Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![191 File:Kara Kamari "Underwater Beauty".jpg](#File:Kara_Kamari_"Underwater_Beauty".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Md Mizarul Islam12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:সোহাগ হোসেন সৌরভ.jpg
- File:Milon shepur.jpg
- File:Milon sohag.jpg
- File:Sohag 1.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon sharper.jpg
- File:Sherpur.jpg
- File:Mizarul Islam Milon.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon (6).jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 12.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 11.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 10.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 9.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 8.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 7.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 6.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 5.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 4.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 3.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 2.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon 1.jpg
- File:Rubel Milon.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon (2).jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam.jpg
- File:Md Mizarul Islam Milon.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 00:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photos by non-contributor (F10). --Wutsje 03:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
The given reason is: This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 10:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/15237218@N00/49012772613 is licensed under cc-by-nc-sa-2.0. --Wdwd (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own works, unclear copyright status
- File:Escudo de Pomán.jpg
- File:Escudo de Tinogasta.jpg
- File:Escudo de Fiambalá.jpg
- File:Bandera de Tinogasta.jpg
- File:Bandera de Fray Mamerto Esquiú.jpg
- File:Bandera Los Altos.jpg
- File:Bandera Valle Viejo.jpg
- File:Bandera Paclín.jpg
- File:Bandera Capital.jpg
- File:Bandera Capayán.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Various logos, definitely not "own work", and extremely unlikely that the uploader holds any copyright for them
- File:Icono Chacarita.png
- File:Icono Américo Tesorieri.png
- File:Icono Vélez Sarsfield.png
- File:Icono Villa Cubas.png
- File:Icono Sarmiento.png
- File:Icono San Lorenzo de Alem.png
- File:Icono Salta Central.png
- File:Icono Rivadavia.png
- File:Icono Policial.png
- File:Icono Liberal Argentino.png
- File:Icono Parque Daza.png
- File:Icono Juventud Unida.png
- File:Icono Independiente (C).png
- File:Icono Independiente (H).png
- File:Icono Estudiantes.png
- File:Icono Defensores del Norte.png
- File:Icono Ferrocarriles.png
- File:Salta Central.png
- File:Rivadavia (Huillapima).png
- File:Liberal Argentino.png
- File:Independiente (Catamarca).png
- File:Juventud Unida (SR).png
- File:Independiente (Huillapima).png
- File:Ferrocarriles (Chumbicha).png
- File:Defensores del Norte.png
- File:Estudiantes de La Tablada.png
- File:Américo Tesorieri (Catamarca).png
- File:Atlético Policial.png
- File:Chacarita (Catamarca).png
- File:Icono Tercena.png
- File:Icono Salta Ctral.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ronhjones (Talk) 23:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Likely not own works: web-size images, disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or taken from FB. Unreliable uploader, many previous DR's.
- File:Estadio maradona la merced.jpg
- File:Estadio jorge cesar vargas.jpg
- File:Estadio las pirquitas.jpg
- File:Estadio defensores de esquiu.jpg
- File:Cancha independiente (c).jpg
- File:Cancha americo tesorieri.jpg
- File:Cancha independiente (h).jpg
- File:Cancha club sarmiento.png
- File:Estadio-bicentenario-cat.jpg
- File:Estadio los fundadores3.jpg
- File:Estadio rafael luna.jpg
- File:EstadioInstitutoCba.jpg
- File:Estadio Minella.jpg
- File:Estadio nuevo monumental.jpg
- File:Estadio julio grondona.jpg
- File:Coloso del ruca quimey.jpg
- File:Estadio Carlos Augusto Mercado Luna.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contribs) 4
[edit]Probable copyvios, given the uploader's track record.
- File:Logo CSCSM.png
- File:Logo CAS.png
- File:Logo CASI.png
- File:Logo CARH.png
- File:Logo CSDPD.png
- File:Logo CALA.png
- File:Logo CAIH.png
- File:Logo FIEL.png
- File:Logo CDVC.png
- File:Logo CSVC.png
- File:Logo CAVS.png
- File:Logo CASLA.png
- File:Logo CDSC.png
- File:Logo CAIC.png
- File:Logo AJUSR.png
- File:Logo CSFE.png
- File:Logo CAET.png
- File:Logo CADN.png
- File:Logo CDCH.png
- File:Logo CDAT.png
- File:Logo CAP.png
- File:Logo Social San Antonio.png
- File:Logo La Tercena.png
- File:Logo La Estación.png
- File:Logo La Carrera.png
- File:Logo La Banda CF.png
- File:Logo Juventud Unida (LF).png
- File:Logo Independiente (SA).png
- File:Logo Deportivo Sumalao.png
- File:Logo Villa Dolores.png
- File:Logo Social Rojas.png
- File:Logo Los Sureños.png
- File:Logo San Martín (EB).png
- File:Logo Obreros de San Isidro.png
- File:Logo Las Pirquitas.png
- File:Logo La Merced.png
- File:Logo Ateneo M. Moreno.png
- File:Logo Defensores de Esquiú.png
- File:Logo Coronel Daza.png
- File:Logo San Martín (Ch).png
- File:Logo Sarmiento.png
- File:Logo San Isidro.png
- File:Logo Parque Daza.png
- File:Logo Rivadavia.png
- File:Logo Liberal Argentino.png
- File:Logo Deportivo Valle Chico.png
- File:Logo Independiente (H).png
- File:Logo Club Fiel.png
- File:Logo Villa Cubas.png
- File:Logo Vélez Sarsfield.png
- File:Logo San Lorenzo de Alem.png
- File:Logo Salta Central.png
- File:Logo Juventud Unida.png
- File:Logo Independiente (C).png
- File:Logo Ferrocarriles.png
- File:Logo Estudiantes de La Tablada.png
- File:Logo Defensores del Norte.png
- File:Logo Chacarita.png
- File:Logo Américo Tesorieri.png
- File:Logo Atlético Policial.png
- File:Icon CSDMA.png
- File:Icon CSDTF.png
- File:Logo Torneo Provincial Catamarca.png
- File:Icon CDI.png
- File:MapaTP23-4.png
- File:Icon CSDBO.png
- File:Icon AEREFI.png
- File:MapaTP23-3.png
- File:Icon CAMM.png
- File:Icon CSLS.png
- File:Icon CTFB.png
- File:MapaTP23-2.png
- File:MapaTP23-1.png
- File:Icon CDOR.png
- File:Icon CSUO.png
- File:Cancha Américo Tesorieri.jpg
- File:IconoSC.png
- File:Icon SC.png
- File:Icon CF.png
- File:Icon DDN.png
- File:Icon RIV.png
- File:IconoPD.png
- File:IconoCSFE.png
- File:Icon PDA.png
- File:Icon SMA.png
- File:Icon CSFE.png
- File:Icon SI.png
- File:Icon SM.png
- File:MapaTP2022.png
- File:Icon CVDBN2.png
- File:Mapa Torneo Provincial Catamarca.png
- File:Icon CSOA.png
- File:Icon CSALT.png
- File:Icon CSDEAB.png
- File:Icon CDH.png
- File:Icon CTFAL2.png
- File:Icon CSDM.png
- File:Icon CSA.png
- File:Icon CDG.png
- File:Icon CAPA.png
- File:Icon UA.png
- File:Icon CAFI.png
- File:Mapa-TP2022.png
- File:Icon CDCJ.png
- File:Icon CARPF.png
- File:Icon CSDRT.png
- File:Icon CSCSM.png
- File:ICON CSCSM2.png
- File:Icon CASISM.png
- File:Icon CASJ.png
- File:Icon LR.png
- File:Icon CSDRU.png
- File:Icon CDCSM.png
- File:Icon CULC.png
- File:Icon CDMN.png
- File:Icon CASP.png
- File:Icon 14Agosto.png
- File:Icon CASLR.png
- File:Icon CASMF.png
- File:Estadio-Defensores-de-Esquiu.jpg
- File:Estadio-Jorge-Cesar-Vargas.jpg
- File:Estadio-de-Las-Pirquitas.jpg
- File:Estadio-Sarmiento-Catamarca.jpg
- File:Estadio-Velez-Catamarca.jpg
- File:Estadio-Independiente-Huillapima.jpg
- File:IconoLBCF.png
- File:Estadio-CAI-Catamarca.jpg
- File:Icon LP.png
- File:IconoCSCDLP.png
- File:IconoCSCDLEM.png
- File:IconoCAP2.png
- File:IconoCASM2.png
- File:IconoCDS2.png
- File:IconoCAIC.png
- File:IconoCSVD2.png
- File:IconoCADN2.png
- File:IconoCALA2.png
- File:IconoCDAT2.png
- File:IconoCASLA2.png
- File:IconoCDVC.png
- File:IconoCSDLM2.png
- File:IconoCDCD2.png
- File:IconoCSLS2.png
- File:IconoCAMM.png
- File:IconoFiel.png
- File:IconoJULF.png
- File:IconoCSSA.png
- File:Icon JULF.png
- File:IconoFIEL.png
- File:Icon CSCDP.png
- File:Icon CSCDLP.png
- File:Icon CSVD2.png
- File:Icon FIEL.png
- File:Escudo LBF.png
- File:Escudo LAF.png
- File:Escudo LTF.png
- File:Escudo LSF.png
- File:Escudo LFF.png
- File:Escudo LFDSR.png
- File:Escudo LDFR.png
- File:Escudo LDFP.png
- File:Escudo LCHF.png
- File:Escudo LCF.png
- File:LigaChacarera.png
- File:Icon VC.png
- File:Icon CARh.png
- File:Icon DN.png
- File:Icon VS.png
- File:Icon PD.png
- File:Icon SLA.png
- File:Icon SAR.png
- File:Icon CAIh.png
- File:Icon LC.png
- File:Icon CAIc.png
- File:Icon DE.png
- File:Icon CDJULF.png
- File:Icon Pirquitas.png
- File:Icon CSSA.png
- File:Icon Csvd.png
- File:EstadioMalvinasCatamarca2.jpg
- File:EstadioMalvinasCatamarca.jpg
- File:Icon CALA2.png
- File:Icon CASI2.png
- File:IconoCASI.png
- File:Icon CDVC.png
- File:Icon CASINC.png
- File:Icon LC14A.png
- File:IconoLC14A.png
- File:MapaTP2020.png
- File:Icon 14AT.png
- File:Icono14AT.png
- File:Icon CDC.png
- File:Icon CAMN.png
- File:Icon CSDA.png
- File:Icon CACHJ.png
- File:Mapa-provincial2020.png
- File:Icon CDMR.png
- File:IconoCSDLPT.png
- File:IconoCDMR.png
- File:IconoCAMN.png
- File:IconoCAJN.png
- File:IconoCASAB.png
- File:Icon CVDBN.png
- File:Icon CSLR.png
- File:Icon CSLP.png
- File:Icon CSDT.png
- File:Icon CSDS.png
- File:Icon CSDLA.png
- File:Icon CSDDQ.png
- File:Icon CSCDSR.png
- File:Icon CJUT.png
- File:Icon CDEZ.png
- File:Icon CASMB.png
- File:Icon CDA.png
- File:Icon CASI.png
- File:Icon CARF.png
- File:Icon CAJU.png
- File:Icon CAIEA.png
- File:Icon CAE.png
- File:Icon CAGN.png
- File:Icon CSDGL.png
- File:Icon CDLC.png
- File:Icon CDO.png
- File:Icon CUS.png
- File:Icon ICNA.png
- File:Icon CASMR.png
- File:Icon CDGL.png
- File:Icon CME.png
- File:Icon CAJN.png
- File:Icono CDLM.png
- File:Icono CDA.png
- File:Icono CAES.png
- File:Icon CAUC.png
- File:Icon CSDBN.png
- File:Icon CSCH.png
- File:Icon CSDLPT.png
- File:Icon CSDR.png
- File:Icon CSDP.png
- File:Icon CDEA.png
- File:Icon CADTC.png
- File:Icon CUA.png
- File:Icon CTFG.png
- File:Icon CSACH.png
- File:Icon CAVSA.png
- File:Icon CASLH.png
- File:Icon CARH.png
- File:Icon ARCA.png
- File:Icon CTFAL.png
- File:Icon CASLB.png
- File:Icon CASAB.png
- File:Icon CAPB.png
- File:Icon CARB.png
- File:Icon CSDEA.png
- File:Icon CANCH.png
- File:Icon CDNVV.png
- File:Icon CSDPD.png
- File:Icon CAS.png
- File:Icon CALA.png
- File:Icon AJUSR.png
- File:Icon CAIH.png
- File:Icon CAET.png
- File:Icon CDCH.png
- File:Icon CSVC.png
- File:Icon CAVS.png
- File:Icon CASLA.png
- File:Icon CDSC.png
- File:Icon CAIC.png
- File:Icon CAR.png
- File:Icon CSFEC.png
- File:Icon CADN.png
- File:Icon CAP.png
- File:Icon CDAT.png
- File:Icon CSVD.png
- File:Icon CSDSA.png
- File:Icono CSCDLE.png
- File:Icon CDJU.png
- File:Icon CDS.png
- File:Icon CSSR.png
- File:Icon COSI.png
- File:Icon CASM.png
- File:Icon CALT.png
- File:Icon CSDLM.png
- File:Icon CCDLC.png
- File:Icon CDE.png
- File:Icon CAISA.png
- File:Icon CDCD.png
- File:CFMES.png
- File:CDSRS.png
- File:CSUOM.png
- File:IconoCDSR.png
- File:IconoCDSM.png
- File:IconoCME.png
- File:IconoCTFB.png
- File:IconoCUS.png
- File:IconoCJU.png
- File:IconoCAJU.png
- File:IconoCASLR.png
- File:IconoCSDLM.png
- File:IconoCDJU.png
- File:IconoAMM.png
- File:IconoCSCDEA.png
- File:IconoCDS.png
- File:IconoCSCDLE.png
- File:IconoCSDLP.png
- File:IconoCSVD.png
- File:IconoCSDSA.png
- File:IconoCDCD.png
- File:IconoCDE.png
- File:IconoCCDLC.png
- File:IconoCALT.png
- File:IconoCSLS.png
- File:IconoCASM.png
- File:IconoCOSI.png
- File:IconoCSSR.png
- File:IconoCDCH.png
- File:IconoCAET.png
- File:IconoCAI.png
- File:IconoAJUSR.png
- File:IconoCALA.png
- File:IconoCSDPD.png
- File:IconoCAS.png
- File:IconoCDAT.png
- File:IconoCAP.png
- File:IconoCADN.png
- File:IconoCSFEC.png
- File:IconoCAR.png
- File:IconoCAI-C.png
- File:IconoCDSC.png
- File:IconoCSVC.png
- File:IconoCASLA.png
- File:IconoCAVS.png
- File:Villa Cubas.png
- File:Sarmiento.png
- File:Ubicacion geografica provincial 2019.png
- File:Estadio-malvinas-argentinas-catamarca.jpg
- File:Cancha Sarmiento.png
- File:Rotonda Banda de Varela.jpg
- File:Estadio P. A. Prevedello.jpg
- File:Polideportivo Chumbicha.jpg
- File:Estadio Primo A. Prevedello.jpg
- File:Cancha Villa Cubas.jpg
- File:Cancha Los Altos.jpg
- File:Cancha Coronel Daza.jpg
- File:Cancha La Merced.jpg
- File:Cancha Las Pirquitas.jpg
- File:Blanco y Azul Horizontal.png
- File:Rojo y Blanco Horizontal con negro.png
- File:Blanco y Azul.png
- File:Celeste y Blanco Vertical.png
- File:Blango y Negro Vertical.png
- File:Verde y Blanco.png
- File:Verde y Blanco Vertical.png
- File:Verde y Blanco con Detalles.png
- File:Verde con Diagonal Blanca.png
- File:Rojo y Negro.png
- File:Rojo y Blanco Vertical.png
- File:Celeste Azul y Blanco Horizontal.png
- File:Bordó Celeste y Blanco Vertical.png
- File:Blanco y Verde.png
- File:Azul y Rojo Vertical.png
- File:Azul y Celeste.png
- File:Azul y Amarillo.png
- File:Azul con vivos Amarillos.png
- File:Azul con V Blanco.png
- File:Amarillo y Azul.png
- File:600px Rojo Negro y Blanco Vertical.png
- File:600px Celeste con Diagonal Azul.png
- File:Polideportivo de Chumbicha 2.jpg
- File:Polideportivo de Chumbicha 1.jpg
- File:Villa Cubas (Catamarca).png
- File:Final - San Lorenzo vs San Martin.jpg
- File:Semifinal - Sumalao vs San Martin.jpg
- File:Octavos - Villa Cubas vs Parque Daza.jpg
- File:Cuartos - Sumalao vs Parque Daza.jpg
- File:San Antonio vs Ferro - Integracion.jpg
- File:Defensores vs Salta Central - Integracion.jpg
- File:Policial vs La Tercena - Integracion.jpg
- File:Sorteo del Torneo.jpg
- File:03ful-f1-2c 0.jpg
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Procedural close: Many of these logos are likely below TOO and a copyvio claim is therefore invalid. Renominate one-by-one instead the ones that you suspect might be above TOO. Not in a batch request. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contribs) 5
[edit]Above threshold of originality in Argentina?
