Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/11/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Bülent_Turan_-_Canakkale.JPG){kind=link}
_-_İsmail_Kaşdemir_-_Canakkale.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Copia_-_Copia.jpg){kind=link}
I accidentally put this in the root of wikimedia, it appears Amcgail (talk) 02:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
{{duplicate|Grafsteen op het graf van de familie Spitzweg in München, Bestanddeelnr 190-1392.jpg}} Aknilak (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
{{duplicate|Grafsteen op het graf van de familie Spitzweg in München, Bestanddeelnr 190-1393.jpg||aknilak}} Aknilak (talk) 07:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
{{duplicate|Grafsteen op het graf van de familie Spitzweg in München, Bestanddeelnr 190-1394.jpg||aknilak}} Aknilak (talk) 07:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
This sculpture is located in what looks like a fenced off business park, which is also where the photographs were taken from. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama "what needs to be public is the place from where the photograph is taken; it does not matter if the work itself is accessible to the public...If a statue is located next to a public street, photographs of the statue taken from that street enjoy freedom of panorama, but photographs of the very same statue taken from a non-public spot do not." So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 1.jpg
- File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 2.jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (2).jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (3).jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (4).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a business park, but a residential area that is separated from the main road by a fence, but can be entered from other directions freely. --Polarlys (talk) 08:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you look at Google Maps the statue is in the backyard of a building that houses a shipping company and a contractor. Maybe they are home based businesses, but I guess it doesn't matter since it's still private regardless. Just because someone can walk around whatever the building is into the backyard to photograph the sculpture doesn't mean it's a public place or that the photographs would qualify for FOP either. Otherwise they should have taken from the street or adjacent walkway, which they clearly weren't. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Taking a photo over a fence doesn’t rule out FOP if you could reach the artwork freely. I miss your proof why this should not be possible. The artwork is likely located on one of the park like green strips that often separate larger housing estates from thoroughfares in Hamburg and are separated from the road by a fence for the safety of children/dogs, although the entire estate is freely accessible from other places. --Polarlys (talk) 08:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, if the photographs were taken on the other side of the fence then they would qualify for freedom of panorama. It would be ridiculous to assume the images were taken from the road just because it's possible to photograph the statue from there though and there just isn't any evidence that's where they were taken from. Like if you look at this image it was clearly taken at ground level and the fence isn't visible in the foreground. The same goes for the rest of the images. The fence should be visible in foreground if the photographs were taken from the sidewalk though. Really, I don't think it's possible to even take ground level shots of the statue like that from the sidewalk to begin with since there's bushes in the way. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Taking a photo over a fence doesn’t rule out FOP if you could reach the artwork freely. I miss your proof why this should not be possible. The artwork is likely located on one of the park like green strips that often separate larger housing estates from thoroughfares in Hamburg and are separated from the road by a fence for the safety of children/dogs, although the entire estate is freely accessible from other places. --Polarlys (talk) 08:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Polarlys has described the local situation correctly. I took the first two images in the list definitely from the public sidewalk on the eastern side of the main road "Elbgaustraße". There is/was a fence partially covered with plants between the lawn area around the residential buildings and this sidewalk. But the sculpture is/was clearly visible from the public sidewalk, especially during winter months. If you use a telelens in winter, you can/could take an image thats nearly unobstructed by the fence or the plants. Take a look into the EXIF-Data of my images and you find, they were taken in February with a focal length around 130 mm. I think, the other images were taken under similar circumstances. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you look at Google Maps the statue is in the backyard of a building that houses a shipping company and a contractor. Maybe they are home based businesses, but I guess it doesn't matter since it's still private regardless. Just because someone can walk around whatever the building is into the backyard to photograph the sculpture doesn't mean it's a public place or that the photographs would qualify for FOP either. Otherwise they should have taken from the street or adjacent walkway, which they clearly weren't. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I took these pictures from the sidewalk. —Minderbinder (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think you did for the reasons I've stated and the fact that you've apparently taken pictures of statues in other non-public places before, like in fenced off school grounds. And completely ingnoring the string of false statements you've made other DRs to. So really no reason to think you didn't just go on the property to take the pictures. Although I'm more willing to leave it up to whomever closes this to decide if they want to give you the benefit of the doubt or not, but there's really no reason to IMO. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The earlier DR by Adamant1 was closed after just 15 hours as "no valid reason for deletion". That was much too early IMO, as this is not a clear-cut case, and Adamant1's argument isn't completely outlandish. Reinhard Kraasch didn't want to re-open the DR, so I'm nominating the files to allow for a longer discussion about the case and hopefully get a more detailed closing statement addressing it.
I've looked at aerial photos of the place where this sculpture is located, and it seems to me that none of the photos could have been taken from the nearby street or sidewalk, they all must have been taken by stepping onto this strip of grass where the sculpture is located. That piece of land is behind some residential building, next to a street, and apparently there are some bushes or trees between the grass and the street. The question we have to ask is is this piece of land sufficiently public as required by German fop, is there a sufficient dedication to the general public as mentioned by legal commentators (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Public)? In the case of the street or the sidewalk this would quite clearly be the case. For the piece of land where the sculpture is located, one could still come to the conclusion that yes, there is a sufficient dedication to the general public, but that question should be adressed. I myself will go 
Neutral
- File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 1.jpg
- File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 2.jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (2).jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (3).jpg
- File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (4).jpg
Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll rephrase: Some of the photos could have been taken from a sidewalk as stated. Let the deciding admin be the judge of that. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't like to repeat myself: all of my images were definitely taken from public ground. As stated above. The other images seem to be taken at nearly exactly the same position. By the way: I've been at the location personally and Adamant's argument IS completely outlandish, if you`ve been there only once. I am extremely annoyed that Rosenzweig is accusing me of lying. Close this silly deletion request as soon as possible --Dirtsc (talk) 07:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Dirtsc: I have not, I repeat not accused you of lying. I have just stated that it seemed to me that the photos could not have been taken from the street. I may be wrong in that, but that was my impression. I mainly nominated these files again because DR should generally stay open at least seven days (Commons:Deletion requests) and Adamant1 clearly felt this DR was closed too early and there was still need for discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I was actually going to vote to keep your images since its more plausable they were taken from the street then it is with the others. The way your acting about the whole thing really doesn't help though. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder what is not clear here and why people who are not familiar with the area doubt, based on interpretations of satellite images or maps, that the sculpture can not be seen from public ground as it was photographed. The sculpture was clearly visible from public paths when I took the photos and could easily be photographed while there were no leaves on the bushes. In the above mentionend Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Public is clearly stated, that "what needs to be public is the place from where the photograph is taken; it does not matter if the work itself is accessible to the public". In my opinion, the reopening of the discussion is completely unnecessary. --Dirtsc (talk) 11:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't like to repeat myself: all of my images were definitely taken from public ground. As stated above. The other images seem to be taken at nearly exactly the same position. By the way: I've been at the location personally and Adamant's argument IS completely outlandish, if you`ve been there only once. I am extremely annoyed that Rosenzweig is accusing me of lying. Close this silly deletion request as soon as possible --Dirtsc (talk) 07:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Es geht doch nicht darum, ob das Foto von Privatgrund oder öffentlichem Grund aus aufgenommen wurde (das können wir doch gar nicht überprüfen), sondern ob der Weg oder Park "der Öffentlichkeit gewidmet" ist oder nicht. In diesem Fall handelt es sich um ein von kleinen Fußwegen durchzogenes SAGA-Gelände, da steht ganz sicher nirgendwo ein Schild "Betreten verboten". Ich gehe bis zum Beweis des Gegenteils davon aus, dass dieses Parkgelände - egal wem es gehört - öffentlich zugänglich ist, und dass es keine Rolle spielt, ob die Skulptur vom Fußweg an der Elbgaustraße aus aus aufgenommen wurde oder der Fotograf ein paar Schritte näher herangetreten ist.
- Mein Eindruck ist auch, dass es hier auch gewisse kulturelle Missverständnisse im Spiel sind, indem vom US-amerikanischem Verhältnis zu Privateigentum ausgegangen wird, wo gleich jemand mit der Schrotflinte kommt, wenn man sich ein paar Meter zu weit von der Straße entfernt. Das ist hier definitiv nicht der Fall. Also noch mal: Ich sehe keinen Grund zur Löschung.
- Englisch: It's obviously not about whether the photo was taken from private or public property (we can't even check that), but whether the path or park is "dedicated to the public" or not. In this case, it is a SAGA site criss-crossed by small footpaths, and there is certainly no sign saying "No trespassing" anywhere. Until proven otherwise, I assume that this park area - regardless of who owns it - is open to the public, and that it doesn't matter whether the sculpture was photographed from the footpath on Elbgaustraße or whether the photographer took a few steps closer.
