Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/06/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 23rd, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just realized I made a mistake when I upload this image and would like it deleted. Thank you! Martha 306 (talk) 01:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 04:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image but forgot to verify the copyright; it's currently held by the Library of Virginia, which had permitted only a low-res version of the image to be uploaded to Wikipedia. Requesting an administrator speedily delete this file. Dabberoni15 (talk) 02:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 04:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Truck lines 186.173.54.136 00:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Truck lines 186.173.54.136 00:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Save Money! 186.173.54.136 00:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 09:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es necesario este logo? 186.173.54.136 00:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 09:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Oppose all your requests. You uploaded some nice black & white photos under an irrevocable Creative Commons license. How would it benefit anyone to grant your request to delete them a year or years later? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my account and all my content Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Oppose all your requests. You uploaded some nice black & white photos under an irrevocable Creative Commons license. How would it benefit anyone to grant your request to delete them years later? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jehpuh (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HLSF Horacio Luciani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Cross-wiki self-promotion. Personal and self-promotional files and pages outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader appears to be a sock of a blocked user: User:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ.

Marbletan (talk) 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is totally blurry Mohamed Gaber1s (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work? 181.43.4.96 19:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty page 181.43.4.96 14:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't. 181.43.4.96 15:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen photo https://www.tourister.ru/world/asia/kazakhstan/city/taraz/placeofinterest/25908 95.57.232.20 17:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my nomination* Kazman322 (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio "© Vadim Petker". --Achim55 (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RedDino7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

from https://www.raftarformularacing.com/garage

Polarlys (talk) 07:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rzgarkurdi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO.

Yann (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by L'Hommedusud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

From the confusion on the user's talk page over dozens of other copyvios (these images are free on the internent so now i have to go Yemen to take a picture of the mosque myself?), they are saying that something is their own CC-licenced work when they mean that they found it for "free" on the internet. Can't find an obvious source for these ones but I assume the same misunderstanding applies.

Belbury (talk) 19:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error by Upload Wiki-archiv-digital (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake in attribution. I am contacting the true owner now. Please delete this picture (Joe-Peyronnin.jpg) until I have this corrected. Peyronnin (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2016 own 186.173.54.136 10:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, stock image copyvio; found on Shutterstock. Tagged. Omphalographer (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 14:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: A copyright is on the watermark CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete 20 upper 15:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A blurred image with no educative or exemplar value. Richard Avery (talk) 14:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChrisDiCas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader requested deletion without a valid rationale. However these are promotional images, and they probably need a written permission from the copyright holder.

Yann (talk) 16:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a derivative work of a copyrighted three-dimensional work. Even though it was taken by the U.S. government, the ability to re-use this photograph rests solely in fair use because the three-dimensional work is the main focus of this photograph (i.e. it is not de minimis. However, Commons does not allow photos to be uploaded under claims of fair use, so this needs to be deleted as derivative of a non-free work. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: per description, "Not official insignia, nor in tacit use flag. This is an original design of the author...". Omphalographer (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by InsertImaginaryCountry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictional flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arab News link identifies photo source as Agence France-Presse; it is copyrighted. Pathawi (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NPS photograph, but I was unable to find any information about the copyright status of the sculpture. – BMacZero (🗩) 05:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: (C) Getty Images 109.71.220.186 06:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [1] gallery

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:

  1. No photographer is credited
  2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General comment

Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:

  •  Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Delete if another agency is credited
  • undelete images that didn't need to be deleted

For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.

--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Clearly not a work by Fars News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with the "received" images above, I disagree with these six. I see no mention of "received" images. Vysotsky (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These photographs are not from Iran (France, Gabon, etc) and are from different times. If you check the link, this one even has a watermark and Fars News has not removed it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Didn't see that. Thanks for making that clear. Vysotsky (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Does not appear to be the original work of an Iranian press agency. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are 'recieved', not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per {{Tasnim}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are recieved

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Received. Not a work by Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The rights of these photos belong to Iranian defense ministry, as previously discussed (Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Files referred to here (link) were previously discussed and kept. Propose to keep per same argumentation. Vysotsky (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are received, not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom and comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No indication that this is a Tasnim work. No photographer credited.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Unlike khamenei.ir, files from Leader.ir are not freely licensed

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted above per nomination and discussion. Ellywa (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim, files from Leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not by Tasnim, but "Received", acc. to sources. Copyright not with Tasnim News Agency. Vysotsky (talk) 21:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Works are 'Received', CC license does not apply as they are taken by the source from somewhere else.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP Iran

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this cannot be a selfie as is claimed. No author given no metadata, used in promotion campaign on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this cannot be a selfie as is claimed. No author given no metadata, used in promotion campaign on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this cannot be a selfie as is claimed. No author given, used in promotion campaign on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this cannot be a selfie as is claimed. No author given, used in promotional campaign on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an old logo that isn't used anymore and that INSEP does not want to be uploaded V L75012 (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Unboxholics Official Fan Club (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Translation merged into File:Guwahati urban morphology.svg ~ Saur (talkcontribs) 11:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Translation merged into File:Guwahati urban morphology.svg ~ Saur (talkcontribs) 11:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Book advertisement by single-time contributor; also bad format (doesn't show the whole cover. File does not contain the book either - and seeing that the author is a conspiracy nut, I don't think we'd want to host the full PDF, either.) Enyavar (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screensho... hum, shot of a screen. Who is the original creator? Gyrostat (talk) 14:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete 20 upper 15:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex to be below the threshold of originality Trade (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep all below TOO. GPSLeo (talk) 07:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per GPSLeo Lukas Beck (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All files are below Threshold of Originality per @GPSLeo and per @L. Beck -- Ooligan (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep all. Ordinary lights are below COM:TOO--A1Cafel (talk) 12:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MehmetKaanUlker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flags and coats of arms related to various fictitious agencies. While some of them have web sites, none of them appear to have any further substance to them, and many appear linked to a web of other unverifiable entities associated with the uploader ("House of Murshed", "Permanent Synod of the Rite", "Qavloical Authority", etc).

