Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This file was initially tagged by Netora as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: source isn't GJSTU-2.0. According to the source page, this photo isn't provided by MAFF, but 京都府生活研究グループ連絡協議会. Original author doesn't allow using this photo without their permission. (画像の無断利用はできません。) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am the uploader. I have misunderstood the terms of use for content. I would like to request an early termination of the request based on the criteria for speedy deletion. --Nux-vomica 1007 (talk) 08:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per consent of uploader to speedy closure. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
copyvio taken from https://celebztreasure.com/get-to-know-talent-beauty-actress-katrina-chiovon/ or https://www.starztreasure.com/hollywood-news-actress-katrina-chiovon-latest-series-the-cab-calloway-story-awarded-by-the-new-york-city-council/ Mateus2019 (talk) 08:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I forgot to remove geotagging data, please delete H982Falklands (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I forgot to remove geotagging data, please delete this. H982Falklands (talk) 10:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Uyyhy76u989oi8o9 151.36.145.131 10:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC) Kept: why?. --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:F541:B95:6F8:8E59 11:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No evidence of infringement, username matches EXIF. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright infrigement Frartn (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: already kept twice, we would really need a bit more explanation than just "copyright infringement" in this case which seems fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Kept: Vandalism. IP blocked for 1 month. --Achim55 (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
We have given you multiple chances to improve here and to provide evidence for your deletion request, but you blew them all. I will be reporting you and your IP address to the Wikimedia Commons admins for vandalism, false reporting, and block evasion. Angelgreat (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC) Kept: Vandalism. User:Frartn blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
delete this, please Frartn (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC) |
Net copyright violation. Where do you find your Admins? 181.43.7.29 18:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- One time uploader. Did you ask him to obtain OTRS permission? 181.43.7.29 19:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
{{Copyvio|Autor: viralzone.expasy.org (this source is not on free license)}} Superjurek (talk) 17:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable, https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kullan%C4%B1c%C4%B1:2A02:4E0:2D6C:228:5499:81EB:C198:CEFB ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Question Could you please wait until images are no longer in use to nominate them for deletion? As long as an image is in use, it cannot be deleted on the basis of claimed lack of notability. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek article got deleted.
- also, there is no sense to wait for deletion. it was obviously not notable. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, vanity article already deleted, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Es un color que no se utiliza Moratoe (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, usused version of flag of Guatemala with wrong colors. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
copyviol. Copyright © 2023 gamerant.com Mateus2019 (talk) 03:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
unused personal picture Trade (talk) 21:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 02:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete again. 186.175.63.231 10:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Wutsje. --Rosenzweig τ 14:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Bu bir deneme Serhat Ertuna 389 (talk) 19:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Blastcat-iNat (talk) 04:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason.
Delete out of scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely uploader own work. probably website capture. Pierre cb (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Apparently the painter (Randall Lavender) is still alive, so the painting is protected by copyright. C messier (talk) 21:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please restore OWL as an active upload. I am in the process of working efficiently with Randall Lavender on permissions for all of his works which have been uploaded to Media, including OWL. I understand that a "Commons" URL is specifically required element for such permissions, but your process is not allowing enough time for me to get that completed. Please restore OWL, and wait for the permissions / copyright agreement materials to be completed and sent along. DZaller (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- It hasn't been deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- This process isn't the same with speedy deletion. But even if it gets deleted before the permission arrives, then if the permission is OK it will get restored. C messier (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 05:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Works by living artist, needs COM:VRT.
- File:Perreault- Embracing Light unframed.jpg
- File:Perreault- There is Light on the Horizon, Mayberry 2019. acrylic on canvas, 84x60in 1.jpg
- File:Perreault- Long and Winding Road 2K.jpg
- File:Perreault- Penny Lane cr 2K.jpg
- File:Perreault- Devil in her Heart 2K.jpg
- File:Perreault- Abbey Road 90.25x60 IMG 1820.jpg
- File:Perreault- Regina Memory.jpg
- File:Perreault- Une promenade avec mon cheri.jpg
- File:Perreault- Tequila Sunrise.jpg
- File:Perreault- One Way IMG 9170.jpg
- File:Perreault- Golden Age 2k.jpg
- File:Perreault- FirstThaw r.jpg
- File:Perreault- Evening Light 2016.jpg
- File:Perreault- Radiating Light 2k.jpg
- File:Perreault- Cosmopolitan 2k.jpg
- File:Perreault- pole reflection full.jpg
- File:Perreault- Carved Alley.jpg
- File:Perreault- winter trees full.jpg
- File:Perreault- college ave 2k.jpg
- File:Perreault- Piffles Dream.jpg
- File:Perreault- Heart in the Park.jpg
- File:Perreault- Evening Jazz.jpg
- File:Perreault- Black Magic.jpg
- File:Perreault- Headlights.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 07:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
The file description is completely fake: that person is not Nazperver Sultan (the third consort of Sultan Murad III). The image in question is a copy of the painting "Meditazione" by Cesare Detti (1880). See: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/meditazione-cesare-detti/UgG4gy1sLokBjQ Sîmbotin (talk) 06:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 08:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: textlogo. --Krd 06:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 06:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 06:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 06:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 06:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Notable painter. See:
- Flash Art, Volumes 252-257, Giancarlo Politi., 2007, page 34
- Frieze Art Fair, Rizzoli, 2004, page 12
- Orson Welles at Work, Lars Bang Larsen, Thomas Bayrle, Lawrence Chua, Paolo Colombo, Phaidon Press, 2002, page 262
- Η Τέχνη στις αρχές του 21ου αιώνα, Σταύρος Τσίγκογλου · 2005, page 258
- FocalPoint (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Scope project allows artists to have Wikidata entry and image in Commons. Keep — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.173.91.255 (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Unknown person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The image was already on the internet in 2017 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
As it is stated in the image description, is a 2012 image, so I don't know why is important that it was on the internet in 2017. Supro23 (talk) 14:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- But it is uploaded way after its creation, so I am challenging its use with Creative Commons. Could you please provide a proof it has been posted with Creative Commons before the upload in Commons? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
not notable, also look other images of user please ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 00:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 06:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
My work. אונגארישער (talk) 01:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 23:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This has been made from a copyrighted logo. וויקיפּעדלער (talk) 03:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.
This is an advertisement, a form of 2D flat arts or graphic arts. This is too recent to be considered public domain; it is very unlikely that the ad producer has been dead for more than 50 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:彰化八卦山大佛.jpg as well as Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan. There is no commercial FOP for artistic works in the island-state of Taiwan. I doubt it is de minimis because the sculpture is intentionally included as an essential theme of this photoshoot. If the statue is removed, the photo becomes a personal photo of Taiwanese Wikipedians that may be out of scope. It isn't used in the user pages of Mingwangx (perhaps one of the four persons here) or on the userpages of three other persons here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Here are photos of the Rubber Duck by artist w:en:Florentijn Hofman, infamous on Wikimedia Commons as one of the works that cannot be hosted as majority of the artist's life-sized duck copies are in countries with no adequate freedom of panorama (like USA). Taiwan is also another such country: see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the return of restrictive non-commercial FOP for non-architecture. All photos depict the duck as the main theme.
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣桃園-1 Rubber Duck in Taoyuan, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣桃園-2 Rubber Duck in Taoyuan, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣桃園-3 Rubber Duck in Taoyuan, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:Sinwuduck1.jpg
- File:Sinwuduck2.jpg
- File:TaiwanP88634693570-01.jpg
- File:TaiwanP88634693570-03.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rubber Duck and Kaohsiung
[edit]Here are photos of the Rubber Duck by artist w:en:Florentijn Hofman, infamous on Wikimedia Commons as one of the works that cannot be hosted as majority of the artist's life-sized duck copies are in countries with no adequate freedom of panorama (like USA). Taiwan is also another such country: see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the return of restrictive non-commercial FOP for non-architecture. All photos depict the duck as the main theme.
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣高雄-3 Rubber Duck in Kaohsiung, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣高雄-4 Rubber Duck in Kaohsiung, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣高雄-5 Rubber Duck in Kaohsiung, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣高雄-6 Rubber Duck in Kaohsiung, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:2013黃色小鴨在臺灣高雄-7 Rubber Duck in Kaohsiung, TAIWAN.jpg
- File:Huangsehsiaoya Kaohsiung 2.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Arrive Glory Pier in Port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.JPG
- File:Rubber Duck at Kaohsiung 20131017 01.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck at Kaohsiung 20131017 02.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck at Kaohsiung 20131017.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck at Kaohsiung at night 20131017.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Testing in Glory Pier in Port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.JPG
- File:ラバー・ダックin高雄.jpg
- File:光榮碼頭黃色小鴨.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rubber Duck and Keelung
[edit]Here are photos of the Rubber Duck by artist w:en:Florentijn Hofman, infamous on Wikimedia Commons as one of the works that cannot be hosted as majority of the artist's life-sized duck copies are in countries with no adequate freedom of panorama (like USA). Taiwan is also another such country: see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the return of restrictive non-commercial FOP for non-architecture. All photos depict the duck as the main theme.
- File:Customs Building, ROC-MOF Keelung Customs and Rubber Duck 20140128.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Christmas Tree in Night 20140107.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Christmas Tree on Maritime Plaza 20131227a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and K602 Nearby Pier 20140107.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Keelung Maritime Plaza 20140907a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Keelung Maritime Plaza 20140907b.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Keelung Maritime Plaza birdview 20140128.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Keelung Maritime Plaza View from East 20131227a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Maritime Plaza 20140107a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Maritime Plaza 20140107b.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck and Maritime Plaza Birdview 20140107a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck at Port of Keelung 20140128.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck front view and Keelung Maritime Plaza lifebelt 20140128.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck front view at Keelung Maritime Plaza 20140107 evening.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck front view at Keelung Maritime Plaza 20140128.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck front view at Keelung Maritime Plaza 20140907.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Front View in Fine Day 20140107.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck front view in Keelung at night 20140107.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck in Keelung Port 20131227a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck in Keelung Port 20131227b.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck in Keelung Port Front View 20131227a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck in Keelung Port Left Rear View 20131227.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck in Keelung Port Right View 20131227.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck in Keelung.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Left Side View 20140107a.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Left Side View in Night 20140107.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Rear View and Workers on Boat Cleaning It 20131227.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck Right View 20140107.jpg
- File:Rubber Duck view from Keelung Maritime Plaza 20131227a.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
non-notable person, self-promoting Mateus2019 (talk) 04:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: F10 --Achim55 (talk) 09:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architectural artworks in Taiwan. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the recent discussion in which TIPO reverted their stance to pre-2018 stance that is quite restrictive for public art. This photo shows a 2D poster board, which is a flat art. Needs commercial license from the poster artist. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Ju Ming in Taiwan
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architecture in Taiwan; see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for TIPO's reversal of opinion regarding free uses of copyrighted public art. The sculptor w:en:Ju Ming is still living as of this writing.