- My impression is also that there are certain cultural misunderstandings at play here, assuming the US relationship to private property, where someone comes with a shotgun if you move a few meters too far from the road. That is definitely not the case here. Again: I don't see a reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Very good, thank you. That is the kind of background information (re "dedicated to the public" or not) needed to decide such a case. --Rosenzweig τ 10:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate the background information. Although just to clarify since you didn't seem to get it on your talk page, I never said this had anything to do with if the statue is on private property or not. By "private" I merely mean "not a public place." It has nothing to do with who owns the property though. As to the whole thing about it supposedly being a park area crisscrossed by small footpaths, they don't seem to exist either on OpenStreetMaps or Google. There are paths in the front of the building going up to the entrances. As well as the sidewalk next to the street on the other side of the fence. Neither one makes where the statue is a park that has footpaths around it though. Anyone can look at either Google Street View or OpenStreetMaps to see there's no paths anywhere near the statue. In fact it, doesn't even look there's a path going around the back of the building to where the statue is. Let alone do they crisscross each other. So I don't think your justification for keeping the images is valid. It would be ridiculous if the standard for what makes something a public place was simply a footpath going up to a buildings entrance. Just as a side to that, I encourage anyone to look at the Google Street View images from in front of the building on Lüdersring. Even the front is fenced off and the parking lots have swing gates baring people from entering them. So in no way is the property a public place. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- On several photos (e.g. File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg you can see in the background the more of less fenced off backside of the buildings. For me, it is also obvious that the location is not part of the properties that you have viewed from the front on Google Street Map, but a strip of land behind these properties, the green stripe I mentioned earlier. --Polarlys (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's fencing for someone's patio. You can see them on the Google Satellite images. Most apartments or office flats have their own private areas in the back of the building. That doesn't make the larger backyard area completely different different property though. Regardless, if you look slightly north of there at Elbgaustraße 205 on the satellite images the property for the larger complex ends right below it and there doesn't even seem to be a way to get to the back of the property because it's blocked by the house and a fence. So the only other option would be in front of the complex on Lüdersring, which as I've said is also mostly fenced off and there's still no path going around the back. So even if where the statue is was separate property, it's still not "sufficiently dedicated" to the public enough to qualify for FOP. But I still think it's part of the complex. BTW, if you look at this Street View image there's no fence there and it's clearly part of the property the building is on, not a separate area. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: Thank you for posting the StreetView image. As this is a location in germany, I didn't expected some usable street view there. ;-) This should settle the case. In the image you see the public footpath along the Elbgaustraße, behind that the fence and some plants, behind that the lawn and the sculpture. Compare the fence und the plants to the pedestrian at the left and you'll find, that there is an nearly unobstructed view from the footpath towards the sculpture. So the images qualify for freedom of panorama, as stated in my above statement. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 07:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Dirtsc: You must have missed the multiple times I've said there isn't an unobstructed view from the ground where the photographs uploaded by Minderbinder seem to be taken from. Nowhere have I claimed there is no way at all to photograph the statue from the street, just not at the angle where these photographs seem to be taken from. I'm sure you get the difference. It's getting rather tiring having to repeat myself over and over because no one on your side of this wants to use an ounce of fairness or honesty when responding to me for some reason. In case your wondering this seems to be about the place where Minderbinder took their images from. How about you tell me how it was possible for him to take photographs from that angle while on the other side of the fence since your apparently the expert here. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- How can I prove that the images are made from the public footpath? They have been taken just a few weeks ago, so if I visit the site now, the conditions should not have changed a lot. Maybe I can do this this weekend. Shall I take a video of the site, shall I duplicate Minderbinders images? Would you believe me, if I take images or videos with my smartphone (because it is the only device I own, that takes images and GPS-coordinates simultaneously)? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Dirtsc: You must have missed the multiple times I've said there isn't an unobstructed view from the ground where the photographs uploaded by Minderbinder seem to be taken from. Nowhere have I claimed there is no way at all to photograph the statue from the street, just not at the angle where these photographs seem to be taken from. I'm sure you get the difference. It's getting rather tiring having to repeat myself over and over because no one on your side of this wants to use an ounce of fairness or honesty when responding to me for some reason. In case your wondering this seems to be about the place where Minderbinder took their images from. How about you tell me how it was possible for him to take photographs from that angle while on the other side of the fence since your apparently the expert here. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: Thank you for posting the StreetView image. As this is a location in germany, I didn't expected some usable street view there. ;-) This should settle the case. In the image you see the public footpath along the Elbgaustraße, behind that the fence and some plants, behind that the lawn and the sculpture. Compare the fence und the plants to the pedestrian at the left and you'll find, that there is an nearly unobstructed view from the footpath towards the sculpture. So the images qualify for freedom of panorama, as stated in my above statement. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 07:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's fencing for someone's patio. You can see them on the Google Satellite images. Most apartments or office flats have their own private areas in the back of the building. That doesn't make the larger backyard area completely different different property though. Regardless, if you look slightly north of there at Elbgaustraße 205 on the satellite images the property for the larger complex ends right below it and there doesn't even seem to be a way to get to the back of the property because it's blocked by the house and a fence. So the only other option would be in front of the complex on Lüdersring, which as I've said is also mostly fenced off and there's still no path going around the back. So even if where the statue is was separate property, it's still not "sufficiently dedicated" to the public enough to qualify for FOP. But I still think it's part of the complex. BTW, if you look at this Street View image there's no fence there and it's clearly part of the property the building is on, not a separate area. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- On several photos (e.g. File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg you can see in the background the more of less fenced off backside of the buildings. For me, it is also obvious that the location is not part of the properties that you have viewed from the front on Google Street Map, but a strip of land behind these properties, the green stripe I mentioned earlier. --Polarlys (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate the background information. Although just to clarify since you didn't seem to get it on your talk page, I never said this had anything to do with if the statue is on private property or not. By "private" I merely mean "not a public place." It has nothing to do with who owns the property though. As to the whole thing about it supposedly being a park area crisscrossed by small footpaths, they don't seem to exist either on OpenStreetMaps or Google. There are paths in the front of the building going up to the entrances. As well as the sidewalk next to the street on the other side of the fence. Neither one makes where the statue is a park that has footpaths around it though. Anyone can look at either Google Street View or OpenStreetMaps to see there's no paths anywhere near the statue. In fact it, doesn't even look there's a path going around the back of the building to where the statue is. Let alone do they crisscross each other. So I don't think your justification for keeping the images is valid. It would be ridiculous if the standard for what makes something a public place was simply a footpath going up to a buildings entrance. Just as a side to that, I encourage anyone to look at the Google Street View images from in front of the building on Lüdersring. Even the front is fenced off and the parking lots have swing gates baring people from entering them. So in no way is the property a public place. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Very good, thank you. That is the kind of background information (re "dedicated to the public" or not) needed to decide such a case. --Rosenzweig τ 10:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Ich habe die von mir angefertigten Aufnahmen komplett vom Fußgängerweg aus angefertigt, dabei über die Bewachsung am Zaun hinweg fotografiert. Dazu würde ich auch eine eidesstattliche Erklärung abgeben. Ich finde es wirklich langsam ganz schön albern, wie hier argumentiert wird. —Minderbinder (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- When I take pictures, I do not upload them in raw format. Rather, I take care to select only the good pictures, frame them by cropping, correct slanting angles, white filter, brightness and saturation. I also usually remove the EXIF information, because I do not care for other people to identify me by the ID of my camera, or follow my footsteps hour by hour, minute by minute. I am making an exception here, and have uploaded the pictures as taken, with EXIF information:
- Check the locations taken, they follow the public footpath by the road.