Omphalographer (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. While the Jewish Anti-Zionist League did exist between 1946 and 1948, there's no historical basis for this "not-official flag", and it's inappropriate for an editor to "propose" a flag for them. Omphalographer (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: flag of unclear significance, probably fictitious (description translates as "Flag of Ouroboros"). Omphalographer (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: joke flag. (Description translates to "Flag of Russia 2014 - 2023".) Omphalographer (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshot of YouTube CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm having a hard time figuring out why this is within project scope. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep just some old user pictures from long before you were active. They have been used and are in use. Multichill (talk) 21:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Multichill. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: I do not understand this request which deserves a global discussion. Fanta logos are hosted on Wikimedia Commons (Category:Fanta logos). Also for years we have pictures of the bottles (Category:Fanta). If the photo is problematic, you have to do a general cleaning. Panam2014 (talk) 08:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's less the logo that is problematic than the rest of the images on the cans, which are presumably copyrighted. At least some of them. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: Which ones? We will have to clean up several files dating back several years. Panam2014 (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely all of the fruit. Probably also the fingers holding cans, and maybe more, depending on interpretation. And yes, we will most certainly have many more images like this one which are problematic as far as coypright is concerned and should be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: Why fingers? How to define what should be deleted? Where are we discussing it? At least this discussion has cleared things up. Panam2014 (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want a broader discussion, COM:VPC might be the proper venue. I don't know how many users might want to participate though. --Rosenzweig τ 13:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete tons of graphics there, way over any threshold of originality. - Jmabel ! talk 15:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal photo The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res and poor quality image of indistinct whale, unusable and redundant to many better ones in Category:Animals of Parc marin du Saguenay-Saint-Laurent. P 1 9 9   13:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res poor quality image of unidentified metro station, unusable and redundant to innumerable better ones at Category:Montreal metro. P 1 9 9   13:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo of my bedroom Markus13666 (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy violation. My photo of my bedroom. Markus13666 (talk) 15:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question Why did you violate your own privacy? That said, this one is not in use nor nearly as good as the one that is, so no objection to a courtesy deletion in this instance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy violation. My photo of my bedroom. Markus13666 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A violation of the privacy policy. File not in use Markus13666 (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not really useful. Duplicate of this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schlafzimmer_14_3.jpg Markus13666 (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy violation. My photo of my bedroom. Markus13666 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason. --Krd 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, image not in use Markus13666 (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep Just kept on June 30, and nothing has changed. This is a good photo, and another photo of this bed is in use. You voluntarily licensed the photo. Your best bet is to stop calling attention to these photos by continually nominating them for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schlafzimmer_14_3.jpg Markus13666 (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph that that the uploader wishes to delete. Appears to have derivative works of characters still in copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 16:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to COM:FOP Costa Rica, there is only a non-commercial FoP for artwork. If banner is above the ToO, it cannot be here on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; works by living artist.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ignoring scope reasons, the image of Pedobear appears to be copyrighted, as it was made after March 1, 1989. I think its inclusion in this image is greater-than-de minimis, so I am requesting deletion of this file. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed free license not seen at source page, which instead has an "all rights reserved" notice Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplikat VSchagow (talk) 13:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khardbass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy diagrams, out of project scope

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I can't even tell what roleplay / fantasy government these images are meant to represent. Omphalographer (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, Fake news CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 07:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The name of the author is on the watermark at the bottom right CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The picture is available on the internet since 2014 according the TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

si tratta di un rudere ottocentesco ubicato presso il sito archeologico Petrusa. La mansio romana si trova accanto. Si tratta di una foto scattato da me stesso anni fa, ma caricata con un altro account. F.conti90 (talk) 10:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non ho capito, quale sarebbe la ragione per cui vuoi la pagina cancellata? Cavarrone (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 12:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: COM:SCOPE. --Kadı Message 12:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, no permission by TV station to be expected. 2003:C0:8F23:6F00:14A5:E7BA:323F:A977 20:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. 61.120.241.1 14:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable event/person, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:

P 1 9 9   14:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope. Low quality, no indication of notability of depicted person. Emu (talk) 14:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional headshot uploaded by an account that has multiple copyright violations. This image does have EXIF data but verification should be send to either COM:VRT or wikiportret.nl Vera (talk) 15:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JossyALLEN

[edit]

Personal pictures, F10 --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; seems to be out of a newspaper, doubtful that "own work". Martin Sg. (talk) 16:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from death announcement on https://abidjan.net/ Culex (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from Mpabox as can be seen on the lower left corner Culex (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo under copyright from https://www.explorer-photo.com/photos/chine/sin-kiang/kunlun-pamir-et-aksai-chin/ Culex (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo under copyright taken from https://www.explorer-photo.com/photos/chine/sin-kiang/kunlun-pamir-et-aksai-chin/ Culex (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen photo Kazman322 (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen photo Kazman322 (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 2007, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, out of scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is a crosswiki spammer trying to promote some unknown products. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Python Online Compiler.png --Jan Kameníček (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, seems to be from a TV show CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, On the internet since 2019 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChinQuoc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked indef. for various reasons. Very unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Werner von Basil as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: s. Impressum: https://www.mit-bund.de/content/steffen-bilger-mdb Das professionelle Bild sollte nicht der Hochladende selbst erstellt haben. Yann (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that the uploader is Büro Steffen Bilger, we may get a premission for a free license. Yann (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Werner von Basil as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ausscghnitt aus einem anderen Bild, das sich ebensfalls im Internet finden lässt ... https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=gkA8nmaa&id=8890EAA292E0E9DC19D2DD1A679ED89956B89540&thid=OIP.gkA8nmaaVIcunD-8A58NsAHaFj&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2f2018.iruworldcongress.com%2fsites%2fdefault%2ffiles%2fstyles%2f600x450%2fpublic%2fteam%2fSteffen+Bilger.jpg%3fitok%3d_nadRa3S&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fR.82403c9e669a54872e9c3fbc039f0db0%3frik%3dQJW4VpnYnmca3Q%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=450&expw=600&q=steffen+bilger&simid=608004233882305255&FORM=IRPRST&ck=110AD947027926EBBE40573C7850B23D&selectedIndex=79&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0; Ergo: professionelle Aufnahme, die nicht vom Hochladenden stammt. Yann (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that the uploader is Büro Steffen Bilger, we may get a premission for a free license. Yann (talk) 19:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Superspritz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Artwork of a living artist, not in the public domain. No FOP in Italy (where the picture was taken) Yann (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per VRT. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Superspritz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Artwork of a living artist, not in the public domain. No FOP in Italy (where the picture was taken) Yann (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann I uploaded this image (and the others) by author authorization. What I need to do to save from delete? Davide Mauro (talk) 06:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Codas: Please ask the author to send a permission for a free license via email. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann I got everything I have to add {{subst:PP}} into images? Davide Mauro (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Codas: Yes, fine. Yann (talk) 10:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per VRTS. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Digitalageohio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. Proper license, date, etc. must be provided.

Yann (talk) 19:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My appologies @Yann i will try to add copyright information hence forth Digitalageohio (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep File:2018 Festival-of-Lights Tape-That Berlin.jpg per de minimi Lukas Beck (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center! Ras67 (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published online in higher resolution: [2]. Dubious ownership claim. Gyrostat (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published online in 2019 with a copyright mention (but no identifiable author though) Gyrostat (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published previously online, uncropped version can also be found. Gyrostat (talk) 22:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This publication states that the photo is coming from FB. The uploader's username implies to be staff. This could be an official image, which would make it unsuitable for CC-BY-SA 4.0 Gyrostat (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cllaimed free license not seen at source website -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not educationally useful. I had uploaded this file years ago without fully understanding the scope of Wikimedia commons. Deadrat (talk) 02:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Is this indeed own work? No metadata. Wouter (talk) 07:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Own work? See here where is mentioned "Photo by Byron Bryson". Wouter (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small. Own work? 186.173.54.136 10:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small. Own work? 186.173.54.136 10:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free art. 61.120.241.1 13:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramesheditor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Great historical photographs. IF they are not copyrighted, they should be uploaded without destructive watermarks, and descriptions of who+what is depicted.

