Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/08/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 2nd, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is test file Djsddd (talk) 06:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request & spam. --Achim55 (talk) 07:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de légende sur liste des décorations Grandvoldemort (talk) 09:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So this seems to be the standard user profile image for a certain Joseph Reed (@JosephReidNZ on twitter/X, Instagram, chess.com, website). The uploader User:Joseph Reid NZ Fan is not Joseph Reed (see en:User:Joseph Reid NZ Fan). She may be the one who took the picture, but based on past experience with images like this, it seems more likely that she just grabbed is from the web there's reason for doubt.

In order to keep this, we would need a written permission from the copyright holder (e.g. via COM:VRT) El Grafo (talk) 08:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just realizing that this is a full resolution image with complete meta data, so maybe not a just a stolen profile picture. @Joseph Reid NZ Fan can you explain where you got this from? --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete immediately all their uploads! 186.174.155.138 12:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Thomas Sankara. This is the image of Chadian politician Moussa Medella. (source) Bookish Worm (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's easier to request a name change, not delete the file! --Raphael Figueira (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, no reason to delete this. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I got the file name wrong. It should be The Clock Clock 2010 by Humans since 1982.gif Spirail (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and renamed to File:The Clock Clock 2010 by Humans since 1982.gif. --Achim55 (talk) 15:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asclepias as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The author died in 1990. Not free in France. Commons:Stamps#France.

Converted to DR for easier undeletion. Undelete in 2061. Abzeronow (talk) 16:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este archivo se debe borrar por G10. 186.175.181.75 00:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Apparently self-promotional material (user name matches company) of a retailer which does not appear to be notable. Speedily deleted per G10 as nominated. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's gross 50.104.22.234 17:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

chce usunąć to Morkeroth (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, own user space. --Achim55 (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of a series with several sharp pictures. This is a useless unsharp one. Dosseman (talk) 09:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 06:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 12:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio See meta data: "Author: Wiebke Maria Wachmann" and "Copyright: Agentur fuer Fotografie". KlausHeide (talk) 14:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 06:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Zamand Karim (talk) 18:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Josi (talk) 19:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

33 MB spam 186.173.161.230 22:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Very clearly in scope, shows notable politician in a notable charity event. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No spam. --Achim55 (talk) 08:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de ma part Astra33 (talk) 11:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 06:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Après concertation avec le propriétaire des armoiries, ce dernier m'a demandé à ce qu'elles soient retirées de site pour ne pas qu'il y est d'ambiguïtés. Astra33 (talk) 07:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio. Also totally miscategorized, this is not a map. Enyavar (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Enyavar:  Comment: This is a very clear case of license laundering. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
? Because it looks identical to File:Coari por satélite.jpg, where the watermark was removed/replaced? Anyway, to me, it's a clear case of CopyVio because of the obvious GE watermark. Anything with that watermark is obviously non-free. --Enyavar (talk) 04:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrigted image, owned by Playbill magazine. Binksternet (talk) 02:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, owned by broadway.com. Binksternet (talk) 02:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, owned by The Guardian newspaper. Binksternet (talk) 02:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Practice Basket at Valmont Park Disc Golf Course in Boulder, CO.jpg Iketsi (talk) 03:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 17:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 17:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So small and blurry so as to be entirely useless mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. (Uploader is blocked for vandalism.) Omphalographer (talk) 02:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pre-1940s American photograph. Subject was born in 1856 and died in 1941. Could be public domain, either by age or formalities. Abzeronow (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese wird ersetzt JeanMeaulnes (talk) 16:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Another file was meanwhile deleted as a duplicate of this file. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1961 map. Too young to be public domain in Turkey. Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was never subjected to a license review. The source link is gone. Right now, following statement is to be found at https://www.aussicht.online/impressum: “Das Copyright für veröffentlichte, von der Verlagsgruppe Bistumspresse selbst erstellte Objekte bleibt allein bei der Verlagsgruppe Bistumspresse. Eine Vervielfältigung oder Verwendung solcher Grafiken, Tondokumente, Videosequenzen und Texte in anderen elektronischen oder gedruckten Publikationen bedarf der schriftlichen Zustimmung der Verlagsgruppe Bistumspresse.” This contradicts the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} claim. AFBorchert (talk) 17:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1986 Times of India clipping. Not yet public domain in India, and I don't see any evidence Times of India would give a free license. Abzeronow (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would require VRT permission from the photographer Kenneth Jonsson as these are 3D works. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Version of a Ukrainian military patch from a site that doesn't appear to freely license works. Abzeronow (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homework assignment; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief text description of volleyball; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than the text "Santi: El término Santi es el nombre común que recibe un conjunto de palabras que hacen referencias a la falta de autoestima." Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy gitau15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