- File:Logo CSCSM.png
- File:Logo CAS.png
- File:Logo CARH.png
- File:Logo CSDPD.png
- File:Logo CALA.png
- File:Logo CAIH.png
- File:Logo CDVC.png
- File:Logo CSVC.png
Trade (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contribs)
[edit]Above threshold of originality in Argentina?
- File:Logo CASI.png
- File:Logo FIEL.png
- File:Logo CSFE.png
- File:Logo CAET.png
- File:Logo Independiente (SA).png
- File:Logo San Isidro.png
- File:Logo Juventud Unida.png
- File:Logo Ferrocarriles.png
- File:Logo Estudiantes de La Tablada.png
Trade (talk) 14:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio from Pixabay, not "own work". 2003:C0:8F28:E000:F49C:92C9:3010:6178 11:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Source & license fixed. --Achim55 (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Qualität auch nicht zeigenswert 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Known LTA vandal. --Achim55 (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 15:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kein schönes Bild OLMEL149 (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
kept (non-admin-closure) Not a valid reason for deletion. The image has no quality problem at all (except maybe to much sky). --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kein schönes Bild Archo08 (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Gibt schönere Fotos Archo08 (talk) 14:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Gibt schöneres Foto'' --[[User:Archo08|Archo08]] ([[User talk:Archo08|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)}} {{copyvio|Kein schönes Fotos} für eindeutige Urheberrechtsverletzungen. {{bad name|Lukas 91}} für falsch benannte Kategorien. {{rename|Stadt Weinfelden.jpg}} für falsch benannte Dateien. {{duplicate|Stadt Weinfelden.jpg}}
Kept: per previous four nominations. stop. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
chlechte Qualität auch nicht zeigenswert 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 09:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 18:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:96E7:4E00:A846:BD64:374E:35B8 15:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:819C:7D8E:CDF2:D87D 07:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Request by known LTA vandal. --Achim55 (talk) 12:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Kein schönes Foto Archo08 (talk) 14:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Gibt schöneres Foto Archo08 (talk) 14:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Request by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hauptsächlich Strassenbelag zu sehen 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:10F2:608D:D398:AF9E 13:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep no valid reason for deletion. IP is currently blocked due to vandalism. Günther Frager (talk) 15:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Mein eigenes Bild und es ist nicht wirklich schön 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:DC1D:E59B:1B7D:C022 10:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Just as likelyhood that nominator is uploader: {{Löschen|1=''Bildqaulität sehr schlecht'' --[[User:OLMEL149|OLMEL149]] ([[User talk:OLMEL149|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 08:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)}} --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Does not look like own work, and even if it is, seems to be out of scope. Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Sock, DENY, ad. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
advertisement Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Pretty sure that Creative Commons didn't exist in 1940. If the author or heir released it, there's no proof here. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 18:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: https://data.bnf.fr/fr/17745067/jacques_pruvost/ Author died in 1984;. --Yann (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
doubt if official logo, poorly made of little educational value Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- No longer in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Poorly self-made logo with no educational value. --Tim Wu (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official wikipede (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Flag of Wuhan.png
- File:Flag of Nanning.png
- Delete: Poorly self-made logo with no educational value. --Tim Wu (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
This photo shows a bust by US artist Anthony Natsoulas, born 1959 and apparently alive, so the bust is still protected by copyright. The bust is shown in a temporary exhibition inside a museum in Germany. There is no freedom of panorama in buildings in Germany. The file should therefore be deleted; it can be restored 70 years pma of the artist. Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023091110009965 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 17:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 06:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Not PD-Pakistan. East Pakistan is today's Bangladesh, Bangladeshi law applies, the work is still in copyright in Bangladesh until 2031 and in the US until 2066. -Mehedi Abedin 14:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Support, I was not aware that PD-Pakistan is ineligible for pre-Bangladesh works. Dead.rabbit (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong file and wrong name Denis Gagne52 (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 03:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- See also discussion here. --Molgreen (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say Keep: good photo of a difficult-to-access subject - MPF (talk) 13:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Missing location data is not a reason for deletion. — Speravir – 23:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 03:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- See also discussion here. --Molgreen (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say Keep: good photo of a difficult-to-access subject - MPF (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Missing location data is not a reason for deletion. — Speravir – 23:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 03:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- See also discussion here. --Molgreen (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say Keep: good photo of a difficult-to-access subject - MPF (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Missing location data is not a reason for deletion. — Speravir – 23:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Bogus own work claim. Probably above COM:TOO Argentina which is hard to interpret. Jonteemil (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Highly decorative. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Bogus own work claim. Probably above COM:TOO Argentina which is hard to interpret. Jonteemil (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The somewhat sketchy look to the player makes this original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Bogus own work claim. Probably above COM:TOO Argentina which is hard to interpret. Jonteemil (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
je ne souhaitais pas mettre cette image. Merci de la supprimer. Eradur123 (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:43, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
File doppelt hocheladen - redundant Babewyn (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
obvious copyvio. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation and no educational valje — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:101e:a:3558:28f4:7312:5e7f:66a6 (talk • contribs) 07:49, 11. Sep. 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
André Barre died in 1970, not PD until 2041. — Racconish 💬 16:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- The book was published in 1911, and the different man from André Barre (1922 – 1970). Maltaper (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, André Barre did not die in 1970 ! how could a man born in 1922 be the author of a book published 11 years before his birth ?
- there was a wrong link on author's page. The author of this book is Adré Barre (1878-1952) d:Q2847210 - Public Domain since 1/1/2023... - source https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb31765386j
- the wrong data on WD and WS was due to an error by a contributor who wrongly moved the link on wikidata, while the author was correctly identified (on wikidata and wikisource) until mai 2022. (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (confusion between homonyms). --VIGNERON (talk) 11:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aeioubrasil (talk · contribs)
[edit]CGI 3D exceeds TOO.
- File:Big Nate Logo.png
- File:Danger Force Logo.png
- File:The Really Loud House.png
- File:Xuxa Produções Logo.png
- File:That Girl Lay Lay.png
- File:Os Smurfs Logo (2021).png
- File:Logo Los Pitufos (2021).png
- File:Tom and Jerry logo (2021).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maximilian-nod (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
- File:Cssfox community celebrates FavF “Break it.”.jpg
- File:Break it. website by Kirk Whayman is a Favorite Fox on Cssfox community of web designers.jpg
- File:Break it. by Kirk Whayman on Cssfox community of web designers landing.jpg
- File:Cssfox 8 home screenshots.png
- File:Cssfox 8. Web design community and website awards.jpg
- File:New FavF certificate. Website awards.jpg
- File:Awards jury certificate. Web design awards on Cssfox.jpg
- File:Community website awards new Jury certificate.jpg
- File:Awards jury and FavF (Favorite Fox) certificates. Web design awards on Cssfox.jpg
- File:Cssfox logo.png
- File:Cssfox community and website awards home page screenshot 2020.jpg
_certificates._Web_design_awards_on_Cssfox.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Possibly out of scope, but what's more severe is that these designs seem to be copyrightable and are not works of the uploader, hence a copyvio. This excludes the images that contain only an image of the certificate. Those can probably be Keep, because the certificate itself appears to be below TOO. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I really doubt any of these will have any practical educational use. Also, the certificates use that "Cssfox" logo, so if the logo's above the ToO, then the certificates should probably be deleted too. Adsci8 (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ondjimusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
- File:Twist Khalifa manipulação de imagem.jpg
- File:Twist Khalifa.png
- File:Twist Khalifa - 2020 Angolan Rapper.jpg
- File:Ondjimusic 20202.jpg
- File:Ondjimusic.png
Trade (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noore Alam Mahin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
- File:Mahin.jpg
- File:BASIS Student Forum Graphic Arts Institute.jpg
- File:PyFellow Team.jpg
- File:PyFellow Web Design Course.jpg
- File:PyFellow.jpg
- File:Noore Alam Mahin.jpg
Trade (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I take the photo by myself, and i didn't steal other's photo ok? 阿姑姑 (talk) 09:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure, it is a photography of an album that is at leat 15 years old. Apart if you are the photographer of the cover, it cannot be kept on Commons. Are you the photographer of the cover? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SaiyanGhost (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
Trade (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Infrogmation as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment I am skeptical about the license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It is the logo of one of the biggest companies in Argentina and enwiki has a local copy because it is considered copyrighted in its country of origin [1]. Günther Frager (talk) 21:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ledesma-Logo.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Il Tiempo is a newspaper with a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a label CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Macrobreed (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope?
- File:Kuldeep Jakhar.jpg
- File:Book Cover of "Fantasy Cricket Expert".jpg
- File:Book Cover of "Fantasy Cricket Expert" 2.jpg
- File:Cactus Foundation volunteer 1.jpg
- File:Cactus Foundation volunteer 2.jpg
- File:Dr. Ritwiz Bihari on World Stroke Day.jpg
- File:Safar, journey of Dilip Patel Sirohi.jpg
- File:Dilip Patel Sirohi at Jawai, Rajasthan.jpg
- File:Back cover photo of "A Brief History of Cricket".jpg
- File:Cover photo of "A Brief History of Cricket".jpg
- File:Shubham Tiwari (Indian author) in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.jpg
- File:Shubham Tiwari with Indian Flag.jpg
- File:Roy Royalty Hamilton.jpg
- File:SS Motivation logo.jpg
_in_Dubai,_United_Arab_Emirates.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 01:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- The book covers are definitely out of scope. I have no comment on the rest of the images. Adsci8 (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 01:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE, even if the page where it's being used on is only a draft for now. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: unlike most files used only in a sandbox, in this case the article in question actually has third-party sources, so it might make it into the mainspace one day. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Complex logo Trade (talk) 02:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Trade Hi, I'll give you my opinion. I think it takes a much higher degree to be complex. The A, derived from plain text as is the entire logo, features only a little bird in the center of the A, which however, does not affect the fact that it is protected, but the threshold of originality, if not a little for the bird, personally I see it low. Giov.c (talk) 07:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I'd consider the bird to be unique, individual, and distinguishable. Adsci8 (talk) 21:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Adsci8. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Adsci8 logically therefore all auchan logos should be deleted from commons, I think (?). In any case, in my opinion the bird, despite being at the limit of originality, can fall into the public domain, you can easily find a bird on the internet and twist it however you want to make the logo. If one runs on commons, there are more complex logos to apparently realize how a little bird camping on the A is almost harmless for copyright Giov.c (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- The other stuff on Commons isn't relevant. Wikimedia Commons doesn't establish legal precedent for Spanish and American law. Adsci8 (talk) 17:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
although logos are too simple to be copyrighted, the graphic designs in the borders as well as the advert text itself does not, therefore it is a derivative work of copyrighted info. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 02:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete And out of scope to boot. Adsci8 (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of project scope - privacy violation not encyclopedically relevant child Hoyanova (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by APiggingPig (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, and no evidence of a free license.
- File:小白浏览器宣传视频.mpg
- File:小白浏览器创意视频.mpg
- File:小白浏览器工作组环境照片(官方拍摄) 02.jpg
- File:小白浏览器工作组环境照片(官方拍摄) 01.jpg
- File:盛趣时代集团斩获“2019年度互联网企业社会责任奖” 01.jpg
- File:盛趣时代集团斩获“2019年度互联网企业社会责任奖” 02.jpg
- File:盛趣时代集团斩获“2019年度互联网企业社会责任奖” 03.jpg
- File:盛趣时代公司官方拍摄照片 02.jpg
- File:盛趣时代公司官方拍摄照片 03.jpg
- File:盛趣时代公司官方拍摄照片 01.jpg
- File:XBBrowser Sidebar Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser Newtab Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser AI Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser Splitscreen Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser Customtool Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser Extension Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser Screenshot Logo.svg
- File:XBBrowser Skin Logo.svg
- File:Download Now Button.png
- File:Reload button.png
- File:SNQU Logo.png
- File:小白浏览器 logo.svg
- File:城市和乡村夜晚的区别.png
- File:突然下雨，小朋友跑回家.png
- File:小猪在泥地里打滚.png
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not own work. --Bedivere (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Bogus own work claim. Probably above COM:TOO Argentina which is hard to interpret. Jonteemil (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Doesn't have "originality that distinguishes them from others by giving their personal imprint" in my eyes, but some relevant legal opinions would be much more useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's almost certainly above the ToO in the U.S. as the human figure can't really be described in terms of simple geometric shapes. Commons requires works to be free in both the U.S. and the country of origin. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's a very simplified human figure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Bogus own work claim. Probably above COM:TOO Argentina which is hard to interpret. Jonteemil (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that this is complex. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's almost certainly above the ToO in the U.S. as the human figures can't really be described in terms of simple geometric shapes. Commons requires works to be free in both the U.S. and the country of origin. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused typical AI (mostly probably Stable Diffusion) output with gibberish text of the kind of which millions of images could be generated and uploaded. Similarly to pornographic images where we also accept only a limited amount that is potentially of COM:EDUSE, I think we have a developing approach of hosting AI-generated media selectively with a focus on COM:SCOPE and COM:EDUSE, see also the draft at Commons:AI-generated media and particularly here, as well as examples of deletion requests such as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:AI-generated portraits of Vincent van Gogh or Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:David S. Soriano. - In this category, I exclude three files from the deletion request because they are in use in Wikipedias: File:Alice and Sparkle cover.jpg, File:Zarya of the Dawn cover.webp (covers of notable books and also examples for Midjourney output) and File:Anthology manga cover.jpg (used in pt:Mangá). Some might also have COM:DW copyright issues (Captain Marvel, Ziggy Stardust).
