Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![97 File:Exhibition panel in the hangar of the "Minoa" ship - archaeological sources 03.jpg](#File:Exhibition_panel_in_the_hangar_of_the_"Minoa"_ship_-_archaeological_sources_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![136 File:"Magnetic Designer"by Lyudmyla Mysko, 2020, gabbro, 236x100x100cm.jpg](#File:"Magnetic_Designer"by_Lyudmyla_Mysko,_2020,_gabbro,_236x100x100cm.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![149 File:La piscine "la Vague".jpg](#File:La_piscine_"la_Vague".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_by_Ellsworth_Kelly_--_Glenstone_(MD)_October_2018_(45168025595).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out-of-scope self portrait. Pierre cb (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Izmir City.gif
Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Md Aminul Islam amin.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20221016-225712 Facebook-01.jpg
- File:Md Aminul Islam.jpg
- File:Md Aminul Islam md Aminul Islam.jpg
- File:Md Aminul Islam md.jpg
- File:Md Aminul Islam artist.jpg
- File:মোঃ আমিনুল ইসলাম.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 11:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional so speedy and gone. --Herby talk thyme 11:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope - privacy violation - cyberbuylling on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 07:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:10, 17 October 2022 UTC: out of project scope - privacy violation - cyberbullying on nl-wiki --Krdbot 13:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Probably not uploader's own work : no exif data, low resolution, looks like a still image from an internet video Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
uploaded the wrong file HenryZhang764 (talk) 14:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: test, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: netcopyvio eligible for speedy deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 23:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Violation. The photo was taken from here: https://www.irekia.euskadi.eus/es/news/47309-por-una-sociedad-mas-justa-redistributiva-cohesionada-cooperativas-economia-social Kofetzek1 (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 10:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope image from likely copyrighted video game Yeeno (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. OoS. Nv8200p (talk) 01:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Vandalism. Edslov (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete. COM:CSD#G3. Only uploaded to vandalize Spanish Wikipedia. Marbletan (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, possibly underage Dronebogus (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete title "teen penis" indicated the subject is likely under 18, potential child pornography. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, meaningless data Gampe (talk) 04:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
unnecessary collage of low quality Jan Myšák (talk) 06:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Outside project scope and at least half is not own work Poliocretes (talk) 07:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Watermark not removed for 5 years by uploader. Positioned such that picture is unusable. 105.155.20.134 07:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
fantasy diagrams, out of project scope
- File:Svgfiles 2018-09-24-21-38-25-307054-12042725113160085469.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2018-09-24-21-30-12-307372-4774048403325889837.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2018-09-24-21-18-24-167316-15083958893921911515.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:5
[edit]Oos garbage
- File:Alimohammed12120.jpg
- File:Franz derechos.pdf
- File:Omar music alraqr12.jpg
- File:احمد سعد ميشو.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 11:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:12
[edit]Not Instagram
Dronebogus (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:12
[edit]Random images of nobody important
Dronebogus (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
OOS vanity crap Dronebogus (talk) 11:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ШмидтДмитрий (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, COM:PENIS.
Xunks (talk) 12:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ROLDAN GABRIEL GERARDO
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Self-promotional personal files (social media handles, brief autobiography, etc.) outside of COM:SCOPE.
Marbletan (talk) 12:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: nonsensical text documents.
Omphalographer (talk) 18:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: Additional nonsensical text documents. Omphalographer (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: another nonsensical text document. Omphalographer (talk) 02:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: ditto. Omphalographer (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: as previously, a nonsensical PDF document. Omphalographer (talk) 04:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 05:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by ROLDAN GABRIEL GERARDO (talk · contribs)[edit]Out of scope: more of the same. Omphalographer (talk) 03:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC) |
Files uploaded by ROLDAN GABRIEL GERARDO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: more nonsense.
Omphalographer (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain-text and semi-finished report about some school experiment. HyperGaruda (talk) 13:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
personal artwork? Avron (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
and File:Imperial Palace of Hue, Vietnam (49579954397).jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{badGIF}} images mostly representing pseudo-scientific diagrams supporting the uploader’s own unencyclopedic misinterpretations of established fact and scientific consensus (e.g. these two are especially embarassing, failing to grasp the basics of 4-dimensional curvature). None of these are in use, but still Commons should not host wholesale incorrect information like this, rather only carefully curated notable cases (such as those of Time Cube guy, maybe). Most of these images also contain uncredited clipart that is unlikely {{own work}} and might be {{copyvio}}, while the remaining few are also otherwise {{out of scope}}.
- File:Saturn says no to Einstein.gif
- File:1aaSpaceCurvatureMatter5.gif
- File:Neutrino or background radiation.gif
- File:1aAtomicNuclei2.gif
- File:1aaBlackHoles.gif
- File:1aaaBrightCores&BlackHoles.gif
- File:1aaaquantum32.gif
- File:1aaaSituationOrbitals2.gif
- File:1aaaStarsDimension.gif
- File:Hex1aProtonNeutronAntiproton.gif
- File:1aaNumbersDoubleSlit2.gif
- File:1aaSpaceCurvatureMatter2.gif
- File:1aaRelativityVersusQM.gif
- File:1aaTheMasterClock2.gif
- File:1aaTheMasterClock.gif
- File:1aaSpaceCurvatureMatter.gif
- File:1aaWaveFunctionColapse.gif
- File:1aaCertaintyPrinciple3.gif
- File:1aCertaintyPrinciple.gif
- File:1aAstrosAndAsteroids.gif
- File:1aAstronautWhonotAged.gif
- File:1aDreams UnconsciousComputing.gif
- File:1aSpeedLightReason.gif
- File:1Cosmos'Creation.gif
- File:1aFutureCosmology.gif
- File:1NothingnessNotEvolve.gif
- File:Hex1aCurvesLoseDimension.gif
- File:Hex1Pi29i.gif
- File:Hex1Fases46b.gif
- File:HexSquaring circle with Phi.gif
- File:Hex1aHydrauliChangeBox.gif
- File:Hex1aPhiPiTwinParameters.gif
- File:Hex1aSquaringCircleIsgotten3.gif
- File:Hex1aDoublingCube1.gif
- File:Hex1aHiggsBosons.gif
- File:Hex1aSquaringWithEqualization.gif
- File:Hex1aDoublingCube4.gif
- File:Sqr.Circle.png
- File:Logo for Pi.png
- File:Hex1aPiCircumscrptionTheorem.png
- File:Hex1aFableSquaringPi.gif
- File:Hex1aPiCircumscrptionTheorem.gif
- File:Hex1aPiFunctionPhi.gif
- File:Hex1aPhiTriangles.gif
- File:Hex1aPositronProof.gif
- File:Hex1aStateOfParticles.gif
- File:Hex1aParticlesDimensions.gif
- File:Hex1aMagneticFields.gif
- File:Hex1aMatter-antimatter.gif
- File:Hex1aIncipientOrbitalSystem.gif
- File:Hex1aNeonAtom.gif
- File:HexCarbon Atom.gif
- File:Hex1aTimeObservation.gif
- File:Hex1aBenzeneOscillator.gif
- File:Hex1aPolarViewBenzene.gif
- File:Hex1aCarbonThreads.gif
- File:Hex1aWaterOnEarth.gif
- File:Hex1aBenzeneSphericalMolecules.gif
- File:Hex1aMagneticEntropyForces.gif
- File:Hex1afourthdimensions.gif
- File:Hex1aNeutron.gif
- File:Hex1aSubatomicStructure.gif
- File:Hex1aCircuitoEconomico.gif
- File:Hex1aCosmicTree.gif
- File:Hex1aWhatIsTime.gif
- File:Hex1aQuadraturePi5.gif
- File:Hex1aQuadraturePi3.gif
- File:Hex1aSquaringDemonstration3.gif
- File:Hex1aSquaringDemonstration2.gif
- File:Hex1aSegmentTrisection10.gif
- File:Hex1aSegmentPartition.gif
- File:Hex1AnglesTrisection2.gif
- File:Hex1aVulgarN-sectionsAngles.gif
- File:HexlifeEssence.gif
- File:Hex1TheNumberPhiandCircumference.gif
- File:Hex1ExtendedPi.gif
- File:Hex1aAsteronAndPoseidon.gif
- File:Hexch.gif
- File:Hex1aMeasuringCertainty.gif
- File:Hex1Fases40.gif
- File:Hex1aUncertainty.gif
- File:Hex1aModularRule.gif
- File:Hex1aRadialAngle.gif
- File:Hex1aOrbitalSituation.gif
- File:Hex1aRadial.gif
- File:Hex1aOscillator.gif
- File:Hex1aChartLevels.gif
- File:Hex1aCovalentBonds.gif
- File:Hex1approach2.gif
- File:Hex1acceleratorParticles.gif
- File:Hex1acamera obscura.gif
- File:Hex8rExc.gif
- File:Hex17r2.gif
- File:Hex1Orbitals coordinates.gif
- File:Hex1Rainbow table of elements.gif
- File:Hex1FloatingIndex.gif
- File:Hex1orbitals.gif
- File:Hex1Pi65.gif
- File:Hex1Fases23.gif
- File:Hex1Pi62.gif
- File:Hex1Prule36.gif
- File:HexSquaring the circle14.gif
- File:HexSquaring the circle12.gif
- File:HexSquaring the circle11.gif
- File:Hex1Fases35.gif
- File:Hex1quantum30b.gif
- File:Hex56b.gif
- File:HexH2.gif
- File:Hex1Priorityrule7.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi29.GIF
- File:Hex1horizont.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi45.GIF
- File:Hex1rf.GIF
- File:Hex1spc.GIF
- File:Hex1quantum5b.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi32.GIF
- File:Hex1quantum28.GIF
- File:Hex1quantum24.GIF
- File:Hex1quantum22.GIF
- File:Hex13f.GIF
- File:Hex32f.GIF
- File:Hex1quantum5.gif
- File:Hex1quantum2.gif
- File:Hex1quantum3.gif
- File:Hex1Fases27.gif
- File:Hex2at.GIF
- File:Hex102.jpg
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete. This is indeed pseudoscientific personal theory. It falls outside Commons scope, COM:EDUSE. Marbletan (talk) 16:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:1a1a1Uncertainty Principle2.gif
- File:1a1a1Non profit enterprises.gif
- File:1a1a1Litium atom.gif
- File:1a1a1Hydrogen atom.gif
- File:1a1aVital molecules.gif
- File:1a1dimensions.gif
- File:1a1Tetracoor.gif
- File:1a2Sbit.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Random illustrations of pseudoscientific concepts without a real educational purpose - out of COM:SCOPE. Some are based on other images missing permission (e.g. photo of Stephen Hawking). See also previous deleted uploads under this user.
- File:PsychologyScience.gif
- File:HiggsBosonsII.gif
- File:Dangerblueshift.gif
- File:WavesPhysicalandImaginary.gif
- File:1a1a1a1aWaves physical and imaginary.gif
- File:1a1a1a1Stuffing forces.gif
-M.nelson (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
As with the already deleted files from this user, these diagrams are full of misleading and/or inaccurate pseudo-scientific nonsense (clearly outside of COM:SCOPE). Many also have potential copyright problems with embedded images and backgrounds that are of unknown source and unknown copyright status.
- File:StarslikeCopyAtoms.gif
- File:UniversalMotionː Time.gif
- File:1a1a1a1a1a1a1a1aEvolutionVersusSuperposition2.gif
- File:FunctionWaveCollapse.gif
- File:FermanCage.gif
- File:Big-bang2.gif
- File:MaxwellBohrFerman.gif
- File:MaxwellDemonstration.gif
- File:GenzelandGhez.gif
- File:FlawsStandardModel.gif
- File:GravityMagneticForces.gif
- File:UniversePixels.gif
- File:MuonRange.gif
- File:1a1a1a1a1a1aOrbitalSystems.gif
- File:FacesOfGod.gif
- File:ClimateByActivity2.gif
- File:ClimateByActivity.gif
- File:1a1a1a1a1aBigBangsReality.gif
- File:StarsAsCopyAtomsII.gif
- File:WaveFunctionColapseofQM.gif
- File:SquaringPiAndFloatingPoint.gif
- File:StarsAsCopyAtoms.gif
- File:CompactParticles.gif
- File:ExoticParticles.gif
- File:HiggsBosonsIII.gif
- File:1a1ExpansionOfMaterials.gif
Marbletan (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Utter nonsense indeed. Incidentally, you know you cannot trust the Physics (superposition is hard!) or the Maths (pi squared is hard!) behind his ideas when he can barely make use of imaging software. Still making GIFs for intended true-color images? Is this 1987…? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment: And block this user for good, too. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Clearly outside of COM:SCOPE.
Marbletan (talk) 14:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, for selfpromo. Taichi (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, for selfpromo. Taichi (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Equivalent to File:Watermolecule.svg but with busy background image that inhibits reuse. Only use-case is uploader's gallery of images they created. DMacks (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 07:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Low-res/{{Bad JPG}}, clearly cropped from some larger uncited image, leaving contradictory/inconsistent artifacts. Tons of high-quality alternatives (depending which details one actually wants) in the various subcats of Category:Water molecules. DMacks (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 07:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused and not educational image
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal logo, used only in abandoned User page of non-contributor George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING; personal photo. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammad Hafiez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private artwork
- File:Puteri Gudipati Ratnasuri Singgara 02.jpg
- File:Lakaran Raja Bunian.jpg
- File:Putera Aria, Raja Bunian.jpg
- File:Putera Aria.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammad Hafiez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: All the files seem to come either from the internet or Facebook. VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator
- File:Puteri Budipati Ratnasuri Singgara.jpg
- File:Tanggalam.jpg
- File:Alam Zara.jpg
- File:Jin Harimau Jadian.jpg
- File:Jin Pendekar.jpg
- File:Puteri Nur, satu-satunya manusia hyrbird keturunan Raja-raja Bunian ketika di wawancara TV9.jpg
- File:Lakaran Mahkota Puteri Nur.jpg
- File:Raja Kalai Sri Bhunawa Maharashthra .jpg
- File:Raja Mustradha Sri Maheswari.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of project scope:empty image, probably test upload George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Crop of photo widely available on web, unlikely to be own work Poliocretes (talk) 07:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused screenshot of User template George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused graph / table George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unusable low quality, unknown person George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
יש קובץ טוב יותר 2A00:7C40:C2B0:305:20C8:4F6B:A5DC:99DE 18:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 13:49, 25 October 2022 UTC: No permission since 17 October 2022 --Krdbot 19:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen? Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope garbage Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope junk
Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope
Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS junk files Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS crap junk Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info + OOS Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Load of OOS crap This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oos garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That was fast. More junk as usual Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Garbagé de OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
_2.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_posted_on_Instagram_CPvlHbYFa7t(JPG).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:1
[edit]Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual collection of Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Oos garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual oos crap
Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Personal spam and potential copyright violations
- File:Azmy Ehab21.jpg
- File:BALSA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:JARDIM BALNEARIO EUCLIDES.webp
- File:MAPA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:Moatazelmasry1632004.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Is this really own work? Dronebogus (talk) 11:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio from [1] Tagged. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Олег Черкасский (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be selfies, so we need the permission from that person.
- File:Julia Dolgorukova2015 09.png
- File:Julia Dolgorukova2015 08.png
- File:Julia Dolgorukova2015 07.png
- File:Julia Dolgorukova2015 06.png
Yann (talk) 18:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Permutation formula.png
- File:Combination formula.png
- File:Kinetic-equation-gases-physical-chemistry-white.png
- File:Kinetic-equation-gases-physical-chemistry.png
- File:Uncertainty principle.png
- File:Bohr atomic.png
Raster image of plain-text math equations; easily written in wiki math markup. DMacks (talk) 18:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Claimed own-work but watermarked and cited to a website with a different name. DMacks (talk) 18:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, for selfpromo. He's the uploader. Taichi (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this work. The actual copyright holder is Johnnie Hamp (see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-27256401). If the uploader can show that they are Johnnie Hamp, then this photo can remain on wiki commons. If not, it should be swiftly deleted. Retinalsummer (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete it. I thought it was public. 146.115.44.47 19:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Tharpe is looking different directions in both images. The BBC image also has noticeable compression artifacting, indicating that it is not from a photo negative (image and performance predate the digital camera by decades). -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure I understand your objection. Flipping and/or compressing an image doesn't void the copyright. The image in question is a still from a Granada TV documentary called Blues and Gospel Train directed by Johnnie Hamp in 1964, who appears to be the copyright holder. The uploader has stated that they thought it was in the public domain, which is a reasonable mistake to make. It may be out of copyright, as it's quite old, but we can't be sure without more information. Hamp is still alive, and may hold the copyright, seeing as he was credited in the BBC article. Retinalsummer (talk) 00:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Tharpe is looking different directions in both images. The BBC image also has noticeable compression artifacting, indicating that it is not from a photo negative (image and performance predate the digital camera by decades). -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works.
- File:Pakistan Military Sculpture.jpg
- File:Pakistani Chengdu F-7PG in a hangar.jpg
- File:PAF Base Samungli.jpg
- File:Pakistan Army Cobra Gunship Cockpit Selfie Video.ogg
- File:HIT APC Talha and Sakb.jpg
- File:Ghauri MRBM.jpg
- File:Shaheen-1A MRBM.jpg
- File:Pak Army Toyota Hilux utility trucks (1998 and 2015 models from front to back).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
taken fromm google maps Joanbanjo (talk) 19:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo of photo and copyvio Joanbanjo (talk) 19:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This isn't original work. It just looks good. It may be from a promo for the Bobcats which was mailed to fans, but I forget where it came from. Ohisylvania (talk) 19:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Given source is a subscription article, "Copyright © 2015, The Paleontological Society" and no sign of a CC license. Felix QW (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Source unknown ("سازمان" means organization. Which organization?). No indication of release under a free license HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- See also w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Priyanka kewat1 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Just how many images of this flag does Commons require. Redundant. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Why would Le Messager publish a photo by one of their journalists under CC license when they won't even let anyone look behind the paywall except for their subscribers? 217.239.15.7 21:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info Dronebogus (talk) 23:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. An unedited, uncropped version exists here. ✗plicit 00:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution image with no EXIF, unlikely own work Yeeno (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep Person pictured is en:Tiarnie Coupland. I couldn't find any evidence of copyright infringement in TinEye and google search. Neither with google nor flickr is there a freely licensed alternative photograph. So the file is the only one we have and should not be deleted. And finally, low quality is no reason to delete. GeorgHH • talk 16:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from facebook. --Didym (talk) 12:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
All files by this user are copyvios. This is just downloaded from the 'net mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom X750 (talk) 08:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This was supposed to be deleted ages ago? anyhow, copyvio, see https://thegarage.com.br/carro/1983-ferrari-mondial-quattrovalvole-coupe-22/ mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
As the original uploader, I would like to request deletion of this unused content. 25stargeneral (talk) 01:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment You are free to request deletion, but a photo of a 3rd-party presidential candidate is surely in scope and potentially useful. Why do you want the photo to be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- You know what, I've changed my mind.
