Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/06/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn... I see the subject is notable. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 10:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Falscher Titel Vgillmeier (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Official photo with no META, unlikely from uploader Pierre cb (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 11:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Official photo with no META, unlikely from uploader Pierre cb (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 11:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of WM as a web host Dronebogus (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sexynudesuploaded (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality images added to satisfy someone’s exhibitionism kink.
- File:Webslut Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan in bed on his knees and elbows.jpg
- File:Webslut Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan kneeling in bed.jpg
- File:Webslut Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan fingering himself.jpg
- File:Webslut Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan laying in bed.jpg
- File:Webslut Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan M position.jpg
- File:Webslut Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan face down ass up 01.jpg
- File:Blake Hill from Grand Rapids Michigan exposure consent video.webm
- File:Shavedexhibitionist.jpg
- File:Shaved male buttocks.jpg
- File:Male chastity 02.jpg
- File:Male chastity 01.jpg
- File:Male Chastity Device.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 11:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GMGtalk 12:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
While the photo has been freely licenced, it is a derived work and there is no evidence of permission by the copyright holder (designer of the poster). TadejM (t/p) 15:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW by Flickr photographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Trabajo muy propio 186.172.134.49 17:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CV [1]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ohwelpwelp (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request, yes. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, you took this picture today. Thanks. 191.125.183.199 02:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The source appears to be the website of "The Perry Johnson Foundation", where this photo has resided at least since March. We are on the horns of a dilemma. Either the uploader is misrepresenting their authority to post this image, or they have authority stemming from an undisclosed COI. BD2412 T 02:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete F1. Clearly taken from his website as pointed out above. 25stargeneral (talk) 03:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Subir la imagen por error Duevitte (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 03:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Ik heb het per ongeluk geüpload RagingR2 (talk) 12:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
wrong upload Drood07 (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 06:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake FELIPE GABRIEL DE SOUZA (talk) 02:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Similarly to the files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by FELIPE GABRIEL DE SOUZA: This file related to a Brazilian football club was uploaded as "own work", but I don't think it is. Its characteristics plus the fact that the user uploaded several clear copyvios lead to me believe that this file is either a video screenshot or grabbed from somewhere on the web. So it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. If it is really own work as claimed, we should have a COM:VRT permission for it. Rosenzweig τ 06:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake FELIPE GABRIEL DE SOUZA (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 05:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake FELIPE GABRIEL DE SOUZA (talk) 02:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 05:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Exhibitionism as mentioned in the description and the photo itself, little educational value A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete I don’t know about you but I find the idea of people using WMC as a way to get off on their exhibitionism kink, and us using that “educationally” so they get satisfaction that people are looking at their nude images, extremely creepy. Dronebogus (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by GreenMeansGo. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Should be removed per COM:PENIS. Mhhossein talk 12:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, non-educational image with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. AshFriday (talk)
Keep Uploaded 3 years ago, not exactly been a problem in all that time. Illustrative of humiliation and submission, and I fail to find any similar examples of this, so not a candidate per COM:NUDITY. --Fæ (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Exhibitionism as mentioned in the title and the photo itself, little educational value A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete it’s been here for 6 years now and never been used. It’s a low quality image meant to satisfy somebody’s creepy fetish. Delete. Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by GreenMeansGo. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
F10. Personal photos by non-contributors. w:de:Benutzer:Kim3108/M47 has no chance of being released. Wikidata notability (if any) relies on the Commons category. C.f. wikidata:Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Q117751514 Emu (talk) 08:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (speedy). --Lymantria (talk) 17:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
投稿者依頼。ファイル名の書き誤りによる。正しいファイル名としてFile:Yamamura Gakuen College.JPG を投稿済み。 Nyao148 (talk) 13:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Renamed: renaming instead. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Not own work? 181.43.4.96 19:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Empty page 181.43.4.96 14:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete 20 upper 15:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- I can't. 181.43.4.96 15:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no reason for this to be a PNG file. This unused image of a chemical reaction can be expressed by text.
Glucosa-6-fosfato + H2O → glucosa + Pi ΔG°' = -12.1 kJ/mol
Marbletan (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as {{ShouldBeText}} indeed. DMacks (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Image of plain text that could easily be converted into TeX or Wikitext. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 04:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:17, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Комплекс памяток на місці масового знищення мирного населення та військовополонених в урочищі Бабин Яр.JPG
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Artwork on the Fourth Plinth is temporarily, cannot benefit from COM:FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in UK. Artist Dan Kitchener is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Мемориальная доска в память Блюхеру Василию Константиновичу на доме №92 ул Кирова, г. Челябинск.jpg
[edit]No FoP for 2D/3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No encyclopedic value, Commons is not a personal image storage site Elisfkc (talk) 03:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No encyclopedic value, Commons is not a personal image storage site Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Architect Jean Montariol died in 1966 A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Liberia A1Cafel (talk) 05:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
The artist de:Erich Kliefert died in 1994, so this 1940 painting is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2065. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings (like this museum) in Germany. Rosenzweig τ 06:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW: Depicted person de:Paul_Vaske died 1986, missing permission for original photo. Wdwd (talk) 06:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Roger Broders died in 1953, so this is not in the PD in France yet. The file can be restored in 2024. Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photo violates infotable author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Only upload of RebeccaGailAbairLawOffice (talk · contribs). Appers to be a book/magazine cover or album cover. But either way it is a derivative work. Missing evidence that it is freely-licensed. Derivative work copyvio. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Vue de la bibliothèque municipale de Tours et de la cathédrale St Gatien à partir de la Loire.JPG
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Pierre Patout died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Italy: non-free architecture. TadejM (t/p) 18:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:Ethyl pyruvate.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:Butyrate-ion-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of any free license. The later version of this logo has a clear copyright notice. This uploader has ignored copyright in several instances. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted quasi-duplicate File:Thao-luan-Thanh-vien-Thich-Nhat-Hieu 2.pdf. --Rosenzweig τ 06:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Personal CV/resume. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2012 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. A CNN image gallery (at 7/14) describes the image as:
Brazilian designer Dinard de Mata proposes the 'Creative Player' - a smartwatch and MP3 player concept that charges with your own pulse. OK so it's not quite in the shops yet but it's a cool idea, alright?
- I can't find the original source (it may not longer be available online), but we certainly can't assume that the designer released this image under a free license. It certainly isn't the uploader's own work. Omphalographer (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 06:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 00:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 01:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yup. Undelete in ~150 years. --Enyavar (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; websearch reveals sculpture is from 2006 by artist Bettye Hamblen Turner. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. ✗plicit 01:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Eva Mena street art - Erykah Badu, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London
[edit]No FoP for "graphic works" like posters or murals in UK
- File:Eva Mena street art - Erykah Badu, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London (5).jpg
- File:Eva Mena street art - Erykah Badu, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London (4).jpg
- File:Eva Mena street art - Erykah Badu, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London (3).jpg
- File:Eva Mena street art - Erykah Badu, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London.jpg
- File:Erykah Badu wall art, Wellesley Rd, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London (3).jpg
- File:Erykah Badu wall art, Wellesley Rd, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London (2).jpg
- File:Erykah Badu wall art, Wellesley Rd, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London (4).jpg
- File:Erykah Badu wall art, Wellesley Rd, SUTTON, Surrey, Greater London.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Artwork by Dan Kitchener (still alive), permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Vera Isayeva (✝1960) and Robert Taurit (✝1969). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Monument 02.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Monument 06.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Mother Motherland 01.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Mother Motherland 02.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Mother Motherland 03.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Mother Motherland 04.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery Sk14 C.jpg
- File:Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery. Mother-Motherland monument. Fragment of the wall- Not a single life is forgotten.jpg
- File:Кладбище.jpg
- File:Пискарёвское кладбище. Центральный монумент.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural works
- File:018. St. Petersburg. Piskarevskoye memorial cemetery.jpg
- File:5216. Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery (2).jpg
- File:5216. Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery (3).jpg
- File:Мать-Родина. Пискарёвское мемориальное кладбище 2H1A2717WI.jpg
- File:Мать-Родина. Пискарёвское мемориальное кладбище 2H1A2765WI.jpg
- File:Мемориал Пискарёвского кладбища.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Modern monument by Igor Voskresensky (still alive), no freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural works--
- File:1069 - Moskau 2015 - Kreml (26336060391).jpg
- File:2019-07-26-Moscow-3177-Monument to Alexander I of Russia.jpg
- File:2019-07-26-Moscow-3178-Monument to Alexander I of Russia.jpg
- File:7181. Moscow. Alexandrovsky Garden.jpg
- File:7206. Moscow. Monument to Alexander I of Russia.jpg
- File:Кремль. Александровский сад. Памятник Александру I - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Кремль. Александровский сад. Памятник Александру I - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Кремль. Александровский сад. Памятник Александру I - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Кремль. Александровский сад. Памятник Александру I - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Памятник Александру I. 2017 год..jpg
- File:Памятник Александру Первому в Александровком саду.JPG
- File:Памятник Александру Первому в Александровском саду.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source and autho A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Le Corbusier (died in 1965) and Pierre Jeanneret (died in 1967)
- File:Immeuble molitor 00.JPG
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (26803823344).jpg
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (27313891952).jpg
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (27412043205).jpg
- File:Paris - Immeuble Molitor (27412043725).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor
[edit]These are some of the more elaborate interior architecture of the building. As France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama, these images infringe the posthumous copyright held by Le Corbusier's heirs, or heirs of the furniture and fixture designers.
