User talk:Rachel Helps (BYU)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rachel Helps (BYU)!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Permisos

Hola, perdoda que te escriba en español.

He visto los archivos subidos por ti y he leído lo que has puesto en tu página de usuario. Es por eso que te informo que podrías solicitar el permiso de autoverificado aquí para que todas tus subidas aparezcar ya verificadas. Un saludo --Jcfidy (talk) 09:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Anñado en inglés es: Autopatrolled --Jcfidy (talk) 11:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Re:File:Dalton-Bust-in-PIVA-LR.jpg

The permission is still dealt with the copyright holder at OTRS. Please addres your concerns in the ticket. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I don't have an OTRS account, so I don't think I can see the ticket. I'll post on the OTRS noticeboard. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:David Dalton.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:David Dalton.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Jarekt: I added the CC-BY-SA 4.0 tag that the photographer's son gave us permission for. I thought the OTRS request would go through sooner and generate a copyright tag? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

IRC

Hi. You might find it helpful to join the Wikimedia Commons IRC channel on Freenode (https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikimedia-commons is a link to the WWW client) to discuss your work... there are usually quite a few people around. English Wikipedia itself also has a channel, at #wikipedia-en. Revent^talk 04:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation @Revent: ! Certainly if I have a time-sensitive or more specific question I'll bring it up in IRC. I like leaving a paper trail of my questions though, just in case other users have similar questions. I've learned a lot from village pump archives. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Understandable, it's just sometimes easier (or less time-consuming) to explain something through an actual 'conversation'... that's the main advantage of IRC, really. Revent^talk 17:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Creator Templates for GLAM Uploads

Hi Rachel, I wanted to draw your attention to my recent updates to the uploads in the collection at Category:HBLL_C._R._Savage_collection. You left out the Creator template for the images, which disassociates the collection with the other metadata available through Wikidata and other sources. For future uploads, especially of notable creators, I would recommend including that data: it will help make your collections more resiliant as we integrate more structured data into Commons. Sadads (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sadads, thank you for your message, and for adding the creator template to the images I've uploaded. I do plan to upload more images, and integrating the metadata better into Commons templates is definitely something I want to improve! I've been having one of my students put images in more image-specific categories, and next time I want to make the image's title the filename. Are there other ways you'd recommend improving the metadata on the images? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

So I am not a commonist first. I am going to @Jarekt: , because he focuses a lot on improving data. As best as I know, creator and institution templates, alongside the standard copyright templates are the core tools. Categories, help us do a lot later, because most categories can be rapidly translated into structured data statements. Also, if you are looking for other data types, the Artwork template documentation does a good job scoping other templates that can be used (such as the Technique template, which is really useful for labeling stuff created with unique techniques). Sadads (talk) 02:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

I can definitely help if you have any questions about technical best practices. Providing proper metadata is a lot of work, but proper use of templates allows your images to be accessible to people that do not speak English. Reading documentation of the templates is a great start. I did not have a chance to work with it yet but Commons:Pattypan uploader sounds like a great tool that might come handy. --Jarekt (talk) 03:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Jarekt, the Pattypan uploader is the tool I used to upload the photos in the Category:HBLL_C._R._Savage_collection, and I used the Photograph template. I'm planning to upload more photos from the collection, but I want to improve how I enter the metadata. Right now I'm putting the link to the photo under Source, but maybe it would be more appropriate under accession number? For date, we often don't know the exact year; I can use the "other date" template, but the effort to change the metadata is fairly large and I'm unsure of the benefits of using the template. Are there any photographs or collections that have excellent metadata I could use as an example of what I should strive for in my own metadata? Many of the NYPL's uploads look really good, like thumb|Habit of the sultaness, or empress of the Turks in 1700. La sultane Asseki ou Sultane reine (NYPL b14140320-1638012). They have their own summary template, is that something I should look into? Thanks for the advice, and sorry for all the questions!. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Some collections have metadata that does not fit existing infoboxes, than we write extensions to existing templates to customize them for this of that institution. NYPL uses custom template . To see some examples see Walters collection, Web Gallery of Art, , NARA or Bundesarchiv collections. The more templates you use the more translations happen and more people can use it. As for link back I would add it through link from accession number and the source could be some sort of "donation from ... institution template. I would also use {{Technique}} and {{Size}} templates. Another think to look into is AutoWikiBrowser and its ability to quickly change descriptions of many files, so some of those can be added afterwards. --Jarekt (talk) 04:22, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Melissa Leilani Larson 2019.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Melissa Leilani Larson 2019.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Understood! I've asked Larson to send the release e-mail. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 22:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stretch Armstrong reunion.jpg

Copyright status: File:Stretch Armstrong reunion.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stretch Armstrong reunion.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I think I fixed this Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)