Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/05/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Recently uploaded PNG. Redundant to File:Google 2015 logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Duckduckgo Bharat Asia (talk) 00:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Go duck go. Stinking puppet. KEEP 186.174.215.82 02:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin closure) - no valid reason for deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Žádost nahrávajícího uživatele. Hrejzadarmo (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:31, 2 May 2022 UTC: Žádost nahrávajícího uživatele. --Krdbot 01:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect geometry of the ethynyl group. Leyo 08:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep: I agree that the geometry was incorrect, but since the image is in use, I uploaded a corrected version. Innerstream (talk) 23:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Leyo 09:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 15:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
i want to delete this picture Hirakel (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: a week ago. --Achim55 (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Il s'agit de ma fille mineure et je n'est pas donné mon autorisation pour publier ces photos 80.12.102.169 08:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 06:28, 4 May 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 14:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Juliegwen (talk) 10:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Notafish at 13:20, 4 May 2022 UTC: black square --Krdbot 20:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Juliegwen (talk) 10:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Notafish at 13:21, 4 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing https://tineye.com/search/fca0415cdc5a9b8a92f41fa3c1b7adbbd2fa9173?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 --Krdbot 20:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Whch11
[edit]- File:Brawlstarsball.png
- File:Brawlstarse.png
- File:Brawlstarsx2point.png
- File:Brawlstarspoint.png
- File:Brawlstarsstarspoint.png
- File:Brawlstarsgems.png
- File:Brawlstarsmoney.png
Discovered when cleaning fancruft on zh:荒野亂鬥. These images are game assets, obviously {{No permission}}. --MilkyDefer 09:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Highly unlikely to be own work, as copyright of the military portraits belong to the People’s Liberation Army/Ministry of Defense of China. 171.49.196.232 10:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 12:37, 5 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): small photo without camera data --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Highly unlikely to be own work, as copyright of Chinese military portraits belong to the People’s Liberation Army/Ministry of Defense of China. 171.49.196.232 10:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 12:37, 5 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution --Krdbot 19:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Likely to be conventionally copyright ("all rights reserved"). The uploader is candid about its source; the problem is that this page says nothing about copyleft or similar. The terms 'n' conditions of the website don't either. (I can't immediately find a website for the photographer, who must surely be this person.) Hoary (talk) 22:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- The subject contacted the publisher CityBeat (Cincinnati) to ask the protocol for permission to use the image. The publisher contacted photographer Hailey Bollinger who has granted permission. I then inserted info into Wikimedia Commons. If this is incorrect, I can have Ms. Bollinger submit the Wikimedia Commons permission. Please advise. AvonMooch (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:David J. Brown.jpg” under ticket:2022050510009477. --Jarekt (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: got valid permission from the photographer. --Jarekt (talk) 11:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Highly unlikely to be own work, as copyright of Chinese military portraits belong to the People’s Liberation Army/Ministry of Defense of China. 171.49.196.232 10:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by CptViraj at 03:25, 8 May 2022 UTC: G2: Broken redirect --Krdbot 07:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned, low quality, very large atom labels vs. short bonds. Leyo 08:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 06:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Photolysis of p-aminobenzoic acid UV filter in water.jpg. Leyo 08:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I have created File:Photolysis of p-aminobenzoic acid UV filter.svg as a higher quality replacement. Innerstream (talk) 14:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There's a high-quality SVG version available. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for creating the higher quality replacement. Hence, delete both JPG versions. --Leyo 07:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 06:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Photolysis of Benzophenone-3 in presence of Benzotriazole.jpg. Leyo 08:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both jpg versions. I have uploaded File:Photolysis of Benzophenone-3.svg as a higher quality replacement for both. Innerstream (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both low-quality JPG files as we now have a high-quality SVG version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 06:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The stereochemistry of the epoxide stereocenters is not correct based on CAS# 20554-84-1. Also, there is inappropriate used of a wedged bond at the top. File:Parthenolide.svg and File:Parthenolide correct stereochemistry.svg are correct options. Innerstream (talk) 00:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (see CAS Common Chemistry). --Leyo 07:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 08:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I agree. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coprophilia
[edit]I do not believe this file to have any realistic educational use nor scientific purpose. Trade (talk) 22:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: You forgot one picture --Trade (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sophos.bel (talk · contribs)
[edit]GoogleMaps CopyVio. (https://www.google.com/maps/@0.1114652,-50.670101,155452m/data=!3m1!1e3)
- File:Ilha do Marajó2.jpg
- File:Delta do Amazonas 2.jpg
- File:Rio Pará 2.jpg
- File:Baía do Marajó.jpg
- File:Rio Pará - Mapa de Recursos Hídricos do Brasil.jpg
- File:Delta do Amazonas.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sophos.bel (talk · contribs)
[edit]CopyVio of GoogleMaps or GoogleEarth
- File:Ilha do Marajó - cidades e rios2.jpg
- File:Ilha do Marajó - cidades e rios.jpg
- File:Marajo island - rivers and cities.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio. Enyavar (talk) 23:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
previously published on Facebook, see here: https://www.facebook.com/1685888151644145/photos/pb.100063596085552.-2207520000../2487575214808764/?type=3 Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
La madre de todos los F10 y F1 191.126.129.50 18:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: personal artwork. MKFI (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. And COM:DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
ВП:КОПИВИО Daemon2010 (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE image of a non-notable individual (ro:Bujgoi Ionut Catalin) Gikü (talk) 20:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
The file is a duplicate (However not exact duplicate) of File:15963559906308928025319946256864.jpg.jpg and is just out of focus and slightly tilted, providing no benefit to the other version. Terasail[✉️] 22:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: both. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use in multiple projects, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kskhh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: As an original uploader of this file, I want this file to be deleted. I have uploaded a better version here: file:Gilgit Baltistan Traditional Hat.jpg. Kskhh (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC). The file is not used anymore and replacement file is uploaded. But in my opinion the nominated file is better than proposed replacement, so discussion is allowed. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No evident reason for deletion; nothing wrong with having more than one image of a type of traditional cultural dress. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, As the original uploader of the file, I request it to be deleted. I have some personal reasons regarding it. I would be very thankful. --Kskhh (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
![51 File:Accel Byzantine Pose "To You".jpg](#File:Accel_Byzantine_Pose_"To_You".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_P6M_Seamaster_Conversion.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
As the original author of this file I want this image to be deleted. As I requested this file to be deleted a month ago and but it was kept. Kindly delete the file as I have some personal reasons regarding it and I don't want any more discussion portal. I would be obliged. As a replacement I have uploaded a clear and better image File:Gilgit Baltistan Traditional Hat.jpg. Kskhh (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please explain what has changed since the previous deletion listing was closed a few days ago, or if you have additional reasons for deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- The man in the picture is my friend. He asked me to remove the previous picture and upload a new one. I uploaded a better version. That is the reason I wanted the old picture to be removed citing I had personal reasons but no one understood. Again as the original uploader of the file I want the image to be deleted. Please give attention to my request. Thank You Kskhh (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept. No new arguments, nothing wrong with current file. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Its been more than 2 months since I started the deletion request for this file which I created. Why the file is not being deleted? I'm the original uploader of the file. Do I not have rights of the file? I already posted the reason of deletion and still the file is there. I request again that the file be deleted. --Kskhh (talk) 14:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment According to the irrevocable CC-by-sa-4.0 license which you authorized for your photo, you have rights to attribution. Others may copy and reuse, as long as they comply with attribution to you in accordance with the license. Listing it repeatedly, until 2 days ago without giving explanation, might have been considered more an annoyance to others in Commons than a reason for deletion. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
unused fayl Sortilegus (talk) 23:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep unused ist not a valid reason for a deletion. The majority of images on Commons is unused on other projects. The File should be renamed to: File:Müqtədir location map.png ;) --Wikijunkie (talk) 02:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep For the closing admin I contest all the 8 May nominations. Details at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goygol in Azerbaijan (semi-secession).svg. Multichill (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 19:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The coat of arms has copyrighted. Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 02:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Considering this user's history of erroneous deletion requests. Fry1989 eh? 14:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- User:Ceahjlazco1882's comment is extremely simplistic, and does not provide adequate details. Keep unless such details are provided. AnonMoos (talk) 22:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ceahjlazco1882 (talk) 03:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Used for promo on wikidata --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Goodbye africa flag map Cookie030307 (talk) 04:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see any reason to delte that file. --Sanandros (talk) 19:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Aus dem Netz kopiertes urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk. Keine Freigabe durch Fotografin Jbergner (talk) 07:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Screencap of copyrighted animation. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
![07:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/05/02#c-MKFI-2022-05-02T07:06:00.000Z-File:Accel_Byzantine_Pose_"To_You".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
![19:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/05/02#c-Sanandros-2022-05-19T19:21:00.000Z-File:Accel_Byzantine_Pose_"To_You".jpg){kind=link}
Suspicous own work claim. Claimed april 2022, but image has been previously published in 2021: https://www.essentialeducationguide.com/news-and-features/Kampar-A-Central-Education-Hub. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
I will not use it João546 (talk) 14:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Bueno, pero otros pueden usarlo. Keep — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.129.50 (talk) 19:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Translation of File:Status iucn3.1.svg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Likley copyright violation. The image is blocky and appears to have been resized / compressed before being uploaded. This would indicate that this image has been copied from somewhere else rather than being the users own image. Their claim that it is their own work from 16 October 2020, 18:58:31 is unlikley since the person portrayed died in 1990. Terasail[✉️] 22:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope for WLE //LevandeMänniska (talk), 08:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Well known cat: https://tineye.com/search/3fc9af0beb8c27fc68421b5704872eca2bc141f0?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BirolYapım (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Detaytarayıcı.jpg
- File:BEDLEX.png
- File:BedleX 2020.png
- File:BDX inc.png
- File:BDX inc bedlex.png
- File:Bxare Studio.png
- File:Birol Yapım.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BirolYapım (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Not used.
