User talk:Ghilt
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 23:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
To Karel K.
[edit]Danke für die Ehrung ... Liebe Grüße --Karel K. (talk) 07:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:RiAFP(H4) PDB4dt5.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:RiAFP(H4) PDB4dt5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:NS1 Dimer InfluenzaH5N1 3f5t bio r 500.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:NS1 Dimer InfluenzaH5N1 3f5t bio r 500.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:RiAFP(H4) PDB4dt5.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:RiAFP(H4) PDB4dt5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Ankry (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:NS1 Dimer InfluenzaH5N1 3f5t bio r 500.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:NS1 Dimer InfluenzaH5N1 3f5t bio r 500.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Ankry (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- No image from this site is declared to be in the public domain:
"Molecule of the Month illustrations are available under a CC-BY-3.0 license. Attribution should be given to David S. Goodsell and the RCSB PDB. [...] All other articles and text on the RCSB PDB site are copyrighted"
Please point a link to the proper license information or follow COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Ankry: , i guess images of RCSB have this license (free of all copyright restrictions), and Magog pointed out the current licensing to me on his talk page. Cheers, --Ghilt (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
File:OUronium peptide coupling reagents HATU HBTU HCTU.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 22:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Uronium peptide coupling reagent COMU.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 22:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Uronium peptide coupling reagent COMU.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 23:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Your message at Donna Gedenk's talk page
[edit]Hi Ghilt, please refrain from messages like this one at Donna Gedenk's talk page which sounds threatening due to the terminating “or a user block for commons will be requested for your account”. At Commons, we like to raise concerns in a mellow way. Threatening with a block at Commons with no obvious violation of local policies at this project is not helpful. Even you appear to agree that there is no problem with her uploads at Commons. You are free to explain at her talk page if you have a concern regarding her uploads and edits on this project in regard to cross-wiki issues and arbcom decisions at de:wp. However, if you see a serious problem with her conduct at Commons feel free to open a thread at COM:AN/U, or at COM:AN if there is a concern independent from a particular user. This is different from de:WP:VM as discussions will take longer and non-trivial cases will be more thoroughly discussed. Thanks for your understanding and kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 13:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, it was meant as a warning against user block violations in de.wp via Commons, not as a threat, but repeating will not be necessary, as well as opening another thread. Best regards, --Ghilt (talk) 13:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, this is best done at de:wp to avoid misunderstandings. Best, AFBorchert (talk) 14:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrist shots has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |