Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Deputado estadual Alexandre Curi durante sessão plenária, na Assembleia Legislativa do Paraná, em fevereiro de 2023.jpg
[edit]Legenda incorreta Kleyton Presidente (talk) 04:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Radhvi (talk) 06:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense PadrioPio (talk) 07:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep Not a deletion reason. It's an electric pole, which is in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 13:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
screw this screw trying to preserve stuff Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I give up Slinkyw (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-wikipedian: out of scope (F10). --Karim talk to me :)..! 01:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted materials Michel Bakni (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Twitter. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Akhil kumar 70 (talk) 14:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason given for deletion. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake CW2468 (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Svetlov Artem (talk) 15:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted material Mindmatrix 15:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 23:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Google Maps screenshot; copyrighted material Mindmatrix 15:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 23:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Aman.shuklaa (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep & stop gaming. CatOnMars (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Aman.shuklaa (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have never known nonsense can be the reason for such requests and feel quite offended and unacceptable. According to the site of Jingshan Temple, a city-level cultural heritage from the Yuhang government, the site is located in the surrounding of 喝石(shouting stone) where I found man-made stony base in the left of the picture. I have consulted and confirmed the infomation with the locals the base is part of the oldest building in Jingshan Temple, dating back to Tang dynasty. In the center of the photo, you can also find a contour of a giant stone, which is another heritage, shouting stone. see indicators here --CatOnMars (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Aman.shuklaa (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep & stop gaming. CatOnMars (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Error while uploading Elekes Andor (talk) 21:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC) Please delete only the injured file. The correct file 4.47 sec must not be deleted. --Elekes Andor (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the apparently defective first file version, per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
There’s no indication that the website has made the image available under CC 4.0 license. Frankie talk 21:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
The owner of this photo has been banned banned from Wikimedia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:%D7%99%D7%A2%D7%9C_%D7%99 Several photos uploaded by the user have already been deleted for copyright violation 84.228.75.181 16:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep Nominator had withdrawn his DR, see Special:Diff/736471407.--A09 (talk) 20:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
It's a derivative work of the historical photograph that is uploaded as taken in 2001 by the uploader. Permission is needed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- As i mentioned, in another uploaded photo, this photo is created on base of the another ver old photo too, with bad quality, so i make a significant changes, clean it up and make looks normal, as "modern", so what's the problem ? Why it's should be deleted, if now, its absloutely another photo ? OleksiiKomapniyets (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Затем, что не вы автор. Lesless (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: blatant copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
It's a derivative work of the historical photograph that is uploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- This photo is created on base of the another ver old photo, with bad quality, so i make a significant changes, clean it up and make looks normal, as "modern", so what's the problem ? Why it's should be deleted, if now, its absloutely another photo ? OleksiiKomapniyets (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: blatant copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
bad quality crop and this is not Julia Kern ... Sandro Halank (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
She is not Julia Kern. It was my mistake Leonprimer (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Marcus Cyron. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Christoph Steinweg) M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo
- und mea culpa! Natürlich ist das Foto von Chris Steinweg, einem ganz formidablen Münsteraner Fotografen. Ich wollte mir auch wirklich nicht die individuellen Rechte daran anmaßen, aber ich habe keine andere Möglichkeit zum Upload gefunden als mit Bestätigung, "dass ich das Urheberrecht für diese Datei besitze". Ich war der Meinung, dass das insofern auch korrekt (oder zumindest problemlos) ist, weil alle Bilder auf der Website des Theaters gemäß Hinweis auf www.f-und-g.de/presse gemeinfrei sind, also frei von persönlichen Rechten. Somit auch dieses Bildmotiv, da ich von der Unterseite www.f-und-g.de/fundus/frlbecker/szenenbilder_fundus heruntergeladen habe.
- Ich bitte aufgrund der freien Verfügbarkeit auf die Löschung zu verzichten - danke! polfux Polfux (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Zeha Schröder.jpg” under ticket:2023022810009339. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 07:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, not notable. Photo used for crosswiki selfpromotion only. Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal file. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cummen2020a (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-quality COM:PENIS.
- File:Cummen2020 my dick befor subincision.jpg
- File:Cummen2020 Im WANKER.jpg
- File:Cummen2020 dick befor subincision.jpg
- File:IMG E3335(1)CUMMEN22020.jpg
- File:IMG 3338(1) CUMMEN2020.jpg
- File:IMG 3336(1)CUMMEN2020.jpg
RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete borders on vandalism with names like “Im [sic] WANKER” Dronebogus (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (design by Rosa Maria Hille) M2k~dewiki (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (design by Rosa Maria Hille) M2k~dewiki (talk) 00:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism purposes discospinster (talk) 02:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism purposes discospinster (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism purposes discospinster (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism purposes discospinster (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
From the looks of this portrait photo it is certainly not self-photographed image of 8CHOLO (talk · contribs). Likely obtained from somewhere. As there are no results from both TinEye and reverse Google Images (via Google Lens), a normal deletion request is made. Small resolution. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCREENSHOT violation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
self promo on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by بهروز دهنادي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Varying sizes and quality, no metadata, some are of poor quality. Doubtful own work.
- File:A Sifu Shirouye hassanzadeh Grand master of iran.jpg
- File:A G sifu behruz dehnadi master of wing chon iran.jpg
- File:سي فو شيرويه حسن زاده، تنها نماينده و رئيس سازمان وينگ چون در ايران. مربي و داور بين المللي ووشو. ٧٧٩٣٠١٩٨.png
- File:Sifu sheroyeh hasanzadeh wing tsun EWTO iran grand master.jpg
- File:Sifu behruz dehnadi EWTO wing Tsun.jpg
- File:Sifu behruz dehnadi wing tsun EWTO.jpg
- File:Sifu sheroyeh hasanzadeh wing tsun EWTO iran grand master.png
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Varying sizes and quality, multiple cameras, doubtful own work.
