Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/10/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 7th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can find this photo on internet like this: https://www.haberturk.com/bakani-abdulkadir-uraloglu-internet-abone-sayisi-72-5-milyona-ulasti-3609235-teknoloji Kurmanbek💬 21:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file violates copyright. not usable. 미솔파 (talk) 00:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content, derivative work, out of bounds of FoP. Image contains copyrighted art by Ibrahim El-Salahi, photographed in the United Kingdom at a temporary exhibition (out of bounds of freedom of panorama). 19h00s (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW by Flickr photographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want it to be visible to anyone no longer. A.jemseby (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request and discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect to nowhere. Sumanuil (talk) 08:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it for speedy deletion --DannyS712 (talk) 12:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The site does not give a free licence, and while the art itself is 2D and PD old, it's on a 3D object. FunkMonk (talk) 10:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licencing status: uploader states the image is own work. Since the photo purpprtedly was taken on board Japan Airlines Flight 123, which crashed on the shown date, 12 Aug 1985, then either the author is one of the only four survivors of the crash, or the image in not their own work. TinEye returns several hits from Reddit and other blogs. Deeday-UK (talk) 13:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, false date and claims - no need to wait, other uploads by user show they have uploaded other obvious copyright viols from various websites. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article Bea0127 (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again: pure nonsens. --Subbass1 (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 14:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictionnal + not in use => out of com:scope 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:708A:63EB:2F9B:F021 13:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination OOS personal fiction. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook (FBMD in metadata), unlikely own work. Komarof (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image from a non-contributor .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Richardnsfg (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by GMatteotti as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyviol Kadı Message 21:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kadı: There already is Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Heinrich Berger for this file. User:GMatteotti keeps messing with these files, wanting them speedied. --Rosenzweig τ 22:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All right, deleted it. Trottapiano (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close because Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Heinrich Berger is still running. --Rosenzweig τ 06:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Common Myna and not Bank Myna. 223.178.208.5 07:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a reason for deletion, use {{Rename}} if necessary. --Rosenzweig τ 14:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I have renamed the file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:12, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo by television production company Another Believer (talk) 01:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used 미솔파 (talk) 12:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by George Chernilevsky. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable. 미솔파 (talk) 00:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - see Getty link in file description 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 21:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iceland. This is an image of the artwork "Sólfarið" by Jón Gunnar Árnason who died in 1989 Snaevar (talk) 20:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As the uploader I'm happy to see this speedy deleted based on this advice. Thanks -- (talk) 21:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for recent artwork in Iceland. Till (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was only temporarilly undeleted to move it to the Icelandic Wikipedia. Now that it's done it will be deleted within a few hours. --Steinninn ♨ 22:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted again by Ymblanter. --Rosenzweig τ 21:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yvan del Sol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leserhane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zyigon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, artist Dan Kitchener is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Bronius Pundzius died in 1959 A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania, artist Aloyzas Toleikis died in 2021 A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot from a game. FunkMonk (talk) 12:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality image, not useful. (was previously in over-wide group image deletion request) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemically incorrect depiction of the salt silver(I) fluoride. Salts consists of cations and anions with ionic, not covalent bonding. Furthermore, salts are only depicted correctly through their crystal structures. The file was replaced by File:Silver(I)-fluoride-from-xtal-3x3x3-sf.png as 3D crystal structure cited to literature. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, poor quality 미솔파 (talk) 12:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Ikan Kekek. 20 upper 16:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 00:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sous copyright ; le compte uploader n'a pas les droits O Kolymbitès (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope / potential copyvio: plain text, numerous uncredited images Omphalographer (talk) 20:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text Omphalographer (talk) 20:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text, possibly defamatory given description? Omphalographer (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: old printout of en:Telecommunications engineering. Omphalographer (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent to File:Silver(I) fluoride.jpg but with in-image caption. Replacement image cites the original's uploader (same uploader anyway) and no license need for the other one. DMacks (talk) 18:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for street art and not deminimis Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  I withdraw my nomination: Given the discussion so far at Commons:Deletion requests/2D Murals in Dublin I now consider this nomination to be unsafe. I therefore withdraw this nomination, but should the "2D Murals in Dublin" I reserve the right to re-nominate. But I don't want this deleted unnecessarily by mistake. Thankyou. 21:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Mrb Rafi (talk) 06:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still anorher completely clueless gallery, similar to newly deleted Sovereign State Flags in Present Day, created by same user, see discussion. Includes fictional or fantasy flags, some micronations, lots of subnational entities that are not or has ever claimed sovereignty, and out-of date flags that certainly is not 'by now'. The Soviet Union as an international organisation, East Germany in the same section as Northern Cyprus and South Ossetia (as "Non-UN members or observers"), Crete represented by a flag from pre-1913 are just some few examples. TU-nor (talk) 07:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Sloppy. Inconsistent. Why is London included, but not Washington, DC, Paris, Moscow, etc? Why are the Tuamotus and Marquesas included, but not the far more populous Society Islands? Although the UK is responsible for defense and international relations of Jersey, Guernsey, and Man, they are not part of the United Kingdom, but are Crown Dependencies. There is a fictional flag of Kingman Reef, an uninhabited, largely submerged US atoll as well as many other fictional flags including the Republic of Molossia, an 11 acre (4.6 ha; 46,000 m2) property in Nevada, USA. And so on.... .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and Jim. See also Commons:Deletion requests/User:Devinwiki2023 about similar content.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, per the above; would be bad even if in user space, but as a gallery (which is a wiki’s main namespace, even though we don’t really use it as such) it’s unacceptable. -- Tuválkin 11:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Created 2004. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painter. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1962. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Created after 1987. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painter. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Created after 1987. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painter. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Created 2019. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painter. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ви вважаєте, що ця композиція -авторська робота художника, чийого імені я не назвала? А я вважала, що це мала архітектурна форма у парку. На скульптури парку не потрібно ж надавати імені автора? Але якщо за якимись юридичними правилами не можна представляти у проекті садову композицію - ну, видаляйте Natalia Parkhomenko (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1980. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1998. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Щур and Віталій Сівко. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