I withdraw my nomination. 25stargeneral (talk) 01:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- You know what, I've changed my mind.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
© 2021 TEMPO - Hak Cipta Dilindungi Hukum Urang Kamang (talk) 03:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It seems to be a part of an exhibition in the museum. If yes, then COM:FOP Netherlands cannot be applied A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused small photo of non-notable persons George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused and unusable image George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused and unusable image. Very poor quality, heavy watermarked George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused and not useful diagram George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable persons George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuliskaardianawati (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: a student work with screenshots, tables, and diagram
- File:Kode-2.png
- File:Kode-1.png
- File:Table-2.png
- File:Table-1.png
- File:Graph-2.png
- File:Graph-1.png
- File:Method-2.png
- File:Method-1.png
George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by I.atthaphon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo
George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hervevalerykengni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused self-promotion of non-notable person
George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo of non-notable company George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused blurred photo with poor description George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 08:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Keine Relevanz, da die Wikipedia Seite zum Logo gelöscht wurde. Platte110 (talk) 09:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
not a free map Vcohen (talk) 09:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, derivate of depicted photo. inside a building, so no FoP h-stt !? 11:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Aw, sorry, I didn't think about it this way. It is part of a permanent exhibition in a public building, but I assume the photo is way too recent. It is a pity, the photo would have been very useful to document the archaeological method. --Eunostos (talk) 11:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: from the visible border I suspect this image is a screenshot from an unknown source. MKFI (talk) 11:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shane.Kelly (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person
- File:Tha Hotshot Profile Photo 3.jpg
- File:Tha Hotshot Profile Photo 2.jpg
- File:Tha Hotshot Profile Photo.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: private photo of non-notable person. Used only in abandoned sandbox George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused random snapshot. Too blurry to be useful George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Icenepalinarain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable persons and event
George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
IP persistently removes no permission tag. Source available, photographer stated but no evidence the photographer agrees to release under CC. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Estimado Minorax:
- En Wikipedia es imprescindible la HONESTIDAD y dejar el ego a un lado. Avisé al autor a través de su página web para que aclarase su asunto, cosa que podría haber realizado usted mismo. Me consta, porque me remitió copia, que envió el formulario de declaración de posesión de los derechos, donde justifica que no sólo los posee, sino que son de libre USO. El borrado de esta imagen supondría un acto de VANDALISMO. Alceix (talk) 12:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- En consecuencia, el asunto ya depende entre el autor y quien deba decidir (que quizá no sea usted). Mi trabajo, por mi parte, es honesto. Así que deje de vandalizar. Alceix (talk) 12:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Instead of reverting the tag, you could've asked the photographer to send in their permission which is clearly stated on {{No permission since}}. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Eso es una falacia lógica. Es MI trabajo y lo defiendo de vándalos una vez contactado con el autor. ¿Por qué, en vez de censurar, no contactó con el autor? Es un personaje público. Alceix (talk) 12:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Como usted está empeñado en imponer sus falacias y su ego, yo borro. Los bibliotecarios ya están trabajando en ello. Alceix (talk) 12:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Conclusión: respete las normas comunitarias de Wikipedia, deje que los que deben decidir decidan y haga mutis por el foro. Y respete el trabajo de otros miembros de la comunidad. Alceix (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- No obstante, le voy a desvelar un secreto, y de paso, para que quede reflejado en la discusión. Esta vez he sido yo quien ha subido esta imagen como puedo subir tantas otras más. Pero cualquier vandalismo contra un personaje público resulta estúpido. ¿Cuánto cree que tardarán en reponer el contenido de esta persona, o el de otra pública, o el de otra? Una, y otra, y otra vez. Lo siento, es lo que tiene SER ALGUIEN. Asúmalo. Alceix (talk) 12:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Instead of reverting the tag, you could've asked the photographer to send in their permission which is clearly stated on {{No permission since}}. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
VRT agent (verify):: Delete We've received Ticket:2022101510004434 regarding File:David Lorenzo Cardiel.jpg. The permission has been rejected: Permission from other than the copyright holder. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
User has the same name as the subject, but there is no evidence of original ownership. In any case, the image is not a selfie, so the uploader is not the photographer. – Rhain ☔ 13:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Globally locked sockpuppet account. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
very small size, doubt is is the work of the uploader Avron (talk) 13:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
URV von https://www.landwirtschaft-mv.de/Landesforschungsanstalt/Institute/IfT/ siehe auch de:Landesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Fischerei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. AxelHH (talk) 13:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
copyviolence Barbarian (talk) 13:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Painting by Rizvan Garabaghly, a modern artist. No permission. Ruthven (msg) 14:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
cropped from this file previusly published on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=672835544211662&set=pb.100044556664241.-2207520000.&type=3 Bradipo Lento (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio? Enyavar (talk) 14:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 15:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since) Krd 17:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- There is no permission for the icons used within the image. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
High quality portrait of a personality, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Lubov Tsokolo-Bulakh.jpg Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- That request was for another image. Yann (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Equivalent to File:H2O-Tetraeder.jpg but with more-distracting background image that inhibits reuse ("background" even overwrites parts of the H atoms). Only use-case is uploader's gallery of images they created. This is a different language than the alt I mention, but given how the content itself is damaged, I don't think it's within WP:EDUSE. DMacks (talk) 18:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There are more images of this type, see Special:ListFiles/Alejandro Porto or user page. --Leyo 07:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Previously published in https://www.bahaiblog.net/articles/videos-film/new-documentary-actress-carole-lombard/, VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: got VRT. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
ohne jeglichen Beleg, kann reine Fantasie sein 79.192.236.172 19:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; in use. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
ohne jeglichen Beleg, kann reine Fantasie sein 79.192.236.172 19:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; in use. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Possibly underage per other uploads, in use but very easy to replicate Dronebogus (talk) 23:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Seems no evidence of child pornography, but random penis picture are out of scope. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; low quality penis. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
wrong source/ author Xocolatl (talk) 15:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Question Can the right source/author be substituted on the page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: quite clearly not "own work" of the uploader as claimed and not enough information to determine the actual copyright status. No hits with reverse image search and a search with the name. The man died in 1927, that is too recent to say that the photo must be in the PD anyway. The file can be restored in 2048 with PD-old-assumed. --Rosenzweig τ 22:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of the Oman Ministry of Foreign Affairs, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Students and Faculty.jpg
[edit]
Photo courtesy of Emilio Garcia, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Students and Faculty - 51924162879.jpg
[edit]
Photo courtesy of Emilio Garcia, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of Khalid Allaoui, a Moroccan-based photographer, not a work from the US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Photo: Credit Scott Kowalchyk/CBS ©2022 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Description said Courtesy photo, which means this photo is not taken by the Flickr user, likely flickr-washing file A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Description said Courtesy photo, which means this photo is not taken by the Flickr user, likely flickr-washing file A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Description said Courtesy photo, which means this photo is not taken by the Flickr user, likely flickr-washing file A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Description said Courtesy photo, which means this photo is not taken by the Flickr user, likely flickr-washing file A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană and EEAS Secretary General Sannino - 52017921921.jpg
[edit]
Photo courtesy of NATO, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană and EEAS Secretary General Sannino - 52017963278.jpg
[edit]
Photo courtesy of NATO, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo and Defense Secretary Mark Esper Meet with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (50537503491).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo Courtesy Office of the Prime Minister of India, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Krd: I thought I fixed the license on the file, did I not? Cryptic-waveform (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo and Defense Secretary Mark Esper Meet with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (50537502026).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo Courtesy Office of the Prime Minister of India, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Krd: I thought I fixed the license on this file, didn't I? Cryptic-waveform (talk) 01:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
![03:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/17#c-A1Cafel-20221017032300-File:"Magnetic_Designer"by_Lyudmyla_Mysko,_2020,_gabbro,_236x100x100cm.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
![17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/17#c-Krd-20221106172800-File:"Magnetic_Designer"by_Lyudmyla_Mysko,_2020,_gabbro,_236x100x100cm.jpg){kind=link}
Uploads by VictorBenitoGarciaRocha
[edit]- File:Distribución Líderes.png
- File:Proyecto-vamos-alto-contra-deserción-escolar-en-Apodaca.jpg
- File:Lideres-del-manana-olga-sanchez-cordero.jpg
- File:Fondo2015-2020LDM.png
- File:Tercera Generación.jpg
- File:FundaciónFleishmanTecDeMonterrey.png - copyright violation - https://www.gtglobal.com/en/the-fleishman-foundation-promotes-young-talent-creates-fleishman-foundation-scholarship-through-lideres-del-manana-program-at-tec-de-monterrey/
- File:BBVATecDeMonterrey.png
- File:TecDeMonterreyYHuawei.jpg
- File:1erEntregaDeLíderALíder.jpg
- File:Logo-lideres-azul-tec-de-monterrey.png
Original uploader (myself) requests deletion. The uploaded material is not and will not be used in any Wikimedia project. The license is not correct or valid.
G1. Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content.