Enyavar (talk) 13:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Download from the subject's website. No indication that uploader = copyright holder. 2003:C0:8F23:6F00:E446:C37D:59EC:FD1B 14:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source: from the press portfolio of the image subject. Thus neither the uploader nor the person named as author (= image subject) is the copyright holder. 2003:C0:8F23:6F00:E446:C37D:59EC:FD1B 14:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheikh Washif Hossain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Self-promotion images by non-contributor. Claims to be a person of public interest are doubtful. (Undelete if he actually comes into Scope)

Enyavar (talk) 14:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation 109.71.220.186 06:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 109.71.220.186 06:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 109.71.220.186 06:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement 109.71.220.186 06:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pouria.asadi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two files are book cover copyvios and the rest are inconsistent in EXIF data, own work claims are dubious.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs COM:CONSENT. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Contact.iuac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images of a non-notable individual ro:Remus Lucian Dondu, images used solely for self-promo. Not including File:Remus Lucian D.jpg in the DR because it can be used to illustrate d:Q12737691.

Gikü (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se puede sacar fotos en la corte suprema? 186.173.192.214 17:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Akshay qué? 186.173.192.214 17:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Studio own work 186.173.192.214 17:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ready new image 186.173.192.214 17:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some discussion has taken place on enwiki indicating these are derivative works of a non-free model and therefore copyrighted. I don't have sufficient knowledge of copyright law in that area, especially given that laws in Sweden, the Netherlands, and the US are likely different, but if that is true then these images should be deleted.

Elli (talk) 01:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If not already done, editors at the Korean, Russian, and Norwegian Wikipedias should be notified as well so that they are aware of the discussion and may take appropriate action in accordance with their own project policies and the copyright law of their respective regions, as all their versions of the toy's page feature some of these files. Joyce-stick (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Additional note: Two of the images, specifically File:IKEA East Palo Alto - July 2021 - 28.jpg and File:IKEA Taoyuan 20200813.jpg are also used in a gallery on the Japanese Wikipedia's version of the "IKEA" article. They should be fine, given that they're both primarily focusing the interiors of the stores and not the toy, but it bears mentioning anyway that the JA wiki editors may need a notification as well. Joyce-stick (talk) 19:12, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So, another editor uploaded yet another Blåhaj image at File:Blåhaj IKEA Kungens Kurva, June 18 2022.jpg. I believe this one could probably be fine since it's yet another one that's more a picture of an IKEA store and less a picture of the toy shark, but I'd honestly not be opposed to just deleting this regardless since it doesn't exactly convey anything not already in the other pictures (I guess it is a marginally higher quality photo than the Palo Alto one?) and we don't really need more of these pictures to be worrying about. I'm not sure if it'd be appropriate to add yet another image to this deletion discussion or if we need to start yet another deletion request/discussion to get that one deleted, if it needs to be, so I'll leave that up to more experienced Commons users. Joyce-stick (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like the photograph is focusing on the sharks to me. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 23:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so. It's definitely the intent, at the least. Well, I don't feel strongly about it one way or another. If it must be deleted, then it should be. Joyce-stick (talk) 05:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:TOYS. The toy is imho too prominent on the photos of the shop interior to be evaluated as de minimis. Cropping would be useless. Therefore all images have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the prior deletion discussion above, these appear to be derivative works of a copyrightable toy, and are therefore not suitable to be hosted on Commons under the terms of COM:L.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: File:Blahaj trans flag.jpg seems to have been automatically and erroneously transferred from dewiki. If deleted, should probably be put back there. Madeline (part of me) 21:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blahaj is a copyrighted toy. Unfortunately, this means that we can't include derivative works that incorporate the three-dimensional work in a greater-than-de minimis fashion. This one does; it's clearly a posed picture that choses a Blahaj to be its central focus, so it needs to be deleted in light of COM:CARES and COM:PRP.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree per nom --Brainy J (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Rudolf-von-Gneist-Gasse.jpg, per threshold of originality, i think!  Delete all the others per nomination! Lukas Beck (talk) 11:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; except the Pfizer advertisement as we have the logo as PD-textlogo. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False licence claim added, see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:Galluppi_family_coat_of_arms.jpg

Artist died in 1955, delete and maybe undelete in 2025 with a pma+70 PD claim. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several others are affected too:

Andy Dingley (talk) 13:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2026 (1955 +70 +1). --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

Originally tagged speedy by Silent Wind of Doom with the rationale: "Images of sports uniforms have been ruled fair use as per this discussion."

The images appear to be original works, but derivative of the actual uniforms worn by the players. Some of these uniform designs appear to consist solely of common property shapes (regular clothing and simple geometry), colors, and text. Others may have more complicated designs and should be considered for deletion.

Guanaco (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Deletion requests look so different on Commons than the main site.
I was notified about a discussion happening there about my uniform images. A recent (at the time) U.S. Supreme Court decision, namely on the case Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, the design elements of a uniform are subject to copyright. As such, the designs of these uniforms are under copyright by their teams, their leagues, and the various manufacturers, whether it be Majestic, Reebok, or New Era.
The discussion came to the consensus of properly licensing uniform images as non-free sports uniforms with rationale and to remove them from Commons. As someone disrupted the ordered file names for the uniforms, and to be more precise, I reuploaded the files under new names, properly licensed them, and tagged the Commons images for deletion as per the discussion ruling them non-free. The ones that weren't moved have already been speedy deleted under request of creator. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Silent Wind of Doom: The decision about Commons images has to be made on Commons, as this wiki is autonomous. It may be more expedient to standardize and host local copies on English Wikipedia as fair use. However on Commons, we should follow the Supreme Court's ruling and apply the test to each image: "[A] feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection only if the feature (1) can be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article and (2) would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work—either on its own or fixed in some other tangible medium of expression—if it were imagined separately from the useful article into which it is incorporated." The court did not address whether they met the threshold of originality, so we can evaluate these in the manner of simple vs. complex logos. Guanaco (talk) 04:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Silent Wind of Doom, you seem to misunderstand how copyright works. For a picture of a uniform, there are two copyrights:
    1. The copyright of the design of the uniform. However, per COM:TOO, some minimal originality is required, and if the design is too simple, then the design is not protected by copyright and so pictures of those designs can be posted to Commons and shouldn't be listed as unfree on English Wikipedia. The designs listed in this deletion request look very simple, although it could be debated that a few of them maybe are sufficiently complex.
    2. The copyright of the picture itself. The person who makes a drawing of a uniform needs to choose a free licence for his contribution to the image. This is the case even if the design of the uniform is copyrighted, and images which are uploaded to English Wikipedia without a free licence chosen by the artist get deleted per w:WP:FREER. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: none of the uniforms here strike me as above the COM:TOO. Just fancy text, plain colors and a stripe or two. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

Out of scope pictures.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

This file was initially tagged by BrunoBernardino as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: <G7> The limit has been way past 7 days, not eligible for speedy.

1989 (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 11:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl

This file was initially tagged by Kontrollstellekundl as Speedy (sla) and the most recent rationale was: Outdated maps of districts of Styria, Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no consensus. --ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files nominated for speedy deletion by Davey2010

These files were initially tagged by Davey2010 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: author req

Moved to DR as G7 doesn't apply to files older than a week.

CptViraj (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 21:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept 3 as requested. --Minoraxtalk 07:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files nominated as speedy delete by Sturm

This file was initially tagged by Sturm as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: No inside pictures are / were allowed. Per COM:FOP Brazil this should be fine, definitely no speedy deletion case.

