Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/06/21
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
mistakenly uploaded Dolon Prova (talk) 05:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
mistakenly uploaded Dolon Prova (talk) 05:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
mistakenly uploaded Dolon Prova (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Spam, not in use. Wiki is not a host for selfies Bilderling (talk) 05:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful source and license. FlorianH76 (talk) 00:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete FBMD in EXIF. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The image is out of scope. FlorianH76 (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nikita zernyshkin (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
photographer is John Paul Pochin (whom I happen to know) but uploader (user:Maxclayman) appears to be a different person; also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nate Wilbourne 1.jpg Schwede66 08:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023062110005759 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 11:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful source and license, the image was taken from here https://newsreport.ge/%E1%83%9B%E1%83%97%E1%83%90%E1%83%95%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%91%E1%83%90%E1%83%9B-%E1%83%A3%E1%83%9C%E1%83%93%E1%83%90-%E1%83%A8%E1%83%94%E1%83%99%E1%83%95%E1%83%94%E1%83%AA%E1%83%9D%E1%83%A1/ FlorianH76 (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful source and license, the image was taken from here https://newsreport.ge/%E1%83%9B%E1%83%97%E1%83%90%E1%83%95%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%91%E1%83%90%E1%83%9B-%E1%83%A3%E1%83%9C%E1%83%93%E1%83%90-%E1%83%A8%E1%83%94%E1%83%99%E1%83%95%E1%83%94%E1%83%AA%E1%83%9D%E1%83%A1/ FlorianH76 (talk) 00:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted b/c it's a crop of an image that was already deleted as a copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Not own work of the user. The image was taken from here https://warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?photo_id=9522 FlorianH76 (talk) 12:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
We uploaded this file by mistake Konsort (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per A1Cafel. The uploader is clearly not here to contribute constructively. Marbletan (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I want this file to be deleted, becuase I have already uploaded a more high quality one Wei-On Yeo (talk) 22:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Wei-On Yeo, that's fine, but could you please link it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here it is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chase_Oliver_2024_Campaign_Logo.png Wei-On Yeo (talk) 01:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. No objection to deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake FELIPE GABRYEL 23 (talk) 02:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:November 2021 in Monaco
[edit]Copyvio. Commercially-licensed photo of a copyrighted public sculpture in a country that has no freedom of panorama, see COM:FOP Monaco. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of François Grimaldi in Monaco for artwork details and authorship.
- File:Statue de François Grimaldi (Monaco) (cropped).jpg
- File:Statue de François Grimaldi (Monaco).jpg
- File:Statue de Malizia (novembre 2021).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Benoît Prieur. --Rosenzweig τ 07:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Tanapat user (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Dwifa Bagaskoro S A (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
copyright issue L'Hommedusud (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subarnamajhi2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most taken from FB per MD and 2 sent via Whatsapp - unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS to keep
- File:Satish Singh AFC Cup.jpg
- File:Satish Singh Football Player.jpg
- File:SatishSingh.jpg
- File:Satish Singh.jpg
- File:IMG-20220302-WA0027.jpg
- File:FBIMG1682572903774.jpg
- File:FB IMG1682572244817.jpg
- File:IMG-20220302-WA0013.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subarnamajhi2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]seems like to be copyvios(low res+no metadata+other copyvios that user have+File:Satish Singh 19.jpg has URL on it) . need proof that shows they are free licensed.
- File:Satish Singh 19.jpg
- File:Satish Singh Churchill.jpg
- File:Ghiixfhkk.jpg
- File:Churchill brothers.jpg
- File:S.singh.jpg
- File:Satish Singh Churchill brothers.jpg
- File:Satish Singh.jpg
- File:Satish Singh football player.jpg
- File:Satish Singh.png
- File:Satish singh.png
- File:SatishSinghFootballer.jpg
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Auteursrecht. Antonius6317 (talk) 13:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Per https://www.pexels.com/license/ pseudo free only: "Don't sell unaltered copies of a photo or video... without modifying it first" Raymond (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Uploading to Commons isn't selling the image, so that wouldn't apply. The page also says, "All photos and videos on Pexels are free to use. Attribution is not required. Giving credit to the photographer or Pexels is not necessary but always appreciated," suggesting the license is equivalent to the public domain. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC) (Edit: at least for noncommercial uses, I guess) Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Copied from a non-free source, https://diapazon.kz/news/119579-kak-na-meste-ogorodov-stroili-centralnii-prospekt-aktobe. The same with the description.Xrtls2 (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful license. It is not own work of the user. The image was taken from here https://liberali.ge/news/view/25584/gaitsanit-qali-deputatebi-akhali-motsvevis-parlamentshi FlorianH76 (talk) 00:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Rita Malich said the does not have an official permit letter from the author to use the photo and they both are not sure the photo has not been published before, asked me to remove Ahasheni (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Not free image, there is no any information in the source that the file has copyright license 4.0. FlorianH76 (talk) 22:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 20:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). This is a very simple text logo. TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Well, COM:TOO Indonesia says "Indonesia's threshold of originality is reportedly low, being based on common law ("Anglo-American model") principles, with 'wallpaper, wrappers, packaging designs and technical drawings' being registered by copyright authorities." I don't know what the hell "Anglo-American model" means, as British COM:TOO is much stricter than American COM:TOO. I'd have to doubt this logo could be copyrighted, but could it be if it were a British radio station? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If this isn't PD-Textlogo, I wouldn't know what is. This logo consists of text only. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Non-free file, violating copyrights and intellectual property rights Ariandi Lie (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per the last deletion request, which you ought to read and pay attention to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Not own work of the user, it was taken from here https://shabat.am/am/article/33183/Sirushoyi-het-orducs-shut-em FlorianH76 (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful license and uploader. The image was taken from here https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderElisashvili/photos/a.766570890041727.1073741827.766565596708923/1449397608425715/?type=3&theater FlorianH76 (talk) 00:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Considering the message "I hereby represent the copyright holder of this picture and accept the terms and conditions of the Wikimedia Foundation" on the file page and the fact that the author field link is to the uploader's userpage, I think that it's very likely that the uploader is the photographer. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It is obvious that the uploader is not the author. He even doesn't know the date when it was shot, because here https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderElisashvili/photos/a.766570890041727.1073741827.766565596708923/1449397608425715/?type=3&theater the photo was uploaded in February 2017; but the uploader stated the date as 7 July 2017.
- FlorianH76 (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- That could be copying/downloading/editing photo. Time of creation changes with such actions taken A09 (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. From facebook, no permission. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful license and uploader. The image was taken from here https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderElisashvili/photos/a.766570890041727.1073741827.766565596708923/1449397608425715/?type=3&theater FlorianH76 (talk) 00:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
It is not own work of the user with doubtful license. There is logo with right license here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_the_Georgian_Dream.svg?uselang=ru FlorianH76 (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Non-free poster. TadejM (t/p) 00:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete Source is correct, but there is no evidence the image is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 00:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Made-up flag that appears to be out-of-project scope as such; no educational value. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
photographer is Courtney Davies but uploader (user:Maxclayman) appears to be a different person Schwede66 08:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
photographer is Courtney Davies but uploader (user:Maxclayman) appears to be a different person Schwede66 08:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Per the lone comment for the Youtube video this was taken from, this tune is Memory from the 1981 musical Cats by Andrew Lloyd Webber. So still copyrighted, and the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 10:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 11:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 11:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 11:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Art piece in front of the San Francisco City Hall, San Francisco, California LCCN2013630044.tif
[edit]Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 11:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works, no permission Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works, no permission, no authors Polarlys (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused random photo of nondescript person, little educational use, unusable composition, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 17:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 17:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I've checked the source, and I don't see a basis for the Creative Commons license. This would at first glance appear to be above the ToO in Indonesia. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
no permission from the given author in metadata - "Author SHARYN BELLEMAKERS" Hoyanova (talk) 06:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Roundabout art in Monaco
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Monaco. Proper information on the sculptor and date of unveiling is required to determine if this roundabout artwork is already in public domain (50 years after sculptor's death). From the initial look of it, it doesn't seem to be designed by a sculptor who died more than 50 years ago.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mirador de la Flor
[edit]This sculpture was designed by still-alive w:H. W. Tatum and unveiled in 1997. There is no freedom of panorama in the U.S. for copyrighted public art. These freely-licensed images are copyvios as lacking permission from the sculptor.
- File:Paseo la Flor 2007.jpg
- File:Paseo la Flor 2008.jpg
- File:Selena memorial, Corpus Christi.jpg
- File:Selena sculpture at Mirador de la Flor.jpg
- File:Selena Statue with flowers.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Info an older pic of perhaps the same subject was deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:SelenaEstatua.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all of them. It's a common misconception that you can photograph something in public and declare it free. Such is not the case for 3D works of art in the U.S. such as this one. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mirador de la Flor
[edit]The monument was built in 1997 by H. W. Tatum (still alive). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required.
- File:Karen at the Selena memorial downtown.jpg
- File:Selena Memorial at 1AM.jpg
- File:Selena Memorial, Corpus Christi.jpg
- File:Selena memorial.jpg
- File:Selena Memorial01.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No source for the images used in these collages. In some cases, the photographers are mentioned, but if the source images are present on Commons, they should be linked.