- File:BedleX Arama motoru.png
- File:Birol Akpan.jpg
- File:Birol Yapım.jpg
- File:Birol Yapım YouTube kanalı.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RCamarena3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Richi Camarena singing.png
- File:Alone - Richi Camarena.jpg
- File:Bonnie & Clyde.png
- File:You'll Always Be.png
- File:Richi Camarena.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm uploading this media because is needed for the creation of a new article of an artist. RCamarena3 (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yanbei art (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Yanbei Art work 16.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 15.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 14.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 13.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 12.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 11.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 9.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 8.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 7.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 4.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 6.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 5.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 2.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 3.jpg
- File:Yanbei Art work 1.jpg
- File:Yanbei Portrait.jpg
RZuo (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nene Cynthia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Strange resolution, strange EXIF, small filesize, strong artefacts, watermarks in images, marked OWN, probably COPYVIO
- File:Nwaanyị a na-agba nkwụ ya na nne ya.jpg
- File:Agbamunkwụ.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na-apụta n'ọgbọ ịchọ di ya.jpg
- File:Nna nwaanyị a na-agba nkwụ ya na-agọzi nwa ya na di ya.jpg
- File:Ụmụ Ada yi ejiji ndị Igbo.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na-achọ di ya ka o bunye ya mmanya.jpg
- File:Ndị ashebi na onye na-agba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na ndị ashebi ya na-apụta n'ọgbọ.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na-agba egwú n'ọgbọ.jpg
- File:Ịgba nkwụ nwaanyị na steeti Anambra.jpg
- File:Ndị ashebi na nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị a na-achọ ịgba nkwụ ya.jpg
- File:Ndị na-agba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Di na Nwunye na-agba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị a na-alu ọhụụ ibunye di ya mmanya.jpg
- File:Emume ịgba nkwụ nwaanyị.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na ndị ashebi ya na-agba egwú mpụta ya.jpg
- File:Di na Nwunye gbara nkwụ.jpg
- File:Foto nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na ndị ashebi ya.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na onyinye dị iche iche e nyere ya.jpg
- File:Onye ashebi.jpg
- File:Ndị ashebi.jpg
- File:Ejiji ndị Ada Eze.jpg
- File:Ejiji Ada Eze.jpg
- File:Emume ịgba nkwụ nwaanyị.png
- File:Ejiji nwa Eze.jpg
- File:Ejiji ndị Igwe.jpg
- File:Foto a na-egosi ebe nna nwaanyị a na-alụ ọhụụ na-agọzi nwa ya nwaanyị na di ya.jpg
- File:Foto nwaanyị a lụrụ ọhụụ na di ya.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị ashebi.jpg
- File:Ịgba nkwụ nwaanyị n'obodo Anambra Steeti.jpg
- File:Foto nwaanyị na-achọ ịgba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Traditional marriage.jpg
- File:Emume ọgbakọ ụmụ nwaanyị (August meeting) n'obodo Amaokwe Item.jpg
- File:Emume mmanwu n'obodo Alayi.jpg
- File:Nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na ndị ashebi ya.jpg
- File:Ejiji ndị igbo( nke ụmụ nwaanyị).jpg
- File:Ndi a gbara nkwụ na ndị ashebi ha.jpg
- File:Mgbe ndị ashebi na-akpọpụta nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Mgbe nwaanyị na-agba nkwụ na-eje ibunye di ya mmanya.jpg
- File:Ejiji ndị Adaeze.jpg
- File:Ejiji ndị Igbo.jpg
- File:Ndị egwu na ngalaba Africa na Asian studies dị n'UNIZIK.jpg
- File:Emume ndị Eze nke otu dibịa ama ama nọnyere ha ụbọchị ahụ.jpg
- File:Emume mmanwu.jpg
- File:Foto ndị na-agba nkwụ.jpg
- File:Emume iri ji ọhụụ n'UNIZIK.jpg
- File:Ndị Igwe,Lolo,Ada, na Onuowu na mmemme iri ji ọhụụ n'UNIZIK.jpg
- File:Ndị Ìgwè,Onuowu na Dibịa ndị Nnamdi Azikiwe University.jpg
- File:Igwe,Lolo na ndị Ada n'UNIZIK.jpg
- File:Item Masquerade ceremony.jpg
- File:Ejiji ndị Lolo.jpg
- File:Igbo traditional masquerade.jpg
- File:Igbo traditional wedding.jpg
- File:Igbo Cultural dress.jpg
- File:Ibunye mmanya.jpg
- File:Igbo Traditional wedding.jpg
- File:The decoration of the traditional wedding place.jpg
- File:Igbo traditional wedding ceremony.jpg
- File:Igbo Traditional dancers.jpg
- File:Amaokwu Item Masquerade.png
- File:Ịgba nkwụ nwaanyị.jpg
_n%27obodo_Amaokwe_Item.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
C.Suthorn (talk) 15:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I am the uploader and I did not realize my metadata had my personal details, I need it deleted please. Beltanemoon (talk) 18:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leandro Mashendo Music (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Albun Musical leandro mashendo.png
- File:Album Leandro Mashendo Music.png
- File:Sello Musical Leandro Mashendo.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 22:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hadi emami 75325 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contribs to wm projects.
- File:Hadi motamedin emami.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی هنرمند سینمایی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 09:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hadi emami 75325 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal pictures
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی مجری برنامه زنده.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی با پرچم امریکا.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی مجری برنامه تلویزیونی.jpg
- File:دی وی دی فیلم نفسهای آخر به کارگردانی هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:فیلم نفسهای آخر به کارگردانی ونویسندگی هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی پرچم امریکا را بر صورت خود نقاشی کرد.jpg
- File:تصویر هادی معتمدین امامی با شهروند های امریکایی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی گفته.jpg
- File:فیلم نفسهای اخربه کارگردانی وتصویربرداری هادی معتمدین امامی در نقش مایکل جردن ایفای نقش کرد.png
- File:عکس سلفی کارگردان سینما هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی یک هنرمند با تجربه هست.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی تصویربردار وکارگردان نفسهای آخر.jpg
- File:مدیر فیلم برداری فیلم نفسهای آخر هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی یک کارگردان وتصویربردار.jpg
- File:تصویربردار هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:شبکه اصفهان با حضور هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی یک هنرمندی که عاشق شهادت است.jpg
- File:شبکه تلویزیونی استانی با حضور هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:شبکه اصفهان زنده رود.png
- File:حضور هادی معتمدین امامی در یک شبکه استانی.jpg
- File:حضور هنرمند سینمایی در یک برنامه تلویزیونی وزنده.jpg
- File:کاریکاتور هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:بازیگر هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی یم عکس یادگاری در تلویزیون.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی یک هنرمند فعال سینمایی.jpg
- File:هنرمندی که همچون ستاره ای درخشید.jpg
- File:هنرمند سینمایی که مجری توانمندی هم هست.jpg
- File:حضور هادی معتمدین امامی در یک شبکه.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی در برنامه زنده.jpg
- File:یوسف هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. Files are outside of COM:SCOPE; personal files of a non-contributor. Marbletan (talk) 13:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hadi emami 75325 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. This user seems to be using commons as a host for their personal pictures
- File:عکس سلفی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:فیلم من یک قهرمانم با اجرای هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:برنامه زنده تلویزیونی با حضور هنرمند سینمایی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:هنرمند سینمایی هادی معتمدین امامی در برنامه زنده رود.jpg
- File:تصویربردار وکارگردان فیلم نفسهای آخر هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:عکس زیبای هادی معتمدین امامی لقب به یوزارسیف.jpg
- File:برنامه زنده رود با حضور هنرمند ستاره سینما هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:ستاره ای که میدرخشد.png
- File:پشت صحنه فیلمبرداری.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی کیست.jpg
- File:پشت صحنه نفسها ی آخر به کارگردانی وتصویربرداری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مدیر فیلمبرداری هادی معتمدین امامی یک کارگردان وتصویربردار حرفه ای وکاربلد سینما.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی در فکر ساختن فیلم.png
- File:یک فیلمبردار سینمایی و یک کارگردان با تجربه همچون هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:فیلم بردار فیلم نفسهای آخر هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:فیلم بردار سینما هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:پذیرایی از هنرمند سینمایی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:پشت صحنه فیلمبرداری با حضور هنرمند پر طرفدار سینمایی.jpg
- File:عکس هادی معتمدین امامی در ارگان های دولتی.jpg
- File:در سازمان دولتی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی در نقش مجری مایکل جردن.jpg
- File:هادی معتمخدین امامی یک فیلم بردار حرفه ای و با تجربه وکاربلد سینما هست.jpg
- File:تصویر کودکی و بزرگی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:تصویربردار حرفه ای هادی معتمدین امامی در فیلم نفسهای آخر.jpg
- File:ادیتور حرفه ای هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مجری خبری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:کاریکاتور هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:ارتش امریکا وایران.jpg
- File:هنرمند سینمایی در ارتش امریکا.png
- File:عکس بزرگی هنرمند سینمایی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:عکس کودکی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:عکس نوزادی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:تصویربردار نفسهای آخر هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:Spider man.jpg
- File:فیلم سه تیغ جهنمی.jpg
- File:شهیدان زنده اند.jpg