- @Rosenzweig: It would seem to me that you have an obligation to end this strange trial. Like I said above, I took these pictures from the public footpath (Bürgersteig) along Elbgaustraße. The EXIF information backs that up. If anybody else wants to challenge that, I would suggest they call me a liar to my face. I have been active on Wikipedia with this account since 2005. That's 18 years. I was elected a sysop on de:WP first in 2008. I know many people there personally, I have a reputation to defend. I am not some punk smearing other people's honesty. Time to stop this behavior. --Minderbinder (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Minderbinder: I'd rather not close this deletion request early again, and I'd rather not close a DR I opened myself if multiple parties with opposing views are involved; another admin should close this. I will however change my vote to
Keep after the extensive contributions by you, Dirtsc and Reinhard Kraasch, you have convinced me that it was and is indeed possible to take these pictures from the sidewalk (through some bushes), so fop does apply. This is not a "trial" BTW, you are not indicted, and nobody called you a liar. The thing here is that this DR was closed very early, with just the standard rationale not addressing the situation while the original nominator was not convinced. Looking at the images (and aerial images of the place), the situation wasn't really clear to me either, so it seemed that additional time for discussion and explanations could be helpful. And it was, you have convinced me. --Rosenzweig τ 08:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Minderbinder: I'd rather not close this deletion request early again, and I'd rather not close a DR I opened myself if multiple parties with opposing views are involved; another admin should close this. I will however change my vote to
- As promised yesterday, I made a video today that shows the location of the sculpture and the public footpath along the Elbgaustraße. As I have no experience with contributing videos to Commons, the quality is not very good, but hopefully good enough to explain the local situation. The height of the camera should be approx. 1.8 m above ground. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting video. Although I'm not exactly sure how it shows Minderbinder's were taken from the path, but whatever. Thanks for making a random video of the location though, I guess. The DR aside, I hadn't actually thought of uploading videos of local places to Commons before and it's kind of a cool idea. Even if not ultimately helpful in this case. And just in case your wondering why it isn't helpful. You clearly didn't take the video from the same spot or angle as Minderbinder's photographs. Although I do think that it supports your photographs being taken from the path. So it's not a complete lose. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Your answer is a joke, isn't it? It is not a "random" video, it is done just a few meters off Minderbinders position. You can definitely identify the footpath and you can see, from what position the images were made and that there can be no problem with the view angle of Minderbinder's photographs. The only one with some kind of problems in this whole discussion seems to be you. What more do you want? Do you want to take a personal view at the spot? I'll be your guide, tell my, when you'll arrive at Hamburg main station or airport and I'll pick you up by car and show you the surroundings. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a "random" video, it is done just a few meters off Minderbinders position. Are you seriously going to tell me a 5 foot difference doesn't matter when your the one arguing they took the photographs on the path? Anyway, the video clearly wasn't taken at the same spot or angle as where Minderbinder took their photographs. Compare the video at about 20 seconds in to File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg. It's not the same spot or angle at all. One of the things I've arguing this whole time is that Minderbinder couldn't have taken the photographs from the path because they would have been blocked by foliage, which your video just proves. There's clearly bushes and a bunch of tree branches that would have gotten in the way of them taking a ground level, frontal shot of the statue from the path. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I can't believe, your are arguing that way. Please look again at the image you named: there is a branch in the foreground right. Compare that to the video and you find, that if the photographer would have stood on the other side of the fence, he would have stepped back into the bushes nearly to touch the fence, to create an image with a branch in the foreground. This would be a very unlikely behavior. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a "random" video, it is done just a few meters off Minderbinders position. Are you seriously going to tell me a 5 foot difference doesn't matter when your the one arguing they took the photographs on the path? Anyway, the video clearly wasn't taken at the same spot or angle as where Minderbinder took their photographs. Compare the video at about 20 seconds in to File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg. It's not the same spot or angle at all. One of the things I've arguing this whole time is that Minderbinder couldn't have taken the photographs from the path because they would have been blocked by foliage, which your video just proves. There's clearly bushes and a bunch of tree branches that would have gotten in the way of them taking a ground level, frontal shot of the statue from the path. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Your answer is a joke, isn't it? It is not a "random" video, it is done just a few meters off Minderbinders position. You can definitely identify the footpath and you can see, from what position the images were made and that there can be no problem with the view angle of Minderbinder's photographs. The only one with some kind of problems in this whole discussion seems to be you. What more do you want? Do you want to take a personal view at the spot? I'll be your guide, tell my, when you'll arrive at Hamburg main station or airport and I'll pick you up by car and show you the surroundings. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting video. Although I'm not exactly sure how it shows Minderbinder's were taken from the path, but whatever. Thanks for making a random video of the location though, I guess. The DR aside, I hadn't actually thought of uploading videos of local places to Commons before and it's kind of a cool idea. Even if not ultimately helpful in this case. And just in case your wondering why it isn't helpful. You clearly didn't take the video from the same spot or angle as Minderbinder's photographs. Although I do think that it supports your photographs being taken from the path. So it's not a complete lose. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep for Dirtsc's photographs, but 
Delete for the rest. We really shouldn't be caving to people with Minderbinder's petulant attitude toward the process and other users. I'd hate to see a precedent set where images are kept purely because the uploader threw a tantrum about it. Plus it's not like anyone has presented a shred of evidence that the photographs were taken from the path in the last week anyway. I guess Minderbinder was to busy going off about how I'm a "punk smearing other people's honesty" or something to provide any. So really all this comes down to is the word of someone who's made multiple false statements and smeared people instead of just providing the evidence they've repeatedly been asked for. Otherwise, I guess we could keep the images just so Minderbinder doesn't have a conniption. I leave it up to the closing admin. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- So this all is not about an objective problem, but about personal sensitivities you have with Minderbinder? --Dirtsc (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Dirtsc: No. It's about there being zero evidence that the images were taken from the street and there being no reason to just take Minderebinder at their word about it because they have a history of making slandering, false statements. They aren't mutually exclusive. Nowhere have I said the images should be deleted just because Minderebinder made some comments that hurt my feelings or whatever. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep no new arguments presented, discussion closed. User Rosenzweig appear to trolling. --Zenwort (talk) 20:16, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep I would like to strongly object to calling Rosenzweig's re-opening of this deletion request "trolling", as it was clearly driven by a desire of thorough discussion of the merits of the deletion request - I don't think that the speedy closing by Reinhard Kraasch after less than a day was justified, as the usual minimum time given for discussion in Commons deletion requests per our policy is seven days. In the meantime, Rosenzweig was convinced by additional background information, and is now voting "keep" too, but I fully understand that he doesn't withdraw the deletion request (awaiting admin closure). Myself, I'm convinced too, but leaving this for the next admin to decide, adding just my vote. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and I think Adamant1 may want to be more picky about the hills he wants to die on in the future. —holly {chat} 20:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
I incorrectly formatted the ownership of the file. I do not personally own it. HaydenSoloviev (talk) 06:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I do not want it to appear anymore and i am the one who posted it Matissrochet (talk) 12:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
nie chcę 46.204.105.210 14:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|https://lebtown.com/2021/09/14/fort-swatara-lebanon-countys-garrison-during-the-french-and-indian-war/}} Goldsztajn (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gennady Guryanov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam. Not in use now. License issues.
- File:SecretDoctrine23 robot helper.png
- File:SecretDoctrine23 MonkeyAndRobo.png
- File:SecretDoctrine23 RailStation.png
- File:SecretDoctrineMain.png
Bilderling (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to nowhere. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Sumanuil: Broken redirects can be speedied per COM:SPEEDY#G2. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 02:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- I will next time, but in my experience, this is actually faster. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G2, please use {{SD}} from next time. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Low quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, was taken from the internet. --Polarlys (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abolfazlnasrollahzadeh (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:PERSONAL, too many selfies.
- File:Abolfazl nasrollahzadeh.webp
- File:Abolfazl nasrollahzadeh sport.jpg
- File:Abolfazl nassrollahzadeh.jpg
- File:Abolfazlnasrollahzadeh.jpg
- File:سیاه سفید.jpg
0x0a (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 06:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abolfazlnasrollahzadeh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:View-of-landscape-nature-v0-tfbr77qqjn9a1.jpg
- File:نمایش زندگی.jpg
- File:شکوفه ریز گل.jpg
- File:Nescafe.webp
- File:پرتور نور خورشید گل.jpg
- File:گذر جاده طبیعت باران ™️.webm
- File:Sea The eye-catching blue.jpg
- File:Flower Small.jpg
- File:Tankabon city.jpg
- File:سیستم مورد نیاز.jpg
- File:گل طبیعت.png
- File:گلبرگ سبز.jpg
- File:درختان پارک شهر.jpg
- File:گل طبیعت رنگ آفرینش.jpg
- File:نمایش نور کالا صوتی.jpg
- File:قهوه فوری.jpg
- File:هوای آفتابی صبح.jpg
- File:میحط طبیعت.jpg
- File:قهوه اسپرسو کلاسیک.jpg
- File:یه روز کاری در شهر و گرفتن عکس از طبیعت میحط.jpg
- File:طبيعت دوهزار.jpg
- File:Tonekabon.jpg
- File:چشم انداز میحط شهر تنکابن.jpg
- File:طبيعت میحط خانه.jpg
- File:در طبيعت.jpg
- File:درخت پرتغال.jpg
- File:در میان درختان پارک شهر.jpg
- File:نمایش از گلهای زرد در طبيعت.jpg
- File:متولد پاییزی.jpg
- File:زیر آسمان شهر.jpg
- File:چشم انداز میحط طبيعت.jpg
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 10:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abolfazlnasrollahzadeh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: the uploader's personal photo.
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 15:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: This user has enough contributions to have a few personal pictures. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 22:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Need to upload an svg version of File:Flag_of_Deseret.png Rainbowlack (talk) 00:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason given for removal. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 01:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use besides spammy userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Justice and Development Party (Turkey) - Bülent Turan - Canakkale.JPG
[edit]_-_B%C3%BClent_Turan_-_Canakkale.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_B%C3%BClent_Turan_-_Canakkale.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Justice and Development Party (Turkey) - İsmail Kaşdemir - Canakkale.JPG
[edit]_-_%C4%B0smail_Ka%C5%9Fdemir_-_Canakkale.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_%C4%B0smail_Ka%C5%9Fdemir_-_Canakkale.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, artist Jorit is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside spammy userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I do not personally own this logo. HaydenSoloviev (talk) 06:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: per description, flag of "a fictional concept". Omphalographer (talk) 07:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- What’s wrong with that Jancake (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons is a repository for educational media for use on other Wikimedia projects. Your fictional flag is not realistically useful for an educational purpose, so it is considered out of scope for Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 22:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erfred1982 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious flags, emblems, and "anthem".
- File:United Kingdom Haven and Irrenberg.svg
- File:ธงสหราชอาณาจักรเฮฟเวนและไอร์เรนเบิร์ก.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of the Heavenly Kingdom.svg
- File:Flag of Heaven.svg
- File:Deo et Libero.wav
- File:Galosier in Uniteo Kingdom Galosier and Aisburgh.jpg
- File:Coat of arm of the King of Kingdom of Glasier.svg
- File:Coat of Uniteo Kingdom Glussiar àt Aisburgh.svg
- File:Flag of Uniteo Kingdom Glussiar àt Aisburgh.svg
- File:Flag of Aisburgh - Flag of the Cross of Saint John the Martyr.svg
- File:Flag of Glussiar - Flag of the Cross of Saint Fernando.svg
- File:Flag of Glussiar (update).svg
- File:Flag of Glussiar.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erfred1982 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: additional fictitious content. (Paintings are either AI-generated or misattributed; none of the attributed subjects or authors exist.)