- File:Immeuble molitor 01 atrio.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 02.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 03.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 04.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 07.1.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 07.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 08.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 09.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 11.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 12.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 14.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 16.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 17.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would save at least 08, 09, 14 and 17 as they show quite generic details or furniture under Commons:UA. --Sailko (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Sailko the #14 one is problematic. We see the relatively-artistic curved wall. I suspect it is also under Le Corbusier's authorship. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. I'm not sure I agree that images 08, 09, 14 or 17 should be saved as they all show off the architecture. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: most as they show distinctive enough architecture. 14 and 17 show that too. Kept 8 and 9 because the architecture shown is too simple for a copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor
[edit]No FoP in France. The architect Le Corbusier died in 1965. France knows a standard of life + 70 years and I suggest to undelete in 2036.
- File:Immeuble molitor 05.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 06.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 10.JPG
- File:Immeuble molitor 13.JPG
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
copy vio of tv series poster Wiki Farazi (talk) 05:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
copy vio of TV series poster Wiki Farazi (talk) 05:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thuus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Unusable due to glare. Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I think this should be kept. Very nice image, despite the glare. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Nothing much visible. Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Nothing much visible. Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Nothing much visible. Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Nothing much visible. Undisclosed location. Holiday snap, thus COM:SCOPE 82.135.82.254 08:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official portrait photos from the site of the Government of Moldova; site however didn't release them as CC0 as claimed – in fact, a site-wide "© All rights reserved" is visible in the footer.
- File:Rodica Iordanov 2022.jpg
- File:Alexei Buzu 2023.jpg
- File:Sergiu Prodan 2021.jpg
- File:Anatolie Topală 2021.jpg
- File:Iurie Țurcanu 2021.jpg
- File:Anatolie Nosatîi 2021.jpg
- File:Ala Nemerenco 2021.jpg
- File:Dumitru Budianschi 2021.jpg
- File:Oleg Serebrian 2022.jpg
Gikü (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)
[edit]License at source is "Public Domain Mark" and not CC BY SA 4.0; also ALL PHOTOS FROM MOLDOVAN PARLIAMENT'S FLICKR SHOULD BE DELETED as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Parlamentul Republicii Moldova Flickr stream. CC TheAafi as the license reviewer of one affected file.
- File:Artur Mija.jpg
- File:S. Prodan 2023.jpg
- File:Dumitru Alaiba 2022.jpg
- File:Doina Gherman 2023.jpg
- File:16.02.2023 Ședința Comisiei juridice, numiri și imunități - 52692613609.jpg
- File:Victor Parlicov.jpg
- File:Rodica Iordanov.jpg
- File:Alexei Buzu.jpg
- File:Lilia Dabija 2023.jpg
- File:Oleg Serebrian 2023.jpg
- File:Veronica Mihailov-Moraru 2023.jpg
- File:Olesea Stamate 2021.jpg
- File:Sergiu Prodan 2023 Parlament.jpg
Gikü (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I'm not sure how I made this error. I've reversed it. I support deletion in accordance with the nomination's rationale. In fact while reviewing I did search the parliament's name a number of times to make sure I was doing a right thing but unfortunately. I perhaps only verified the message the Flickr-review template was saying and forgot to change the license-template. Now there is so much, the source is clearly having some inaccuracies and it is difficult to believe them. As the nominator mentions elsewhere These three files, however, were made 20+ years ago, and it is unclear whether they too are Parliament's work or not.. ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense PD rationale - the medal may be PD, but the photograph of the medal is a separate work and there is no free license at the source site. (Medals are 3D works, so Bridgeman does not apply.)
Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free poster. TadejM (t/p) 15:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for buildings in France. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich gedocvh um ein wertk des lebenden Malers Michael Zimmermann Lutheraner (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die Abbildungen sind von mir persönlich fotografiert. Die Ölgemälde sind Teil des Bestandes des Literaturmuseum "Theodor Storm" in Heilbad Heiligenstadt, ein Museum in dem ich als wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin arbeite. Fotografiert und hochgeladen wurden sie mit der Genehmigung des Museumsleiter Dr. Gideon Haut und des Künstlers Michael Zimmermann mit dem das Museum in einem engen Kontakt steht. Die Werke werden aktuell in einer Sonderausstellung öffentlich gezeigt.
- Wichtig für den Beitrag sind die Abbildungen, da sie den abstrakt-expressionistischen Stil des Künstlers abbilden und dem Leser des Beitrages einen Eindruck von Michael Zimmermanns Werken ermöglichen. HenRoth (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- @HenRoth: Die Genehmigung des Künstlers, dieses Werk (und die beiden anderen) hier unter einer freien Lizenz hochzuladen, muss von ihm per E-Mail erfolgen und dokumentiert werden. Siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 06:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich gedocvh um ein wertk des lebenden Malers Michael Zimmermann Lutheraner (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die Abbildungen sind von mir persönlich fotografiert. Die Ölgemälde sind Teil des Bestandes des Literaturmuseum "Theodor Storm" in Heilbad Heiligenstadt, ein Museum in dem ich als wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin arbeite. Fotografiert und hochgeladen wurden sie mit der Genehmigung des Museumsleiter Dr. Gideon Haut und des Künstlers Michael Zimmermann mit dem das Museum in einem engen Kontakt steht. Die Werke werden aktuell in einer Sonderausstellung öffentlich gezeigt.
- Wichtig für den Beitrag sind die Abbildungen, da sie den abstrakt-expressionistischen Stil des Künstlers abbilden und dem Leser des Beitrages einen Eindruck von Michael Zimmermanns Werken ermöglichen. HenRoth (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich gedocvh um ein wertk des lebenden Malers Michael Zimmermann Lutheraner (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die Abbildungen sind von mir persönlich fotografiert. Die Ölgemälde sind Teil des Bestandes des Literaturmuseum "Theodor Storm" in Heilbad Heiligenstadt, ein Museum in dem ich als wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin arbeite. Fotografiert und hochgeladen wurden sie mit der Genehmigung des Museumsleiter Dr. Gideon Haut und des Künstlers Michael Zimmermann mit dem das Museum in einem engen Kontakt steht. Die Werke werden aktuell in einer Sonderausstellung öffentlich gezeigt.
- Wichtig für den Beitrag sind die Abbildungen, da sie den abstrakt-expressionistischen Stil des Künstlers abbilden und dem Leser des Beitrages einen Eindruck von Michael Zimmermanns Werken ermöglichen. HenRoth (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free monument. TadejM (t/p) 19:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also the following:
- --19:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
copy vio of TV series poster Wiki Farazi (talk) 05:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works by a non-notable artist: out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Autumn leaves on trees with pathway -- 1 of 33.jpg
- File:Cliffs and mountains and sky at sunset -- 2 of 33.jpg
- File:Trees and mountains and clouds and sky -- 3 of 33.jpg
- File:Deer in the snow with trees at dusk -- 4 of 33.jpg
- File:House and tree and mountain and sky -- 5 of 33.jpg
- File:Japanese bridge with autumn foliage -- 7 of 33.jpg
- File:London panorama with Big Ben -- 6 of 33.jpg
- File:Tree and bushes and grass -- 8 of 33.jpg
- File:Mountain and blue sky and clouds -- 9 of 33.jpg
- File:Autumn scene with people and trees -- 10 of 33.jpg
- File:Seascape inlet with rock formations -- 11 of 33.jpg
- File:Apples on a branch -- 12 of 33.jpg
- File:Sunrise with flowers and sky -- 13 of 33.jpg
- File:Flowers on a branch with light blue background -- 14 of 33.jpg
- File:Landscape with trees -- 15 of 33.jpg
- File:Monarch butterfly sipping nectar from a flower -- 16 of 33.jpg
- File:Fruits on a table -- 17 of 33.jpg
- File:London panorama -- 18 of 33.jpg
- File:Fruit basket -- 19 of 33.jpg
- File:Trees in winter with snow -- 20 of 33.jpg
- File:Pathway to the beach with dunes -- 21 of 33.jpg
- File:Trees and sky -- 22 of 33.jpg
- File:Autumn landscape with sky and trees and grass -- 23 of 33.jpg
- File:Winter sunset with trees and snow -- 24 of 33.jpg
- File:Trees and bridge and stream and clouds -- 25 of 33.jpg
- File:Lookout over the sea with trees and the ocean -- 26 of 33.jpg
- File:Trees and stream and sky and clouds -- 27 of 33.jpg
- File:Ocean waves and foam seascape -- 29 of 33.jpg
- File:Seascape and clouds and boats and trees -- 28 of 33.jpg
- File:Flowers in a vase with water and grey background -- 30 of 33.jpg
- File:Stream and bushes and tree and bridge -- 31 of 33.jpg
- File:Mountains and sky and trees and clouds -- 32 of 33.jpg
- File:Gondola on Venetian canal with buildings -- 33 of 33.jpg
Ankry (talk) 06:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep These are competent non-blurry watercolor artworks that depict natural settings, and have possible educational uses (including watercolor technique) which are within the scope of Commons. The database is valuable to the worldwide community because its collection is extensive and comprehensive; these images add to this. As a Wikipedian with 10+ years experience, I have often hunted for images for articles but didn't find what I needed. Tomorrow another Wikipedian could be looking for a farmhouse or seascape or tree-lined pathway and one of these images may meet their needs. There is neither a pecuniary agenda since these images are donated as public domain, and no promotional agenda since their creation was done for enjoyment and not for commercial purposes. In short, keep.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 09:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion and autopromotion of unknown artists is not Wikimedia Commons role. I found no evidence of any published critic article about this artist, nor any evidence of their art exhibitions. If the images are used in Wikipedia or another Wikimedia projects to illustrate something, they are in scope But only those which are used. Ankry (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. These images are not promotional; rather they are the work of an amateur hobbyist with no plans of becoming a commercial artist. The titles have been requested to be changed to sound less promotional.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion and autopromotion of unknown artists is not Wikimedia Commons role. I found no evidence of any published critic article about this artist, nor any evidence of their art exhibitions. If the images are used in Wikipedia or another Wikimedia projects to illustrate something, they are in scope But only those which are used. Ankry (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The subjets of this content seem within scope, had a camera been used these would almost certainly be in scope, I don't see why there should be a problem that they are watercolours Oxyman (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unknown artist and unused images. Wikipedia is not an art gallery. Pierre cb (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: what Commons policy prohibits artwork from unknown artists?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Another question: what Commons policy says that artwork must be used now to avoid being deleted?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Comment: I don't see anywhere in Commons policy where it says "not an art gallery".--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia might not be an art gallery, but it ain't Commons either. DMBFFF (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It has been the practice for many years to delete personal artwork. Scope gives example "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" Keyword is OBVIOUS. I do not see a compelling argument to exclude these images as being exceptional to the criteria, especially not the whole set. The part of the explanation by the uploader does not hold as none of the described techniques are not described in the images and there is no clear authority by artist.