- File:هنرمندان هالیوودی.png
- File:گالری.jpg
- File:گالری عکس کودکی تا بزرگی هنرمند هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:برای تماشای فیلم همه سکوت کنید.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی در نقش اسپایدر من.png
- File:گالری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:سینما را باید دید.png
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی یک کارگردان حرفه ای سینمایی.png
- File:تدوینگر و تصویربردار هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:تار مرد عنکبوتی هادی معتمدین امامی در این نقش ایفا کرد.png
- File:عکس سلفی از بازیگر هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:کارگردان میگوید حرکت.png
- File:ادیتور حرفه ای هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:کارگردان ونویسنده سینما هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:نویسنده وکارگردان هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:بازیگر هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:هنرمند سینمایی هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:کارگردان هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:بازیگر سینما هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:ACTOR HADI EMAMI.png
- File:Michael Jordan OR HADI MOTAMEDIN EMMAI PC.png
- File:مدیر فیلمبرداری فیلم نفسهای اخر.png
- File:Michael Jordan OR HADI EMAMI ACTOR.png
- File:عکس هنری هادی امامی.png
- File:Michael Jordan OR HADI MOTAMEDIN EMAMI.png
- File:یک قهرمان.png
- File:عکس هادی امامی.png
- File:سینما بهترین برای کسانی که سینما را دوست دارند.png
- File:همیشه باید گزارش درست را به مردم باید ابلاغ رسانی کرد.png
- File:LIKE USA EMAMI TV COVID.png
- File:تی وی امامی.png
- File:من یک مجزی خبری هستم.png
- File:مجزی توانمند شبکه سی ان ان.png
- File:نفسهای آخر هادی معتمدین امامی.png
- File:تلویزیون برنامه ی سی ان ان.png
- File:Tv usa cnn actor emami.png
- File:Tv usa hadimotamedinemami.png
- File:TV CNN 1.png
- File:همه باید به سینما احترام بزاریم.jpg
- File:جلوه ویژه کامپیوتری چیست.jpg
- File:مرد عنکبوتی یا شخصیت قهرمان هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مجری شبکه تلویزیونی.jpg
- File:جلوه های ویژه در پرده کروماکی.jpg
- File:مدیر فیلمبرداری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:سینما واقعاعشق است.jpg
- File:سینما اگر پیشرفت کند.jpg
- File:سینما با واقعیت خیلی فرق دارد.jpg
- File:تصویربردار حرفه ای هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:اگر سینما را دوست دارید پس باید حمایت کرد.jpg
- File:حمله هواپیما های جنگنده به ویروس هادی معتمدین امامی در نقش یک سرباز فداکار.jpg
- File:هادی امامی به یک شخصیت هالیوودی تبدیل شد در فیلم نفسهای اخر.jpg
- File:بازیگر هالیوودی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مجری بی نظیرهادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مرد عنکبو.تی هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:آخرالزمان.jpg
- File:زامبی.jpg
- File:فیلم بردار هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:نفسهای آخر.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:هادی معتمدین.jpg
- File:Hadi emami.jpg
- File:هادی امامی.jpg
- File:Hadimotamedinemami.jpg
- File:Hadi motamedin emami.jpg
- File:Hadiemami.png
- File:Hadiemami.jpg
- File:Hadi emami.png
- File:بهترین برنامه ماه مبارک رمضان روبه افق ومجری این برنامه هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:روبه افق در ماه مبارک رمضان و عید فطر در خدمت شما بینندگان عزیز هستیم.jpg
- File:برنامه روبه افق مجری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:بهترین برنامه ماه مبارک رمضان روبه افق مجری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:برنامه پس از زندگی مجری هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مجری برنامه ماه مبارک رمضان.jpg
- File:مجری روبه افق هادی معتمدین امامی.jpg
- File:مجری شبکه روبه افق.jpg
- File:مجری برنامه تلویزیونی شبکه روبه افق.jpg
- File:مجری برنامه ماه عسل.jpg
- File:مجری تلویزیونی روبه افق.jpg
- File:مجری برنامه ماه رمضان.jpg
- File:مجری برنامه روبه افق.jpg
- File:مجری روبه افق.jpg
- File:مجری.jpg
- File:روبه افق.jpg
- File:Hadi EMAMI.png
- File:Hadi Motamedin Emami, writer and director.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. Files are outside of COM:SCOPE; personal files of a non-contributor. Marbletan (talk) 13:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- I added two more files uploaded by Hadiemami1404 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , an obvious sock of Hadi emami 75325. Marbletan (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. Just found a image of this guy on the Latest files. Someone please stop him. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- FatimaEmami1402 just uploaded File:هادی امامی هنرمند سینمایی.jpg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alex Kwakye Aboagye (talk · contribs)
[edit]com:out of scope low quality images.
RZuo (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Om Bansur Classes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
- File:बानसूर.jpg
- File:Om Bansur.png
- File:Om Bansur Classes.jpg
- File:ओम बानसूर क्लासेज.jpg
- File:Om Bansur Classes.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
informations de copyright dans les metadonnées du fichier. L'auteur de la photo n'est pas le contributeur, détenteur du compte commons. gpesenti (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC) It exist copyright information on file metadata. The photo author is not the contributor, owner of the commons account. --~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpesenti (talk • contribs) 15:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
4 KB porno robado de alguna parte 191.126.129.50 19:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Junto con el File:Lund the sex organ.jpg, las únicas "contribuciones" de un bonafide usuario — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.129.50 (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as no educational value. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 13:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Asikul Islam Mizan known as a Bangladeshi musician, music composer and artist. He was born on 22 December 2002 in Dhaka, Bangladesh. 191.126.129.50 18:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: the nom is nonsense, but this was uploaded by a self-promoting user. Out of scope. --✗plicit 02:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
MD Mizanur Rahman Mia Known as a Musical Artist who has made a big name in the digital marketing world. 191.126.129.50 18:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: the nom is nonsense, but this was uploaded by a self-promoting user. Out of scope. --✗plicit 02:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Same as File:MD Mizanur Rahman Mia.jpg 191.126.129.50 18:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: the nom is nonsense, but this was uploaded by a self-promoting user. Out of scope. --✗plicit 02:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
More O'Dea files found from NLI - May 2022
[edit]- File:"S. Silk builder, decorator yard, Co. Dublin" - is actually Woking in the UK (22816516010).jpg
- File:A soft day thank God - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:An apple a day... (6154913219).jpg
- File:Cooling down the midlands (49131560981).jpg
- File:Culchies on track for... - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:December 1, 1963 - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:December 5, 1961 - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:General Motors diesel locomotive on trial at Nesbitt Junction, near Enfield in Meath February 24, 1961 (6925304409).jpg
- File:Gleeson O'Dea & Co. Ltd. No. 21-22, Christchurch Place, Dublin City, Co. Dublin. (27648328816).jpg
- File:Great Squishing Drama of 1959 (8469505943).jpg
- File:Guinness Barge (7446316960).jpg
- File:Hodson Bay Hotel, Athlone, Co. Westmeath (24461287479).jpg
- File:I didn't know O'Sullivan was in gaol(?) (24431292544).jpg
- File:I see the train a coming, a coming down the line... (17256090891).jpg
- File:Instruments at Clonsilla, Co. Dublin... (9671507516).jpg
- File:Irish Railways (6683314633).jpg
- File:Mail passing, Rathduff, Co. Cork (49546741301).jpg
- File:Mallow North (6851082239).jpg
- File:March 23, 1963 - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:P. McCormick (6898552460).jpg
- File:Phil Lyons (6880199411).jpg
- File:Queen Street, Dublin City, Co. Dublin. - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:Rev. Frank Skuse, Kilnagross Rectory, Clonakilty - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:Rush & Lusk accident, Rush & Lusk, County Dublin (28217265276).jpg
- File:Sidings at Maynooth? No - its Cork! (8344499413).jpg
- File:Signalman (6781681537).jpg
- File:South Crossover (6785061870).jpg
- File:Station, Porthall, Co. Donegal. - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:The Ford 100E 107E 300E Anglia Popular Prefect Escort Squire Tha (7118003345).jpg
- File:The Signal Cabins innards - Flickr - National Library of Ireland on The Commons.jpg
- File:This is an Offal Photograph... (6984956846).jpg
- File:Trim Castle, Trim, Co. Meath (49097589982).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(24431292544).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with NLI Ref.: ODEA O'Dea images via the NLI should not remain on commons unless copyright ownership by NLI or permissions from O'Dea heir(s) can be established. I only just picked this up in the last couple of days due to spotting an image on a article I had been working on; and I apologise for missing this in 2019. Should be set for undeletion in 2063. I would be as happy as anyone if this deletion nomination can be rescinded at some point and I may explore if the opportunity arises if that is possible. Thankyou. --Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I guess I'm missing the point. I looked at five O'Dea photographs. The original source (this example) mentions Reproduction rights owned by National Library of Ireland. I take that as a statement that the NLI is having copyright of the O'Dea photos. If then the NLI decides to publish these photos on Flickr (same example, on Flickr) with the tag No known copyright restrictions, and NLI is listed in this category of institutions declaring their photographs "free of copyright restrictions", I suppose these photographs are welcome to be hosted on Commons? Vysotsky (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) + no clue about who this is and why photos of her should be in Commons
