Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/03/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 14th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Domenico Dobrovolskis (BudZillus) (Traumzeit Festival 2013) IMGP5519 smial wp.jpg

[edit]

Hi zusammen, 2A02:8109:BCC0:1D84:15D5:6A96:FF44:3259 11:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi zusammen, mein Name ist Domenico Dobrovolskis. Ich bin die Person auf diesem Foto. Ich möchte, dass dieses Foto gelöscht wird. (Falls das nicht möglich ist kann auch einfach mein Name gelöscht werden.) Wichtig ist mir nur, dass dieses Bild nicht mehr auftaucht, wenn mein Name in eine Suchmaschine eingegeben wird. Der Hintergrd: Ich arbeite als Business Coach & Trainer, viele meiner Kunden sind aus der Digital-Wirtschaft, wo es üblich ist, Geschäftspartner / Dienstleister vorher zu "googlen". Und da dieses Bild zum einen sehr alt und nicht besonders vorteilhaft ist wäre es mir lieb, wenn es nicht mehr bei Suchanfragen auftaucht. Ist das möglich? Bei Rückfragen oder zur Verifizierung können Sie mich gerne anrufen (0177 4906587) oder per Mail anschreiben: domenico.dobrovolskis@gmail.com. Vielen Dank und beste Grüße - Domenico Dobrovolskis 2A02:8109:BCC0:1D84:15D5:6A96:FF44:3259 11:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Por qué esta discusión está archivada? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.38.157 (talk) 01:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Interior view of the auditoirum.jpg

[edit]

Wrong upload Zlwchurchintl (talk) 13:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Druidesa.jpg

[edit]

I'm the author of the picture and uploader. I mistakenly thought that the esculpture's authors died in 1936: it was in 1990, so it is still in copyright. My bad! Froaringus (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ан-225 Мрия, репортаж Первого канала.png

[edit]
 Speedy delete This is a frame from a TV report. See at 1:40: https://www.1tv.ru/news/2022-03-04/422647-eksklyuzivnyy_reportazh_pervogo_kanala_iz_gostomelya_kotoryy_kontroliruyut_rossiyskie_desantniki --

And it is not free image (video). You can't use it on wiki. It is already fourth or fifth such image on wikimedia and all of them are on delete request. Kursant504 (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Occult Symbol.png

[edit]

Unuseful low quality symbol invented by user Camocon on the basis of their own idiosyncratic ideas. It has no historical traditional spiritual value. 37.160.0.91 17:54, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:INUSE ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 20:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No COM:EDUSE. Used only on three user's pages of the same user (probably the same who created it?).--37.161.191.53 16:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Occult Symbol.png

[edit]

Symbol invented by user for their own use. Against COM:EDUSE and COM:HOST. It's currently used only on users' spaces, not on mainspaces. 37.160.161.2 16:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: repeated disruptive request by block-evading user. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Punic Birds-Head Headdress.jpg

[edit]

Unneeded extreme low quality image. 37.161.191.53 16:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The nom has been blocked for their disruptive and offensive behavior. Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Punic Birds-Head Headdress.jpg

[edit]

Very low quality clipping from another image of higher quality. Not used and not useful. 37.160.161.2 16:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: repeated disruptive request by block-evading user. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CadishismPalm.svg

[edit]

Symbol invented by user to represent their own imagined religion. There is not any "Cadishism" in the real world. COM:EDUSE, COM:NOTHOST. 37.160.0.91 19:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Perhaps a correction in the description are merited, even perhaps a rename, but a decent and usable palm vector either way. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 23:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Delete since "Cadishism" does not exist, but, given that it is a high-quality SVG drawing of a palm, re-upload it with a new name and description if you think it should be kept on Commons.--37.161.191.53 15:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The nom has been blocked for their disruptive and offensive behavior. Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 22:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CadishismPalm.svg

[edit]

Symbol invented by user for their own use; there's no source testifying that this is a symbol of a religion named "Cadishism" (probably it itself invented). Against COM:EDUSE and COM:HOST. It's currently used only on a personal list of the user who invented it. 37.160.161.2 16:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: repeated disruptive request by block-evading user. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Neo-Tanit Symbol.png

[edit]

Symbol invented by user Camocon on the basis of their own idiosyncratic ideas. It has no historical traditional spiritual value. 37.160.0.91 17:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep Seems to be COM:INUSE ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 01:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No COM:EDUSE, and COM:HOST. It's used just on a user's subpage listing icons.--37.161.191.53 15:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In-use. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 22:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Neo-Tanit Symbol.png

[edit]

Symbol invented by user for their own use. Against COM:EDUSE and COM:HOST. It's currently used only on a user's personal page. 37.160.161.2 16:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: repeated disruptive request by block-evading user. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Natib Qadish Moon Goddess.png

[edit]

Symbol invented by user Camocon on the basis of their own idiosyncratic ideas. It is not the symbol of any moon goddess and has no historical traditional spiritual value. 37.160.0.91 17:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:INUSE ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 20:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No COM:EDUSE, and COM:HOST. It's used just on a user's subpage listing icons.--37.161.191.53 15:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In-use. Has context on page. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Natib Qadish Moon Goddess.png

[edit]

Symbol invented by user for their own use. Against COM:EDUSE and COM:HOST. It's currently used only on a user's personal page. 37.160.161.2 16:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: repeated disruptive request by block-evading user. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бакутин, Иван Александрович.jpg

[edit]

appears to be selfie, no other clear notably tagged Wolfgang8741 (talk) 11:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sofies Welt Mindmap de 01.jpg

[edit]

falsches Format; gleiches Bild ist nun im PNG-Format auf Commons File:Sofies Welt Mindmap de 01.png --Matutinho 19:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The 7 members of Billlie.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: This uploader does not authorize C.C. Tychou12 (talk) 04:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 07:57, 15 March 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: Image does not list any CCL --Krdbot 15:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Info zu Hans-Albers-Anwesen Garatshausen 10.jpg

[edit]

Auf Wunsch der porträtierten Dame und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 10:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Info zu Hans-Albers-Anwesen Garatshausen 15.jpg

[edit]

Bitte löschen auf Wunsch des Hochladers und einer der portraitierten Damen Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 10:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/188710573@N06

[edit]

Flickrwashing. New account, 0 followers

Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Coworkers

[edit]

SD|F10 (personal photos. I do not see anyone cooperating, collaborate, what the title of the (not yet existing) category suggests. These are just selfies and group photos, not reusable. Some are perhaps even copyright violation

JopkeB (talk) 14:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedy per CSD#F10. — Racconish 💬 09:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandung at the night.jpg

[edit]

no permission 240F:79:15ED:1:20CA:E922:576B:33E3 07:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VC점령지역.jpg