GPSLeo (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I was personally in charge of this photowalk. Although we were allowed to photograph, we were asked, a posteriori, that the photos were not uploaded to Commons. Among all other participants, we agreed not to upload these pictures. Sturm (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as above. I have uploaded most of the images and we have agreed to delete them at the request of church's maintainers. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 00:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Aren't we past the courtesy takedown period, at this point we have to rely on copyright and FOP laws. I see nothing that would violate privacy, I see images of floor tiles and stairs, and walls. I think the church should file an official takedown notice and explain why these images should be hidden from view. That way we have the name of an official from the church, and not possibly some random parishioner complaining about privacy, that does not represent the view of church council. I would assume most churches would want a visual inventory of their interiors in case of theft, vandalism, or catastrophic destruction. --RAN (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I also attended to this event and I have heard about the conversation with the Father responsable for the church. He was emphatic about not publishing the photos of the interior of the church. Here is the thing: the Father contacted us with this request after the photowalk; in the meantime, some pictures were uploaded. Moreover, as much as I know about the scenario of cultural heritage in Brazil (I have studied the issue for more than 10 years now), most churches in rural areas do not disseminate their interiors and their collections because these buildings are settled in the middle of nowhere and have no security systems neither watchmen. The cases of robbery, fire and other vandalism are too many in Brazil. We must avoid wikis to be the reason for other losses... Sintegrity (talk) 01:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. We should not support a discourteous lie without a more compelling reason than just to host photos of a church interior. Being given a tour on the condition of not publishing the photos is something we should respect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand all your arguments but if we start deleting these files in this case we would go away from the strict rule to only delete files for copyright or privacy reasons. This would open the gates for censorship of files. We even have files where we lost a court case Category:Images subject to Reiss Engelhorn Museum lawsuit. In this and other cases we just hide the original uploader but keep the files. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I'm shocked those images aren't being hidden, pending the results of an appeal. As for this, the analogy I'd give is that we often grant courtesy deletions to uploaders well beyond the official period when they are allowed to reconsider their uploads on Creative Commons licensing. Let's hide these photos as a courtesy deletion for the church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imagesdomainepublic

[edit]

Uploader request well after 7 days, all unused. To be clear, I am not the uploader, I just converted to DR after the uploader tagged for speedy deletion.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Why would we want to delete beautiful PD flower pictures? Some of these images are quite good and potentially usable as thumbnails in articles. If you'd like to request the deletion of specific images you think are not useful, please do that, but I definitely oppose the wholesale deletion of all of these images. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as excluded educational content.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting here that I converted these from speedy deletion nominations by Omphalographer as I felt that COM:CSD#G1 didn't apply to any of them, and no speedy criterion applied to most of them. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of these files are Wikipedia pages printed to PDF, then uploaded to Commons. My take is that they're "redundant content [...] used for testing" (CSD G1) - they're redundant to the Wikipedia pages they were printed from, and they were most likely created as a result of the user messing around with the "download as PDF" and "upload file" sidebar links, rather than as a deliberate process. I can certainly send these to DR in the future if that'd be preferred. Omphalographer (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from speedy deletion requests. These are all a few-month-old 20px by 20px images, requested for deletion by the author, and in use on template pages created by the author. These logos are so low-resolution to prevent their educational use, and are therefore out of COM:SCOPE, so they should be deleted.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. These are all resized versions of images which are, in many cases, non-free, e.g. File:AGI-VN.png is a tiny version of vi:File:Logo tỉnh An Giang.svg which is used under a claim of fair use. Omphalographer (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from User:Atcovi's speedy request. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, reason for deletion?

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not familiar with Commons all too well, so I didn't realize there was a time limit to G7. I simply want these audio clips to be deleted because the "Mujawwad" recitations are in use and these audio clips are not avaliable on any page (therefore serving no purpose). -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not being currently in use is not a deletion reason. Atcovi, I assume you uploaded these clips because the recitation is of high quality. Do you now think it is not of high quality? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I just believed the Mujawwad recitations were better to use rather than the Murattal recitations due to the Tajweeed employed. But if not in use & my desire for these clips to be deleted is not a valid reason, then I have no problem revoking my request and leaving them to be. -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=URAA, see Category:Three Smiths Statue Yann (talk) 19:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, photo was found on https://web.archive.org/web/20230127011448/https://savoirfairecie.com/artists/hen-yanni Yann (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The photo was available on the web before (January) it was uploaded (June). The company seems to manage artists in France and clearly states the images in their website are copyrighted [3]. The page today states that the photos were taken by Aleph Molinari. It can be that the uploader works for such agency, or was the photographer, but we should not keep this image unless there is an explicit permission via COM:VRT. Günther Frager (talk) 17:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yahoo!知恵袋から盗んだ画像です。

ブルーメンタール (talk) 09:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

私の所有物です。 いい加減になさってください。 毎度、全く相変わらずです。 これまで同様に、私の気に入らない画像に、ありとあらゆる難癖をつけて私の作品の削除依頼を繰り返す相変わらずの行為です。


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free foto. This is a derivate work of not-free foto from president.gov.ua. "president.gov.ua" published this foto under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license: https://www.president.gov.ua/photos/thumbs/robocha-poyizdka-prezidenta-ukrayini-na-donechchinu-5109 / https://www.president.gov.ua/storage/j-image-storage/29/53/09/292bee1cdb09574041e96007e3a1fa83_1671539501_extra_large.jpeg . And all "nc" (Noncommercial) and "nd" (No Derivatives) licenses are not acceptable at Commons. Kursant504 (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You again?
As usual you "forget" to mention that this file was uploaded to Flickr by an account called "President Of Ukraine" that is the official flickr account of the President of Ukraine\Presidential Office of Ukraine. Another thing that you "forgot" mention is that this file has an flickreview that confirms the free license. Another thing that you "forgot" to mention is that the President of Ukraine\Presidential Office of Ukraine is stil releasing some of its images on Flickr and that all of them have been release under free licenses like CC-BY or CC-PD, fact that is competly normal to do.
And for last you forgot to mention your real reason to want to delete this image, like trying to hide images of putinists war crimes like the massacre of Bucha like you tried in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Killed woman in Bucha.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bucha civilians massacred by Russian soldiers, c. April 2022 - 02.jpg or the willfull bombing of an civilian theater in Mariuopol marked as having civilians Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mariupol Drama Theatre Destroyed 2.jpg.
So this action of yours is not new, either, Kursant504, as you are "an prolif uploader of imagery\propaganda taken\released by the Russian Ministry of Defense of this war of agression and that this same regime that he seems to support. (...) Given that he used the same excuse to try to delete several images of the russian perpetrated Massacre of Bucha (the cold and intentional execution of civilians by putinists criminals), the real reasons to want to delete this image, showing putinists war of agression and the ukranian defence, is questionable at best and clear at worst, trying to hide this same putinist war crimes and the ukranian resistance.". So nothing new as in this part he is already well known by some administrators and you have been blocked for the same kind of shanenigans as can be seen Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections/Archive_32#User:Kursant504. It doesnt matter that you do this because you are an putinist enabler, an true putinist, an vatnik or a tankie, your attempt is clear as water. Glorify a war of agression and hide the defense of a people against it. Tm (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Presidential Office of Ukraine is free to publish the same photo under different licences on different resources. We are free to pick the licence that corresponds to our needs, in this case the one on Flickr — NickK (talk) 21:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There is a two moments:
    1) Account on flickr says: (https://www.flickr.com/people/165930373@N06) "...Official photographs may not be used for promotional purposes including on merchandise, or for commercial use including business materials...". So it is means "nc" (Noncommercial) license. And can't be used here.
    Apparently, the owner of this account does not understand the license under which he places these photos on flickr.
    2) I didn't see any official confirmation that this account is really owned by the Office of the President of Ukraine. As I understand anyone can create such account on Flickr and write that he is the official representative of anyone from any country.
    As I think a someone just create this account for license laudering (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:License_laundering) because foto from "president.gov.ua" are become "nc" (Noncommercial) and "nd" (No Derivatives) for a some time ago. And through downloading them to flickr this man(?) making them free. Kursant504 (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Or maybe this is a some type of Flickrwashing. Kursant504 (talk) 09:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Also if you will look at License History of this account, you will see:
    Date
    March 13, 2021 at 10:53:17 PM GMT+3
    Old License
    Public Domain Work
    New License
    All rights reserved
    I didn't understand why Creative Commons CC0 1.0 is still using here. Kursant504 (talk) 09:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kursant504: It is linked exactly in the top right corner of the most official website, how can it be license laundering? It is obvious that both website and Flickr are official channels, and 'this man' is a staff member of Volodymyr Zelenskyy. They apply different licensing policies on different channels, I don't know why, I don't work for them. The only thing I care about that there is a photo under a compatible license in the official stream, so I don't see a reason not to use it. Had they wanted to prevent us from using this photo or anyone from using it commercially, they would have chosen a different license, but they have not — NickK (talk) 22:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Now I see. Also I understand that they put different licenses to different fotos.
    But I still think that there is an error when choosing a license on Flickr. I remind you that the description of the Flickr account states that: (https://www.flickr.com/people/165930373@N06) "...Official photographs may not be used for promotional purposes including on merchandise, or for commercial use including business materials...".
    This does not match the license under the photo. Perhaps a person responsible for the account simply does not know which other license he should choose.
    Also, if you will read "Other Information" about "CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication", you will see:
    "Unless expressly stated otherwise, the person who associated a work with this deed makes no warranties about the work, and disclaims liability for all uses of the work, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law."
    But as we see, description of Flickr account and "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license" on "president.gov.ua" - expressly state that this foto can't be used for commercial purposes. So it can be used on Commons. Kursant504 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Kursant504 almost certainly knows perfectly well that this was, is and will be the official account of the Presidency of Ukraine, as he, as i said above, has tried to delete seceral photos taken by ukrainians related with their struggle afgainst the putinist war of agression, but that fact has stopped him of making wrong or blatenly false claims.
    What he probably doenst know is that the change of licenses are conscious, or would it be that, shortly after the start of the war of agression, several albuns had its license changed from All Rights Reserved to CC-By or CC-BY-SA or CC-PD and that, around the same time as the Presidency of Ukraine changed the license on its website, it changed again several more albuns to CC-PD and has continued to upload photos under the same license. File was flickreviewed and is under a free license.
    He claims that the staff of Presidency of Ukraine knows what is doing when changed the license on its website, but for some dark arts magic, the same staff does not know what is doing when changing licenses on its official flickr account? It is the same staff, so a change of official channel does not one forget what the different licenses are
    And "...Official photographs may not be used for promotional purposes including on merchandise, or for commercial use including business materials...", is the same language used is clearly a reminder about personality rights, as this the same language as other political organizations use like the white house on the exif of its photos say This photograph is provided by THE WHITE HOUSE as a courtesy and may be printed by the subject(s) in the photograph for personal use only. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not otherwise be reproduced, disseminated or broadcast, without the written permission of the White House Photo Office. This photograph may not be used in any commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.. Tm (talk) 11:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    In case you haven't noticed, we are here together trying to figure out this situation.
    Regarding your example: it would be very useful if you could show where there was a discussion of similar photos and administrators or users during the discussion came to the conclusion that these photos, where commercial use is prohibited ("nc" (Noncommercial) use), are acceptable for uploading to the Сommons.
    Just the fact that this is the "USA" and that this photo has not yet been deleted from the Commons for some reason (no one had a try to create a DR) - it does not mean anything in itself.Kursant504 (talk) 12:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, you are someone that is constantly trying to delete images of the ukranian defense against an war of agression started by the regime of your country or trying to delete images of the war crimes commited by said putinist regime and uploads tons of images taken by the Russian MOD that glorifies this same war of agression, so you are not someone "trying to figure out this situation", as you tried to pass this account as flickrwashing, claim that is a derivative work (the photo is the same as on the official website and derivative works are not this).
    With your las answer it just shows that you do not know what are licenses and personality rights are and what are the differences between them.
    This was discussed in Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2009/09#White_House_photos.3F were it was said "In case of the White House photostream the images are government created. It is your first point, this is a case of Commons:Non-copyright restrictions, you may not use obama portraits for advertising in respect to personality rights and maybe other legal restrictions. " or in Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2011/05#White_House_flickr_photos_public_domain?_What_about_the_extra_restrictions?. And of course of if the Ukrainian Presidential Press Service that takes this photos changed the license in the official website is relevant to you, the same Ukrainian Presidential Press Service having changed the flickr license in flickr just after the
    As i said, many of the photo albuns before the day of the putinist invasion (February 20233) were licensed as All Rights Reserved. Take as an example File:President is on a working trip to the east of Ukraine. (51729992724).jpg uploaded by me in Marh 15 2022, that licensed as All Rights Reserved in February 25 2022, an exact day after the start of the war of agression and that was [President is on a working trip to the east of Ukraine. | Flickr (archive.org) relicensed as CC-PD as or before March 15] (so less than 20 days after) and almost a 1 and half later is still licensed as CC-PD and to this day the Ukrainian Presidential Press Service still upload photos under CC-PD to its official account on Flickr
    Just admit, you are a supporter of the putinist regime of your country 3 day "special military operation" that is now almost 1 and half year old and you will do anything to try to delete photos that shows its war crimes or the ukranian defense
    So if for you it was relevant that the license in the official website was changed to CC-BY-NC-ND, that fact that the licenses were changed from All Rights Reserved just after the invasion to CC-PD, change also made by the Ukrainian Presidential Press Service and that still uploads under CC-PD to its official flickr account it should be also relevant. Tm (talk) 19:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep IMO the Flickr license from the President of Ukraine overrides the site license. The Flickr account holder should know about which license they choose and what copyright term within that license. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Kursant504 you are arguing something that clearly PD are copyright violation, and asking something obviously copyright violation as PD. This file follows Flickr licensing. God knows the reason. Lemonaka (talk) 13:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And who is she? OoS. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No chance 186.173.54.136 00:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is now a license claim on the file, but the photo lacks metadata and the name of the stated author is different than the username of the uploader. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). This is true, but this file appears to be under COM:TOO USA and it's currently used in an EnWiki sandbox. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, not a meaningful contributor. --P 1 9 9   03:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark on image. I uploaded a replacement image at File:Pepsi Special.jpg Fpmfpm (talk) 02:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version: File:NEC PC-8801, Sony KV-1311CR and NEC PC-6082A 20160816.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 08:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fallahsara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fallahsara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos + out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover/content from 1977 Polarlys (talk) 09:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. No exif data available. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   03:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotografía del ingeniero 186.173.54.136 10:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and superseded. --P 1 9 9   03:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hay otra más grande. 186.173.54.136 10:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9   03:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO from https://vhci.lbs.edu.ng/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Photo-12-11-2021-11-04-06-scaled.jpg C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tega1604 --C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is own in scope? 186.173.192.214 17:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9   04:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and OoS. --P 1 9 9   04:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is my channel. Axadem (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Please open a VRT request [[4]] as instructed on this link. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --P 1 9 9   04:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: flag and insignia of a non-notable micronation, deleted from ruwiki in Feb 2022 (cf. ru:Обсуждение участника:Done1ka).

Omphalographer (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like a painting, author unknown. Very likely to be protected. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from the web with a fake licence added to it. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:Galluppi_family_coat_of_arms.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 21:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Full-size version: File:Dixie as Psylocke standing, front view at All-Con 20100313a.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 05:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9   13:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Lhekha

[edit]

Unused personal images and low quality photographs of products and books. Unlikely to be useful.

File:Vegetables 4.jpg has readable newsprint in the background, which is probably copyrighted. --Clarinetguy097 (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I looked at several of these. It's too big and various a bunch of images to delete all of them, as some are product photos which are usable and some are family photos that seem to me not to be usable. I suggest you nominate specific photos that really seem unusable, so that they can be considered individually or at least in manageable groups. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • As far as I'm concerned, your position is wrong. Or, rather, your standards are unnecessarily high. Keep in mind that images are used in online articles as thumbnails. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Realistically images like File:Rice 4.jpg are clearly unusable. To the point that it's laughable to act like images of such a low quality as it will ever be used in articles. Maybe your standards are just that unnecessarily low compared to mine and Clarinetguy097s though ;) --Adamant1 (talk) 07:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That particular image isn't usable, no, but File:Key chain 4.jpg and File:Vivo 2.jpg are, for example. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per the nominator. I don't really feel wading into what makes something a "personal" image or not, but a lot of these are clearly OOS. A few like File:Old group photo.jpg might possibly be copyright violations to boot. Maybe a few are worth saving due to being educational, but I'm having a hard time figuring out which ones. If someone wants to list a few files they think serve an educational value I'm fine excluding the images from my vote. Otherwise all the images should be deleted as OOS and/or COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. It probably would have been a pointless hassle to do them all as separate nominations anyway. It's not like the closing admin won't check through things to make sure it's all on the up and up before deleting the images either. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (OoS, DW, and poor unusable images). Kept several decent images of household objects. --P 1 9 9   14:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't the good coat (see https://web.archive.org/web/20111109214215/http://www.murist.ch/) Pillonel.christophe (talk) 06:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's in use, so please first head over to the talk page of the wikipedia article and clarify the right coat of arms. I'm not convinced that the shop site of a flag manufacturer is more reliable than what we have here. There's certainly a more official page which shows the coat of arms of municipalities in Fribourg. In either case, this is not a reason to delete until we have clearly proven this one is wrong and an updated version exists. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the municipality of Murist no longer exists following the merger with municipality of estavayer. However, archives of old documents can be found: for example (see the header of the official document):
https://www.yumpu.com/fr/document/view/1158776/17-juin-2011-commune-de-murist
Or
https://www.yumpu.com/fr/document/view/1308668/reglement-sur-le-droit-de-cite-communal-commune-de-murist Pillonel.christophe (talk) 07:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found the archive of the official internet site of The Murist municipality:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111109214215/http://www.murist.ch/ (Because Murist municipality merge with Estavayer) Pillonel.christophe (talk) 08:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so the bottom part is slightly different. That's a reason to upload a new version or to fix the existing one, but not just to delete an almost-correct image. And the fact that the municipality no longer exists is obviously not a reason to delete. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, how could we upload a new version? 193.5.240.9 13:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Use the Upload Wizard. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: inuse. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the good coat Pillonel.christophe (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The good coat is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Murist-150x150.jpg Pillonel.christophe (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. If you have a better SVG version (or you could ask the Graphic Workshop to help you create one), just click "upload a new version". --P 1 9 9   14:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information is present for the very large, greater-than-de minimis photographic meme behind the speaker. As such, for lacking sufficient essential information, this should be deleted in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image is File:The wikipedias serious.jpg. --Didym (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: source image now known and is free. Resolved. --P 1 9 9   14:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quasi duplicate of ISS Expedition 70 Patch.png in wrong file format! Ras67 (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1986 images from Honduras, looks like from old publication or video. Not 2023 work by uploader as claimed. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Honduras cannot be assumed to be out of copyright without source/publication information -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for not labeling correctly and please delete if necessary GiraffeNotebook98 (talk) 16:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumptive copyright photo is the central focal point of this image is not De minimis. Ooligan (talk) 07:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image use blur version now, it can still keep.--Wpcpey (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Wpcpey, This image appears substantially blurry now. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 04:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Unfortunately I have to agree with Ooligan as the image is now out of scope. The surrounding is intentionally blurred to focus on the copyrighted photo in the middle. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
copyrighted photo is looks blur and not really copyrighted now. Wpcpey (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Innacurate map, Hungary, Halych, and Jerusalem weren't Byzantine dependencies at all. 2A01:36D:1400:2409:F9F9:FA12:DDE5:2596 02:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Not a valid reason for deletion if the file is in use. This file is in use at cs:Byzantská říše, en:Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty and ro:Dinastia Comnenilor. Brianjd (talk) 09:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is just a Photosopped fantasy map. This map make user seems it already spreaded everywhere this fake map. Please check out the history of Kingdom of Hungary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary, King Béla III of Hungary (1172-90) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Béla_III_of_Hungary, Byzantine Empire, the Byzantine article itself show another different map for the same year 1173: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire_under_the_Komnenos_dynasty#Manuel_I_Komnenos What is the academic source of this Photohsopped map? Any academic map? Kingdom of Hungary and Halych was never part of the Byzantine Empire, nor in 1173 during the reign of King Béla III of Hungary. Check out wiki articles about Hungary, King Béla III. I think Wikipedia is not a place for fantasy maps. We need use academic maps like this or adapt these maps: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_mediterranean_1190.jpgOrionNimrod (talk) 16:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_I_Komnenos
In 1172, after his father King Stephen died, Bela, who was groomed to become the Byzantine heir (in the event Manuel didn't have a son), swore fealty to the Emperor and returned home to be crowned King of Hungary. For the rest of Manuel's reign, there was no attempt from Hungary to regain its lost Croatian territories and relations were cordial.
After the failure of the joint Egyptian Expedition in 1169, King Amalric was left in a subordinate position to his ally Emperor Manuel, who became the protector of Jerusalem. NeimWiki (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @NeimWiki, I continue the conversation here, Bela did not make any vassal oath and Hungary was never vassal state of the empire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Byzantine_Empire_under_the_Komnenos_dynasty#Fake_map OrionNimrod (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The YouTube video does not indicate a Creative Commons CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CoffeeEngineer Archived copy says otherwise. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
True, Thank you for the confirmation. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: valid license. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination Lukas Beck (talk) 12:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deleting the files. First I would like to export the structured data added to the respective pages. Need to figure out how this is done. Marbot (talk) 09:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank your for allowing me to export the structured data prior to deleting the files. Cheers -- Marbot (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deleting the files. First I would like to export the structured data added to the respective pages. Need to figure out how this is done. Marbot (talk) 09:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank your for allowing me to export the structured data prior to deleting the files. Cheers -- Marbot (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nomination Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination Lukas Beck (talk) 12:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep all of them, accept File:Berlin Fernsehturm am Alexanderplatz - panoramio (1).jpg, File:Berlin Fernsehturm am Alexanderplatz - panoramio (2).jpg, File:Flughafen Berlin Tempelhof terminal Festival of Lights 2011.jpg, File:Berliner Fernsehturm am Alex Festival of Lights 2011.jpg, File:Tempelhof Festival of Lights 2011.jpg and File:Quadriga Brandenburger Tor.JPG per nomination. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the depicted temporary artworks don't seem to clear the ToO. MB-one (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If an image of this cat does not meet ToO it will also not be in SCOPE. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 00:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep all of them, accept File:Germany, Berlin- Festival of lights 2009 7.jpg and File:Germany, Berlin- Festival of lights 2009 8.jpg Lukas Beck (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If "no FoP Germany for temporary art" is correct, then all photos here would have to be deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Festival_of_Lights_(Berlin) and many, many other categories as well. -- Bwag (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Disagree Not every file has to be deletet. Some of the buildings are only irradiated in one color. So I don't see in these pictures something protectable. So we have to be carefull what we really want to delete and what can be kept. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep I don't see anything in these pictures that could be protected by copyright. Most of the buildings are only irradiated in one color. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep all below TOO except File:Charlottenburg-palace-fol.jpg. File:Rote Rathaus Festival of Lights 2007.jpg and File:Neptunbrunnen Berlin Festival of Lights.jpg are not even different to the regular illumination. GPSLeo (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:Charlottenburg-palace-fol.jpg per nomination.  Keep for all others. I don't see anything in these pictures that could be protected by copyright. Most of the buildings are only irradiated in one color. --Lukas Beck (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The "Festival of Lights" consists of the illumination of a number of well-known buildings in Berlin. Illumination does not meet the threshold of originality which is associated with art, it is a technical act. In particular I oppose the deletion of my photo "Nachtblick_von_der_Möckernbrücke_(2006).jpg" (night view from Möckern bridge). The file name/title already highlights that the illuminated object, the Deutsches Technikmuseum (the blue building), is not the main focus of the photo, it only covers about 1/8 of the area. The photo is about the night view of various illuminated objects. Several of them were/are regularly illuminated, like the former BVG building, bridge, street lights, car lights, subway train. Iotatau (talk) 21:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I'm not really sure what would be above the threshold of originality here. Just to be clear, that's not to say light displays like these in general can't be, but there has to be something involved in the display besides a single, solid color. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't see anything in these pictures that could be protected by copyright. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted two per discussion, kept rest. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a YouTube channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Free Art License" is definitely the wrong license. It might be PD, but without source and author you can't tell. 146.60.74.167 21:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely above TOO, at least partially. Country of origin is Canada. The wordmark is not protected by copyright in the US, but it may be copyrightable in Canada. Canada generally has a similar threshold of originality for copyright protection but does not have the same categorical exemption for typeface. The axe is likely copyrightable in both jurisdictions. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the axe is above TOO in both US and Canada, but the text is below in both. Thus, I would Crop to only include the text, and RevDel the prior version. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the axe is below TOO in the U.S., but I don't know how much stricter Canada is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped, revdeled per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=795552695262606 This is not the source. Yann (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other images by this user are not own works, so it is unlikely this to be OK. Yann (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nomination, accept File:Bahnhof Berlin Zoo City West.jpg, File:Berlin - Festival of Lights 2013 - geo.hlipp.de - 43411.jpg, File:Berlin - Schloss Charlottenburg.jpg, File:Berlin Leipziger Platz - Festival of Lights.jpg, File:Berlin, Potsdamer Platz - Festival of Lights 2013 - Elb 0002e93d.jpg and File:Bundesrat - Festival of Lights Berlin (10176157264).jpg. Lukas Beck (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP Germany for temporary art