JopkeB (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The channel, i just found out this is not free license so better to not keep it NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 09:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of permission for this image on clothing, which is a central, highly visible, prominent and important part of the image. As made clear by use of this file (to discuss and illustrate image on clothing) it is not some accidental appearance, and does not qualify as COM:DM In addition, flickr account is quite dubious and not really trustworthy. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I think the t-shirt is "de minimis" because the title of the image suggests that the focus is on the person's gesture (ahegao) and not on his clothing. De728631 (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Then cropping this image should work fine, right (I am not planning to do this, as I do not want to have THAT in my upload list)? But then for example use at Enwiki should be removed as it is specifically about clothing Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- You may crop it and upload that as a new version, but I don't think the file needs to be overwritten. De728631 (talk) 14:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- If there is consensus, however, that this is not de minimis, I still think we can keep the image by blurring the t-shirt. This method was suggested by Jmabel in another context, and here it would enable us to preserve the guy gesturing while eliminating the derivative image of the artwork. De728631 (talk) 14:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I agree that image with blurred tshirt would be no longer problematic as far as copyright goes Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Then cropping this image should work fine, right (I am not planning to do this, as I do not want to have THAT in my upload list)? But then for example use at Enwiki should be removed as it is specifically about clothing Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It’s a T-shirt, obviously de minimis because the guy is the subject and his clothing is just in the image with him. Use has nothing to do we de minimis status. Cropping or blurring would disrupt the overall image and is unnecessary. Dronebogus (talk) 02:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Person died in 2015, can not be own work of 2022 Drakosh (talk) 11:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-scope Pierre cb (talk) 11:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use at pt.wikinews. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
i guess this is some sort of joke 🤷 Loominade (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
cropped the watermark. I am the author. I did not give permission. 87.97.95.155 13:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, no permission from the author. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because the author wants it to be deleted. Thank you Vidna (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: painting of a non-notable author, out of the scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unreadably blurred map Enyavar (talk) 14:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo of non-contributor. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Désolé mais cette image n’est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Mbernardin (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo of non-contributor. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Désolé mais cette image n’est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Mbernardin (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal picture of an unknown person. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Désolé mais cette image n’est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Mbernardin (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal picture of an unknown person. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal picture of an unknown person. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Not public domain. Appears to have been copied from: https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty-and-research/accounting/faculty PianoDan (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Badly blurred, no realistic use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 16:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't get that argument, I'd vote fro keep.--Sanandros (talk) 19:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: doubtful own work, another version of the same image is used in the person's Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=303522445106265&set=a.303522428439600. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright ©, Hugo Treffneri Gümnaasium 2022 191.126.129.50 18:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no indication of free license at the source website. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
This is not Rosa Luxemburg. Unused art of non-notable artist, out of scope. Uploader is indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 01:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
not educational purposes Encik Tekateki (talk) 04:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not likely own work with that "EXIF not found" text in the middle of image. Velma (talk) 08:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted Yandex maps https://yandex.ru/maps/237/novokuznetsk/?ll=87.164300%2C53.771157&z=13.41 Svetlov Artem (talk) 08:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution among copyright violations. I suspect again copyvio. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
low res duplicate of File:Turkmenistan-2019-US-Dept-State-map.jpg Enyavar (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arefinshawon (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permission, taken from facebook
Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
duplicate, unfinished version of File:The Berber language as spoken in North Africa.png Enyavar (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
duplicate, unfinished version of File:The Berber language as spoken in North Africa.png Enyavar (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 10:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 10:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete: copyvio (https://goo.gl/maps/duMwRxujb2kda2pC9). --HyperGaruda (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)- Delete Sure. --Orijentolog (talk) 08:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
User history and small size Rohalamin (talk) 10:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Art Hekayat 2.png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Also: File:Greg Maluma 2021(1).jpg EXIF credits " ARTFISO" as author in both cases. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of computer game, missing permission, needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Screenshot is made by the owner of the computer game - Latvian National Library Foundation LNB Atbalsta biedrība (talk) 14:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, copyrighted. Kadı Message 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Source Sukhram Rathva Twitter 191.126.53.91 14:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete CSD F1 - copied from https://twitter.com/SukhramRathava -- DaxServer (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tulika and Satvik (talk · contribs)
[edit]GoogleMaps CopyVio
- File:Kalachuris of Mahishmati.png
- File:Territory of the Kalachuris of Mahishmati.png
- File:Possible extent of territory of Panduvamshis under Maha-Shivagupta Balarjuna.png
- File:Vishnukundina Empire map.png
- File:Aulikara Empire map.png
Enyavar (talk) 14:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
possibly out of scope: Geomarketing map without explanation, unused. Enyavar (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted cartoon charakter Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Scope . 191.126.129.50 19:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
"English: This is human sex organ. Penis is most important part." Que valor educativo, no? Black or white, pene es pene y tenemos muchos. El usuario no esta aqui para contribuir. COM:PENIS 191.126.129.50 19:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Ver también: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cum girl pics.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.129.50 (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Explicit. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Per EXIF, copyright holder is 'CRISTIAN VASILE IGU.RO'. There is no proof of permission from that person. Gikü (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Per EXIF, author is 'FOTO CATALIN EREMIA 0744842022'. There is no proof of permission. Gikü (talk) 20:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Pure vandalism – see ro:Dracu' din Taine Gikü (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Sustituido por imagen svg Daniqui04 (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion.--GerritR (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
The license for the signature is only fair use in US, not UK so it should be removed from wiki commons 350z33 (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment To expand on nom: the UK considers someone's signature "an artistic work"; this applies not to signatures individually made in the UK, but to signatures of British people as their original artistic work. Clarifying this so there are no arguments about the svg file being based on a signature made in Czechia. Debating if Raducanu is British or Canadian for this purpose, well, might have merit, but the source is also pretty British patriotic. Kingsif (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ruthven. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). The third one (logo) probably is copyright violation (is the logo of Google News, see for instance https://sites.google.com/site/dailynews4nl/).