[edit]

Poor quality. Text is not legible. Not in use. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zones indiennes Dakota du Sud.png

[edit]

Google Maps Copyvio Johnj1995 (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Striker Entertainment.jpg

[edit]

Logos are not free images 331dot (talk) 10:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uncyclomedia 2007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A unused bunch, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 20:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Icon123456789.png

[edit]

Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baby hex.png

[edit]

Out of scope: No realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 21:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Florencia Freijo-Escritora Mal Educadas.jpg

[edit]

Copyright © 2022 Planeta. Todos los derechos reservados. 191.125.38.157 23:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roland Béguelin 23 juin 1974.jpg

[edit]

Jérémy Toma n'est pas le détenteur des droits sur cette photo. Cette photographie de Roland Béguelin fait partie des archives de Roland Béguelin déposée aux Archives cantonales jurassiennes. D'après l'inventaire (https://archivescantonales.jura.ch/detail.aspx?ID=504316) le producteur de la photo est M. Michel Domon, Bassecourt. En raison des droits d'auteur, les Archives cantonales n'ont pas numérisé cette photo dans la galerie de notrehistoire.ch (https://notrehistoire.ch/galleries/roland-beguelin) Jérémy Toma a peut-être photographié ce document d'archive mais il n'en n'a pas les droits car il n'en est pas l'auteur original. 193.246.28.135 07:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Potassium tartrate monobasic.png

[edit]

No charge on potassium. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think this is really an issue. There are three ways the oxygen-potassium bonding could be depicted. If it were drawn with a line bond (as O-K), indicating that it is covalent, that would be unambiguously wrong. If it were drawn as an ion pair (O- K+), that would be clear and correct. Representing it as OK is a bit ambiguous, but commonly understood to mean ionic in this context. It's not ideal, but not wrong either. As someone pointed out in other discussion, NaCl is a common way of depicting sodium chloride and File:Potassium tartrate monobasic.png is really no different than that. Marbletan (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Now that Chem Sim 2001 has created a high quality alternative, there is no reason to keep this lower quality version, particularly in light of the other concerns regarding the uploader. Marbletan (talk) 15:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I agree to the opinion of User:Marbletan. Abbreviating an alkoxy group with OM (M = metal ion) is commonly used in organic chemistry. However, the file consists of uncited fragements that are hardly visible. But when you take a look at this User's upload history (bunch of extremely low-quality files), you know he hasn't drawn this file by himself. For this reason, I decided to upload File:Potassium-bitartrate-2D-skeletal.svg with depiction of charges. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Technetium-heptoxide-3D-vdW.png

[edit]

Wrong geometry. The Tc-O-Tc bond should be straight like this. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calcium-carbide-3D-balls-ionic.png

[edit]

3D cation+anion picture instead of it's crystal structure. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 04:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magnesite-3D-balls-ionic.png

[edit]

3D cation+anion picture instead of it's crystal structure. Have File:Magnesite-3D-vdW.png as alternative. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tentonana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lehel died in 1972. Need permission from their heirs as this is not free yet

Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Up65akhil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS

A09090091 (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Up65akhil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file collection, all unused, out of scope.

GeorgHH • talk   11:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FrankCastle809 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/advertisement file collection, all unused, out of scope.

GeorgHH • talk   11:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reverendo Igor Beraldini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 14:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amit singh bhandari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal files

— Racconish 💬 14:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igouros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 14:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Igouros (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Technetium-heptoxide-3D-balls.png

[edit]

Wrong geometry. The Tc-O-Tc bond should be straight like this. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 04:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 21:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 21:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:יאסר עבד רבו.jpg

[edit]

I CROPPED IT BUT I DONT NEED IT Bar (talk to me) 00:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, not used. --Ahmadtalk 22:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Billlie GingaMingaYo.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: This FACEBOOK uploader does not authorize C.C. (FACEBOOK Post) Tychou12 (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Capa of "Ven".jpg

[edit]

Out of scope, self-promotional, bad quality images of a non-notable music album. The source of the image is also suspicious. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 20:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aftermath LP back.jpg

[edit]

Je ne pense pas que digimeister soit l'auteur de ce dos de pochette, d'autant plus que la notice de copyright y est visible. (une solution pourrait être de garder le fichier tout en masquant les photos du groupe) Sété40 (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ONEOHTRIX POINT NEVER.JPG

[edit]

Image can easily be retrieved from photographer Timothy Saccenti's website here. No indication that user has rights to file. Link: http://timothysaccenti.com/projects/stills/oneohtrix-point-never-r-plus-seven/ 2601:1C0:4501:EBA0:951B:23D9:E1CD:B8E3 21:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File has a permission ticket. If you want to (re)check a VRTS ticket please go to COM:VRTN. --Wdwd (talk) 14:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Strange Flowers 2015.jpg

[edit]

No requiere OTRS? 191.125.38.157 23:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission, uploader not author. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KyivstarTV-with-1+1media-Logo.png

[edit]

The logo is outdated. It is no longer relevant and usable Олексій Непота (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OLL.TV icon logo.svg

[edit]

The logo is outdated. It is no longer relevant and usable Олексій Непота (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OLL.TV logo.svg

[edit]

The logo is outdated. It is no longer relevant and usable Олексій Непота (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KyivstarTVlogo.png

[edit]

The logo is outdated. It is no longer relevant and usable Олексій Непота (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image1-vecv.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope — Racconish 💬 16:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GökhanÇıkrıkçıoğlu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish 💬 16:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:C507B9F6-A7D8-Mei19-s7i.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLJ4bnj11Wc&t=706 at 11:46 痛 (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bfe946ecf30f45859185b03fd0114393-0001.jpg

[edit]

The proper file already uploaded, delete this file Wikilingua (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schirn-penck-ffm003.jpg

[edit]

copyvio (text) Martin Sg. (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VictoriaHamilton (14921545923).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope for the project Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Schirn Kunsthalle

[edit]

copyvio, artist d. 1967 (pd in 2037), no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enrique Gómez Martínez.jpg

[edit]

https://360radio.com.co/partidos-tradicionales-representan-nadie-importa-enrique-gomez/ Jakob990 (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 14:11, 22 March 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: Copyrighted image https://magazindeloriente.com/2021/11/02/partido-salvacion-nacional-revive-su-movimiento-politico/ --Krdbot 20:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JustJamesHere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, although free on Flickr I don't see that they have any EDUSE

Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry i will check again JustJamesHere (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also add file:Khaby lame.png

which this picture was suspected of been re-created after deleted. This picture was first created by then User:Agustin03072005 or his masters before deleted. MrKDunleavy (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I blocked James indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khaby lame.png

[edit]

This video isn't own work and it is copyright by the owner. Totally violation of the commons policy. MrKDunleavy (talk) 10:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Signatures uploaded as own work.