F2. Fair use content: Such content is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons and is subjected to speedy deletion. --VictorBenitoGarciaRocha (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo courtesy of Yassene Ameur
[edit]Photo courtesy of Yassene Ameur, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita - 51926042396.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita - 51926042231.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita - 51926132668.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita - 51926673905.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo Courtesy of Yassine Ameur
[edit]Photo Courtesy of Yassine Ameur, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in an International Women's Day Event - 51926708078.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in an International Women's Day Event - 51926956304.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in an International Women's Day Event - 51927253120.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in an International Women's Day Event.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in an International Women's Day Event - 51926616726.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in an International Women's Day Event - 51927253040.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo Courtesy of Soufiane Zarhouni
[edit]Photo courtesy of Soufiane Zarhouni, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Young Moroccans - 51925568727.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Young Moroccans - 51925568747.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Young Moroccans.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Young Moroccans - 51925568757.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Young Moroccans - 51926632103.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo Courtesy of Manuel Carracedo
[edit]Photo courtesy of Manuel Carracedo, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Holds a Round Table Discussion with the Press (51923354697).jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Spanish Foreign Minster Albares.png
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with U.S. Embassy in Madrid Team.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Spanish Deputy Foreign Minster Moreno Bau.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in the Spain-U.S. Cybersecurity Seminar - 51923786416.png
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in the Spain-U.S. Cybersecurity Seminar.png
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with Women Leaders and Entrepreneurs.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo courtesy of Walter Mesquita
[edit]Photo courtesy of Walter Mesquita, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid
- File:Secretary Clinton Poses for a Photo With Members of the U.S. Rio+20 Delegation (7449876482).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Poses for a Photo With Serbian President Nikolic (7449875806).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Poses for a Photo With SustainUS Youth Members (7449875932).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Poses for a Photo With Australian Prime Minister Gillard (7449875582).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Departs Brazil After the Rio+20 Conference (7449877014).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Greets SustainUS Youth Members (7449876332).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Shakes Hands With OPIC President and CEO Littlefield (7449876898).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Shakes Hands With Lebanese Prime Minister Mikati (7449875708).jpg
- File:Secretary Clinton Delivers Remarks During the U.S.-Africa Clean Energy Finance Initiative Launch (7449876578).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo courtesy of Vanessa Manca and Clint Carroll
[edit]Photo courtesy of Vanessa Manca and Clint Carroll, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană and NATO Permanent Representatives.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană and EEAS Secretary General Sannino.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in Joint Press Conference.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in Joint Press Conference - 52021579638.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Attends the U.S.-EU Dialogue on China - 52017979163.jpg
- File:Deputy Secretary Sherman Attends the U.S.-EU Dialogue on China.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Bogus CC license. Should be sourced and relicensed accordingly to be kept.
- File:안무 장군.jpg
- File:홍범도 동료.jpg
- File:홍범도 이인복.jpg
- File:계봉우.png
- File:최호림.jpg
- File:구춘선.png
- File:Владимир Васильевич Попов.jpg
- File:Американская авантюра в Сибири 2.jpg
- File:Наумов Тихон Иванович.jpg
- File:니항의 유태인 시위.jpg
- File:아무르강 니항항구 흑룡강 입구.jpg
- File:니항사건 일본군 충혼탑 근경.jpg
- File:니콜라예프스크 사건 일본군 재공격, 니항사건 일본군.png
- File:Николаевский инцидент. Николаевска-на-Амурe 니항사건 항구.png
- File:니콜라예프스크 사건 석전영사 시마다 니항사건.png
- File:니콜라예프스크 사건 니항사건, 이시다 영사, 일본군 병영.jpg
- File:Nikolaevsk insident japanese.png
- File:일본군의 시베리아 침략, 만주 침략도.jpg
- File:니콜라예프스크 사건, 니항사건 감옥.png
- File:니항 사건, 니콜라예프스크 사건, 廟街事件, Николаевский инцидент Мемориал Скорбящая мать2.jpg
- File:니항사건 추모비, Мемориал Скорбящая мать.jpg
- File:니항 사건, 니콜라예프스크 사건, 廟街事件, Николаевский инцидент 마가 마을 과거.jpg
- File:니항사건 사할린의용대1.jpg
- File:니항사건 사할린의용대2.jpg
- File:니항사건 충혼탑 일본군1.jpg
- File:니항사건 충혼탑 일본군2.jpg
- File:니항사건 충혼탑 일본군 거대 충혼탑2.jpg
- File:니항사건 충혼탑 일본군 거대 충혼탑.jpg
- File:만주사변 하르빈 일본군 거대 충혼탑.jpg
- File:니항사건 충혼탑 일본군 거대 충혼탑3.jpg
- File:니항사건 충혼탑 일본군 거대 초혼비.jpg
- File:자유시참변 자유시의 1900년대 이슬람계 주민.jpg
- File:니항사건 니콜라예프스크 사건 1920년 2월 파르티잔 아무르강변 Николаевск Инцидент.jpg
- File:니항사건 니콜라예프스크 사건 1920년 2월 파르티잔 진입 Николаевск Инцидент.jpg
- File:북양정부 강방함대 니항사건 포격위치 Николаевск Инцидент.jpg
- File:니항사건 실업학교 Николаевск Инцидент.jpg
- File:니항사건 마가 마을 マガ村全景 Николаевск Инцидент.jpg
- File:니항사건 강방함대 북양정부 니콜라예프스크 중국 함대.jpg
- File:자유시 참변 현장 과거 수라제프카 항구.jpg
- File:자유시 참변 현장 옛건물 Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей (40).jpg
- File:수라제프카 기차역.jpg
- File:자유시 참변 현장 Stroitelstvo mosta cherez rzeyu v alekseevske zabivka svaj (1).jpg
- File:니항사건 니콜라예프스크 사건 추모비 (6).jpg
- File:니항사건 니콜라예프스크 사건 추모비 (5).jpg
- File:니항의 물고기 저장.jpg
- File:니항사건 추모비, 니콜라예프스크 사건 추모비1.jpg
- File:니항사건 니콜라예프스크 사건 추모비 (4).jpg
- File:니항 1923년 파르트잔.jpg
- File:1920년 니항에 진입하는 일본군.jpg
- File:1920 г. Горожане встречают отряд Тряпицына 니항 사건.jpg
- File:29.02.1920 г. Горожане встречают отряд Тряпицына 니항사건.jpg
- File:Николаевске-на-Амуре Скорбящая мать10.jpg
- File:Памятник борцам за победу Советской власти на Николаевска-на-Амуре.jpg
- File:Николаевске-на-Амуре Скорбящая мать 3.jpg
- File:Николаевске-на-Амуре Скорбящая мать 2.jpg
- File:Николаевске-на-Амуре Скорбящая мать, 니항사건, 니콜라예프스크 사건, 니콜라옙스크 사건.jpg
- File:니콜라예프스크 사건, 니항 사건 희생자 추모비, Николаевске-на-Амуре Скорбящая мать.jpg
- File:홍후즈 처형.jpg
- File:붙잡힌 홍후즈.png
- File:체포된 홍후즈.png
- File:제야강 1907-1909 한국계 추정.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 한국계 추정Тип корейца - пильщика леса.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Вид парохода «Петербург» на реке Зее.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Пароход «Ханка» у пристани на реке Зее.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Китайские джонки у берега близ города Сахалян напротив Благовещенска.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Пристань города Благовещенска.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Сплав плотов по реке Зее.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Кореец.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Постройка лодок на берегу реки Инорогды.jpg
- File:제야강 1907-1909 Типы китайских рабочих (маньчжуров).jpg
- File:강형함 니항사건 니콜라옙스크 사건 중화민국 강방함대.png
- File:아무르강 흑룡강 흑수강 애혼성.png
- File:우수문1914 верста. Станция Ушумунь2.jpg
- File:아무르주 인 역 주변의 한국인 Korejtsy-prodavtsy-ovoshhej-na-stantsii-In.png
- File:1914 верста. Станция Ушумун. Жилые дома.jpg
- File:아무르주 인역 주변의 고려인.png
- File:채세윤 박윤천 부대.png
- File:1920년경 자유시 반일열사.jpg
- File:1921년경 장갑차.jpg
- File:반일열사 장상두 я .и. жан-сан-дю яшка.jpg
- File:반일열사 리포 м.и. ли-по участник граждансой войны.jpg
- File:Smolyak Mezhduusobica В.Г.Смоляка Междоусобица Тряпицын Яков Иванович.jpg
- File:박일리야 박윤천 신한민보 원동소식 1924년경 만주 요하지방.jpg
- File:이범석 우등불2.jpg
- File:이범석 우등불1.jpg
- File:Суражевка весёлая улица.png
- File:Схема улиц п. Суражевка 1915 г.jpg
- File:니항시내 지도 일본.jpg
- File:니항사건 감옥2.jpg
- File:니항사건 감옥.png
- File:니항사건2.jpg
- File:島田元太郎시마다상회.jpg
- File:니항사건 전람회.jpg
- File:国辱記.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 미하일로 체스나코프스카야 기차역.jpg
- File:1920 год. Партизаны приамурья. Удивительная история читайте здесь http smolbattle.ru.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 1915지도.png
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 1915.png
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей1950년대.jpg
- File:블라디보스톡 고려인.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 1913년 공장.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 스탈린동상.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 여객선3.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 기차역.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 세르게이 라조.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 설립자2.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 설립자.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 여객선2.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 여객선.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 1938.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 1917.jpg
- File:Амурская область Свободный Суражевка Музей 제야강.jpg
- File:1920-4-5 일본군 학살.jpg
- File:1918. Дети.jpg