- File:Bangladeshi unique-dancer vida sinha setu.jpg
- File:Bd likee star prince mamun and bd unique dancer vida sinha setu.jpg
- File:Ricky859.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 03:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
El 2008?! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.129.50 (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Useless poor quality picture Finncle (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep good enaugh quality.--Sanandros (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
useless picture Finncle (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
not a good image Finncle (talk) 15:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
bad quality Finncle (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 16:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
clearly a copyviol (production still) — danyele 16:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
not a good image Finncle (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted cartoon charakter Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted cartoon charakter Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Minorax. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan. I.e. we cannot host this photo of an original mural which is copyrightable and non-free. De728631 (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Needs commercial license permission from the muralists as Azerbaijan does not allow commercial exploitations of works in public spaces by living or recently deceased artists. So Azerbaijani public artistic works of such artists are off limits here without COM:VRTS permissions from them. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ВП:КОПИВИО https://twitter.com/yoshkinkrot/status/1500222746625728513 Daemon2010 (talk) 19:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
ВП:КОПИВИО https://war.segodnya.ua/war/vtorzhenie/voyna-v-tylu-vraga-ili-provokaciya-kremlya-kto-stoit-za-vzryvami-v-rossii-1617846.html Daemon2010 (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Aleksandra Ptčar.png|user=Smooth O
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the nominated image seems to be a screenshot from smartphone, i.e. it might be a copyvio.-- Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with File:Aleksandra Ptčar.png, which is just a crop from the above mentioned file. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Forgot to crop out my name! Mooonswimmer (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; crop can be uploaded to replace this. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Khuong Huu Long died in 1983, so the original photo must be made before 2005. Licence status unclear. GeorgHH • talk 21:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=766600857#File:Dr_Khuong_Huu_Long_Health_Minister.jpg){kind=link}
No es correcto Dave Ramz (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Footage copyrighted by Warner Bros Inc (1) --Bacromisee (talk) 16:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted asset of TransformCo, inaccurate to official imagery. TAC PlazaMaster (talk) 03:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, this is textlogo and ineligible for copyright. And the file cannot be deleted due to inaccuracy, because it is used and even in multiple projects. That case does not matter, is the file accurate or not. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Ne ho caricato una copia in più alta risoluzione grafica Ivan Mosso (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC) Ivan Mosso (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Callate, callate, callate que me desespero! Cuantas veces proponer la misma ficha? Basta ya... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.53.91 (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, I did not find better version. Current files is in public domain, its copyright is expired. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Ne ho caricato un'immagine più completa sotto gli aspetti visivi e descrittivi di questa Ivan Mosso (talk) 03:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. No evidence of such a replacement upload. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:54, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error TroNpo (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 07:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Old photography with the unconform sign Biolonistes (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a reason for deletion, because Commons hosts old and outdated photos to show history. Nevertheless I delete the photo, because source country is France. There is no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Not likely own work and not useful as screenshot of a .pdf file. Velma (talk) 07:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, really, this is not own work. Without knowing, who is the author and when (s)he died, we cannot host the file in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
This File not free Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 08:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Vladimir Solovjev, why? It is a wall-painting of XII century. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept, at moment. Quality is not good. If we have better photo about the same, then we can delete this one. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Lawrie Marshall railway photographs
[edit]- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-704-Tara-Street-1955-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:GNR-Great-Northern-Railway-Steam-116-Portadown-1955-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:GNR-Great-Northern-Railway-Steam-42-Bundoran-1955-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-402-Inchicore-1955-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-383-Broadstone-1955-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-674-Inchicore-1955-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-550-Broadstone-1955-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-Loco-640-Mullingar-1952-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-Loco-391-Inchicore-1952-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-Loco-9-Mallow-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-543-Broadstone-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-432-Albert-Quay-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-501-Limerick-Jn-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-432-(not462)-Albert-Quay-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-384-Inchicore-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-345-Cork-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-311-Headford-Jn-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE-Coras-Iompair-Eireann-Steam-57-Tralee-1952-Irish-LM.jpg
- File:CIE Coras Iompair Eireann Steam Loco 656 Portarlington 1952 LM.jpg
- File:BCDR 223 Queens Quay 1952 by Lawrie Marshall.jpg
-Albert-Quay-1952-Irish-LM.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These are files uploaded by myself, Djm-leighpark, for which I in good faith have reasonable presumption I own copyright for and have therefore licensed under CC BY-S.A 4.0. The original author was Lawrie Marshall and I have been assured by a message from the seller, of whom I have no reason to doubt and is considered to be an honourable person by at least one third party, that they were sold on behalf of the family with copyright. However I have been deficient in contacting the seller while this set has been accumulating to contact wikimedia.org to evidence the relevant permission direct to permissions ticket; to a degree more concentrating on large negative scanning (cheap and dirty and method with some limitations) and cataloging rather than getting the permissions sorted. To be abundantly clear any fault here lies with me and not the vendor. While I have contacted the vendor this morning I have indicated that as I am not able to edit articles on the English Wikipedia any more my immediate interest in these images and providing evidence they are properly licensed is minimal and I am no longer willing to input resource in that area. I am however passively supportive if permission is evidenced and will provide better scans should I acquire them. In this changed circumstance this morning it is appropriate I present these images for deletion but of course this can be rescinded if there is evidence provided to the ticket. Thankyou. --Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- My message (on standard mail) to the seller was blocked probably due to triggering a spam filter. I could probably find an alternative but per my comments above I am not moved to bother, certainly not at this time. This mean additional information to the permissions ticket has changed from possible at 08:09 to unlikely now. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- A good faith VTRS volunteer has been in contact on VRTS Ticket#2022022310011613 over the last 24 hours but is telling me how I have problems and not giving me solutions, which is why I had to raise this ticket as soon possible after I'd lost the will to pursue to evidence the provenance trail for the image(s). One image here has been deleted already, though not mentioned here, and others should probably follow as soon as possible given the current circumstance. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work? This is a cropped version of this photo. See also here. No metadata. Wouter (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
The depicted wall-painting seems to be current (i.e. copyrighted) and installed indoors, and thereby hardly covered by Israel's freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with: File:ציור קיר בחדר אוכל.jpg
Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
A forrásnál ez szerepel képaláírásként: "1962-65 között a jelenlegi Atád Áruház emeletén (Széchenyi tér 28.) működött a könyvtár." Eszerint az ott lévő két kép (amelyek egyike ez) 1962-65-között készült, nem pedig az 1950-es években. A kép nem közkincs régi és nincs engedélye sem, így Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Hungary demands 70 years from creation and often more, so the photo is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-free content, shows sheet music of a composition by Karl Kindsmüller (1876-1955), so will be in PD only as of 2026 FordPrefect42 (talk) 12:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, will be undeleted in 2026. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-free content, composition by Karl Kindsmüller (1876-1955), so will be in PD only as of 2026 FordPrefect42 (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, will be undeleted in 2026. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
The usage permission for these images seems to come from a link to the artist's website, which is now a dead link. So either they aren't PD anymore or at least we have no of knowing if they are or not.
- File:Black Sunrise by Herbert Murrie.jpg
- File:Tuscan Skies by Herbert Murrie.jpg
- File:Wind and Rain Lots of Pain by Herbert Murrie.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 12:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The permissions have been archived here. De728631 (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually looked for an archived copy of it but couldn't find for some reason. That said, how do we know it's still valid? Like I don't think the existence of the page being backed up on Archive.org is legally binding. For all we know the reason he deleted the page from his website is because he didn't want the images to be PD anymore. If it ever did go to court I doubt a fair use case could be made on the archive.org backup alone. I don't see why he would have deleted the page from his site unless he didn't want the images to be PD anymore either. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, i.e. once you have granted them you cannot retract them. That said, the Archive.org copy is evidence that such a licence was granted at a time. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Not to be pedantic, but Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 is not a license. It's a reference for understanding the legal code, but that's about it. Other than that it has no legal value and its contents don't appear in the actual law. Also, according to this page from Commons "The licensor reserves the right to release the Work under different license terms or to stop distributing the Work at any time." So your claim that someone can't retract or change the license is simply wrong. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- First of all, the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Deed is synonymous with the actual licence for the purposes of Wikimedia Commons. This is because the deed does link to the licence proper. That said, the licence itself cannot be terminated (section 7 b) even if the distribition of the work has been stopped by the original author. It is actually a requirement per COM:Licensing that "all copyrighted material on Commons (not in the public domain) must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose". Per community decision long ago, this requirement is met by all CC licences that allow commercial reuse and the making of adaptions on the original work. De728631 (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't really feel like debating this beyond what we have, but if you don't mind me asking, what would be the point (legally or otherwise) in someone changing the license on an image if it didn't terminate the previous license? Like say Herbert Murrie changes the license to a more restrictive one, then could someone just tell him to shove it and continue using the image however they want? Or is usage of the image both restrictive and non-restrictive at the same time? How would that even work in court? Legally or otherwise "You can use the image, but you also can't use the image" is just nonsensical. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- That is exactly how it works: You can always rely on a previous, more permissive CC licence which will trump any later, restrictive versions. The point is that these licenses are focused very much on the reusability of the works, so if the author after three years suddenly decides he'd rather not make them accessible to the general public, all those that did use his work before are still protected from any new claims for royalties and such. De728631 (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't really feel like debating this beyond what we have, but if you don't mind me asking, what would be the point (legally or otherwise) in someone changing the license on an image if it didn't terminate the previous license? Like say Herbert Murrie changes the license to a more restrictive one, then could someone just tell him to shove it and continue using the image however they want? Or is usage of the image both restrictive and non-restrictive at the same time? How would that even work in court? Legally or otherwise "You can use the image, but you also can't use the image" is just nonsensical. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- First of all, the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Deed is synonymous with the actual licence for the purposes of Wikimedia Commons. This is because the deed does link to the licence proper. That said, the licence itself cannot be terminated (section 7 b) even if the distribition of the work has been stopped by the original author. It is actually a requirement per COM:Licensing that "all copyrighted material on Commons (not in the public domain) must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose". Per community decision long ago, this requirement is met by all CC licences that allow commercial reuse and the making of adaptions on the original work. De728631 (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Not to be pedantic, but Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 is not a license. It's a reference for understanding the legal code, but that's about it. Other than that it has no legal value and its contents don't appear in the actual law. Also, according to this page from Commons "The licensor reserves the right to release the Work under different license terms or to stop distributing the Work at any time." So your claim that someone can't retract or change the license is simply wrong. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, i.e. once you have granted them you cannot retract them. That said, the Archive.org copy is evidence that such a licence was granted at a time. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually looked for an archived copy of it but couldn't find for some reason. That said, how do we know it's still valid? Like I don't think the existence of the page being backed up on Archive.org is legally binding. For all we know the reason he deleted the page from his website is because he didn't want the images to be PD anymore. If it ever did go to court I doubt a fair use case could be made on the archive.org backup alone. I don't see why he would have deleted the page from his site unless he didn't want the images to be PD anymore either. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
com:dw. please clarify why they are copyright free.
