Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 23rd, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 04:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is not being used in any WIkipedia page. Josedani99 (talk) 03:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Josedani99:  Delete, also the source is listed just as "Facebook" so it's probably also a copyvio QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 09:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Notrealname1234 as no license (No license since), however, admin pls check logID/310733019 and see what happened here before Jan.2023. -- Tuválkin 00:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Me filing this DR does not constitute a deletion vote, of course. This is an 1811 book, so it’s trivially {{PD-old}}. I noticed Notrealname1234’s speedy deletion vandalism through my monitoring of Fae’s talk page: The gravedancing attempts are notable — not only because they are so many, but also because they are so clueless. -- Tuválkin 00:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuvalkin at the time, there were no license, that's why i marked it. Notrealname1234 (talk) 00:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It had been marked automaticly by a bot, awaiting for a human to check it and fix the issue. A human user in good faith would have quickly seen it’s an 1811 book and ask an admin to undelete the vanished edits to try to rescue the original page information.
You did nothing of the sort: You went ahead and approved the bot categorization by creating a speedy deletion, risking us to lose this 1811 book from our repository. I don’t care if it was due to sheer cluelessness or as a small-minded attempt at reducing Fae’s legacy — eitherway you should keep your hands off the speedy deletion button, either on your own volition or after being sanctioned to do so.
-- Tuválkin 01:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didnt even see the date, and there were still no license. @Tuvalkin Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You should have seen the date, as I easily did. To see there’s no license in the filepage, that’s a text-parsing bot’s job. Human editors are supposed to be creative and inquisitive. -- Tuválkin 01:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and checking the description, it was a test. Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And checking from the contents, it’s a 1811 book we want to keep. The only reason to delete it would be a duplicated upload, in wich case we’d expect a deletion notice rationale saying so should one follow the redlink — and that’s not the case. That why an admin is needed here. -- Tuválkin 01:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's an 1811 book. Why on earth are we having a deletion discussion just because a user who is no longer active on Commons failed to tag it appropriately when it was uploaded? - Jmabel ! talk 01:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: Fae’s original file page edit is not available. Non-admins can only see he uploaded this on 2021-05-02T17:46:25, yet the current filepage history goes back only to 2023-02-10T16:35:23, with a «test» edit made by @GPSLeo: Can we have the missing revisions undeleted by one of you? Maybe Fae indeed «failed to tag it appropriately», or maybe not. (Incidentally, it’s quite a cold way to refer to one of the best among us, as merely «a user who is no longer active on Commons». This grave dancing thing is really disheartening, and I wouldn’t expect to find you engaging in it.) -- Tuválkin 04:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are no deleted revisions. I created the page. There is a bug resulting in files being uploaded without any file page. Here is the related Phabricator task. GPSLeo (talk) 07:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{Information}} filled out and PD tags added. None of what I did required an admin. All it took was looking at the content of the document.
I realize this has not been open for seven days, but User:Notrealname1234, do you have any objection to my closing this as kept? - Jmabel ! talk 02:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe admins should add their voice to those who oppose non-autopatrolled accounts from creating speedy deletion requests (as in the case at hand — and look at this other nugget of nonsense!), and IPs from creating deletion requests — that would cut down the workload and decrease the risk of having legitimate content deleted for no good reason. -- Tuválkin 04:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per everyone here. Notrealname1234 (talk) 13:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. As discussed, public domain work from 1811, just lacked the tag. - Jmabel ! talk 15:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDM College Basketball photos

[edit]

Source at Flickr is Public Domain Mark.

Abzeronow (talk) 16:18, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using the depreciated license {{PD-Austria-1932}} and author died 1950. Can be restored in 2021 with {{PD-old-auto}}

JuTa 02:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using depeciated license {{PD-Austria-1932}} and author died 1990. Can be restored in 2061.

JuTa 02:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using depreciated license {{PD-Austria-1932}} and author died 1963. Can be restored in 2034.

JuTa 02:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using depreciated license {{PD-Austria-1932}} and author died 1964. Files can be restored 2035.

JuTa 03:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Files using obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}} and death date of the author is unknown. Copyright might be owned by Wilhelm Hlosta (1904–1984). So restore in 2045.

JuTa 10:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using Creator:Franz Löwy and {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Aurhor died in 1949. Can be restored in 2020.

JuTa 10:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Rudolf Jobst (1872–1952) and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died 1952. They can be restored in 2023.

JuTa 10:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Lotte Meitner-Graf (1899–1973) and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using obsolte license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died 1973. Can be undeleted in 2044.

JuTa 11:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Trude Geiringer and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died 1981. Can be restored in 2052.

JuTa 11:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Hermann Brühlmeyer and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died in 1966. Can be restored in 2037.

JuTa 11:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Stanislaus Walter and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using the obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died 1974. Can be restored 2045.

JuTa 17:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Shmuel Joseph Schweig and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using the obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died 1984. Can be restored in 2055.