These six images were only used for 2013 abandoned draft en:User:Laqy/Dr.A.B.Rajib Hazarika,PhD,FRAS,AES which was deleted in 2019. Fayenatic london (talk) 08:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The technical diagrams are effectively nonsense - in particular, the "LAQUIT Microprocessor" is a badly mangled recreation of part of a TI OMAP5 block diagram with some elements modified or duplicated. Omphalographer (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is wrongly identified, see Discussion page 128.214.129.14 21:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, please take a look at Commons:File renaming how to fix this. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NakNak toys

[edit]

Per Com:DW. As Hasbro released this product in 2001, some photos also has Commons:Packaging issues.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are screenshots from a cc by licensed Vimeo video of Canadian artists. The producer licensed three other videos in the series as non commercial. I uploaded these to the appropriate articles, then wrote her and asked if she would change the last three to Attribution like the first one... instead, she replied saying the license on the first one was an error. So it goes.

GRuban (talk) 22:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing free license. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photo which based on the file name and author information ("Photo by Glen Millington, Copyright Crafts Study Centre") was taken from the website of the University for the Creative Arts (UCCA). Unlikely to have been released under the license given. BabelStone (talk) 23:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 17:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in Metadata indicated that the image was first published on Facebook/Instagram, also the user's only uploads, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious sourcing, certainly not taken some 30 years after Salvador Dali died. Also derivative crop File:Julio Ruzafa (cropped).jpg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i don't see the point Tbo47 (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's an unknown individual Tbo47 (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i don't see the point Tbo47 (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. 85.117.113.103 15:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Military occupied and illegally annexed by Russia Crimea showed as a normal part of Russia which is incorrect. UA0Volodymyr (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong author Tomer T (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW: Missing permission (and additional info like auther) for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of Germany are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the artist's death. In this case both the artists, Lex Weyer and Hans-Joachim Fuchs, died in 2005. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2076.

Adamant1 (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text is set unusable. M.J. (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://archidiecezjalubelska.pl/biskupi/amizinski/ Wiktoryn (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 00:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allied Forces Northern Europe.jpg would also need to be deleted or redirected to the superseding SVG. Worldlydev (talk) 00:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not the same; this appears to be a period patch, the other is digital artwork. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cession of Louisana to the United States

[edit]

All of these files (one PDF and six images) are now redundant to File:The Cession of Louisana to the United States.pdf, which is both higher quality and in use.

TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me there is something to be said for keeping the three pages with readable content. - Jmabel ! talk 05:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no requirement to delete, no consensus to do so. Some prefer jpg versions of media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 00:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; TOO Hong Kong is low. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 00:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern coin, I don't see a reason for it to be covered by {{PD-Palau}}. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unverified license claim for media from 3rd party. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania, artist Bronius Pundzius died in 1959

A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete, engravings were made in 1943 according to w:en:Puntukas. Possibly eligible for U.S. copyright as per COM:URAA; even if the work falls out of copyright in Lithuania, the files should not be restored until the longer U.S. copyright expires. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally posted on Twitter-now-X by the Western Australian Museum without a statement of CC license 3 years ago - uncertain if this is the original photographer now releasing the work? https://twitter.com/wamuseum/status/1324197918731988992 Anaxial (talk) 04:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no confirmation of free license status; watermark makes it doubtful that this is the original version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio/no permission - see metadata: Author DJANGO VAN ARDENNE Copyright holder DJANGO VAN ARDENNE Hoyanova (talk) 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author given no metadata either Hoyanova (talk) 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio/no permission - see metadata: Author DJANGO VAN ARDENNE Copyright holder DJANGO VAN ARDENNE Hoyanova (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CallMeTimid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are unused personal photographs, this appears to be out of COM:SCOPE.