RZuo (talk) 13:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image appears in many places on the Web without a free license. Small image, no camera EXIF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, VRT-permission was received, but not accepted. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Defining constants in the 2019 International System of Units with the hyperfine transition frequency of Cs, speed of light in vacuum, Planck constant, elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, Avogadro constant, luminous efficacy.jpg
[edit]
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko ( talk) 14:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScientistBuilder (talk • contribs) 16:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I will contact the BIPM to request copyright permission.ScientistBuilder (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
@ScientistBuilder: If you visit this page and then click on the item "SI Illustration guidelines", and go to page 2, you will see that one of the conditions for using the downloads is that you may not stretch, squash them etc. Wikimedia Commons however demands that any images that are downloded are "free" - ie you are free to stretch, squash them and do anything else that you like to them etc. It is due to this incompatibility that we do not allow the file to be downloaded. If however you wish to use the file in an English Wikipedia article, you can download it into the English Wikipedia under the "fair use" scheme, provided that it is used in an article straight away. You can do likewise for any other Wikipedia that allows "fair use" (Simple Wikipedia for example requries that ALL images come from Commons, so does not allow "fair use"). Martinvl (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree with barring No Derivatives. A finished work of art should have no derivatives. For example, the Mona Lisa and Van Gough's Starry Night are best in their final state. ScientistBuilder (talk) 23:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete The license CC BY-ND 4.0 is unfortunately incompatible with Commons (see COM:L#Forbidden_licenses). COM:VRT permission is needed if we want to keep the file here. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 17:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, in my opinion the file is so simple, that it is ineligible for copyright. Nevertheless I delete it per nomination: out of project scope, should be .svg, if useful. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Because the author wants it to be deleted. Thank you Vidna (talk) 14:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Yo también lo quiero. Obra de arte sin permiso expreso. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.53.91 (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that uploader Vidna and painter Natasha Lelenco are the same person. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- It's a cover of an episode of a podcast that is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Seems in scope to me. IagoQnsi (talk) 05:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, in scope, ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy Italy only awarded 20 years protection for portraits up until URAA. --RAN (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per Richard. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
See the disputed-tag, see en:Kalachuris of Ratnapura: Original research resulting in suboptimal map exaggerating their area of rule. Unused. Enyavar (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, in addition, the map is ugly. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Newer. Redundant to File:Google org logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Recently uploaded PNG. Redundant to File:Google 2015 logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING. No date, so impossible to check if the design is old enough to be acceptable. BrightRaven (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, unfortunately this is true. I could not find the year as well. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
That's very obviously not a simple geometrical image Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- It does not meet the Commons:Threshold of originality because it is a tracing of a silhouette derived from a submission by a member of the public. It is not an original design produced by the transportation agency. Further, skyline graphics like this one are not protected by copyright law per FoP-US guideline. I will update the template to something more precise and remove this deletion request. Thank you Middle river exports (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- > However, the sweat-of-the-brow doctrine means that even complicated images/ files may be ineligible for copyright protection so long as they consist solely of information and are utterly lacking in originality and creativity— in that case, this tag may be appropriate.
- The buildings depicted are from before 1990; also, I have changed the referenced template in the second part of the threshold of originality template to PD-ineligible, because the description is more fitting than "simple shapes." Hopefully this clarifies things - the main reason this cannot be considered copyrighted is it contains no original work. Middle river exports (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- And I've added the deletion nomination template back, I just realized that is meant to stay up to link to this even if the deletion is contested. My mistake Middle river exports (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, there are also complex waves on the logo. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- The waves are not complex. Anyone could reproduce them with ease.--Middle river exports (talk) 19:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 19:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, but in my opinion this is textlogo. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Mbernardin (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
bad quality Finncle (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I agree. Uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
bad quality Finncle (talk) 15:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I agree. Uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The photograph is actually copyrighted. On the CD with the exact same photograph, there is a warning - "Warning: All Rights Reserved". http://www.45worlds.com/cdalbum/cd/moccd13793 Yoshiman6464 (talk) 16:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm assuming they took the photo from Billboard magazine where it was published originally, almost 50 years prior. Allowed to be uploaded to Commons based on the rule stated on its page: This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1927 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1972/BB-1972-11-11.pdf Andre666 (talk) 06:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- They did, but the photo is still copyrighted since it's on the official album. The same photograph is used in the original 1972 album too with a copyright note on the back, seen here. The album was released on
AugustSeptember 1972, two months before its use on Billboard (on November 11, 1972). Yoshiman6464 (talk) 12:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- They did, but the photo is still copyrighted since it's on the official album. The same photograph is used in the original 1972 album too with a copyright note on the back, seen here. The album was released on
Deleted, if the photo is published on album cover before in Billboard, then it is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Not the best of scans. Can be replaced by File:Mozes, Theo van Doesburg.jpeg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I agree. Uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This photo was previously unpublished. Therefore, the copyright expires 120 years after its creation. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
-2022-05-02T16:21:00.000Z-File:MSS2243_B3_F2_Mineva&EdaKohlheppBack.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep See: Commons:Publication (made public, not appearing in a magazine or online) for the Berne and URAA definition of publication, where a copy sent from the photographer to the sitter constitutes publication. If you can show that this image only exists as a photographic negative that remained with the photographer, then I would agree that it was never made public, but we can all see that it exists as a carte de visite from the uncropped version. Images made public, without a visible copyright notice, are in the public domain up until 1977. --RAN (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm happy to discuss this. Let's centralize at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This photo was previously unpublished. Therefore its expiration expires 120 years from the date of its creation and is still under copyright. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
-2022-05-02T16:22:00.000Z-File:Minerva_Teichert_horse.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep See: Commons:Publication (made public, not appearing in a magazine or online) for the Berne and URAA definition of publication, where a copy sent from the photographer to the sitter constitutes publication. If you can show that this image only exists as a photographic negative that remained with the photographer, then I would agree that it was never made public, but we can all see that it exists as a carte de visite from the uncropped version. Images made public, without a visible copyright notice, are in the public domain up until 1977. --RAN (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm happy to discuss this. Let's centralize at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This photo was never published, so its copyright does not expire until 120 years after the date of creation. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
-2022-05-02T17:36:00.000Z-File:Minerva_Kohlhepp_Teichert_1908.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep See: Commons:Publication (made public, not appearing in a magazine or online) for the Berne and URAA definition of publication, where a copy sent from the photographer to the sitter constitutes publication. If you can show that this image only exists as a photographic negative that remained with the photographer, then I would agree that it was never made public, but we can all see that it exists as a carte de visite from the uncropped version. Images made public, without a visible copyright notice, are in the public domain up until 1977. --RAN (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I would really like you to be right! Thanks for pointing me to the Berne convention. It states: "The expression "published works" means works published with the consent of their authors, whatever may be the means of manufacture of the copies, provided that the availability of such copies has been such as to satisfy the reasonable requirements of the public, having regard to the nature of the work." This has implications for how I do my work in the future, so I want to be extra thorough. I asked one of our copyright experts what her ideas are on the subject, and I'll get back to you once I know more. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, RAN, our copyright person got back to me. I will just summarize what she told me for my own future reference (since I assume you may be familiar with the argument)--basically that your argument comes from Granse v. Brown Photo Co, where the court ruled that selling a copy of a photo to the buyer of the photo constituted publication. There is a however though, in that another copyright expert, Melville Nimmer, disagreed that this constituted distribution to "the public". Despite that however, she said there was a reasonable basis for arguing that these photos have been published. I consider this to be good news and I would like to rescind my deletion nomination on this photo and the two others: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Teichert horse.jpg and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:MSS2243_B3_F2_Mineva&EdaKohlheppBack.jpg. Thank you for your patience as I researched this. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Rachel Helps (BYU): Distributed images up to the year 1989 may be in the public domain if {{PD-US-1978-89}} applies, publication without registration of the copyright within 5 years. I am not aware of any commercial photographers (as opposed to press photographers) appearing in the registration database. Imagine the expense of registering thousands of photos that have no commercial value beyond the initial sale. Even the Associated Press only registered a handful of iconic photos, before abandoning the process as too burdensome. --RAN (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's good to know! I have recently uploaded some pre-1989 newspaper photos that would fall under that as well. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Pinging Clindberg--a friend of mine said that you have a lot of experience with copyright on Commons. Do you agree with the conclusions of this discussion? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
-2022-05-12T19:36:00.000Z-File:Minerva_Kohlhepp_Teichert_1908.jpg){kind=link}
- Oof. "Publication" was an incredibly tortured subject under the 1909 Copyright Act... it had huge importance, but was not defined in the law. Things like books were easy, but what constituted publication of things like photographs was often much harder. There is a definition in the 1976 act, but events before that went into effect in 1978 had to use the old law.