JuTa 17:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Rudolf Schloß and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using the obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Lifespan of author is unknown.

JuTa 17:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Karl Winkler and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using the obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Lifespan of the author is unknown.

JuTa 18:27, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Photoatelier Dietrich and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using the obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Lifespan of the author is unknown.

JuTa 18:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Fred Cesanek and using {{PD-Austria-1932}}

[edit]

Files using the obsolete license {{PD-Austria-1932}}. Author died 1965. Can be restored in 2036.

JuTa 19:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ~riley (talk) 04:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files listed is empty.

Notrealname1234 (talk) 00:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted two that were recreated as empty file pages after the files had been deleted, restored five redirects that someone had blanked. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kesalahan Crusade Ju (talk)


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kesalahan Crusade Ju (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

? What is your rationale? What does "Kesalahan" mean? --Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. I overrule the decision. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia and the building looks like modern. Probably the photo violates architect's copyright. I'll delete almost-copy file:GMIM Jemaat Torsina Kembes.jpg, uploaded by DR nominator, due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosplayer of Kongō, Kantai Collection at PF25 20161106a.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 17:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Added by mistake Gioppolognomo (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Enigma Large (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

4 Sushantakumarmanna (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test or vandalism by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image shows this paper[1] as source, but paper don't have such a figure. It is paratype specimen of Callichimaera (MUN-STRI 27044-02), but in the paper it with text to show each parts, and no fossil image without text can be found. There is no evidence of permission from Javier Luque, if uploader is not author themselves. Paper itself is Non-commercial licence, so it is not usable either. I will try to contact about that to Luque on Twitter if possible. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Callichimaera perplexa Luque et al 2019 by Oksana Vernygora.tif. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 03:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now got reply from Luque, it looks like permissioned. Should be noted in file.[2] Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 23:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. I will put this Tweet as evidence of permission. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol, cf. internews24.com — danyele 14:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio, various reverse image search hits prior to the upload here. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol: photo by REUTERS/Claudia Greco, cf. thestar.com.my — danyele 15:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly a copyviol, cf. user's upload history — danyele 15:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio, various reverse image search hits prior to the upload here. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated picture Inaki LL (talk) 22:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated picture Inaki LL (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated picture Inaki LL (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated picture Inaki LL (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated picture Inaki LL (talk) 22:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://eyelandsawards.com/2021/12/30/eyelands-book-awards-2021-prizes-grand-prizes/ with no obvious onward licencing 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete nominated erroneously for deletion discussion 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license; seems to be copyright violation, see https://www.seiska.fi/kotimaa/painisyleilya-jyvaskylan-yossa-rallimestari-kalle-rovanpera-biletti-villisti-kohukuvat-seiskassa/159749 Unnamelessness (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. File must be deleted Markmakr8 (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees. --Achim55 (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright vio? Joschi71 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tidak Awanxyz (talk) 04:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: That or advertising. --Herby talk thyme 07:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
---
Kept, discussion happened on the deletion request for the image this is extracted from.MrNoobNub2 (talk) 03:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
=== File:Walter White al carrer d'Antoni Suárez, València (cropped).JPG ===

Photo this is extracted from is also being nominated MrNoobNub2 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing of Walter White

[edit]

MrNoobNub2 (talk) 03:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Walter White al carrer d'Antoni Suárez, València (cropped).JPG
  • File:Walter White al carrer d'Antoni Suárez, València.JPG

Photo is a drawing of a copyrighted character, Walter White. Original drawings of copyrighted characters are also not allowed on commons.  I was wrong, file is suitable for Commons. I withdraw my nomination., MrNoobNub2 (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No per FoP in Spain --Joanbanjo (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but please clarify? I do not live in Spain, so I wouldn't know. Thank you. MrNoobNub2 (talk) 17:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Did not know this, will close the nomination. Thank you for letting me know. But can you please add this licensing tag to the images? Thank you. MrNoobNub2 (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, graffitti is covered by works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares may be freely reproduced, distributed and communicated by painting, drawing, photography and audiovisual processes See:

Spain

The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article 35.2 of the Royal Legislative Decree 1/1996 of April 12, 1996, and amended by Law 5/1998 of March 6, 1998, which states that:
Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares may be freely reproduced, distributed and communicated by painting, drawing, photography and audiovisual processes.
See COM:CRT/Spain#Freedom of panorama for more information.

català | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | italiano | македонски | 中文 | +/−


Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contains sensitive and private information Huda nassar (talk) 10:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Zhang Wentian, copyvio

Midleading (talk) 03:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no metadata, out of project Zafer (talk) 05:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tegzes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images, apparently showing various Hungarian actors, were all uploaded with CC0 license tags, but without an explanation why. They look like a collection of screenshots/movie stills, film posters and photos from old newspapers and magazines. They're all probably still copyrighted and should be deleted unless convincingly shown to be in the public domain or under a free license and given proper sources, dates, authors and license tags.

