Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/28
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
These are the steps, which must be done for an ordinary deletion request. 36.250.86.194 09:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
sagoshader 94.140.246.27 06:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 07:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
flag of grenada 94.140.246.27 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason given. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
abdullah balouch 182.178.55.82 23:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- So far as I can tell, there is no basis for this deletion request. Keep. Alkari (?), 1 March 2013, 01:12 UTC
Kept: McZusatz (talk) 11:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
هذا الملف هو تشويه للعلم الموريتاني إذ لا يحافظ علي شكل الهلال والنجمة في العلم القديم لذلك نطلب حذفه ونطلب من صاحب الملف التواصل معنا علي البريد ibentiris@gmail.com لأجل إعطائه الملف الصحيح مرفق بالمقاييس ومفاتيح الألوان ابن تيرس (talk) 03:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- There is a different version of this flag. Ydecreux (talk) 08:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on many, many projects. Commons should not delete used files even if they're inaccurate. See COM:NPOV. Personally, I think there's a violation of COM:OVERWRITE here, but that's not a reason for deletion either. --bjh21 (talk) 11:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Disruptive request in retaliation for the editor's files (variants on the flag) being nominated for deletion. Number 57 (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Update: ابن تيرس/Ibentiris has been blocked on en.wiki for sockpuppetry related to this flag issue. This should be speedy closed. Number 57 (talk) 17:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Regardless of the nominator’s standing or supposed motives, a problem with the crescent shape (which I gather from Google Translate is the issue) is not cause for deletion. Inaccuracies should be tagged and discussed instead, and there’s always the option to create alternative versions.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
This file is a distortion of the Mauritanian state flag ابن تيرس (talk) 14:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: There is a sockpuppet activity regarding the file. --E4024 (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ibentiris/ابن تيرس/Jelloud Najem has now had his accounts globally locked so hopefully the disruption is finished. Number 57 (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as there's no policy-based reason to delete. That being said, while I support the speedy keeping of this file, I strongly recommend that it's changed, but I acknowledge that this is not the place to discuss that. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: Suspicious activities around the file continue, FYI. --E4024 (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As for the issues with the design, this was what I was sent from their Embassy in Tokyo, Japan, by Japanese vexillologist Nozomi Kariyasu. I drew the design based off of this document, which was a radical change from the March 2017 proposed law to what eventually was adopted late of 2017. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- And I will gladly work with all parties to get this design right. I still think my issue is, along with others, is what was the legal source or point where the design got changed from the 15/70/15 to what their Embassy in Japan sent us. I personally have not found that legal point yet and I am not having much luck pointing to where it happened, though I remembered this just now. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
mauritania 94.140.246.27 06:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 08:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
flag of senegal 94.140.246.27 07:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 08:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
as an author I ask to delete this screenshot because of wrong licence Danylo Parubii (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Afbeelding is niet van gebruiker zelf, maar is gehaald van een fandom-pagina. Thieu1972 (talk) 06:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: I never said at any time that the image was mine, I also put the source where I got the image. Sebano1999 (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo is copyrighted by its creator, Nintendo. Although the logo is available in logos fandom under free license, this is copyright violation itself: logos fandom has no right to license (or even use) copyrighted material. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
No longer required 2001:8003:2044:4500:ECC9:CF1:D78C:1E5C 10:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use on 5 projects. --Achim55 (talk) 11:12, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
not required 2001:8003:2044:4500:FCAC:613:7AB6:E798 13:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep In use, and stop requesting deletion of this file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- For the record, in use at de:Paul von Hindenburg, en:Paul von Hindenburg, fi:Paul von Hindenburg, fr:Paul von Hindenburg, hu:Paul von Hindenburg and tr:Paul von Hindenburg. Brianjd (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kinda useless, honestly. I uploaded it by accident. Isognato carice (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:-54 Flim process.jpg}} Corqe (talk) 19:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Not a dupe but a crop. --Achim55 (talk) 19:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Uploader's request. Copyrighted material uploaded by accident. Upload for Freedom (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 15:35, 28 October 2022 UTC: author's request on creation day --Krdbot 19:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Without further description and source this file is out of scope. Current description is only advertisement. GPSLeo (talk) 16:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This is the only reproduction of this painting by Edgar Degas on Commons. The description can be changed without a deletion request. Is there any reason not to change the description now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- This information was not linked from the file page. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I figured it out from the title. Anyway, yes or no to my question? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept; work identified and filepage changed. --GPSLeo (talk) 06:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.31 16:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete File description says the source is https://images.bauerhosting.com/legacy/media/6123/929b/e39a/a111/4c7b/baca/dune-3.jpg?format=jpg&quality=80&width=960&height=540&ratio=16-9&resize=aspectfill and the author is Denis Villenueve. The category Dune (2021 film) suggests that, as expected, the movie is non-free. It is reasonable to assume that this image is also non-free. I will tag this file as a {{Copyvio}}. Brianjd (talk) 06:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedily. --Storkk (talk) 08:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Non-free logo. TadejM (t/p) 14:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022102810013641 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:LOGO MLADI BORCI NOB (1).png” under ticket:2022102810013641. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope; utter nonsense related to user's other crackpot ideas. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Universe is Quantun Build Deacon Vorbis (talk) 20:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination see other files deleted. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Giorgia Meloni in 2022
[edit]Files marked with "Immagini messe a disposizione con licenza CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT" (Images made available under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT license), fails Commons's Commons:Licensing requirement. Legal notice said "Unless otherwise stated, all content published on this Website (text, images, photographs, videos, etc.) is made available under a CC-BY 3.0 license". IMO this falls under the otherwise circumstances.
- File:Cerimonia di insediamento del Governo Meloni 2022 2.jpg
- File:Cerimonia di insediamento del Governo Meloni 2022.jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni - First Council of Ministers meeting (1).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni - First Council of Ministers meeting (2).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni - First Council of Ministers meeting (3).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni - First Council of Ministers meeting (4).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni 26.10.22 (1).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni 26.10.22 (2).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni 26.10.22 (3).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Premier (cropped 2).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Premier (cropped).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Prime Minister (1) (cropped).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Prime Minister (1) (cropped2).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Prime Minister (1).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Prime Minister (2).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Prime Minister (3).jpg
- File:Giorgia Meloni Prime Minister (4).jpg
- File:Meloni Draghi (1).jpg
- File:Meloni Draghi (2).jpg
- File:Meloni Draghi (3).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Conte Toti Bucci 2020.jpg. Pinging @Gbawden. Brianjd (talk) 15:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. Unfortunately all galleries on the Italian Government website are marked as CC-BY-NC-SA, so there are only a few CC-BY images. --Jaqen (talk) 07:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, sadly. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Decent portrait but not so good as to keep it just as a portrait and a bit blurry, so yes, out of scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Yes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Watermark, regardless of anything else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
self-promotion Trade (talk) 14:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 19:52, 2 November 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 02:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted album art, no EXIF, so likely copyright violation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete doubtful "own work" and probably not freely licensed. PierreSelim (talk) 08:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Apparently copied from Facebook, per the EXIF, so presumably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Tiny photo, no EXIF, likely copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Promotional watermark. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Doubtfully free PierreSelim (talk) 08:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:HOST and project scope. PierreSelim (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:HOST and project scope. PierreSelim (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Looks like copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete CD Cover, likely copyrighted PierreSelim (talk) 08:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Author is MAIHSIANGYUN, not uploader. See EXIF shizhao (talk) 02:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 10:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 10:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Good photo, but taken from Facebook per the EXIF that starts with "FB". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Siegfried Assmann
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2021; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Bk altarfenster nord.jpg
- File:Bk südfenster.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, innen Fensterfront.jpg
- File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Kreuz.jpg
- File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Mosaik.jpg
- File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Pult und Kanzel.jpg
- File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Relief Taufkapelle.jpg
- File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Rundfenster.jpg
- File:Kko ostfenster.jpg
- File:Kko westfenster.jpg
- File:Margaretenkirche Rose Moderne Verglasung IMGP2154.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Immer man wech damit. Und bitte keine Wiederherstellung in 74 Jahren. --Smial (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover - upload locally as fair use in Wikipedia, but must be deleted from Commons unless the proper permissions are given. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover - upload locally as fair use in Wikipedia, but must be deleted from Commons unless the proper permissions are given. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover - upload locally as fair use in Wikipedia, but must be deleted from Commons unless the proper permissions are given. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover - upload locally as fair use in Wikipedia, but must be deleted from Commons unless the proper permissions are given. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Is this really a selfie? It doesn't look like one to me. No EXIF, either. Presumably, needs COM:VRT permission. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of presumably non-notable man, uploaded by a user with only this upload. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Blurry image, nothing can be seen, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Blurry image, nothing can be seen, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Blurry image, nothing can be seen, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Blurry image, nothing can be seen, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Blurry and unused photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative image rendered blank becuase of problematic source image. Decided to make a raster version in stead. B. Jankuloski (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Blurry image, unable to see the object clearly A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 14:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this company doesn't seem particularly notable. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure URAA got restored due to it falling out of copyright in 1997, so this is copyrighted in the US. Sennecaster (talk) 02:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- What? Can I have a translation please? Oxyman (talk) 03:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Oxyman Generally, if a work was copyrighted in its source country on 1 January 1996, then it is also copyrighted in the US – even if the source country’s copyright has since expired. See Commons:URAA-restored copyrights.
