Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_Programme_logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_infomation.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14792335308)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_v2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_PAPINASHVILI,_Amiran_(GEO)10.jpg){kind=link}
![281 File:Trenque Lauquen - Estación de ómnibus mural "Identidad Trenquelauquenche" 1.JPG](#File:Trenque_Lauquen_-_Estación_de_ómnibus_mural_"Identidad_Trenquelauquenche"_1.JPG){kind=link}
my identity is vulnerabile Stracter (talk) 07:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, personal image, oos. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete | uploaded a file with graphic errors }} AodrenMg (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 10:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 10:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Hqxqdsed Cascading style sheets (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We don't delete talk pages. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Falscher Dateiname durch LrC ("-" angehängt), identisch mit "Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 035 2023 03 10". F. Riedelio • 💬 07:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized files. Promotional. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Bulk request here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Juskirat2000 Estopedist1 (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nomination withdrawn in favor of mass DR. --Rosenzweig τ 18:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
This is just a chapter from a book, which has just been uploaded completely Kriny Jasmin (talk) 16:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
This is just a chapter from a book, which has just been uploaded completely Kriny Jasmin (talk) 16:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate file Greg Henderson (talk) 16:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 09:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
This cover-artwork is surely not PD-textlogo and the source from which is has been taken or redrawn, clearly states "© 2006-2023 Orrore a 33 Giri · Tutti i diritti riservati". -- Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with File:La donnna il sogno e il grande incubo.svg, which is also from a All-rights-reserved source. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedily deleted as copyright violation. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Incompatible license for wiki commons. Fossiladder13 (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Authors request Alexios09 (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Photo copy from offical website 72.255.226.237 11:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep Not relevant reason for delete. The official website don't have this image. This IP also have spam update in Chinese Wikipedia. Wpcpey (talk) 12:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, understood, thanks 😊 72.255.226.237 12:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
AD image 72.255.226.237 11:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Not relevant reason for delete. This IP also have spam update in Chinese Wikipedia. Wpcpey (talk) 12:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, argee with Wpcpey 72.255.226.237 12:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. This image is copyrighted by Tangren Media and Chinese Entertainment Shanghai, the creators of the show and no evidence to suggest that the file is under CC licensing. Bookish Worm (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_Programme_logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Programme_logo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
non-free logo; no fair use on Wikimedia Commons BusterTheMighty (talk) 03:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
_Programme_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
_Programme_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:NUDE
- File:Mein Schwanz voll erigiert mit Cockring.jpg
- File:Low-and-loose and adult-cut cock, mein Schwanz.jpg
- File:Mein Penis mit Dorsal-vein.jpg
- File:Meine Dorsal-vein.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- warum meine Bilder löschen?/why take out my pics? Vorhaut-weg (talk) 01:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- read: COM:NUDE @Vorhaut-weg ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 09:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete The names imply that these images aren't intended for any educational purpose. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- read: COM:NUDE @Vorhaut-weg ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 09:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Beschnittener Penis.jpg
- File:Downward curved penis.jpg
- File:Stiff cock.jpg
- File:Corona glans penis.jpg
- File:Nicht erigierter Penis.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another batch of COM:PENIS.
- File:Masturbation01.jpg
- File:Total schlaffer Penis.jpg
- File:Shaved genitals.jpg
- File:Beschnittener, erigierter Penis.jpg
- File:Eichel eines beschnittenen Penis.jpg
- File:Circumcised cock.jpg
- File:Cock with cockring.jpg
- File:Circumcised penis with dorsal-vein.jpg
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep File:Shaved genitals.jpg, there’s one vein that makes it… uh… different, though of course, thankfully, I’m not a specialist on Commons penises. I wouldn’t oppose it to be deleted if someone comes up with a random, obscure category with hundreds of veiny penises, lol… Delete the rest. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The ones with cock rings. At least in the Category:Cock rings there are no other pictures actually showing them in use. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. We had hundreds of men with cock rings, that one is not special. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I now agree, I was looking at the wrong category. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vorhaut-weg (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PENIS again
- File:Extrem low-and-loose beschnittener Penis im schlaffen Zustand.jpg
- File:Extrem schlaffer, beschnittener Penis.jpg
- File:Circed Penis.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete rest of it. and this user needs a block. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- already 1 week blocked by yann. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The copyright of this portrait is not specified clearly. The file's origin is the Party's Facebook page and it did not mention the right to using this picture. Wutkh (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Misaligned central column text in PNG thumbnails. For some reason, this wasn't caught by SVG Check.
Note that I only meant to nominate the latest version for deletion (the one I uploaded), not the entire file. Is that possible? Alhadis (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I don't think It's possible to delete a specific version, we can only reverse to the previous you want. Meanwhile, to have a true confirmation, I did reversed to the good one. MacOS Weed (talk) 01:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- That's unfortunate. In that case, this deletion request can be closed. Alhadis (talk) 01:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is possible for administrators to delete individual versions of a file, but it isn't generally done unless there's something seriously bad about the version, like if it contains non-free content or is vandalism. A simple error like this doesn't need to be erased from history. Omphalographer (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- I read that if a file was uploaded erroneously, requesting deletion within a quick enough time window can result in a speedy deletion. As I'm beginning to understand, this only pertains to the file's overall entry, and not individual revisions uploaded to improve upon the original.