- File:트리피츤 처형.png
- File:Wladiwostok Parade 1918.jpg
- File:ЧХВЕ КОРЕ (ЦОЙ НИКОЛАЙ МАКСИМОВИЧ) 최고려 koryo-saram.ru rossijskie-korejtsy-v-bor-be-za-nezavisimost-korei.png
- File:이인섭.png
- File:께르비로의 피난.png
- File:일본이 주장하는 니항사건.png
- File:И.Т. Андреев с семьей. 1916 г.jpg
- File:29482u블라디보스톡.jpg
- File:7017블라디보스톡.jpg
- File:7007블라디보스톡.jpg
- File:P1350422Верхнеудинске. Апрель 1920 года.jpg
- File:P1350415Верхнеудинске. Апрель 1920 года.jpg
- File:P1350413Верхнеудинске. Апрель 1920 года.jpg
- File:일본군 장갑차.jpg
- File:일본군 시베리아 침략3.jpg
- File:일본군 시베리아 침략사진2.jpg
- File:일본군과의 회담.jpg
- File:1918년경 하바로프스크의 일본군.jpg
- File:일본군 장갑차 1918년에서 1922.jpg
- File:1920년 4월 4일에서 5일경 스파스크 일본군 학살.jpg
- File:1918년경 장갑차.jpg
- File:블라디보스특의 일본군과 장갑차.jpg
- File:4월참변 일본군학살.jpg
- File:일본군4월학살사진.jpg
- File:1917년경 블라디보스톡.jpg
- File:1917년 블라디보스톡 고려인.jpg
- File:Zastavka5.jpg
- File:Nikou 05.jpg
- File:니항사건추모식 블라디보스톡.jpg
- File:水戸歩兵第2連隊第3大隊の尼港事件招魂祭.jpg
- File:셰묘노프일본군1919.jpg
- File:트리피츤2.jpg
- File:하바로프스크1920-4.jpg
- File:일본측주장4.jpg
- File:트리피츤1.jpg
- File:일본측주장5.jpg
- File:일본측주장1.jpg
- File:일본측주장2.jpg
- File:일본측주장3.jpg
- File:석전영사와 시마다.jpg
- File:Grigory-semyonov.jpg
- File:그리고리셰묘노프.jpg
- File:Kolchak3.jpg
- File:1920년대 하르빈.jpg
- File:1921년경 아무르주 블라가베셴스크에서 군사령관 에이히.jpg
- File:1918년경 블라가베셴스크.jpg
- File:1920년 아무르주 블라가베셴스크에서 백파 피해자 장례식.jpg
- File:1920년 미군27연대 하바로프스크.jpg
- File:1920년 일본군이 미군 27연대 쪽에서 하바로프스크.jpg
- File:1918 하바로프스크에서의 미군.jpg
- File:스바보드니 마나자나 항일유격대.jpg
- File:아무르주의 일본인과 백파군.jpg
- File:39245 original 러시아내전 일본군 5사단.jpg
- File:38781 original 트랜스 바이칼의 일본군 5사단 매복.jpg
- File:39429 original러시아 내전시 5사단에 의한 희생자.jpg
- File:1920년 장갑열차 이르쿠츠크.jpg
- File:1918블라디보스톡의 일본인.jpg
- File:이르쿠츠크의 체코군단.jpg
- File:1919년경 하바로프스크의 일본군.jpg
- File:1918-7-28 체코군 가이다 장군의 이르쿠츠크 입성.jpg
- File:1919년 블라디보스톡 국제간섭군.jpg
- File:Жертвы Колчака в Новосибирске.백파군대 학살 1919.jpg
- File:1919년 백파군대에 의한 학살.jpg
- File:Жертвы террора Колчака. Сибирь, 1919 г 2.jpg
- File:블라디보스톡 일본군.jpg
- File:1918. Международная военная полиция (International Military Police).jpg
- File:1918. Азиатские дети возле дома.jpg
- File:시베리아의 일본군.jpg
- File:세르게이 라조.jpg
- File:스바보드니의 백파군 일본군.jpg
- File:수라제프카 학교 계획.jpg
- File:수라제프카 마을의 개척자.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%EC%B5%9C%EA%B3%A0%EB%A0%A4_koryo-saram.ru_rossijskie-korejtsy-v-bor-be-za-nezavisimost-korei.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
For File:Wladiwostok Parade 1918.jpg the source is correctly assigned. I have correctly filled in, the author. The image is free. Accipiter Gentilis Q. (talk) 12:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Bogus CC license. Should be sourced and relicensed accordingly to be kept.
- File:Николаевск-на-Амуре 니항 항구 니항 사건.jpg
- File:니항 사건 Николаевск-на-Амуре 니콜라예프스크 사건 일본군 재공격.jpg
- File:Николаевск-на-Амуре 니항 사건 일본 영사관.jpg
- File:Николаевск-на-Амуре 니항 사건 감옥.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for statues and 2D works.
- File:니항의반일열사묘 (1).jpg
- File:니항의반일열사묘 (18).jpg
- File:Памятник борцам за победу Советской власти на Николаевска-на-Амуре 3.jpg
- File:나우모바 거리.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This scupture was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [2]. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This scupture was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [3]. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [4]
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the external hit ([5]) is not identical to our image; for example, see the person before the right wall in the background. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
![[5]](https://www.guide-piscine.fr/medias/image/centre-aquatique-la-vague-piscine-a-mayenne-23085-1200-630.jpg){kind=link}
![09:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/17#c-Túrelio-20221017095000-File:La_piscine_"la_Vague".jpg){kind=link}
- Keep You are correct, and the photo is in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 14:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
![14:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/17#c-Kadı-20221113140700-File:La_piscine_"la_Vague".jpg){kind=link}
I do not wish to have this photo in Wikimedia. I never gave permission for that. 2A02:1810:A595:E00:CD67:D49A:8AF7:DB6B 09:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It looks to me like the upload to Flickr is the problem. Have you complained to the uploader there? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 17:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I do not wish to have this photo in Wikimedia. I never gave permission for that. Viona.ielegems (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Please contact with Flickr. We have nothing to do here. --Kadı Message 17:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Incompatible Licence on Flickr. The licence on Flickr is NC-ND which is incompatible with Commons licencing. Furthermore, the image was uploaded by a bot and thereafter reviewed by a malfunctioning bot which is now blocked. These aspects were never considered at the previous DRs. Since the licence controversy on Flicker has been resolved, either the corresponding change NC-ND is made at the licence over here, or else the file is deleted. NB: The event is in Germany,and the uploader Slick-o-Bot is running on a data centre in Germany. SinghIsFxing (talk) 23:37, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Viona Ielegems at the victorian picnic 2009.jpg for extensive debate around these issues, involving another image depicting the same subject. Brianjd (talk) 00:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- The issue over there is quite different. Here it is about an NC-ND Flickr licence which is incompatible with Commons licencing, and the plethora of malfunctioing Flickr mass upload bots which were all terminated by 2015. SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC).
- @SinghIsFxing The file description indicates that it was license reviewed and, at the time, had a (irrevocable) CC BY 2.0 license. I don’t know what malfunctions the bot had, but I assume that the reviews are still valid; otherwise they should be removed. Brianjd (talk) 00:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Under german / EU law, The photographer never had the authority or model release to licence it for commercial and derivative usage. Hence he seems to have corrected himself on Flickr for all his uploads. Hence Commons may at times choose to delete images, for example as a goodwill gesture to a photographer who has made a mistake. Also, those licence changes automatically apply subsequently and this file cannot be kept on Commons.SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- @SinghIsFxing This seems to be conflating personality rights and copyright issues, as already discussed at the other DR. Brianjd (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Brianjd No, this is a LICENCING issue which involves assignment of commercial rights by a person who himself never had the commercial exploitation rights. To take an example, if you buy a stolen car and the thief is caught then do you become the owner of the car or can morally sell it onwards to an innocent person ? SinghIsFxing (talk) 02:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- There is an interesting series of problems here (1) The photographer changes his licence on Flickr to NC-ND, (2) The FlickrReviewBot is admittedly malfunctioninhg and was stopped and (3) All mass Flickr uploads were stopped in 2015. All these circumstances combined need the retainers to prove that the present licence is correct and valid. Good Luck doing that. SinghIsFxing (talk) 02:35, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- @SinghIsFxing I’m not responding to you anymore, until you can demonstrate that you have actually read the previous comments and provide specific responses to them. Brianjd (talk) 02:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- "Under german / EU law, The photographer never had the authority or model release to licence it for commercial and derivative usage" - why? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- "Also, those licence changes automatically apply subsequently" - not really. They do not revoke earlier license, but maybe original license was tainted/invalid anyway. But there is no explanation why it would be Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- @SinghIsFxing This seems to be conflating personality rights and copyright issues, as already discussed at the other DR. Brianjd (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Under german / EU law, The photographer never had the authority or model release to licence it for commercial and derivative usage. Hence he seems to have corrected himself on Flickr for all his uploads. Hence Commons may at times choose to delete images, for example as a goodwill gesture to a photographer who has made a mistake. Also, those licence changes automatically apply subsequently and this file cannot be kept on Commons.SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- @SinghIsFxing The file description indicates that it was license reviewed and, at the time, had a (irrevocable) CC BY 2.0 license. I don’t know what malfunctions the bot had, but I assume that the reviews are still valid; otherwise they should be removed. Brianjd (talk) 00:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- The issue over there is quite different. Here it is about an NC-ND Flickr licence which is incompatible with Commons licencing, and the plethora of malfunctioing Flickr mass upload bots which were all terminated by 2015. SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC).
