Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/08/10
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Phpinjected (talk) 01:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused uncat personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Phpinjected (talk) 18:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: file had already been deleted on August 10 by Infrogmation, nominator now created an empty file page with the DR. --Rosenzweig τ 06:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by آیت الله محمدتقی پورمحمدی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly not own works
- File:امام جمعه مراغه.jpg
- File:محمد تقی پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:پایگاه نشر آثار و دروس آیت الله حاج شیخ محمدتقی پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:آیت الله حاج شیخ محمدتقی پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:آیت ... محمدتقی پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:حاج شیخ محمدتقی پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:آیت الله پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:آیت الله محمدتقی پورمحمدی.png
- File:محمدتقی پورمحمدی.jpg
- File:آیت الله محمدتقی پورمحمدی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Aleksander Oppenkowski (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Appeal. I think it doesn't violate anything! Kalisidina (talk) 15:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvio. --Yann (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Image already exists on Wikimedia as File:Roosevelt Elk at Northwest Trek.jpg, this author used the image as his own and incorrectly labeled it as an Alashan Wapiti.204.102.229.130 18:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Under an all-rights-reserved license per https://www.flickr.com/photos/vfh/13394059684/ C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, ARR @ https://flickr.com/photos/16092491@N00/13394059684. --Achim55 (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake license, non-free source website.
- File:Александр Викторенко.jpg
- File:Maria Kalashnik.jpg
- File:Иван Рыжиков.jpg
- File:Рубен Евгеньевич Симонов.jpg
- File:Сергей Пудовкин.jpg
- File:Локтев.jpg
- File:Неонила Белецкая.jpg
- File:Кирилл Дыцевич.jpg
- File:Ростислав Поточняк.jpg
- File:Александр Мерлин.jpg
- File:Тамара Попатенко.jpg
- File:Карен Аванесян.jpg
- File:Ефим Чемеровский.jpg
- File:Георгий Струве.jpg
- File:Филоненко.jpg
- File:Мулерман.jpg
- File:Irina Peter.jpg
- File:Нина Воронель.jpg
- File:Рената Муха.jpg
- File:Елена Бутенко.jpg
- File:Natalia-tenyakova 85.jpg
- File:Елена Леонова фигуристка.jpg
- File:Тереза Дурова 2.jpg
- File:Юрий Юрьевич Дуров.jpg
- File:Евгений Майхровский.jpg
- File:Тереза Дурова2.jpg
- File:Leningradski Dixieland.jpg
- File:Viktoriya Andreyanova.jpg
- File:Logo-3.1.png
Komarof (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete All the sources are the images themselves so it is impossible to see their license. Some of the uploads are from non trusted sources like VK or Twitter. Günther Frager (talk) 21:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LonerMovementInvestments01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:GodPrey - Umsamo (ft. Willy Greepsin) cover.jpg
- File:GodPrey - Umsamo (ft. Willy Greepsin).ogg
- File:GodPrey - Stimela (Official Audio).ogg
- File:GodPrey - Serve IVE (Official Audio).ogg
- File:GodPrey - Allen Farya (Prod by. Oscar Mbo & C-Black).ogg
- File:GodPrey & Vuss Vilanculos - Crazy (Cover).png
- File:LonerMovement Investments.png
Achim55 (talk) 08:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- i know. but i never shared any of the links. i think you might have the wrong idea of what im doing. im a just trying to keep my music safe and liscense. it is not my fault that i have a lot of work to liscence. i was expecting more of a complement based on how of hard work i put. LonerMovementInvestments01 (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Commons is not your webhost. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Under an all-rights-reserved license per https://www.flickr.com/photos/vfh/13394059684/ C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023081010007461 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I meant to post it on wikipedia! SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 05:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I meant to post this picture on Wikipedia only, and for some reason it posted on commons, so can this just be deleted please? SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 06:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
copy vio, maps is from Google Maps service Wiki Farazi (talk) 06:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded wrong new version of image I am David Fincher (talk) 10:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Riggwelter as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: According to VRT ticket 2023080110010171, the uploader claims ownership of the full copyright to this photo. This is not true; the uploader has only bought the right to use the photo, but not to release it under a free license. The photographer has not notified VRT of her intention to release it under any free license. This is therefor copyright infringment, and the photo must be deleted. The uploader has been notified through VRT ticket 2023080110008414. Yann (talk) 16:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- As per agreement between the photographer and the artist the artist has all the rights to the image you are referring to.
- However - the hassle with Wikipedia and the image has been draining and time consuming and there is now a new image of the artist on Wikipedia. I will delete the first image so you can calm down. Moreyskan (talk) 07:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: User request, i.e. [1]. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Blurry image, no useful description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep – I think this is objectively speaking a good image. That it's not in focus is an intentional effect, skillfully used by the creator of this image. I could also easily see this image used in the context of f.ex articles on mental health. In fact, I even added it to the Norwegian wikipedia article on Social alienation. That being said, it could definitely use a better description and categorisation. TommyG (talk) 07:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In scope Юрий Д.К 18:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Currently used on a Wikipedia project. Chamaemelum (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Now in use. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Mural no FoP in U.S.A Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Mural no FoP in U.S.A Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Samaanslife Viber
[edit]Most likely previously published on Viber social media as file names bear "Viber" name. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the originals overwrite these Viber-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-35-48-353.jpg
- File:Viber image 2023-02-20 10-32-32-764.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-35-49-450 (2).jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-35-49-450.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-36-44-205.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-37-08-787.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 23-44-27-359.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-34-53-941.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-37-07-814.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-37-09-412.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-37-09-955.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 23-44-27-026.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-35-46-772.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-36-42-043.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-35-50-479.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-11-24 18-36-44-575.jpg
- File:Viber image 2021-04-27 21-51-07-925 (2).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW of painting by modern artist Catherine de Saugy; unclear why uploader would have rights to license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
painting by modern artist; needs copyright holder permission if uploader is not the artist or confirmation if they are, via COM:VRT Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image without EXIF data, visual characteristics suggest screengrab. Also added:
--P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Per the description "Company headshot" and no indication of permission provided. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caballero AG (talk · contribs)
[edit]no indication of free license at source
- File:Subsecretario Victor Orellana.png
- File:Subsecretaria Veronica Silva.png
- File:Subsecretario Barrueto.png
- File:Subsecretaria Nicole Cardoch.png
- File:Subsecretaria Verónica Pardo.png
- File:Subsecretario Xavier Altamirano.png
- File:Subsecretario Salgado.png
- File:Subsecretario Claudio Reyes.png
- File:Subsecretario Boccardo.png
- File:Subsecretaria Albagli.png
- File:Subsecretaria Andrea Albagli.jpg
- File:Subsecretario Larraín.png
- File:Ministro Álvaro Elizalde (2023) (cropped).png
- File:Ministro Álvaro Elizalde (2023).jpg
Polarlys (talk) 15:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Old French photograph that's undated. Possibly public domain but we'd need a publication date to verify that. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This is derivative work Vera (talk) 16:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
1983 photograph from Pakistan. Not public domain in Pakistan or the US. Abzeronow (talk) 17:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angelo Campolo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright holders in metadata are "Valentina Pellitteri", "Michela Piccinini", or "GIANMARCO VETRANO": not consistent (even in camera models), possible copyvios.
