Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/03/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 15th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружено по ошибке Иван Бакутин (talk) 22:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just the words "I love vandalism." repeated over a very long sequence. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


"(non-admin closure)" Changed DR into a speedy deletion request: Used the wrong template to report this Vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eggspressions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission may be pending for the first 50, but I'd say that 400 slightly different pixel art egg cartoons were out of COM:SCOPE as "artwork without obvious educational use", if not full-on COM:SPAM self-promotion.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, regardless of copyright ownership + speedy per CSD#G10. — Racconish💬 15:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. I think, this is a duplicate. Saw this picture a few days ago yet. Xocolatl (talk) 17:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalspam. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy violation. Image used for cyberbullying on Lowie l**** ErikvanB (talk) 17:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wutsje at 17:44, 15 March 2022 UTC: Content intended as a threat or attack (G3) --Krdbot 20:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mám novější verzi RowenCZ (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:07, 15 March 2022 UTC: mám novější verzi. G7 --Krdbot 02:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mám novější verzi RowenCZ (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:07, 15 March 2022 UTC: G7 --Krdbot 02:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful Xocolatl (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie Kereta caretta (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalis. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrenos en venta Aitorembe (talk) 23:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Informations concernant les familles de FOUCAULT / de TOURNEBU. Rien à faire sur l'encyclopédie Wikipédia. 2A01:E0A:4BC:B3D0:88D7:4C:7B21:CE90 12:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page désormais isolée : informations concernant les familles de FOUCAULT / de TOURNEBU. Rien à faire sur l'encyclopédie Wikipédia. 2001:861:3881:A310:5859:45DC:52B3:AF70 20:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete... Isolated and useless page. 2001:861:3881:A310:5859:45DC:52B3:AF70 19:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

useless and isolated file 46.218.153.46 15:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image à supprimer : page isolée désormais et ne servant donc à rien - ces informations n'ont rien à faire sur Wikipédia / Wikimédia ... 2A01:CB06:9001:C6C3:2CFB:C901:58D3:C213 20:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sans intérêt / à supprimer 46.218.153.46 08:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No valid reason for deletion and per fr:Discussion:Famille de Foucault (Normandie) in scope. However, no source is given, so we don't know if the license is acceptable. --Achim55 (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

È stato caricato contro i diritti di Flickr Brunokito (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, NC-licensed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Caricato contro i diritti di Flickr Brunokito (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, NC-licensed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope is? 191.125.38.157 01:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP issue. Cisco Chamber of Commerce advised by email that the sculpture was finished 1996, so it's within copyright. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 02:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable individual 67.81.203.17 04:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value or useful in Wikimedia projects. Velma (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph appears to have been taken from Esquire Magazine which credits professional photographer Christian Anwander for the photo. 108.71.214.235 07:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. На фото не танк. 2. Нет символов указывающих что техника российская. 3. Не ясно где сделан снимок. 4. Считаю излишним указывать кем уничтожена. Нарущение ВП:НТЗ Anahoret (talk) 12:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • English translation of deletion request above by Google Translate: "The photo is not a tank. 2. There are no symbols indicating that the equipment is Russian. 3. It is not clear where the picture was taken. 4. I consider it unnecessary to indicate by whom it was destroyed. Violation of VP:NTZ"--agr (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Does somebody know what presumably WP: shortlink is meant by VP:NTZ? Phiarc (talk) 19:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is the Russian equivalent of w:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, misspelled in Cyrillic, which is not applicable. --RAN (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, no valid reason for deletion. OTOH, I only see the remnants of one tank.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. На фото не танк. 2. Нет символов указывающих что техника российская. 3. Не ясно где сделан снимок. 4. Считаю излишним указывать кем уничтожена. Нарущение ВП:НТЗ Anahoret (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anahoret Please translate your reasons for deletion into English, so that English Users can participate in this discussion. Thanks, Ooligan (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Point# 4- COM:NPOV is a Wikipedia policy that does apply to the Wikimedia Commons. I assume the Russian Wikipedia policy (ru:ВП:НТЗ) also does not apply to the Commons project. Points 1, 2 and 3 are not valid reasons to delete this file. Any file can have the "description" edited. If new information justifies a file name change that can be done without deleting this useful file. The exact same reasons were used by the same User and then translated into English by User:Jeff G. here- [1] --Ooligan (talk) 00:13, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, no valid reason for deletion. OTOH, I only see the remnants of one tank.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. На фото не танк. 2. Нет символов указывающих что техника российская. 3. Не ясно где сделан снимок. 4. Считаю излишним указывать кем уничтожена. Нарущение ВП:НТЗ Anahoret (talk) 12:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. The photo is not a tank. 2. There are no symbols indicating that the equipment is Russian. 3. It is not clear where the picture was taken. 4. I consider it unnecessary to indicate by whom it was destroyed. Violation of ru:ВП:НТЗ (COM:NPOV)
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Anahoret Please translate your reasons for deletion into English, so that English Users can participate in this discussion. Thanks, Ooligan (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Point# 4- COM:NPOV is a Wikipedia policy that does apply to the Wikimedia Commons. I assume the Russian Wikipedia policy (ru:ВП:НТЗ) also does not apply to the Commons project. Points 1, 2 and 3 are not valid reasons to delete this file. Any file can have the "description" edited. If new information justifies a file name change that can be done without deleting this useful file. --Ooligan (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as above. I also don't understand point 4: By whom it was destroyed is important information for putting it in a context. For point 3: Likewise; if we get evidence that the source is lying or sloppy on such information, we should put in a disclaimer as for many WW2 files, but until then it is probably enough to state the source. –LPfi (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, no valid reason for deletion. OTOH, I only see the remnants of one tank.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose the filename and Spanish description refer to the group of files. –LPfi (talk) 17:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free work, see COM:PACKAGING. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free work, see COM:PACKAGING. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 12:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free work, see COM:PACKAGING. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free work, see COM:PACKAGING. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license permission Espantalho de Oz (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 08:08, 23 March 2022 UTC: No permission since 15 March 2022 --Krdbot 14:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear who this person is and why he's notable. Low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, photo of non-notable person. Uploaded by a user with no useful contributions to the project who has used this photo to vandalise a Wikipedia article.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be just a low quality photograph of File:평형상수식.jpg. This version therefore isn't needed, and since {{ShouldBeText}} applies to the original, maybe they both aren't needed. Neither are in use. Marbletan (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de publication, Post error jeune homme solitaire (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 18:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de publication, Post error jeune homme solitaire (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 18:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de publication, Post error jeune homme solitaire (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 18:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de publication, Post error jeune homme solitaire (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 18:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de publication, Post error jeune homme solitaire (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 18:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licensing information: it's impossible for this 1930s image to be "own work" by the uploader. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I won't accept any such on-the-fly-declarations that works are "anonymous" by people who have clearly not done any research about the work. Plus it is (almost certainly) German, no later than 1939, and the law about about German anonymous works pre-1995 is worded in such an unfortunate way that we cannot use it. Which means this could still be protected by copyright because the author of a 1939 work easily could have lived beyond 1951, so therefore I'm deleting it per the precautionary principle. The file can be restored in 2060 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 00:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at source given, not own work, no indication of CC0 license at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not enough information to ascertain the copyright status of that photo. I'm not even sure it actually is from 1950 as claimed (I don't see that year anywhere on the web page given as a source) or if the work is really Hungarian in origin (apparently the man shown died in Milwaukee, USA?), so I'll delete it per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 00:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

