Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 23rd, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erruore di caricamento. Immagine non usata ViciDig (talk) 06:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TajPharmaImages (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images have been published before (for example, https://tajpharma.in/ivermectin-tablets-usp-12-mg-manufacturers-suppliers-exporters/, https://tajgenerics.com/comprimidos-de-ivermectina-taj-pharma-ultimo-preco-exportadores-fabricantes-e-fornecedores/, https://www.behance.net/gallery/121631217/The-export-of-Injection-Remdesivir100mgvial/modules/691951047). OTRS permission needed.

Considering that Remdesivir and Ivermectin have been in the news as pseudoscientific Covid cures I suspect this may an attempt to use Commons for advertising.

MKFI (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 14:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TajPharmaImages (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Content created as advertisement/spam. See also Special:Permalink/603068502#TajPharmaImages.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. It's all clearly promotional. The uploader has been blocked as a sock of a user that has been spamming here for Taj Pharma for more than a decade. As mentioned in the previous deletion request, the file names and image descriptions touting ivermectin as a Covid treatment are problematic as well. Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of these files, Jimmy kumar Lal (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, is clearly a sock of TajPharmaImages (and older accounts such as Tajpharmagroup (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log), who has been uploading promotional images to Wikimedia sites for many many years and whose socks have been indefinitely blocked many times. Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam spam spam spam... Speedy, gone!. --Herby talk thyme 13:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request. --Boylarva99 (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by Lawren Harris (1885-1970), a Canadian artist. May be OK on the English Wikipedia. Yann (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's porn. 162.142.32.136 21:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work but copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 21:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ערוך101 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these are old works and is not the uploader's work as the license proclaims. Proper attribution and licensing is needed.

1989 (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All files are images from public domain old books. I did not know how to upload them as such.
Anyway, those images are essential for various important public Wikipedia articles.
If it is possible, tell me how to change their licensing properly.
Thanks. ערוך101 (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ערוך101: See Commons:Copyright tags and replace the license to what is appropriate. 1989 (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the files. Thanks for your guidance. ערוך101 (talk) 23:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. 1989 (talk) 23:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

二次的著作物である。(It seems a kind of derivative works.)(明治学院大学アメリカンフットボール部 ニュースブルーメンタール (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sorry but we have to delete this image because it is a photo of a protected artwork ("derivative work") and we do not have the necessary permission from the rightsholder. Gnom (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of a better SVG image. We dont need duplicates. I will correct and customize the SVG. Perhelion (talk) 14:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Commons:Transition to SVG. Rauenstein 21:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand you argumentation, then we can upload 1:1 copy bitmaps of every SVG!? That makes really no sense. I'm a bit pissed off, that you have removed the DL against the rules. I think only admins can close a DR?!? -- πϵρήλιο 22:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is the exact copy of the SVG, so it's elidgeable for deletion. However, the file is in use, which automatically means that we shouldn't delete it unless it's a copyvio. It's up to the specific project to decide what version they want to use. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 07:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Not any more... Sorry, but I still don't see logic here. Then we must keep all duplicates/redundants which are in use... That PNG version is more worse than the SVG. The SVG version has now also some heraldic fixes more. Any duplicate/redundancy makes double senseless work (...management, maintenance) for all related (means all technique too and all those not mentioned drawbacks, that redundancies bring with itself.)! But anyway that policy stays clearly here: Commons:Deletion_policy#Redundant/bad_quality (if somebody don't know) -- πϵρήλιο 09:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we keep everything that is in use (unless it's a copyvio). Since this has been removed from use only after this deletion request has started, i propose to wait a little bit before closing. If it won't be reintroduced on some article, then we can delete. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 07:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Our rule is simple -- if the png predates the svg, we keep it. We do not keep pngs that postdate the equivalent svg. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then you must delete it, because the equivalent SVG is 2 minutes older as the PNG. And also this deletion request was removed on the same day, so here is another rule violation. -- πϵρήλιο 16:45, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate}} File:DE-ST_15-0-82-180_Koethen_COA.svg Ollemarkeagle (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: has already been discussed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not the flag of Srivijaya, but a modern forgery of Srivijaya flag. This is like the 3rd time a person tried to pass this flag as a historical flag. This image has been deleted from Commons before and reuploaded. The file desc itself redirect to Reddit, where it is stated as modern fabrication. Surijeal (talk) 15:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Farei upload de outro com as informações devidas. Brucmou (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F2. --King of ♥ 04:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no this is far from "very poor quality". It would probably make a better photograph if the wheel was repainted, but for a photograph of a white wheel against a light sky, it's an adequate photograph. Our scope is always broad and it would be hard to make any case that this is outside it. Nor was any such attempt made – these vague handwaves at policies are no sort of deletion rationale. And surely I don't have to point out to an admin that "not used" is no sort of deletion rationale whatsoever. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, per Andy Dingley. -- Tuválkin 15:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OK. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not cleared under copyright - uploader claims it is available under CC4.0 but is actually taken from a website HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted COM:CV, claimed license unsupported by source site (which has clear copyright notice) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not cleared under copyright - uploader claims it is available under CC4.0 but is actually taken from a website HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not cleared under copyright - uploader claims it is available under CC4.0 but is actually taken from the website parliament.nz. That website explicitly states that photographs of MPs are not available under CC. HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should have read it fully. I just looked and saw it was free to use. I did not read the full document. Very silly move of mine. Thatbigperson (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - this photo is copyrighted, it never has been released under a CC-BY licence vip (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - this photo is copyrighted, it never has been released under a CC-BY licence vip (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary undeleted as per [1]. --Yann (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary undeletion has enabled us to find a good replacement, as far as Dutch Wiktionary is concerned there are no objections against deletion. --MarcoSwart (talk) 12:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted again after temporary undeletion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Unfree sculpture. The artist, Peter Tiamzon de Guzman , is still living. There is also no FOP exception here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No FOP for works of art in the Philippines, per COM:FOP Philippines. --Ellywa (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Mohammad Murtaza Zaidi