- File:Grand master Shiroyeh Hassanzadeh Wing Tsun trainer in IRAN.jpg
- File:Seminar 1387 in niavaran park grand master hassanzadeh.jpg
- File:دفاع شخصی اموزش وینگ چون.jpg
- File:دفاع شخصی استاد دهنادی.jpg
- File:Sifu dehnadi Master of martial arts.jpg
- File:GYM Sifu Dehnadi.jpg
- File:Sifu Dehnadi EWTO.jpg
- File:سیفو بهروز دهنادی دفاع شخصی.jpg
- File:سیفو بهروز دهنادی وینگ چون.jpg
- File:Sifu Dehnadi wing chun.jpg
- File:Sifu Dehnadi wing tsun.jpg
- File:Grand master shiruyeh hasanzadeh wing tsun EWTO.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
File:HK Mid-levels 上亞厘畢道 Upper Albert Road Bus stop ads Tom Cruise 鬼影約章 Chost Protocol Dec-2011.jpg
[edit]No FOP in Hong Kong for the poster which can't be considered as DM in this picture. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination --Lukas Beck (talk) 08:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of an artwork. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Per exif, this is a screenshot, permission needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
File:American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan, New York City, United States of America (9860410525).jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Model of Dunkleosteus terrelli (fossil placoderm) (Late Devonian; Cleveland, Ohio, USA) 9 (33845441810).jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (© Thomas Victor) M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- The photo belongs to Die Damen und Herren Daffke and they have all the rights for usage as long as the Copyright by Thomas Victor is mentioned, which is the case here. 188.108.173.62 10:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Schleich toy. FunkMonk (talk) 14:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Photo 2D artwork with no contextual information, most likely not freely licenced originally. FunkMonk (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC) FunkMonk (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Google Maps screenshot; copyrighted material Mindmatrix 15:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Google Maps screenshot; copyrighted material Mindmatrix 15:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- What does "no edit summary" mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Greenberg (talk • contribs) 17:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian/not notable person: OoS --Alaa :)..! 16:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Early to mid 20th Century American photograph that was published in a 1952 book. Book would have to be checked for non-renewal. If it was renewed, undelete in 2048. Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Turkey, Iran, Syria and Iraq's borders are not correct. This map is for making propaganda of some ideologies. Useless and needs to be delete. Kadı Message 19:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Turkey, Iran, Syria and Iraq's borders are not correct. This map is for making propaganda of some ideologies. Useless and needs to be delete. Kadı Message 19:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, you are right but Kurdish Wikipedia has problems about neutrality. This map is wrong, that's why I nominated it. Kadı Message 06:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Those are not deletion reasons. Are you, as a Commons administrator, unfamiliar with Commons' deletion policies? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Turkey, Iran, Syria and Iraq's borders are not correct. This map is for making propaganda of some ideologies. Useless and needs to be delete. Kadı Message 19:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Of course you're right about the borders, but the image is in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, In use but Kurdish Wikipedia has problems with neutrality. Maybe, notifying the foundation will be needed about this issue. We couldn't have wrong maps here. Kadı Message 06:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- You know that inaccuracy is not a deletion reason. COM:INUSE is the commanding policy, so there is no "in use, but" unless what follows the "but" is copyright violation or some other superseding policy violation. And I don't think this group of deletion requests shows your neutrality in regard to the Kurds and Kurdistan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Kurdistan is a geocultural area. It is not a country so this map is inappropriate. Kadı Message 19:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE photo of a non-notable individual - ro:Alexandru Mușătoiu. Gikü (talk) 19:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian/not notable person: OoS --Alaa :)..! 19:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Turkey, Iran, Syria and Iraq's borders are not correct. This map is for making propaganda of some ideologies. Useless and needs to be delete. Kadı Message 19:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Turkey, Iran, Syria and Iraq's borders are not correct. This map is for making propaganda of some ideologies. Useless and needs to be deleted. Kadı Message 19:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Kurdistan is a multi-national region. Isn't it inappropriate for you, as an admin, to be on a crusade against all maps of Kurdistan, including a bunch of files that are in use? (This one is not but could be useful.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, I nominated only these ones. I know it is a geocultural area, and I will not nominate all of them. But these maps shows it like a country. This is inappropriate. Kadı Message 06:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- What's inappropriate is to request deletion of files in use, and this series of DRs falls into an obvious pattern that shows your bias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, it is not currently in use. If I were biased, I would nominate all files. As an administrator I can not be biased, I abide by the policies in every process. Regards, Kadı Message 08:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- It was in use when you nominated it, as you know, and showing the borders of Kurdistan is useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- What's inappropriate is to request deletion of files in use, and this series of DRs falls into an obvious pattern that shows your bias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, the person does not seem to be notable Jan Kameníček (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Not useful AI "art" Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: exceeds COM:TOO. This is a government work; however, {{PD-MAGov}} does not apply because that law only applies to works by the state government, not those by municipality governments. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 34
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Arcs de la Mosquée Hassan-II.jpg
- File:Hassan II Mosque - Grande Mosquée Hassan II.jpg
- File:Mosque Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco, 摩洺哥.jpg
- File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg
- File:Mosquée Hassan II -2.jpg
- File:Mustapha ennaimi - 23768064204.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 35
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Casablanca, Morocco (51256636929).jpg
- File:الدار البيضاء مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg
- File:جامع الحسن الثاني.jpg
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of an unknown teenager. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 01:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullah bin Ripon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another youtuber. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Abdullah bin Ripon 04.jpg
- File:Abdullah bin Ripon 03.jpg
- File:Abdullah bin Ripon 02.jpg
- File:Abdullah bin Ripon 01.jpg
- File:Abdullah bin Ripon.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 13:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
پرونده:لباس محلی بلوچی برتن مرد بلوچ.JPG گیشتر (talk) 07:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nonsense, picture was taken from a public place (street/sidewalk) and it is therefore covered by the Freedom of panorama rules of Germany (The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article § 59 of the German copyright law, which states that "It shall be permissible to reproduce, by painting, drawing, photography or cinematography, works which are permanently located on public ways, streets or places and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies. For works of architecture, this provision shall be applicable only to the external appearance." As with all other “limits of copyright by legally permitted uses”, no changes to the actual work are permitted under § 62 of the German copyright law (UrhG).) --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- KeepUnrelated reason for deletion request and I think it was user's mistake.--MehdiTalk 09:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
This should be deleted since it's essentially a needless, 1/1 copy of Category:Tasso (Graffitikünstler). Which isn't the point in gallery pages. Adamant1 (talk) 16:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Galleries should not be created if they merely duplicate the purpose of a category. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violence Mạnh An (talk) 12:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Promo photo with no EXIF, appears lower res on subject's social media at https://www.instagram.com/p/Cksi08MPkzF Belbury (talk) 08:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
This video does not appear to have an educational purpose, so does not fulfill the Commons:Project scope guideline. ZandDev (talk) 01:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
These images are taken from one of the anatomy atlases that are commonly used in the medical field (e.g. Gray's, Grant's, Netter's, etc), I'm just not sure which one exactly Bait30 pls ping me when you reply? 02:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
These images are taken from one of the anatomy atlases that are commonly used in the medical field (e.g. Gray's, Grant's, Netter's, etc), I'm just not sure which one exactly Bait30 pls ping me when you reply? 02:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JJMC89 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: book page - dubious claim of own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks likely old enough to be PD, anyway, and in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The first word should be corrected to "early," and since per w:Aesculapian Club the club was founded in 1773, this is probably an 18th-century document and almost certainly PD. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep When you scan a document, the derivative copy you make is your own work. A list of names is ineligible for copyright and I adjusted the license. --RAN (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hosting file. No uses. Αλέξης ο Μέγας (📢 | 📥) 04:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcquidditch as no permission (No permission since)
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
File:فروشگاه-فرش-و-تابلوفرش-شکوری-شکوری-کارپت-09380855900-09143525834-سرتیپ-شکوری-shakouricarpet.jpg
[edit]promotion and advertisement [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Advertising or self-promotion. --MehdiTalk 08:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 05:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 05:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 17:58, March 12, 2023, by Pi.1415926535 (Nonsense (G1)). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Probably an old enough picture to be in the public domain but we need more information Bedivere (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Fictional, out of scope N Panama 84534 05:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: description said: Immagine tratta dal sito www.cabia.net col permesso degli autori (Google Translate: "Image taken from the site www.cabia.net with the permission of the authors"). Insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This photos seems to come from some unknown source and similar to a gallery of photos found on Facebook ([1]). License claimed for these is doubtful. There's also several similar photos apparently of the same subject, from different uploaders:
- File:Nayak prasad singh नायक सिंह.jpg
- File:Nayak Prasad.jpg
- File:Bharatpura patna bihar, nayak prasad singh.jpg
—chaetodipus (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Varying quality, multiple cameras. File:Anthony Haden Guest Sharing Country New York 2017.jpg's EXIF credits "Elliot Goldstein" as the copyright holder and File:Adam Knight and Harry Triguboff.png is clearly a screenshot. Doubtful own work.
