Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
's_official_photo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Raziffernandez (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user. --Achim55 (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Raziffernandez (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
This is my profile photo 181.203.88.27 01:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10). --Wutsje 02:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
it so bad NTDEV (talk) 10:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Silly deletion request. This seems like a ridiculous reason to delete the page. Without further elaboration, this basically amounts to nothing anyway. --DanTahHedgehog (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake IAS VINOD (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 06:46, 28 January 2022 UTC: Accidental creation (G1) --Krdbot 14:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
The author has not agreed for this image to be uploaded Fossiladder13 (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No proof that this file was published under a free license on the source page. --Regasterios (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vetri Murugan (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images uploaded from Instagram [1] without a compatible license
- File:Bus image 12.jpg
- File:Bus Image 11.jpg
- File:Bus image 10.jpg
- File:Bus image 9.jpg
- File:BUS Image 8.jpg
- File:Bus image 7.jpg
- File:BUS IMAGE 6.jpg
- File:BUS IMAGE 5.jpg
- File:BUS image 4.jpg
- File:Bus Image 3.jpg
- File:BUS image1.jpg
- File:Bus Image.jpg
-- DaxServer (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vetri Murugan (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Likely not own works but screenshots, all of them have black bars at top and bottom.
- File:Pond of Jarjangi village.jpg
- File:Swamy vivekananda statue at ZPHS High school Jarjangi.jpg
- File:Jarjangi shivalayam.jpg
- File:A ariel view of shiva temple and simple road.jpg
- File:Jarjangi junction.jpg
- File:ZPHS government school in Jarjangi village.jpg
- File:Jarjangi village cool climate and full moon at early in the morning at 3,'o clock.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Misspelling, rest of shifting Vogelfreund (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:25, 28 January 2022 UTC: CSD G2 (unused and implausible, or broken redirect) --Krdbot 14:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
It does not give the correct copyright information Fossiladder13 (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:42, 28 January 2022 UTC: No permission since 16 December 2021 --Krdbot 20:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
This picture should be deleted because it does not give the correct copyright information Fossiladder13 (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 15:42, 28 January 2022 UTC: No permission since 16 December 2021 --Krdbot 20:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patricia Joyce Pinheiro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author of the letter pt:Manuel Pedro de Alcântara died in 1965.
- File:Carta páginas 3-4.png
- File:Carta páginas 3 e 4.png
- File:Carta página 2.png
- File:Carta página 1.png
Abzeronow (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & have been in No License for a while prior. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source says that the image is licensed and there is nothing that states that the author released it into the public domain. Ciridae (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep just a crop of File:(Portrait of Lilyann Carol, National studio, New York, N.Y., ca. Oct. 1946) (LOC) (5269516316).jpg which is in the public domain. Walmart, like Alamay is just reselling copies of PD images and using copyfraud to make you think your are paying for something special. I changed the license to match the version from the LOC. Cropping an image doesn't transfer the copyright or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 13:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination This checks out. I'll withdraw the nomination. Ciridae (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by МаксРоманюк (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:FPR-200.25GT 2.jpg
- File:Модель XL 400 Казахстан Джамбул.png
- File:Калининград STRAHL 3000 FR.jpg
- File:X18-Katı-Gubre-Romorku--18.jpg
- File:X18-Katı-Gubre-Romorku--11.jpg
- File:X18-Katı--11.jpg
- File:X13-Katı-Gubre-Romorku-Siyah.216-copy.png
- File:Прицепной навозоразбрасыватель CELIKEL CRAFTER X18.jpg
- File:Процесс приготовления корма.jpg
- File:Горизонтальный кормораздатчик.jpg
- File:Процесс загрузки.jpg
- File:Производство кормораздатчиков.jpg
- File:Celikel. Трактор с горизонтальным кормораздатчиком.jpg
- File:Вертикальный кормораздатчик с двумя шнеками.jpg
- File:Вертикальный прицепной кормораздатчик.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pompastic1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files this user uploaded could either be replaced by images with higher resolution, or totally out of project scope.
- File:TU08c8ccccccc.png
- File:555vcvb.gif
- File:666dddd.gif
- File:Xxddde.gif
- File:Chaa000a.gif
- File:Chaaa.gif
- File:Chase Logoxxxxxx000.gif
- File:Chase Logoxxxxxx.gif
- File:TU00R445sdd2.png
- File:TU00R445.png
- File:TURMMCS.png
- File:WE1111111.png
- File:Wdwdw-dwd6.png
- File:Kdf00-85258c558.png
- File:Kdf00-88fefefj.png
- File:C5c5c88-885d.png
- File:885cs-ccc555.png
- File:85258-566deefKDIWUDW.png
- File:85258-566deefwd.png
- File:85258-5sxsxs5.png
- File:00-999-88dcscscs.png
- File:0--28cscsSJJS58525.png
- File:0--28cscs33.png
- File:0--288777-8ccsc.png
- File:0--288888dcwsc.png
- File:88-888c8c55.png
- File:89-999-98-wrtyuixxd.png
- File:89-999-98-sssdxxxxd.png
- File:89-999-98-sssdd.png
- File:66-66-77888dddd.png
- File:66-66-55000CCCSDD.png
- File:66-66-55000CCCS.png
- File:66-66-55000cx.png
- File:8888--999-999999gg9.png
- File:778888dd525-55522.png
- File:778888525-555225555c5.png
- File:Jdfj-efefjddejf.png
- File:Jdfj-efefjejf.png
- File:999885well-scsh-loooooogoooo555.png
- File:Well-scsh-loooooogoooo.png
- File:Dkdkdkjrgrg-rgr-gr-gr.png
- File:Jrgrg-rgr-gr-gr.png
- File:Ss-scscscsc-scscwwwwwwww.png
- File:Djj-dvdvddvdv-dvdv.png
- File:W7777777777.png
- File:Weee2225.png
- File:Welll0.png
- File:Zzx8852.png
- File:Wells Fargo logo.1.png
- File:Wells Fargo logo.2.png
- File:Wells fargo.2.png
- File:Wells fargo.1.png
Stang★ 16:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:00, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Riyavashistmakeup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion, Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Riya vashist playing flute.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist doing makeup.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist with her Mentor.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist at New York.jpg
- File:Tisya Vashist.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist Graduation.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist photo.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist Makeup Artist.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist.jpg
- File:Riya Vashist honoured by Aditi Govitrker.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope "police maps", all unused, created by a vandal sockpuppet who had history of vandalizing existinf maps of the Philippines.
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO BAR.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO13.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO12.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO11.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO9.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO10.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO7.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO8.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO6.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO5.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO MIMAROPA.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO4A.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO3.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO2.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO1.png
- File:PNP Police Map of PRO-COR.png
- File:PNP Police Map of NCRPO.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per above discussion, maps created by a sockpuppet with a history of uploading inaccurate maps of the Philippines. This is an edit of File:Ph fil Maguindanao.png with changes to some borders.
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Historical of Philippine National Police. Sockpuppet user who has uploaded inaccurate/hoax maps and TV logos, and unsourced "new" or "new (tentative)" versions of police badges. Any number of these may be deliberately inaccurate.