- The idea then was an unpublished work did not fall under the federal copyright law's protection; it was under "common law copyright", which was a much lesser protection and not well defined, but it existed. Once you published a work (or explicitly registered it with the U.S. Copyright Office), the common law copyright ceased to exist. If you published without a copyright notice, you got no federal protection either, and it was public domain. If you published with a copyright notice, you got 28 years of federal copyright, which you could renew (only in the last year) for another period -- originally another 28 years but later extended so the full term was 95 years if renewed. Because of the consequences of publishing without notice, courts created the concepts of "limited publication" versus "general publication". "Limited publication" did not cause loss of copyright; only "general publication" did. A book author giving copies of manuscripts to various publishing houses would be "limited"; only the publication of the book for the general public would be the important event. There were even different definitions of "limited publication"; one definition was giving out copies to a limited set of people, for a limited purpose, and with restrictions on further distribution. All three had to be satisfied, otherwise it was general publication. Other circuits went more for a general availability of copies to the public as a definition. Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US has some discussion on the pre-1978 law, but in the context of public statues, which had some more specific court cases around it. There can be some surprising results -- things like TV or radio broadcast, since tangible copies were not distributed, is not considered "publication" even though it was suddenly exposed and known to the general public. There was a court case on the Oscar statuette, which had been part of TV broadcasts for years, but the only physical copies were given to winning actors with no right of re-sale, so that remained "limited publication" until the statuette was registered with the U.S. Copyright Office years later (and so is still under copyright). A painting at an exhibition is similarly not publication in and of itself, but if there was no effort to stop say photographers from making further copies, then it could be considered publication at that point (as discussed in that link). (Common law copyright was extinguished in 1978; you got federal protection from the moment of creation under that law.)
- Another difficulty was in who actually owned the copyright of a commissioned work, or when single works like paintings were sold. Court cases were quite divided, until the 1976 act made clear that the ownership of an object was distinct from the ownership of the copyright, and copyright was not transferred unless in writing. So these days, the photographer owns the copyright of say wedding photographs, unless the contract says otherwise. Before 1978 however, there were some strong precedents both ways and it's very muddy.
- Coming back to this photo, the details can make all the difference. If it was taken by a family member, and was just part of the family papers, then yes it was clearly unpublished at least until those papers (or other copies) were given out. If it was a photograph taken at a photo studio, it gets murkier. You could argue that the common-law copyright was owned by the family as the commissioning party, who could then choose when and where to publish it -- in that case, it remained unpublished. If you take the view that the copyright was owned by the photographer, then the sale probably constituted general publication. It was given only to a limited set of people (the family), but it was not for a limited purpose, and there were no restrictions on further publication. Furthermore, copies were sold, which almost always was and is considered publication. In that view, it became published immediately, and if no notice was on the copies given, then immediately public domain. Whether the transfer of family papers to an archive could be considered publication of previously unpublished works, or a transfer of the still-existing common-law copyright (meaning the archive/library then has the right to publish), can be another thorny question. If copies of the photo were given to others as a carte de visite, that would almost certainly be general publication at the time as well.
- Normally we often assume works were made to be published, and thus assume publication near when a work was created, unless there is some specific reason or evidence that it could have remained unpublished. Works coming out of family archives however do have the very distinct possibility of being unpublished, so the details should be examined a lot more closely. In the end, our standard is the Commons:Precautionary principle -- if there is a significant doubt as to its status, we would delete. However, not every theoretical doubt rises to that standard. Usually, the publication question is more of a theoretical doubt -- while technically possible for a work to remain unpublished for a long time, it was very rare. For stuff coming out of family papers though, you would want at least some argument of earlier publication, most likely. I just noticed the uncropped versions on the earlier uploads; since that was clearly taken by a studio (Prater of Pocatello, Idaho), and there is also clearly no notice, I think I'd consider that {{PD-US-expired}}. So, Keep for me. There is a reference to a photographer William J. Prater who was in Pocatello around that time -- if that was a studio with many employees the author may be anonymous, but if the company was primarily him then he would be the author. Another site discusses a William James Prater, born in Wales in 1881, but living in Pocatello in 1909 and dying in 1950 in California -- could well be him. Which if he was the author, would also make it {{PD-old-70}} for other countries (though Commons would only care about the U.S. status for this photo). The analysis of those other two linked photos could be different, though the one with the two women certainly feels like a posed photo from a studio as well. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, thank you for your detailed explanation, Clindberg. I will definitely reference it the next time a question like this comes up. I'd like to know more about copyright issues with old photos--is there a book or other resource you'd recommend? I will be reading over Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- copyrightdata.com collects a lot of court cases on various copyright-related topics; they have multiple pages on publication. Interestingly, it seems like motion pictures which have had the most court cases in this area; the moment of publication of those is therefore fairly well defined. www.coolcopyright.com also has a bunch of court cases organized by topic, but not sure they have any the publication aspects. There are some papers out there on the publication topic, such as one by Russel Tabor in 2005 or another by Thomas F. Cotter in 2008, depending on how deep you want to get into the weeds. Those both note a number of court cases and their inconsistencies. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per Carl. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This photo is not own work by the uploader. They they stated in their talk page that they just downloaded it from somewhere else and just "ticked boxes" during the upload: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BerriBlue#Disclaiming_COI MarioGom (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there, yes the file should be deleted, sorry!
- I removed it from the wikipedia page and replaced it with one I took myself, but looks like someone re-uploaded it. Wil57 (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Karim185.3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided and own Google-search did yield no hit for exactly this image (only similar ones).-- Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I tend to not believe own work. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Karim talk to me :)..! 23:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The same image has been re-uploaded perhaps? ─ The Aafī (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Info File:Rashad al alimi adress 2022.jpg has been added to this nomination. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Karim185.3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found elsewhere on the web
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided and own Google-search did yield no hit for exactly this image (only similar ones).-- Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment @Túrelio: you can see the word, بلقيس, in English: Belqees channel, a YouTube channel. Most of its content doesn't include the C C linsce. //youtu.be/dm5oQ3YFCfI This is an example for its content, which is similar to the nominated file approximately. Regards. Karim185.3 (talk) 05:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Pls provide a link to the video which shows the screenshot of that scene.--Sanandros (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I tend to not believe own work. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
_P6M_Seamaster_Conversion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_P6M_Seamaster_Conversion.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of file:USS Albemarle (AV-5) at Ponta Delgada (Azores) 1958.jpg. btphelps (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
_at_Ponta_Delgada_(Azores)_1958.jpg){kind=link}
_P6M_Seamaster_Conversion.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
_P6M_Seamaster_Conversion.jpg){kind=link}
Español: la concha de mi vieja que feo es y el nombre de usuario demuestran que es una pagina de agresion, o sea vandalismo 191.126.129.50 19:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Yo encuentro paginas de vandalismo como esto y mi premio es la nota esta (ni siquiera escrita en un buen inglés!): "Either enter the captcha or give it up. You if a template you are inserting contains an URL, you will be prompted for each page you’re editing. Create an account, do some useful stuff and become autoconfirmed. 191.126.129.50 19:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Que "useful stuff" puedo hacer? Bloquear el tipo que escribió este padrón malescrito? O ir a pegar un combo al vándalo que subió esta foto con insultos como "feo de mierda"? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.129.50 (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, crop from copyvio. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Bandai Namco Group
[edit]Both are most likely above COM:TOO Japan.