Yahya (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: though signatures themselves are likely to be PD, we have no source to confirm the accuracy of the images. Not used anywhere, deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Even if these "drawwings" are "own work", the original sources of the files or images used to create them needs to be cited. There is no way with so many styles that the photos were all work of a single person, and highly unlikely that person would be the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Person's Signature can not be public domain

Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Dispositions as follows:
  •  Weak keep File:Madani's Signature in Urdu.svg, as the relevant jurisdiction appears to be India. While there is no information on COM:SIG regarding India, COM:TOO India suggests that the TOO in India has shifted to being more like in the United States. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, this should likely be tagged as {{PD-signature}}.
  •  Weak delete the rest, as the relevant legal jurisdiction for them appears to be Bangladesh, and I see no information on the relevant pages discussing whether Bangladeshi law protects signatures. COM:SIG and COM:TOO do not discuss Bangladesh. The text of COM:FOP Bangladesh, however, states that as a former British colony we should assume a legal system modeled after British law, and that in the absence of legal authority to the contrary, should assume that the copyright rules are similar, which would counsel deletion (cf. COM:SIG UK). More generally, COM:PRP would assume a file is not allowed without positive evidence that it is allowed. I say weak delete because I'm basing this entirely on implications of Commons policy/summary pages rather than an actual policy statement or knowledge of Bangladeshi copyright law.
69.174.144.79 14:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, keeping File:Madani's Signature in Urdu.svg per COM:TOO India. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously from published source, however, not given, nor author... licensing not possible without source/author. And PD photos uploaded as own work. Photos taken from Still image uploaded as own work

Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author/ Artist and Copyright holder is different in each instance.

Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission and few unused personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rao Gopal Singh Kharwa.png

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Krayon95 (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 09:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Normandy Olaf Cats.png

[edit]

Other models exists. This one is not used on pages Oedipe23 (talk) 01:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing alternative file names). --Wdwd (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Small house during January 2016 Oregon snowfall.jpg

[edit]

I am the owner of this photo and house. I did not give permission to use this photo on Wikimedia TheFlyingSnail (talk) 01:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All my photos were set to All Rights Reserved. Flickr was marking it as CC which is the primary reason why I deleted my Flickr account. TheFlyingSnail (talk) 15:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user:Adeletron 3030. --Wdwd (talk) 09:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Normandy with Olaf and leopards.png

[edit]

Other models exist. This one is not used on any WP pages. Oedipe23 (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing alternative file names). --Wdwd (talk) 09:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Metolius Rock Rings - 01.jpg

[edit]

I own this photo and never gave permission for it to be used. My flickr account was deleted in December 2020. TheFlyingSnail (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep TheFlyingSnail, in 2016 the photograph was available on Flickr under cc-by-sa-2.0 license, which gives permission for copying and reuse. CC licenses are not revocable, so even if you stop making you photos available at the original location, they can be used and reused by others. --Jarekt (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Echo Jarekt. No valid reason for deletion. Permission granted once is granted forever. Kingofthedead (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Normandy with Olaf and leopards.svg

[edit]

Another version exist - No more WP page use this one Oedipe23 (talk) 01:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing alternative file names). --Wdwd (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tanphu.luong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: User also uploaded multiple other copyvios.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 02:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BlasonBASSE-NORMANDIE.PNG

[edit]

This is incorrect (tails) - No WP pages use this Oedipe23 (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BlasonBASSE-NORMANDIE.PNG

[edit]

Fichier inutilisé et non conforme (léopards non conformes) Oedipe23 (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. @Oedipe23: you could consider to add {{Fact disputed}} to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. --Ellywa (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qian-du-1763-1844-china-ink-landscape.jpg

[edit]

The image has a copyright symbol and "All rights reserved" Ooligan (talk) 05:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file is PD-old. --Wdwd (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qian-du-1763-1844-china-ink-landscape.jpg

[edit]

Inferior to replacement File:Qian Du - Ink Landscape (1805).jpg due to small size and watermarks. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BrownMemorial1911.png

[edit]

Very low quality and badly edited photo, now unused, totally replaced by superior quality photo Smuckola (talk) 07:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, filename of replacement not given. --Wdwd (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BrownMemorial1911.png

[edit]

COM:Redundant Very low quality and badly edited photo, basically destroyed and with no original, now unused, totally replaced and superseded by superior quality photo at File:John Brown statue at Quindaro Township.jpg Sorry for not linking the replacement before. Smuckola (talk) 08:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a duplicate, and the quality is not so bad that it absolutely must be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Putler.jpg

[edit]

Likely to be derived from other materials, we need verification 219.78.190.165 08:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M. Sarwar Jahan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most are from https://mubarakahmadkhan.org/, File:M.A. Khan.png has a blue border showing it was taken from somewhere, File:8LfUdJILFvVIw2FcOD4ZMArTuh3gkCrVmAcRqHFL.jpg and File:DSC2852-scaled.jpg have sources but no free licenses. File:Mubarak Ahmad Khan.jpg is from FB.

Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M.I..jpg

[edit]

Extremely low quality, no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dooshandgranaat uitleg.jpg

[edit]

Looks like an older publication, so 'own work, 13 March 2022' will not be correct. Encycloon (talk) 09:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doos handgranaat uitleg2.jpg

[edit]

Looks like an older publication, so 'own work, 3 March 2022' will not be correct. Encycloon (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dooshandgranaat uitleg 3.jpg

[edit]

Looks like an older publication, own work March 2022 will not be correct. Encycloon (talk) 09:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Onditi.jpg

[edit]

The date is certainly wrong. The same image appears on this page https://www.riarauniversity.ac.ke/index.php/2022/01/27/congratulations-to-prof-francis-onditi-dean-school-of-international-relations-and-diplomacy-for-his-recent-appointment-as-an-associate-professor-of-conflictology/ from January 27. This is a cropped version of that photo, and the watermark of the university is partially present on the upper right corner. Pikavoom (talk) 09:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karim0156 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos. Not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 09:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Serpentine Pavilion 2008 designed by Frank Gehry. (c) Iwan Baan.jpg

[edit]

EXIF shows copyright by Iwan Baan ELEKHHT 10:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vivek Pandey india (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file collection, all unused, out of scope.

GeorgHH • talk   10:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dpma registerabfrage zoigl.jpg

[edit]

COM:Screenshot of German Patent and Trade Mark Office website. Larryasou (talk) 11:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the information. If its not in need to add this as source, it can be deleted. I added it only as qualified source.
xx 2003:F0:7700:76BE:809E:DE32:45DF:58F8 11:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:You Know You Cannot See Yourself So Well As By Reflection.png

[edit]

copyright is credited to Victoria & Albert Museum - image widely available in high res on the web https://archleague.org/article/table-dinner-frida-escobedo-brian-bell-david-yocum/ ELEKHHT 11:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tallera siqueiros.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of free copyright. Image has been published in higher resolution prior to upload here in September 2012 in Mexican media, with copyright attributed to "EFE".

ELEKHHT 11:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مؤمل الدراجي.jpg

[edit]

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 12:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marathon Barcelone Carte.jpg

[edit]

copyright kavval.com Jmax (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NA.ANedit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata credits Electric Umbrella Images Inc., apparently a commercial photography firm. Please submit copyright statement via COM:VRT.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gs Skan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used for self promo

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by へええ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While these photos are from the website of the prime minister of Japan, they are the work fo Getty Images, not the ministry staff.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bobanfasil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web downloads from different sources, ridiculously upscaled and licensed as CC without credible source info

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Husseinamad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files

— Racconish 💬 14:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JumuiyaMap2055.png

[edit]

out of scope: fictional super tanzania Enyavar (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JumuiyaFlag.png

[edit]

out of scope: flag for a fictional super tanzania Enyavar (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (cf. also similar flag of Category:East African Community). --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JumuiyaCOA.png

[edit]

out of scope: CoA of a fictional super tanzania Enyavar (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (cf. also similar CoA of Category:East African Community). --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Bioceleb

[edit]

Out of scope, self-promotional, bad quality images of a non-notable person. --Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 20:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and likely flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zmievy Valy.svg

[edit]

A poorly traced map, almost certainly copyrighted. No indication of a free licence. — kashmīrī 22:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; what software was used to make the map? Likely unfree. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anyone knows who is this guy in the zebra crossings? (3915374601).jpg

[edit]

Me parece inutil 191.125.38.157 23:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't see an EDUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ross Kemp 2015.JPG

[edit]

Not "own work" as claimed by uploader. The metadata names "Dave Williams/Soundd ltd" as the photo's copyright holder. Tried to find the copyright holder's contact info or website without avail. George Ho (talk) 01:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ogunquit Flag.png

[edit]

Flag of non-existent country, out of project scope Salavat (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New Flag of Finland.png

[edit]

Fake flag of Finland, no source to prove authenticity Salavat (talk) 03:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Falkland islands flag.png

[edit]

Fake flag of the Falkland Islands, no source to prove authenticity Salavat (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chinese Empire Flag.png

[edit]

Fake flag of the Chinese Empire, no source to prove authenticity Salavat (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gaming Console.png

[edit]

registered trademarked logo Wolfgang8741 (talk) 11:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Bad file name, unused and redundant to File:PlayStation 2 wordmark.png. Leonel Sohns 13:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irbis1983 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful claim of own work. The first two photos have watermarks crediting other photographers; the third seems to credit Snow Leopard Conservancy but doesn't provide permission from them, and can be found on TinEye prior to being uploaded here.

-M.nelson (talk) 12:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irbis1983 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful claim of own work. These seem to be illustrations taken from a book.

-M.nelson (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prasenjeet.jpg

[edit]

Personal file — Racconish 💬 14:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sky 31.jpg

[edit]

J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Maroua sym (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; g7. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Los dias de Ana" con Fernanda Mistral ,Duilio Marzio y Silvestre.jpg

[edit]

Small size, likely derivative — Racconish 💬 14:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taapsee Pannu at the Actors' Roundtable 2021 (6).jpg

[edit]

image is not from parties and event and fails Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama Shaiksuhana2 (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - BH license requires the photo to be from a party, set or event. Those images would come from the Parties & Events section of the website, not from the celebs section where this image is from. Ravensfire (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taapsee Pannu at the Actors' Roundtable 2021 (4).jpg

[edit]

picture is not from parties and events. fails Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama Shaiksuhana2 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - BH license requires the photo to be from a party, set or event. Those images would come from the Parties & Events section of the website, not from the celebs section where this image is from. Ravensfire (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Family Express.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from movie posters. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done posters cropped out. — Racconish 💬 15:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope, not webhost etc. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hypothetical california map 2021.png

[edit]

Out of scope: Not a platform for hypothesis and pet theories Enyavar (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Waldman international book fair.jpg

[edit]

Unused, low quality and redundant to the high quality version. Leonel Sohns 15:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Flamingo Flag.png

[edit]

Unused fantasy flag; no further contect given Enyavar (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:140815 AlvinKyneKonflikt 1.gif

[edit]

The music video this derives from has no proof of being under a free license. In fact, it says it is licensed by "WM Music Distribution (on behalf of Alvin Records); Polaris Hub AB, and 1 Music Rights Societies", so it is most likely copyrighted. QuickQuokka [talk] 16:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Хмарин В.Н.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and (c) at source. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Internet pornography by country.png

[edit]

no source given Hoyanova (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stema rezina.svg

[edit]

Unsourced inferior version of File:CoA of Rezina.gif Gikü (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Law allows us to reproduce any 2D drawing, colour or black and white for Public Domain. So, we can make a better drawing of the SVG file in the future. The .GIF file has restricted licence in Ukraine or Russia and is a direct scan of from a book that may be before 1979 when the International Copyright Law was ratified and signed by all states. If You use the .GIF file on German Wikipedia were is used the SVG we may break the law. FlorinCB (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raketnyj-udar-14.3.2022-po-doneczku-768x576.jpg

[edit]

No confirmation of free license Kamolan (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File map flag of sovothank.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictional map of... Thailand? Enyavar (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File map flag of bandiaterra.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictional map of... Japan? Enyavar (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File map flag of patch amberdash.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictional map of... "many location"? Enyavar (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File map flag of sodor.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictional map of... the UK? Enyavar (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File map flag of qitzikwaka.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictional map of... Niger and Chad? Enyavar (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File map flag of limberwisk.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused fictional map of... Jan Mayen? Enyavar (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:French union map.png

[edit]

Out of scope: Map of fictional country Enyavar (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UFSR map.png

[edit]

Out of scope: map of fictional alternate France Enyavar (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Possible french union flag.png

[edit]

Out of scope: flag of fictional alternate France Enyavar (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yandex-logo.svg

[edit]

Duplicate Олексій Непота (talk) 20:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; what file is it a dup of?. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yandex-logo.svg

[edit]

Unused, redundant to File:Yandex logo 2021 Russian.svg Leonel Sohns 19:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 08:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Affiche exposition Memphis.jpg

[edit]

own work? But Nathalie Du Pasquier's article where it is used says it is her work. Victuallers (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chinese Empire.png