Rosenzweig τ 16:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crusade Ju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logos, no evidence of a free license or public domain.

Yann (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953, so these are not in the public domain yet. The files can be restored in 2024.

Rosenzweig τ 17:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if this is eligible for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} but, logo of this Philippine w:en:barangay is claimed to be for viewing purpose only (not for public use, with three exclamation points added by uploader). I suspect Barangay Caridad Norte has copyright enforcement over their logo, maybe because the logo is not designed by a government employee but a hired designer contracted to the barangay government, typical of logo creation arrangements here in the Philippines in recent years. Per COM:Philippines#Government works, copyright does not disappear just by passing the work to the government; the government (barangay in this case) just acquires the copyright, unless a stipulation indicates the logo designer surrendered their copyright. That contract needs to be forwarded to COM:VRTS admins via email, however.

Commons does not accept any content where commercial epxloitation is forbidden without licensing clearance from the author/designer. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Grigory Alekseevich Zakharov died in 1982 A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Grigory Alekseevich Zakharov died in 1982 A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Georgy Frangulyan is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is out of scope. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work and likely copyrighted - reverse image search shows numerous uses as a logo of some sort. Mifter (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted sculpture, as it was unveiled in 2015. As there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, a commercial license permit from the sculptor is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing. Account has 0 followers, 2 photos, etc Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Marieve Petit, i think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the last remaining upload of this user, all others were copyvios. Considering the file's tiny size, this one is most likely a copyvio too. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not CC BY, but possibly {{PD-textlogo}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, PCP. Gbawden (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vesan99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in Russia for contemporary sculpture.

Komarof (talk) 03:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. And what does it mean? Is this your personal opinion or are there any decisions of the wiki-community on this matter? I would appreciate clarifications and links. Vesan99 (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I see. It was a new topic for me (limitations) - free panorama. Dura lex (ой, дура! ) - sed lex. I will re-upload ones to the Russian Wikipedia as non-free with fair use. Thank you for the useful and valuable lesson. Good luck!Vesan99 (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:魚類學, author is Chen Jianshan(1898-1988), copyvio

Midleading (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, likely to be a derivative work, thus a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TROPHY, derivative of a copyrighted 3d art Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 2015 by Jumber Jikia (1950–). There is no freedom of panorama in Georgia, permission from the architect is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright watermark and CC BY-SA 4.0 are not compatible Beko (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 08:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Micropets

[edit]

Screenshots from a video game, Possible ad --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Definitely promotional; uploader was indef blocked on enwiki for related content. Omphalographer (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contains sensitive and private information Huda nassar (talk) 10:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: incomprehensible request. --Krd 12:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm pretty sure this photograph is not the uploader's own work from 1913 as claimed, so the GFDL and CC licenses are not valid. We're told that the photo is from 1913, and from the context it's pretty clear it was taken at the airfield in Johannisthal close to Berlin in Germany.

We're not told when and where it was first published though, if a photographer was credited or known etc., so we can't really determine the copyright status of the photo. It's not yet old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}} either, so the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2034 with PD-old-assumed. Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953, so these are not in the public domain yet. The files can be restored in 2024.

Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2003:C0:8F03:4A00:ED07:3106:C0A0:402B as no permission (No permission since).--JordiCuber (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Reiner Gebrauchstext ohne SH, does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. N.B.: The sentence from Hummel's Memories, though certainly protected text, is a legitimate citation and does not place a problem here.--JordiCuber (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You nominate this for deletion and then say "keep" three minutes later? That doesn't make any sense. --2003:C0:8F1A:9400:3CE5:6C17:12DA:40F0 16:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist die ganz übliche Praxis, um die automatische Schelllöschung zu stoppen und eine Entscheidung zu erzwingen.--JordiCuber (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Man Above All (talk · contribs)

[edit]

screenshots or phone photos of screens.