- File:Brookline MA Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Manhattan NY Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Brooklyn NY Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Jamaica Plain Boston Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Mission Hill Boston Photo Collage 2.jpg
- File:Brookline Village MA Photo Collage 2.jpg
- File:Morningside Heights Manhattan Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Astoria Queens Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Brookline Village MA Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Mission Hill Boston Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Jersey City NJ Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Hillsboro Beach FL Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Allentown PA Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Bethlehem PA Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Clinton NJ Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Park Ridge IL Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Lagadia Arcadia Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Bethlehem Township NJ Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Pill Hill Brookline MA August 2015 Photo Collage.jpg
- File:Brookline MA August 2015 Photo Collage 2.jpg
- File:Brookline MA August 2015 Photo Collage.jpg
Didym (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Khoshnevis Mansion
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Iran
- File:HG79780-2.jpg
- File:HG79803.jpg
- File:باغ خوشنویس مهریز.jpg
- File:باغ خوشنویس.jpg
- File:سردر اصلی باغ خوشنویس.jpg
- File:نسمنب.jpg
- File:کوشک باغ خوشنویس.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
@Krd: please be kind and restore all photos, it's a historical building, almost 200 years old! An infobox Khoshnevis Mansion clearly states it's style is the Qajar architecture, which I referenced by four sources in Wikidata. I don't know why I'm losing my time on all of it, if someone can nominate and delete all so easily. --Orijentolog (talk) 07:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted as per [1]. Yann (talk) 22:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 11:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It's simply a wall, I don't see how can it violate FOP. --Orijentolog (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of Independence
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan
- File:Kazakh Eli monument.jpg
- File:Palace of Independence (Nur-Sultan).jpg
- File:Palace of Independence Astana.jpg
- File:Palace of Independence Astana1.jpg
- File:Palace of Independence, cropped.jpg
- File:Дворец Независимости 2017.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sammyboohoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:NUDE
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing new here Dronebogus (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:New Schoolchildren's Palace
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan
- File:Astana DSC04087 (7709571960).jpg
- File:Astana DSC04088 (7709574388).jpg
- File:Astana DSC04089 (7709576816).jpg
- File:Astana DSC04090 (7709579304).jpg
- File:Astana DSC04091 (7709581606).jpg
- File:Astana DSC04092 (7709584118).jpg
- File:Дворец школьников Астана 2017 1.jpg
- File:Дворец школьников Астана 2017 2.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a label CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover, Ad for a videoclip CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Closer up view of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Closer up view of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Closer up view of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Closer up view of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Closer up view of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
View of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Close up view of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
View of the inverted Pyramid. This work by Pei is not public domain, and there is no FOP in France. Miniwark (talk) 12:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JerusalemianSamaritan (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these is own works, and no evidence of a free license, or public domain.
- File:KinoBandMembers.jpg
- File:Thetyrtlesaltcropfix.jpg
- File:Thetyrtlesalthist.png
- File:Beatlescolorcrop.jpg
- File:Beatlescolorhamburg.png
- File:Radiohead young.png
- File:Microsoftwordmarkold.png
- File:Bidenrumsfeldcampaign.png
- File:USSR President Seal.png
- File:Grigory Vasylievich Romanov.jpg
- File:Ali Salem al Beidh al Jazeera.png
- File:Gino Gallagher Older.jpg
- File:Piotr Ikonowicz in 2021.png
- File:Saif al-Islam Gaddafi.png
- File:Stanislav Grospic.jpg
- File:FrancoisLumumba.jpg
- File:Sankaraolder.jpg
- File:Aleksandar Paunov.jpg
- File:Hysni Milloshi Portrait.webp
- File:Nur ul Haq Ulumi.webp
- File:Pcstoflag.png
- File:Churchburnt.jpg
- File:Spanish Riots3.jpg
- File:Spanish Riots2.jpg
- File:Spanish Riots1.jpg
- File:Spanish State2022.png
- File:PinWheelLogo2005.png
Yann (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:PRP unless proven PD status or a permission from copyright holder is obtained. A09 (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
screenshot from a non-free source, Google Maps.Xrtls2 (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
promotional material; promoting their business; source unclear; The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not only promotional but useless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Does BBC allow the use of their photos? 191.126.161.210 01:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 07:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted very similar files (by the same uploader) File:Blublublublu.pdf, File:Blablabla.pdf, File:Blublublu.pdf, and File:Historia de la contabilidad.pdf. --Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Just a dictionary definition. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 12:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Just a dictionary definition. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 12:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Brief bit of mostly nonsense text. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Mission statement for an organization. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
This is just a list of someone's social media accounts. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Text definition of a neologism. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure whether to call this text a joke, a hoax, or simply vandalism but in any case it is outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a paragraph of advice about how information and communications technology can be used in education. It is outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: primarily plain text. Please consider contributing this content (with appropriate sources) to a Wikipedia article. Omphalographer (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution 3 better files Bridge at Chatou (c. 1875) by Pierre-Auguste Renoir in the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute Oursana (talk) 01:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
No proof of Crative Commons, VRT asked CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Unrecognizable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think that matters, but what does matter is that it's a personal image of someone with very few edits to their credit. It could possibly be kept if it's considered to be an interesting photo of a man in a mask, but I'm not suggesting that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope personal photos. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Own work, 53 KB senza EXIF 186.174.1.76 18:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation : extracted image w:The Flash (2014 TV series) Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Picture used by this artist's official Facebook page as profile pic [2]. A wider version is also visible [3]. "Own work" very unlikely. Titlutin (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:LIC no metadata, frame from the film 『白猫』Обг. 20:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
i dont like it ChrisDiCas (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment "I don't like it" is not a deletion reason. This photo looks usable, but who took it and therefore needs to give permission for its use? The Source and Author fields are nonsense. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. However this is a promotional image, and it probably needs a written permission from the copyright holder. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ChrisDiCas. Yann (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Right. Which I assume won't be forthcoming, if this individual represents the company. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
i dont like it ChrisDiCas (talk) 21:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
all the articles about christopher dicas ChrisDiCas (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This seems like copyright violation, anyway, unless you work for Mary Sita photography. Do you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
i am the author of this article and i want to delete everything even and my account ChrisDiCas (talk) 05:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- None of those are deletion reasons. Do you own the copyright? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skrattar du Fölora du (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: flags of various non-notable (and quasi-fictitious) micronations.
- File:Flag of Aerldaria (Micronation).png
- File:Flag of the Slinky Republyc (Micronation).png
- File:Flag of the Second Empyre of Slin (Micronation).png
- File:Flag of the Slink Empyre (Micronation).png
- File:Flag of NFA (Micronation).png
- File:Flag of the Kingdom of Zandrovia.png
- File:Flag of DeWaCo Estates (Micronation).png
Omphalographer (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Facebook 191.126.161.210 01:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Copyvio from FB. --Kadı Message 11:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused portrait by one-time uploader, apparently self-promo Enyavar (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused portrait by one-time uploader, apparent self-promo Enyavar (talk) 08:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The Bing logo is appearing on the bottom left CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Osservatore storico (talk) 10:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Looks usable to me, and remember, anyway, that Commons is not an encyclopedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 11:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Immagine obsoleta, i lavori dei cantieri sono proseguiti da quando è stata scattata questa foto. Inoltre é troppo scura e non si vede nemmeno bene il parco. Ci sono delle altre immagini piú recenti che ho scattato che possono sostituire questa immagine. SkorpioDecano (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; the photo serves to represent what it looked like during the construction period. —holly {chat} 21:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Osservatore storico (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 11:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Immagine obsoleta, i lavori dei cantieri sono proseguiti da quando è stata scattata questa foto. Inoltre é troppo scura e non si vede nemmeno bene il parco. Ci sono delle altre immagini piú recenti che ho scattato che possono sostituire questa immagine. SkorpioDecano (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; the photo serves to represent what it looked like during the construction period. —holly {chat} 21:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do%C4%9Fukan_Uluta%C5%9F not notable, out of project scope. + it seems to be copyvio.
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
photograph of book cover, possible copyvio Clarinetguy097 (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagrams, out of project scope
- File:Bengal Parliament 2045.svg
- File:Republic of Bengal Parliament 2040.svg
- File:Republic of Bengal Parliament 2035.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-06-17-06-37-15-342033-11190600469021292848.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament 2035.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament 2030.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament 2040.svg
- File:AandN2030.svg
- File:AandN Islands.svg
- File:A.svg
- File:Bengal Parliament.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]fake diagrams, misleading data. West Bengal assembly has 294 seats
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-02-12-36-50-396842-16212686351913243482.svg
- File:Bengal House of Representatives, Parliament Parliament 2023.svg
- File:Bengal house of representatives Parliament 2025.svg
- File:Republic of Bengal House of Representative Parliament 2025.svg
- File:Bengal House of Representative Parliament 2025.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not own works, no source, wrong license.
- File:Sukanta Majumdar.jpg
- File:Bubagra.jpg
- File:Manik Saha CM of Tripura.jpg
- File:Sudip Roy Barman INC.jpg
- File:AWg2xM1t 400x400.jpg
- File:Indian Secular Front.jpg
- File:Indian Communist.webp
- File:AbbasISF.jpg
Yann (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Meaningless and likely fictitious political diagrams – see previous mass DRs of this user's files.
- File:AIMLBENGAL.svg
- File:Bengalcongress.svg
- File:BengalKing.svg
- File:BECPIINC.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-07-07-50-53-143202-17496110479291107288.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-05-11-50-37-960757-8380466473500137627.svg
SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Also in the same vein:
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-22-02-22-39-543350-17554360943410084685.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-07-22-02-21-12-007245-1202180064590759093.svg
Enyavar (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover, Unrecognizable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Profile of a Youtube account CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
vague picture, unlikely educational and not being used anywhere. Lemonaka (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. An out-of-focus picture of... something. A wood surface? Maybe marble? I really have no idea what I'm looking at here, and the file name and description provide no help whatsoever. Omphalographer (talk) 08:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ReevesPlayer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
because i dont likeit ChrisDiCas (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think your user talk page can be deleted by request, and "I don't like it" is not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 12:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Crystal ball in low resolution Enyavar (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jameswood79 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Future election maps - speculation is not educational
- File:ElectoralCollege2024Hypothetical2ByJameswood79.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2024HypotheticalbyJameswood79.svg
Enyavar (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Is it OK? 191.126.161.210 10:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be nonfree image of Israeli rapper (image also found at https://israel-la.co.il/ozelhouse3/) Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
It makes no sense to store this file in jpg Артём 13327 (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file in use. --Wdwd (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Better version at File:Minecraft missing texture block.svg, can replace the subpar JPEG compressed version. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 20:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Leonel Sohns 09:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by svg. Not used anywhere. Lemonaka (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Image has the broadcast watermark of Global News, a program on the Global television network of Canada, hence it is most not likely the work of the uploader as stated. Ben MacLeod (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
License is likely false, source listed is just a Google search suggesting the uploader just pulled the image from the internet and the it is likely under a non-free liscence. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 02:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Metadata gives the source of this image as jbdodane.com. It doesn't seem that any of the pictures on that website are freely licensed. This panoramio user is known for license laundering many different images related to Liberia. 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 05:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete wie Antrag. Danke an die IP für den Revert meines Unsinnsedit auf Wikivoyage, hier paßt offenbar jemand gut auf. --Ralf Roletschek 17:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution, better file:Claude Monet - Poppy Field in a Hollow near Giverny - Google Art Project.jpg Oursana (talk) 06:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
bad quality and low resolution better file:Claude Monet - Poppy Field in a Hollow near Giverny - Google Art Project.jpg Oursana (talk) 06:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Heinrich-Heine-Allee
[edit]This part of the train station was completed in 2016. This art is unfree until at earliest 2085. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.