- Files on Commons must be public domain or freely licensed in both the source country and the US. Brianjd (talk) 15:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- UK gov't said in a response to an enquiry that crown copyright's expiration extends worldwide and the works can be used freely in any country, so this is fine as even if there was any copyright or restoration there is no issue in this case. See all the UKGov templates. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- If that's the case, then I stand corrected; however, the guidance is incredibly confusing, and COM:UK probably needs a wording change in that case--I'll probably get around to an attempt in the next 12 months :P Sennecaster (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Tiny, unusable. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Flag of a nonexistent country. Its accompanying article, en:Draft:People's Republic Of Aidenia, was speedy deleted as a hoax. Delete as out of scope. Eureka Lott 02:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
In use but looks like a copy of a book cover that's presumably still under copyright (author born in 1935). Can be uploaded to Wikipedia as fair use but cannot be hosted on Commons. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover - upload locally as fair use in Wikipedia, but must be deleted from Commons unless the proper permissions are given. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The cover is from a Greek Orthodox copper plate engraving from the 1700s. Unquestionably in the public domain by age. There is nothing in the rest of the book cover to be sufficiently creative to attract copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- To my eyes, it is a modern book cover, but if a modern book cover that uses a reproduction of an 18th-century cover is PD, it should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art. --Yann (talk) 22:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of presumably non-notable person. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
In use, but no useful EXIF, likely copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Presumably copyvio: photo of an album cover. Must go through COM:VRT to be hosted on Commons. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a derivative work. Source of both images (cattle and the background) should be given A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
EXIF not useful, tiny image, so I believe likely copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable art by non-notable artist; we don't even know their name! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Laos A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Small and not very good-quality photo of unidentified poet reciting, so presumably out of scope. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Photo reproduced from catalog, lacking in notice of permission; needs COM:VRT approval. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support agreed -- Chainwit. (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted banners A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Flattering photo, but seems to be of a non-notable person and lacks really useful EXIF info. Also not great technically, if we were thinking of keeping it as just a portrait. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Valuable image (the Farsi Google-translates to "Achaemenid period gold sword"), but contains a big watermark. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Art for an album that seems to have disappeared without much of a trace, uploaded by purely promotional account with no activity since 2017. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Edit of https://www.canva.com/p/templates/EAFJ6myji7w-tips-to-overcome-cyberbullying-infographic/ with new text, top left image has Canva watermark across it. Belbury (talk) 07:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of a non-notable person, out of project scope. — Haseeb (talk) 07:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Highly notable historian and politician unknown to Haseeb. The photo has appeared in newspapers. Photo is not part of any vindictive and political project based in Bangladesh. Checkout the use of this image with a Google search to determine whether or not the photo was used. Unless the person was notable, the newspapers would not have used this photo. 123.136.25.130 09:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Notable per IP user above and with a VRT ticket. Here's an example of a page showing how notable this man is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- — Haseeb (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's intolerable if they're threatening you. Discussing any other subject in that context seems really trivial, but why wouldn't a photo of a significant person be of educational value? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The article about this person has been deleted from enwiki through discussion (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky). This means the person is not significant enough that wikipedia requires. If you see the deletion discussion there, you can see that an IP user has tried many times to keep the article. Thus the intention of keeping article by IP user(s) and IP's comments and activities here seems that article creation and uploading image are only for advertising purposes; And the person doesn't have enough significancy. — Haseeb (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would disagree that a person has to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article in order for us not to hide their photo. I'm satisfied that the web search results I got, including the one I linked, show that this is a notable enough person to refrain from hiding this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's intolerable if they're threatening you. Discussing any other subject in that context seems really trivial, but why wouldn't a photo of a significant person be of educational value? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Book - 1 - " Allah ordered to kill all polytheists and atheists if they refuse to enter Islam ".pdf
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE as "nothing educational other than raw text". Belbury (talk) 08:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- At what point does PDF's of books become educational? --Trade (talk) 01:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- No judgment needs to be made on whether this PDF is educational. COM:SCOPE says that if a file contains only text, Commons generally isn't the right place for it, however educational that text may be. Belbury (talk) 08:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- At what point does PDF's of books become educational? --Trade (talk) 01:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We need permission from the translator anyway. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Getadmission2022 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional article pages as PDF, out of project scope.
Achim55 (talk) 08:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
The PD-template, which was used to tag this image, states "any work done entirely by an artificial intelligence or computer algorithm". However, the head of Plato cannot be invented by an AI on its own. So, without any information whether a verified PD-old source was used, the validity of that template seems to be questionable. (The source-site itself grants only an incompatible CC-NC license). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, it can, because I can ask for a marble statue with beard (the thing I asked for) and it is done. Wether you think this person is actually Plato or not, is another question. Theklan (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I also want to add that the template doesn't say "entirely". And that I used Photoshop to make it completely black and white and then colorize it to a pale color. So, even if the head was created entirely by Midjourney, the images wasn't done entirely by the software. I also took part. Theklan (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Template:PD-algorithm/doc states: "This template marks all images released under PD-algorithm (any work done entirely by an artificial intelligence or computer algorithm)." (bolding by me) --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't say so within the template and the template doesn't link to that definition. No wonder people use it differently than you expect. Just change the license to one that is applicable. --Enyavar (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to discuss also this. The "entirely" here doesn't make sense, because all AI creations are stochastic. They are evidently "inspired" (read as copied if you want) in images that may be under copyright or not, but the creation is always new. You don't get two "Plato"'s with the same prompt twice. Even me, I got 12 differnt ones till I get to this that was satisfactory for me. So the word "entirely" will never apply to the creation by the AI itself. I would read it as "with no further human intervention". If the image was created by an AI and a human added letters, features or whatever... then it isn't "entirely" done by an algorithm, that is what the license covers. Theklan (talk) 18:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't say so within the template and the template doesn't link to that definition. No wonder people use it differently than you expect. Just change the license to one that is applicable. --Enyavar (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Template:PD-algorithm/doc states: "This template marks all images released under PD-algorithm (any work done entirely by an artificial intelligence or computer algorithm)." (bolding by me) --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Based on the image and on Theklan's claims, I see up to three possible Copyright claims:
- The hypothetical original image of some bearded marble statue used by the AI. A superficial check via GoogleImages/TinEye doesn't yield me such an original. Looking closer, I kinda doubt the DR's claim: there are incongruities in the "sculpture", see for example where the beard and the neck connect. It seems to me as if it's an AI-made generic redrawing of a marble statue. AI's are that good by now. And let's not forget that even IF there is an original photo, PD-old might still be applicable. For this whole point, I see the burden of proof by the DR-requestor: please show us the supposed original, instead of just alluding that the original might hypothetically exist.
- The "creative process" of fitting a VR device onto the marble head of a statue was done by the AI (on the uploader's request) and doesn't fall under copyright.
- Theklan themselves claims to have fixed colors in post, and that they were the person who requested the image from the AI, triggering the creative process in the first place. When Theklan uploaded the image afterwards, they deliberately waived CR claims of their own.
- Summing it up: Keep and add Theklan to the list of authors. --Enyavar (talk) 10:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I also want to add that the template doesn't say "entirely". And that I used Photoshop to make it completely black and white and then colorize it to a pale color. So, even if the head was created entirely by Midjourney, the images wasn't done entirely by the software. I also took part. Theklan (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Is there a good reason to keep this? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Promotional page for apparently non-notable company. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Promotional page for apparently non-notable company. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Promotional page for apparently non-notable company. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No useful EXIF information. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
surely not "own work", in fact some campaign poster (Georgia?) source not provided. Mateus2019 (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Beyond scope. Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Beyond scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
beyond scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
beyond scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
beyond scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
beyond scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Suivolo: This photo you uploaded is in use on many articles. What is your reason for wanting it deleted? Belbury (talk) 13:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht, das Foto hochzuladen. Als Geste des guten Willens würde ich mich freuen, wenn das Foto gelöscht wird. Suivolo (talk) 16:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think we can do a courtesy deletion of a photo that's in such wide use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht, das Foto hochzuladen. Als Geste des guten Willens würde ich mich freuen, wenn das Foto gelöscht wird. Suivolo (talk) 16:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, we know you're asking for a courtesy deletion, but you haven't explained why, and in this case, regardless of the reason, I oppose deletion because the photo is in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unconvinced that the photo's author and the uploader are the same person. The photo seems high quality and professional. How the photographer made the sunlight more contextually convincing is too "subtle" to describe. George Ho (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer: Collin Stark. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Colorised version of a photo c. 1956. Alamy has the original at https://www.alamy.com/a-photo-of-laurel-and-hardy-in-old-age-oliver-hardy-right-has-lost-a-lot-of-weight-due-to-the-cancer-that-he-was-fighting-at-the-time-image473260719.html (described as a photo taken in 2022 and in the public domain, which seems unlikely). Can't find any convincing evidence that this image is in the public domain. Belbury (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal files (homework assignments, essays) outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has not other contributions.
- File:Kwl chart.png
- File:Kwl chart.pdf
- File:Different Legends.pdf
- File:A Memory from Kızkumu Beach.pdf
- File:Myth of The Kızkumu Beach.pdf
Marbletan (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster. If the uploader is authorized to upload this please send VRT confirmation. MKFI (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Toptop1324 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Remaining uploads of this user. No copyright problems here: these files are so trivial as to be apparently meaningless. No useful descriptions or categories. Not in use.
Brianjd (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CensusIhavandhoo2022 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected copyright violation: images are watermarked "Ihavan Rahvehi City". If the uploader is authorized to upload these please send VRT confirmation.
- File:Ihavandhoo day time.jpg
- File:Ihavandhoo habour night time.jpg
- File:Ihavandhoo night time real.jpg
- File:Ihavandhoo day view 2.jpg
- File:Ihavandhoo night view 3.jpg
MKFI (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of Iranian defence ministry. Same pictures published by defanews.ir without watermark and with higher quality (please see gallery here).
- File:10-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:9-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:8-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:7-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:6-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶- بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:5-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:4-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:3-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:2-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:1-پهپاد ایران-مهاجر۶.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).