RZuo (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already pre-existing as File:ESC 2024 Map.svg. No need for a duplicate that will be impossible to gradually update as we're getting closer to the event. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 05:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Emir doski (talk) 17:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 05:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange, unused, no description of what it is supposed to represent or where it is supposed to be used. It is also low resolution with lots of artifacts. This fails COM:EDUSE and thus should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Left side looks like a horizontally squashed File:Siebmacher001.jpg; right side looks like a rendition of File:Vatican City CoA.svg. No value added by combining them, especially at this low quality. Omphalographer (talk) 21:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 05:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contains a logo that can no longer be associated with Elisa Molinarolo 2001:B07:AA7:CB29:B45B:B5AB:1A9C:E3D6 20:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. In use. We don't delete images just because the subject's sponsorship deal has expired. Omphalographer (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. The file has been uploaded under a regular YouTube CC license. Like almost all CC-licensed files, YouTube features a logo. There is no regulation governing which logos are and which logos are not permitted on YouTube CC-licensed images. --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: No valid reason for deletion, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 07:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, in use. --Rosenzweig τ 05:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image has two watermarks overlaid over one another, which suggests this is not an original work, and rather copied from the internet. it also looks very photoshopped which raises a COM:SCOPE issue. 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 22:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not illustrate any credible model European federation as proposed by any reliable source. It is purely the opinion of the creator so the title is misleading. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unused personal fiction; we are not a webhost. --Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File renamed after mistaken identity Elizium23 (talk) 09:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 20:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File renamed after mistaken identity Elizium23 (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-educational, out of scope, unused obvious vanity image, the only upload by this user. Acabashi (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 23:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OOS non-notable fiction. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, not an own work, file already deleted on 22 July 2023 and reuploaded by same uploader PizzaKing13 (talk) 06:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; probably taken from this site Medelam (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not a work of an agency of the United States and miamivalleyjails.org states, "©2001- 2023 Board of County Commissioners, Montgomery County, Ohio" Ooligan (talk) 00:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto de mi autoría y no quiero que siga disponible en wikipedia, sin importar las veces que haya sido descargada anteriormente Najeraa (talk) 01:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have uploaded this image 2 years ago under a free license, which cannot be revoked. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Ruthven. --Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

фон не прозрачный Ddjoul (talk) 09:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no license. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was approached by the person pictured, they see the picutre as derogatory. It is not used anywhere, there is a better picture in the category. janbery (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Closed as a courtesy deletion. Anyone may reverse this at any time without consulting me. --GMGtalk 14:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't exist. Josedani99 (talk) 03:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request; unused, no evident in-scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not being used in any Wikipedia page. Josedani99 (talk) 03:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is miHoYo character, the user did not own this copyright Nostalgiacn (talk) 09:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is miHoYo character, the user did not own this copyright Nostalgiacn (talk) 10:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?id=firebird-logo it says: These renderings were prepared for the Firebird Project by Stefan Heymann. The Firebird trademarks and logos are owned by the Firebird Foundation Inc., on behalf of the Firebird Project. The images may be used at no charge for any authorised purpose related directly to the software distributed by the Firebird Project. To request authorisation to use the Firebird logo for any purpose, please contact us to describe the purpose and make your request.

Files on Commons must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose. One should not be forced to ask for permission for any purpose use.

Two of the files still in the category which I don't nominate I'd say fall under de minimis. File:Firebird logo.svg is licensed with {{PD-textlogo}} however I'd say it's clear that this logo surpasses COM:TOO US.

Jonteemil (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement 219.107.160.115 14:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of copyright? This logo is created with standard kanji/kana etc letters, and the only deviation from that could be the colouring in red. I don't think that suffices as a threshold of originality. Paracel63 (talk) 15:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it’s not calligraphy and plain text is not copyrighted in Japan Dronebogus (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspicious internet grab. RZuo (talk) 14:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

enwiki vandalism user, not notable Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious licensing as an own work. Apparently official or press photo. See also TinEye GeorgHHtalk   17:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purely made up flag hosted on WCommons (COM:HOST): COM:EDUSE. Veverve (talk) 19:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.Mattsson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Purely made up fantasy flags hosted on WCommons (COM:HOST): they violate COM:EDUSE. Those should be deleted.

Veverve (talk) 19:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although simple in design, this album cover comes from Scotland and COM:TOO UK applies. Tbhotch 23:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, above the ToO in the UK. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hharikrishna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photos using diverse cameras or softwares. inconsistent style. hence not own work.

RZuo (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it own work? 186.175.37.159 19:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find any google lens or tineye hits. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This photo shows the state media via posters on main avenues. In 2006 after George W. Bush visit Georgia embarked upon a series of military adventures against Russia. This media is a historical reminder of the prelude of those times. If deleted an important aspect of this historical window will be lost.Ertly (talk) 06:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • It may destroy the historical value, but copyright is copyright. We must respect the copyright of the poster creator. You may wish to save on your laptop/mobile phone as a reference. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete @Ertly: we don't allow content where commercial uses by end-users is not allowed. See COM:FOP Georgia: photos of modern artworks and architecture, including posters which are graphic art, are not allowed to be freely used. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in India for photographs of murals. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 18:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in India for photographs of 2D wall paintings. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 18:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File includes obsolete template, i simply dont have time to change them all.