Lukas Beck (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo,
- as creator of this work, I have to admit, that I don't have special rights for this art. You can delete it.
- BR
- GodeNehler GodeNehler (talk) 07:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
https://www.newsfirst.lk/sinhala/2019/02/19/%e0%b6%b8%e0%b6%ad%e0%b7%8a%e0%b6%af%e0%b7%8a%e2%80%8d%e0%b6%bb%e0%b7%80%e0%b7%8a%e2%80%8d%e0%b6%ba-%e0%b6%b7%e0%b7%8f%e0%b7%80%e0%b7%92%e0%b6%ad-%e0%b6%9a%e0%b6%bb%e0%b6%b1-%e0%b6%b8%e0%b7%90/ dates this image to 2019, a year prior to its upload here. Belbury (talk) 10:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 19:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The photographs is on the internet in 2019 acording to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 19:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture on a blog in 2011 http://musartes.blogspot.com/2011/01/henry-stephen-limon-limonero.html CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 19:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works, no evidence of a free license.
Yann (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Selfie uploaded by someone else than the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of an orchestra CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indiates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WILLIAM0169 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, unsourced, useless video stills (two are blank).
- File:Paparazzi records soccer player.jpg
- File:Look who died in an accident.jpg
- File:Amoresdecasa.jpg
- File:Tyrtr.jpg
Belbury (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Non-trivial design, probably above COM:TOO United States -- DaxServer (talk) 17:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I think this is pretty clearly below COM:TOO United States. Let's see what the closing admin thinks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per IK. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since). TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fails COM:TOO South Korea. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since). TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Don't see how this can be considered to be under TOO. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The metadata of this image contains a copyright notice: "Copyright Paul Davis". This Panoramio user is known for license laundering many different images related to Liberia; one of the images has even been deleted as part of a COM:DMCA request. No reason to believe this is own work. 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 04:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The sculpture was completed in 1991 by Marisol Escobar (1930–2016). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2087.
- File:150829 157 Battery Park - American Merchant Mariners' Memorial, Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island (21050762739).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners Memorial (5814839005).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners Memorial (7454673270).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners Memorial HDR (5094013866).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial (219791582).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial (5071773606).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial (82942237).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial -- Battery Park (NY) April 2016 (27437307111).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial -- Battery Park (NY) April 2016 (27475013506).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial -- Battery Park New York (NY) April 2016 (27410608292).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial -- Battery Park New York (NY) April 2016 (27509492665).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial Battery Park New York (NY) April 2016 (27509494695).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial June 2023 (2).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial June 2023 (3).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariners' Memorial June 2023 (5).jpg
- File:American Merchant Mariner’s Memorial.jpg
- File:Battery Park 2012 05 04 0185 (7159647976).jpg
- File:Battery Park 2012 05 04 0186 (7159647394).jpg
- File:Merchant Marine Memorial, Battery Park, NYC.jpg
- File:New York - Battery Park - panoramio.jpg
- File:New York - panoramio (139).jpg
- File:NYC-battery-park-merchant-mariners-mem.jpg
- File:P8120241 (20613818146).jpg
- File:Statue of Liberty (6279259567).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Political billboards are non-permanent display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 11:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- They still can benefit from Commons:De minimis. Bazi (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; is not COM:DM. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Billboard for Andrej Babiš with handwritten text "Babiš steals" at Regional elections in Czechia in 2016 in Třebíč, Třebíč District.jpg
[edit]Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- There is only one this billboard in Czech republic, its memory of Regional elections 2016. The billboard was also covered by media. --Frettie (talk) 11:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright is copyright, regardless of memorial purpose. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The image is out of scope FlorianH76 (talk) 00:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The Georgian image description translates as "Giorgi Chelidze 'exercises'", and given the existence of w:Giorgi Chelidze, that makes this presumably in scope. However, it's a really tiny and poor-quality image for 2019. I suspect copyvio. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: we cannot know for sure if the pictured person is that Giorgi Chelidze or any other man with the same name; also it is unclear why he is pictured this way; no foreseeable educational use, out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
porque pertenece a una información personal, sin relevancia histórica. Giuseppe.acciniec (talk) 03:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
seems to be copyvio; original photo is from an Instagram and not from Reddit. AryKun (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Own work? 191.126.161.210 10:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete clear deep fake/photoshopped vandal/attack/harassment image and used to spam deep fake images for the infobox at w:en:Stephan Trojansky. Creator blocked at enwiki for socking. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 10:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Artwork. No proof of authorization. 2A01:CB14:B39:8B00:5F2:424C:86CF:B5B0 12:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- C'était un travail collectif de la Ligue communiste révolutionnaire en 1968 & personne ne sait qui participait à l'élaboration de l'affiche. Il n'y a donc personne pour donner une quelconque autorisation ou revendiquer la paternité du document.--François GOGLINS (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Et François GOGLINS, je crois que la ligue n'existe plus; c'est vrai? Donc personne ne peut la rappresenter pour donner une autorisation collectif. Si tout ça est vrai, est-ce qu'il y a aucune raison de ne pas mettre ce document au domaine public? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- La LCR, à force de scissions, a de nombreux descendants idéologiques & politiques. Là il s'agit d'un ouvrage collective, non signé, dont personne ne sait qui l'a réellement produit. Il n'y a pas d'autorisation à rechercher. --François GOGLINS (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Je comprends, mais je pense qu'on va supprimer l'image cependant. Je la maintenirais. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- La LCR, à force de scissions, a de nombreux descendants idéologiques & politiques. Là il s'agit d'un ouvrage collective, non signé, dont personne ne sait qui l'a réellement produit. Il n'y a pas d'autorisation à rechercher. --François GOGLINS (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Et François GOGLINS, je crois que la ligue n'existe plus; c'est vrai? Donc personne ne peut la rappresenter pour donner une autorisation collectif. Si tout ça est vrai, est-ce qu'il y a aucune raison de ne pas mettre ce document au domaine public? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution 3 better file Le Palais Contarini by Claude Monet (Wildenstein 1766) Oursana (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Identical to Rochester, August 2022 12.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Apparently useless template (it contains the URL https://www.google.com/maps and nothing else) only invoked in obsolete or erroneous ways, on three pages written before the most recent creation of this template in April 2023. Belbury (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
no metadata no author given, weird image of some one with a freaky expression and lots of make up. Hoyanova (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Issartmedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam, the name matches the brand. Fake license logo can't be own or free
Bilderling (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S.BATHRUNISA (talk · contribs)
[edit]They are not own images since they miss proper EXIF and images are very small. It could be screenshots from videos and copied from any other sources. Also same type of images deleted for this user.
~AntanO4task (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK DELETE IT S.BATHRUNISA (talk) 16:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No permission from artist Charles M. Carrillo A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Photo of a photo, COM:DW A1Cafel (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and OoS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright infringement as the map is made by author Altan Tan for his book "Turabidin'den Berriye'ye Aşiretler Dinler Diller Kültürler". --Semsûrî (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Póster ? 186.174.1.76 18:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: DW of book cover. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Copie d'une carte postale ancienne sans autorisation - Copy without permission of an old post card. Best regards - Thierry (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- PD-Art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing all essential info to determine copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
I misidentified the person in the picture. Toobigtokale (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Toobigtokale, would you like help with editing that suitably? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe; the picture is no longer useful to my purpose though, as it's the wrong person entirely. Should I just ignore the photo and not use it? I'm not really familiar with policy around this kinda thing. Toobigtokale (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- You uploaded it within the past week, so you can receive a courtesy deletion, but if it might be useful to someone else, you could choose to leave the photo up with a suitably changed filename and file description and any other changes it needs. If you'd like to do that, let me know what changes you'd like to make. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.Abdul... 186.174.1.76 19:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- In use, no deletion reason given. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, photo of existing photo or screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Noh own work 191.126.161.210 01:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). The uploader states It is just a map with some lines and circles. Can't see how that would be subject to copyright, which appears to be an attempt to write a public domain claim such as {{PD-ineligible}}. However, the map appears to have some creative input, including coloring and labels, and I think it's over the relevant TOO, so I'm bringing this to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. If this image were in use - which it is not - it could easily be recreated using a freely licensed map base, e.g. one from OpenStreetMap, or indeed using an embedded map with markers. We can do better than a screenshot of Apple Maps with some text and circles drawn over it. Omphalographer (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. I did not think is was over the limit. I uploaded it to be used on David Grusch UFO whistleblower claims. It is not used there, so I don't care. Just delete it then. Marginataen (talk) 09:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Unlikely to be own work, Taken after 1977 if it is from the USA CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
The account on Flickr has unsourced photos licensed with a PD, I don't think this is in the Public Domain. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
This image should be deleted due to copyright violation. The "V" with a leaf on the left end is an internationally protected trademark according to: https://branddb.wipo.int/en/brand/WO500000001459412?asStructure=%7B%22_id%22:%22ab07%22,%22boolean%22:%22AND%22,%22bricks%22:%5B%5D%7D Amanhomoman (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Amanhomoman: Trademark, which is not enforced by Commons, and copyright are not the same. Which country's COM:TOO are you saying this is above? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is unrelated to what Amanhomoman is claiming but the artist is listed as Peepal Farm Foundation but no evidence is given for this and the account has uploaded the image as their own work which is probably not true. I suggest deleting this image because there is no evidence who the author is, thus the copyright status is unknown. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: above TOO - thus copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xernyce Baxter (talk · contribs)
[edit]not notable? out of project scope.
