Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/11/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
-1.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_The_Lady_in_the_Lace_Shawl_by_Adolf_Münzer_-_Museu_Nacional_d'Art_de_Catalunya.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![214 File:20231026 121307 is the same as "Thumbnail" above. Excuse me. This way is more informative!.jpg](#File:20231026_121307_is_the_same_as_"Thumbnail"_above._Excuse_me._This_way_is_more_informative!.jpg){kind=link}
een email dient tot niets Verloren16 (talk) 09:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
geen email auv Verloren16 (talk) 09:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
bestand wordt niet aanvaard Verloren16 (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commerciale Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Le photographe n'était pas d'accord sur une condition. Il n'autorise pas l'utilisation commercial Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 13:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; moderately out-of-focus mediocre snapshot of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, low quality snapshot of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, poor quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Mateus2019 (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- We even have the Category:Election posters in Italy, are all the pictures in that cat copright violations? --ManfredK (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- If they are COM:DW of material under copyright, unless there is explicit permission to free license from copyright holder. No doubt some election posters may be public domain by age or under COM:TOO - but that is generally not the case with clear photos of recent posters that include significant artwork or photographs. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW of photos &c on posters. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 05:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, non-notable fiction. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Stolen from [1] Veverve (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: printout of a Wikipedia article. Omphalographer (talk) 19:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, on Commons Peter Manns can be deleted. Verloren16 (talk) 07:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Manns is onnuttig voor mijn Wikipedia Verloren16 (talk) 07:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ik heb het bestand genomineerd voor verwijdering Verloren16 (talk) 08:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Profile picture from Reddit CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 01:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Very likely Frickrwashing, from a newly created Flickr account with a single image and no followers. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also personal photo by non-contributor (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 16:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
cannot be a sellfie as is claimed (uploader is this person) also totallty unclear who made this image and whether it is the person or another cyclist Hoyanova (talk) 09:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given - unlikely to be a selfie as is claimed Hoyanova (talk) 09:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
cannot be a selfie or made by the uploader (the same person) as is claimed no author given Hoyanova (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
photoshopped image without photographer or permission, cannot be a selfie as is claimed (uplaoder is this person) Hoyanova (talk) 09:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
image from instagram so cannot be a selfie as is claimed (uploader is this person). No author given no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) Hoyanova (talk) 09:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) Hoyanova (talk) 09:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) Hoyanova (talk) 09:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadataused for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission, metadata give a copyright notice, cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope, legs of a not encyclopedically relevant person Hoyanova (talk) 10:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope - used for promo for not relevant subject on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata used for promo on nl-wiki for two not encyclopedically relevant young persons Hoyanova (talk) 10:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata cannot be a selfie as is claimed (given uploader is this person) used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata used for promo on nl-wiki by not relevant person Hoyanova (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given no permission no metadata used for promo on nl-wiki by not relevant person Hoyanova (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Image copied from https://pejo.pl/galeria/ Masti (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Shekpeer (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy - uploader req of recent unused file. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope no author no permission, no metadata, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
AUS-CB-STUDIO
[edit]
Possible copyvio: Logo of an artist, Ad --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope, used for promotion of not encyclopedically relevant person on nl-wiki ErikvanB (talk) 11:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 - nl.wiki sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO SE.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO VC.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO SN.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO SM.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BT.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BS.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BD.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BL.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BM.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BN.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BC.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO BV.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DEJESUS CRISTO DF.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO GF.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO HJ.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO RG.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO CXS.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO VBD.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO TMP.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO PLA.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO PKM.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO PHM.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO PMG.jpg
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO PUBLICO.jpg
- File:REDE MUNDO TV.png
- File:BISPO VINICIUS DE JESUS CRISTO.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy F10 with a few also F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Fotostudio Peter Wagner M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- you can delete it. need to ask Fotostudio Peter Wagner if it is ok to use the picture here.I am sorry for not knowing better. Mr.Monkeyfist (talk) 19:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- So it's necessary to wait getting the OTRS-Mail from Peter Wagner ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 20:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- You mean COM:VRT. The acronym OTRS was deprecated, though COM:OTRS redirects to COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- So it's necessary to wait getting the OTRS-Mail from Peter Wagner ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 20:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 02:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
2020 photograph by Canadian Armed Forces. No free license stated at source so it won't be free until 2071 under Crown Copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this church, Ernesto Vichi, died in 2008. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2079.
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 01.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 02.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 03.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 04.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 05.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 06.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 07.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 02:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about the artist of this mural, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since the building its located in was built in 1976. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Roma, chiesa di Nostra Signora di Coromoto - Altare, tabernacolo e sede.jpg
- File:Roma, chiesa di Nostra Signora di Coromoto - Ambone.jpg
- File:Roma, chiesa di Nostra Signora di Coromoto - Fonte battesimale.jpg
- File:Roma, chiesa di Nostra Signora di Coromoto - Presbiterio.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 02:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text; not a user interface element appropriate for use on Wikimedia sites. Omphalographer (talk) 02:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patrick.lee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: additional unused user interface elements not useful on Wikimedia sites.
Omphalographer (talk) 02:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DIVYANSH RATIO PANT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused, unidentifiable logos.
- File:Divyansh coventer.png
- File:GGH.png
- File:Divyansh ratio new.png
- File:Divyansh ratio.png
- File:Divyansh.png
Omphalographer (talk) 02:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pantheon (Syracuse)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Gaetano Rapisardi, died in 1988. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2059.
- File:Croce Costanza Bruno.jpg
- File:Il Pantheon di Siracusa.jpg
- File:Il Pantheon-Syracuse.JPG
- File:Interni Pantheon di Siracusa 01.jpg
- File:Interni Pantheon di Siracusa 02.jpg
- File:Interni Pantheon di Siracusa 03.jpg
- File:Pantheon (Siracusa) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Pantheon (Siracusa) 10 11 2019.jpg
- File:Pantheon di Siracusa.jpg
- File:Pantheon Siracusa.jpg
- File:Siracuse StThomasChurchPantheon 010 1651.jpg
- File:Siracuse StThomasChurchPantheon 010 1714.jpg
- File:Syrakus 2015-04-02zzb.jpg
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10_11_2019.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:San Giovanni Battista (Rome)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about the architect of this building, Antonpaolo Savio, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was built in 1965. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 01.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 02.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 03.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 04.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 06.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 07.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 02:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Per description above, the memorial was completed in 1979 by Hendrik Johannes van der Merwe (1956–2019).There is no freedom of panorama in South Africa. The copyright term of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2070.
- File:1 Kapperkop Pretoria 18.jpg
- File:1 Kapperkop Pretoria 19.jpg
- File:1 Kapperkop Pretoria 20.jpg
- File:1 Kapperkop Pretoria 21.jpg
- File:1 Kapperkop Pretoria 22.jpg
- File:Fallen Heros 1.JPG
- File:Fallen Heros 2.JPG
- File:Fort Klapperkop-012.jpg
- File:Fort Klapperkop-013.jpg
- File:SADF Commemorate.jpg
- File:SANDF Memorial, Fort Klapperkop, Pretoria, South Africa..jpg
- File:South African Defence Force Memorial001.jpg
- File:South African Defence Force Memorial002.jpg
- File:The South African Special Forces HQ Memorial 01.jpg
- File:The South African Special Forces HQ Memorial 02.jpg
- File:The South African Special Forces HQ Memorial 03.jpg
- File:The South African Special Forces HQ Memorial 04.jpg
- File:Those Who Fought.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Georgia, artist Gia Japaridze is still alive
- File:Architecture bridge details, Tbilisi.jpg
- File:Dzveli Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia - panoramio (322).jpg
- File:Galaktion Bridge, Tbilisi.jpg
- File:Galaktion Bridge.jpg
- File:Tbilisi (9458113609).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Central Phoenix, AZ, Urban Grocery and Wine Bar Mural, artist Sentrock, 2011 - panoramio.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
my fault 水餃喵 (talk) 16:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP for monuments in RUssia Altenmann (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
-1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
-1.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused image of text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused screenshot of Wiktionary. Omphalographer (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: screenshot of a (since abandoned) Wikipedia draft article. Omphalographer (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Этот файл не используется, и был загружен мной по ошибке Emil Dalalyan (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE - Non-educational unused photo Arian (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
no permission from photographer "CHOAY".
