Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 5th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YaThaWinTha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope.

Afeef (talk) 04:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YaThaWinTha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Allow for personal use only according to icon websites. ([1], [2], [3])

NinjaStrikers «» 08:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: csd f1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random pic of nondescript beach and rocks, poor composition, nothing particular educational, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random pic of nondescript roots, nothing particular educational, poor quality, unusable and out of scope P 1 9 9   03:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random pic of nondescript rock, nothing particular educational, very poor quality, unusable and out of scope| P 1 9 9   03:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Diego Vimana (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Diego Vimana (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random pic of nondescript bush, nothing particular educational, poor quality, unusable and out of scope| P 1 9 9   03:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. — Afeef (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used for self-promotion of fa.wikipedia Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neel K Raju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 09:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope personal picture. IceWelder [] 10:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope personal picture. IceWelder [] 10:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories, low quality and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 10:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories, low quality and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description or valid categories, and so not educationally useful Commons:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 10:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories, low quality and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:NOTHOST as no useful description, location or valid categories and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories, low quality and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Floridamusicians (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal self promotional images - outside our scope. Commons is not a web hosting platform

Herby talk thyme 11:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es un archivo incorrecto Lupita Vargas M (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

دوست ندارم باشه Aliahmadi79 (talk) 04:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

دوست ندارم باشه Aliahmadi79 (talk) 04:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright at source https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12275-018-7551-3 MPF (talk) 11:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no longer out of scope: added to its item. Jane023 (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination --Trade (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made this crop of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:(4)_Action,_in_the_night,_between_the_MARY,_of_Liverpool,_Capt._Crow,_and_Two_British_Men_of_War._Decr._1806.jpg in error. Please delete it. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a picture of me, I don't want to be published here. 78.62.58.76 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

asdfgh fff 78.62.58.76 20:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sss1s1s1s1s Spectoph (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sss1s1s1s1s Spectoph (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sss1s1s1s1s Spectoph (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: sss1s1s1s1s. --Achim55 (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:nudity. Low quality female nude picture. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It shouldn't be deleted for low quality, but because there is no exif data, we require a higher standard for the category, since it is so easy to grab a screen shot of other people's images. --RAN (talk) 21:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. Per TinEye, this is a cropped version of an image from Metart.com, a commercial porn site. --Rosenzweig τ 00:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation, previously published in several sites, one example: https://newswatchindia.com/news/bindas-khabar/10%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%82-%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8-%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%80-%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%80-%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%9A%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%9A/ MKFI (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 18:35, 5 October 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 01:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has NC in its license on iNaturalist, which is not allowed on Commons. Schwede66 18:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: Have a look at the licenses on the individual photos - they're all CC-BY. For some reason, iNaturalist has separate licensing for its photos and the observation data. --Prosperosity (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that is confusing but you are indeed correct. Sorry for that. Michal, could you please close this deletion request as the licence is fine? Schwede66 01:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: True, sorry both! We learn new things here all the time :). --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MadamXMedia111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work claims; image exists on candidate's campaign site: (https://tullformayor.ca/).

Elli (talk) 05:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copvios so speedy. --Herby talk thyme 07:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/who-is-ibrahim-traore-soldier-behind-burkina-fasos-latest-coup-2022-10-03/, credited VINCENT BADO / REUTERS, this is copyvio NorthAfricanArmsDealer (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page should've been deleted more than seven days ago Luke Hirst (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image of a series. Definitely not own work as claimed Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as copyvio of Warner Bros image, https://www.buzzfeed.com/bimadewunmi/there-can-only-be-one-and-therell-probably-be-no-black-peopl Lord Belbury (talk) 17:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Judge Jane Stranch.jpg Snickers2686 (talk) 22:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the nominator has withdrawn this by removing the deletion template from the file, and nominated the other, later upload instead. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closed procedurally per Lord Belbury; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Judge Jane Stranch.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Enagbare (talk) 21:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Jane Stranch.jpg Snickers2686 (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can tag duplicate files with {{Dupe}} rather than opening a deletion request. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: tagged the other one as dupe and deleted/redirected. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect should be removed. This picture does not show the Kennedy Compound. This is 151 Irving Avenue in Hyannis. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I tried to use {{bad name}} to request removing the redirect, but it doesn't work for such cases. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 02:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright FAO/ Giulio Napolitano watermark on image. Ooligan (talk) 05:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, EXIF on other versions of this image uploaded by this user all say "Copyright holder FAO. Photo credit must be given. Editorial use only." - "editorial use only" is not compatible with Commons. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above; not free licensed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright FAO/ Giulio Napolitano watermark on image. Ooligan (talk) 05:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, EXIF also says "Copyright holder FAO. Photo credit must be given. Editorial use only." - "editorial use only" is not compatible with Commons. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above; not free licensed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Packet images are very likely to be copyrighted. QubeCube (talk) 06:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; clear COM:DW. (Unfortunately was in use.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. https://gogo.gs/info/terms 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. https://gogo.gs/info/terms 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private image. Poor quality George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as likely copyvio, image appears on many other websites as a motivational poster, eg. https://quotesgram.com/img/new-year-quotes-about-footsteps/12555943/ Lord Belbury (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above, certainly DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete it's also a copyvio image dating back to at least 2013, not the uploader's own work. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These 2 files were uploaded via the API by myzelf, but in a wrong manner. They can be deleted now.

OlafJanssen (talk) 11:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; image description pages without images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-0 license Drakosh (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license Drakosh (talk) 12:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN; license corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio screenshot of a game. Also out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person. Joke, used for personal attack. Also corrupted image (red drawing over the photo) George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Yemen A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep This is in Israel, which has FoP. Please pay enough attention to see the difference between Hebrew and Arabic and notice "Mahane Yehuda Market, Jerusalem" in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I believe I, the uploader, have violated copyright laws uploading this image to Wikimedia Commons, since I am a new user and have now read the proper ways of uploading. Luna MacArthur (talk) 02:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Luna MacArthur: The Britannica source appears to credit the U.S. Department of Defense for the photograph, so it might be {{PD-US-Gov}}. Is your statement I believe I, the uploader, have violated copyright laws uploading this image to Wikimedia Commons based solely on the fact that the image was taken from Britannica's website? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Red-tailed hawk Yeah, pretty much. 112.208.5.237 08:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Red-tailed hawk I'd like to appologise in advance if my actions were in violation to Wikimedia's rules. 112.208.5.237 08:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If Brittanica is hosting a public domain photo... it's fine to re-use it provided that Brittanica hasn't altered the photo in a way that goes above the threshold of originality. That's the very nature of the public domain. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It’s weird because I can’t seem to find the painting anywhere other than the Britannica article, and usually government-commissioned portraits are ubiquitous. The closest thing I could find was this Getty Images photo: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/portrait-of-american-republican-politician-and-37th-news-photo/684172345. I’m not saying it isn’t PD, but I’m also not finding any evidence it is either. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well just to be safe, can it just be deleted? I pretty much only wanted to upload this Birch Bayh image and nothing more, and was just messing around with the Richard Nixon one. Luna MacArthur (talk) 23:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess this qualifies for speedy deletion. I feel like a portrait painting of one of the most controversial U.S. presidents is inherently worth keeping, but if the uploader is requesting deletion and the license is iffy, then ¯\_ツ)_/¯ . Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can find a crop being used in the New York Post, though it credits The White House rather than the DoD. That being said, you're right that it's newly uploaded and unused, so I guess this is a G7. I'm skeptical that this is not PD, but I have no objection to deletion along the lines of G7. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty, thanks for understanding. Luna MacArthur (talk) 03:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How long is the wait for deletion though? Luna MacArthur (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Looks like a crop of https://npg.si.edu/object/npg_S_NPG.78.76 which is © Philippe Halsman Archive. Multichill (talk) 21:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as Multichill notes, it is a work by Philippe Halsman, commercial photographer, not an employee of the White House or other US Federal Government agency. It was taken in 1968; Nixon did not become President until the following year. (Some online reusers seem to have been sloppy about accurate attribution and sourcing, but we now know better. Fortunately we have many legitimately PD photos of Richard Nixon.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion; from all evidence not US Gov work; no indication of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page double créée par erreur. Michelet GTD (talk) 03:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fichier existant déjà et il n' y a pas de texte associé à l'image. Michelet GTD (talk) 03:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kerstin Frykstrand died in 1997. No source of this illustration being free. QubeCube (talk) 06:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не свободное. Fluttershytalk 08:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque es una imagen mía sin mi consentimiento Adaca07 (talk) 13:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The uploader has removed their license; I take this as an attempt at concurrence with deletion. Uncat unused photo, apparently of a minor, no evident in-scope importance. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused promotional SPAM George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as a copyvio from a 2010 blog entry, https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-axis-of-greed-the-nature-and-structure-of-the-economic-elite/17767. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: self-promotion of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: bad quality portrait, apparently depicting non notable person, no redeeming qualities, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 06:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused thumbnail of File:LariviereBatailleDunes.jpg. Rather duplicate Estopedist1 (talk) 07:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il ne correspond pas au logo de la ville de la baule-escoublac Maxime44490 (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 06:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 10:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. High quality picture, well framed, easily described and categorised. Better than a lot of the existing images in Category:Tire marks on snow. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ONEYouthNepal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused logo and promo materials of non-notable organization