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Search results don't suggest any great notability, but I think this is a very good professional portrait and should be kept as such unless there is some kind of copyright issue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Joan Fuster Bonnin
[edit]This Spanish artist died in 1943, so his works are still protected in Spain until the end of 2023 (Spain has 80 years pma for authors who died before 7 December 1987). So the files should be deleted. They can be restored when both their Spanish and US coyprights (restored by the URAA) will have expired. Unless the paintings are dated, that will have to be assumed to be in 2039 (1943 + 95 + 1).
Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
The copyright is with TRIPTYQUE jj@triptyque.be according to the metadata. Has the user this copyright? Wouter (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- public picture available on Franc Bogovic's linkedin, instagram and facebook profiles. 185.78.181.77 15:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- So what? You didn't read COM:L. --Achim55 (talk) 15:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete this. 186.175.98.214 00:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 08:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Pixabay images published after January 2019 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 11:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is not clear if the user is the holder of the rights. Probably not.. Perhaps, but we need to have a DR if this is essentially a "delete per COM:PRP" case. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The file shows important politicians of Greece, of the 1980s, prime minister and ministers of Greece. Photo has taken by a photojournalist and clearly protect by copyright laws. 193.92.155.185 17:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This user ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) is blocked in Wikipedia - Greek edition. Also baseless argument. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- And a baseless assumption. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- See talk (discussion) page (in greek) users' ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A3%CF%85%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7_%CF%87%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B7:%CE%94%CF%8E%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%A3%CF%84%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%8D%CE%BA%CE%B7 ModernTacitus (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek President with Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou in the 1980s. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- All rights reserved ©. Meaning that I have uploaded legally this photo and shared the use of rights with Wikipedia, according to its bylaws. ModernTacitus (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek President with Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou in the 1980s. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- See talk (discussion) page (in greek) users' ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A3%CF%85%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7_%CF%87%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B7:%CE%94%CF%8E%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%A3%CF%84%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%8D%CE%BA%CE%B7 ModernTacitus (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- 193.92.155.185 same user as user ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη - Forgive her english. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023062610003626 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Krdbot All these tickets/permissions mean that user Modern Tacitus must be the personal photographer of Eleftherios Papadimitriou. Am I wrong ? ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Creator was Anemone Schneck-Steidl, how died in 2020. Her art is unfree until 2091. Her art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.
- File:Keramikobjekte U-Bahn-Station Heinrich-König-Platz - Anemone Schneck-Steidl 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1217.jpg
- File:Keramikobjekte U-Bahn-Station Heinrich-König-Platz - Anemone Schneck-Steidl 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1218.jpg
- File:Keramikobjekte U-Bahn-Station Heinrich-König-Platz - Anemone Schneck-Steidl 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1220.jpg
- File:Keramikobjekte U-Bahn-Station Heinrich-König-Platz - Anemone Schneck-Steidl 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1221.jpg
- File:Keramikobjekte U-Bahn-Station Heinrich-König-Platz - Anemone Schneck-Steidl 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1222.jpg
Lukas Beck (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. FOP doesn't apply to images taken inside of building interiors. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Creator was Erwin W. Zimmer, how died in 1998. His art is unfree until 2069. His art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.
- File:Tafeln U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater - Erwin W. Zimmer 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1201.jpg
- File:Tafeln U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater - Erwin W. Zimmer 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1202.jpg
- File:Tafeln U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater - Erwin W. Zimmer 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1205.jpg
- File:Tafeln U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater - Erwin W. Zimmer 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1206.jpg
- File:Tafeln U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater - Erwin W. Zimmer 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1207.jpg
Lukas Beck (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The train station was built in 1994. This art is unfree until 2065. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.
- File:Melodie in Stein- U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1210.jpg
- File:Melodie in Stein- U-Bahn-Station Musiktheater 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1212.jpg
Lukas Beck (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Trinenkamp
[edit]Creator was Many Szejstecki, how died in 2016. His art is unfree until 2087. His art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.
- File:Wandgestaltung U-Bahn-Station Trinenkamp - Many Szejstecki 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1181.jpg
- File:Wandgestaltung U-Bahn-Station Trinenkamp - Many Szejstecki 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1182.jpg
- File:Wandgestaltung U-Bahn-Station Trinenkamp - Many Szejstecki 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1183.jpg
- File:Wandgestaltung U-Bahn-Station Trinenkamp - Many Szejstecki 2021-09-11 Gelsenkirchen-1184.jpg
Lukas Beck (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is not clear if the user is the holder of the rights. Probably not.. Perhaps, but we need to have a DR if this is essentially a "delete per COM:PRP" case. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- this photo shows two greek MP at 1980's. It has definitely copyright status 193.92.155.185 17:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- puppet ip 193.92.155.185 of the latter user. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou with Mikis theodorakis. Also the latter user ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη is blocked in Wikipedia - Greek edition. Also 193.92.155.185 is puppet account of hers'.
- It is a baseless assumption.
- See talk (discussion) page (in greek) users' ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A3%CF%85%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7_%CF%87%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B7:%CE%94%CF%8E%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%A3%CF%84%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%8D%CE%BA%CE%B7
- Forgive their english. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- All rights reserved ©. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Meaning that I have uploaded legally this photo and shared the use of rights with Wikipedia, according to its bylaws. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- All rights reserved ©. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023062610003626 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Krdbot All these tickets/permissions mean that user Modern Tacitus must be the personal photographer of Eleftherios Papadimitriou. Am I wrong ? ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is not clear if the user is the holder of the rights. Probably not.. Perhaps, but we need to have a DR if this is essentially a "delete per COM:PRP" case. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly the uploader should at least fix the date. This is certainly not a 2023 image, but from the 1960ties or so. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- This user ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) is blocked in Wikipedia - Greek edition. Also baseless assumption. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- See talk (discussion) page (in greek) users' ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A3%CF%85%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7_%CF%87%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B7:%CE%94%CF%8E%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%A3%CF%84%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%8D%CE%BA%CE%B7 ModernTacitus (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- you should check the behavior of the user Modern Tacitus. 193.92.155.185 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
delete the photo shows ex Greek prime minister, circa 1980. It has definitely copyright status 193.92.155.185 17:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Vandal & trol IP193.92.155.185. Same user as user ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek PM with his Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou in the early 1980s. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- All rights reserved ©. Meaning that I have uploaded legally this photo and shared the use of rights with Wikipedia, according to its bylaws. ModernTacitus (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek PM with his Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou in the early 1980s. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023062610003626 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Krdbot All these tickets/permissions mean that user Modern Tacitus must be the personal photographer of Eleftherios Papadimitriou. Am I wrong ? ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is not clear if the user is the holder of the rights. Probably not.. Perhaps, but we need to have a DR if this is essentially a "delete per COM:PRP" case. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- This user ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) is blocked in Wikipedia - Greek edition ModernTacitus (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also this is a baseless assumption. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
delete photo shows the prime minister of Greece at 1991 (right). Probably has taken by a photojournalist during a public event. It is under a copyright staτus definitely 193.92.155.185 17:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- See talk (discussion) page (in greek) users' ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A3%CF%85%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7_%CF%87%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B7:%CE%94%CF%8E%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%A3%CF%84%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%8D%CE%BA%CE%B7 ModernTacitus (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek PM with his Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou ModernTacitus (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- All rights reserved ©.Meaning that I have uploaded legally this photo and shared the use of rights with Wikipedia, according to its bylaws. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo depicts Greek PM with his Greek MP Eleftherios Papadimitriou ModernTacitus (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- puppet ip 193.92.155.185 of the latter user. ModernTacitus (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- meaning ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη ModernTacitus (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023062610003626 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Krdbot All these tickets/permissions mean that user Modern Tacitus must be the personal photographer of Eleftherios Papadimitriou. Am I wrong ? The specific image appears to be a scan from a newspaper or a magazine. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is not clear if the user is the holder of the rights. Probably not.. Sure, but if this is essentially "delete per COM:PRP", we need a DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- the photo shows a greek MP at 1981. It has definitely copyright status 193.92.155.185 17:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- All rights reserved ©. Meaning that I have uploaded legally this photo and shared the use of rights with Wikipedia, according to its bylaws. ModernTacitus (talk) 08:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023062610003626 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Krdbot All these tickets/permissions mean that user Modern Tacitus must be the personal photographer of Eleftherios Papadimitriou (esp. this image is without doubt a publicity photo). Am I wrong ? ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 12:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from ReverbNation https://www.reverbnation.com/fatjosh CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no confirmation that this photo was published (!) anonymously anywhere more than 70 years ago. So, there is no reason to believe that it is in the PD now. Kursant504 (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep That is irrelevant when the photographer is unknown (which seems to be the case). For works of unknown photographers, they enter PD 70 years after creation. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- No. Proofs needed that it was published and fotograf is unknown (published anonymously). Maybe somebody took this photo from book without specifying the author of the foto? And PD is 70 years after publication. It is important. Kursant504 (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe additional information could be found in the original upload log here, but that has been deleted. What we do know is that it was certainly published before 2007. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- No. Proofs needed that it was published and fotograf is unknown (published anonymously). Maybe somebody took this photo from book without specifying the author of the foto? And PD is 70 years after publication. It is important. Kursant504 (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This is a protected trademark according to https://branddb.wipo.int/en/brand/WO500000001459412?asStructure=%7B%22_id%22:%22ab07%22,%22boolean%22:%22AND%22,%22bricks%22:%5B%5D%7D It is not free for use by anyone, hence a copyright violation. Please remove it. Amanhomoman (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- The link you cite has an icon but it is in black. It is not the same icon to what has been uploaded to WikiCommons which is white and green including a white box. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Commons does not protect trademarks. The only relevant question is whether this logo is above COM:TOO Switzerland, and since the text at that link doesn't seem to mention one thing about logos, I have no idea. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep A "V", a circle, a square. I think this is way below TOO. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- i am of the opinion that the user demanding the removal believes that a trademark implies copyright. i don't know how to help them understand this is not true. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.163.76.245 (talk) 14:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- We were asked on this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Veganism) to reach out to the original author Peepal Farm Foundation. This we did and the feedback we received from them on the 21st of June 2023 was:
- "The attributed author of this image was listed as Peepal Farm Foundation. We have taken action and requested the deletion of the image. Meanwhile, we have edited the page and changed the author to "V-Label Switzerland." We are V-Label Switzerland and request to have the picture removed.