RZuo (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 06:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of persmission from Corita Kent Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The website states that the file is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) licence, NOT Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported licence as the uploader claims. That Creative Commons licence is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons, so this file should be deleted. 85.131.110.103 15:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope?
Trade (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if the article ever makes it out of Draft they can be undeleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope
- File:JBAND$ in April 2022 leaning against a headstone.jpg
- File:JBAND$ at a music video shoot with gold jewellery on in autumn 2019.jpg
Trade (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
the source itself is CC, but the photo is really belongs to TV100? i believe this is copyvio. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: I uploaded the image but as Modernprimat stated I had concerns about if it belongs with TV100 after uploading. TV100 may took this image from another source, so by the reason of this, the file can not be in Commons. Best,--Kadı Message 17:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: scan of a newspaper. The uploader probably doesn't realise this is a violation ColinFine (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
copyvio https://esportes.r7.com/futebol/fotos/lembra-dele-adriano-gabiru-marcou-um-dos-gols-mais-importantes-da-historia-do-internacional-08022016 MartynaSzmato (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Flickr source says " (C) BBC - Photographer: Adrian ROgers" and metadata contains " Copyright Notice - WARNING: Use of this copyright image is subject to the terms of use of BBC Pictures' Digital Picture Service (BBC Pictures)". No basis for CC-BY license. Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
This file is absolutely copy of AM 100 dram Ag 2005 Shirakatsi b.png image. Vahe (talk) 19:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andras.b331 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; the huwiki articles were deleted as non-notable subjects.
Bencemac (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akbarmaulana240420001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Above Indonesian TOO
- File:Liga 2 Indonesia Baru.png
- File:Liga 1 Indonesia.png
- File:Logo PSMS.png
- File:Logo smk tritech.png
Trade (talk) 21:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Deleted due to copyright violations. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
This artwork is a modified version of this publicity photo. Genericusername57 (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 00:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in ZA, artist Tienie Pritchard died in 2021 due to COVID-19 A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
It is the same file that is already uploaded here. J talk 05:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
It is the same file that is already uploaded here. What the author did was just cut out the "radio" above the logo without any reasonable explanation. J talk 05:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, plain text table. Omphalographer (talk) 05:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Nigerian government works are copyrighted by default, and I was unable to find evidence that this image was released under a compatible license. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GrahamEike (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: various unused, unidentified photos of people and an equally unused apportionment diagram.
Omphalographer (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DanielLopez23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
According to the description on this board, the board was installed not earlier than 1971 (46th year of the Showa era). Text is not in PD, thus possible infringement of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused dimly lit photograph of a computer room. Description and title are not helpful to determining why this would be in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Low quality blurry photo, not useful. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this church, Ernesto Vichi, died in 2008. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2079.
- File:Roma, chiesa di Santa Giulia Billiart - Cappella del Santissimo Sacramento.jpg
- File:Roma, chiesa di Santa Giulia Billiart - Interno 1.jpg
- File:Roma, chiesa di Santa Giulia Billiart - Interno 2.jpg
- File:Tuscolano - S. Giulia Billiart 08.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sant'Anna (Rome) - Interior
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about who the architect of this building is, they clearly haven't been died for more then 70 years since it was built in 1988. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone has evidence to the contrary.
Adamant1 (talk) 02:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The architects were Francesco Calippo and Angelo Zamagna (see). Zamagna seems to have died in 2007, but I couldn't find any information about Calippo.--Friniate (talk) 15:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about who the architect of this building is, they clearly haven't been died for more then 70 years since it was built in 1988. So this image is copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone has evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 02:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The architects were Francesco Calippo and Angelo Zamagna (see). Zamagna seems to have died in 2007, but I couldn't find any information about Calippo.--Friniate (talk) 15:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 02:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: image of unclear significance. (Not an animation, despite the title.) Omphalographer (talk) 02:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/groom-putting-ring-on-brides-finger-53891104 Omphalographer (talk) 03:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete, the presence of this image on a stock photography website is insufficient because photos from Commons may be uploaded there fraudulently. However, TinEye reports multiple matches that pre-date this file, and it was used in a HuffPost story that is dated before the upload here.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 23:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 03:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the artist of this stained-glass window, Paola Grossi Gondi, seems to still be alive. So this image is copyrighted until an undetermined date. Adamant1 (talk) 03:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Santa Monica (Ostia) - Interior
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Ernesto Vichi, died in 2008. So these images are copyrighted until 2079, unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Lido di Ostia, chiesa di Santa Monica - Cappella del Santissimo Sacramento.jpg
- File:Lido di Ostia, chiesa di Santa Monica - Interno 1.jpg
- File:Lido di Ostia, chiesa di Santa Monica - Interno 2.jpg
- File:Lido di Ostia, chiesa di Santa Monica - Interno verso la controfacciata.jpg
- File:Lido di Ostia, chiesa di Santa Monica - Presbiterio.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Massimo Battaglini, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 1.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 2.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 3.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 4.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 5.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 7.JPG
- File:Roma, chiesa di Nostra Signora di Coromoto - Esterno.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Massimo Battaglini, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 6.JPG
- File:Roma, chiesa di Nostra Signora di Coromoto - Interno.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information on the architect of this building, Alberto Durante, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was built in 1978. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:San bartolo tuto int.jpg
- File:Scandicci, chiesa di San Bartolomeo in tuto - Interno verso la controfacciata.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Durante died in 2018 cfr. Friniate (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information on the architect of this building, Alberto Durante, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was built in 1978. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
Adamant1 (talk) 03:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Durante died in 2018 cfr. Friniate (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about who the architect of this building is, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was built in 1975. So these images are copyrighted until an as yet undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Chiesa del Santissimo Nome di Maria, Villa d'Asolo 01.jpg
- File:Chiesa del Santissimo Nome di Maria, Villa d'Asolo 02.jpg
- File:Chiesa del Santissimo Nome di Maria, Villa d'Asolo 03.jpg
- File:Gurekian-chiesa villa asolo.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The architect were it:Ohannes Gurekian, who died in 1984 and Armen Gurekian, who is still alive. The last image was uploaded by a user who seems connected with the author (from what he writes in the file he could even be Armen Gurekian himself). Unfortunately although it seems that no VRT authorization is present.--Friniate (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about who the architect of this building is, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was built in 1975. So these images are copyrighted until an as yet undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Legnago - Chiesa di San Vito Martire e Madonna della Pace - 2023-09-30 21-43-29 001.jpg
- File:Legnago - Chiesa di San Vito Martire e Madonna della Pace - 2023-09-30 21-44-20 001.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 03:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:San Martino Urbano
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP inn Italy and although I couldn't find any information about the architect of this building, Angelo Tramontini, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years since it was built in 1960. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date.
- File:Interno Chiesa di San Martino Urbano.jpg
- File:Interno della chiesa di San Martino Urbano Treviso fronte.jpg
- File:SanMartinoUrbanoInterno.jpg
- File:Treviso - Chiesa di San Martino Urbano - 2023-09-14 17-37-11 001.jpeg
- File:Treviso - Chiesa di San Martino Urbano - 2023-09-14 17-37-11 002.jpeg
- File:Treviso - Chiesa di San Martino Urbano - 2023-09-14 17-37-11 003.jpeg
- File:Treviso - Chiesa di San Martino Urbano - 2023-09-14 17-37-11 004.jpeg
Adamant1 (talk) 04:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Angelo Tramontini died in 1986 see. Friniate (talk) 16:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sant'Anna (Champoluc)
[edit]Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Mario Federico Roggero, died in 2012. So these images are copyrighted until at least 3083.
- File:Altare della Chiesa di Sant'Anna - Champoluc (Ayas).jpg
- File:Chiesa di Sant'Anna - Champoluc (Ayas).jpg
- File:Interno della Cappella del Santissimo nella Chiesa di Sant'Anna - Champoluc (Ayas).jpg
- File:Interno della Chiesa di Sant'Anna - Champoluc (Ayas) (II).jpg
- File:Interno della Chiesa di Sant'Anna - Champoluc (Ayas).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(II).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The architect was Mario Roggero, see. Friniate (talk) 16:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Any information about if or when he died anywhere? All I can find is some news articles about a jeweler named Mario Roggero who shot some robbers. I assume their different people though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's a different person, I couldn't find any info about the architect... Friniate (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Probably Mario Federico Roggero (1919-2012). There's a couple of things he did with the architect Carlo Mollino where he's also refered to as one. Although he mainly seems to be designer, but I don't know why it wouldn't be him. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's a different person, I couldn't find any info about the architect... Friniate (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Any information about if or when he died anywhere? All I can find is some news articles about a jeweler named Mario Roggero who shot some robbers. I assume their different people though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:The New Orleans Bee July 1855
[edit]Totally useless files due to the extremely low quality of the scans, which makes it impossible to read anything in the paper.
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0001.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0002.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0003.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0004.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0005.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0006.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0007.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0008.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0009.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0010.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0011.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0012.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0013.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0014.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0015.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0016.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0017.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0018.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0019.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0020.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0022.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0023.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0024.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0025.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0026.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0027.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0028.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0029.pdf
- File:The New Orleans Bee 1855 July 0030.pdf
Adamant1 (talk) 04:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
https://www.tanja7.com/tag/%D8%A3%D8%AE%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B4/page/3/ Xocolatl (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Because it is test picture (mynd prufa) of no use, wrongly placed in Kopavogur category. Loranchet (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless picture (with no description) of some dirty pavement and someone's feet. Poor composition, hard to imagine what encyclopedic value is there in this picture. We have many better pictures of pavements. This looks like a trash pic you accidentally make with your phone camera and then delete. Waste of space. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://geoservices.ign.fr/cgu-licences No free license. Yann (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Omaracharay (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KEROSENE UGANDA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: various personal images with no realistic educational use.
- File:Kerosene product.png
- File:Marry you by snap.jpg
- File:SNAP ECOTOWISKY.jpg
- File:DOGA.jpg
- File:MY LOVER CATHERINE.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Own photo, duplicate upload Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 06:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phillipbarcio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phillipbarcio (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication that these image have been released by the photographer or the artist whose work is depicted.
- File:8 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:7 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:5 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:6 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:4 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:1 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:3 Jessica Snow.jpg
- File:2 Jessica Snow.jpg
WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Movilización por la desaparición y muerte de Debanhi Escobar el 22 de abril de 2022 en Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. 02.jpg
[edit]
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:DW, missing permission for shown photograph. --Wdwd (talk) 12:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image added along with an edit in pl.wiki [3] which is most probably a hoax. No person with this name can be found in search engines, nor any source of this photo. It seems to be out of scope, I see no educational value here. Wostr (talk) 08:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused logos by an unreliable uploader.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: A watermark appears on the bottom left of the picture, implying the uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Jeivan maro
[edit]- File:ESCUCHA MI NUEVO ALBUM proposito.png
- File:Jeivan Maro.png
- File:Album proposito jeivan maro.jpg
- File:Album proposito de jeivan maro.jpg
F10, Possible copyvio: Album covers, banners from social medias --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (offizielles Pressefoto) M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild wurde von der offiziellen Website aus dem Bereich "Pressefotos zum Download" entnommen: https://www.claudia-kurver.de/epk/
- Dort steht, dieses Bild darf ohne Angabe von Credits frei verwendet werden. 92.213.73.25 11:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission (via COM:VRTS). --Wdwd (talk) 14:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: No freedom of panorama for recent artwork in Iceland. Till (talk) 11:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- OK. I didn't know there was no panorama freedom for recent artwork in Iceland. I will remove the image from the "Viatger del Sol" page. Lalpino (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: Contemporary architecture is copyrighted in Iceland. Till (talk) 11:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from Instagram CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
And also
- File:Statue of Tchaikovsky in Trostianets (1).jpg
- File:Statue of Tchaikovsky in Trostianets (2).jpg
- File:Statue of Tchaikovsky in Trostianets (3).jpg
- File:Statue of Tchaikovsky in Trostianets (4).jpg
- File:Trostyanets' Pam'yatnyk Chaykovs'komu 02 Myru vul. (YDS 7728).JPG
- File:Пам'ятник П. І. Чайковському 59-250-0089.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник П. І. Чайковському у Тростянці.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник П. І. Чайковському.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник П.І. Чайковському. Тростянець.jpg
- File:Постать Чайковського.jpg
- File:Тростянець, Пам'ятник П. І. Чайковському.JPG
- File:Тростянець, Пам'ятник Чайковському.JPG
- File:Тростянець. Пам'ятник П. І. Чайковському..JPG
- File:Чайковський.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Чайковському в Тростянці.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1984. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Seriously? But what if this statue is in "Wiki Loves Monuments" catalog? Really strange and annoying request, as for me. Trostianchanyn (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- "Wiki Loves Monuments" catalog is not rules of Wikimedia Commons. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, but if this files "violate sculptors and architecs copyright", why you give it an attention only for now? Because I see there is the photos which is made in 2014. And also, we don't know who is the sculptor of this statue, how I can contact him or his family? And one more question: why we need to ask permission, if many photos of statue of Chaikovskyi is already used in the Internet? This is nonsense🤦♂️ Trostianchanyn (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Read about freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Regards. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- I categorically don't agree with your opinion, because other photos of this statue is already used in the Internet, so why I can't download my own image? Can you explain why? Ah, yes, "free" encyclopedia, maybe I leave from this sh#t. 👎👎👎 Trostianchanyn (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- You're arguing with Ukrainian laws and the policy of Commons, not necessarily individual Wikipedias, to require photos hosted here to be available for commercial use. Some Wikipedias do allow fair use; Commons does not. All that said, the name of the sculptor is Nikolai Makarovich Sukhodolov. He was born in 1920, but I have not found his death date (and if he's alive today, God bless him!). The statue was erected in 1964, per https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pjotr-Iljitsch-Tschaikowski-Denkmal. If you'd like to try to track down his heirs and ask them whether they'd be willing to contact COM:VRT to give Commons permission to host photos of them, you'd be doing a good service, but otherwise, look into which Wikipedias might be able to use which photos locally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Trostianchanyn simple answer, Wikimedia Commons does not accept any content that is not allowed to be exploited commercially, read COM:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. All licenses permitted here are commercial-type: CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-zero, and PD. Wikimedia Commons strictly upholds the principles of Free Cultural Works, and will never allow non-commercial content. Ukrainian copyright law is not compatible for Commons. The fact that the Ukrainian government only introduced non-commercial FoP means they are not willing to welcome the exposure of Ukrainian public monuments in the free culture Internet. Better to not have modern Ukrainian public monuments hosted here than tolerate unfree content and unfree licenses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Trostianchanyn as for your reply on existence of images on the Internet, those images are not under commercial licenses, and so following artists' copyrights and the restrictive Ukrainian laws.