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per the nominator. Admittedly I didn't look at every single individual image. The ones I did check though clearly have unique artist elements to though. For instance File:Germany, Berlin- Festival of lights 2012 2.jpg. Although a few might not be above the threshold of originality, but I'm super sure where the line is when it comes light displays like these. So I'm just voting to delete all of them just to air on the safe side. That said, a few images could probably be kept. Most, if not all, of them are clearly unique enough to qualify for copyright though. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    For some of them I agree, but most of them don't have such uinque artist elements. So we should be very carefull about deleting these files. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: About half of them don't qualify. Deleted the rest. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The station was built in 1975. This art is unfree until at earliest 2046. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Beiwerk (de minimis), Übervorsichtige mögen es rechts etwas abschneiden. (Overcautious ones may crop it a bit on the right side.) -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I like that idea. Now, someone has to delete the old version. It's still visible. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also the old version was covered by freedom of panorama - no need to modify it. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 22:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 22:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Phyrexian as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Promotional copytighted image |source= https://lesabattoirs-cognac.fr/videoclub-photo-1-copyright-julie-reynaud/ Yann (talk) 19:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Reynaud is the Matthieu's sister, we need to ask her. ThomasM911 (talk) 10:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 13:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Obvious COM:DW case, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vince Lombardi Trophy. This is a photograph taken in a public place. While I agree that this is a obvious derivative work of the trophy, the file is not eligible for F3 speedy deletion, so I am opening a DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Myanmar, freedom of panorama in Burma/Myanmar ceased to exist by 2022, courtesy of the retroactive 2019 copyright law. Per w:en:Wunna Theikdi Stadium, it was completed in 2012 and designed by construction firm Max Myanmar.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen extraída del Facebook de esta persona, posible copyvio pertile (talk) 10:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Básicamente, es una imagen pública de un personaje público. Si hay algún tema con el copyright, dígame cual puedo poner, la imagen es pública y la persona es un político con imagen pública. Queda mejor , entiendo , con una imagen real que un ícono de una silueta genérica — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixba (talk • contribs) 13:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Mixba, gracias por comentar. Todos queremos que haya una imagen real y no una silueta, y aprecio mucho tu interés en que así sea. Si querés subir una sin problemas tiene que ser subida por el autor real de la foto, la mayoría de los políticos asumo que tienen un equipo de prensa que se la saca y la sube, a veces es es alguien que andaba cerca y le sacó una foto al político mientras pasaba.
El tema del copyright es complejo, Commons (parte de la Fundación Wikimedia) exige no solamente permiso para usar la foto sino que automáticamente cualquiera pueda usar esa foto para lo que quiera, incluso para un proyecto comercial. Entonces esta foto de Leandro Zdero podría utilizarla yo tranquilo en cualquier documento porque como la subieron a Commons, es como si Commons me la regalara por así decirlo. Pero como el que subió la foto no subió una de él, el verdadero autor podría hacerle un juicio a Wikimedia. No importa si el autor es un fotógrafo al que Zdero le pagó en su momento para subirla a Facebook, la Fundación Wikimedia no puede arriesgarse a eso. pertile (talk) 18:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is now a license, but it's not clear to me that this is old enough to be in the public domain based off of my examination of the sources. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk  Question Making the file available for download (and probably use it) by the municipality itself, will this file get the necessary license? Because I did not find any information about the file and its license. ImanFakhri (talk) 13:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merely making it available for download and personal use does not render a file into the public domain in Iran. It may well be the case that the seal is greater than 30 years old (which would render it in the public domain), but I'm not really able to find evidence of that. Do you happen to have any information on the history of this seal? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Red-tailed hawk As I said, no. Unfortunately, I could not find any information about this file. ImanFakhri (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt if you can keep it. IMO it must be deleted. Iman, you can upload it here. Rohalamin (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rohalamin Alright then, i will. Thank you. ImanFakhri (talk) 05:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Version vectorielle disponible GladiusTM (talk) 07:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by svg 775498247r (talk) 08:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is clearly a different interpretation of the COA, it's worth keeping. holly {chat} 22:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Myanmar, freedom of panorama in Burma/Myanmar ceased to exist by 2022, courtesy of the retroactive 2019 copyright law. Per w:en:National Museum of Myanmar (Naypyidaw), the museum building began construction in 2010 and opened to public in 2015. A commercial license permission from the building architect is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Myanmar, freedom of panorama in Burma/Myanmar ceased to exist by 2022, courtesy of the retroactive 2019 copyright law. Per w:en:Maha Thetkya Yanthi Buddha, it was completed in circa 2015. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The station was built in 1979. This art is unfree until at earliest 2050. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this photo was taken and first published in the UK in 1936 as claimed, it was protected by UK copyright on the URAA date in 1936, and is therefore still protected by copyright in the US (because of the URAA, until the end of 2032).