העליתי בטעות Elaimon (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:05, 28 March 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: poster --Krdbot 19:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not celebreties, self photo Kereta caretta (talk) 09:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 45aslan789456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works but low-res screengrabs with inconsistent or missing EXIF data. Many readily found online. Unreliable uploader.

P 1 9 9   02:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The nomination is similar to Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Rubin16/review2 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Rubin16/review.

I have carefully reviewed the list of these monuments and from my point of view these photos are just reprints (derivative works) or complex statues or bas-reliefs.

rubin16 (talk) 07:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Epran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and sketch, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aviationentusiasta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, DW, missing EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   14:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thedominicmarks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrabs or crops from an unknown source.

P 1 9 9   14:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pave69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagrams without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works considering the inconsistent styles.

P 1 9 9   15:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tynchuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional images and logo, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious COM:LL: extensive collection of historic images, montages, and scans without proper source, author, attribution, and permission. Uploader should check this before blindly performing a mass upload!

List of files

P 1 9 9   02:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think that these shouldn't be so blindly nominated for deletion as a lot of them look to be old enough to be "PD-old-assumed", we should probably also add an "Undelete in 2XXX" (latest realistic date) as many of these images are of historical places and most certainly have educational value. If they were first published in the United States of America we would have been easily able to assume PD status for the older ones, too bad that Canada has the UK's strict copyright © laws. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Striked the images to be kept according to discussion above. Except File:SIMCOE, Ontario - Methodist Chucrh p1907 pc (36646892583).jpg, File:Stouffville,Ontario Churches pc 1912 (15303912627).jpg, File:Prescott SS - Rapids, Burned 1909 in Montr1880 Passenger Steamship - Lachine Rapids al (10398356554).jpg- the photos might be old enough but the coloring is more recent and that will induce a new copyright imho.

Deleted: per nomination most, see above. --Ellywa (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious COM:LL: extensive collection of historic images, montages, and scans or photos of existing pictures without proper source, author, date (or unreliable date), attribution, and permission.

List of files

P 1 9 9   03:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious COM:LL: collection of historic images, montages, and scans or photos of existing pictures without proper source, author, date (or unreliable date), attribution, and permission. Also includes many low-res inconsistent images without EXIF data. Unreliable source. (Last batch.)

P 1 9 9   15:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enlazador de mundos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enlazador de mundos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 14:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agassac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspapers too recent to be free and not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2010169anushan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small Images without useful metadata suggesting not own work of uploader and more like a promotional upload.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 15:02, 11 April 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 19:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 08:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 08:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 08:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio AT (talk) 09:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use and non-free logo duplicated and moved to Wikipedia, File:Trash Taste.jpeg, COM:GCSD (F8) Sparkl (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Percy-Liza.jpg MrKDunleavy (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn per nominator's comment in the DR's history: "No longer need to be deleted since the LTA has been approved by copyright owner". The file now has VRT permission. -M.nelson (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus VRT ticket - uploader and ticket sender is LTA/vandal (see Awindy1712 and Agustin03072005) from an address with a generic host and a name that a) does not even match who they purport to be in the body and b) does not match any known nickname(s) used by the actual author, Alex Melgarejo (Instragram, Facebook, Twitter). VRT agent made no effort whatsoever to establish connection between sender and known author. By way of analogy, this is like accepting an email from bobsmith@hotmail.com that says "I am the Queen of England and I am the copyright holder". Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Percy Liza.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom -M.nelson (talk) 08:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unverified source, listed as "Press Information Bureau, Government of India". @Junior Jumper: tagged as no source - not quite correct, but source is vague and unverified. Photo was uploaded to Commons in January 2020, and is at writing in use in some 30 pages in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This image came from somewhere and we need to know more about its origins than simply saying "government". I did a reverse image search and could not find this on a government website. It has circulated around the Internet elsewhere. For an upload in 2020, we expect that content like this comes from a website which the uploader discloses. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change to keep We have en:DD News and the office of the President of India portraying this image as the official portrait used in a tribute. The most natural explanation for this sort of use is that this is the official portrait of the office of the President of India. That is not surprising, considering that the person depicted is former president of India. It should have the same license as that on the current president at File:Ram_Nath_Kovind_official_portrait.jpg. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The source metadata on the file has been updated. If satisfied, the nomination may kindly be withdrawn. The image is (most likely) an official portrait of a former President of India. User4edits (talk) 01:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: Some sources indicating it is an official potrait and a government property -- https://ddnews.gov.in/national/nation-pays-tribute-dr-apj-abdul-kalam-his-birth-anniversary & https://twitter.com/rashtrapatibhvn/status/919458297161441280 Thanks, User4edits (talk) 20:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation: @Bluerasberry: Any update? Regards, User4edits (talk) 07:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it can be kept. Good work researching, folks. Any remaining objections @Junior Jumper:  ? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion; nominator now says they think it can be kept, and I concur. Thanks for the good work, people. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work on this GIF animation of a chemical. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Leyo 09:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hello i made this image and i uploaded 3 years ago and i want delete this image. please delete this image MoeinMaGe (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 15:19, 19 April 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 19:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. And fails COM:LR. P 1 9 9   14:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork or logo, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. And not own work as per description. P 1 9 9   14:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused math equation, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram, illegible, unusable, out of scope. And looks like screengrab. Also added:

