amantle Moalusi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flag and logos.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is available in the download section of website of the depicted singer (in larger size, direct link). Unfortunately there is no free license mentioned, so it could be copyrighted. There is no proof that the uploader is the real author (photographer) as the images (uploaded and from website) do not contain any metadata. Gumruch (talk) 23:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.us-rs.si/o-sodiscu/sodniki/. © 2023 Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije. Vse pravice pridržane. ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigfatman8766 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unidentifiable, probably fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think it’s funny we can’t use “kill” anymore but in any case definitely OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No free license from what I could see. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, needs evidence to back up claim. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW, needs source etc. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the author (Marlin Suyata) A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights Image 185.13.107.190 09:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 09:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-encyclopedic person and a photo MarinaMann (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and possible copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wappenwiki creates and publish files under cc-by-NC-SA. This license is not compatible with commons' terms. You cannot, therefore, reuse their templates on commons. 82.124.119.228 13:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Wikimedia Commons licensing policy, Wappenwiki has been asked to release their work used as templates for this image (currently under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 - free to share and adapt with attribution) under a license such as CC BY or CC BY-SA permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Confirmation pending. Thank you for your understanding! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"※ 해당 콘텐츠는 상업적 목적으로 사용이 불가합니다. ※" translates to NC. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Origanlly uploaded by Ulla Højgaard in 2019, a less cropped version was uploaded by Marginataen in 2023. Marginataena states that they got the larger file from a now-deleted blog post on a politcial party's website.This raises the question of whether the original upload was a copyright violation. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, I am sure that the blog where I found the better version was published in 2023, so before her original update uploade in 2019. If we have no proof of prior publication, I think we should keep. The question is if the better and less cropped version uploaded by me should be deleted. Marginataen (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marginataen, I think the best course of action is to assume all of this user's content is copyright violations. They frequently take content from Facebook posts, news articles (each crediting a different photographer by name), and then lie and misdirect when called out on it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with permission. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrigth explicite (EXIF) Unptitpeudtout (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune source démontrant qu'il s'agit d'autre chose qu'un travail personnel Aréat (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune source démontrant qu'il s'agit d'autre chose qu'un travail personnel Aréat (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune source démontrant qu'il s'agit d'autre chose qu'un travail personnel Aréat (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author: Marko Alpner. Uploaded without permission (info: https://radiokrka.svet24.si/clanek/novice/dve-zlati-piscali-za-dan-d-izvajalec-leta-in-album-leta-2019-787550) ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cannot be Creative Commons if the author is unknown PizzaKing13 (talk) 00:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload appears to come from spam site for spam purposes Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy of Krajinski park Goričko (published 20 Jul 2012: https://www.zurnal24.si/slovenija/dozivite-grajsko-zivljenje-162605 - see gallery) ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken by photojournalist Motaz Azaiza and published on November 18 on his social media (Twitter and Instagam). No proof it's free of use. An authorization is needed. Titlutin (talk) 00:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof of public domain, image taken c. 1980–1982 PizzaKing13 (talk) 00:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof of public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof of public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof of PD PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source explicitly says it was not created by the US government, image is not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster Trade (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?@Krd: --Trade (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I have blurred the copyrighted part, the text should be below COM:TOO US--A1Cafel (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: edited version; original Deleted as apparent DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster Trade (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted dove flag Trade (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per A1Cafel. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted banner Trade (talk) 01:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo in the background Trade (talk) 01:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination withdrawn by nominator. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist Andreas Lemberg is still alive and as a source a magazine or something (Publikation) is given. The subject of the painting is a well known personality in German folktales specially in Göttingen, and in the article Göttingen the file is also used, I believe more as a promotion than a relevant information.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file violates copyright 93.42.66.128 12:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file is explicitly athorized thorugh WLM OTRS, if you had red the description or the note in the category (NB: Museum explicitly authorized the upload of its contemporary art collection for WLM 2016 (See authorization for these modern artists copyright artworks by the museum.). --Sailko (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See this, closed with law citation by User:Ruthven --Sailko (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undated and unattributed AI-upscaled photo of an artist who died in 1978, unclear if the image "was created prior to 1976 and published prior to 1978" as is required by the {{PD-Italia}} applied here. Belbury (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We are looking at a 50 year old man, not a 75 year old man, so yes, the image was created prior to 1976. --RAN (talk) 17:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We're actually looking at what an AI thinks a blurry photo of Lattuada might look like at higher resolution, so he may appear younger here than in the original.