AFBorchert (talk) 07:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no confirmation of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : photo from company site under copyright Culex (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 91.248.239.146 09:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: reverse image search shows earlier online publication at [1]. (If the uploader is Erdmann or has permission from copyright holder; please send confirmation per COM:VRT; image can be undeleted.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zimidar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Description says: "He had uploaded this picture on this social media"; does not appear to be the work of the uploader.

Anon126 ( ) 10:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dear Anon126 I'm trying to explain to you can't judge because of description Yes, I believed that in the description of this artist's image, we wrote that it was uploaded on social media soon. But if there is something wrong with it then we remove it from the description. I am a new editor in Wikimedia common in uploading images. You guys should help me. And I need to understand what to write in the description and title of the image. Once again I thank you for finding mistakes in this image and giving me notification Zimidar (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zimidar: The problem is not the description, but rather copyright licensing. Wikimedia Commons can only accept photos and other materials that are free to use by anyone, for any purpose (including commercial purposes). Being made public on social media or elsewhere on the Internet is not enough: The copyright owner (likely the photographer) must provide explicit permission that meets the requirements I mentioned. Anon126 ( ) 12:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Anon126 I agree with you Any image I have uploaded to Wikimedia common I have licenses as an artist and photographer That's why I uploaded i understand this thing I upload only the images whose copyright owners provide me a copyright license and allow me to do so. Now I just don't understand how to explain to Wikimedia common and How do I show or tell that I own a license for an image I uploaded? that's my own work Zimidar (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zimidar: Just to be clear, all of the following must true:
  1. You are the copyright owner of the photos. (For example, you took the photos yourself, or the photographer transferred the copyright to you under an agreement.)
  2. You can provide evidence of this over e-mail. (For example, if you have an e-mail address that can be connected to a photography studio, you can send an e-mail from that address.)
  3. You are willing to allow anyone to use the photos for any purpose, including commercial purposes. (You can impose certain conditions if you want, like giving credit/attribution and requiring that modified versions of the photo must be equally free to use.)
  4. There is nothing preventing you from granting permission. (For example, if you have an agreement with another party that would prevent this, then you cannot grant permission.)
If all this is true, please follow the instructions here. You will fill out a form which will create an e-mail to send to the permission verification team. In the form, please indicate each photo you've uploaded you want to grant permission for (in case you cannot grant permission for all of them).
Anon126 ( ) 08:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Other uploads by the same user should be reviewed as well. Anon126 ( ) 12:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Through a reverse image search, I found File:Nasir Zaman latest photo his Village.jpg at [2], File:Shahzad Sidhu photo shoot for Roab Song.jpg at [3], and File:Shooter Kahlon photo shoot for Stick Talk Song.jpg at [4]. Anon126 ( ) 08:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep i wikimedia common follow all import and tension conditions and am agreeable. Right now this image has been tagged with Commons Deletion This tag should be removed. Because if I believe and I prove that I have the license of this image, the license has been provided to me by being the photographer. And I don't see any problem or any such issue in this image that we should talk about it. But more editor in the come here to talk and look at the issues. Zimidar (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Permission/explicit free license confirmation can be sent to COM:VRT, image could be undeleted, but it is unclear to me that it belongs here as being in COM:SCOPE.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower-resolution version of File:Yankari Elephants.jpg – there should be a scan for exact image matches to prevent reuploads Prototyperspective (talk) 10:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait wihout information or location. Out of scope, Only category 'sidewalk café'. 'eeeewewe' is probably random input. Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posible copyvio: Album cover, or inside of the booklet CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is no personal work: https://www.cameronsmanagement.com.au/home/2023/3/16/camerons-welcomes-dr-kylie-moore-gilbert-to-the-agency Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Sorry. It was a mistake. Apparently Iran8923 uploaded this image to Wikipedia on January 2022 then cameronsmanagement.com.au used this photo on 16 March. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nom withdrawn by nominator. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded on 8 September 2023, the link provided above by User:Shkuru Afshar has used this photograph on 16 March 2023 (almost six months before upload on Commons). Also, CNN published an opinion by Moore-Gilbert on 24 October 2022 (almost a year before upload on Commons) that included a lower-quality version of this photograph and credited it as "Courtesy Kylie Moore-Gilbert". As this is the uploader's sole contribution, I think we need a permission for this file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, poor quality (was previously in over-wide mass deletion request. ) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image in use. Vysotsky (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete, nom withdrawn by nominator. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Terosaur

[edit]

These images appear to be part of a scheme where supposed inclusion of pterosaurs in amber is used to heighten the prize[5][6] dramatically, without any scientific confirmation.[7][8] The images are at best original research and pseudo science, but a deliberate commercial scam at worst, and are therefore commons:out of scope. --FunkMonk (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StubbyGang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fake maps, AI images, falsely attributed artifacts - material to illustrate fake articles in en-WP and az-WP