P 1 9 9   14:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, illegible, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Promotional poster of fictional nation Enyavar (talk) 21:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: map of fictional nation; Hala'ib is factually controlled by egypt Enyavar (talk) 21:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of fictional nation; islands are controlled by Russia/US Enyavar (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating for deletion due to copyrighted content and a potentially misleading description; The image can be found on the Justin Chart site at https://justinchart.com/we-rock-the-world/ where it states "Copyright © 2022 Justin Chart. All Rights Reserved" in the footer of the page. The sole content on the page is Justin Chart's music video "We Rock The World". If you pause the video at 0:59 mark you will see the Commons image is actually a cropped screenshot taken from this copyrighted video. The video can also be found on the Justin Chart Youtube account https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD2-_UymUMo . The description that it's in front of a live audience seems misleading as there is not any audience in the video and the location appears to be a rehearsal studio, as opposed to a music venue. Nico Jay from LA (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 00:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Iván & Jersson 191.125.38.157 00:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.125.38.157 01:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obra de arte, requiere permiso del pintor 191.125.38.157 01:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the painter agrees with the publishing. How can I add the permission? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.24.43.8 (talk) 06:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have signed permission of the author. How can I add it? Adam Šnobl (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Šnobl: send permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obra de arte, requiere permiso del pintor 191.125.38.157 01:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have signed permission of the author. How can I add it? Adam Šnobl (talk) 13:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the painter agrees with the publishing. How can I add the permission? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.24.43.8 (talk) 06:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its inapropriate to show this photo as example for female genitals. It should either be deleted or exchanged with an image that is not that porn, and can also be shown to children in school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teiresias Wiki (talk • contribs) 21:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can just remove malformed requests like these, no need to bring it up here. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept. Human anatomy is within project scope. Infrogmation (talk) 03:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vaginanena.jpg 2806:102E:12:59D3:35B2:F0DE:CDCC:B 01:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de proteccion, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieran para corroborar mi dicho. 2806:102E:12:4104:6C1C:2F38:461:B413 01:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment translation: This photo was uploaded by my ex-partner to discredit me and keep the custody of my children, I present a Criminal Complaint for the Olympia Law and Revenge Pornography, which is filed under preliminary investigation 3048/2021 in the city of Guzman Jalisco, in which they granted me measures of protection, from all this I can send the data that is required to corroborate my statement. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. No es usada. Hay muchas similares. Caso de acoso machista. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.38.157 (talk) 01:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de proteccion, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieren para corroborar mi dicho. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2806:261:490:93f5:28f6:2fdd:9cf2:5b18 (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de proteccion, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieran para corroborar mi dicho.. 2806:102E:12:4104:6C1C:2F38:461:B413 01:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de proteccion, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieren para corroborar mi dicho. mi nombre Irene Cardenas 2806:102E:12:4104:6C1C:2F38:461:B413 01:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral, dubious claim of revenge pornography as this could theoretically be claimed of any pornographic photograph or any nude photographs depicting human male or female genitalia. Why I am suspicious is because of the fact that it took around a decade since upload for this request to be made. While I'm not familiar with Mexican family law I don't think that photographs of people that cannot be identified are admissible in court, so there exists the possibility that the above is trolling. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto nunca fue autorizada por mi persona, misma foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, por lo que se presentó denuncia penal por ley Olimpia y pornografía de venganza en Ciudad Guzmán Jalisco, bajo averiguación previa 3048/2021, dentro de la misma se me otorgaron Medidas de protección otorgadas por la fiscalia del Estado de Jalisco. Por lo que solicito sea Elimina. 2806:261:490:8DBA:E952:F0:E23F:A86A 01:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --plicit 01:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por qué esta discusión está archivada? 191.125.38.157 01:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; taken from insta. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vagnena3.jpg 2806:102E:12:59D3:35B2:F0DE:CDCC:B 01:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vagnena3.jpg 2806:102E:12:59D3:35B2:F0DE:CDCC:B 01:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de proteccion, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieran para corroborar mi dicho. 2806:102E:12:4104:6C1C:2F38:461:B413 01:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de proteccion, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieren para corroborar mi dicho. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2806:261:490:93F5:28F6:2FDD:9CF2:5B18 (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral, dubious claim of revenge pornography as this could theoretically be claimed of any pornographic photograph or any nude photographs depicting human male or female genitalia. Why I am suspicious is because of the fact that it took around a decade since upload for this request to be made. While I'm not familiar with Mexican family law I don't think that photographs of people that cannot be identified are admissible in court, so there exists the possibility that the above is trolling. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, presente Denuncia Penal por Ley Olimpia y Pornografia de Venganza la cual se radica bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad Guzman Jalisco, en la cual me otorgaron medidas de protección, de todo esto puedo mandar los datos que se me requieren para corroborar mi dicho. mi nombre Irene Cardenas 2806:102E:12:4104:6C1C:2F38:461:B413 01:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral, dubious claim of revenge pornography as this could theoretically be claimed of any pornographic photograph or any nude photographs depicting human male or female genitalia. Why I am suspicious is because of the fact that it took around a decade since upload for this request to be made. While I'm not familiar with Mexican family law I don't think that photographs of people that cannot be identified are admissible in court, so there exists the possibility that the above is trolling. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto nunca fue autorizada por mi persona, misma foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, por lo que se presentó denuncia penal por ley Olimpia y pornografía de venganza en Ciudad Guzmán Jalisco, bajo averiguación previa 3048/2021, dentro de la misma se me otorgaron Medidas de protección otorgadas por la fiscalia del Estado de Jalisco. Por lo que solicito sea Elimina. 2806:261:490:8DBA:E952:F0:E23F:A86A 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Escope ? 191.125.38.157 01:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Escope ? 191.125.38.157 01:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Escope ? 191.125.38.157 01:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture is not from parties and events. fails Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama Shaiksuhana2 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - BH license requires the photo to be from a party, set or event. Those images would come from the Parties & Events section of the website, not from the celebs section where this image is from. Ravensfire (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9   15:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wooferblow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without any edits.