Notrealname1234 (talk) 00:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Is that a valid reason to delete them? I imagine templates are going to be deprecated going forward, is the plan to delete those images, rather than fix them? The second EU license is valid, so this is just about being too lazy to delete the old one. --RAN (talk) 04:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, obviously. (Oh, and I «simply don’t have time» to open a section about you in AN/U right now, but maybe someone else does.) -- Tuválkin 04:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment from retired user who was the uploader of some of these and got a notification for that reason: Some of these seem to fit the criteria of {{PD-old-assumed}}, and others will in just a few years (2023-120=1903). I agree that the copyright situation of some of these is not great; I would not have uploaded them if I had been aware that PD-Austria-1932 would become obsolete. But there are only 69 files still using that template at all, hardly an impossible number to check individually. Tokfo (talk) 07:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment There may be another option - a new template for simple photographs originally published in Austria and taken more than 50 years ago. See a new discussion topic on Template talk:PD-Austria-1932. Let's get this clarified before deleting anything. Thanks! Sapfan (talk) 11:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Request rejected. --Sapfan (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep no reason for deletion --Albinfo (talk) 12:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     I withdraw my nomination Notrealname1234 (talk) 13:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. holly {chat} 19:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think we need an empty low quality category, we already had {{Low quality}} A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as this appears to be a sandbox. If Matlin wants it deleted, then fine, but there's no real harm in keeping this around. holly {chat} 19:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright article as evidenced by the Nine Entertainment newspaper SHM/Age article [3]. Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AstoriaHistory (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope: aaand another fiction

Enyavar (talk) 08:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think the design is abstract enough that it would be below COM:TOO India. Nominating for further opinions, or else the uploader has to send permission [using COM:RELGEN] -- DaxServer (talk) 10:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No longer used, so now out of scope. holly {chat} 20:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused vanity selfie image, the only upload by the user. Commons is not a personal photo album Acabashi (talk) 11:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:BabenuMiskas002.JPG Hugo.arg (talk) 12:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; next time, use {{Duplicate}} for faster service. holly {chat} 20:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:BabenuMiskas003.JPG Hugo.arg (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unvtalents (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope.

Larryasou (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Koeda-Fudousan

[edit]

TV cropped [4], [5].

eien20 (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it’s a copyright violation, then it should be tagged instead with {{copyvio|https://rakuyosha.moo.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/7e1d15aed8eae409633ab5a867c8382b-150x150.jpg}}. -- Tuválkin 21:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: On the other hand, the original photo in Commons was uploaded in 2015. Is this webpage containing the same photo really older? (The oldest record in Archive.org, already with this photo, is from 2021, so that’s not a proof.) -- Tuválkin 21:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like our photo is older online, as the url of the offered proof of older original inucldes an automated reference to July 2017. This could have been altered from a previous, older version, but the evidence is flimsy. I suggest we  keep on COM:AGF grounds. -- Tuválkin 21:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question The photo in [6] is just an small thumbnail, so the image can't have been taken from there, and the first one just doesn't show the image. What's the reason to suspect copyvio? If the reason is in the text I'm sorry I can't read japanese.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't say that the file copied from website. the contributor say " 小枝不動産取材"(mean: cover by Koeda real estate) . I doubt that 2 files made by cropped from tv program . --eien20 (talk) 12:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Meaning that the copyvio claim is a generic one, and the link to this webpage is not meant as proof, merely as an illustration. It’s still not evident on the face of it, more info being necessary, in my opinion, to delete these images from Commons on copyright grounds.
    And yes, not at all cropped from a TV screen in anyway, judging from the EXIF metadata of the original photo as uploaded.
    -- Tuválkin 16:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the «small thumbnail» you mention, while transcluded from (long-url-here)-150x150.jpg is also available at (same-url-here).jpg, at 300×225 px — this dual presence online being a feature of the CMS system used to generate the webpage it contains. It’s still smaller and more recent than the image we host. -- Tuválkin 15:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: Deletionists on duty be advised that File:Koeda-Fudousan Katsura Koeda P6237036.JPG is in use and that a previous DR on grounds of scope, affecting both files, was closed in favour of keeping. -- Tuválkin 16:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 20:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Great coat of arms of Sweden.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Ukraine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Não dei autorização para usar Ventriconi (talk) 17:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright YukiKoKo (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The photo was properly licensed on Flickr and verified by the bot, regardless of what the watermark says. However, we already have a ton of photos of red-tailed hawks and this one is fairly low-res, so it's not really worth arguing over. holly {chat} 20:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image apparently showing the uploader (who does not appear to be notable), not in use, also apparently not the uploader's own work. Should be deleted per the precautionary principle and as out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 19:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagram 186.175.37.159 19:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Karnameh Institute Arts and Cultural has published this image on its public Instagram page for free" is a fundamental misunderstanding of what public domain means. holly {chat} 20:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 186.175.37.159 19:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Karnameh Institute Arts and Cultural has published this image on its public Instagram page for free" is a fundamental misunderstanding of what public domain means. holly {chat} 20:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2023 Imago 186.175.37.159 19:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free audio sample Backto80s (talk) 19:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is It free? 186.175.37.159 19:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Mahdi Khazali and Loghman Madayen have published it on their public page" does not mean "public domain". holly {chat} 20:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Users in good standing are allowed to have photos on their user pages. holly {chat} 20:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. The photo was clearly taken by a profesional photographer and can be found on the web with a higher resolution at Dante Medina's Facebook page Günther Frager (talk) 21:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken in 1974 in Argentina, and thus still copyrighted in its country of origin in 1996 at URAA date. Thus is should be deleted following COM:PCP. Günther Frager (talk) 21:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of a copyrighted work. The image is taken from movie produced in Argentina where they copyright expires 50 years after the death of the script writer, producer and director. Since it was filmed in 1978, it is clearly still protected by copyright in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:The image is not a screenshot of the film, as the nominator might imply. It is a photograph, more specifically a film still (known in Spanish as foto fija, which are taken during the production of a film to be used in posters, advertisements and to be freely disseminated to the press. Therefore, the copyright restrictions that apply to the image correspond to those of a photograph, which is 25 years.--Bleff (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even if we consider it as a photography, it was still copyrighted in Argentina in 1996 at URAA time, and thus not in the public domain in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 22:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image may be in the PD in Argentina, but it is clearly no in the public domain in the United States as it was taken in 1996. Günther Frager (talk) 22:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of a copyrighted work. The image is taken from movie produced in Argentina where they copyright expires 50 years after the death of the script writer, producer and director. Since it was filmed in 1974, it is clearly still protected by copyright in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 22:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not a screenshot of the film, as the nominator might imply. It is a photograph, more specifically a film still (known in Spanish as foto fija, which are taken during the production of a film to be used in posters, advertisements and to be freely disseminated to the press. In this example, you can even see the stamp that was put on many Argentine film stills of the time. Therefore, the copyright restrictions that apply to the image correspond to those of a photograph, which is 25 years.--Bleff (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even if we consider it as a photography, it was still copyrighted in Argentina in 1996 at URAA time, and thus not in the public domain in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 22:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image can be in the public domain in Argentina, but it is clearly on in the public domain in the United States as it was taken in 1993. Günther Frager (talk) 22:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is in the public domain in Argentina, but it is clearly not in the public domain in the United States as it was taken in 1995. Günther Frager (talk) 22:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is a drawing of copyrighted character Asriel Dreemurr from Undertale, making this image not suitable for commons. MrNoobNub2 (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThis does not look anything like the game --Trade (talk) 22:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete because it’s a bad photo of average quality art of an “in-name-only” derivative. Out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point me to a better image of Asriel? Trade (talk) 22:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there was one, it would be a copyright violation Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Fan art, images need to be useful, and I don't see how this would be. holly {chat} 20:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry picture of someone's thermometer. out of COM:SCOPE 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 22:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