- File:Adam Knight and Rick Amor.jpg
- File:Adam Knight and GIna Rinehart.jpg
- File:Aboriginal Boys with Mazambique AFL Team.jpg
- File:Adam Knight and John McEnroe.jpg
- File:Adam Knight made Perpetual Benefactors 2012 Gold Coast Art Gallery.jpg
- File:Adam knight and former Premier Jeff Kennett.jpg
- File:Anthony Haden Guest Sharing Country New York 2017.jpg
- File:Adam Knight and Tommy Watson.jpg
- File:Adam Knight and Formula One driver Mark Webber.jpg
- File:Adam Knight and Queenie McKenzie.jpg
- File:Adam Knight with Clifford's family at the Clifford Possum opening Retrospective at the National Gallery of Victoria.jpg
- File:Adam Knight and former US Ambassador John Berry.jpg
- File:Ralph Willis, Rover Thomas at 1st Opening 1995 Knight's Indigenous art Gallery.jpg
- File:Adam Knight visiting Gabriella Possum Nungurrayi and her children (1994).jpg
- File:Adam Knight and Harry Triguboff.png
- File:Adam Knight & Johnny Waraangkula.tif
- File:Photo Ella Room ARU adam knight owned.jpg
- File:Fred Myers and Adam Knight at Adams Exhibition Sharing Country.jpg
- File:Prince Andrew at Bond Art Photo Adam Knight.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ajasonk --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, flag and coat of arms of a non notable fictional country.
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 08:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree AAAAA143222 (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE#Artwork without obvious educational use, coat of arms of a non notable fictional entity.
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 15:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JJMC89 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: book cover - dubious claim of own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. The depicted cover itself is below COM:TOO and GoogleImages and TinEye did not yield any hits. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD. This is the original minute book of the w:Aesculapian Club, which was founded in 1773. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, per {{PD-scan|PD-old-100-expired}}. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Túrelio and Ikan Kekek, shouldn’t the logo (File:Aesculsapean 3.tif) be undeleted then? It must be old as well. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, if it hasn't been changed for hundreds of years. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Apparently it hasn’t. [2] RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, if it hasn't been changed for hundreds of years. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
P199, would you mind undeleting File:Aesculsapean 3.tif. Best, RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @RodRabelo7: sorry, the proper procedure is to go to COM:UNDEL. That way it is discussed and documented why it was undeleted. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused, horrendous quality, replaced with File:Tateishi-sama,Katsushika,Tokyo.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 11:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet.CDrama500 (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. First found online in 2015, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Copy righted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 12:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scrrenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- مرحباً، هل من الممكن ان توضح سبب ترشيحك للصورة للحذف؟ شكراً Agiri mohammad (talk) 14:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use on userpage of active user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo used on her personal website https://www.billiejoporter.com/about/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Published online prior to upload to Commons, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: A copyright watermark can be seen on the bottom left CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo from a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Author will bild mit sich selber entfernen. Author wants to remove his own picture. Sunshine cali (talk) 13:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover or from this YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaNC8TB_yus CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No meaningful contributions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Marked as SD by B25es with the following rationale: “Out of scope: painting by the uploader, artist with no references in Google”. Should be discussed IMO. Does it have any educational value? RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Comment Apparently the user uploaded some paintings of File:Alein N. Gutiérrez Rabassa.jpg. I have no reason to believe the user is the artist. Therefore, they should be marked as no permission, am I correct? RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've googled Alein Gutiérrez Rabassa. No answer.
- As for De la serie escatopaisaje Óleo sobre lienzo70x100cm 2007, if we at least knew what is it about, (or who did it, as it seems it could be another person), it could have some educational valeu. Otherwise, it's just a painting about unknown made by unknown at an unknown time. Should any of those doubts be solved, it could fit in some category. For instance, if it could be stablished the it's a painting from a painter in Nepal, it could be used as an example of Nepali paintings. But we know nothing. I would be greatly thankful if the uploader took a couple of seconds to add some info about the file. B25es (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and not own work anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable person (only the first name), No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mandava suryakala
[edit]Low quality, self-created artworks that are unlikely to be educationally useful. --From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I second the proposal: to be deleted. B25es (talk) 10:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MelbourneStar as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 – Hoax: this is not a real flag. In my opinion this is hoax, but the file is used in Wikidata, so I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Because I noticed that there's a white line on the flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Fix the file and upload the corrected version on the same page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MelbourneStar as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 – Hoax: this is not a real flag. In my opinion the flag is a hoax, but as it was kept after regular DR, I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake CW2468 (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
ในนามเจ้าของภาพ ต้องการนำภาพไปเผยแพร่ที่อื่น จึงต้องการลบออกจากคอมมอนส์ -Formcruz (talk) 15:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Don't see much educational potential for this file; clearly replaceable with text and out of COM:SCOPE. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. To be deleted. B25es (talk) 10:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Full duplicate of File:Homyakovo (6991447366).jpg Michgrig (talk) 16:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary, later duplicate of File:Kuusela Hungary 1952.jpg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 16:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
no proof the user have rights to upload this here Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, uploaded in bad faith. Frank | discuss 17:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope images, possibly promotional activity for new artists. The uploaded uploads this kind of different images without Exif data or edited Exif data. Nahid Hossain (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Yahya (talk) 13:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree AAAAA143222 (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
fork File:Ss433 art big.gif, not own work (NASA) Lesless (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This is a fake logo, made up in the style of the 2016 Mastercard rebrand. Alas, as shown in the Wikipedia article for Mondex, the Mondex system fell out of use in all regions by 2008, at the latest. This logo is constantly being edited into articles in various languages, and it can cause misinformation and confusion. It serves no purpose being on Commons being a dream logo and causes more harm than good since editors have to edit it out of articles... Matan2001 (talk) 18:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian/not notable person: OoS --Alaa :)..! 19:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded for self-promotion Schniggendiller (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- … in w:de:David Krasavice (already deleted). --Schniggendiller (talk) 21:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_2019.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Late_Devonian;_Cleveland,_Ohio,_USA)_9_(33845441810).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![151 File:סמל מחלקת מעל"ח (מערכות לחימה).jpg](#File:סמל_מחלקת_מעל"ח_(מערכות_לחימה).jpg){kind=link}
_-_DPLA_-_b440013659785e028c43701688d28c5a_(page_44).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_2019.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2019.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2019.jpg){kind=link}
_2019.jpg){kind=link}
_2019.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
CUMMEN22020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_CUMMEN2020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
CUMMEN2020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(Late_Devonian;_Cleveland,_Ohio,_USA)_9_(33845441810).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Late_Devonian;_Cleveland,_Ohio,_USA)_9_(33845441810).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561659860).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15746509615).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aesculapian_Club_Member_List_1895.png){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
-20231125035800-File:David_Krasavice_Pussy_Power_Projekt.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-20231125041100-File:David_Krasavice_Pussy_Power_Projekt.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603761440.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603163287.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118056009.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118056593.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118056427.jpg){kind=link}
_Sinaloa.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118058571.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603166835.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603746416.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603767696.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603746904.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by El Nuevo Doge (talk · contribs)
[edit]Violations of COM:FOP US. Copyrighted 3D works, 2D works, packaging, etc. Some also featuring copyrighted characters