- File:Angelo Campolo 88.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo 8.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo ww.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo w.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo wikipedia.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo, attore, regista.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo, attore e regista.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo, foto.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo 2021.jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo .jpg
- File:Angelo Campolo.jpg
- File:Angelo-Campolo foto.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 18:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The user can be the real Angelo Campolo, but he doesn't own the copyright of the photos he is in. As indicated the metadata states the copyright holders are the respective photographers. @Angelo Campolo you can contact the photographers and ask them to release the work under CC-BY, see COM:VRT for the details. Günther Frager (talk) 21:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Beatles in Almaty
[edit]The statue was installed in Almaty in 2007. Its author is Eduard Kazaryan. There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan.
- File:08 Скульптурная композиция "Памятная скамейка the Beatles" в парке на горе Кок Тюбе.jpg
- File:09 В парке на горе Кок Тюбе.jpg
- File:10 В парке на горе Кок Тюбе.jpg
- File:Beatles bench monument on Kok-Tobe Mountain..JPG
- File:Kazakhstan P9190588 002 (26251521578).jpg
- File:Kazakhstan P9190589 017 (39413755904).jpg
- File:Kok Tobe statue of Beatles 2022-06-17.jpg
- File:Statues of Beatles in Almaty 01.jpg
- File:Statues of Beatles in Almaty 02.jpg
- File:Statues of Beatles in Almaty 03.jpg
- File:The Beatles on Green Hill in Almaty, Kazakhstan.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 22:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Frank Zappa Memorial (Vilnius)
[edit]The statue is located in Vilnus since 1995. Its author is Konstantinas Bogdanas. There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania.
- File:Bust of Frank Zappa - Vilnius - Lithuania - 01 (27266485734) (2).jpg
- File:Bust of Frank Zappa - Vilnius - Lithuania - 02 (27266483604) (2).jpg
- File:Bust of Frank Zappa - Vilnius - Lithuania - 03 (27878031875) (2).jpg
- File:Bust of Frank Zappa - Vilnius - Lithuania - 04 (27878030085) (2).jpg
- File:Frank Zappa - Flickr - lostajy.jpg
- File:Frank Zappa Vilnius.jpg
- File:Popiersie Franka Zappy w Wilnie.jpg
- File:Zapp cu.jpg
- File:Zappa - Flickr - shawnzam.jpg
- File:Zappa Vilnius.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 22:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Iraq has never been part of the US. If Puerto Rico isn't on the map, Iraq shouldn't be on it either. 178.68.55.7 23:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fortunately, not in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
As well as:
- File:劊子手的下場に関する考察.pdf
- File:《北支派遣記念》写真帳の写真に関する考察.pdf
- File:所謂“南京大屠殺”の一枚の写真に関する考察.pdf
- File:南京戦に於ける上新河遭遇戦の死者に関する考察.pdf
- File:『陥都血涙録』に関する考察.pdf
- File:「南京大虐殺犠牲者名簿の壁」に関する考察.pdf
- File:100部隊が細菌戦実験を行っている写真に関する考察.pdf
- File:關於《北支派遣紀念》相冊照片的考察.pdf
Out of scope: plain text PDF content, and these documents all appear to be self-authored w:Nanjing Massacre denial material. Omphalographer (talk) 01:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, it seems these five files are based on GoogleEarth Screenshots which makes them CopyVios; compare GoogleMaps.
- File:Neighborhoods of Xico.jpg
- File:Xico II map.jpg
- File:Xico map.jpg
- File:Desembocadura Arroyo Artículo 123.jpg
- File:Territorial limit of Xico Leyva.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 23:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images or small crops from an unknown source, missing essential source info.
- File:Ney González Sánchez (IB).jpg
- File:Antonio Echevarría Domínguez (IB).jpg
- File:Roberto Sandoval Castañeda (IB).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel Navarro Quintero, (IB).jpg
- File:Antonio Echevarría García (IB).jpg
- File:Edgar Veytia Cambero (ID).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel Navarro Quintero, desfile 16-09-22.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not own works as stated:, screenshots missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. (Many more uploads by this user look suspicious...)
- File:Casa de Gobierno del Nayar.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Rosamorada.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Del Nayar.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Jala.jpg
- File:Presidencia Municipal de Ixtlán del Río.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Xalisco.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de San Blas.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Ruiz.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de San Pedro Lagunillas.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de La Yesca.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Santa María del Oro.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Valle de Banderas.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Tuxpan.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Tecuala.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Tepic.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Santiago Ixcuintla.jpg
- File:Embotelladora Coca-Cola del Nayar.jpg
- File:Embajada mexicana en Ucrania.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The chemical structure is incorrect - one of the phenyl rings is missing double bonds. We have correct high-quality alternatives including File:Imatinib in its binding site.svg and File:Binding interaction of imatinib.svg that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Factually incorrect replaced by factually correct. The replacement also has larger fonts (nom'ed is small and somewhat illegible), where actually reading the AA residue details is part of the EDUSE of this thing. DMacks (talk) 18:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Especially with File:Imatinib in its binding site.svg we have a high-quality 1:1 replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy Suhayl091 (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Personal image, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Suhayl091 (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Personal image, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The source website said "中華職棒 版權所有 © 2023 All right reserved." This file is not under CC-4.0 巴波 (talk) 07:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The source website said "中華職棒 版權所有 © 2023 All right reserved." This file is not under CC-4.0 巴波 (talk) 07:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The source website said "中華職棒 版權所有 © 2023 All right reserved." This file is not under CC-4.0 巴波 (talk) 07:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright holder Benoit GRANIER / Matignon Hektor (talk) 07:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Blurry image of a random road. Too low quality to be realistically useful. C messier (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not even showing a hotel! Casual snapshot, useless and worthless photo, part of the random uploads by Panoramio upload bot. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Company logo with no obvious educational purpose. The uploader intent is clearly advertisement. Tacsipacsi (talk) 10:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a work by Fars, file is obtained. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a work by Fars, file is obtained. (Mehr usually leaves the name of photographer empty when it recieves a file) HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a work by Tasnim, no photographer is credited and it does not mention they were taken by its reporter. No indication either. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
No photographer credited. No indication that it is a work by Tasnim. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sourceofgrace (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded with various names as author (including Reza Zamuni, Yasir Ghazvini, Rûdaw Research Centre, Ali Nasrallah, Adel Abdel Salih Abdel Hussein, Ali al-Fatlawi, Hussein M. R. Ali, etc.) but all tagged as "own work". The uploader is clearly not the copyright owner.