- My mistake… Alhadis (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Image at this filename has been corrected. --DMacks (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Both the description and the EXIF mention that this is an Associated Press photo, and the Flickr uploader doesn't appear to be Mel Melcon, the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi Abzeronow. This image is from the same uploader as this one, which has also been nomiated for deletion. It seems to me that this uploader has simply uploaded images by others without any indication of rights clearence, so i'd recomend deletion. In addition to these two images, ive identified two more from my recent upload by the same Flickr uploader which should probably be deleted too. Sorry that these were missed before the Commons upload. File:Super Typhoon Haiyan damage in Tacloban city, two young people on a river bank (1595).jpg & File:Road littered with debris in Tacloban city (1594).jpg. Thanks, Jason Jason.nlw (talk) 19:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll manually add those to this DR. Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This a logo for a Japanese university. The claim that the logo is under a CC license is obviously false. The only question is whether this meets COM:TOO Japan, or is PD as too simple for copyrigfht. Whpq (talk) 03:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Norway. Artist Tracey Emin is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
_infomation.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_infomation.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. The text on this sign likely copyrighted. ✗plicit 05:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
_infomation.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
_infomation.jpg){kind=link}
I suspect its taken from either this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2FYldYKTyk - around the 39ː20 mark? or a similar video on YT - its clearly a screenshot. Need OTRS to prove own work claim Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 10:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. This isn't incidental. The purpose of the image is pretty clearly only to show the display of the products. Just the swirly design on the side of the bag is complex enough that it would qualify for copyright protection. GMGtalk 11:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons is not a gallery for displaying personal art works. Out of the project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
This is not a real flag, it is not used anywhere. This flag is actually used: Flag of the fictional "Belgorod People's Republic".svg. KittenBroEeev (talk) 12:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
It is a copyrighted logo of an institution. Jihan (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of an Institution Jihan (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of an Institution Jihan (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
1958 composition by an author that I cannot find a death date for. Musical works are Life + 70 in Indonesia, and since 1958 is after 1952, it's not public domain in Indonesia yet. Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of Dragon Ball artwork Di (they-them) (talk) 17:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
-20230704170000-File:Saiyan.jpg){kind=link}
- Pinging from Deletion requests/File:Xinnie the Pooh.png @A11w1ss3nd, Mako001, Di (they-them), and RodRabelo7: --Trade (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral. I've no idea why I was pinged here. In what way is this distinctive to Dragonball, as opposed to some very generic manga hair? Andy Dingley (talk) 08:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, i did not meant to cause offense. I just appreciated your expertise since you are very knowledge about fan art and derivative works Trade (talk) 22:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of project scope, unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep One of the few files in Category:Corsages (flowers) (contains only 29 other images) and in category Category:Flowers as confetti (contains only 3 other images), and also quite high-quality. Also one of the few files in Category:Women wearing sandals in art to depict something else than the Seated Liberty dollar. Chiolite (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, a copyvio. The character in the picture looks suspiciously much like a character from the video game Eldarya. Even though none of the pictures on the linked page directly match this file, the game in question has customisable characters. Therefore, it is highly likely that this picture was directly copied from the said game. Chiolite (talk) 11:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Logo of company, no free-use, element of spam in pl-wiki. Title of the file means "Downloads (1)". Hoa binh (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license; {{PD-URAA-Simul}} license tag is false: Malta joined the URAA in 1996. Uniblue wasn't founded until 2003, so this photograph has to be from 2003 or later, and therefore the photographer had to still be alive in 2003. Copyright in Malta and the U.S. are both 70 years after the death of the author if discovered, so this work is copyrighted in both Malta and the U.S. until at least the last day of 2073, possibly later. (If the author is not discovered or is not a human author, then at least in the U.S. it's 95 years from first publication or 120 years from first creation.) Closeapple (talk) 19:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Diagram relating to a locomotive that started service in 1945, and this was published in a French magazine in 1949. Possibly public domain in France, but URAA would apply since this was definitely published after 1938. Abzeronow (talk) 20:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 01:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 01:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad quality, a new version was made PageOrganizer (talk) 01:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (new, larger version at File:Volvo V40 (facelift) (cropped).jpg). --Rosenzweig τ 06:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Magic Kingdom
[edit]No FOP in the US. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Partners Statue at Magic Kingdom
- File:-CHIP AND DALE-MAGIC KINGDOM - panoramio.jpg
- File:-Fantasiland-Magic Kingdom Park - panoramio.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 03:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Magic Kingdom
[edit]No FOP in the US. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Partners Statue at Magic Kingdom
- File:Gaston Plaque at Walt Disney World Magic Kingdom.jpg
- File:Gaston Statue at Walt Disney World Magic Kingdom.jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (108) (17248784011).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (109) (17249343035).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (110) (17061565748).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (111) (17041914347).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (23) (16629157883).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (24) (16629157533).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (25) (17247608182).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (26) (16626895924).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (32) (16629155883).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (33) (17041933227).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (39) (17041931077).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (4) (17249365885).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (5) (17041939227).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (91) (16629142663).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (92) (17041919477).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (98) (17249345515).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (99) (17223326286).jpg
- File:Walt Disney World Dedication Plaque.jpg
- File:Walt Disney World Plaque.jpg
_(17248784011).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17249343035).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17061565748).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17041914347).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16629157883).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16629157533).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17247608182).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16626895924).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16629155883).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17041933227).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17041931077).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17249365885).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17041939227).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16629142663).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17041919477).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17249345515).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17223326286).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 15:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Magic Kingdom - Topiaries
[edit]Copyrighted characters and topiaries are art covered by FOP, per per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (106) (17061566858).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (113) (17248782721).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (114) (17061782280).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (115) (17061564048).jpg
_(17061566858).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17248782721).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17061782280).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17061564048).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Magic Kingdom - Personal
[edit]These images have no educational value. Commons is not a personal photo repository COM:EDUSE
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (143) (17063116179).jpg
- File:US Magic Kingdom 1211 (144) (17061775600).jpg
_(17063116179).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17061775600).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 15:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Franz Pichler (Künstler, 1939)
[edit]Work by contemporary artist Franz Pichler, who is still alive. This is all derivative work
- File:Franz Pichler Es-ist-nicht-nie-zu-spät.jpg
- File:Franz Pichler Hommage an den Apfel.jpg
- File:Franz Pichler incidente.jpg
- File:Franz Pichler Szenen-aus-dem-Bauernkrieg.jpg
- File:Franz Pichler Was-heisst-hier-Liebe.jpg
- File:Franz Pichler-heiligenverehrung.jpg
- File:Franz-pichler-arbeitsunfall1.jpg
- File:Franz-Pichler-Dolomitenomlett.jpg
Vera (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This was apparently taken in Italy, so even FOP cannot apply. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio: Derivative work from an undisclosed source. The drawing is not "own work", see here. 2003:C0:8F3D:1600:1575:EDE6:3F70:4E77 22:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-free file, per here. BrazilianDude70 (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
All of the other uploads by this editor have been blatant copyright violations. There is no source for either of these and no reason to believe that they are available to us as shown.
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Puro gelateriya.png
- File:Anvar Abduqayumov.jpg
- File:Anvar Abduqayum.jpg
- File:Afiyet doner kebab.png
- File:Uzbekistan asostsatsion of respublic.png
- File:Bolalar uchun eng yaxshisi toybola.png
- File:Toybolatoys.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Private file collection, all unused. Out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 17:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 09:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Personal file collection, all unused. Out of scope.