P 1 9 9   15:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, out of scope, or copyvio of some album cover (?). P 1 9 9   15:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a non-notable company Gikü (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and not used anywhere. Subject does not appear to be notable. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality and not used in any articles. A somewhat better version exists at File:Garybauerlogo.gif. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael López F. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sketch type drawings out of scope.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and unused. There are many images of the subject that are far better. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and unused. There are many far better images in Category:Lake Zakrzówek. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 19:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-res version of File:Living on a Blue Planet - Nauru.jpg Enyavar (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-res version of File:Living on a Blue Planet - Nauru.jpg Enyavar (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xdjeandoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images collected from the internet with metadata including transmission data, google, and so on - indicative of not own work, incorrectly licensed images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikiecoleblot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collages require that each image be licensed, these appear to be from various sources, and may contain copyrightable internal elements unable to be separated from the image, i.e. COM:DW.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dominiquecmontg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images in collages need individual licenses. Also unsure how images of Dominque, become property of the user account - they're not selfies.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and unused. Plenty of better alternatives exist. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmitrovka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works, Facebook sized or smaller. Two are similar, seems like they cut a picture frame out from behind his head.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vulgar image that was used to vandilize a wiki article of a handicap politician. Washuotaku (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nude sunbathers who were not asked to be pictured AGnias47 (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Penbukam44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of free license at source website. Copyright issues aside, the images are of low quality and not used anywhere.

Ixfd64 (talk) 20:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused logo of non-notable company. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictional map of Georgia conquering Armenia Enyavar (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictional map of Georgia conquering Armenia Enyavar (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto hat eine Lizens die darf nicht mehr verwendet werden Berlinvladicorda (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Darf nicht mehr verwendet werden Berlinvladicorda (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMG-20161020-WA0000.jpg darf nicht mehr vervendet werden Berlinvladicorda (talk) 21:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Origin doubtful and inappropriate label Kdkeller (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: Unused map of some IT infrastructure; only upload of user, no context Enyavar (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: meaningless map and three logos. Adversarial content. Enyavar (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

placing labels on top of someone else's work is not own work: author of basemap needs to be stated Enyavar (talk) 21:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so this is a google map... is it as simple as stating this is a screenshot from google maps, or is there an alternative mapping program/source where I can recreate this map where it's public domain? 207.194.87.105 22:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OpenStreetMap.org is what I know best, but there is also some wikimaps project where I don't know a lot about. GoogleMaps is however copyrighted, please don't upload anything with GM basemaps. All the best, thanks if you're going to fix it! --Enyavar (talk) 11:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" highly unlikely, author needs to be stated Enyavar (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kagurazakanaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads appear to be copyvio (magazine cover, scans, artworks not in public domain)

Spicy (talk) 21:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All files besides "Chun wen wang ceramics monthly cover.jpg" are scans from books. "Chun wen wang ceramics monthly cover.jpg" is from the magazine website. How should I go about using these images in this article? Kagurazakanaa (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, I think they are scans from books, but uploaded to Flickr by the article's person a long time ago. I saved them at the time, but the online files may have been deleted a while ago. Kagurazakanaa (talk) 00:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock photo lifted from the internet, not uploader own work. Vihelik (talk) 22:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaginanena.jpg 2806:102E:12:59D3:35B2:F0DE:CDCC:B 01:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vagnena3.jpg 2806:102E:12:59D3:35B2:F0DE:CDCC:B 01:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dildos o Consoladores Nena.jpg 2806:102E:12:59D3:35B2:F0DE:CDCC:B 01:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 08:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta fotos se esta utilizando bajo un alias ajeno a la persona titular, ya que el mismo se presento denuncia penal por pornografia de venganza en contra de mi expareja, bajo averiguacion previa 3048/2021 en ciudad guzman jalisco, cualquier dato que se me requiera se los brindo con gusto. 2806:102E:12:4104:6C1C:2F38:461:B413 22:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral, dubious claim of revenge pornography as this could theoretically be claimed of any pornographic photograph or any nude photographs depicting human male or female genitalia. Why I am suspicious is because of the fact that it took around a decade since upload for this request to be made. While I'm not familiar with Mexican family law I don't think that photographs of people that cannot be identified are admissible in court, so there exists the possibility that the above is trolling. Likewise, this photograph doesn't even include any people. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto nunca fue autorizada por mi persona, misma foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, por lo que se presentó denuncia penal por ley Olimpia y pornografía de venganza en Ciudad Guzmán Jalisco, bajo averiguación previa 3048/2021, dentro de la misma se me otorgaron Medidas de protección otorgadas por la fiscalia del Estado de Jalisco. Por lo que solicito sea Elimina. 2806:261:490:8DBA:4960:4FE9:AD66:D5F3 23:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion, kept twice previously, including with same argument earlier this month. No person is seen in image. Same or similar block of text have been placed by anons to argue for deletion for sexual or nudity related photos by multiple different photographers taken decades apart; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cum shot on butt.jpg for some more details. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto nunca fue autorizada por mi persona, misma foto fue subida por mi expareja para desprestigiarme y quedarse con la patria potestad de mis hijos, por lo que se presentó denuncia penal por ley Olimpia y pornografía de venganza en Ciudad Guzmán Jalisco, bajo averiguación previa 3048/2021, dentro de la misma se me otorgaron Medidas de protección otorgadas por la fiscalia del Estado de Jalisco. Por lo que solicito sea Elimina. 2806:261:490:8719:A59A:55FE:92CA:BB91 12:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous, no support for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Patent Nonsense. Enyavar (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MohammadArif0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photo Mhhoh (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Free status already explained in the file. --Benevolen (talk) 03:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has free license on YT. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously studio picture (see IMDb for example) and even if the user who calls himself "ClaudiaBlack" actually were here, she would not hold the copyright. 88.78.237.36 23:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file should be merged to File:Johann Zoffany - Prince Ernest Gottlob Albert of Mecklenburg-Strelitz - WGA25998.jpg because it's an exact copy Ecummenic (talk) 02:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Escope ? 191.125.38.157 01:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parodia de Zack de GordserUniverse le encanta traficar arabes en camionetas de nyat cat con polvitos magicos ,si este cabron gordo puto te pega en el pene te desvanece de la galaxia y espacio tiempo ,cuidado le encanta abusar de pingüinos 191.125.38.157 01:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es necesario 191.125.38.157 01:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is found via a website and it is clearly not the owner picture. Admin: Please review if the picture is stolen or not. MrKDunleavy (talk) 04:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This image was taken by Clint Groves. On AirlineFan.com he also posts photos taken by others, in which case he clearly states who took them. This image has no such description.NORECH (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the wrong photo. This is a parachute supply drop. No personnel shown. 2600:1700:F360:5FC0:45EC:1346:47F3:3933 04:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to File:Supply drop in Afghanistan.jpg, and set the author to "Staff Sgt. Michael B. Keller", based on the same photo in a US Air Force website.[4] Verbcatcher (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 04:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model placed on a GoogleMaps basemap: CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 08:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just the repetition of the word "I love vandalism." Over and over again. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Tangopaso (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and copyvio per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie- not in scope. Not used for User page. No other contributions since 2021. Ooligan (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie- not in scope. Not used for User page. No other contributions since 2021. Ooligan (talk) 09:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, not celebrity Kereta caretta (talk) 09:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie Kereta caretta (talk) 09:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Haroon Beg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhbeg (talk • contribs) 20:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded to wikipedia instead with proper copyright information. Cendiosamuel (talk) 09:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Tamarillys: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Google Translate: Лицензии Creative Commons являются «безотзывными». JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Duggan jon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshot snippets, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   13:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Nonsense map. Enyavar (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional flag for "bad bad country" Enyavar (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF, author of the photo is Armin Durgut (https://armindurgut.com/about-me/), proffesional photographer. No permission. Smooth O (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INSA-4GP-gr1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused rough diagrams without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   13:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dácil Perdigón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and sketches, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   14:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9   14:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Friday RIcky Dred (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot intended for promotional purposes, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without any edits. P 1 9 9   14:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1980s theatre flyer with photograph, no evidence of CC-Attribution or any free licence. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo doesn't seem enough simple to be PD: there's the drawing of a owl. Ruthven (msg) 14:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file isn't used in any Wikimedia project and an exactly identical SVG version is available. It isn't required for attribution either. Hiculd (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of nondescript room with promotional description, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshopped image of non-notable team, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without any edits. P 1 9 9   14:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, photo of a new (and therefore) copyrighted banner, not de minimis. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'm going to say that this is too simple. The Lady Techters script is PD on commons already. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work claim by username of subject. Title suggest photographer Annie Boedt and there is copyright 2009 in the metadata. Doubt about the licensing. Agora (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res image of nondescript place/building, no location, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res computer rendering of nondescript building, no description, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny thumbnail of some pizzeria, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rishu9525 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: web-size images with FB code in EXIF data. And likely not own works.