- File:BFP Northern Mindanao.png
- File:BFP Bangsamoro.jpg
- File:BFP Soccsksargen.jpg
- File:BFP Caraga.jpg
- File:BFP Zamboanga Peninsula.jpg
- File:BFP Davao.jpg
- File:BFP Negros.jpg
- File:BFP Eastern Visayas.png
- File:BFP Central Visayas.jpg
- File:Logo-Big.png
- File:BFP Western Visayas.png
- File:BFP Bicol.jpg
- File:Cropped-bfp-3.png
- File:BFP Calabarzon.jpg
- File:NEW-REGIONAL-LOGO.png
- File:BFP Cordillera.jpg
- File:R2-1-e1597053507179.png
- File:President of the Philippines logo 2022.png
- File:PNP Northern District.png
- File:PNP Eastern District.png
- File:PNP Southern District.png
- File:PNP Quezon City.png
- File:PNP Manila Police District new logo 2022.png
- File:PNP Police Regional Office Bangsamoro Autonomous Region.png
- File:Old Nueva Vizcaya Police.jpg
- File:Cebu City Police Office seal (old).png
- File:Police Regional Office 4B logo.jpg
- File:RscxxY3o 400x400.jpg
- File:PNP RMFB12.png
- File:PNP RMFB14.png
- File:PNP RMFB13.png
- File:PNP RMFB10.png
- File:PNP RMFB11.png
- File:PNP RMFB9.png
- File:PNP RMFB7.png
- File:PNP RMFB8.png
- File:PNP RMFB6.png
- File:PNP RMFB5.png
- File:PNP RMFB4B.png
- File:PNP RMFB4A.png
- File:PNP RMFB2.png
- File:PNP RMFB3.png
- File:PNP RMFB1.png
- File:PNP RMFB15.png
- File:PNP RMFB NCRPO.png
- File:PNP PRO 18 NOCPPO.jpg
- File:Neg-or-police.jpg
- File:Police Regional Office 18 logo.png
- File:PNP Sulu.png
- File:PNP Tawi-Tawi.png
- File:PNP Cotabato City.png
- File:PNP Maguindanao.png
- File:PNP Basilan.png
- File:PNP Lanao del Sur.png
- File:PNP Agusan del Sur.png
- File:Police Regional Office 13 logo.png
- File:PNP Butuan.png
- File:PNP Surigao del Norte.png
- File:PNP Surigao del Sur.png
- File:PNP Agusan del Norte.png
- File:PNP Dinagat Islands.png
- File:Police Regional Office 12 logo.png
- File:PNP General Santos.png
- File:PNP Sultan Kudarat.png
- File:PNP South Cotabato.png
- File:PNP Sarangani.png
- File:PNP Cotabato.png
- File:Police Regional Office 11 logo.png
- File:PNP Davao.png
- File:PNP Davao Occidental.png
- File:PNP Davao Oriental.png
- File:PNP Davao de Oro.png
- File:PNP Davao del Norte.png
- File:PNP Davao del Sur.png
- File:Police Regional Office 10 logo.png
- File:PNP Iligan.png
- File:PNP Cagayan de Oro.png
- File:PNP Misamis Occidental.png
- File:PNP Misamis Oriental.png
- File:PNP Lanao del Norte.png
- File:PNP Bukidnon.png
- File:PNP Camiguin.png
- File:New-logo-pro9small.png
- File:PNP Zamboanga.png
- File:PNP Zamboanga del Sibugay.png
- File:PNP Zamboanga del Sur.png
- File:PNP Zamboanga del Norte.png
- File:Cropped-PRO8 icon-1.png
- File:PNP Southern Leyte.png
- File:PNP Samar.png
- File:PNP Northern Samar.png
- File:PNP Tacloban.png
- File:PNP Ormoc.png
- File:PNP Biliran.png
- File:PNP Eastern Samar.png
- File:PNP Leyte.png
- File:Police Regional Office 7 logo.png
- File:PNP Siquijor.png
- File:PNP Mandaue.png
- File:PNP Negros Oriental.png
- File:PNP Lapu-Lapu.png
- File:PNP Cebu.png
- File:PNP Bohol.png
- File:PNP Cebu City.png
- File:Regional Police Office 6 logo.png
- File:PNP Bacolod.png
- File:PNP Negros Occidental.png
- File:PNP Iloilo City.png
- File:PNP Iloilo.png
- File:PNP Guimaras.png
- File:PNP Antique.png
- File:PNP Aklan.png
- File:PNP Capiz.png
- File:Police Regional Office 5 logo.png
- File:PNP Sorsogon.png
- File:PNP Masbate.png
- File:PNP Catanduanes.png
- File:PNP Naga.png
- File:PNP Albay.png
- File:PNP Camarines Norte.png
- File:PNP Camarines Sur.png
- File:Police Regional Office Mimaropa logo.png
- File:PNP Puerto Princesa.png
- File:PNP Palawan.png
- File:PNP Romblon.png
- File:PNP Oriental Mindoro.png
- File:PNP Occidental Mindoro.png
- File:PNP Marinduque.png
- File:Police Regional Office 4A logo.png
- File:PNP Quezon.png
- File:PNP Rizal.png
- File:PNP Cavite.png
- File:PNP Batangas.png
- File:PNP Laguna.png
- File:PNP Olongapo.png
- File:PNP Zambales.png
- File:PNP Angeles.png
- File:PNP Nueva Ecija.png
- File:PNP Pampanga.png
- File:PNP Tarlac.png
- File:PNP Aurora.png
- File:PNP Bataan.png
- File:PNP Bulacan.png
- File:PNP Santiago.png
- File:PNP Quirino.png
- File:PNP Nueva Vizcaya.png
- File:PNP Isabela.png
- File:PNP Batanes.png
- File:PNP Cagayan.png
- File:PNP Pangasinan.png
- File:PNP Ilocos Sur.png
- File:PNP La Union.png
- File:PNP Ilocos Norte.png
- File:PNP Baguio.png
- File:PNP Mountain Province.png
- File:PNP Kalinga.png
- File:PNP Benguet.png
- File:PNP Ifugao.png
- File:PNP Cordillera.png
- File:PNP Apayao.png
- File:PNP Abra.png
- File:Quezon City Police District badge (old).png
- File:Southern Police District (old).png
- File:Manila Police District badge (old).png
- File:Northern Police District NCRPO (old).png
- File:Eastern Police District (old).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Also bundling in three more police/media logos from later sock User:Gilas Pilipinas GT500:
- File:PNP Manila Police District new logo 2022 (Low Visibility).png
- File:MBC Television (Sama-sama Tayo, Pilipino!) logo.png
- File:MBC Radio (Sama-sama Tayo, Pilipino!) logo.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Lord Belbury (talk) 15:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nissan2021, map uploaded by sockpuppet of a user with a history of inaccurate maps of the Philippines. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused map created by sockpuppet with a history of uploading incorrect maps and damaging existing maps. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused map, all versions uploaded by sockpuppets of the same user who has a history of making false map uploads and edits. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Celeb5-2-1-2012-2.jpg
- File:Celeb3-2-1-2012-2.jpg
- File:Celeb2-2-1-2012-2.jpg
- File:Celeb4-2-1-2012-2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials.
- File:Zasady podczas jazdy.gif
- File:Zasady naszej firmy.gif
- File:Wymagania.gif
- File:Cele naszej firmy.gif
- File:Info o firmie.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jet Aerospace Aviation Research Center (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snthilakammarist (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has uploaded three other photos of this person without evidence of permission, making it likely that these two are also copyright violations from somewhere. File:Vivekanandan Krishnaveni Sasikala (1).jpg is watermarked "JAYA P".
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete perm nom. The user is also blocked in en.wiki[2] and has socked with multiple accounts since.[3] Suneye1 (talk) 09:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his/her uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of presumably copyrighted text Mike Peel (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
The second batch of 81 files uploaded by indef banned user Claudio Pistilli, this time unused 3D chemical models. I think it's better to discuss his files in batches, because it saves time. These files are divided into two sections:
- 1
- 3D models that are derivative works of other Commons files without mentioning original files thus they may be copyright violations + there are problems with proper configuration, different size of atoms of the same element, misaligned bonds etc.