[edit]

Small size photos, lacking EXIF data, possibly copyright violations. Many of them are extracted from videos which I can't locate, but have found other shots from them online. The user has also uploaded many other files that have been already deleted. --C messier (talk) 12:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Rodrigolopes has already nominated some other files, where he was able to locate the source, but noted that all of them appeared to be a copyright violation. EPorto (WMB) also noted that their source was questionable, as they appear to be screenshots (as one of them has a magnifing glass on it). --C messier (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, outside Commons:Project scope Calistemon (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, outside Commons:Project scope Calistemon (talk) 15:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, outside Commons:Project scope Calistemon (talk) 15:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, outside Commons:Project scope Calistemon (talk) 15:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:JAC logo.jpg. No usage of Wikimedia projects. mattbr 15:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Srrkanth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used on Commons for speedy deleted spam article. Only other use is WP:EN spam article up for speedy deletion. Although the logo is PD-text logo, the images are probably copyvios and certainly would require OTRS to keep as they all appear elsewhere on the Web without a free license. This is a single location store, not notable by our standards or WP:EN's.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Srrkanth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly promotional images for a retail store with an entry. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 16:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HISTORIA GmbH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 16:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INNSIRE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amanmdshala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

JopkeB (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free derivative work. 1989 (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free derivative work. 1989 (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free derivative work. 1989 (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free derivative work. 1989 (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, no useful as .pdf in Wikimedia projects. Velma (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and reuplod of the file which was deleted in 2021. --Rosenzweig τ 01:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a random greenery, little to no COM:EDUSE and more like COM:WEBHOSTing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadiasalam10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 08:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic with no evidence of permission. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fvelval (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 08:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Low quality dw of File:Gateway Space Station Module Map.jpg, unused. --Achim55 (talk) 10:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hikyapi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 09:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shueb1025 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 09:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; personal image of low resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo; uploaded by SPA Ankry (talk) 10:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from Google earth Ms0801 (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hi-media (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. Hi-media logos redundant to File:Hi-media-baseline.jpg. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 12:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabaxxy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 12:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rv self, not needed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwamikagami (talk • contribs) 10:08, 21 December 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own upload, duplicate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwamikagami (talk • contribs) 10:25, 18 December 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baijumaev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files grabbed from the web.