- File:Flag of Kingdom of Hainos and Irrenberg.svg
- File:Prime Minister - Sir Thomas Nels Jeansis.jpg
- File:Fredrix VI of Hainos and Eirenberg.jpg
- File:Scanrite the Great.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 07:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. (Description makes it clear that this was made up by the uploader.) Omphalographer (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused tiny flag, redundant to File:Flag of Paraguay.svg et al. Omphalographer (talk) 07:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This picture misrepresents critical facts.
According to the description, this picture shows the "3 worlds circa 1975"; however, it messes up several crucial facts:
- China and USSR has been hostile to each other since 1960s. Moreover, China has never joined the Comecon. Hence, China shall not be drawn as the same "bloc" as USSR.
- As of 1975, Ethiopian Empire, an ally with US, was still the ruling government. Hence, the color of Ethiopia is contestable.
- Laos is debatable as well. The Civil War ended at the end of 1975; beforehand, Laos was supported and protected by SEATO; afterwards, Laos became a close ally with Vietnam.
- India signed Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with Soviet in 1971, hence deviating from non-alignment. Its color should be reconsidered as well.
Johnson.Xia (talk) 08:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV. Argue facts on Wikipedia or some other Wiki site, not on a Commons deletion request thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)- Keep per User:Ikan Kekek. As the original image creator (many, many years ago), I would also point out that your objection regarding the Sino-Soviet split is already addressed and explained in the image description. This map was specifically made to illustrate the Three-world model, which conventionally grouped the Soviet and Chinese blocs together as the ‘Second World’. Vorziblix (talk) 11:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep if you disagree with a file's content, create a discussion on its talk page, or modify it yourself. Just because something is "wrong" in your opinion, doesn't mean it should be deleted. Discombobulates (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The map is regarding the "Capitalist Bloc" and "Socialist Bloc" of the Cold War-era. It isnt necessarily about formal alliances of USA and USSR. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 18:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/Flag maps of Antarctica
[edit]Out of scope: Flag maps claiming the entirety of Antarctica for Chile/Australia/NewZeeland/Norway, and one case of Antarctica claiming Ohio for whatever reason. All files are unused as far as I checked.
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Chile).svg
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Chile), vertical.png
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica Region, Chile).png
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica Region, Chile).svg
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Norway).png
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Australia).png
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (New Zealand).png
- File:Antarctica flag map of Ohio.png
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_vertical.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 09:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Territorial claims in Antarctica are complicated (and disputed!), and these flag maps don't even begin to represent them accurately. Omphalographer (talk) 18:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- File:Flag Map of Antarctica (Chile).png should probably be included in this deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Я передумал, чтобы это изображение хранилось здесь. I changed my mind to have this image stored here. ПростоГость (talk) 12:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE. Unused files uploaded by non-contributor. These file's descriptions don't make sense. These sentences don't need keep by image files.
- File:つキよみのカ三さま つキよみのみこと つキのカ三さま 月読命 月の神さま ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:あおうえい いつら 五十ら 五十連 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:おほかむづみのカ三 とつぎ みとのまぐはひ 二二 男女 結婚 夫婦 神人 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:スサナルのミコト ク二の神さま くにつち 地球 日本雛形 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:あまつひつぎすめらみこと 天津日嗣皇尊 天子さま 天皇皇后両陛下 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:天照大神殿の十種の神宝 あまてらすおほかみとののとくさのかむたから ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 天子 岡本天明.jpg
- File:かず 数 かぞへたもふ 数へ保ふ すうぢ 数字 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:〇九十 まこと 二二 ふぢわはれたり とつぎ みとのまぐはひ 結婚 夫婦 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:かずうた 数歌 あめのかずうた 天の数歌 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:いろ八 いろは いろ八のり十 いろは祝詞 いろ八祝詞 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:一二三 ひふみ 一二三のり十 ひふみ祝詞 一二三祝詞 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:いろ八 いろは いろ八のり十 いろ八祝詞 いろは祝詞 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:一二三 ひふみ 一二三のり十 一二三祝詞 ひふみ祝詞 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明.jpg
- File:一二三 ひふみ 一二三のり十 一二三祝詞 ひふみ祝詞 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 幣立神宮 岡本天明.jpg
- File:一二三 ひふみ 一二三のり十 一二三祝詞 ひふみ祝詞 ひつくのか三 ひつくの神 ひふみ神示 日月神示 あまてらすおほかみ 天照大神 岡本天明 幣立神宮.jpg
Netora (talk) 12:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dalemccarthy72 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NETCOPYVIO: these images are taken from various websites and are falsely claimed to be all own work. Based on file descriptions and file names, they were clearly uploaded for the purpose of promoting Dale Mccarthy Real Estate. I've given below some examples of websites that the images are copied from.
- File:Silverado-ranch-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png - https://www.vegasrealtymanagement.com/short-term-rentals/
- File:Anthem-henderson-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png - https://neighborhoodsinlasvegas.com/top-5-las-vegas-retirement-communities/
- File:Anthem-country-club-photo-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.jpg - https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/16-Pine-Hollow-Dr-Henderson-NV-89052/61750925_zpid/?mmlb=g,1
- File:Downtown-las-vegas-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png - https://posterfoundry.com/downtown-las-vegas-nevada-at-night-neon-signs-photo-photograph-cubicle-locker-mini-art-poster-12x8/
- File:The-arts-district-las-vegas-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Sun-city-aliante-north-las-vegas-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Southern-highlands-las-vegas-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Skye-canyon-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Rhodes-ranch-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Peccole-ranch-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Paradise-hills-henderson-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Mountains-edge-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Mission-hills-henderson-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Macdonald-ranch-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Macdonald-highlands-henderson-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Macdonald-highlands-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Anthem-highlands-henderson-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Lake-las-vegas-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Anthem-country-club-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Inspirada-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Green-valley-ranch-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Centennial-hills-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Carmenere-lake-las-vegas-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Calico-ridge-henderson-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Cadence-henderson-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
- File:Aliante-north-las-vegas-nv-dale-mccarthy-real-estate.png
Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. en:Draft:Manish Shrivastava was twice deleted as spam. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
see warning at Category:Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial DanielPenfield (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:FOP US. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
De toute évidence pas un travail personnel Aréat (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete photo is clearly a derivative image. The uploader is not citing the original images and their respective licenses. Günther Frager (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Low quality porn Dronebogus (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please stop your objections. I think you’re singling me out because I have a small penis. Let the video proceed and it will give confidence to other men who also have small penises. Ok thanks!
- Pete North469 (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete: per nom, extremely poor quality, re-upload. Uploader User:Pete North469 is obviously a sockpuppet of User:Thepussyslayer469. --Achim55 (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
User blocked for copyvios. Images of personalities with manipulated, but incomplete EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not convinced the uploader has a solid understanding of copyright and what is and is not a compatible license. Per COM:PRECAUTION, delete the files. Ravensfire (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Diploma CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even a diploma; this looks like some sort of award document. Uploader blocked on itwiki for self-promotion. Omphalographer (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright Ignacio.zavala194 (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Tineye found copies, but none have an attributed author or a copyright claimant. No image of Talcott Parsons appears in the renewal database. --RAN (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Now properly dated, attributed, and licensed. --RAN (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
this file is a blurry image that looks like it has been taken in error, and is not representative of the title AKanji-WMF (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 07:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Materialscientist. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
personal image Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Scaled-down duplicate of File:USS Ralph Johnson anchored in Tokyo Bay (Jan. 26, 2023).jpg. 0x0a (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Per {{FoP-India}}, freedom of panorama in India does not apply for text. Probably the photo violates text author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused tiny photo with no apparent educational purpose. At size/quality may also not be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete in addition to the nom's thoughts, there is no educational vale, the file is not in use, and I believe it to be out of scope for Commons 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Photo of a emerging talented Pakistani actor Samar Abbas Jafri User:BryanAli786 19:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @BryanAli786 There is nothing in what you have said that is based upon any form of policy. Please seek to ensure that opinions expressed here are rooted in policy. "Emerging" and "talented" are not appropriate rationales to retain a file. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, uploader blocked on simple english wiki as a sock known to promote this person [1]. Ravensfire (talk) 02:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I was unable to verify license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. Please see COM:DW. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value. Poor quality image and very low resolution. Headlock0225 (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The claimed license of {{PD-US-no notice}} is not valid for this file, as it as published in 1987. It is possible that {{PD-US-1978-89}} applies, but we would need actual confirmation of whether the book had a copyright notice. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Réunion (France) A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I do not own this file. I uploaded it apparently by accident a few years ago. HaydenSoloviev (talk) 06:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's COM:INUSE, and if it's a 1910 logo, it's presumably in the public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: no evidence this is an official flag. Omphalographer (talk) 07:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified, unused flag. ("Flag of country" - but what country??!) Omphalographer (talk) 07:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 07:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Copy vio from this https://megabook.ru/media/%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C site Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Copy vio from this https://teterinskoje.ru/?yandex-source=desktop-maps site Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Copy vio from this https://mykaleidoscope.ru/x/mesta-i-dostoprimechatelnosti/8796-gorod-shuja-dostoprimechatelnosti-64-foto.html site Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Copy vio from this http://www.turizmvnn.ru/cont/show/5792702/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Copy vio from this https://sobory.ru/photo/179784 site Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Also the only contribution by the uploader. Watchduck (quack) 12:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
no selfie as is claimed but copyvio from https://www.uu.nl/medewerkers/JWSchot. Also no permission from the photopgraper - see metadata that read "Author NURAN GELICI" Hoyanova (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Own file, mistake in prononciation Culex (talk) 13:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The license is incorrect, the source website is copyrighted. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author given - see metadata - ©Sérgio Huoliver 2014 Hoyanova (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 15:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Uploads by Baildan
[edit]- File:Flag of Tuva (Alt version).svg
- File:Flag of Tuva (5-22-2006).svg
- File:Flag of Tuva (9-23-2009).svg
- File:Flag of Buryatia (8-29-2014).svg
- File:Proposed Flag of Khalistan 1 (2022-9-25).svg
- File:Flag of Tokushima Prefecture (2008-2-29).svg
- File:Bandera Baluxistan Iranià.svg
- File:Afrian America Flag.svg
- File:Bandera D'Àtica.svg
- File:Flag of Siberia (2007-8-1).svg
- File:Flag of The State of Las Bela.svg
- File:Flag Of Bashkortostan.svg
- File:Flag of Bashkortostan (2019-3-9).svg
- File:Flag of Bashkortostan (2010-10-12).svg
- File:Flag of Bashkortostan (2009-1-13).svg
- File:Flag of Bashkortostan (2006-07-18).svg
- File:Flag of Salinas, Puerto Rico (2009-11-14).svg
- File:Flag of Salinas, Puerto Rico (2006-08-27).svg
- File:Flag of Bali (2008-09-18).svg
- File:Flag of Bali (2008-09-14).svg
- File:Salar flag (2013-08-13).svg
- File:Flag of Buryatia (2011-12-24).svg
- File:Flag of the UNIA (2007-03-27).svg
- File:RNA Flag.svg
- File:The Flag of the national movement of Mohajirs people (Mujahirs, Islamis, Undris, Urudus).svg
- File:Flag of Åland (2009-07-10).svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Various historical revisions and other erroneous flags uploaded by what appears to be a Jurisdrew sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 16:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Most of these flags actually existed or exist. 91.122.153.113 18:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Redundant. There are two photographs of this same artwork in the project, with much better resolution: File:Eliseu Visconti - Dorso de mulher 01.jpg and File:EliseuVisconti-P352-Dorso de mulher (3).jpg. Dornicke (talk) 16:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Text document, scope? Is this out of copyright? Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Source of the photograph is Facebook per metadata Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Emmy Award statuettes
[edit]Standalone images of the Emmy Award statuette are considered copyrighted in the U.S. Please see Category:Emmy_Award_statuettes.