- File:Osman12.jpg
- File:Mohamed34.jpg
- File:Samo14.jpg
- File:Samo1457.jpg
- File:Mohamedosman1457.jpg
- File:Mohamedosman1437.webp
GeorgHH • talk 18:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: business logo which is not confirmed to be free TheStriker (talk) 09:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per en:Sweat_of_the_brow#Israel. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit offir logo final 2.png. -- Geagea (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
from https://www.facebook.com/dezofficiel/. Promotional. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 15:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry Grossafter (talk) 11:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The main subject of the picture (the metro line) is not blurry. It is very notable because until yesterday we had zero picture of this metro line. Syced (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Syced, not that bad. --Strakhov (talk) 15:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Grossafter (talk) 11:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Foreground is indeed blurry when viewed full-page, but fine at thumbnail size, and we have no better picture of this major intersection. Showing the new metro line in the same picture is also important. Syced (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Syced, not that bad. --Strakhov (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juskirat2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused and uncategorized files. Promotional. Out of project scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 12:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright and scope issues. --Strakhov (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo, used for a prank article on ro.wp. —Andreitalk 13:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 15:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]No FoP in Japan
- File:9 Matsuyamamachi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken 852-8118, Japan - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:9 Matsuyamamachi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken 852-8118, Japan - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:9 Matsuyamamachi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken 852-8118, Japan - panoramio.jpg
- File:Nagasaki (4695494581).jpg
- File:Nagasaki (4696129236).jpg
- File:Nagasaki Peace Park (31310088571).jpg
- File:Peac park symbol - panoramio.jpg
- File:Peace ceremony - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Peace ceremony - panoramio.jpg
- File:Peace Statue (Nagasaki) 01.jpg
- File:Peace Statue (Nagasaki) 02.jpg
- File:Peace Statue (Nagasaki) 03.jpg
- File:Peace statue - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Peace statue - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Peace statue - panoramio.jpg
- File:Peace statue side view..jpg
- File:The Statue of Peace 平和祈念像 - panoramio.jpg
- File:平和祈念像 - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nagasaki Statue and above DR.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]This statue was created by ja:北村西望 (Seibō Kitamura) (1884 - 1987). No FoP in Japan for statues.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace Statue (Nagasaki)
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Japan for non-architectural works
- File:Bức tượng hòa bình.jpg
- File:Nagasaki Friedenspark Denkmal.jpg
- File:Nagasaki Peace Statue - panoramio.jpg
- File:長崎平和公園・平和祈念像.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, if this statue has no freedom of panorama in Japan then the photo can be deleted. -Artanisen (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1965 by Leonid Brynn(1928–2000). There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2071.
- File:2012 - panoramio (186).jpg
- File:2012-05-30 - panoramio.jpg
- File:2012. Донецк 135.jpg
- File:2012. Донецк 136.jpg
- File:2012. Донецк 221.jpg
- File:2012. Донецк 224.jpg
- File:2012. Донецк 226.jpg
- File:BrynnLA107.jpg
- File:BrynnLA114.jpg
- File:Donetsk zhertvam fashizma.jpg
- File:Lenins'kyi district, Donetsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, 83000 - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Photo of Monument to " Victims of fascism» .jpg
- File:Братская могила - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Жервам фашизма - panoramio.jpg
- File:Жертвам фашизма - panoramio.jpg
- File:Монумент "Жертвам фашизма".jpg
- File:Монумент - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Пам'ятник жертвам фашизму. Донецьк.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 001.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 002.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 003.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 008.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 009.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 011.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 012.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 013.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 014.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 015.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 016.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 017.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 019.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 020.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 021.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 022.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 023.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 028.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 029.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 030.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 031.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 032.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 033.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 036.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 037.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 041.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 042.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 043.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 044.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 045.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 047.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 049.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 050.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 056.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 063.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 065.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 066.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 067.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 068.jpg
- File:Памятник жертвам фашизма в Донецке 078.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- User:Leobrynn is son of sculptor and he is copyright holder --Butko (talk) 08:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Then we need confirmation from him that he's fine with publication of images of the monument. He should write a mail to COM:OTRS. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 547.jpg
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 548.jpg
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 549.jpg
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 550.jpg
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 552.jpg
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 700.jpg
- File:2012. День металлурга в Донецке 701.jpg
- File:2012. День семьи в Донецке 287.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 344.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 345.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 348.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 349.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 350.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 565.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 567.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 568.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 569.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 570.jpg
- File:2013. Донецк 643.jpg
- File:Adda82. Памятник святым равноапостольным Кириллу и Мефодию перед фасадом Дворца культуры металлургов.jpg
- File:Кирилл и Мефодий - panoramio (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Photographs of politicians do not come under PD-exempt as they are separately copyrighted by the person who took the photo or by the political office. Bookish Worm (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 1. left.jpg
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 2. Rud D P.jpg
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 3. Cupov P I.jpg
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 4. Sergeev F A.jpg
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 5. right.jpg
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 7. Yakubovsky F R.jpg
- File:Lugansk Memorial WWI. 8. Parhomenko O Y.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, not in public domain (post-1989). See this for authorship info of the public artwork. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- @GustafSeb: Would you please care to elaborate and precisely name (and preferrably also link) the law you are referring to? --Rosenzweig τ 06:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- The newest law on this subject is Säkerhetsskyddslagen 2018 ( https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/sakerhetsskyddslag-2018585_sfs-2018-585/ ) which talks about the distribution of information regarding the security of the Swedish state, including but not limited to infrastructure, placement of infrastructure, and similar topics.
- However, the subject has a long history in Sweden, and I’d recommend you read the Swedish Constitution (specifically the Press Freedom law) as it also has details on the subjecty.
- Moreover the most recent law about protected objects is 2010:305 which superceded 1990:217. see https://lagen.nu/2010:305
- The gererall idea in these laws is that things which are improtaint for the functioning of the state, have restrictions on them regarding how information is allowed to be shared. This means that more or less any infrastructure, which if broken, could harm the citizens of the country may not be systematically mapped out, and/or stored in one place, by any party. It is the distrobutor (or any person who has information on any subject regarding infrastructure in Sweden) which has the duty to personally guarantee that the information is stored and distrobuted in accordance with the law, and the distrobuter can never sign away this responsibility.