George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leobracamonte1995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable persons

George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F8. Exact or scaled-down duplicate Theklan (talk) 11:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of what? Lord Belbury (talk) 17:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the duplicated file was redirected here. --Strakhov (talk) 06:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by МБУ ДО ДДТ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos by non-contributors: out of COM:SCOPE and also possible Personality Rights' violation including those of children.

A.Savin 11:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdallahamisi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files and copies of a deleted Wikipedia article for a user that has been indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia for self-promotion. These files are outside COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiccdew forever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private artwork. Low quality, fake .svg

George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If any of this text were to be needed on Wikimedia projects it should be written as text on that project, not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 06:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of a deleted Wikipedia draft article. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If any of this text were to be needed on Wikimedia projects it should be written as text on that project, not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 06:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jimjamrai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable persons

George Chernilevsky talk 13:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 10:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Afifa Afrin (talk) 10:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope

Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafahedhosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos by a non-contributor. Commons is not a web host for personal photos. Has no educational value. Out of project scope.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo, unusable poor quality George Chernilevsky talk 13:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: horrible quality, blurried, holiday pic, no meaningful background: out of scope, not useful. --Strakhov (talk) 06:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal CV for non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions. Marbletan (talk) 13:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 13:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 13:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 13:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rsihagcpjc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. Cross-wiki self-promotion only.

Marbletan (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Self-)Promotional image Kritzolina (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional Australian passport designs

[edit]

These are fictional designs of an Austalian passport uploaded by User:Milesupshuroutlast. They don't resemble any actual Australian passport design. Perhaps they are showcasing the artist's skill or imagining what a new passport series could look like. I don't believe the files are realistically useful for an educational purpose (COM:NOTUSED), and they might be confused for being real designs, and so should be deleted. --Liguer (talk) 14:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruslan7777777777777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of them seem to be out of scope: no explanations for events’ photos, some pictures are just legal documents of the company. The author’s article in ru.wp was deleted, too

rubin16 (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unidentified logo - out of scope since 2016 Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file with people from india - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private diagram - selfdescription - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a slogan on a shirt, no particular purpose nor educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, could be used to illustrate the concept of joke slogan T-shirts, but the image quality is very low due to whatever filters have been applied, and the framing poor. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Lord Belbury. --Strakhov (talk) 06:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Users Satzypapa, Kiuxilils, and Marcosbaiter

[edit]

These images were uploaded by User:Satzypapa, User:Kiuxilils, and User:Marcosbaiter. These images should be deleted per COM:NOTUSED (files used in Commons only) and COM:SPAM (self-promotion). Files are not used outside Wikidata (entries which also should be deleted). Wikipedia articles were deleted Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajib Karmakar, Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaysen, Bobito and Isan Maher don't seem to ever had Wikipedia articles. I don't see any educational use for this images. Category for KHAYSEN should also be deleted because it would be empty after this deletion. --Mika1h (talk) 15:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion, unuseful blurred image. --Strakhov (talk) 06:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Funzioni di correlazione (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gent. amici Tutte le immagini sopra citate sono dei pdf tratti dal mio libro: SONAR Principi-Tecnologie-Applicazioni pubblicato nel 1992. Di ciò potete sincerarvi visionando il mio sito (non a fini di lucro) http.www.sonar-info.info Tutte le immagini contenute nelle 90 lezioni del corso sono sviluppi personali derivati da studi precedenti pubblicati sul mio sito.