- Note that Wikimedia Commons admins have deleted tens of thousands of Ukrainian public buildings and monuments in the past, and this will still continue, as long as non-commercial restriction for public monuments exists. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I categorically don't agree with your opinion, because other photos of this statue is already used in the Internet, so why I can't download my own image? Can you explain why? Ah, yes, "free" encyclopedia, maybe I leave from this sh#t. 👎👎👎 Trostianchanyn (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Read about freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Regards. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, but if this files "violate sculptors and architecs copyright", why you give it an attention only for now? Because I see there is the photos which is made in 2014. And also, we don't know who is the sculptor of this statue, how I can contact him or his family? And one more question: why we need to ask permission, if many photos of statue of Chaikovskyi is already used in the Internet? This is nonsense🤦♂️ Trostianchanyn (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- "Wiki Loves Monuments" catalog is not rules of Wikimedia Commons. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it seems that the license is CC-3.0, noncommercial, no derivative use Ergo Sum 19:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Is this PD-US-not renewed? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep No image of this description has been registered or renewed in the USA, it also looks like it was taken in Italy so PD-Italy would also apply.
Kept: per RAN and Squirrel - license fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: Are you only nominating this for deletion because Jockstrap are a British band? That artwork is available worldwide—it's sourced from the US Apple Music page. Why is it strictly beholden to UK copyright law? Ss112 (talk) 03:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Because it was created in the UK. Omphalographer (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Says who? I don't know where it was created, and I don't think anyone but the musicians do. British artists are capable of making work outside of the UK. It could be additionally copyrighted to one of their international labels. Ss112 (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- British band, British record, British record label. We are going to treat this under British rules. Even if we didn't, this is copyrightable almost everywhere else. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: How is it copyrightable everywhere else? The public domain tag says "basic handwriting, and simple geometric shapes". That's why I imported it because that's exactly what this is. Two hand-drawn love hearts joined together and "I♡UQTINVU" are simple geometric shapes and basic handwriting. Ss112 (talk) 02:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- British band, British record, British record label. We are going to treat this under British rules. Even if we didn't, this is copyrightable almost everywhere else. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Says who? I don't know where it was created, and I don't think anyone but the musicians do. British artists are capable of making work outside of the UK. It could be additionally copyrighted to one of their international labels. Ss112 (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Because it was created in the UK. Omphalographer (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1964 by Sydney Harpley (1927–1992). There is no freedom of panorama in South Africa. The copyright term of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2043.
- File:An abstract sculpture of statesman Jan Smuts by Sydney Harpley.JPG
- File:Companys Garden in July 2018 -08.jpg
- File:Companys Garden in July 2018 -09.jpg
- File:Jan Smuts in the Company's Gardens, Cape Town, South Africa.jpeg
- File:Jan Smuts statue at the Company Gardens.JPG
- File:Jan Smuts Statue in Company Gardens.JPG
- File:JC Smuts and the Cape Town National Gallery - panoramio.jpg
- File:JC Smuts Bust - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monument in The Company's Gardens - statue.JPG
- File:Smuts 1 20180718.jpg
- File:Smuts 2 20180718.jpg
- File:Smuts 3 20180718.jpg
- File:Smuts Monument.JPG
- File:Status.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The deletion request is valid. I have a prospective. What about asking the users to add delete tag themselves so that they will not get warning regarding getting blocked which has happened to me. In the request I have two images, uploaded in 2028. I got a message from another user that it is my last warning. Sad. Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 07:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text of unclear significance. Omphalographer (talk) 06:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:55, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
File:(Barcelona) The Lady in the Lace Shawl by Adolf Münzer - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya.jpg
[edit]_The_Lady_in_the_Lace_Shawl_by_Adolf_M%C3%BCnzer_-_Museu_Nacional_d%27Art_de_Catalunya.jpg){kind=link}
_The_Lady_in_the_Lace_Shawl_by_Adolf_M%C3%BCnzer_-_Museu_Nacional_d%27Art_de_Catalunya.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright still active for 10 years Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment Adolf Münzer died in 1953 so it should be free in 2024. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted It's now 2024 in Germany. Abzeronow (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyio: A signature appears on the photograph, suggestiong the uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manila Boy21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are more-than-a-decade-old uploads, but no one has managed to check the inconsistent authorships of the image files. Each of the image file has a different author stated, and it is impossible to ascertain if the uploader is indeed one of the four photographers(?) or if they only did the job of uploading. Identity confirmations of the uploader and the four authors are required, through COM:VRTS correspondence.
- File:Marawi.jpg - author is "Mahid"
- File:Marawi City.jpg - author is "Suhayla"
- File:MSU Marawi.jpg - author is "Wahab Salic", camera model in EXIF metadata is Nokia N70-1
- File:Marawi State University Peace Park in Lanao del Sur.jpg - author is "Husnei", camera model in EXIF metadata is Panasonic DMC-FZ3
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Some startling discovery: one of the uploader's past uploads (now-deleted from public view) was "Angel Locsin.jpg", and a check on the file title's logs shows that it was deleted through Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Angel Locsin.jpg. Apparently, Manila Boy21 (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of Gerald Gonzalez (talk · contribs), in concluding this investigation of mine. So all these files must be Deleted immediately as contributions of a sockpuppet of a sanctioned Filipino user on enwiki – sanctioned due to questionable images and copyright-problematic uploads. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.soychile.cl/Osorno/Sociedad/2014/03/07/234991/La-Conferencia-Episcopal-nombro-al-arzobispo-Fernando-Chomali-como-administrador-apostolico-de-Osorno.aspx Rutsq (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
SVG format images are available.