- File:47-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:46-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:45-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل3 و ابابیل اطلس.jpg
- File:44-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر6.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).
- File:31-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:28-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:29-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:30-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:27-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:26-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:25-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [1] gallery
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.
- File:42-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل و اطلس.jpg
- File:41-پهپاد ایران- جت ناصح.jpg
- File:40-پهپاد ایران- کرّار.jpg
- File:16-پهپاد ایران- کمان۲۲.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.
- File:30-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:29-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:28-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:27-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:26-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:25-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:24-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:23-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:22-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:21-موشک- فکور.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.
- File:35-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:34-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:33-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:32-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:31-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:30-هواپیما- جنگنده صاعقه.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:
- No photographer is credited
- The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.
- File:44-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:43-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:42-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:41-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:40-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:39-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:38-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:37-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:36-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- General comment
Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:
- Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Delete if another agency is credited
- undelete images that didn't need to be deleted
For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.
--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.
- File:12-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:11-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:10-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:9-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:7-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:6-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:5-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:4-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:3-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:2-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photo taken from leader.ir, which does not release with a free license
- File:9-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not; the files are marked as "received". — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.
- File:29-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:28-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:19-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:18-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:17-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:16-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:15-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:14-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:13-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:12-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:11-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:10-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:9-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:8-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:7-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply
- File:23-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:22-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:21-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.
- File:27-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:26-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:25-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:24-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News
- File:32-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:31-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:30-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:29-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:28-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:27-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:26-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:25-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:24-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:23-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.
- File:14-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:13-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:12-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:10-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:9-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:8-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:10-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:6-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:5-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:4-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:3-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:2-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:1-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:22-Popular gathering and support for Gaza children-Tehran-تجمع مردمی و حمایت از کودکان غزه- تهران.jpg
- File:3-The burial ceremony of the martyrs who defended the shrine-Milad Heydari,Meghdad Mahghani-مراسم تشییع پیکر شهدای مدافع حرم- میلاد حیدری و مقداد مهقانی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Rebel Films Copyright holder Rebel Films". VRT permission from Rebel Films needed. MKFI (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Rebel Films Copyright holder Rebel Films". VRT permission from Rebel Films needed. MKFI (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Due to human error in processing the metadata, this file was erroneously determined to be out of copyright and was uploaded. However, its inception date is not actually before 1927. Baskaufs (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a print from 1940 and there is no copyright notice. {{PD-US-no notice}} would seem to fit here. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Behroz ansarimajd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Altered screenshot from Adobe Connect (?). Also Commons:Project scope.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable user-made art by non-contributor (2 edits in 2017). Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person, img not used @WM Mateus2019 (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Found a colour version on the web - https://abadis.ir/fatofa/%D9%BE%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B9%DB%8C%D9%84%DB%8C/ (and others) - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: personal image. MKFI (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Not 2022 own work as claimed, appears to be a scan of an unknown source. MKFI (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
A placard. Not sure about the TOO here. TadejM (t/p) 14:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Agree FOP applies. A09 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:FOP Slovenia A09 (talk) 11:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- @A09 So first you say FoP applies, then that it doesn’t apply? This is very confusing. The FoP section hasn’t changed since the last DR. Pinging @Slowiki, Yann. Brianjd (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The poster on the tree is very simple, it might qualify as {{PD-ineligible}}. The poster at the back should be cropped anyway. Yann (talk) 10:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann: I guess I indented my vote supporting deletion too far. That's why I am putting it once more. Sorry for slipping A09 (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @A09 The comment FOP applies sounds like keep, because it is permitted under FOP. Your second attempt, where you said COM:FOP Slovenia with a link, was much clearer. Brianjd (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for misunderstanding, meaning was lost in translation of mentioned message A09 (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- @A09 The comment FOP applies sounds like keep, because it is permitted under FOP. Your second attempt, where you said COM:FOP Slovenia with a link, was much clearer. Brianjd (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The poster is no more simple than this logo that was found copyrighted in Slovenia (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Slovenia#Threshold of originality). As said for the logo at the linked page, this poster also contains both verbal and graphic elements, which can't be separated and convey an overall message. --TadejM (t/p) 12:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per-TadejM. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Umar Qureshi Copyright holder Copyright Umar Qureshi, 2017". VRT permission from Umar Qureshi needed. MKFI (talk) 14:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-free banner. TadejM (t/p) 14:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-free logo. TadejM (t/p) 14:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by simple wikitable on eswiki --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 14:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) Ooligan (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Historical drawing under bogus Creative Commons license. License tag must be fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art, renamed. --Yann (talk) 22:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I believe so, and a really poor-quality image, maybe ruined by post-processing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.31 14:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.31 14:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.31 14:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.31 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tokokemasankita (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G10
- File:Spoutpack Bubble.jpg
- File:Sachet Transmetz.jpg
- File:Sachet Super.jpg
- File:Pouch Window Ecopack.jpg
- File:Pouch Window Transmetz.jpg
- File:Pouch Transmetz.jpg
- File:Pouch Retort Pack Bubble.jpg
- File:Pouch Super.jpg
- File:Pouch Lightpack.jpg
- File:Pouch Ecopack.jpg
- File:Pouch Cair Bubble.jpg
- File:Pouch Boilpack Bubble.jpg
- File:Flat Bottom Window Ecopack.jpg
- File:Flat Bottom Super.jpg
- File:Flat Bottom Lightpack.jpg
- File:Flat Bottom Ecopack.jpg
- File:Fancy Pack Tun.jpg
- File:Fancy Pack Jar.jpg
- File:Fancy Pack Bottle.jpg
- File:Cubepack.jpg
- File:Drinkpack Bubble.jpg
- File:Bag Vakumpack.jpg
- File:Canpack.jpg
- File:Bag Transmetz.jpg
- File:Bag Super.jpg
- File:Bag Retortpack.jpg
- File:Bag Boilpack.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 07:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
File:National Gallery of Art - Sculpture Garden - Washington DC - United States Capital - October 2010 (5132685641).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern sculpture, no freedom of panorama in Mongolia A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Undeleted There is now FOP in Mongolia. Abzeronow (talk) 01:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free work by Š. Valentinčič (still living). TadejM (t/p) 14:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by F. Kvaternik (d. 2018). TadejM (t/p) 14:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. Unknown date of creation. TadejM (t/p) 14:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. TadejM (t/p) 15:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Modern sculpture. TadejM (t/p) 15:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: Work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). TadejM (t/p) 15:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). TadejM (t/p) 15:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. TadejM (t/p) 15:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. TadejM (t/p) 15:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by B. Kunaver. TadejM (t/p) 15:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). TadejM (t/p) 15:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. TadejM (t/p) 15:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. TadejM (t/p) 15:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architectural work. (Letonja, [2]) TadejM (t/p) 15:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Non-free sculpture by S. Batič (d. 2015). TadejM (t/p) 16:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture (Ograjenšek). TadejM (t/p) 16:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
The threshold of originality in Iran is extremely low and there is no freedom of panorama in Iran. The image and logos displayed in this image appear to be above Iran's TOO and, given that there is no FOP in Iran, renders this file non-free in Iran (its country of publication). As such, this should be deleted as violating our licensing terms. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Not PD-ROC-exempt shizhao (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for commercial use in Slovenia. This architecture is copyrighted to Jože Plečnik (d. 1957), while the verses are copyrighted to Mile Klopčič (d. 1984). It will only be free for Commons in 2055. TadejM (t/p) 13:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. TadejM (t/p) 14:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by V. Premk (unknown year of death). TadejM (t/p) 14:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free work by J. Logar. TadejM (t/p) 15:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
File:2018 08 12 world guinness record Slovenija 2018 KOŠNJA U SNEŽET Cerkno 2018 Potrdilo udeležencem.jpg
[edit]Non-free material. TadejM (t/p) 15:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free work by Karl Filipčič. TadejM (t/p) 16:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
1947 image is stated as in copyright at source: https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df70cq60q No evidence of free license --Animalparty (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This cover is a work of de:Willy Herzig, who died in 1978, so it is still protected by copyright in Germany and should be deleted. The file can be restored in 2049. Rosenzweig τ 19:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
If it is "own work", how hasn't Exif data? Considering that it looks much like an institutional portrait, I have strong suspictions that it is Commons:COPYVIO. Stego (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Because i made a placement error on the text label for the capital paramaribo.i have uploaded a corrected version. SurinameCentral (talk) 23:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7. Also, superseded by the clearly superior file Suriname Location Map with Borders, Capital and Coordinate Grid Lines.svg and not in use.
- @SurinameCentral Next time, please overwrite the file instead of uploading a new one. You can also request a rename if necessary. Brianjd (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Taken from a website, https://www.billydinh.com/about Liz (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but he doesn't seem very notable. 1 credit on IMDB, 380 following on Twitter. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel Speedy keep Source file for the widely used collage Various size penises.jpg. Can we somehow tag the source files so this doesn’t keep happening? Brianjd (talk) 15:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Thumb with no META data to prove real source. Doubtful, it is from uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 03:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Thumb with no META data to prove real source. Doubtful, it is from uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 03:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Not a self-portrait, so "own work" and the author's name are wrong. Also lacks proper EXIF information. Presumably would require permission from the estate of the artist and probably the photographer as well for Commons to host it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Class photo of apparently non-notable school, though correct me if I'm wrong. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused self-portrait of unidentified person. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Class picture of apparently non-notable school, and without useful EXIF information. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Mongolia A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Undeleted There is now FOP in Mongolia. Abzeronow (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Nice photo, but not so good I think we should keep it just as a portrait. Non-notable subject, in use only in the abandoned sandbox of a user with no global contributions since 2017. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Good portrait in nature. Yann (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Good photo. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Presumably non-notable subject, in use only in the abandoned sandbox of a user with no global contributions since 2017. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Commandernavy (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Iranian Troops in Forward Trenches during Iran Iraq War.jpg
- File:Map shows movements Ghaznavi Force of Op Gibraltar.jpg
- File:Myanmar Army personal undergoing training in Pakistan together with Pak Soldiers and Marines.jpg
- File:An RBS-70 Mounted APC of Pak Army Air Defence.JPG
- File:153 SP AirDefence Regiment.png
- File:69 Punjab Pak Army Murdan e Hur.jpg
Didym (talk) 10:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2021, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sofort löschen, das Teufelszeug. Yours sincerely Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2021, no fop Ulricus Angelus (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ich beantrage die sofortige Löschung. Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Triple Bridge
[edit]Work by Jože Plečnik (d. 1957); per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons until 2028.