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639760692).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639760146).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759720).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759298).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638655343).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639758374).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638654621).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639757572).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639757088).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639756678).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638652883).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639755700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638649147).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648319).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639751128).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638647293).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639749706).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639749118).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638645065).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638644613).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639747600).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638643667).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639746590).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639746092).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639745516).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638641581).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638640977).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639743798).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639743254).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639742762).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639742284).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638638381).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639741256).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639740770).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638636965).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638636097).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639738802).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638634927).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638634403).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639737242).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639736700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639736296).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639735728).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639735046).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638630493).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638626289).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638626757).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639727328).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639724244).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639725170).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639724700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639723792).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639722928).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639723364).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639721700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639721258).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638616959).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639720854).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638616467).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638615677).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638615313).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639718492).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638614823).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638614437).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638613033).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638613615).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639713528).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638605959).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639709932).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638605411).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639708116).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638603953).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638602301).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639706746).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639707636).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639706070).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638601541).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638600523).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639704280).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638599881).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639702080).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639699974).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639702502).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638597391).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638598321).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639701086).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639698812).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639698050).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(Oinkers42) (talk) 20:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759720).jpg Is a simple utilitarian object without any artistic merit and the head is completely de minimis, also File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg the packaging has an ivalid copyright notice due to the lack of year in the claim so it is public domain. El Nuevo Doge (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am unconvinced about the first of the two; simple design but Disney character.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- Keep File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg as {{PD-US-defective notice}}, though for safety I suggest cropping out the cardboard box (as all sides of the box are not visible, the possiblity of a valid notice on a side not seen cannot be ruled out); the toy guitar seems ok. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is still a derivative work, no matter how bad license requirements are on Ebay. This is Wikimedia Commons. A09 (talk) 22:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have Delted what I think are the obvious cases. Some of the remaining ones there might be some argument at being out of copyright for lack of compliance with the old US copyright laws - however as Disney was generally fastidious about copyright and remains litigious in protection of their properties, unless a strong case can be made about images individually, I and precaution favor Delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; kept those believed more general. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Not the user's own work. Source: https://www.google.com/search?q=Arianagodoy&sxsrf=AJOqlzV4KbWvAA6Am7EtrADcl8tiLunhmA:1677450228831&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj_-JGInbT9AhWZ_7sIHXYGB6AQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw#imgrc=M8F26Xz4B8s_GM Brunnaiz (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: EXIF Copyright holder simonecargnoni.com. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- this photograph was taken by me personally. GuardiamarinaVeneziano (talk) 15:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- years ago the image was uploaded to my website www.simonecargnoni.com but later removed from it.--GuardiamarinaVeneziano (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Copied above from talk. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. If really own work, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is an IDF symbol without any authorization. Euro know (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
![14:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/02/26#c-Euro_know-20230226141000-File:סמל_מחלקת_מעל"ח_(מערכות_לחימה).jpg){kind=link}
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:סמל ויקיפדיה.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2023032310011388. -- Geagea (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:סמל מחלקת מעל"ח (מערכות לחימה).jpg” under ticket:2023032310011388. -- Geagea (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT. -- Geagea (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
![21:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/02/26#c-Geagea-20230323212200-File:סמל_מחלקת_מעל"ח_(מערכות_לחימה).jpg){kind=link}
PNG files are generally not own work, other than the fact that this person may not be in scope. 191.126.1.245 16:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In use at en:Draft:Joseph Sokol. --Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I am the requester of the deletion. The photo is verifiably own work. I initially made the deletion request because I could not rename the photo. However, since then I have successfully been able to request a rename. The photo has been renamed. There is no longer a need for the photo to be deleted. Please remove this Deletion Request. Relspas (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Relspas: The nominator has requested deletion for other reasons. One, they doubt that you are the actual photographer of this photo and suggest that it is in fact a copyright violation. Given the fact that the photo is apparently available at LinkedIn in high resolution, one might be inclined to agree. If the photo is "verifiably" (your) "own work" as you say, you should be able to confirm this by sending a permission by e-mail per the COM:VRT procedure. Second, the nominator apparently thinks that Joseph Sokol is not notable enough for us to host his photo. I don't (yet) have an opinion about that. --Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: I am not the photographer, but have express permission from Joseph Sokol (the owner of the photo) to publish this cropped version (and no other version of the photo) under the CC license for public use. He made expressly clear that the full size image is not to be put under the CC license. I labeled own work because I was given permission from the owner of photo (maybe that was incorrect usage of "own work"). Please explain best way to proceed -- possibly relabel photo with "permission granted from owner"? Relspas (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- The only possible way to resolve this is if the photographer (or rights owner of the photo) sends a permission by e-mail per the COM:VRT procedure, as mentioned above. A simple claim like "permission granted from owner" won't be accepted. --Rosenzweig τ 06:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Email sent following COM:VRT procedure. {Permission pending} template used on main photo page. Relspas (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- The only possible way to resolve this is if the photographer (or rights owner of the photo) sends a permission by e-mail per the COM:VRT procedure, as mentioned above. A simple claim like "permission granted from owner" won't be accepted. --Rosenzweig τ 06:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: I am not the photographer, but have express permission from Joseph Sokol (the owner of the photo) to publish this cropped version (and no other version of the photo) under the CC license for public use. He made expressly clear that the full size image is not to be put under the CC license. I labeled own work because I was given permission from the owner of photo (maybe that was incorrect usage of "own work"). Please explain best way to proceed -- possibly relabel photo with "permission granted from owner"? Relspas (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Relspas: The nominator has requested deletion for other reasons. One, they doubt that you are the actual photographer of this photo and suggest that it is in fact a copyright violation. Given the fact that the photo is apparently available at LinkedIn in high resolution, one might be inclined to agree. If the photo is "verifiably" (your) "own work" as you say, you should be able to confirm this by sending a permission by e-mail per the COM:VRT procedure. Second, the nominator apparently thinks that Joseph Sokol is not notable enough for us to host his photo. I don't (yet) have an opinion about that. --Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I am the requester of the deletion. The photo is verifiably own work. I initially made the deletion request because I could not rename the photo. However, since then I have successfully been able to request a rename. The photo has been renamed. There is no longer a need for the photo to be deleted. Please remove this Deletion Request. Relspas (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023022810004531 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 03:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speaking with Sokol, he decided not to proceed with COM:VRT procedure because of difficulty finding who the photographer was (who according to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org holds the copyright). He recommends deleting the photo instead. Relspas (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 10:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Doubts avbout the video copyrights CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Bild wurde durch ein neues Werk ersetzt - neues Foto mit deutlich homogeneren Hintergrund. Das alte Foto zeigt einen deutlich veränderten Originalzustand ohne Sonnenblenden und entspricht daher nicht dem Original. (Neues Foto: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Signalbau_Huber_M%C3%BCnchen_K.G._Fu%C3%9Fg%C3%A4ngerampel.jpg ) Ampelseite (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Ein neues Foto ist kein Grund ein Altes zu löschen. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for three-dimensional works of sculpture in the United States. This sculpture was only unveiled in 2015 and the author is still alive, and thus it is not PD. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for three-dimensional works of sculpture in the United States. This sculpture was only unveiled in 2015 and the author is still alive, and thus it is not PD. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment DO NOT RESTORE! Outright copyvio: seen on file log is the site [3]. Per [4], "You agree not to copy, reproduce, publish, transmit, distribute, perform, sell, create derivative works of, or in any way exploit, the Sites, Services, Marks or Content, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent or TIME." _ (non-admin comment) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDITY Lukas Beck (talk) 13:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 01:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDITY Lukas Beck (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 01:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDITY Lukas Beck (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 01:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Md.Farhan Mahmud as Speedy (Db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author. Too old for G7, so converting to DR. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Design of text is possibly above TOO --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Seems like a simple enough textlogo to me, but do you know any relevant case law that would suggest that this is too complex to be PD under U.S. law? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: too simple for copyright. ✗plicit 01:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDITY Lukas Beck (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We need different colors and sizes and ethnicities to avoid selection bias. The category is overrepresented by Caucasian and shaved. If your upset by the filename, change it. --RAN (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Non of these information are given in the file describtion. Without these information the file is useless in points of size or ethnicities. Lukas Beck (talk) 08:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete How many vaginas we need to avoid bias? We already had hundreds of them. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I don’t see what’s so great here
- Dronebogus (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep high quality--Trade (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: deleted by Red-tailed hawk. --Kadı Message 23:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDITY Lukas Beck (talk) 13:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this, btw please bundle nominate extremely similar images in the future Dronebogus (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review, I will take a look on it in the future. Lukas Beck (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: deleted by Red-tailed hawk. --Kadı Message 23:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDITY Lukas Beck (talk) 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Mobile upload! I think this guy goes to prostitution centers with the cellphone at hand. Delete. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality vagina photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Red-Tailed Hawk. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7. In use on bewikisource; those should be taken care of before deleting it here. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- There is problem in copyright of illustrator. I will reload it with deleted illustrations. Gleb Leo (talk) 19:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The first file version with the offending artwork by be:Анатоль Мікалаевіч Тычына (died in 1986) was already deleted by Túrelio. It can be restored in 2057. --Rosenzweig τ 20:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
A drawing based on a photo found in Figure 7, page 4 of: Monk, Janice. “Presidential Address: Women, Gender, and the Histories of American Geography.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94, no. 1 (2004): 1–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694065. The photo is credited to the "American Geographical Society Archives, New York". Note the exact similarities in the eyes, hair, ears, mouth, and pose. Veggies (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Although I see no clear evidence that the drawing is derived from this, i want to add that the original article was published in is an article published in 1907 so the photograph was taken before that. On can reasonnably assume it is in the public domain. Hyruspex (talk) Hyruspex (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- source : https://update.lib.berkeley.edu/tag/martha-krug-genthe/ Hyruspex (talk) Hyruspex (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- This argument seems to me to be enough to say that this image has its place on Commons. Of course it would be ideal to be able to recover the original photo but that's another subject. Alacoolwiki (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- User:Hyruspex: What is this link for? Am I supposed to see something relevant here? -- Veggies (talk) 23:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes the date of the event where Martha Krug was actually photographed "In December 1904, American geographers gathered in Philadelphia to launch a new professional society, the Association of American Geographers (AAG)."Hyruspex (talk) 08:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- How do you know that that was when the photo was taken? It doesn't say anything about any pictures and there are no photos on that article. -- Veggies (talk) 21:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes the date of the event where Martha Krug was actually photographed "In December 1904, American geographers gathered in Philadelphia to launch a new professional society, the Association of American Geographers (AAG)."Hyruspex (talk) 08:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- source : https://update.lib.berkeley.edu/tag/martha-krug-genthe/ Hyruspex (talk) Hyruspex (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The original photograph that was republished in that 2004 article was definitely published before 1928. The subject was born in 1871 and this was definitely taken before World War 1 based on the clothing and that the sitter looks to be in her thirties or early forties. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO Australia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Seems above the ToO in Australia. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
_-_DPLA_-_b440013659785e028c43701688d28c5a_(page_44).jpg){kind=link}
_-_DPLA_-_b440013659785e028c43701688d28c5a_(page_44).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted material from 1945. The license states: "This media file is in the public domain in the United States. This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1928" I think this image must be deleted. 77.7.53.10 08:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
_-_DPLA_-_b440013659785e028c43701688d28c5a_(page_44).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep One page from a 1945 US college yearbook that was completely uploaded to Commons by a bot (the other pages can be found by substituting the page 44 part of the file name with other page numbers). The whole yearbook can also be seen at [5]. From what I see, there is no copyright notice in it (which would be common for a yearbook from that time), so {{PD-US-no notice}} would apply. --Rosenzweig τ 13:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- as I thought, the license we use now ({{PD-US}} = "...prior to January 1, 1928") is just wrong. Thanks for that information. --95.118.36.193 15:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Rosenzweig. I'll fix the license to be more specific. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