- For a more comprehensive understanding, please contact a professional lawyer. I am no legal professional, I’m just a normal Wikipedia contributer who wanted to alert Wikipedia about this issue potential issue.
- Some of the pictures I’ve marked for deletion here, have the ”photography is not permited” sign visible in yellow in the picture.
- There are no comprehensive list of which objects are covered by these laws. It is the distrobutor who must personally ask permission from the Government for each and every picture (which is suspected to be covered by the law) to know which pictures (and information in generall) is legal to distribute, and under which sercumstanses it is legal to distribute the information. A good tell is the yellow sign normally position on the site telling you that you are not allowed to photograph the object (visible in some of the pictures).
- In generall any object owned by the Teracom AB, Svenska kraftnät AB, or Swedens National Defence, is most likely covered (since it’s not publicly known what ifrastructure is covered, I can’t actually tell you, however I’d be suprised if not all the named parties above are covered). But it may also cover private infrastructure which could be used by the public to communicate with for example emergency services, meaning anything connected to the internet, or telecommunications in generall, or electricity. Other institutions which may be illegal to document may include journalistic institutions such as newspapers or the offices of SVT, SR, and UR (as this could be used to hinder the free expression of journalists).
- Other laws which may be relevant could be the portion of the Swedish Constitution which constitutes the ”Total Defence” which demands duty, and loyalty, to the people and democracy, for anyone who enters the country.
- Wikipedia has a quite good article on the topic here: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyddsobjekt
- GustafSeb (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep First, this is not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. Second, Skyddslagen only prohibits depiction, not publication. /ℇsquilo 08:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[1] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[2] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- GustafSeb (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Breaking the Swedish Act of protected objects. It is illegal to photograph, measure or in any way depict a "protected object" such as the tower in question HåkanStenquist (talk) 18:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Breaking the Swedish Act of protected objects. It is illegal to photograph, measure or in any way depict a "protected object" such as the tower in question HåkanStenquist (talk) 18:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep per previous deletion request, keep all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Breaking the Swedish Act of protected objects. It is illegal to photograph, measure or in any way depict a "protected object" such as the tower in question HåkanStenquist (talk) 18:42, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. This picture is taken so long ago that the protection may be irrelevant as it demonstrates the old analog technology. Please refer to Teracom AB or the Swedish National Defence Departnment for answers GustafSeb (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- First of all, this is an invalid reason for deletion, per precedent. Secondly, violation of Skyddskagen is not high treason (what a ridicolous claim). It is an ordinary crime with a prescription period of ten years. This photo is almost ten years old, so if you like to prosecute me you have to hurry up. /ℇsquilo 06:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[3] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[4] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[5] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[6] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[7] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[8] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Remove my picture Hampthy (talk) 17:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Question Is that an order? This photo looks usable. Give a reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 19:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[9] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[10] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[11] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[12] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[13] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[14] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Are you serious? This are just the controls of an elevator. What makes you think this is protected in any way? --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[15] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[16] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minhkhang01214977535 (talk · contribs)
[edit]per watermark, not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
Estopedist1 (talk) 05:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulamartinm (talk · contribs)
[edit]publication and very likely images from it. Unlike that own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.
- File:Ipf15.jpg
- File:Musica y espacio cd.jpg
- File:Ipf14.jpg
- File:Ipf13.jpg
- File:Ipf12.jpg
- File:Ipf 11.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 05:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep On Commons, only copyright and personality rights are relevant for the question whether to delete or keep something. In case you refer to en:Censorship in Sweden#Military installations, there is no mention of a threat of a prison sentence. FoP is irrelevant, too. --A.Savin 12:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, @GustafSeb: security laws are not important. Kindly read COM:Non-copyright restrictions. Restrictions not connected to copyright of sculptors or architects, like privacy and security rights, are not reasons to delete photos in many cases. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe the same discussion as with Nässjömasten? Public service uses a similar image in the news for Follingbomasten. VisbyStar (talk) 20:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Can you please prove any of this? --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[17] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[18] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[19] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[20] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[21] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[22] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not high treason. It may be a minor offence which is by now past the statute of limitations. The relevant pieace of legislation is skyddslagen,[23] according to which the maximum penalty for taking a photo of a proctected object is one year. The statute of limitations is two years according to the Criminal Code (BrB 35:1 p1).[24] This is not a copyright issue. Edaen (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Krd: What discussion? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- ???? This picture is 50 years old and provided by a Swedish Government agency. They certainly wouldn't provide us with an image of a protected military secret (besides that I don't see anything protected here). --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Don't get the reasoning behind this nomination either. As PaterMcFly says, 50 years old picture provided by a Swedish Government agency and still available online in the catalogue of the Swedish National Heritage Board (Riksantikvarieämbetet), so is the Swedish National Heritage Board committing high treason or what...? Gestumblindi (talk) 19:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
The picture depcits a national protected object. Distribution of the material is considered high treason according to Swedish law (and may be seen as crime against the constitution and a direct threat to democracy). The object is not covered in the Swedish panorama freedom. Distribution of the picture may be sentenced with prison sentence up to undetermined time, the highest sentence you can get in Sweden. GustafSeb (talk) 06:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion, per precedent. /ℇsquilo 08:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright belongs to https://pressefoto-zink.de/ Lanthan2003 (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Нет подтверждения того, что указанный автор данного произведения согласен лицензировать данный файл по указанной лицензии ItsPol (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but file is COM:INUSE, so no speedy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Clear copyright violating image taken from this page on the Walmart store. Strugglehouse (talk) 20:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Not very large, with oxygen atoms off-center. Have File:3-phenylchromen-4-one.svg with better alignment, less blocky text, and obviously SVG is superior to GIF. DMacks (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
And likewise:
DMacks (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both; unused low quality images with good replacements. Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete {{BadGIF}} and both files per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: blurry image, nonsensical description, uploaded by a vandalism-only account on eswiki. Omphalographer (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eddymatelot (talk · contribs)
[edit]High quality photo with no exif and an album cover. Uploader claims to be in the photo. Found online eg https://genius.com/artists/Eddy-matelot - I think we need OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, poor composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality COM:VAGINA photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
174.207.32.46 04:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No valid reason provided for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: useless raster duplicate of a vector file. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. Promotional. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Olavo de Carvalho
[edit]Source does not appear to be the official YouTube channel. Please check on Wayback Machine if necessary.