- File:Ju ming military.jpg
- File:Ju ming taichi.JPG
- File:Taichi by Ju Ming at Academia Sinica 20120420.jpg
- File:Taichi by Ju Ming at Academia Sinica Activity Center 20140315a.jpg
- File:Taichi by Ju Ming at Academia Sinica Activity Center 20140315b.jpg
- File:太極 - panoramio.jpg
- File:太極，作者朱銘，德富文教基金會董事長 吳東昇於1991年5月1日贈與臺大，現址位於椰林大道上文學院旁。 2014-06-15 12-00.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architecture in Taiwan; see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for TIPO's reversal of opinion regarding free uses of copyrighted public art.
All artworks are authored by sculptor w:en:Ju Ming, who is still alive as of this writing. Commercial license permit from him, via COM:VRTS correspondence, is required, in accordance with TIPO's current restrictive stance on Taiwanese freedom of panorama.
- File:Ju Ming Museum 02.jpg
- File:Ju ming ROC military.jpg
- File:Juming Museum - Einstein.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 03.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 04.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 05.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 06.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 07.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 08.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 09.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 10.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 11.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 12.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 13.jpg
- File:Juming Museum 朱銘美術館 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2363758673).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2363760201).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2363762485).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2364589880).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2364591584).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2364593258).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2364595202).jpg
- File:Juming Museum, Jinshan, Taiwan (2364596044).jpg
- File:新北市朱銘美術館 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:新北市朱銘美術館 - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:新北市朱銘美術館 - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:新北市朱銘美術館 - panoramio.jpg
- File:新北市朱銘美術館 太極廣場 - panoramio.jpg
- File:朱銘美術館 Juming Museum - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:朱銘美術館 Juming Museum - panoramio.jpg
- File:朱銘美術館 Zhuming Arts Museum - panoramio.jpg
- File:朱銘美術館本館 The Main Hall of Zhuming Art Museum - panoramio.jpg
- File:軍艦 Warship - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama for public art in Taiwan; see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan regarding this restriction. The nominated artwork is 飲水思源 (In Memory of He-De and Ru-Syue), which was authored by sculptor Wang Ying-Hsin according to this website. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Publicity. The watermarks make the photo useless for Commons. The same applies for File:Egy Tour photos2.jpg Wouter (talk) 10:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
These German stamps are the work of Detlef Glinski, born in 1933 and apparently alive. The stamps feature paintings by various painters (all four already deceased), but also graphical artwork by Glinski. Commons consensus achieved after a court decision several years ago is that unlike previously claimed, German stamps are not official works and therefore protected by copyright. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored 70 years after Glinski's death.
- File:10 Pf 1981 SED PT001.jpg
- File:20 Pf 1981 SED PT001.jpg
- File:25 Pf 1981 SED PT001.jpg
- File:35 Pf 1981 SED PT001.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 14:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
These are quite recent (2004 to 2018) German stamps designed by de:Johannes Graf (Grafiker) (born in 1960) using photographs by various photographers. Commons consensus achieved after a court decision several years ago is that unlike previously claimed, German stamps are not official works and therefore protected by copyright. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored 70 years after the deaths of both Graf and the respective photographers, so not for a long time.
- File:DBP LT Arngast 55 ct 2011.jpg
- File:DBP LT Falshöft 55 ct 2010.jpg
- File:DBP LT Roter Sand 55 ct 2004.jpg
- File:DBP LT Wangerooge 45 cent 2018.jpg
- File:DBP LT Westerheversand 55 ct 2005.jpg
- File:DPAG 2006 Neuland.jpg
- File:DBP LT Greifswalder Oie 45 ct 2004.jpg
- File:DBP LT Darßer Ort 45 ct 2018.jpg
- File:DBP LT Arkona 55 ct 2012.jpg
- File:DBP LT Dornbusch 55 ct 2009.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 14:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Schade. WSee WSee (talk) 15:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This photo shows what appears to be a 2000/2001 commemorative coin of the en:Alderney pound. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bailiwick of Guernsey, that coin should still be copyrighted, and the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 15:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Macau, this 1981 Macau banknote is still copyrighted, and the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by کیان شمسایی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Memory kaleshi (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Krd 06:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 03alexandro (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Oleksandr Dudkin.jpg
- File:Перечинський квест.jpg
- File:Logoperechynonline.jpg
- File:Iqonlineeducation.jpg
- File:Mistoonline.jpg
- File:Miroslava Misyaylo.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by QuickArtisan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, also missing permission
- File:Pool Removal Perth 2.jpg
- File:Pool Removal Perth.jpg
- File:Doutor score.jpg
- File:Email Marketing.jpg
- File:Best of the web directory.jpg
- File:Dr . Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador ).png
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )7.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )6.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )5.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )4.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )3.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )1.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador )2.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi ( GoodWill Ambassador ).jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi 3.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi 7.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi 8.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi 6.jpg
- File:Yaser Alsaidi 2.jpg
- File:1200418NscnV1632454537.png
- File:Nur Amin.jpg
Didym (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal pic HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maximomichea (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - unused, poor quality personal drawings
- File:Skash - wikipedia.png
- File:Stailson alegre - wikipedia.png
- File:Stailson y sus amigos - wikipedia.jpg
- File:Giantmouth - wikipedia.png
- File:Sindo.png
- File:Stailson (sol monstruoso).png
- File:Stailson wikipedia.png
- File:Stailson(alegre).png
- File:Buchy.png
- File:Stailson.png
- File:Skash.png
- File:Giantmouth por Máximo Michea.png
- File:Giantmouth.png
- File:Giantmouth personaje animado de terror.png
- File:Stailson y sindo - wikipedia.png
- File:Stailson dibujo.png
- File:Sindo - wikipedia.png
- File:Stailson - wikipedia (animacion sol).jpg
- File:Sindo - wikpedia (animacion terror).jpg
- File:Giantmouth dibujo terror.png
- File:Giantmouth dibujo.png
Эlcobbola talk 22:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name of the uploader is not the same as the one in the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, promotional, out of scope, and can't determine jurisdiction for TOO so PRP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is a copyright violation but I've found it multiple places with no author listed. I'm not sure it's an original work. Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio - Billboard is not a copyleft publication DGtal (talk) 06:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works Ssirdeck (talk) 06:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works Ssirdeck (talk) 06:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works Ssirdeck (talk) 06:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Madame Bernon in a Mainbocher corset Paris Ssirdeck (talk) 06:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Madame Bernon in a Mainbocher corset Paris Ssirdeck (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works Ssirdeck (talk) 06:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works Ssirdeck (talk) 06:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative works Ssirdeck (talk) 06:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Advertising, though the file description could be edited. Is the company notable enough for us to want their logo? I'm not sure; what do you think? Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope, likely above COM:TOO Hong Kong. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Not used, insufficient description. Cover = album cover? Unfortunately, this is the user's only upload, back in 2015, so I don't think we'll be getting a clarification. A quick web search of "outs album" did not turn up this photo, so if it was an album, it may have disappeared without a trace. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
A quick web search suggested that this company is not notable. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
A quick web search suggested that this company is not notable. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
A quick web search suggested that this company is not notable. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 07:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
self-promoting image Mateus2019 (talk) 09:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- how is it a selfpromoting image? i think its a nice image 164.160.5.126 09:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep: en:Paddyman. --Achim55 (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
self-promoting image Mateus2019 (talk) 09:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: en:Paddyman. --Achim55 (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: subject has article on English Wikipedia. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
self-promoting image Mateus2019 (talk) 09:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: en:Paddyman. --Achim55 (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
deleted because of copyvio this morning under another file name Mateus2019 (talk) 09:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Keepactive (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source site reads You may download and print out content from this site only for your own personal and non-commercial use and provided that you do not remove or modify any copyright, trademark or other proprietary notices., so I'd like to discuss. Maybe we can keep them if COM:VRT procedure is done. In addition, a verification of the account could be helpful I think.
- File:Girl riding on a cycling track.jpg
- File:Basket of basketballs.jpg
- File:Tennis Balls Pressurised Cans.jpg
- File:Table Tennis racquet and ball on table with the net - side view.jpg
- File:Table Tennis racquet and ball on table - top view.jpg
- File:Clay tennis courts melbourne looking down the net.jpg
- File:Empty clay tennis court in Melbourne Australia looking down the middle.jpg
- File:Clay tennis courts melbourne looking from one end of the court.jpg
- File:Tennis Racquets and Balls on a Clay Court.jpg
- File:Large family camping tent.jpg
- File:Bendigo Easter Egg Hunt.jpg
- File:A man and girl on a canoe.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull.jpg
- File:Motorcycle Stunt Rider in front of a crowd.jpg
- File:Run Melbourne Half Marathon Starting Line.jpg
- File:Cycle resting on the side of a cycling track.jpg
- File:Australian Open Kids Tennis Day.jpg
- File:Australian Open Womens Singles Tennis Match.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 10:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I am Kunal founder of KeepActive. Those terms only apply for content downloaded from our website. These images have been uploaded to WikiMedia Commons with the intent they can be used in personal or commercial products provided the source is attributed.
- Further, we have used our official domain and email when signing up for the account.
- If the above is not adequate, we can update the T&Cs on the website to say "Unless stated otherwise, you may download and print out content from this site only for your own personal and non-commercial use and provided that you do not remove or modify any copyright, trademark or other proprietary notices. We do license some content to Wikimedia Commons under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license."