Enyavar (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1928 Spanish newspaper. Could be public domain in Spain, will enter the US public domain in less than 3 months. Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I missed that the author was credited, the text is public domain in Spain. The photograph is also possibly by the same author. We can probably close this as keep on January 1, 2024. Abzeronow (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion; undelete next year. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://diecezja.opole.pl/index.php/sylwetki/bp-waldemar-musiol Wiktoryn (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo, the author is unlikely to be dead for 50 years A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW, copyright status of original unknown. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mainly just a screenshot of a mother and child, neither is notable. Out of scope. Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, snapshot showing back of heads of 2 people at aquarium without showing anything well. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contrary to claims, this 1953 medal is not an official work of Germany in the sense of {{PD-GermanGov}} because it is not "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment". Per [9], it was designed by German artist de:Rudolf Oelzner, who died in 1985. The files should therefore be deleted; they can be restored in 2056.

Rosenzweig τ 20:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, incredibly bad stitching, a suitable version from roughly the same time period exists as File:RT-Gmindersdorf_Wirtshaus.jpg Windharp (talk) 20:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution, landmark is too far away Artwhitemaster (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: midling photo but not particularly bad; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Toys Fma12 (talk) 22:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Shows specific corporate commercial set of US toys from 1990s, still under copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW This is not original artwork based on the apperance of the person, it is clearly a copy of a specific photo eg [10] which has not been shown to be free licensed. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:11, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo used to create the drawing was taken in Spain where copyright for simple photographs is 25 years. She moved to to México in 1939 at the age of 63 (she is way younger in the image), also the source cites the image has catalogue number 984 from the collection DBSE 1879-1939. We just need to acknowledge the source. Günther Frager (talk) 23:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion; thanks, Günther Frager. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChambersMgt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Publicity shots from the subjects' management company (all used at https://www.chambersmgt.com/artists), which would be useful to have if the images are genuinely freely licenced, but they may not be. The same user has been ignoring COI concerns on enwiki, so may not be paying close attention to the boxes they're ticking when uploading photographers' work to Commons. Permission should go through COM:VRT.

Belbury (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and it doesn't make sense that the site does not state anyone is free to take the photo from their site and use as they please per CC-BY-SA 4.0 terms. The website is stamped copyrighted. This needs to go through OTRS. Until then, it should be deleted. Graywalls (talk) 16:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 21:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1991. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status.

  • The identified author of the photo is Dave Guttridge, a professional photographer trading as The Photo Unit, whose clients include Imperial College (where the subject of the photo works), and whose website states his photographs are copyright him.
  • The stated source of the photograph however, is from the Wikimedia blog, where it was included in a blog post, credited as "Photo via (subject), CC BY-SA 4.0."

It has to be assumed therefore, without a clear statement to the contrary, that somebody somewhere in this complex chain of custody, has not obtained a proper release from the author and/or Imperial and/or subject (or properly recorded said release to denote who owns what and how it came to be here). Markus Warner (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose we can argue about whether the copyright status is unclear, but I trust the Wikipedia blog author verified the copyright status of the photo before publishing it as "Photo via Jess Wade, CC BY-SA 4.0" // sikander { talk } 🦖 00:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The claimed copyright status here is clear (author, source, license and subject all documented), but it doesn't actually match the status implied by that credit line. I cannot trust the judgement of a blog author who apparently didn't realise it's a requirement of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license to include attribution to the picture creator, David Guttridge, and possibly also Imperial, if they also hold an interest. Commercial photographers don't take what looks like a commercial (and quite specific) use photograph, and then sign away all commercial interests in it, including transferring/voiding their basic attribution right, just so it can be put on a blog. It clearly isn't a selfie, it was possibly a favour/gift, but the sort of confusion that could give rise to that credit line on the blog, is common. Markus Warner (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Info The filer of this request is a globally locked harassing LTA. Blablubbs (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: closing this deletion discussion as Keep for the time being, as it's a LTA who is harassing Jess. --Nick (talk) 09:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Click To Go as no permission (No permission since)