- File:OLAVO de CARVALHO anuncia Novo Regime Militar no Brasil..webm
- File:Olavo de Carvalho em 2013.png
RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment On December 28, 2018, the official channel had 568K subscribers, while the channel that uploaded the aforementioned video had less than 2.7K. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support: as the uploader of a snapshot of the video, I support the deletion of these files. The YouTube video I took the snapshot from is no longer available. But what really matters here is that Olavo's videos (from the alleged "official" channel") are NOT under some CC license. So the reuploader had no right to put a CC license under the video. Bageense (talk) 13:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment As far as I can see, the source is archived and show that the video was uploaded on April 12, 2012 under a free license.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 20:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata, I did not bring this fact into question. What really matters is whether that channel was an official YouTube channel, and apparently it was not (see the two archived links above), so it did not have any rights to license a Carvalho’s video under a free license, as it was not its copyright holder. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Literally just read my comment above. Bageense (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality Luda.slominska (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. See watermark. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Not free image. The source states that "all rights reserved" and this is web-screenshot from Maxar Technologies. Maxar is a private companie, not a part of ESA. Kursant504 (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. No location given. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
This is an older photo. I would like it deleted in favor of a newer one Wangombe-g (talk) 08:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deleting the old one. Just upload one with a new name. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikidfan97630wiki2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on any of these uploads. All claimed as "own work".
- File:St.augustine.founded-EST.1513-1565.jpg
- File:E Madrido defranpainting.jpg
- File:Download229grandmalil.jpg
- File:GrandmaLill22jpgfile.jpg
- File:Hadvzil K 2014.jpg
- File:Bes29030.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikidfan97630wiki2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Gagerobertsononhisbirthday.NOV 2.jpg
- File:Grandmalill andkevindroniakUSStarbucks.jpg
- File:Stand photographic.jpg
lNeverCry 22:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikidfan97630wiki2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Google gives no clear answers to "Kermit Glover", so signature can be deleted as well. Another signature (for ca Arian Meany) is also unused and unidentified
Estopedist1 (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Kermit.glover.1923.jpg is Harlan Randall and the image is PD from the National Photo Company Collection at the LOC. I will move to correct name. The signatures are fake. --RAN (talk) 05:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2014, there is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan - photographer needs permission from the architect IPPON01 (talk) 10:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan - photographer needs permission from the architect IPPON01 (talk) 09:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan - photographer needs permission from the architect IPPON01 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized files. Self-promo. Out of project scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 10:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VickyVikinga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a gallery for displaying personal art works. Out of the project scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. No location given. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pavellevshic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused files. Files are not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED.
Estopedist1 (talk) 11:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The date stated by the alleged owner and the date in the metadata does not match. The image can be found here. the owner also claimed ownership of File:محمد حمدان دقلو.jpg before. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MuttafuknSomebody (talk · contribs)
[edit]not acceptable sourcing
Estopedist1 (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio : Gaston Chaissac died in 1964 (so less than 70 years ago) and there's no FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not in public domain artwork Miniwark (talk) 12:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
_(14792335308)_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14792335308)_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio : Gaston Chaissac died in 1964 (so less than 70 years ago) and there's no FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
_(14792335308)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete not in public domain artworks Miniwark (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
_(14792335308)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Unused and uncategorized file. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo Vaquez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused files. Files are not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED.
Estopedist1 (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
The source video is licensed as YouTube CC-BY, but the channel owner does not appear to be the copyright holder of this video. The channel is a news channel and the videos seem to be taken by the general public. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Syunsyuminmin. Thanks for taking the time to verify copyright compliance. That said, I think your assessment is very likely wrong. The Youtube channel points to the news agency official website (puntodincontro), and it matches the identity of the Youtube channel. Unless it's found that the video originates elsewhere (in which case, puntodincontro is deceivingly republishing under CC BY without permission), we should take the licensing terms at face value. Isacdaavid (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination - I doubt that puntodincontro grants licenses in some cases that are not granted to official channels, but I could not find a source for this photo. Perhaps they have permission or have their own photos.--Syunsyunminmin (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to see relation with en:Mckeenstreet Music. Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- uploaded from enwiki by user:Mcapdevila. S/he answered here: User_talk:Estopedist1#Mckeen_kezar.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Ukraine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of NATO.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. Looks like some sort of personal art work. Out of the project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
apparently superseded by File:Proj Ortog.png Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Publio Quintilio (talk · contribs)
[edit]photos of unknown origin, likely crops, certainly not own work (see uploader’s history)
- File:Papa Benedetto XVI.jpg
- File:Chrissymetzin Number 2.jpg
- File:Chrissy Metz in this is us 2.jpg
- File:Chrissymetzthisisus.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Invisible Community (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos for a esports team so minor that I can't verify that they ever existed. (The joke practically writes itself.) Several Google hits for "Invisible E-Sport", but none of them appear to use these logos.
- File:Official Invisible Logo (Red White).jpg
- File:Invisible E-Sport Logo.png
- File:Official Invisible Logo (Gold).png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized files. Promotional. Out of project scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 19:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable logo. Omphalographer (talk) 19:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
not notable, out of project scope. see https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%8A ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- if the page got deleted
Speedy delete them. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used anymore. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sufyan T. Al Dulaimi (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable out of project scope see: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%8A
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- if the page got deleted Speedy delete them. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
not a work of the Federal Government Mike Rohsopht (talk) 14:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
新たな画像を撮影し差し替えたため あっちゃん2011 (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
新たな画像を撮影し、差し替えたため あっちゃん2011 (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eleonorahon (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission sent for these copyrighted images.
- File:Norma De Saint Picman, "Le Paon Albino - Hommage à Madani Bo".jpg
- File:Norma De Saint Picman in front of her "Heavenly manna" painting and "Noravisionsolar" video.jpg
- File:Portrait of yoga teacher and influencer Savina Atai, owner of this physical aquarelle created by artist Norma De Saint Picman.jpg
File:Artist Norma De Saint Picman painting Lido di Venezia Sunset on solar panels, ny Aron Raphaël Stojan Pičman.jpgfile has permission,--A09 (talk) 09:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
A09 (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- The last file mentioned has ticket permission. Krd 14:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- My bad, will remove it. A09 (talk) 09:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 14:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Póster own work 186.172.199.162 23:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Scott Leaver / BATS! Productions owns the copyright to this image and has uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons for use. Sleaver2 (talk) 00:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Children's Peace Monument
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Japan. From 1958, copyrighted in USA until 1954, presumably also copyrighted in Japan.