- File:1-propenol3D.png
- File:2-propenol3D.png
- File:3-phenylpropionatamide3D.png
- File:4-ethyl-phenol3D.png
- File:4-Methoxybenzyl chloride3D.png
- File:Acetophenone hydrazone 3D.png (+ File:Phenylmethylhydrazone3D.png redirect)
- File:Allylbenzene 3D.png (+ File:Phenylpropene3D.png redirect)
- File:Amyl butyrate3D.png
- File:Amyl formate3D.png
- File:Anisyl formate3D.png
- File:Anisyl isovalerate3D.png
- File:Anisyl phenylacetate3D.png
- File:Anisyl propionate3D.png
- File:Anisyl valerate3D.png
- File:Anthranilic acid3D.png
- File:Benzothiazole3D.png
- File:Benzyl acetate3D.png
- File:Bromoacetamide3D.png
- File:Cinnamyl anthranilate3D.png
- File:Cinnamyl benzoate3D.png
- File:Cis-anethole3D.png
- File:Crotyl alcohol 3D.png
- File:Cyclopropylamine3D.png
- File:Diallylphthalate3D.png
- File:Diphenyldiazomethane3D.png
- File:Ethyl fluoroacetate3D.png
- File:Ethylbenzene3d.png
- File:Geranyl cinnamate3D.png
- File:Guaiacol cinnamate3D.png
- File:Guaiacol cinnamate3D.png
- File:Indole-3-acetaldehyde3D.png
- File:Indole-3-acetamide3D.png
- File:Indole-3-carbinol3D.png
- File:Indole-3-ethanol3D.png
- File:Indole-3-Lactic acid3D.png
- File:Indole-carboxaldehyde.png
- File:Indole-pyruvic acid3D.png
- File:Indolenine3D.png
- File:Lead element3D.png
- File:Methanesulfinyl chloride3D.png
- File:Methionine3D.png
- File:Methyl bromoacetate3D.png
- File:Methyl caproate3D.png
- File:Methyl iodoacetate3D.png
- File:Methyl isobutyrate3D.png
- File:Methyl isovalerate3D.png
- File:Methyl trichloroacetate3D.png
- File:Methyl-butyrate3D.png
- File:Methylvinylether3D.png
- File:Neopentyl alcohol3D balls.png
- File:P-anisate methyl ester3D.png
- File:Phenethyl formate3D.png
- File:Potassium 4-amino-benzoate3D.png
- File:Potassium bromoacetate3D.png
- File:Potassium chloroacetate3D.png
- File:Potassium dichloroacetate3D.png
- File:Potassium fluoroacetate3D.png
- File:Potassium iodoacetate3D.png
- File:Potassium isophthalate3D.png
- File:Potassium phthalate3D.png
- File:Potassium trichloroacetate3D.png
- File:Propyl formate3D.png
- File:Pyridoxine3D.png
- File:Sodium hypochlorite3D.png
- File:Sodium oxalate 3.png
- File:Trichloromethane sulfonic acid3D.png
- File:Trifluoro-methane-sulfinic acid3D.png
- 2
- 3D models from PubChem of ChemSpider with proper source, but invalid license (AFAIK PubChem is in public domain and also 2D and 3D graphics), however, I'm in favor of deleting these files as they are unused and of not very good quality.
- File:4H-1-Benzopyran.png
- File:Acetamidine3D.png
- File:Chromane3D.png
- File:Chromone3D.png
- File:Cyclopropanecarboxamide3D.png
- File:Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid3D.png
- File:Cyclopropanone 3D structure.png (+ File:Cyclopropanol 3D structure.png redirect)
- File:Fumarylacetoacetic acid3D.png
- File:Geranyl cinnamate3D 2.png
- File:Geranyl cinnamate3D 2.png
- File:Iodoacetyl chloride3D.png
- File:Methacrylonitrile3D.png
- File:Sodium bromo-acetate3D.png
- File:Thioformamide3D.png
Wostr (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is a 3D chemical structure copyrightable? We should just develop our own chemdrawing program that generates the structure on the fly from the SMILES string and puts it in the infobox. We have a dozen different program generating the images, so the styles are not consistent across Wikidata. --RAN (talk) 05:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've seen this question regarding whether representations of chemical structures are copyrightable being debated in another forum, and it's not an easy question to answer. I think in the case of simple 2D structures a good argument that they are not copyrightable can be made; hence the text of {{PD-chem}}. But there is an intellectual aspect needed in determining the appropriate conformation of a 3D structure and also subjective (or creative) aspect to determining features such as best viewing orientation to depict key chemical features, that makes any blanket statement about the copyright status of 3D structures impossible to make. Regarding automatically generating 3D images, this is already done in the chemistry infoboxes on English Wikipedia. It seems to work fine for small molecules, but I think I've seen cases where it simply fails to give a chemically meaningful result for larger molecules. Marbletan (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all of batch 1. The uploader's 3D structures which are composites of other files leads to inconsistencies - the same chemical element shown with different colors and/or sizes is simply misleading. The potential licensing issues are a concern as well. I see only negatives in keeping these images, and nothing to be lost in deleting them. I don't have a strong opinion of batch 2. Marbletan (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete batch 1. both due to licensing and misleading (at best) factual details. DMacks (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Leyo 10:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
copyvio [4] Briu (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
![[4]](https://d6scj24zvfbbo.cloudfront.net/b8dccee5018231ba2d2a568c8866488a/200000136-43c9643c9a/450/20210816_125354.jpg?ph=cbb15a50cf){kind=link}
Deleted: Has been published before and requires therefore a written permission which is handled by the support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edithobayaa1 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Likely not own works but DW or screenshots, see borders on numerous images and watermark on File:Khadija Akobila.jpg. Unreliable uploader with innumerable previous DR's.
- File:Khadija Akobila.jpg
- File:A nurse in a mask.jpg
- File:A policewoman.jpg
- File:A female nurse.jpg
- File:An usher.jpg
- File:Student ushers.jpg
- File:Female ushers in Ghana.jpg
- File:A female doctor.jpg
- File:Female student nurses.jpg
- File:A Ghanaian model.jpg
- File:A Ghanaian nurse.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Dubious source info + out of scope, soapboxing (also a bad use of pdf) Dronebogus (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly soapboxing, would have little to no value by any metric even if not. Учхљёная (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Bulgarian juror Mimo Garsia (juror; Sofia Regional Court; term 2021 - 2025)'s official photo.jpg
[edit]%27s_official_photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%27s_official_photo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright © 2022 Съдебен заседател Мимо Гарсия. All Rights Reserved. 181.203.88.27 01:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder Imatjon@gmail.com 181.203.88.27 01:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
COM:OOS – Pbrks (t • c) 02:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Учхљёная (talk) 03:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Domain not free 2600:100C:A203:122C:997C:F3:B343:7821 07:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: GFDL given. --Achim55 (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vanveenpatrick (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. And self-promotional uploads, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: 2009 upload, no reason for suspicion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: 2009 upload, no reason for suspicion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be above COM:TOO Portugal --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Thanks very much for flagging.
- I am helping the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation with their content. I am authorised to upload their logo, what can I do so that their logo can be made available online?