Previously survived DR, ineligible for speedy. Converting to DR for further discussion. King of ♥ 14:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per the precautionary principle. Absent any clarifications from the parties directly involved, that one credit line ("via Jess Wade") is frankly doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Satisfying existing and future re-users that this is a legally released image currently seems to rely on little more than guesswork regarding the precise circumstances and contractual arrangements that led to this image being created, and what communications took place between Wade and the blog author to satisfy themselves they were aware of the full implications of that credit line. Simply trusting the parties involved surely has no basis in policy, precisely because the circumstances are so unclear. Click To Go (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete for pretty much the same reasons I pointed here. ─ The Aafī (talk) 04:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This should presumably also cover File:June-8 Jess Wafe BEM.jpg and File:WikiHerStory - Jess Wade.png, so @AJohnson (WMF), Victuallers, and Jesswade88: . Maybe someone knows how to add those derivative images to this deletion request?
  •  Keep As the King of Hearts wrote earlier, when a large organization says an image is released under an acceptable license we generally believe them. The fact that large organization is Wikimedia itself, all the more so. After all, if we can't believe Wikimedia, how can we believe OTRS/VRT? After all, they're just permissions-commons@wikimedia.org...--GRuban (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @GRuban I must ask again, where did Wikimedia Foundation claim that the image is freely-licensed? I also pointed in my reply that I linked above about certain problems wrt permissions on the Diff blog in very recent blogs. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Let's wait for the subject and/or the Wikimedia Foundation folks to respond to the pings. I could make a convincing argument that would go nowhere if one of them shows up and says "whoops!", or, vice versa, they could show up and say, "yes, we're sure because of X". --GRuban (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Embaressing If this project doesnt believe itself then whats the point in offering a view? Is there nothing that we are mot willing to throw on to this bonfire for common sense Victuallers (talk) 07:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete unless permission is provided through OTRS/VRT; based on the image extracted from the blog.wikimedia.org post [11], the metadata indicates the image creator is a professional photographer who generally retains copyright for their images (according to their website), but is not credited in the blog.wikimedia.org attribution. If the image creator has provided permission, then this can be made available, i.e. through OTRS/VRT, which appears to be standard practice, e.g. FAQ: I am not the author, but I have permission. Beccaynr (talk) 13:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    OTRS/VRT is the exception and by no means the rule. Over 99% of Commons files are here because they are either PD due to age, or marked with a free license on the site where they were published; fewer than 1% have OTRS/VRT permission. Not to say that requiring such permission isn't necessary at times, but it's certainly not the standard. --GRuban (talk) 18:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    To clarify my comment, when I wrote "standard practice, e.g." followed by a link to a Commons FAQ section, this was intended to indicate an apparent standard practice when someone is not the author of an image, but has permission. Beccaynr (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with prejudice Jess Wade was directly asked to comment here on 20th Ocotber. She has completely ignored it. This shows a flagrant disregard of the issues raised, namely what, if anything, did she do to reassure the blog author she was legally entitled to release that image on a free license. The blog author no longer works for the Foundation, and the absence of any proof she filed paperwork with the Foundation to demonstrate she had satisfied herself Wade was legally entitled to release it, combined with Wade's silence, leads to only one logical conclusion. This image represents both a legal risk and a reputations risk to Commons, precisely because it involves a corporation and an editor who absolutely should know better. And to state the obvious, no, trusting large organizations to just know what they are doing when it comes to licensing, is not Commons policy. You don't even need to see proof that even the Foundation doesn't necessarily know what it's obligations are to know that, but thankfully someone has provided it. Jekarran (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept. I reviewed the license. Wikimedia movement is generally very competent in copyright matters and I see no reason to doubt in license. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of Germany are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the artist's death. In this case I wasn't able to find information about when or if the artist Ernst Finke died, they clear haven't been dead for more then 70 years since a few of these stamps were published in 1980. So the images are copyrighted until an unknown date unless someone can figure out the date of death if there even is one.

Adamant1 (talk) 20:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you should read the texts clearly written on the pages of the uploaded pages/pictures/stamps when you mark some for deletion. At least the following stamps

Oppose for:

are marked with (in short): text no copyright because of simple text; graphics no copyright because all designer of the pics are dead for more then 100 years, and also these are marked with like "allready checked, no copyright" (see category). NobbiP 21:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe its just me, but I don't think what like 5 out 30 images? being based on prior works that are PD makes the whole thing invalid. Also, I did actually look for examples of the originals before hand but couldn't find them ans we don't just assume things are 1/1 recreations without evidence. Although there are guidelines about assuming good faith, which your clearly ignoring with the snide comment that I didn't put any effort into this. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: kept the ones noted to be based on 19th century works, deleted the rest. All of those 1967 to 1980 stamps are still protected in Germany as well as the US (URAA). I couldn't find out much more about Finke either, except that he was apparently based in (West) Berlin and probably employed by the Bundesdruckerei. There are two people named Ernst Finke in the 1980 West Berlin phonebook, one of them also in the 1991 phone book, so he could have been alive in 1991. If the year in which Finke died can be found at one point, the files can be restored either 70 years pma or 95 + 1 years after first publication (URAA), whichever comes later. If the year of death cannot be found, they can be restored in 2079 (120 + 1 years, {{PD-old-assumed}}, after the first publication of a work by Finke we know of, which is a 1958 stamp). --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author and there is a watermark on the bottom right of the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very complex logo. The license is wrong.