- File:Black boy reading a African American superhero comic book.jpg
- File:Comic cover a.i.jpg
- File:Elvis Presley as Captain Marvel Jr.jpg
- File:Example of fanzine.jpg
- File:Ninja coloring book 2.jpg
- File:Retro robot classic pulp cover.jpg
- File:Retro sci-fi fanzine cover.jpg
- File:Sci-Fi fanzine cover.jpg
- File:Stable Diffusion - Pulp magazine - 1.jpg
- File:Ziggy Stardust comic cover.jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 10:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment So your point would be: those IA generated images should be deleted unless they are included in some WP article? Don't you think those images can be of some value to illustrate comic book articles in any project with no need of using NFCC images? Fma12 (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- In theory, yes (if the project agrees with using "fake" images that don't correspond to any real comic book, even with garbled pseudo-text such as in your upload File:Comic cover a.i.jpg - questionable from an encyclopedic viewpoint), but IMHO we should, in such cases, only accept a select amount of images that were actually uploaded with a particular use case in mind, because otherwise, we couldn't stop people uploading hundreds, thousands, millions of such pictures which are generated with virtually no effort whatsoever using an AI like Stable Diffusion. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Distorted simulacra of comic books. These images don't look enough like real comic books to educationally illustrate what a comic book is. Adsci8 (talk) 14:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. As noted in the nomination, many of these are treading very close on the line of becoming derivative works; for example, File:Elvis Presley as Captain Marvel Jr.jpg is obviously w:Captain Marvel Jr., File:Comic cover a.i.jpg is a dead ringer for w:Poison Ivy (character), and so on. Moreover, it's unclear that there's any real educational use for these images; encyclopedia articles like w:Superhero or w:Graphic novel typically use real fair use or public domain images rather than original artwork, machine-generated or otherwise. Omphalographer (talk) 23:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: : if a random comic art which depicts a red haired girl is considered a copyvio of characters such as Poison Ivy or Jean Grey, I would consider this an exagerated perception of the precautionary principle. Thus AI-generated comic images should be forbidden before they are suspected of being "copyvios" of any comic character.
- IMO the real problem is having this amount of images and very few of them being used in comic articles because (as you stated) NFCC images are always the first choice to illustrate articles.
- Fma12 (talk) 09:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Don’t want on here anymore. A.R.M. 14:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Question Because? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)- Keep No reason for deletion specified. Yann (talk) 09:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revokable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
I don’t want this on here anymore. Please take it down. A.R.M. 14:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Question Because? We don't take orders. Please give us a good reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revocable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:53, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Take this down as I do t want any of my contributions to this band be on here anymore. A.R.M. 14:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revocable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
I don’t want this here anymore. A.R.M. 16:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revocable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Not useful. Experimenting? Henxter (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
This image has been manipulated to insert an advertisement on the tail of the helicopter! The original image appears in various places online (including https://www.pinterest.com/pin/294634000591417078/) and is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Omphalographer (talk) 19:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atom labels; not drawn according to MoS guidelines. Replaced by File:Trichlorophenylsilane-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality alternative. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Marchuk17 (talk) 08:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The picture may be educationally usefull, but I see an other controverse here. We have this picture, most likely taken from the same spot with a at least very similar sky. But these two images came from different users. And we don't have any metadatas in each case. At least questionable, i think! --Lukas Beck (talk) 09:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, imo in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful. Private photo. It's not suitable for illustrating the sky. Ergoldsbach is far away and almost invisable. Marchuk17 (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Completely usable. If you think the description or title should be changed for greater accuracy, please do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Already kept one mounth ago. The doubts I expressed back then are still valid. But the decision was made to keep it and within a month little had changed. Lukas Beck (talk) 04:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photo are basically identical https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ergoldsbach_0002.jpg Marchuk17 (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Similar image but different angle and color tones. Not really a valid reason for deletion. —Tcr25 (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:Redundant. Crazyheart1 (talk) 20:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I think it would be appropriate to grant the deletion request at this point. The garden looks like private property to me. I think that the user basically has a good reason for not wanting this property, which really has no purpose for us, to be published here, regardless of why the image was uploaded in the first place. I think the alternative image would be a fair compensation. I mean, does it really depend on the color of the sky? I think we should delete the image for the benefit of the person who uploaded it. --Lukas Beck (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep per previous DRs, and not close to identical. Also, giving up to people who make repeated ill-founded deletion requests is a very bad practice, because it encourages them. Finally, I don't think it's up to you to presume that this photo " has no purpose for us." I think you mean no purpose for you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Germany. The photo does not fall under the freedom of panorama, as it is a publicly closed place (fenced garden of a private house). A photo of a publicly closed place taken from inside a publicly closed place. Marchuk17 (talk) 12:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The photograph does not show anything copyrightable IMO, so freedom of panorama is irrelevant. --Rosenzweig τ 20:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Take this down. I don’t want it here anymore A.R.M. 20:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revocable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files Uploaded by Cork12
[edit]- File:SC Berkeley County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Cherokee County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Clay County Government Center.jpg
- File:New Cabarrus County Courthouse.jpg
- File:NC Chatham County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Wake County Courthouse.jpg
- File:NC Clay County Government Center.jpg
- File:Watauga County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Old Cabarrus County Courthouse.jpg
- File:New Greenville County Courthouse1.jpg
- File:New Swain County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Bamberg County Courthouse 5.jpg
- File:NC Wilkes County Courthouse.jpg
- File:New Mecklenburg County Courthouse, Charlotte NC.jpg
- File:Saluda County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Bamberg County Courthouse Interior.jpg
- File:NC Wayne County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Chatham County Justice Center.jpg
- File:NC Clay County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Gates County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Bamber County Courthouse Annex.jpg
- File:Bamberg County Courthouse 3.jpg
- File:New Iredell County Courthouse.jpg
- File:NC Mitchell County Courthouse.jpg
- File:NC Alexander County Courthouse.jpg
- File:NC Brunswick County Courthouse.jpg
- File:SC Dorchester County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Currituck County Courthouse 2012.jpg
- File:Hertford County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Old Greenville County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Barnwell County Courthouse2.jpg
- File:Bamberg County Courthouse.jpg
- File:SC Union County Courthouse.jpg
- File:New Caswell County Courthouse.jpg
- File:New Greenville County Courthouse2.jpg
- File:New Chesterfield County Courthouse South Carolina.jpg
- File:Bamberg Country Courthouse 1.jpg
- File:Greensboro Guilford County Courthouse.jpg
- File:SC Laurens County Judicial Center.jpg
- File:High Point Guilford County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Barnwell County Courthouse1.jpg
- File:Bamberg County Courthouse 4.jpg
- File:NC Martin County Courthouse.jpg
- File:South Carolina Beaufort County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Orangeburg County Courthouse.jpg
- File:New Kershaw County Courthouse.jpg
- File:SC Florence County Courthouse.jpg
- File:Vance County Courthouse.jpg
- File:SC Marion County Courthouse.jpg
Per Wikipedia:Indy beetle#Robeson County, North Carolina Update (around the middle of the discussion), @Cork12 got permission from John Deacon (the copyright owner) to use the files from their website (http://www.courthouses.co), but they did not get Mr. Deacon to fill out a VRT waiver which means they can't be used on Wikimedia Commons. All attempts by me or Cork12 to contact Mr. Deacon have been unsuccessful. Unless anyone is willing to try contacting them again, these files and any files uploaded from that website in the future should be deleted. I thought that the user had deleted these images a while back but I guess they never got to it. Thank you for your time and have a good day! -- DiscoA340 (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- To add to that per Cork12, Deacon originally gave permission for his photos to be used on Wikipedia "with no charge", but this is not the same as them being under any sort of CC license on Commons, and certainly not the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I contacted the creator and he has acknowledged he has not filed a VRT for the images, and I assume that means he has no plans to in the future, since the VRT takes about 30 seconds to send. If he changed his mind, they can be restored. --RAN (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Published elsewhere https://twitter.com/DGPR_PAF This is not a work by the uploader, as the they claim. MarioGom (talk) 21:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW of the copryrighted original: w:File:FL Studio 11 just logo.png. Jonteemil (talk) 22:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
It says on the file page: This image is for the sole use of Kent961 wikipedia userpage. Usage without the consent of Kent961 restricted. Commons can't host files that can't be used freely by anyone. Jonteemil (talk) 22:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
It says on the file page: For the sole purpose of Kent961 userpage information. Usage outside of Kent961 wikipedia userpage restricted. Commons doesn't store files that can't be used freely by anyone. Jonteemil (talk) 22:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
I don’t want this on here anymore. Take it down please. A.R.M. 22:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revocable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Take it down please. A.R.M. 22:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revokable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Take it down please. A.R.M. 22:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revokable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Take it down please. A.R.M. 22:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revokable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Take it down please. Thanks A.R.M. 22:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revokable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Take it down please. A.R.M. 22:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (for all of the above). Why? Please specify a valid deletion reason. CC licenses are irrevocable and the image is to old for a courtesy deletion. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - CC licenses not revokable and the window for courtesy deletion has long passed. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Logo/flag of a fictional organization. Out of com:scope by the looks of it.
Jonteemil (talk) 22:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Pozo Millonario Tamalero.jpg. Jonteemil (talk) 22:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful (possibly self-promotion). 213.87.162.113 22:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Image upload of non-contributor. No usage. MexTDT (talk) 23:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGING: The labels show artworks by de:Christian Warlich, who died in 1964. The file can be restored in 2035. Rosenzweig τ 08:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of the scope of the project. It is a screenshot from a google platform. It contains personal information. Luisalvaz (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
unused personal image Denniss (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
No educational value, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Above TOO so should be deleted if not perhaps {{PD-old}} can be verified. Jonteemil (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
probably copyviol, cf. Google Lens — danyele 01:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jaqen (talk) 10:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehdihosseini2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:Tv-interview-3.png
- File:Innovation factory of mashhad.png
- File:Sanei.png
- File:Ali-sanei.jpg
- File:Tv-interview-1.png
- File:Tv-interview-2.png
Trade (talk) 00:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination.. Kadı Message 15:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination.. Kadı Message 15:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
My upload, unknown if photo was actually published prior to 1989 or prior to Hurley uploading it. reppoptalk 00:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr sahil purkait (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope?
Trade (talk) 01:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only self-promotion. --Polarlys (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 01:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:NOTHOST, photo of non-notable person with no educational value. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since)
However, it appears to be correctly licenced.The only quibble is that the uploader has claimed it as their own work, whcih is unlikely 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not the uploader work but from some media source undeclared. Commons cannot keep unsourced and unknown copyright status material. Pierre cb (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I did some digging, and it looks like the closest that I could find as a source is here. It features 4 images that are in the same location as this one, and all four are under a CC-BY-4.0 license. My guess is that the image uploaded here is a copyright violation from a journalist or some other Ukrainian source. I found this licensed version of this same image with less compression. I've gone ahead and uploaded 3/4 of the images featuring Maksym Kuzminov from the official Defence site, and replaced the image on the Wikipedia page. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete in view of the comments by MonkeyBBGB
coupled with the fact that it is now unused.I have struck my prior opinion 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)- Comment it is no longer unused. Struck that element. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I tried to remove it from the Russian wikipedia page, but it was locked. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unclear source, no permission. --Polarlys (talk) 19:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot, not the actual photograph. Luisalvaz (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Adsci8 (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo uploaded for abuse Drakosh (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be copyvio (album cover) Adsci8 (talk) 22:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Marie-Anne Perreault died in 1974, not PD until 2045. Same applies to File:Croff - L’enjôleuse, 1928 cover.png. — Racconish 💬 16:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Very low resolution, no metadata, PP on social medias ([2]): dubious ownership claim
Gyrostat (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
The source for the image 'legit.ng" lists their source as an instagram account. I cannot locate the account, however, this appears to be a professional work, and we should have better sourcing. Darth Mike (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope, COM:SS Adsci8 (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content, possible copyright issue re. "Derechos Reservados" in header. Omphalographer (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 21:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
As far as I know, cover arts cannot be saved here. 193.166.136.182 08:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- the larger issue is this is not an own work by the uploader, and it features Goofy, a copyrighted character. Delete MonkeyBBGB (talk) 18:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 15:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedi:Silinmeye_aday_sayfalar/Dicle_%C3%96z%C3%A7er - out of project scope
- File:Dicle Özçer- Doğada Çekim-Ağustos 2020- Foto Juan Sebastian Valencia.jpg
- File:Dicle Özçer- Film Setinde-5 Aralık 2018- Foto - Juan Sebastian Valencia.jpg
- File:Dicle Ozcer.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- please wait until discussion sorted out, if the page got deleted please
Speedy delete them. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Kept High quality with VTRS and could realistically be used. One lower quality is INUSE
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedi:Silinmeye_aday_sayfalar/Cezmi_G%C3%BCner_Omay out of project scope
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- please wait until discussion sorted out, if the page got deleted please Speedy delete them. --
- please wait until discussion sorted out, if the page got deleted please
- ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Deleted One deleted due to no permission, other kept, has VTRS and could realistically be used
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedi:Silinmeye_aday_sayfalar/Hikmet_Toker out of project scope
- please wait until discussion sorted out, if the page got deleted please Speedy delete them. --
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Kept - high quality with VTRS - could realistically be used. A google search found him as an associate professor
although pd-textlogo, com:NOTHOST, personal file with no valid educational value. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
All of these files are personal in nature. Their descriptions are questionable, to the point where one of them claims to be the discovery of a "new species" in its title.
- File:Orlando imitando un emoticono.png
- File:Orlando después de haber bebido de tomarse 2 "uno al día".png
- File:Orlando en el podio.png
- File:Orlando Cosplay 2 "Hogwarts".png
- File:Orlando Cosplay.png
- File:Orlando y una nueva especie marina.png
- File:Orlando afeitado.png
Susmuffin (talk) 06:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
There is an error in the chemical structure in the middle of the bottom row. The uploader has already made the necessary correction, but uploaded it with a different file name (File:Sacubitril synth process (corrected).png). This incorrect version should therefore be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete everything was stated above. Wostr (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & as we have a corrected version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
German stamps especially those which were printed since 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all made by de:Heinz Schillinger who died in 2008, so his works won't come into public domain before 2079.
- File:DPAG-1997-BayerischerWald.jpg
- File:DPAG-1997-LueneburgerHeide.jpg
- File:DPAG-1997-NorddeutscheMoorlandschaft.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1807 Fränkische Schweiz.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1808 Havellandschaft.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1809 Oberlausitz.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1810 Sauerland.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Eifel.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Gendarmenmarkt.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Holsteinische Schweiz.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Saalelandschaft.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Spreewald.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2103 Passau.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2133 Saarschleife.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2003 MiNr2355 Ruhrgebiet.jpg
Correlatio (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 12:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Heinz Schillinger, died in 2008. So the images are copyrighted until at least 2079, if not longer due to their copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide.