To the comment about the equivalent photos could be within scope is true, but these are not the photographs, they are an artist's rendition. We have also deleted photographs that uploaders have said are within scope, so that is not a valid argument to retain. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I see numerous obvious educational uses: to teach about London, how to draw a farm house or flowers or streams or other landscapes, to teach in biology how a monarch butterfly derives nourishment by sipping nectar. An art teacher could use one to illustrate how to depict a stream. To presume that there are no possible educational uses seems to render a premature judgment.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC) I realize people are itching to delete these images, but before proceeding, perhaps consider the repercussions.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep FWIW—being neither artist nor high-ranking Commonist——IMO these paintings might be of a particular style—impressionist? expressionist? Group-of-7 fan?—I don't know, again I'm not a painter. However, if they can be slotted into the appropriate categories of style, or other things relevant, they might be a lot more useful to those interested in using such for educational uses about such styles. Moreover, a lot of paintings in Commons is old stuff—the copyright laws, while stupid (i.e. too restrictive, IMO), nonetheless allow us to avail of the wealth of antiquity; still it's nice to see modern stuff being uploaded to Commons that while aren't masterpieces, aren't garbage either. (That said, maybe User:Tomwsulcer might do what I did and set up his own wiki. :D)
DMBFFF (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We traditionally offer a certain degree of latitude to contributors to put their personal works on the Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, as part of their overall contributions. For example a page or two of biographical notes, some personal photos for their user page, even some humorous essays are pretty standard. These are only 33 images, when the contributor has uploaded over 3000 highly valuable files to Commons, we can be pretty sure they are not merely using Wikimedia Commons as their personal art gallery. And note that the Commons absolutely is an art gallery, we have thousands, if not millions, of excellent art images. --GRuban (talk) 15:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]I'm not convinced these are actually own work. It seems unlikely that someone would upload their painting/sketch by taking a picture of a computer screen, as is evident in several of these files. Many also show clear signs of digital manipulation, and some look more like the work of an oil painting filter in image editing software than actual oil on canvas. Even if they were actually painted, they are all likely derivative works of non-free images.
- File:April Wilkerson is an American YouTuber who does do-it-yourself woodworking and metalworking projects.jpg
- File:Xyla Foxlin is an American entrepreneur and engineer and YouTuber.jpg
- File:American engineer and entrepreneur and YouTuber Xyla Foxlin won the Greater Miss Cleveland beauty contest.jpg
- File:Civil rights activist Taylor Dumpson.jpg
- File:American daytime drama actress Marcia McCabe.jpg
- File:Restaurateur and food writer and chef and baker Charlie van Over in front of Restaurant du Village around 1986.jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: These images were obviously derived from photographs of unknown origins. It is very unlikely that these photographs were released into the public domain by their owners. I participated in a Discord discussion on this topic. Susmuffin (talk) 03:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Susmuffin: A link to the actual discussion would be far more useful than a link to the Wikipedia article on Discord. Brianjd (talk) 08:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- The link leads to Wikipedia's page for its own unofficial Discord server. While there have been a few occasions when the join button has been deactivated, it appears to work. The discussion is in #english-wikipedia. Susmuffin (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Susmuffin: So it does. I should have noticed it was in the "Wikipedia" namespace. But when I use the join button, it asks me stupid questions (it makes me enter a name, then accuses me of being a robot). I wouldn't want to encourage the use of such things. Brianjd (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- The link leads to Wikipedia's page for its own unofficial Discord server. While there have been a few occasions when the join button has been deactivated, it appears to work. The discussion is in #english-wikipedia. Susmuffin (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Susmuffin: A link to the actual discussion would be far more useful than a link to the Wikipedia article on Discord. Brianjd (talk) 08:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Quite apart from the fact that these are obviously (poorly) doctored images derived from other sources where the copyright status is unknown, the results are just plain awful and would be of absolutely no use to the project even if they were acceptable in other respects. If I was the subject of a BLP article on Wkipedia, and I saw one of these ugly images being used to illustrate me, I'd certainly be thinking "WTF?" --DanielRigal (talk) 11:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep These are original artworks of notable persons who don't have any other images; so there is an educational purpose for each one. The process is fair -- they spring from images from YouTube videos which are then matted on a screen, so the proportions in the face are exact, painted (oil / watercolor / pastel ), re-photographed and uploaded, meaning that the end result is entirely original. There are no copyright issues here because they are new creations. What I have done is what all artists do -- they take things from real life, and create something new from what they have seen. These particular images are faithful to what the persons look like, in that they faithfully convey their faces and are recognizable. They are not ugly but beautiful. I am in contact with several of the people depicted and I have had no complaints, no "wtf" comments suggested by Mr. Rigal, but instead I got "thank yous". They like these images of themselves. Deleting these images will crimp and narrow the encyclopedia and further push it into obscurity.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- While I can see why you might believe that "the end result is entirely original" I think it is pretty clear that this is mistaken. These are processed photographs taken from copyrighted media. The fact that your processing involves some manual work to degrade the image quality is not sufficient to make them entirely original works. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- General comment. I suggest that the community begins thinking about what I consider to be a huge problem with Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. It's that many subjects lack images -- whether people or places or things. I've run into this problem time and again: I've written hundreds of Wikipedia articles on a huge range of subjects, during 13+ years, and when I consult the Commons database, there's nothing there for me. So my Wikipedia articles are blank, boring-looking text. Images make an article look appealing and beautiful and fun to read. So, what is the core of the problem? We rightfully value copyrights and we rightfully assume that everything out there on the web is protected by copyrights, so we can't use it as it is BUT if create something new, similar enough to the original for purposes of recognize-ability, but new and fresh, we can use it. Such a method solves the problem. It doesn't violate copyrights. It communicates what a subject is about. It brings beauty and color to visually-boring pages of text. This method can be used by any of us in our drive to improve the encyclopedia. And I recommend that the community embrace this method.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Request. Please don't delete the images until there has been further discussion, and a resolution, from the Wikimedia administrators' noticeboard. Administrators will need to see the six images before making their decision.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant Derivative work of non-free content (F3); as some examples:
- File:Xyla Foxlin is an American entrepreneur and engineer and YouTuber.jpg is derived from this (e.g. horizontal flip and color edited);
- File:Restaurateur and food writer and chef and baker Charlie van Over in front of Restaurant du Village around 1986.jpg is derived from this book jacket;
- File:Civil rights activist Taylor Dumpson.jpg is derived from this;
- File:American daytime drama actress Marcia McCabe.jpg is derived from this. --Эlcobbola talk 14:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope promotional content: images illustrating topics from the uploader's own novel.
- File:Shallasbusters Seven Observational Interplanetary Vehicle.png
- File:Starship Engine Internal Warp Drive from Jakks Journey.png
- File:Schematic diagram of related philosophical themes from novel Jakk's Journey.png
- File:Planet Theta Green LIX in outskirts of Andromeda Galaxy.png
- File:Gravawand which resembles a fountain pen.png
- File:Planet Ziggurato with two habitable moons orbiting.png
- File:The Six Double Yous Aligning for Jakk at the Horse Trough.png
- File:Planet Enkrannium VI serves as base station for Starships in Andromeda Galaxy Quadrant III.png
- File:Mining Planet with Opposing Derricks.png
- File:Hovering Power Plant in the Innersphere Ocean on planet Hugubu.png
- File:View of Art planet from spacebus window with purple plant.png
- File:Quadra-warp drive engine from sci-fi novel Jakk's Journey.png
- File:Hugubuian Explorer spaceship from sci-fi novel Jakk's Journey.png
- File:Planet Envaporanium V from book Jakk's Journey.png
Omphalographer (talk) 03:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all as out of scope and of no use to the project. Maybe also revisit this user's other uploads as many others may have problems too. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 13:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poorly manipulated photos. While the Rockettes did perform at Trump's inauguration, these photos do not truthfully depict that performance.
- File:Trump Inauguration Swearing In Bible and Precision Dance Company The Rockettes in Background.png
- File:The Radio City Rockettes were honored to perform at the inauguration of Donald J. Trump in 2017.png
Omphalographer (talk) 03:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. These are badly manipulated photos of unknown provenance. They are incorrectly tagged as the uploader's own work, which they are not. All he did was combine other people's photos, poorly. Collage can count as original work, if it is sufficiently transformative, but this is nowhere near the point where that could even begin to be argued. Anyway, it is not our job to make Trump look any sillier than he already does in genuine photos. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates text author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. It's my own work. Can I stay theis photos? Ohrimko (talk) 19:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 13:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
accidentally pressed the upload button while explaining how to upload an image to a new user. Khaatir (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 13:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Album cover HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 13:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 13:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 10:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 13:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Si no van a borrar esta foto por lo menos cambienle el nombre. Que significa female woman?! 191.126.152.222 10:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Your objection to the file's name is not an argument for its deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samyarghodrati1369 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, self promo of a "musician"
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Setare Baroon.ogg
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Iranian Singer .webp
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Azad Bash Music.ogg
- File:Samyar Ghodrati New Picture.jpg
- File:Samyar Ghodrati New Pic Bass.webp
Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samyarghodrati1369 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images that are outside our scope. A batch has been deleted previously.