- File:Children peace monument.jpg
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2005 01.jpg
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2005 02.jpg
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2008 01.JPG
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2008 02.JPG
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2008 03.JPG
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2008 04.JPG
- File:Children's Peace Monument 2008 05.JPG
- File:Childrensmemorial.jpg
- File:HiroshimaChildrensPeaceMonument6982.jpg
- File:Sadako Memorial.jpg
- File:Sadako statue.jpg
- File:SasakiMonHiroshima.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Children's Peace Monument
[edit]Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Children's Peace Monument 2
No FoP in Japan for 3D works. See also the above DRs.
- File:A tribute to child victims of the bomb; 2005.jpg
- File:Child peace monument - panoramio.jpg
- File:Children's Peace Monument - Hiroshima Peace Park (41371495954).jpg
- File:Children's Peace Monument - Hiroshima Peace Park (landscape) (28217905328).jpg
- File:Children`s Peace Monument 兒童和平紀念碑 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Children`s Peace Monument 原爆之子像 - panoramio.jpg
- File:DSC 0298 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Girl with origami crane - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sadako and Paper Crane - panoramio.jpg
- File:兒童和平紀念碑 Children`s Peace Monument - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:兒童和平紀念碑 Children`s Peace Monument - panoramio.jpg
- File:平和記念公園, 廣島, Hiroshima (6238309381).jpg
- File:平和記念公園, 廣島, Hiroshima (6240779393).jpg
- File:平和記念公園, 廣島, Hiroshima (6241297336).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(28217905328).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 16:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Children's Peace Monument
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Japan for non-architectural works
- File:20181111 Childrens Peace Monument.jpg
- File:ChildrenHiroshima2.JPG
- File:Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, Hiroshima Prefecture; June 2009 (02).png
- File:Hiroshima Peace Park (46377584471).jpg
- File:Hiroshima7.jpg
- File:Paper cranes hanging outside of the Children's Peace Monument.jpg
- File:The Children's Peace Monument (6155593055).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Except for the following, which are photographs of paper cranes and not the monument:
- I would also vote to Keep File:The Children's Peace Monument (6155593055).jpg, as the focus for that photograph is not on the monument, but the surrounding glass cases. Opencooper (talk) 04:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: The strings of cranes are works of art so are under copyright, but I am amenable to someone explaining otherwise. Per a request on my talk page, I've undeleted File:The Children's Peace Monument (6155593055).jpg and cropped out the statue. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
_v2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_v2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photographs of politicians do not come under PD-exempt as they are separately copyrighted by the person who took the photo or by the political office. Bookish Worm (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
_v2.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
_v2.jpg){kind=link}
Own work! La moto o la chica? 186.172.199.162 23:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- This image was uploaded by the photographer / copyright owner for use on Wikimedia Commons many years ago. Sleaver2 (talk) 00:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
small resolution, no exif data - unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" small is better than no image. --RAN (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Use of PD-EU-no author disclosure, as explicitly referenced in the license itself, requires that "Reasonable evidence must be presented that the author's name [...] was not published" (underline added), which is not to be conflated with "random Internet sites fail to reference an author". The suggester has been told this many times, and has presented no such evidence. The potentially applicable license, {{PD-old-assumed}}, applies for works 120 year from creation, but it is plausible that the subject is older than 53 in this image . ([2023-120] - 1850). Per COM:EVID "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable license.". --Эlcobbola talk 18:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Mitch199811 (talk) 20:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The artist died in 1995 therefore we need authorization or an informatio that this painting is in a country that accept FoP. Same problem for File:Henry Simon - Autoportrait.1930 (huile sur contreplaqué).jpg and File:Henry Simon. La bourrine aux dindons. 1946, huile sur isorel.jpg (same uploader). -- TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Henry Simon actually died in 1987, so the files can be restored in 2058. --Rosenzweig τ 21:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Goldsmith died in 2003, which means this is copyrighted. Fake license anyway. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 18:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: not an original work by Jerry Goldsmith (an arrangement of The Star Spangled Banner), but still the arrangement as well as the particular recording will be copyrighted; certainly not uploader's own work anyway. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio Foto: Daniel Kolman Lutheraner (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominator: Exif data says "Daniel Kolman", uploader's name "JeanBaklazan" doesn't match that, so we would need a VRT permission. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted image, no permission sent A09 (talk) 14:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
The image infirnges on the copyright for the poster. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped to remove poster. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Not own works as per description, need COM:VRT.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
User does not have permission. According to an old version of the uploaders user page the name of the uploder is "Sodikjon Karimov". The photographer of the image is called "Menno Lesterhuis". The provided judoinside link does not say that the image is under a CC license. IPPON01 (talk) 03:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Unknown source and licence, see TinEye and google lens GeorgHH • talk 17:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP UK for interior display posters. Belbury (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Lifted from Instagram, little information to its origin and true author who holds the creative commons license on whatever this image is. Words in the Wind (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lifted from Instagram and social media, with little information as to its true owner, or who holds the Creative Commons license on it. Words in the Wind (talk) 18:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
small resolution, no exif data - unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Certainly not own work, but as the subject of the photograph, Otto Rosenberger from Latvia, died in 1856 (see uk:Отто Розенберґер or et:Otto Rosenberger), the photo can't be taken later and therefore qualifies most likely for {{PD-old-assumed}}. As there is no information on the actual author and publication date (just the false "own work" claim), there might be a small risk that it was first published recently and thus would still be copyrighted in the US, but for a work of 1856 or earlier I think it would be reasonable to assume an early enough publication. I tend towards Keep and fixing the licensing, as the photo, though extremely small and low quality, is in use in Ukrainian Wikipedia (COM:INUSE). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Agree, provided you do the fixing. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Copied from [25]. Yann (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License OK now, but the article doesn't match the source, so I removed the picture from there. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
