User talk:Tango555

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tango555!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Áreas urbanas España.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Áreas urbanas España.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

LMLM (talk) 02:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, it is a derivated work from land cover. All the Infographics are mine. As per land cover web site use is free. Tango555 (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Estación central Alicante.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Estación central Alicante.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Estación central Alicante.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

LMLM (talk) 02:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

It’s a capture from YT channel, so delete it. Sorry. Tango555 (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:IFA Alicante.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:IFA Alicante.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:IFA Alicante.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

LMLM (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Article has been deleted, so delete file. Tango555 (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Municipios del PATAE.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Municipios del PATAE.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

LMLM (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Is a capture from local public cartographic with rights, I have send a mail to them asking for permission Tango555 (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Me han contestado con la página donde dicen que es permiso

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

• attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 truetrue

. Actualizo la imagen a ver si me aclaro. Gracias por tu tiempo. Gracias a tus avisos estoy aprendiendo un montón sobre derechos de uso.

https://icv.gva.es/es/condiciones-de-uso-de-la-geoinformacion-icv Tango555 (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

He arreglado la imagen, creo que bien y voy a añadir notas legales en las imágenes. Gracias Tango555 (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PATAE - Municipios.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PATAE - Municipios.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

LMLM (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

It’s an old version. Delete it please. Tango555 (talk) 15:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Miura 5.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Miura 5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Miura 5.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

LMLM (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

I will ask the enterprise if not I will use some from their wiki page. Tango555 (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Bórrala , ya he encontrado otra y si me dices cómo, lo hago yo. Saludos Tango555 (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Aeropuerto de Alicante.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aeropuerto de Alicante.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

LMLM (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Is a land cover Corinne capture, maybe is mandatory to write year as Copernicus. Tango555 (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hola, ya es visto que hablas español, genial. Al igual que en el caso de áreas urbanas, COPERNICUS permite su uso mencionando la coletilla de que es su trabajo y año. He añadido esto a la imagen y en los dos artículos donde aparece la imagen he añadido lo mismo y una nota legal enlazando a la web de ellos no aclaran los derechos de uso. Gracias por tu tiempo una vez más ¿Sería suficiente? Tango555 (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Aclaro que Copernicus y Corinne es lo mismo. Corinne es el nombre del satélite y Copernicus el consorcio europeo que gestiona los datos de ese satélite. Tango555 (talk) 17:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Esquema del Área metropolitana de Alicante-Elche.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Esquema del Área metropolitana de Alicante-Elche.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

LMLM (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

This is an infographic 100% mine. I can send you proof of the works by mail. Anyway I will not use this file so please delete it. Tango555 (talk) 15:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Te enlazo una imagen para que veas que es 100% trabajo propio, solo que lo hago en numbers que no es propio de imágenes y capturo las infografías y las recorto, por eso igual en megadatos te sale como captura y lleva a confusión. Saludos. https://ibb.co/Xbf8g0V Pero repito, se puede borrar, porque la descarté. Muchas gracias Tango555 (talk) 19:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Área metropolitana de Alicante-Elche.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Área metropolitana de Alicante-Elche.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

LMLM (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Old version. Please delete it. Tango555 (talk) 15:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Re: Copernicus

Saludos, Tango555. Se puede reutilizar libremente la información de Land Cover pero no los mapas. Lo que has subido es una captura de pantalla de un página web. Lee https://lcviewer.vito.be/disclaimer: All texts and illustrations, including the exported reports, on this website are copyright protected. You may copy or print the information for personal use. LMLM (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hola, acabo de revisar esta página Commons:Free media resources/Map y dice que los mapas del CNIG son de libre uso, y dentro de eso mapas hay mapas de Corinne y Copernicus. Con lo que podría ir al IGN y hacerlo desde ahí con exactamente el mismo mapa.

yo los mapas los bajé de aquí https://land.copernicus.eu/global/products/lc

y ahí justo arriba en about y policy dice esto:

Input data

Data exploited by the Global Land Service (e.g. from Sentinels) are provided through dedicated contracts between ESA and the European Commission. Access to these data is not ensured via this portal.