- File:Le triple pont (Ljubljana) (9378881246).jpg
- File:Ljubljana Slovenia (16291952032).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Slovenia (7367916428).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:07, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Ljubljana Slovenia (16291952032).jpg is a photo of the river (with the bridge), not a photo of the bridge. It looks like the classical example of the images of the square of Louvre showing the copyrighted pyramid, which is De Minimis because the subject is the place (the example is explained in Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete According to Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines:
Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different, but potentially still useful.
The bridge is a key part of the picture. No de minimis at all. --Discasto talk 14:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Louvre at night centered.jpg is the textbook example of "De Minimis" in a urban ladscape. I don't see the bridge more key to File:Ljubljana Slovenia (16291952032).jpg than the Louvre pyramid in File:Louvre at night centered.jpg.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted two and kept the file under discussion with some doubts as de minimis, the image without the bridge still has sufficient value. Basvb (talk) 22:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Triple Bridge
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Not free for Commons until 2028.
- File:Ljubljana 13 (5756149103).jpg
- File:Ljubljana BW 2014-10-09 13-47-00.jpg
- File:Ljubljana BW 2014-10-09 13-47-49.jpg
- File:Ljubljana Tromostovje.JPG
- File:Triple Bridge (Tromostovje) at dusk (11992236725).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 16:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Triple Bridge
[edit]No FOP in Slovenia.
- File:Ljubljana (33355340614).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (35679194681).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (35814705825).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (35816079635).jpg
- File:Ljubljana - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Slovenija 2013 - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:The Triple Bridge in Ljubljana 01112016.jpg
- File:Tromostovje - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Tromostovje - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tromostovje Ljubljana (Three bridges) - panoramio.jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Triple Bridge
[edit]As per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Non-free architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957).
- File:03 2019 photo Paolo Villa - F0197786 - Lubiana - Piazza triplice ponte - mercato coperto - Joze Plecnik - Secessione viennese Liberty bis.jpg
- File:03 2019 photo Paolo Villa - F0197803 - Lubiana - Triplo ponte - Joze Plecnik - Chiesa dei Francescani - Barocco temperato - campanile - obelischi.jpg
- File:Ljubljana in Ljubljanica.jpg
- File:Ljubljana Slovenia (16291952032).jpg
- File:Lubiana, fiume.JPG
- File:Triple Bridge (48700985028).jpg
- File:Triple Bridge, 2020.jpg
- File:Triple-Bridge-Ljubljana-2021-Luka-Peternel.jpg
- File:Словенка на велосипеде (40090048855).jpg
TadejM (t/p) 00:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- At least File:Словенка на велосипеде (40090048855).jpg falls under Commons:De minimis --Butko (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (except for one file). --Rosenzweig τ 09:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Triple Bridge
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: The architect died in 1957 (copyright expires in 2028).
- File:2021-07-27 Ljubljana s Tromostovjem in frančiščkansko cerkvijo.jpg
- File:Ljubljana (35813661775).jpg
- File:Ljubljana - Tromostovje (48874740667).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (1).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (2).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (3).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (4).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (5).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (6).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Tromostovje (9).jpg
- File:Tromostovje (Pinter).jpg
TadejM (t/p) 15:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
G7 - запрос от автора/загрузившего Kurandx (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res artwork. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Not very helpful EXIF info. Do we need to delete for possible copyvio? Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I want to chage image's name and re-upload Hojong9474 (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Hojong9474, filenames can be changed without deletion requests; just request a filename change. What name do you want? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Not in use. Do we keep this kind of file? I think plain text in the appropriate Wiki, such as Wikipedia, is more Wikimedia-style, but correct me if I'm wrong. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Thumb image without META data, unlikely uploader work. Pierre cb (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry I found the META. Pierre cb (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, credit in EXIF data not matching uploader (Author fsantoandre). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Thumb image without META data, unlikely uploader work. Pierre cb (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry I found the META. Pierre cb (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, credit in EXIF data not matching uploader (Author fsantoandre). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Not clear picture. And unusefulness. DeloarAkram (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
OOS, couldn't find anywhere. Maybe a forged flag. Lemonaka (talk) 19:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
just black Mateus2019 (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: It's actually a photograph, just of Earth at night. Still, I agree that the image doesn't hold much value. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, useless. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I suspect the "own work" claim is false as in previously deleted images by this user -CVEPcv- has stated "This image was provided to me by Richard Webb himself, the person portrayed in the image.": (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ric Webb at the US Army War Games (circa 1985)..jpg). As Richard Webb is the subject of the images he is not author either. Photographer(s) unknown.
- File:RicWebb-BioBox2.png
- File:RicWebb-BioBox.png
- File:Glen and Ric 2019 American Helicopter Museum and Education Center-Award.jpg
MKFI (talk) 08:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Altar mit Kruzifix der Auferstehungskirche (Großhansdorf).jpg
- File:Kanzel der Auferstehungskirche (Großhansdorf).jpg
- File:Schützende Hände für Maria mit dem Kinde (Otto Flath), Ghd..jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Lachen, löschen, löschen. Yours sincerely Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wenn schon dieser furor delendi, dann aber konsequent, gültig für alle Bilder. Yours sincerely Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
It has been removed from the source website (Unsplash) because of copyright issues. 5.127.124.58 11:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
KeepThe facts as I can see them: (1) This image is from Unsplash and was published prior to 5 June 2017 under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. (2) The Exif data show correctly that Fazel Gomar made this photograph. (3) Creative Commons licenses can't be revoked (see here). Vysotsky (talk) 12:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)- @Vysotsky Yes, assuming that Unsplash or its contributors actually had the right to apply CC0, it would be non-revocable. But what if they did not have that right? You say that the EXIF data ‘correctly’ shows that Fazel Gomar made this photo, but how do you know that? Brianjd (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- According to the Exif data the photo was made on 11 Aug. 2014 (which is only an indication, but could be correct). Fazel Gomar still has this photo on Flickr under a different account, "joined 2015", but now under a different license "all rights reserved" - photo uploaded 5 Jan. 2015. Perhaps User:5.127.124.58 can shed more light on the supposed "copyright issues"? Vysotsky (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't even know that this file existed on the Internet until a few days ago, with an EXACT LOCATION to my living city!! So plz remove it or at least remove my name and EXIF data from it. 5.127.39.177 08:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- According to the Exif data the photo was made on 11 Aug. 2014 (which is only an indication, but could be correct). Fazel Gomar still has this photo on Flickr under a different account, "joined 2015", but now under a different license "all rights reserved" - photo uploaded 5 Jan. 2015. Perhaps User:5.127.124.58 can shed more light on the supposed "copyright issues"? Vysotsky (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey dude, It's Fazel. I am the owner of the pic and just submitted the removal request because I DIDNT UPLOADED IT to unsplash and someone uploaded it with my name, so i requested to delete the file from unsplash and they deleted the file and the fake account as well. if u doubt my ownership i can email u the original file (without visual effects and other photos i've took in the location). do plz remove it from the directory, ty. 5.127.39.177 08:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky Yes, assuming that Unsplash or its contributors actually had the right to apply CC0, it would be non-revocable. But what if they did not have that right? You say that the EXIF data ‘correctly’ shows that Fazel Gomar made this photo, but how do you know that? Brianjd (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete Sufficient remarks by photographer. Vysotsky (talk) 14:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky Or some IP user claiming to be the photographer. I don’t really understand what’s going on here. Why is the image on Flickr with a title that identifies the location and the photographer’s name? Brianjd (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yea its a bit confusing so lemme explain it. Once i've uploaded the photo to Flicker (about 2015) but I didn't know that 1)the file includes these EXIF data and the exact location tag 2)my photo can be indexed by Google, Wikimedia or any media directories and anyone can find it (and also find these EXIF data including my living city) just by searching my name!! 3)Someone uploaded it to an Unsplash profile with a creative commons license. So as the owner, I reported the file and requested Unsplash to remove the photo and they removed the file and the fake profile as well. More info about the file on my Flicker account: It will be removed soon. Because I created the Flicker profile about 7 years ago (high school days) and i cant remember the email address i used to create the account, i asked flicker guys to send me some hints in order to help me remember the mail address, so i'll be able to login to the account and remove it. thank you guys for understanding my privacy concerns about the file and its metadata. 5.127.39.177 15:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I also logged into my old wiki account to not be a an "IP user" anymore :) Fazelium (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above comment (submitted by "Fazelium" account) was submited by me and i will send further comments with this account (posted this comment to assure you I'm the same person). 5.127.39.177 16:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fazelium also added information to enwiki about Iran in 2007. Their story seems plausible. But I still don’t understand why the photo here has more metadata than the one on Flickr. Also note that the photo’s title gives away the location anyway, regardless of the location tag. Brianjd (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: strange story, but I treat it as a courtesy deletion of an unused file with potential privacy issues. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
In use, but no useful EXIF information. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: cropped from unknown source, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
A large size copy exists in the same category. Both by me, I accidentally uploaded it twice. Dosseman (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected to File:Kossuth Museum men's room 8747.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