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Iranian Singer And Artist.jpg
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Iranian Singer.jpg
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Iranian Singerr.jpg
- File:Another photo of the singer Samyar Ghodrati.webp
- File:Samyar Ghodrati Bass Pic.jpg
Herby talk thyme 11:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Obtained from the internet, copyright status unsure
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, advertising. The article about this company in ruwiki (ru:Keyggri) is protected from creation indefinitely. Radmir Far (talk) 15:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
copyvio Fourmidable (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author as per the metadata, Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Businessman and scientist of very dubious notability, self-PR might be suspected, out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Main object is a cup with logo, highly likely a copyright violation. Красный wanna talk? 18:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agree, Delete per COM:DW - unfortunate, since otherwise it would have been a good photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 14:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata indicate these images came from Facebook. Previously published images require COM:VRT verification.
- File:Keyshia Cole - Lights On Festival (4).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Lights On Festival (Sep. 18, 2021) (3).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Lights On Festival (Sep. 18, 2021) (2).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Lights On Festival (Sep. 18, 2021).jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claims. No camera/phone model for any of these files. Many of the images, like File:Keyshia Cole - Paris, France 2013 (1).jpg, show that these are screenshots in the EXIF. File:QueenNaijaGlam.jpg was clearly taken by the subject of the photo, not the uploader. No reason to believe these aren't all just derivative works from unattributed sources. COM:PCP applies.
- File:KeyshiaColeGlam.jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Kissimmee, Florida 2022 (cropped).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole @ Essence Fest 2013.jpg
- File:KeyshiaColePink2021.jpg
- File:QueenNaijaGlam.jpg
- File:KeyshiaCole2017Live.jpg
- File:Queen Naija @ Theatre of Living Arts 2.jpg
- File:Queen Naija @ Theatre of Living Arts 10-27-2021.jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Newark, New Jersey 2016 (2).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Newark, New Jersey 2016 (1).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Paris, France 2013 (3).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Paris, France 2013 (2).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - Paris, France 2013 (1).jpg
- File:Keyshia Cole - @ Chrysler Hall.jpg
✗plicit 02:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 16:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_24.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![151 File:"Danza de Indios" Diablada.jpg](#File:"Danza_de_Indios"_Diablada.jpg){kind=link}
_042.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Wendenstrasse_(ca._1912)_(52075179836).jpg){kind=link}
_National-gallery-in-Prague_-_GRAYCODE,_jiiiiin(Taebok_Cho,_Jinhhee_Jung).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_24.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_24.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_24.jpg){kind=link}
_24.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_21.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_19.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-20230619183000-File:Château_de_la_Belle_au_Bois_Dormant_-_Disneyland_Paris_(12-08-2020).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
farachia does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - bogus PD claim -- Whpq (talk) 21:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 23:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
no proper source, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - completely bogus PD claim. -- Whpq (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This should have been tagged for speedy deletion. [24Cr][talk] 23:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal project. From the file descriptions (For Numberdopydeg wiki(-:) these were intended for https://numberdopydeg.fandom.com rather than Commons.
- File:Numberdopydeg the terrible Mikes.png
- File:Numberdopydeg Rainbow.png
- File:Ninety-Seven Thousand One Hundred-Four (Figured-Out).png
- File:UltraStup.png
- File:StupcrashThousand.png
- File:StupaneThousand.png
- File:StupThousand.png
- File:Ninety-Seven Thousand One Hundred-Four.png
- File:Rob??.png
- File:Stupine one off-on a rectangle.png
- File:Ronald 2.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Belbury (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all those per nominator. Those drawings are poorly made and completely redundant.
- The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 06:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained icons.
- File:My channel logo (old).jpg
- File:Attribution-exe.png
- File:Attribution-exe (No black colors).png
- File:Double Wales Dragons.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Belbury (talk) 20:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ugh... - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 21:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
When, where and how did Juani Bousqet, the copyright owner, give permission to Commons to use his work? SPEEDY ? 191.125.183.199 01:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Probably the common misunderstanding that the pictured person owns the right to the image. Certainly not a reason for speedy deletion, because this can be fixed easily by the uploader by providing the relevant permission from the photographer. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of free license permission from the copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Did you take the picture from your own Facebook page? 191.125.183.199 02:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CV facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Purported to be a depiction of the Yoruba mythological being Oshun, but there is no grounds to establish that this is an illustration of that subject and not a mundane stylized portrait of a black woman. The author intends to use the image on Wikipedia, but the image is not compatible with that project's policies. Alalch E. (talk) 03:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The Original Artwork by me is made to represent Oshun, The Oshun Deity Color's are said to be Yellow and Orange tones and she is said to be a beautiful dark skinned Woman with roots from Nigeria, Africa, where this type of clothing and head scarfs are very common, her skin and the Art I made is representative of a Oil painting that could represent Oshun. Why is this a Issue for this person I do not understand and I repeat myself the image is my Digital Art and not a Image from a black Woman that I took ( first they said it was Ai now this which is both false ) . I think it is sad that people can't stand it when there are black skinned Goddesses.. it is better to leave a wooden Picture that is so much less mundane ( that was previously there and is now removed from that spot) it was not very representational of a dark skinned Goddess. The wooden picture can be a bit further down the line but it is not a representation of who people in the Yoruba religion and in spiritual circles worship. A Image needed to be created because there were was no actual Creative Commons Images of a Black Goddess called Oshun so I made one generously . This Person does not see the likeliness the goddess, maybe they should look up what the black goddess Oshun is supposed to look like.. very unpleasant and sad to see close minded people even on Wikipedia, They removed the Image sadly from the Wikipedia Page as well as trying to have it removed from the Wikipedia Commons. Dimitrios Pallis (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: apparently original artwork (no other versions found in reverse image searches), not obviously out of scope whether or not selected to illustrate one particular en:w article. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
perchè immagine obsoleta, ci capita spesso di aggiornare le immagini dei Luoghi di Posa della sentieristica e vorrei sapere come fare una procedura veloce ? CarloPro (talk) 07:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If these signs have changed, you can upload a new image to replace this one. There is no need to delete the old image first. Omphalographer (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nicole Luisoni
[edit]How exactly does this porn collection pass COM:SPAM? It sure seems like “advertising or self-promotion” for the model and the photographer, as “non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills”. C.f. wikidata:Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Q119225164
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524724152).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524724452).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524724687).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725077).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725337).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725492).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725532).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725652).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725692).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725807).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524725957).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524726132).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524726612).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524726647).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524727382).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524727662).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524727817).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524728017).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524728267).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524728287).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524728412).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524728482).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524728927).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524729332).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524729432).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524729542).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524729767).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524729937).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524730127).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524730597).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524730777).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524731667).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524731832).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524732117).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524732437).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524732717).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52524734227).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525192461).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525192631).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525193861).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525194031).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525194231).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525194996).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525195346).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525195481).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525196466).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525196556).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525197141).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525197626).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525197861).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525197941).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525198271).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525198791).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525199041).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525199621).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525199791).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525199916).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525200996).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525201871).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525202411).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525202931).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525469729).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525469989).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525470069).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525470494).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525470539).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525470599).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525470799).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525472084).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525472389).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525473064).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525473999).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525474029).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525474574).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525474699).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525474819).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525475004).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525475119).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525475679).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525475939).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525476079).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525476274).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525476354).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525476489).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525476774).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525477494).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525477604).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525477984).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525478639).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525478929).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525479244).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525479444).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525667220).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525667335).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525667850).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669225).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669400).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669495).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669575).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669695).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669845).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669920).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525669990).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525670315).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525670400).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525670430).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525670795).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525671690).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525671805).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525672055).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525672570).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525672735).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525672885).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525673295).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525673565).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525673730).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525674155).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525674715).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525674850).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525675045).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525675395).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525675725).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525675870).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525743563).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525743633).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525743678).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525743973).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525744233).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525744333).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525745003).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525745638).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746033).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746088).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746198).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746263).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746423).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746613).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746658).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746783).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525747093).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525747548).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525747588).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525747963).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525748618).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525749438).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525749513).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525749708).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525749928).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525750833).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525751288).jpg