- Hope this helps clarify things. Keepactive (talk) 10:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Terms have been updated to "Unless stated otherwise, you may download and print out content from this site only for your own personal and non-commercial use and provided that you do not remove or modify any copyright, trademark or other proprietary notices. We do license some content to Wikimedia Commons under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license." . Please refresh the page and visit https://keepactive.com.au/terms Keepactive (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for clarification! So
I withdraw my nomination this DR. --Achim55 (talk) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for clarification! So
Kept: nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
taken from commercial Haaretz newspaper (photo by Tomer Applebaum) with no OTRS DGtal (talk) 10:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Small, low-res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Publicity. Only a crop of a small part may be of use for Commons. Wouter (talk) 10:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
As the Description says this from the Netflix site therefore copyright Netflix Headlock0225 (talk) 10:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete copy violation Waran18 (talk) 08:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found elsewhere online using Google Images and TinEye. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
copyvio violation : https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/990721618002041520/ Waran18 (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This photo is ripped from the Micode YouTube channel, the date is incorrect and this image does not indicate that it is licensed under a CC license. 2A01:E0A:808:C0A0:163C:3B2A:7218:3F60 15:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. self promotion. uploaded for wikidata item Lectrician1 (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Actually,This is Japanese Vandalism.--鼓天 (talk) 23:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. --Karim talk to me :)..! 17:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment even if it is own work, the freedom of panorama in Iraq is not OK. --Karim talk to me :)..! 00:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)- Comment The picture has been on the web, here since October 2018. --Karim talk to me :)..! 00:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
COM:DERIV as a 2D artwork from a TV show on a sweatshirt, as the named focus and enwiki usage of the image. Belbury (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo . Given that this isn't a really complex logo, does COM:TOO apply? Or the many otherwise simple elements (two circles, 5 stars, some letters and many ovals) make it too complex? C messier (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @C messier: see COM:TOO Russia: "Simple result (consisted of simple geometric shapes and / or text) of creative work (creative human activity) is copyrightable. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, Part 80 of Session Resolution No. 10 of April 23, 2019 on Application of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation". --Drakosh (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Then Delete C messier (talk) 13:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Then
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
unused personal picture Trade (talk) 20:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Possibly derivative candy packaging? Trade (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a video game? Trade (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
unused personal picture Trade (talk) 21:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Images originates from website where images are under copyright, as website mentions: Maurice Boyer Photography © 2022. Extra premission is required here to keep this image on Wikipedia Mdd (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
No indication that uploader = copyright holder (see metadata). 87.150.11.47 21:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation. Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/02#Nigerian_naira_banknotes says Nigerian currency less than 70 years old is copyrighted. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Because its quality is too high Alan Crist (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Borrar este y todos otros, ya que es imposible saber quién es el artista, el fotógrafo y el que los subió. 186.173.91.255 23:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality is too high Alan Crist (talk) 00:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
please delete it Alan Crist (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It's not really useful for any Wikimedia projects because of the obtrusive promotional watermarking, therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 21:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: obtrusive promotional watermarking, no realistic educational use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Because its quality is too high Alan Crist (talk) 23:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
why you don't delete my own image AS I WISH? Alan Crist (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment All of this stuff might be deleted as out of scope, but if you think that acting impatient and entitled to have work you uploaded under an irrevocable license years ago deleted right away will help your cause, you are wrong. Wait your turn like everyone else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: obtrusive promotional watermarking, no realistic educational use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Because its quality is too high Alan Crist (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a deletion reason. You chose to upload it 3 years ago under an irrevocable license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
delete it Alan Crist (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: obtrusive promotional watermarking, no realistic educational use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
These are my eyes. This was used as a project image for high school, it has outlived its use 2601:500:817F:6CA0:EC9F:D369:892:3A35 23:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Blastcat-iNat (talk) 04:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason. The reason to delete would be if he is not notable. Is he or not? However, he's pretty active at en.wikipedia though new there, so we might cut him some slack. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — per Ikan Kekek and COM:SELFIE: The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project. Please read that page before opening DR's similar to this one, Blastcat-iNat … even though this file is not in use on either Cryptohydrate or Cryptohydrate (enwiki) that is insufficient reason to delete.
Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 22:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
![16 File:Owl, 1992, 14" x 12", oil on panel (private collection).jpg](#File:Owl,_1992,_14"_x_12",_oil_on_panel_(private_collection).jpg){kind=link}
_advertisement_in_Taipei.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_of_Kevin-Thevenard_railway_line,_Eyre_Peninsula,_South_Australia.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![21:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/22#c-C_messier-20230122210700-File:Owl,_1992,_14"_x_12",_oil_on_panel_(private_collection).jpg){kind=link}
![05:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/22#c-Krd-20230125054600-File:Owl,_1992,_14"_x_12",_oil_on_panel_(private_collection).jpg){kind=link}
_advertisement_in_Taipei.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_advertisement_in_Taipei.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_advertisement_in_Taipei.jpg){kind=link}
_advertisement_in_Taipei.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work / likely copyright violation. Low resolution, lacking proper EXIF, and numerous hits turn up in a reverse image search. The corresponding websites suggest that this might be a cellphone wallpaper from the days before smartphones. HyperGaruda (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Files by Arthur Schlander
[edit]
Both files mention in the EXIF data that they are a work of the agency neumayr.cc and its permission is needed to have them published under CC-BY-SA 4.0. --C messier (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
self-promoting ordinary person, no other contrib. (this seems to be a photomontage whereas the background might not be own work) Mateus2019 (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
copyright not clear ; this is a recent archaeological discovery Toyotsu (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The picture is the word of RexCrudelissimus, the person who uploaded it to commons - as an ancient runestone, the image itself cannot be under copyright.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per above (I think editor meant "work" rather than "word"). Even if the image were liable to be under copyright, the uploader took the picture himself, and released it under the proper license. Carlstak (talk) 15:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- STRONG OPPOSE'. Why was this picture even nominated?--Berig (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- How can we be sure that RexCrudelissimus took the picture himself ? This stone is not in any museum for the moment as far as I know --Toyotsu (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry. According to English Wikipedia, "The University of Oslo has placed the stone on public exhibition from January 2023 until late February 2023". I was wrong and I apologize to @RexCrudelissimus. Toyotsu (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This file is copied from instagram [1] gpesenti (talk) 13:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_sneeuwkapel_te_Retie_-_368332_-_onroerenderfgoed.jpg Dentonny (talk) 13:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep @Dentonny: no it's not, look at the traffic sign on the left. It's perfectly fine to have multiple images of the same subject. Deleting the image won't save any disk space. Multichill (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, per Multichill. This photo shows the building’s surroundings on the left side, a street corner with arrow signs and utility cabinets — less well composed and less esthetically pleasing than the other photo, but informative. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivate work of 2d art Mindmatrix 14:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
EXIF data indicate this is from instagram. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 12:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please be so kind and delete this file. It is the same as my photograph named Am Stintmarkt in Lüneburg, Niedersachsen.jpg (also just under an other name). The file Am Stintmarkt in Lüneburg, Niedersachsen.jpg should not be deleted. Thank you very much in advance, Monika Hoerath Monika Hoerath (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a reason. Krd 06:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:Am Stintmarkt in Lüneburg, Niedersachsen.jpg by the same uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Youtube video not created by YT uploader, just posting someone else's as far as I can tell. Like Flickrwashing. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 04:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with that. Supertoff (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
the author died in 1956 Ssirdeck (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete And undelete in 2027. --C messier (talk) 12:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
This file is a montage of two files that were both deleted for copyvio: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bombing at Baghdad Airport 2020.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bombing at Baghdad Airport 2020 1.png. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Didnt she died? 186.174.113.62 17:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Isnt she died? How can you take a foto? 186.175.131.169 14:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly false claims by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
This file is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
This image is not free (it belongs to the Paris 2024 Olympic Committee) and is certainly not the personal work of KGrandino. --Abalg (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Agree They are designed by Joachim Roncin. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 01:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a copyright violation. Based on a screenshot from Google Maps. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a copyright violation. Based on a screenshot from Google Maps. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument aux morts de Tréguier
[edit]This sculpture has been designed by Francis Renaud (1887-1973), an artist who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, these pictures must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:01 Tréguier Le monument aux morts.JPG
- File:22 Treguier 1.jpg
- File:22 Treguier 2.jpg
- File:Tréguier - Monument aux Morts - AD22 - 16FI6531.jpg
- File:Tréguier - Monument aux morts de la Guerre - AD22 - 16FI6530.jpg
- File:Tréguier. Carte postale. Monument aux Morts. Amaury.jpg
- File:Tréguier. Carte postale. Monument aux Morts. Yvon.jpg
- File:Tréguier. Monument aux morts.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 00:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
File:John O'Dowd, Chris Conway & others at Belfast Grand CEntral Station construction site.jpg
[edit]
No evidence of free licence stated, likely from weaverscross.co.uk (per likely title in description) by Translink (as stated). weaverscross.co.uk does not state use of free licence (corporate links go to Translink.co.uk), whereas translink.co.uk does not state the free licence either, with only OpenDataNI data stated to be under Open Government Licence or Translink’s Access to Information Licence. Image also present at farrans.com which does not show the free licence stated either. Therefore no evidence of free licence or potential OGL (which only applies for OpenDataNI data). DankJae 01:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Translink is in the public domain as it is the name of the nationalised transport company in Northern Ireland. Thus the image is in the public domain. FundTheNINE (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @FundTheNINE, Is there proof backing up that statement? If so, please provide it, ideally on the website source itself. I fail to find it from the potental sources above. Where exactly is it from? No source link on the actual image was provided. If true, the default {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license is incorrect. DankJae 00:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no support for claimed license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The video from which this capture was taken is a collection of different videos from different authors and reuploaded to a suspicious account with only 1 video hosted, most presumably the CC license has been used in a spurious way (license washing). Author validation is required to confirm that he's the author of all compiled original videos. Taichi (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Compilation video with sources not named, no evidence that original photographer authorized license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
accidentally uploaded a duplicate file, this can be deleted now Ur Nan123 (talk) 03:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, unused, fairly prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Xi Knight as no permission (No permission since). In-use and uploaded in 2009, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: actual license status and authorship of original not in evidence. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as no permission (No permission since). Widely used 2006 upload, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Multiple image searches show no earlier uploads nor alternative copyright claims. Assuming good faith from original uploader unless there is reason to doubt. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maxinvestigator as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free book cover
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the inscription of this cup is really above COM:TOO. See for comparison: File:George Orwell - Keep the Aspidistra Flying.jpg.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with: File:Pride&Prejudice Mug01.jpg
Kept: In both cases, image is of simple text. The one possible copyright issue would be the inclusion of the Penguin Books penguin logo - I have added {{Trademark}}, as I see we have several other images including this logo. This keep decision should not be considered to prejudge if inclusion of the penguin logo is determined to be a copyright violation, in which case all instances of it on Commons should be listed for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maxinvestigator as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free book cover
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the inscription of this cup is really above COM:TOO. (The image as such seems to be from the uploader, at least I couldn't find any hits of this reproduction.) -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I own this book and scanned the cover myself. ~~BinaryPhoton — Preceding unsigned comment added by BinaryPhoton (talk • contribs) 12:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- That was never doubted. However, ownership of a still copyrighted work of art (created by somebody else) does not give one the copyright over this work. In the case at hand the question is only whether the cover-design has enough originality to be copyrightable. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep for two reasons -
1) This falls below COM:TOO according to me as it is just text written in a normal font + solid colors are used with just a tint of white at upside.