A large size copy exists in the same category. Both by me, I accidentally uploaded it twice. Dosseman (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected to File:Kossuth Museum stair hall 8767.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Probably uploaded by the pictured person, but doesn't look like a selfie ("own work"). Credited "Foto: Team Sauerland" in this article: https://www.vg.no/sport/kampsport/i/dOb77o/thanderz-med-poengseier-i-tyskland 4ing (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Logo. copyrighted HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution photo withowu EXIF data, therefore unlikely to be own wok. Uploader had already published another photo that turned out to be cropped from an unfree photo from the web so their autorship statements are not trustworthy. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
If this is a 1955 German postcard as claimed, it simply cannot be in the public domain in Germany and the US. Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
1996Larry clearly photographed an image of Roland Shaw that was on his computer (we can see the pixels) Sété40 (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-sized image, all previous uploads by this user already deleted as copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I mean you've given multiple reasons why you think this particular image doesn't qualify, do you want to choose one for me to address? MsContent (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Image probably obtained from internet (source mentioned: "Public Picture") HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Without prejudice to whether both are copyvio, this is certainly inferior to File:Centromedico.jpg, which is in use. But notice ©Carlos Montenegro on this file. I think, unfortunately, both will have to be deleted for copyright violation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foto-grupo-centromedico1.jpg. I'm afraid this is copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Factwritertoor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per File:AuferstehungskircheGhd.jpg, this artwork is on the publicly accessible outside of the church, so freedom of panorama does apply. --Rosenzweig τ 22:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: This artwork is on the publicly accessible outside of the church, so freedom of panorama does apply. --Rosenzweig τ 22:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, image published by IRNA before being uploaded here in April 2022: https://www.irna.ir/news/84714876/%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%84-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B4%D9%87%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%B7%D9%87%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%87%D9%85%DA%86%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photograph by Hassan Ghareeb for ISNA: https://www.isna.ir/news/8303-00236/%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%87-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%AF%D9%82-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A2%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Isna is a public domain فرات۱ (talk) 08:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think the photos are the same . The ISNA photo has watermark in left and down side , but the contribution to Wikipedia does not have the sign "ISNA" . More than that the metadata shows the contributed image is the original ( like more megapixels and ... ) . If the original photo belongs to the photographer and he?she himself had published it in one media outlet , that does not means he can not publish it elsewhere ( including Wikipedia ) . So I think deletion is wrong . --Alborz Fallah (talk) 12:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The uploader confirms above that this photo is obtained from ISNA, but falsely says that the website is in public domain (Footer: "© 2022 Iranian Students' News Agency. All rights reserved"). ISNA photo's metadata also indicates that it was taken with a Canon EOSD60 camera, so we can be sure that this is a cropped version of ISNA photo. We have no proof that Hassan Ghareeb is the copyright holder (he took this photo for ISNA, so it is reasonable to think ISNA owns the right), that would be the case if they send an email to Commons and declare that this photo is free. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
The URL provided doesn't show the photo's license status. Finding the file on photo on https://www.cincyjungle.com/2022/10/5/23388374/hayden-hurst-opportunity-to-show-he-belongs-bengals it simply shows image is from Wesley Hitt/Getty Images Diddykong1130 (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
duplicado Lucero Novoa Llerena (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded by mistake the wrong version and did not update the file with the new version. The new correct version is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Convex_vs._Not-convex.jpg
Thus, a deletion would be okay to avoid duplicates. Varagk (talk) 16:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7 and because it is essentially a duplicate of the other file (which is in use). It would have been better to overwrite this file with the new version; it would also have been better to use a vector format (I have tagged the new file {{SVG}}). Brianjd (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Iran and the threshold of originality in Iran is extremely low. The poster centered in the front of the image is too much of the image to be de minimus and this image lacks a source for the poster. As such, this should be deleted as lacking source information on the presumptively non-free poster and as being a non-free file itself. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I blurred the poster to exclude the presumptively non-free part (The only part which is not blurred is the system's name ["پوش", etc.] which would be PD-Text and also an important part of this image, because it is from an unveiling ceremony and helps identifying the vehicle from similar equipment). I hope this problem is resolved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- In light of the blurring, I have no issues remaining. The old revisions, however, will require revision deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion: hide first file revision as copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Is duplicate of "Kutahya archaeological museum 8836.jpg" but with one .jpg too many, in the same category. Thought asking to rename it was the preferred method, but deleting it is better, as I added the full size version to the other picture today. Dosseman (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused and duplicate of File:Kutahya archaeological museum 8836.jpg. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by J. Suhadolc (still living). TadejM (t/p) 13:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture. TadejM (t/p) 13:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by A. Suhadolc (d. 1983) and I. Spinčič (d. 1985). TadejM (t/p) 13:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture by Jakov Brdar (1999). TadejM (t/p) 13:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by A. Sigulin (d. 1996) and M. Božič (d. 2008). TadejM (t/p) 13:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: The sculptor J. Papič died in 1990, so the file will only be available for Commons in 2061. TadejM (t/p) 14:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sticker. TadejM (t/p) 14:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by sculptor T. Svetina (d. 1998). TadejM (t/p) 14:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also File:Št. 15-2 Spomenik delavcevm tovarne Veriga.jpg. --TadejM (t/p) 14:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Brdar (still living). TadejM (t/p) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by Karel Putrih (1910-1959) and Zdenko Kalin (1911-1990).
- File:Ljubljana, Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, portal (1).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, portal (2).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, portal (3).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, portal (4).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, portal (5).jpg
TadejM (t/p) 15:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by F. Kralj (d. 1960).
- File:In Front Of The University (7441372434).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Evropa in bik (1).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Evropa in bik (2).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Evropa in bik (3).jpg
TadejM (t/p) 15:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculptural work.[3] TadejM (t/p) 15:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also File:Krvavec NOB 2019 02 14.jpg. --TadejM (t/p) 15:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Krvavec NOB 2019 02 14.jpg. Dominant part of the photo is snow with a rock, sculptural work is de minimis here, details on the plaque are hardly visible. MZaplotnik(talk) 12:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- I have to disagree. The relief is the essential part of the photo in this case too. --TadejM (t/p) 13:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free sculptural work. TadejM (t/p) 15:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep Depictions of national coats of arms without authorial creativity are not copyrighted. In addition, this coat of arms by annonimous author from an unknown forge was errected in 1945, so it has been in public domain since 2015. --Hladnikm (talk) 06:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this is not a simple depiction of the national coat of arms but a sculptural work with sufficient authorial creativity. Please see Commons:Derivative works. Orphaned works are still copyrighted as there is no proof that the author died in 1951 or earlier (as explained at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Slovenia). We only accept orphaned works that are at least 120 years old as free. --TadejM (t/p) 11:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. Non-free map. TadejM (t/p) 16:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep The Geopedia maps by Sinergise, GURS (Geodetic administration of Slovenia) and OpendStreetMaps are equipped with the CC 4.0 International licence (check in the bottom line on the map). --Hladnikm (talk) 06:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination The map originates from the OSM, it should be relicensed though. --TadejM (t/p) 12:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
This file came from the YouTube video which has its own copyright. Nt (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
No. It's not a YouTube video. The resolution is different--Wewillgogo (talk) 12:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wewillgogo, could you upload EXIF data, showing things like what camera you used to shoot the photo, the time stamp, the exposure and so on? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Ikan Kekek No data. --Wewillgogo (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is TwitchTV Snapshot. -- Wewillgogo (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks. And TwitchTV uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, so anyone can do a screenshot of any of their clips or even upload the clip here freely? Or is this video in particular under a CC license? Where on that site is the relevant licensing information noted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- That person did not indicate a separate license.
- therefore
- Licensed under the Twitch Standard License.
- This is a Twitch Standard License (8. User Content - a. License to Twitch.. Reference )
- https://www.twitch.tv/p/en/legal/terms-of-service/ Wewillgogo (talk) 02:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I read this: "Unless otherwise expressly stated in writing by Twitch, by agreeing to these Terms of Service you are granted a limited, non-sublicensable license (i.e., a personal and limited right) to access and use the Twitch Services for your personal use or internal business use only." Then I read the "License to Twitch," and maybe I'm missing something in the legal language, but it looks like it gives Twitch and anyone the company specifically decides to license: "an unrestricted, worldwide, irrevocable, fully sub-licenseable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free right to: (a) use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display such User Content (including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Twitch Services (and derivative works thereof) in any form, format, media, or media channels now known or later developed or discovered; and (b) use the name, identity, likeness, and voice (or other biographical information) that you submit in connection with such User Content." Nonexclusive is good because that doesn't per se preclude others to do these things, but where does it state that it's OK to use Twitch content for commercial purposes without affirmative permission from Twitch? I see an implication that that could be OK but no clear language expressly permitting it, so that would be likely to be a problem here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- May I know what's best for the current situation?