- File:Nicole Luisoni (52525752793).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Emu (talk) 07:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- While we might not need that many, they are all in a decent quality and we would need to check each one individually whether it's unique enough to keep. Therefore I am opposing a mass deletion. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Neither "porn" nor "spam" as the nominator claims. (Talented photographer on Flickr who shares much of their work under free licenses. Some of their work includes what I would consider tasteful non-explicit nudes. Category:Files from Anyul Rivas Flickr stream) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- That’s the second time that the main argument seems to be that we somehow like the photographer because of their other work. Is this really Commons policy? I find that hard to believe. --Emu (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- That was not my intended "argument". My argument is simply that the stated reasons for deletion are not valid, since I do not think the photos can be legitimately considered either "porn" or "spam". The parenthetical mention of the Flickr photographer gives additional context. Would you consider all of their photos to be "spam"? For my personal opinion, yes that is a rather high number of photos of a model - and from the same Flickr photographer we have even higher numbers of photos of racing motorcycles and race cars. Well, those are not sports that I follow, but as long as the photos are of good quality and illustrate in-scope topics, there is nothing wrong with having many of them. I don't think the photographer has intent to create spam, but rather to photograph topics that interest them. Some Wikimedians thought them useful to copy here - I don't see how they became spam in the process. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- COM:SPAM, as you are no doubt aware, is one of the only three shortcuts for the scope guideline in question. Since neither COM:PARTYPICS nor COM:PERSONAL seem more appropriate, I chose COM:SPAM in lieu of an even more suitable shortcut. I quoted the relevant provisions of said guideline and I think they are applicable. Of course it is porn but that’s not really the point: Pictures of people, logos and artwork are inherently more problematic than, say, motorcycles in a legitimate race, because they have a higher tendency to be there just to put someone or something “on the map”. In this case, Wikidata notability is claimed for the model. --Emu (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- That was not my intended "argument". My argument is simply that the stated reasons for deletion are not valid, since I do not think the photos can be legitimately considered either "porn" or "spam". The parenthetical mention of the Flickr photographer gives additional context. Would you consider all of their photos to be "spam"? For my personal opinion, yes that is a rather high number of photos of a model - and from the same Flickr photographer we have even higher numbers of photos of racing motorcycles and race cars. Well, those are not sports that I follow, but as long as the photos are of good quality and illustrate in-scope topics, there is nothing wrong with having many of them. I don't think the photographer has intent to create spam, but rather to photograph topics that interest them. Some Wikimedians thought them useful to copy here - I don't see how they became spam in the process. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Of course it is porn" - I disagree strongly. I am interested in hearing why you consider these photos "porn". None are explicit nor depict sexual situations. Many contain nudity, but many others do not. I agree with the statement by Jimbo Wales "mere nudity is not pornography" [2]. A number show bare breasts and some show pubic hair, but I didn't notice any genitalia at all (I have not studied all the photos in detail; going by the thumbnails and spot checks). Some of the photos which do show full nudity are discrete to the point that not even a bit of nipple is visible, eg File:Nicole Luisoni (52525673730).jpg. Is File:Nicole Luisoni (52525751288).jpg "porn" by your definition? Common swimwear is often more revealing. Porn?!? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- I’m not sure if you are doing yourself a big favor in quoting Jimbo, but anyway: I agree, mere nudity is not pornography. Indeed, pornography doesn’t have to include nudity at all. Wiktionary’s definition of pornography is “The explicit […] visual depiction of sexual subject matter; any display of material of an erotic nature.“ In short, if it’s intended to titillate, it’s pornography. And this image set most certainly aims to titillate, although its success in this endeavor is probably rather mixed. But as you mentioned, this isn’t really the point. --Emu (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- “I know it when I see it”, and this ain’t it. Is The Birth of Venus porn now because it depicts nudity? Dronebogus (talk) 11:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- I wrote: I agree, mere nudity is not pornography. Indeed, pornography doesn’t have to include nudity at all. How exactly does your response relate in any way to that? --Emu (talk) 12:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- “I know it when I see it”, and this ain’t it. Is The Birth of Venus porn now because it depicts nudity? Dronebogus (talk) 11:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- I’m not sure if you are doing yourself a big favor in quoting Jimbo, but anyway: I agree, mere nudity is not pornography. Indeed, pornography doesn’t have to include nudity at all. Wiktionary’s definition of pornography is “The explicit […] visual depiction of sexual subject matter; any display of material of an erotic nature.“ In short, if it’s intended to titillate, it’s pornography. And this image set most certainly aims to titillate, although its success in this endeavor is probably rather mixed. But as you mentioned, this isn’t really the point. --Emu (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Of course it is porn" - I disagree strongly. I am interested in hearing why you consider these photos "porn". None are explicit nor depict sexual situations. Many contain nudity, but many others do not. I agree with the statement by Jimbo Wales "mere nudity is not pornography" [2]. A number show bare breasts and some show pubic hair, but I didn't notice any genitalia at all (I have not studied all the photos in detail; going by the thumbnails and spot checks). Some of the photos which do show full nudity are discrete to the point that not even a bit of nipple is visible, eg File:Nicole Luisoni (52525673730).jpg. Is File:Nicole Luisoni (52525751288).jpg "porn" by your definition? Common swimwear is often more revealing. Porn?!? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The first picture might be useful to illustrate women with breast filling (silicone) but so many pictures of an out of scope person are naturally not necessary. The nudity lobby will always defend this kind of spam (and accuse others of censuring Commons, never mind, just laugh at that :), however Commons is not a junk depot. Delete "most", keep one or two. 181.43.4.96 19:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your insights into the internal workings of Commons. --Emu (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep As uploader. Per comments of Infrogmation. This is porn????????????????????? Non explicit nude and non nude photos taken in a "nude photography workshop,
[in]Barcelona" ("Taller de fotografía de desnudo, Barcelona") are porn? Clearly not porn but that is not really the point.
And spam? This is another clear example of a catch 22 situation. If it is only one or two images of an unidentified model, some ask to delete it for some reason, if it is several images of an identified model delete it the same for other reasons. It can be a clearly identified situation, with a clear case but even the same someone will ask for deletion for "reasons".
Images clearly in scope and clearly not porn or spam, but again this not admire me as the deletion requester moninate files to deletion without understanding what or whom they depict, like in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Thássia Naves. Tm (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- I withdrew this nomination as a sign of AGF although the person in question probably isn’t notable at all. I now realize that this was a mistake. --Emu (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- the ones in Category:Shadow stripes are the only ones we have so far that use this motif with human portraits.
- and as others have pointed out, this photographer's photos are pretty high quality, definitely belonging to the upper echelons among all that we have in https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Boudoir+model&title=Special:MediaSearch , Category:Boudoir photography. it might be erotic, but it's not really pornographic.
- besides, not all are nudes, e.g. File:Nicole Luisoni (52524730777).jpg, File:Nicole Luisoni (52524724687).jpg.--RZuo (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- before chalking up 150+ edits, why doesnt emu first test the water by nominating some of the most revealing ones? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- (ofc, his/her intention is to delete the wd item. leaving out any would defeat that purpose. then we all ended up here wasting time, thx a lot to users who try to remove some basic info about a model whose photos have been a bonus to the repertoire of commons.) RZuo (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- So your argument boils down to a) some photos show shadow stripes and b) I should nominate a subset based on degree of nudity although nudity isn’t an issue at all, scope is? OK, not really sure how to react to this remarkable pleadings. --Emu (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- this user's original rationale is "porn" and "SPAM". so this user thinks a non-nude, not so revealing photo is as pornographic as a full frontal?
- people see what they want to see. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) --RZuo (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, the original rationale was It sure seems like “advertising or self-promotion” for the model and the photographer, as “non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills”. COM:SPAM is a link – I have already explained that I can’t change the way Commons names shortcuts. And porn collection is a descriptive term for this image set. I do not understand your second sentence. --Emu (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Emu, as pointed by RZuo, this deletion request has all to do with your arguments on the wikidata deletion request (opened by other) of Nicole Luisoni wikidata item, as per your own words in the wikidata deletion request you opened this deletion request here in Commons so you can have the wikidata item deleted.
- So why did you again not state that fact in your initial opening of the deletion request and only state it after this nomination was opened for several hours and several users made comments?
- A similar pattern happened in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Thássia Naves as you commented, only after withdrawing this nomination, that you oppened it do to d:Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2023/06/01#Q109733363. A little bit more of initial transparency would help. Regards. Tm (talk) 02:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- You do realize that there is a link to the Wikidata RfD right in the nomination, don’t you?
- After many, many words, the only argument seems to be that Commons somehow lacks shadow stripes on nude bodies. And that I’m the baddie for pointing out that we might not need those pictures. --Emu (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, the original rationale was It sure seems like “advertising or self-promotion” for the model and the photographer, as “non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills”. COM:SPAM is a link – I have already explained that I can’t change the way Commons names shortcuts. And porn collection is a descriptive term for this image set. I do not understand your second sentence. --Emu (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- So your argument boils down to a) some photos show shadow stripes and b) I should nominate a subset based on degree of nudity although nudity isn’t an issue at all, scope is? OK, not really sure how to react to this remarkable pleadings. --Emu (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I looked at a few of these, and I think they're high enough quality to be worth keeping as examples of portrait photography. And as an aside, "porn collection" is an extremely inaccurate description of portrait photographs, some of which are nude and some clothed. If this is porn, so are portrait paintings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep All I see here is exceptionally high quality artistic nude photography. It’s not porn, it’s not spam, and it’s not useless or out of scope. The worst part is the uninformative boilerplate titles. This nomination, and the nominator’s combative responses to keep votes, are far more disruptive than anything here. Dronebogus (talk) 11:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The images are watermarked with the name of the photographer. Plus at least from what I've seen the descriptions all reference who the models are and link to more images of them on Flickr. I don't know how people can claim that isn't spam. There's no reason someone would hire professional models to do extremely high quality nude photoshoots and release on free platforms like this one or Flickr except to upsell people on checking out more of their paid work. That's basic internet marketing 101. As to the question of if they are "pornographic", who cares? They clearly aren't educational and that's the important thing here. Although I will say the images are clearly erotic and softcore pornography is a thing. Take it how you will, but these images clearly fit in the genre. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep No valid deletion reasons. Definitely no spam here. The files are obviously in scope even if the model is non-notable. Watermark isn't reason to deletion, see COM:Watermarks#Discouraged_watermarks. I don't understand why we want to delete photos such File:Nicole Luisoni (52525746033).jpg. MUCH more useful for Commons if we will delete tons of (nude) ugly women! Юрий Д.К 17:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No requirement to delete, no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Dubious screen footage TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW of unknown original, certainly not a photo of the person 10 years after they died. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 10:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, uncat, no useful description, low quality image of no evident in scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 10:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; vague image not useful in illustrating title, no evident other importance. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
The source page is licensed as cc-nc-nd. see to the right of the picture GeorgHH • talk 10:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Greg Smolonski Copyright holder © Photovibe Usage terms Under“The 1988 Copyright, Designs&Patents Act” the copyright to all images belongs to Photovibe until stated otherwise in separate written document. Client may only use images in ways that have been agreed at the time they were commissioned. If further uses are later required then permission must be obtained.". MKFI (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fishermen, Petrozavodsk
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architectural artworks in Russia. Sculptural copyright violation; the sculpture dates to 1991 and its author is w:en:Rafael Consuegra, now deceased. The work remains under his posthumous copyright for 70 years.