P 1 9 9   14:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too tiny to be useful. P 1 9 9   14:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XDestac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Website photo" per description. Missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9   15:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TeckHuatCo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and DW, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. And not notable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. Extracted image also added:

P 1 9 9   15:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense: Zaporizhzhia Republic never existed, will never exist and this flag was never used TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the whole contribution of user "Орден Ленина" should be deleted. --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, lacks EXIF data, possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10}}=={{int:filedesc
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Though likely meant as personal image, IMO this image has value as stock-image of an existing school in India. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload among copyright violations. I suspect again copyvio. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no useful as jpg file. Velma (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, scanned from: Olivier G. Fatton, Dunia Miralles: Coco. Edition Patrick Frey, Zürich 2019, ISBN 978-3-906803-81-4 Sandstein (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,
mein name ist Frank Stahl. Ich war der Freund und Liebhaber von Coco, eine deutlich längere Zeit, als Fatton. wir haben uns schon 1989 verliebt und waren mehrmals gemeinsam. Die eingestellen Bilder sind von mir erstellt worden. Frank Stahl 16:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stahlwerke (talk • contribs) 16:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, scanned from: Olivier G. Fatton, Dunia Miralles: Coco. Edition Patrick Frey, Zürich 2019, ISBN 978-3-906803-81-4 Sandstein (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a personal photo. Out of project scope. Startus (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Personal content. GeorgHHtalk   21:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexander Calder's work is not PD-old-70 Goesseln (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, on display in Kunsthaus Zürich, an art museum in Switzerland. Freedom of panorama applies, see COM:FOP Switzerland. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Seems I made an error - see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#COM:FOP_Switzerland - doesn't apply to interior spaces. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comme indiqué, photo sous copyright Jacques Ballieu (talk) 16:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.2.79 17:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Confirmed, many web hits (before uploaded here) on twitter, pinterest, facebook, imgur etc. --Achim55 (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Ed, Edd n Eddy.svg, COM:GCSD (F8) Sparkl (talk) 17:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie Kereta caretta (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: cant find the dup but no eduse. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор фото, хочу убрать фото из свободного доступа. Tamarillys (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork Joschi71 (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Joschi71 (talk) 10:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value apparent Joschi71 (talk) 10:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educationable value apprent, personal artwork Joschi71 (talk) 10:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, no educational value apparent Joschi71 (talk) 10:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, no educational value apparent Joschi71 (talk) 10:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and unusable test file ; not an actual election apportionment diagram Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: Map to illustrate fictional state Enyavar (talk) 11:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: Flag of a fictional state Enyavar (talk) 11:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: Flag of a fictional state Enyavar (talk) 11:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: Map to illustrate fictional mégalopode state Enyavar (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crosswiki spam (see Simple English Wiki and English Wikipedia logs) Fehufanga (talk) 11:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technical error Holy Nepal (talk) 11:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use in multiple projects, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kskhh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: As an original uploader of this file, I want this file to be deleted. I have uploaded a better version here: file:Gilgit Baltistan Traditional Hat.jpg. Kskhh (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC). The file is not used anymore and replacement file is uploaded. But in my opinion the nominated file is better than proposed replacement, so discussion is allowed. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original author of this file I want this image to be deleted. As I requested this file to be deleted a month ago and but it was kept. Kindly delete the file as I have some personal reasons regarding it and I don't want any more discussion portal. I would be obliged. As a replacement I have uploaded a clear and better image File:Gilgit Baltistan Traditional Hat.jpg. Kskhh (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Could you please explain what has changed since the previous deletion listing was closed a few days ago, or if you have additional reasons for deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The man in the picture is my friend. He asked me to remove the previous picture and upload a new one. I uploaded a better version. That is the reason I wanted the old picture to be removed citing I had personal reasons but no one understood. Again as the original uploader of the file I want the image to be deleted. Please give attention to my request. Thank You Kskhh (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept. No new arguments, nothing wrong with current file. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Its been more than 2 months since I started the deletion request for this file which I created. Why the file is not being deleted? I'm the original uploader of the file. Do I not have rights of the file? I already posted the reason of deletion and still the file is there. I request again that the file be deleted. --Kskhh (talk) 14:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment According to the irrevocable CC-by-sa-4.0 license which you authorized for your photo, you have rights to attribution. Others may copy and reuse, as long as they comply with attribution to you in accordance with the license. Listing it repeatedly, until 2 days ago without giving explanation, might have been considered more an annoyance to others in Commons than a reason for deletion. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hello i made this image and i want delete this MoeinMaGe (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a screenshot, of unknown origin. 4ing (talk) 11:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Map of Independent Turkic Countries.png; uploader says in description that he got the image title wrong Enyavar (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dissected 4-part world map; unused. Multiple usable blank world maps already exist; uploader has given no educational use case or description for the map.. Enyavar (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dissected 4-part world map; unused. Multiple usable blank world maps already exist; uploader has given no educational use case or description for the map.. Enyavar (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dissected 4-part world map; unused. Multiple usable blank world maps already exist; uploader has given no educational use case or description for the map.. Enyavar (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dissected 4-part world map; unused. Multiple usable blank world maps already exist; uploader has given no educational use case or description for the map.. Enyavar (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover art, https://godra.bandcamp.com/album/nightcity. Username matches the artist, but this was a single-upload account, with no evidence of permission. Photographer is not credited. May be a fan upload, may not have had the photographer's permission to relicence as CC-Attribution. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that it is Creative Commons licensed Amisom (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to https://pictures.reuters.com/archive/BRITAIN-WEDDING--GM1E74T0FPT01.html, more likely to be another shot from the same or a nearby press photographer at this 2011 event than a single-upload Commons user. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TinEye detects a prior use of this at MSN.cn (e.g. [5]), in December 2010, about a year before its upload here. Therefore, its "own work" status becomes questionable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing to state the uploader owns the copyright for this, and the Youtube link is dead too Lugnuts (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The link is fixed now, but it's a standard yt license. --Achim55 (talk) 20:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License has been fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission at source of image. Hamza Ali Shah (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and unused. We already have plenty of images of ducks. Furthermore, this image is unlikely to be the uploader's own work due to the resolution and lack of metadata. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 20:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" claim due to low resolution. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 12:34, 29 April 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:4-Tivoli RazorLight 0702 AvK 01125.jpg --Krdbot 14:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) - but the image appears to be old enough to be kept. Nominating for help with appropriate license as there is an author listed but my German isn't good enough to find his dates on the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The photographer is apparently Eduard Pippeel from Lodz, a Polish city which once had a sizable population of German speakers (it belonged to Prussia from 1793 to 1807 and later to Nazi Germany from 1939 to 1945). {{PD-Poland}} seems to apply, as I don't see any copyright notice on this or another of the Pippeel photographs we have. viaf.org has him as Edward Pippel (Polish spelling of the name?) and says he lived 1868-1938. I'll go with PD-Poland and {{PD-1996}}. --Rosenzweig τ 02:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, {{PD-old-auto-expired}} seems to work better here. --Rosenzweig τ 02:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo violates copyright Osama Eid (talk) 00:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello
The logo is ours, and there is no copyright in the information provided.
We hope to review it well, and not to rush to remove information without verification.
Thank you so much مصطفى عياش (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   01:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Escope ? 191.125.38.157 01:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal artwork, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   01:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Escope ? 191.125.38.157 01:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal artwork, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   01:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work as claimed. no exif, and the 500x500 size makes it likely this was taken from the internet Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no exif, probably taken from http://www.nabg-us.org/about-us.html, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yahya.ait2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from FB per MD, unlikely to be own work as claimed. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here before upload - https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/no-proof-yet-on-bcg-benefits-tb-mortality-might-go-up-warn-expert/article61448723.ece - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image exists on Internet on April 2021. https://cdn.yeniakit.com.tr/images/news/625/muhammed-emin-yildirim-kimdir-nerelidir-muhammed-emin-yildirim-kitaplari-h1617859573-71e1a5.jpg Michel Bakni (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted painting, as evidenced at the credits on the bottom-left: C. Zablan. The subject herself became a president from 1986 to 1992, and died in 2009. Impossible that this painting is in public domain by age, and the artist is unlikely a government employee (as most of the exhibits in Presidential Museum & Library are either donations or collections given by private citizens, like artists). No indication of a commercial license permission from the painter. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyrighted painting is an important subject here. For the painting detail, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:FvfMalacanangMuseum0040 28.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious violation of painter's copyright. Per the artist's signature at the bottom-left, the artist is Cai Zhen Hui (apparently a Chinese painter, as evidenced by the Chinese characters on his signature), and he signed the date as 1999. There is also no freedom of panorama for free commercial exploitations of public art in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Elcobbola#Models and no COM:FOP Philippines. The model artist of this diorama must be still alive today (or if not, not yet 50 years deceased for it to pass {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}}). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A poster made by the Viet Cong would not be the work of a U.S. government employee. However, there is a possibility that the poster is in public domain for other reasons. Copyright issues aside, the quality of this image is pretty poor. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and no longer used. Several better alternatives have since been uploaded. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is all over the internet via TinEye search. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random image copied from the web, used in etwiki in an article about a nonexistent village.--Vihelik (talk) 22:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Random image copied from the web, used in etwiki in an article about a nonexistent village, the article has been deleted. Vihelik (talk) 22:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright belongs to the American toy-company Mattel, Inc. Trade (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing sufficient information about date of publication to clarify copyright status. Taken in 1955 doesn't mean it was published 1955, and we don't know where it's from so it can't be verified. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obra de arte, requiere permiso del pintor 191.125.38.157 01:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the painter agrees with the publishing. How can I add the permission? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.24.43.8 (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have signed permission of the author. How can I add it? Adam Šnobl (talk) 13:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Uploader request[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File moved, redirection is unnecessary Vaibhav265 (talk) 22:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't know why the uploader is trying so hard to obscure and remove relevant info, including the object coords (there is nothing personal about this info!). This filename is valid for the depicted location. In fact, this filename is better than the new name because it is specific, whereas the new name (HillsideSuburbWN) is generic, meaningless! --P 1 9 9   14:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, redirect from previous name of renamed file. --Rosenzweig τ 20:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is results of DNA for the tribe< and it is not true and not showing the whole tribe parts, also it needs correction because it is not an absolute fact Matharish44 (talk) 02:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC) This is a completely fake genealogy presentation and misleading information about Zahran's DNA test results. Its source is an unknown Twitter account. Moreover, the majority of the tribe branches are not included in this file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed A Alzahrani (talk • contribs) 09:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, all this can be true, but the file is still used in ar.wiki and the file is in our project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file provides incorrect genetic information of Zahran Tripe, It does not contain information about the test numbers, which DNA laboratory performed the genetic testing, or what study or entity conducted these tests! There is simply no approved source or reference for this file. The only approved source for genetic tests for this tribe is the Twitter account @Zahran_ZS5833, and this official account has never approved this file. Talza92 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Nothing has changed since the previous nomination; the file is still in use and still in scope. Omphalographer (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response. So you are okay with providing wrong DNA results information of any society and it’s okay to be published here? Talza92 (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Uploader request[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File moved, redirection is unnecessary Vaibhav265 (talk) 22:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't know why the uploader is trying so hard to remove relevant info, including the object coords (there is nothing personal about this info!). This filename is valid for the depicted location. --P 1 9 9   14:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we usually keep redirects. --Rosenzweig τ 13:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With unknown author it's not possible to apply this license which is based on years since author's death. Nominating these separately due to different countries of creation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should help fixing the license instead of requesting deletion, especially when you do know that the image is PD. grin 16:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No proper, verifiable source (translates to just "Transylvanian District of the Society of Social Brothers"), not able to establish the copyright status of this image. Can be restored in 2063 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 10:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per the precautionary principle. Since the images of the other coin that were uploaded by this user were copyvios, this one is probably a copyvio as well. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per the precautionary principle. Since the images of the other coin that were uploaded by this user were copyvios, this one is probably a copyvio as well. --Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per original description copyvio from [6] anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 21:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per original description copyvio from [7] anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 21:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP - Exif data says author is Wazylyna Thomas, it's unclear if this is the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP - Exif data says this is from "Numiscorner" and author is Wazylyna Thomas, it's unclear if this is the uploader (files with this author in the Exif data were also uploaded by another user). --Rosenzweig τ 21:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP - Exif data says this is from "Numiscorner" and author is Wazylyna Thomas, it's unclear if this is the uploader (files with this author in the Exif data were also uploaded by another user). --Rosenzweig τ 21:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier m'appartient et je ne veux plus qu'il apparaisse sur Wikipedia Artha59 (talk) 13:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP - Exif data says author is Wazylyna Thomas, it's unclear if this is the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, account has 3 photos, 0 followers

Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 22:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted sculpture. See also: [8] (which states it dates to 1987). Needs sculptor's commercial license permission (or his heirs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 22:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old logo, not in any article now Ovedc (talk) 13:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 22:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jmcgnh as no permission (No permission since) In November 2021. It is unused, and uncategorized, but there is nothing obvious to show it's not "own work." There are zero hits on Tineye and zero hits on Google Images. Requesting that Jccgnhl provide reason it's not own work rather than just reverting edits which is why I am sending it to Deletion Nomination. If it's causing reversions, better to discuss! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete — This photo is one of a group of archival photos uploaded by User:Kinngcoolkaran in support of en:Draft:Pioneer Auto Group. This one appears not to have ever been linked to the draft and the others have since been deleted. I use context and visual evidence to dispute the claim of 'own work' and date of 2021. If the caption were correct, this photo would date from fairly early in the existence of Pioneer Auto Group but the aerosol cans and plastic antifreeze jugs would make 1970s more likely. These discrepancies were enough for me to tag as 'no permission'. Jmcgnh (talk) 23:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see anything in that photo which could not be in use in 2021, and context really has nothing to do with rights to the photo. Please explain why you think the uploader didn't take this photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Regardless of the copyright status, the draft article was abandoned and deleted about three months ago, so this image no longer serves any purpose. howcheng {chat} 22:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) but it seems to be old enough. Perhaps an expert on Danish copyright could provide proper tag for this historic image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The source website states that it's public domain, so that seems good enough to me. howcheng {chat} 22:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image cannot be as a logo, has ever been, and cannot be used as a logo Олексій Непота (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sure it is in PD in New Zealand.

The author isn't anonymous - "Fine Arts Professor John Simpson designed a simplified version of Canterbury College's arms and it was duly approved and authorised by the English Kings of Arms in Letters Patent dated 10 May 1965."(link). So, 50 years since publication date not applicable.