- Can I change it to a YouTube picture that is licensed for distribution? Wewillgogo (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Can I just change the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license? Wewillgogo (talk) 14:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- What in the terms on Twitch would give you the right to change them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I read this: "Unless otherwise expressly stated in writing by Twitch, by agreeing to these Terms of Service you are granted a limited, non-sublicensable license (i.e., a personal and limited right) to access and use the Twitch Services for your personal use or internal business use only." Then I read the "License to Twitch," and maybe I'm missing something in the legal language, but it looks like it gives Twitch and anyone the company specifically decides to license: "an unrestricted, worldwide, irrevocable, fully sub-licenseable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free right to: (a) use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display such User Content (including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Twitch Services (and derivative works thereof) in any form, format, media, or media channels now known or later developed or discovered; and (b) use the name, identity, likeness, and voice (or other biographical information) that you submit in connection with such User Content." Nonexclusive is good because that doesn't per se preclude others to do these things, but where does it state that it's OK to use Twitch content for commercial purposes without affirmative permission from Twitch? I see an implication that that could be OK but no clear language expressly permitting it, so that would be likely to be a problem here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
(i) Unless otherwise agreed to in a written agreement between you and Twitch that was signed by an authorized representative of Twitch, if you submit, transmit, display, perform, post, or store User Content using the Twitch Services, you grant Twitch and its sub-licensees, to the furthest extent and for the maximum duration permitted by applicable law (including in perpetuity if permitted under applicable law), an unrestricted, worldwide, irrevocable, fully sub-licenseable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free right to: (a) use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display such User Content (including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Twitch Services (and derivative works thereof) in any form, format, media, or media channels now known or later developed or discovered; and
Twitch allows secondary creation and there is no separate mention of prohibiting commercial activities, so I think cc-by is correct. -- Wewillgogo (talk) 00:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
The Twitch license clearly states that secondary creations and commercial activities are prohibited. However, there is no prohibition in user content. This explains it. (7. License Reference) -- Wewillgogo (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Your reading of the license is different from mine. An admin will make a decision. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Okay. I will wait for the admin's decision. Wewillgogo (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Twitch TV licince cannot be converted into BY-SA-4.0. Terms are incompatible. Twitch TV may have such a permission for themselves, but they cannot grant it onwards to the whole world. Uploader is mistaken in his reading. SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:47, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Definitely not a simple enough artwork to be ineligible for copyright Bedivere (talk) 04:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete definitely copyrightable logo. Too many questions about this. Why is it PD in Chile ? How does the uploader claim it is his own work. SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TwoWings as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.flickr.com/photos/69319441@N08/8752690738/
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the image-version on Flickr is from May 2013, i.e. 4 years after our upload, and has no valid EXIF-data. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- The upload on Commons is earlier than the Flickr version but the Flickr version is of higher quality, which makes me think it's coming from elsewhere. Too dubious to be kept. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete A version of this photo is featured in this 2007 news article, which credits the photographer as Martín Diego Rodríguez. Felix QW (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- However, wrt metadata: our image has valid camera data, showing that is has been shot in 2007. The other hits do not have valid metadata. In addition, the hit from 2007[4] can't be the source, as it's heavily cropped and low-res. Anyway, per COM:PCP deletion seems reasonable. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete per COM:PCP SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free monument. Work by Jože Plečnik and Milan Arnež. TadejM (t/p) 13:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by F. Šubelj. TadejM (t/p) 14:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ni razloga za izbris Slowiki (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free monument. TadejM (t/p) 14:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. TadejM (t/p) 16:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The FAW logo exceeds COM:TOO China. Wcam (talk) 22:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Error en imagen, falta el texto 'Gáldar Ayuntamiento' puede verlo en http://galdar.es/imagencorporativa Olivertacoronte (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arch. Plečnik's Marketplace
[edit]As per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Non-free architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957), becomes PD in 2028.
- File:Drevored na Adamič-Lundrovem nabrežju 01.JPG
- File:Ljubljana 1971, Városi piac a Hármas hídnál. Fortepan 50230.jpg
- File:Izdelava spodnjega kamnitega dela Tržnic nad reko 1940.jpg
- File:Ljubljana - Plečnikove tržnice 2.jpg
- File:Ljubljana - Plečnikove tržnice 3.jpg
- File:Ljubljana - Plečnikove tržnice 4.jpg
- File:Ljubljana Central Market from the Dragon Bridge.jpg
- File:Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia (Old Camera) (32940142693).jpg
- File:Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia (Old Camera) (32940188493).jpg
- File:Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia (Old Camera) (32940189333).jpg
- File:Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia (Old Camera) (32940190313).jpg
- File:Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia (Old Camera) (32940190933).jpg
TadejM (t/p) 00:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arch. Plečnik's Marketplace
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. The architect died in 1957 (copyright expires in 2028).
- File:Ljubljana - Plečnikove arkade (48874745227).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Ljubljanica (5).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Ljubljanica (6).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Ljubljanica (7).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Ljubljanica (8).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Plečnikove arkade (1).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Plečnikove arkade (2).jpg
- File:Plečnikova tržnica.jpg
TadejM (t/p) 15:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 14:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama Ulricus Angelus (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 14:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
same source, reasoning, and image as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhagavan Vishnu.jpg Hekerui (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete publication date is around 1965 in India. so in copyright. SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 14:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Compositions by Ralph Vaughan Williams published after 1927
[edit]- File:5 Variants of ‘Dives and Lazarus’ (Vaughan Williams, Ralph).jpeg
- File:RVW Symphony (No.5) in D major, I Preludio FS Page 3.png
- File:Vaughan Williams - Symphony No. 8 - III. Cavatina.pdf
English composer Ralph Vaughan Williams died in 1958, so in general his compositions are expected to be under copyright until 2028. Works published in the US before 1927 should be PD per Template:PD-US-expired, so we should be able to keep them. --Jaqen (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. From what I gathered, these were published in the UK in 1940, 1943 and 1956, so they are all still protected in the USA because of the URAA. The files can be restored in 2036, 2039 and 2052 respectively. --Rosenzweig τ 18:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded here as a photo of the French Meurisse agency, claimed to be in the public domain. It is however originally a Spanish photo, published here in 1931 and credited to Alfonso, that is es:Alfonso Sánchez García, who died in 1953. So its source country is Spain. It is a studio portrait, so not a "simple" photograph, and {{PD-Spain-photo}} does not apply. The photograph is therefore still protected in Spain until the end of 2033 (80 years pma for authors who died before 7 December 1987), and the file should be deleted. The file can be restored in 2034. Rosenzweig τ 09:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree as per nom. SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:41, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Suivolo, you need to give a reason why courtesy deletions should be made. Tell us why in each case. Thanks. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht, das Foto hochzuladen. Als Geste des guten Willens würde ich mich freuen, wenn das Foto gelöscht wird. Suivolo (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this file. Suivolo Suivolo (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Tiny, useless. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Tiny, useless. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Tiny, useless. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Error la imagen corporativa fué modificada en 2020, el texto debajo del escudo se ha cambiado, puede consultarlo en http://galdar.es/imagencorporativa Olivertacoronte (talk) 11:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Novamier London as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: we own this content but we made a slight mistake on the license, please remove it so we can re do it. Thanks.
Novamier: No need to do that, just press the edit button or let us know here so we can make the change for you. Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- We didn't want to upload it as free to use, we want to upload it as non-free file so it is marked as fair use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novamier London (talk • contribs) 15:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- Then we will have to delete it. Fair use material is not allowed here on Commons. --Achim55 (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
That's perfect, please delete it as soon as possible, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.39.102.107 (talk) 09:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This logo is very likely below the threshold of originality for US laws, but not for UK laws. Therefore, this file could be moved to enwiki under w:Template:PD-ineligible-USOnly. --Matr1x-101 {user page - talk with me :) - contribs!} 14:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Артём 13327 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo
I believe this logo is under COM:TOO US. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: licensed changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. —howcheng {chat} 18:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. This seems to be a screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQusj6tD97w which credits the "National Park Service's webcams" and links to https://video-monitoring.com/construction/olympic/, which states "Copyright © 2013 Erdman Video Systems, Inc. in collaboration with the National Park Service". This suggests that the video was set up or taken by Erdman Video Systems whom themselves (or their employees) would own the copyright. (If it were taken by an employee of the National Park Service, {{PD-USGov-NPS}} might apply.) This is all assuming that video from a webcam is naturally copyrighted in the US. -M.nelson (talk) 22:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I take issue with that assumption. In my opinion, video from a webcam is not copyrighted: it has no human author. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: As there is no human authorship, copyright cannot apply. License changed to {{PD-ineligible}} because it doesn't seem like we have one for webcams/camera traps. —howcheng {chat} 18:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TMETSJETSYT (talk · contribs)
[edit]More radio station logos that are highly unlikely to be CC-licensed "own work".
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:59, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. All are pretty clearly {{PD-textlogo}} and below the threshold of originality in the US (see examples at COM:TOO US). IronGargoyle (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. All are probably below US TOO. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO US. --Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Iran's threshold of originality is extremely low, stating that Paintings, pictures, drawings, designs, decorative writings, geographical maps or any decorative and imaginative work produced in any simple or complex manner are protected by copyright. This photograph contains two copies of the same simple design on the monitors on the right, while it contains a simple geographical map in the monitor on the top left. The image is left almost meaningless if there were to be a simple crop to remove all the monitors, as this would leave only a sliver down the center of the image. As Iran lacks any freedom of panorama, this image should be deleted as non-free in Iran. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- This photograph is intended to show a command and control system, not the image in the monitors (they can be turned off and still this image is meaningful). So, with the monitors blurred this image will be OK if that is the problem, although I don't see any reason to consider a map of Iran protected (Iranian law clearly says maps are protected only if they are "ابتکاری" or "innovative", per Article 2, note 5) or an abstract computer wallpaper should be considered an artwork originated from Iran (it could have been obtained from anywhere). The monitor below also shows a Windows XP screensaver. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm relying on the English Translation of the Iranian copyright laws deposited with WIPO, which specifies that geographical maps ... produced in any simple or complex manner are copyrightable. Is there a major discrepancy between the English translation (and our COM:IRAN) and the Persian that would affect this?