- File:Oz Pearlman Emmy Award.jpg
- File:Pepe Motta - Emmy Awards Winner.jpg
- File:Premi vinti da franco zeffirelli, grammy 01.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Same picture as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C2%A9_Marian_Stefanowski.1.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have determined, as the author, that this file no longer contributes positively to Wikimedia Commons JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 18:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have determined, as the author, that this file no longer contributes positively to Wikimedia Commons JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 18:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have determined, as the author, that this file no longer contributes positively to Wikimedia Commons JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have determined, as the author, that this file no longer contributes positively to Wikimedia Commons JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have determined, as the author, that this file no longer contributes positively to Wikimedia Commons JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have determined, as the author, that this file no longer contributes positively to Wikimedia Commons JOGOS Public Assets (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The actual source, date of publication, and other information regarding this postcard was not provided. Sunnya343 (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly published pre-1970s without a copyright notice. See this EBay listing. While the postcard is undated, the producing firm went out of business in 1969. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per comment - I've fixed the file. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low quality photo of a pizza, badly blurred without evident compensating uniqueness nor importance. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article PapaYoung89 (talk) 22:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article PapaYoung89 (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry PapaYoung89 (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Photographs are not allowed subject to FOP in Singapore per COM:FOP Singapore. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Such image of publicly displayed 2D image is not allowed with FOP. However, if it is part of a larger image, Commons:De minimis may be possible (given that some of the stores are pretty much decorated with streamers and whatsnot in relation to the campaign). Robertsky (talk) 06:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that this is uploader's own work - image signature is different that user name Goldsztajn (talk) 00:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Image taken from: SECOND SEMINOLE WAR (1835-1842) FORTIFICATIONS IN THE VOLUSIA AND FLAGLER COUNTY AREA. Goldsztajn (talk) 01:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: An illustration by Randy Jaye. Unlikely to be own work, COM:VRT suggested. --Strakhov (talk) 20:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work (no metadata, low resolution/file size, high quality content compared with other uploads by this user, satellite image), has uploaded many copyright violations of architecture before
- File:The governmental district.jpg
- File:Al-Fattah Al-Aleem Mosque.jpg
- File:Egypt's Grand Mosque 01.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 01.jpg
- File:The grand Egyptian museum.jpg
- File:The GEM.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 07:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be video screenshots. No metadata.
0x0a (talk) 05:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
User blocked 3 months for copyvios (2nd block), web size images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Indoor Halls of the Olympic City of Egypt.jpg
- File:Misr stadium in the Olympic City of Egypt 08.jpg
- File:Misr stadium in the Olympic City of Egypt 07.jpg
- File:Misr stadium in the Olympic City of Egypt 04.jpg
- File:Misr stadium in the Olympic City of Egypt 03.jpg
- File:Misr Stadium 1.jpg
- File:Madinaty.1.jpg
- File:New Administrative Capital of Egypt.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 06.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 044.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 055.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 00.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 022.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 066.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 8.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 7.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 6.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 4.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 5.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 3.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 2.jpg
- File:Egypt's Olympic city Hall 1.jpg
- File:Olympic City of the New Administrative Capital 04.jpg
- File:Olympic City of the New Administrative Capital 05.jpg
- File:Olympic City of the New Administrative Capital 06.jpg
- File:Olympic City of the New Administrative Capital 03.jpg
- File:Olympic City of the New Administrative Capital 02.jpg
- File:Olympic City of the New Administrative Capital 01.jpg
- File:New Alamein city 05.jpg
- File:New Alamein city 04.jpg
- File:New Alamein city 02.jpg
- File:New Alamein city 01.jpg
- File:New Alamein city 03.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 19.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 20.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 18.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 16.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 17.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 15.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 14.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 13.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 12.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 10.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 11.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 09.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 07.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 08.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 06.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 05.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 04.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 03.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 02.jpg
- File:Hassan Moustafa Sports Hall 01.jpg
- File:Borg al-Arab indoor hall of Alexandria 06.jpg
- File:Borg al-Arab indoor hall of Alexandria 05.jpg
- File:Borg al-Arab indoor hall of Alexandria 04.jpg
- File:Borg al-Arab indoor hall of Alexandria 01.jpg
- File:Borg al-Arab indoor hall of Alexandria 03.jpg
- File:Borg al-Arab indoor hall of Alexandria 02.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 04.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 02.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 03.jpg
- File:Cairo Stadium Indoor Halls Complex 01.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 09.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 07.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 08.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 05.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 06.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 04.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 02.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 03.jpg
- File:New capital indoor sports Hall 01.jpg
- File:Egypt's central park 02.jpg
- File:Egypt's central park 01.jpg
- File:Egypt islamic center.jpg
- File:The Governmental district.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 07.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 06.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 05.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 04.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 01.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 03.jpg
- File:Towers of the CBD of the NAC of Egypt 02.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 09.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 08.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 07.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 04.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 05.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 06.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 02.jpg
- File:New Alamein city of Egypt 03.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Das Logo ist veraltet. Es gibt seit zwei Jahren ein neues. Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW (talk) 15:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. If necessary have the file renamed and / or amend the description. --Rosenzweig τ 19:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 20:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Available at a higher resolution (albeit with a later upload date) at https://www.flickr.com/photos/dsrag/29589113025/. Does not appear to be the uploader’s work. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work, taken from Facebook (FBMD in metadata). Komarof (talk) 05:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 05:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 05:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- The DW concerns are in reference to all of the example photos in the screenshot. Since this is open-source software, I suspect (hope!) that its default photos are available under some sort of free license, but we still need to identify what licenses those are and satisfy any attribution requirements they may have. Omphalographer (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Two different photo in the file history, description and metadata don't match, likely not own work. Komarof (talk) 05:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.seeingthefield.com/. If you have permission, please submit to COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- The image of Len Bilous (LenBilous.webp) is taken from his website www.seeingthefield.com per Len Bilous's direction. The website www.seeingthefield.com is jointly owned by Len Bilous, TJ Kostecky and Wayne Hann, Jr. MSCInteractive (talk) 15:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/CzJrAqaurVS/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==. If you are the photographer, please contact COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 10:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
non free picture: https://ligue-feminine-handball.fr/joueuses/marie-prouvensier/ LeFnake (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
completely blurred (upscaled) unusable image; used only on the user's talk page — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
completely blurred (upscaled) unusable image; used only on the user's talk page — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Kota Rajasthan India Clockwise from the top Aerial View of Chambal River , Ghatotkacha Circle , Kishore Sagar Talab , Bansal Classes , Jagmandir Palace , Aerial view of Kota , City Mall Kota , Garh Palace Museum , Aerodrome Circle.png
[edit]
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Probably not an own work (other uploads from this user are already deleted as copyright violation). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation. Picture from te web DirkVE (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
No selfie as is claimed - in the decription it clearly reads "foto by: F.D.S.; 2021." so this photographer has not given permission Hoyanova (talk) 17:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: fair use Yann (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from Facebook, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Старший сын 1969, на фото артисты Тишин, Малинин, Мазуренко, Панасюк, Марченко, Ицков.jpg
[edit]
wrong date - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Das Foto ist verpixelt. 37.4.228.195 21:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wenn du User:Reza Hajatpour bist, logge dich bitte ein und bestätige. --Achim55 (talk) 21:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Published previously https://www.dirs.phil.fau.de/ueber-uns/team/professorinnen/prof-dr-reza-hajatpour/ and https://www.dirs.phil.fau.de/files/2022/04/lebenslauf-prof-hajatpour.pdf, so COM:VRT procedure required. --Achim55 (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
handled far better by Category:Merrick McCartha. indeed, that is what the category is for. Surely this is an "article" of sorts and not what Commons is for 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
no author no source no permission - it is stated that this is a "press picture" in the title but everything is unclear also who this depicts due to the goggles Hoyanova (talk) 13:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Hoyanova,
- I saw you reported the photo. because you think it is an unclear photo. These are the official press photos taken halfway through this year.