- Image was set to NC-ND before 2019, see https://web.archive.org/web/20190125215804/https://www.flickr.com/photos/soul_stealer/6600139665/ Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- "either the corresponding change NC-ND is made at the licence over here, or else the file is deleted" - there is also a third possibility: we can and will keep file under CC-BY-2.0 Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- " reviewed by a malfunctioning bot which is now blocked." bot was blocked for marking everything is failed. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FlickreviewR Is there any indicator that bot had also accidents with falsely claiming that image is compatible? And that this file was under a different license? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- CC-BY-2.0 was probably tainted anyway because Flickr uploader did not have rights to commercial (German/Belgium) without consent. Nominator says here no permission was given to photographer. Flickr Uploader probably corrected himself by changing to NC-ND. We should also respect that change now that we are aware of it (it is also required in terms of the actual licence BTW because of the compulsory attribution clause) and amend our licence to NC-ND.
- You are correct the earlier licence is not revoked, but at the same time it needs to be refreshed in terms of the attribution clause. It turns on the reason the licence was amended on Flickr, if it was due to a mistake of the photographer then our licence is also tainted and we have a moral duty to inform subsequent reusers.
- Soon after this upload the malfunctioning bot was marking everything as attribution failed, but the files were being approved nonetheless. It made no difference if it was a good attribution or a bad attribution, all of them were being approved.
- It is better to err on the side of caution and delete this file considering that the model is also asking for it saying she never gave permission for it to be uploaded to Wikimedia. The clear meaning is that she never consented to the image being publicly shared. The burden of proof now shifts onto the photographer or to the Slickbot operator for the image to be retained. SinghIsFxing (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- "Soon after this upload the malfunctioning bot was marking everything as attribution failed, but the files were being approved nonetheless." - can you link example edit? For example in this file was NOT approved. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- In the link you gave, it seems confirmed from this diff that the bot was malfunctioning when reviewed by a human. Also I can't be asked to prove a negative. That proof has to be given by the bot operator. SinghIsFxing (talk) 22:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- "CC-BY-2.0 was probably tainted anyway because Flickr uploader did not have rights to commercial (German/Belgium) without consent." what is the reason for this claim? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- That would be COM:CSCR#Belgium, although I personally would not agree with way it is (incorrectly) written in the Commons policy. SinghIsFxing (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- "Soon after this upload the malfunctioning bot was marking everything as attribution failed, but the files were being approved nonetheless." - can you link example edit? For example in this file was NOT approved. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=119773083){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion and decision at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Viona Ielegems at the victorian picnic 2009.jpg. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
فيصل العيسى 83.110.169.236 18:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- The deletion reason is simply the name, Faisal Al-Issa. So if the file description and name need changing, change the file description and request a name change. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Luxeuil-les-Bains
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France; sculptor died in 1971 (see fr:Claude Grange) and works are still in copyright in France.
- File:2020-08 - Luxeuil - Saint Colomban - 01.jpg
- File:2020-08 - Luxeuil - Saint Colomban - 02.jpg
- File:Colomban de Luxeuil 0002.jpg - De minimis may apply
- File:Colomban de Luxeuil 0003.jpg
- File:Colomban de Luxeuil 0004.jpg
- File:Colomban de Luxeuil 0006.jpg
Sennecaster (talk) 02:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- LOL ! A.BourgeoisP (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete : I agree : No COM:FOP#France (alas). Except for File:Colomban de Luxeuil 0002.jpg which is de Minimis because the statue is only a small part of the photo. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Photo courtesy of the Blue House, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license in invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Added PD-KoreaGov tag, since Blue House was the was Executive residence owned by the Korean government and this photo was provided for use by the the US State Department to be publicly placed on Flickr under the their license. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 21:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think this photo fulfills criteria #5 Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. [Courtesy of the Blue House] makes it clear that it is not a US government work, and the link placed on the Flickr license page especially advises that others may have rights to the content. Felix QW (talk) 20:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- The photo file name give by the U. S. State Department is "Deputy Secretary Sherman Meets With ROK President Moon" - that was "current news" and is why this photo was released on the State Departments Flickr account to the worldwide public. This photo is a prime example of fulfilling "criteria #5" as at that time, "current news." Ooligan (talk) 16:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think this photo fulfills criteria #5 Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: #5 says nothing about photographs, which are not "simple news reports". And "Courtesy of Blue House" does not say that the photo is the work of the ROK, just that they supplied it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument des Basques
[edit]Not in PD in France. Creators are Claude Grange d.1971 (architect) and Mathieu Forest d.1955 (sculpture). Undelete in 2025 or 2041. I've purposefully not nominated images containing sections of the memorial where only place names are displayed as I question whether they cross the creativity threshold to warrant copyright protection.
- File:Basque Memorial 1.jpg
- File:Basque Memorial 2.jpg
- File:Basques Memorial.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-01.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-02.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-03.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-04.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-05.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-06.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-07.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-08.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-09.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-15.jpg
- File:Monument aux basques 5474.JPG
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3138.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3139.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3140.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3141.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3142.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3143.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3144.jpg
Labattblueboy (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument des Basques
[edit]No FOP in France; per fr:Claude Grange, sculptor died in 1971 so works are still copyrighted in France.
- File:Basque Memorial 3.jpg
- File:Basque Memorial 4.jpg
- File:Basque Memorial 5.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-10.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-11.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-12.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-13.jpg
- File:Craonnelle-FR-02-Monument des Basques-14.jpg
- File:Jouanic Bertin Lestoquois 5478 Paquette Mittlhauser.JPG
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3138-c.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3139-cropped.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3141-c.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3144-c.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques at Chemin des Dames (France 2015).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sennecaster (talk) 02:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Oppose. Les photos montrant l'ensemble du monument ont déjà été supprimées en 2018 (voir plus haut). Ici, il s'agit de photos montrant des petites parties et sans aucune originalité. Et il ne peut pas y avoir de recadrage permettant de voir l'oeuvre dans son entier. --Poudou99 (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- english version: All photos that showed the "Monument des Basques" as a whole were removed in September 2018 (see above).
- The photos proposed now for deletion show very small parts of the Monument. What is shown in these photos are only details without any architectural originality. One can consider that does'nt fall into the rule "NoFop In France". --Poudou99 (talk) 03:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose — Pour la même raison. --François GOGLINS (talk) 06:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC).
Support File:Jouanic Bertin Lestoquois 5478 Paquette Mittlhauser.JPG, File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3139-cropped.jpg, File:Monument des Basques - IMG 3144-c.jpg and File:Monument des Basques at Chemin des Dames (France 2015).jpg. The others may be de minimis; I'm not sure the wreath with names is copyrightable.--Labattblueboy (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The first three look OK, but the wreaths in the rest are certainly creative sculptures. Note that using Oppose and Support are ambiguous -- do you oppose deletion or oppose keeping? Please use Delete and Keep. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument des Basques
[edit]No FoP in France, architect Mathieu Forest died in 1955 and sculptor Claude Grange died in 1971
- File:Basque Memorial 3.jpg
- File:Basque Memorial 4.jpg
- File:Basque Memorial 5.jpg
- File:Monument des Basques au chemin des dames (17236228286).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep except File:Monument des Basques au chemin des dames (17236228286).jpg. As noted in the previous nomination results, the wreaths in the first three images are likely free use.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm not convinced the other three are okay to keep, but I won't overrule Jim. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fondation Biermans-Lapôtre
[edit]No FOP in France; en:Marcel Gaumont died in 1962 and works are still copyrighted in France.
- File:Entrée de la Fondation Biermans-Lapôtre 2010.jpg
- File:Entrée de la Fondation Biermans-Lapôtre, Paris 2003.jpg
- File:Paris - Fondation Biermans-Lapôtre (18054714026).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sennecaster (talk) 02:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in France, en:Marcel Gaumont died in 1962 and the works are copyrighted in France.