where does the author state the license? 46.131.36.172 18:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 22:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incertitude 2A01:E0A:9CC:6210:9074:BE56:FAB1:1884 11:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

erreur demande de retrait Rhinocéros blanc (talk) 07:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abuloveayrin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Used in vanity article.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abuloveayrin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely web/social media photos

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; while some of these look like they could be own work, there are a bunch that could have only been taken by a member of the football club because they show players during training sessions, and members of the public are generally not allowed in, and it's extremely unlikely that the uploader is an employee of multiple clubs on opposite sides of the country. Not only that, but the EXIF of File:Rahul Bheke,jpg says "The Camera Guy" is the author, so I concur that these are probably downloaded from various sites. holly {chat} 22:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Echohk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is a bit hard to understand the source websites with after translating. Perhaps, the uploader could direct us where copyright license is stated, or can send it via COM:RELGEN

-- DaxServer (talk) 10:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I do not claim that I hold any rights to the photo but was attributed to the article (https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/437/0000347897) from which the picture was sourced. With proper credits to the source, I uploaded to the Wiki Commons as the only way to use this photo in the article page I was trying to create for the group, Crezl. Please let me know how to rectify this. Many thanks. Echohk (talk) 11:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Echohk. To host files here on Commons, they need to be in public domain with a license like Creative Commons. Merely that a picture is credited is not enough. Thus all the uploads are COM:NETCOPYVIO and eligible for speedy deletion under COM:F1 -- DaxServer (talk) 14:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I am in the processing of getting some sort of email approval then. In the case of a person who takes a photo of artists with their camera/phone, could the person who took the picture give permission by email to allow me to upload to Wikimedia Commons to be used for Wikipedia articles? May I ask what would be your suggestions on how to go about finding/getting permission for a photo of a musical group like Crezl, which is a brand new group, which currently does not have an agency/entertainment company to reach out to? Thank you in advance. Echohk (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To the first question, yes. You will have to ask the photographer or those who own the rights for permission. You can use Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator for further process. To the second question, I have no idea how to contact Crezl, I don't know who they are. Maybe try asking on social media where they are active, it could be better -- DaxServer (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's been nearly 4 months and no VRT verification has taken place. We can undelete if it ever comes in. holly {chat} 22:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think the design is abstract enough that it might be below COM:TOO India. Nominating for further opinions. If else, the uploader needs to send permission [via COM:RELGEN] -- DaxServer (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I concur that PD-textlogo can apply here. holly {chat} 22:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO. PD-textlogo is not applicable apparently. Larryasou (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Larryasou:
Entiendo que tienes dudas por el dibujo que aparece en el logo de la Asociación para la Recuperación del Palacio Arzobispal de Alcalá de Henares (ARPA). Dicho dibujo es una representación del escudo del Cardenal Tavera (1472-1545). Es un relieve de 1535, situado en la parte superior (dintel) de una puerta de la escalera diseñada por Alonso de Covarrubias (1488-1570) en el Palacio Arzobispal de Alcalá de Henares. Por lo que ya no tiene derechos de autor. Puedes encontrar imágenes de esa puerta en:
El Palacio Arzobispal de Alcalá de Henares ardió el 11 de agosto de 1939, destruyendo la mayor parte de sus instalaciones. Por lo que la asociación ARPA usa ese dibujo como símbolo, para conseguir la recuperación de dicho palacio. Un cordial saludo: Raimundo Pastor (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I believe the pattern is no longer copyrighted and {{PD-old-100-expired}} should apply to this logo. One more question, did you made this logo? I couldn't find any source.--Larryasou (talk) 13:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He añadido "PD-old-100-expired". Yo no he diseñado ese logotipo. Un cordial saludo: Raimundo Pastor (talk) 10:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. holly {chat} 22:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Russia except architecture.