- The picture on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veganism states: "The symbol widely used to denote a vegan-friendly product". This is not true (i.e. it is not widely used on vegan products, but very rarely found on any vegan products, if at all). Furthermore, this description implies that the image can be taken by anyone and placed on a product, which again is not true as the symbol of a "V" with a leaf on one end is a protected trademark.
- If all of this still is not sufficient for the removal, please reply in detail what steps are still missing to process the removal. Lswissveg (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Commons does not protect trademarks; your company does, if people try to violate them. Commons is concerned with copyright, not trademark. Note that I already stated that above; you just don't like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- i am of the opinion that the user demanding the removal believes that a trademark implies copyright. i don't know how to help them understand this is not true. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.163.76.245 (talk) 14:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Why is this not removed yet? We have been made the owner of the picture uploaded to WikiCommons and the deletion request still stands. Lswissveg (talk) 13:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep A "V", a circle, a square. I think this is way below TOO. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Highly unlikely to pass COM:TOO. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Why keep? We have been made the owner of this picture and request it to be removed. What do we need to do or prove to get it removed? Please be specific.
- The image description says "The symbol widely used to denote a vegan-friendly product". Where are all these products? We work internationally to provide vegan certification and have certified more than 50'000 products. I am not aware of any products that have this symbol on them and it is most certainly not "widely used". Lswissveg (talk) 07:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Commons uses {{Trademarked}} to identify trademarks but does not delete them. It should be kept also because firstly the current trademark status has been changing between revoked and protected continually over the last few years - including during this discussion, and secondly because this image is a derivation with different colours and a border, and the leafed V alone in green has been marked as too simple for copyright protections on commons (which I presume means also too simple to be trademarked). The actually File:V-Label 2023.png and it's variations (yellow and green in a circle with category text) are the ones in use and are marked as trademarked on commons already. - [[User:Amousey|Amousey]] (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of an artist CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also probably out of scope. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Not sure about the copyright, the source page doesn't mention something specific. Delete per COM:PCP. C messier (talk) 11:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- PS: On second thought, the source appears to be main website of NASA's SWIFT mission and so this must be in public domain as {{PD-NASA}}.--C messier (talk) 12:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2009 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
no author given copied from elsewhere, used on nl-wiki for nonsense article Hoyanova (talk) 12:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Klaudius Dziuk) M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Godzilla 81.150.17.251 13:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Ayaanigodzilla 81.150.17.251 13:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Ayaanigodzilla" isn't an argument Mariomassone (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
this file is under copyright law (https://editions-thuries.fr/) gpesenti (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Two repetitions of a walking sequence of an individual recorded using a motion-capture system.gif
[edit]No information of a CC license for the picture on the article TheNileRex (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t understand the issue here? Is it related to the fact that figures in the scientific publication referenced showing some of the same data (but different from this one which I made specifically for Wikipedia) do not have a CC license? This is a different illustration. Larslau (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- It’s just an animated version of the figure on the paper TheNileRex (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use, so must be kept if there are no licensing problems. And it seems to be properly licensed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
My own photography 186.175.129.13 15:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- sostituzione foto Sidifuad (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Very small, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality nude male photo, I think we had much better alternatives in photographs taken by Sasha Kargaltsev A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, the image is blury, but Kargaltsev is a notable photographer, so we should keep all his freely licensed works. Also, this image is blury because it was originaly taken with a Polaroid camera, so this is the original quality of this artwork. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
An underexposed image, I don't think it illustrate the subject properly A1Cafel (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the underexposure seems deliberate, for artistic rather than illustrative purposes. Dronebogus (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Tapa de libro 186.174.1.76 18:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Poster, no permission. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Tapa de libro 186.174.1.76 18:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The logo is not own work of the user, wrong license FlorianH76 (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Pretty simple logo, but I don't see any COM:TOO Georgia. No-one on this site knows anything about Georgian copyright law? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: If we don't have any info about the TOO in that country, we need to assume it's very low. —holly {chat} 23:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Polimerek as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: According to tjhe information from Fundation mentioned as the owner of the copyright - they claim that thy got agreemet for only one publication and they are not owners. This unclear who the owner can be as the author is uknown but it might died after 1953. According to Polish law this is orphanted work. Besieds all - the agreemet from 2007 is insuficcient, we had much more liberal rules regarding agreements in 2007 than nowaydays.. VRT permission was accepted for this file, so I'm opening a DR rather than actioning the speedy. I will note that {{PD-Poland}} indicates that photographs published before 1994 in Poland without a copyright notice are presumed to be in the public domain, and this photo is from c. 1942, so this may well be in the public domain. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- The photo is from 1942 but it wasn't published before 1994, therefore this expeption doesn't work for this photo. It can only be applied to the photos which were published without copyright notice before 1994 so if one want to use this ezxception must prove that such publication has happened. This photo was actually published for very first time in 2003 in a book "Sylwetki kobiet-żołnierzy I Służba Polek na frontach II wojny światowej", [4] and the book is copyrighted toghether with all photos used in this book. The Fundation which published this book claim that it got agreement from possibile copyright owner of this photo for single use in this book only. The agreemet from 2007 has been accepted (by me) too fast and it is insufficient anyway - it is for "Wikipedia only" and there is no chance to get proper agreement, so I am fixing now my own old mistake... Polimerek (talk) 08:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). The claimed (non-machine readable) license is "S dovolením převzato z knihy Radomíry Sedlákové, Karel Prager: Lidé si na nové věci teprve musí zvyknout. Praha: TITANIC, 2013. ISBN: 978-80-86652-54-2". This doesn't appear to be compliant with COM:L, so I'm bringing to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). The claimed license is "Ik verkreeg toestemming van de persoon die de foto's publiceerde om ze te gebruiken voor deze pagina", but mere permission to use on Wikipedia is not compliant with COM:L. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is a claimed license of Ik verkreeg toestemming van de persoon die de foto's publiceerde om ze te gebruiken voor deze pagina, but mere permission to use is not compliant with COM:L. As such, bringing to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). The claimed license is not machine readable, and reads Ik verkreeg toestemming van de persoon die de foto's publiceerde om ze te gebruiken voor deze pagina. However, mere permission to use an image on Wikipedia is not enough to meet COM:L. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is a claimed license (not readable by a machine) that reads S dovolením převzato z knihy Radomíry Sedlákové, Karel Prager: Lidé si na nové věci teprve musí zvyknout. Praha: TITANIC, 2013. ISBN: 978-80-86652-54-2. However, mere permission to use an image is not enough to satisfy COM:L, so I'm bringing to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is a claimed license that cannot be read by a machine. This reads S dovolením převzato z knihy Radomíry Sedlákové, Karel Prager: Lidé si na nové věci teprve musí zvyknout. Praha: TITANIC, 2013. ISBN: 978-80-86652-54-2. However, mere permission to use on Wikipedia (or to reproduce faithfully) does not satisfy COM:L, so I'm bringing this to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). This image has a claimed license that is not readable by a machine. The license text says Převzato z knihy Radomíry Sedlákové, Karel Prager: Lidé si na nové věci teprve musí zvyknout. Praha: TITANIC, 2013. ISBN: 978-80-86652-54-2. However, this doesn't appear to be a release that allows re-use under a free license, so this doesn't appear to satisfy COM:L. As such, I'm bringing this to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since). TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep TOO could be borderline, but it can be assumed that the sign is (also) visible publicly somewhere, so COM:FOP applies. Due to the perspectivic distortion in the image, this could even be a photography and not a scan. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Proof: File:Zoo_ulm_entrance.jpg shows the logo on a public-facing wall. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I'm going to assume this is a photo of the logo because of the perspective distortion, as the other photo clearly shows it's not intended to be that way. That means FOP applies. —holly {chat} 23:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz
[edit]This train station was built in 2016. This art is unfree until 2087. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either.
Lukas Beck (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo,
- as creator of this work, I have to admit, that I don't have special rights for this art. You can delete it.
- BR
- GodeNehler GodeNehler (talk) 07:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete Per the nominator and uploader. Both the architecture of the train station and the artwork on the walls are clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz
[edit]The images were uploaded after the deletion request, but are protected by copyright for the same reason. There is no freedom of panorama for interior shots in Germany.