- File:Arbaeen 1996.jpg
- File:Saleh al-killidar.jpg
- File:Abdul Hussein al-Killidar.png
- File:Hashem Nasrallah.png
- File:Aref Nasrallah.png
- File:Hasan al-Shirazi.jpg
- File:Muhsin al-Qazwini.jpg
- File:Rouhani and Khoei.png
- File:Seyyedfadhilmilani.png
- File:Jawadalbalaghi.png
- File:Ali Sabziwari.jpg
- File:Aza al-Sada al-Khadam.jpg
- File:King Faisal I Abbas shrine.jpg
- File:Technocrat Lineup.jpg
- File:Mohaliadil.jpg
- File:Hakimabbas.jpg
- File:KCOC 1960s.jpg
- File:Faisal kilidar 1957.jpg
- File:Muhamedhusaynqazwini.jpg
- File:Mridhasistani.jpg
- File:Hashimqazwini.png
- File:Al-Modarresiyya.jpg
- File:Hadi al-Modarresi.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: File:King Faisal I Abbas shrine.jpg and File:Hashimqazwini.png which are PD by their age. --RAN (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most, kept the ones RAN mentioned. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Image clearly contradicts to Wikipedia's Advertising Guidelines (as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion) Mr.Doctor.No (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. This is Commons, not Wikipedia, though this video clip is used on a Wikipedia. But Mr.Doctor.No, why don't you edit the file description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the correction, perhaps I have not expressed myself clearly. Since the file evidently contains advertising, this still constitutes a violation of the Guidelines (please refer to this Link for the Commons Guidelines regarding advertising). Mr.Doctor.No (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- The file is in use. We don't delete files that are in use, even if the intent was to advertise, but you can edit the file description to eliminate advertising from it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claims. Low-quality files without EXIF and one screenshot from Facebook.
- File:زينب علي حمزة.jpg
- File:زينب علي.jpg
- File:زينب.jpg
- File:زوزاية.jpg
- File:زنوبة.jpg
- File:زينب العارضي العراقية.jpg
- File:مسرحية احذرو انه بينكم.jpg
- File:العارضي.jpg
- File:كربلاءزينب العارضي.jpg
- File:زينب العارضي احذروا.jpg
- File:زينب العارضي احذروا انه بينكم.jpg
- File:مسرححية احذروا انه بينكم.jpg
- File:بينكم انه.jpg
- File:زينب العارضي000.jpg
- File:زينب العارضي ...العراق.jpg
- File:زينب العارضي.jpg
- File:زينب علي العارضي.png
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
My original CG work which has been modified and historically inaccurate now. Mdewinkeleer (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Question Where's the better version, then? PaterMcFly (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Sandbox-only files by EyedBolty
[edit]- File:(Chief) Warrant Officer 3 (WOFF3) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:(Chief) Warrant Officer 4 (WOFF4) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:(Command) Warrant Officer 5 (WOFF5) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:(Sub) Warrant Officer 1 (WOFF1) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:6 star General (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:7 star Marshal (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:8 star Marshal (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:9 star Marshal (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air Chief Marshal (ACM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air Commodore (ACMD) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air General Marshal (AGM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air Grand Marshal (AGRM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air High Marshal (AHM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air Marshal (AM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air Supreme Marshal (ASM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Air Vice Marshal (AVM) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Aircraftsman - Aircraftswoman (AC - ACW).png
- File:Bundesheer - Army.png
- File:Bundesluftwaffe - Airforce (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Chief Specialist (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Command Specialist (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Corporal (CPL).png
- File:Corporal (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Deputy Commander in Chief (DCiC) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Deutsche Jungvolk (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Flight Lieutenant (FLTLT) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY) (Pilot).png
- File:Flight Lieutenant (FLTLT) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Flight Sergeant of the Air Force (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Flight Sergeant of the Air Force (SGTAF) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY.png
- File:Group Captain (GRPCPT) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY) (Pilot).png
- File:Group Captain (GRPCPT) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Group Flight Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Group Flight Sergeant (GRPSGT) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Kaiserjungend - Imperial Youth (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Kaiserliche Deutsche Sozial Partei - Imperial German Social Party - KDSP, Kazi (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Kaiserliche Sozial Arbeiten Front - Imperial Social Working Front (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:LAC - LACW (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Lance Corporal (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Lance Corporal (LCPL).png
- File:Leading Aircraftsman - Leading Aircraftswoman (LAC - LACW).png
- File:Master Specialist (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Officer Cadet (OFFCDT) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Ordnungspolizei - Order Police (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Pilot Officer (PLTOFF) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY.png
- File:Pilot Officer (PLTOFF) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Schutzabteilung - Storm Detachment (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Senior Pilot Officer (SPLTOFF) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Senior Pilot Officer (SPLTOFF) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Senior Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Senior Sergeant (SNRSGT) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Sergeant Dont Use sandbox only.png
- File:Sicherheitsdienst - Security Service (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Specialist (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Specialist First Class (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Squadron Flight Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Squadron Flight Sergeant (SQNSGT) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Squadron Leader (SQNLDR) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY) (Pilot).png
- File:Squadron Leader (SQNLDR) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Staatlicher Schutz - State Protection (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Staff Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Staff Sergeant (SSGT) (DONT USE SAND BOX ONLY).png
- File:Su Deutsches Rotes Kruez (DONT USE UNLESS SANDBOX).png
- File:Technical Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Technical Sergeant (TSGT) Dont Use Snadbox Only.png
- File:WOFF 3 (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:WOFF1 (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:WOFF2 (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:WOFF4 (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:WOFF5 (Maybe) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:WOFF5-6 (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Warrant Officer 2 (WOFF2) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Wing Commander (WGCDR) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY) (Pilot).png
- File:Wing Commander (WGCDR) (DON’T USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Wing Flight Sergeant (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
- File:Wing Flight Sergeant (WNGSGT) (DONT USE SANDBOX ONLY).png
These files say "Don't use sandbox only", whatever this means. But it's pretty clear that they should not be used and therefore are out of scope. COM:SCOPE --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Personal files by حسین هادی پور
[edit]- File:حسین هادی پور 01.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 02.png