School assignments; outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than the text "XSS BY Citade"; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than the text "Leprerease - When a person or people feel really good about themselves, (e.g. Self-Love)"; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief text that translates to "The tragic story of Luka Khazarian Luka Khazarian is a victim of capitalism (2000-2021). A boy who gambles sacrificed." Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief text description of PowerPoint. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than the text "Fred Door … Fred Door, No context needed". Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief personal opinion about why you should visit Cappadocia. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted duplicate File:Cappadocia Assignment.pdf and File:Cappadocia Text.png (with the same text), both by the same uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1965 photograph from Pakistan. Could be public domain in Pakistan but not in the US due to URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a fantasy flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More than dubious "own work". 178.9.51.10 23:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; certainly not own work from 2022 as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More than dubious "own work". 178.9.51.10 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No photographer is named; the file can be restored in 2057 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More than dubious "own work". 178.9.51.10 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The photographer is named as Haenchen, that is de:Karl Ludwig Haenchen, who died in 2003, so the photo is still protected in Germany until the end of 2073. The file can be restored in 2074, its US cpyright will have expired by then as well. --Rosenzweig τ 06:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More than dubious "own work". 178.9.51.10 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; certainly not own work from 2023 as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 06:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More than dubious "own work". 178.9.51.10 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; certainly not own work from 2023 as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (and absurdly low resolution) PNG render of File:Bandeira de Curitiba.svg. Omphalographer (talk) 02:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused flag of unclear significance, likely fictitious. Arms of Montenegro with unidentifiable colors on the right. Omphalographer (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COSTUME. the material was made in 2018([1]) eien20 (talk) 02:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tee 4 at the Valmont Disc Golf Course in Boulder, Colorado.jpg Iketsi (talk) 03:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical to File:Tee 7 (41964274340).jpg Iketsi (talk) 03:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Colorado School of Mines seal JPG images

[edit]

SVG version File:Colorado School of Mines seal.svg is superior as a vector version. JPG format is inherently poorly suited to logos and seals due to compression. All global uses have been migrated to the SVG version.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:14, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 03:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope M2k~dewiki (talk) 07:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"out of scope" is only a reasion for deletion of files which are hosted on Wikipedia. "Wikimedia Commons is a a collection of freely usable media files to which anyone can contribute". --Yasny Blümchenkaffee (talk) 08:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's just named a bit different: lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 08:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Fictional/fantasy, 0 "Krumplilland" hits on Google, 6 for "Krumpliland" pointing to tiktok, facebook, youtube..., linked by the b:Micronations/Starting your own micronation trash. Just proclaiming a micronation doesn't generate notability. --Achim55 (talk) 08:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The person who uploaded the picture can no longer log in and would like to have the picture deleted. 2A02:908:1862:2260:5053:46:C7EF:EBBA 03:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete that's not correct, see Commons:Out of scope. no educational use. --Icodense 08:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Fantasy flag. --Combrian (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The person wants the picture to be deleted, but can no longer log in to the account. . 2A02:908:1862:2260:5053:46:C7EF:EBBA 02:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]

out of scope 2A02:908:1862:2260:A4DF:1EF6:C9A8:9A67 23:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adam29721234321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused, fictitious content.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: "fictional country". Omphalographer (talk) 04:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious content (cf. https://tep.wiki/wiki/Vessarlian) Omphalographer (talk) 04:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: "A Flag for a fictional Union of the southern states of America". Omphalographer (talk) 04:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aidenman2763 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: joke flag / arms.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: "Bandera hipotética" (hypothetical flag). Omphalographer (talk) 05:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photos with no exif. I found one here - https://www.freefeelgoodmusic.com/jdillian PCP - unlikely to be own work as claimed. Category Category:J'Dillian should also be deleted as it will be empty @Warburg1866:

Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Oivind Arvola and Martin Losvik - not own work as claimed. All need OTRS to keep

ːCategory:Håvard Lund should also be deleted as empty

@Warburg1866:

Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Luda.slominska (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author MARCELLA MILANI". VRT permission Marcella Milani needed. MKFI (talk) 07:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work of a stock photo: https://depositphotos.com/32108825/stock-photo-blue-sunrise-view-of-earth.html MKFI (talk) 08:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Hozza. P". VRT permission from photographer needed. MKFI (talk) 08:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will submit authorization from author.
If failing to do so, is it possible to change the image? KOGCERT (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KOGCERT: you can always upload another image provided it actually is your own work (ie. you held the camera) or you can prove it is freely licensed. MKFI (talk) 08:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from company website: https://mtlecommerce.com/cooperathon/ (https://mtlecommerce.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Cooperathon-2019.jpg). If the uploader is copyright holder please send VRT permission. MKFI (talk) 08:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is outside the scope of Commons. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 08:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 08:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 08:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 08:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 양념파닭 (talk) 07:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 17:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 사용되기를 원치 않음 Geumbagi (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free licence ManuRoquette (talk) 09:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Senate portraits are published on the aph.gov.au website, which only uploads with a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 AU licence (see copyright information) Neegzistuoja (talk) 10:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dueño del bar Butterflies? 186.175.145.94 10:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about the meaning of the nomination. But I want to raise the question whether this fits into our COM:SCOPE. Apparently, this picture is related to abondoned draft at en:wp, created on 23 April 2023‎. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a low-res copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Panoramio_-_V%26A_Dudush_-_Северск.jpg Bestalex (talk) 11:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A official character poster of a TV drama, and no information from the author is provided to confirm the copyright license. 银色雪莉 (talk) 12:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIchael Polim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of personal photos. COM:PERSONAL

Larryasou (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asano7612 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTUSED. Unused logos of questionable notability company.

Netora (talk) 12:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PEREGRINO69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: screenshots of "film by Jesús Vinuesa".