Xunks (talk) 14:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no such place as Azad Jammu kashmir ... this picture is a tool for geopolitical tool for an issue that is under United nations Consideration ... Apart from removing the picture the Author should also be permanently banned 2003:F2:670A:8800:703E:895A:A368:A326 15:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:New Jac motors logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThatOneAussie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BABGAss2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work' by different uploaders. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 16:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MzStudios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 16:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mothukuru Suryaprabha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic with no evidence of permission. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BattMan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Redundant to File:HIU-Logo 1107 CMYK.tif. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 16:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:HIU- Logo.PNG. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 16:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hafenkrone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hkgn1432 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 17:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be an album cover or similiar; potential copyvio Nutshinou Talk! 17:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be an album cover or similiar; potential copyvio Nutshinou Talk! 17:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 18:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nghman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 18:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZohaibSaleem84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 18:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hưng Lộc Phát (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 19:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:HMS HOST logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 19:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no description, no useful category, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep View of Paris at sunset, with acceptable quality. Darwin Ahoy! 02:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: If you think this file is useful, could you please rename it, and add a meaningful description? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann ✓ Done Darwin Ahoy! 14:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: issue resolved. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no description, no useful category, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Categorized and useful - malfunctioning irrigation sprinkle in Paris. Darwin Ahoy! 02:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: If you think this file is useful, could you please rename it, and add a meaningful description? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann ✓ Done Darwin Ahoy! 14:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: issue resolved. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no description, no useful category, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep categorized and useful - interior of a church in Paris, showing a decorated fluted column with part of a via sacra. Darwin Ahoy! 02:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: If you think this file is useful, could you please rename it, and add a meaningful description? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann ✓ Done Darwin Ahoy! 15:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: issue resolved. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drwngt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piotr Mroczek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images relating to HO'X stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lotutt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uprisingpictures (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ladlahoc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junzifeng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational Ecritures (talk) 22:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, non notable person, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 23:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used Таллархо (talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is no valid reason for deletion.--GerritR (talk) 13:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion & in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asysyifaa Tera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 16:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 09:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model, a permission from the artist is needed. Yann (talk) 22:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well good luck, considering it was made in 1681 [2].  Keep. Borysk5 (talk) 16:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Model is old enough. That information is needed. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, from Haringey Advertiser Oxyman (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW by Flickr user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smw-media (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but most marked Copyright holder Harald Schwarz, SMW-MEDIA.com in exif. I think we need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammadamani1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on wikidata d:Q110244951

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader admitted to the substitution of authorship and that he took the photo from the Internet [3] Venzz (talk) 06:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я передумал. Больше не хочу чтобы было доступным публично Kostya2006 (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per other nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader admitted to the substitution of authorship and that he took the photo from the Internet [4] Venzz (talk) 06:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я передумал. Больше не хочу чтобы было доступным публично Kostya2006 (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader admitted to the substitution of authorship and that he took the photo from the Internet [5] Venzz (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete, copyvio: http://cheb-news.net/society/2021/05/28/31864.html --Drakosh (talk) 12:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Sports.ru copyright infringement 95.31.191.213 07:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archive photo, maybe 1940-1960 1966-1970, no original source, date, author. No permisiion from actual copyright holder Drakosh (talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work http://letopis.msu.ru/peoples/6909 Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 15:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:05, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Archie02 (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G2. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs by Klaus Rudloff uploaded by מנחם.אל

[edit]

This was a pain to compile, and there might be more. But these photographs by Klaus Rudloff have no OTRS verification or permission information (besides a few that state "I got permission from the photograpger", which isn't good enough.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing in the list above and deleted as well, Ellywa (talk) 22:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto de 1960s, no es trabajo propio, menos de 2021! 191.125.53.32 00:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Missing evidence of copyright status, please contact COM:VRT if you are the copyright holder. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyright status of images used (COM:DW). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lotroo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I strongly suspect that these maps are not the uploader's own work as claimed. Too much variation in the size, style, and quality of each one. If the uploader can provide the online source, perhaps the CC-Zero license can be confirmed also.

Senator2029 12:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would say  Keep Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: While the maps are signed "R.Botev", it seems quite clear to me that R.Botev's contributions were limited to adding labels to pre-existing maps. This is especially evident when comparing the fonts of the signature and some of the labels, which are quite pixellated with the labels of the base maps, which are usually smooth. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lotroo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

To quote Senator2029 verbatim: "I strongly suspect that these maps are not the uploader's own work as claimed. Too much variation in the size, style, and quality of each one. If the uploader can provide the online source, perhaps the CC-Zero license can be confirmed also."