- I'm also perfectly fine with blurring the monitors and allowing the image to stay. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is very strange that the word "ابتکاری" in the original Persian text is absent in English translation. Also, the phrase "simple or complex manner" seems to be a translation of "به صورت ساده یا ترکیبی", I think the word 'complex' refers to a collage (derivative work), not a sophisticated work (though a sophisticated work is also copyrighted). I am not a legal expert and I am unaware of any court rulings (if they are available), but this is what I understand from the original text. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'll gladly defer to someone who's able to read the original language text provided that there appear to be discrepancies. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:38, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- It is very strange that the word "ابتکاری" in the original Persian text is absent in English translation. Also, the phrase "simple or complex manner" seems to be a translation of "به صورت ساده یا ترکیبی", I think the word 'complex' refers to a collage (derivative work), not a sophisticated work (though a sophisticated work is also copyrighted). I am not a legal expert and I am unaware of any court rulings (if they are available), but this is what I understand from the original text. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Keep Per [5], Iranian copyright law only covers works that include "knowledge, art or innovation" and I don't think a screensaver on Windows XP qualifies. Use is also de minimis because the subject of the photo is the physical equipment itself, not what is shown on the screens. Streamline8988 (talk) 02:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Keep I don't see any problem in the free publication of the image. U can see lots of images with high resolution of Maps of Iran in this category! Why any one should use the geographical map in the monitor on the top left? :-| --MehdiTalk 07:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm usually pretty conservative in applying COM:DM and COM:TOO to cases like this, but here I just don't see anything copyrightable on the screens. It's text, an outline map (more or less raw GIS data), and maybe some geometric figures at low resolution. --Xover (talk) 07:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 15:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
It was released on flickr under a CC license, but is itself a screenshot from the game Second Life. The flickr user doesn't actually own the rights to the photo. 38.15.241.7 14:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'd picked up the idea that all Second Life object content was public domain, but I'm not sure where I got that from. {{Second Life}} says that all intellectual properties of an object in Second Life belong to the subscriber who created it, which wouldn't apply to screenshots of others' work. Does this mean that all screenshots in Category:Second Life where it's not clearly stated that the Flickr/Commons uploader personally created all objects in shot should be deleted? --Belbury (talk) 15:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I have absolutely no idea what any of the terms mean, but it seems like COM:Second Life may provide some further insights. Felix QW (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The designs belong to the Second Life user that created the in-game items, not the person that took the screenshot and uploaded it to Flickr. --Xover (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See also [6]. Ruthven (msg) 15:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
No Meta data on this thumb image : unlikely uploader work. Pierre cb (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:PRP. Also applies to extracted image File:Irina Hauser - Crop from La Inmensa Minoría.jpg. --Xover (talk) 08:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bekjanbektenbai
[edit]Bekjanbektenbai (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
This user first received a block warning a few weeks ago and I have today blocked the user for 1 week. Two press photos from AFP and ITAR-TASS from the 1990s have been speedy deleted. All the user's uploads from July 2 and July 3 are photos of photos displaying various Russian politicians of the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Some also of Nikita Chrusjtjov and Leonid Brezhnev. Note that this user also edits Wikicommons with the user name MisterBoris. I do not believe that this contributor is the copyright owner of any of these photos:
- File:Асанбай Асқаров 18 жаста.jpg
- File:Kunaev and Askarov.jpg
- File:Zamanbek Nurkadilov.jpg
- File:Кеңес Мұстаханұлы Аухадиев.jpg
- File:Brezhnev and Kunaev.jpg
- File:Kunaev,Nazarbaev and Gorbachev.jpg
- File:Yegor Yakovlev and Aleksandr Yakovlev.jpg
- File:Nurkadilov.jpg
- File:Zamanbek Qalabaiuly Nurkadilov.jpg
- File:Asanbai Askarov.jpg
- File:Ғабит Мүсірепов.jpg
- File:Конаев и Мусирепов.jpg
- File:Хасангалиев.jpg
- File:Honeccer and Kunaev.jpg
- File:Teenager Dinmuhamed.jpg
- File:Great grantfather Asylbek bi and father Askar.Picture Asanbai Askarov.jpg
- File:Зақаш Камалиденов.jpg
- File:Gennady Kolbin.jpg
- File:Yakovlev Ivan Dmitrievich.jpg
- File:Panteleimon Ponomapenko.jpg
- File:Nikolai Belyaev.jpg
- File:Члены Политбюро.jpg
- File:50 th anniversary Askar Konayer.Next to him brother Dinmukhamed Kunayev.jpg
- File:Askar Konayer akademik.jpg
- File:Khrushchev and Konayev.jpg
- File:Colleague Konayev and Brezhnev.jpg
- File:Дінмұхаммед Қонаев пен Зухра Ялымова.jpg
- File:И.Жуков,А.Қонаев,А.Асқаров,Н.Назарбаев,Х.Бектұрғанов.jpg
- File:Family Konayev.jpg
- File:Tatar grantmather Dunmukhamed Konayev Khadisha.jpg
Thuresson (talk) 09:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Bekjanbektenbai (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
Unfortunately the user who has had issues before keeps uploading COM:DWs tagging them as Own work while placing random text under ‘Author’ (i don’t think crediting this or this user makes any sense):
- File:Zyn-zyn Kulpash.jpg — a COM:SS from a TV show which is highly likely copyrighted: [7]
those are COM:PACKAGING:
- File:Chips Lays cheese.jpg
- File:Lays Stix cheese chedder.jpg
- File:"Lays"Рифлёные нежный сыр с луком.jpg
- File:Шоколад Нестле.jpg
those are photos of monuments in Kazakhstan (some of their other uploads are of buildings and it’s hard to tell how old they are):
- File:Тұрар Рысқұлов ескерткіші және "Құлан Дән"ғимараты.jpg
- File:Дария Еволенконың бюсті.jpg
- File:Бюст Абая в Кулане,Жамбылская область.jpg
and those are (poor quality) book scans without an attempt to determine the original protographer or date:
- File:Photo Vladimir Nabokov.jpg
- File:Фронтиспис.jpg
- File:Aleisandr Blok.jpg — it seems this one is by M. Nappelbaum as credited here (and there’s better quality here) and it has even been deleted before.
Can someone explain to them how to follow the rules? — 188.123.231.36 09:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bekjanbektenbai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of non-free book covers, posters, photos and packaging.
- File:Chingiz Aitmatov-great kirgiz writer(1928-2008).jpg
- File:Sobranie sochinenyi persidskogo drevnego poeta Nizami(IX-X v.).jpg
- File:Биб.всемир.литер.jpg
- File:Книги "Библиотека всемирной литературы"издательство Эксмо.jpg
- File:Шерхан Мұртазаның қанатты сөзі және суреті бейнеленген баннер.jpg
- File:Books of Chingiz Aitmatov.jpg
- File:Ғабит Махмұтұлы Мүсірепке-120 жыл.jpg
- File:Абай энциклопедиясы.Атамұра баспасы,1995(Абай Құнанбайұлының 150-жылдық мерейтойына арналған),100000 дана.jpg
- File:Ч.Айтматов фото.jpg
- File:Zyn-zyn Kulpash artisteri.jpg
- File:Пирожное Тими от кондитерской компании Конти.jpg
- File:Father Aleksandr Blok Aleksandr Lvovich Blok.1900-s.jpg
- File:Көшпенділер орыс тілінде.jpg
Xunks (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Father Aleksandr Blok Aleksandr Lvovich Blok.1900-s.jpg, which is PD --RAN (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. RAN's exception just above looks reasonable so File:Father Aleksandr Blok Aleksandr Lvovich Blok.1900-s.jpg can be kept. --Xover (talk) 08:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: One exception kept per discussion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree logo. Eleassar (t/p) 22:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: photo of a window + simple logo + de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by J. Plečnik (d.1957) and non-free logo. TadejM (t/p) 15:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Ruthven, who closed the previous DR claiming that the logo is both simple and de minimis. Brianjd (talk) 06:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I haven't changed my mind, but I prefer to let another admin to close the DR. PS: It would be better to check the discussion page of files to avoid reopening an already settled DR... --Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. See COM:TOO Slovenia: logos like this cannot be assumed to fall below the threshold of originality in Slovenia. --Xover (talk) 08:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: agree with Ruthven the logo is De minimis, as it is disturbed by reflections and other effects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. TadejM (t/p) 15:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- To velja za vse spomenike NOB? Tudi za spomenik v Crngobu? Mravlja Matjaz (talk) 09:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- To velja za vse spomenike, ki izpolnjujejo merila za avtorsko zavarovano delo (individualnost, intelektualnost, stvaritev, področje ustvarjalnosti in izraženost) in je njihov avtor umrl pred manj kot 70+1 leti ali tudi če avtorstvo ni znano. Preostala dela so prosta. Trenutno so v javni lasti dela tistih avtorjev, ki so umrli leta 1951 ali prej. --TadejM (t/p) 13:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Spomenik v Crngrobu je (po mojem mnenju) dovolj preprost, da po slovenski zakonodaji ne more biti predmet avtorskih pravic. --TadejM (t/p) 13:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP, there is no Freedom of Panorama in Slovenia. This is a fairly modern monument and still copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Non-free map. TadejM (t/p) 15:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep The Geopedia maps by Sinergise and GURS (Geodetic administration of Slovenia) are equipped with the CC 4.0 International licence (check in the bottom line on the map). --Hladnikm (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, Sinergise (the company that provides Geopedia) cannot legally license work by GURS as CC. The CC license can only apply to the work created by Synergise. The copyright on the map belongs to GURS and the copyright to photos belongs to their respective authors (it's a semi-participatory project). --TadejM (t/p) 12:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sinergise wouldn't indicate the map CC without an agreement with GURS. Wikimedia Foundation should appreciate governmental projects, paid by the tax money, going public under the CC licence. Ad photos on the information board depicted: they are all mine, the uploader's. Some of them are also individually upladed on Wikimedia Commons. The design of the information board is mine, too. Donated to the public with love. --Hladnikm (talk) 19:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the photos; this should then be covered by the CC license on the image description page. Regarding the map, however, I don't think there is sufficient evidence that the CC license applies to it. It would help if Sinergise provide an explicit statement in this regard via the VRT system. --TadejM (t/p) 20:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep GURS mapping is generally available under a CC-BY license, as the terms of use of the e-Surveying platform show:
Data from the Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter: GURS) have the status of public information and are available under the terms of the international Creative Commons license 4.0. (recognition of authorship). The full license is accessible at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Keep GURS mapping is generally available under a CC-BY license, as the terms of use of the e-Surveying platform show:
- Felix QW, I have figured out that the maps have not been produced directly by the Geodetic Administration but by the Geodetic Institute. The Institute has a copyright symbol (©) on their website.[8] It is therefore unlikely that this map is CC. --TadejM (t/p) 22:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, for now, per TadejM and COM:PRP, as there seems to be just too much uncertainty about licensing and the provenance of individual parts of this compilation. However, it seems likely that large parts of this are or could be compatibly licensed, so with better provenance information it might be possible to undelete or upload a new version. --Xover (talk) 08:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion and remark of Xover. Per COM:EVID we need evidence all parts of this image are licensed with CCBYSA. As this seems not the case, the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Geopedia
[edit]Non-free photos and maps. Could be free, but the ticket needs to be checked.