2) This picture is used in 3 wikis revolving around this book (and the picture).
A solid keep. --Contributers2020Talk to me here! 16:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Looks to be simple text layout with simple colored stripes. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 62.18.48.251 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio|source=www.linkem.com
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether this logo is really above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: TOO:Italy is uncertain. Current license claim is false. Unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The map on the depicted board is likely copyrighted. Unfortunately, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission by the copyright-holder is necessary or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Many of the other images in Category:Information boards in Val Taleggio have the same problem. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- OK. This image indeed contains the written text "All Rights Reserved" (in Italian), so I agree about deleting it. I was not aware that a public panorama can be subject to copyright. I'll take care to avoid this in the future. Is the absence of a copyright string enough to allow an image ? Or in more general, how this issue can be avoided in the first place? Like taking the photo from distance?
- I'm asking not to complain, but just to understand how to operate. Amadvance (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- As this is a discussion-page, you are free to complain ;-) . I hadn't even seen the ARR-note, which you mention. So, this was not relevant for me and it would not have been necessary to assume existing copyright. In countries with no usable freedom-of-panorama exception, such as Italy, France and some others, the relevant questions whether photos of such kind of board are o.k. to upload to Commons, are 1) is the content above threshold of originality, and, if yes, 2) might the content be old enough to be in the public domain (70 years pma) already. The latter is usually not the case and anyway requires to identify the author.
- In the case at hand, I mainly looked at the map on the board and found it rather creatively designed, which was enough for me to assume copyrightability. I didn't even look at the text-portions. If there would have been only text on the board, it depends on its originality and a bit on the amount. --Túrelio (talk) 15:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- I did research a bit, and it looks like that the freedom-of-panorama is not relevant. This link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Noticeboards_and_signs says explicitly that for "Noticeboards and signs" .. "Freedom of Panorama does not extend to permitting photographs of 2D artworks or extended textual matter".
- Potentially, it looks like that the whole Category:Information_boards is questionable. So, it's still a bit unclear to me what is allowed or not. But for sure, anything that has a copyright string or statement, like the image in question, should be removed, as the author clearly states his intention to enforce copyright.
- But I'm a bit skeptic about removing other images that have similar ones in the main Category:Information_boards. Amadvance (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. Honestly, the statement on COM:CB leaves me speechless, especially as no reason for this judgement is provided. I will put this up for discussion elsewhere. There is little need for hurry with this DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Il ne s'agit pas d'un travail personnel (l'image est sous droite ESA : https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2005/11/Jean-Pierre_Swings_un_astrophysicien_liegeois_tres_heureux) Gabon100 (talk) 09:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Il ne s'agit pas d'un travail personnel (l'image est à priori sous copyright de l'Uliège : http://200.ulg.ac.be/ledoux.html) Gabon100 (talk) 09:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Image obatined from https://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/dece0a39-caab-4eb3-af07-baa930a97326, the license CC-BY-NC 3.0 (Au) Gderrin (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- scratch all that, The NC part was hidden by the link. You are correct, its by-nc not by. Should be deleted --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 10:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- For the record, since you seem to be very knowledgable about Australian plants I assume you have some experience with this, on the resource page https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2423557420 it lists an original license of BY-NC, and then an 'interpreted' linking to the straight CC-BY license. Im assuming thats an automatic thing and not accurate? --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 10:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Wait, now im even more confused. On the ALA image details for that image, it also lists a straight CC-BY not BY-NC: https://images.ala.org.au/image/details?imageId=6c94549c-e576-4e74-8b43-9131e9f33f6d --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 10:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that's correct, but https://images.ala.org.au/image/details?imageId=6c94549c-e576-4e74-8b43-9131e9f33f6d was not cited. The image was also not correctly uploaded as a .jpg file. Gderrin (talk) 11:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Since you've uploaded a higher resolution image, can this file be speedy deleted? Im much less familiar with commons maintenance as opposed to enWP. --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- My understanding is that the file is deleted by an administrator after 7 days. Gderrin (talk) 12:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Since you've uploaded a higher resolution image, can this file be speedy deleted? Im much less familiar with commons maintenance as opposed to enWP. --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that's correct, but https://images.ala.org.au/image/details?imageId=6c94549c-e576-4e74-8b43-9131e9f33f6d was not cited. The image was also not correctly uploaded as a .jpg file. Gderrin (talk) 11:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Horcrux as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: We don't know if the drawing is in PD: we just know that it hasn't been created after 1927, so the author could even have died in the 1970s
Given it is possible to be in the public domain, IMHO, this needs to be discussed. If the author is unknown, then Template:PD-anon-70-EU can apply. C messier (talk) 11:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. There is a signature at the bottom right. The first letter is very stylized so I'm not 100% what it says, but perhaps someone with more knowledge of antique prints might have an idea. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Signature is of Anselmo Ballester (1897-1974); still under copyright per EU law. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
EXIF data indicate that it is copyrighted ( ©Angela Sterling Photograhy ) so publishing under CC-BY-SA is a copyrights violation. C messier (talk) 11:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Files by Maxime2023
[edit]- File:Sylvia1996PopovaErkelSzinhaz.jpg
- File:Diótörő-Tsygankova.jpg
- File:DonQuijote-Korea-JiYoungKim.jpg
- File:NagyTamas.jpg
Various scans and photographs of the same dancer. However there is no evidence provided that the photographers have agreed to have their photos published with CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. --C messier (talk) 12:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation > https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiva-3a_1UipCCMZNgKf5gp16dsizKZ3qPXxJxMeVUTF3OMk6ImO2WLFGQmHU8lTZt3-dP2zaVc-rcxK52cSysWe09KWMroqFAKUz_1oN411ZE3lXAUPT8PFdW-oexo2ZTru7iB78kLF0rAc871POzXE-KQU0cFA Mateus2019 (talk) 07:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright license is held and released by us, this image, including the lower third graphics do not hold any copyright restrictions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruzzie (talk • contribs) 22:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not the user's own work. Brunnaiz (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Questionable claims of own work. One is a satellite imagery and the other lacks metadata and has low resolution
- File:Satellite imagery Shahid Soleimani catamaran.jpg
- File:Shahid soleimani catamaran in the sea.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zhiwarkurdi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable own work. None of them have metadata, all low resolution. One is a book cover.
- File:Shahed alavi-us.jpg
- File:Shahed alavi-kurdish clothing.jpg
- File:اhresh qaderi njari.jpg
- File:Hqaderi1515.jpg
- File:Qaderi in lalesh.jpg
- File:Aghle syasi.jpg
- File:Yyyسمینار 2.jpg
- File:Photo ۲۰۱۷-۰۲-۰۲ ۱۹-۵۳-۱۷ل.jpg
- File:Kkkاتن.png
- File:13254203 1599557207022542 5176661751100716476k.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Francis Renaud (sculptor)
[edit]This sculpturehas been designed by Francis Renaud (1887-1973), an artist who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, these pictures must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Duffour - L'Art à l'église et au foyer - Les plus belles statues religieuses (catalogue commercial) - Page 07.jpg
- File:La Bretonne du Goëlo (Renaud statue).jpg
- File:Saint-Brieuc - Monument aux morts de la guerre - AD22 - 16FI5054.jpg
- File:Saint-Brieuc - Statue La Bretonne de Renaud AD22 - 16FI5055.jpg
- File:Statue d'Yves Le Trocquer.JPG
- File:Trévé - Monument aux Morts - AD22 - 16FI6667.jpg
- File:Trévé monument aux morts en 2021.jpg
- File:Étables-sur-Mer - Le monument aux morts et l'église - AD22 - 16FI1182.jpg
_-_Page_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pymouss Let’s talk - 00:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the historical postcards that came from the French archive. If the archive revokes their license, then we should delete. Historically we sided with government institution's lawyers and their assessment of the copyright status of works they release. If they revoke their license, then we should delete. A French government institution's lawyers would know more about competing copyright claims of publication more than 70 years ago versus FOP than we would know. --RAN (talk) 05:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- The images:
- File:Trévé monument aux morts en 2021.jpg
- File:La Bretonne du Goëlo (Renaud statue).jpg
- File:Statue d'Yves Le Trocquer.JPG
Are contemporary image, not released by the archive. --RAN (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep For the first image, the work is a photograph. This is not a 3D reproduction. Moreover, the author of the photo is not Francis Renaud and it's a reproduction of a commercial document intended for wide and free distribution. For the other old documents, these are old views, some produced before 1928, where the works are far from being very visible. --Etienne5962 (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour Pymouss, ok bien compris, donc pour le fichier File:Trévé monument aux morts en 2021.jpg, du fait que l'intérêt de cette image est la liste des noms sur le monument au mort et non pas la sculpture de Francis Renaud, je l'ai remplacé par le même cliché mais en ayant caché la sculpture, avec un rectangle gris, ce qui permet de conserver cette photo en ne supprimant que le fichier original qui n'apparaît plus sur l'article utilisant cette photo. Cordialement --Quoique (talk) 08:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Quoique: ce rectangle gris est très loin d'être suffisant. Si seuls les noms t'intéresse, j'ai fait un racadrage sur lesdits noms : File:Trévé_monument_aux_morts_en_2021_-_noms.jpg (tout le reste est soumis à droit d'auteur). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- I deleted the clearly copyvio photos, I'll contact the departmental archives of Côtes-d'Armor to check if they indeed had some rights (also notifying Vlegall). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: Have you received any reply? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: no definitive answer yet. I just learned that their is no lawyer at these archives (@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): ). Thus, I would lean toward Delete (I could always restore afterward in case I've got a positive answer). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 19:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: no definitive answer yet. I just learned that their is no lawyer at these archives (@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): ). Thus, I would lean toward
- @VIGNERON: Have you received any reply? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination-- the works shown will be under copyright in France for another 20 years. The images infringe on their copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful own work; this doesn't have an EXIF, as other files uploaded by the user do. If proof of authorship is provided (whatever it is) the nomination is withdrawn. Bedivere (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's the same view at the same day than File:Santa Teresa (35019094772).jpg. So this is 100% unnecessary. I'm the author of both. —Ismael Olea (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's the same view at the same day than File:Santa Teresa (35019094772).jpg. So this is 100% unnecessary. I'm the author of both. —Ismael Olea (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's the same view at the same day than File:Santa Teresa (35019094772).jpg. So this is 100% unnecessary. I'm the author of both. —Ismael Olea (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The title idicates the photographer Ira Barillo, who is not the uploader/ Her website is here : https://irabarillo.com/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Karl-Heinz Bobbe
[edit]As a follow-up to Commons:Deletion requests/File:FDC 1985 GDR Charite pm B002a.jpg: These German stamps are the work of Karl-Heinz Bobbe, born in 1927 and apparently alive. Commons consensus achieved after a court decision several years ago is that unlike previously claimed, German stamps are not official works and therefore protected by copyright. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored 70 years after Bobbe's death.