- I work in the management office for Mr. Polska and these are the official photos that will be visible everywhere from now on. Peters Amber (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Republishing an historic image does not transfer the copyright or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 21:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence that the claimed license is valid. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately this file is under a CC-BY-NC license and so not suitable for Commons. See [2] or the end of the video, which explicitly gives the license. Kusma (talk) 21:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). I have asked the author for permission, no reply so far. I need more time for that. 0x0a (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Info Please note that this article(https://www.telepolis.de/features/Zukunft-der-Staedte-Megaprojekte-in-Indonesien-und-Aegypten-7203275.html) shows an incorrect CC-BY-4.0 license acquired from Commons. 0x0a (talk) 15:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no license. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Image is likely to be obtained from https://sitbatan.blogspot.com/2013/02/spain-philippines-and-brunei-connection.html without any license or permission from the owner. It is claimed by the author as their own work, which is not true at all as the original image was published in 2013. Furthermore, the latest image that is uploaded into Wikimedia Commons bears a striking resemblance to the 2013 image in terms of contrast. 202.160.38.9 00:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it is true that i don't own the image. But i did not obtained it from there. I obtained it somewhere else and its unknown where the actual original image came from. Also, there are other blogs that uses this image. Like This Also the one i got it from was from here. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oh i'm quite unaware of the existence of an older version than the link mentioned, perhaps it is randomly shown on everyone's Google searches, where it can appear or not on the top searches. Based on the link, it was published back in 2008 by a renowned scholar named Rozan Yunos. In my opinion, the majority of his research are valid if used properly. But however, there were no license or indication of free use provided by the blog publisher. It is more than likely to come from an unknown artist, whom Mr. Rozan Yunos obtained permission to post on his blog from. Or, if the image was personally taken by himself without any permission and posted it, then he is considered as violating the copyright rules of Brunei. According to the Emergency (Copyright) Order 1999, any 2D works such as drawings or illustrations are "Not-free" and protected for a duration of 50 years before becoming "Free Use". In this case, the published content is less than 50 years of age or above. There is nothing wrong in uploading files to Wikimedia, but the sources should be clear enough, and following the rules of Wikipedia and the country related to the work. Therefore, I highly suggest you to upload any pictures originally taken by you as "own work". Uploading "own work" is acceptable as long as it is coming from us, not sourced from other authors or websites without any permission, and appropriate licenses are used. Thanks. 202.152.72.147 11:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Undocumented work. Bogus licensing. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Flag map of Antarctica"
[edit]Out of scope: flag maps where the (unofficial) flag is also the map. Confusing, unnecessary, and unused outside userspace.
Omphalographer (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- These flags in the map are COM:INUSE so there is no real reason to delete these. 96.64.111.81 19:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, they are not. None of these images are in use outside of userspace galleries. Omphalographer (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Look at the source; https://www.crwflags.com/FOTW/flags/aq!.html. 2601:47:4081:50C0:4488:34C1:8482:199 15:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Is that reliable? 2601:47:4081:50C0:D903:7986:FCAD:4464 03:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- If it is, then there is no correct reason to delete this. 2601:47:4081:50C0:D903:7986:FCAD:4464 03:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- ... why are you talking to yourself? Omphalographer (talk) 03:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- If it is, then there is no correct reason to delete this. 2601:47:4081:50C0:D903:7986:FCAD:4464 03:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Is that reliable? 2601:47:4081:50C0:D903:7986:FCAD:4464 03:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Look at the source; https://www.crwflags.com/FOTW/flags/aq!.html. 2601:47:4081:50C0:4488:34C1:8482:199 15:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, they are not. None of these images are in use outside of userspace galleries. Omphalographer (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:INUSE has the section title "File in use in another Wikimedia project" (bold in original) and the very first sentence includes "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation" (bold added). The IP, indeed an LTA, appears not to have actually read the policy. Third party sites not only explicitly do not satisfy COM:INUSE, but may also demonstrate these to be copyvios as that site (1996) predates upload (2021). --Эlcobbola talk 14:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Flag maps of Navassa Island
[edit]Out of scope: unofficial (and potentially copyrighted) flag on two maps; unusable black background on the "US Flag" variant. All unused outside the uploader's userspace gallery.
.svg){kind=link}
- File:Flag Map of Navassa Island (US Flag).jpg
- File:Flag map of Navassa Island.jpg
- File:Navassa Island flag map.png
- File:Navassa Island flag map.svg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all Made-up fantasy design with no usage or recognition should not be used on any wiki and is out of scope. It is also potentially copyrighted. I have also added File:Navassa Island flag map.svg to the nomination. Reywas92 (talk) 05:58, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- As you are aware, Navassa Island flag map.svg is being used on https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlag_van_Navassa. In that article it is clearly stated that that flag has no official function. The article also states who designed the flag, when it was first used, why,...
- I see no reason to delete Navassa Island flag map.svg or Navassa Island flag map.png. Removing those files would be damaging to the nlwiki. MLTRock (talk) 19:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- As I noted in the nomination, this design is likely to be copyrighted. It's likely above the threshold of originality, and doesn't fall under any of the typical exemptions for flags because it isn't a government work. We can't keep copyright violations, regardless of whether they're in use or not. Omphalographer (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- What is damaging is that nlwiki has an article falsely presenting this fantasy design as the flag of Navassa when Navassa does not have a flag. You cannot just disclaim that as "unofficial" when that is not the case either and the design has only been used at a single event organized by the designer, not used by anyone else. Reywas92 (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Your statement is untrue. As you yourself have stated you do not speak Dutch. You are therefor not qualified to judge the contents of an article written in Dutch. As several people on the nlwiki have explained to you: the article on the nlwiki is not presenting the 'fantasy flag' as the flag of Navassa. The article on the nlwiki explains who designed the flag in question and when the flag in question was used. All of those things are verifiable facts. MLTRock (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh shut up, Google Translate works perfectly well. I am perfectly capable of understanding what it says. Just because it's true that a random person named Harry Wheeler made up his own flag as a fantasy or commemorative design to represent the uninhabited island at a single event he organized does not mean any wikipedia needs to falsely indicate in a standalone article that this is now the "Flag of Navassa", regardless of if you call it "unofficial". I scribbled some colors on some fabric, said it represented your hometown, and flew it outside my house. Is that the "unofficial" flag of your town now? Can it have an article? Whatever disclaimers you have still betry that literally no one with any right to say this is the island's flag has acknowledged it. Reywas92 (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nowhere in the nlwiki article does it say that the flag in question is thé flag of Navassa, official or unofficial. MLTRock (talk) 08:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh shut up, Google Translate works perfectly well. I am perfectly capable of understanding what it says. Just because it's true that a random person named Harry Wheeler made up his own flag as a fantasy or commemorative design to represent the uninhabited island at a single event he organized does not mean any wikipedia needs to falsely indicate in a standalone article that this is now the "Flag of Navassa", regardless of if you call it "unofficial". I scribbled some colors on some fabric, said it represented your hometown, and flew it outside my house. Is that the "unofficial" flag of your town now? Can it have an article? Whatever disclaimers you have still betry that literally no one with any right to say this is the island's flag has acknowledged it. Reywas92 (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you want to prohibit unofficial and fantasy made-up flags even when they are sourced or not copyrighted? They are COM:INUSE when they are sourced. 2601:47:4081:50C0:F34:9337:AF93:F95 20:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Your statement is untrue. As you yourself have stated you do not speak Dutch. You are therefor not qualified to judge the contents of an article written in Dutch. As several people on the nlwiki have explained to you: the article on the nlwiki is not presenting the 'fantasy flag' as the flag of Navassa. The article on the nlwiki explains who designed the flag in question and when the flag in question was used. All of those things are verifiable facts. MLTRock (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Is this the same design as the Navassa flag on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Palmyra Atoll (local).svg? bdijkstra (overleg) 16:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, these are all variants on the same Harry Wheeler design. Omphalographer (talk) 17:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- We should transfer these to English Wikipedia, especially the flag of Navassa, and Johnston. 2601:47:4081:50C0:7EC6:F154:6BEC:30BE 06:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Again, this is not the "flag of Navassa", it's a design some unrelated person made up for Navassa and never used on the island or adopted in any way. It has no place on enwiki whatsoever. Reywas92 (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Like I said, unofficial flags that have sources are COM:INUSE. Impossibrubro (talk) 05:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Again, this is not the "flag of Navassa", it's a design some unrelated person made up for Navassa and never used on the island or adopted in any way. It has no place on enwiki whatsoever. Reywas92 (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- We should transfer these to English Wikipedia, especially the flag of Navassa, and Johnston. 2601:47:4081:50C0:7EC6:F154:6BEC:30BE 06:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. Impossibrubro (talk) 05:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, these are all variants on the same Harry Wheeler design. Omphalographer (talk) 17:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:INUSE has the section title "File in use in another Wikimedia project" (bold in original) and the very first sentence includes "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation" (bold added). The IP, indeed an LTA, appears not to have actually read the policy. Certain of the images have been added to the uploader's userpage, however. On this, policy and guidelines including the following: COM:INUSE requires a file be "legitimately in use" (one notes, quite distinct from merely "in use") with two considerations: 1) "realistically useful for an educational purpose" - at least certain fail per discussion and 2) "legitimately in use as discussed above," which relates to "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project". A bulk userpage gallery of personal fictitious flag images meets neither the letter nor spirit of this provision. File:Navassa Island flag map.svg is the lone exception; it is in use on nl:Navassa and was not merely "slapped" into the article to circumvent INUSE, but was in fact subject to a discussion that had support for retention. The path to deletion is thus: 1) approach the project currently using this image and persuade them to discontinue that use and 2) open a DR with a new rationale that the file is not used and that its having been universally removed is evidence of being so flawed as not to be useful for an educational purpose. --Эlcobbola talk 15:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- It has been brought to my attention that I neglected to consider the referenced previous DR related to this flag. That DR found this flag, which originated elsewhere without indication of a free license, to be above TOO. This flag is a derivative of that flag, and thus that discussion is applicable. This is a copyright issue regardless of scope; nl.wiki is free to make a fair use claim if allowed on that project. Эlcobbola talk 19:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indiana jo (talk · contribs)
[edit]The background maps may not be freely licensed and the sources are required.