- File:حسین هادی پور 03.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 04.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 05.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 06.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 07.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 08.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 09.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 10.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 11.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 12.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 13.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 14.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 15.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 16.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 17.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 18.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 19.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 20.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 21.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 22.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 23.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 24.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 25.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 26.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 27.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 28.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 29.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 30.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 31.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 32.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 33.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 34.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 35.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 36.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 37.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 38.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 39.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 40.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 41.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 42.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 43.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 44.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 45.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 46.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 47.png
- File:حسین هادی پور 49.jpg
- File:حسین هادی پور 50.jpg
Personal files by mostly non-contributor. As far as I can tell none of these files is actually in use. If one or two were in use, we could keep those. 50 files seems like a lot. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 23:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep A postcard from 1915 is PD. Just fix noob errors, rather than nominate them. --RAN (talk) 00:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The censored, not the original version of the flag of Nazi Germany is used. We must not censor Nazi symbols in images; to mark them as prohibited, there is Template:Nazi symbol. 178.68.55.7 23:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. As noted on the file page, there's a better rendering of this at File:Flag map of Germany (1939).svg. It's unclear what stage of the war (or the leadup to it) this map is meant to represent, or what criteria were used for including territory within the borders. Omphalographer (talk) 03:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete brcause of strange border choices in the east. A flag map without the mast defining feature of the flag, is a strange choice too. Enyavar (talk) 03:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elizium23 as no permission (No permission since) RAN (talk) 23:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep licensing issues have been resolved. I trust RAN's assessment of its PD status. Deletion request may be withdrawn if possible. Elizium23 (talk) 23:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Also Keep. --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:35, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is the archive system used by the State Archive in Austria. I can call up the images through a dynamic search but I don't get a permalink. I can find a few in the series with another search and added one more image where I can see the permalink. The spelling of the name of the bridge is the problem. The archive lists no restrictions, other have to decide if they get PD-EU for being in an Australian archive or PD-Ukraine for depicting a bridge in Ukraine, probably both is best. It looks like a photographer knew the allies were going to bomb it, and took a series of photos before, during, and after the destruction, brave fellow. OK, I found all the permalinks. Here is the bridge today: File:Zalyshchyki Railway Bridge 3.JPG, you can see the two replacements sections clearly. --RAN (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. As with File:Third Reich Flag Map.png, it's unclear what point in time this map is meant to represent or what parts of the Italian Empire are being included. It doesn't clearly correspond to anything else I see in Category:Maps of the Italian Empire. Omphalographer (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Needs permission if deemed above COM:TOO France. Otherwise, relicense to {{PD-textlogo}}, obvious bogus own work claim. Jonteemil (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Nvm, Delete as redundant to File:LogoASMonacoFC2021.png. Jonteemil (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per revised nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a duplicate file of File:Barack Obama singing in the East Room.jpg. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The prince worldwide (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: joke flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 03:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: flag of a fictitious micronation. Omphalographer (talk) 03:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: flag of a fictitious country. Omphalographer (talk) 03:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Preserve my private life and my identity on internet Jemmyx (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Selfie uploaded by non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 00:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 13:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
out of scope. only in use on hoax/unfinished sandbox article
last image is also a copyright violation (notice the watermark)
Nutshinou Talk! 00:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING Nutshinou Talk! 00:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio, creo. 186.173.189.111 00:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as out-of-scope portrait of non-notable musician. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 13:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Needs permission if deemed above COM:TOO France. Otherwise, relicense to {{PD-textlogo}}, obvious bogus own work claim. Jonteemil (talk) 02:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Files found with https://maroshionline.tk/
[edit]- Files
Unreliably-licensed files that originated on English Wikipedia. The claimed source website is "https://maroshionline.tk/". But checking on older archived copies at Wayback Machine (from 2009, from 2016) only yields a blank page with "Coming soon..." as the only content. There is also no assurance that w:en:User:Shmaroshi is the same as Maroshi Online (or at least its site admin). Questionable commercial CC licensing claim. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused and bad quality image of unidentified artwork. Hardly usable. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 04:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Krd 06:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking any information needed for determining context. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
this mugshot is not a federal work but a work of the government of Texas. Works of US states are not automatically in the public domain and there is no exception for works of Texas. 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 09:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Scan from a book. No indication that cc-zero applies. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
35 kb? Probably not own work... Xocolatl (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope. COM:SCOPE Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Spam. Not in use, Not sure if that commercial sample and a well-looking advertizing image is own or free Bilderling (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, used in spam articles --Drakosh (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake license, the book is probably not CC-BY-SA. Wikisaurus (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Probably fake license, I do not see any proof of CC-BY-SA, while the username of the uploaded are name+surname different from name+surname of the claimed author. Wikisaurus (talk) 17:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jefferson B. Corpuz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope. And likely not own works: transmission code in EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:52, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Proteus77~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, fictitious micronational flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 20:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Work from well-known artist, no VRTS or reason to think uploader had right to upload it. Prosfilaes (talk) 21:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Uploader has uploaded many works as "own work" that clearly aren't; no reason to believe this one. Prosfilaes (talk) 21:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/The Oracle’s Tears, Rodger Mack
[edit]The statue is a work of Rodger Mack (1938-2002) and was installed at Syracuse University in 1999. There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the US. The files can be undeleted in 2073.