P 1 9 9   12:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work, credit in EXIF not matching uploader. P 1 9 9   13:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: small crop/thumbnail image from an unknown source, missing essential source info. P 1 9 9   13:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these files were uploaded using PD-Mongolia for the license but it hasn't been 75 years since the stamps were published. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 14:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these files were uploaded using PD-Mongolia for the license but it hasn't been 75 years since the stamps were published. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these files were uploaded using PD-Mongolia for the license but it hasn't been 75 years since the stamps were published. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamps of Australia created after 1973 are clearly copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamps of Australia created after 1973 are clearly copyrighted. Adamant1 (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this own work? Copyright? Higher resolution can be found here = [2]. Wouter (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Is this bookcover own work? See here. Wouter (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hungary stamps from the country are clearly copyrighted. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image imperfections indicate this is a video screenshot and not an original photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the image is a screenshot from this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JbHD8Ljtn0&t=150s. The camera angle is the same, as are the player positions. nicolas talkpage★★★ 03:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Same that the last message. --Combrian (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a drone footage Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, screenshot from this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDX5p6o0O1o&t=62s. nicolas talkpage★★★ 03:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Is this bookcover own work? See the many hits here. Wouter (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cambodia stamps of Cambodia are clearly copyrighted. So these files should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been previously published (https://www.instagram.com/p/CjiCGy2LTV4/) with no indication of a free license. Uploader might be authorized to upload this, but VRT permission is needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 14:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dairycattle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author AliA Copyright holder Abraham Ali". Additionally previously published in https://www.eabxgroup.com/discover/leadership/ with no indication of a free license. VRT permission is needed to verify copyright.

MKFI (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1958 Austrian stamp whose authors died in 1967 and 1982. Undelete in 2054 when all copyrights expire (URAA would apply here so U.S. copyright expires last). Abzeronow (talk) 15:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - obviously a screenshot from some webpage, not an own work MF-W 16:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC) And additionally:[reply]

Corresponding (machine-translated spam) articles have already been deleted on the respective Wikipedias. --MF-W 16:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The web page in question is https://scratch.mit.edu/. Their terms of use permit "commercial use of Scratch, user-generated content, and support materials" under CC-BY-SA 2.0, but I'm not sure that encompasses this part of their web site. Omphalographer (talk) 21:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unattributed, unreliable machine translation of File:Komponen Rubik Kiub Yang Telah Dilabel.jpg, low-resolution copy MF-W 16:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design of the card may be copyrighted. COM:CB#Payment_cards

Larryasou (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-trivial logo King of ♥ 17:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-trivial logo King of ♥ 17:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandro357 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not notable person. COM:PERSONAL

Larryasou (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxalat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope. COM:PS

Larryasou (talk) 17:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: ©Tous droits réservés Assemblée nationale 2019

Late 1950s or early 1960s photograph. Still under copyright by France's government. Would enter the French public domain in the early 2030s. Abzeronow (talk) 17:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has claimed the work of multiple authors to be his "own" work. Other files uploaded by this user were authored by Raimo Olavi Toivonen (R.O.T.). I believe all files uploaded by this user need to be re-examined, as the claim of "own work" for multiple authors simply can't be true. They also have been tagged as abusing multiple accounts. Skyerise (talk) 17:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cabin55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not notable person. COM:PS

Larryasou (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Algeria-photo-except doesn't apply to stamps because they aren't photographs and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Algeria says nothing about their copyright status. So this image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zakariahossain27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

collection of personal photos. COM:PERSONAL

Larryasou (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a Flickrwashing and appears to be from https://www.transparencia.coari.am.gov.br/audiencias-publicas; might be free as it is government work, but I'm not familiar with Brazilian copyrights Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a Flickrwashing account, see https://www.cidadesdomeubrasil.com.br/am/coari Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a FLickrwashing acccount, appears to be from https://acheiparintins.com.br/2023/04/24/parintins-ganha-guia-comercial-para-festival-folclorico-de-parintins/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to an obvious Flickrwashign account. Please provide the actual source for these images.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, I checked the notice about the photograph File:Catedral de Coari.jpg. What can I do so it doesn't get deleted. Please help me. Thank you. Williamferreiraam (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Williamferreiraam I would change provide the actual source, not your Flickr link, and since it looks like it was taken around 1910, I think {{PD-Brazil-Photo}} or {{PD-BR-1935}} should work as the license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll insert. Williamferreiraam (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 21:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope

Nutshinou Talk! 21:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope (selfies). GTRSTFG.jpg and DFJFKFL.jpg are blurry and nondescriptive, so they have no educational value.

Nutshinou Talk! 21:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. A few of these images like File:SPACE STATION.jpg look like they might be of notable subjects, but the image names and descriptions make it practically impossible to identify what we're looking at. Omphalographer (talk) 23:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all these photos are sourced from facebook. they feature many different cities far apart. it's hard to tell if the uploader did take these photos. i cant see the other deleted uploads so i dont know what they might suggest about the authenticity of this user's authorship.