La stesura delle lezioni del corso è costata molta fatica, vi prego, non alteratene le spiegazioni con la cancellazione di immagini. Vi ringrazio per la comprensione --Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Our purpose is educational. Uploader says the files are used for education. I do not know what kind of education it. Perhaps someone who speak the language can help. --MGA73 (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I file in discussione sono parte integrante del corso di Applicazioni Tecniche per il sonar.

--Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 06:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Funzioni di correlazione (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Funzioni di correlazione (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be footage from the show, thus not free. StarTrekker (talk) 17:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. --Strakhov (talk) 06:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief "biography" of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on Wikimedia, it should be text not a PDF. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as "nothing educational other than raw text". Lord Belbury (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal fiction project, out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on Wikimedia, it should be text not a PDF. Marbletan (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief "biography" of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on Wikimedia, it should be text not a PDF. Marbletan (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on Wikimedia, it should be text not a PDF. Marbletan (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on Wikimedia, it should be text not a PDF. Marbletan (talk) 20:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same but B&W picture exists at https://feministmediastudio.ca/ian-alan-paul/ with no clue about which came first. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The b/w version was published 2020 (URL: https://feministmediastudio.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/portraitweb.jpeg). --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio Thank you. I feel foolish at having been unable to determine that now.
Since the image here in colour was uploaded on 1 June 2022 the prior publication pre-dates our upload. Does the colour vs B&W issue make a difference since the shot is intrinsically the same? Or do we simply wait a reasonable time for COM:VRT to bear fruit? 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikolajay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freely-available license - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhrifFwy_mo Evaders99 (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freely-available license - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhrifFwy_mo Evaders99 (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freely-available license - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhrifFwy_mo Evaders99 (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per username, uploader is the subject. No evidence that they own the license, as this photo was surely taken by someone else. This editor's only activity has been autobiographical/abandoned draft, so alternatively it's a selfie of a non-contributing editor. DMacks (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 12:01, 28 October 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 19:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a free license, uploaded from Twitter at https://twitter.com/EvertonStadium/status/1572586561518305280/photo/2 DankJae 18:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio? I cannot see the appropriate license on the originating homepage Fnielsen (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The permission that is linked https://www.was.digst.dk/ku-dk does not mention licensing, it describes accessibility. — Fnielsen (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not covered by the law on the website means the document is not legally protected unless the document is "Documents posted on the website before 23 September 2018 are not made available unless they are assessed as being essential for administrative processes." 赤羽蒼玄 (talk) 04:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure? "Not covered by law" is a subsection of a section about availability, and deals with archiving policies of the website. "Not covered by law" in this context refers to publication policies that aren't legally required. There's nothing there about copyright. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this is my misinterpretation. It has been replaced with a Twitter file, according to the Twitter Terms of Service[4] indicating "By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty- free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods now known or later developed (for clarity, these rights include, for example, curating, transforming, and translating). This license authorizes us to make your Content available to the rest of the world and to let others do the same." 赤羽蒼玄 (talk) 16:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it's only for Twitter. All contets: What’s yours is yours — you own your Content, but Twitter can use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute. Example post with free license: https://twitter.com/ealaoui/status/904389719882072064 白猫shiro nekoОбг. 00:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 10:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 10:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum3D, the company is considered non-notable and that case the logo is out of project scope. The uploader is globally locked due to long-term abuse. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo, unusable poor quality George Chernilevsky talk 13:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused logo of non-notable club George Chernilevsky talk 13:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused promotional SPAM from FB George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I very strongly doubt the claim of "own work" for this photo of Quentin Tarantino by a user with no other contributions to Commons, and a nonsense description for the photo. Jmabel ! talk 18:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Yemen A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Puerto Rico A1Cafel (talk) 15:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of contemporary sculpture; no FoP per COM:FOP France Эlcobbola talk 17:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged "Copyright © 2022 Klima Naturali™ All Right Reserved" at cited source. If uploader is copyright holder, needs OTRS ticket for proof of this. MPF (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Safety concerns. I took the photo and would like it removed for subjects safety. Cmichel67 (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --James F. (talk) 21:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:KoHuMaho