- File:西三川砂金山地図.png
- File:鶴子銀山地図.png
- File:Tokunoshima Worlg Heritage Area Map.jpg
- File:Okinawa Island World Heritage Area Map.png
- File:Amami Ōshima World Heritage Area Map.jpg
- File:Japan Nansei-Shoto World Heritage Map.gif
0x0a (talk) 06:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 17:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering (F6) by LTA sock - here well before Flickr upload. --Эlcobbola talk 16:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Cannot be a selfie as is claimed (uploader is this person), picture has been made in 205 by an olympus camera according to metadata so unknown photographer and no permission either Hoyanova (talk) 08:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Cannot be a selfie as is claimed (uploader is this person), picture has been made in 2005 by an olympus camera according to metadata so unknown photographer and no permission either Hoyanova (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
_-_Copia_-_Copia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Copia_-_Copia.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author, A watermark appears on the bottom right CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
_-_Copia_-_Copia.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
_-_Copia_-_Copia.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
The architect of the museum is Rudolf Christ who died in 1975, interior spaces are not covered with FoP-Switzerland. And Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland I suggest to undelete in 2046.
- File:Basel BS Kunstmuseum Basel Hauptbau Innen 1 St. Alban-Graben 16.jpg
- File:Basel BS Kunstmuseum Basel Hauptbau Innen 2 St. Alban-Graben 16.jpg
- File:Basel BS Kunstmuseum Basel Hauptbau Innen 3 St. Alban-Graben 16.jpg
- File:BaselKunstmuseumEingang.jpg
- File:Kunstmuseum Basel Foyer 1 Stockwerk.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep As for File:BaselKunstmuseumEingang.jpg, please check out the former deletion request (2019), when this file was kept. -- Vysotsky (talk) 09:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:BaselKunstmuseumEingang.jpg. I think my colleague Taivo closed the 2019 DR properly as it was proven that the photo was taken from a public place. Abzeronow (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, but all works in interior spaces are excluded from FoP in Switzerland also if they are accessible to the public like museums.[3]p.158. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: All the interiors but File:Kunstmuseum Basel Foyer 1 Stockwerk.jpg lack of original caracter and are below ToO (just rooms and corrdiors). I've added {{De minimis}} for the artworks. The stained glass is kept per previous DR. Ruthven (msg) 15:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schweiz-alt.png Rainbowlack (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's an unrelated entity so it's not a duplicate. Category:Horizontal bicolor blue and yellow flags is full of flags that look like the national flag of Ukraine but aren't its duplicates. TFerenczy (talk) 09:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oops! No clue how I missed that, thanks for pointing it out haha. Rainbowlack (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- And also I just realized it's not even the same shade of red. Well, one more flag to vectorize! Rainbowlack (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oops! No clue how I missed that, thanks for pointing it out haha. Rainbowlack (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. —holly {chat} 17:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
There is already a similar file of the painting with frame as File:Marie Petiet - Blanchisseuses 01.jpg Munfarid1 (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Next time, you can use {{speedydelete|G7}} for your own recently uploaded and unused files, and it will get deleted usually within 24 hrs instead of over 2 months. —holly {chat} 17:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
License laundering. TVTen uploaded the video under Youtube Creative Commons license, but it's not the copyright holder of the video, which is Big Hit Music, as stated in the description as 제공/출처 : 빅히트 뮤직=Provided by/Source: Big Hit Music Chiyako92 (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
1. Derivitive of a file with different copyright. Photoshopping a photo under a differen licence doesn't transfer full ownership to "Rama" to rellease under CC. 2) This image is used to illustrate the FACS but is just a re-liveried image of an American F22. Thus it is a misleading fantasy image adding nothing to the article it is used on. 79.173.136.58 13:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep
- 1) the original image is public domain, so I have every right to use it as I did. Credits are given and I explain what I did to the original image.
- 2) the F22 has two rudders and two elevators, and diamond wings; the plane depicted here has lambda wings and only two rudder-elevators, and the shape of the body and cockpit is different from that of the F22. And the air intakes are nothing alike. If the nominator had the slightest notion of what the SCAF is, they would have spotted these differences. I therefore posit that they are not qualified to make such strong and sweeping statements as "misleading fantasy image adding nothing to the article it is used on".
- Rama (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Same as 1) above and not liking an image in an article isn't a valid reason to start a deletion request. The RedBurn (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 17:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pelikana as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no evidence that the uploader made this picture all by themselves, although this commons page is now quoted with this as author on various other websites. Looking at the other uploads by user there seems strong reasons for doubts that uploader properly understood the implications of authorship in general, and in particular of the copyright licensing on commons. Everything was declared as "own work". Peli (talk) 14:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Compare to this autogram card on auction a bit later but also larger (and signed). 1 compare offspring use here 2 Peli (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; source is The New York Times where it's credited to Carmen Chan, NYT photographer. —holly {chat} 17:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. moto.it — danyele 16:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- yes is the photo of Moto.it but is my photo, because i work like freelancer at Moto.it. I am a professional journalist and videomaker 79.27.19.167 16:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep: the two poses are a bit different, to be honest.... — danyele 16:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is my bio at Moto.it the photo is mine, it is part of a series of photos that I took in Bagnaia after the GP victory. All photos are mine and I chose to publish this one on Wikipedia 79.27.19.167 18:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. I have also emailed the uploader (and attempted to contact him via Instagram) to request verifying his identity via VRT. —holly {chat} 17:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. moto.it — danyele 16:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- the same answer I gave for the photo of Bagnaia: yes is the photo of Moto.it but is my photo, because i work like freelancer at Moto.it. I am a professional journalist and videomaker 79.27.19.167 16:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete: unlike Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bagnaia mugello 2023.jpg, here the Marquez photo is the same from Zamagni's article in Moto.it; there's no indication about a free release from the source — danyele 16:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is my bio at Moto.it the photo is mine, i say again! It's the photo I took of Marquez when he came to the press room to talk to us journalists, monday 11 of september 2023 79.27.19.167 18:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. —holly {chat} 17:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Polarlys as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not freely licensed: Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
Looks {{PD-medical}} to me, converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Abzeronow. —holly {chat} 17:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
This page has been under discussion to delete for over three years with a consensus to delete it. Epolk (talk) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment Already under discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/06/Category:Files with all upper case file names. Omphalographer (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural keep, as category deletion is handled via the CFD process, which yes can sometimes take years. —holly {chat} 18:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Assimilando conceitos - Gestalt TremDeGoiasUai (talk) 20:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't understand this one at all, but it's an uploader request on the same day of upload, so it's that counts as a G7 speedy deletion. —holly {chat} 18:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Still copyrighted — Racconish 💬 04:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata suggests the photo had been published on facebook. Permission needed. Larryasou (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The filename and the username and the fact that its only usage is on a user page in bg-WP suggests that the uploader got the photo from his own Facebook account. —holly {chat} 01:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The uploader appears to be the subject of the photograph accroding to the description. Plus, the photo was previously published at [4] and attributed to Димитър Танчев. If the uploader owns the copyright, he should contact COM:VRT with the evidence. 0x0a (talk) 06:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I kept it the last time it was nominated for deletion, but I'm deleting it this time based on the new information. —holly {chat} 23:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NBS13QRS as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The picture was not really owned by the owner of this picture and was presumed taken illegally from https://www.flickr.com/photos/89082190@N06/15137721332/. Also, it was an LTA who created this. Wdwd (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The nominator has no understanding of how Flickr works or how Commons works. --RAN (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 23:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
FoP Switzerland does not apply for interior spaces. The new wing of the Kunstmuseum Basel was newly built inaugurated in 2016 and the architects are still alive.Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland
- File:Neubau des Kunstmuseums in Basel - Innen-1.jpg
- File:Neubau des Kunstmuseums in Basel - Innen-2.jpg
- File:Neubau des Kunstmuseums in Basel - Innen-3.jpg
- File:Neubau des Kunstmuseums in Basel - Innen-4.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Looking outside
[edit]This file is not depicting any kind of art work, in my sense. It is rather showing the view at the outside. The selection (le cadrage) is mine. I suggest this file is not deleted.