False author, false date, false license. PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
False date, false author, obviously false license. PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Despite what the license says this image is just made up of "simple" geometric shapes or text. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
_-_PAPINASHVILI,_Amiran_(GEO)10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_PAPINASHVILI,_Amiran_(GEO)10.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
User does not have permission. According to an old version of the uploaders user page the name of the uploder is "Sodikjon Karimov". The photographer of the image is called " Tamas Zahonyi". The provided judoinside link does not say that the image is under a CC license. IPPON01 (talk) 10:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
famous person. Unlike that own work. Scarce EXIF-data. Image by non-contributor Estopedist1 (talk) 15:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:2021. Донецк IMG 20210508 193936.jpg
- File:2021. Донецк IMG 20210508 193940.jpg
- File:2021. Донецк IMG 20210508 193955.jpg
- File:2021. Донецк IMG 20210508 194004.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fred Breinersdorfer
[edit]EXIF data says these photos are by Andreas Pein, verification should be send to volunteer release team
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 12:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
The author of this work of art (the representation of the religious personality in question) only died in 1993. As a result, it is not yet copyrights free. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- You mean Vranousis himself painted it? I thought he just published a portrait by a 17th C monk? If you are correct - speedy delete.Мико (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Мико: The technique used here doesn't really look as dating from the 17th century. 😕🤷♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can't tell. But you are absolutely right - it is really Vranousis who painted it: "Για την φυσιογνωμία του, μελέτησα μια μικρογραφία χειρόγραφου που βρέθηκε στην μονή Προδρόμου Σερρών, καθώς και πολλές περιγραφές βιογράφων του." My apologies for the mistake. Still one question remains - the signature and the seal are 17th C - can't we just crop the file? Мико (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Мико: Most probably yes, if they really belong to Skylosophos. However, they should better be uploaded under a new file name so not to obstruct this present deletion request and also to be more accurate regarding the name of the file. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can't tell. But you are absolutely right - it is really Vranousis who painted it: "Για την φυσιογνωμία του, μελέτησα μια μικρογραφία χειρόγραφου που βρέθηκε στην μονή Προδρόμου Σερρών, καθώς και πολλές περιγραφές βιογράφων του." My apologies for the mistake. Still one question remains - the signature and the seal are 17th C - can't we just crop the file? Мико (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Мико: The technique used here doesn't really look as dating from the 17th century. 😕🤷♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion, apparently not yet PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
If this is under COM:TOO India, then it becomes PD, otherwise a copyright violation. If the color gradient is ignored, the logo is under TOO India -- DaxServer (talk) 14:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: TOO uncertain; claimed license unsupported. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CarmenEsparzaAmoux as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:F2. This image is not from 1915. It is from 1966, as seen here: Pacifica Historical Society.
Converted to regular DR to allow for evaluation about whether this image was published with or without a copyright-notice. In the later case it would be in the PD now (per File:PD-US table.png). -- Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Incorrect claims. Photo may be PD for other reasons, but is lacking factual information needed to determine. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BuntuKonye (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works but screenshots, missing essential info: original author, source, and permission.
- File:J. Mario Belougi in BBC Documentation for East Timor, 1999.jpg
- File:J. Mario Belougi (Jakarta, Juli 1999).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACUSA and COM:FOP. See [26]. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 07:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no specific reason for deletion. --Krd 03:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no specific reason for deletion. --Krd 03:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no specific reason for deletion. --Krd 03:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no specific reason for deletion. --Krd 03:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no specific reason for deletion. --Krd 03:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This is probably copyrighted due the unique design and I doubt uploader created it in the meantime. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Not in use, the PDF contains all of the pages. Klippiti (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
no FOP in Turkmenistan Didym (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
User does not have permission. According to an old version of the uploaders user page the name of the uploder is "Sodikjon Karimov". The photographer of the image is called " Сергей Кивенко". The provided link does not say that the image is under a CC license. IPPON01 (talk) 10:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
this image represents the former TISM shop sign (and not the logo); the file is not in use and is of little relevance. Epicamused (talk) 11:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Has educational use. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
this is a fake logo or a shop sign, the company never used it; the file is not in use. InterComMan (talk) 09:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Former TISM shop sign per User:Epicamused above. Should be kept, with suitable edits to the file description and a corrected filename. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- At second look, it has some explanatory elements: maximum, minimum, mode etc. So educational purpose may be under consideration. In this case, we can keep the file Estopedist1 (talk) 12:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Without thorough documentation in the file description, charts lose most of their educational value when they're severed from the context of the text they were meant to illustrate. This one is no exception; it's clearly meant to illustrate something fairly specific about the biochemical dynamics of glucose, but the explanatory text is missing. Moreover, the image has an embedded copyright notice ("© 2013, DCC Karlsburg") which isn't consistent with the claim of PD-self; it's likely to be a copyright violation and should be deleted regardless.
- (As an aside, "MODD" doesn't mean "mode". It's an acronym for "mean of daily differences", which is a metric of glycemic variability.) Omphalographer (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, chart could be a copyvio and is not that useful of a chart. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
誤ってアップしたため あっちゃん2011 (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Hid the accidental upload from July. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW Krd 14:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In use; I suggest cropping off the top half of the photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped per suggestion from Infrogmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Sculptural copyright violation. There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Cambodia. The monument was built in 1996, hence the sculptor is unlikely to be dead for more than 50 years and the monument is still unfree. Nominated photos show the monument as the principal subject.