- File:Powellvenator2.jp.png → File:Powellvenator size comparison diagram.svg
- File:Qiupanykus.jp.png → File:Qiupanykus size comparison diagram.svg
0x0a (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Low quality old file. In addition, a file from the Amsterdam Museum is now being used of the same portrait. Amsterdamszilver (talk) 14:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Imho no need to delete. This is the only version isolated from the frame as can be noted in Category:Anthonij Bonebakker Ellywa (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Ellywa. Lidewij (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I also agree. Do an oval crop first of the framed version, then we can discuss deletion. --RAN (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: consensus for keep. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
New version of higher resolution: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anthonij_Bonebakker_(1730-1797),_objectnr_7478.jpg + https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:.._DAT_Collectie_images_S_7478_000_(1).jpg Amsterdamszilver (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
,_objectnr_7478.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and redirected to the replacement file. —holly {chat} 00:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused, unattributed, poor res extraction of Complete neuron cell diagram en.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
It shows the logo of the AAPS on the ruler. Another image of this specimen was later uploaded without the AAPS ruler showing. Poozeum (talk) 17:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, besides, the ruler might be helpful to some (and logo is obviously DM). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused low quality version of File:We Can Do It! NARA 535413 - Restoration 2.jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 17:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
This file is low quality copy of AM 100 dram Ag 2006 RB Bear b.png image. Vahe (talk) 17:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo comes from https://discovernikkei.org/en/journal/2015/1/2/issey-nakajima-farran/ Likely not free image RedPatch (talk) 18:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
wrong date, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Corrections made. --RAN (talk) 01:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No source. No way to verify the age. --Stefan2 (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. RAN's "corrections" are nothing more than assumptions out of thin air. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Document without historical importance, i.e., not in COM:SCOPE. Günther Frager (talk) 19:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful edits by this user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't know who created this photo, but I doubt this photo belongs to the uploader. Looks too well made (if not professional) to believe that it belongs to the uploader. The person poses well; must have been direction of photographer or the assistant. George Ho (talk) 20:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, small web-sized screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
This image is likely not the uploader's own work - see the Google Image search https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gisbubb&hl=en&re=df&p=AbrfA8q5TMSP7R-_JvRDCDpqv6DZjAUr5c0n9bw1t6q4i6TBTrIDz1A1Ec7SbPYwsWvel6__xSkJyQXLmGTk9Nml-ACvzZNk6DkU5ZQtDW0OaQ300pQiSC2gpyu4bK4UTw4Hcp6gqopsTV-NXBk1MbOpDO85puVknKuwaTNjK65SreIf2BrHmj9YUfLPnkGkyrxIG813_Z-tzu1kf8hQrWeEz9GjFfq5zRjy8yCTnkIJZW_UGGaacXgMD2V4AAozPDWocEjp5fvWGBGIpAHFG7ejG02UKeQXV8dHAIFfiGXebrh0ZiVV2d5ECaKqRG0m4rDZ1RHZuhS6wZfQwaxA5DmwNHT9wt5NgX1Tz1OnrglhMJmbrQ%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKREk1WkRWa05qTTJMV1EzT1RRdE5HVmtNeTA1WVdNekxXVTVPRGMyWTJSaU0yWXlaQklmYXpaNk5rbFFabTlPWW05aFNVVXhUR3gwZUVKVlRISkpSVkJ5UTNWU1p3PT0iXQ== GoingBatty (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
people on the foto Vaija (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
File:20151213 xl P1010528-20-Minutenverkehr nach Strausberg Nord - Werbeaktion der S-Bahn - Waren Sie schon auf dem Strausberg.JPG
[edit]
Bitte Um Löschung: Innenaufnahme, unscharf, Wunsch des ursprünglich hochladenden, keine Verwendung --Molgreen (talk) 05:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this church, Ernesto Vichi, died in 2008. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2079.
- File:Roma, chiesa di Santa Giulia Billiart - Facciata (aggiustata focale).jpg
- File:Roma, chiesa di Santa Giulia Billiart - Facciata.jpg
- File:Tuscolano - S. Giulia Billiart 01.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Giulia Billiart 02.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 02:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep little originality -- Blackcat
12:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like a pretty unique building to me, but then I know the standard of originality is higher in Italy then other places. Although I don't think thst should be used as an excuse to keep random images thst would otherwise be COPYVIO either. So..I leave it up to the closing admin. I do wish the stanard of originality was clearer though. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, show me where this is 'original'. If it were original, no mass-housing buildings might be pictured. Italy has a high threshold of originality both on architecture and on photography. For example the Calatrava viaduct in Reggio Emilia can be considered original. This building nowhere close to be original. -- Blackcat 17:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what your on about since the last time I checked this isn't "mass-housing building." But come on, are you seriously going to tell me there's no unique architectural elements in this image or that the building is at all comparable to something like this? --Adamant1 (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't care whether it's comparable or less with whatever. I only notice that there are only simple geometric shapes made with concrete. -- Blackcat 17:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- OK, Blackcat. Your the one who brought up housing units. Regardless, all buildings are made up of basic geometric shapes. That's litterally how they work. You can't just act like a building is below the threshold of originality because it happens to have a rectangular window or whatever. What matters is the design of the building as whole and at least IMO its unique enough this case to be copyrighted. If you disagree with that because it has a rectangular door like other buildings, cool. I leave it up to the closing admin to decide. Although its clearly not at all as generic as a mass-housing unit, which again you brought up to claim it isn't original. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't mention housing unit but mass housing, which is different (and I suppose you meant "you're the one", not "your the one"). I mention as example of building with no originality whatsoever. -- Blackcat 18:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The word "mass" is a distinction withput a purpose. Regardless, this building has original elements to it. Although as I've said, I'm more then willing to let whomever closes make the final call. Its certainly better then pedantically arguing over the semantics of if a building is a mass-housing unit or not lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is, instead, especially in Italy (a country in Southern Europe surrounded by Adriatic, Mediterranean and Thyrrenian Sea) where architects in the aftermath of WWII built lots of houses with little or no originality. -- Blackcat 19:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know about that. I think your underselling the uniqueness of post war church buildings over there. Some of them quit unique. Certainly no church where I'm from in the states even comes close. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Architects and art experts won't agree. -- Blackcat 20:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not to put words in your mouth, but it seems like you just want there to be a de facto standard where every building in Italy is below the threshold of originality because all buildings are made up of basic geometric shapes and post war architecture of houses or something. You'd have to agree that wouldn't be tenable way to do this. We have to draw the somewhere. I've actually skipped over a lot of church buildings because I don't think they are original enough to be copyrighted. So it's not like I'm out there just indiscriminately nominating images of generic houses for deletion or anything. But if I were to compare this church to other ones, for instance Chiesa di Sant'Elena (Roma) or San Raffaele Arcangelo (Rome) to name a couple, it clearly has original architectural elements to it. I'd probably never suggest that a building like San Raffaele Arcangelo does though. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Architects and art experts won't agree. -- Blackcat
- I don't know about that. I think your underselling the uniqueness of post war church buildings over there. Some of them quit unique. Certainly no church where I'm from in the states even comes close. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is, instead, especially in Italy (a country in Southern Europe surrounded by Adriatic, Mediterranean and Thyrrenian Sea) where architects in the aftermath of WWII built lots of houses with little or no originality. -- Blackcat
- The word "mass" is a distinction withput a purpose. Regardless, this building has original elements to it. Although as I've said, I'm more then willing to let whomever closes make the final call. Its certainly better then pedantically arguing over the semantics of if a building is a mass-housing unit or not lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't mention housing unit but mass housing, which is different (and I suppose you meant "you're the one", not "your the one"). I mention as example of building with no originality whatsoever. -- Blackcat
- OK, Blackcat. Your the one who brought up housing units. Regardless, all buildings are made up of basic geometric shapes. That's litterally how they work. You can't just act like a building is below the threshold of originality because it happens to have a rectangular window or whatever. What matters is the design of the building as whole and at least IMO its unique enough this case to be copyrighted. If you disagree with that because it has a rectangular door like other buildings, cool. I leave it up to the closing admin to decide. Although its clearly not at all as generic as a mass-housing unit, which again you brought up to claim it isn't original. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't care whether it's comparable or less with whatever. I only notice that there are only simple geometric shapes made with concrete. -- Blackcat
- I'm not really sure what your on about since the last time I checked this isn't "mass-housing building." But come on, are you seriously going to tell me there's no unique architectural elements in this image or that the building is at all comparable to something like this? --Adamant1 (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, show me where this is 'original'. If it were original, no mass-housing buildings might be pictured. Italy has a high threshold of originality both on architecture and on photography. For example the Calatrava viaduct in Reggio Emilia can be considered original. This building nowhere close to be original. -- Blackcat