Komarof (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Russia for such artworks (even if photos are from a freely licensed website - this website is not proper copyright holder for artist's works).

Komarof (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, see also COM:FOP Russia. --Wutsje 06:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A work from 1974. The paragraphs on the right-hand page can be considered copyrightable. This wouldn't be the user's own work, but a scan of an existing book, so CC0 is incidentally the wrong license. I can't find a more complete scan online, but I don't have enough evidence to say if this lacks a copyright notice, so it should probably be considered copyrighted until that evidence is produced. PseudoSkull (talk) 03:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think when Monocletophat123 claims "own work" it means they took the photo of the coin collection folder and that's their own coins that are being shown. Apart from the panel with the text, the rest of it appears to be {{PD-ineligible}} to me, so I think we can crop out the rightmost panel and keep the rest of the image. holly {chat} 22:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair point, and I'd support Holly Cheng's solution. PseudoSkull (talk) 22:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I have reuploaded the file, having cropped out the copyrighted material. holly {chat} 17:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that every listed file should be deleted. For example, on files like File:Фото з конкурсу на косплей на арці дружби народів.jpg, File:Відкриття пішохідно-велосипедного мосту в Києві, 2019, 10.jpg the monument serves only as a background for a photographed event. --Perohanych (talk) 12:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that every listed file should be deleted either. In addition to the current events exemption mentioned above, I wonder if it is possible to copyright a rainbow shape in general. For example, on File:Kyiv Monument to the Friendship of Nations.jpg or File:Арка дружби народів 07.jpg only the general shape is seen without specific details. The rainbow shape itself seems to be below TOO almost anywhere in the world. (On the contrary, specific architectural details like File:Арка Дружби.jpg or statues like File:Воз'єднання України з Росією 8370.jpg are definitely copyrightable). I think this nomination should be split into three with current events (Ukrainian copyright law exemption) / general rainbow shape (not copyrightable) / clearly copyrightable details — Nick UA (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Perohanych and Nick UA: File:Фото з конкурсу на косплей на арці дружби народів.jpg can be kept because the shown work is just an unimportant part of the sculpture. But File:Відкриття пішохідно-велосипедного мосту в Києві, 2019, 10.jpg is not de minimis, as I see a potential for reusers to exploit it as having independent economic significance (the sculpture is very prominent in the photo). Again, the "current events" exception is a type of free use, not equals to de minimis. With the Ukrainian government now providing a very restricted FOP with "independent economic significance" restriction, it is now clear that "current events" purpose is a fair use-type of free use, which also exists in our country's copyright law at Sec. 184.1(d) as well as in most of other copyright laws. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Well, that's not what Ukrainian court practice says. For example, in this Supreme Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases decision the current events exemption dominates the (then non-existent) FOP. In that case the court considers that a publishing house printing a book (a photo album, not a news media) with pictures of an event occurring in front of a copyrighted mural did not violate the copyright law, because it is a picture of a current event and it does not violate the copyright of the author of the mural. Adding a photo in a (commercial) book is a threshold definitely above fair use, and the abovementioned case is quite similar to, say, File:Відкриття пішохідно-велосипедного мосту в Києві, 2019, 10.jpg, as it is also a photo of a current event taking place in front of a copyrighted object — NickK (talk) 17:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose şodo File:Арка - Arc (25204015652).jpg → it's simply texture--Albedo (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted most. Kept those which I cropped away the monument and/or monument was obscured enough and wasn't the intended subject. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The monument was completed in 2006 by Zurab Tsereteli (1934–). There is no freedom of panorama in Georgia, permission from the artist is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notification. If deletion is legally necessary, no objection. Andrew Dalby (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. The monument is only a part of the whole composition in some pictures. The "De minimis" is applicable, when the sculpture is not the main subject of the picture, but the Freedom Square in total.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 10:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have my support. To delete several dozoms of pictures of the Freedom Square in Tbilisi makes no sense. It is just a kind of vandalism. Matti&Keti (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is why we need a review and not treat everything the same and delete everything without wasting a second thought. For those who face the deletion I have some advice: You can upload the picture with the "no commons" template in any wikipedia language that permit freedom of panorama. You can find these countries here here and the majority languages of those countries have a high probability that they support freedom of panorama. I also think that very often commons takes the rules way too far against the fotographers interests, that want to share information about the country and do not intend to harm the copyrights of architects and artists that contribute with their creations to the public appearances of towns, cities, streets and squares. So I think it is Ok to exclude pictures, that have the questionable object as the main subject, but to keep pictures that have it as part of the whole scenery and do not focus on the protected object.