1989 (talk) 05:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp Personal photographs - out of scope - the Commons is not a web host for personal photos - personal names are revealed

Krok6kola (talk) 02:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious... the very most photos at this list (except:
Kristines (2204346433).jpg
Bend Oregon (USA, September-October 2018) - 21 (50917141633).jpg
Big mandy (2412749504).jpg
Chomp (1646739574).jpg
Em (845382426).jpg
Gnaw (1645842713).jpg)
are photos of well-known, encyclopedic people from Poland. If you don't live in Poland please google file names or descriptions... Matlin (talk) 05:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Krok6kola and Matlin: I've now moved this out to a separate deletion request here. - Jmabel ! talk 18:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC) @Krok6kola: Wouldn't it have made more sense to start this with a question on Matlin's user talk page, rather than a mass deletion request? - Jmabel ! talk 18:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp


Deleted: per nomination - this is what happens when matlin uploads indiscriminately. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, when Krok6ola nominate files indiscriminately and you delete it without discernment - this user doesn't nominated all files which meet its criteria for removal XDDDD See Category:Photographs by Ja Fryta XDDD Matlin (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file is in Category:Sky Italia. Would not the Italian copyright rules apply? Senator2029 03:50, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source to prove the license, I wasn't able to find it via Google Images either. rubin16 (talk) 07:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Fan art, COM:DW sугсго 07:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, no COM:Freedom of panorama in Italy. sугсго 07:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philip R. Ford is claimed as the "author", but the Wikipedia article about him credits Kristen Trattner as the photographer. Furthermore, the photo itself looks crisp and clear. Maybe too professional? George Ho (talk) 08:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the description in the article was there before the file, however it is unlikely to be own work as the author stated is "Phillip R. Ford" and this is not a selfie. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyvio. This is a screenshot because the zooming tool is pictured there. This could be deleted and the original picture should be uploaded if the license is otherwise ok. Velma (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 08:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary data 221.151.81.220 09:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - potential copyright issue too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and as far as I can see not a creator of something Achim55 (talk) 10:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted again. --Achim55 (talk) 17:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, lacks EXIF data, the uploader has uploaded also many files that are copyright violations. C messier (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, lacks EXIF data, the uploader has uploaded also many files that are copyright violations. C messier (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WelcomeToMyLife - Taxi Service and Travel Tips and Tricks ideas in 2021, and More Information Update In Hindi..`! 191.125.53.32 11:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es trabajo propio. 191.125.53.32 11:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely grabbed from a social media - also likely a personal image from a non contributor. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not Tony Curtis but Claude Akins with Poitier 2001:2003:F7B9:2500:80E6:4BFB:BB6B:3556 11:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Claude Akins (easy to see) ! CecilF (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This person is not notable, his photograph was uploaded by his brother for promotional reasons. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no advertising, it is loaded under the topic category presenter, TV studio. Please do not delete it. --DENAMAX (talk) 17:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used on user namespace and the uploader is a contributor, see COM:INUSE. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have quite many good pictures of this Ukrainian football player. This pisture is very small and of very low quality, and another person pictured is someone unknown and insignificant. There is no foreseeable use of this picture beyond promotion of that second guy. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon! I ask you not to delete it if I use it in my personal space, I hope for impartiality and adequacy. --DENAMAX (talk) 17:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used on user namespace and the uploader is a contributor, see COM:INUSE. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ложные данные о лицензии: https://www.a-nav.org/ru/howitworks.html вкладка Системная архитектура -- Tomasina (talk) 12:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also unsused diagram of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jakenight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. All files available on-line on various sources.