- File:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz, Düsseldorf, Oktober 2023 (05).jpg
- File:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz, Düsseldorf, Oktober 2023 (06).jpg
- File:U-Bahnhof Graf-Adolf-Platz, Düsseldorf, Oktober 2023 (10).jpg
Lukas Beck (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Das Copyright von dauerhaft in öffentlich zugängigen Bahnhöfen angebrachter Kunst in Deutschland ist nicht geklärt und wird nur von einigen Rechtsanwälten, nicht unbedingt ohne Eigennutz, angenommen. Ich bin für Behalten, solange es kein gegensätzliches Urteil gibt. -- Kürschner (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wir haben dieses Thema lang und breit diskutiert und das Ergebnis ist auf Löschen gefallen. Dieses Urteil mehrerer erfahrender Admins und weiterer qualifizierter Mitwirkender sollten wir beachten. Am Ende haben wir auf Commons die Regelung, Bilder auch dann zu löschen, wenn es nur begründete Zweifel am Urheberrechtsstatus gibt. So oder so sehe ich keine Rechtfertigung, diese Bilder nicht zu entfernen. Lukas Beck (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Es gibt nach wie vor zahllose Artikel zu deutschen U-Bahnhöfen, die noch bebildert sind. Ältere Berliner U-Bahnhöfe vielleicht mal ausgenommen sollte doch nach der Argumentation nahezu kein Bild in den Artikeln zu deutschen U-Bahnhöfen mehr möglich sein, das die Architektur zeigt und nicht irgendein belangloses Detail? --FloSch (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Deine Argumentation ist für mich nicht nachvollziehbar. Wir können keine urheberrechtlich geschützten Bilder behalten, nur da diese für Bebilderungen von Artikeln benötigt werden. Das Urheberrecht steht dabei über nahezu allem. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Genau das sage ich doch gerade und wundere mich darüber, warum es noch so viele Bilder von U-Bahnhöfen in der Wikipedia gibt. In de:U-Bahn München sind auf jeden Fall noch so einige, für die es ein Architekten-Copyright gibt. Warum stellst du da keine Löschanträge? FloSch (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Florian, Commons ist ein unvollkommenes Projekt und wird das auf absehbare Zeit bleiben. Besteht also ein Zustand über Jahre, muss das nicht bedeuten dass es auch richtig so ist. Ganz im Gegenteil, oft ist es das gerade nicht. Alles steht und fällt auf freiwilliger Mitarbeit; und jeder, einschließlich dir, sei ausdrücklich ermuntert auch mal selbst mitzuhelfen, das schließt eben auch Löschanträge mit ein. MfG --A.Savin 08:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Genau das sage ich doch gerade und wundere mich darüber, warum es noch so viele Bilder von U-Bahnhöfen in der Wikipedia gibt. In de:U-Bahn München sind auf jeden Fall noch so einige, für die es ein Architekten-Copyright gibt. Warum stellst du da keine Löschanträge? FloSch (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Deine Argumentation ist für mich nicht nachvollziehbar. Wir können keine urheberrechtlich geschützten Bilder behalten, nur da diese für Bebilderungen von Artikeln benötigt werden. Das Urheberrecht steht dabei über nahezu allem. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Es gibt nach wie vor zahllose Artikel zu deutschen U-Bahnhöfen, die noch bebildert sind. Ältere Berliner U-Bahnhöfe vielleicht mal ausgenommen sollte doch nach der Argumentation nahezu kein Bild in den Artikeln zu deutschen U-Bahnhöfen mehr möglich sein, das die Architektur zeigt und nicht irgendein belangloses Detail? --FloSch (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wir haben dieses Thema lang und breit diskutiert und das Ergebnis ist auf Löschen gefallen. Dieses Urteil mehrerer erfahrender Admins und weiterer qualifizierter Mitwirkender sollten wir beachten. Am Ende haben wir auf Commons die Regelung, Bilder auch dann zu löschen, wenn es nur begründete Zweifel am Urheberrechtsstatus gibt. So oder so sehe ich keine Rechtfertigung, diese Bilder nicht zu entfernen. Lukas Beck (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Das Copyright von dauerhaft in öffentlich zugängigen Bahnhöfen angebrachter Kunst in Deutschland ist nicht geklärt und wird nur von einigen Rechtsanwälten, nicht unbedingt ohne Eigennutz, angenommen. Ich bin für Behalten, solange es kein gegensätzliches Urteil gibt. -- Kürschner (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per above nomination: Missing permission for shown artworks on the walls, no COM:DM too. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
This train station was built in 1986. This art is unfree until 2057. This art in this train station is probably not covered by the freedom of panorama either, since it was recorded inside a building and the German freedom of panorama does not apply to public interiors either. Lukas Beck (talk) 07:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete As the nominator says freedom of panorama does apply to building interiors and the artwork in this image is clearly modern. So there's zero reason it would be covered by freedom of panorama, which also goes for the architecture of the train station in general. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. Commercially-licensed photo of a copyrighted public sculpture in a country that has no freedom of panorama, see COM:FOP Monaco. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of François Grimaldi in Monaco for artwork details and authorship. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in france Lukas Beck (talk) 07:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Claimed (non-template license) of "S dovolením převzato z knihy Radomíry Sedlákové, Karel Prager: Lidé si na nové věci teprve musí zvyknout. Praha: TITANIC, 2013. ISBN: 978-80-86652-54-2", but I don't think that complies with COM:L. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no valid license, would need VRT permission from the copyright holder. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Claimed (non-machine readable) license is "Převzato z knihy Radomíry Sedlákové, Karel Prager: Lidé si na nové věci teprve musí zvyknout. Praha: TITANIC, 2013. ISBN: 978-80-86652-54-2". However, I don't think that this is compliant with COM:L, so I'm bringing this to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no valid license, would need VRT permission from the copyright holder. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license. Probably a non-free image. License (Mil.gov.ua ) applies only to materials posted on the web-site Mil.gov.ua, Kursant504 (talk) 04:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- The image is taken from a video from the official social media site of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (i.e https://twitter.com/DefenceU/status/1654605507070402560). Works from a website, social media or YouTube channel of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The original source was a Telegram channel of the SSO of Ukraine but if that's the case the source has been changed to the one posted by the official social media site and is now covered by the liencense. LordLoko (talk) 00:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Again: license (Mil.gov.ua ) applies only to materials posted on the web-site Mil.gov.ua, not on their social media. Needed link where this foto/video published at Mil.gov.ua. Kursant504 (talk) 10:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- For example license ((dpsu.gov.ua)) says "This file comes from the website or social media of the Border Guard Service of Ukraine and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International". But license (Mil.gov.ua) didn't applies on it's social media. Kursant504 (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- ((Dsns.gov.ua)) - license is the same: "...from the website or social media...". But ((Mil.gov.ua)) is not. Kursant504 (talk) 12:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Then why is mil.gov.ua different from dsns.gov.ua, dpsu.gov.ua or ngu.gov.ua? The prínciples should be the same, If anything, the license should be updated LordLoko (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, principals are not must be the same. It is mean that Mil.gov.ua adds his own media only at Mil.gov.ua. on social media they could use not-free media. You can write a letter to the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and ask them to contact the Wiki to expand the license. At this moment, license ((Mil.gov.ua)) didn't applies on it's social media. Kursant504 (talk) 13:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but why are they different then? If the law is the same? Is there a specific legislation you can quote? LordLoko (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- What "law" is the same?Kursant504 (talk) 04:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- In a nutshell, how these licenses work: a license information must be posted on the site (or like a note at the bottom) that the materials are free (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International etc.). Sometimes, in addition, a the copyright holder (MoD of Ukraine) send a letter to the Wikimedia Commons services stating that it really allows the free use of materials from it's web-site. If we are talking about accounts on other web-sites, then, for example, there should be an indication on YouTube that the videos are posted as free (in the basic settings, all videos are not free). It should be the same on Twitter/telegram/FB: the account should clearly state that these are free materials (like here: https://web.archive.org/web/20220303014031/https://www.facebook.com/MNS.GOV.UA/about_privacy_and_legal_info), or the same in a letter to Wikimedia Commons. Kursant504 (talk) 04:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. I understand now. The thing I was talking is that Ukrainian law has images published by Ukrainian government bodies be under but I understand this licensing tag question is complicated. My question is: what could be done? I believe this images have an enourmous encyclopedic and historical value for their pages. LordLoko (talk) 17:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Try asking on forum. This is not the place for these discussions. In fact, now the license is incorrect and this photo is not free. Kursant504 (talk) 07:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. I understand now. The thing I was talking is that Ukrainian law has images published by Ukrainian government bodies be under but I understand this licensing tag question is complicated. My question is: what could be done? I believe this images have an enourmous encyclopedic and historical value for their pages. LordLoko (talk) 17:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but why are they different then? If the law is the same? Is there a specific legislation you can quote? LordLoko (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, principals are not must be the same. It is mean that Mil.gov.ua adds his own media only at Mil.gov.ua. on social media they could use not-free media. You can write a letter to the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and ask them to contact the Wiki to expand the license. At this moment, license ((Mil.gov.ua)) didn't applies on it's social media. Kursant504 (talk) 13:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Then why is mil.gov.ua different from dsns.gov.ua, dpsu.gov.ua or ngu.gov.ua? The prínciples should be the same, If anything, the license should be updated LordLoko (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, would need permission from Ukraine's government. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
It looks like a scanned, darkened photograph for official documents - from a professional photographer. The user has no other files and edits, which makes it unreliable that he is the author of the files. Matlin (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Jakim prawem jakaś anonimowa osoba usiłuje cenzurowac biogram znanej i cenionej artystki?!
- Biruta Markuza sama wybrała swoje zdjęcie profilowe i upoważniła mnie do jego zamieszczenia w swoim profilu.