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3159 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr Kleinbogen 2601.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr Zusammendruck 2697, 2698.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2790.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2980.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2981.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3156.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3157.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3158.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3159.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr Zusammendruck 3156-3159.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3245.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3246.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3247.jpg
_1981,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_2601.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2697,_2698.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2790.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2980.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2981.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3156.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3157.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3158.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3159.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_3156-3159.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3245.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3246.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3247.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I am adding
_1981,_MiNr_2601.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(also by Bobbe) to this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. The images can be restored 70 years after the artist dies. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
These two files show 2020 stamps by some private German mail company. They are protected by copyright and should be deleted. It's not even clear who took the photographs, and the photographer(s) as well as stamp creator(s) are most probably still alive, so any restoration of the files could be only after 120 years with PD-old-assumed.
Rosenzweig τ 14:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
This photo shows a 2010 coin from Aruba. I don't know who the medalist is, but a 2010 coin is almot certainly still protected in Aruba (and also the US), so the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Schade. WSee WSee (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Probably wrong attribution. Likely, scanned from school archive and not own work. Also, project scope is dubious Ignatus (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Photograph that was created in 1921 by Bassano. Only question is did it become available to the public in 1921 or 1974? Abzeronow (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I know, but we also have deleted Bassano images when it was unclear when they were published according to UK law. @Clindberg: Abzeronow (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, when they are the silver gelatin prints and obviously published at the time. If this was an unpublished negative, and we can't show publication, we tend to delete them since they would be under copyright in both the US and UK in that case. Bassano sometimes took multiple negatives, and only published one of them, but negatives were still in the collection when they went to the NPG. In this case, they seem to have three negatives. Can we find evidence of this one in print? Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Heh, found a photo of his daughter published by Bassano. None of these three yet though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please advise if I am wrong. The image is taken from the link below.
- And the following license is issued for this image.
- Please find, attached, a copy of the image, which I am happy to supply to you with permission to use solely according to your license, detailed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
- It is essential that you ensure images are captioned and credited as they are on the Gallery's own website (search/find each item by NPG number at http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/advanced-search.php ).
- This has been supplied to you free of charge. I would be grateful if you would please consider making a donation at https://my.npg.org.uk/dev/contribute2.aspx?don=11&fieldAmt= in support of our work and the service we provide.
- Regards
- Rights and Images Department National Portrait Gallery St
- Martin's Place London WC2H OHE
- Having this license is not enough? Sr. Rinoseronte (talk) 11:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Sr. Rinoseronte: , COM:L would be a handy reference for you in the future. We don't accept NC-ND because the Wikimedia Foundation feels that that license violates the Definition of Free Cultural Works (https://freedomdefined.org/Definition) and (https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy). Which is why we're trying to determine if this was made available to the public in 1921 (making it public domain in the US and UK) or in 1974 (it would still be in copyright in the UK and because of URAA, the US). Abzeronow (talk) 15:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
The painter died in 2013, so this painting is still copyrighted. C messier (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @C messier I am aware of copyright issues, I will get permission to publish from Ananda, so that this copyright
- issue is taken care
- Thanks
- Joy 2405:201:401D:E15B:C4E9:4111:A055:4E87 15:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
https://kerala.gov.in/ Restricts usage despite allowing free usage. There is a copyright policy popup link at the bottom menu which says ഈ വെബ്പോർട്ടലിലെ ഉള്ളടക്കം മറ്റ് സ്ഥലങ്ങളിൽ സൗജന്യമായി ഉപയോഗിക്കാവുന്നതാണ്. അങ്ങനെ പുനരുപയോഗിക്കുമ്പോൾ, വസ്തുതാവിരുദ്ധമായോ, നിയവിരുദ്ധമായോ ഉള്ള രീതിയിൽ ഉള്ളടക്കങ്ങൾ ഉപയോഗിക്കരുത്. translating to The content of this web portal can be freely used elsewhere. When so re-used, the contents must not be used in a manner that is untrue or unlawful. and thus does not meet our licensing terms -- DaxServer (talk) 17:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- The tool you are using to translate is not correct because the website has a English version too which you can see by selecting the language in uppermost part of the webpage. The copyright policy clearly states:- Material featured on this portal may be reproduced free of charge. However, the material has to be reproduced accurately and not to be used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Wherever the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. Hence it is free licenced and can be redistributed because it doesn't meet any criteria for the deletion. you have requested it for speedy deletion under the reason F4. Failed license review which states the licence being 'non-free', restriction on 'commercial use' and 'derivative work', both three are not applicable here as both three are allowed according to the copyright policy of the governmental website. —— Ku423winz1 (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 17:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- [...] not to be used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Commons cannot control that and is out of scope. Also, the CSD was F1, not F4. -- DaxServer (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- WP:CSD#F1 is for ' unused duplicates or lower-quality/resolution copies of another Wikipedia file having the same file format ' and I find no link between F1 and the file I uploaded as it is used and has good resolution. For use it in derogatory manner and misleading context I would say files with this Copyright policy can be used as it is used for Template:Indian Army, and I think it is not a serious restriction because every author would or can file a police case if you use it in derogatory or misleading manner. —— Ku423winz1 ([[User talk:Ku423winz1#top|talk — Preceding undated comment was added at 03:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- You're confusing between en:WP:CSD#F1 (for English Wikipedia) and COM:CSD#F1 (for Wikimedia Commons). Also there is something wrong with your signature -- DaxServer (talk) 08:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link to
{{Indian Army}}. I think we can create a{{Kerala Government}}template similar to that? I'll leave this now to a closing admin to determine if this is valid -- DaxServer (talk) 09:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)- @DaxServer: actually I don't know how to reply with signature. And yes I think it would be helpful to make a copyright tag for Kerala government with the title like FL-Ker i.e. free licenced Kerala or something like that.—— Ku423winz1 (talk)
- WP:CSD#F1 is for ' unused duplicates or lower-quality/resolution copies of another Wikipedia file having the same file format ' and I find no link between F1 and the file I uploaded as it is used and has good resolution. For use it in derogatory manner and misleading context I would say files with this Copyright policy can be used as it is used for Template:Indian Army, and I think it is not a serious restriction because every author would or can file a police case if you use it in derogatory or misleading manner. —— Ku423winz1 ([[User talk:Ku423winz1#top|talk — Preceding undated comment was added at 03:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- [...] not to be used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Commons cannot control that and is out of scope. Also, the CSD was F1, not F4. -- DaxServer (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@DaxServer: , please remove now the deletion nomination tag from the image.—— Ku423winz1 (talk)
Deleted: The restriction "the material has to be reproduced accurately and not to be used in a derogatory manner" is an ND restriction and also disallows using the image to illustrate an article opposed to the subject. That is not a free license. With a free license you can publish a copy of the photo with the caption "This man is a crook". Of course if that isn't true, you may have to defend a suit for libel, but a free license would allow it on a copyright basis. This license does not. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Metadata says "عکس از عباس حجت پناه", copyrightholder is Abbas Hojjatpanah. No indication of own work by uploader. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mojtabaroshani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable own work claim. One of the pictures is credited to 'Mohammad Tajik' in metadata.