- File:DBP 1993 1684 Kap Arkona Rügen.jpg
- File:DBP 1993 1685 Goslar.jpg
- File:DBP 1993 1686 Wasserkuppe Hohe Rhön.jpg
- File:DBP 1994 1742 Schloss Neuschwanstein.jpg
- File:DBP 1994 1743 Erzgebirge.jpg
- File:DBP 1994 1744 Wertheim.jpg
- File:DBP 1994 1745 Mecklenburgische Seenplatte.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1996 Germany CptKoep pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp Hr.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2079. --Rosenzweig τ 17:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Kraus
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Peter Kraus, seems to still be alive. So the images are copyrighted until an undetermined date.
- File:FDC 1986 GDR-XIPTSED06 MiNrBl83 pm B002.jpg
- File:Friedrich Schiller GDR stamp.jpg
- File:Se-tenant 1988 GDR MiNr31683169 pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1986 GDR XiPTSED MiNr30093012 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1990 GDR MiNr3310 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamps 1989 GDR MiNr32543255ZD pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr Block 080.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3009.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3010.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3011.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3012.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3013.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Block 083.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3095 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3096 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3096 II.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3097 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3098 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3099 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3100 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3096 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3097 I.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3168.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3169.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3170.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3171.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3172.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3190.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3191.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3192.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr Kleinbogen 3190.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr Kleinbogen 3191.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr Kleinbogen 3192.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr Zusammendruck 3168, 3169.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3310.jpg
_1985,_MiNr_Block_080.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3009.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3010.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3011.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3012.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3013.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_Block_083.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3095_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3096_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3096_II.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3097_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3098_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3099_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3100_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3096_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3097_I.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3168.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3169.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3170.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3171.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3172.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3190.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3191.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3192.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3190.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3191.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3192.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_3168,_3169.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3310.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 04:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored 70 years pma of the artist. --Rosenzweig τ 17:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Andrea Voß-Acker
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case it's pretty clear that the designer, Andrea Voß-Acker, hasn't been dead for that long since these stamps were published in the early 2000s. So they are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can find out if Andrea Voß-Acker is dead and when exactly they died.
- File:Chess olympiad 2008 stamp.jpg
- File:DPAG 2005 2491 Dresdner Frauenkirche.jpg
- File:DPAG 2007 2632 Labrador Hunde.jpg
- File:DPAG 2008 Wohlfahrt Do J Wal.jpg
- File:DPAG-2005-WeltjugendtagKoeln.jpg
- File:DPAG-2006-Fussball-WM ESST.jpg
- File:DPAG-2006-Fussball-WM.jpg
- File:DPAG-20060201-Stadion.jpg
- File:DPAG-20060202-Pferd.jpg
- File:DPAG-20060203-Muenchen.jpg
- File:DPAG-20060204-Berlin.jpg
- File:DPAG-20060205-WM-Plakat.jpg
- File:Olympische Spiele 2008.jpg
- File:Segelflug Weltmeisterschaft 2008.jpg
- File:Sheet of German 145+55 2008 Summer Olympics stamps.jpg
- File:DPAG 2012 Post-Serie Winterferien.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 05:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- (about the Chess Olympiad 2008 stamp) Thanks for bringing this to my attention. In 2008 when I uploaded it, postal stamps were generally viewed as being in the public domain in Germany. This changed only with the Loriot case, decided on 27 March 2012. So while the deletion request is legally correct, I am at no personal fault here, as at the time of uploading I was neither aware nor could foresee that a court might decide against the public domain status. I agree with the deletion. --Conspiration 13:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Totally. I don't think anyone is the wrong for uploading images of German stamps before the court case. I see at as just a weird quirk of how the legal system in Germany works that we unfortunately have to deal with by deleting the images. It's totally not on the users who originally uploaded the images though. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- (about the Chess Olympiad 2008 stamp) Thanks for bringing this to my attention. In 2008 when I uploaded it, postal stamps were generally viewed as being in the public domain in Germany. This changed only with the Loriot case, decided on 27 March 2012. So while the deletion request is legally correct, I am at no personal fault here, as at the time of uploading I was neither aware nor could foresee that a court might decide against the public domain status. I agree with the deletion. --Conspiration 13:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, except one that has a VRT permission. I inquired about that one at COM:VRTN. The files can be restored 70 years pma of the artist. --Rosenzweig τ 17:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Deleted File:Chess olympiad 2008 stamp.jpg as well because per COM:VRTN we don't have a proper permission in the ticket. --Rosenzweig τ 20:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, as far as I remember I had asked for clarification from the Federal Postal Office to make sure stamps are in the public domain, and submitted that as a ticket with the upload. This was overturned by the 2012 court decision. --Conspiration 21:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case I couldn't find any information about the stamp's designer, Alex Choiniere, but they clearly haven't been dead for 70+ years since the stamp was published in 2000. So it can be restored at an undetermined date. Adamant1 (talk) 07:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored 70 years pma, or in 2121 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 18:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Profile of myself 2803:6602:207:2B00:2447:237B:C987:4D6B 17:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Erwin Poell
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. In this case the artist Erwin Poell seems to still be alive. So the images are copyrighted until an undetermined date.
- File:DBP 1974 811 Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 812 Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 835 Eishockey-Weltmeisterschaft.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 896 Bayreuther Festspiele.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 921 Palais de l'Europe.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 976 Interparlamentarische Konferenz.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1002 Europäisches Parlament.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1053 Internationaler Kongreß für Erziehung und Bildung Hörgeschädigter.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1063 Weinbau in Mitteleuropa.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1088 Patentamt.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1179 Reinheitsgebot Bier.jpg
- File:DBP 1984 1209 Direktwahlen zum Europäischen Parlament.jpg
- File:DBP 1988 1395 Bethel.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1436 IG Bergbau und Energie.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1436-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1460-R.JPG
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 619.jpg
_1970,_MiNr_619.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 619.jpg zeigt eine Briefmarke aus dem Jahre 1947 File:Saar 1947 225 Große Saarschleife.jpg von Vytautas Kazimieras Jonynas (1907–1997). Das Urheberrecht läuft 2067 aus, da die Zusätze von Poell {{PD-text}} sind. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Erwin Poell was born in 1930 and is apparently alive, he published his memoirs in 2022. --Rosenzweig τ 17:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Paul Froitzheim
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the artist of these stamps, Paul Froitzheim, died in 2018. So the images are copyrighted until at least 2089. If not longer due their copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide.
- File:DBP 1966 511 Jugend Reh.jpg
- File:DBP 1966 512 Jugend Gaemse.jpg
- File:DBP 1966 513 Jugend Damhirsch.jpg
- File:DBP 1966 514 Jugend Rothirsch.jpg
- File:DBP 1967 529 Jugend Kaninchen.jpg
- File:DBP 1967 530 Jugend Wiesel.jpg
- File:DBP 1967 531 Jugend Hamster.jpg
- File:DBP 1967 532 Jugend Fuchs.jpg
- File:DBP 1970 648 Katholikentag.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 786 Deutscher Rundfunk.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 901 Vogelschutz Goldregenpfeifer.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 974 Fossilien, Fledermaus.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 975 Fossilien, Urpferdchen.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 977 Katholikentag.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1113 Weihnachten.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1129 Die Fromme Helene.jpg
- File:DBPB 1965 250 Waldschnepfe.jpg
- File:DBPB 1965 251 Fasan.jpg
- File:DBPB 1965 252 Birkhahn.jpg
- File:DBPB 1966 291 Rehbock.jpg
- File:DBPB 1966 292 Gämse.jpg
- File:DBPB 1966 293 Damhirsch.jpg
- File:DBPB 1966 294 Rothirsch.jpg
- File:DBPB 1967 299 Kaninchen.jpg
- File:DBPB 1967 300 Wiesel.jpg
- File:DBPB 1967 301 Hamster.jpg
- File:DBPB 1967 302 Fuchs.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 316 Wildkatze.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 317 Fischotter.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 318 Dachs.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 319 Biber.jpg
- File:DBPB 1970 354 Minnesänger.jpg
- File:DBPB 1970 355 Minnesänger.jpg
- File:DBPB 1970 356 Minnesänger.jpg
- File:DBPB 1970 357 Minnesänger.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1981, MiNr 658.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1968, MiNr 549.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1968, MiNr 550.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1968, MiNr 551.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1968, MiNr 552.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 612.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 613.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 614.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 615.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 648.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) Jugendmarke 1965 10 Pf.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) Jugendmarke 1965 15 Pf.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) Jugendmarke 1965 20 Pf.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) Jugendmarke 1965 40 Pf.jpg
_1981,_MiNr_658.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_549.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_550.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_551.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_552.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_612.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_613.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_614.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_615.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_648.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jugendmarke_1965_10_Pf.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jugendmarke_1965_15_Pf.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jugendmarke_1965_20_Pf.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jugendmarke_1965_40_Pf.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 06:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The 1965 stamps don't name Froitzheim on the stamps themselves, so will enter the PD in Germany in 2036 and in 2061 in the US; the files can be restored in 2061. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case I couldn't find any information about the stamp's designer, Peter Lorenz, but they clearly haven't been dead for 70+ years since the stamp was published in 1978. So it can be restored at an undetermined date. The same goes for the following images:
- File:DBP 1974 800 Internationale Jugendarbeit.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 801 Internationale Jugendarbeit.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 802 Internationale Jugendarbeit.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 803 Internationale Jugendarbeit.jpg Adamant1 (talk) 06:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Peter Lorenz was born ca. 1933 and might still be alive. The files can be restored 70 years pma. --Rosenzweig τ 17:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Harry Scheuner
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Harry Scheuner, is still alive. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.
- File:Adam Ries (timbre allemand).jpg
- File:DPAG-1997-KölnerKarneval.jpg
- File:DPAG-20060303-Ingolstadt.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3153 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3154 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2260 Brettspiel.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2261 Holzspielzeug.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2261 Puppe.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2263 Teddybär.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2264 Elektrisches Spielzeug.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2403.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2404.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr Zusammendruck 2716-2721.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Kleinbogen 3057-3062.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3120.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3121.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Block 088.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3134-3139.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3153.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3154.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr Kleinbogen 3215-3220.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr Kleinbogen 3289-3294.jpg
- File:Stippefoettche Karneval Marke.jpg
- File:Tag der Briefmarke (Saxonia).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_2403.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_2404.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2716-2721.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3057-3062.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3120.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3121.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Block_088.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3134-3139.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3153.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3154.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3215-3220.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3289-3294.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 07:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope?
- File:Nasroabtidoon.jpg
- File:Calikey.jpg
- File:Galmudugday14august.jpg
- File:14augustgalmudugday.jpg
- File:Galmudug day 14 August.jpg
Trade (talk) 01:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Please be more descriptive about such mass deletion requests. I see no reason why e.g. File:File:Maajidkaguriceel.jpg (picture of a church) or File:Shangaani Mogadishu-s-old-town-.jpg (picture of a castle) should be out of scope. And for many of the others, it's hard to tell whether they're in scope without being able to understand the non-english description. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
I have cut down the images nominated. Better now? @PaterMcFly: --Trade (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, partly. But why did you add a speedy deletion tag when the images are already in a deletion request? That should only be done in obvious cases, and the deletion reason "missing permission" does not apply, because the licensing is correct. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Small size + lack of meta data means that the images were likely taken from somewhere else Trade (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Krd and Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 01:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I know that Commons has perversely decided that social media doesn't exist, but this guy is a big Tiktok star: 418 Following, 2.8M Followers 97.5M Likes. But who cares about 2.8 million people; they're somehow insignificant for Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- He seems decently notable, but I wonder could this be a copyright violation? This looks like a professional, possibly promotional photo, has "Copyright 2018. All rights reserved." in metadata, uploader has previous photo (of what looks like same person) deleted for copyright violation. Though I have not been able to find this image on the internet (searched TinEye and Google Images). Uploader also looks like a promotional account, might be Alvaro Antoli himself (question who owns the copyright still arises)? DJ EV (talk) 11:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good point. It would be best for User:Alvaroantoli to read COM:VRT and make or facilitate the appropriate contacts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I dont see that happening unless you are going to reach out to him outside of Commons Trade (talk) 20:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know him and don't have a Tiktok account. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good point. It would be best for User:Alvaroantoli to read COM:VRT and make or facilitate the appropriate contacts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio, either delete or get permission via COM:OTRS Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- The image was released as part of a courtcase around the dismembered arm.
- It was released via Victoria Police and therefore I believe it should fall under creative commons.
- https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/web-sleuths-quickly-link-devil-tattoo-and-punk-band-20150210-13b3nd.html Matt rees1 (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- It was released via Victoria Police and therefore I believe it should fall under creative commons. That doesn't follow. The police force didn't create this image. They may have published it, or some version of it, but that doesn't make them its author, and certainly doesn't mean that their including it in a press release implies that it's now freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Matt rees1 It looks like you tried to reply to me in a private email. If you'd like to respond to my comment, please do so here on the wiki. Omphalographer (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies. Im struggling sometimes with the interface used here to message. Im quite new to Wiki
- I was just asking as to why there is an issue with posting the image on Wikipedia given that the image has been published on Australian news web sites and the the original image was a photo taken of a tattoo by Victorian Police, and that person is now deceased.
- There would be no way to understand who the original tattoo artist is / was and if that person is even alive anymore. Matt rees1 (talk) 05:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for posting that here. In summary:
- This image isn't the tattoo. It's part of the album art for the album Tooth & Nail (compare here: https://downtimeoz.bandcamp.com/album/tooth-nail). The tattoo, part of which is shown in the article you linked, was based on the same source artwork which inspired the album art - notice that the tattoo shows the devil holding a spray can, not the flowers seen on the album cover.
- Even if that weren't the case, the use of this image by the police force, or by news agencies, doesn't mean that it is in the public domain. That artwork still has an owner somewhere - either its artist, the heirs of that artist if they're no longer alive, or a company they may have produced that work for - and that owner still owns the rights to this image. Their ownership isn't stripped away just because the image was, briefly, a matter of public interest.
- Omphalographer (talk) 05:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I apologise. I thought this was the other image. I'm not sure how I missed that.
- The artist has given his approval for the artwork to be used from the cover. His name is James Meek and is a very close friend of mine.
- He is also the bass player of said band. Matt rees1 (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please have him contact the Commons:Volunteer Response Team with evidence of permission. The page I linked has details on how he can contact the team, and what information he will need to provide. Omphalographer (talk) 20:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I will do this as soon as the other image issue (devil with spray can) is resolved as there is no point posting this image without the other image being approved.
- The reason for this image is to show the differences between the two. Matt rees1 (talk) 04:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please have him contact the Commons:Volunteer Response Team with evidence of permission. The page I linked has details on how he can contact the team, and what information he will need to provide. Omphalographer (talk) 20:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for posting that here. In summary:
- @Matt rees1 It looks like you tried to reply to me in a private email. If you'd like to respond to my comment, please do so here on the wiki. Omphalographer (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- It was released via Victoria Police and therefore I believe it should fall under creative commons. That doesn't follow. The police force didn't create this image. They may have published it, or some version of it, but that doesn't make them its author, and certainly doesn't mean that their including it in a press release implies that it's now freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Per similar rationale as this Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Heinz Schillinger
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of this country are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the artist. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2,079 since the artist, Heinz Schillinger, died in 2008. If not longer due to the copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave it up to the closing administrator to decide which term should apply.