- Więc z czym macie problem?! w czyim interesie jest to "deletion requests"?! :/ ElaPi (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this looks like a passport photograph, and the uploader admits that they aren't the photographer. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot from this YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgVFstSyLBI&t=145s CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, requires VRT permission from the copyright holders. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure out the copyright status of this image, while the photograph could be cropped and tagged with a "{{PD-Art}}" tag, it was published in 1962, per "COM:EGYPT" this is "Publish + 50 years" (so 1962 + 50 + 1 = 2013), however I am not certain if this is in the public domain in the United States of America as it doesn't fall under "{{PD-1996}}", meaning that that "Generally, the U. S. copyright term for works published before January 1, 1978, lasts for 95 years from the year of first publication. Although sound recordings fixed before 1972 were not then protected by federal copyright, those sound recordings will receive the remainder of the term they would have received had they been protected by such copyright when published. For example, a sound recording published in 1925 will be protected until 2020. For works published on or after January 1, 1978, the term of copyright is the life of the author plus 70 years." (per the US Copyright Office). I can't figure out if such works fall under "{{PD-Egypt-official}}" which is based on "[Copyright protection] shall not cover the following: Official documents, whatever their source or target language, such as laws, regulations, resolutions and decisions, international conventions, court decisions, award of arbitrators and decisions of administrative committees having judicial competence." (which doesn't seem to apply to an educational chart). -- Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment, I think that it might be in the public domain in the United States of America per Copyrightability of Tables, Charts, and Graphs (Internet Archive's Wayback Machine) found in the University of Michigan Library: "Charts, graphs, and tables are not subject to copyright protection because they do not meet the first requirement for copyright protection, that is, they are not “original works of authorship,” under the definitions in the Act.6." and also Research Guides: Copyright Basics: Copyrightability (Internet Archive's Wayback Machine) which states "Charts, Tables, and Graphs Unless they possess a modicum of creativity, charts, graphs, and tables are not subject to copyright protection, because they are purely factual. Thus, they do not meet the originality requirement.", with the satisfying conditions being (Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. For details and exceptions, see the Library Copyright Policy. ©2018, Regents of the University of Michigan):
- Original: To qualify as original, the work must be created independently and must have “at least a modicum” of creativity.
- A work of authorship: Works of authorship include literary works, musical works, pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works, audiovisual works, and sound recordings, as well as many other types of creative works.
- Fixed: A work must also be "fixed in a tangible medium of expression" by or under the authorization of the author. Writing a work on paper or on a computer hard drive, recording a work on tape, and sculpting a work out of marble (or ice!) all satisfy this requirement. An unrecorded improvisation (e.g., in music or dance) would not satisfy this requirement.
- So, it's possible that it falls under the "Works not copyrightable in the US are not affected." clause of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), meaning that this work should be tagged with "{{PD-Egypt}}", "{{PD-Art}}" (after some cropping), and "{{PD-1996}}" (due to this work not being copyrightable in the United States of America). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: While the chart itself would be covered under {{PD-chart}}, the photo itself is of a 3D object and therefore has its own separate copyright. This is similar to saying a photo of a PD painting is PD-Art, but not when the frame is also included in the shot. —holly {chat} 17:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, non-notable, out of scope. —holly {chat} 18:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Given the involvement of non-NASA personel and that it wasn't published in the Hubble websites, but in a copyrighted journal, IMO this image isn't available with a compatible license. C messier (talk) 11:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Hubble photos by non-NASA/ESA personnel are not guaranteed to be free. —holly {chat} 18:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: While I cannot rule out of the possibility of using a timer, the photo is unused and the subject appears to be not notable enough for an article, so deleting it for being out of scope. —holly {chat} 18:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The source mentions "Except where explicitly stated, all rights are reserved and content should not be copied, adapted, redistributed, or otherwise used without the prior written permission of Kenneth W. Cavagnolo." It mentions that this image was created by Chadra X-ray observatory, but the project page mentions it is all right reserved. C messier (talk) 11:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Question What are the rules about images created by Chandra X-Ray Observatory? Can they be copyrighted, or are these inappropriate copyright claims? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Theoretically, Chandra is a NASA project and as such its images are in public domain, but the website that hosts the archive mentions that it is all rights reserved. A previous discussion about the issue was closed with keeping the images. However, I'm not sure if the image we see here is available as is by Chandra or if it is edited in a way that makes it a derivative work with copyright on its own; I searched its name here and I got a b/w image. C messier (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Would colorizing an image, if it's done as an automatic and not a specially considered artistic fashion, bring a copyright with it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- It really depends where the threshold of originality lies. An automated program probably not, but looks like the author ran the data through SAO9 image processor. Don't know if playing with curves, image scale and image color brings a copyright. C messier (talk) 06:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Would colorizing an image, if it's done as an automatic and not a specially considered artistic fashion, bring a copyright with it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: While the US does not have "sweat of the brow" copyright, I am certainly no expert here so I'll assume that some level of creativity was required to convert that black and white image into this nice color one, which would engender a new copyright. —holly {chat} 18:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- This photo was taken during the recording of the music video and Igor Jack is the owner of the rights. The video and photos can be viewed on the official website www.igorjack.com as well as on the official Instagram account. Of course, it also has raw photos. Igorjack98 (talk) 21:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the photo is unused and the subject appears to be not notable enough for an article, so deleting it for being out of scope. —holly {chat} 18:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" laut Metadaten aber Urheber Foto: Claudia Jacquemin Lutheraner (talk) 11:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. The picture is provided by ASAM and also available at the ASAM website here: https://www.asam.net/conferences-events/detail/asam-international-conference-2019/pictures-1/ 83.25.163.29 12:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank fuer die Anfrage. Das Photo wurde bei der Konferenz gemacht and mir geschickt. Mehrere Photos aus diesem Event sind hier verfuegbar: https://www.asam.net/conferences-events/detail/asam-international-conference-2019/pictures-1/ 83.25.163.29 08:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ich habe jetzt eine Referenz hinzugefuegt, falls es hilfreich ist. 83.25.163.29 08:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank fuer die Anfrage. Das Photo wurde bei der Konferenz gemacht and mir geschickt. Mehrere Photos aus diesem Event sind hier verfuegbar: https://www.asam.net/conferences-events/detail/asam-international-conference-2019/pictures-1/ 83.25.163.29 08:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission: Claudia Jacquemin must agree to release the photo under a free license. You can have her contact COM:VRT to start the process. —holly {chat} 18:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is marked as the author; Possible VRT asked CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This is almost certainly a case where the subject gave his phone to a friend and asked them to take a picture of him. While strictly speaking, the friend owns the copyright on it, I think that making them go through the VRT process is unnecessarily bureaucratic. I think it can be safely assumed that the friend would have zero qualms about transferring the copyright to the subject (who appears to be a verified account according to the fr-WP user page). —holly {chat} 18:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The source mentions it is available CC BY-NC-SA, which isn't compatible. If it is indeed a Hubble image, then this must be shown with a different source. C messier (talk) 11:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and also I would like to show my appreciation that the project responsible for this image is called "H0LiCOW". —holly {chat} 18:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works, no permission Polarlys (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep! --Svajcr (talk) 13:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- The author died 82 years ago, so it should be PD 70 partly. Juandev (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per cs:Pavel Socháň – výber z fotografií and Google Translate, the photos were probably taken in the 1890s, and if we assume a contemporaraneous publication date, that would make them PD in the US as well as in Czechia. —holly {chat} 19:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this illustrated cloth(?) banner, temporarily on display in a public place in Japan, is subject to Japanese law on freedom of panorama. DS (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see the need to remove that image. Because I think that the main body of this banner is the warning text, and the illustration (which account for less than one-third of the entire banner) is merely subordinate to it. (Machine translation is used. I apologize if the English text is inappropriate). Kyoww (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I cropped the photo just to show the Kansai dialect part, which would be covered under PD-text. —holly {chat} 19:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No permission given by the journal (see link) Ghilt (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- i agree with that decicion, i didnt know that such an picture falls under copyright. Im sorry, i try to educate myself better the next time. The Other Karma (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
American copyright in this image will have been resurrected by the URAA in 1996 and will last until at least 2025, if we take the circa date to be exact and agree that publication was anonymous by British law. Felix QW (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- See en:Copyright_law_of_the_United_Kingdom#Copyright_term. Untill 1995, the copyright protection term in the UK was 50 years, not 70 years, so the image was out of copyright by 1995 (date of the law change), and by 1996 (URAA date). Besides, per COM:URAA, "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." Materialscientist (talk) 21:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good point, thank you! I always assumed the EEA extensions in 1995 were fundamentally retroactive, as there have already been European countries that were both in the Berne convention and had 70 year terms (e. g. Germany), but I would be happy to stand corrected as that would help us keep a lot more pre-war English media. Felix QW (talk) 21:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Actually no, the 1995 UK copyright extensions were in fact retroactive. en:Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights also says that the UK had 70 years pma (which also means 70 years for anonymous works) on the URAA date.
- The Duration of Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 1995 No. 3297 (specifically, Regulation 16) revived some expired UK copyrights: "The new provisions relating to duration of copyright apply— [...] (d) to existing works in which copyright expired before 31st December 1995 but which were on 1st July 1995 protected in another EEA state under legislation relating to copyright or related rights." (EEA = European Economic Area, that's the EU plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway). An anonymous 1929 photograph was protected by copyright in Germany (and probably other EU countries) on 1st July 1995. Which means its UK copyright was revived by the 1995 regulations. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Correct, but as noted in Copyright law of the United Kingdom, "The normal practice of British law would have been to freeze the extension, applying it only to new works, rather than reviving expired copyrights." Materialscientist (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- The Duration of Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 1995 No. 3297 (specifically, Regulation 16) revived some expired UK copyrights: "The new provisions relating to duration of copyright apply— [...] (d) to existing works in which copyright expired before 31st December 1995 but which were on 1st July 1995 protected in another EEA state under legislation relating to copyright or related rights." (EEA = European Economic Area, that's the EU plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway). An anonymous 1929 photograph was protected by copyright in Germany (and probably other EU countries) on 1st July 1995. Which means its UK copyright was revived by the 1995 regulations. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfortunately, this photo had its copyright restored by the 1995 law, which then made it subject to URAA. The sentence Materialscientist quoted from context clearly means "Contrary to the normal practice of British law, the copyright was restored anyway." Undelete in 2025. —holly {chat} 19:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Samral
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Several non-trivial logos claimed to be PD because of inegibility (File:AzPFL_logo.jpg), claims that files are released under CC without evidence (File:Isa Gambar (1).jpg), files supposed to be in PD because of age but undated (File:Pənahəli xan.jpg) or created long after the limit for copyright expiry (File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg). In at least one case, the claim of authorship seems to be simply false (File:Cəmil Həsənli (21.09.2013).jpg).