- File:The Oracle’s Tears, Rodger Mack, 1999 (Syracuse University) 01.jpg
- File:The Oracle’s Tears, Rodger Mack, 1999 (Syracuse University) 02.jpg
- File:The Oracle’s Tears, Rodger Mack, 1999 (Syracuse University) 03.jpg
- File:The Oracle’s Tears, Rodger Mack, 1999 (Syracuse University) 2016.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 23:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation. Copied from https://ppw-ewenement.pl/ Masti (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Witam, jestem jednym z właścicieli federacji PpW Ewenement Wrestling, oraz administratorem wspomnianej strony ppw-ewenement.pl, wspomniane Logo jest w pełni autorskim projektem do, którego jako federacja posiadamy wszelkie prawa i jesteśmy w trakcie procesu jego oficjalnej rejestracji. Goblin414 (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Translation: "Hello, I am one of the owners of the PpW Ewenement Wrestling federation, and the administrator of the mentioned website ppw-ewenement.pl, the mentioned Logo is a fully original project to which we, as a federation, have all rights and we are in the process of its official registration" —translated by QuickQuokka.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Masur (talk) 09:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Renominating for deletion. This is absolutely a copyright violation, and as User:Goblin414 mentioned, they have all rights reserved. This is clearly above the threshold of originality. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 12:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The SVG version appears to be uploader's own work but the design is still owned by the original creator. Hence proof of permission from original creator/owner is needed. Jonteemil (talk) 01:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- the logo is made up of basic geometric shapes, so IMVHO it’s under the threshold of originality. Moreover, my version is reasonably distinct from the original. Therefore, no permission is needed Vale93b (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's similar enough to violate the club's copyright. And I also think the logo is complex enough to be copyrightable. Jonteemil (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per @Jonteemil QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 13:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'd also like to highlight that the logo, being in the form of a crest/escutcheon, can arguably be treated similarly to municipal coats of arms, which are complex enough to be copyrightable as well, but are also commonly accepted on Wikimedia Commons without copyright infringement issues if they are independently redesigned (as is the case here) by the users according to the original blazon. Vale93b (talk) 09:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Is there then a free blazon on which you based this version? Jonteemil (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- No, but there’s COM:TOO Italy Vale93b (talk) 22:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Is there then a free blazon on which you based this version? Jonteemil (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'd also like to highlight that the logo, being in the form of a crest/escutcheon, can arguably be treated similarly to municipal coats of arms, which are complex enough to be copyrightable as well, but are also commonly accepted on Wikimedia Commons without copyright infringement issues if they are independently redesigned (as is the case here) by the users according to the original blazon. Vale93b (talk) 09:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per @Jonteemil QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 13:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's similar enough to violate the club's copyright. And I also think the logo is complex enough to be copyrightable. Jonteemil (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
no FoP un U.S Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Mural no FoP in U.S.A Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment from photographer/uploader; no objection. I was not as aware of FOP/DW concerns when I upload this 15 + years ago. Note: Image is currently in use in multiple projects; perhaps alternative images can be identified and substituted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Mural no FoP in U.S.A Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Utah Presidential Election Results 1932.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:38E5:50E:1833:3186 02:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not identical and has a better north/south orientation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This map was already made and first made as a svg File:Utah Presidential Election Results 1932.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:DDD9:F734:13C0:1EFD 21:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per the last deletion request thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Redundant with File:West Virginia Presidential Election Results 1920.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:38E5:50E:1833:3186 02:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This one looks OK to replace, since the SVG looks better than the PNG in this case, though to my knowledge, Commons policy is not to delete PNGs just because a similar SVG was uploaded. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Crop of File:Mayor Dr. Muiz.webp, a copyvio: Previously published here: https://malecity.gov.mv/en/news/191 (dated "30 Jun 2022"). Website is marked "© 2021 Secretariat of Malé City Council". COM:Maldives does not state a copyright-free license for Maldivian government works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wait, I made a mistake. This should have been a speedy delete request, not a regular deletion request. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Files by Ravittej.shriraam.2
[edit]- File:Californium1.jpg
- File:Californium1.gif
- File:Kerignola.jpg
- File:Keraliyasamskrithasahithyacharitham.jpg
- File:Kendriyavishwavidhyalaya.jpg
- File:Kendriyakukkatasamstha.jpg
- File:Kendra1.jpg
- File:Kendujaramandalam.jpg
- File:Wilson1.gif
- File:Sanskrit Litterateurs.jpg
Files are obviously copied from around the internet and not own work. COM:LL --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 04:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://en.sokon.com/en/about/about.html. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- COM:TOO China appears to be applicable. It's unclear to me whether this is or is not above such standards, so I'd support deletion per COM:PCP unless someone with more knowledge about Chinese legal decisions and standards disagrees. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bremps as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no indication getty images releases this under cc license of any sort, own work very dubious|source= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/prime-evil-eugene-de-kock-mastermind-of-apartheid-death-squads-to-be-set-free-10014836.html. Heavily used 2016 upload, converting to DR just to make sure. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; other false license claims copyright violations by uploader. No evidence of free license, good reason not to trust uploader claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandra Aceng (talk · contribs)
[edit]I cannot trust the own work claims of this user. A mix of cameras, some missing exif completely, this is normally a red flag. The photos of Lyer incl File:Neema Lyer.jpg - are credited to Smilez Photography. I have already deleted 2 that were found on the web and unlikely to be own work. PCP
- File:Sylvia Rwabwogo.jpg
- File:Rita Aciro.jpg
- File:Christine Butegwa.jpg
- File:Hon. Silas Aogon.jpg
- File:Neema Lyer, Pollicy.jpg
- File:Neema Lyer.jpg
- File:Neema Lyer,.jpg
- File:Florence Ebila.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph, de minimis does not apply HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Usage of Commons as personnal storage CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
I want to delete my own contribution, Thank you, Yoann Toutoclic (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The photo was submitted 4 months ago and participated in March's photo challenge. Günther Frager (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Good photo. I prefer not to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion; good quality useful photo, on Commons too long for automatic courtesy deletion without no reason offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in my photo, but as the owner, I want it removed. Thanks, Yoann Toutoclic (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Commons licenses are irrevocable. The image is to old for a curtesy deletion. So Keep. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above, and don't request deletion again 3 days after this deletion request is closed as kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Please respect the copyrights that you claim to protect. Please delete my photo. Toutoclic (talk) 07:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Please do not nominate it again. Next time you will get blocked because of your distruptive edits. --Kadı Message 07:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value Zafer (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake license, Great Soviet Encyclopedia is not CC-BY-SA neither PD yet. Wikisaurus (talk) 17:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Replaced photo. 31.195.92.218 07:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- I do not understand. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This flag was previously on alternate history fandom: 2603:6080:FBF0:560:10B0:E252:CAAD:4957 20:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please delete the flag or else Кирилл Телегин (talk) 21:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Or else what? You'll do what your father did? (By the way, that's a reference to an old joke about a man who knocked on a door and said "If you don't feed me, I'll do what my father did!" What his father did was go to bed hungry.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- (By the way, I don't oppose deletion at all, but your remark comes across strangely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:10, 12 August 2023 (UTC))
- Oh! You've got some sense of humor, but only when you make the jokes? You should also learn to enjoy other people's jokes... 186.175.16.32 02:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
This flags Is previously deleted on Wikimedia commons, so it's on alternate history fandom 2603:6080:FBF0:560:6C6F:B879:FC64:8107 12:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, being used. 186.175.16.32 02:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Isn't it used only on a user page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Kirill Telegin. Fry1989 eh? 23:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation 92.211.176.193 21:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't find a web source. Did you? --Achim55 (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Well, this is in the EXIF: "Special instructions FBMD2300096b01000023a30000ffce000076fd0000b1750100dc05020018160200d305030016520300a6650300". FBMD is usually further up in Metadata, but this is surely suspicious. If User:Mashaaaaaaaaaa wants their one upload so far to stay up, they need to contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Statue of Mickey Mouse. Günther Frager (talk) 22:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Recent statue, no FOP for statues in US. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Statue located at the Blizzard Entertainment HQ in Tampa Florida. There is no freedom of panorama in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Almost completely black, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I think it would be a good image for something like en:Dark forest hypothesis. Chamaemelum (talk) 14:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- To display a block square, there is no need for an image. Three lines of CSS code is much more efficient. 16:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I've already explaned why Юрий Д.К 17:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. No requirement to delete; no consensus to do so. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused, not evidently useful. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Distorted image of the flag. 178.68.55.7 23:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very badly done, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
No licensing information is available GEO-GZHU (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Template:Subst : delete2 GEO-GZHU (talk) 13:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
almost certainly a copyright violation and not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The original image supdloaded by CarlosCallejasvtates in its metadata that the rights belongs "Neto Flores Photography". We should also delete its derivative work File:Carlos Calleja (cropped).jpg. Günther Frager (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
almost certainly a copyright violation and not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete it is clearly a professional shot, but with low quality. It seems to be a crop of this image available on the web since 2011. Maybe the source was another image, but definitively not own work. Günther Frager (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
No proof that CC-zero applies HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Iraq, you can just fix noob errors yourself, instead of nominating them for deletion. --RAN (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Northeast Supreme Administrative Council (1932).svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Northeast Supreme Administrative Council (1932).svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality duplicate of File:Pillars of creation 2014 HST WFC3-UVIS full-res denoised.jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Work from well-known artist; while there is a Flickr check, there's no reason to think the Flickr account holder had the rights to the painting (and some question about the rights to the photo), and while there may have fair use concerns, they are irrelevant to us. There's also possible US legal complexities; when was this published and if necessary, when was it renewed? But none of the work needed to establish that is evidence on the image page. Prosfilaes (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Unauthorized use of a copyrighted character (although its copyright expires next year). Nosferattus (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Official emblem of the 53rd Fighter Squadron of the Romanian Air Force during WW2 (falls under "official symbols of the State, public authorities and organizations, such as armorial bearings, seals, flags, emblems, shields, badges and medals" from Romanian Law no. 8/1996 of March 14, 1996). It featured heavily on their aircraft, two examples being this video or this photo. This particular drawing was made by me after the drawings shown in the book "Romanian Fighter Colors 1941-1945" and after period photographs. Alin2808 (talk) 06:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- OK, but clearly the Romanian Air Force doesn't own the copyright for Mickey Mouse. Even if the Mickey Mouse image had been officially licensed to the Romanian Air Force (which is extremely unlikely), that still wouldn't make the image public domain due to character copyright. Nosferattus (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Did the 349th Bombardment Squadron own the copyright for Mickey Mouse? Or perhaps the Condor Legion did? Point I'm making here is these are historical official emblems, so their copyright should not be attached to the character they represent. Alin2808 (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- OK, but clearly the Romanian Air Force doesn't own the copyright for Mickey Mouse. Even if the Mickey Mouse image had been officially licensed to the Romanian Air Force (which is extremely unlikely), that still wouldn't make the image public domain due to character copyright. Nosferattus (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The other two have also been deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal file. Unused, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 17:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Useless screenshot of a broken URL; they forgot to add the "m." before wikipedia.org 20 upper 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Max Planck Medal
[edit]This medal named after German physicist Max Planck was first awarded in 1929, so it was probably created around that time. The photos are by the uploader, but the medal itself might still be protected in Germany (if the medalist died after 1952) and in the US (1929 work, restored by the URAA).
So the files should be deleted. If we can find out the medalist's name and year of death, the files can be restored 70 years pma (but not before 2025 because of the URAA). If we can't find the name, the files can be restored in 2050 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. Note: Pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works.
Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (© Kay Blaschke) M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Dieses Bild wurde von Kay Blaschke im Auftrag von Dr. Hubert Messner erstellt und wurde als Cover für sein 1. Buch verwendet. Ich habe es online auf der Website von der Süddeutschen Zeitung kopiert. Herzlichen Dank. Arnoparmeggianibrixen (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Arnoparmeggianibrixen: Um dieses Foto hier behalten zu können, benötigen wir eine dokumentierte Freigabe/Genehmigung des Fotografen. Das läuft per E-Mail, Details und E-Mail-Adresse siehe unter COM:VRT/de. Ohne eine solche Genehmigung wird die Datei gelöscht werden. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ich habe in der Zwischenhezit von Urheber (Fotograf Kay Blaschke) per Mail die Bestätigung erhalten, das Bild auf Wikipedia zu verwenden. Wo kann ich den Screenshot der Mail anhängen? Arnoparmeggianibrixen (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Arnoparmeggianibrixen: Nirgends. Der Urheber soll die Mail selbst an die auf der Seite COM:VRT/de (diese Seite bitte lesen) genannte Adresse schicken. Mail-Weiterleitungen werden nicht akzeptiert, es gab mit denen in der Vergangenheit wohl Missbrauch oder zumindest zu viele Missverständnisse. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Arnoparmeggianibrixen: PS: "Bild auf Wikipedia zu verwenden" reicht nicht, es braucht eine Freigabe des Bildes für jedermann und jegliche Zwecke unter einer freien Lizenz. Siehe Commons:Licensing/de. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Alles klar, habe alles dem Fotograf weitergeleitet. Danke für die Hilfe. Ich hoffe er ladet es bald hoch. Arnoparmeggianibrixen (talk) 10:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ich habe in der Zwischenhezit von Urheber (Fotograf Kay Blaschke) per Mail die Bestätigung erhalten, das Bild auf Wikipedia zu verwenden. Wo kann ich den Screenshot der Mail anhängen? Arnoparmeggianibrixen (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Still no permission. --Yann (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
No obvious reference for this image, seemed to be something original research. @Accipiter Gentilis Q.: who find this Lemonaka (talk) 22:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:Atomnoe-pravoslavie1.jpg represents original research, and I have not found it to be associated with the term nuclear orthodoxy. Practically it could be preserved only as a symbol imagined by the author. My opinion is that, however, it can cause confusion by suggesting that it would be a valid symbol, which it is not. Considering the importance of the topic (Atomic Orthodoxy), I think it is best that the current image be deleted. Accipiter Gentilis Q. (talk) 22:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Its as Svastica for Hitlerism - Historical truth - Should be in Wikipedia with annotation 91.202.108.184 11:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Low quality and resolution, lack or absence of credible metadata, all suggest a possible copyrights issue. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. DW of https://alchetron.com/cdn/abdul-jeleel-ajagun-903eaa23-b5c1-493e-a71b-c92675b1c4b-resize-750.jpg. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Unneeded raster duplicate of File:HotNewLogo.svg. Not CC licensed. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 13:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim. Low-quality file without EXIF that may be a screenshot. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW No indication that the source image is free of use. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
c'est une image non recadrée Olive34830 (talk) 09:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Wrong formula in the 6th row of the 2nd column, corrected table in File:Tabela_transformacji_Z_poprawiona.png (the source of the correct formula [3] - page 9, item 9). Chrumps (talk) 09:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Black and blurry photo, very similar to File:Héracklès archer bronze de Antoine Bourdelle Musée Bourdelle à Paris.JPG (same user) Romainbehar (talk) 10:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
No proof of cc-zero HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Natalia Gómez Bustillo
[edit]- File:Primer Seminario Internacional sobre Management Politico-11 y 12 de junio de 2002.jpg
- File:Doris Capurro with Pepe Mujica, former President of Uruguay.jpg
- File:Doris Capurro junto al expresidente Mauricio Macri en la inauguración del parque eólico Corti. 23 de mayo 2018.jpg
- File:Doris Capurro con el Papa Francisco. Septiembre 2014.jpg
- File:Foto Doris.jpg
All files are attributed to the subject of the photographs, Doris Capurro, and they're obviously not selfies. One is attributed to Juan Corral in the Exif data. COM:LL --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 01:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I can't confirm that this image is copied from somewhere but something doesn't feel right with this picture:
- It looks like a professional picture but is rather grainy.
- The creation date matches the upload date.
- The user did nothing else than upload the picture and add it to the en and ru Wikipedia articles.
Cryptic-waveform (talk) 04:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- This photograph was personally provided by Julia Mayarchuk specifically to be featured on her Wikipedia page. I kindly request the removal request to be canceled as the photograph is personal and approved by the author. Ivaliska (talk) 05:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- As you're not the copyright holder of the picture, you will need to follow the steps here: Commons:Volunteer Response Team#If you are NOT the copyright holder. It'd be also helpful to add date and author information on the file page. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 11:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Also, photos uploaded to Commons have to be available for commercial use, not just to use on Wikipedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- As you're not the copyright holder of the picture, you will need to follow the steps here: Commons:Volunteer Response Team#If you are NOT the copyright holder. It'd be also helpful to add date and author information on the file page. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 11:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs VTRS from the photographer not the person in the photo. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Doubt on the own work claim. The uploader uploaded one file without metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Low quality and resolution, lack or absence of credible metadata, all suggest a possible copyrights issue. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by سید محمد سبطین کاظمی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable own work claim. Low-quality files without EXIF.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahlebait12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable own work claim. Low-quality files without EXIF.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment These are 2011 photos. Keeping in mind that "small size and no EXIF" are not deletion reasons on their own, do you have any other evidence that these are copyright violation? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, good quality photos with no exif are suspicious - only uploads of this user. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
can't be own work. wrong date etc. see article and metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 13:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Xocolatl: Comment: Seems to be based on File:Nariman Narimanov in 1913.jpg, which is public domain, however I am unsure if the coloration made it under a different copyright. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 13:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I did the coloring and quality enhancement myself. 188.253.237.215 22:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- (Message with IP Address written in Əvvəl belongs to mənə) Ryzen.shogun (talk) 22:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Coloring is mine. There was a problem with the previous message. The IP address of the message belongs to me. Ryzen.shogun (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: The coloration is probably original enough to get a seperate copyright, thus the license being valid QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 23:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be copyright holder of image Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Requested COM:VRT permission on their user talk page, let's give them another week. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Specifically:
- File:Vendsyssel Kunstmuseum - Skulptur af Gottfred Eickhoff.jpg
- File:Vendsyssel Kunstmuseum med skulptur af Gottfred Eickhoff.jpg
- File:Vendsyssel Kunstmuseum, Hjørring.jpg
- File:Øregaard Museum 03.jpg
