Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
There’s already an official flag on File:Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg and it’s source from a government website. This variant flag’s source is from (Vexilla Mundi) and there’s a big different between the two sources in terms of values and credibility. Aziz bm (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE, COM:NPOV. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Filelefteros (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2010 (pd in 2080).
- File:Faustina Iselin- Auf dem Rhein (Rheinbrücke Krefeld-Uerdingen) 1965.jpg
- File:F.I. Podere Siena Alta Maremma 1995.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 10:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Filelefteros (talk · contribs)
[edit]de:Gustava Iselin-Haeger died in 1962. PD in 2033.
- File:Dorfszene mit Mädchen und Gänsen.jpg
- File:Gustava Haeger. Haus in den Dünen.jpg
- File:G.H. Selbstportrait ca. 1900.jpg
- File:Gustava Haeger- Portrait der Käthe Liebermann, 1904.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Tagged as "Missing permission" on 6 June 2022, closing immediately. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thumb RudessAlp (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.135.19 (talk) 01:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/LA_FIFAS.jpg LA FIFAS (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete This appears to be an author requesting deletion of their recently-uploaded work that is not currently used in any Wikimedia project. Mhawk10 (talk) 05:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
OOS CRAP Dronebogus (talk) 11:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mhawk10 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: While this is a cropped screengrab of a clip of a video published by Voice of America, the footage is clearly labeled as coming from the Associated Press (AP) in the top left corner of the Youtube video itself. As such, this is a violation of the Associated Press's copyright. Converting to DR, currently in use on a Main Page. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete This is a clear copyright violation and should be speedy deleted. There is no fair use justification under the law, since the AP sells stock footage for profit, so there is no way to defend this being on a main page if the AP wanted to order a DMCA takedown. Mhawk10 (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Now that it won't break the Chinese Main Page. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Bastiansioo (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bastiansioo, la próxima vez que lo bloqueen por abusar de varias cuentas. --Achim55 (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
The photo is taken by a media Vietnamnet, so it can't come under PD-VietnamGov license tag as it strictly meant for legal documents of the government. The image was also uploaded by a sock puppet account of a blocked user. 110.225.144.60 11:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 14:41, 30 June 2022 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) --Krdbot 20:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
As a rookie, I was learning how to make an entry and mistakenly published this, I think. GratefultoGod (talk) 18:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Anuraga arasi (talk) 06:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Kopuram 4.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Anuraga arasi (talk) 06:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Rainbow 21.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Anuraga arasi (talk) 06:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:A view of beauty.jpg. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sowmiyachandru (talk) 06:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sowmiyachandru (talk) 06:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sowmiyachandru (talk) 06:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No evidence to suggest that Tuoitre news licenses its image CC 4.0, as it clearly states © All rights are reserved at the b of the website. 110.225.144.60 17:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:40, 30 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. No evidence to suggest that Tuoitre news licenses its image CC 4.0, as it clearly states © All rights are reserved at the bottom of the website. --Krdbot 01:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/18/5f/df/a6/photo0jpg.jpg?w=1400&h=-1&s=1 Magnolia677 (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- My error, I actually meant to add this as a copyright violation. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Fehlerhafter Upload aus Versehen. Keine Verwendung in einem Artikel, da das Unterkapitel doch nicht als relevant genug erachtet wurde. Sorge41 (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Tuncay_Tolga_%C3%96Z%C3%87AKMAK.jpg Ozcakmak08 (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Tuncay Tolga ÖZÇAKMAK.jpg - no es trabajo propio
There is a mistake. They are not the original group Las Ketchup 84.120.105.58 12:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:17, 1 July 2022 UTC: Hay un error. Ellas no son el grupo original Las Ketchup --Krdbot 13:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brindha sakthivel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images copied from WhatsApp, unlikely to be own works.
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 09.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 07.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 06.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 10.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 08.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 05.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 04.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 02.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 01.jpg
- File:IMG-20220429-WA0005 03.jpg
Yann (talk) 12:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khoihuong2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Nguyễn Hồng Khôi.png
- File:Nghệ Sĩ Hồng Khôi 02.jpg
- File:Nghệ Sĩ Hồng Khôi 03.jpg
- File:Nghệ Sĩ Hồng Khôi.jpg
- File:Hồng Khôi.jpg
- File:Nguyễn Hồng Khôi MF.jpg
- File:Nguyễn Hồng Khôi.jpg
- File:Gioan hồng khôi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. The goals of Commons aren't served by it hosting images of every rando out there. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
A collection of low-res photographs of cars from all over with no evidence of ownership.
- File:تولید دنا.jpg
- File:دنا با دیزاینر زیبا.jpg
- File:دنا پلاس.jpg
- File:خودروی سورن پلاس.jpg
- File:سورن.jpg
- File:نمای جلوی سورن.jpg
- File:سوزن معمولی.jpg
- File:سورنelx.jpg
- File:نمای عقب سورن پلاس.jpg
- File:سورن پلاس.jpg
- File:نمای جلوی سورن پلاس.jpg
- File:سورن پلاس تاکسی.jpg
- File:تارا از کنار.jpg
- File:نمای تارا.jpg
- File:تارا از جلو.jpg
- File:تارا.jpg
- File:سریع ترین خودرو های ایران.jpg
- File:سایپا آریا از نمای کنار.jpg
- File:نمای جلوی آریا.jpg
- File:آریا از عقب.jpg
- File:سایپا آریا نمای عقب.jpg
- File:سایپا آریا.jpg
- File:نمای عقب پژو۴۰۵.jpg
- File:نمایه جلو پژو slx.jpg
- File:Screenshot ۲۰۲۱۰۶۲۲-۱۴۱۷۵۰ Instagram.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The files are copied from the Internet and do not belongs to the user. Parsa 2au (talk) 13:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
The user cannot be trusted with own-work claims. They just upload images from the internet and call them their own works!
- File:آمیکو آسنا.jpg
- File:سورن تاکسی.jpg
- File:باردو.jpg
- File:مزدا وانت.jpg
- File:النود.jpg
- File:آریو زوتی.jpg
- File:رانا.jpg
- File:خط تولید نیسان.jpg
- File:نیسان آبی.jpg
- File:نیسان زامیاد.jpg
- File:وانت پادرا.jpg
- File:پژوپارس.jpg
- File:زانتیا۲.jpg
- File:ایموجی محبوب.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 11:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardosrocha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:14-EMPREGADA-HOME-OFFICE-COM-FALTAS.png
- File:13-NAO-APARECE-OPCAO-PARA-TROCA-TURNO-EQUIPE.png
- File:08-COMO-INSERIR-MARCACAO.png
- File:06-COMO-LANCAR-EMPREGADO-SOBREAVISO-EMERGENCIAL.png
- File:05-COMO-SOLICITAR-INTERVALO-NAO-REALIZADO.png
- File:04-COMO-EXCLUIR-MARCACAO-INCORRETA.png
- File:03-COMO-LANCAR-EMPREGADO-HORARIO-ADMINISTRATIVO-DEFINITIVO.png
- File:01-COMO-FAZER-TRATATIVA-PARA-PAGAR-HORAS-RECESSO.png
- File:02-APROVACAO-HORAS-EXTRAS.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itz Emmason (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects. See also Special:DeletedContributions/Itz Emmason.
- File:Itz Emmason doings 07.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason doings 06.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason doings 04.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason doings 05.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason doings 02.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason doings 01.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason doings 03.jpg
- File:Gods own.jpg
- File:Itzemmason pictures.jpg
- File:Itz Emmason pics.jpg
- File:Itzemmason picture.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 21:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Not useful YoshiniSivakumar 123 (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused image of an unspecified award, no educational value, out of scope; COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable persons with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope; COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 00:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable persons with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope; COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 00:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable persons with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope; COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 00:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo without further description, no educational value, out of scope Feyth (talk) 00:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused diagram with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope Feyth (talk) 01:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused diagram with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope Feyth (talk) 01:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused diagram with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope Feyth (talk) 01:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
No es Wikipedista 191.126.135.19 01:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
other uploaded same picture கவிக்குமார் ப (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Is important? 191.126.135.19 01:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Arab South? Qué? 191.126.135.19 01:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Description English: He take rest for kick all of tention. Soo badly weather today 191.126.135.19 01:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
English: His first day of job 191.126.135.19 01:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Permission email is archived at Ticket:2020050510012305 and it is unnecessary for Commons to host a copy. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal photograph KartikMistry (talk) 06:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text". Lord Belbury (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
promotional, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Budhathoki bipin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files only used for cross-wiki self-promotion using multiple accounts. These files fall outside COM:SCOPE.
- File:Bipin Budhathoki-.jpg
- File:Bipin Budh athoki.jpg
- File:Bipinbudhathoki.jpg
- File:BipinBudhathoki.jpg
- File:Bipin Budhathoki.jpg
- File:Bipinbudhathoki07.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joserosaok (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Copies of Wikipedia articles. Should be replaced with links on service pages.
- File:01b7a98909d14d21941be8b92b330fe5-0003.jpg
- File:01b7a98909d14d21941be8b92b330fe5-0002.jpg
- File:01b7a98909d14d21941be8b92b330fe5-0001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
No relevancy Andre Engels (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
group portrait of some non-notable people Andre Engels (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused self portrait Andre Engels (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
unused, poor quality and out of scope Ske (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Nicole Prause Suspension from Twitter For Targetted Harrasment of Exodus Cry and Other Advocates Against Sex Trafficking in the Porn Industry.jpg
[edit]Unused poor-quality photo of a screen, likely out of scope. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Edited images of politicians uploaded for vandalism/hoax at w:User:Avessinus/sandbox; no educational value.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Ske (talk) 18:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
poor quality and no description Ske (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
other uploaded same picture கவிக்குமார் ப (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 10:57, 7 July 2022 UTC: unused content was: "#REDIRECT 
", and the only contributor was "Túrelio" (talk) --Krdbot 19:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Problemas de imágen! 2806:10AE:6:827B:31D5:D754:5FCE:33BD 07:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete DNLA8 (talk) 12:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This is seriously a weird nomination. Given the multiple unsuccessful nominations by the uploader, it should be speedily deleted per COM:GCSD#G7. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:27, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, uploader agrees. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Capture from the TV Cannel CNews CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Dubious CC BY-SA claim. Assuming that this file is from the Philippines (given its only usage) and given that it is not by a government agency, this is a likely copyright violation. Chlod (say hi!) 04:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 12:53, 24 July 2022 UTC: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Krdbot 19:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LeonaardoG as no permission (No permission since). Simple text, but unused and apparently out of COM:SCOPE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The source of this file prohibits the use of its files anywhere. Ivshyn (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
The source prohibits any distribution of this file without written permission. (Джерело забороняє будь-яке використання цього файла без письмової згоди.) Ivshyn (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "© UNIAN.NET, 1998 - 2022 Alle Rechte vorbehalten.". --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
The use of this file without written permission is prohibited by the source (Використання даного файлу без письмового дозволу заборонено джерелом) Ivshyn (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted picture by WWE.com HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture by WWE.com HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture by WWE.com HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture by WWE.com HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of a free license SlvrHwk (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 21:45, 7 August 2022 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY --Krdbot 01:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
No indication of a free license SlvrHwk (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete The image comes form Sci-News.com so there's almost zero chance that it's PD. Although it is used in a ton of other places, but I couldn't find where it originated from. So I'm still not comfortable saying it's OK for Commons to host the file. That said if someone can find the original image directly from Jared Voris there's a possibility they licensed it as PD or something. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Image built with some kind of avatar app (many others at https://tineye.com/search/05dbee50d2d9391d9cf831d40ef08b27a2b814e4?sort=size&order=desc&page=1), derivative work. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
The photo was created in an ICT class, the teacher asked me to do the work to serve as a profile picture for the moodle platform, so when I was done, I took a print and sent it to moodle. The photo is my own. Gabriel Duartez (talk) 19:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment This is now used, however there is still no license. Yann (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (no permission from Gironafc.com). Ruthven (msg) 10:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Andel as no permission (No permission since). 1919 photo, PD? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The URL given in the source field ([1]) shows another version of this file. The actual source could be [2] or [3]. The author named, Sennecke, is apparently de:Robert Sennecke, a German press photographer who died in 1940 at the age of 55. He was based in Berlin and had other photographers working for him and his photo agency though, and [4] says that one of those photographers took that photo in the city of Bottrop, which is located at some distance from Berlin. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" if you don't want to credit Robert Sennecke. --RAN (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept, we have now reason to believe, that the photo is in public domain due to age. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyio: Photograph of a diploma, Use of Commons as personal space CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Un joven que no es usuario 191.126.135.19 01:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment ¿Cómo usted sabe eso? La foto se usa en una sola página: una página de usuario de la Wikipedia Inglés (en:User:Md Sharif Arman). Por eso, "Un joven que no es usuario" me parece falso, pero además sospecho que esa foto no tiene permisión válida. Mhawk10 (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --✗plicit 14:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: L'auteur de la photo indique la chaîne de télévision CNews comme source. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Cette photo est la photo du site officiel du militant Thierry Paul Valette, utilisée avec son accord et réalisée apr son attachée de presse, libre de droit ( precisé sur le site du militant Jeangoutou (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou: Est-ce que vous avez l'url de cette information ?
Deleted: per nomination. c'est au photographe de nous écrire à VRT. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from Facebook https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1407369529533442&set=pb.100007812244957.-2207520000..&type=3 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Cette photo est récupérée d'un article de presse, aucune idée pour le copyright ou autorisation je l'avoue Jeangoutou (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: les articles de presse sont sous copyright généralement!. Ruthven (msg) 08:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Thierry Paul Valette aux côtés d'Alexandre Malfaye, co-anime le grand débat à la mairie du 15ième à Paris en présence de la secrétaire d'État Emmanuelle Wargon (capture Cnews).png
[edit]Possible copyvio: Screenshot from the TV channel CNews CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Un screenshoot d'une émission TV est interdit ?, Jeangoutou (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou effectivement, c'est interdit. Je vous recommande la lecture de Commons:Licensing/fr (en commençant par le tutoriel illustré) : il me semble que la plupart de vos ajouts sur Commons ne respectent pas les règles en terme de licence. Pour simplifier, vous n'avez pas le droit d'ajouter une photo que vous n'avez pas prise vous-même, sauf si l'une de ces conditions est remplie :
- elle est dans le domaine public (auteur décédé depuis plus de 70 ans) ;
- l'auteur de la photo la publie sous une licence compatible (qui autorise la copie, le réemploi et la commercialisation). Dans ce cas, il faut que ce soit l'auteur qui fasse la déclaration de consentement en prouvant son identité. El pitareio (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Bonsoir
- très bien merci je vais en tenir compte et refaire différemment,merci encore Jeangoutou (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou effectivement, c'est interdit. Je vous recommande la lecture de Commons:Licensing/fr (en commençant par le tutoriel illustré) : il me semble que la plupart de vos ajouts sur Commons ne respectent pas les règles en terme de licence. Pour simplifier, vous n'avez pas le droit d'ajouter une photo que vous n'avez pas prise vous-même, sauf si l'une de ces conditions est remplie :
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo on Mediapart in 2019, but already in Liberation in 2016 according to TinEye https://blogs.mediapart.fr/thierry-paul-valette/blog/230119/acte-11-premiere-nuit-jaune-des-gilets-jaunes-citoyens?userid=9d6037f0-9f06-42c2-84bc-b3739f615955 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo from Mediapart https://blogs.mediapart.fr/thierry-paul-valette/blog/180219/apres-nuit-jaune-le-printemps-jaune?userid=9d6037f0-9f06-42c2-84bc-b3739f615955 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photo autorisée , réalisée par la chargée de communication du militant , madame Sabi Céline , , et accord du militant Jeangoutou (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou: Alors, il faut des preuves. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo from Mediapart https://blogs.mediapart.fr/thierry-paul-valette/blog/180219/apres-nuit-jaune-le-printemps-jaune?userid=9d6037f0-9f06-42c2-84bc-b3739f615955 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The date of the update and the one of the descritption do not match CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Validé par la famille Jeangoutou (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou: Avez-vous des preuves de cela ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vous pouvez contactez madame Paulette Ayme, sa petite cousine, fille du cousin de Paul Pagès, agée aujourd'hui de 96 ans Jeangoutou (talk) 23:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou: , Premièrement, c'est à vous de fournir les justificatifs, deuxièmement, si cette photo n'est pas dans le domaine public et que vous n'êtes pas de facto autorisé à la téléverser, mais qu'on vous donne le droit de le faire, je jetterai un œil à cette page : [5] (je n'ai jamais eu l'occasion de m'en servir), troisièmement, vous n'êtes pas l'auteur de la photo, merci de corriger cela, quatrièmement, je trouve ça extrêmement impoli de balancer des informations personnelles de quelqu'un sur internet, à la vue de tous, surtout en donnant autant d'informations. Je suis prêt à ouvrir une requête à votre encontre pour cette entorse. Dès que j'aurai le temps, je demanderai si un masquage est nécessaire. Merci de faire le nécessaire pour mettre en ordre la situation. Cordialement, CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vous pouvez contactez madame Paulette Ayme, sa petite cousine, fille du cousin de Paul Pagès, agée aujourd'hui de 96 ans Jeangoutou (talk) 23:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeangoutou: Avez-vous des preuves de cela ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.
@Jeangoutou: Ce n'est pas à la famille di photographié de valider quoi que ce soit ! C'est au photographe (ou à ses héritiers). Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo with a clear copyright on the Closer website https://www.closermag.fr/people/louis-de-funes-dur-avec-ses-enfants-les-confidences-cash-de-son-fils-patrick-1359729#img12 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Photo reprise d'un article de presse Jeangoutou (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Wider picture on this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYzCkLs9VlA CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Wrong and Malfunktion Logo (the B) Michael Aeberhardt (talk) 11:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Why is this request still unanswered and open? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.120.57.34 (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- is this logo old enough to be out of copyright?
- according to https://steigerlegal.ch/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/intellectual-property-and-the-internet_2014_extract-switzerland.pdf , swiss TOO might be low. this logo is probably copyrighted. RZuo (talk) 08:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- @RZuo: according to the PDF you linked, "Swiss courts have been very reluctant to grant copyright, design or any other legal protection to typefaces." Why wouldn't that cover this? - Jmabel ! talk 15:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- i didnt see that sentence. i only saw the parts "Originality is used as a threshold for copyright protection with the statistical uniqueness of a work often used as a practical test." and "In practice, the threshold is low with higher requirements only for certain categories of works.".
- we need more references to understand swiss law on this.
- otherwise, i tend to think that this logo, not just simple letters but with those stripes of varying widths over the letters, might be over TOO. RZuo (talk) 15:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- @RZuo: according to the PDF you linked, "Swiss courts have been very reluctant to grant copyright, design or any other legal protection to typefaces." Why wouldn't that cover this? - Jmabel ! talk 15:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: there's also a technical problem with this file. in the middle of the B it's not correct. File:BLT Logo 54mm RGB.svg is the correct version.--RZuo (talk) 15:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @RZuo: It is currently in use. Yann (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
1972 y photo, person died in 1993. Cannot be own work of 2022. Copyright status? Original author? Source? educational purpose? Drakosh (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Я лично его фотографировал на фотоаппарат "Смена" в 1972 году. Сканировал в 2022 году. Михаил Ткачук (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Technically it is possible that this person was photographed by his relative 50 years ago: nothing too unusual about it. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by பிருந்தா சுப்ரமணி (talk · contribs)
[edit]92 images of questionable provenance, mostly with small size and no metadata. See COM:ANU#User:பிருந்தா சுப்ரமணி.
- File:கொய்யாப்பழம்.jpg
- File:அம்மன்.jpg
- File:கற்றாழை இலை.jpg
- File:துளசி இலை.jpg
- File:மாடு.jpg
- File:Mango dry leaf.jpg
- File:Shiny sky.jpg
- File:Bunny rabbit.jpg
- File:Mango flower tree.jpg
- File:Hibiscus orange flowers.jpg
- File:Rabbit bunny.jpg
- File:Cropping land.jpg
- File:Custard apple fruit.jpg
- File:Water drop in leaf.jpg
- File:Lemon fruits.jpg
- File:Jasmine leaves.jpg
- File:Coccinia flower.jpg
- File:Pasture grass land.jpg
- File:Red rose love.jpg
- File:Morning views.jpg
- File:Goat and kids.jpg
- File:Nandhiyavattam flower.jpg
- File:Araucaria cunninghamii leaf.jpg
- File:Rangani flower.jpg
- File:Wax begonia leaf.jpg
- File:Scarlet sage flower.jpg
- File:Baby hand.jpg
- File:Yellow flower plant.jpg
- File:Echeveria decora.jpg
- File:Mango Tree fruit.jpg
- File:Tomato plant garden.jpg
- File:Striped barbados lily flower.jpg
- File:Painters palette.jpg
- File:Fotografixiaomi.jpg
- File:Peacock in park.jpg
- File:Ladyfinger crop.jpg
- File:Ladysfinger garden.jpg
- File:Jasmine leaf.jpg
- File:Impatiens flowers.jpg
- File:Tomato vegetables.jpg
- File:Hibicuss.jpg
- File:Bike r15.jpg
- File:Chocolates love.jpg
- File:Chicken fry food.jpg
- File:Ice cream glass.jpg
- File:Icecreams.jpg
- File:Hibiscuss white flower.jpg
- File:Hibiscus flower red.jpg
- File:Hibiscus plants.jpg
- File:Cape marguerite flower.jpg
- File:Carrot grass.jpg
- File:Mango leafs.jpg
- File:White clitoria.jpg
- File:Clitoria plant.jpg
- File:Blue clitoria.jpg
- File:Brinjal plants.jpg
- File:Lablab plant.jpg
- File:Rose leaf pot.jpg
- File:Evening cloudy.jpg
- File:Utthumalai night view.jpg
- File:Ganesha poojai.jpg
- File:Zebu cattle.jpg
- File:Yercaud hill view.jpg
- File:Paper craft cycle.jpg
- File:White rose flowers.jpg
- File:Clitoria leaf.jpg
- File:Smoky cloud.jpg
- File:Cajanus lineatus.jpg
- File:Leaf blossom.jpg
- File:Tomatos plant.jpg
- File:Tapioca roots.jpg
- File:Mango flower with ant.jpg
- File:Cloudy rain.jpg
- File:Break of day.jpg
- File:White hibiscuss.jpg
- File:Sugar fruit tree.jpg
- File:Pink Rose flowers.jpg
- File:Mango Leaves.jpg
- File:Garden geranium flower.jpg
- File:Hen Chick.jpg
- File:Asystasia gangetica.jpg
- File:Coconut Seedlings.jpg
- File:Maize crop.jpg
- File:Goat and kid.jpg
- File:Pasture grass.jpg
- File:Sun rise (morning).jpg
- File:Coconut palm tree.jpg
- File:Chiku flower.jpg
- File:Chiku fruit.jpg
- File:Baby leg.jpg
- File:Agricultural land nature.jpg
- File:Mango fruit in tree.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment We should keep images with metadata. Could you please withdraw these? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I don't feel like wading into the metadata issue, but I did look through like the first 15 images. Most of them are of questionable quality and usefulness. There's also a few later on, like File:Chocolates love.jpg that could possibly be copyvio. So I think the best option would be to delete the batch and then someone can do an un-deletion request for the few that might be salvageable. Although I doubt anyone will. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Can we find any evidence of these being copyvio? If not a single one of them is proven to be a copyvio, then I don't think it makes sense to use COM:PRP to delete the whole batch on a mere hunch. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No evidence presented that they are not the uploaders. I stored my early images online and some hosting sites stripped off metadata and reduced the size of the images, such as Facebook. --RAN (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I'm not saying Facebook doesn't strip metadata in some cases, but at least from what I've seen they keep Exif data and add a special tracking code to it. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Spot checking EXIF data where it exists, I see the same two cellphone cameras. All the files have a similar amateur quality and broadly similar locations and subjects. As a whole, this is entirely consistent with one person's own work. Marbletan (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Still no concrete evidence of copyvio after a week. I am open to changing my mind if actual evidence is discovered. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @George Chernilevsky as the Admin who deleted File:Smoky cloud.jpg and Pierre cb as the user who tagged it. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Look at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Smoky_cloud.jpg. Deleted per other nomination as OOS. Useless file IMO. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Just to clarify the reason I singled out File:Chocolates love.jpg as copyvio is because the wrapper designs are clearly copyrighted and they probably don't qualify for de minimis. I'm not claiming the image is copyvio because I think the uploader ripped it off from somewhere else or whatever though. Probably they didn't (I'm not wading in either way though since I haven't looked at all the images), but the candy wrappers clearly aren't PD. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per King of Hearts. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations XxAlanEZExX (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations 2800:810:496:8F1A:34A8:BF3A:F560:507C 17:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 09:19, 29 October 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 12:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). Is this particular rendering of the EMS logo above COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Useless small file with no exof info .. speedy deletion 2003:F2:6730:4200:9DFD:CD8B:1F7A:8759 08:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
small useless picture with no exif data.. speedy deletion 2003:F2:6730:4200:9DFD:CD8B:1F7A:8759 08:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
useless small file with no exif .. speedy deletion 2003:F2:6730:4200:9DFD:CD8B:1F7A:8759 08:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
In my opinion, this is an artistic photo and {{PD-Sweden-photo}} cannot be applied. We have also received complaint from the copyright holder in ticket:2022063010004244 Ankry (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Uploaded only to place a spam link inside the file description. ToughDonk (talk) 09:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations XxAlanEZExX (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The Red bull logo is copyrighted and there is no evidence of it being released under a free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The website no longer being around isn't a justification to delete the image. Especially in an instance like this one where it's clearly PD. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The website no longer being around isn't a justification to delete the image. Especially in an instance like this one where it's clearly PD. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesi ve içerik artık mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
mevcut değil Xharin (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Google-translates as "not available." What do you mean? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
web sitesinden silinmiş konu Xharin (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused and no clear relevant subject Andre Engels (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep — We need more public domain content to choose from. PseudoSkull (talk) 19:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No vaild reason for deletion. Fine image. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The image comes from Unsplash and they appear to have licensing terms that conflict with the goals of Commons. For instance photos cannot be sold without significant modification and can't be replicate a similar or competing service. I doubt anyone would ever run afoul of the second point, but people definitely use images from Commons in commercial products without significantly modifying them. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Template says "This image is from Unsplash and was published prior to 5 June 2017 under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication." and image is in scope. Tm (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a greater than de minimis depiction of Mickey Mouse, using a costume that does not solely involve clothing that might be considered everyday. As Mickey Mouse is copyrighted in the United States, and no exception under COM:COSTUME is present, this picture should be deleted as a copyright violation. Mhawk10 (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a greater than de minimis depiction of Mickey Mouse, using a costume that does not solely involve clothing that might be considered everyday. As Mickey Mouse is copyrighted in the United States, and no exception under COM:COSTUME is present, this picture should be deleted as a copyright violation. Mhawk10 (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a photograph of a two-dimensional work that is in a public location but is very much there on a temporary basis (this is a photo of a sign at a protest). The sign itself appears to go beyond COM:TOO for Peru, which is where the sign was displayed. Mhawk10 (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
The sign appears to be beyond COM:TOO for Perú, and it might well be more than a de minimis presentation. The laws of Perú don't explicitly protect items that are temporarily displayed in public, as far as I know, and this is clearly not a permanent display. Mhawk10 (talk) 02:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Not an own work. The photograph was created around 1900 in Moscow, can be in PD if published before 1917 but the proper source is needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot from the TV channel BFM TV CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This duplicates File:Cross-City Line.png. See en:User_talk:G-13114#WCML_/_Cross-City_Line_maps for details. G-13114 (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: different image. --Krd 07:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This duplicates File:West Coast Main Line.png. See en:User_talk:G-13114#WCML_/_Cross-City_Line_maps for details. G-13114 (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: different image. --Krd 07:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation - scan of an article (about the subject, but not by him), no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 20:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation - scan of an article (about the subject, but not by him), no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 20:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as copyright violation per nom. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This is an obvious copyright violation just uploaded today by a brand new user. It even states so in the description but then used the custom rationale of it being their own artwork. PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- speedy delete obvious violation of copyright --『白猫』Обг. 15:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- speedy delete Obvious copyvio is obvious Dronebogus (talk) 10:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, artist is still alive (born 1943) Maimaid (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. Please keep the fotos. They are approved by the Hedwig-Emmert-Stiftung. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunstagenturveragaeng (talk • contribs) 10:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- "Approved by the Hedwig-Emmert-Stiftung" is not enough. There is no indication that the rights holder has authorized the use of the photo for this purpose using the prescribed forms to Wikimedia. --Maimaid (talk) 12:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, artist is still alive (born 1943) Maimaid (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, artist is still alive (born 1943) Maimaid (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, artist is still alive (born 1940) Maimaid (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative works? High Contrast (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Not an artistic work. Chinese Seal stamp (possibly old), which should be ineligible for copyright similar to western signatures (serving the same purpose). --Latebird (talk) 11:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Kept. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Author or uploader request deletion Miborovsky (talk) 22:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: invalid reason for 2005 upload which is in use. --Krd 08:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative of Commons:Deletion requests/File:LandsForSerbia.PNG Ранко Николић (talk) 23:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Useless personal image Dronebogus (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of the TV channel CNews CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC) --Kadı Message 17:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot from the TV channel BFM TV CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Youy can see file:Interview BFM TV Ruth Elkrief.jpg, y have take the picture her Edoirefaitdel'art (talk) 09:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Edoirefaitdel'art: Cela m'a l'air d'être une capture d'écran de BFM TV. Avez-vous les droits pour l'utiliser ?--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This is apparently a temporary exhibit--not permanent, not a monument or architecture--by a living artist (see en:Brick House (Leigh)). No COM:FOP Italy for that. DMacks (talk) 23:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see how that can apply, especially when there are loads of similar photos of exhibited artwork already in Commons under Category:Venice Biennale. Akerbeltz (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Category:Venice Biennale may well need to be scoured for other infringing items. I just spot-checked, and am generally only seeing images of very old things, individuals involved with it, or crowd-scenes. Conversely, Category:Italian FOP cases/deleted seems full of precedent for deletion of creative 3D works of recent vintage. Template:NoFoP-Italy is quite clear that these sorts of things are protected. DMacks (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
DMacks (talk) 18:29, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this image and two others, but it's best to combine them into one image. I did this in ScribeNewWMFDevsImg.png. AndrewTavis (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this image and two others, but it's best to combine them into one image. I did this in ScribeNewWMFDevsImg.png. AndrewTavis (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this image and two others, but it's best to combine them into one image. I did this in ScribeNewWMFDevsImg.png. AndrewTavis (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Not CC-BY YouTube lisence in the video description Urang Kamang (talk) 00:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
YouTube image is unfree D2W59E (talk) 05:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this file to be online anymore, because of misuse. Radiominded (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Misuse on Wikimedia projects or outside? --Túrelio (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Outside of Wikimedia, for use against the wishes of the portraited person.--Radiominded (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Normally, I tend to accede to requests by the subject of the photo, but this was obviously posed, so the person certainly knew his photo was being taken, and the license isn't revocable, which is to say that even if we stop hosting it, uses outside of Wikimedia Foundation projects will still be legal. Given the issue you raise, wouldn't it make the most sense to add the {{Personality rights}} tag to the image, and keep it? - Jmabel ! talk 00:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep image is already released to PD, deletion in Commons wont diminish anyone's rights to do what ever they want to this picture. Besides really nice picture illustrating Zwarte Piet. --Justass (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm the person who made this image. I placed it here without permission of the illustrated person. He asked me to delete it, because he doesn't want it to be online here, because people started using the picture against his will. He didn't knew it was online here. --Radiominded (talk) 15:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- OK that's at least given us some reason for removal apart from the photographer's change of mind. If the subject actively objects, it might be reasonable for us to accede to their wishes. Also I think we may have had issues with personality rights laws in the Netherlands in the past. --Simonxag (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The person in question never agreed to this photo being presented online, despite the licencing. We're nice people, right? It's a great photo, but I'm sure we can find a replacement—it's not that big of a deal. — Lasse Havelund (p) (t) 14:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete
_________________
Deleted/Uploader reqested.--Fanghong (talk) 02:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Professonal picture without any metadata of unknown origin no author given uncertainty about copyright status due to lack of data MoiraMoira (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC) I have updated the description. Hausofmakeup (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Please, remove this picture. Zwartmaker (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). Previously subject to DR and history split, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep If the original license was valid. --RAN (talk) 02:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The persons in the picture are recognizable. There is no indication of their permission to use it with a free license, in fact, there are indications they object to it on legally valid grounds. MarcoSwart (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep I can understand why the people in the photograph would want it deleted. That said, they don't own the copyright. Nor does Commons need the permission of models to host images featuring them. That's just my opinion though. Someone else could probably go a completely different way with it, but I do think deleting an image just because a person in said image has a problem with it being hosted on Commons could set a bad precedent. Especially if it's just because some stupid people online are misusing the image, which obviously isn't Commons' problem. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Dutch copyright is applicable and "portrait rights" are part of Dutch copyright law. MarcoSwart (talk) 08:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Professonal picture without any metadata of unknown origin, uncertainty about copyright status due to lack of data. ErikvanB (talk) 10:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
I have updated the description.Hausofmakeup (talk) 13:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- See here this is OK in Dutch. I withdraw nomination MoiraMoira (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- How? — I withdraw my nomination. ErikvanB (talk) 18:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- See here this is OK in Dutch. I withdraw nomination MoiraMoira (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
The actor on this picture does not give permission to use this picture. He wants this to be removed. 84.80.105.245 17:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing campain to erease this photograph. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). Previously survived DR, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Although the original website is gone, when checked in 2016 it was properly licensed. I am not sure what the argument no permission is referring to, is Eugene Zelenko challenging the original release? We really need more info than using sdelete and writing "no permission", Eugene Zelenko really needs to articulate what he finds deficient. Eugene Zelenko also needs to slow down and do more work up front, instead of passing the bulk of the work onto others. --RAN (talk) 21:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
no certainty whether this image portrays this person, no author given no metadata no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Looks like copyright violation. The first one is also on https://www.trendsmap.com/twitter/tweet/1534034777472479233.
JopkeB (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm in this picture and i don't want it to be public anymore Daniel11732y (talk) 16:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This video was uploaded by a hired photographer who does not own the copyright. The copyright belongs to Festival de Jerez, as seen on screen. Binksternet (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1966. Old photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Not uploaders work, unknown original source. See also TinEye GeorgHH • talk 18:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Matlin (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- No proof that this is derivative work (Korom is an old guy) + FOP in Hungary. Matlin (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- This photo was definitely created much early than 23 September 2020, 12:22. So real source should be provided to determine copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- File:Domestic-connectivity map.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moneytrees (talk • contribs) 21:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Low quality to the point of not being usable. Possible copyright violation. Other file is a duplicate. Moneytrees (talk) 21:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurmanbek as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Kurmanbek (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Di (they-them) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work from black and white image found at https://www.foundationdor.org/fr-price-legacy-society Di (they-them) (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I just realized that the original black and white image is in the public domain because it was published before 1927, please disregard the deletion request. Di (they-them) (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Description English: Bangladesh 191.126.135.19 01:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
F10 belly 191.126.135.19 01:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Alguién de nombre Arman 191.126.135.19 01:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Alguién de nombre Arman 191.126.135.19 01:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Alguién de nombre Arman 191.126.135.19 01:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Alguién de nombre Arman 191.126.135.19 01:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I suspect this may be a copyvio because of the logo on the top left corner. I couldn't imagine an ordinary Wikimedian taking a photo needing to put the image there. I failed however to find concrete proof via Google image search, but I suspect this WhisperToMe (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete This looks like a promotional image for a Vietnamese restaurant chain. Who knows which one, but it's probably copyvio wherever it comes from. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I suspect this may be a copyvio because of the logo on the top left corner. I couldn't imagine an ordinary Wikimedian taking a photo needing to put the image there. I failed however to find concrete proof via Google image search, but I suspect this WhisperToMe (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete This looks like a promotional image for a Vietnamese restaurant chain. Who knows which one, but it's probably copyvio wherever it comes from. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I suspect this may be a copyvio because of the logo on the top left corner. I couldn't imagine an ordinary Wikimedian taking a photo needing to put the image there. I failed however to find concrete proof via Google image search, but I suspect this WhisperToMe (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Author died in 1976 (en:C. Kondaiah Raju), not free copyright nor in the public domain. Thyj (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Author died in 1976 (en:C. Kondaiah Raju), not free copyright nor in the public domain. Thyj (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Author died in 1976 (en:C. Kondaiah Raju), not free copyright nor in the public domain. Thyj (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Author died in 1976 (en:C. Kondaiah Raju), not free copyright nor in the public domain. Thyj (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
English: Abdurahiman Ahimad Bashir was born in eastern central Ethiopia on 1/1/1994 He entered school when he was five years old. And the start of the study on his sheikh, Muhammad Sheikh Muhammad Al-Ethiopi, and he completed the recitation of the Qur’an. He entered school when he was five years old. And the start of the study on his sheikh, Muhammad Sheikh Muhammad Al-Ethiopi, and he completed the recitation of the Qur’an He is nine years old. And the beginning of his second study with the science of hadith and the transmission and recitation of the Qur’an At the school institute in Jimma, Aba Jifar, and his sheikh was quoted on the authority of Muhammad al-Arousi And when he reached the age of 13, he obtained the certificate of the Noble Qur’an. After that, he began memorizing the Qur’an at the University of Eastern Ethiopia in Harar in the city of Uday, and he learned to memorize the Qur’an.The Noble Qur’an has been memorized to a high degree Indoctrination and intonation were possible, according to Sheikh Abdullah Ahmad Al-Harari And the beginning of the seventh readings on the authority of Sheikh Abdul Rahman Al-Harari for three years and he successfully completed his recitation and obtained his fourth certificate from Al-Furqan University And in 2016, I got him to be an imam in the city of Riyadh at the Khalid Mosque. 191.126.135.19 01:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (No permission since). 2008 upload, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I had no ide who [w.jakubas] is. I checked, but there is no such registered user at pl:wiki. Hence - the source (and the permission) of this image stays unclear. Masur (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in the absence of any actual evidence that this is a copyvio or similar, let's assume [w.jakubas] is the actual name of the uploader (though perhaps written in a different way). --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Fake image, from https://berroz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/instagram-Laleh-Eskandari-iranian-actress-62.jpg GeorgHH • talk 12:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Low-res image that has been published at https://www.apitonacional.com.br/entrevistas/gutembergfonseca.htm and elsewhere, doesn't appear to be the uploader's work? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:34, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Unclear source, so free license cannot be confirmed Kamolan (talk) 19:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
No free license on source. Must be deleted.--Kursant504 (talk) 12:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
The subject became a Cardinal in 1946, so this was under copyright well after the URAA date. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
dublication File:Cuadro de nudos.jpg Zaripov999 (talk) 04:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by আর রাফি হোসেন (talk · contribs)
[edit]@আর রাফি হোসেন: The EXIF indicates that "Kazi" is the photographer of these images. Is that you or somebody else?
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no answer. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Taiwan Power
[edit]Logo of data provider is not within the scope of {{GWOIA}} license. Related DR:COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of universities and colleges in Taiwan
- File:Taiwan Power Company Logo.jpg
- File:Taiwan Power Company Logo.svg
- File:Taiwan Power Company Seal.svg
Larryasou (talk) 07:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Fictional flag, might be used to make a "very controversial political statement" which should stay away from civil discussion here on Wikipedia. Says on user page under the flag "Just a matter of patience", which can be interpreted as something going against civil discussion. Centralismo (talk) 07:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Neutral, while it is indeed a fictional flag, it is currently being used by multiple users (not that that ever stopped an admin before from deleting an image as being out of scope) and can easily be used to illustrate "the concept of Islam in (Dutch) Limburg". But yes, it does seem to be able to be interpreted as a political position that as far as I know is original to the Wikimedia Commons. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I don't find the arguments for deletion compelling. That said, I know Wikipedia has a rule against using talk page templates that have bigoted opinions. For instance anti-gay marriage talk page templates are not allowed. While I don't think the flag alone is at that level, the whole "Just a matter of patience" thing could be taken as bigoted, or at least anti-Dutch. So I think there's grounds to delete it. Especially since it's just being used on user pages. I doubt it would have any useful purpose outside of that. Let alone an educational one. I also doubt it would be appropriate to have an anti-gay marriage flag on a user page with the caption "it's only a matter of time." Really, the whole thing just comes off like a veiled threat. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete This is a waste. 95.52.115.241 13:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:35, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Unlike most other types of works, audio recordings published in the US in 1926 don't become public domain until 2026. See https://www.copyright.gov/music-modernization/pre1972-soundrecordings/ for further details. Nosferattus (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- You'd be hard pressed to find actual proof that this 1926 recording still holds copyright today. That being said, just upload the 1911 version of the song. Maineartists (talk) 02:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Maineartists: Prior to passage of the Classics Protection and Access Act, US pre-1972 audio recordings were protected by state common law copyrights rather than federal copyrights. And most of those state copyrights lasted indefinitely as they had no set time limits. Regardless, I took your advice and uploaded the 1911 version of the song to act as a replacement. Nosferattus (talk) 03:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Support We can restore the 1926 version some of these days... (i.e., in a little over three years). Gildir (talk) 05:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2027 with {{PD-US-record-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 15:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
No real source Hurfer (talk) 00:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Instagram? 191.126.135.19 01:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Description English: His happiness mood for given promotion and increase salaries. No le gustaron mucho al parecer 191.126.135.19 01:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 10:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
No longer want this on Wikipedia, lost rights to image Imonfirenow (talk) 03:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Imonfirenow How did you lose rights to this image? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Lost rights to image Imonfirenow (talk) 03:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Imonfirenow How did you lose rights to this image? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Lost image rights Imonfirenow (talk) 03:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Imonfirenow How did you lose rights to this image? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Scanned photo from the archive, Pd-old claims without any evidence. Xunks (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Of course the uploader meant his indication "own work" just as "own scan", as he/she added the source "photo from the archive of the Museum of Fatih Karim, Aitovo village". The lable "own work" is long gone, and it seems very likely that the photo really was made before 1952, so the indication thats it's older than 70 years seems very credible. ThomasPusch (talk) 12:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
A self fabricated hoax map based on 0 sources. Its packed with errors. For example, tt shows empires which didn't even exist at the time. Mughal Empire the largest empire, that existed then is missing entirely. The pic seems to have been deleted multiple times in past yet gets reuploaded with a different name. The fake map has no encyclopedic value and should not be kept as a webhost to prevent misinformation Venkat TL (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
(copying the comment relevant to this discussion, from file talk page and also for preserving the discussion .--Venkat TL (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC))
- (Comments from English language Wikipedia)
- Gross Inaccuracy 1
1. This map has no verifiable reference.
2. This map inaccuracy in the depiction of major rivers. It shows the Brahmaputra to flow directly south west to flow in to the Ganges, this ignores the fact that the Brahmaputra flowed along a course towards south east to meet the Meghna before it met the Ganges.
3. This map depicts that no Mughal rule existed in India in 1758. This is historically false. Mughal territory in India ceased to exist only on 1858.
4. Deccan plateau is shown as a part of Maratha empire which was actually a part of Hyderabad state.
I think this fictional map should be removed to keep Wikipedia standards. 202.72.235.205 (talk) 06:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Gross Inaccuracy 2
1. When did Maratha's Rule Delhi and Punjab
2. When did they Cross Magadh and Bengal.
This is wrong Information Please remove this from Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.84.116 (talk) 01:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Related deletion debates
- Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/24
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marathas India (1758).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/07
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:India 18th century.JPG– that links to this page.
Four months later and the file hasn't been deleted yet. This is fascinating!! 178.120.61.131 23:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 10:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
joined to second part II in Wa Henri Simon moirt di l' åbe.ogg Lucyin (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
joined to first part II in Wa Henri Simon moirt di l' åbe.ogg Lucyin (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This looks like copyright violation. Please mention a link to the source and/or more information about the source. You need a VRT ticket (written permission of the maker) if you did not make this image yourself. JopkeB (talk) 15:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The exact photo is also on https://www.indiamart.com/healthyenviro-solutions/noodle-making-machine.html. This same page mentions on the bottom: "All Rights Reserved (Terms of Use)". JopkeB (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo is also on https://www.tradeindia.com/products/automatic-noodle-making-machine-5577422.html. On the bottom of this website is: All rights reserved. JopkeB (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
illegible and low quality map - photograph of a screen Enyavar (talk) 17:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Either not own work or non-notable, possibly both Andre Engels (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Not Own work: Художник М.А.Добров. 1924 год. (=Artist: M.A. Dobrov, 1924). Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Рисунок из моей личной коллекции, перешел по наследству от моего деда Васильева Сергея Дмитриевича. Васильеву Сергею Дмитриевичу рисунок подарил Миллер Петр Николаевич в 1924 году на собрании общества "Старая Москва". Михаил Ткачук (talk) 17:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: M. A. Dobrov is apparently ru:Добров, Матвей Алексеевич, who died in 1958. Factoring in the Russian wartime copyright extensions, the file can be restored in 2033. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
GangXta ArabMONEY .. whose real names are "COSMOS KWAMI DOGBEDA NKUENYENUTSU is a Ghanaian by Birth from Kpando Bame in the Volta Region of GHANA West Africa Born on the 24th day of March 1990. Father: JOHN K. NKUENYENUTSU .. Mother : Manti Agnes Abena . Is an Afrobeat, Reggae Dancehall, Dancehall, Reggae Artist who made waves with his hit track .. https://audiomack.com/gangxta-arabmoney/song/vote-fi-the-worldno-war-prod-by-apex-jusen 191.126.135.19 01:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Also deleted File:DSC 29783 (2).jpg (uploaded by the same user, showing the same person) for the same reason. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
unused and no clear specification of what building this is Andre Engels (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Fine image, illustrative of an architectural style. It took only seconds to identify the subject, by looking at the uploader's global contributions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The Exif says the image comes from Facebook. So the image is likely not the uploaders own work and/or otherwise copyvio. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Adamant1. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jasonkwe as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 127th Bomb Squadron.PNG |2=dupe, this one smaller resolution, younger |3=Jasonkwe
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted and redirected to File:127th Bomb Squadron.PNG. --Rosenzweig τ 14:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded as 'own work' but I doubt that the uploader was a photographer 100 years ago Hiro (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep When you scan an object, the derivative work you create is your own work. The original work is in the public domain. --RAN (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Published on Facebook/Instagram first, we need the specific source and permission 219.78.190.14 16:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely own work. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of Dmitry Azarov is an employee from the Presidential Office of Russia, identity verification is needed 219.78.190.14 14:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Dmitry Azarov is an employee for en:Kommersant [6], he has been taking photos for the presidential administration for a long time, but there is no data on whether he is in the Kremlin pool. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of Dmitry Azarov is an employee from the Presidential Office of Russia, identity verification is needed 219.78.190.14 14:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of Dmitry Azarov is an employee from the Presidential Office of Russia, identity verification is needed 219.78.190.14 14:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of Dmitry Azarov is an employee from the Presidential Office of Russia, identity verification is needed 219.78.190.14 14:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
No se necesita permiso? 191.126.135.19 01:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Use fonts that may be protected by copyright, and the specific origin of the file is doubtful. It is recommended to move to zhwp before it is officially identified. 滑稽金苹果 (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm not sure that it's own work Kazman322 (talk) 06:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: inthis case I think there is no reason to assume it's not. --Krd 18:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
File:HLSIB1b pdmP5y5t2TBMGDVfU21zC51g8F QRyFqX 7fLP1FV19mWp9yKo3t7nMBXiWjt0 gOE4iy0B-itjbEtyG.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO Russia: "Simple result (consisted of simple geometric shapes and / or text) of creative work (creative human activity) is copyrightable", COM:PRP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
image comes from https://www.comune.rimini.it/amministrazione/organi-di-governo/sindaco/jamil-sadegholvaad. It is not own work; the website does not state any copyright policy. BouncyCactus (talk) 10:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- oh, sorry for this inconvenient. Since the image came from a public institute i wrongly assumed it could be used for educational purposes. I should have look closely.
- If i can reach to them and ask them about permission to use it, could this be allowed? or would still be against wikimedia regulation? Thanks for the clarification Mattia.Gaggiato (talk) 12:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattia.Gaggiato: No worries :)
- Yes, it would be allowed. They must state explicit permission to use such file under the CC-BY-4.0 license or equivalent, either in publicly accessible form online or by sending a mail to VRT. Here are the instructions: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VRT BouncyCactus (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattia.Gaggiato: in general, anyway, files that meet fair use or other educational purposes must be uploaded directly to the relevant Wikipedia. On Wikimedia Commons only freely licensed material is admissable. BouncyCactus (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- thanks for the clarification i promise i won't repeat the same mistake, unfortunately i wasn't able to get a response from them so the image is still unavailable. Mattia.Gaggiato (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattia.Gaggiato: in general, anyway, files that meet fair use or other educational purposes must be uploaded directly to the relevant Wikipedia. On Wikimedia Commons only freely licensed material is admissable. BouncyCactus (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for months sadly. --James F. (talk) 21:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The eraldic shield is not the official one. I act on behalf of the City Council of Foncoberta. Carles Ponce Campoy (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Este escudo no es el oficial, el oficial ya esta subido al sevidor de wikipedia solo faltaria eliminar del servidor este escudo para que no salga en las busquedas de internet. Carles Ponce Campoy (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Carles Ponce Campoy: The official shield is likely under copyright and cannot be used unless the copyright holder releases the file in the public domain. No valid resson for deletion, Keep. Jonteemil (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a valid reason to delete a free version of a coat of arms. Carles, el seu comentari demostra una falta de coneixement sobre com funciona l'heràldica. Keep. --Xavigivax
(talk) 09:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-2012.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_1965.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-2012.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2012.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-2012.jpg){kind=link}
-2012.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-2022-06-30T21:39:00.000Z-File:FrPriceCol.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 21:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyio: Photograph of a diploma, Use of Commons as personal space CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The certificate design should be {{PD-USGov}}. It could be useful to illustrate this type of congressional recognition certificate. Better categories would be ideal though. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
I would nominate for speedy deletion but I do not read Chinese nor do I have a Weibo account. Appears to be official social media photos ripped from the group's account.
BriefEdits (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Not Creative Commons lisence because from WordPress Urang Kamang (talk) 05:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
I can't see any benefit from this image due to the poor image quality. 2003:DA:170D:4116:6C48:4363:D270:E10F 10:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. One of a limited number of images of this station at night. Usable quality for lower resolution applications. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raphaël28190 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works of an artist who died in 2009, so autorization needed.
File:Le Pont des Arts peinture.jpgFile:Paysage rouge avec Notre-Dame et ses ponts.jpgFile:Notre-Dame sous un ciel d'orage.jpgFile:Lever de soleil sur Notre-Dame.jpg- File:Les ponts de Notre-Dame sur la Seine comme au ciel.jpg
File:Les déportés.jpgFile:La Bouillabaisse.jpgFile:Autoportrait devant Notre-Dame.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I don't really understand why these files could be deleted. The legal owner of the work (painter' s daughter)gave me the right of diffusion for these document.
- Sorry for my plain english.
- En français :
- La propriétaire des droits sur ces œuvres (la fille de l'artiste) me les a cédé pour Wikipédia.
- Sincérement
- @Raphaël28190 Raphaël28190 (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Where can I upload the autorization ? Raphaël28190 (talk) 20:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Voir Commons:OTRS/fr. --Shev123 (talk) 11:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nous avons reçu un courriel à l'équipe support par Ticket:2022070410011122 qui est en cours de traitement. – We have received an email at the support team per Ticket:2022070410011122 which is about to be processed. Mussklprozz (talk) 21:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Voir Commons:OTRS/fr. --Shev123 (talk) 11:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Where can I upload the autorization ? Raphaël28190 (talk) 20:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Nous avons maintenant reçu une autorisation valide de tous les héritières pour toutes les images par Ticket:2022070410011122- – We have now received a valid permission from all heirs for all the pictures per Ticket:2022070410011122. --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Partial closure: Kept all except File:Les ponts de Notre-Dame sur la Seine comme au ciel.jpg. @Mussklprozz: I don't understand French, does File:Les ponts de Notre-Dame sur la Seine comme au ciel.jpg have permission from this ticket too? (Feel free to ping me if you need undeletion to tell.) Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Undeleted that one too. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible ad knowing that some of his diplomas have been uploaded to Commons as well: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CAMP_Certificate_of_Recognition.jpg ; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Certificate_of_Congressional_Recognition.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Administrative Palace, Ploiești
[edit]Per ro:Consiliul Județean Prahova, this building in Romania was begun in 1968 and completed in 1971. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Romania, Romania has a term of protection of 70 years pma, so this building, which is surely above the threshold of originality, is still protected by copyright. Since freedom of panorama in Romania is for non-commercial use only, these images are not suitable for Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. The files can be restored 70 years after the death of the architect, whoever that may be.
- File:87848 - panoramio.jpg
- File:878979 - panoramio.jpg
- File:CASA ALBĂ (Sediul Consiliului Judeţean Prahova, al Prefecturii şi Primăriei Ploieşti) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Centru - panoramio - eug.sim.jpg
- File:Palatul administrativ Ploiesti.jpg
- File:Palatul Administrativ.jpg
- File:Ploiesti (35).jpg
- File:Плоешти 2012 - panoramio.jpg
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Manbij revolutionaries logo2.png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC) - Oppose deletion: The images are self-constructed, simplified versions of the group's actual logo, made using assets available in creative commons. In essence, the logos are adjusted versions of an image made by me - even the text was written using Microsoft Paint and does not exactly fit the group's original version. The only "complex" parts, the guns, are not from the group's copyright-protected logo, but based on photos from Wikimedia. Applodion (talk) 22:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Krd: So the fact that the images were created by me and were clearly distinct from the originals did not count? Applodion (talk) 20:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Krd: Would you be so kind to respond? Applodion (talk) 08:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Previosly published Shakhtyorsk photos
[edit]- File:Шахтерск2020.jpg
- File:Шахтерск1.jpg
- File:Шахтерск2-2020.jpg
- File:Шахтерск3-2020.jpg
- File:Шахтерск4-2020.jpg
All photos are previously published here. Probably, other uploads of the user have the same issue.--Yellow Horror (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Можно сослаться на Википравило, запрещающее публикацию в Википедии фото, ранее опубликованных за ее пределами?--LukaE (talk) 07:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @LukaE: во всех случаях помещения на Викисклад ранее опубликованного в другом месте изображения требуется либо доказательство пребывания изображения в общественном достоянии; либо явное указание в источнике свободной лицензии, совместимой с CC BY-SA 4.0; либо офрормление разрешения на публикацию изображения под свободной лицензией от автора или иного обладателя исключительного права через службу VRT. Где это тут прописано в правилах, увы, не подскажу, ориентируюсь по практике.--Yellow Horror (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The images contain a watermark "uglecorks news". The sourcewebsite given by Yellow Horror cannot be reached today, but I assume they were copied from that site and are protected by copyright. Therefore these images have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jasonkwe as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 920th Rescue Wing.jpg |2=Other image is older and better resolution |3=Jasonkwe
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio Thanks, I appreciate this. I didn't realize there were guidelines for redundant vs duplicate so I'm reading up on them now. Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 07:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Túrelio, I think deletion is inappropriate. First, this is a png file, which has no extra blank, so it can give other users more options. Second, the resolution of 920th Rescue Wing.jpg looks better, but it contains extra blank, and when those blank are removed, its resolution will be the same as png. All in all, I don't think it should be deleted. Thanks. EcksrAywiSskeYone (talk) 12:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @EcksrAywiSskeYone Thanks for the advice. I don't know enough about the advantages and disadvantages of different image file formats except for lossiness. Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 20:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