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:KoHuMaho. I believe they should be deleted immediately. Judging by the title and description of the images the user seems to be underage. Steven6719 (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}} license. All three elements of this logo are complex enough to push this above the threshold of originality in the United States. plicit 00:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is pretty low-res so it's hard to tell but it looks like a newspaper clipping. The claim of ownership is therefore dubious. Pichpich (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF: Author=NOEL CASTRO, Copyright holder=Noel Castro. I highly doubt that this image is the uploaders own work or was ever published under a free licence Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hosseyn01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free work by en:Jean-Michel Sanejouand. Indicating "Artist's courtesy" is not sufficient, the artist's permission (including commercial use) must be sent with COM:OTRS/COM:VRT mecanism. / Œuvre non libre de en:Jean-Michel Sanejouand. L'indication "Artist's courtesy" n'est pas suffisante, l'autorisation de l'artiste doit être transmise par le mécanisme COM:OTRS/COM:VRT et doit autoriser l'utilisation commerciale.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and give uploader some time to respond. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - screenshot of a (presumably) copyrighted video, no evidence of permission — Yerpo Eh? 08:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssis-praf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private images / logo

George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wforwoodley as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The picture wants to be commercial
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about the rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused photo of non-notable person. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thoriq85 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsplash photos uploaded after 2017 are incompatible with Commons. See Template:Unsplash.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. New user that appears to be somewhat active. --P 1 9 9   15:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sasere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person

George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File:Sasere.jpg was taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't a dog treat container fall under the "utilitarian objects" of COM:TOYS, rather than being a mere toy? Lord Belbury (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: while its use may be utilitarian, its design is clearly unique, therefore likely proprietary. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images do not have metadata/EXIF, which makes the “own work” claim hard to take. The low resolution of the images also makes the origin doubtful. Minerva97 (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Minerva97 (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   16:04, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted newspaper clipping Ske (talk) 18:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lord Belbury as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Album cover Yann (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QubeCube as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted computer rendering of a road ferry, used as press material for the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket) |source=https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/trafikverket-miljardsatsar-pa-sjalvkorande-elfarjor Yann (talk) 18:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not from Sweden Radio's site, it is from the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket) press page, with several images for free download.
If they didn't want pictures in the media, and that should probably also include Wikipedia, then it would have been written that way. Jonnmann (talk) 08:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They may want it on Wikipedia, but "free for the press" isn't enough for Commons. That and similar phrases usually don't imply a permission to make derivative versions for any purpose, which is required in our definition of a free licence. –LPfi (talk) 08:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think these are the uploader's own work, they must have been taken from the manufacturer's web site or similar. You can find some of them on the web sites of music instrument dealers, compare [5] (in much higher resolution).

Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

QR code that links to a cloud-hosted document. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Draft Wikipedia article for a non-notable individual. Uploader blocked for promotion while abusing multiple accounts. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on Wikimedia, it should be text not a PDF. Marbletan (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been grabbed from a LinkedIn profile without proper rights. Star Garnet (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains images that are very likely copyright violations (book covers, newspaper articles, etc.) Marbletan (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate / older version of Voorgevel Logegebouw, unused Cnemo99 (talk) 20:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see https://writers.coverfly.com/profile/writer-2e83341e1-105165). Film archive 1 has contacted me on my Wikipedia user talk page (W:User talk:WikiDan61) and claimed copyright ownership. WikiDan61 (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I assume this is where I come to dispute this as copyright infringement. Just popping in to say that I was given permission by the owner of the photo to use this photo. It was sent to me via a text by the person who owns the photo. I was given permission. Further, the photo was flagged because it's being used on coverfly. Coverfly is listed on Jon Alston's page (the wiki page of the photo in question, which is a photo of Jon himself) as a source for his writing credits. It is all the same thing. Coverfly and a section on his wiki page both list his writing credits. It's the same picture because it's the same person -- and that person gave me permission to use the photo. Wikipedia doesn't prohibit one editing articles about themselves; the owner of the page is doing this by proxy. Film archive 1 (talk) 22:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have a letter stating that is true where do I upload it. Film archive 1 (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Film archive 1, contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted if COM:VRT permission is ever received. --P 1 9 9   16:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the former logo of I Want One of Those, a British online retailer. All the rights were purchased by THG plc, another British firm, in 2010. It may be PD in the US. But my understanding of COM:TOO UK is that it must be PD in both the US and the UK. And the TOO is very low indeed for British logos. Happy to be corrected if that's all wrong, I won't try again. Dgp4004 (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nothing but pure simple text, must be below TOO even in UK. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work; this is a photo of another image. Tineye has over 1,000 hits (impressively, finding the underlying image) since 2008. -M.nelson (talk) 21:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This work of art is of 1999, so it cannot be in the Public Domain yet. I see no VRT ticket. Even if the uploader is the only heir, we still need a VRT ticket to confirm. See Commons:Volunteer Response Team for details. JopkeB (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt that the image was taken by the uploader or was ever published under a free licence. Looks like a snapshot/scan of an old photograph.
Same for:
- File:PNHS Main Quadrangle 1980s.jpg
- File:PNHS Teaching Staff 1970s.jpg
- File:Rosa Sioson.jpg
- File:Soriano Rosario.jpg
- File:Angelita Samson.jpg Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info of original author and permission. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded from FB... Onel5969 (talk) 12:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image was released under the stated license Auguel (talk) 14:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded the watermarked image by mistake Yash Soorma (talk) 14:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: although the watermark can easily be removed or cropped, I did a courtesy deletion because there are numerous good alternatives available its category. --P 1 9 9   16:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not appear to be own work, an image search finds it on many sites, including e.g. https://www.flickr.com/photos/142985093@N02/27453102320/ which was uploaded over 5 years before the image was uploaded here. - Nikki (talk) 14:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in AzerbaijanIran A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment You are being too hasty. This is Iranian Azerbaijan, not the Republic of Azerbaijan. I just checked: they don't have FoP, either, but please don't be slipshod in your rush to delete everything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in AzerbaijanIran A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative work from an image from this source (published in 2018). Uploader doesn't seem to have license to create and publish such a derivative.  Băng Tỏa  21:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the creator or uploader of this file, but I guess this image is not, as you say, a derivative of an image from [6]. It looks like he took a photo of himself or someone else and generated this file with the app 天天P图. This is a guess, but I think it's very likely unless the same image as this file can be found on the web. As for the copyright issue, I will download this app to check out the copyright rules. 源義信 (talk) 14:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I found the Service Agreement, which says "You own the intellectual property rights in the information content you photograph or create using the Software and Services ("User Content")." Here is a guide of the app, in which you can find the same template as this file. If you need to verify this yourself, you can download the app here. 源義信 (talk) 14:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing. According to a source, this is a photoshoot of Liu Yifei with Cosmopolitan, photographer is Liu Zongyuan. The owner of the Flickr account doesn't seem like a genuine photographer at all. Copyright statement on the website of Chinese Cosmopolitan doesn't say that commercial use is allowed.  Băng Tỏa  22:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reviewed on May 5th 2022 by reviewer Shizhao yet the image seems to be a derivative/photoshopped product from an original photo which looks like this - raw and unfiltered. On that website bdliuyifeiba.lofter.com, as I clicked on the tag "liuyifei", the result is a bunch of blog posts full of copyright violations - photos from Harper's Bazaar, film posters, Marie Claire's covers as well as a few other magazine covers. This proves that the owner of this blog is not a photographer who can legitimately hold copyrights to these images at all.  Băng Tỏa  23:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:29, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COIN, promotional use. Possibly taken from some official internet site. MexTDT (talk) 23:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this:
  • Facebook page of uploader (full name: Lino Javier Grazia), owner of GRAZIA Producciones, responsible for the tour of Bhagavan Vasquez in South America. [7]
  • Allegations of wikihounding towards him after being exposed as COIN on eswiki.[8]
MexTDT (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Brwz as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: New legal claims to copyright brought by Whitney Museum. Previously considered in public domain. What are the claims? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Whitney Museum has identified new heirs to the Hopper estate that previously were not known, and determined that copyright has transferred to them. Previously, no known copyright for the work existed because neither Hopper nor his wife had children, and therefore there was good reason to determine certain works of his to be "abandoned" and in the public domain. The situation is in flux, but as a precaution it's requested that the image be deleted. After assesing the new claim to ownership, if the work is determined to be 100% in the public domain it will be added again. Thanks. -brwz (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And why isn't it just {{PD-US-not renewed}} like all of the other paintings? Multichill (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know exactly. It might be or might not be. But that ambiguity that has arisen in light of the Whitney's claims is the issue, and in light of the new claims the public domain status of the works need to be reassesed by counsel. Brwz (talk) 12:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Kept: no valid reason for deletion for pre 1927 works -- deleted later ones. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:14, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is licensed as {{PD-logo}}, but it for that to be OK the file would need to be "PD-logo" in both the United States (where the Commons servers are located) and Kuwait (which is likely where the logo was first published). The logo is at best a borderline case per for being PD in the US per COM:TOO United States and seems more complex than the type of logos usually considered not eligible for copyright protection under US copyright law. Things are even less clear when it comes to Kuwait because the threshold of originality under Kuwaiti copyright law is unclear. I asked about this at User talk:King of Hearts#File:Kuwait Finance House Logo.svg and it was pointed out that this logo may be protected by copyright under Kuwaiti copyright law per item 6 of COM:NOP Kuwait. Under both US and Kuwati copyright law, even if each of the individual elements of the logo are ineligible for copyright protection, the combination of them together can be creative enough for the logo as a whole to be eligible for copyright protection. So, unless it such a thing can be clearly demonstrated to not be the case (e.g. a copyright court ruling stating the logo is too simple to be copyrightable), I'm not sure this can be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this file was ever published under a free licence. "C Bernadett Yehdou/deval" See https://www.welt-sichten.org/artikel/40308/wer-evaluiert-muss-keine-beliebtheitspreise-sammeln
Same for File:Jörg Faust, 2021.jpg Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While these are some decent photographs of human feet in various slightly different positions I do not anticipate this montage being used educationally Dronebogus (talk) 11:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the nominator. Pointless montage that has no educational value. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unilateral supervote close by admin against valid consensus to delete (“not educational”) Dronebogus (talk) 05:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination 1914 is too late for {{Pd-old-assumed}}. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination per nomination 1914 is too late for {{Pd-old-assumed}}. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination per nomination 1904 is too late for