- Thank you, Sardinhapao (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Sardinhapao: Kindly ask them to send in their permission to COM:VRT. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:28, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Special:Diff/633378367. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded under PD-TH-exempt by User:Thomson Walt
[edit]
- File:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-07.jpg
- File:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-06.jpg
- file:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-05.jpg
- file:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-04.jpg
- file:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-03.jpg
- file:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-02.jpg
- file:Miss Grand Thailand 2019-01.jpg
- file:Miss_Grand_Nepal_2016.jpg
- File:Miss Grand Nepal 2016 05.jpg
- File:Miss Grand Nepal 2016 04.jpg
- File:Miss Grand Nepal 2016 03.jpg
- File:Miss Grand Nepal 2016 02.jpg
- File:Miss Grand Nepal 2016 01.jpg
- File:MIG 2021 Press Conference 04.jpg
- File:MIG 2021 Press Conference 03.jpg
- File:MIG 2021 Press Conference 02.jpg
- File:MIG 2021 Press Conference 01.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 11.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 10.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 09.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 08.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 07.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 06.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 05.jpg
- Its derivative: File:Anronet Roelofsz.png
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 04.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 03.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 02.jpg
- File:MGI 2020 Welcoming Ceremony 01.jpg
The files given are tagged with Template:PD-TH-exempt. However, they do not fall under the given act as they are works in "artistic domain" (photographs). Act asides, majority of them were imported from websites that have "copyrighted" stated in the sites per se. --Chainwit. (talk) 08:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Logos of Srinakharinwirot Demonstration Schools
[edit]- File:SWU Patumwan Demonstration EN Black.svg
- File:SWU Patumwan Demonstration Icon Colour.svg
- File:SWU Patumwan Demonstration EN Color.png
- File:SWU Patumwan Demonstration EN Colour.svg
- File:SWU Patumwan Demonstration TH Black.svg
- File:SWU Patumwan Demonstration TH Colour.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Ele EN Black.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Ele EN Colour.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Ele En White.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Ele TH Black.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Ele TH Colour.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Ele TH White.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Sec EN Black.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Sec EN Colour.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Sec EN White.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Sec TH Black.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Sec TH Colour.svg
- File:SWU Prasanmit Demonstration Sec TH White.svg
Reasons for deletion request: These files are falsely tagged under Template:PD-TH-exempt. However, they are copyrighted works of Srinakharinwirot University (from [5]), to which they are copyrighted works by the university that do not qualify under the cited act. --Chainwit. (talk) 08:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Raziffernandez (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
...fuera del contexto de Commons. Imagen personal. --181.203.88.27 01:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 14:11, 14 February 2022, by Fitindia (CSD F10). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
This is a musical album cover EP with no sign that the uploader has the proper permission Pierre cb (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Suspecious to copyright violation. Uploader has just 2 uploads and claims it to be his own work. this picture can be found in many press websites Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep Useful & potentially educational, even accounting for dubious copyright. Учхљёная (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright always trumps "Useful & potentially educational". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Song album cover with no evidence that the uploader has the proper copyright Pierre cb (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh look at that a fresh batch of NOT INSTAGRAM pics has been dumped in category:1 for no reason! Dronebogus (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Quién es? 181.203.88.27 01:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Учхљёная (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable person, out of scope. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:King of Hearts. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Instagram, Facebook, Commons 181.203.88.27 01:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
COM:OOS. – Pbrks (t • c) 02:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Учхљёная (talk) 03:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
COM:OOS – Pbrks (t • c) 02:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep Not really doing any harm, and in honesty the wikis could use more specimens of picrew-style art for examples. --Учхљёная (talk) 03:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hisham Nafo Official Portrait 181.203.88.27 01:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? De quién es la imagen? 181.203.88.27 01:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
سنڌي: this is profile picture of Abdul Hakeem Palh 181.203.88.27 01:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
A renowned scholar, teacher and Hakim - own work 181.203.88.27 01:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- CopyVio and/or a PhotoShopJob suspected. "Own photoshop work" possible, but source of the face-part of the image needs to be stated. don't keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enyavar (talk • contribs) 03:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Enyavar, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Own work (la revista?) 181.203.88.27 01:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hakeem at the Independent Bar 181.203.88.27 01:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Also
There is no freedom of panorama for temporal works in the Philippines. Needs commercial license permission from the artists who created this banner. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 06:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused, unsourced flag. The accepted flag among the Cascadia movement is the en:Doug flag, File:Flag of Cascadia.svg. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Velma (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Velma (talk) 08:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
I suspect that this image is cropped from a larger original or is a screenshot. Suspicious own work claim. MKFI (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
"by Light Designs Photography", watermarked image. VRT permission from Light Designs Photography needed. MKFI (talk) 09:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author LUCA SCOGNAMILLO". VRT permission from Luca Scognamillo needed. MKFI (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gilas Pilipinas GT500 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Maps created by the sockpuppet of a user blocked multiple times for inaccurate/hoax maps of the Philippines (eg. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ph regions and provinces (22 Regional Centers).png).
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Intentional vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 10:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination SeanJ 2007 (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination, user-generated fantasy/speculative artwork. Definitely out of Commons' scope. -Ianlopez1115 (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright Stalisabal (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Unclear image and out of scope Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad quality pic that does not represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of bad quality that does not really represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of bad quality that does not really represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of bad quality that does not really represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture of bad quality that does not really represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of bad quality that does not really represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture of bad quality that does not really represent anything. Periegetes (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Too small to be useful. Velma (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:EDUSE, not used in any arrticle. NoonIcarus (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Mejor, sus otras contribuciones son mentirosos trabajos propios. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.60.235 (talk) 12:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Author is en:Nate Dunn, die in 1983 shizhao (talk) 12:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hannelore Baron
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1987 – public domain in 2057.
- File:Hannelore Baron (1926-1987), Untitled, 1981.jpg
- File:Hannelore Baron (1926-1987), Untitled, 1983.jpg
- File:Hannelore Baron (1926-1987), Untitled, 1986.jpg
,_Untitled,_1981.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Untitled,_1983.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Untitled,_1986.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Old information and dose not hold value anymore DewezDJ (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 13:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
no longer in use, very low resolution — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore IAS VINOD (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
privacy violation - group juveniles no encyclopedic value used for privacy violation on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 15:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Because it does not have the correct copyright data. Fossiladder13 (talk) 15:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Published at https://www.silivritarihder.com/post/tarih-boyunca-su-kemerleri prior to Commons upload. Please submit license release to COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused hand-drawn diagram, we have lots of high-quality Category:Anatomy of the human knee images DMacks (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.eskiistanbul.net/1082/zeyrek-cinili-hamam. If you own this image, please follow the directions at COM:VRT to verify that the license is correct. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Je ne comprends pas ce qu'il ne vas pas. Pourriez-vous expliciter s'il vous plait ? 2001:861:4040:4BE0:A808:8622:3974:C36D 16:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram and trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Center of Excellence and fields of strength University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria.jpg
- File:International Logo University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria.png
- File:Logo University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria.jpg
- File:Die 10 Center of Excellence und Stärkefelder der FH OÖ.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Velma (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, variations exist, multiple images stitched together, example: [6]
-- DaxServer (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also, the users are part of cross-wiki w:Karna promotion, see w:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#LTA sockpuppetry, puffery of Karna of Mahabharata -- DaxServer (talk) 11:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
According to these data, the author of the photo is the person depicted on it. But it's not a selfie. In addition, the photo has already been published on a site https://www.elvirbabayev.cf (link). Permission is required. GAndy (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Robotje (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation: no permission by contemporary artist; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
The source cannot be correct. Xocolatl (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Tagged by @Afeef: as lacking permission; unclear what permission is lacking -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unidentified person, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