    I can't see from the sourcing that we know when the photograph was first published, there's just a mysterious description of Bruno G. Lattuada, Image property of Bruno G. Lattuada, Giordano Bruno Lattuada, creative commons. at it:File:Giordano Bruno Lattuada.jpg. Belbury (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, but not by 25 years, and we have the original to compare to. Upscaling smooths the grain and strengthens borders, it doesn't de-age. --RAN (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Insufficient info to determine copyright status of original. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR Commons:Undeletion_requests#File:Giordano_Bruno_Lattuada.jpg. Circa 1950s photograph, this is not a photograph of a man in their 70s. Abzeronow (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Sources Support that this was the 'Personal Monogram of Queen Victoria'. Sources Quoted by the creator are no longer accessible. Hence the file should be deleted. 2409:4055:31D:1CC1:2DE1:B0B3:C13E:D181 14:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Porky Pig doesn't expire until 2031. Nosferattus (talk) 16:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: A lynx and a hound are okay. - THV | | U | T - 06:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a company logo. It is not used on Wikipedia. Vitor Pizzuto (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused, false license claim, seems over Brazil TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, the statue is work of Yrjö Liipola (1881-1971). Estormiz (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I am likely bot uploader of the photo I confirm that it should be deleted from commons as statue is not free. --Zache (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is taken from a youtube video seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLT5b-xY4-U 204.248.114.252 17:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Okay, so what? Not a valid reason for deleting. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 01:41, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion; license seems valid, no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The texts presented here are (still) under copyrights of their respectful owners. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, for personal and non-encyclopedic use. Taichi (talk) 21:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 22:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 22:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, doubts about ownership based on mobile app upload. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete A TinEye search finds several different images of this scene taken at different times of day and with different cloud formations. However, a few of the TinEye results show the exact same lighting and cloud formation with those versions of the photograph "first found" in 2017 and 2018. The webpages now return 404 file not found errors (so the only evidence is the TinEye search results). The file was first uploaded here on 21 June 2019, which suggests a copyright violation, or at the very least a file with inadequate permission that will need evidence submitting through COM:VRT. From Hill To Shore (talk) 01:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: "flag map" of an ethnic group, not a state. Unclear what the map geographically represents, especially given that the ethnic group numbers no more than a few hundred people. Omphalographer (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Sumer predated the use of national flags by many thousands of years. Omphalographer (talk) 23:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 15:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment currently it's in use in ru.wikipedia (here). Strakhov (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no reason to think out of copyright in source country (El Salvador). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no reason to think out of copyright in source country (El Salvador). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no reason to think out of copyright in source country (El Salvador). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no reason to think out of copyright in source country (El Salvador). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no reason to think out of copyright in source country (El Salvador). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted flag Trade (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public domain "author's life plus 70 years or fewer" claimed on a photograph where the uploader has not identified the author. Possible that this undated early 20th century photograph was taken by someone who died after 1953. Belbury (talk) 13:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fefecece (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos claimed as public domain per "author's life plus 70 years or fewer", where no author is specified by the uploader or at source. If any of these are self portraits taken on a timer, both Anna Laetitia Pecci and Salvador Dalí both died less than 70 years ago.

Belbury (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, the statue is work of Aimo Tukiainen (1917-1996). Estormiz (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company account now blocked; no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by presumed company rep (promotional username): no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gungun01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:FOP Japan. According to the articles[4][5], the statue of Shizuka Kamei (亀井静香) was built in 2023 and Tadanori Nagayama (永山忠則) one was built in 1975. Both its copyrights are kept.