- Looks like a pretty unique building to me, but then I know the standard of originality is higher in Italy then other places. Although I don't think thst should be used as an excuse to keep random images thst would otherwise be COPYVIO either. So..I leave it up to the closing admin. I do wish the stanard of originality was clearer though. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
I find the degree of lack of FOP in Italy (and France and Romania) appalling, but it's the law, and we follow it. Yes, there is certainly enough originality in that building to merit a copyright. There are plenty of choices in that design that aren't merely functional or conventional. So, sadly, we have to delete. - Jmabel ! talk 20:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: , the threshold of originality is very high here. Not to mention that Vichi was an engineer, not an architect, and his work was more oriented to materials, not to design. -- Blackcat 21:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: is there anything in Italian copyright law about whether or not the designer of a building has a credential as an architect? - Jmabel ! talk 21:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: , your question has nothing to do with the topic. The matter is the threshold of originality, and this building doesn't reach it. -- Blackcat 21:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: If it has nothing to do with the topic, why did you raise it? - Jmabel ! talk 21:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: it's your question that has nothing to do with the topic. -- Blackcat 22:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't want to get in a pissing match here, but you wrote "Not to mention that Vichi was an engineer, not an architect". I then asked you whether his not having a credential as an architect had any bearing under Italian copyright law. I was trying to understand if I was missing one of the premises of a syllogism. Apparently I was not. I wouldn't normally put this the following way if you hadn't accused me of asking something that "ha[d] nothing to do with the topic," but: apparently your mention of him not being an architect had nothing to do with the matter at hand. I made the mistake of assuming that you had mentioned this fact because it was because it was in some way germane. Apparently, I was wrong in making that assumption. - Jmabel ! talk 06:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- My mention of him as engineer HAS to do. Your question HAS NOT to do. Because it's a wrong question. An engineer is normally not supposed to be designed-oriented but rather material-oriented, because of their background. What has the law to do with that? Yours is a completely off-topic question. -- Blackcat 11:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what you think engineers do, but they can and often are involved in the design of the building. So your really just arguing over semantics having to do with a job title that for all intents and doesn't really matter because Ernesto Vichi designed the building either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Excuse me but I don't understand what you say. -- Blackcat 14:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Do a Google search about what engineers do. I was pretty clear about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Excuse me but I don't understand what you say. -- Blackcat
- I'm not really sure what you think engineers do, but they can and often are involved in the design of the building. So your really just arguing over semantics having to do with a job title that for all intents and doesn't really matter because Ernesto Vichi designed the building either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- My mention of him as engineer HAS to do. Your question HAS NOT to do. Because it's a wrong question. An engineer is normally not supposed to be designed-oriented but rather material-oriented, because of their background. What has the law to do with that? Yours is a completely off-topic question. -- Blackcat
- I don't want to get in a pissing match here, but you wrote "Not to mention that Vichi was an engineer, not an architect". I then asked you whether his not having a credential as an architect had any bearing under Italian copyright law. I was trying to understand if I was missing one of the premises of a syllogism. Apparently I was not. I wouldn't normally put this the following way if you hadn't accused me of asking something that "ha[d] nothing to do with the topic," but: apparently your mention of him not being an architect had nothing to do with the matter at hand. I made the mistake of assuming that you had mentioned this fact because it was because it was in some way germane. Apparently, I was wrong in making that assumption. - Jmabel ! talk 06:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: it's your question that has nothing to do with the topic. -- Blackcat
- @Blackcat: If it has nothing to do with the topic, why did you raise it? - Jmabel ! talk 21:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: , your question has nothing to do with the topic. The matter is the threshold of originality, and this building doesn't reach it. -- Blackcat
- @Blackcat: is there anything in Italian copyright law about whether or not the designer of a building has a credential as an architect? - Jmabel ! talk 21:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
We seem to have no consensus here so far, so I will mention this discussion on Commons:Village pump/Copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 02:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Tuscolano - S. Giulia Billiart 01.JPG and File:Tuscolano - S. Giulia Billiart 02.JPG. We don't see much architectural details on those two. Yann (talk) 10:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 09:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation: Image was uploaded from twitter on November 1, 2023. URL was later changed to a source saying 4.0 license, but the source says image was published on November 2. Date discrepancy indicates potential copyright violation. The source (media) says Imam Khamenei created the image (Nov 1), but the twitter URL was not from Imam Khamenei. As deletion requestor, I would ask that email confirmation be required to prevent deletion, given the potential violation. WeatherWriter (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Small note: The uploader currently has at least 3 uploads within the last few days at deletion request discussions for potential copyright violations. WeatherWriter (talk) 03:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- As the user who has nominated the above-mentioned uploads by this user, I think the file nominated here file is NOT a copyright violation (please see my explanations below). I can assure you Hanooz has correctly confirmed this file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete We don't play with copyright. Tradediatalk 09:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as this is clearly not a copyright violation. The handle @Khamenei_m on X (formerly Twitter) belongs to the English section of khamenei.ir (Ali Khamenei's official website) and is one of the 17 accounts followed by the verified account @khamenei_ir. Also, the file uploaded from X (formerly Twitter) was only 675 KB (dimentions 1,365 × 2,048), while the second version sourced from khamenei.ir has much more quality (3.18 MB; 2,730 × 4,096). That being said, it is not feasible that the latter had taken the file from the former. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The Twitter account and the website are unambiguously the same organization, and the file (even the Twitter version) is watermarked with Khamenei.ir. The file has a confirmed license review tag as well. This file was clearly originated by Khamenei.ir, watermarked by them, freely licensed by them, and published simultaneously on different platforms. Streamline8988 (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 09:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Meets COM:TOO UK. Adam9007 (talk) 04:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The file does not meet the threshold of originality since the logo's substance is wholely common property; per T.O.O. guidedlines, typographical logos are not considered original intellectual property. The Union Jack design embedded into the logo also does not meet T.O.O., as it is public-domain material[1] and does not have sufficient creative transformation applied to it for its public-domain status to be invalidated. Arkansore (talk) 14:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The merging of the N and the F, the shadows, and the Union Jack background combined seem to me to be enough to meet the threshold; I'm seeing more originality here than on the Edge logo, which has been legally ruled to meet the threshold. Adam9007 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- In the judge's statement regarding the ruling declaring the Edge logo eligible for copyright protection, it is stated that artistic originality requires 'the expenditure of more than negligible or trivial effort or relevant skill in the creation of the work'; this being expressed in the subject through the 'distinctive slash and projection on the middle bar of the "E"'. This makes for two clear metrics in the UK system for what makes a logo artistically original: 'distinctiveness' and 'non-trivial effort'.
- Regarding the 'distinctiveness' aspect, you state, for one, that the merging of the logo's letters is one feature that makes the logo meet the threshold. I would argue that this is not the case, as the merging of letters is common typographical practice and is not distinctive by any means; in the case of logos, compare the Kia logo as an example, which is internationally considered beneath the threshold of originality. Another example is the Yankee symbol, also the PlayStation logo — which could arguably be considered original with its shifted perspective between the P and the S, but still, it shows that letters being merged in a logo is not distinctive and could widely be considered, per the judge's own words, 'trivial effort' and not demonstrating clear artistic originality.
- You also bring up the drop shadows featured behind the typography as an example of artistic originality; however, the aforestated legal ruling necessitates distinctive transformation to meet the threshold of originality. The drop shadow could not be considered a distinctive artistic development in any case; it is universally available in essentially all graphic design programs, including Photoshop, Illustrator and GIMP, not requiring any original creative input to be expended and is as such categorised by and large as common property.
- Additionally, as I had mentioned in my previous reply, the Union Jack background is public-domain material, making it incapable of adding to a design's creative originality — the T.O.O. guidelines measure the designer's original creative input but the Union Jack background is dependent on previously created work, which makes its inclusion unoriginal and falls under trivial effort.