image out of scope, only used for self-promotion, questionable copyright Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Same picture than File:HMS Holland 1 1991.jpg, but of lower quality. Borvan53 (talk) 20:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of item depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Uploader did not take photo depicted in this photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Picture has copyright
[edit]
This is the file from which is this picture. --Stebunik (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DW of free image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work due to size, quality and overprinting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
art by Barry James without COM:OTRS permission by Barry James Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Watermark not matching uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unknown source and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unknown source and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unknown source and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image Cjp24 (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
It is indicated that the photo is taken from Facebook. The author is not named and there is no permission. Venzz (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Photo of my friend we uploaded as a joke. ADiveroli (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Photography uploaded by me of lower quality to an existing one. Zumalabe (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
This file is not really that useful NightWolf1223 (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 23:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 23:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Googlemaps Copyvio, unused Enyavar (talk) 23:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
COMMONS:OOS. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Fails to provide any knowledge, not instructional or not informative Mercy11 (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Statue located at Dartmouth College (New Hampshire) more likely erected in 2000s and lacks freedom of panorama per COM:FOP US. George Ho (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Spain-anon-80. Spain affords an 80 year window of copyright for anonymous works. --RAN (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per {{PD-Spain-anon-80}}. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Picture ripped from proantic.com, Galerie Caroline Miguet-Giafferri, picture n°2. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 14:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Site reads "Ce site ne doit en aucun cas etre reproduit, copié, vendu ou exploité pour raisons commerciales sans autorisation écrite de Proantic.com.". --Achim55 (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Photo of magazines, DW. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Tineye dates another copy of this to 2020, size is facebook or smaller. Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
likely copyviol, given the watermark Lone-078 (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 16:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, https://www.flickr.com/photos/cheriff/32013634306/ from 2016, "all rights reserved". --Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 16:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, https://weheartit.com/entry/173345360 from 2015. --Rosenzweig τ 15:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 16:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, https://www.flickr.com/photos/29902963@N07/7052132355 from 2012, "all rights reserved.". --Rosenzweig τ 15:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 16:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, https://www.flickr.com/photos/menosultra/14137760470 from 2014, "all rights reserved". --Rosenzweig τ 15:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Not of any usemore. Just a part of a discussion about the excistence of the village of Doora. Request for removal of own picture. The Banner (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We do courtesy deletions in the week after the upload, but this was uploaded 6 years ago. It is in use on a discussion page, so apparently it's still useful there and might be useful beyond that. BTW, I also don't see the need to block out the name of a person who died 25 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 15:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
I no longer own the copyright to this photo, so I'm requesting it to be deleted to avoid problems H2rty (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- If you were the rightful owner of the copyright when you released that photo under CC-BY-SA (you say that you "no longer" own the copyright), that license is irrevocable and you therefore aren't able to sell the exclusive rights to the photo later, it remains licensed for free use according to the terms of that license. I therefore tend to see this deletion request as invalid - unless you could argue that you never were the actual copyright owner, which is possible as it's described as an "Official Portrait"...? Gestumblindi (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep due to recent events, its obvious he did take this image and thus does own the rights to this image but since CC is irrevocable as mentioned above, i see no reason to delete this imageStemoc 08:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. An official portrait could very well be in the public domain, but I also don't doubt that the uploader took the photograph. The EXIF data matches other images of the same judge by this user. Official or not, the image is free enough for Commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wait, I don't understand this "official or not ... free enough" reasoning. The copyright situation must be made clearer. "Could very well be in the public domain" and doubts about the uploader as the image's author aren't enough to keep it. If we can assume that everything is correct as it currently stands in the file description; that is, H2rty took that photo personally, was the owner of the rights at the time of upload, and released it under CC-BY-SA, the license is irrevocable. If H2rty isn't actually the photographer, we would have to find the precise reason why, if at all, the image is in the public domain, and apply the fitting PD license template (but it doesn't seem to be a photograph of the federal US government?) instead of CC-BY-SA. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- I am just saying that it seems clear the uploader took the photo (because of the matching EXIF data). There are two options then if we assume that: The uploader is not a federal employee and so could have released the image as CC-BY-SA. The other option is that the uploader is a federal employee who took the photos on the job. If so, the image must be in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wait, I don't understand this "official or not ... free enough" reasoning. The copyright situation must be made clearer. "Could very well be in the public domain" and doubts about the uploader as the image's author aren't enough to keep it. If we can assume that everything is correct as it currently stands in the file description; that is, H2rty took that photo personally, was the owner of the rights at the time of upload, and released it under CC-BY-SA, the license is irrevocable. If H2rty isn't actually the photographer, we would have to find the precise reason why, if at all, the image is in the public domain, and apply the fitting PD license template (but it doesn't seem to be a photograph of the federal US government?) instead of CC-BY-SA. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 00:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Potential issue as there was a Belgian painter named Charles Michel who died in 1967. http://www.artnet.com/artists/charles-michel/ This is a 1909 work so that Michel (born 1874) could have worked on it. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The signature in the drawing matches that of the Belgian painter who died in 1967. The file can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 01:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Photo taken from Find a Grave not proven to be out of copyright yet. No back photo proving prior use either. Unsure whether Gabi Rona created the photo. Must have distributed it, nonetheless. George Ho (talk) 08:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- en:Publicity still? Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter whether it's a publicity still. Do you have pictures or sources of the actual photo yet? George Ho (talk) 07:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Certainly does. If it is a publicity still it was intentionally left out of copyright and now free. Copy of the photo is on MPTV. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 14:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'll put this another way: do you have proof of its first publication? It can be deleted per COM:PCP. --George Ho (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- No. It is possible that this picture wasn't put in circulation before 1977. There are no such evidences (trades, autografed scans etc.) in internet. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 09:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- If that were true, that'd be unpublished until 1978, but I think you have no proof that it was published between 1978 and 1 March 1989, the period when copyright notice was still required. As I can assume, it was published somewhere after March 1989 when the notice is no longer required for copyright. (more in charts) --George Ho (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- My previous "No" means "I have no proof, I agree that this photo may be deleted per COM:PCP". I already replaced this photo in one article, where it cannot be left as red link. Other uses will be replaced later, after expected deleteion. Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 10:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- If that were true, that'd be unpublished until 1978, but I think you have no proof that it was published between 1978 and 1 March 1989, the period when copyright notice was still required. As I can assume, it was published somewhere after March 1989 when the notice is no longer required for copyright. (more in charts) --George Ho (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- No. It is possible that this picture wasn't put in circulation before 1977. There are no such evidences (trades, autografed scans etc.) in internet. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 09:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'll put this another way: do you have proof of its first publication? It can be deleted per COM:PCP. --George Ho (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Certainly does. If it is a publicity still it was intentionally left out of copyright and now free. Copy of the photo is on MPTV. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 14:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter whether it's a publicity still. Do you have pictures or sources of the actual photo yet? George Ho (talk) 07:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted asserted at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0590055/mediaviewer/rm2403375104/ and https://www.mptvimages.com/images?phrase=2702_0002. No proof of release. DrKay (talk) 08:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence that it was published without a notice or for another reason that it would be in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; artist died in 1964. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The entire estate of Helga Ancher - including artist's rights – was bequeathed to Anchers Hus, now Skagens Kunstmuseer after her death in 1964. I uploaded the artwork while working as head of communication at Skagens Kunstmuseer and by permission of the board and director Duotoned (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Duotoned: We need a properly documented permission by e-mail for this. See COM:VRT for the procedure. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Per User talk:Duotoned, a permission was sent today. --Rosenzweig τ 16:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Duotoned: We need a properly documented permission by e-mail for this. See COM:VRT for the procedure. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor resolution image 2600:100C:A203:122C:997C:F3:B343:7821 02:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It's the best we have. --Rosenzweig τ 14:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Gabriel hoff (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation x2: neither permission by contemporary artist no by photographer.