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 514.jpg
- File:Böttcher-Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP - 200 Jahre Beethoven - 10 Pfennig - 1970.jpg
- File:DBP - 200 Jahre Hegel - 20 Pfennig - 1970.jpg
- File:DBP 1963 401 Jugend Wiedehopf.jpg
- File:DBP 1963 402 Jugend Pirol.jpg
- File:DBP 1963 403 Jugend Gimpel.jpg
- File:DBP 1963 404 Jugend Eisvogel.jpg
- File:DBP 1964 451 Olympia Tokio.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 705 Butterfrauen.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 706 Reiter.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 707 Nussknacker.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 708 Taubenhaus.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 709 Weihnachten.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 764 Briefmarkenausstellung IBRA.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 765 Briefmarkenausstellung IBRA.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 766 Briefmarkenausstellung IBRA.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 767 Briefmarkenausstellung IBRA.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 774 Umweltschutz.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 775 Umweltschutz.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 776 Umweltschutz.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 777 Umweltschutz.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 Block 9 Briefmarkenausstellung IBRA.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 818 Wohlfahrt Blumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 819 Wohlfahrt Blumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 820 Wohlfahrt Blumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 821 Wohlfahrt Blumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1974 824 Weihnachten 1974.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 836 Jugend Lokomotiven.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 837 Jugend Lokomotiven.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 838 Jugend Lokomotiven.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 839 Jugend Lokomotiven.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 866 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 867 Wohlfahrt Alpenblumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 868 Wohlfahrt Alpenblumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 869 Wohlfahrt Alpenblumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 870 Wohlfahrt Alpenblumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1975 874 Weihnachten 1975.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 877 Hans Sachs.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 878 Lufthansa Junkers F 13.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 879 Bundesverfassungsgericht.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 882 Jugend Olympia.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 883 Jugend Olympia.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 884 Jugend Olympia.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 885 Jugend Olympia.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 903 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 904 Wohlfahrt Gartenblumen Phlox.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 905 Wohlfahrt Gartenblumen Ringelblumen.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 906 Wohlfahrt Gartenblumen Zinnien.jpg
- File:DBP 1976 907 Wohlfahrt Gartenblumen Stiefmütterchen.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 931 Jugend Schiffe.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 932 Jugend Schiffe.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 934 Europa Landschaften Rhön.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 935 Europa Landschaften Siebengebirge.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 948 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 949 Wohlfahrt Wiesenblumen Kümmel.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 950 Wohlfahrt Wiesenblumen Löwenzahn.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 951 Wohlfahrt Wiesenblumen Roter Klee.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 952 Wohlfahrt Wiesenblumen Wiesensalbei.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 963 Deutsches Museum.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 982 Wohlfahrt Waldblumen Aronstab.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 983 Wohlfahrt Waldblumen Goldnessel.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 984 Wohlfahrt Waldblumen Türkenbund.jpg
- File:DBP 1978 985 Wohlfahrt Waldblumen Leberblümchen.jpg
_1975,_MiNr_514.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Zu File:DBP 1976 877 Hans Sachs.jpg: Die Abbildungen stammen aus dem 16. Jahrhundert ({{PD-old-100-expired}}), die Schriftzeichen erreichen keine Schöpfungshöhe ({{PD-ineligible}}). Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination. The Hans Sachs drawings are not exact reproductions, but recreations, apparently Schillinger's work, but they follow the original very closely, so I don't think they're sufficiently original for their own copyright. I've therefore kept the Hans Sachs Stamp. A few stamps from 1963 and 1964 will enter the public domain in Germany 70 years after publication (with {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}), they can be restored in 2059 and 2060. I've added notes and categories. --Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Heinz Schillinger
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany stamps of this country are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the artist. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2,079 since the artist, Heinz Schillinger, died in 2008. If not longer due to the copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave it up to the closing administrator to decide which term should apply.
- File:DBP 1986 1274 Jugend Augenoptiker.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1275 Jugend Maurer.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1276 Jugend Friseur.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1277 Jugend Bäcker.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1315 Jugend Installateur.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1316 Jugend Zahntechniker.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1317 Jugend Fleischer.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1318 Jugend Buchbinder.jpg
- File:DBP 1990 1455-1458-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1455-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1456-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1457-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1458-R-max-und-moritz.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1484-1487-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1484-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1485-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1486-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1487-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1512-1519-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1512-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1513-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1514-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1515-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1516-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1517-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1518-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1519-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1602-1606-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1602-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1603-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1604-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1605-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1606-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1627-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1630-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1631-1635-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1631-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1632-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1633-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1634-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1635-R.JPG
- File:DBPB 1968 322 Puppe.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 323 Puppe.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 324 Puppe.jpg
- File:DBPB 1968 325 Puppe.jpg
- File:DBPB 1969 348 Zinnfigur 1835.jpg
- File:DBPB 1969 349 Zinnfigur 1850.jpg
- File:DBPB 1969 350 Zinnfigur 1850.jpg
- File:DBPB 1969 351 Zinnfigur 1860.jpg
- File:DBPB 1971 412 Kurbelmännchen.jpg
- File:DBPB 1971 413 Ritter auf Pferd.jpg
- File:DBPB 1971 414 Hampelmann.jpg
- File:DBPB 1971 415 Schaukelamme.jpg
- File:Dorfkirche Bochum-Stiepel Briefmarke 2008.jpg
- File:DPAG-2005-1200JahreMagdeburg.jpg
- File:DPAG1998-04-16-MarkgraeflichesOpernhausBayreuth.jpg
- File:DPAG1998-Noerdlingen.jpg
- File:DBP - 200 Jahre Hölderlin - 30 Pfennig - 1970.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2274 Museumsinsel Berlin.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1972, MiNr 435.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1972, MiNr 436.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1972, MiNr 437.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1972, MiNr 438.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 473.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 474.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 475.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 476.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 481.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 488.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 489.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 490.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 491.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 510.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 511.jpg
_1972,_MiNr_435.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1972,_MiNr_436.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1972,_MiNr_437.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1972,_MiNr_438.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1974,_MiNr_473.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1974,_MiNr_474.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1974,_MiNr_475.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1974,_MiNr_476.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1974,_MiNr_481.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_488.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_489.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_490.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_491.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_510.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_511.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 00:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Robert Weemeyer: It's massively rude and just convolutes the discussion to comment inside of someone else's comments, and we aren't suppose to modify each others comments anyway. Plus it's not clear what images your talking about to begin with. So can you just write a single message underneath the nominations and list what files you want kept instead of doing it inline by editing my nomination comments? Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Zu File:DPAG-2005-1200JahreMagdeburg.jpg: Der Holzschnitt stammt aus dem 15. Jahrhundert ({{PD-old-100-expired}}), die Schriftzeichen erreichen keine Schöpfungshöhe ({{PD-ineligible}}). Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wiederherstellung meines von Adamant1 kommentarlos gelöschten Diskussionsbeitrages zu File:DBP 1990 1455-1458-R.JPG, File:DBP 1990 1455-R.JPG, File:DBP 1990 1456-R.JPG, File:DBP 1990 1457-R.JPG und File:DBP 1990 1458-R-max-und-moritz.JPG: Die Zeichnungen dieser fünf Dateien stammen aus dem 19. Jahrhundert ({{PD-old-100-expired}}), die Schriftzeichen erreichen keine Schöpfungshöhe ({{PD-ineligible}}). Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, kept 6 per Robert Weemeyer. --Rosenzweig τ 15:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Heinz Schillinger
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Heinz Schillinger, died in 2008. So the images are copyrighted until at least 2079, if not longer due to their copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide.
- File:DBP 1979 1014 Internationale Verkehrsausstellung IVA.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1023 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1024 Wohlfahrt Rotbuche.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1025 Wohlfahrt Stieleiche.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1026 Wohlfahrt Weißdorn.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1027 Wohlfahrt Bergkiefer.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1051 Confessio Augustana.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1052 Naturschutzgebiete.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1059 Wohlfahrt Ackerwildkräuter Hornköpfchen.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1060 Wohlfahrt Ackerwildkräuter Ranken-Platterbse.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1061 Wohlfahrt Ackerwildkräuter Kornrade.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1062 Wohlfahrt Ackerwildkräuter Träubelhyazinthe.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1065 FIP-Kongress für Philatelie und Postgeschichte Kleinbogen.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1065 FIP-Kongress für Philatelie und Postgeschichte.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1087 Umweltschutz.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1090 Jugend Borda-Kreis.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1091 Jugend Spiegelfernrohr.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1092 Jugend Binolularmikroskop.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1093 Jugend Oktant.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1108 Wohlfahrt Wassernuss.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1109 Wohlfahrt Seekanne.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1110 Wohlfahrt Wasserfeder.jpg
- File:DBP 1981 1111 Wohlfahrt Wasserlobelie.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1150 Wohlfahrt Teehybride.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1151 Wohlfahrt Floribunda.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1152 Wohlfahrt Bourbonrose.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1153 Wohlfahrt Polyantha-Hybride.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1168 Jugend Reitwagen.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1169 Jugend NSU.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1170 Jugend Megola Sport.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1171 Jugend BMW.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 04:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Heinz Schillinger
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Heinz Schillinger, died in 2008. So the images are copyrighted until at least 2079, if not longer due to their copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide.
- File:DBP 1985 1242 Jugend Draisine Laufmaschine.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1243 Jugend NSU Germania Hochrad.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1244 Jugend Kreuzrahmen-Niederrad.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1245 Jugend Adler-Dreirad.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1250 Limburger Dom.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1255 Mophila.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1255,1256 Mophila.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1256 Mophila.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1264 Eisenbahn Johannes Scharrer.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1268 Automobil.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 512.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1975, MiNr 513.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 517.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 518.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 519.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 520.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 524.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 525.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 526.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1976, MiNr 527.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 544.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 545.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 546.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 547.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 556.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 557.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 558.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1977, MiNr 559.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1978, MiNr 573.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1978, MiNr 574.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1978, MiNr 575.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1978, MiNr 576.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 607.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 608.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 609.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 610.jpg
_1975,_MiNr_512.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1975,_MiNr_513.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_517.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_518.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_519.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_520.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_524.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_525.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_526.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_527.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_544.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_545.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_546.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_547.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_556.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_557.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_558.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_559.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_573.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_574.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_575.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_576.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_607.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_608.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_609.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_610.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 04:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Vermerk: File:DBP - Bronzekultwagen - 30 Pfennig - 1976.jpg wurde aktuell zur Schnelllöschung vorgeschlagen. Sollte diese Datei gelöscht werden, so kann auch sie 2079 wiederhergestellt werden. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Harry Prieß
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer Harry Priess seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date.
- File:Briefmarken BD111.jpg
- File:DDR 1962 Michel 898.JPG
- File:DDR-1964-001.jpg
- File:DDR-1964-002.jpg
- File:DDR-1964-003.jpg
- File:DDR-1964-005.jpg
- File:DDR-1968-001.jpg
- File:DDR-1968-002.jpg
- File:DDR-1968-003.jpg
- File:DDR-1968-004.jpg
- File:DDR-1968-005.jpg
- File:DDR-1968-006.jpg
- File:Stamp GDR 1966 Michel 1209.JPG
- File:Stamp GDR 1966 Michel 1223.JPG
- File:Stamp GDR 1966 Michel 1224.JPG
- File:Stamp GDR 1966 Michel 1226.JPG
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1960, MiNr 0768.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1960, MiNr 0769.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1960, MiNr 0770.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1960, MiNr 0771.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1004.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1005.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1006.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1007.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1008.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1966, MiNr 1209.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1966, MiNr 1220.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1966, MiNr 1221.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1966, MiNr 1226.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1411.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1412.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1413.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1414.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1415.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1416.jpg
_1960,_MiNr_0768.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1960,_MiNr_0769.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1960,_MiNr_0770.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1960,_MiNr_0771.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1004.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1005.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1006.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1007.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1966,_MiNr_1209.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1966,_MiNr_1220.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1966,_MiNr_1221.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1966,_MiNr_1226.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1411.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1412.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1413.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1414.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1415.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1416.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Prieß is named on the pre-1966 stamps, so all files can be restored 70 years pma. --Rosenzweig τ 19:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the artist of these stamps, Heinz Schillinger, died in 2008. So the images are copyrighted until at least 2079. If not longer due their copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide.
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1973, MiNr 789.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 704 Goslar.jpg
- File:DBP 1972 746 Helgoland.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 787 Saarbrücken.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 788 Aachen.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 789 Bremen.jpg
- File:DBP 1973 761 Hamburg.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1973, MiNr 761.jpg
- File:DBP 1971 678 Nürnberg.jpg
- File:Briefmarke BD128.jpg
- File:DBP 1970 622 Oberammergau.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1973, MiNr 787.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1969, MiNr 603.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 622.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 649.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1970, MiNr 654.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1971, MiNr 678.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1971, MiNr 704.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1972, MiNr 747.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1973, MiNr 762.jpg
_1973,_MiNr_789.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_761.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_787.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1969,_MiNr_603.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_622.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_649.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_654.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_678.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_704.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1972,_MiNr_747.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_762.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 06:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Hans Günter Schmitz
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In this case the designer, Hans Günter Schmitz, is still alive. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.
- File:DBP 1990 1452-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1494-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1544-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1644-R.JPG
- File:DBP 25. Todestag Konrad Adenauer 100 Pfennig 1992.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2090 Albert Schweitzer.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Deutscher Fußballmeister.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2083 DGB.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2089 Expo 2000.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2101 Friedrich Ebert.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2102 Filmfestspiele Berlin.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2130 EXPO 2000.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 Block54 Gesundheit.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2163 Albert Lortzing.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2171 Wuppertaler Schwebebahn.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2185 Europa Wasser.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2200 Herz-Kreislauf-Krankheiten.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2201 Krebserkrankungen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2202 Infektionskrankheiten.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2203 Depressionen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2216 Jüdisches Museum Berlin.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1988, MiNr 801.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1988, MiNr 802.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1988, MiNr 803.jpg
_1988,_MiNr_801.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_802.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_803.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 07:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, kept one as below COM:TOO Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 08:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not "possibly" but certainly. Either as a derivative work from the book cover, or as the professional promo photo, take your pick. --2003:C0:8F28:E000:8893:1AB9:3694:4BF3 15:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope / copyvio: plain text content and unsourced images. Omphalographer (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope / potential copyvio: plain text content, uploader's username doesn't match name in document. Omphalographer (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Bruno Petersen
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. I wasn't able to find any information about the artist Bruno Petersen, but I assume they haven't been dead for 70+ years since the stamps were published in the mid 1950s. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can figure out if and when he died.
- File:GDR-stamp Friedensfahrt 10 1955 Mi. 470.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Friedensfahrt 20 1955 Mi. 471.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Arbeiterbewegung 60 1955 Mi. 478.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Bodenreform 5 1955 Mi. 481.JPG
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955 MiNr 482.jpg
- File:GDR-stamp Bodenreform 20 1955 Mi. 483.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Friedensfahrt 10 1956 Mi. 521.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Friedensfahrt 20 1956 Mi. 522.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Sportfest 1956 Mi. 530.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Sportfest 1956 Mi. 531.JPG
- File:GDR-stamp Sportfest 1956 Mi. 532.JPG
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1954, MiNr 0426.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1954, MiNr 0427.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0470.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0471.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0477.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0481.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0482.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0483.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0521.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0522.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0527.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0530.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0531.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0532.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1956, MiNr 0533.jpg
_1955_MiNr_482.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1954,_MiNr_0426.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1954,_MiNr_0427.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1955,_MiNr_0470.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1955,_MiNr_0471.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1955,_MiNr_0477.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1955,_MiNr_0481.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1955,_MiNr_0482.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1955,_MiNr_0483.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0521.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0522.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0527.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0530.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0531.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0532.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1956,_MiNr_0533.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Petersen is named on all these stamps, so 70 years pma apply in Germany. File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1955, MiNr 0477.jpg and File:GDR-stamp Arbeiterbewegung 60 1955 Mi. 478.JPG also name Eigler, that is Kurt Eigler (1911–1982), so these two stamps are protected until at least the end of 2052 in Germany. US copyrights for these 1954, 1955 and 1956 stamps run to the end of 2049, 2050, and 2051, respectively. Since we don't know when Petersen died, the files can be restored after 120 + 1 years with {{PD-old-assumed}}, in 2075, 2076, and 2077. If Petersen's year of death is found, they can be restored 70 years pma, but not before the respective US copyrights and Eigler's copyright for the two stamps mentioned above run out, so in 2050, 2051, 2052, and 2053. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Jan Piwczyk
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the artist's death. In this case the artist, Jan Piwczyk, died in 1972. So the images are copyrighted until at least 2043, if not longer due to their copyright status being renewed by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide.
- File:DR 1943 860 Goldschmiedekunst.jpg
- File:DR 1943 861 Goldschmiedekunst.jpg
- File:DR 1944 864 Robert Koch.jpg
- File:DR 1944 887 Adolf Hitler 55.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 19 Aufdruck auf 332.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 20 Aufdruck auf 332.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 23 Aufdruck auf 336.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 26 Aufdruck auf 340.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 30 Aufdruck auf 348.jpg
- File:Generalgouvernement 1940 31 Aufdruck auf 349.jpg
- File:Znaczki GG 025.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- "70 years after the artist's death" means copyright runs out in 2042 and the stamps can be undeleted in 2043. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Good catch. I accidently typed a 7 instead of a 4. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. One could debate if the Generalgouvernement stamps are actually Polish or German, but since all artists are named on the stamps, the result is the same (70 years pma apply), and it does not matter in this case. File:DR 1944 887 Adolf Hitler 55.jpg was created together with Gottfried Klein (1904–1981), the Generalgouvernement stamps are with Wacław Boratyński (1908–1939), and the rest are with Ernst Rudolf Vogenauer (1897–1972). US copyrights for these 1940s stamps will expire at the end of 2039 or earlier. The stamp together with Gottfried Klein can be restored in 2052, the rest of the files can be restored in 2043. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Karl Hans Walter
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70+ years after the designer's death. In the case the stamps are designed by Karl Hans Walter and Gerhard Schulz. While I couldn't find any information about the later, Karl Hans Walter died in 1999. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2,070. If not longer depending on the URAA and when Gerhard Schulz died. Although I'm fine with the images being un-deleted in 2,070 if it's unclear how long Schulz has been dead for.
- File:Lorenz Werthmann (timbre RFA).jpg
- File:DBP 1954 202 Oberlin.jpg
- File:DBP 1954 203 Pappenheim.jpg
- File:Pappenheim Stamp 1954.jpg
- File:DBP 1954 200 Kollwitz.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Only File:DBP 1954 200 Kollwitz.jpg and File:Lorenz Werthmann (timbre RFA).jpg are by Walter and Gerhard Schulz, the other three are by Walter and Leon Schnell (1888–1961). All of them are named on the stamps, so 70 years pma do apply in Germany; US copyright for these 1954 stamps runs to the end of 2049. The Walter/Schnell stamps can be restored in 2070, while the Walter/Schulz stamps can be restored in 2075 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. If someone finds out when Schulz died, those two can be restored 70 years pma of either Walter or Schulz, whoever of them died later. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Александр Матвеев Николаевич (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyrighted?
- File:Zaporozhie-metro-map.gif
- File:Схема перспективного развития казанского метро.jpg
- File:Схема казанского метро.jpg
RZuo (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Clamed license not supported by source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Александр Матвеев Николаевич (talk · contribs)
[edit]attributed to various websites. no evidence of permission.
- File:Театральная Набережночелнинского метро.jpg
- File:Станция Мусы Джалиля.jpg
- File:774 км (оп), Татарстан.jpg
- File:Обсерватория (оп), Татарстан.jpg
- File:ВРД платформа.jpg
- File:Интерьер станции Зилант.jpg
- File:ВЛ80с на платформе 771 км.jpg
- File:Входной павильон станции "ЗИЛАНТ".jpg
- File:Проект станции Тулпар.jpg
- File:Входной павильон станции Академическая Казанского метро.jpg
- File:Пешеходный переход станции Академическая Казанского метро.jpg
- File:Кассовый зал станции Академическая Казанского метро.jpg
- File:Казанское метро в Trainz 12.jpg
,_%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RZuo (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 20:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giangphan15052004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, no source, no evidence of a free license.
- File:ĐT741 thị trấn Tân Phú, huyện Đồng Phú, tỉnh Bình Phước.jpg
- File:ĐT741, huyện Đồng Phú.jpg
- File:Thị trấn Thanh Bình, Bù Đốp.jpg
- File:Trung tâm hành chính Hớn Quản.jpg
- File:Vườn quốc gia Bù Gia Mập.jpg
- File:Huyện Bù Đốp nhìn từ xa.jpg
- File:Trung tâm thị trấn Lộc Ninh.jpg
- File:Thị trấn Đức Phong.jpg
- File:Tuyến QL91 quận Bình Thủy.jpg
- File:Toà Vietcombank Bình Thủy, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:KTX Đại học Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Phường An Khánh, Ninh Kiều.jpg
- File:Toà nhà Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Toà nhà Sheraton Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Đại lộ Hoà Bình, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Phố CBD Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Khu chung cư 91B, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Khu dân cư Hưng Phú, Cái Răng.jpg
- File:Cầu vượt quận Cái Răng.jpg
- File:Nút giao IC3 Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Phố đi bộ Ninh Kiều, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Lê Hồng Phong, Bình Thủy, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Chợ đầu mối Cái Khế Cần Thơ nhìn từ trên cao.jpg
- File:Đặng Văn Dày, quận Bình Thủy.jpg
- File:Khu đô thị Stella Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Đường Trần Hoàng Na, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Phường Tân An, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:QL1, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Nút giao Võ Văn Kiệt - CMT8 - 918.jpg
- File:Khu đô thị Cái Khế.jpg
- File:Đường Võ Văn Kiệt, Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Khu đô thị Nam Long.jpg
- File:Khu dân cư Văn hoá Tây Đô.jpg
- File:Đôi bờ Cái Răng - Ninh Kiều.jpg
- File:Khu dân cư Hưng Thạnh, Cái Răng.jpg
- File:Toà Mobifone Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Thị trấn Thới Lai.jpg
- File:Thị trấn Thạnh An.jpg
- File:Chợ Thốt Nốt và khu dân cư chợ Thốt Nốt.jpg
- File:Các khối cơ quan thị xã Phước Long.jpg
- File:Đường Nguyễn Tất Thành, Phước Long, Bình Phước.jpg
- File:KDC phường Long Phước.jpg
- File:Khu hành chính Phước Long.jpg
- File:Khu hành chính.jpg
- File:TTTM thị xã Chơn Thành.jpg
- File:QL13 phường Thành Tâm, Chơn Thành.jpg
- File:Đường Nguyễn Hữu Cảnh.jpg
- File:QL91-Quận Thốt Nốt.jpg
- File:Chợ Thốt Nốt nhìn từ trên cao.jpg
- File:Phường Trung Kiên.jpg
- File:Hồ Long Thủy, TX. Phước Long.jpg
- File:Hồ Long Thủy nhìn từ Thác Mơ, Long Thủy.jpg
- File:Đường Cách Mạng Tháng Tám, quận Bình Thủy.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 20:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Miren Castle
[edit]Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free sgraffito by Lojze Čemažar (1950–). Architecture by Ivan Vurnik (d. 1971).
- File:1. postaja.jpg
- File:10. postaja.jpg
- File:11. postaja.jpg
- File:12. postaja.jpg
- File:13. postaja.jpg
- File:14. postaja.jpg
- File:2. Postaja.jpg
- File:3. postaja.jpg
- File:4. postaja.jpg
- File:5. postaja.jpg
- File:6. postaja.jpg
- File:7. postaja.jpg
- File:8. postaja.jpg
- File:9. postaja.jpg
TadejM (t/p) 12:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 20:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AgustínOlano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Thumbnail-sized, low-res, no metadata. Doubtful own work.
- File:737-700 Aerolineas Argentinas.jpg
- File:Embrear ERJ-190 Aerolineas Argentinas.jpg
- File:737-800 Aerolineas Argentinas.jpg
- File:AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS BOEING 737 MAX-8.jpg
- File:A330-200 Aerolineas Argentinas.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 20:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Festus K.A. Oppong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
- File:Wilberforce Asare Aboagye.jpg
- File:Festus Kwabena Asante Oppong.jpg
- File:Nana Achampong at AUCC.jpg
Trade (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Image 2 is in use on user page, uploader has some other edits, so this is allowed. Image 3 is in use, and Image 1 appears to be of somebody notable (even though the image is not currently in use). PaterMcFly (talk) 06:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, Logo of an artist CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, no useful categorization. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evident in scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as no permission (No permission since)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Heavily used upload from 2010, should be discussed. No evidence other than being small without EXIF. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not having exif is not, in itself, a reason for deletion. The image is not really good, which is in favor of this being the uploaders own work. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Here https://vk.com/photo-8926495_144760169 it was published earlier. FlorianH76 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Also here is an archive of photos from that event https://legendy.retrofm.ru/photo/2009/msk/1022 FlorianH76 (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; documented as being online before Commons upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as no permission (No permission since). Heavily used upload from 2010, should be discussed. No evidence other than being small without EXIF. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I see no reason to believe this cannot be the uploader's own work. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Reverse image search shows many other versions online. While in a short search I was not able to confirm any predated the 2010 upload to Commons, the only other upload by this user has already been deleted as a copyviol, no reason to think this is any better. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JustKevinBrown (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope?
- File:Icon of Soundrop.svg
- File:Personal Monogram of Kevin Brown.svg
- File:Kevin Brown in October 2019.jpg
- File:Kevin Brown's Signature.svg
Trade (talk) 01:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the Soundrop icon; https://soundrop.com/ is a potentially notable company. Delete the rest. Omphalographer (talk) 02:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination for File:Icon of Soundrop.svg--Trade (talk) 02:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 3 per nomination; kept 1 per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work. This photo was taken by Dave Edge, and published by himself at https://www.shipspotting.com/photos/1182816 in 2010, and with permisson/credit at http://www.tynebuiltships.co.uk/Z-Ships/zarian1947.html. Davidships (talk) 02:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not uploader's "own work". From a set taken by Fotoflite on 06/06/1982. Compare https://www.fotoflite.com/store/general-cargo-ship/lagos-palm-11-detail (specific image not shown on their current website, but can be be obtained if required) Davidships (talk) 02:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
lightbulb may meet threshold of originality. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 02:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license, author "I don't know". --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
delete only previous versions, as they had background that exceeded TOO which made it nonfree. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- agreed. Keep on newest version. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I have revision deleted the old logo, but I am not convinced that the current logo is simple enough to be PD-textlogo. Leaving for another admin to decide. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Only the background part was copyrightable. It has since been removed, so no need to delete this as its stylized letters appear to be under WP:TOO in Japan, as seen through the other below-TOO examples, whose lettering implies the inclusion of much more elaborate styles. Nacaru (talk) 17:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: most recent; older versions deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Psuedo-pixalation probably meets TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uncertain if over TOO:Japan. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
obvious copyvio. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
woman silhouette meets TOO, must confirm work via COM:OTRS. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
CGI 3D exceeds TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Still a simple logo IMO Fma12 (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Seems PD-text. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
wrong license, possible copyvio as it meets TOO and doubt origin of the file. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, license not supported by source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
TOO exceeding copyvio. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trade as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-oppo-rvo2&sca_esv=562487504&sxsrf=AB5stBg4Wv4Yazec_ZTw1OfYsOl9hYApig:1693819332862&q=atikur+rahman+mahi&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj9iJjd0JCBAxWMzDgGHc9xDRMQ0pQJegQIChAB&biw=360&bih=668&dpr=2#imgrc=kEHuPDNvr3PjYM. Clearly PD-text, but is it in scope? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. It's just someone's name written in a particular font (not really a signature as claimed). Marbletan (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio, https://pod.co/radio-hope-classic/gudstjanst-2021-02-21-pingstkyrkan-solna-predikan-olof-edsinger claims copyright and the uploader doesn't even claim to have taken the photo himself Tournesol (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Taken from Der Standard without permission. A.Savin 10:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- But does this rise above any threshold of originality? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is about the photo. No matter the quality or composition, the photographer always can claim copyright. --A.Savin 15:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Author of this photo (according to Der Standard) is: de:Heribert Corn. --A.Savin 15:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Question Is this considered a faithful reproduction of flat art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's a photograph. If you photograph something, you gain the copyright on the photoghraph, not on the subject photographed, you know? --A.Savin 00:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- In that case, why do we reject attempts by museums to copyright their reproductions of flat art? I really have never understood this area of Commons policy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know. Probably because scans are not copyrighted as such. This here is not a scan. It is a photograph by Heribert Corn, born in 1964 and still alive. --A.Savin 02:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Photographs by museums of their flat art that's public domain are not considered to be under copyright on this site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright violation, false claim of authorship, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Per precautionary, the user already uploader similar photo which is unfree. A.Savin 10:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Does this rise above any threshold of originality? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This is about the photo. No matter the quality or composition, the photographer always can claim copyright. --A.Savin 15:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
most probably not own work but a copyright violation (licence washing), see text lower left 2A01:599:A08:C642:DC38:4CC3:9D11:4926 11:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![11:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/11#c-2A01:599:A08:C642:DC38:4CC3:9D11:4926-20230911111100-File:Kara_Kamari_"Underwater_Beauty".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