RoyZuo (talk) 20:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all and  Strong support of ban. Notorious disruptive editing, misleading filenames and junk descriptions. Out of scope, possibly piracy. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These uploads are mostly from May 2023, so a block at this point seems unnecessary. Omphalographer (talk) 23:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The image comes from the stated source http://ca.sabadell.cat/MediAmbient/d/parcfluvial.pdf but the legal notice in the web where the pdf is linked from https://ca.sabadell.cat/Ripoll/p/ParcFluvial_cat.asp clearly claims all rights reserved.https://www.sabadell.cat/ca/copyright and there is no evidence of any free license. Pere prlpz (talk) 21:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

هده الصورة قديمة لا أريد أن تظهر على محركات البحت Simo sidox (talk) 22:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Simo sidox:  Speedy delete per COM:G7. You are the author and uploader of the file, and have a right to speedily take it down. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded more than 3 years ago, so doesn't qualify for G7.  Delete per F10 and out of courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 08:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: F10, no contribs to mw projects. --Achim55 (talk) 08:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per metadata, no evidence this work was released under the stated CC license/ 24.199.57.19 22:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/New Zealand stamps of the country created after 1944 are copyrighted for 100 years. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2045 if not longer. Adamant1 (talk) 23:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/New Zealand stamps of the country created after 1944 are copyrighted for 100 years. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2085 if not longer. Adamant1 (talk) 23:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/New Zealand stamps of the country created after 1944 are copyrighted for 100 years. Plus the image on the cover is probably copyrighted on top of it. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2073 if not longer. Adamant1 (talk) 23:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 23:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/New Zealand stamps of the country created after 1944 are copyrighted for 100 years. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2083 if not longer. Adamant1 (talk) 23:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:Cyclopropanecarboxylic-acid-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We can have more than one diagram of the same acid. Furhtermore, they are visually different so they can fit different users and reusers. Additionally, it is not a low quality image.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pere prlpz: There are Manual of Style guidelines for drawing chemical structures within Commons:WikiProject Chemistry and this structure clearly does not match the criteria. In addition, we already have a bunch of other representations in Category:Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Chem Sim 2001: That's just an explanatory essay and a project to make diagrams in a unified way. There is no policy that all diagrams that don't follow that rules should be deleted and, more importantly, diagrams following other rules still have a large potential educative use and they are therefore in scope. There are great series of maps in Commons with common appearance and criteria, but maps with other appearance and criteria are still useful. A chemical diagram may be useless if it's wrong (e.g. it puts the wrong atoms in the molecule), but not for following different graphical criteria than a given series of images. And if we have a lot of them, that's better to reusers who will be able to choose the one that better fits their needs.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Chem Sim 2001: I just realized that you linked to an essay on English language Wikipedia, not on Commons. en-Wikipedia policies and discussions deal with en-Wikipedia content, not that in Commons. If editors in enwiki don't like this file they just need not to use it in enwiki.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Commons wikiproject for chemistry has also adopted it (pointing exactly to the English and/or German wikipedia style-guides). DMacks (talk) 19:08, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete such low quality diagrams are not worth keeping in Commons, if there are proper structural formulae that are in line with IUPAC recommendations. En/De.wp guidelines are in many ways close to IUPAC recommendations, so ignoring them just based on the project they are placed in is shortsighted. Wostr (talk) 18:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Chemical structure images such as this are outside the standard conventions used across Wikimedia projects. They are rarely (if ever) used. I think they are more likely to just cause clutter here and to add difficulty finding more useful images without adding any educational benefit over other existing images. Marbletan (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No necesita permiso? 186.174.155.138 15:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are French works, so the license is wrong.

Yann (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

French stamp, this is still under a copyright, at least until 2035. Yann (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ritzel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising, external source, wrong date (not "2023" pictures).

Cjp24 (talk) 02:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some files from https://nippon-classic.de/ Cjp24 (talk) 02:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Zamand Karim (talk) 18:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Algeria-photo-except doesn't apply to stamps because they aren't photographs and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Algeria says nothing about their copyright status. So this image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: works of applied art in Algeria enter public domain only if published prior to 1973. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the licensing information this stamp clearly wasn't published on or before 1987. Nor is it a photograph. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although I am the uploader, I see that this does not respect the local licence, I support the process, thank you for working on it ~@Adamant1 Dezedien (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. It happens sometimes. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is totally blurry Zamand Karim (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i dont see. --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 06:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Psycho Motel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, or under a free license. Most other files by this user were deleted as copyvios, small size, no metadata.

Yann (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are my own works and taken with family on my phone. Psycho Motel (talk) 06:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Psycho Motel: Could you please upload the original images with full EXIF data? Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I just dont know how? Psycho Motel (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Psycho Motel: Go to each of these files, and click on "Upload a new version of this file" at the bottom. Yann (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept File:RobAdams1.jpg per valid VRT ticket. Other files can be restored if we receive corresponding VRT tickets. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Materialscientist. --Rosenzweig τ 11:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The abstract painter, Gianni Dova, died in 1991, and there is no permission (so far) to publish his artworks on Commons.