- File:Werkgruppe Berge.jpg
- File:Domus via.jpg
- File:In's Kristall.jpg
- File:Arbor sta 2004 4 49 Kopie.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The permission has been given by the photographer Philipp Schönborn to the author personally Gabriel hoff (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- We do need here an official permission Mr Schönborn as well as by Ms. Oßwald (see Commons:VRT). --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 14:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
low resolution png screenshot from a video/elsewhere, taken in 1969, similar angles available via ČTK photographed by Jan Bárta, unlikely own work TFerenczy (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Its original, not from Jan Bárta ! Vlado022 (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Jestliže to je originál, proč je tak nízké kvality s tenkým černým pruhem dole? Na adrese https://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/10123383458-pribehy-slavnych/401223100031002/ je v čase 35:15–35:22 klip z videa, které vypadá totožně jako tento snímek. Pořídil jste ho vy? Dá se to nějak ověřit? TFerenczy (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Neviem. Tak potom treba zmazat a pokusim sa spravit z toho dokumentu s uvedenym zdroja. Vlado022 (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Jestliže to je originál, proč je tak nízké kvality s tenkým černým pruhem dole? Na adrese https://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/10123383458-pribehy-slavnych/401223100031002/ je v čase 35:15–35:22 klip z videa, které vypadá totožně jako tento snímek. Pořídil jste ho vy? Dá se to nějak ověřit? TFerenczy (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, most likely copyvio screenshot. Though apparently from another video, not the one linked (must have been from another camera right next to the first one). --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of a sign that is most likely copyrighted. Mike Peel (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep This sign is placed in the public street Calle El Castillete in front of the free and public accessible Castillo de Santa Catalina. Therefore it's clearly covered by FoP-Spain. -- Ies (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep If this poster with an explanation in German, ie to invite German tourists to visit, was not FoP-Spain, what photo of a sign would be allowed to be published? --Im Fokus (talk) 19:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Risk of violation of the photographer's copyright, {{PD-Art}} does not apply as the seal is a 3D object, see COM:PDART. The public domain claim appears to be based on the following statement from the owner of the source website: "I make no claim to any copyright on the seal or the images". This does not indicate that the writer is the photographer; this type of wording often indicates that images on a website have been copied from elsewhere. The same image appears on the website of the (UK) National Archives [7], where it is credited to "Cliché Atelier de photographie du Centre historique des Archives nationales de France, Paris", indicating that photograph was made by the French National Archives. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also delete the derivative file File:Seal of Owain Glyndŵr.png. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
I vote to keep.Hogyncymru (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Hogyncymru: , this is not a poll, and it should be a discussion. I can see no evidence that the photographer has licensed this image. The photographer's permission is required, see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. If you think I have misinterpreted the situation the please clarify how. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not OK per Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. If a coin is considered a 3D object, a seal is too. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Çünkü Selfie Ekshilimon (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, you need to be more specific than that. --Rosenzweig τ 00:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be a copy from image previously published elsewhere [8] Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The photo must have to obtain from somewhere with no Copyright. But not copied from the link you have given.
- You can check this: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisxoiU6aWvf6w8qGRbSvLc-ORunwL1lcusBpfItfuEStmAhRlSo8x16NF43XYn6SQi8VQtKXvTj0l0VZVFLQ0ON2b-9BUxFNm6S5HmicbqTmf1d2JHjzgPJZbqgbahYz6_1Yg54HwybxD3eB6sZok4bY1JwjoQ&start=10 Arunudoy (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Arunudoy: The licensing on commons seems to claim this is your own work from 2012 and that you are a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license to that work. If I have misunderstood that or it is not true or the original source and its license cant be determined then it needs to be removed from commons. There's little point trying to get me to own this further. As far as I can see you uploaded the file and the onus is on you to confirm its provenance or the file gets deleted. That is about the end of story apart from admins on commons may need to pursue for copyright violations. Please sort. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- As it is deleted, I guess it is now fixed. Hopefully a "image needed" tag will be beneficial. Regards- Arunudoy (talk) 13:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- To be more precise @Arunudoy I removed the image from en:Draft:Sanjib Baruah as your previous answer seems to indicate it highly probable you have not understood or were deliberately falsifying the licensing. The image is not yet deleted from commons, the nomination still requires to be reviewed and accepted, but at this point I would suggest deletion is probable. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- My apology. I did some mistake, uploading the image and checking the boxex. I did in hurry. Again, apology. :) - Arunudoy (talk) 18:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- To be more precise @Arunudoy I removed the image from en:Draft:Sanjib Baruah as your previous answer seems to indicate it highly probable you have not understood or were deliberately falsifying the licensing. The image is not yet deleted from commons, the nomination still requires to be reviewed and accepted, but at this point I would suggest deletion is probable. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- As it is deleted, I guess it is now fixed. Hopefully a "image needed" tag will be beneficial. Regards- Arunudoy (talk) 13:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Arunudoy: The licensing on commons seems to claim this is your own work from 2012 and that you are a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license to that work. If I have misunderstood that or it is not true or the original source and its license cant be determined then it needs to be removed from commons. There's little point trying to get me to own this further. As far as I can see you uploaded the file and the onus is on you to confirm its provenance or the file gets deleted. That is about the end of story apart from admins on commons may need to pursue for copyright violations. Please sort. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Daisystinkafds as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Yomiuri giants insignia.png
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (SVG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: vector and raster files are not really duplicates, plus the background colors are different. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Daisystinkafds as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: SoftBank Hawks insignia.png
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: background colors are different. --Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, [9] from 2020. --Rosenzweig τ 13:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Files by user Beatrix Ruiz 65
[edit]- File:Catálogos Hiroshima.png
- File:Ejemplos vídeos.png
- File:Guintche Marlene Monteiro.jpg
- File:Meet the artist.png
- File:Neon Hiroshima.jpg
- File:Rino-2 Alice-Brazzit.jpg
- File:Sala Hiroshima grada.jpg
- File:The-national-body-poster.jpg
Collections of file without EXIF, or from different cameras. Doubtful that these were all taken by the same photographer, and therefore doubtful that creators of these files agreed to release freely. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not only are the photos probably not own work, several of the depicted works would need a permission as well. --Rosenzweig τ 02:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
False license. The photo may be available under a license Template:PD-Russia, but you need to know the year of publication and the author (or be sure that the author was not specified when publishing). GAndy (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP, also found on Facebook in higher resolution. --Rosenzweig τ 11:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Part of a 1932 letter. Author died in 1965 pt:Manuel Pedro de Alcântara but this is like a resume. So would be this be considered {{PD-text}} in Brazil? @DarwIn: Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow Thanks for pinging me. Yes, considering the existing jurisprudence, I have not the least doubt this is {{PD-text}} in Brazil. Darwin Ahoy! 23:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I agree with PD-text. --Rosenzweig τ 22:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Although copyright terms in Argentina are relatively short, the uploader has falsely claimed ownership so we can't verify where these photographs were initially published.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image published under Copyright on 12/29/2021 by the Europa Press agency. --Goldorak (talk) 23:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation 83.200.38.153 23:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, [10] from 2014. --Rosenzweig τ 23:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Original file: File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-67.svg Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Stm Logo.png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission from school representative. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the logo seems to be above COM:TOO Canada to me. --Rosenzweig τ 23:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation. Not own work of the uploader, realistically speaking. This is almost certainly a photograph of a photograph, i.e. of the the original photograph which looks like an official photograph taken in the, 50s/60s based on information in Nawab Mir Khudrath Nawaz Jung Bahadur Twsabin (talk) 21:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- I concur with this assessment. I do not believe this is the uploader's own work. Perhaps they took a photograph of a photograph as suggested but that doesn't make it their own work. --ARoseWolf 16:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The man shown died in 1971, and Pakistan is a 50 years pma country, so the original image could be in the public domain if we had some more accurate information about the original source, author, possibly publication. But we don't. --Rosenzweig τ 23:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
copyviol, already deleted at least once Lone-078 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- All uploads by this user should be checked, there are very likely other copyvios among them. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. These are someone else's drawings and most likely copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
likely copyviol, given the watermark Lone-078 (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per {{PD-Art}}. Image is a faithful reproduction of a 2-dimensional artwork which is clearly in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: with {{PD-Art}}. This is from one of the tombs (Horemheb) in the Valley of the Kings. I traced the image back to this presumably pre-2010 website, where the guy says that all the images are scans of postcards because you're not allowed to take your own photographs there. So this is probably where this image, which is now all over the Internet, originally came from. We have much better photos in Category:KV57. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