[edit]

Fake map of the Chinese Empire, no source to prove authenticity Salavat (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ro-Drobeta-Turnu Severin 2.ogg

[edit]

It’s a joke file in which the author sings the city’s name in a weird voice. I normally wouldn’t care, except that it’s being used to disruptive effect on en.wiki, where the author keeps inserting this file instead of the one featuring the standard pronunciation. Biruitorul (talk) 12:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

native severin dialect do not delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by PUPGPC (talk • contribs) 10:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evenito Logo.jpg

[edit]

My name is Tobias Giger, I am the CEO of evenito AG in Switzerland. This logo belongs to an old evenito company that does not exist anymore. Please delete this logo as its using our name and its being found on google and across the internet. thank you. 212.90.204.174 14:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:《变法通议》.png

[edit]

It's a cut of an Ad Image from online shop, lacks proof of owning original Copyright or permission lisencce. 银色雪莉 (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete the book cover is copyrighted. --沈澄心✉ 16:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete use of publications cover without written license DuckSoft (talk) 10:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amalgamation practical illustration.jpg

[edit]

no permission given see metadata for how to obtain them and see https://librarycompany.org/using-the-library/rightsrepro/ Hoyanova (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is a lithograph from 1836, we currently store a dozen images from the same illustrator. We don't need the permission of the person creating a scan of a public domain image according to the w:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. ruling. The website actually states: "Unless otherwise noted, the Library Company of Philadelphia does not claim copyright for materials in its collections." So, why are you claiming that we need their permission? --RAN (talk) 04:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:RAN, PD-art. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DEU Erftstadt COA.svg

[edit]

Move File:Stadtwappen der Stadt Erftstadt.svg here due to standardization according to de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Wappen}} Nordat (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we usually keep redirects. --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Europe Union (with Ukraine).png

[edit]

Out of scope: Let's not get ahead of ourselves, this is not gonna happen soon. No educational content, unused. Enyavar (talk) 19:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep for now - INUSE. Could be used to show what the EU would look like with them in it?. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't in use until a day after the nomination. I still think the educational value is a stretch. --Enyavar (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter Pan's Flight - Houses.jpg

[edit]

No FOP in France, very clearly a structure Elisfkc (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: ONCE AGAIN, before nominating a photo for deletion, please look at the discussion page of the photo. If it exists, you will see that there was already a nomination for deletion. For the present photo, you will see that there was already a discussion on december 5th 2021 and THE DECISION WAS KEPT! --Tangopaso (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: And once again, if you read that discussion, it was because it was a procedural keep, because the closing admin thought that it was sloppy deletion request, nothing to do with the merits of the situation. Elisfkc (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, constructed in 1992. --Rosenzweig τ 12:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Main street by night.jpg

[edit]

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: ONCE AGAIN, before nominating a photo for deletion, please look at the discussion page of the photo. If it exists, you will see that there was already a nomination for deletion. For the present photo, you will see that there was already a discussion on december 5th 2021 and THE DECISION WAS KEPT! --Tangopaso (talk) 20:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: And once again if you read that discussion, it was because it was a procedural keep, because the closing admin thought that it was sloppy deletion request, nothing to do with the merits of the situation. Elisfkc (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Disneyland Paris opened in 1992. --Rosenzweig τ 12:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vladimir Putin at award ceremonies (2016-03-10) 37.JPG

[edit]

Просьба удалить фото по запросу пресс службыMeirYartsev (talk) 15:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Понимаю, но мне кажется, что это не правильно. Он много с кем фотографировался за 20-ть с лишним лет. Это не значит, что все его поддерживают. Вы же в «Единую Россию» не входите, за драконовские законы не голосовали и не поддерживаете эту «спецоперацию». --Alexander (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete| 1= авторские права, фото принадлежит TASS и покупается на сайте https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-moscow-russia-10th-mar-2016-russias-president-vladimir-putin-l-awards-98325830.html}} MeirYartsev (talk) 13:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

По авторским правам я могу предположить, что у ТАСС с Кремлём есть договорённости на передачу прав на отдельные изображения. Плохо, что при этом нет явного указания ТАСС со стороны Кремля. Но то, что фотография выкладывается в меньшем разрешении на одном сайте, никак не мешает продавать её в большем на другом сайте. Это вполне распространённая практика. — putnik 10:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The website given as source states all material is licenced CC-BY-SA, except material of TASS. However, the detailed information of this image, http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51485/photos/43454, does not show the photo is from TASS. --Ellywa (talk) 20:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:David P. Bloom.jpg

[edit]

image taken from an ebay listing of copyright protected source material. not properly licensed ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-US-1978-89, after 1989 you did not have to put the copyright notice on images anymore, and the Library of Congress has stated that the Associated Press never renewed any copyrights, the expense outweighed any benefit, since they created up to a thousand images each day. --RAN (talk) 05:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The uncropped version has also been uploaded as File:David P. Bloom with caption.jpg. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I see that the captioned version says 'USA TODAY', which suggests that they rather than AP may have been the originator of the photo. Accordingly, we can't really assume that anything AP did regarding copyright is relevant. And further to this, the image was originally uploaded under a Creative Commons license, which certainly wouldn't have been appropriate, since the uploader made no claim to own any rights to the photo. The file page now asserts that the image is public domain, claiming that it was published 'without a copyright notice'. I can't really see how that can be verified either. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
AP is the source and USA Today is the recipient of the image. The text is standardized for all AP images that use their Laser Photo service starting circa 1980. Essentially a high resolution fax machine. You can verify with your eyes that there is no copyright notice. If you want to see what a valid copyright notice for a news service looks like see Category:Bain copyright notice. Out of 30,000 images, they put a copyright notice on about a dozen. AP never used copyright notices, you can look through the entire collection of them that we host. We host over 30,000 wire service images between AP and UP and UPI and Bain and others. Copies made public must contain a copyright symbol, not the copy that is placed in the newspaper. The copy in the newspaper is covered by the copyright notice on the masthead of that issue of the newspaper. Even a degenerate version of the copyright symbol leads to a loss of copyright. See: Commons:Publication -RAN (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This is mentioned here. Yann (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-US-no notice}} seems to apply here. —howcheng {chat} 21:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LUX 1968 MiNr0770 pm B002.jpg

[edit]

According to Copyright rules by territory/Luxembourg copyright extends to 70 years after the author of the work. In this case both authors of the stamp died in the 80s and it obviously hasn't been 70 years yet. So this is clearly not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 21:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EB 1988 SUI MiNr1380 pm B002.jpg

[edit]

The stamp isn't in the public domain per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland#Stamps. Which states the term of copyright for stamps is 70 years after publication. So the file should be deleted. Adamant1 (talk) 04:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 21:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FDC 1988 SUI MiNr2786 pm B002.jpg

[edit]

The stamp isn't in the public domain per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland#Stamps. Which states the term of copyright for stamps is 70 years after publication. So the file should be deleted. Adamant1 (talk) 04:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 21:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MaxiCard 1982 SUI MiNr1234 pm B002.jpg

[edit]

The stamp isn't in the public domain per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland#Stamps. Which states the term of copyright for stamps is 70 years after publication. So the file should be deleted. Adamant1 (talk) 04:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 21:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boeing 727-81 JA8302.jpg

[edit]

Created by confirmed shock in violation of block or ban. This picture was re-created by the same sock after deleted. MrKDunleavy (talk) 07:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the fact that this was uploaded by a sockpuppet is irrelevant; the image's PD status depends on when and where it was published (latest possible date: 1966). Per the Hirtle chart, if it was published in the US then US rules apply; if only in Japan, it's still copyrighted thanks to the URAA because it wasn't PD in Japan as of 1 Jan 1996. —howcheng {chat} 21:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iran Koochak Park 25.jpg

[edit]

No FOP in Iran Rohalamin (talk) 11:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

as you can see in official site of Mehr news agency and this template, All Content by Mehr News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.-- Matin.A» Talk» 12:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Matin abdavi, We are not talking about the license of the image. Yeah, that's correct that the image is published under CC4 but where is the permission of the statue owner? Rohalamin (talk) 06:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rohalamin The owner of the statue is unknown because Karaj Municipality has not mentioned the creator of this work anywhere. and Aref Fathi one of the photographers of Mehr N. agency with the permission of Karaj Municipality has took this picture. Anyway, I don't want to violate Wikimedia's rules, so any decision on your part is respectable.
@Matin abdavi Thus the municipality of Karaj is the owner! Rohalamin (talk) 10:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/Hyogen no jiyu wo mamoru kai

[edit]

License does not seem good enough. There was no statement of irrevocability and in fact their website doesn't seem to have a page of license statement anymore. Commercial reuse was not explicitly allowed. (archive)

A revised version without the illustration might be fine ({{PD-textlogo}}), but not the current version in my opinion.

whym (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; COM:TOO Japan indicates that the text-only version would be fine. —howcheng {chat} 22:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hombres reunidos en una casa.jpg

[edit]

No indication of prior publication — Racconish 💬 14:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This photo was uploaded by an indigenous archive working with Wikimedia Argentina Chapter. It is part of a collection of photos donated by the autor (an investigator) in the 60', the photos where used in cientific journals of that time and have been on display ever since at this community institution. Unfortunately they do not have the resources to process each photograph and be able to mention each place where it was used, although being on display in Argentina counts as "published". Thanks! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 22:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haldiram's Logo SVG.svg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as no permission (No permission since)

This request for permissions has been challenged thus, on the file tag page: "This file should not be deleted because it is too simple to be eligible for copyright. This file is in public domain. IconEditorMaster (talk) 08:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)"

So I have interpreted that as a full challenge and thus created the full discussion.
My rationale in the first place is that it is more complex than a simple geometric design and text. The stylised monogram in the top part of the ellipse is sufficient, in my view, to require copyright protection, and thus permission Timtrent (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I believe that the talk page challenge (quoted above) from IconEditorMaster should be treated as  Keep so I am logging this in full transparency Timtrent (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment They have now offered an opinion below, so I have struck my comment above as being redundant Timtrent (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as I already informed in talk page of the file, because this file is in public domain. Because this file is too simple to be elegible for copyright in India. IconEditorMaster (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because according to User:Timtrent, this file may be eligible for copyright because he says "The stylised monogram in the top part of the ellipse is sufficient, in my view, to require copyright protection". But I think that it is not eligible for copyright because some logos like File:Coca-Cola logo.svg are having a similar design like this logo, but they are still not eligible for copyright and are in public domain. IconEditorMaster (talk) 09:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment You may offer as many comments as you wish. You may not offer an opinion to retain the file more than once. I have struck this !vote and retained the comment. Timtrent (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:TOO India indicates that the threshhold of originality in India is similar to that in the US, in which case this would be acceptable. —howcheng {chat} 22:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LUX 1977 MiNr0954 pm B002a.jpg

[edit]

Despite the copyright tag this is not an official act of the authorities of Luxemburg. What might make it PD is the fact that it's based on a Roman mosaic. Although maybe it is an original work since it's a stamp. If so, then the copyright extends for 70 after the work is published. Adamant1 (talk) 04:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: imho this stamp adds so little to the mosaic, it can be considered below threshold of originality per COM:TOO Luxembourg. Therefore decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dong Leshan.jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it PD-1996 since it was published abroad in 1950 and no copyright has been renewed? Kingoflettuce (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet,the photo is in copyright protection in China in 1996,so the picture has copyright in the US now because of URAA. SD hehua (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the PRC gov doesn't consider the agreement to be binding? Strange. Anyway, if you say so... Kingoflettuce (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The WMF is in the US.But the URAA pictures seems no common sense to be deleted or not.So let us wait for the admins to decide whether the picture should be deleted. SD hehua (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting this image. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion.” I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from the USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wan Li.jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wan Li.jpg

[edit]

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:万里.jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:万里.jpg

[edit]

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:万里 (cropped).jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 09:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:万里 (cropped).jpg

[edit]

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enlai-Yingchao (1963).jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enlai-Yingchao (1963).jpg

[edit]

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment There is really only one way how this could have been in the public domain in the Republic of China in 2002. The comprehensive treatment at the Chinese Wikiversity page shows that an image taken after 1962 is in the public domain if (somewhat counterintuitively) it has been published with a copyright registration before 1975. Otherwise, copyrighted in the US per URAA rules. Felix QW (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    These two adults are Chinese commies, not Taiwanese. Copyright of this photo would not expire before 2014 in China. Iphoneuser88 (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Clear delete, then. I suppose I only mentioned the Republic of China as the only option, since first publication in mainland China would completely prevent PD status in the USA.
    But I agree that this seems clearly a mainland image, and that there copyright status at the URAA date is clear. Felix QW (talk) 14:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1964-03 1964年 中国访问阿联酋 周恩来 纳赛尔 陈毅.jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 09:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1968-08 1968年5月 尼泊尔副首相兼外交部长基尔提·尼迪·比斯塔访问中国 与毛泽东林彪合影.jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 09:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kirti Nidhi Bista (cropped).jpg

[edit]