- File:"Рыбаки" на Онежской набережной.jpg
- File:Embankment Onezhskaya. Sculptures 1.jpg
- File:Embankment Onezhskaya. Sculptures 3.jpg
- File:Karelia (2006) 01.jpg
- File:Naberezhnaya v Petrozavodske 10.JPG
- File:Performance tribute to fishermen. Pier on Lake Aonigh, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Petroz fishers.jpg
- File:Petrozavodsk on the lake.jpg
- File:Skulptuur paigutati kaldapealsele 1991 aastal..jpg
- File:Tsentr, Petrozavodsk, Kareliya Republits, Russia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Tsentr, Petrozavodsk, Kareliya Republits, Russia - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Онежская набережная скульптура "Рыбаки".jpg
- File:Памятник Рыбаки.jpg
- File:Петрозаводск. Набережная Онежского озера. - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Петрозаводск. Набережная Онежского озера. - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:ПетрозаводскНабережнаяОнежского озера.jpg
- File:Россия, Карелия, Петрозаводск, Центр, Онежская наб. (Центр), Рыбаки с сетью, 14-44 12.06.2008 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Россия, Карелия, Петрозаводск, Центр, Онежская наб., Рыбаки с сетью, 12-53 15.06.2008 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Россия, Карелия, Петрозаводск, Центр, Онежская наб., Рыбаки с сетью, 14-43 12.06.2008 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Россия, Карелия, Петрозаводск, Центр, Онежская наб., Рыбаки с сетью, 14-44 12.06.2008 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Рыбаки - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Рыбаки.НабережнаяПетрозаводска.jpg
- File:Скульптура "Рыбаки" на набережной.jpg
- File:Скульптура на набережной "Рыбаки".jpg
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%A0%D1%8B%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D1%81_%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8E,_14-44_12.06.2008_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
It would seem taken from here. Luurankosoturi (talk) 10:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader of the picture said on his/her talk page that (s)he took the pictures from the website of Sifter Capital (whose logo I also asked to be removed). (S)he also says (s)he has permission for the photos. I ask him/her to comment on this. Luurankosoturi (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure if this logo does meet the threshold of originality. Luurankosoturi (talk) 10:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: false claims, false license, uncertain TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soviet.astronaut (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious free licence at clipartlord.com - the top astronaut image at the source URL also appears on this Education Scotland page copyrighted to Learning and Teaching Scotland with a much stricter licence (You may not sell or permit third parties to sell or license an image).
Belbury (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Lack of Image source and license(E.g. CC-BY/Public Domain) -Hoben7599 (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
According to the description in Spanish, it claims to be a postcard from 1916, however it appears retouched with colors for what could be a derivative work. It is not clear if it is a later collection or if the postcard was really made in 1916. Taichi (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
![19:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/19#c-Taichi-20230619192500-File:"Danza_de_Indios"_Diablada.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. There's no reason to doubt that this postcard was tinted at the time it was produced; this was a common process at the time, especially for souvenirs and postcards. It'd be much more unusual for this sort of retouching to be applied after the fact, and I see no reason to assume that was the case here. See w:Hand-colouring of photographs for details. Omphalographer (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Omphalographer. Such printed colors are failrly common in 1910s postcards. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
![19:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/19#c-Infrogmation-20230629194600-File:"Danza_de_Indios"_Diablada.jpg){kind=link}
At the request of the rights holder: User talk:Welkend#File:Bibliothek des Konservatismus Logo.svg Welkend (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep I think this could be below TOO. GPSLeo (talk) 10:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep per GPSLeo. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This appears to be below TOO. Should the library insist, they can request a takedown or courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
You have the above Graphic uploaded to Wikipedia purporting to represent the Library of Conservatism logo. The graphic shown in this form is not our logo (purple on white is not part of our corporate design and was never made by us). Please delete this misleading graphic. 62.96.185.42 07:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC) Dr. Wolfgang Fenske, Director of Bibliothek des Konservatismus (Library of Conservatism) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.96.185.42 (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed, the logo should be inverted (white text with purple background) and then kept. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The figurative mark is a graphic stylization of our house facade, which is also reminiscent of a bookshelf or a stack of books. It was created professionally by a graphic artist (golden ratio, etc.). The graphic artist is the sole owner of the copyright, the library is the sole owner of the usage rights. We therefore ask for the immediate deletion of this similar and any future original graphic. We expressly do not agree to publication on Wikipedia.
- Dr. Wolfgang Fenske, Director of Bibliothek des Konservatismus (Library of Conservatism) --62.96.185.42 14:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: send a formal takedown request to foundation:Legal:DMCA takedowns. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
No license source 95.57.233.229 18:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Fictional flag Kazman322 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
No license source Kazman322 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 4ing (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
No evidence to be own work, taken from the internet Ориенталист (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung, als Urheber wird die Organisation VdK Niedersachsen angegeben - Urheber kann aber nur eine natürlich Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission (press photo). --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Irrelevant image Satpal Dandiwal (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused test image, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Potentially out of scope? A1Cafel (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of project scope. Achim55 (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ah now we are somewhat more clear - the USER PAGE - sir/madam - please be more precise when communicating in clear native English. I have no issues with you removal of my user data - if this is a problem though in candor it is NOT SELF PROMOTION is is providing context to who I am as an editor. I challenge you that I am self promoting - I am NOT selling anything and only providing publicly available information. I did think you were referring to my edits of the Siegfried Sassoon page - so your note makes absolutely no sense to a native English speaker. AS I HAVE CHALLENGED YOUR CLAIMS OF SELF PROMOTION as clearly utter nonsense - please add back the data! Thanks old chap... Exnihilox (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for slimming down your page.
I withdraw my nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 15:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- I had always planned to do so - in truth I'd prefer ADMINS focus on my edits to the SIEFRIED SASSOON page - I did make minor live edits. The 'user page' concern was in reality a little trivial and I had updated my CV with the full intention of reducing the content to make it more relevant to Wikipedia - I do appreciate your diligence though - many thanks. Exnihilox (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The current page is more aligned with what I think a user should be revealing. I think this important - if I change a page relating to IMMUNOLOGY, COMPUTER SCIENCE, BIOCHEMSITRY, FDA, WEAPONS SYSTEMS etc. I am revealing to others that I am doing so with some authority - without knowing at least something about an editor - it can be challenging to understand their true motivations. I did take care to remove anything the had the tone of a CV or resume - I am happy to debate the current USER PAGE I created - and insist it not be removed without robust dialog! Many thanks and apologies for being so blunt - but it took a lot of effort to understand what the ADMIN was actually concerned with - there does seem a language issue with this specific ADMIN! Many thanks. Exnihilox (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for slimming down your page.
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alighiero Boetti
[edit]Art works by en:Alighiero Boetti who died in 1994. Uploaders need permission from the copyright owner to post the files. See COM:VRT
GeorgHH • talk 22:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Dirk van Bronkhorst op zijn sterfbed tijdens het beleg van Leiden in 1574 Rijksmuseum SK-A-4170.jpeg Mbch331 (talk) 17:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: higher resolution, not an exact duplicate. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Changed credit. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: fixed. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/acknowledging.html Lithopsian (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- It has credit and it does not say that it is any user's own work. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- I changed the licensing SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Unless otherwise specifically stated, no claim to copyright is being asserted by STScI and material on this site may be freely used as in the public domain in accordance with NASA's contract. [3]. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DSS images are copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Despite the claim this is an ESO image, there is no link, I can't find any trace of it at their website, and the page today and in the past claims that the image weas created using Aladin lite Lithopsian (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Third time lucky. To be perfectly frank, I don't believe the claim that this is an image originating at ESO. There is no link given here, I can't find any trace of it at eso.org, the image was initially uploaded with the claim that it was an Aladin Lite image and it still makes that claim today. If the creator removes the nomination tag again, I will consider this evidence of bad faith and escalate it for administrator action. Nomination discussions are closed by an administrator, occasionally another third party, once arguments have been presented. Lithopsian (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: see above. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The given permissions link does not apply to this image. DSS is copyrightː https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: see above. No further information given which would justify a deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
_042.jpg){kind=link}
_042.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
En ole antanut lupaa kuvan ottamiseen, julkaisuun tai käyttämiseen - kiellän sen. Inka Auhagen DonaInkita (talk) 20:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
_042.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion (public event). --Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
_042.jpg){kind=link}
Unreliable user 181.43.4.96 21:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
I see no indication on the stated source of a free license. All of the uploads of this editor that I have looked at so far have been problematic. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Mesmo caso do TSE. Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CM:DW, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
I see no indication on the stated source of a free license. Almost all of the uploads of this editor that I have looked at so far have been problematic. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Tribunal Superior Eleitoral? Foto registrada e paga por órgão público? Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emerson Júnior GSF (talk · contribs)
[edit]I see no indication on the stated sources of any free license. Almost all of the uploads of this editor that I have looked at so far have been problematic.
- File:Waltham Glória- Progressistas.jpg
- File:Cleoci Rodrigues-PODE.jpg
- File:Emivaldo Pereira de Oliveira-PDT.jpg
- File:Lineu Olimpio.jpg
- File:EronildoLopesValadares.jpg
- File:JúlioSérgiodeMelo.jpg
- File:JoséOsvaldodaSilva.jpg
- File:PedroJoaoFernandes.jpg
- File:Márcio Luís da Silva.jpg
- File:José Uilton Nascimento Oliveira.jpg
- File:AnaPereiraBraga.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Please do not delete the TSE files until they send me a response. I consulted them on this matter and, if there is a license, they contacted Wikipedia directly. My matter is being analyzed by the Ombudsman.
- As for the files that are my authorship, they belong to a PUBLIC GALLERY OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE PORANGATU TOWN CHAMBER and as the portraits were purchased by the Town Hall, the author did not impose his authorship on them. The photos are my rights. Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 15:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Emerson Júnior GSF emailed me as follows.