- File:Hadi Zonouzi & Sharimoghadam.jpg
- File:Hadi Zonouzi & Nematzadeh.jpg
- File:Hadi Zonouzi in Studio.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
this is a map various of Haemodorum occurrences which are not identified to species MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination request of uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I believe it to be a copyright violation ColinFine (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there. Don Miller owns this photo and gave permission to use it. I took a photograph of the photograph, which is what was uploaded here. Mamaofonebear (talk) 16:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like a photo of a newspaper article? When/where was it published? If you have permission to license from the original copyright holder, submit as detailed at COM:VRT. Just be honest and accurate about who created what, dates, etc. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is an actual photograph. It has "This paper manufactured by Kodak" on the back. How can I send you a photo of the picture (front/back) in its entirety so you can see that it is not from an article? Mamaofonebear (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- A photo of a newspaper clipping? Thanks for that clarification. The issue however is derivative work copyright - see COM:DW. The copyright belongs to the original publication, not whoever took the photo of it (unless it was the same person). So, what publication is this from, and when? Many old newspapers are out of copyright... but we'd need information of what and when it is to determine. Thanks -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, it is not from a newspaper clipping or an article. It is a photograph from a Kodak camera. Mamaofonebear (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Is there an email or something I can send the picture to so you can see that it is an actual photograph (glossy, semi-glossy) from a camera? Mamaofonebear (talk) 14:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, it is not from a newspaper clipping or an article. It is a photograph from a Kodak camera. Mamaofonebear (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- A photo of a newspaper clipping? Thanks for that clarification. The issue however is derivative work copyright - see COM:DW. The copyright belongs to the original publication, not whoever took the photo of it (unless it was the same person). So, what publication is this from, and when? Many old newspapers are out of copyright... but we'd need information of what and when it is to determine. Thanks -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is an actual photograph. It has "This paper manufactured by Kodak" on the back. How can I send you a photo of the picture (front/back) in its entirety so you can see that it is not from an article? Mamaofonebear (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like a photo of a newspaper article? When/where was it published? If you have permission to license from the original copyright holder, submit as detailed at COM:VRT. Just be honest and accurate about who created what, dates, etc. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Mamaofonebear: Yes, procedure explained at COM:VRT. However the issue remains - look at the photo, it is a photo of a newspaper or magazine article, and the copyright is by whoever wrote it. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, you are right. I thought this was referencing another photo that I may have uploaded with a similar file name. I believe this article is from HUNTING & FISHING in CANADA. I understand if it must be deleted. The sole purpose was using it as a reference to show his significance and that he is the father of Don Miller, who the main article is about. I did not intend for it to be published, but rather used as reference. Mamaofonebear (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Map (satellite view) of Kevin-Thevenard railway line, Eyre Peninsula, South Australia.jpg
[edit]_of_Kevin-Thevenard_railway_line,_Eyre_Peninsula,_South_Australia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_Kevin-Thevenard_railway_line,_Eyre_Peninsula,_South_Australia.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am the author. This map has been superseded by Map (satellite view) of Lake MacDonnell-Thevenard railway line, Eyre Peninsula, South Australia.tif. Retaining this map would be misleading. SCHolar44 (talk) 23:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/Mohamed.Louail.dz/photos/pb.100043854202943.-2207520000./815516805155755/?type=3. 1930s photograph. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Algeria only awards 10 years of protection for photos. Posting a public domain image to Facebook doesn't transfer the copyright to Facebook or to the poster, or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023012310008574 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://www.diocesisalerno.it/arcivescovo-metropolita/il-motto-e-lo-stemma-scelti-da-mons-bellandi/ . Antonio1952 (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of Iranian defence ministry. Same pictures published by defanews.ir without watermark and with higher quality (please see gallery here).
- File:10-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:9-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:8-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:7-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:6-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶- بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:5-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:4-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:3-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:2-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:1-پهپاد ایران-مهاجر۶.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).
- File:47-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:46-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:45-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل3 و ابابیل اطلس.jpg
- File:44-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر6.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).
- File:31-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:28-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:29-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:30-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:27-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:26-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:25-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [2] gallery
![[2]](https://media.mehrnews.com/d/2022/08/24/4/4257952.jpg){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.
- File:42-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل و اطلس.jpg
- File:41-پهپاد ایران- جت ناصح.jpg
- File:40-پهپاد ایران- کرّار.jpg
- File:16-پهپاد ایران- کمان۲۲.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.
- File:30-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:29-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:28-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:27-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:26-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:25-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:24-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:23-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:22-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:21-موشک- فکور.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.
- File:35-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:34-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:33-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:32-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:31-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:30-هواپیما- جنگنده صاعقه.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:
- No photographer is credited
- The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.
- File:44-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:43-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:42-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:41-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:40-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:39-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:38-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:37-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:36-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- General comment
Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:
- Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Delete if another agency is credited
- undelete images that didn't need to be deleted
For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.
--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.
- File:12-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:11-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:10-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:9-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:7-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:6-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:5-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:4-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:3-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:2-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photo taken from leader.ir, which does not release with a free license
- File:9-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%88_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84%E2%80%8C_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%AA%E2%80%8C_(%D8%B9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%88_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84%E2%80%8C_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%AA%E2%80%8C_(%D8%B9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%88_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84%E2%80%8C_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%AA%E2%80%8C_(%D8%B9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not; the files are marked as "received". — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.
- File:29-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:28-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:19-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:18-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:17-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:16-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:15-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:14-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:13-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:12-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:11-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:10-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:9-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:8-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:7-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply
- File:23-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:22-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:21-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.
- File:27-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:26-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:25-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:24-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News
- File:32-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:31-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:30-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:29-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:28-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:27-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:26-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:25-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:24-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:23-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.
- File:14-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:13-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:12-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:10-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:9-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:8-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:10-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:6-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:5-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:4-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:3-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:2-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:1-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:22-Popular gathering and support for Gaza children-Tehran-تجمع مردمی و حمایت از کودکان غزه- تهران.jpg
- File:3-The burial ceremony of the martyrs who defended the shrine-Milad Heydari,Meghdad Mahghani-مراسم تشییع پیکر شهدای مدافع حرم- میلاد حیدری و مقداد مهقانی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JonasBR as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO Brazil. --Rosenzweig τ 17:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by user:JonasBR as Logo, but there has already been a discussion and it was kept as too simple. --C messier (talk) 20:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Brazil has a high threshold of originality for logos per COM:TOO Brazil. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussions. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Moj News does not credit any photographer. Considering that the gallery this image is taken from ([3]) features photographs from multiple venues of the olympic games on one single day and this small news agency lacks enough resources to cover all of them, we can assume that these pictures are not works by Moj News Agency, they are obtained from another source and CC does not apply. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- These two files are derived from this photograph and have the same problem:
Please considers these too. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by JonasBR as Logo. Given that this isn't a really complex logo (two circles, a star and some letters), maybe it is below the threshold of originality. C messier (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Brazil has a high threshold of originality for logos per COM:TOO Brazil. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep agree, it's true. Iyusi766 (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Highly likely to be copyvio. Source is not freely licensed and file was not found in the source HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
And:
This is a super low resolution photo that's cut 200x200 with no exif. Very likely plucked from the web and not own work Vera (talk) 22:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
This photo was credited to Janita Sassen in the caption on the Dutch Wikipedia. Vera (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo . However this isn't a really complex logo. It is the company name and two rather weird, yet simple geometric shapes. Is it below COM:TOO or not? C messier (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PRP. There is not much information about the threshold of originality in Uzbekistan and this is not a simple shape. It is an abstract representation of a bull's head. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --✗plicit 04:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Glat Entertainment
[edit]All of the files uploaded by the following users:
- Pedro Renteria (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Osmoniopreda (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Salvadormedia1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- PeliculasTT2023 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
All part of a series of sockpuppets appointed by the Brothers Tavera from Glat Entertainment, a minor Mexican audiovisual production company that has tried time and time again to publicize works and people related to this company. Many of these files have been used to make personal promotional galleries in Wikidata entries of deleted eswiki pages. All are promotional material, such as “behind the scenes” shoots, red carpet, and similar. There’s no usage of these files, AFAIK.--MexTDT (talk) 00:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep See for instance File:Carla Estrada (cropped).jpg which is in use. It is a crop from a larger image. I chose the first image marked for deletion, and it is in use. --RAN (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- That file was made from one of the nominated files but was not uploaded by these users. Like I’ve said, some of them are in use to make promotional galleries in Wikidata entries created by the main user and sockpuppets but have no articles linked to them. MexTDT (talk) 18:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - not a proper DR. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bedivere as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously deleted. See User_talk:Jialxv#File:Homenaje_a_Victoriano_Juaristi.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Since these are old, should be discussed for potential PD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is my photo of my own collage from a public exposition with old pictures inside. Exactly, what is the problem? I don't understand. Jialxv (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Jialxv: Your collage is a derivative work of the old pictures, so it is only allowed if all the old pictures are in the public domain (see rules for Spain). The photos are probably OK per {{PD-Spain-photo}}, but non-photos are subject to a term of 70 years after the author's death (or 70 years after publication for anonymous works). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
The file is an image uploaded by TMLN123, in which the uploader specified neither the source, author and license template when the file was uploaded (see the originally uploaded version, the author and source information was due to later addition of structural data).
Afterwards, Air Astana 1388 edited the file by claiming that the file is taken by TMLN123 and licensed under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} (at [4] and [5]), apparently in good faith but without the consent of the uploader.
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Yeti_Airlines_ATR-72_9N-ANC.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=725236751){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Yeti_Airlines_ATR-72_9N-ANC.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=725265014){kind=link}
While I have asked TMLN123 whether he took the image and license it under such license, and Air Astana 1388 on whether the edits were authorized by TMLN123 (see here and here respectively), both of them have yet answered to these questions. As a result, the file's source, authorship and license are all unknown, with the information added by Air Astana 1388 and subsequently copied into structural data being null and void. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Info: The deletion was delayed in order to solicit information from the involved users, and also due to auto-protection at Wikipedia(s). I'm ready to withdraw and request to close this discussion if the source, authorship and licensing information can be validated by TMLN123.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)- @Air Astana 1388: notifying stakeholder.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
picture superseded by a newer one which better demonstrates the branding
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author, may be copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 20:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry that the author ist unknown, but the person is without doubt Karl Schrage. The photo was probably taken in the end of the fifties or in the sixties, my mother kept it as her favourite teacher's favourite photo. Why is it a problem to put this photo into the article about Karl Schrage, dead since 1972? Could the unkown author of the photo make any other use of the photo today? Anyway, I still hope to find another photo of Karl Schrage. Sybille Demmer (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - a 1950-60s photo will have a German copyright for many more years and a US copyright until 2050 or so. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fariborz1359 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable own work claims. Two of the files are copyrighted logos.