The file should be deleted per Not-PD-US-URAA. SD hehua (talk) 09:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There has been no discussion about this image, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. In addition, the file page is showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sơ đồ tổ chức Hành chí thị xã Ninh Hòa.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No proof of free licensing. Maybe {{PD-VietnamGov}} applies. Also threshold of originality must be considered. I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: See also talk page. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
translated with google translate from talk page, Ellywa (talk) 19:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is an image I took from Ninh Hoa Town Portal website, because I have no experience with image copyright, I took it without checking if this image is free or not. I know this violates Wikipedia's standards, so I'm very sorry. Hope the moderators delete this image for the following reasons:
- Poor quality images. - There is no proof that this is a freely used image. - The image is not necessary in serving the description of the object in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanphu.luong (talk • contribs) 01:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination and remarks. --Ellywa (talk) 19:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brent Renaud's passport (cropped).png

[edit]

No evdience that this passport photo is the work of a US Federal employee Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The community is deeply devided over such cases. But imho the copyright of the passport photo is not in the hands of any state authority, but in the hands of the person who made it. So therefore decided to deleted the photo. And put a de minimis warning on the complete passport image, File:Brent Renaud's passport.png. --Ellywa (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Budak Plaju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old documents, photos, logos. Not own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the following

[edit]

Deleted: per nomination delelted 4, kept 4 per my comments above an per remarks of others on this DR. --Ellywa (talk) 20:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Themarine1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most. Deleted two, see motivation per image at the list. --Ellywa (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 筆和擦膠必有用 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No proof that the telegram account https://t.me/s/itarmyofukraine2022 IT ARMY of Ukraine is in any way officially a part of the Ukrainian armed forces. This article covers it and it seems to be a volunteer initiave boosted by some officials. Their listed email is "itarmyua@gmail.com"

TFerenczy (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file descriptions can be edited instead of deletion, or do you mean the copyright licences are invalid? Also Ukrainian Government is now under Russian cyber attacks, it is too harsh to expect they always use Governmental websites for official email. 筆和擦膠必有用 (talk) 03:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple wiki articles show is in scope whether it's government-organized or not. The official in the article and elsewhere is calling this entity a decentralized volunteer movement. A Forbes article is saying the minister for Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov is behind it and the ministry Facebook claims it is their initiative https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=322693079900015&set=pb.100064779754205.-2207520000..&type=3 but doesn't mention it on its website. So I would say it's hard to tell if it's public domain government work. But if the logo is considered simple enough this is a moot point and it can stay regardless. Maybe it will become clearer in the coming days. TFerenczy (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. And what is the w:Threshold of originality in Ukraine? There is no information available in Commons. 筆和擦膠必有用 (talk) 09:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. My working assumption is that TOO in Ukraine is similar to the TOO in other post-soviet states (such as COM:TOO Russia) and quite low. The comment that [m]aybe it will become clearer in the coming days whether or not this logo was created by the government of Ukraine unfortunately has not rung true. That being said, while TOO is presumed to be low, there are a large number of unprotected works in COM:Ukraine, including symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations. Regardless of if this is a volunteer organization's logo or if this logo is a government work, this would still be in the public domain in Ukraine. It appears likewise below the TOO in the United States; just as for the Nikon brand logo the the combination of a square, yellow background, ten elongated white ovals, and the brand name "Nikon" simply do not rise to the level of creativity necessary for copyright protection, so too would the logos composed of a generic black shield, a yellow background, a single generic lightning bolt, and the letters "IT" fail to achieve the threshold of originality in the United States. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader did not provide evidence these logos are in PD per COM:EVID. Regarding teh mark of Red-tailed hawk: If TOO in Ukraine is similar to TOO in Russia due to historic reasons, the image should be deleted as wel. Per COM:RUSSIA Simple result (consisted of simple geometric shapes and / or text) of creative work (creative human activity) is copyrightable. So the threshold for protection is rather low, therefore the images should be deleted as well. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:March of the Volunteers (Pathe Records - 1935).ogg

[edit]

Previously nominated for different reason but then kept. Also previously nominated again as part of mass-nom, but then one comment said that, citing COM:URAA-restored copyrights, this file should be treated separately from the other file that I'm concurrently nominating for deletion.

Initially, I thought that the sound recording (taken from a video of a user playing a very old 1935 phonorecord/gramophone recording) would still be copyrighted in the US as a sound recording per URAA. However, according to PRC law or ROC law, the item's copyright as a sound recording in either sovereign state lasted fifty years after its first publication, i.e. 1935. Well, it may no longer be copyrighted as a sound recording or an "audiovisual" work/material (or whatever) (but that's) because URAA doesn't apply to non-US works whose copyright in country of origin already expired by time of enactment, be it either 1996 or 2002, at least one decade after term expiration. (If it were, the US copyright of a foreign sound recording would've lasted 100 years, i.e. until 2036.) However, it's still a derivative of a work that is still copyrighted in the US, and its US copyright lasts almost eight more years, i.e. until 1 January 2031 2030, ninety-five years after the song's first publication.

True, Commons:URAA-restored copyrights says: "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." Furthermore, there are cautions about m:United States non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term. However, from what I learned, the US government has intended to keep standards higher than Berne convention and has been apparently reluctant to abide to one rule disallowing longer terms than the terms of country of origin. Furthermore, consistent US government standards has been expected from US citizens and entities. Hopefully, this isn't "a mere allegation", is it? George Ho (talk) 20:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC); edited, 17:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now torn between 2030 and 2031. More likely 2030 because the lyrics was created in 1934, one year before the music. I can stand corrected. --George Ho (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Absent a rationale for the deletion of this recording, the only claim of copyright is to the musical work itself (the score and lyrics). However, both the score and the lyrics are in the public domain in the U.S., where this recording originated; thus, this recording is not copyrighted. For further discussion, see this deletion discussion, where I more fully outline my rationale. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The lyrics are in the public domain in the US? The lyricist of March of the Volunteers (Tian Han) died in 1968, and fifty years after lifetime was extended for the song in China and Taiwan. As said before, the lyrics were still copyrighted in China or Taiwan when URAA extended to works originally published in either sovereign state. Also, the song wasn't originally published as part of a law. Furthermore, the recording contains potentially US-copyrighted lyrics. Too bad some others think any "government" work is an "edict" defined by law. George Ho (talk) 23:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • George Ho: I won’t repeat my arguments about the public-domain status of the original work here, as I have laid out the argument in full in the other discussion. However, I will respond to some other points you make here. It does not matter whether the song was originally published in a law or not. Unlike most rules of copyright, the government-edicts doctrine doesn’t look to where a work was first published. “Furthermore, the recording contains potentially US-copyrighted lyrics.” Is this a separate claim to the claim that the lyrics of the March are copyrighted? If it is, I am not sure to what you refer. The URAA does not apply to laws, which cannot be copyrighted in the United States; thus, discussion of restoration and the lengths of copyright terms and author’s lives is besides the point. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    According to certain other discussions the copyright belongs to Pathe and thus expired, not to Tian Han. I am unfamiliar with ROC laws regarding corporate authorship, but according to the aforementioned discussion the song would fall under PRC corporate copyright law and is thus expired. Duonaut (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The work is published in 1935, this is not contested. According to COM:China “For an audiovisual work, the protection period for its right of publication shall be 50 years, ending on December 31 of the 50th year after the creation of the work; and the protection period for its rights shall be 50 years, ending on December 31 of the 50th year after the first publication of the work”. Although not specifically mentioned on that page, it is reasonable to assume this is also valid for an audio recording. So the copyright expired in China in 1986. Therefore the recording can be kept. As decided in this previous DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:March of the Volunteers instrumental.ogg. --Ellywa (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:March of the Volunteers.png