Ruthven (msg) 06:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6340881.jpg can be an exception because it shows more the painter than the work? The work is not shown entirely but is only partially visible in the background. Could we perhaps also consider that—since they are black and white photos by a photographer with a peculiar style—they are not faithful reproductions of works but more historical reportage of Dova's art studio? However we are sorry for the problems that have arisen and we will certainly avoid uploading again images that may present the same problems. --Spinoziano (BEIC) (talk) 09:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The opening statement is incorrect. We have a license, from Paolo Monti. The question is whether Paolo Monti was legally able to give such a license, on which see Commons:BEIC#Rights. The legal standards to determine the answer have been discussed before. Once again I encourage everyone to engage with the legal standards determined by experienced copyright lawyers and I'm sorry to see once again that didn't happen here. Nemo 05:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination except one de minimis per discussion. Though BEIC owns the copyright on the photos they are derivative of paintings. — Racconish💬 13:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not the user's own work, it is a screenshot of an interview between Mac Allister and Brighton and Hove Albion. This is not covered under Creative Commons, the user has lied about the copyright. Bnwkr (talk) 20:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - it's the same user who has uploaded a Shutterstock originated image of . I have however, found the source of the screenshot [3] (at 1:35) but it is currently not reviewed in order for users to allow the usage of this image globally. Obviously, I agree that this is not the uploader's own work and therefore lied about that. Iggy the Swan (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete it is not work, and the source provided by Iggy (a YT video) doesn't have a free license. Günther Frager (talk) 12:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is now at File:Grey.svg. Should have been a rename, not redirect. No need for this file Lobsterthermidor (talk) 01:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused PNG render of File:Flag of Argentina and Spain.svg. Omphalographer (talk) 02:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No se presentan licencias. Diréctamente sacado de https://twitter.com/CentAm_Beauty/status/1257580934137667586 Geom (talk) 12:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of claimed free license at web source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sin licencias claras. Diréctamente sacado de https://twitter.com/CentAm_Beauty/status/1257580934137667586 Geom (talk) 12:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khadija2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs of photographs and of text, and of apparently contemporary artwork, with no artists credited or permission shown. There is no freedom of panorama for the museum and gallery these photos were taken in, per COM:FOP Nigeria.

Belbury (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Nigeria#Freedom of panorama is okay for 2022 uploads.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury@Robert Weemeyer there is an unfinished discussion regarding the issue of retroactivity at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Nigeria. Can both of you comment there? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No deeper intention behind my nomination here, I interpreted the linked FOP page only showing a  Not OK (with no " OK before 17 March 2023") as meaning that Nigeria never had any Commons-usable FOP laws. Belbury (talk) 16:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo of a DVD box with image related to TV series that originally ran from 1989 to 1996. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 13:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, clear CV COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Stefan Schooten Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This clearly isn't the uploaders own work and Australian stamps created after 1973 are copyrighted in the meantime. So the file should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake FoA with bad edition. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake FoA with bad edition. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Que romántico! 😍 186.174.155.138 15:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused text with irrelevant title. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be one of 3 authors, but there is no indication that the other 2 authors agree to the release. Skyerise (talk) 16:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia benötigt 2001:14BB:676:EF50:A49E:E6BD:14AB:C180 15:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, but image is actually from Mikko Kuronen's dissertation, a different person than the uploader. Skyerise (talk) 16:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia benötigt 2001:14BB:676:EF50:A49E:E6BD:14AB:C180 15:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy reasons for the sake of protecting real life name and identity from potential harassment or doxxing. AustroHungarian1867 (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use in hr:Likovna umjetnost umjetne inteligencije. No proof of what is stated in the deletion request as there is no name or pseudonyme in the file exif, on filepage or on Deep Dream Generator where the image also avaible and linked from commons filepage. Tm (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Tm. (Note: If there is some actual privacy/harassment issue, please send details to COM:VRT.)--Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly Flickrwashed image, previously published at https://todahora.com/lula-visita-fabrica-honda-manaus/, Flickr account is not the owner Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Flickr account seems to upload images from other sources; no indication they have authority to grant license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish-language book cover that uses a photograph created after 1972. Bolivia is publication plus 50 for photographs (or creation if unpublished). Would need more information on photograph to determine when copyright expires. Abzeronow (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unfortunately still lacking info needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|F10}} Greenlightred (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Greenlightred as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10}}|subpage=File:Cliffs of Moher, Liscannor, Ireland (Unsplash).jpg|year=2023|month=August|day=2 It is possible that this photo should be deleted -- it's a pretty useless shot of water -- but it is not what the speedy deletion request says (personal photo by a non-contributor). Jmabel ! talk 19:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Free licensed, no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://2017.cbhsaofrancisco.org.br/corrego-confusao-e-revitalizado-em-sao-gotardo/ Py4nf (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is unclear who is the photographer. Is it anonymous work – unclear (the fact that I and you do not know the photographer does not mean anonymous). When and where the photo was made – unclear. When and where the photo was first published – unclear. FlorianH76 (talk) 00:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-Bhutan, Bhutan is 50 years from creation. As Queen of Bhutan, we can assume it was taken there. We make educated guesses about every image uploaded prior to exif data recording the gps and date. --RAN (talk) 02:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The file copyright status cannot depend on any guesses. It's a serious thing. If you don't have a proof of when it was taken, where, by whom, then only deletion. FlorianH76 (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, we do rely on guesses a lot of the time. For example, {{PD-old-assumed}} is based on the idea that most people die within 50 years of creating a work, so for countries with a life+70 copyright term, in cases where the author is unknown we assume that works older than 120 years are public domain, even though there is a very small chance that they are still copyrighted. Likewise, we often make assumptions about country of origin even if it can't be proven with absolute certainty. -- King of ♥ 02:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    But how do we know here that the author is unknown? The link source is just a photo which could be taken from anywhere. FlorianH76 (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Right, it's a case-by-case basis. Often we assume that the country of origin of a photo is the country in which it was taken, but it depends. -- King of ♥ 02:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment As a data point, the she (or her social media team) posted the image this is cropped from to her Facebook page in 2012. Doesn't really add any info about photographer or date, but does help inform some of the guesses around where it was taken. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ориссное, герб неофициальный, не используется. Dmsav (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Герб городского округа город Уфа в соответствии с Методическими рекомендациями по разработке и использованию официальных символов муниципальных образований (Раздел 2, Глава VIII, п.п. 45-46), утвержденными Геральдическим советом при Президенте Российской Федерации 28.06.2006 года может воспроизводиться со статусной короной установленного образца. Куку Кукуевичъ (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
15. Гербы не имеют изобразительных эталонов. Единственным эталоном герба является его геральдическое описание (также называемое «блазон»),
составляемое по специальным правилам с применением гербоведческой терминологии. В пределах соответствия описанию допускаются самые разнообразные художественные и дизайнерские интерпретации изображения герба. Любое изображение, точно соответствующее геральдическому описанию герба и
выполненное с соблюдением основополагающих геральдических традиций является полноценным и полноправным изображением герба. http://www.admin-nnr.ru/adm/doc/metod.pdf Куку Кукуевичъ (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake CoA with bad edition. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake CoA with bad edition. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of an icon with a watermark. Fake CoA. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake CoA with bad edition. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