Netora (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Aprilia Racing Logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:630 CHED Logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Static GIF. Replaced with File:IAB logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Porky Pig doesn't expire until 2031. Nosferattus (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland for buildings only, the statue is work of Aimo Tukiainen (1917-1996). Estormiz (talk) 17:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope CzarJobKhaya (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a svg version has been substitued (waiting for /ta and /pl translated pages to be refreshed) Christian 🇫🇷 FR (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am hesitant to speedy-delete a file that his so heavily in use, so I'm starting a DR in case there is some reason it would be in the public domain, or some way we can get relevant rights. Clearly, the photo cannot date from decades after the subject's death, and "own work" is not at all likely to be true. There is a Fondation Amadou Hampaté Ba in Abidjan which might own the rights and, if so, might grant a license to this or some other photo that could be substituted. Does anyone want to follow this up? Jmabel ! talk 22:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photographie a été capturée durant ma visite au sein de la Fondation Amadou Hampaté Ba, sélectionnée parmi plusieurs photographies imprimées qui m'ont été présentées. Afin d'éviter toute controverse, j'ai l'intention d'aborder la responsable de la fondation afin de solliciter une autorisation formelle pour sa diffusion. Kahoutoure (talk) 11:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kahoutoure: Merci. Connaissez-vous COM:VRT/fr? Cela explique ce dont nous avons besoin. - Jmabel ! talk 19:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - a permission must be sent, if this happens then the image will be restored. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune source démontrant qu'il s'agit d'autre chose qu'un travail personnel. Très mauvaise qualité d'image. Aréat (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune source démontrant qu'il s'agit d'autre chose qu'un travail personnel Aréat (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune source démontrant qu'il s'agit d'autre chose qu'un travail personnel Aréat (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not appear to be Yusuf Hussain Humayun. Not sure who this is. gobonobo + c 00:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: That's not a valid reason to delete the file. Title and description should be changed if it's a different person.Syrus257 (talk) 07:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sil - Wrong crop! Yusuf H. H. has his photo here. 31.143.250.104 04:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader's comment: It does look like a wrong crop and a matter of incorrect naming. I am also not sure about the identity. So, I don't see any issues deleting this picture unless someone can identify him. ~ Nahid Talk 18:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unknown subject. --Royalbroil 01:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. It is an image, not a work of art, so the license is not applicable. --Royalbroil 01:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster Trade (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: image on poster was blurred so no reason to delete. --Royalbroil 01:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is not in public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 02:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1) No source given. 2) El Salvador is a pma-70 country, or 70 years for works by unknown authors. Assuming the 1944 date is correct, it would have become PD in 2015, which is after the URAA restoration date of 1996. holly {chat} 21:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of Google, not in scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is a 26-minute long video, not an image. It appears to be an instructional video in the w:Wayuu language about how to edit Wikipedia. Omphalographer (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 21:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Используется злоумышленниками Rndthernd (talk) 06:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Удалить Rndthernd (talk) 06:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. holly {chat} 21:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file violates copyright Carlo Dominioni (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file is explicitly athorized thorugh WLM OTRS, if you had red the description or the note in the category (NB: Museum explicitly authorized the upload of its contemporary art collection for WLM 2016 (See authorization for these modern artists copyright artworks by the museum.). --Sailko (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See this, closed with law citation by User:Ruthven --Sailko (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko Do you have the VRT ticket number for checking? Thanks Ruthven (msg) 08:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven It did not go thour VTR, but through WLM organizers, this was already discussed here, the document was visible at the time, you already closed the other DR after checking that. Maybe you can ask again User:CristianCantoro or User:Dario Crespi (WMIT) to double-triple-check-it again. --Sailko (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko I get: This site can’t be reached. The web page at https://wikimediaitalia.owncube.com/index.php/s/jENqDulQFnqN1I5?path=%2FRavenna%20(RA)%2FIstituzione%20MAR%20-%20WLM%202016 might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.