_-_DPLA_-_b440013659785e028c43701688d28c5a_(page_44).jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded by a sock who claims to own the copyright. Seems extremely unlikely as the virtually identical image was uploaded to English Wikipedia as a fair use logo.. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Condorito_logo.png and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Condoritofan2012 Meters (talk) 04:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per COM:PCP. Chile's ToO could be low. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Any evidence for the claim "selfpublished"? Gunner Poulsen =/ Bertil Mortensen. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: only hits on TinEye are Wikimedia hits and this was uploaded in 2005. The uploader's talk page says Mortensen is his local politician and I think we AGF here. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep it’s salvageable; it’s taken at a good angle on a white background and is well lit. This seems like a genuine contribution rather than “[grabs phone and drops pants] look at my dick, there are many like it but this one is mine” Dronebogus (talk) 07:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Dronebogus. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused, horrendous quality, replaced with File:Tateishi-sama,Katsushika,Tokyo.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Commons:INUSE on French Wikipedia. However, even if all uses are converted to the 2017 version, retention of the 2005 version provides a contrast on how the location changed (or not) in 12 years. From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: File Is In Use. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in 2000. No Permission from the sculptor Петро Головчак and architect Богдан Гром’як. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Господи, навіть не здогадувався, що така колізія існує. Будьте добрі, роз‘ясніть мені, будь ласка, чи є спосіб законно завантажити фотографію будівлі, не звертаючись до архітекторів? Belcher.Jr (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Нема. І тут навіть не так сама будівля (вона загалом не надто оригінальна архітектурно), як скульптури атлантів. Тож дозвіл треба і від архітектора(-ів) і від скульптора. Але якщо ви працівник ЗУНУ, запитайте в керівництва щодо цього. Раджу порадитися також з диретором бібліотеки ЗУНУ, він багато тямить у Вікіправилах. Можливо, архітектори та скульптори при оплаті за проєкт передали авторські права на виш. Тоді треба дозвіл від університету. Така ж ситуація щодо неСвободи панорами є і з головним (адміністративним) корпусом ЗУНУ на Львівській. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Або фотографувати здалеку і так, щоб дерева перекривали атлантів та архітектурні особливости :) Як ось тут є кілька таких файлів. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Мабуть, поки використаю щось з наявного. Дякую, пане Миколо! Belcher.Jr (talk) 11:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Sculptures appear to be de minimis to me, but the building is still copyrighted and there is no FoP in Ukraine. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The Cleveland Metroparks operates the nature center where this image was taken. The Metroparks is a legal entity of the State of Ohio. Thus, technically, it is a state or public museum. I have sent a request to the Metroparks for clarification of their copyright expectations. My research has found several art museums that release personal images for general use (educational and teaching purposes-of the museum) under the Creative Commons [CC-BY-SA] use agreement. I will update this deletion request when I receive an answer. Chris Light (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. even if the sculptor was a Ohio state employee, they'd also still have a copyright since Ohio doesn't automatically release their works to the public domain. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the US, and this is in a private museum anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 14:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Private museum is neither here nor there, though I presume the Dunkleosteus is a sculpture, in which case, yes, Delete. - Jmabel ! talk 17:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The Cleveland Metroparks operates the nature center where this image was taken. The Metroparks is a legal entity of the State of Ohio. Thus, technically, it is a state or public museum. I have sent a request to the Metroparks for clarification of their copyright expectations. My research has found several art museums that release personal images for general use (educational and teaching purposes-of the museum) under the Creative Commons [CC-BY-SA] use agreement. I will update this deletion request when I receive an answer. Chris Light (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Would need VRT from sculptor or copyright holder. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Trustyeditor
[edit]- File:Shinagawa Tokyo.jpg
- File:NIKONOS WHITE 1963.jpg
- File:NIKONOS Collection.jpg
- File:Nikon S3M S250 and C Battery Pack.jpg
- File:Nikon S3M and S250.jpg
- File:Nikon S3M and Nikon S Black.jpg
- File:Nikon S3M 1960.jpg
- File:Nikon S Black 1951.jpg
- File:Nikon Museum.jpg
- File:Nikon Museum Special Collection.jpg
- File:Nikon Headquarters.jpg
- File:Nikon FM Gold 1977.jpg
- File:Nikon F50 Gold 1997.jpg
- File:Nikon F2 750 1976.jpg
- File:Japanese Old Vintage Collection.jpg
- File:Important Cultural Property Japan.jpg
- File:Calypso PHOT 1961.jpg
- File:1.5 m Rangefinder 1936.jpg
- File:CALYPSO or NIKKOR 1968.jpg
Uploader claims CC-SA license, but I couldn't find indication of CC-SA license in the source, which is copyrighted. --Fukumoto (talk) 07:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I also could not find a Creative Commons license at source. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Proposed flags of Crimea
[edit]According Ukarinian copyright law, project of official symbols are copyrighted until adoption.
- File:Flag of Crimea, proposal -2.GIF
- File:Flag of Crimea, proposal 1.svg
- File:Flag of Crimea, proposal 2.svg
- File:Flag of Crimea, proposal 3.svg
- File:Flag of Crimea, proposal 4.svg
- File:Flag of Crimea, proposal 5.svg
- File:Flag of Crimea, rejected proposal.svg
Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- All but proposal 5 are a clear case of {{PD-ineligible}} and should be marked as such. It might also be the case with 5, but one needs to investigate the copyright status of that coat of arms. I have concerns about File:Flag of Crimea, rejected proposal.svg though as the source seems to contain some different projection of map of Crimea, so it is possible that this is a version that has never existed (but I guess it gives some idea to the reader so still has educational value). --Base (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Proposal 5 had a coat of arms from 1992 so that was deleted, the rest are below the ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
I don't understand, the author and source are clearly indicated in the template. What's the problem? GJo (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm referring to this request: [6].—GJo (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AAltamura-Stemma.png&diff=735923199&oldid=484359142){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
HDP is a political party of Turkey. So, they can not be elected in Iraq, Iran and Syria. This map is not correct. It is useless. Needs to be deleted. Kadı Message 18:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - HDP is a political party in Turkiye. There is no need to show the party on a completely different map. Kurmanbek 💬 19:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Please stop requesting the deletion of images that are in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, this map is not correct. Kurdish Wikipedia has problems with neutrality. HDP is a political party of Grand National Assembly of Turkey. Jeocultural area of Kurdistan is irrelevant with HDP. Kadı Message 06:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Start a thread on the file's talk page and stop withdraw this inappropriate, waste-of-time deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, It is not in use right now. Kadı Message 18:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Did you remove it? Anyway, I won't change my vote. It's a useful map. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Why would it be useful? The territory of a sovereign state appears to be formally merged with another piece of land. It's a very difficult situation politically. Kurmanbek 💬 14:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you don't think showing the shape of Kurdistan is useful, you are not looking at things purely in terms of information. You have to remember that Commons does not take sides in disputes. If we did, we wouldn't host any photos of any genocidal or mass-murdering regimes such as those of Hitler and Stalin, but of course we do, because we are providing information. Argue against the existence or shape of Kurdistan elsewhere, if that's what you'd like to do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Did you remove it? Anyway, I won't change my vote. It's a useful map. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Start a thread on the file's talk page and stop withdraw this inappropriate, waste-of-time deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In Use by Kurdish Wikipedia. Discussion of it violating NPOV has to made at Kurdish Wikipedia not here. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Per the Copyright Notice at The Satanic Temple's website (https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/legal-notices), this logo is under full copyright. Nominated for deletion rather than speedy in case the logo was previously released under a copyleft license. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Gosh, I don't seem to have an active log-in on Commons. Anyhow: I've contacted the Satanic Temple and brought this to their attention. Let's hope an emissary of Hell will arise from the nether depths and settle the use of their logo on WP. I included a link to this deletion request, so let's see if they adapt their license for use on WP. 217.22.141.45 09:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. A copyleft release does feel like something they would do, but without anything explicit we can't do anything. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a real own work, uploaded by an accidental user. See global contributions... 191.126.170.180 22:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Low quality photograph, COM:Vagina. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alan Turing
[edit]The photographer of this 1928 photograph of Alan Turing, taken in Sherborne, Dorset, England where he went to school at the time, is claimed to be unknown. But that is not true, it's a photographer named Chaffin from Sherborne, see [7] ("Chaffin" at the lower left of the photo), [8] (page 4) and also en:Talk:Alan Turing/Archive 4#May a photo of Christopher Morcom be added? with more sources and details. That would be a photographer from Sherborne photo studio W. M. Chaffin & Sons. There were several photographers from that family working in that studio. Eliminating those that died before 1928, we are left with two photographers possibly active in 1928: William Matthew Chaffin Jr (1861-1937), son of the studio's founder also named William Matthew Chaffin, and his son Arthur Reginald Chaffin (1893-1954). I've corroborated the death years of both with Ancestry.
We don't know for certain which of the two took the photo, William Matthew Junior (aged 67 at the time) or Arthur Reginald (aged 35). The possibility that it was the latter is rather high in my opinion, so per COM:PCP, there is significant doubt about the freedom of this photograph.
Also, the US copyright of a 1928 British photograph was restored by the URAA, so the photograph is still protected in the US until the end of 2023.
Given these circumstances, the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2025 when both UK and US copyrights should have expired.
- File:Alan Turing Age 16 Colorized.jpg
- File:Alan Turing Aged 16 (cropped).jpg
- File:Alan Turing Aged 16.jpg
- File:Alan Turing at age 16, colorized.jpg
- File:Alan Turing at age 16.jpg
- File:Berliner CSD 2012 by andreas tw - 02.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 17:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It appears that we have two possibilities and Rosenzweig has chosen the youngest person so that the image is still under copyright, and ignored the older so that the image is in the public domain. If we don't know which of the two, or an unnamed third assistant, it would still be anonymous. I don't think we should delete based on a coin flip. --RAN (talk) 00:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- This situation means that there is significant doubt, and COM:PCP says delete in such a case. Plus there's the URAA issue which you did not address at all in your statement. --Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- A coin toss is 50/50, maybe 51% would be more significant than 50%. --RAN (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Of course 51 is more than 50, but 50 is already significant enough. We now have the info from the school archive btw which says that that the photo was "most probably" taken by the son, so the younger of the two. And you still did not address the URAA issue at all. --Rosenzweig τ 11:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- A coin toss is 50/50, maybe 51% would be more significant than 50%. --RAN (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- This situation means that there is significant doubt, and COM:PCP says delete in such a case. Plus there's the URAA issue which you did not address at all in your statement. --Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP and URAA. Unless those who want these to kept can show evidence that the elder Chaffin is the photographer rather than the younger one, then we could restore this next year. If the authorship is 50/50 chance of still being under copyright in the UK, it is sensible that we assume that the younger one is the photographer. And even if this were anonymous which it isn't, it would have still been restored by URAA because 1999 is after 1996. Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The Alan Turing file was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2015 but the verdict was to keep. Do we really need to renominate previously adjudicated files? -- WikiPedant (talk)
- Yes, if circumstances have changed like in this case. The previous DR did not mention the photographer Chaffin at all and was closed as PD-UK-unknown looks fine. But as demonstrated, the photographer is not unknown. --Rosenzweig τ 19:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment OK, this is embarrassing, but I actually haven't contacted the school archivist yet like I promised in en:Talk:Alan Turing/Archive 4#May a photo of Christopher Morcom be added?. I just sent them a message using this link: [9]. I've been meaning to send a message, but I kept putting it off. I promise I'll keep you all updated if there's any replies. FunnyMath (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I got a response, and I replied back. Still waiting on another response. FunnyMath (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Before I forget, I just want to apologize for my huge procrastination. It's unacceptable and I won't keep people waiting for that long anymore. I'll stick more strongly to my promises from now on. FunnyMath (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I got a response. I replied back asking for permission to forward their email to a trusted volunteer.
- @Rosenzweig: What email address would I forward this email to once I have their permission? FunnyMath (talk) 11:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Before I forget, I just want to apologize for my huge procrastination. It's unacceptable and I won't keep people waiting for that long anymore. I'll stick more strongly to my promises from now on. FunnyMath (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I got a response, and I replied back. Still waiting on another response. FunnyMath (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- @FunnyMath: You would not forward it at all, because forwarded e-mails are not accepted as permissions (apparently there was too much misunderstanding and abuse in the past). Instead, such an e-mail should be sent directly by the one giving the permission to the address named at the COM:VRT page (see there for details, the text that should be used etc.) There's also an "interactive release generator" there (COM:VRT/CONSENT). Regards --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- OK, got it. FunnyMath (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- @FunnyMath: You would not forward it at all, because forwarded e-mails are not accepted as permissions (apparently there was too much misunderstanding and abuse in the past). Instead, such an e-mail should be sent directly by the one giving the permission to the address named at the COM:VRT page (see there for details, the text that should be used etc.) There's also an "interactive release generator" there (COM:VRT/CONSENT). Regards --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I got permission to make the email public. I also asked for information about a photo of Christopher Morcom, which is unrelated to the deletion discussion:
Dear [Name omitted]
This is what I have managed to ascertain about both the Alan Turing and the Christopher Morcom photographs:
Photograph of Alan Turing taken by Chaffin of Sherborne in 1928.
The photograph would have been taken by either William Matthew Chaffin (1861-1937) or his son Arthur Reginald Chaffin (1893-1954), but most probably by the latter. Arthur Reginald Chaffin died on 24 June 1954 at South Street, Sherborne, aged 60. We cannot prove that the photograph was commissioned by Alan Turing, though this seems likely.
The photograph was first published in 1959 in Sara Turing’s Alan M. Turing (Cambridge, Heffer & Sons Ltd., 1959) with the caption ‘Alan at Sherborne School. Aged 16. Photograph by Chaffin, Sherborne. (Copyright).’
The photograph (signed ‘Chaffin, Sherborne’ and ‘Alan M. Turing’) was part of a collection of material given to Sherborne School by Alan’s mother, Mrs Ethel Sara Turing, between October 1965 and 1967 (Accession no. 2011/006) and is held in the Sherborne School Archives.
Photograph of Christopher Morcom cropped from the Upper 5th form group photograph taken in 1927.
There is no photographer’s name on the Upper 5th form photograph, which includes Christopher Morcom, but it was probably taken by William Matthew Chaffin (1861-1937) or his son Arthur Reginald Chaffin (1893-1954), but most probably by the latter. Arthur Reginald Chaffin died on 24 June 1954 at South Street, Sherborne, aged 60. We cannot prove that the photograph was commissioned by Sherborne School but because the Upper 5th form photograph was taken annually this seems very likely. Copies would have been made available for purchase by the boys and staff at Sherborne School.
The photograph is contained in an album of Upper 5th form photographs for the years 1919 to 1945 held in the Sherborne School Archives.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
[Name omitted]
- This is from the Sherborne School Archives. FunnyMath (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- So ... some more details, but nothing really important we did not already know. Specifically, they do not know which of the two Chaffins took the Turing photo. But since the situation is the same for the photo of C. Morcom, that one should be safe for Wikimedia Commons in 2025, just as the Turing photo. Thank you for asking them. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 12:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Just to confirm, would it be necessary to confirm the authenticity of the email with VRTS? FunnyMath (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think so, not for the Turing photo, all relevant information was already there. Only if you want to really make sure for the Morcom photo that the "photographer = one of two Chaffins" information (relevant for copyright) is officially documented somehow. --Rosenzweig τ 14:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I see. I asked the archivist to send a copy of the email to VRTS, but they might not be willing to do that. Either way, it should be admissible evidence in that case. FunnyMath (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I inadvertently caused this lengthy and detailed discussion about three years ago when I made what I thought to be an innocuous request. Since Mr. Morcom was warranted to rate his own subsection on Mr. Turing’s Wikipedia article due solely to his youthful association with Mr. Turing, I asked if a photograph of him could be added to his subsection. I also pointed out a photo of him cropped from a group school photo that I found online and asked if someone with more tech skills than myself (i.e., almost any editor on Wiki!) could put the photo on the article having, at the time, no idea of the copyright considerations such would involve.