- File:Fazel1359.jpg
- File:Dr-enayat.jpg
- File:Heydari1398.jpg
- File:Resalat-logo-bank.png
- File:Resalat-Bank.png
- File:Heydarimasod.jpg
- File:Fazel980301.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
PD-Iran does not apply according to source, no indication HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claims
- File:Asal badii R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:Poopak goldarre2 R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:Poopak goldarre R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:Anvae khatne zanan R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:Namaz kabe R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:Namaz malezi R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:Divar chin R.ESLAMI.jpg
- File:ختنه R.ESLAMI.png
HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source is copyrighted video on Youtube, meaining that this image is a copyvio. Daniel Benny Pinheiro (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source is copyrighted video on Youtube, meaining that this image is a copyvio. Daniel Benny Pinheiro (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image does not appear to be an original work created on 1/5/2023 as stated in the Commons file data; an identical image appears on a copyrighted web page dated 7 May 2022. See https://www.theamericanconservative.com/anglican-julian-dobbs-the-based-bishop/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dclemens1971 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
2023-01-05 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.175.63.231 (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - © 2022 The American Conservative, a publication of The American Ideas Institute. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
EXIF data indicate that the photo is copyrighted by © Amanda Lindgren and thus publishing it under CC-BY-SA 4.0 maybe a copyrights violation. C messier (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- This photo is provided by the artist herself (Karolina Blixt), who has received it from the photographer (Amanda Lindgren) for use on the web. Fetjocke (talk) 10:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Fetjocke: , what I can tell is that the photographer provided the photo to be used on the artist's website, which has an 2022 © All rights reserved tag. There is no evidence provided that it is available with CC-BY-SA 4.0. The photographer must give permission to be available with such a license. --C messier (talk) 12:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, because uploader is Christian Svane (look his other uploads). VRT-permission from author Christian Sørensen is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DCB as no permission (No permission since). Converting to DR per Doc.Heintz's comment on File talk:Matthias Jügler portait.jpg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Photo on Matthias Juegler's website can be found on 2019, which predates the 2023 upload. Also, the metadata has a copyright notice as well. In either case, this is a copyvio. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Image is recieved, not a work by Mehr News HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Watermark says "گنجینه پژوهشی ایرج افشار", own work questionable HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
not own work https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiszocIFBRvnUXmtgPZSF1DMjRjjmVcfOIXbpkCVJwfei7MqLF7DCvArMrnWertSCEoa8j2e3dcUgvGTFXkg0QbT5Eg39PrhsGFJa6QKaEYJM573PdSwowXvyIzxivbzaeOloiwKy75D-U080m_1J5A3xEsbJXw Mateus2019 (talk) 07:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete Appears to be the logo of an Australian group, very likely doesn't satisfy COM:TOO Australia. Eiim (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Appears to be above the Australian ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Double with Malaysia national football team kits Flix11 (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no need to deleted. Emptied the file page and included a redirect. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a band. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: logo of a German musical group. such logo's appear not elegible for copyright protection per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany. --Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. COM:TOO Dominican Republic does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho these images are showing a creativity of the designer and are therefore copyrighted. The images have to be deleted as a consequence. --Ellywa (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since). Converting to DR. Photo is apparently own work so the center image can be censored to put the rest below COM:TOO. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: deleted the first version, uploaded censored version. --Ellywa (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Moses+Letlang%22+Botswana&bih=951&biw=1920&hl=de&sxsrf=AJOqlzWnYv9HuDC6rQp-TenlS7691Y-LwQ%3A1674375790898&ei=bvLMY-fANsPTsAeGn6TYBg&ved=0ahUKEwjnr_Lx39r8AhXDKewKHYYPCWsQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=%22Moses+Letlang%22+Botswana&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQA0oECEEYAUoECEYYAFDTCFi1EWCdEmgBcAB4AIABdogB0QaSAQM1LjSYAQCgAQHAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp Mateus2019 (talk) 08:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE, not used on the projects in any article. --Ellywa (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free logo. Image has copyright watermarks no permission
The image has been nominated for deletion and was kept as TOO simple. C messier (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- If we look closer to the image to the second O we can see a watermark of Dreamstime. Image Exif also mentions that the author is Mariia Shapilova | Dreamstime.com and https://www.dreamstime.com/about-stock-image-licenses has no indication that the image is free. There are various alternate logo already available in Category:Zoom Video Communications.
- ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Tiven2240: If there is another version of this logo (with the camera) without the watermarks would be welcomed but apparently this logo is considered to be below the threshold of originality and thus can't be copyrighted. --C messier (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: simple text logo, font with a very simple symbol. Below TOO of the USA. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Нет источника файла Semyonus (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Как же нет, когда он указан? AlexTref871 (talk) 05:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Esta imagen ya tienen otra versión en SVG Moratoe (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept version File:Partido Unionista Logo (Guatemala, 2016).svg. The jpg version was only used on a user page. --Ellywa (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This template is not in accordance with Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Honduras and this country is not listed on Commons:Coats of arms, the countries where COA are in PD. The link to the Honduran law on the template does not show a COA is in PD. It states a COA cannot be used as a trademark. Please note in addition the discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo de Copán Ruinas.svg. Ellywa (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. As mentioned in the referenced discussion: Article 83 of the law cited in the template reads Signs that are included in any of the following prohibitions may not be registered as trademarks. So the cited article is about trademark registration, not copyright.The copyright law for Honduras is Copyright and Related Rights Law (Approved by Decree No. 4-99-E, and as Amended by Decree No. 16-2006). Limitations to copyright ("Limitaciones y Excepciones al Derecho de Autor") are in Title IV, and I can find no mention of "symbols" there. In fact, the law makes no mention of coats of arms (escudos) at all that I can tell.In other words, {{PD-Coa-Honduras}} appears to be nonsense and should be deleted.This currently affects 39 files, most or all of which were uploaded by COAmaker17. These will have to be reviewed to see if there are other paths to compatible licensing (e.g. the original designs may be so old the copyright has expired, or the owner may have released it under a compatible license). If not, these files all have to be deleted as COM:DW of presumed copyrighted original designs. --Xover (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ellywa @Xover If the coats of arms cannot be registered as trademarks then there can be no copyright on it since the coats of arms are used as the trademark of the municipal corporation and if the trademarks are a type of intellectual property and the coats of arms cannot be registered as trademarks therefore Both these can remain in a legal loophole where, as well as being coats of arms, they cannot be registered as trademarks in the (ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS) mentioned in both laws, both in the Law of Copyright and Rights related and the Industrial Property Law what is necessary to have the protection of the law. Article 123 of the Law on Copyright and Related Rights also allows the reproduction of works for educational purposes: ARTICLE 123. Domestic reproduction will be lawful in a copy made by the user solely for private use, or for educational purposes, non-profit, from directly from another support that contains a phonogram or audiovisual work published or from broadcasting or another form of communication. COAmaker17 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @COAmaker17: The arguments you make in this message are, legally speaking, nonsense. Trademarks and copyright are two entirely different things, and one has effectively nothing to do with the other. Your "reproduction for educational use" argument is about fair use, which is explicitly not permitted on Commons (fair use, as an affirmative defence, presupposes that a copyright exists and has been infringed; it's an argument why you should not be punished for an acknowledged copyright violation). Your argument in the message below may have more merit, but I've not yet had time to look at it. Xover (talk) 07:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ellywa @Xover If the coats of arms cannot be registered as trademarks then there can be no copyright on it since the coats of arms are used as the trademark of the municipal corporation and if the trademarks are a type of intellectual property and the coats of arms cannot be registered as trademarks therefore Both these can remain in a legal loophole where, as well as being coats of arms, they cannot be registered as trademarks in the (ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS) mentioned in both laws, both in the Law of Copyright and Rights related and the Industrial Property Law what is necessary to have the protection of the law. Article 123 of the Law on Copyright and Related Rights also allows the reproduction of works for educational purposes: ARTICLE 123. Domestic reproduction will be lawful in a copy made by the user solely for private use, or for educational purposes, non-profit, from directly from another support that contains a phonogram or audiovisual work published or from broadcasting or another form of communication. COAmaker17 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep @Ellywa @Xover Definitely coat of arms/flags/emblems are PD in Honduras read article 12 of the REGULATION OF THE COPYRIGHT LAW AND RIGHTS RELATED: Exclusions. They are not subject to copyright protection, among others: g) Reproductions or imitations, without authorization, of coats of arms, flags or emblems of any country, state, municipality or administrative political division equivalent, nor the denominations, rules, symbols, initials or emblems of governmental, non-governmental or any international organizations another officially recognized organization, as well as the verbal designation of the themselves. Please recover both coat of arms you deleted.