Not a valid permission to me. Permissions must be validated by community approved users (i.e. COM:VRT) and be stored permanently on WMF's servers, unless they are freely accessible somewhere. This is clearly not the case. Ruthven (msg) 09:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao Ruthven, l'autorizzazione non è passata da OTRS, ma tramite Wiki Loves Monuments. Io non so che fine fanno quelle autorizzazioni, magari puoi provare a sentire Christian Cenci (responsabile di quell'anno) o Dario (responsabile attuale) o Federico, però ti assicuro che era consultabile e che autorizzava esplicitamente "le opere" di quel museo. Tu stesso l'hai letta e hai salvato un altro file simile di questa collezione nel 2018, nella procedura che ti linkavo. Da una parte voglio difendere in tutti i modi possibili questi file perché sono le tra le pochissime foto di arte contemporanea che abbiamo, in alcuni casi veramente uniche; dall'altra sono stanco di dover rispiegare ogni volta come stanno le cose e le autorizzazioni ottenute, anche perché io non faccio parte dell'organizzazione di WLM Italia, e se ci sono dei problemi su come vengono registrate e archiviate le autorizzazioni è un problema che va risolto a monte, non può essere scaricato sulle spalle dei singoli fotografi. Io so che quando ho caricato ero in buona fede e avevo le spalle coperte dall'organizzazione del concorso. Il mio l'ho fatto con onestà e con dedizione, se però devo poi perdere continuamente tempo a difendermi dagli attacchi della community più "scettica", a un certo punto il gioco non vale più la candela. In questo momento ci sono tre procedure di cancellazione su file legati quell'edizione di WLM. Se le autorizzazioni passate sono carta straccia, io dovrò ridimensionare notevolmente l'affidamento che faccio sul concorso, e perdere meno tempo nelle edizioni future a caricare grandi numeri di file in nome della conoscenza libera. --Sailko (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ruthven, the authorization didn't go through OTRS, but via Wiki Loves Monuments. I don't know what happened to those authorizations; maybe you can try reaching out to Christian or Dario. However, I assure you that it was accessible and explicitly authorized "the works" of that museum. You yourself read it and saved another similar file from this collection in 2018, in the procedure I linked to you. On one hand, I want to defend these files in every possible way because they are among the very few photos of contemporary art we have, some of them truly unique; on the other hand, I'm tired of having to explain every time how things are and the obtained permissions, especially since I'm not part of the WLM Italy organization. If there are problems with how authorizations are recorded and archived, it's an issue that needs to be solved upstream, it can't be dumped on the shoulders of individual photographers. I know that when I uploaded, I did so in good faith and had the support of the contest's organization. I did my part with honesty and dedication, but if I have to constantly waste my time defending myself from the attacks of the more "skeptical" Commons community, at some point, the game is not worth the candle. At this moment, there are three deletion procedures on files related to that edition of WLM. If past authorizations are worthless, I will have to significantly reduce my reliance on the contest and spend less time in future editions uploading large numbers of files in the name of free knowledge. --Sailko (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko Il fatto è che non possiamo affidarci alla mia memoria per le autorizzazioni (o alla memoria di chiunque). Il progetto ha degli utenti fidati che verificano le autorizzazioni segnalate (usando {{Licensereview}} ad esempio) oppure i ticket VRT. Se si monta un sistema di autorizzazioni parallelo, va fatto bene e rispettando le regole comunitarie, le quali vogliono che le autorizzazioni siano verificate. Se ciò non avviene, si corrono dei rischi, come ora che l'autorizzazione si è persa e il file va in cancellazione. Nessuno mette in discussione la tua buona fede, ma il sistema di gestione delle autorizzazioni che è chiaramente inaffidabile.
English: The point is that we cannot rely on my memory for authorisations (or anyone's memory). The project has trusted users who verify reported permissions (using {{Licensereview}} for example) or via VRT tickets. If a parallel authorisation system is set up, it must be done properly and in accordance with the community rules, which want the permissions to be verified. If this is not done, you will take risks, such as currently that the authorisation is lost and the file goes to DR. Nobody questions your good faith, but the permission management system, which is clearly unreliable.
Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I asked the organizers to publish the authorization again --Sailko (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ruthven. The authorizations is filed here now. I was told this is also accessible when you click on the WLM number in the photos. It clearly states "Collezione Mosaici Moderni" including opere d'arte ivi contenute (works of art there displayed). Since that museum has only contemporary works, the authorization explicitly allows all these works of arts. By the way the authorization was not renewed after 2016, so these files are even more precious, as now there are not any longer allowed. If you agree, please close this, and this and this. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 20:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would recommend to the closing admin to link the permission in the file page and to validate it with {{Licensereview}}, in order not to restart this discussion again, new time the permissions server goes offline. Thanks Ruthven (msg) 14:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The link to the authorization has been updated. holly {chat} 21:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Latvia

Krd 16:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dislike this universal "no FOP". Architect Pekšens died in 1928. — Regards, Olgerts V (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per @Olgerts V: . Passes {{PD-old-architecture}} as the architect died more than 70 years ago. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Per File:14 Terbatas iela.jpg: Architect: K.Pēkšēns, A. Medlingersv. lv:Artūrs_Mēdlingers (1880—1961). If that is not true, I'd withdraw the nomination. --Krd 08:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd wait, what is the involvement of the 2nd architect in this building here? I can withdraw my comment and vote if the building is found to be a co-authorship work of those two architects. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, I only have this information from the mentioned file page. I now replied to the permission sender in ticket:2023123010002714 and asked for further information. Krd 09:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no definite answer yet, but as of now I think we have to consider Artūrs_Mēdlingers as co-creator and delete the images per PCP. Please wait another few days at least. Krd 12:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per https://mantojums.lv/cultural-objects/7681: Autors: K.Pēkšēns, A.Medlingers  Delete --Krd 10:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination as co-author died in 1961. Undelete in 2032. holly {chat} 21:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file, per the file name showing German photographer Hans Hildenbrand (1870–1957) in 1914, was uploaded in 2012 with a CC license tag as an "own work", which it is obviously not. As this very similar photograph (via [6]) from Hildenbrand's own studio (apparently the very same photo session, though dated to 1903 here) shows, the photo was almost certainly taken by Hildenbrand himself, most likely with some sort of self timer or similar. 1914 is not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}, so the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2028, 70 years after Hildenbrand's death (no URAA problem). Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The immediate source for the photo is apparently Hildenbrand's 1915 passport, see here (last of the 6 images) in a 2014 newspaper article. The passport was probably shown in other books or articles before that. --Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I changed the license to "PD-EU-no author disclosure" and passport images have been "made public". They have been viewed by the person that stamped the passport. Passport images always have two copies made, one for the passport and one for the passport application, that the government keeps. While it is possible that he took the image on a timer, we really have no evidence for that. We have several other images of photographers and their passport images, and we have them as author=unknown. --RAN (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say there is very significant doubt about your "no author disclosure" hypothesis when the other photo I linked above, from the same photo session, comes with a credit to Hans Hildenbrand. So even if we're not 100 % sure, the precautionary principle applies. And all that stuff about publication or not is irrelevant here. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A professional photographer does not need an "anonymous assistant" to photograph himself in his own studio, nor does he need a mirror. And there is a credit to Hildenbrand himself. --Rosenzweig τ 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per investigation by Rosenzweig. holly {chat} 21:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted illustrations on sign Trade (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, j'aimerais avoir plus d'information sur cette demande de suppression Kondotikodro (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asclepias: --Trade (talk) 21:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - see COM:DW. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file link points to a hosting in the National Assembly of Costa Rica website, however the creator of the logo isn't the National Assembly of Costa Rica (another institution must be assumed, very likely the proper Fuerza Pública de Costa Rica). Therefore, the actual licensing of the logo cannot be that of the hosted site (COM:LAUNDER). Since there is no clear origin, I create the DR. Taichi (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, i´ll change the source to the site of the Ministry of Public Security of Costa Rica, who is the "chief" and administrator of the Fuerza Pública, and has a licence of CC BY 4.0 DEED. Mito0504 (talk) 06:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Mito0504. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file violates copyright Carlo Dominioni (talk) 17:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file violates copyright Carlo Dominioni (talk) 17:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of the different kits present on this screenshot were already present under the form of wikicode. Don't see any real reason for their screenshot capture and the upload of the latter here on commons. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but it's COM:INUSE. holly {chat} 21:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Holly Cheng: Not anymore, as I proceeded to replace the file in question with a good old wikicode table. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 23:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, let's give it a week to see if anyone reverts. Otherwise, we'll assume you have consensus. holly {chat} 00:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no longer in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]