Dlwldms (talk) 11:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; kept text only version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Monaco A1Cafel (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PCP: uploaded by Alkrylov, Author: Aleksandr E. Vyatkin, Copyright holder: Bertinin (as per metadata). Uploaded by user, who had copyvio upload under the same file name. Komarof (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license scope doesn't cover logo. 0x0a (talk) 12:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GWOIA is used on many pages. If this file is to be deleted, it may be necessary to check the files that use this template. BlackShadowG (talk) 05:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the first extra clause of the license, which states "The authorized scope does not include ... administration's logo". 0x0a (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, FBMD in metadata. Taken from Facebook, unlikely own work. Komarof (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Komarof I sent this photo to myself via Facebook messenger. -- Maksim L. (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please upload the original if your are the photographer. --Yann (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, FBMD in metadata. Taken from Facebook, unlikely own work. Komarof (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Komarof I sent this photo to myself via Facebook messenger. -- Maksim L. (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please upload the original if your are the photographer. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saltypepper125 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works, small file size and resolution.

NinjaStrikers «» 14:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bea0127 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of a nondescript dog and a woman in a silvery white dress, supposedly a "wedding photo". Private images, out of project scope.

Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerns over copyright Expressive101 (talk) 14:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Permission at source file. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Дубликат файла File:Putinandshirak.jpg MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The websites copyright statement doesn't licences images GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 2002. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptors Борис and Богдан Руді. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1989. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2004. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Степаненко. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2004. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Степаненко. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1978. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Аркадій Юхимович Мацієвській. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1978. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Аркадій Юхимович Мацієвській. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1978. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Аркадій Юхимович Мацієвській. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And all files from category Category:Pike from Kremenchuk sculpture

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2009. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Володимир Максименко. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1996. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2000. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1997. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2001. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 2018-2023. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptors Сергій Галенко, Марко Галенко, Дар'я Вовк, Юрій Білявський, Ольга Колесник. --Микола Василечко (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

all files! --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of public domain, random date of creation, adequate rationale missing. Komarof (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Komarof The date of the photo is not random. The photo is posted in the catalog of the exhibition, which was held in 1941. This means the photo was taken in 1941 or earlier. The exact date was not indicated in the source. -- Maksim L. (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


hi,
I would argue against the proposed deletion of the photo of the Traveller Pride mural located at the entrance of the Halting Site on Margaret's Road, Dublin, Ireland. I ask that you consider the following.
This addition to Wikimedia Commons was included in Wiki Loves Folklore 2021
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Folklore_2021/Ireland
The basic aim of which is to collect photos of human cultural diversity to illustrate articles in various Wikimedia Foundation projects.
The cultural group being celebrated in the mural is under-represented in society at large. For members and allies to see the mural photographed and reproduced on the internet (and no mere blog or forum but rather on Wikipedia no less) has immeasurably positive effects.
From my perspective the Reason listed for the nomination: i.e. "Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland", is not being applied universally. There are, in fact, many Wikimedia Commons categories for street art, with circa 200 photos of murals in Belfast. The inclusion of such images add to the spirit of the free online encyclopaedia; universal application of the reason for deletion would see Wikimedia be much poorer as a result. If I have failed to properly Categorise the photo, then feel free to point me in the direction of where I can be educated so as to learn from my mistake.
The mural in question has since been destroyed in an act of anti-social behaviour. Outside of Flickr, this photo on Wiki Commons is all that remains of a moment that captures cooperation among different families, generations and genders. A feat of mutualism that resulted in a outpouring of creativity. The mural both celebrates cultural pride generally and also facilitated the cultivation of pride for this specific collaboration between people for whom art lies outside of their everyday lives. Cograng (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cograng sorry but, Irish murals still under artists' copyrights are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Images must be commercially resuable (thru commercial Creative Commons licenses) without restraint from artists of the depicted artworks. Irish copyright law does not include flat arts like murals as among works that can be freely depicted in photographs (those can only be depicted for non-commercial or private purposes). Only buildings, sculptural monuments, and artworks by craftsmen or artisans like stained-glass windows and mosaics are permitted to be photographed for free or commercial purposes. It is the mistake of the Irish organizers of Wiki Loves Folklore if they included murals in their list of works that can be photographed.
There is one more option, though. You, as the photographer/uploader, should contact the artists of the mural you depicted in your photo, and ask for their clearance on the commercial Creative Commons license you applied to your photo. They should send an email agreeing to that license to Wikimedia via email address indicated at COM:VRTS.
Wikimedia Commons does not accept non-commercial licenses, which do not conform to the Principle of Free Cultural Works that Commons:Licensing policy upholds. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Дубликат файла File:Pak_Thae-song_in_Moscow.jpg - он в высоком разрешении MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and created a redirect to the other file. holly {chat} 22:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the concern expressed in s:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#Index:The_University_Hymn_Book.djvu ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant concern being: "The issue is the contribution of a Canadian author, who was still active in the 1960's.
Namely :- w:Ernest_MacMillan (18 August 1893 – 6 May 1973)."
Commons needs the work to be out of copyright in both the US and origin countries. I'm not sure this the case for this item.
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This file should be transferred to English Wikisource and the Commons file deleted.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Copyright outside the US due to contributions from author that lived until 1973. File was INUSE on enWS so it has been copied locally (enWS only requires works to be PD in the US, which this one is being published more than 95 years ago). --Xover (talk) 19:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images say the photographer Mauricio Nievas released this in the public domain, but the template was added by the uploaded and there is no source of such claim. Also these images feature copyrighted artworks and there is no indication that they have a free license (notice there is no FOP in Argentina). We need a COM:VRT from the photographer and a source indication the artworks have a free license (e.g. permission from artists).