Sennecaster (talk) 02:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Photo Courtesy: The University of Texas Austin
[edit]Photo Courtesy: The University of Texas Austin, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid
- File:Secretary Tillerson Holds up a Jersey Dedication to him at the University of Texas Austin (39132322715).jpg
- File:Secretary Tillerson Participates in a Q&A at the University of Texas in Austin (39132508005).jpg
- File:Secretary Tillerson Participates in a Q&A at the University of Texas in Austin (39132507725).jpg
- File:Secretary Tillerson Participates in a Q&A at the University of Texas in Austin (39132508155).jpg
- File:Secretary Tillerson Delivers a Speech at the University of Texas (25159557337).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Also dubious in terms of COM:FOP Ukraine, as the author of an obelisk commemorating the year 1945 would have to have died before 1952. Felix QW (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
very unlikely own work, looks like a scan. Depicted person died 1953, real author not mentioned Raymond 06:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" --RAN (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Question Do we not need to know a bit more about the provenance of the photo to conclude that? Felix QW (talk) 20:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - might be pd in the EU, but not in the USA per URAA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This picture is a fanart of Touhou Project that is a video game series. ZUN, the creator of Touhou Project says "If you are a legal person creating Fan Content as a business activity, please contact us." (see [6]). It means some rights reserved in commercial use. Therefore, it is not a CC-BY-SA license. Kinketu (talk) 10:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Question: The provided link states that the new requirements regarding business activities were introduced on November 10, 2020. Embodiment of Scarlet Devil, of which the character Rumia is from, was first released on August 11, 2002, and there already exists a mountain of tens of thousands of existing fanmade Rumia artworks elsewhere, many of which are being used in commercial activities, as creators have been following the original copyright guidelines laid out by ZUN on February 3, 2002 which is more permissive in terms of copyright. Is it possible for ZUN to retroactively alter the copyrights which affect thousands of content creators who have made Touhou derivative works, many of which whom are operating commercially, almost two decades later? I have my doubts that this would hold up in US law courts, from a US copyright perspective, and the Wikimedia servers are located in Florida, while the fanart creator is located in Australia. From a legal standpoint, at best, content creators drawing old content from Embodiment of Scarlet Devil (2002) can choose to retroactively comply with the new changes out of goodwill, but there is no legal way of enforcing this; conversely, any newly-made official Touhou works created after November 10, 2020 (for example, Unconnected Marketeers, released May 4, 2021) would likely be fully covered by this new copyright guideline from a legal standpoint, and thus it would not be permissible to release derivative fanworks of Unconnected Marketeers (2021) content under a CC-BY-SA license. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 14:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Under the original copyright guidelines laid out by ZUN on February 3, 2002 (translation:Touhou Wiki:Copyrights>Copyright status/Terms of Use of the Touhou Project>Original text), ZUN states "For the commercial production of derivative material, or the mass circulation of derivative material outside of doujin shops, you must seek my permission. To publish on commercial magazines and books, you must notify me." So I think, it's not a CC-BY-SA license. If this piceture distributed under the CC-BY-SA license, anyone can use it in commercial and mass production without ZUN permission. --Kinketu (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- It appears that points 1 to 9 are additional usage conditions laid out in addition to the copyright clause provided in the second paragraph. That is, while the copyright is stated to belong to the creator of the derivative work, ZUN provides additional conditions on top of that, which in his words, are "to avoid trouble". I wonder if swapping the license from CC-BY-SA to PD-Own would still allow us to adhere to these requirements? It might also be possible to maybe add details of ZUN's additional conditions within the file description, so the reader is aware that there are additional points to consider before re-using the image? Similar to how some file descriptions display the {{Fan art}} template, which mentions that the original rights owner still has trademark protections and other various protections on top of copyright (quote: "Before using this content, please ensure that you have the freedom to do so under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's legal rights."); from my interpretation, this would fall under a non-copyright restriction placed upon usage of the work, rather than a restriction of the work's copyright itself. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 17:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, here are various examples of existing images on Commons that feature additional non-copyright requests and restrictions: File:2018-05-20 Felix Haßmann auf SIG Captain America-9009.jpg, File:Arâches-la-Frasse - Télégraphes Postes Téléphones.JPG, File:RiversOfSabah SungaiLiwagu-08.jpg, File:Almanac 2016230160714 2016-08-17 Summer Breeze - Sven - 1D X II - 0084 - AK8I3643 mod.jpg, File:2012-05-28 Cuxhaven DSCF0092.jpg, File:2018.05.11.-06-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim--Listspinne-Maennchen.jpg, File:Bivacco Suretta.jpg, File:Alter Juedischer Friedhof Aplerbeck IMGP2760 wp.jpg, File:UH-1H PCAM rotors.JPG. A similar notice can be placed on this image regarding the non-copyright restrictions requested by ZUN. It is very much apparent that the requests that ZUN has asked of re-users of derivative works exist outside of the realm of copyright, and hence there isn't actually any restriction that prevents the copyright holder of a Touhou derivative work from releasing it under a CC license of their own choosing. It is the responsibility of re-users of these works to decide whether or not they comply with the additional requests ZUN has made on top of the copyright clause. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 22:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Copyrights itself includes the right to distribute (See w:Copyright#Economic rights). Wikimedia allows non-copyright restrictions (See Commons:Non-copyright restrictions), but I interpret there is no rule to allow copyright (includes right to distribute) restrictions that violate the CC-BY-SA license. According to the Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses, "Non-commercial, educational, personal, or editorial use only" and "Notification of the creator required, rather than requested, for all or for some uses" are prohibited. As long as the original creator ZUN states "For the commercial production of derivative material, or the mass circulation of derivative material outside of doujin shops, you must seek my permission. To publish on commercial magazines and books, you must notify me.", I interpret uploading the picture in Wikimedia Commons is not allowed. We will wait for another person's interpretation. --Kinketu (talk) 11:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, here are various examples of existing images on Commons that feature additional non-copyright requests and restrictions: File:2018-05-20 Felix Haßmann auf SIG Captain America-9009.jpg, File:Arâches-la-Frasse - Télégraphes Postes Téléphones.JPG, File:RiversOfSabah SungaiLiwagu-08.jpg, File:Almanac 2016230160714 2016-08-17 Summer Breeze - Sven - 1D X II - 0084 - AK8I3643 mod.jpg, File:2012-05-28 Cuxhaven DSCF0092.jpg, File:2018.05.11.-06-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim--Listspinne-Maennchen.jpg, File:Bivacco Suretta.jpg, File:Alter Juedischer Friedhof Aplerbeck IMGP2760 wp.jpg, File:UH-1H PCAM rotors.JPG. A similar notice can be placed on this image regarding the non-copyright restrictions requested by ZUN. It is very much apparent that the requests that ZUN has asked of re-users of derivative works exist outside of the realm of copyright, and hence there isn't actually any restriction that prevents the copyright holder of a Touhou derivative work from releasing it under a CC license of their own choosing. It is the responsibility of re-users of these works to decide whether or not they comply with the additional requests ZUN has made on top of the copyright clause. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 22:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- It appears that points 1 to 9 are additional usage conditions laid out in addition to the copyright clause provided in the second paragraph. That is, while the copyright is stated to belong to the creator of the derivative work, ZUN provides additional conditions on top of that, which in his words, are "to avoid trouble". I wonder if swapping the license from CC-BY-SA to PD-Own would still allow us to adhere to these requirements? It might also be possible to maybe add details of ZUN's additional conditions within the file description, so the reader is aware that there are additional points to consider before re-using the image? Similar to how some file descriptions display the {{Fan art}} template, which mentions that the original rights owner still has trademark protections and other various protections on top of copyright (quote: "Before using this content, please ensure that you have the freedom to do so under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's legal rights."); from my interpretation, this would fall under a non-copyright restriction placed upon usage of the work, rather than a restriction of the work's copyright itself. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 17:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Under the original copyright guidelines laid out by ZUN on February 3, 2002 (translation:Touhou Wiki:Copyrights>Copyright status/Terms of Use of the Touhou Project>Original text), ZUN states "For the commercial production of derivative material, or the mass circulation of derivative material outside of doujin shops, you must seek my permission. To publish on commercial magazines and books, you must notify me." So I think, it's not a CC-BY-SA license. If this piceture distributed under the CC-BY-SA license, anyone can use it in commercial and mass production without ZUN permission. --Kinketu (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Dissemination of false information Thearmins (talk) 10:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution better 2 other files: File:Camille Pissarro 022.jpg, File:La Varenne Saint Hilaire (Camille Pissarro), Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest – 377.B.jpg Oursana (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
,_Museum_of_Fine_Arts,_Budapest_%E2%80%93_377.B.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete This low quality image is no longer needed when higher quality samples are available.--Javidd (talk) 19:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Many Filipino residents of Australia don't want to have a mixed-ethnic flag of the Filipino Australians. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 10:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Question And? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination fictional flag. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Because there aren't many Chinese Koreans who are using this flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 10:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Question Even if there are only a few, what would make this not useful? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: fictional flag. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Not PD US, presumably Disney stock art. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
-20221017132400-File:Pinocchio_oreilles_d'ane.jpg){kind=link}
- I think that image could be "PD-US-no notice" as the other images from the category:Pinocchio (trailer screenshots).