30 декабря 1839 года утвержден другой герб Уфы: "В верхней части щита герб Оренбургской губернии. В нижней серебряной части бегущая куница". http://www.heraldicum.ru/russia/subjects/towns/ufa.htm Барабас (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork from an album published in 1985. The image is in the public domain in Argentina, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, this is still protected by copyright in the US. Following COM:PCP we should delete this file. Günther Frager (talk) 15:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work: https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/simone-de-beauvoir-aus-ihrem-nachlass-ist-ein-roman-erschienen-ld.1651245?reduced=true

French photograph created in 1928. Could be public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-France + PD-1996. --Yann (talk) 15:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://paulinebessonart.wixsite.com/dax-la-torte/circuit-1

This looks like a photograph that is at least 100 years old. It could be public domain but we should have actual first publication information to verify that. Abzeronow (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Psychologist Guy as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted material not Chamaemelum's own work taken directly from Edward's paper https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12879450/
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as opinions seem to differ. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep due to Commons:Threshold of originality § Charts. The image was not "taken directly from Edward's paper." I used the allele frequency data to code a simulation and then used a stylized line to give the "vibes" of the original figure from the early-internet era. Of course, this line, the axes, the axes titles, etc., was all originally generated and nothing was taken from the figure. Fonts, thicknesses, the existence of axes tick marks, etc. all differ between images.
The two figures overlayed are here: https://imgur.com/a/1EBhZQ0. We can clearly see that the figure nominated here is different.
The image is "inspired" by the paper, of course, so there may be some attribution required for that. Otherwise, the image is allowed to remain on Wikipedia due to Commons:Threshold of originality § Charts (see policy and examples there, which sometimes even allow graphs/figures to be reused with less modification than this re-made from scratch image). The image should be tagged under PD-chart (View PD-chart category examples here [4].). Chamaemelum (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the image is a copy from the Edward's paper [5] which can be seen here [6]. The only difference is a the size of the numbers, the claim that "nothing was taken from the figure is not true". The claim they re-made the image from scratch is unlikely. Chamaemelum is a banned user who is indef blocked on Wikipedia and has also uploaded a lot of copyrighted material which admins are now reverting. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This is ridiculous [7], anyone can see it is the same chart. It should be noted Chamaemelum has uploaded other images onto Commons as their "own" work some of which have been deleted. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The below will detail that the image was not "directly" copied and that the "only difference is a the size of the numbers" is false.

There is more, such has the lines/box around the entire plot in the new plot vs. only axes lines in Edwards', various other attributes of the line, and more, but in the interest of brevity the above examples more than suffice.

Chamaemelum (talk) 02:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been informed by another user that "copyright-wise," even if it was directly copied from Edwards' paper (it wasn't), it would still be "below the threshold of originality" and therefore could be uploaded and used without modification. Chamaemelum (talk) 03:04, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is {{PD-ineligible}} anyway. Yann (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://maitron.fr/spip.php?article128807