![01:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/11#c-Infrogmation-20231005013900-File:Kara_Kamari_"Underwater_Beauty".jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot from Faebook HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Author died in 1977, will enter public domain in 2048. — Racconish 💬 15:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Seems a bit more complicated than the original deletion request postulates. The work is 1909, which would be public domain in the United States as the tag claims. Copyright law of the United States says if a work was first published abroad before the current lower limit year in PD-US-expired then it is also public domain in the United States. However, Wikimedia Commons requires most works to be public domain in their country of origin as well UNLESS it was a simultaneous publication. I'd like to point to E. H. Shepard deletion request for more info on this general topic. It is in the original French which doesn't mean that it wasn't published simultaneously in the United States, but we need more conclusive evidence that it was published in the United States. I looked at the 1909 copyright logs and found notices for works by the real life Henry Bataille, but not for this novel bearing his name. There are no returns for Denys Amiel, the author. To be diligent I also looked at the 1910 and 1911 logs. None of those years returned anything either for Amiel. So I have to say that this likely needs to be undeleted in 2048 which is 70+1 years after the death of Amiel. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Tagged as if it were published in USA, but was published in France. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Photoshopped hoax image. Possible copyvio. Adsci8 (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jevon dan pak presiden.jpg. Adsci8 (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The picture is a screen grab from the movie Sound Thoma and is not copyright free Jupitus Smart (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This image is used maliciously to discredit the person by uploading it to their wikipedia page claiming a possible connection to the Russian Federation and contains false information FishingCrazyFish (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, no useful categorization, dubious. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: A watermark is in the middle of the photograph CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The image presents an item from Eton College Library, which retains copyright of any images of its holdings. Eton did not find a record for any permission requests to reproduce this image online, and therefore it should be taken down the website. 82.113.237.68 13:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Copyfraud? Simple photograph of a more than 200 years old book. --Achim55 (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Achim55. If the original is out of copyright, institution holding a copy lacks authority to recopyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The photograph was taken by me at Eton -- I was in the library with camera and tripod. Under UK law the person making images holds the copyright to same. As noted above, the work is out of copyright. The person who states that "Eton college could not find any permission requests" is hardly our problem here, and the statement that Eton "retains copyright of any images of its holdings" is a nonsence. One of these kind of 'laws' made up by a certain type of person IP address: 82.113.237.68, has not joined the wiki club but they are sitting in Eton. For some reason, legal expertise is claimed, I guess it comes from watchining too much Rumpole. Frankly I am not vested in whether is stays or goes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zippymarmalade (talk • contribs) 13:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Brinkhoff/Moegenburg M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have permission to use and distribute this photo. I can upload a screenshot of the email from Ralf Brinkhoff Cosmomontoya (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Cosmomontoya: Uploading a screenshot is not the way to do it. We need a permission to use the file under a free license, sent by the photographer / rights holder per e-mail to COM:VRT and then confirmed. See details and e-mail address at COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 09:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks - I just sent the email from the photographer, Ralf Brinkmann, to you. Cheers Cosmomontoya (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Cosmomontoya: As far as I know, the photographer themselves must send the e-mail directly to COM:VRT, no forwarding allowed (apparently too many misunderstandings or misuse). --Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks - I just sent the email from the photographer, Ralf Brinkmann, to you. Cheers Cosmomontoya (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Cosmomontoya: Uploading a screenshot is not the way to do it. We need a permission to use the file under a free license, sent by the photographer / rights holder per e-mail to COM:VRT and then confirmed. See details and e-mail address at COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 09:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023091310006722 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 13:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Not useful/ out of scope. Uploaded while editing "Maartje karapetian" on nl.wikipedia.org; said page was deleted as it was out of scope. This orphan image should therefore also be considered as out of scope on Commons. Henxter (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bellesalces (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images without EXIF data and credit in watermark not matching the uploader.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Same image as in two other sites, one and another, so we need some proof of license. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Awful quality2806:101E:A:3558:28F4:7312:5E7F:66A6 05:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Perfectly usable as a thumbnail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: also DW. --Didym (talk) 14:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as no permission (No permission since)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Heavily used 2013 upload, should be discussed. The uploader was born in 1946, so it's not impossible that they took this 1983 film photo. What does everyone else think? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I tend to agree, but the uploader has a history of deleted uploads and seems to never react to messages on his talk page. Some of the uploads are clearly ok, but for others like this one, I wouldn't be so sure about the claims. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; unverified license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
doubt ownership, confirm via COM:OTRS Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation also includes https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:C%C3%B3digo_QR_del_Instituto_Gastron%C3%B3mico_Madeleine,_Mazatl%C3%A1n,_15_de_noviembre_de_2022_02.jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:C%C3%B3digo_QR_del_Instituto_Gastron%C3%B3mico_Madeleine,_Mazatl%C3%A1n,_15_de_noviembre_de_2022.jpg-2806:101E:A:3558:28F4:7312:5E7F:66A6 05:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Looks fine per COM:TOO Mexico, which shows very complex logos that are OK to upload to Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
As there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France, it needs to be discussed whether the depicted objects are below threshold of originality. Otherwise this image might be a unfree derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Ange Michel Déferlante b.jpg
- File:Ange Michel Chenille a.jpg
- File:Parc Ange Michel Tourbillon b.jpg
- further images in Category:Attraction du parc Ange Michel
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Errato caricamento. Immagine non ritagliata correttamente Adelvanga (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced Aitorembe (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, collage of unsourced images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced Aitorembe (talk) 18:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, inappropriate use of user page. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Biometric Match Between Ocomtún Mayan city in the Yucatán Peninsula and Visigoth Coins from the 6-8 Century AD.jpg
[edit]
Unsourced Aitorembe (talk) 18:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong file and wrong name Denis Gagne52 (talk) 20:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/badgreeb
[edit]These are clear professional photos from Flicker user badgreeb that I doubt they were taken by this user. The Flickr user uploaded several images with CC-BY license that are clear copyvios like A Hard Day's Night cover, With the Beatles cover, Yellow Submarine cover, etc. Other photos with CC-BY are well known like this one or this one. Other photos on his collection suggest he is a fan with a low spec camera [3] [4] [5] [6].
- File:Ringo Princes Trust (tall crop).jpg
- File:Ringo Princes Trust.jpg
- File:Tina Turner&Robert Cray.jpg
- File:Harrison and Clapton.jpg
- File:TinaTurner&Clapton.jpg
- File:George-Harrison-playing (tall crop).jpg
- File:George-Harrison-playing.jpg
- File:George Harrison playing.jpg
- File:Ringo starr.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Günther Frager (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There seem to be reasons to be suspicious of some of the flickr uploads by this user, but the on-stage images listed above don't really strike me as "clear professional photos". They are blurry and not particularly well composed. In cases like this, where the evidence is circumstantial, I am content to assume good faith. -- WikiPedant (talk) 18:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- I doubt they are amateur. For example, File:Ringo starr.jpg is by no means taken by an amateur nor by chance, File:TinaTurner&Clapton.jpg was given to VIP ticket during Turner's '96 wold tour, as indicated on this auction of signed photos [7], File:George-Harrison-playing.jpg according to [8] is credited to either Peter Stillor or Michael Putland, File:Harrison and Clapton.jpg is likely a screenshot from the documentary "The Second Annual Prince's Trust All-Star Rock Concert" by Keith McMillian [9], the other images from that event may also come from it. The full concert is available on Youtube, and there is an album. Günther Frager (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, and further spot checking. The Flickr user clearly puts a combination of images from various sources on their stream, including DW, copyviols taken from websites, without bothering to use correct licensing. Looking at the rest of their photo stream, appears unlikely that they are old enough to have been taken high quality photos of rock musicians from the early 1960s on (other photos from such decades of more mundane subjects would be expected). Sample reverse image search shows some of the photos online before Flickr upload. Flickr user is unreliable, frequent copyright violator. Images on their Flickr stream should not be assumed to be own work, and claimed licenses should not be assumed to be accurate. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I have added the Flickr user to Commons blacklist of Flickr users. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I doubt this is own work. Looking at https://tineye.com/search/0c872c8b211064a24b8af6d41c5c5c415af9ad86?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 it was on the web on Feb 10, 2019. Some other (now blocked) user managed to find the same image in higher resolution. Multichill (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; reverse image search shows it on stock image sites 2 years before upload to Commons. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Photo privée / personal content 109.130.216.46 20:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo by non-contributor, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no proper source (it is a link to EBay). It is not even clear the image was first published in the USA as it was premiered in the UK. Also this suggest the copyright belongs to KPA. Günther Frager (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no proper source (it is a link to Instagram). The film was a British production and was premiered in the UK. It is not even clear the country of origin is the USA. Without a full information it was first published in the USA and without a copyright notice we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
This image is used maliciously to discredit the person by uploading it to their wikipedia page claiming a possible connection to the Russian Federation and contains false information FishingCrazyFish (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
This image is used maliciously to discredit the person by uploading it to their wikipedia page claiming a possible connection to the Russian Federation and contains false information FishingCrazyFish (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
This image is used maliciously to discredit the person by uploading it to their wikipedia page claiming a possible connection to the Russian Federation and contains false information FishingCrazyFish (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ARMcgrath as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: reqested to have these pics taken off
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:AceVonJohnson12023.jpg
- File:Johnny Martin Bass 2.jpg additional claim "remove for potential legal reasons"
- Keep No reason for deletion specified. Yann (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Commons licenses are irrevocable and these are useful. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
juste pour besoin de formation Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Elle devrait être supprimée car je n'en ai aucun droit sur cette image et je n'ai eu aucune autorisation pour pouvoir la publier sur d'autres sites, donc pour éviter d'être poursuivi en justice par l'auteur, je voudrais la supprimer. Carlosbfta (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, but the content of this information-board is above COM:TOO and unfortunately, in Italy there is no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry I overlooked that--Oursana (talk) 09:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Misci (Lungiarü) 15.jpg
- File:Misci (Lungiarü) 4.jpg
- File:Seres (Lungiarü)23 Map.jpg
- File:Seres (Lungiarü)24 Map.jpg
- File:Seres (Lungiarü)40.jpg
- File:St. Martin in Thurn, Longariu, Val di morins.jpg
- File:Val di morins Doppelmühle.jpg
_15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
23_Map.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
24_Map.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
40.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- As Italy seems to have a high Threshold of originality, it might discussed for each of the listed image whether the depicted item is or is not above TOO-Italy. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think that helps in these cases, and unfortunately, I believe all these images will have to be deleted as above that threshold. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Homerethegreat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works. Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. You also have to fix the author, source, date, and license.
- File:חנא רובינא דונה איזבלה יצחק פרקנל.png
- File:Eliyahu Isaac Frenkel Frenel.png
- File:Jaffa1935FrenkelFrenel.png
- File:Frenkel Frenel The prophet Elisha הנביא אלישע יצחק פרנקל.jpg
- File:Shabtai Levy Yitzhak Frenkel.jpg
- File:The Country and its Fruits 1938 by Isaac Frenkel.jpg
- File:בית הכנסת חורבה בירושלים Hurva Synagogue by Yitzhak Frenkel יצחק פרנקל.jpg
- File:משה הלוי האוהל הבימה Theatre Director Moshe Halevy ציור של יצחק פרנקל by Yizthak Frenkel.jpg
- File:אלוף אבידן Israeli General Shimon Avidan 1941.jpg
- File:Alexandre Yitzhak Frenkel Abstract.jpg
- File:Alexandre Yitzhak Frenkel Abstract 2.jpg
- File:JerusalemDomeFrenkel.jpg
- File:תל חי 1920 לאחר מאורעות Tel Hai after Attack.jpg
- File:Marcel Marceau 1958 Painter- Frenkel Frenel.jpg
- File:צפת פרנקל Safed Frenkel.jpg
- File:תאטרון פרנקל Frenkel Frenel Theatre.jpg
- File:Rolly Schaffer רולי שפר עץ זית.jpg
- File:Rolly Schaffer ציור צפת רולי שפר.jpg
- File:רולי שפר.jpg
- File:Ilana, Fourth Wife of Frenkel Frenel אילנה אשתו הרביעית של יצחק פרנקל.jpg
- File:Paris 1920s 1930s Frenkel Frenel.jpg
- File:ישיבת המטכ"ל הראשונה First IDF Committee Meeting, Frenkel Frenel 1948, יצחק פרנקל.jpg
File:Frenkel Frenel with Alain Poher Orangerie.jpg- File:Frenkel Frenel and Alain Poher Orangerie.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Would you like the copyright holder to email you directly? Or permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? Thank you. Homerethegreat (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please note, that I have fixed in the files the author, date... Homerethegreat (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011203 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011285 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011301 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011356 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011427 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011454 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023112210011463 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
The emojis may be copyrighted Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is something I generated with Midjourney. I further edited the image in my Canva account and the emojis included are from their elements. According to Canva's section on content licences and commercial use, I'd be free to use their materials for commercial purposes, so I figured a non-commercial purpose would be just as fine. If an ultimate decision-maker here disagrees with my interpretation, OK. I'm just responding! Canva also say if you’re the creator of an original design, you’re also its copyright holder. But if you used third-party content (e.g. stock media from the Canva library) in your design, your ownership is subject to those third-party rights," but again, I am not claiming ownership, this Wiki image is released as a public domain design. GH Images (talk) 13:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think the issue here would lie in the emoji. Canva states that your work is subject to 3rd party rights. You are releasing your work as public domain, because you are the copyright holder. Under Canva's license agreement, which the emojis in this image are subject to, they state that you are not allowed to "remove any notice of copyright, trade-mark or other proprietary right from any Content or Canva Design". These emojis seem to violate that part of the agreement since you are releasing the entire work under a CC0 waiver. The options are to return to Canva and find other emojis under a CC0 waiver that they have already put into the system, or to try out another source like OpenMoji which is a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. This would limit you to sharing it under the same terms. But would still allow you to openly share them.
- But in this case I believe this image has to be deleted. Delete MonkeyBBGB (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- The vomiting face emoji is definitely from the open-source Twemoji set (compare https://emojipedia.org/twitter/twemoji-15.0.1/face-vomiting). Omphalographer (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at it, it seems like the Twemoji's are CC-BY-4.0 license. So Canva is utilizing those, but not properly listing it it seems. Yes the vomit emoji is in Twemoji's list, but I don't see the other three. Would still recommend re-doing and re-uploading. Still delete this current image. Thanks for the clarity on Twemoji source :) MonkeyBBGB (talk) 03:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- The vomiting face emoji is definitely from the open-source Twemoji set (compare https://emojipedia.org/twitter/twemoji-15.0.1/face-vomiting). Omphalographer (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Geen toestemming, zie https://www.mirjampol.com/galerij/ en https://www.mirjampol.com/algemene-voorwaarden/ Thieu1972 (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- rechten zijn in bezit van Mirjam Pol. Aangezien ik haar PR/Marketing verzorg ben ik, namens Mirjam Pol, gerechtigd deze beelden te gebruiken. Sabine weghorst (talk) 11:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture from the internet, not own work Leokand (talk) 06:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Question @Leokand: Can you help by pointing to where on the internet this came from? I've tried reverse image searching on Tineye and google images, and I'm not finding any matches to non-Wikimedia sites. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no proof of copyvio. —holly {chat} 18:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not PD-Pakistan. East Pakistan is today's Bangladesh, Bangladeshi law applies, the work is still in copyright in Bangladesh until 2031 and in the US until 2066. -Mehedi Abedin 14:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Mehediabedin The photo is dated 7 March 1971. Bangladesh was fully liberated on 16 December 1971. Its declaration of independence was on 26 March 1971. Other countries began to recognize Bangladesh in December 1971, with Bhutan and India being the first to recognize Bangladesh on 6 December. So PD-Pakistan clearly does apply on 7 March 1971. This photo is from his speech on 7 March 1971, which was in the final days of a united Pakistan. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 08:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Please close this nomination because the date falls within the period of a united Pakistan (and hence falls under PD-Pakistan), when East and West Pakistan were together. The photo is from 7 March 1971, which was in the final days of a united Pakistan. 7 March 1971 is considered a Pakistani period by both Pakistan and Bangladesh. Moreover, Bangladesh became effectively independent on 16 December 1971 after Pakistan surrendered.--Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- You don't understand the point. The timeline doesn't matter here. The matter is the current country. The copyright law of the current country will apply here. Mehedi Abedin 12:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- And we have examples for this. See here and here. Even I uploaded historical photos without knowing that and for this some of my uploaded photos removed from Commons. That's how it works. Mehedi Abedin 12:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- You are basically claiming that Bangladesh was never part of Pakistan. Your nomination is politically-motivated as usual. Bangladeshi law does not apply retrospectively. Its called the non-retroactivity principle. Mehediabedin is not a legal or historical expert by any means. Under the Bangladesh Copyright Act, this photograph will not fall under such a category because it's not an artistic work depicting a painting or cinema. Its a simple photograph which was taken pre-Bangladesh and its copyright has expired. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Well, let me clear things:
- Am I basically claiming that Bangladesh was never part of Pakistan? - No, we are talking about copyright law and its implementation in commons, not history. I can see it is you who trying to make the nomination the topic of controversy to distract from the nomination process.
- Your nomination is politically-motivated as usual. - An unjust accusation or so called "claim" without valid reason. Remember that not all Bangladeshi photographs under PD-Pakistan wasn’t nominated for deletion by me. There were many users who knows the fact that photos from Pakistan period is under PD-Bangladesh. And they nominated many of these photos for deletion.
- Bangladeshi law does not apply retrospectively. Its called the non-retroactivity principle. Mehediabedin is not a legal or historical expert by any means. - Well tell that to administrators who deleted many Bangladeshi photographs licensed under PD-Pakistan. I am not expert, but they did the work and that's how Wikimedia commons work.
- Under the Bangladesh Copyright Act, this photograph will not fall under such a category because it's not an artistic work depicting a painting or cinema. - Well that was only an example. There I provided another example where the photo was deleted. And we can find many examples.
- Its a simple photograph which was taken pre-Bangladesh and its copyright has expired. - And again you didn't understand the point. The photo was taken in East Pakistan which is now Bangladesh. And that's why copyright of Bangladesh will be applicable here.
- There is a possibility that after clearing this point you will not still understand and make bassless accusations against me like that time you made in English Wikipedia. But still okay for me. Mehedi Abedin 13:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am sure you understand that Wikimedia policy relies on local law. Bangladeshi law will not apply retrospectively to this photograph because this is not an artistic work or cinematic work. Under the Bangladesh Copyright Act 2000, copyright will extend to artistic and cinematic work only. In this case, this is a non-artistic, non-cinematic photograph on 7 March 1971 which falls under PD-Pakistan. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- We are not talking about cinematic work. We are talking about a photograph which falls under Bangladeshi law. See here to see how the copyright law apply for the photo. And unfortunately it doesn't fall under PD-Pakistan. And for the same reason many non-fictional works under PD-Pakistan were removed from commons. For another example, see this ongoing deletion nomination (not nominated by me). And there are many examples where photos were removed. Mehedi Abedin 06:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Bangladesh Copyright Act 2000 is not retroactive. Hence, only PD-Pakistan applies. Your other examples have different conditions. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Well let's see if the administrators agree with your point. Mehedi Abedin 09:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Bangladesh Copyright Act 2000 is not retroactive. Hence, only PD-Pakistan applies. Your other examples have different conditions. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- We are not talking about cinematic work. We are talking about a photograph which falls under Bangladeshi law. See here to see how the copyright law apply for the photo. And unfortunately it doesn't fall under PD-Pakistan. And for the same reason many non-fictional works under PD-Pakistan were removed from commons. For another example, see this ongoing deletion nomination (not nominated by me). And there are many examples where photos were removed. Mehedi Abedin 06:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am sure you understand that Wikimedia policy relies on local law. Bangladeshi law will not apply retrospectively to this photograph because this is not an artistic work or cinematic work. Under the Bangladesh Copyright Act 2000, copyright will extend to artistic and cinematic work only. In this case, this is a non-artistic, non-cinematic photograph on 7 March 1971 which falls under PD-Pakistan. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Well, let me clear things:
- You are basically claiming that Bangladesh was never part of Pakistan. Your nomination is politically-motivated as usual. Bangladeshi law does not apply retrospectively. Its called the non-retroactivity principle. Mehediabedin is not a legal or historical expert by any means. Under the Bangladesh Copyright Act, this photograph will not fall under such a category because it's not an artistic work depicting a painting or cinema. Its a simple photograph which was taken pre-Bangladesh and its copyright has expired. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- And we have examples for this. See here and here. Even I uploaded historical photos without knowing that and for this some of my uploaded photos removed from Commons. That's how it works. Mehedi Abedin 12:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- You don't understand the point. The timeline doesn't matter here. The matter is the current country. The copyright law of the current country will apply here. Mehedi Abedin 12:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The discussion of Pakistan vs. Bangladesh misses the point. The uploader seems to be claiming that the photo was first published in Pakistan during 1971 (although he has presented no evidence to that effect). If what he claims is true, however, then following the steps of Commons:PD files#Determination of public domain in US (and copyrights) leads one to the conclusion in step 4 that the image is under copyright in the US until the end of 2066, and thus may not be on commons. The uploader has previously demonstrated a lack of understanding of copyright on multiple occasions. --Worldbruce (talk) 08:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: It doesn't matter if Pakistani or Bangladeshi law applies; in either case, the photo became PD after the URAA restoration date (1996), so it's protected until 2067 in the US. —holly {chat} 18:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: The photo was originally licensed under CC-BY-SA according the "Flickr License History". Since CC licenses are not revocable, the preceding license is still valid. {{Flickr-change-of-license}} added. Larryasou (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep reasoning above. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept CC licensse are irrevocable. Larryasou (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)}}
Geen toestemming, zie https://www.mirjampol.com/galerij/ en https://www.mirjampol.com/algemene-voorwaarden/ Thieu1972 (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- rechten zijn in bezit van Mirjam Pol. Aangezien ik haar PR/Marketing verzorg ben ik, namens Mirjam Pol, gerechtigd deze beelden te gebruiken. Sabine weghorst (talk) 11:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- In dat geval moet je niet op de website zetten dat niets mag worden overgenomen door derden. Je zult dan een licentie moeten plaatsen die gelijk is aan de licentie van Commons. Thieu1972 (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Kan je mij dat uitleggen? Het beeldmateriaal komt uit haar eigen bestand maar staat inderdaad ook op haar website maar daar is het niet vanaf gehaald.
- Mirjam Pol heeft de rechten van dit beeldmateriaal (dat ook op haar website staat) afgekocht om vrij van rechten te mogen gebruiken. In haar algemene voorwaarden op de website staat: “Het is niet toegestaan beeld- of tekstmateriaal te gebruiken of te kopiëren”.
- Aangezien het haar eigen beelden zijn mag ze deze toch zelf wel gebruiken voor bijvoorbeeld publicatie op wikipedia? Sabine weghorst (talk) 07:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- PS: In overleg met Mirjam Pol hebben we besloten dat we de twee beelden die wij nu hebben geplaatst (en die nog niet door jullie zijn goedgekeurd) willen verwijderen en daarvoor in de plaats twee andere beelden willen plaatsen op haar wikipedia-pagina. Sabine weghorst (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bedenk je je wel dat je door plaatsing van dit soort foto's op Commons het ook toestaat dat ik de foto's commercieel hergebruik en op mokken en t-shirts kan afdrukken? Plaatsing op Commons betekent namelijk vrijgave voor alles en iedereen, inclusief commercieel gebruik.
- Los daarvan: op basis van een gebruikersaccount die zegt dat alles in orde is, zal nooit worden gezegd 'ok, dan is het goed'. Je zult moeten met bewijzen moeten komen. Daar bestaat een procedure voor. Maar doe gewoon het makkelijkste dat er is: maak zelf een foto van haar, en plaats die alleen hier. Of: kijk eens hier, voor een uitleg over de mogelijkheden. Want uiteraard is een foto van Pol zeer gewenst. Thieu1972 (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oke, het is allemaal dus wat gecompliceerder dan gedacht. Ik begrijp de situatie nu beter. Dank voor de uitleg. Graag willen we (Mirjam en ikzelf) alleen de update van de tekst en de wedstrijdresultaten plaatsen zonder beeldmateriaal. Dat is mogelijk, toch?
- Op een later tijdstip bekijken we welk beeldmateriaal daarbij geplaatst kan worden. Sabine weghorst (talk) 12:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- De tekst aanpassen kan altijd. Alleen was de tekst die je tot nu toe hebt geplaatst, ook niet erg geschikt: veel te subjectief, niet zakelijk genoeg, geen afstand. Daarom raden we ook altijd af om iets te schrijven over een onderwerp waarbij je (financieel, emotioneel, juridisch) betrokken bent. Het gaat vrijwel altijd mis. Thieu1972 (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ik ga de tekst aanpassen zoals ook de persberichten met meer afstand, zonder emoties en zonder quotes. Kan ik in de laatste versie het fotomateriaal weghalen en de tekst aanpassen? Dan kan het kader met de wedstrijdresultaten behouden blijven? Sabine weghorst (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Goedemorgen, ik heb een nieuwe bewerking uitgevoerd op de pagina. Hoe lang duurt het voordat deze goedgekeurd wordt? Sabine weghorst (talk) 08:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- De tekst aanpassen kan altijd. Alleen was de tekst die je tot nu toe hebt geplaatst, ook niet erg geschikt: veel te subjectief, niet zakelijk genoeg, geen afstand. Daarom raden we ook altijd af om iets te schrijven over een onderwerp waarbij je (financieel, emotioneel, juridisch) betrokken bent. Het gaat vrijwel altijd mis. Thieu1972 (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- PS: In overleg met Mirjam Pol hebben we besloten dat we de twee beelden die wij nu hebben geplaatst (en die nog niet door jullie zijn goedgekeurd) willen verwijderen en daarvoor in de plaats twee andere beelden willen plaatsen op haar wikipedia-pagina. Sabine weghorst (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- In dat geval moet je niet op de website zetten dat niets mag worden overgenomen door derden. Je zult dan een licentie moeten plaatsen die gelijk is aan de licentie van Commons. Thieu1972 (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
The Flickr page is supposedly for the subject, and the EXIF data reveals photographer as "manu suarez @la diapo". Needs VRT from Manu Suarez in my opinion as the subject is not the copyright holder. Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hola, el autor de la foto es el titular de la cuenta de Flickr que cuenta con la licencia necesaria para ser utilizada en Wikimedia Commons, desde el fomento en que la fotografía se subió a su Flickr, y desde ahí se utilizó en Wikimedia. No veo el sentido del borrado cuando la foto cumple con la normativa para estar en Wikimedia Commons. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 21:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission is needed through VRT from the photographer, Manu Suarez, to be sure this file is licensed CCBYSA. --Ellywa (talk) 21:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
wrong date (he died in 2011). where is the photo from? Xocolatl (talk) 11:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Bolivia is a 50 year from creation or being made public jurisdiction. --RAN (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. In this case it is not shown when the image has been published for the first time. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 09:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=800565113#File%3AGuillermo_Kenning_Voss%2C_de_la_falange_boliviana.png){kind=link}
Undeleted by Yann after the UDR discussion most likely due to misunderstanding: there is no evidence in the discussion (nor in the undeletion rationale) that the image should be considered a collective work. Copyright term for other photos is independent on creation date. Ankry (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep OK. So we need to assume it was published at the time. Commons:Licensing#Old orphan works should cover this. Yann (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete We need to know when this was published as we don't have evidence this was a collective work. Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the license reads: "collective audiovisual or photographic work", I think people are reading it as: "collective audiovisual or collective photographic work". I have never heard of a "collective photographic work", one person chooses when to press the shutter button, and that person is the creator. I have never seen a copyright jurisdiction declare a single photographic image as a collective work. But I have seen "collective audiovisual" works, where a photomontage has a dozen images, each from a different photographer. We use photomontages here in the WikiUniverse, and we require that each creator be acknowledged. See:Category:Montages --RAN (talk) 19:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- COM: Bolivia says "Economic rights in collective audiovisual and photographic works, phonograms, broadcasting programs and computer or computing programs, shall last 50 years starting from their publication (emphasis mine), exhibition, fixation, transmission and utilization, as appropriate, or, if they have not been published, since their creation" Abzeronow (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- RAN has a very good point. There is no such thing as "collective photography". So this should be read as photographic work or collective audiovisual. Yann (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- A "photographic work and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication (or creation, whatever date is the latest)" (emphasis mine). --RAN (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please present evidence that this was created before 1946 and unpublished past 1995 or that this was published before 1946, because we also need evidence this is public domain in the US, which the UDR did not resolve. Abzeronow (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- We don't need a proof of publication. As mentioned before, photographic works get into public domain 50 years after publication or creation, whatever date is the latest. Guillermo Kenning Voss is not more than 30 here, so this is from 1947 or before. Yann (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Every image prior to an exif date and gps stamp has information estimated from clues in the images, we have half a dozen images of him at various dates including his wedding. In the image he appears about age 30. I am not seeing any significant evidence presented that the age estimate is wrong. Perhaps if you presented a reliable source dating the image differently, it could supersede our own estimate. For instance if the image came from his passport, we would have an exact date. --RAN (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
This is really complicated. First, the date. The image is dated to the end of the 1930s on several web sites, for example "Kenning a fines de los años treinta" here, so 1939 would be the year to base any calculations on.
As for Bolivia's copyright law, I looked at the original text in Spanish, and it appears that the English translation is somewhat confusing or even misleading, at least it is missing a comma. Per article 19 of the law, the 50 year term from publication/creation is valid for "las obras colectivas, audiovisuales y fotográficas, los fonogramas, los programas de radiodifusión y los programas de ordenador o computación" (collective works, audiovisual works, photographic works, phonograms, broadcasting programs and computer or computing programs). So there is this 50 year term for any photographic works, regardless of author. How that plays out in this case depends on the date of first publication. If in1939 (or not before 1990), the photo would be in the PD in Bolivia, and the URAA would not have restored its US copyright. If first published at a later date (before 1990), URAA restoration might have taken place, or it might even still be protected in Bolivia. We don't know the photograph's publication history, and we also don't really know what is considered "publication" in Bolivia besides the obvious ways of printed books / newspapers etc.
To make matters even more confusing, Bolivia is a member of the Andean Community, which has a common copyright jurisdiction. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Andean Community#Threshold of originality, the Andean Court ruled that "A simple photograph that does not meet the requirement of originality cannot be considered a photographic work and is consequently not protected by copyright." The case was about Peru I think, but it should be applicable to Bolivia as well. So simple photographs (as opposed to photographic works) are not protected by copyright. COM:TOO Andean Community notes that "An example of simple photographs is a simple portrait or taken in automatic booths." Is this a simple portrait as interpreted by courts in the Andean Community? I cannot really tell, I'd need examples to compare this with.
Since there are clearly (too) many unknowns here, we should probably go with {{PD-old-assumed}} and wait until 2060 unless we can find out more facts that enable us to come to another decision. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Rosenzweig. —holly {chat} 18:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)