very likely copyviol, just like all of the user's uploads Lone-078 (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP, most likely a copyvio. This shows the back panel of Tutankhamun's throne (compare File:Ägyptisches Museum Kairo 2019-11-09 Tutanchamun Grabschatz 01.jpg), so not a 2D object; cannot keep this with {{PD-Art}}. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
No source to support claim "Before 1950". NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 13:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, this is used in w:vi:Huy Cận as a picture of a man who was born in 1919. He looks under 29 in the photo, so 'before 1950' is probably accurate. This is public domain in Vietnam if it is an anonymous work and it was published more than 50 years ago, see COM:Vietnam. However, the writing at the bottom right probably identifies the photographer or the studio, so it should not be treated as anonymous. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: To me he looks 25 to 35. Also, according to this source, he was born in 1917, and to this source, he became a minister of North Vietnam in 1946. Therefore this is likely to be his official portrait. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Whether this is public domain depends on whether is an anonymous work. The author being anonymous is different from their being unknown, see Commons:Anonymous works. If the writing on the image is a signature then the work is not anonymous, even if we don't know whose signature it is. COM:Vietnam indicates that if this is not anonymous then it would public domain 50 years after the death of the photographer. As a rule of thumb we add 50 years when the author is unknown, so this would not be assumed to be public domain until 100 years after it was taken. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: To me he looks 25 to 35. Also, according to this source, he was born in 1917, and to this source, he became a minister of North Vietnam in 1946. Therefore this is likely to be his official portrait. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. The signature could be that of a photo studio, making an anonymous work less likely. In any case we don't have enough information to assess the copyright status of this image. We could restore the file 100 years after creation with {{PD-old-assumed}}, but when was this taken? Before 1950 as claimed? Before 1960? Or later? Probably not as late as 2005, when this man died. --Rosenzweig τ 17:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Ubykh abugida and other useless content
[edit]- Category:Ubykh (Webex) Abugida
- File:Webex Syllable PPHE.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PPHA.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PPH.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PPE.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PPA.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PP.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PHE.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PHA.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PH.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PE.svg
- File:Webex Syllable PA.svg
- File:Webex Syllable P.svg
- File:Webex Syllable O.svg
- File:Webex Syllable IWE.svg
- File:Webex Syllable IW.svg
- File:Webex Syllable FE.svg
- File:Webex Syllable FA.svg
- File:Webex Syllable F.svg
- File:Triple-n.svg
- File:Rhenia Emblem-BayonetWar communist.png
These files are all of my own creation and upload. They're all entirely fictitious in content, relatively unused as far as I can tell, have no educational value, and are easily out of scope, but most importantly I can say for certain that they're a clear violation of COM:NOTHOST. --Учхљёная (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well, COM:NOTHOST also means that you cannot expect your uploads to be deleted whenever you feel like seeing them gone. For now, Keep File:Triple-n.svg, which is in use. It may even be more generally in scope, according to 1234qwer1234qwer4 in the discussion page. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:Rhenia Emblem-BayonetWar communist.png is in use, too, but that seems to be corcumscribed to the uploader’s own user pages (presuming multiple accounts). As long as this use persists, though, it cannot be deleted. Better to first blank/edit those user pages, then ask for deletion in Commons. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: I'm not expecting them deleted at a time I choose, and nor do I have any control over anything on the English wikipedia anymore. I know that most of them are completely useless and just wish to expedite the inevitable process of them being deleted; I've made many mistakes in my past. However, you make a good point about the triple n. I was quick to judge and the quality can definitely be improved later down the road, but I won't pretend like similar situations haven't resulted in a fast & decisive delete before. Учхљёная (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Учхљёная: You mean en:User:Pickmeup123/sandbox is not yours? (@Pickmeup123: hello?) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: That's correct. I wouldn't expect a response either, it looks like one of a few other accounts created solely to look like a sock of mine, that happened a few times before I was banned. Apologies for the late response, Учхљёная (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC).
- @Учхљёная: You mean en:User:Pickmeup123/sandbox is not yours? (@Pickmeup123: hello?) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: I'm not expecting them deleted at a time I choose, and nor do I have any control over anything on the English wikipedia anymore. I know that most of them are completely useless and just wish to expedite the inevitable process of them being deleted; I've made many mistakes in my past. However, you make a good point about the triple n. I was quick to judge and the quality can definitely be improved later down the road, but I won't pretend like similar situations haven't resulted in a fast & decisive delete before. Учхљёная (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the two that are in use, per the discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I think the video this comes from is not owned by the YouTube user, Global Fashion News, but by Dolce & Gabbana, the fashion company. Please compare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56LzYP10G4M - the Global Fashion News video, 8:40 mins long, 3,155 views, Jan 17, 2017 to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3XYCHZMEDY - the Dolce & Gabbana video, 14:50 mins long, 4,541,847 views, Jan 14, 2017. Of course the number of views isn't determining, but the order of magnitude is, the D&G has 1000 times the views, of the GFN video. Also the date uploaded is, it was uploaded earlier. The videos are cut slightly differently, so they're not second-for-second identical, but they're clearly mostly the same video, especially the runway part, which is where we're getting this screenshot. The specific picture of Sonia Ben Ammar we're talking about here is from about 1:05 on the Global Fashion News video and about 2:01 on the Dolce & Gabbana video. GRuban (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73 and Starklinson: This isn't the Commons uploader's fault, or the license reviewer's, but I'll ping them both here for future videos - Global Fashion News has a lot of great Creative Commons licensed videos but I don't think those videos are their own work. --GRuban (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment I agree that the video seems to be the same. GFN speciflicy claim they have the copyright. D&G does not claim to have the copyright. I Do not know If GFN is a trustworthy media or not. I know this May not be the Best proof but since D&G have not asked GFN to Take down the video perhaps the copyright is cleared between those two? --MGA73 (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
No proof that an author of the photo was an American, despite Los Angeles as the location. Also, no proof of first publication. Just a link to an Instagram post. George Ho (talk) 22:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Building doesn't look old enough to not be affected by COM:FOP#Romania Gikü (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Same here: File:Palatul Administrativ.jpg. Gikü (talk) 08:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: The building was completed in 1971 according to Romanian Wikipedia. Gildir (talk) 03:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Unusual/Complex shapes; one Q on front, one Q on back, a non-simple shape in middle of the can. Fails COM:PACKAGING. George Ho (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Armbrust as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO South Korea, the threshold of originality in South Korea seems to be very low. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
This logo looks too complex for {{PD-textlogo}} to apply. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 07:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The logo has been already since 16 May 2018 by S Group Coop. --2001:999:230:7AC4:5449:42CE:B80E:90FC 11:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This logo has also {{PD-shape}}. No reason for deletion. --2001:999:20:F250:5449:42CE:B80E:90FC 21:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- That doesn’t matter, as it contains elements that are too complex for {{PD-shape}} too. (Also when the image was uploaded isn’t relevant whether the file is free or not.) Regards, User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 23:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This logo has now {{Trademarked}}, instead of {{PD-shape}}. --2001:999:20:F250:5449:42CE:B80E:90FC 02:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, this logo is complex enough for PD-shape or PD-textlogo. According to COM:TOO Finland, "...In particular, the threshold is high when only basic colors and shapes (such as triangles, squares and circles or capital letters) are used." Also please notice that Delete request is not vote. Stang★ 20:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Look at the SVG logos of political parties in Finland, e. g. the Sozialdemokratische Partei Finnlands Logo.svg, Logo of Left Alliance, Finland.svg and Keskusta.svg. --2001:999:0:9725:2423:8E5:D9DB:9586 23:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply, and I make another DR. Stang★ 00:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as it is apparently above COM:TOO Finland. --Rosenzweig τ 15:53, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Riggwelter as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is the official coat of arms for Sorunda municipality in Sweden. Swedish councils' coats of arms are protected by copyright, and may not be licensed according to a free licence, and therefor can't be uploaded on Wikipedia. The uploader also states that this is his work, which isn't true since it is a photo of a coat of arms protected by copyright. This is therefor copyright infringment and the photo must be deleted. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per request. Riggwelter (talk) 09:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also the photo is apparently taken from Facebook accd. to the Exif data. That coat of arms could perhaps be PD-old, but I'd need more information about its author, time of creation etc. to decide that. --Rosenzweig τ 15:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Territorial Evolution of the Ottoman Empire 1299-1923.gif <-- this is nanahuatl's.. this is modern primat's--> not the same image Modern primat (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, out of project scope.--Kadıköylü (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. I don't think this is out of project scope as claimed in the discussion, but it is a) completely unsourced b) unclear who actually made this given its obvious connection to the previously file. --Rosenzweig τ 15:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