(Oinkers42) (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Sapiens-uma-breve-historia-da-humanidade-livro-yuval-harari-320001-MLB20265211115 032015-O.jpg
[edit]
I am dubious about the licensing. User:Danielcamarg uploaded the original Portuguese book cover, claiming it as "own work", which seems unlikely: who is Danielcamarg that they control the copyright of the book cover? Then User:Entropiness replaced it with a different image (an English cover) , without as far as I can see making any declaration about the licence. ColinFine (talk) 19:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Even if it is the case that both editors own the copyright of the respective versions, it was an error for User:Entropiness to upload a fundamentally different image to replace the original one: they should have uploaded it as a new file, and left the original one alone. --ColinFine (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. This probably could’ve been tagged as {{Copyvio}} instead since it seems highly unlikely to be COM:Own work. The COM:OVERWRITE is a separate issue, but I don’t think either version of the cover can be kept since neither uploader is likely the copyright holder. — Marchjuly (talk) 20:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Not a simple cover. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Clearly not "own work". Sumanuil (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, source is needed to show, that the reconstruction is correct. Give a source and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Nobody alive today was around in 1799, so "own work" is obviously a lie. Sumanuil (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is a modern drawing-reconstruction based on the coat of arms. Whether such a flag actually existed, I do not know. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, source is needed to show, that the coat of arms is correct. Give a source and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence has been provided that the uploader has the rights to the image. Highly unlikely that a TV show's title card is free from copyright Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, at first I thought, that so simple logo is ineligible for copyright, but ... the letter A spoils that. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Keine Quelle, kein Urheber, nichts. Nicht einmal sicher, ob es eine Erfindung oder ein ernsthaftes Wappen ist GerritR (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, seems out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error TroNpo (talk) 20:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DERIV of a specific artwork, https://www.artstation.com/artwork/KO6lr4, possibly even just put through a single photoshop filter. Lord Belbury (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Nope. It's free. It comes from here: https://freesvg.org/dorian --Chlorineer (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- That's a different and much lower resolution image, which may also be based on the artstation model linked above, or (if the model was based on an original photo) the original photo. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- OK to delete. I added the image created by OpenClipart to File:Satoshi Nakamoto image.jpg. It looks significantly different than the artstation one. It could even be argued that it does not even meet the threshold of originality but credit was given under same CC license.--Chlorineer (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, I've rolled File:Satoshi Nakamoto image.jpg into this deletion discussion given that I've literally just said that it had the same COM:DERIV problems. I'm not seeing a CC-licence at artstation, and freesvg.com looks like anyone can upload a picture and claim it as public domain. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- OK to delete. I added the image created by OpenClipart to File:Satoshi Nakamoto image.jpg. It looks significantly different than the artstation one. It could even be argued that it does not even meet the threshold of originality but credit was given under same CC license.--Chlorineer (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- That's a different and much lower resolution image, which may also be based on the artstation model linked above, or (if the model was based on an original photo) the original photo. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks like the original version is an AP press image: https://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/APTOPIX-Bitcoin-Founder-Denial/56ae83bf0ce440008a95c1a189f88903/12/0, and that artstation.com is based on that. From the cropping, File:Satoshi Nakamoto (Dorian Nakamoto).jpg is a filtered version of the artstation picture and File:Satoshi Nakamoto image.jpg is a filtered version of the AP photo. Both are deletable under COM:DERIV, being based on a single specific copyrighted source image. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small image, no EXIF. Uploader has made false claims of "own work" on other images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Friends, preventing me from continuing to build my work, prevents me from being able to build the notoriety needed to be reviewed by you. I am learning, and making an effort to put the categories together. Not always fast enough, because alone I am building the tree, the algorithms, the data, the art, the writing, the independent research in Brazil, etc. In the coming days, I will build on top of the American Wikipedia, to maintain the necessary links, as it happens in the Brazilian Wikipedia. I ask for patience and support so that I can present more data, correct my mistakes and maintain the integrity of the information and the expected quality. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong?
- You cannot inform and state and publicly disclose facts that offend the reputation of (someone), in this case this is called "Defamation" in my Country. The message that "Uploader made false claims of "own work" on other images" is wrong. ( Please review this information against my personal reputation. A misinterpretation occurred, in the facts I wrote as a reply in another image, due to the translation from Portuguese to English.
- Amigos, impedindo-me de continuar a construir o meu trabalho, impede-me de poder construir a notoriedade necessária para ser revisto por vós. Estou a aprender, e a fazer um esforço para juntar as categorias. Nem sempre suficientemente rápido, porque sozinho estou a construir a árvore, os algoritmos, os dados, a arte, a escrita, a pesquisa independente no Brasil, etc. Nos próximos dias, vou construir em cima da Wikipédia americana, para manter as ligações necessárias, tal como acontece na Wikipédia brasileira. Peço paciência e apoio para que possa apresentar mais dados, corrigir os meus erros e manter a integridade da informação e a qualidade esperada. Por favor, ajude-me a compreender o que estou a fazer mal?
- Não pode informar e declarar e divulgar publicamente factos que ofendem a reputação de (alguém), neste caso, isto chama-se "Difamação" no meu País. A mensagem de que "Uploader fez falsas alegações de "trabalho próprio" em outras imagens" está errada. ( Por favor, reveja esta informação contra a minha reputação pessoal. Ocorreu uma interpretação errada, nos factos que escrevi como resposta noutra imagem, devido à tradução do português para o inglês. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCF11 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- File:Lanna Rodrigues.jpg MCF11 (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sir, I promise I will improve. I will start a new project with another photo, for your review and permission. Please do not distrust my reputation and my work. There is no reason to expose myself publicly, without good faith and honesty on my side. I thank you for your understanding, I apologize in advance for the misinterpretation on my part in this linguistic confusion.
- Senhor, prometo que irei melhorar. Iniciarei um novo projecto com outra fotografia, para a vossa revisão e autorização. Por favor, não desconfie da minha reputação e do meu trabalho. Não há razão para me expor publicamente, sem boa fé e honestidade do meu lado. Agradeço-vos pela vossa compreensão, peço antecipadamente desculpa pela interpretação errada da minha parte nesta confusão linguística.
- MCF11 (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Andrew Romanov 1721
[edit]- File:Coat of Arms of Russia 1584.png
- File:Coat of Arms of Russia 1497.png
- File:Unofficial Civil Flag of Finland 1848.jpg
- File:Russian Imperial Standard 1703.png
- File:Russian Imperial Standard 1828.png
- File:Russian Imperial Standart 1830.png
Centuries-old flags and standards, all labelled as "own work". Unless the uploader is an immortal wizard, they can't be "own work". At the very least, they should have copyright information that doesn't imply magic and/or time travel.--Sumanuil (talk) 20:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- These are modern reconstruction drawings based on some historical data. Whether they existed in this form in reality or not, I cannot say. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Then they should have been identified as such. If they are accurate, then a Commons-acceptable license might apply, but they wouldn't be "own work". Reconstructions or hypothetical works might be, though. Sumanuil (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, source is needed to verify, that the coats of arms are correct. Gove a source and the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded the same image twice PancoPinco (talk) 12:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Pls link the other file.--Sanandros (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, smaller duplicate of [8:File:Johann Friedrich I. von Hohenlohe-Neuenstein (1617–1702).jpg]]. --Rosenzweig τ 16:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded twice the same image PancoPinco (talk) 13:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Pls link the other file.--Sanandros (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, smaller duplicate of File:Siegfried von Hohenlohe-Weikersheim (1619–1684).jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
broken and unusable James Denesuk (talk) 00:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- For me it runs fine. Why to delete?--Sanandros (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- But for me the file is corrupt. Taivo (talk) 20:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - works OK for me. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Per description "Manoj Pandit in a Police Man Role" this seems to be a film still. Uploader is a media consultant for the actor. This does not give him right to upload the film still. VRT-permission from film producing company is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination -Pete Forsyth (talk) 20:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guy WF Loftus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep They all appear to be "PD-UK-unknown" (made public prior to 1952) except File:Alan Gordon Finlay (1890-1959) in 1954.jpg which should be restored on January 1, 2025. --RAN (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Richard Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted:
- Named photographer was Jacintha Laura May Buddicom (1901-1993) It will be PD in the UK on 1/1/2088.
- Was not PD on the URAA date, so its US copyright will expire on 1/1/2023.
- The same.
- As a 1954 work by an unknown author, its UK copyright will expire 1/1/2025 and its US copyright on 1/1/2050.
Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I cannot verify the license. Source site seems to be taken down. Probably we must delete the image now. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Taivo, If the source site of the file has been deleted, what should I do so that the file is not deleted from the commons? Moises✯ (
) 21:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- By principle, you can draw yourself a new map. But taking current (or another copyrighted) map and modifying it is not acceptable. You can draw new map totally by yourself. Maybe there exists a map of Omacha district with free license somewhere in Internet, but usually maps in Internet are protected with copyright and you cannot use them. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, map does not appear to exceed the threshold of originality that is required to establish copyright in the US. Should have the {{PD-map}} template added to page. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 19:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: the source site archived version does not indicate a free license, but says to contact the author. Ruthven (msg) 11:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations 179.34.32.171 16:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyright violation. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is Brazilian TV station. The logo is simple, it does not surpass threshold of originality. But there is no article about the TV station. Maybe the logo is out of scope? Taivo (talk) 11:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete This is not plausibly a copyright violation; it is {{PD-textlogo}} in both Brazil and the USA. The Brazilian TV station is plausibly notable, so I think that it is probably worth keeping. However, File:Novo logotipo Globo InterTV.jpg is identical to this file and in higher resolution, so this file should be deleted as a duplicate. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Red-tailed hawk. Ruthven (msg) 11:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations 179.34.32.171 16:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is Brazilian TV station. The logo is simple, it does not surpass threshold of originality. But there is no article about the TV station. Maybe the logo is out of scope? Taivo (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep This is not plausibly a copyright violation; it is {{PD-textlogo}} in both Brazil and the USA. The Brazilian TV station is plausibly notable, so I think that it is probably worth keeping. However, File:Novo logo Globo InterTV.jpg is identical to this file and in lower resolution, so that file should be deleted as a duplicate of this one. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Red-tailed hawk. Ruthven (msg) 11:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Insulting name, although it's a redirect Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Translation: After 1949, the right-wing son of a bitch - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- ???What happened?Why someone move it back to another similar name? SD hehua (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: The actual file is here: File:1949之後 右派子女話當年.mp3. It's currently tagged to be moved to this filename. ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 23:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- DeleteThe name is definitely disobeys the policies related of commons because of the insulting name. SD hehua (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- cc: @Túrelio... I couldn't move the file. Could you delete the redirect and close this discussion? Regards, Kadı Message 21:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not move,It should not be used as a filename. SD hehua (talk) 10:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- cc: @Túrelio... I couldn't move the file. Could you delete the redirect and close this discussion? Regards, Kadı Message 21:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)