- "Protocolo de nº: 61602321120854
- Senhor(a) EMERSON JR. G.S.FIGUEIREDO
- Em resposta à mensagem recebida pela Ouvidoria do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE), a Secretaria de Tecnologia da Informação esclareceu:
- "Em atenção ao relato, informamos que as imagens constantes da Página Divulgação de Candidaturas e Contas Eleitorais (link abaixo) não possuem restrições de uso. Equipe Técnica STI/TSE. https://divulgacandcontas.tse.jus.br/divulga/?fbclid=IwAR1VfQCPYc04qcdofP239KSVp-vfZDyU0NUs01mBxu5FUpoFfpgvjH_mTpI#/"
- O Tribunal Superior Eleitoral agradece o contato.
- Solicitamos a gentileza de responder a pesquisa de satisfação que foi enviada em seu e-mail.
- Tribunal Superior Eleitoral
- Ouvidoria
- Setor de Administração Federal Sul - SAFS - Quadra 7
- Lotes 1/2 - 8º andar - Sala A860 - Brasília(DF) - 70070-600" [ends]
Using email for general problems that are not confidential simply wastes everyones' time.
The statement above has two problems -- it is not a CC license, but simply a statement of present policy. It is entirely revocable and therefore does not meet Commons requirements. Also, we do not accept forwarded licenses. A proper CC license must be sent using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
No indication of a free license from the actual photographer . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Foi uma imagem compartilhada pela neta do fotografado! Ela não usa a wikipédia e me compartilhou a foto por whatsapp! Todos os outros artigos que você marcou eram de autoridades públicas que o publicaram! Todas! Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- E ela não possui um acervo online! Ninguém normalmente o faz. Eu coloquei o nome dela, mas você não pode esperar que haja um artigo wiki sobre a autora! Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission; @Emerson Júnior GSF: Please take a look at COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Metadata information gives as author of the work Adriano Vizoni. There is no indication that Mr. Vizoni has authorized publication of the material here on Commons. Minerva97 (talk) 21:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete For the reasons mentioned above. Minerva97 (talk) 22:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Isn't this picture made by someone else like one of this kid's parents? Wouldn't the kid need permission to post that here? If someone else shot this image then they hold the copyright and not the uploader. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Info The user also uploaded similar image File:ProGamerYT1902AJ Dogs Recruiter.jpg -- William Graham (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal image, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
While the photograph may be own work as claimed, the photograph shown is clearly not the work of the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Novamente, pela quarta vez. Essa foto pertence à galeria dos Presidentes da Câmara, que pagou o trabalho! A partir dos momentos que eles pagaram, eles detém o direito sobre o retrato. A partir do momento em que EU fotografo, a OBRA é MINHA! Pois é uma versão própria do retrato. Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023070510010549 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 10:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
i need to rerecord this file to be clearer Lea.fakauvea (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Not PD.Japanese calligraphy is protected by copyright. In the Copyright Textbook of Agency for Cultural Affairs [4](table on page 6), "Copyrights of Art - Paintings, prints, sculptures, cartoons, calligraphy, stage sets, tea bowls, pots, swords and other arts and crafts, etc." あずきごはん (talk) 10:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Not PD.Japanese calligraphy is protected by copyright. In the Copyright Textbook of Agency for Cultural Affairs [https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/chosakuken/seidokaisetsu/pdf/93736501_05.pdf](table on page 6), "Copyrights of Art - Paintings, prints, sculptures, cartoons, calligraphy, stage sets, tea bowls, pots, swords and other arts and crafts, etc."}} あずきごはん (talk) 10:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Not PD.Japanese calligraphy is protected by copyright. In the Copyright Textbook of Agency for Cultural Affairs [https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/chosakuken/seidokaisetsu/pdf/93736501_05.pdf](table on page 6), "Copyrights of Art - Paintings, prints, sculptures, cartoons, calligraphy, stage sets, tea bowls, pots, swords and other arts and crafts, etc."}} あずきごはん (talk) 10:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Not PD.Japanese calligraphy is protected by copyright. In the Copyright Textbook of Agency for Cultural Affairs [https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/chosakuken/seidokaisetsu/pdf/93736501_05.pdf](table on page 6), "Copyrights of Art - Paintings, prints, sculptures, cartoons, calligraphy, stage sets, tea bowls, pots, swords and other arts and crafts, etc."}} あずきごはん (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:鈴木朝潮
[edit](art prints, paintings)
- File:デシタル版画作品.jpg
- File:デジタル版画.jpg
- File:デジタル版画作品.jpg
- File:デジタル版画作品４.jpg
- File:デジタル版画２.jpg
- File:フレスコジクレー、デシタルプリント版画作品.jpg
- File:フレスコジクレー、デシタルプリント版画作品、.jpg
- File:春陽13年ー完成４００－２.jpg
- File:銅版画作品.jpg
- File:銅版画作品、５８ｃｍＸ９３ｃｍ.jpg
- File:雨の記憶、銅版画、.jpg
(sculpture)
(installation view of paintings at the National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts)
Works of art uploaded by 鈴木朝潮 (talk · contribs) that are promotional(COM:ADVERT), not useful for educational purpose(not COM:EDUSE) and without permission. --Peka (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as requested except File:第16回中華民国国際版画ビエンナーレ.jpg, which might be de minimis and is in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Subject of image is copyrighted characters Elisfkc (talk) 03:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Because de minimis El Nuevo Doge (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not sure how the characters can be de minimis when they take up like half of the image, if not more. Also, the name of the file is literally "Disney princess bottles." So the uploader clearly took the photograph because of the characters on the bottles. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete copyright status is debatable (what constitutes dm in mexico?) but this is out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
There is an error in this image's resolution. DatukSinga (talk) 06:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mrrobot2067 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
While the photo has been freely licenced, it is a derived work and there is no evidence of permission by the copyright holder (designer of the poster). TadejM (t/p) 15:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; DW poster is centered so doesn't seem worth trouble to try to crop or blur -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
La persona que subió esta foto mintió sobre otra foto que subió. Así que dudo que está sea su obra propia. 191.125.136.193 23:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Two of his "own work" Klhoe Kardashian uploads have been deleted already, and there's a third which will be happening shortly. I'd actually go one further and kill all of his uploads on the basis of tainted provenance. Tabercil (talk) 16:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Strugglehouse (talk · contribs)
[edit]duplicate files. i put them nomination for delete instead marking for speedydeletion, because user stated that "they are not duplicate" in his user talk page. note: i put the images that are not in use and clear duplicate. so, if it is in use, i put the other duplicate(if its exist) or even older file. im gonna add additional info that shows which file is duplicate with other file.
- File:TheOdd1sOut at the 2022 "Creator Clash" Boxing Event (cropped) 3.jpg, duplicate with: File:TheOdd1sOut at the 2022 "Creator Clash" Boxing Event (cropped).jpg
- File:Kurtis Conner (cropped).png, duplicate with: File:Kurtis Conner (cropped) 2.png
- File:Miley Cyrus (23585698670) (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:Miley Cyrus (23585698670) (cropped).jpg (you can Weak keep this)
- File:Miley Cyrus at MMVA 2010 crop (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:Miley Cyrus at MMVA 2010 crop (cropped).jpg
- File:Charli D'Amelio in Nov 2020 4 (cropped).jpg, duplicate with: File:Charli D'Amelio in Nov 2020 4 (cropped) 2.jpg
- File:Tom Scott, CIUK keynote (31706422316) (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:Tom Scott, CIUK keynote (31706422316) (cropped).jpg
- File:Tom Scott at dConstruct (15151526895) (cropped) 3.jpg, duplicate with: File:Tom Scott at dConstruct (15151526895) (cropped) 4.jpg
- File:Tom Scott at dConstruct (15151526895) (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:Tom Scott at dConstruct (15151526895) (cropped) 4.jpg
- File:Brent Rivera 2020 (cropped) 4.jpg, duplicate with: File:Brent Rivera 2020 (cropped) 5.jpg
- File:Brent Rivera 2020 (cropped) 3.jpg, duplicate with: File:Brent Rivera 2020 (cropped) 5.jpg
- File:Brent Rivera 2020 (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:Brent Rivera 2020 (cropped) 5.jpg
- File:Logan Paul (cropped) 2.png, duplicate with: File:Logan Paul (cropped).png
- File:Danny Gonzalez in 2023 (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:Danny Gonzalez in 2023 (cropped) 3.jpg
- File:Danny Gonzalez 2022 (cropped).png, duplicate with: File:Danny Gonzalez 2022 (cropped) 2.png
- File:Joey Graceffa (cropped).jpg, duplicate with: File:Joey Graceffa (cropped) 2.jpg
- File:JacksFilms (7486842272) (cropped) 3.jpg, duplicate with: File:JacksFilms (7486842272) (cropped) 2.jpg
- File:MrBeast in 2021 (cropped) 3.jpg, duplicate with: File:MrBeast in 2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:MrBeast in 2021 (cropped) 2.jpg, duplicate with: File:MrBeast in 2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:MrBeast in a YouTube Video in 2022 (cropped) 5.jpg, duplicate with: File:MrBeast in a YouTube Video in 2022 (cropped) 4.jpg
- File:MrBeast in a YouTube Video in 2022 (cropped) 3.jpg, duplicate with: File:MrBeast in a YouTube Video in 2022 (cropped).jpg
- File:James Rallison at Vidcon (cropped).jpg, duplicate with: File:James Rallison at Vidcon (cropped) 2.jpg
- File:Danny Gonzalez in 2023.jpg, duplicate with: File:Danny Gonzalez in 2023 (cropped).jpg ( i did mistake here, you can Delete "(cropped)" file. and Keep "2023" file. older upload should be Keep.)
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.png){kind=link}
_(cropped)_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_2.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped)_4.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped)_2.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Strugglehouse&oldid=772739444#duplicate_files ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- I said they aren't duplicates because they aren't. "Duplicate" means something is an exact copy of something else. All my images are different. Some are similar (i.e. cropped differently) but none of them are exactly the same.