- COAmaker17 (talk) 01:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. Ok, this is a much better starting point. The linked document does indeed seem to say that symbols and flags of any administrative division etc. are exempt from copyright. However, the actual PDF linked appears to be a draft rather than a final (adopted) version, and it is undated and has not been assigned a document number. It is also hosted on the website of the Chamber of Commerce, i.e. a business association rather than a governmental agency. The document itself is also very strange. It appears to be in the form of an executive order regulating the implementation of the previously cited copyright law. But it then goes on to essentially create a whole new law without citing the parts of the original law that authorises such changes. It is not clear to me that the executive has the authority to override the legislative in this way.However, the most immediate problem is that this document does not appear to be available on WIPO Lex, or a Honduran government website, and that its legal status is not clear. I think we need to find an official copy of this document (whatever was published, if it was published, in the Honduran Gazette or similar). On that basis we can try to figure out whether there's an actual CoA exception in Honduras. If the document is an actual effective regulation we also need to review it against COM:Honduras to see if it affects anything else there (for one thing, it seems to say that no logo for any company or organisation is eligible for copyright, regardless of complexity or artistic merit).I can muddle along with translations of the law, but I don't think I can navigate the government websites etc. of Honduras (I can't even find their websites, and enWP points to a 2007 Internet Archive snapshot... Do they even have a website?). So someone else will have to do the digging on that. Xover (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- The document is available in CCIC. La CCIC es una entidad de Derecho Público, reconocida por el Estado, con personalidad jurídica propia, fundada en 1931 y con sede en San Pedro Sula, Cortés, que asocia de forma voluntaria, a personas naturales y jurídicas dedicadas al comercio, la industria, y la prestación de servicios, con el fin de promover, mediante el desarrollo empresarial, el progreso social de Honduras. In the Constitution of Honduras article 245 the President of the Republic have the faculty to:
- To issue directives and decrees and to issue regulations and resolutions according to the law In that law itself it says En ejercicio de las funciones que le confiere el artículo 245, numeral 1 y 11 y 248 de la Constitución Política de la República; 116, 118 numeral 2 y 119 numeral 2 de la Ley General de la Administración Pública; 41 y 42 de la Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo; 189 del Decreto No. 4-99-E Ley del Derecho de Autor y de los Derechos Conexos, artículo y 57 del Decreto No. 16-2006, Ley de Implementación del Tratado de Libre Comercio, República Dominicana, Centroamérica, Estados Unidos these are the laws that gives the faculty to the ejecutive to emit this regulation. Normally Honduras government websites have missing information thats why the Chamber of Commerce (A public entity recognized by the state with own juridic is apparently the hosting website with own legal personality). COAmaker17 (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very helpful regarding the authority of the executive. However, a Chamber of Commerce, recognized by the state or not, is not a government entity: it is a special interest lobbying organisation. In other words, this could equally well be a draft of something they wanted to lobby the Honduran legislature to adopt and which has no official standing (no force of law). We'll need some sort of plausible chain of evidence from some part of the Honduran government (that could include the WIPO or the UN or similar listing it as being an in force regulation in Honduras). Xover (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Xover Well then I need time to find a dated and a document number version of this document already got response from Instituto de la Propiedad and they suggested me to contact a person who could have the document meanwhile i have not other feedback from this person who would send me the document. COAmaker17 (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very helpful regarding the authority of the executive. However, a Chamber of Commerce, recognized by the state or not, is not a government entity: it is a special interest lobbying organisation. In other words, this could equally well be a draft of something they wanted to lobby the Honduran legislature to adopt and which has no official standing (no force of law). We'll need some sort of plausible chain of evidence from some part of the Honduran government (that could include the WIPO or the UN or similar listing it as being an in force regulation in Honduras). Xover (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. Ok, this is a much better starting point. The linked document does indeed seem to say that symbols and flags of any administrative division etc. are exempt from copyright. However, the actual PDF linked appears to be a draft rather than a final (adopted) version, and it is undated and has not been assigned a document number. It is also hosted on the website of the Chamber of Commerce, i.e. a business association rather than a governmental agency. The document itself is also very strange. It appears to be in the form of an executive order regulating the implementation of the previously cited copyright law. But it then goes on to essentially create a whole new law without citing the parts of the original law that authorises such changes. It is not clear to me that the executive has the authority to override the legislative in this way.However, the most immediate problem is that this document does not appear to be available on WIPO Lex, or a Honduran government website, and that its legal status is not clear. I think we need to find an official copy of this document (whatever was published, if it was published, in the Honduran Gazette or similar). On that basis we can try to figure out whether there's an actual CoA exception in Honduras. If the document is an actual effective regulation we also need to review it against COM:Honduras to see if it affects anything else there (for one thing, it seems to say that no logo for any company or organisation is eligible for copyright, regardless of complexity or artistic merit).I can muddle along with translations of the law, but I don't think I can navigate the government websites etc. of Honduras (I can't even find their websites, and enWP points to a 2007 Internet Archive snapshot... Do they even have a website?). So someone else will have to do the digging on that. Xover (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above. It is evident coat of arms and symbols are not covered by trademark protection. If proof surfaces they are exempt from copyright protection too, I will reconsider this vote. Bedivere (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Xover I found a great similarity with the Venezuelan template, basically it uses the homologous law of the Honduran one, which is the Industrial Property Law and if the Honduran one is incorrect, Venezuela one is also incorrect (although it has been in force since 2011) here is a comparison of both laws Industrial Property found in the Template:PD-VenezuelaGov and on Honduras one:
- Honduras: Artículo 83: No podrán ser registrados como marcas, los signos que estén comprendidos en alguna de las prohibiciones siguientes, cuando: Incluyan una reproducción o imitación total o parcial, de un escudo, bandera u otro emblema, sigla, denominación o abreviación de denominación de cualquier Estado u organización internacional, sin autorización del Estado o de la organización internacional de que se trate.
- Venezuela: Artículo 33.- No podrán adoptarse ni registrarse como marcas: 2º) la Bandera, Escudo de Armas u otra insignia de la República, de los Estados o de las Municipalidades y, en general, de cualquier entidad venezolana de carácter público; 3º) los signos, emblemas y distintivos de la Cruz Roja y de cualquier otra entidad de misma índole; 4º) la Bandera, Escudo de Armas u otras insignias de naciones extranjeras, salvo cuando su uso comercial esté debidamente autorizado por certificado expedido por la oficina correspondiente de la nación interesada.
- Same law (Ley de Propiedad Industrial) but seems no one started a Deletion request or edited the Template. Also Venezuela PD is of 60 years so likely a lot of coat of arms would be deleted of Spanish Wikipedia and would be only in english wikipedia as Fair Use For example Caracas coat of arms that is from 2022. Also I found several Korean flags and shields that for some reason used this template (Template:PD-KoreaGov) to be in the public domain. I don't know in which part of the law that this template quotes says that flags and coat of arms are not protected by copyright but here is an example (File:Flag of Yeongyang.svg) and if someone knows could explain it. I still have not received a response from the Property Institute or from the person who was supposed to answer me about the Regulation. COAmaker17 (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can't read Korean law and can't have an opinion. I can say, though, that Venezuelan law does not protect coats of arms and other symbols mentioned within the industrial property law as trademarks, but that has nothing to do with copyright. The intellectual property law makes no specific mention, as the previous one does, about coats of arms and similar symbols. As a result, if they are not in the public domain per one of many of the requisites established by the same law, they are under copyright and should be deleted. Same happens with the template and affected files here. Bedivere (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Found an English language translation of the Korean copyright act and it makes mention, in the article devoted to works not protected by copyright, to works by local or central governments that are acts such as bulletins, ordinances and the likes. I don't think a coat of arms can be considered one of the expressly considered unprotected works. Bedivere (talk) 04:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- I also found a similarity in Template:PD-Coa-Hungary where it does not explicitly mention the coat of arms and flags and is used as an argument for the flags and coat of arms to be in the public domain. Here is a comparison between two parts of the two laws:
- Hungary : Copyright, Act, 1999
- Chapter II
- Preamble
- The Object of Copyright Protection
- (4) The protection provided by this Act shall not cover legal provisions, public
- resolutions, authority announcements and documents, as well as standards and other like
- regulations.
- Honduras: Copyright and Neighboring Rights Law
- Chapter II
- Limitations to Protection
- Article 54. The Laws, regulations, agreements and other provisions emanating from the corresponding organs of the State, may be published individually or in collection by individuals, after they have been published in the Official Gazette, respecting its complete official text. Likewise, they may be inserted without authorization in newspapers and in works in which, due to their nature or purpose, it is convenient to quote, comment on, criticize or copy them verbatim.You can see that the Honduran Copyright Law also does not protect the laws and publications of state organs the same as in Hungary what is used in the Template: PD-Coa-Hungary. In the copyright law of Hungary it does not expressly say that the coat of arms and flags are not protected by copyright as well as that of Honduras. But both have a similar article with what is argued in that template so that the coat of arms and flags are in the public domain. COAmaker17 (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The Honduras law refers to documents, not works of art such as coats of arms. Bedivere (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also Hungary law Template:PD-Coa-Hungary maybe is because coat of arms came from public documents. COAmaker17 (talk) 00:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please remain on topic, @COAmaker17. This request for deletion is about the Honduran coats of arms, not those of elsewhere. Bedivere (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Seems to me like that Hungarian template is only an interpretation of the law. It refers strictly to some documents, not works of art. It should be discussed and/or deleted too. Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is in relation to the subject I am showing some templates that have been supporting the public domain of coat of arms and flags for years and if there is a similarity with the Honduran law I will show it .I hope someone helps interpret both laws or explain why the Hungarian law does leaves the coat of arms in the public domain because in the Honduran law there is also an exception similar to the one stated in that law. COAmaker17 (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Honduran law, as the others you have linked, refer to documents, not works of art such as coats of arms. That means they cannot be included here. Of course if another copyright law says coats of arms and symbols are public domain literally (for any reason, including but not limited to being uncopyeoghtable, or public agencies or institutions being ineligible to generate copyrights) then they are, but that is not the case here. Bedivere (talk) 12:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- So if the Hungarian law does not explicitly mention the coats of arms and flags, is it wrong too? And should that template be deleted? COAmaker17 (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's what I've consistently said, but that is not the point of this deletion request. You can request it though, I'd support it. Bedivere (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- So if the Hungarian law does not explicitly mention the coats of arms and flags, is it wrong too? And should that template be deleted? COAmaker17 (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Honduran law, as the others you have linked, refer to documents, not works of art such as coats of arms. That means they cannot be included here. Of course if another copyright law says coats of arms and symbols are public domain literally (for any reason, including but not limited to being uncopyeoghtable, or public agencies or institutions being ineligible to generate copyrights) then they are, but that is not the case here. Bedivere (talk) 12:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is in relation to the subject I am showing some templates that have been supporting the public domain of coat of arms and flags for years and if there is a similarity with the Honduran law I will show it .I hope someone helps interpret both laws or explain why the Hungarian law does leaves the coat of arms in the public domain because in the Honduran law there is also an exception similar to the one stated in that law. COAmaker17 (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also Hungary law Template:PD-Coa-Hungary maybe is because coat of arms came from public documents. COAmaker17 (talk) 00:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- The Honduras law refers to documents, not works of art such as coats of arms. Bedivere (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can't read Korean law and can't have an opinion. I can say, though, that Venezuelan law does not protect coats of arms and other symbols mentioned within the industrial property law as trademarks, but that has nothing to do with copyright. The intellectual property law makes no specific mention, as the previous one does, about coats of arms and similar symbols. As a result, if they are not in the public domain per one of many of the requisites established by the same law, they are under copyright and should be deleted. Same happens with the template and affected files here. Bedivere (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. No special limitation on copyright of coats of arms in Honduras is found. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)