If you are interested in accessing those data, please check the following

Access conditions for data provided by ESA

Access conditions for data provided by EUMETSAT

Output products and information

All users of the Global Land service products benefit from the free and open access policy as defined in the European Union’s Copernicus regulation (N° 377/2014 of 3 April 2014) and Commission Delegated Regulation (N° 1159/2013). This includes lawful use reproduction, distribution, communication to the public, adaptation, modification and combination with other data and information or any combination thereof. Access and use can only be limited in rare cases of security concerns, protection of Third Party risks or risks of service disruption.

By using the products, you acknowledge that these conditions apply and renounce to any claims for damages against the European Union and the data providers (Global Land Service).

Whenever you distribute the original products or communicate them to the public, you are required to refer to the data sourcethrough (at least) the following statement:

Copernicus Service information [Year]

where [Year] is the year of publication or distribution.

In case you adapted or modified the products, the statement must be:

Contains modified Copernicus Service information [Year]

For more complete credits or acknowledgements, please refer to the Credit part of the product metadata or contact our help desk.

The same help desk should be contacted to inform the Global Land Service of your publications.

Es un poco confuso todo. Mil gracias. Si me lo vas a borrar, dímelo ya y empiezo a coger otra fuente o me lo hago entero solo desde cero. Saludos y gracias. Tango555 (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Olvídate, tienes razón, lo pone en el mismo disclaimer del mapa, pues me busco otro visor. Gracias. Tango555 (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

    :hola, gracias por tu tiempo, como siempre. habría que verlo, lo de Copernicus. Ellos mismos te llevan una normativa Europa https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013R1159 que dice lo siguiente 

Artículo 7

Condiciones relativas a la utilización

1. Se dará acceso a los datos dedicados del GMES y a la información de servicio del GMES a los efectos que se detallan a continuación, siempre y cuando sean lícitos:

a)

reproducción;

b)

distribución;

c)

comunicación al público;

d)

adaptación, modificación y combinación con otros datos e información;

e)

cualquier combinación de las letras a) a d).

2. Los datos dedicados del GMES y la información de servicio del GMES podrán utilizarse en todo el mundo sin limitación de tiempo.

Artículo 8

Condiciones relativas a la información que deben facilitar los usuarios

1. Al distribuir o comunicar al público datos dedicados del GMES e información de servicio del GMES, los usuarios informarán al púbico de la fuente de dichos datos e información.

2. Los usuarios velarán por no dar la impresión al público de que las actividades que aquellos lleven a cabo cuentan con el respaldo oficial de la Unión.

3. En caso de que los datos o la información hayan sido adaptados o modificados, los usuarios lo indicarán claramente.

que es parte, lo que dicen ellos dicen en varias partes de su web. Incluso en el disclaimer.

Lo que ellos protegebson los datos personales, dibujos o ilustraciones de su propia web. Copernicus es un proyecto público europeo abierto para todo el mundo y legislado así, tú puedes crear tu visor y yo no tengo derecho a copiarte el visor y a copiarte las conclusiones que saques en un estudio, pero los mapas los abiertos para todos los ciudadanos. los mapas son totalmente libres por normativa europea. Es ley.

Además otros visores, con los mismos mapas, tienen la misma licencia. El IGN es libre y tiene hasta enlace en commons y el ICAV tengo un mail suyo donde me dicen que solo tengo que darles la atribución pero que todo el contenido de mapas es libre.

Ten en cuenta que no son empresas privadas ni usa , que son satélites público europes y que su uso es abierto para todos el mundo según ley de europea.Tango555 (talk) 10:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Por ejemplo el ICV que usa imágenes de satélites europeos libres u otros en algunas capas me dice que puedo usarlos simplemente nombrando la fuente.

Los productos provenientes de proyectos PNOA, SIOSE i LiDAR deben citarse de la siguiente forma: Proyecto año CC BY 4.0 www.scne.es

Ejemplo: PNOA 2007 CC BY 4.0 www.scne.es

El IGN los tiene e igual, los puedo usar, me va a tocar repetir la infografía quizás con otros tonos base básicamente según el visor.

Puedes escalar esto? Muchos editores se beneficiarían, siento ser tan pesado. Muchas gracias