- Cymbella (talk) 20:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well, it is not present in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r757c5O2bio, which is the trailer for the film. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, sorry I did not watch the trailer, I thought it was present. When will the film become public domain ? Cymbella (talk) 18:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- The film comes into the public domain in 2036. However, this image could have been made afterwards. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, sorry I did not watch the trailer, I thought it was present. When will the film become public domain ? Cymbella (talk) 18:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well, it is not present in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r757c5O2bio, which is the trailer for the film. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, requires permission from the heirs of the painter Charles Eyck, who died in 1983. No applicable freedom of panorama in France. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This scupture was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [7]. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- I personally do not care to be brought into a silly deletion request argument. This is a perfect example of why so many Wikipedia articles do not have images and why people do not put images on Commons. Do what you must; just keep me out of the discussion. P.S. you misspelled sculpture. Whoisjohngalt (talk) 16:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Whoisjohngalt, images can be uploaded locally at en.wikipedia for fair use, just not on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Video is not available under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed). Frankie talk 18:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I do not understand which description you were referring to in your edit summary of removing that image. Ronherry (talk) 19:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- I examined it all, I think you're referring to the old version of YouTube where the licenses used to appear below the video description. The current version does not do that anymore. I went through the Intellectual Property clause of the "Terms of Service" of E! News, which permits use for non-commercial purposes. Ronherry (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Commons unfortunately doesn't host files under non-commercial licenses Spiderwinebottle (talk) 20:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_by_Ellsworth_Kelly_--_Glenstone_(MD)_October_2018_(45168025595).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Ellsworth_Kelly_--_Glenstone_(MD)_October_2018_(45168025595).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free content - derivative work, contains the entirety of Ellsworth Kelly's copyrighted sculpture Untitled (2005). 19h00s (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The artwork in question appears to be a simple steel rectangular prism, which does not meet the threshold of originality for copyrightability in the U.S. Toohool (talk) 07:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the ToO is very low for monumental scuplture. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Demande de la personne qui est dessus en accord avec l'auteur de la photographie et alors qu'une meilleure photo a été publiée. Boungawa (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Haseeb55 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 02:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, no exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo and Defense Secretary Esper Meet with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (50536778483).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo Courtesy Office of the Prime Minister of India, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- With corrected license to India GODL this should be fine? --GPSLeo (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: License has been fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable persons George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment There is a stub article about w:Kevin Zapata, if he's the same guy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not the footballer unfort. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by PaulGorduiz106 as Speedy (Db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. This one has a thumb in the way and DataBlitz Ayala Center Cebu (10-05-2022).jpg is a better image of the same subject. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
sbagliato inserire la descrizione e nome come da messaggio vorrei ricrearlo Djsumm (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Che nome vuoi? Puoi cambiare la descrizione in ogni caso, allora non c'e problema con questo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. No exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
No. I am owner of the original photograph of my family and there is no notice to the photographer while the original photographs is made about 1900 to 1910. Thank you for your works. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 10:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ownership of physical copy doesn't assume copyrights ownership. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" --RAN (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover: Please add a Wikidata entry for the patriarch of the family and add the image there. We need more info on the family, you can link from Wikidata to Findagrave and Familysearch and Wikitree. --RAN (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and RAN: . Thank you for your recommondation. But I need more time to do so (I only know the litte girl on the left - she is one of my grandma's). Sincerely, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: License fixed with thanks to RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Blurry, bad shot. Out of COM:SCOPE with enough alternatives in Category:M39A2.-- Kop Buster (talk) 11:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There is no photo of this cannon in the "Springfield Armory National Historic Site Archives" museums and collections and there is not "enough alternatives in Category:M39A2" as this is also the only image of a cutaway of this cannon. Tm (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. For example: this, and this. --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- مساء الخير
- كيف حالك
- انا لا اريد انت تكون حقوق الصورة لي
- انا فقط اريد تغيير الصورة الشخصية الي صورة أفضل Nahmoud reda (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Nahmoud reda: this file is a copyright violation. --Karim talk to me :)..! 22:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园居 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: G7. 作者或上傳者請求刪除，上传版本错误，删除后重新上传 In use. Yann (talk) 11:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- 作者請求删除后重新上传新的版本--颐园居 (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- 作者請求删除后重新上传新版 颐园居 (talk) 15:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- 作者或上傳者請求刪除，上传版本错误，重新上传 颐园居 (talk) 06:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- @颐园居: Are you aware that you can upload a new version over the existing version? It is not necessary to delete the old version to do this. If there is a particular reason you need the old version deleted first it would be best if you explained what it is. Xover (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per author request. Not in use. SCP-2000 07:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be based in part on an uncredited pre-existing map (https://www.desertfhp.org/alamito-creek-restoration?lightbox=dataItem-iqiecjz2). Lord Belbury (talk) 16:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by I dream of horses as no permission (No permission since) Krd 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work of a new user whose sole upload this is. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per the outcome of the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arms of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.svg Frodar (talk) 19:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced flag Alexphangia Talk 15:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sock, DENY. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo and Defense Secretary Mark Esper Meet with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (50537501346).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo Courtesy Office of the Prime Minister of India, not from the US Federal Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed author and license. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: GODL-India. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Perchè è una foto vecchia, è stato aggiunto un nuovo monumento alla piazza. Gianfranco Grieco (talk) 11:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Dunque, quest'è una foto storica. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep there is no reason to delete a photo because it is "no longer current" and even more so it is preserved ZioNicco (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Devo sostituire la foto con un'altra foto più recente. Come la posso eliminare? Grazie Gianfranco Grieco (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Devi non sostituire questa foto. Per piacere upload una nuova foto con un'altro nome. Grazie. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- E' già caricata la nuova foto, non me la fa caricare di nuovo. Devo solo sostituirle, è tanto difficile fare semplici operazioni? Gianfranco Grieco (talk) 09:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Io in fase di inserimento metto la nuova foto, però poi mi compare sempre quella vecchia. Della vecchia ho richiesto la cancellazione, si può cancellare. Lasciare solo quella nuova che è poi l'immagine giusta attuale. Grazie a chi può aiutarmi. Gianfranco Grieco (talk) 09:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Devi non sostituire questa foto. Per piacere upload una nuova foto con un'altro nome. Grazie. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Devo sostituire la foto con un'altra foto più recente. Come la posso eliminare? Grazie Gianfranco Grieco (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
No proper indication why this 1969 publication should be free. Same with anything else uploaded from it, FunkMonk (talk) 00:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @FunkMonk I didn't see a copyright notice, did you? If not, how about {{PD-US-no-notice}}? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- If it can't be found on the copyright renewal database, sure. I didn't see there was another tag going all the way up to 1977. FunkMonk (talk) 10:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- I checked the renewal database and didn't see anything, but also pretty sure a renewal wouldn't be enough. See COM:HIRTLE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There indeed seems to be no copyright notice on the issues of Breviora from which this image is taken. Renewal would be irrelevant here, but publication without a copyright notice is still sufficient for it to fall into the public domain. Felix QW (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- I checked the renewal database and didn't see anything, but also pretty sure a renewal wouldn't be enough. See COM:HIRTLE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- If it can't be found on the copyright renewal database, sure. I didn't see there was another tag going all the way up to 1977. FunkMonk (talk) 10:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-no notice. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
This is not a simple text logo and above threshold per COM:TOO USA. Please also note undeletion request of similar logo https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=696983656#File:The_Rings_of_Power.png Ellywa (talk) 16:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @YAOUMFA and Ankry: You may be interested in this discussion? As for me, Keep as that so-called source doesn't indicate enough information how this is complex. I may consider 1. to nominate screenrant.com to w:WP:RSN to judge whether this is a reliable source or not (because, at least I believe that that site looks like having contents that are political propagandas, like RT or Sputnik from Russia), and 2. re-start an undeletion debate. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:45, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- My opinion would depend on the country of origin: Delete if it is Germany, Keep if it is US. However, I am unable to identify it. Ankry (talk) 12:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- The English and German logo have the exact same origin (Amazon Studios: USA) and exact same design. The English version is denied on wikicommons for its design. Impossible to keep the German logo then. Or we have to dispute that previous decision. YAOUMFA (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- The undeletion request discussion of the English version has been re-opened. Wait and see how that goes... YAOUMFA (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- @YAOUMFA: dude you literally uploaded this picture, which is the same logo. As I am not 100% familiar with the rules as to what counts towards PD, I decline on making a comment of keep/delete. I uploaded the picture in good faith, because many other logo images on Commons are also not just as simple as the letters that make up this text, for example. Rayukk (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Rayukk: I am all for keeping both German and English versions for the same reason as you. It's others who are nitpicking about the design and sadly some of those are admins. YAOUMFA (talk) 22:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Rayukk and YAOUMFA Suddenly, that file you both mentioned is also nominated: have a look at this page. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- @YAOUMFA: dude you literally uploaded this picture, which is the same logo. As I am not 100% familiar with the rules as to what counts towards PD, I decline on making a comment of keep/delete. I uploaded the picture in good faith, because many other logo images on Commons are also not just as simple as the letters that make up this text, for example. Rayukk (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- The undeletion request discussion of the English version has been re-opened. Wait and see how that goes... YAOUMFA (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- The English and German logo have the exact same origin (Amazon Studios: USA) and exact same design. The English version is denied on wikicommons for its design. Impossible to keep the German logo then. Or we have to dispute that previous decision. YAOUMFA (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- My opinion would depend on the country of origin:
Deleted: As the English version of this logo was deleted for being above TOO, this necessarily must be the case for this as well. —howcheng {chat} 21:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio JLAYG (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 21:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
same source and reasoning as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhagavan Vishnu.jpg Hekerui (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Came across this when went to the talk page to ask another question. For me, I think the image fits very well in the place where it is currently. If you decide to delete this image, for novice researchers like me, it would be good if you can find an alternate image of God Vishu to replace this one. Asteramellus (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: It is definitely not the same image as File:Bhagavan Vishnu.jpg. If we delete this one we will have to delete 500+ others in subcats of Category:Mahabharata Book (Hindi) as well. --Achim55 (talk) 18:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Correct, it is an image from page 781, not from 672, and I modified the above text accordingly. The rationale is the same though, there is no difference in source and reasoning. What do you say about the rationale? Hekerui (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with @Achim55. It's not the same image as the Bhagavan Vishnu, and belongs to the public domain in India. I see no reason for its deletion as per the offered rationale. 182.65.70.200 10:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- The rationale is that there's no evidence of PD in India or anywhere else because there is insufficient information on publication date/place and copyright holder - not that it's a duplicate. Hekerui (talk) 12:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. Too many unknowns here. Anyone wanting to keep / restore this please provide some robust rationale why this image is supposedly in the public domain in India. Like: When was it first published? When was the book it was taken from published? Who is the artist (there seems to be a signature)? When did this artist die?. --Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