as Gottfred Eickhoff died in 1982 and there's not any FOP in Denmark for works of art. The two others, currently, is one placed in Sweden where their FOP should cover it since the statue seems to be "permanently placed on or at a public place outdoors", the other is just a shadow on a wall. TherasTaneel (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Not sure about the freedom of panorama CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Question COM:FOP Portugal addresses the "use of works, such as works of architecture or sculpture." Are we to understand that as a non-exhaustive list that would include this kind of image? Is there any record at all of Portuguese jurisprudence, legislation or legislative history regarding other types of works? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- It seems that, according to the definition, we an leave it on Commons. Meanwhile, I am not aware of any legislative history regarding Portugal and the FOP. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:47, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- I can't assume this kind of work has freedom of panorama in Portugal. There are many countries that give FoP to sculptures and architecture but not murals. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- FoP in Portugal applies to everything. Portugal law regarding FoP is seen as one of the best use cases in Europe here's the Communia's explanation for reference. The FoP mark was added. Is there any chance the deletion mark can be taken down, please. Thanks RCorreia (WMPT) (talk) 08:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- If any kind of publicly displayed art is covered by Portugal's FoP laws, great. An admin will eventually make a decision and close the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I can't assume this kind of work has freedom of panorama in Portugal. There are many countries that give FoP to sculptures and architecture but not murals. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete File source is the Iconomus website, which uses an unfree non-commercial license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). If the content is being legitimately relicensed under a free license, COM:VRTS must be used to certify it. Darwin Ahoy! 23:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Krd. —holly {chat} 01:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KìttyCãssiø (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. A mix of cameras and some with no exif. File:Tomoko Kawase fast4.jpg is clearly marked (c). PCP
- File:There will be love there cover full.jpg
- File:Tomoko Kawase fast1.jpg
- File:Tomoko Kawase fast3.jpg
- File:Tomoko Kawase fast2.jpg
- File:Tomoko Kawase fast4.jpg
- File:The brilliant green 100年MUSIC FESTIVAL.jpg
- File:Thebrilliantgreen DFDZ-5007 1280.jpg
- File:Thebrilliantgreen DFCZ-1004 1280.jpg
- File:The brilliant green - LIKE YESTERDAY Promo.jpg
- File:Thebrilliantgreen DFCZ-1003 1280.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Autorennen Rennautos Auto Racing Race Cars (Sonderausstellung Verkehrszentrum München).jpg
[edit]Image likely taken inside the museum, so the text is protected by copyright and FOP does not apply. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Several files in Category:Sonderausstellung Wahnsinn Illegale Autorennen (Exhibition). —holly {chat} 19:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Seyyed Nasir Hosseini, the representative of Wali Faghih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist).jpg
[edit]Not a work by Tasnim, no photographer credit nor an indication of being created by the agency HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
wrong ubication with personal data. I will add a similar photo with correct information after delete Koffermejia (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Apparently there is permission from the photographer. But I do not see permission from the heirs of Jacqueline de la Baume Dürrbach (1920-1989, see mutualart.com), the creator of the tapistry, and Pablo Picasso (died 1973), the maker of the painting which was the inspiration for this tapestry. JopkeB (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, per no copyright violation. This is a major artwork exhibited in the United Nations Building as a part of their art collection. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- And why is this not copyright violation?
- Is the Freedom of Panorama in the United Kingdom so broad that it includes temporary exhibitions? Because this photo was not taken in the United Nations Buildings, but during a temporary exhibition in London.
- Is the Freedom of Panorama in the United States (where the United Nations Buildings in New York are) so broad that it includes pieces of art indoors?
- I think both these questions should be answered with "NO". So it is indeed copyright violation. And it does not matter for copyrights whether it is about a major artwork or not. JopkeB (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- And why is this not copyright violation?
Deleted: COM:DW. —holly {chat} 19:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 222.117.173.33 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Looks useful if there's no copyright problem, but it needs relevant categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and I put it in Category:Unidentified automobiles, as Google Lens couldn't figure out the logo on the bottom car. —holly {chat} 19:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 范 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- This could have educational use if the license is OK. Yann (talk) 16:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but needs categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and placed in Category:Fingerprint scanners. —holly {chat} 19:47, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 范 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- This could have educational use if the license is OK. Yann (talk) 16:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but needs categories. I don't understand why there's an allergy to companies providing useful images of their own products. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; placed in Category:Closed-circuit television (CCTV). —holly {chat} 19:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Turkish newspaper. I cannot make out a date on it. Abzeronow (talk) 16:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- The date can be seen on the higher resolution version of the same newspaper (here). As we have seen, the date for the newspaper is "PAZARTESİ 15 KANUNUEVVEL 1930" (right upper corner) means "MONDAY DECEMBER 15 1930". According to the Turkish Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works No.5846 article 27 the protection period ends after 70 years. Consequently the stated image has no copyright, kind regards. Yeminli Savaşçı (talk) 16:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. This would appear to be public domain in Turkey, but this was not public domain in Turkey in 1996 so URAA would have restored U.S. copyright, which would exist until January 1, 2026. Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; undelete in 2026. —holly {chat} 19:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
poor quality Luda.slominska (talk) 19:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Such assessments of image quality as "poor quality" should not be the yardstick for deletion. On the one hand, this would open a gateway for the arbitrary exercise of discretion and, on the other, even images with minor technical characteristics can make an important contribution to documentation and illustration - you never know what might be used for what. --Anil Ö. (talk) 00:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Deletion policy: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. That`s the case.--Luda.slominska (talk) 20:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We don't seem to have another photo of this view, so I tagged it with {{Blurry}} and we can revisit deletion when there's a suitable replacement. —holly {chat} 19:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
The whole text of this inscription - created/inaugurated in 1991 according to the signature at the bottom - is still under copyrights belonging to its original author. And as its length proves, it's far more than a simple mention or anything like that. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
No publication information is given making it impossible to determine copyright status Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP, undelete in 2062. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
No proof that PD-Iraq allies. No source or date of publication known HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Circa 1970s photograph but no publication date so difficult to tell if it was published before 1999. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
No proof that PD-Iraq allies. Date and source unknown. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP, no source to tell if Iraq was country of first publication or date of publication. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claims. One has visible watermark (motahari.ac.ir) and one is a copyrighted logo. Only one upload by this user is known to be not a copyvio File:سید حسن مدرس.jpg, which is a historical picture in public domain wrongly claimed to be own work.
- File:20161109065808!سپهسالار-شبستان زمستانی1.jpg
- File:Sepahsalar mosque.jpg
- File:Shahid motahari university.png
- File:سپهسالار-ضلع جنوبی حیاط.jpg
- File:Rouhani (in Youth).jpg
- File:Rouhani (Friday prayers).jpg
- File:Ayat Allah Rouhani.jpg
- File:Rouhani.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- For some of these images, would they not fall under the
{{PD-Iran}}
license under article 16? If we can upload the original sourced picture then use that license. Or perhaps, we can edit the work uploaded as the user may have incorrectly known about that license. Ali313korosh (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)- @Ali313korosh I think in order to prove that article 16 of the Iranian copyright law is applicable to these images, we should have evidence on their date of publication (not the date of creation). For example, if we know that an image was printed in a book published more than 30 years ago, that file will fall into the public domain. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Aha that makes sense! Thanks for that. You are very knowledgable on these matters, really appreciate the work you do here! Ali313korosh (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Ali313korosh I think in order to prove that article 16 of the Iranian copyright law is applicable to these images, we should have evidence on their date of publication (not the date of creation). For example, if we know that an image was printed in a book published more than 30 years ago, that file will fall into the public domain. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)