Getty Images has several versions of this photograph, none of them crediting a photographer. But they also have a very similar photograph here, credited to Fayer, dated December 03, 1936. Not only the date, but also the dress, hair style, brows, bracelet, they are all exactly the same, making it quite clear that the two photos were taken in the same photo session. Fayer would be Austrian photographer de:Georg Fayer, who had a photo studio in London from 1935 to 1937, where he was photographing the royal family as well as various society people and film and stage stars. So it's quite clear he is the author, and the {{PD-UK-unknown}} tag is wrong. Fayer died in 1950, so his works were protected in the UK until the end of 2020, and the URAA restored their copyright.

So however you look at it, this photograph is still protected by copyright in the US, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2033.

Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and ordered a universal replace with File:Vincenzo Laviosa - Duke and Duchess of Windsor - Google Art Project (cropped).jpg. holly {chat} 22:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tega1604 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COPYVIO like Commons:Deletion requests/File:VHCI Lab Display With Students.jpg

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep as no online links are provided to support this copyvio claim.
Also it's quite likely that these really are own work and what's needed here is COM:VRT, not a rushed deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/File:VHCI Lab Display With Students.jpg has been deleted (and there is the online link) and it does not look like a VRT has been started. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; source is https://vhci.lbs.edu.ng/projects/vhci-photo-gallery/, which states "All rights reserved". holly {chat} 22:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe it may be under copyright. Getty claims it owns the rights: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/portrait-of-sibling-singers-donny-and-marie-osmond-1975-news-photo/515354800 Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Picture used as a vignette for this YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=644SmqDdJ74&list=OLAK5uy_miszdRLWM_Iwg49C07fmcu7r2Lv1BcXb0 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Official portrait of Ivor Richard, Member of the CEC.jpg Yann (talk) 18:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph was taken in Austria circa 1930 by an anonymous person per the ONB link in the source parameter Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Austria says 70 years of copyright for anonymous works, making this PD in Austria during 2001. This means the copyright was restored in 1996 for the USA..Per Commons:Hirtle chart, this has a 95 year copyright length in the USA. This means it won't be PD in the USA until 2026. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Per en:Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights, Austrian photographs published before 1932 (or created before 1932 and then not published within 20 years) were not protected by Austrian copyright on the URAA date. Their protection in Austria was restored on a later date, but that did not affect the URAA, which did not restore the US copyright for those photographs. --Rosenzweig τ 22:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If that is the case, then both Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Austria and Template:PD-Austria should mention this exception. Also, since PD-Austria-1932 is no longer valid, which license would fit here instead? MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the author of this photograph is really anonymous in a legal sense as claimed, {{PD-anon-70-EU}} and {{PD-1996}}. Though we don't really know when it was actually published the first time. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: Assuming that the author of this is truly unknown, then MrLinkinPark333 is correct and this needs to go because it wasn't PD at the URAA date. However, if your analysis is correct then {{PD-Austria-1932}} should be valid, shouldn't it? holly {chat} 16:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Howcheng: On the URAA date for Austria (January 1, 1996), photographs published before 1932 (or created before 1932 if unpublished for 20 years) were not copyrighted in Austria, regardless if they were anonymous or not. If applicable, they were re-copyrighted and got an Austrian copyright of 70 years pma (or 70 years from publication if anonymous) a few months later, but for URAA purposes, only what was valid on the URAA date counts. So the copyright of a 1930 Austrian photo, anonymous or not, was not restored in the US (unless we know it was first published at a later point in the 1932 to 1950 time frame, but I don't see any indication that this applies). For details see en:Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights. --Rosenzweig τ 17:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: In other words, {{PD-Austria-1932}} should be a valid license tag? holly {chat} 17:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, because Austria re-copyrighted most of these photos a short time later, giving them a 70 year term. Which will have expired by now for some of them (like this one if it is anonymous). The tag is still useful to determine the URAA status though. --Rosenzweig τ 17:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Absent any other evidence, we normally assume publication of photos soon after creation, and we can also assume that the source would have listed the creator if they were known. holly {chat} 16:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist of stained glass windows died in 1992, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Seems de minimis to me. holly {chat} 22:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: windows are de minimis, focus is on the general architecture. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The station was built in 1975. This art is unfree until at earliest 2046. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless the art in this train station is only a small part of the photographs nominated for deletion. Thus in my point of view de minimis applies to all those photographs and they should not be deleted.
--193.240.244.155 00:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree that we can only see a small portion of the murals and the focus is clearly on the station itself, so de minimis should apply. holly {chat} 22:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped, old versions hidden. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The station was built in 1975. This art is unfree until at earliest 2046. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We can only see a small portion of the art in question, and the focus of the picture is the train itself, so de minimis should apply. holly {chat} 22:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The artwork is still a quite big and prominently visible part of the photo. Maybe cropping would be a solution? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped, old version hidden. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Miwako Sato as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Reuploading of files deleted for copvio, namely, File:PhraChaoAnantaworaritthidet.jpg and File:Chao Ananta Worarittidet.jpg; former rationale was > Taken from this website which says "Copyright © kalyanamitra group 2023 All Rights Reserved." PD-Art? Yann (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to [5] and Google Translate, the painting was created in 1902-03 by an unknown artist, so {{PD-old-assumed}} would definitely work. However, it also says that the person depicted is actually unidentified and Chao Anantaworaritthidet is only one of the possibilities of who it might be. So that being the case, I would say  Keep but rename to "Painting of the governor of Nan At Phumin Temple.jpg" or something similar. holly {chat} 23:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]