Günther Frager (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mural installed in 2019 in la Plata. There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works. Günther Frager (talk) 12:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verifiable source missing, probably a non-free photo of 3d object, photographer's permission required. Komarof (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Art-and-Air (talk · contribs)

[edit]

License {{PD-RU-exempt}} is not applicable. The depicted coin is not a state symbol of the Russian Federation and copyrightable.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete While {{PD-RU-exempt}} says: "state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations;", this does not appear to be legal tender issued by Russia. An objet d'art that merely happens for have the physical shape of a coin is not ipso facto money in any meaningful sense. --Xover (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Xover. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Art-and-Air (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are just copyrighted badges/medals, not state symbols as PD rationale states. No evidence of PD. The last one has the author's name on it.

Komarof (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the uploader's authorship. They uploaded it saying it was piramids in Mexico state, then adding Metadata Teotihuacan. It is recognizable as a different famous ruin in Mexico, El Tajin, in Veracruz state. (I have changed the description and categories accordingly.) I suppose it's possible the uploader was confused and thought they were at a different famous ruin in a different part of Mexico, but to this extent seems unlikely. No EXIF. I did not find the image elsewhere in a reverse image search, but the view is a fairly common tourist shot. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to disbelieve uploader at this time. holly {chat} 23:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Le Projecteur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remining images, no EXIF data, screenshots, montages, very unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Je certifie que ces images sont bien la propriété de Le Projecteur, qui les a lui-même réalisées.
Je trouve votre réactivité déplacée et peu encourageante pour les néophytes Wikipedia, car comme je l'ai indiqué à "Supertoff" qui s'est avéré être un administrateur que je prenais pour quelqu'un de malveillant ayant par 3 fois supprimé mon contenu et qui a bloqué mon compte, j'ai commencé hier le remplissage de cette page utilisateur en toute bonne foi, et lui ai laissé le message ci-dessous, demandant mon déblocage et la réouverture de cette page dans les conditions mentionnées ci-dessous.
Il a fallu que l'on me supprime cette page pour que je découvre les messages d'avertissement !!
Merci
MESSAGE laissé à 13h52
"Bonjour
Néo utilisateur de Wikipedia, en créant cette page, j'ai cru à un actee malveillant en constatant sa suppression !!!
je pense avoir été victime d'un péché de jeunesse en y insérant une iconographie que je pensais pouvoir y insérer à partir d'icônes dont je suis propriétaire, et j'avoue ne pas avoir compris sa suppression et son blocage.
Cette page n'ayant pas eu de problème avant l'insertion de ces images, pouvez-vous me la débloquer que je la remette dans l'état précédent.
Merci
Le Projecteur Le Projecteur (discuter) 7 octobre 2023 à 13:52 (CEST)[répondre]
PS : et j'avoue ne pas avoir vu d'avertissement...
Merci Le Projecteur (discuter) 7 octobre 2023 à 13:53 (CEST) Le Projecteur (talk) 18:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Le Projecteur: Si ces images sont les vôtres, pour chacune, il faut fournir les sources. Par exemple, pour File:IcoIA2.png, quelle est l'image utilisée ? Si c'est la vôtre, il faut l'importer sur Commons, ou confirmer la licence par email (via COM:VRT). En l'absence de preuve, si les informations sont manquantes, elles seront supprimées. Yann (talk) 19:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as it's been 3 months since the request for VRT communication. holly {chat} 23:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without META proving the ownership by the uploader and wrong date as the TS passed in Guadeloupe of Octobre 2, 2023 Pierre cb (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, qu'est-ce que c'est que cette bêtise ? J'ai daté en mettant hier cette photo sur Commons à cette date car le portable que j'utilise aujourd'hui (un Xiomi) n'a pas la fonction de datation qu'avait mon ancien portable (un Samsung). Je ne comprends pas ce que signifie la fonction META ? Mais je jure que je suis bien l'auteur de cette photo ! Enrevseluj (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Plus exactement, ma femme a pris la photo et me l'a envoyé par Whatsapp pour la mettre sur Commons. Enrevseluj (talk) 21:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pierre cb: . Comment puis-je retélécharger la photo ? Lorsque j'essaie de le faire, un message me dit que le fichier existe déjà ? Cordialement. Enrevseluj (talk) 23:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Enrevseluj: Il suffit d'utiliser le lien Téléverser une nouvelle version de ce fichier qui mène à https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Ciel_rouge_avant_la_temp%C3%AAte_Philippe.jpg&wpForReUpload=1 et de télécharger votre nouvelle version depuis votre source. Quand je fais cela, c'est depuis mon ordinateur, je ne sais pas comment ça se fait d'un autre médium. Pierre cb (talk) 02:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Non, cela me marque : Le fichier téléversé est une copie exacte de la version actuelle de File:Ciel rouge avant la tempête Philippe.jpg. Je ne sais absolument pas comment faire. Moi, j ai juste voulu mettre ce cliché montrant un phénomène particulier alors que j ai lu qq part que cela se produisait souvent avant un événement de ce type. J ai téléchargé une deuxième photo que la copine de mon fils a pris au même moment et là les métadonnées apparaissent bien sauf que cela date du 8 octobre alors que la photo est du 2. Après est-ce que cela ne se date pas du moment où les photos sont envoyées par Whatssapp ? Bref, je ne maîtrise pas ce sujet là.
Concernant les photos de la tempête, il y a peu d éléments à photographier. Les réparations ont été faîtes assez rapidement et le coin où j habite a été moins touché que le coin de Goyave par exemple. J ai juste remarqué des fils électriques qui pendent sur la chaussée à Deshaies derrière le collège. Voulez-vous que je les photographie quand même ? Cordialement.
Enrevseluj (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Reconstruction after 2000. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painters Ігор Зілінко, Михайло Миколайчук, Ярослав Новак, Валерій Лебедь. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