Smooth O (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official WWE image, appears in many places online, definitely not copyright free ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image (and it's cropped version) is a portrait painting, not a photograph, according with PD-Italy template, only "simple photographs" are protected for a period of 20 years from creation. Those images that don't meet the "simple photographs" criteria, are protected for a period of 70 years after the author's death, a time that it's impossible to be passed yet.--81.40.135.122 13:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. I added the source link to the file page. Painter Maria Grazia Simonetta (b. 1955) is AFAIK still alive. --Achim55 (talk) 13:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture of a newspaper is still a copyright infringement. Dajasj (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

لبست ضرورية Abdovno (talk) 14:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: image is used but it's an uploader request done the same day of the upload. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A useless photo with a huge Watermark right at the lower middle portion.. practically useless for anyone ... must be deleted as it serves no purpose except free publicity to the photographer ... 2003:F2:670A:8800:703E:895A:A368:A326 15:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission given and this is not made by the person himself as claimed since he clearly holds both hands elsewhere Hoyanova (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the photo is a derivatice work of the painting too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder JUAN CEVALLOS 191.125.53.32 01:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaded elsewhere online prior to Wikimedia Commons acording to Google. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art painting, no author mentioned, probably not OK. Yann (talk) 20:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of copyrighted trophy 219.77.176.112 03:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 21:52, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map without a source. Lack of credibility and educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: most are in use. Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. Deleted one per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? I found this photo also on https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/10312443-meet-the-grassroots-organization-fighting-for-social-justice-in-mississauga-and-brampton/ and https://www.thestar.com/local-brampton/news/2021/01/24/meet-the-grassroots-organization-fighting-for-social-justice-in-mississauga-and-brampton.html JopkeB (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyright violation .. Speedy Deletion 2003:F2:670A:8800:703E:895A:A368:A326 15:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer, see above. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of which other file? --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
this is the better File --Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we don't delete raster files just because there is now also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Wappendatei kann gelöscht werden, es existiert eine exzellente SVG-Datei von diesem dargestellten Wappen (DE-ST_15-0-91-020_Pretzsch_COA.svg). Alle Verlinkungen zu den unterschiedlichen Wikipedien sind mit der SVG-Version verknüpft und die PNG-Datei wird daher nicht mehr genutzt und kann entfernt werden. Beide Dateien zeigen einunddasselbe Wappen von Pretzsch. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Es kommt doch nicht auf irgendwelche leichten Farbunterschiede an, sondern darum ob der Wappeninhalt derselbe ist! Und wenn das der Fall ist handelt es sich um ein und dasselbe Wappen von Pretzsch. Somit liegt eine Redundanz vor und das überflüssige Wappen kann entfernt werden, da es sowieso nirgends auf keiner Seite gezeigt wird. Der Ort Pretzsch hat nur ein Wappen und dann reicht auch nur eine exzellent präsentierte Wappendatei völlig aus! --Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement - no way near notable. Dr. Coal (talk) 01:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete out of scope. Kadıköylü (talk) 08:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo, Hello, I think this discussion could be closed. Kadıköylü (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, spam image, COM:PACKAGING. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inflammatory/hateful title, seems to be used exclusively by bigoted users on the Ukrainian Wikipedia. There are other images that can represent Anti-LGBT+ Sentiment. Dronebogus (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete uk:Шаблон:Користувач проти пропагування, виправдання і афішування ЛГБТ seems to be the source of this. The image was added by user:Green Zero. Commons shouldn't be used to spread hate. Multichill (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Its not a hate, its freedom of speech. Any person can to say for or against about anything. — Green Zero обг 20:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
irrelevant to the topic

Additional arguments, context or comments:

 Delete User pages shouldn't be used to propagate hate against a class of people.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not only it's hate speech, it, and the discussion around it seems also to be a violation of Universal Code of Conduct so hard, that it should warrant a global lock for the uploader. Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Hate speech is not protected speech; this is clearly a violation of the Universal Code of Conduct — OwenBlacker (talk; please ping me in replies) 23:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. First of all: I do not share the views against the promotion, justification and propagation homosexuality. However, there are two possible uses of this file.
    • First of all, it is a nice illustration of en:LGBT rights opposition and related topics, and we have multiple equally symbolic images on other topics (e.g. File:Anti-Ukrainian.svg). They are not nice to representiatives of respectively LGBT or Ukrainians, but they do illustrate real movements targeting these groups. Wikipedians did not invent LGBT rights opposition, it exists no matter we like it or not.
    • Secondly, Ukrainian Wikipedia is traditionally tolerant to people announcing their views on talk pages, at least that helps to clearly understand in which topics these people have strong opinions and we should check their edits for NPOV biases. And these works on the entire political spectrum, say, Ukrainian Wikipedia also has uk:Шаблон:Прихильник комуністичних ідей despite Communist symbols being banned in Ukraine. The views announced in uk:Шаблон:Користувач проти пропагування, виправдання і афішування ЛГБТ are quite widespread, say, they match en:Hungarian anti-LGBT law. I do not like the fact that such views are popular, however, I cannot deny the fact that a significant number of people (including a significant number of Wikipedians) share them. It's better when people warn you of their intolerant views, much easier to understand them than if they hide these views.
    If the mere mention of LGBT rights opposition violates UCoC, then, well, we should ban all people displaying this flag, delete related articles and we would have an illusion of problem solved. If we, however, accept that the existence of LGBT rights opposition is a fact that does not depend on us, I don't see a reason to delete this file. Exactly the same way as we have multiple other anti- like File:Anti-Ukrainian.svg, File:Anti-Catholicism.svg and all other anti-. We probably just need to rename this file to something like File:Anti-LGBT-flag.jpg and keep it together with others — NickK (talk) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • NickK makes three good points here— it’s a good illustration, it’s similar to many other files that aren’t controversial, and it’s arguably only making the anti-LGBT people look worse. But the slippery slope argument is gratuitous. User content is held to much stricter standards than articles (though not to the level if instantly banning them for this). * There’s a difference between articles on homophobia and discriminatory crap on your userpage. It’s is violating the Universal Code of Conduct whether you like it or not[1], and since Wikimedia is a private organization it doesn’t have to abide by any sort of “freedom of speech” law. Dronebogus (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. UCOC article 2: In all Wikimedia projects, spaces and events, behaviour will be founded in respect, civility, collegiality, solidarity and good citizenship. This applies to all contributors and participants in their interaction with all contributors and participants, without expectations based on age, mental or physical disabilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field. Nor will we make exceptions based on standing, skills or accomplishments in the Wikimedia projects or movement. (Emphasis mine)
  • <references> insert here — Yuri V (tc), 19:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]
    • @Dronebogus: I would doubt this. If File:The user against the promotion, justification and propagation homosexuality.jpg is offensive against sexual orientation, gender identity, File:Anti-Ukrainian.svg is offensive against national, (...) ethnic and cultural background, while File:Anti-Catholicism.svg is offensive against religious (...) background. I don't understand why being against LGBT rights is any different from being against ethnic, cultural or religious rights. I do understand that there is an ongoing discussion in the American society about LGBT rights, thus the topic of LGBT rights opposition is particularly painful in the US, while in other areas of the world topics of ethnic, cultural or religious rights can be more painful due to different local contexts. I really say we need one standard, if having an image symbolising opposition to a sexual orientation-related movement is not allowed, neither should be images symbolising opposition to ethnic, cultural or religious identity-related movements.
      I don't think that this is the right place for a freedom of speech discussion. Wikimedia Commons has no authority over freedom of speech elsewhere. What we are discussing is whether this image has its place on Wikimedia Commons. We have 49 pictures in Category:Anti-LGBT logos, still there is a problem with only this one. Is it any different from others? No, it is visually similar, for example, to File:Anti-LGBT.svg, File:Anti Gay and Lesbian movements sign.gif, File:Anty LGBT.png or File:Utilisateur no mariage homo.jpg. Some of them are used in the main namespace, for example, on ka:ჰომოფობია. There was a previous discussion resulting in keeping Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti-LGBT.svg or Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anty LGBT.png.
      Thus if the Commons decides that it cannot host any pictures that depict views violating UCoC, then deleting this one would make sense. But as long as this picture depicts a notable and really existing, want we this or not, LGBT rights opposition movement, and as long as Commons does not have views-based deletion criteria, there is no reason to delete this image — NickK (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, you’re right. I’m more just trying to get rid of userboxes that clearly are in violation of the code, and lacking the multilingual infrastructure to do this I’m resorting to proxy methods. That’s why I’ve proposed a multilingual project to work on systematically removing this sort of content. Dronebogus (talk) 21:44, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    > "then, well, we should ban all people displaying this flag, delete related articles and we would have an illusion of problem solved"