- File:2 Golden lions Sihanoukville.jpg
- File:Golden Lions roundabout Sihanoukville Cambodia.jpg
- File:Golden Lions Roundabout.jpg
- File:Krong Preah Sihanouk 10.jpg
- File:Sihanoukville. Two lions. Golden lions.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The building itself is in public domain. The banner showing the exhibition advertisement is COM:DM, it is small enough (a few % of the total image) and falls under Ukrainian current events exemption (see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2013/12#Ukrainian_copyright_law_current_events_provision). Please also note that as an art centre this building always hosts exhibitions so it always has a banner of an ongoing exhibition (see File:Червоноармійська вул., 1-3 DSC 5315.JPG, File:Будинок прибутковий з готелем «Берлін», Червоноармійська, 3.JPG, File:Червоноармійська вул., 1-3 DSCF9290.JPG, File:Київ, Велика Васильківська вул. 1-3, Будинок прибутковий з готелем «Оріон».jpg), as a result, it is completely impossible to take a picture of it without any banner — Nick UA (talk) 06:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment presumably the problem is the image of a skull in the center of the sign (work of living artist) - I suggest blurring that bit. Most or all usage is to illustrate the museum building. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this suggestion. Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have made a request accordingly at Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop#Request to blur skull in File:PinchukArtCentre.JPG -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- The skull has been blurred. PawełMM (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- The skull has been blurred. PawełMM (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have made a request accordingly at Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop#Request to blur skull in File:PinchukArtCentre.JPG -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this suggestion. Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: DW problem blurred (older version Deleted). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- The first photograph appears to be from 1897 to 1902. http://www.cosmicelk.net/19thcentury.htm Would appear to be {{PD-old-assumed}}. EDIT: Same photograph as File:Korjacká osada.jpg Abzeronow (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Info Here's what http://www.koryaks.net/history.html says about the first photograph "Vladimir Jochelson conducted ethnographic research during an expedition in 1900-01 as part of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition managed by Franz Boas and the American Museum of Natural History. These black and white pictures of Koryak people living in the northern areas around Penzhinsky Bay were taken by Jochelson and his wife Dina Brodskaya. Images on this page are from the American Museum of Natural History. Brodskaya also served as expedition physician and carried out the physical anthropological research, which later formed some the data for her dissertation." Based on this info, Keep first file. Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: first file per Abzeronow; deleted the other two. —holly {chat} 17:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Not "laws and regulations, resolutions, decisions and orders of State organs, other documents of a legislative, administrative or judicial nature". Besides, the author is not clear. When I read the title, it seems to me that the author is the school instead of the government. Njzjz (talk) 07:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- For the seconds point, by the title, it is clearly not authored by a school, unless there is a actually school called "Turpan Centralized Education and Training School". The title should refer to "centralized education and training schools" in Turpan. According to its text, the "Q&A strategies" handbook is meant for explaining the situation of students and why they are forced to study in these institutes, to their family members (typically children, according to the 10th paragraph). I don't think it is reasonable to assume "school" staff of such kinds of institutes would be able reach the families of the students. I guess the handbook may be distributed to government-employed community workers or local cadres. For the first point, I suppose it might be "of administrative nature" as it seems be an attachment of an possible administrative document not included in the file, according to the left-top corner tag in the first page. And, the tone of this handbook indicates that it is written for those who works on the behalf of 党和政府 (the party and government), for example: 我们正在通过招商引资、引进企业，这些企业都需要大量有技术的劳动力 (we are attracting investment and introducing enterprises, which require a large number of skilled labor), 一定要珍惜党和政府提供的这次免费教育机会 (you must cherish this free education opportunity provided by the party and government), 如果你的家人没有工作、且愿意就业，他们还可以在我们引进或兴办的企业中找到一份满意的工作 (If your family members are unemployed and willing to work, they can also find a satisfactory job in the enterprises we introduce or establish), 你的困难党和政府将会全力帮助解决 (The party and government will do their best to help solve your difficulties), etc. The actual concern is the author of this document is unclear. --虹易 (talk) 02:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: While I think the licensing is OK, the file is uncategorized and unused, so I'm deleting it for being out of scope. Please feel free to undelete if someone can find a use for it. —holly {chat} 17:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACUSA and COM:FOP. See [27]. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Lean Keep; looks like a set of old license plates with the number "15" painted over them; under US:TOO. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: To me, this artwork would be sufficently creative enough to get a copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Ложные сведения о лицензии: в источнике копирайт https://ria.ru/20200901/manyak-1576536975.html?in=t -- Tomasina (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику https://sibireport.ru/tpost/y236uffc51-krasnoyarskii-zver-chudovische-iz-lozhka -- Tomasina (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Лицензия не соответствует источнику: в тексте упомянут неназванный автор https://ngs.ru/text/criminal/2020/12/11/69612881/ -- Tomasina (talk) 18:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: game content being hosted for use by https://monakrom.itch.io/feed-the-slime, rather than for educational use on Wikimedia sites. (Description: Music for my game. The wikimedia url is used in the code to allow for music on the web.) Omphalographer (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, video game is not notable. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Inthehidden (the uploader) as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: by demand of the people photographed. COM:INUSE, but possible COM:PEOPLE issues; discuss. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- The persons are clearly identifyable, so I guess we should delete it. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- I was asked personally by them to delete it. thx 103.108.231.19 18:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just wanted to tell everyone, that for this tribe it is a serious matter and this has to be deleted as soon as possible Inthehidden (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Question Inthehidden, to be clear, you're asking for the earlier version, which shows two men, to be deleted, not the current version, correct? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose that would make more sense, but I'm not exactly sure why the file was overwritten mid-DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Inthehidden (the uploader) as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: by demand of the people photographed. COM:INUSE, but possible COM:PEOPLE issues; discuss. Inthehidden (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Original version hidden. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
again, I was asked by the people themself to delete the file. since first time it took forever I changed the photo to something else. But this should also be deleted now. Please do this as soon as possible as they really want it to be deleted, Inthehidden (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Confused There are no people in this image. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: It is not the same image per upload (already deleted) nor description, so hard to classify as education; delete per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Argentina does not give FoP for art (it's a mural, but it's clearly more than just a utilitarian building or similar structure), and it seems new enough that it would not be PD due to age. DMacks (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
And likewise:
- File:Trenque Lauquen - Estación de ómnibus mural "Identidad Trenquelauquenche" 2.JPG
- File:Trenque Lauquen - Estación de ómnibus mural "Identidad Trenquelauquenche" 3 y "Buen Viaje".JPG
that are various other perspective-views of the same subject. DMacks (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment the mural has the official emblem of Trenque Launquen [28]. The mural itself is an advertisement about a photo contest organized by the local government. All that said, I'm not sure whether the emblem is PD or not. Günther Frager (talk) 22:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. The original emblem and the one on the mural seem to be totally different outside of the man holding the spear and even in that case they don't have the same facial features. So I wouldn't be surprised if the mural has it's own copyright separate from the original emblem. Really, I don't see why it wouldn't. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear Admins, I would like to nominate this video for deletion. The speaker who donated this video to Wikitongues User Group as part of its language revitalization efforts no longer wishes to appear online.@ Bogreudell who made the upload has also requested for deletion on the discussion page. Kindly consider this request. Thank you! Tochiprecious (talk) 05:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Currently in use in 2 projects. User:Bogreudell appears not to have been active on Commons since June. If there has been discussion about this matter elsewhere in Wikimedia projects, could you please provide a link, thank you? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nomination, personality rights. --Krd 07:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)