He was still alive in 2017 (link), so, 50 years since death not applicable too rubin16 (talk) 07:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:New Zealand, applied art is protected for 25 years from creation. Simpson was alive in 2021 btw [9]. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's old logo, it's not actually 83.238.117.194 13:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; we don't delete historic logos just because they're historic. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mab an Garrek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work on four old black and white images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These a photographs of old, out of copyright from newspapers and postcards from the UK.Mab an Garrek (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, per nomination, kept one from 1899 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. File:Almond Giles.jpg was published in 1907 and can be restored in 2028 with PD-old-assumed. I'm not given enough information about the other two to determine their copyright status. I would have kept them if they simply had to be at least 120 years old, but that is not the case. Philip Hancock died in 1927, so that file can be restored in 2048. --Rosenzweig τ 22:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aeschylus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are recordings of a fake IRS robocall. I do not think the uploader has the copyright to these unless they are the scammer.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz I created these using an online text-to-speech site. If they violate copyright, by all means delete them. Aeschylus (talk) 04:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aeschylus Whose script did you use? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The script from this file
and then changed the words to become an SSA scam. I then put the words into freetts.com and downloaded the results. Aeschylus (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 00:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With unknown author it's not possible to apply this license which is based on years since author's death. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should help fixing the license instead of requesting deletion, especially when you do know that the image is PD. grin 16:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On the basis of the description that this photo originated in Romania and based on Template:PD-RO-photo, I understand that this photo would, under Romanian copyright law, be in the public domain and have amended the licenses accordingly. If the origin is proven or strongly suspected to be from outside of Romania, the status would need reviewing. Bungle (talkcontribs) 07:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the precautionary principle. There is not enough information to be able to determine the copyright status. The source is said to be unknown by the uploader (strange, the uploader should know it), so I'm not entirely convinced that even the 1943 date is correct. The photo could have been taken in Romania or Hungary (the man was a member of the Hungarian parliament starting in 1940) or even in France if 1943 is not correct and it is more like 1947 or later; the photo could have been published at some point or not, and the author could be truly anonymous (in a legal sense), or this could be just another case of "I don't know and can't be bothered to try to find out".

Dezső lived until 1976. While the photo is probably not from 1976, it's the one solidly evidenced year I really have, so the file can be restored in 2097 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. Unless someone can come up with some solid evidence for an earlier year of creation of this photograph. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work 191.125.38.157 01:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The photo is File:Lenin and stalin.jpg and probably not problematic because it was taken in 1922 by Lenin's sister, who died in 1937 (but I don't know when it was first published. Another photo showing the two at the same meeting, same photographer too, was apparently published in Pravda in 1922). Is the text really {{PD-ineligible}} though? Even short texts can be original enough for copyright protection, and Stalin died less than 70 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 12:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per remark of Rosenzweig. Can be undeleted 70 years pma Stalin, who died in 1953, so in 2024. . --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work 191.125.38.157 01:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, is written by Stalin and translated by the uploader hopefully?. Can be undeleted 70 years pma Stalin, who died in 1953, so in 2024. . --Ellywa. --Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source cited seems the most plausible for the source of the image, and is licensed under the stated license. However, I cannot locate the image there, or with wayback machine, or reverse image search :( What do we do, assume the uploader is correct or delete based on PRP? Buidhe (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to lack of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, wrong license ΚηœrZupator   13:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, in addition above TOO per COM:TOO. --Ellywa (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website says it is not affiliated with the U.S. Army and carries an "All rights reserved" notice. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copywashing. License is correct. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 17:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Illegitimate Barrister: Does this mean the pattern was designed by the U.S. Army rather than the company? Ixfd64 (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not give evidence that this design is in PD. In additon per COM:CLOTHING, such a design element might be copyrighted. Therefore, this images must be deleted imho. --Ellywa (talk) 21:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1990 Hungarian Parliament candidate is unlikely own work by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is a relative (via VRTS). grin 16:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Grin: Can you please update the file description page with the ticket information? Ping me when done and I'll close this out. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 22:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes and no. I almost have put on the permission template but then realised that the relative hasn't provided any proof (or even statement) that they are either the author (they are not) or possess the rights (I can't know). All I said is that it is definitely not unlikely, since they are a relative.
The ticket hasn't been replied since 3rd may, 2022. Either we choose to believe that since the person is family then possibly possess the rights or we choose to be strict and delete due to missing proof. I have inserted the ticket number in the discussion page. grin 09:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With Unknown Author, it's impossible for the currently applied license to be 100% certain to be valid. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered to help the uploader to pick the right license instead of putting it on RfD? The image is clearly anon+publication date+70 free. grin 16:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, COM:EVID requires enough information to do that from the uploader, and in this situation without a creator name, we're stuck. The photographer could easily have been alive in 1941 and alive to 2000 like several members of my family - all old enough to take photos in 1941. So "dead 70 years" is not automatic for a photo taken in 1941. Even the subject died within last 40 years. When I have sufficient information to assist, I do. But if I don't have enough, I don't feel good about guessing. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On the basis of the description that this photo originated in Romania and based on Template:PD-RO-photo, I understand that this photo would, under Romanian copyright law, be in the public domain and have amended the licenses accordingly. If the origin is proven or strongly suspected to be from outside of Romania, the status would need reviewing. Bungle (talkcontribs) 07:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. In addition, imho this is an artistic photo, so protected in Romania as well. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1941 - in 2062 . --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With unknown author it's not possible to apply this license which is based on years since author's death. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should help fixing the license instead of requesting deletion, especially when you do know that the image is PD. grin 16:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On the basis of the description that this photo originated in Romania and based on Template:PD-RO-photo, I understand that this photo would, under Romanian copyright law, be in the public domain and have amended the licenses accordingly. If the origin is proven or strongly suspected to be from outside of Romania, the status would need reviewing. Bungle (talkcontribs) 07:57, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore, this image must be deleted. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1940 - in 2061 . --Ellywa (talk) 21:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certificate, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which is not a deletion reason of an otherwise PD image. You should help fixing the license. grin 16:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hungary, an anonymous published work is protected for 70 years. As this form is from 1942 it is now in PD and can be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gombabandi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This series of portraits includes images claimed as own work, images with unknown authors but licensed as 70 years post mortem, and other issues with claims and licenses all of which add up to COM:EVID and COM:PRP that these are likely all incorrectly licensed.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Ellin Beltz should rather help fellow editors picking the proper license instead of (demonstratively) listing otherwise legal images for deletion. By cursory look it is obvious that the uploader is not familar with the huge amount of license templates and needed help, instead of this. Wikipedia is a cooperative project, not a competitive one. --grin 16:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination deleted all exept 1, which had permission through VRT. If somebody would take the trouble, the images could be listed on the undelete category, for 121 years after the photo was made. --Ellywa (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]