    I would actually point that conflating the templates with a view that is expressed outright with "related articles" is not a great point. The en-wiki essay, en:WP:NONAZIS (which, right, is not used on uk-wiki) does a fine differentiation in that, and prohibits the expression of some ideas; but doesn't forbid neutral articles on these views. This needs to be kept in mind.
    However, what I wrote is not an argument against the renaming, it may be renamed if the discussion will come to that. Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sleeps-Darkly: Firstly, this image can illustrate a neutral article on these views. Secondly, well, there is a difference between having some views, displaying these views and harassing other users based on these views. Harassing LGBT+ users is not acceptable, but it does not mean all users displaying these views do harass LGBT+ Wikimedians (some of them might do - and usually receive sanctions for that - but most don't). Don't forget that we talking about a country where only 7% of population support LGBT and 47% are openly anti-LGBT (still way better than in 2013 when 63% of population considered LGBT+ people as immoral who need to be cured). Thus if you label roughly half of the population as nazis (and we are talking about only one type of views)... well, good luck building a new community after destroying the existing ones. Ukrainian community is obviously not an example of tolerance, but portraying it as nazi is too much — NickK (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And I would actually advise against going this way. See, the file probably can be used this way after being renamed. I should stress again, the NONAZIS (and UCoC) points that some ideas should not be expressed, not that they can't be held. Considering this, the argument about "47%"/"half the population" is not really going to be accepted. Why? Around 47 users at this moment have this image included on their page, inside the template that states their view outright (important caveat in the NONAZIS, mind. the NONAZIS differentiates between stating the view and displaying the imagery - and I need to stress this difference again).
    Do you really believe that "47" users represent like half of the Ukrainian Wikipedia? Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No, definitely not. I am pretty sure many users with homophobic views do not express them publicly. Pretty much the same way as I could have displayed the opposite template on my user page, but I don't do it as I personally do not want to use such opinion templates. The ratio is pretty accurate though.
    What I am not comfortable with is the following approach. We know that user A has homophobic views, but we tell them: if you want to continue participating, please hide the fact that you are a homophobe. Will they stop being a homophobe because they have hidden it? Obviously not. Will it be better if we would be unable to publicly say that A has homophobic views (because UCoC, attack using a stereotype)? I don't think so.
    I think this page is absolutely not the right place for this debate and it should probably move to some UCoC policy discussion on Meta. Deleting this single file will not solve anything as long as that template on Ukrainian Wikipedia can use any other image from Category:Anti-LGBT logosNickK (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If your community decides its most important, insurmountable belief is that LGBT people are gross then it doesn’t need to be on Wikimedia anyway. Dronebogus (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep of course. I was very surprised how much here hatred towards those who have other views, have freedom of speech, defend own rights. I mean a hate speech of Sleeps-Darkly. If somebody is against loud music from midnight to morning, he loves music, but against the noise. — Yuri V (tc), 22:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]
  • “If somebody is against loud music from midnight to morning, he loves music, but against the noise” What’s that supposed to mean? And nothing Sleeps Darkly said is remotely hate speech! Dronebogus (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 DeleteImage used to promote homophobia on Wikipedia.Bradford (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It is totally a violation of the universal code of conduct Karlalhdz (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this graphic is realistically useful for an educational purpose - Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. This is also evidenced by the current use only on user pages to share with the world their views hostile to homosexual people. Additionally, on Commons there are over a dozen variants of crossed out LGBT flags that can be used as illustrations in articles on homophobia, in what way is this one better? In addition, in my opinion, the title of the file is not informative, it does not say what the file contains, and it only serves to share views that are hostile to homosexual people.
I think the minimum thing to do is to change the name to a more neutral one in accordance with the Neutral_point_of_view and I would even recommend  Delete it because is not useful for educational purposes. Grudzio240 (talk) 12:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
off-topic and inappropriate comments
  • There are no contradiction between
Yuri V (tc), 19:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]
do not do this again user:Yuri V. or you will be reported — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dronebogus (talk • contribs) 20:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC); signed — Yuri V (tc), 22:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Dronebogus and Sleeps-Darkly: Several times I heard someone was clinging to the handsome young man (no-gay): "It is normal. It's okay. It's very nice. Try it. You will be very pleased." There are known cases of rough violence. Are you for or against LGBT violence, propagation, agression? — Yuri V (tc), 10:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]