- I understand that with the Edge logo being an example of a seemingly simple design meeting the UK T.O.O. guidelines, it could appear that this logo would meet the threshold too, but deconstructing the ruling and the guidelines themselves shows to be more nuanced and demonstrates that the National Front logo does not pass the originality threshold. Arkansore (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- The merging of the N and the F, the shadows, and the Union Jack background combined seem to me to be enough to meet the threshold; I'm seeing more originality here than on the Edge logo, which has been legally ruled to meet the threshold. Adam9007 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: per Arkansore. Ruthven (msg) 09:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) MrKeefeJohn (talk) 11:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The photo was taken in Cupertino California (USA) and not in Italy, the author and the year of shooting are missing ZioNicco (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There's freedom of panorama for buildings in the U.S. The author field is as follows: "The original uploader was Enigma87 at Italian Wikipedia." 28 April 2008 is the original upload date. I don't see any reason to think either of those things are untrue. Do you think a tilted partial picture of a building is likely to have been downloaded from some website, rather than shot by an amateur photographer and uploaded to it.wikipedia? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- The photo on it.wiki was deleted because the source was not present, nor the author, uploaded with an incorrect license, the year of shooting is not indicated. On it.wiki whoever uploaded the photo uploaded others that were deleted due to problems. ZioNicco (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader user (wrongly) PD-Italy as template. It wasnt then considered as a personal work. Author and source missing then,. Ruthven (msg) 09:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 作者或上傳者請求刪除, F3. 非自由版权内容的衍生作品.
Converted to regular DR to allow fo discussion. Not qualified for G7. And why should this be a derivative? -- Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- 上傳者請求刪除--Tyg728 (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's not enough for an upload from 2019. Why do you want it deleted? --Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- 非自由版權内容的衍生作品--Tyg728 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Get more specific! There is nothing in this image which would qualify as an artwork. So, of what might this be a derivative? --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- 没有版權的擁有者的授權--Tyg728 (talk) 12:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The photo was uploaded years ago, and the photographer seems to be Tyg728. If not, please clarify why aren't you the copyright holder of this photo. Ruthven (msg) 09:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
摄影师不是Tyg728。未经原作摄影者授权，上傳者Tyg728請求刪除 Tyg728 (talk) 05:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- 上傳者Tyg728不是版权持有人，未经照片的版权持有人授权。删除吧。--Tyg728 (talk) 04:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 請刪除--Tyg728 (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, as they state they are not the photographer. No need to not beleive this statement. --Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 81.41.182.243 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No proof that the BNF relased this specific 1953 issue under the cc-by-sa 4.0 license. It may be undeleted after 1 January 2024, after 70 years since its original publication in France.
Converted to DR for discussion, it would become PD in France in 2024. Not in the US until 2049. Abzeronow (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- A discussion took place on FR WP [Bistro]. to support adding these files to Commons. Further to this, Conditions d’utilisation explains that "The non-commercial reuse of this content is free and free in compliance with the legislation in force and in particular maintaining the mention of the source of the content as specified below". « Source gallica.bnf.fr / Bibliothèque nationale de France » OR « Source gallica.bnf.fr / BnF ».]}}.
- Happy to discuss further. Charc2018
- Charc2018 (talk) 10:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- As stated in the other DR, we cannot accept noncommercial only licenses at Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Abzeronow. Ruthven (msg) 09:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 81.41.182.243 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No proof that the BNF relased this specific 1953 issue under the cc-by-sa 4.0 license. It may be undeleted after 1 January 2024, after 70 years since its original publication in France.
Converted to DR for discussion and easier undeletion. It would appear to become public domain in France in 2024 as part of a collective work, but not in the US until 2049. Abzeronow (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- A discussion took place on FR WP [Bistro]. to support adding these files to Commons. Further to this, Conditions d’utilisation explains that "The non-commercial reuse of this content is free and free in compliance with the legislation in force and in particular maintaining the mention of the source of the content as specified below". « Source gallica.bnf.fr / Bibliothèque nationale de France » OR « Source gallica.bnf.fr / BnF ».]}}.
- Happy to discuss further.
- Charc2018 (talk) 10:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately we cannot accept noncommercial only licenses here. I realize that this is an important piece of media but there isn't a way for us to host it currently. Abzeronow (talk) 15:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Abzeronow. Ruthven (msg) 09:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 18:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The image was clicked on Tata Projects Banker's Meet 2022 and it is a free license been copied and distributed across all media releases. This picture is used on Tata Projects official website and LinkedIn Individual profile. Prathm.Shinde09 (talk) 04:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Tata Projects did not distribute their material under free license. The source site states: "©2023 Tata Projects Limited. All Rights Reserved.". Ruthven (msg) 09:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1960 by Salvador Barata Feyo (1899–1990). There is no freedom of panorama in South Africa. The copyright term of the country is 50 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2041.
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 075.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 077.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 078.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 079.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 080.jpg
- File:Bartolomeu Dias (3087806374).jpg
- File:Dias statue (cropped), Cape Town.jpg
- File:Dias statue, Cape Town.jpg
_2018_075.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2018_077.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2018_078.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2018_079.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2018_080.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Cape_Town.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Hmm, it looked older. Looking back through the photos, it has 1952 written on it though (but not 1960?). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Talking with @Discott: , he suggests that this is a government work, which per en:Copyright_law_of_South_Africa#Copyright_term would be copyrighted for 50 years from publication - which would have expired in 2002. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel possible interference of COM:URAA? U.S. copyright establishment for eligible international works, making the public monument only acceptable by January 1, 2056 (95+1 years after 1960). Of course, {{Not-free-US-FOP}} is only valid for monuments from countries with commercial FoP (and can only be used for South African monuments if South Africa has now complete FoP). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I wasn't meaning US copyright law, sorry, but SA law - the article I linked to above states that "Government works are protected for fifty years from first publication". Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel sculptural works are almost always at mercy with U.S. law, unless they are already in public domain on the date the URAA took effect in the country. Since this is a sculpture (not an architecture), U.S. law also needs to be considered. See also the re-deletion of several Slovenian sculptures because of still existing U.S. copyright even if the works are in public domain locally (in Slovenia). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I wasn't meaning US copyright law, sorry, but SA law - the article I linked to above states that "Government works are protected for fifty years from first publication". Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel possible interference of COM:URAA? U.S. copyright establishment for eligible international works, making the public monument only acceptable by January 1, 2056 (95+1 years after 1960). Of course, {{Not-free-US-FOP}} is only valid for monuments from countries with commercial FoP (and can only be used for South African monuments if South Africa has now complete FoP). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- The impact of COM:URAA in this case is both interesting and something I am unsure of. I will ask Prof Schonwetter at the University of Cape Town's Intellectual Property Unit about this for a more informed answer than I could possibly provide. Sorry for my delayed reply. -Discott (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Discott URAA can be ignored actually, since we have the template {{Not-free-US-FOP}} which can be applied to all images of all copyrighted South African monuments – provided that South Africa successfully implements FoP. If there is no valid FoP, URAA needs to be considered. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- The impact of COM:URAA in this case is both interesting and something I am unsure of. I will ask Prof Schonwetter at the University of Cape Town's Intellectual Property Unit about this for a more informed answer than I could possibly provide. Sorry for my delayed reply. -Discott (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; undelete in 2048 unless changes to FOP law in South Africa are realized. —holly {chat} 21:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1950s or 1960s photographic print. Could be public domain but we'd need to verify it. Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I cannot find any version of his name in the registration or renewal databases. --RAN (talk) 01:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Here is a link to the page I got the image from: https://photoarchive.lib.uchicago.edu/db.xqy?one=apf1-09179.xml
- As this is my first time trying to upload an image, was not sure how to cite it. Here is a link for their rights and permissions page: https://photoarchive.lib.uchicago.edu/rights.html
- So the credit line would be: University of Chicago Photographic Archive, apf1-09179, Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library
- Again wasn't really an option to use this to cite the name.