І без дозволу попів?! Чи не в цьому справа? Ви б краще, шановний пане, боролися за видалення пам'ятників "героям" НКВС, СМЕРШУ та іншим більшовикам. В очах рябить від їх кількості! Бондар Володимир (talk) 12:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Вам хто заважає боротися «за видалення пам'ятників "героям" НКВС, СМЕРШУ та іншим більшовикам», якщо вам «в очах рябить від їх кількості!»? --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Most of the files as DM or cropped to rid of new works. Deleted photos that were not de minimis. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible attempt at making a vector version of [12]. The original file should be uploaded instead. I would guess that it is PD-old already, considering Johann Develey died in 1886. The unknown painter probably died more than 70 years ago. XenonX3 (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone must upload and replace the original in the articles before deleting it --Ezarateesteban 21:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@XenonX3: Please upload the other file and do a universal replace. Ping me when done and I'll close this out. Thanks! holly {chat} 22:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no longer in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Transcriptions of documents are handled at Wikisource. Omphalographer (talk) 17:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ompholographer Dear Ompholographer,
Thanks for your interest. I see your point, but i am wondering how to accomodate a fragment on Wikisource. It seems out of scope there? This indeed plain text chapter here at Commons is simply to help researchers, students and other interested people studying Dutch (legal) history getting to grips with this difficult 17th century learned study in Latin, French and Dutch all mixed up...(About the right to have an army for a town Hagesteyn in the mediaeval bishopric of Utrecht.) It seems to not fit well on Wikisource as it is not a full-text book .dvi with transcription - as is standard on wikisource - or similar. What do you think? Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please try to upload this document of 47 pages to Wikisource, nobody will expect to finisch the project in a short time. The document is out of scope on Commons and not used on the projects today. --Ellywa (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eve73 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. Some old images may be in the public domain due to lack of copyright notice or renewal, but evidence must be provided.

Yann (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Wait – It looks like the uploader has uploaded what is basically personal images received from the person appearing in the photos, ref de:Wikipedia:Qualitätssicherung/7._Oktober_2023#Albert_C._Humphrey. It might be better to refer this user to Commons:VRT. TommyG (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So how would that make them any less copyvio? The uploader has in fact stated that they have received them from the image subject, and that he owns the Urheberrecht - which is simply not possible at least for the ones where German Urheberrecht law applies.
Anyway, certainly none of these are the uploader's "own work" from 2023. --2003:C0:8F31:D700:E431:71DE:8097:E920 12:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep To be eligible for a copyright in the United States you had to register for a copyright and renew that copyright up to 1964. from 1977 to 1989 you had 5 years to register for a copyright. After 1989 all images were copyrighted without the need to register. I have searched through both databases and there are no registrations or renewals for any variations of this person's name. Several look post 1989, but if the uploader is making a claim that a family member or they took the images, they can release under cc or cc-heirs. All noobs use the upload date as date=. because that is the default setting. We fix, rather than delete. --RAN (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copies had to be published/distributed though to lose copyright. Having some prints from friends may not count. The early family photographs, he could well be able to license them as an heir. The US Army one is PD-USGov, so that should be OK (and a copy was clearly distributed to him if not PD-USGov). A lot of the others are muddier. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:49, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is totally unclear what the copyright status of these photos is, per COM:EVID the uploader should show evidence the photos are in PD. In addition, the artist lives in Germany since the 70s as can be concluded from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Eve73/Albert_C._Humphrey. So it is likely most of these images have been made in Germany and the German copyright is not expired, due to the other copyright system within the EU. The images must be deleted as a consequence, regrettably. --Ellywa (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]