Late 1930s or 1940s French photograph. We'd need more information about when this was first published to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:POSTER and COM:FOP Niger. This picture contains non free elements and should be deleted. The pictures of the 2 men used on this poster probably aren't free (COM:DW). Without any more information (photographers' names, original licence, date/place of 1st publication), we should be careful. Titlutin (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The persons on the billboard are fictitious to the best of my knowledge. The one on the right wears a uniform unknown in Niger (the red star on his cap is not in use in Nigérien uniforms) and he has deliberately been given a "Ché Guevara-like" look, in tune with the billboard's anti-western message. The other man is also fictitious to protect his identity, considering the politically sensitive message of the billboard. (Note his sunglasses.) Furthermore, the image is not in contravention of COM:FOP Niger. COM:FOP Niger states that it is permitted "to reproduce, broadcast or communicate to the public ..... a photographic work ..... that is ..... located in a place open to the public, except if the image of the work is the main subject of such reproduction ...... or communication AND if it is used for profit-making purposes". Note the word AND. It doesn't say OR, or AND/OR, but AND, so both conditions must be fulfilled. And the latter condition, that I posted the image for profit-making purposes, is by definition not fulfilled by the very nature of Wikipedia. If necessary, I could give the image another CC-licence to preven any profit-making by others. (In that case, which licence?) NigerTZai (talk) 20:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello NigerTZai ! To answer your comment:
  1. Whether the people pictured aren't from Niger and/or are actors (and therefore "fictitious") is irrelevant: another photographer (maybe 2 different photographers) took their picture, and therefore they are protected by copyright until proven otherwise.
  2. For COM:FOP Niger, you omitted an important word in your quotation: "a photographic work [...] that is permanently located in a place open to the public". According to COM:POSTER: "Even where [FOP does permit photograph of 2D artwork], posters will usually be excluded since they are normally located temporarily rather than permanently in a public place.". This poster isn't permanent since it's probably been replaced since 2019.
  3. And lastly, as you pointed out, "except if the image of the work [...] is used for profit-making purposes". The problem is that Commons licencing doesn't allow for non-profit making purposes. All images uploaded on this website must allow commercial use, which is impossible if the original licence of the work doesn't allow such use. You can check Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses for more information on this topic. --Titlutin (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Titlutin. You say "Commons licencing does not allow for non-profit making purposes." Do I understand that correctly?? I often see photo's that I uploaded to Commons on other websites, both on for-profit and (apparently) non-profit websites. I always use CC BY-SA 4.0. So is this non-profit use by third parties not allowed? NigerTZai (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NigerTZai. It depends on the licence you chose for your photos. But in the case of {{CC BY-SA 4.0}}, one of the condition of reuse is "Share Alike": "If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original". So indeed, a website that would use one of your pictures without mentioning its original licence but instead pretending that their website's licence applies by default isn't something that's allowed. You should check Commons:Enforcing license terms if you want to contact those third parties in order to make them respect the terms of the licence you chose for your pictures. Hope this helps. --Titlutin (talk) 11:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proof that the uploader is the author Les Meloures (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a scanned photograph from a magazine published in Argentina in 1995. The photo is currently is in the public domain in Argentina (25 years after publication), but it is not in the United States (70 years pma). Günther Frager (talk) 19:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proper description, out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Prise 2 (2018) logo.png, low resolution and not used. 23.237.58.12 19:22, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not exact copy, colors are different. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. File is in use on another project. Deleting it when it is not a duplicate would break things. --Majora (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, logo available on articles Consumers (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The logo can nevertheless be useful. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The logo will never be useful because the background (PRISE 2 letters and digit) should not be transparent. Instant Fisherman (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. No valid reason for deletion. NAC. –Davey2010Talk 20:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not real logo, transparent font inside letters and not used 2605:B100:51B:22E5:B4E8:4075:2983:65B3 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's from the Ins of person in the photo, and no information from the author is provided to confirm the copyright license. 银色雪莉 (talk) 12:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 10:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Three identical images. The photo subject uses the photo on social media (https://twitter.com/Valerii_Markus) and it has been shared on social media at high resolution (https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1635324075005591553) prior to being uploaded to Commons. The newest upload from User:Oleksiy Butenko includes their own name as the photographer in EXIF, but this needs to go through COM:VRT as a photo which has already been published online.

Belbury (talk) 13:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot from Google maps (blurred areas, stiching errors), has small size and is without EXIF data. . The street view image is very similar (see the bikes and motorbikes), but not the same. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 13:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake CoA with bad edition. The real is: Dmsav (talk) 15:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a scan from a newspaper published in Argentina in 16 December 1977. This is currently in the public domain in Argentina, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, the image is still protected by copyright in the USA. Following COM:PCP we should delete it. Günther Frager (talk) 15:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has a MIT license, which is a software license. Needs a license for the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. More importantly, the focus of the photo is a bus with a full-vehicle advertising wrap. The content of that advertisement isn't freely licensed, and is the primary focus of the photo (i.e. not de minimis). Omphalographer (talk) 22:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is de minimis and the bus is the focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fairly certain that the advertisement was the intended focus of the photo; if it weren't, I wouldn't expect the file name to have "in HSBC" in it. Even if it weren't, though - the entire surface of the bus, other than its windows, is covered in the advertising wrap; it's impossible to look at the bus without seeing the advertisement. There are other photographs of similar buses in Category:Alexander ALX500-bodied Dennis Trident 3 which depict the same model of bus less prominent advertisements, or with none at all. Omphalographer (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The letters "HSBC" are surely over no country's COM:TOO. If the photographer wanted a really clear picture of the entire advertisement, they would have shot the side of the bus head-on, so that the photograph of the woman was really clear and much more emphasized. Seeing mostly text, with the front of the bus at least as emphasized as the left side of it, does not seem like copyright violation to me. But of course all of this is moot if the photograph itself is not properly licensed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as incidental inclusion on grounds of the advertisement per precedence. See here, here, and discussion here. If anyone has any concerns on the name having HSBC, we can move to remove the name similar to this case. No opinions on problems with the license, but the uploader hasn't been active on commons since 2019, so I doubt they'll suddenly come back and add a license to it. S5A-0043Talk 08:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in Italy Lukas Beck (talk) 15:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlucho510 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claims. The Formula one photograph was uploaded by this on 28 May 2011 and uploaded here on 3 June 2011. The ship with PC-22 was found uploaded on 27 July 2011 here while it was uploaded here on 25 August 2011. GC-21 here on 3 June 2011.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I kept the 2 larger ones, and deleted the 2 small ones. The Formula is a different picture, and I don't see a copy of the PC-21 ship. --Yann (talk) 21:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, but there is a second author and no evidence they have also approved the release. Skyerise (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia benötigt 2001:14BB:676:EF50:A49E:E6BD:14AB:C180 15:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not freely-licensed HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HeminKurdistan:  Comment: On the bottom of the page, it states