- His name is Charles Arnold Anderson and went by C. Arnold Anderson in research papers. LizOHIO2021! (talk) 00:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The terms & conditions do not allow for commercial usage, making it not free for Commons purposes. —holly {chat} 21:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a horizontally flipped and cropped version of this: https://www.hyperstealth.com/tacam/Tacam-R-100_small.jpg Schierbecker (talk) 19:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
TIFF versions of Geograph images
[edit]- File:Heanton Punchardon St Augustine tower+aisle from NW GeoUK 3221284.tif
- File:Dawlish St Gregory chancel + south chapel GeoUK 4489159.tif
These files are redundant with, respectively, File:St Augustine's church, Heanton Punchardon - geograph.org.uk - 3221284.jpg and File:St Gregory the Great's church, Dawlish - interior - geograph.org.uk - 4489159.jpg. In each case the TIFF and JPEG versions are visually identical, though there do appear to be some extra compression artifacts in the TIFF version. I would have tagged the TIFF versions with {{Duplicate}}, but that's not applicable where the images are in different formats. --bjh21 (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's o. k., I generated these files, because I had found them in Geograph, but not in the Commons, as they were not categorized with the depicted buildings.--Ulamm (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This image may be present at the CIA website, but obviously CIA is not the proper copyright holder for this. This is a still from Soviet TV broadcast, no one else could film this press conference in the USSR Ministry of Defence office. 188.123.231.18 11:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Should satisfy Template:PD-RU-exempt, specifically news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like). S5A-0043Talk 11:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- User:S5A-0043, no way. PD-RU-exempt is about simple texts w/o creative input, not images and not videos. What you call "television programs" are just TV listings. --188.123.231.18 12:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- If the image is a snippet from a “Soviet TV broadcast” as you claimed, how is a video produced by a news agency at press conference and released onto the news not a news report? S5A-0043Talk 12:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Also the template doesn't mention "simple texts (without) creative input" or even the word "simple" in the entire template. How did you come to the conclusion that it is about simple text? S5A-0043Talk 12:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- User:S5A-0043, hem, you don't understand the difference between text and video??? US president meets Japanese premier ahead of G-7 summit - this is what the whole world means saying "news report". --188.123.231.18 12:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Seems like you're missing the point. There is zero mention of the condition of having to be "text" to satisfy PD-RU-exempt. Is anonymous folk art necessarily text? If not, why is it covered in PD-RU-exempt? And also, this is a video featuring an interview with Malaysian Prime Minister en:Anwar Ibrahim, posted by en:Channel NewsAsia. Do you not consider this a news report? S5A-0043Talk 13:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- User:S5A-0043, hem, you don't understand the difference between text and video??? US president meets Japanese premier ahead of G-7 summit - this is what the whole world means saying "news report". --188.123.231.18 12:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- User:S5A-0043, no way. PD-RU-exempt is about simple texts w/o creative input, not images and not videos. What you call "television programs" are just TV listings. --188.123.231.18 12:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is not CIA-work. This is not RU-exempt: news as themself (as facts, as events) are uncopyrightable, specific text-video report about facts/events is copyrightable. Alex Spade (talk) 14:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Well... If CIA had a spy present at the Soviet press conference and that spy managed to make a video record, this video record might be PD-USGov-CIA, right? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Andrei Romanenko, your waggish assumptions are shattered by COM:EVID. --188.123.231.51 06:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- You don't trust CIA, do you? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Andrei Romanenko, your joke has clearly gone on far enough to become wacky. By the way, the CIA website never stated that the author of this filming was an agency employee, it's just another uploader's assumption. --188.123.231.72 11:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- You don't trust CIA, do you? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Andrei Romanenko, your waggish assumptions are shattered by COM:EVID. --188.123.231.51 06:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; obviously not a US government work. —holly {chat} 18:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
uploader does not identify sculptor, name of work or location, but this appears to be a 1930s-era artwork by sculptor Edward Field Sanford (1886 - 1951) located on the 158th street side of the courthouse and thus still protected by copyright--see [4] DanielPenfield (talk) 08:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thumbnail is a scuptural group at the Bronx County Courthouse, New York.jpg. —holly {chat} 21:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. PD-US-no notice. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
uploader does not identify sculptor, name of work or location, but this appears to be a 1930s-era artwork by sculptor Edward Field Sanford (1886 - 1951) located on the 158th street side of the courthouse and thus still protected by copyright--see [5] DanielPenfield (talk) 08:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thumbnail is a scuptural group at the Bronx County Courthouse, New York.jpg. —holly {chat} 21:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. PD-US-no notice. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
File:20231026 121307 is the same as "Thumbnail" above. Excuse me. This way is more informative!.jpg
[edit]
uploader does not identify sculptor, name of work or location, but this appears to be a 1930s-era artwork by sculptor Edward Field Sanford (1886 - 1951) located on the 158th street side of the courthouse and thus still protected by copyright--see [6] DanielPenfield (talk) 08:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thumbnail is a scuptural group at the Bronx County Courthouse, New York.jpg. —holly {chat} 21:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. PD-US-no notice. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eric Duff as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence for copyvio was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Full-res photo and no hits with Google Lens or TinEye. Would be better with EXIF, though. —holly {chat} 21:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Similar to this https://www.instagram.com/p/CktuU1wJOES/?hl=en&img_index=1 Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per various remarks, no reason to assume it is not an own photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eric Duff as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence for copyvio was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Full-res photo and no hits with Google Lens or TinEye. Would be better with EXIF, though. —holly {chat} 21:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per various remarks. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
uploader does not identify sculptor, name of work or location, but this appears to be a 1930s-era artwork by sculptor Edward Field Sanford (1886 - 1951) located on the 158th street side of the courthouse and thus still protected by copyright--see [7] DanielPenfield (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Question What are the copyright rules on sculptures in the U.S.? Do they just become public domain 95 years after creation, as per COM:FOP US's reference to 1928, or is there a specific number of years since the artist's death that is relevant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Publication is what would matter. Works published before 1964 needed a copyright notice to get a copyright, and that copyright needed to be renewed 27 or 28 years from registration. Abzeronow (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- What does "publication" mean in regard to public sculptures? Presumably, their placement in public? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Per COM:PACUSA, before 1978, public display of a sculpture or a painting did indeed count as publication, so the work needs to have a copyright notice on it. The SIRIS record (IAS 76002842) description does not contain any mention of such a notice (and it would, I've seen it for others such as the Marine Corps War Memorial) so I think {{PD-US-no notice}} is applicable for the statue. —holly {chat} 21:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Very interesting. Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- I assume you're going to personally visit the sculpture and inspect it to determine whether or not it has a copyright notice carved into it somewhere? This is why the burden of proof should be on the uploader to know what exactly it is they're uploading. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- If a copyright notice was on the statue, the SIRIS record would say so. —holly {chat} 17:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- What does "publication" mean in regard to public sculptures? Presumably, their placement in public? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete My two cents: Uploader, User:Rochelle626 did not make this photo, as they stated in the description "Photo by Anton Mikofsky". So the uploader cannot claim the copyright. We would need permission from the photographer through VRT. Imho also these three images should be deleted for the same reason: File:20231026 120802 is a scuptural group at Bronx County Courthouse.jpg, File:20231026 121205 is a scuptural group at the Bronx County Courthouse.jpg, File:20231026 121307 is the same as "Thumbnail" above. Excuse me. This way is more informative!.jpg. These have been kept in other DR's. Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ellywa. I probably should have caught the disrepancy of credit. Would require VRT from photographer as this has no EXIF data. Object is PD-US-no notice. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}