Underlying lk (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg my images.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
= PD-old-70. what's the matter ?--samral talk 23:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Juggler2005 (talk) 00:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Yeni nəbz qəzeti.jpg File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg File:Isa Gambar (1).jpg--samral talk 13:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC) I thought that there is copyright of the logo.--samral talk 13:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 2 pictures below is from a Pakistani newspapers of the 1890 scan. Article "Peshawar Nights" about the book. If you want to learn, you know that when researching the book printed: File:"Dürrü Nəcəfi" jurnalının 1-ci səhifəsi.jpg File:"Dürrü Nəcəfi" jurnalının 2-ci səhifəsi.jpg.--samral talk 13:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg File:The Twelve Imams.jpg File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg File:Pənahəli xan.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg and File:Isa Gambar (1) You know, because I've installed incorrectly delete. File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg belongs to me. My. Prove otherwise if the command is not so--samral talk 16:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural close. Please renominate in smaller batches. Natuur12 (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photos from a book published in 1990. No evidence that they are in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. (...) In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader."
Juggler2005 (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Krd 13:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Artwork. No date, no author information. No evidence that these pictures are in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. (...) In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader." Juggler2005 (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
File:AzPFL logo.jpg Delete File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg Delete File:AHC logo.jpg Delete File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg Delete File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg Delete File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg Delete File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg Delete File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg Delete File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg Delete File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg Delete File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg Delete File:The Twelve Imams.jpg Delete File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg Delete File:Pənahəli xan.jpg Delete File:KHC logo.jpg and Delete File:Isa Gambar (1) Delete--samral talk 18:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Deleted 2 files per nomination. (Discussion for the rest sadly is not comprehesible. Please renominate if necessary.) --Krd 13:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright for these files is claimed to have expired, but the author and date of publication are missing (Naməlum means 'unknown'), therefore the claim is impossible to verify.
Underlying lk (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Ok. I agree Delete. But No. Because its scans pages of Journal of Durru Najafi article about of "Peshawar Nights". And Peshawar Nights is a Shi'a book by Sultanu'l-Wa'izin Shirazi[1] ("Prince of Preachers from Shiraz")[2] recounts a public debate between Shi'a Muslims and Sunni Muslims. The debate took place in the city of Peshawar in the North-West Frontier Province (present-day Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) in Pakistan of British India beginning on 27 January 1927. References 2015-1927=88. And 88>70 :)--samral talk 20:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Deleted: except the two. Natuur12 (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photos made by azerbaijani photographer Ehtiram Jabi and previously shared social network [6]. Most likely grabbed by Samral somewhere from social media.
--Sefer azeri (talk) 20:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The images bore no resemblance to user's own photography, including metadata. User has never claimed to be Ehtiram Jabi except for these seven pictures. COM:OTRS can be filed by Mr. Jabi at any time, should he so desire, and the images could be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC) Deleted: deleted by Ymblanter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
False dates of shooting, unlikely to be uploader's work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
http://sia.az/az/news/politics/745641.html
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC) Deleted: Deleted by someone else. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC) Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC) |
Possible COM:FLICKRWASHING, every one of these images was uploaded to Flickr as PD 1.0 a week or so before it was uploaded to Commons. In each case the Flickr user has uploaded no other images.
- File:Qlobal TV yaşıl.jpg
- File:Qlobal TV yaşıl masa.jpg
- File:Qlobal TV yaşıl stul.jpg
- File:Qlobal TV göy.jpg
- File:Qlobal TV qırmızı.jpg
- File:Elvar Osmanov.jpg
- File:Mətləb Ağa.jpg
- File:Elgiz Əlizadə.jpg
- File:LANDAU uğur 4.jpg
- File:LANDAU Kindergarten 1.jpg
- File:LANDAU PreSchool 3.jpg
- File:PreLANDAU 4.jpg
- File:LANDAU Xeyriyyə 1.jpg
- File:Landau Xeyriyyə 2.jpg
- File:LANDAU Academy 3.jpg
- File:LANDAU Academy 2.jpg
- File:LANDAU Academy 1.jpg
- File:LANDAU PreSchool.jpg
- File:LANDAU PreSchool Xətai.jpg
- File:LANDAU Kindergarten.jpg
- File:LANDAU School logo.png
- File:LANDAU School Asset.png
- File:Orxan Bayramov.jpg
- File:Vahid Məmmədli 2023.jpg
- File:Mollalar Əşrəf.jpg
- File:Rəhman Abdullayev.jpg
- File:Səbuhi Qarayev.jpg
- File:Şəmil Sadiq.jpg
- File:Rövşən Abdullaoğlu Afrika (1).jpg
- File:Rövşən Abdullaoğlu Afrika.jpg
- File:Rövşən Abdullaoğlu Antarktida buz.jpg
- File:Rövşən Abdullaoğlu kitab sərgisi (2022).jpg
- File:Rovshan Abdullaoglu Readers’ Favorite.jpg
- File:Rövşən Abdullaoğlu Antarktida Azərbaycan bayrağı.jpg
- File:Rövşən Abdullaoğlu Antarktida.jpg
- File:Rovshan Abdullaoglu (cropped).jpg
- File:Rovshan Abdullaoglu.jpg
File:Çinarə Köçərli (2020).jpg--Krd 10:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)- File:Nəcəf Allahverdiyev.jpg
- File:Eldar İsmayılov (ictimai xadim).jpg
- File:Lalə Ədalətqızı 2022.jpg
Belbury (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- VRT is receiving several tickets related to this DR, but up to now none of it was confirmed. --Krd 12:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Belbury, I did not upload any of these photos to Flickr. Each image has been uploaded by its author. I just explained the rules and procedure to them. I have informed all the authors of the picture. Each of them gives and will give more detailed information about it by mail. samral talk 15:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
All were deleted already, except one, which is kept. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
German freedom of panorama does only applies for permanently installed works. Lukas Beck (talk) 16:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted advertisement. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Doubt on the own work claim CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, although I could not find earlier versions on the web, I doubt this is the own work of uploader, who did not comment and was a single uploader user. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Unknown COM:TOO for Venezuela, thus assumed "Not OK". Also, the current design seems a little bit different with the t not touching the blue area. Should be transferred to respective Wikipedias as non-free logo -- DaxServer (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Unknown COM:TOO for Venezuela, thus assumed "Not OK". Should be transferred to respective Wikipedias as non-free logo -- DaxServer (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Unknown COM:TOO for Columbia, thus assumed "Not OK". Should be transferred to respective Wikipedias as non-free logo -- DaxServer (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Unknown COM:TOO for Venezuela, thus assumed "Not OK". Should be transferred to respective Wikipedias as non-free logo -- DaxServer (talk) 17:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Some french handwritten text with half a diagram and no description really, cannot be used for anything. -- Deadstar (msg) 18:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep given its context as part of an extensive archival collection, I see no harm in keeping everything that archive considered worth having. - Jmabel ! talk 20:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the archive actually has this one (couldn't find it on their website anyway). -- Deadstar (msg) 09:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, so you made me dig a bit... if this scrap of a manuscript is by Gabrielle Émilie de Châtelet (and this is a big IF as the file merely has "Du Chatelet (?)" with the question mark), it may be part of the collection referenced here: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/x8v9xmk9 but this is all conjecture as there is no access to the actual archive referenced and Wellcome doesn't seem to be sure either. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the archive actually has this one (couldn't find it on their website anyway). -- Deadstar (msg) 09:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no urgent need to delete this file. --Ellywa (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The license is doubtful. The source is not free and author is not clear. FlorianH76 (talk) 23:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- The whole website is published under GNU FDL, as stated in the footer. („Copyright notice COPYLEFT (C) MAIDAN.ORG.UA – 2000-2023. This website is distributed according to GNU Free Documentation License. It means in short – you can copy and share anything from this site with attribution, however you cannot change the texts.“) A pity the 2003 version of the URL is not in the Internet Archive, however, the license is clear. We should maybe remove the CC license template, however I'm not completely savvy with these „GNU FDL only“ stuff and what is compatible with CC and what is not. Elya (talk) 10:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- The copyright notice is self-contradictory, as it links to GFDL 1.3, but then says: "It means in short – you can copy and share anything from this site with attribution, however you cannot change the texts." This is a non-derivative restriction, which makes content from this website unusable for Commons. It's also unclear if the copyright notice is supposed to apply only to the text, or also to all the images from the website, and if not, what license applies to the images, if any. -- 2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 11:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This is a grandfathered old file, license is OK. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Authorship and license are doubtful. It is doubtful that this is the own work of the uploader. FlorianH76 (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: TinEye doesn't find anything before upload to Commons, and it has camera EXIF. I don't see a reason to doubt this is an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio : scan of an old postcard without author permission - Scan d'une vieille carte postale avec probable violation du droit d'auteur. Best regards - Thierry (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Looks old enough to be PD-Art. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Ikan,
- Please, can you explain what you mean when you say : "Looks old enough to be PD-Art" ?
- In Europe, Copyright Duration Directive CD 93/98/CEE states that pictures are in public domain 70 years after their author died. These pictures were taken at the beginning of the 20st century. if the photograph were 20 years old in 1920 and was dead when he was 70, the date for falling in public domain is : 1970 + 70 years = 2040. We are in 2023, so before 2040. There is a risk that the picture is not public according to the law.
- What is your opinion ?
- Best regards - Thierry (talk) 19:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- I responded on my user talk page, since you contacted me there. This looks like a 19th- or very early 20th-century photo to me, but I don't know for sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Info Publisher is Phototypie Ressot et Guionie. Web search gives me a 1900-1920 date range on this publisher. Abzeronow (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: With a date of early 20th century, {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} could be a possibility, but we don't know if the photographer's name is on the back of this postcard and thus we cannot make a determination on the copyright status. —holly {chat} 16:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Я автор этого файла и хочу его удалить так как загрузил аналогичные более подходящие для проекта и статей фотографии Well-read MountainMan (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Well-read MountainMan: This photo is currently in use, so we can't delete it. Please replace it in ru:Армавир (Южно-Кавказская железная дорога) and ping me when done, and then we can do the courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 19:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Holly's offer is still open but we're not leaving this open indefinately. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)