- File:Geopedia vnosno polje2.jpg
- File:Kozjak geopedija2.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 02.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 03.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 04.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 1.jpg
- File:Spomenik 18 ustreljenim partizanom, Šmartno v Tuhinju.jpg
- File:Zemljevid Otočca in Struge.jpg
- File:Zračni posnetek Otočca in Struge.jpg
TadejM (t/p) 16:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The Geopedia maps by Sinergise, GURS (Geodetic administration of Slovenia) and OpendStreetMaps are equipped with the CC 4.0 International licence (check in the bottom line on the map). --Hladnikm (talk) 06:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- In addition, there is a special permission from 2018, before the licence CC 4.0 International has been chosen: {{PermissionTicket|id=2018021710008914|user=Sphilbrick}} --Hladnikm (talk) 07:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The data by GURS can't be freely licensed by the company Sinergise since that would be license washing. One can only license the content for which they hold copyright. That means that only the website itself is CC, but not the maps provided by the GURS. The air photos could be free for lack of creativity, whereas the photos of monuments are not free as they belong to their respective uploaders (it's a semi-participatory project). In the best case, that would mean that files
- are currently out of the licensing scope of Commons.
- Some of these files could be trimmed on the left to only show the free aerial photo. --TadejM (t/p) 11:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The photos of the partisan monuments within the layer Partizanski spomeniki on Geopedia are by default licenced CC 4.0, because we the participants of the project have chosen this licence among the others when creating the layer. Whoever uploads his photos into this layer, is aware his photos are not copyrighted. Photos in other Geopedia layers (Kozjak geopedija2.jpg) are mine and separately uploaded on Wikimedia Commons, e. g. File:Grad Kozjak3.JPG. If this would be the solution, I am ready to upload also other Geopedia photos separately on Wikimedia Commons. More copies more information. --Hladnikm (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Is it possible to verify somewhere that the contributors have agreed to have their images published under the CC license? An explicit statement by their respective authors would be required for these photos. --TadejM (t/p) 20:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- There is an explicit information at the bottom of the information page of the layer Partizanski spomeniki at Geopedia, that the text and photos we contribute are published per default under the CC licenece and thus in public domain. Should it be translated in English? --Hladnikm (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- The copyright notice does not refer neither to these photos that were contributed by third parties (users of the portal) nor the data that is attributed to GURS. No translation of the notice is required but an explicit permission of the photographers needs to be provided. Please note that CC and public domain are different copyright statuses. --TadejM (t/p) 09:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Some of the files in question contain an OTRS ticket from the time, maps haven't been free yet. Tere are no third party contributers of the photos embeded (with one exception: File:Geopedia vnosno polje2.jpg - feel free to delete it). All the other embeded photos are mine, they are also separately present on Wikimedia Commons and my explicit statement has been added to the description of the files which contain these photos. --Hladnikm (talk) 07:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Geopedia vnosno polje2.jpg, File:Spomenik 18 ustreljenim partizanom, Šmartno v Tuhinju.jpg and File:Kozjak geopedija2.jpg
- The main element of these pictures is the user-contributed content (which is distributed under the CC license). The map data is there only to demonstrate how to use the Geopedia GUI as the images are used in the wikibooks:sl:Nova pisarija textbook (see for instance #Zemljevidi) and as such de minimis. In the worst case, this should fail into fair use and before eventual deletion, someone needs to make sure the content is uploaded to the local Wikibooks. --Miha (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure about other pictures where map is the main content. Perhaps data from OpenStreetMap could be used instead at least in some cases (e.g. File:Zemljevid_Otočca_in_Struge.jpg). --Miha (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter who and where reuses these images. The map is the major and essential part of the composition. Re OSM, I agree with that. --TadejM (t/p) 13:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- You have partially misunderstood me. It matters where the images are used not to clarify the copyright issue, but to make sure that the entry on Wikibooks stays complete. Commons is not just another online repository of free images, but is there to support an enrich other Wikimedia wikis. Before possible deletion, the image material should be transferred there if permissible under the terms of fair use. I'm stressing this out since I remember the consequences of your previous activity (mass deletion nominations under your previous nickname) and the damage it created to the local community, because this aspect was not taken into consideration and no one felt responsible/had time to transfer image material before deletion.
- For the files above, I would still argue that de minimis applies: "Copyrighted map is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless)." Here it does matter to look at how the file is used. For instance, File:Geopedia vnosno polje2.jpg shows how to add/edit a (new) entry on Geopedia. But since this is a border case and any other map layer could be shown with the same result, I would suggest the author to upload another version of the images with OSM layer activated instead of other (possibly non-free) layers when possible. Only in rare cases, where purpose of the image is to show how specific functions work with a non-free layer, the images should be transferred to local wikis where fair use is permissible.
- But first of all, we should make sure which the GURS layers are licensed how, since the footer of the webpage shown in the images indeed explicitly says that the ortophoto layer is licenced with CC licence. --Miha (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I did some more research and found out information on licensing of GURS data: https://www.e-prostor.gov.si/dostopi/javni-dostop/?acitem=1821-4. The page says:
Podatki Geodetske uprave imajo status informacij javnega značaja in so na voljo pod pogoji mednarodne licence Creative Commons 4.0. (priznanje avtorstva). Licenca je dosegljiva na spletnem naslovu creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl. V skladu s to licenco je dovoljeno vsakomur, da podatke iz evidenc Geodetske uprave, nekomercialno in komercialno, uporablja pod pogojem navedbe vira podatkov. Dovoljeno je tako deljenje kot predelovanje podatkov.
Translation:
Data from the Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter: GURS) have the status of public information and are available under the terms of the international Creative Commons license 4.0 (recognition of authorship). The full license is accessible at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Under this license, any user is allowed to use the data from the GURS records for commercial and non-commercial purposes, provided they indicates the data source. It is allowed to share and adapt the data.
GURS also explicitly lists the following datasets as freely available:
- Orthophoto DOF050 (sheet by sheet)
- National topographic database
- National topographic maps
- National large-scale maps
- Digital elevation model
- Basic geodetic system
- Register of geographical names
- National border record
- Register of spatial units
- Building cadastre
- Land cadastre
- Real estate register
- Consolidated cadastre of public infrastructure
- Valuation models register
- Real estate market records
- Data on sheets repartition of the maps
I did not check all the images in the category, but the ones I inspected seem to use this data. --Miha (talk) 19:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Source? --TadejM (t/p) 01:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- It seems legit. Thanks. --TadejM (t/p) 16:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Miha, I'm not sure that the CC licensing also applies to the maps since they have not been produced by the Geodetic Administration itself but by the Geodetic Institute, which has a copyright symbol (©) on its website.[9] It is therefore unlikely that the maps have been CC licensed. Therefore, the images File:Spomenik 18 ustreljenim partizanom, Šmartno v Tuhinju.jpg and File:Zemljevid Otočca in Struge.jpg are evidently out of scope. I don't object to replacing them with free OSM maps. --TadejM (t/p) 22:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well, in this case it is best to clarify the situation with GURS and GIS. GURS states pretty clear that the CC licensing applies to "Orthophoto DOF050" and "National topographic maps", whereas GIS just displays the copyright symbol (without any further detail), so one of them is at least partially misleading. --Miha (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per my understanding, GURS can't license under CC the material that was created by another institution. Anyway, I'm open for evidence to the contrary. --TadejM (t/p) 14:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- What about providing some evidence that this is copyrighted material? Or evidence that data does not originate from GURS but GIS? Rather than spending time for thoughtlessly finding always new reasons for removing content that is actually included in other projects, you could also replace the images with OSM equivalents. --Miha (talk) 18:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- I already provided above:
- The evidence that this is work by GIS – by linking above to the GIS site where this is explicitly stated.
- The evidence that GIS materials are copyrighted – this is also clearly stated on their site.
- Now the onus is on you or whoever wants to keep the images to provide the evidence that GIS has agreed to transfer the copyright to GURS and put it in the public domain.
- Re spending time on thoughtless proposals, reporting spurious images here is very targeted and only a part of my work on Commons (my contributions are publicly visible). As to the replacement, I'm not well versed in OSM, so I'm leaving this task for others. --TadejM (t/p) 22:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per TadejM and COM:PRP. There is just too much uncertainty here. --Xover (talk) 08:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remarks of TadejM and Xover. If required for transfer to Wikibooks with fair use, the images can be temporary undeleted. Please contact me in that case. --Ellywa (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC)