Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![20 File:Official evidence written by the French commander "General Pelle, Admiral Dumesnil and M. Graillet".png](#File:Official_evidence_written_by_the_French_commander_"General_Pelle,_Admiral_Dumesnil_and_M._Graillet".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_Thüringen,_Deutschland_07.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Крекова_Николая_Авксентьевич.jpg){kind=link}
will update fully detailed version Hycons (talk) 04:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's bio, out of project scope. --Achim55 (talk) 10:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Autopromoción, sin relevancia alguna Exo22 (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: used in a user page, valid photo. --Ezarateesteban 11:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Innapropriate image EnIRtpf09b (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as attack-image. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Alpine A310 - Jean Ragnotti.png
- File:Photo aérienne de Cherisy.png
- File:Lavoir à Cherisy.png
- File:Viaduc de Cherisy en 1945.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
User with heavy history of copyvios. Why uploading PNG images? Please upload the original images with metadata. May be copied from FB.
- File:Ligne de Départ Dreux.png
- File:Laurent Bouliou Dreux 2021.png
- File:Supercar Dreux 2021.png
- File:Départ Course Dreux 2021.png
- File:Emanuel Anne Dreux 2021 (3).png
- File:David Fèvre et Romuald Delaunay Dreux 2021.png
- File:Yann Le Lay et Mathéo Seigneur Dreux 2021.png
- File:David Fèvre Dreux 2021.png
- File:Jimmy Terpereau Citroën C2 S1600 2.png
- File:Jimmy Terpereau Dreux 2021.png
- File:Jean-François Blaise Dreux 2021.png
- File:Départ Dreux 2021.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader has claimed {{PD-textlogo}} but the dinosaur skeleton imagery likely takes this logo above the threshold of originality.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 14:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy Jeremy (talk) 13:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:20, 13 June 2022 UTC: I realized it is bad for my privacy --Krdbot 19:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source. Xocolatl (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 18:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yuval Y § Chat § 20:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Already exists Category:Bread of Jilotepec (name in English)
Kept: as redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 20:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover Gikü (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:56, 14 June 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: book cover/page --Krdbot 19:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it has private location data in the exif tags Jeremy (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:27, 16 June 2022 UTC: it has private location data in the exif tags G7 --Krdbot 19:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it has private location data in the exif tags Jeremy (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:27, 16 June 2022 UTC: it has private location data in the exif tags G7 --Krdbot 19:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it has private location data in the exif tags Jeremy (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:26, 16 June 2022 UTC: it has private location data in the exif tags G7 --Krdbot 19:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it has private location data in the exif tags Jeremy (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:26, 16 June 2022 UTC: it has private location data in the exif tags G7 --Krdbot 19:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it has private location data in the exif tags Jeremy (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:26, 16 June 2022 UTC: it has private location data in the exif tags G7 --Krdbot 19:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non mi piace Medatedua (talk) 05:51, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Non importa che cose non ti piace, ma "Source: YouTube" non 'e possibile per Commons. Clear copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Ikan Kekek, COM:PRP, no clear free licensing. --Strakhov (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Anywhere this brief bit of text is needed, it should be written as text, instead of a .jpg image. Marbletan (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Brief biography/CV for non-notable individual. Outside Commons:Scope. If this text really is needed anywhere, it should be written in text, not as a .pdf. Marbletan (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
I request that this picture I added about the Smyrna fire be removed because I made some mistakes on the page. Realizer35 (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Official evidence written by the French commander "General Pelle, Admiral Dumesnil and M. Graillet".png
[edit]
I request you to remove this picture because I made some mistakes in a written page I added about the Smyrna fire. Realizer35 (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
I request you to remove this picture because I made some mistakes in a written page I added about the Smyrna fire. Realizer35 (talk) 16:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
No educational use, out of COM:SCOPE. Made up flag for a made up country. "Kirisuna" seems to have been invented by the uploader by combining the names of some anime characters together. No conceivable use in projects. 192.76.8.94 20:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 00:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
advertisment Tagishsimon (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 00:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). Flickrwashing! --Karim talk me :)..! 22:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Obvious copyvio, from Getty Images: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/mahmoud-abdelrazek-shikabala-of-egypt-in-action-during-the-news-photo/939139084 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 00:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blesskid boykino esaïe officiel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Esaïe.jpg
- File:Ogoubi kossivi esaïe.jpg
- File:Blesskid boykino officiel.jpg
- File:Ghettogan.jpg
- File:Blogueur Blesskid esaïe.jpg
- File:Influenceur boykino esaïe.jpg
- File:Réalisateur ogesko esaïe.png
- File:Blesskid.png
- File:Blesskid boykino esaïe officiel.png
Achim55 (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schleimi01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]We have enough and better Penis pictures at Commons. COM:PENIS
- File:Samenerguss ,Ejaculation 05.jpg
- File:Samenerguss ,Ejaculation 04.jpg
- File:Samenerguss ,Ejaculation 03.jpg
- File:Samenerguss ,Ejaculation 01.jpg
- File:Samenerguss ,Ejaculation 02.jpg
- File:Vorhaut zurück falten 04.jpg
- File:Vorhaut zurück falten 02.jpg
- File:Vorhaut zurück falten 03.jpg
- File:Vorhaut zurück falten 01.jpg
- File:Private Bilder 286429.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 08.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 07.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 06.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 04.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 05.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 01.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 03.jpg
- File:Kleiner Penis nach der Rasur 02.jpg
- File:Abspritzen.ogg
Migebert (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Migebert: Last file might be useful - there's no derivative of ejaculating sound in commons. See Category:Audio files about human sexuality. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 15:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schleimi01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PORN, low quality, generic, or just plain not educational.
Dronebogus (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission of depicted person Maimaid (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ra'ike T C 13:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality (pixelated, low resolution), replaced by File:Dichlooretheen.svg. Leyo 09:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. The unused file redirect File:Dichlooretheen.gif should get deleted as well! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, replaced by File:OrganosulfurLogo.svg. Leyo 09:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There's no need to keep that PNG file when we have a high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Azide ion. Leyo 13:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused poorly cropped versions of File:Selenoyl fluoride 3D Space Filling.png from same uploader. These versions are not needed. Marbletan (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Fake OTRS tag. Proper license is non free Streamline8988 (talk) 15:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure for the OTRS tag, but the photo is licenced with CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 by its author, see: https://www.vitalykuzmin.net/Copyright-policy I guess the OTRS info is incorrect and should be removed to avoid misunderstanding. Maybe mistake made by the uploader. MrDark (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS tag valid for uploads before 30 August 2017 only. --Wdwd (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed salah mohamed rabe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional photos, mix of cameras, some with author info in exif, not own work as claimed. And scope?
- File:محمد صلاح صوت من قلب مصر.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد صلاح والمخرج مجدى ابو عميره.jpg
- File:محمد صلاح حفله.jpg
- File:محمد صلاح والأطفال جيل مصر.jpg
- File:مبادرة إدعم يتيم مؤسسها محمد صلاح إبن المنيا.jpg
- File:Inbound2464950435790589609.jpg
- File:المطرب والفنان محمد صلاح.jpg
- File:ابن الصعيد محمد صلاح.jpg
- File:فنان من الصعيد المطرب محمد صلاح.jpg
- File:وزيرة الثقافه المصريه تكرم محمد صلاح.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد صلاح.jpg
- File:The best singer in Upper Egypt mohamed salah.jpg
- File:الفنان والمطرب المصرى محمد صلاح.jpg
- File:Mohamed Salah singer.jpg
- File:افضل اغنيه وطنيه شبابيه 2019.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]
Dronebogus (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Unremarkable WP:PENIS pics
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Gbawden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]Low quality penis images
File:Enlarge 2425408393.png- File:Erect circumcised penis.jpg
- File:Male anus, perineum, scrotum and penis II.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand the benchmark for "low quality". It demonstrates exactly what it stated. I believe in regards to both empirical characteristics (resolution, clarity, etc) and usefulness, it surpasses many other images left under this category. Rafe101 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The world makes a little more sense. Thanks Rafe101 (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the rest. 186.175.219.84 22:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized the first one is not low quality and in use; removing Dronebogus (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]SERIOUSLY WE DO NOT NEED MORE DICK PICS
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (1).gif
- File:Human Male Ejaculation (2).gif
- File:Human Penis (1).jpg
- File:Human Penis (10).jpg
- File:Human Penis (11).jpg
- File:Human Penis (4).jpg
- File:Human Penis (5).jpg
- File:Human Penis (6).jpg
- File:Human Penis (7).jpg
- File:Human Penis (8).jpg
- File:Human Penis (9).jpg
- File:Human Penis+.jpg
- File:Human Penis-.png
- File:Low and tight circumcision.jpg
- File:Male penis flaccid to erect.jpg
- File:My dick.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penis
[edit]- File:Erectpenis.jpg
- File:Erectpenis14.jpg
- File:Fully erect male with a cock ring on the testicles.gif
- File:Malepubichair.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 - also CSD U3 of their userpage and a block. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Strange angles, not drawn according to en:MOS:CHEM, better alternatives in Category:Borane. Leyo 09:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I drew this based on the exact details of File:BH3.png, the bitmap image this SVG was created to replace. If you decide on deletion, remember to nuke File:BH3.png as well. OmenBreeze (talk) 09:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- You could just update your settings according to en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing#Suggested molecule editor settings and re-draw the structure. --Leyo 11:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I use Adobe Illustrator, and I know precisely squat about chemistry. Also, please read the part on my user page concerning preservation of detail. OmenBreeze (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- It does not really make sense to draw chemical structures using Adobe Illustrator, when specialized software (see above) is available. --Leyo 19:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's the program I'm most proficient in. You're talking to a graphics designer, not a chemist. In any case, it's a moot point, because I'm recreating the detail of somebody else's work, not creating my own. OmenBreeze (talk) 10:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- In my view, it's a waste of time to re-draw non-MOS-compliant chemical structures 1:1 using Adobe Illustrator. --Leyo 20:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- I couldn't give a crap what you think of my time, quite honestly. OmenBreeze (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- In my view, it's a waste of time to re-draw non-MOS-compliant chemical structures 1:1 using Adobe Illustrator. --Leyo 20:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's the program I'm most proficient in. You're talking to a graphics designer, not a chemist. In any case, it's a moot point, because I'm recreating the detail of somebody else's work, not creating my own. OmenBreeze (talk) 10:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- It does not really make sense to draw chemical structures using Adobe Illustrator, when specialized software (see above) is available. --Leyo 19:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- I use Adobe Illustrator, and I know precisely squat about chemistry. Also, please read the part on my user page concerning preservation of detail. OmenBreeze (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- You could just update your settings according to en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing#Suggested molecule editor settings and re-draw the structure. --Leyo 11:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom. I have uploaded File:Borane-2D-structure.svg drawn according to MOS in ChemDraw. No matter how good the vectorization is, if there's a factual issue in it, it's useless. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
SUDAH LAMA Rei Fell (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
SUDAH LAMA DAN DITUTUP Rei Fell (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Blank page request Rei Fell (talk) 12:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Own user space. --Achim55 (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request Npubemgpyr (talk) 20:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Npubemgpyr: Om uppladdaren ber om radering strax efter uppladdning brukar önskemålet bifallas mer eller mindre automatiskt. Nu har det ändå gått mer än en månad och det är möjligt att utomstående använder filen (se mw:InstantCommons), så då behövs någon orsak utöver ditt önskemål.
- Vänligen berätta varför du vill ha bilden raderad. Om orsaken inte kan behandlas publikt kan du skicka e-post till lämplig adress, såsom info-commons@wikimedia.org. Att kontakta en enskild användare, såsom mig, hjälper inte mycket, eftersom den som skall radera filen, och den som läser en begäran att återskapa den, också måste övertygas.
- [Please provide a reason why the file should be deleted – the 7-day grace period has passed.]
- –LPfi (talk) 19:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have privacy concerns relating to the image itself. Npubemgpyr (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- In that case, I suppose e-mailing info-commons@wikimedia.org is the best path forward. I assume the mail queue is handled confidentially either by WMF staff or VRT volunteers. As the privacy problems aren't obvious, and discussing them in public may make them worse, I assume the e-mail path to be the right path forward. If the people responding deem that your concerns are valid, I think the file can be deleted on their recommendation. –LPfi (talk) 09:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have privacy concerns relating to the image itself. Npubemgpyr (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per VRT ticket request, not in use. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Obsiously old photo, not own work by uploader. Image has been imported to ruwiki as fair use WindEwriX (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright the file was sent by me but i analyzed sources and i see that it is not free content to share o will really assume this mistake i analyzed this main source of the newspaper Folha de S.Paulo: (https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/webstories/cultura/2021/10/joao-gomes-vaquejada-e-forro-eletronico/) Remove the file does not have free license. LeonaardoG (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 09:29, 5 July 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 13:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Like all the other user's uploads, this portrait was taken from another website https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisFhzP6XljeVJT4Z63CyNXQ_1VLm9T8ApA43W9Z8LbTVwr8YdLZF0S56kt6d7fEOYe3PyWOLFEPe66KqnWsyKig_1mr0pk5wM2W7zJWhgHu9RhlBjNphZPSkodyJPvW-FOCAqOxqfveAfIVQ8b4LvPQ3oM6iBBA Putitonamap98 (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:42, 8 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 19:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright the file is not approved the user who added the TAG is not a member of the VRT and the source of the video on YouTube does not show this image see the history of the VRT file added by itself LeonaardoG (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- The image is Copyright this proves the YouTube source and pay attention to the file history. LeonaardoG (talk) 15:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, was already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
no permission of depicted person Maimaid (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for that, Maimaid. @Admins, please delete this image asap. --Neitram (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, was already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the wrong logo from Livestorm (I'm the uploader), the other correct one was added to wikipedia commons already. This is safe for deletion. Thibdavoult (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 19:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
This portrait is an official work by the Alabama State Government. Not the Federal Government. Thus, it is not Public Domain. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 20:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 20:26, 24 July 2022 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY --Krdbot 00:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Picture is either found to be inappropriate or not created by owner of this picture. If found appropriate. Please explain. MrKDunleavy (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Inappropriate use of CC license by the uploader of the YouTube video. The video solely relies on non-free images. The original image is credited to The Image Direct (as seen here) without evidence of a free license. Throast (talk) 14:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Youtube video is using the image as fair use, but copyright content they use that way isn't under the CC licensee the are using for video. WikiVirusC(talk) 16:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Youtube-poster seems indeed unlikely to be owner of all these images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2016.[1] Hence, its architect is unlikely to be dead for more than 50 years. There is no freedom of panorama exception in the Philippiness, too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Instagram file copyright. LeonaardoG (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright LeonaardoG (talk) 02:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright the user continues to upload files protected by copyright even after being warned LeonaardoG (talk) 03:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
reupload Hacketteps (talk) 04:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion (reuploaded as File:Al Ain Safari.jpg). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
removal of duplicates File:Mariehamn museum knots.jpg Zaripov999 (talk) 04:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as uploader. A photo showing also the chairs is not a duplicate, but the photo is blurry (as many in this batch; most are not duplicates, or duplicates to GFDL 1.2 only photos). –LPfi (talk) 10:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Agree it's not dublicate, it's COM:Redundant. Has badder quality, chairs do not affect a meaning of the photo . LPfi Zaripov999 (talk) 04:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:San Francisco - Willie Mays statue at Pac Bell-91 (37624172971).jpg for artwork details. The sculptor is still alive: commercial license permission from him (the sculptor) is a must. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The statue here is the integral element (not trivial). For artwork details see Commons:Deletion requests/File:San Francisco - Willie Mays statue at Pac Bell-91 (37624172971).jpg. Commercial license permission from the still-living sculptor is a must. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ham II#Louvre Pyramid Flickr images imported by Ham II (talk · contribs). Interior architecture is shown here. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The architectural work will remain copyrighted as I.M. Pei is not yet dead for more than 70 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not secure Medatedua (talk) 06:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No license since 2022-06-13. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
not secure Medatedua (talk) 06:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
not secure Medatedua (talk) 06:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
not secure Medatedua (talk) 06:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo for non-wikipedian: out of Scope --Karim talk me :)..! 06:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
رفعته عن طريق الخطأ KhaledYasser.Y (talk) 19:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not free since 2017 " Except where otherwise noted, all photos and videos by Vitaly Kuzmin are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License." Streamline8988 (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was uploaded as an "own work" when it clearly says it came from the official NC secretaries youtube channel. There is no proof this is in the creative commons Indy beetle (talk) 08:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Exact copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ferris_Wheel_Ain_Dubai_in_Dubai_02.jpg Renek78 (talk) 08:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Interior view ceiling Antwerp-Central railway station.jpg Dutchy45 (talk) 09:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Picture under copyright without explicit permission. Not the first time the uploader does this. Trizek from FR 09:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This image appears to have been uploaded for self-promotion Abd.nh (talk) 09:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yep. Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unknown author and "from private archive" is not possible with the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licence, please read COM:L.
- File:König F-J Nordlohne 2.jpg
- File:König F-J Nordlohne.jpg
- File:Königsthron 1980-81 in Lohne.jpg
- File:Schützenkönig 1980-81.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 10:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and category also deleted as empty. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Not own work 07 (talk) 10:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; photo of photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raniluvsri (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 11:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. Commons isn't a personal file host. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pojalustayuidi (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. Commons isn't a personal file host and these images have zero educational value. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violoation. The painter died in 2020, so the painting is not in the Public Domain. I do not see a VRT ticket. The uploader might be family, but Commons still needs a VRT ticket, because everybody can make an account with wathever account name. JopkeB (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
An error occurred while uploading and I would like to undo my activity and redo it again. Ken Tony (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? This photo is also on https://www.gentedechota.com/chota/distrito-anguia/ (nearly in the middle) and https://tiengtrung.cn/wiki/es/Distrito_de_Angu%C3%ADa (and others). I do not see a VRT ticket nor technical details of the camera. JopkeB (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:SELFIE. Baidax 💬 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
It's not a campaign van. See File:Wang Ding-yu's Mitsubishi Delica YM-6849 left side 20081207.jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, it's a redirect. Why didn't you leave the redirect alone instead of blanking it without discussion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unneeded redireect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
photographie d'une couverture d'un livre récent très probablement sous droit d'auteur Olivier Tanguy (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
"own work" via personal satellite is unlikely. No source for the basic satellite image indicated. Possible copyvio? Enyavar (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE. 176.59.55.149 14:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. The same picture appears at https://gunjan.myportfolio.com/beyond-premieres without indication of a CC-BY-SA-compatible license. The "own work" licensing therefore seems dubious. Tigraan (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: the same is seen at the NatGeo profile as well: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/find-explorers/gunjan-menon Jay (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Lo ricarico in formato .svg
- Grazie Remo Attilio Maria (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file can and should be deleted to avoid confusion because a better quality file with the same logo is available. Look: File:Antalis-logo.png --Karsten Schulze (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright infringement DSwissK (talk) 14:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
No useful file name, description or categorization. Looks like it might be incense, but a guess like that is not a good basis for educational use of an image. Anyway, given the uploader's user name and with the company name all over the company name all over the picture, this looks like unwanted advertising for Ferrer & Saret.
Copyright-wise we'd need a written permission via COM:VRT, and I'd say it's out of scope too. El Grafo (talk) 14:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Poorly cropped version of File:Nanoimprint-en.png/File:Nanoimprint-en.svg in an inappropriate file format (pdf). This version is unused and unneeded. Marbletan (talk) 14:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
not own work, taken from https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a15355496/tom-hoover-the-father-of-the-hemi-passes-away-at-85/ MB (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/CZtssBMs-bI/, photographer unclear Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, I suppose for some kind of online gaming community. Doesn't appear to be used elsewhere on the web, so while it may (or may not) be OK copyright-wise, keeping it seems pointless per COM:SCOPE. El Grafo (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Duplicado del archivo A-8Spain.png Mabema1 (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nagnath Mhetre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Malkappa Gurubasappa Udagi news paper.jpg
- File:Freedom Fighters.jpg
- File:Tamrapatra Malkappa Gurubasappa Udagi.jpg
- File:(Freedom Fighter) Malkappa Gurubasappa Udagi.jpg
- File:Malkappa Gurubasappa Udagiमालकप्पा उडगी.jpg
_Malkappa_Gurubasappa_Udagi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahmoud Kamali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality drawing, out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced and not own work 145.255.171.180 16:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Informações insuficientes. Cosmo Skerry (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Not own work (it's from Time Life). It's from 1944 so might be covered by some US out of copyright rule? Multichill (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very doubtful own work. Bull died in 2004, but own work from 2022? Seems to be from https://blenderartists.org/t/outlaw-the-bull-but-colored-instead-of-bronze/1378875 Multichill (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This image is stated to be own work, but it has been previously published. This article predates the upload by 1 year and includes this image as well as several other images which are obviously from the same photo shoot. Note that the same image is also posted to the subject's Facebook, but is one moth later than the upload to Commons. COM:VRT confirmation of permission would be needed. Whpq (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
See exif: © 2017 Navy Nhum Streamline8988 (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Billboard for a concert CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Changed mind about upload, may have not uploaded properly. LanguageLovingNerd (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Jelican9 (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Copyrighted image taken from a copyrighted website. Delete. Kadı Message 16:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
According to the EXIF data, this photo was taken by professional photographer Axel Schmidt. User:Robert Nowatzki uploaded it as his own work with no permission or indication that he might be Axel Schmidt. Entbert (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator Midjourney does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator Midjourney does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator Midjourney does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree it's not useful in an article on WASP-33b, but it's useful in articles on the bot/program/tool that generated it - as such I've included it in Midjourney's article on English Wikipedia. Similar photos used in the DALL-E wikipedia are uploaded onto Wikimedia under a "Public Domain" license, e.g. File:A Shiba Inu dog wearing a beret and black turtleneck DALLE2.jpg. Thisisarealusername (talk) 06:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. It's an excellent example of the status of Midjourney at the time of its generation when fed a specific article. It should also include a link for which revision of the article that it was based on. It probably does not belong on the WASP-33b article itself, though. -- 97.94.196.210 23:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Probably should be renamed to better reflect exactly what it is. -- 97.94.196.210 23:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Image appears to be a digital reproduction from an unknown source. It is suspicious enough to arouse COM:PCP concern. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The image is presumably subject to {{PD-algorithm}}. Otherwise, per their terms of service, Midjourney grants paid users full copyright to generated images in return for non-exclusive license, which subscribers grant to Midjourney.Note that non-paid users are only granted CC BY-NC 4.0 license. That being said, need some clarifications from @Kleinhern on whether the image was generated with paid subscription. Adamant.pwn (talk) 21:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: uncertain copyright status and questions not resolved by uploader; COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- @P199: should it mean that all images tagged with {{PD-algorithm}} are subject to deletion? Adamant.pwn (talk) 10:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Of course not. In this case, the uploader did not provide the clarification that you asked for. I also agreed with User:A1Cafel. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is not useful/encyclopedic enough to depict this astronomical object with scientific accuracy, according to Wikipedia's image policy. This image also has insufficient licensing information, thus counts as a copyright violation. The image generator SpaceEngine does not specify a public commercial license that grant permission to be used on Wikimedia Commons. Additionally, SpaceEngine's Solar System planet and moon textures were made by other artists, and they must be credited (with permission) as well. 2603:8000:F402:4700:9D6D:38D3:D763:8868 20:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused speculative flag with no evidence of basis in reality Dronebogus (talk) 23:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
file in copyviol: photo by CONOR MCDONNELL, cf. metadata — danyele 23:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload. Is there any valid reason to doubt it now after it's been on Commons for 14 years? The useless request for review by FlickreviewR 2 when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found" looks like a misuse of the process. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since). A source is already given, and the file has already been kept in a deletion process last year (see above). Andre Engels (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Logo exceeds COM:TOO China. Larryasou (talk) 05:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
My own file -.- I have no idea why I uploaded this rather irrelevant image in the first place. Thank you ,- KaiKemmann (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
My own file -.- I have no idea why I uploaded this image in the first place. Thank you ,- KaiKemmann (talk) 18:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
My own file -.- I have no idea why I uploaded this image in the first place. Thank you ,- KaiKemmann (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
My own file -.- rather irrelevant - Thank you ,- KaiKemmann (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
,_Th%C3%BCringen,_Deutschland_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Th%C3%BCringen,_Deutschland_07.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My own file -.- rather irrelevant -.- Thank you ,- KaiKemmann (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
,_Thüringen,_Deutschland_07.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
,_Thüringen,_Deutschland_07.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Villem Ogost (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused fantasy or hoax images and map, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Imperial Crown.png
- File:Flag Imperial.png
- File:Map Imperial.png
- File:Philippine Imperial Coat of Arms.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
low res Copy of File:Byzantine Empire Themes 1025-es.svg, unused Enyavar (talk) 20:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, too tiny to be useful. --Rosenzweig τ 13:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
HRS Prince Tom of UK? 191.126.169.2 23:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 13:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
The film was renewed, in 1956: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015084451130&view=page&seq=459&skin=2021&q1=%22LAST%20WARNING%22 PseudoSkull (talk) 21:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can principally be restored in 2025, but the non-free soundtrack must be removed.. --Rosenzweig τ 12:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
doubtful own work, copyright holder in EXIF doesn't match the author on commons — Dudek1337 (talk) 22:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; per the "© Andres Rebollo" in the Exif data this is most likely a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, see EXIF. 176.59.56.130 18:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 20:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Dubious PD-simple claim. The Super Hornet, for example, is not a simple geometric shape Эlcobbola talk 14:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Even though this is a AI generated photo, I think this could be considered a derivative work, because it has obvious similarities to Minecraft. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 14:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep- Styles are not copyrightable. A Minecraft screenshoot would have copyright but not an image in the style of Minecraft. If styles were copyrightable we would have just only one cubist painter, only one impressionist painter, only one fauvist painter, only one minimalist artist, only one modernist achitect, only one jazz composer, and so, but we have many of each style.
- Taking an image and redrawing it in Minecraft style would make it a derivative work of the original image, not a derivative work of Minecraft.
- Additionally, this image is differerent enough not to be confused with a Minecraft screenshoot.
- There may be trademark issues if Minecraft style images were used in a videogame - just like if images of an Apple were used to sell computers - but those are non copyright issues.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment The copyright reason was a wrong reason to delete and we should avoid setting a wrong precedent by deleting a file on that basis. However the no potential educative use reason has some merit.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Pere prlpz's observations; see also Commons:Trademarks and Category:Minecraft. Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as an unused, low quality image which is unlikely to be used: it's worthless as an illustration of Kahlo, and seems no different to any other Dall-E output on Commons for illustrating the general concept of Dall-E output. If I drew something like this myself and uploaded it as public domain, I would expect it to be deleted. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No interest to keep. Moreover, this illustration of poor quality could not be generated by DALL-E for the simple reason that its interface does not allow to generate illustrations for personalities. --Madelgarius (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- This was generated by the former Dall-e Mini (now Craiyon) which does all for the generation of images of personalities. Also, Dall-E does allow images to be generated with art styles of painters, including Frida Kahlo, whose work is mostly self portraits.–Auric (talk) 10:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a low quality image that doesn't serve any (educational) purpose per COM:SCOPE. There is no reasonable scenario where a blurry low-res AI generated image blending a game screenshot with a person is of any use to anyone. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 16:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:SCOPE. Low resolution and unused image. SCP-2000 14:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 14:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Cette photo a été prise sans le consentement du sujet par Bull-Doser, un contributeur qui a été banni à plusieurs reprises par Wikimedia Canada (voir https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bull-Doser) FrederiqueDube (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Too bad quality to be usable. --Myloufa (talk) 11:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cette photo a été prise sans le consentement du sujet par Bull-Doser, un contributeur qui a été banni à plusieurs reprises par Wikimedia Canada (voir https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bull-Doser) Alice Rivard (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Making false claims about another editor isn't a good look for someone when you're trying to delete their work.
- Bull-Doser is not banned by Wikimedia. Nor by Wikimedia Commons. Whatever happens in Canada stays in Canada and has no relevance here.
- There is no indication that Samuel Archibald has any issue with this photograph, nor that you are in any position to speak for them. If they happen to read this and they do, then COM:VRTS might be a more useful channel than poorly-supported DRs.
- The photograph was taken at what I believe to be a public event. I see no reason under Canadian law why this photo would not be permissible, no more than (for instance) File:Nadine Walsh.jpg. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not a good picture at all anyways. We don't reallhy see the subject's face and the quality is quite low. --Myloufa (talk) 11:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 14:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mirals are categorised as "graphic wotks" and being excluded from British FOP 219.78.191.185 17:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:FOP UK. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No evidence for permission on the linked Twitter feed or in this particular tweet. The same image can be found at https://presidency.gov.krd/en/president-nechirvan-barzani-offers-easter-greetings-2/ ; the website's Terms and Conditions state: "Unless indicated otherwise for specific items or collections of content (either below or within specific items or collections), this copyright material is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. [...] Please note that this licence does not apply to any images, graphics, logos, emblems and trade marks on the website or to the website’s design elements. Those specific items may not be re-used without express permission." HaeB (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 08:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
To assume a university logo is created at the very date of the uni's creation is absurd. Have no idea why "Internet search" could be a valid source that proves the logo is created before 1927, the Wikipedia article says "The university's coat of arms was granted by the College of Arms in 1954." Please have a look at the uploader's contribution, many of his uploads have the same problem. 淺藍雪❉ 04:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: The existence of this image has led to a perfectly legitimate fair use image being deleted. The file with this name that had been on en.wikipedia peacefully since 2008 was moved to File:University_of_Chester_coat_of_arms_(fair_use).png (because the Commons version 'stole' its name) and was then deleted because it was no longer used in any articles. This is a loss to the University of Chester article. - Green Tentacle (talk) 14:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. @Green Tentacle: please ask for undeletion on en: wikipedia on basis of fair use. Fair use is not allowed on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 08:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Epigraphia Indica
[edit]These are published less than 60 years ago. A GODL license appears to have been applied, but it's not clear from the liinked license information if this applies to items that pre-date it's implementation, such as earlier journal publications.
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 34.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 35.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 36.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 37 No. 5 January 1968.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 37 No. 8 October 1968.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 37.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 38 Nos. 1-7.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 39 No. 1 January 1971.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 39 No. 4 October 1971.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 39 No. 5 January 1972.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 39 No. 6 April 1972.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 39 No. 7 January 1973.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 39.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 40 No. 1 April 1973.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 40 No. 2 July 1973.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 40 No. 3 October 1973.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 40 No. 4 January 1974.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 40 No. 5 April 1974.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 40 No. 6 July 1974.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 41.pdf
- File:Epigraphia Indica Vol 42.pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/Media in Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India, “… a Government work, where Government is the first owner of the copyright, copyright subsists until 60 years from the year in which the work is first published.” However, according to the text on {{GODL-India}} “…all shareable non-sensitive data … generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India, all users are provided a worldwide … license to ” (in my words) freely use the material in accordance with Commons policies. As these surveys were performed according to the title pages of the oldest files by “Government Epigraphists” this licence is valid and these files can be kept. The most recent files show a copyright sign “Government of India” so the GODL-India is also valid imho. --Ellywa (talk) 08:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This is circa 1920 photo, source country is probably France. How do you know, that the photographer is 70 years dead? How do you know, that the photo is published before 1927? Taivo (talk) 09:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Anatole France died in 1924. Thus the photo has been printed at least 3 years before 1927. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- How do you know, that the photo was printed in France's lifetime? Taivo (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" Occasionally when I do a Google image search I come up with another copy attributed to a photographer, but that is rare. Generally we go by Occam's Razor, the simplest explanation, that if someone scans a print, it has been made public around the time of the picture being taken. For instance the LOC Bain collection is scans of the original glass negatives, and some have never been made public. --RAN (talk) 02:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. There is no evidence per COM:EVID that the file is in the public domain by showing when this photo has been published according to COM:FRANCE. or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. Therefore the file has to be deleted. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. This photo has been made before 1924. Therefore it can be undeleted 121 years after 1924 - in 2045.. --Ellywa (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Tagged as "own work", but it is unlikely that the uploader is the author of the HMS Prince of Wales crest. (If he is, then it is unauthentic and should be deleted anyway.) It needs to be demonstrated that this image is authentic and public domain under UK and US law. B (talk) 10:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim. These might be {{PD-USgov}}, but there is not enough information to be sure.
- File:RADM Childs Japan.jpg
- File:RADM briefing CDC Director Tom Frieden 2015.jpg
- File:Dr Childs NIH.jpg
- File:RADM Childs with ADM Girior.jpg
- File:RADM Richard Childs.png
- File:RADM Richard Childs, M.D.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay sir/ma'am. I am the Chief of Communications for Commissioned Corps Headquarters, which is the headquarters for one of the 8 uniformed services in the U.S. and due to the current ongoing COVID-19 pandemic I am juggling deployments with this task. The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. Thank your taking the time to make sure all works proposed for wiki are in fact reasonable, accurate, and original work. The picture in question is in fact is PD-USgov since this is in fact original work of the Federal Government and not the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. If I need to rename the file to reflect the PD-USgov I will do so. Please advise if there is anything else that I need to do reference the use of this image. PHScomms (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- In addition, all of these pictures in question were taken by the federal government, specifically a Commissioned Officer in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. As a trained Public Affairs Officer, and Chief of Communications at Commissioned Corps Headquarters for this uniformed service I was deployed with Rear Admiral (RADM) Childs at multiple locations around the world and I was with him in garrison at Bethesda's National Institutes of Health to take the images in question on federal government time as a federal government employee conducting federal government business. As the creator of this proposed wiki page for my boss, RADM Childs, I am his Chief Public Affairs Officer. My name is Commander Mike Muni, and I can be reached at michael.muni@hhs.gov. PHScomms (talk) 22:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I believe the above is sufficient to keep the files. Some of the images already have a separate OTRS ticket. @PHScomms: I will note that some images do not currently have {{PD-USgov}} but {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} which you might not be able to actually offer since it is more restrictive than PD-USgov. You should change these. Additionally I would advice you to read en:Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure as disclosing you are a paid employee is mandatory for editing en-wiki. MKFI (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remarks of PHScomms. --Ellywa (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Not trivial Lesless (talk) 13:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
@Lesless: Can you expound on your reasoning for nominating this image for deletion? This is a brand's logo. WikiIsKnowledge (talk) 21:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- What's the problem with this file? Glades12 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- And it's copyrighted. Lesless (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep The case is tricky: the shapes are simple and everything remains below what is generally considered as threshold of originality. In Russia, the case law on logos remains vague (see COM:TOO Russia). Pragmatically speaking, I doubt we are exposing ourselves to a big risk by keeping in this case. — Baidax 💬 21:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Russia; even simple creative works have copyright protection in this country. Therefore this file has to be deleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 21:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Inaccurate map derived from a CIA map as part of a campaign by an organisation called "kashmirCountry free", alleging that the map accurately shows the "land of the people of Kashmir". Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I can remember from looking at other maps, it looks accurate, although the file description [edit: and filename] is [are] perhaps a bit tendentious. Do you have a real complaint about the accuracy of this map in presenting actual conditions, or are you trying to argue from a Pakistani nationalist, Indian nationalist or Kashmiri nationalist point of view that would have Commons deny the existence of actual conditions in favor of a map of someone's claims that are not an accurate representation of things as they are? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek, no reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Despite having a CC-BY license, the Youtube channel most likely did not create this image, i.e. this is a 3rd-party photo reused by the source video. Wcam (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Support The original image is to promote the group's Young-Luv.com album. BAJI 23:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)- Delete Per above. SCP-2000 14:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The licensing information says that the file is licensed under the "Government Open Data License - India", but I'm not convinced an image posted to Twitter, rather than hosted on the government website, would be covered by that. The image was posted to Twitter by the official account of the President of India, but there is nothing I can see there to suggest it might be covered by the GODL license. We have no idea who took the photo for one thing, it might not have been a government employee. Amakuru (talk) 14:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- "it might not have been a government employee" ... of course. The President of India may have had dozens of photos taken that day by the official photographer but he decided for this one twitter post that he would steal a pic off the web and get another of his employees to post it to his official twitter feed.... but is it likely? The twitter feed is his, its his employee. Why would he or she decide to not use the photos taken by the official photographer? I see no evidence to support this unlikely scenario. Victuallers (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I also don't particularly like Twitter as a source to be honest, but it's the world we live in. To work it through:
- The image was posted at https://twitter.com/rashtrapatibhvn/status/1501099664774668291
- The profile of rashtrapatibhvn says "This is the official Twitter account of Rashtrapati Bhavan and is run by the President’s Secretariat. Tweets from the President are signed #PresidentKovind"
- The license under which this picture is published on wikicommons is Template:GODL-India which says: Following the mandate of the National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy (NDSAP) of Government of India that applies to all shareable non-sensitive data available either in digital or analog forms but generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India, all users are provided a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to use, adapt, publish (either in original, or in adapted and/or derivative forms), translate, display, add value, and create derivative works (including products and services), for all lawful commercial and non-commercial purposes, and for the duration of existence of such rights over the data or information.
- This picture is shared in digital form by an official account of the Government of India, therefore i see no problem with it being on commons under this license Mujinga (talk) 19:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Two weeks on, can this be closed? Mujinga (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Mujinga: yes, alright. I'm not entirely happy with this, as it doesn't seem completely unambiguous, but if the community has decided it's OK then so be it! Amakuru (talk) 11:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: The contents of this site may not be reproduced partially or fully, without due permission from The President of India. See Yann (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is the President above the law? Surely we comply with the law. There are a million examples of where someone says that they claim a copyright... but Wiki has always gone with the law. The proposer if you look above was arguing that the photo was not taken by the President, or that some minion was interpreting his wishes .... seems that the rationale changes and we are to assume (today) that the President does have authority and some minion has not interfered. I continue to argue that the law is the key issue here. The license is not revokable whoever you are. Victuallers (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. Dwinug (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%90%D0%B2%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%90%D0%B2%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a derivative work of a 3D object that is uploaded from Internet with no photographer's permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The Arm & Hammer is not a free logo. The picture on the bottle is not a drawing made of simple geometric forms.
Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:Packaging. --Ellywa (talk) 22:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Source shows no free licence. Google Images suggests that it might be a government work but going by Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Dominican Republic there does not seem to be an automatic exemption from copyright for government works. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
While the original file may fall under COM:DEMINIMIS, here the crest could be copyrighted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Also it is not fulfill Commons:FOP UK. SCP-2000 14:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. A de minimis template added on File:Aldershot Military Rugby Stadium.jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 22:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Herb miasta Chełmna jest tu nieprawidłowy. Na wykorzystanie herbu miasta wymagana jest zgoda właściciela tj. Gminy Miasto Chełmno/ Urząd Miasta Chełmna 2A01:117F:42B:D200:28F7:C3F4:CF62:9CB0 18:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: In use on many pages, see also File:Cherb miasta Chełmna na budynku siedziby władz miasta. - panoramio.jpg for ref. --Achim55 (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Ad1. Jest prawidłowy (patrz załącznik nr 2 z Statutu). Ad2. Natomiast urzędowe symbole nie stanowią przedmiotu prawa autorskiego (art. 4 pkt 2 prawa autorskiego). Użycie herbu w sytuacjach, w których służy do oznaczania spraw związanych z gminą/miastem jest zgodne z prawem i gmina nie ma tu nic do gadania. Malarz pl (talk) 07:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:INUSE and {{Polishsymbol}}. SCP-2000 14:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. The image is correctly licenced with {{Polishsymbol}}. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Dino Adventures Auftritt in Luxembourg (Foto von Judith Langenberger 15.08.2019 Luxemburg.jpg
[edit]
Most likely a copyrighted design in a country without freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Luxembourg. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
file in copyviol, no indication in the original source about a free or under CC licence release — danyele 23:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 22:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
no indication of CC license at source Landroving Linguist (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
no CC license is given with that picture - copyright violation Landroving Linguist (talk) 23:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. COM:TOO Andorra does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creativity of the designer and it is therefore copyrighted. The image has to be deleted as a consequence. --Ellywa (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Verbcatcher as Logo (above threshold of originality). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete (as the tagger). This is the logo of the Kenyan TV station K24 TV, so we should apply Kenyan copyright rules. Commons:Kenya does not give any guidance on the applicable threshold of originality. In the absence of country-specific guidance we should apply the UK threshold, for two reasons: the UK is the former colonial power so it is probable that Kenyan law is based on UK law, and the precautionary principle should make us assume a very low threshold, such as that applicable in the UK. This logo would be too complex to be public domain in the UK, see COM:TOO UK. Its complexity is similar to w:en:File:Clerical Medical logo.svg, w:en:File:ITV logo 2019.svg and w:en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg, which have all been assessed as eligible for UK copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per Verbcatcher. --Ellywa (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
at the bottom of all the pages is ©, and there is no mention of the CC BY-SA 3.0 license anywhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilnur efende (talk • contribs) 09:32, 13. Jun. 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