Public domain
The copyright situation of this work is theoretically uncertain, because in the country of origin copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author, and the date of the author's death is unknown. However, the date of creation of the work was over 120 years ago, and it is thus a reasonable assumption that the copyright has expired (see here for the community discussion). Do not use this template if the date of death of the author is known.
You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.
. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons CC0 1.0 license Drakosh (talk) 12:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Drakosh (talk) 12:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken in 1975, likely not own work, larger version used in https://www.amazon.com/Richard-Theodor-Kusiolek/e/B00AVZLROW%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share MKFI (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the editor that added this image. I have the rights to use the image given by the person depicted. RogerRdz (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RogerRdz: if you have the rights to use the image please send confirmation of that to VRT. Even if you have the rights to use the image you still can't upload it as your own work unless you actually took the photograph. Please fix the photograph author. MKFI (talk) 07:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Will do! RogerRdz (talk) 00:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina Goji1895 (talk) 13:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio. Thoughts? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no free license at source page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this own work? This article in Scientific American mentiones "Credit: INGO ARNDT Getty Images". Wouter (talk) 20:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the former logo of Zavvi, a British online retailer. All the rights were purchased by THG plc, another British firm, in 2009. It may be PD in the US. But my understanding of COM:TOO UK is that it must be PD in both the US and the UK. And the TOO is very low indeed for British logos. Happy to be corrected if that's all wrong, I won't try again. Dgp4004 (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO UK. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the link of the Youtube channel does not direct to the Author which is Arabia channel Abu aamir (talk) 07:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of CC-SA 4 license Drakosh (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Невірна атрибутація Сарапулов (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]