- I don't mind having some images deleted if they aren't in use, but I don't agree they are all copies of each other. Strugglehouse (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- yes, you are right @Strugglehouse , they are not duplicate, but they are actually COM:Redundant. so, still, very very similar 2 files shouldnt coexist. these files should be Delete.
- making slightly crops doesnt mean you have to create another file. please read: COM:CROP. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- yes, you are right @Strugglehouse , they are not duplicate, but they are actually COM:Redundant. so, still, very very similar 2 files shouldnt coexist. these files should be
- Delete Some of these are clearly "duplicates" like File:Joey Graceffa (cropped).jpg and File:Joey Graceffa (cropped) 2.jpg. Just because one of the images is slightly larger then the other doesn't mean it isn't essentially an identical image. As to the others, I feel like acting like they aren't duplicates is just arguing over semantics. Things like this are what happens when there's literally zero standards for when it's OK to upload duplicate images or not. Just because someone can "technically" upload multiple files of essentially the same image with a half centimeter "crop" being the only difference between them doesn't mean we should automatically keep the images "because they aren't duplicates" or some nonsense. The fact is that the images are extremely similar, if not essentially the same. Just because there's a barely noticeable difference between the images doesn't mean they aren't the same. Otherwise someone could insert random, microscopic pixels into an image thousands of times and mass upload them because technically they aren't duplicates. We clearly need to draw the line somewhere and I think images like File:Joey Graceffa (cropped).jpg and File:Joey Graceffa (cropped) 2.jpg clearly cross it. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete We do not need four crops of Brent Rivera. These are excessive. SWinxy (talk) 12:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Strugglehouse (talk · contribs)
[edit]per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Strugglehouse , COM:Redundant.
- File:Eddie Izzard comes to Crouch End (cropped).jpg, redundant with File:Eddie Izzard comes to Crouch End.jpg
- File:Charli XCX & Addison Rae 2021 (cropped).jpg, redundant with File:Charli XCX & Addison Rae 2021.jpg
- File:Miley Cyrus Wonder World concert at Auburn Hills 07 (cropped).jpg, redundant with File:Miley Cyrus Wonder World concert at Auburn Hills 07.jpg
- File:Bella Poarch smiling (cropped).jpg, redundant with File:Bella Poarch smiling.jpg
- File:Logan Paul (48086619418) (cropped).jpg, redundant with File:Logan Paul (48086619418).jpg
- File:Jack Douglass at VidCon 2014 (cropped) 2.jpg, redundant with File:Jack Douglass at VidCon 2014 (cropped).jpg
- File:KSI August 2018 (cropped).png, redundant with File:KSI August 2018.png
- File:Logan Paul August 2018 (cropped).png, redundant with File:Logan Paul August 2018.png
- File:Danny Gonzalez (cropped).png, redundant with File:Danny Gonzalez.png
- File:Mark Rober 2020 (cropped) 4.jpg, redundant with File:Mark Rober 2020 (cropped) 3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- these files is redundant from another users. so, i didnt see in first DR. im gonna also which file is redundant with other file. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- please add proper image to wikis before delete them. i cant do it all of it, it requires to be autoconfirmed. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- i changed files. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per my comment in the prior DR, which should be above this one. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Strugglehouse (talk · contribs)
[edit]per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Strugglehouse , COM:Redundant.
- File:Anthony Padilla (cropped).png, redundant with File:Anthony Padilla.png
- File:Beardymanparty (cropped).jpg, redundant with File:Beardymanparty.jpg
- File:Hank Green During His Cancer Diagnosis Announcement Video in 2023 (cropped) 2.jpg, redundant with File:Hank Green During His Cancer Diagnosis Announcement Video in 2023 (cropped).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
While the photograph may be own work as claimed, the drawing shown is clearly not the work of the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Que desenho que você tanto vê?? Se é uma foto da GALERIA DOS PRESIDENTES DA CÂMARA MUNICIPAL obviamente terá o mandato subtitulado embaixo, mas de resto a obra é minha! Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023070510010709 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- This can be kept under {{PD-Brazil-Photo}}, but we do need to fix authorship and other metadata. Chico Venancio (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
While the photograph may be own work as claimed, the drawing shown is clearly not the work of the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Que desenho?? Isso veio da Galeria dos Presidentes da Câmara Municipal, obviamente viria com o mandato, a obra é minha! Emerson Júnior GSF (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023070510010709 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- This can be kept under {{PD-Brazil-Photo}}, but we do need to fix authorship and other metadata. Chico Venancio (talk) 18:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This file is not part of the CQ Roll Call collection; nor is it under one of the public domain CQ Roll Call authors. AlaskaGal (talk) 22:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —RP88 (talk) 12:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Per file:Aiello del Friuli – Meridiana.jpg, this is 2003 installation. There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry! Would agree with deletion! Lars Staffanski (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Claim of "own work" and an image in 2022 but image is from sites (in an article from 2021) such as https://www.soyfutbol.com/seleccionmexicana/Marcelo-Flores-hace-oficial-su-eleccion-por-la-Seleccion-Mexicana-20220516-0024.html and https://www.elfutbolero.com.mx/ligamx/Marcelo-Flores-como-el-futuro-de-Mexico-20211208-0032.html RedPatch (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
_Wendenstrasse_(ca._1912)_(52075179836).jpg){kind=link}
_Wendenstrasse_(ca._1912)_(52075179836).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Migebert as no license (No license since). 1912 German postcard. Definitely public domain in the US, could be public domain in Germany, publisher information might be on the backside. Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Have sent a message to the uploader at Flickr with the question to look at the backside of that postcard for the publisher or photographer. Will wait for an answer from him. Migebert (talk) 19:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll be ready to look up the photographer or publisher if you get that information from the Flickr uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- The Uploader wrote that he does not have that postcard anymore and he cannot say if there was a publisher stated on the backside. He remembers the year only when the postcard was sent and he said, if there were a publisher on the backside he would have written that on his upload. Can we assume an anonymous publishing? Migebert (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose we could. Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- The Uploader wrote that he does not have that postcard anymore and he cannot say if there was a publisher stated on the backside. He remembers the year only when the postcard was sent and he said, if there were a publisher on the backside he would have written that on his upload. Can we assume an anonymous publishing? Migebert (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll be ready to look up the photographer or publisher if you get that information from the Flickr uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 23:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP Netherlands for photographs of outdoor photographs. Belbury (talk) 17:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Beit lessin's mike.jpg
[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The photo taken in Tel Aviv. FoP Israel does not cover posters that not situated permanently in a public place. -- Geagea (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Originally discussed in he.wiki her. -- Geagea (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Bright-red wooden longhorn steer outside the Western Art Artifacts Store in Johnson City, Texas LCCN2014633828.tif
[edit]Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Undelete in ~150 years. Enyavar (talk) 05:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Undelete in ~150 years. Enyavar (talk) 05:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of permission for this logo. Please also see sl:Wikipedija:Izbrane slike/Predlogi/Slika:Anticorona flag by Heraldica Slovenica.svg.
If you hold the copyright or can obtain the permission, please see Commons:VRT. TadejM (t/p) 15:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
File:+3x10^8m-s, beyond the light velocity(2017) National-gallery-in-Prague - GRAYCODE, jiiiiin(Taebok Cho, Jinhhee Jung).jpg
[edit]_National-gallery-in-Prague_-_GRAYCODE,_jiiiiin(Taebok_Cho,_Jinhhee_Jung).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_National-gallery-in-Prague_-_GRAYCODE,_jiiiiin(Taebok_Cho,_Jinhhee_Jung).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: No sign of Creative Commons on the websites in the source CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO. Promo shot found elsewhere on the internet (see e.g. cropped version here), likely not uploader's own work, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 16:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've submitted my photo to ZKST Zalec as a concert organisator. You see I have a non cropped verison of the photo, they hava cropped it. Dejan Lavbic (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Dejan Lavbic: the ZKST Žalec page was just an example. If you're the copyright holder, please send a permission according to instructions here (can be in Slovene), it's standard procedure for assurance in case a work is already published elsewhere. — Yerpo Eh? 11:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; it's been four months and no documentation received. —holly {chat} 20:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that this file actually is the purported license. I cannot see the Creative Commons license anywhere in the link provided. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that this file actually is the purported license. I cannot see the Creative Commons license anywhere in the link provided. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that this file actually is the purported license. I cannot see the Creative Commons license anywhere in the link provided. -- In fact, the license I find on the website itself is "Bản quyền © 2017 thuộc trung tâm hoạt động văn hóa khoa học Văn Miếu - Quốc Tử Giám". -- Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment, as this educational image is in use perhaps it would be wise to locally upload it to Wikipedia. Also, undelete when? 200 (two-hundred) years from now? I think that 150~200 years is a safe bet to state that these images would ascend into the public domain then. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
No evidence this puppet is in the public domain. TadejM (t/p) 16:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Mi trabajo propio. Hoy estuve con Su Santidad... :) 186.174.165.91 17:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Tomé esta foto cuando tenía 10 añitos. 186.172.134.49 17:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright Tango555 (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and ordered a universal replace with File:Málaga Local Train.svg. —holly {chat} 20:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
1950s Airplane schematics that weren't created by NASA, but the source is from NASA @ShakespeareFan00: . The copyright for this might be expired due to non-renewal which should be checked. Abzeronow (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Even though the report itself was made by North American Rockwell, the NASA source for the report says "Copyright: Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted." I read this as meaning Rockwell gave up the copyright when they submitted the report. —holly {chat} 20:32, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted work without attribution: https://www.rawpixel.com/image/9214923/png-blue-sky Ђидо (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Ђидо: Your link goes to a page with a flag of China. Where is the original source for this image? —holly {chat} 23:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, according to the exif data this photo is copyrighted by Rawpixel Ltd., which seems not the same as the uploader. Therefore the photo must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}