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 18:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. No FOP? Sure, legally that may be so. However, I can post all my tourist photos on my own blog and the whole world can see it. Or election posters for that matter. If Wikimedia wants to be a repository for "educational" purposes it might want to do something about FOP, such as negotiations if required for exempt. Meanwhile, me as an ordinary citizen cannot even revoke my license and take back some photos that overly enthusiastic community members mass uploaded as they are somehow highly important "for educational purposes". This is getting silly. Sorry for the rant. Labrang (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The difference is that you may live in a country where it is totally legal to do this. But in Georgia it might be not. Commons is a project that needs to comply with the laws in many countries. The achitect or the artist of the sculpture might not be aware of your site or just might not care, even like the idea that photographs of their building or sculpture exist, but the laws say otherwise. As long as it is not enforced, or even enforceable, you are fine with it, while commons with millions of photos might face a huge lawsuit, also the user of the photo in this jurisdiction.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the FOP photos, that everybody can put on whichever platform (be it their own site, or facebook or insta for that matter). Apparently Commons applies rules more strictly than those platforms, hence I suggest there may be a need for a discussion with the relevant authorities to open up some FOP aspects for "educational purposes" (apparently one of the prime aspects). The point is that this FOP is carrying water to the sea. Labrang (talk) 06:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose This proposal is too broad and I am in shock some of these beautiful imagery can be proposed for deletion! Freedom Square is very historic site and because of central placement of statue, with this flawed logic any photo of Freedom Square or its part can be erased just because it has this statue in it. It is difficult to avoid this status because of placement. If somebody request removal for legal reason, that's one thing to comply but to proactively search and delete any and all photos with this statue is almost vandalism as somebody else say above. Can you find something else to do please. It will be more productive and improve this community.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 01:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, most since the focus was on the sculpture. Kept a few where the monument is de minimis. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this artist is called Airco caravan and the image has been uploaded by Airco caravan but this cannot be a selfie as is claimed so no author given, no metadata and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Why can't it be a selfie? Haven't you heard of tripods and camera timers? TinEye was not able to find another instance of this image, so unless you can find a definitely copyvio source, I'm reluctant to delete. holly {chat} 19:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of a copyrighted work. The image is taken from a movie produced in Argentina where they copyright expires 50 years after the death of the script writer, producer and director. Since the producer Armando Bo died in 1981, it is clearly still protected by copyright in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not a screenshot of the film, as the nominator might imply. It is a photograph, more specifically a film still (known in Spanish as foto fija, which are taken during the production of a film to be used in posters, advertisements and to be freely disseminated to the press. Therefore, the copyright restrictions that apply to the image correspond to those of a photograph, which is 25 years.--Bleff (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't look like poster or an advertisement, and it is not clear the production disseminated it as it appeared in a magazine in 1975, 27 years after its production. Günther Frager (talk) 22:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per COM:PCP, Undelete in 2044 (PD in Argentina in 2032, PD in the US in 2044). --Abzeronow (talk) 20:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo recieved, not a work by Mehr. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Also affected:[reply]

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, likely to be a derivative work, thus a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader claims to be the brother of one of the people in the photo. Any reason to doubt that? holly {chat} 18:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, likely to be a derivative work, thus a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader claims to be the brother of one of the people in the photo. I don't see any reason to doubt that. holly {chat} 18:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The models are marqued as the authors, Found on this blog from 2009 http://babiestageblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/rheinufer-fest-kehl-1992009.html CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have written to the email addresses shown on https://www.sirqusalfon.com/contact and will update if I get a response. holly {chat} 20:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: I am working with their representative to get a new photo. Once I have that sorted out, I'll come back and delete this. I'll use CommonsDelinker to do a universal replace with the new photo, so I need the old one to not be deleted until then. holly {chat} 17:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE 2: Got a new photo from their representative and am awaiting confirmation on the licensing. holly {chat} 20:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and replaced with File:Sirqus Alfon.jpg. holly {chat} 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]