-
3
MHM (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Public toilets
[edit]This file is not depicting art work, isn't it? I am interested in knowing why such very much public places are not free to share...
-
4
MHM (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
FoP in Switzerland should not count for interior spaces. Staircases and rooms are mentioned as an example what should not count. The building, which is an extension of the Kunstmuseum Basel on the other side of the street of the original wing, was newly built and inaugurated in 2016.Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the author A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel Hello, The photo (of the mural in Naples) is taken by Luca Rosini, the director, whom I contacted when I wrote the Italian page of his film and he gave me the image in question which is not protected by any copyright.
- I am sorry for my ingleze which is not very good....
- Let me know,
- F. 2A01:827:1A82:E501:C536:DC71:A6E1:1AA5 07:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @France mala: If you obtain the permission from Luca Rosini, you can send the written permission to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 08:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
edit (firm) --France mala (talk) 07:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The middle left image is a derivative work (digital retouching of an old image), so it cannot be included as a public domain work. It must be replaced with the original image without any digital retouching. Taichi (talk) 07:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Also File:Marta Ofelia Stutz.png, it's the same collage. Taichi (talk) 07:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Taichi: How do you know it was digitally retouched? Assuming that it's true, the retouching itself may not have generated a new copyright depending on how much restoration work was done. —holly {chat} 17:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly, retouching doesn't grant a new copyright if it's minor. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 15:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep You just need to fix the license to PD-EU, instead of CC, no need to delete, these are amazing historical images. --RAN (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete RAN always forgets about URAA. Even if we assume the 1945 date is correct and that the author is truly unknown, it wouldn't be PD in the US until 2041. —holly {chat} 17:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Holly is correct, URAA applies. Undelete in 2041. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Daniel Barbaroux (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 1945 French photograph, won't be PD in the US until 2041. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation EOLO SpA; another better file already exists (File:EOLO-CIANO-BIANCO.png) 2A01:E11:1A:990:54DB:2432:4D80:544A 19:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If this is a copyright violation, then so is the other file. However, both are below COM:TOO Italy in my opinion. —holly {chat} 18:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly, below the ToO of Italy. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom and Commons:Deletion requests/PD ineligible signatures DrKay (talk) 20:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wait, is this source from Tweet from Governor General of Canada if you referred? 49.150.0.134 23:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- If this signature is going to be deleted, then maybe it should be re-uploaded to Wikipedia (not to Commons). RyanW1995 (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- See in Commons:Deletion requests/File:1949.06.08 - John G. Hawthorne signature.jpg and Commons talk:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom law, as discussed by A1Cafel. For misstates the relevant UK law and the cited sources, and the user who wrote it no longer stands by it.. 49.150.0.134 13:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons precedents. UK ToO is very low, and the page still reflects that signatures are copyrightable in the UK. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Suspected Vandalism. The audio file poorly reflects the pronunciation of the Latin word "niger" using a rhotic vowel at the end instead of an alveolar trill or tap despite the uploader showing that they are capable of accurately pronouncing the word in Ecclesiastic Latin in their other audio file SalamanderPotato (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- I do not assume bad faith. On the other hand, both of his pronunciations are quite bad. Probably they wanted to replace this one by File:LL-Q397 (lat)-Titulation-niger (black).wav, so it should be deleted and replaced by the latter. --Achim55 (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. @SalamanderPotato: Please replace the current usages before we can proceed with deletion. —holly {chat} 18:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE, can be renominated when no longer in use. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The claimed license of {{PD-US-no notice}} is not valid for these files. No information about actual publication is provided, making it impossible to know whether they were published in the correct time period and without a copyright notice.
- File:1930 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Station - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1935 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Station - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1935 - LVRR Black Diamond Streamliner Arriving - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1938 - LVRR John Wilkes Train - 30 Apr MC - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1939 - LVRR Engine Asa Packer - 31 Jan MC - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1947 - Lehigh Valley RR Black Diamond arriving at Allentown.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station and NJC Terminal Airphoto - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station Clock Tower - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station Looking North From Platform Hamilton Street Bridge - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station Passenger Viewing Deck - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station Passenger Waiting Room - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station Southbound Train - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1949 - Allentown LVRR Station View From Track Boarding Platform - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1950 - Hamilton Street Bridge over Jordan Creek at LVRR Station Allentown PA.jpg -- halftone
- File:1950 - Lehigh Valley RR Black Diamond arriving at Allentown.jpg
- File:1950 - Lehigh Valley RR Station over Jordan Creek Allentown PA.jpg -- halftone
- File:1952 - Lehigh Vally Railroad Black Diamond Pulling Out of Allentown Station Pennsylvania.jpg
- File:1954 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Trains At Allentown Station.jpg
- File:1957 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Arrival - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1960 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Station - Allentown PA.jpg -- not in halftone, but same photo as the next one
- File:1960 - LVRR Allentown Passenger Station - Allentown PA.jpg -- halftone
- File:1961 - Last LVRR Train coming into Allentown Station Allentown PA.jpg -- halftone
- File:1962 - Allentown LVRR Station Last Passenger Train Leaving Southbound - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1962 - Linden Street Bridge over Jordan Creek Looking South Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1965 - Fourth Street Redevelopment Area - Lehigh Valley RR Station - 1 Apr - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1965 - Fourth Street Redevelopment Area - Lehigh Vally RR Station Looking West on Hamilton - 1 Apr - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1965 - Fourth Street Redevelopment Area - Lehigh Vally RR Station Looking West on Hamilton Closeup - 1 Apr - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1965 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Passenger Station - 1 Apr - Allentown PA.jpg
- File:1965 - Lehigh Valley RR Station - 1 Apr - Allentown PA.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Those up to 1964 as PD-not renewed. I am looking through the renewal database for anything related to "Lehigh Valley Railroad" or "Lehigh Valley RR" and not finding any books or individual photographs. The uploaded has said they have been scanning material from the Allentown Library photo archive. They are all anonymous. I have asked the uploader to put me in touch with the library but they never write back. I want to suggest the library upload them to Flickr Commons as "no known restrictions". --RAN (talk) 04:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- PD-US-not renewed requires publication before 1964. Do you have proof that these files were actually published before 1964? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There's zero evidence these photographs were published anywhere before being uploaded to Commons. A few actually appear to be of slides that were purchased by the uploader, which clearly haven't been published according to the common understanding of the term. Nor would the uploader own the copyright to the slides simply because they purchased them from someone else. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Some of these were definitely published because they were printed in halftone (I've marked them above), and that would have only been done for printing in a newspaper or book. Still, I think we need more info. —holly {chat} 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, we would need to know when they were published, and what the copyright situation is with those publications. Lacking that, we must assume they are still under copyright. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Some of these were definitely published because they were printed in halftone (I've marked them above), and that would have only been done for printing in a newspaper or book. Still, I think we need more info. —holly {chat} 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 12:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The claimed license of {{PD-US-no notice}} is not valid for these files. No information about actual publication is provided, making it impossible to know whether they were published in the correct time period and without a copyright notice (in the publication, not just on the photo itself).
- File:1933 - Flood of 1933 - Lehigh Valley RR Station Looking At Jordan Creek.jpg
- File:1933 - Flood of 1933 - Lehigh Valley RR Station Platform.jpg
- File:1963 - LVRR Station.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. There's zero evidence these images were published anywhere prior to being uploaded to Commons. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
The claimed license of {{PD-US-no notice}} is not valid for these files. No information about actual publication is provided, making it impossible to know whether they were published in the correct time period and without a copyright notice.
- File:1970 - Allentown LVRR Railroad Station.jpg
- File:1970 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Station.jpg
- File:1972 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Station Allentown.jpg
- File:1972 - Teardown of LVRR Station.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment All of these look like professional photos that were almost certainly published shortly after creation. If someone can work out where they were published, the odds are strong that it was a newspaper and that copyright was not renewed after 28 years, so any of these up to and including 1963 are potentially {{PD-US-not renewed}}, but we'd need evidence. Also, if these are deleted, we should definitely add the appropriate categories to this page to make sure they get undeleted when their respective copyrights are presumably expired, renewal or not, after 95 years. - Jmabel ! talk 02:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. There's zero evidence these images were published anywhere prior to being uploaded to Commons. I'm not really sure where the claim of them being "professional" photographs comes from either. Certainly the file descriptions don't anything about it and at least the first photograph looks like it came from a slide. So it was more then likely taken by an amateur. Just as a side to that, it seems like the uploader went out of their way to any prior publication when they uploaded other files and there's no reason they wouldn't have done the same here if the images had been printed anywhere else before. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a modified version of a photo that is already uploaded. HaydenSoloviev (talk) 06:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @HaydenSoloviev: What is the other photo? —holly {chat} 23:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 17:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, literally just text and a repeated five-sided shield outline. Belbury (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not plain text in the center. --Krd 12:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Krd. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This Celestia screenshot uses assets created by MiR on the Celestia Motherlode. The Readme.txt file in that add-on states "Only free to use for non-commercial purpose". SevenSpheres (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