- Having read the discussion here, I would like to ask if it is certain that the actual photographer owns the rights to a photo he or she took (assuming the subject does not) or whether his studio employer does? Merely because the name “Chaffin” appears on the photo of Mr. Turing, does that necessarily mean that either of the two Chaffins discussed here actually took the photo? More to the point, even if the younger Chaffin did, as his father was still alive at the time the photo was taken, could that possibly mean that his father, as the owner of the studio, owned the rights?
- I believe that some or maybe even most of Matthew Brady’s famed American Civil War photos were not taken by him personally, but rather by his employees, yet he seems to have owned the rights to all of them as he tried to sell the collection when he encountered financial difficulties later on.
- Finally, thank you, FunnyMath, for your apology to me on my home page for taking so long to research this matter, but such was totally unwarranted! You were never under any obligation to do anything at all. Still, I appreciate your courtesy in the matter and for taking such pains (whenever such was done) to research matters so thoroughly. You are a credit to Wiki! Best regards!HistoryBuff14 (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoryBuff14: The important question for us is not who owns the copyright of a photo but how its copyright term (the duration) is determined. I researched this a while ago for another deletion request. The UK's current en:Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 9 ("Authorship of work.") says "In this Part “author”, in relation to a work, means the person who creates it." Section 12 ("Duration of copyright in literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works.") says "Copyright expires at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the author dies, subject as follows.", followed by some more detailed rules for special types of works. Accd. to section 4 ("Artistic works."), photographs are artistic works. So it is clear: The author of a photograph in the UK is a human being, namely the photographer. It is not some sort of corporate entity, company or such, it is also not an employer. Copyright expires 70 years after the death of the person who is the author. As far as we could determine, the Chaffin & Sons studio was a small family-owned studio without any branches and only two photographers active in 1928, namely William Matthew Chaffin Jr and his son Arthur Reginald Chaffin. --Rosenzweig τ 21:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Rosenzweig is right. It's the lifetime of the author that determines the length of the copyright, not the lifetime of the copyright holder.
- As for the copyright holder of the Turing photo and the Morcom photo, it's most likely Sherborne School itself. In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alan Turing Aged 16.jpg, DieSwartzPunkt said "... I am aware of someone that I know having just obtained a copy of a photograph from Sherborne school for use in some Alan Turing related publication (a very similar photo clearly taken at the same time). Sherborne school were adamant that they owned the copyright and proper attribution had to be made if the photograph was used..." This was eight years ago, but I'm sure the copyright holder is still the same.
- Since Sherborne School apparently asserted their copyright in the past, and the archivist has said the author is most likely the younger Chaffin, I would say we should Delete the photos. People who use the photos without the school's permission are very likely to get into legal trouble. FunnyMath (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, whatever you guys think is proper. However, I feel badly as I certainly never wanted to have Mr. Turing’s photo removed, just Mr. Morcom’s added. Thanks again for your efforts.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's fine. We'll soon be able to use both photos in 2025, which is pretty soon relatively speaking (since copyright terms tend to last for a long time). If we hadn't done the research, then we would have to assume that the photos would enter the public domain in the US in 2048 (1927+121) and 2049 (1928+121). FunnyMath (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- We can continue to use the photo of Alan Turing that's on English Wikipedia, but we would have to re-upload it on English Wikipedia instead of Commons. The resolution of the image would have to be reduced, and it would be used under fair use. There's no other public domain or freely licensed photo of Turing that I'm aware of, so it should stay on the article. FunnyMath (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- We have two other photos of Turing on Commons, both said to be in the public domain:
- If the authors are truly unknown, then we would have to change the current photo to one of those two instead. FunnyMath (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- We can continue to use the photo of Alan Turing that's on English Wikipedia, but we would have to re-upload it on English Wikipedia instead of Commons. The resolution of the image would have to be reduced, and it would be used under fair use. There's no other public domain or freely licensed photo of Turing that I'm aware of, so it should stay on the article. FunnyMath (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's fine. We'll soon be able to use both photos in 2025, which is pretty soon relatively speaking (since copyright terms tend to last for a long time). If we hadn't done the research, then we would have to assume that the photos would enter the public domain in the US in 2048 (1927+121) and 2049 (1928+121). FunnyMath (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoryBuff14: And thank you for starting the thread at the Alan Turing talk page. It helped inspire me to do the research on the photos in the first place. It was an enjoyable happy accident. FunnyMath (talk) 16:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, whatever you guys think is proper. However, I feel badly as I certainly never wanted to have Mr. Turing’s photo removed, just Mr. Morcom’s added. Thanks again for your efforts.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoryBuff14: The important question for us is not who owns the copyright of a photo but how its copyright term (the duration) is determined. I researched this a while ago for another deletion request. The UK's current en:Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 9 ("Authorship of work.") says "In this Part “author”, in relation to a work, means the person who creates it." Section 12 ("Duration of copyright in literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works.") says "Copyright expires at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the author dies, subject as follows.", followed by some more detailed rules for special types of works. Accd. to section 4 ("Artistic works."), photographs are artistic works. So it is clear: The author of a photograph in the UK is a human being, namely the photographer. It is not some sort of corporate entity, company or such, it is also not an employer. Copyright expires 70 years after the death of the person who is the author. As far as we could determine, the Chaffin & Sons studio was a small family-owned studio without any branches and only two photographers active in 1928, namely William Matthew Chaffin Jr and his son Arthur Reginald Chaffin. --Rosenzweig τ 21:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I see. I asked the archivist to send a copy of the email to VRTS, but they might not be willing to do that. Either way, it should be admissible evidence in that case. FunnyMath (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think so, not for the Turing photo, all relevant information was already there. Only if you want to really make sure for the Morcom photo that the "photographer = one of two Chaffins" information (relevant for copyright) is officially documented somehow. --Rosenzweig τ 14:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Just to confirm, would it be necessary to confirm the authenticity of the email with VRTS? FunnyMath (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- So ... some more details, but nothing really important we did not already know. Specifically, they do not know which of the two Chaffins took the Turing photo. But since the situation is the same for the photo of C. Morcom, that one should be safe for Wikimedia Commons in 2025, just as the Turing photo. Thank you for asking them. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 12:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and ordered universal replacements with File:Alan Turing az 1930-as években.jpg where applicable. —holly {chat} 21:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by MelbourneStar as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 – Hoax: this is not a real flag. As the file is used, discussion is needed. For example, does Australian low threshold of originality apply? Taivo (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, not in use on the projects, except on a Wikidata item. As being a self designed flag it has no educational value and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 17:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}