[edit]

Previously nominated for different reason but then kept. Also previously nominated again as part of mass-nom, but then one comment said that this file should be treated separately from the other file that I'm concurrently nominating for deletion.

As I was told by uploader, who also happens to be one of Commons admins, Template:PD-EdictGov and de minimis are supposed to apply. However, a page of a sheet music is not an "edict", and the whole image primarily or solely centering on the page is not "de minimis". Also, it's a two-dimensional faithful representation of a sheet music page. Furthermore, it's a derivative of a song that is still copyrighted in the US per URAA. The song's US copyright was restored in either 1996 (PRC) or 2002 (ROC). The song's copyright in either PRC or ROC expired in 2019, years after URAA restoration. Meanwhile, the US copyright will last until 1 January 2031, almost nine years from now.(see my reply with the same following timestamp: George Ho (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

True, Commons:URAA-restored copyrights says: "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." Furthermore, there are cautions about m:United States non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term. However, from what I learned, the US government has intended to keep standards higher than Berne convention and has been apparently reluctant to abide to one rule disallowing longer terms than the terms of country of origin. Furthermore, consistent US government standards has been expected from US citizens and entities. Hopefully, this isn't "a mere allegation", is it? George Ho (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Chinese Wikisource also considers the stand-alone lyric subject to URAA, but the music sheets as parts of the Chinese and Macanese laws are considered legally sanctioned. Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/URAA review asks to treat each affect file case by case and to tell affected wikis. Leaving this to any disinterested administrator to close, maybe upload a new version with no lyric as a compromise?--Jusjih (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@George Ho: What efforts have been made to inform likely affected wikis per Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/URAA review about this? I see no effort of yours to inform any Chinese wiki, [1] so I have informed s:zh:Wikisource:写字间#義勇軍進行曲澳門法定歌譜在共享資源的存廢討論 about this. To any closing admin: if deleting the lyrics, please consider uploading a "censored version" pending confirmed expiration of URAA copyright in the USA, but the description will also have to be changed. Yet I really wonder how any US court will interpret the copyright status of a "URAA-copyrighted" lyric sanctioned in Chinese and Macanese laws. See also m:Wikimedia Foundation Legal department/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge that may allow wikis to wait until formal takedown requests by genuine copyright holders.--Jusjih (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you care about the national anthem so much, there are pages containing sheet music: [2][3][4][5]. BTW, notifying individual projects about this? Also, I don't know why sheet music used in legislatures are not treated as separate from edicts or legislature. George Ho (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@George Ho: should the performance (File:March of the Volunteers instrumental.ogg) by the U.S. Navy Band does not affected by the URAA? SplitterVale (talk) 10:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The composer died in 1935, and the tune's copyright expired in ROC or PRC. But the lyrics came one year earlier. Now I'm unsure whether the US copyright of the lyrics expire in 2030 or 2031. More likely 2030, ninety-five years after the lyrics' first publication. I guess the instrumental is okay to use as fifty years after composer's lifetime had already passed until 1986. I don't think URAA would restore the music's US copyright, but it already restored the lyrics'. --George Ho (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Illegitimate Barrister, Félix An, and AKA MBG: Any suggestions about the above comments? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the Chinese anthem is copyrighted, but I'm not an expert on this, unfortunately. Sorry. Félix An (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The lyrics were removed from the Wikipedia article about the song, making the URAA applicable. George Ho (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Or probably we need users participated another set of deletions to help judging this matter? @Zanhe, Tomchen1989, and Lvhis: ? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This PNG file is from the Macau law, which is in the public domain in the U.S. (see PD-EdictGov). The file has both the music and the Chinese lyrics, so both are in the public domain (again, in the U.S.). Based on my reading of the Macau PD template, the law is in the public domain; thus, this file is in the public domain in Macau. As this work is in the public domain in both Macau (the country of origin) and the U.S., it can be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. George Ho: This work is part of the law; thus, it is an “edict of government.” See the decision of the Supreme Court in Georgia v. PRO. It does not matter whether the work would be copyrighted, if the sheet music was not included with the law; because it is included with the law, it is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: see also this file, which contains the score and lyrics in an official gazette. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      A sheet music is a "law"? Seriously? I'm getting worried about the results based on the vote above. What about the lyricist's lifetime and extended terms afterwards? Furthermore, the Supreme Court case doesn't mention any song as part of an annotation or something like that. George Ho (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • George Ho: The case wasn’t about music, but the decision of the Court is generally applicable and binding. It does not matter who wrote a law, or, in this case, part of a law. Because the March—the score and the lyrics—are part of some law which was binding on some country at some point, the score and the lyrics are in the public domain forever after. That is why I did not discuss the applicability of the URAA and author’s-life laws; they are not relevant to the fact that this work is a law (or a part of a law). “[T]he [government-edicts doctrine] … applies to whatever work legislators perform in their capacity as legislators.” Slip op., at 8–9. “[C]opyright does not vest in works that are (1) created by … legislators (2) in the course of their … legislative duties.” Slip op., at 9. There are multiple sources for the score and lyrics of the March, but I will mention the version I have given immediately above. It is a part of a law—an “Appendix”—and is thus clearly a “work[] … created by … legislators … in the course of their … legislative duties.” Thus, the work cannot be copyrighted in the United States. It does not matter whether the work has the force of law—the Court explicitly rejected that argument. The government-edicts doctrine “applies regardless of whether a given material carries the force of law.” Slip op., at 6. The Court also directly responded to and refuted the argument of Justice Thomas in his dissent (see note 4). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        The decision was 5–4. The court case may be overturned anytime. May not be now, but makes me wonder when. George Ho (talk) 01:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the lyrics are from 1934, and in PD in China. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion.” I decided to keep the image, because it has a correct licence for the country where it originated. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/03/14&oldid=684480285"