no evidence this sound recording is in the public domain in the United States under Title II of the Music Modernization Act, per COM:PD Hekerui (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, this is in the public domain. See the license and other files in Category:The War of the Worlds (radio drama). Yann (talk) 12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The license says this sound recording would enter the public domain in 2038. The pictures in the category are not sound recordings. Please elaborate. Hekerui (talk) 09:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: ? {{PD-US-record}} was changed in 2018 because of the new law (Music Modernization Act) in the US. --Rosenzweig τ 21:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- When was this recording first published btw? The copyright terms of the MMA, as reflected in {{PD-US-record}}, run from the year of publication. Per Commons:Publication#United States, “ A public performance or display of a work does not of itself constitute publication”, so I think the 1938 radio broadcast was not the time this recording was first published. The first actual publication (as in “the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership”) I could find (per [11]) is a 1955 vinyl record. A recording first published in 1955 is copyrighted for a period of 110 years after first publication, so until the end of 2065. --Rosenzweig τ 17:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- The license says this sound recording would enter the public domain in 2038. The pictures in the category are not sound recordings. Please elaborate. Hekerui (talk) 09:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Broadcast was not publication, correct. However I'm not sure the recording of a radio broadcast, if just taping what went out over the air, would necessarily qualify for the threshold of originality. So, not sure the sound recording terms have a bearing. On the other hand, the radio program itself did have a script, and supposedly Howard Koch registered that script in 1940 and renewed it in 1968. I have not been able to find those registrations and renewals, but there was a court case where Orson Welles tried to get himself named as a co-author, which was rejected since while Welles had come up with the basic idea, and made some late alterations, the script itself was written by Koch. So I'd have to guess these registrations are out there somewhere (though the court case happened before a renewal was due). If they do exist, then it's copyrighted in the U.S. until 2036. Koch died in 1995, so it could be copyrighted in many other countries until 2066. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete @Clindberg: I think I found the copyright registration. It's not for the script as a standalone publication, but for a 1940 publication by en:Hadley Cantril, published by Princeton University Press and containing the complete script. The easiest way to find registration and renewal is probably to search here for Invasion from Mars, which gives you
Cantril, Hadley. Invasion from Mars; a study in the psychology of panic, with the complete script of the famous Orson Welles broadcast, by H. Cantril, with the assistance of Hazel Gaudet & Herta Herzog. © Apr. 15, 1940; A 140410; Princeton univ. press, Princeton N. J. 5553. The renewal is from 1967, 26 May, R4 10861. - en:The War of the Worlds (1938 radio drama)#Authorship says
A condensed version of the script for "The War of the Worlds" appeared in the debut issue of Radio Digest magazine (February 1939), in an article on the broadcast that credited "Orson Welles and his Mercury Theatre players". [...] The complete script appeared in The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic (1940), the book publication of a Princeton University study directed by Cantril. Welles strongly protested Koch being listed as sole author since many others contributed to the script, but by the time the book was published, he had decided to end the dispute. - So to sum it up, the original broadcast was not copyrighted as such because it was not published (by US definition), and the sound recording terms probably don't apply because just taping the broadcast is below the threshold of originality. With the script copyrighted however, the content of the broadcast is copyrighted in the US because of said registration until the end of 2035 and enters the PD in 2036.
- If this file is deleted, the other versions should be deleted as well:
- I will add the DR tag to the file pages as well. --Rosenzweig τ 12:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, interesting. Nicely done. I should have read the en-wiki article more :-) Renewed in 1967 then, not 1968, but same difference. Delete then, for sure, and undelete in 2036. The record is also available in the Stanford database; renewal number R410861. The one-issue Radio Digest from 1939 does not appear to have been renewed -- the original was B399991 in February 1939 to "Cecilia Co." But, sounds like that was not the whole script. Apparently Welles and/or Columbia had rights for a few years per specific agreement, so that magazine was likely done with permission, and those portions would be PD. But the full script would still be under copyright, since the rights reverted to Koch after those few years. Welles didn't quite give up his claim at the time -- sounds like Koch got paid for its use in a 1957 TV show, which is what Welles sued over to get himself named as an author or at least co-author, but was rejected by the 9th circuit in 1962, so Koch was the only author. The renewal was not in his name, but I guess it would work like a contribution to a periodical, where the periodical was renewed. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, interesting. Nicely done. I should have read the en-wiki article more :-) Renewed in 1967 then, not 1968, but same difference.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
These files have been languishing in "no license" since November. They were all correctly sent there by Eugene Zelenco. But as they are in use on Polish Wiki books I would like to ask for help getting them fixed so we can keep them if it is possible. I fixed several other images of this series where there was sufficient information for me to do it. The essential difficulty is that the illustrations were published after 1926 and we only have "anonymous" as author, so it is impossible to know if the EU license offered is correct. This is a procedural nomination without prejudice to the uploader who is trying to illustrate Polish Wikibooks.
- File:Ilustracja str 129.jpg
- File:Ilustracja Str 143.jpg
- File:Ilustracja Str 177.jpg
- File:Ilustracja str 181.jpg
- File:Ilustracja str 211.jpg
- File:Ilustracja Str 253.jpg
- File:Ilustracja Str 319.jpg
- File:Ilustracja str 83.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Czarny tulipan (1928).pdf 173.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Czarny tulipan (1928).pdf 203.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Czarny tulipan (1928).pdf 75.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu203.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu303.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu433.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu479.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu543.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu605.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu659.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu719.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Dwadzieścia lat później.djvu79.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu 23.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu102.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu117.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu134.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu152.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu163.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu173.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu186.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu193.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu224.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu245.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu261.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu281.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu295.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu304.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu317.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu333.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu343.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu361.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu368.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu53.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu83.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu89.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu112.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu160.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu224.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu288.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu402.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu466.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu530.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu578.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu628.jpg
- File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.jpg
.pdf_173.jpg){kind=link}
.pdf_203.jpg){kind=link}
.pdf_75.jpg){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Source file is after removing .jpg, for example: File:PL Dumas - Naszyjnik Królowej.djvu, File:PL Dumas - Karol Szalony.djvu, "ilustracja" is from File:PL Aleksander Dumas - Czarny tulipan.djvu. Matlin (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:PL Dumas - Neron.jpg is File:PL Dumas - Neron.djvu, FIleFile:Ózef Balsamo.djvu tom XII.jpg is File:PL Dumas - Józef Balsamo.djvu, File:Zola - Rozkosze życia okładka.jpg is File:PL Zola - Rozkosze życia.djvu (these files should be not deleted propably). Matlin (talk) 14:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: What exactly are people supposed to fix here? Not that anbody showed up to do so in the last five months anyway ... --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- These seem to be old enough, but I am not an expert on European Licenses or Polish artists. Where authors were given, I tried to fill in the information as best as I could. The files are in Use on Wikibooks, so even though Eugene's nomination is procedurally 100%, I stopped and did a full deletion nomination in the hope that someone could provide enough information to keep them. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- So restore deleted files, per my previous comment... Matlin (talk) 19:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- These seem to be old enough, but I am not an expert on European Licenses or Polish artists. Where authors were given, I tried to fill in the information as best as I could. The files are in Use on Wikibooks, so even though Eugene's nomination is procedurally 100%, I stopped and did a full deletion nomination in the hope that someone could provide enough information to keep them. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I looked at the book files, and as far as I could see, neither the illustrators nor the translators are credited. The illustrations are not signed, so I think they qualify for the {{PD-anon-70-EU}} tag. Concerning US copyrights, I didn't see any US-compliant copyright notices in the books, so there are no subsisting copyrights. And on the URAA date (1996-01-01), Poland had a copyright term of 50 years (after the death of the creator if known, from publication if the creator is unknown). The books were published in 1910, 1928 and 1932, so the anonymous illustrations were all in the public domain in Poland on the URAA date, and the {{PD-1996}} tag fits. --Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)