All rights reserved for Equestrian Deputy. The content is permitted by mentioning the source. 1389

Maybe this falls under {{Copyrighted free use}}? QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If the photographer is unknown, how could they autorize the publication?. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement to https://pullmaneditions.com/products/alfa-romeo-8c-2900-lake-como?_pos=1&_sid=f73a9bdeb&_ss=r Pullmaneditions (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find any information about Charles Avalon. Is he alive? I think so. --Achim55 (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, lacks info needed to confirm copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CB#Payment cards, the designs of these cards may be above COM:TOO South Korea and therefore be copyrighted.

Larryasou (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork from an album published in 1984. The image is in the public domain in Argentina, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, this is still protected by copyright in the US. Following COM:PCP we should delete this file. Günther Frager (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл загружен в нарушении АП. Указана неверная лицензия. Файл не является собственной работой загрузившего. Сам загрузивший подтверждает это, например, вот здесь https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Евгений_Куликов_1991.jpg SergioOren (talk) 23:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Коллаж. Нет подтверждения, что все изображения авторства загрузившего. На разных интернет-ресурсах указаны разные авторы приведённых на коллаже изображений. Файл загружен в нарушении АП. Указана неверная лицензия. Файл не является собственной работой загрузившего. Сам загрузивший подтверждает это, например, вот здесь https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Евгений_Куликов_1991.jpg SergioOren (talk) 23:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Право на собственное изображение принадлежит изображённому ) Загружено с его согласия для неограниченного использования. A7767248 (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
С чего вы взяли, что права принадлежат изображённому? В общем случае права принадлежат фотографу. Если фотограф заключал с кем-то договор о передаче прав, это ваше бремя показать этот договор. Lesless (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Из метаданных файла нельзя сделать вывод, что это непосредственно оригинал цифровой фотографии (или скан с неё сделанный автором оригинала). Как видно, это цифровое изображение отредактированное в 2006 году. Хронологически, судя по визуальной оценке возраста, сама фотография относится к 90-м годам, если не раньше. Можно было бы довериться, что файл — собственная работа пользователя, как указано. Однако, сомнительный предыдущий вклад и заверения загрузившего, позволяют предположить, что ситуация с нарушением АП аналогичная. SergioOren (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Какое нужно подтверждение? Право на собственное изображение принадлежит изображённому ) Загружено с его согласия для неограниченного использования. A7767248 (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • A7767248, С чего вы взяли, что права принадлежат изображённому? В общем случае права принадлежат фотографу. Если фотограф заключал с кем-то договор о передаче прав, это ваше бремя показать этот договор. Lesless (talk) 09:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality SVG, other examples of road signs of this type exist EthanL13 (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@EthanL13: Would you be able to point to an example of such a sign? It would make it easier to close this discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Red-tailed hawk This and this, for example; though the latter isn't the best quality it is at least a true SVG. The former I plan to replace with a SVG at some stage. EthanL13 (talk) 09:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken by Hilda Lizarazu (a known musician and photographer) during the 1980s (the band formed in the late 1970s and Lizarazu was born in 1963). This is currently in the public domain in Argentina, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Following COM:PCP we should delete this file. Günther Frager (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This stamp clearly isn't the uploaders own work and at least one of the artists, Charles Dufresne, hasn't been dead for more then 70 years yet. So this image is clearly copyrighted until at least 2027, if not longer depending on how long other artist Boutet has been dead for. Unfortunately I couldn't find any information about them to find out, but the stamp is still copyrighted until at least 2027 regardless. Possibly longer then that if the status was restored by the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator to decide. Adamant1 (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think {{PD-Libya}} applies: "It is a work created by a legal public or private entity and 30 years have passed since the year the work was created" and/or "It is another type of work and than 25 years have elapsed since the the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author) and fifty years have elapsed since the year of publication."  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree. There's zero evidence stamps of Libya are in the public domain and if we applied your standard to them without evidence then the same could go for essentially everything else since most works are "created by a legal public or private entity" and more then 30 years old. The template doesn't exist just to give us an out and/or excuse to host whatever we want as PD because "legal public or private entity and age." That's not how this works. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Files on Commons have to be in the public domain in the source country and in the United States. These stamps were published in what is now Libya, so Libya can be considered the source country. And according to Libyan copyright law, this stamp is in the public domain and was been so for a long time. This means it is in the public domain also in the US, {{PD-1996}}. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Robert Weemeyer. --Ellywa (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]