This is a very weird question and borders on being inappropriate. Please do not tag me again with questions like these. Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate comments
 Keep The freedom of speech is fundamental in a democracy. So we have a right to express our rejection of homosexual propaganda. The similiar images are quite common here, see Category:SVG Anti logos. --A1 (talk) 18:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia is not a democracy, at least in the traditional sense— it’s a consensus democracy, not a 1-person-1-vote democracy. Free speech on Wikimedia must comply with the Universal Code of Conduct, which forbids hostile behavior towards people because of their sexual orientation. Wikimedia also isn’t a soapbox, so no you don’t have any explicit right to “express your rejection of homosexual propaganda” either. Dronebogus (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless the freedom of speech is valuable for Wikipedia. At least it is my right to express here that any kind of censorship is inapropriate here. A1 (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently you missed the part: “However, the statement "Wikimedia Commons is not censored" is not a valid argument for keeping a file that falls outside the normal permitted Wikimedia Commons scope.” Dronebogus (talk) 19:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. While there might be potential narrow use cases for this file, the fact is, that it is clearly used to advocate for the continued oppression of a group, under the guise of 'its just an opinion, I too should be allowed to platform my opinion'. Ppl can think whatever they want, but to support certain things in user boxes is something else, and we shouldn't allow Commons rules to be abused to facilitate this. If this were "I do not support black people" or "I do not support rights for jews" this discussion would have ended quickly already. NickK says: "I would doubt this. If File:The user against the promotion, justification and propagation homosexuality.jpg is offensive against sexual orientation, gender identity, File:Anti-Ukrainian.svg is offensive against national, (...) ethnic and cultural background, while File:Anti-Catholicism.svg is offensive against religious (...) background." And they ARE. They just aren't used to platform that particular point of view (to the same extend), and this image is and apparently the Ukrainian community doesn't want to take action, so that action falls on us. Its usages is a violation of the code of conduct, and the educational use of the image is only very theoretical and very narrow. Little is lost by deleting this. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 15:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment discussion seems to have died and consensus appears to be 7D to 5K (not even factoring in the not-great reasoning of some of the K arguments and the fact that one is the uploader and another is a known disruptive user)— I think an admin should close this. Dronebogus (talk) 18:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate comments removed again
 Comment There is no consensus for deletion: meta:don't vote on everything, w:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY. This file is agaist aggressive LGBT-propagation, against of discrimination of non-LGBT. I repeat (19:21, 22 January): there are no contradiction between the user supports rights LGBT and the user against agressive propagation. — Yuri V (tc), 08:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]
 Delete as a UCOC violation.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es trabajo propio ni es usuario 191.125.53.32 01:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 12:10, 28 February 2022 UTC: Screenshot of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 13:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope; Unused; Fave SVG; I searched the USGS Bee Inventory sites and don't find they use this logo at all. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, as uploader. This file was intended to be included in a creator template I never ended up creating. The Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab (BIML) was using this logo at one time, but I guess no longer. I got it from their website. Rrburke (talk) 10:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of a photo, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation, as it exists as a non-free stock photo taken in 2012. https://www.alamy.com/stock-image-person-wears-a-guy-fawkes-mask-which-today-is-a-trademark-and-symbol-165080470.html?irclickid=ThaxY73kqxyIRy5XvDzTa12cUkGwLAV9QQVQ2o0&irgwc=1&utm_source=77643&utm_campaign=Shop%20Royalty%20Free%20at%20Alamy&utm_medium=impact Yoshiman6464 (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no description, no useful title, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Photo of the Dervaux candélabre. Categorized and useful. Darwin Ahoy! 02:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: If you think this file is useful, could you please rename it, and add a meaningful description? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Interessant und gar nicht so schlecht.--GerritR (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept and renamed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images show the 1929 architectural work of French architect w:Roger Gonthier (died 1978) in an intentional (not accessory) manner. France has no commercial freedom of panorama, and therefore all these images infringe on his copyright, held by his heirs. Copyright expires by January 1, 2049 (70+1 years after his death), so undelete or restore these in 2049.

Anyone calling for keep must obtain COM:VRTS correspondence of permission from Gonthier's heirs for their (uploaders') use of commercial Creative Commons licensing. Non-commercial license is forbidden as per COM:Licensing. French laws cannot be changed further as France has opposed free-culture freedom of panorama in the past.

Note that a local file exists on enwiki, as en:File:LimogesStationTower.jpg, under their local exemption doctrine allowing full resolutions of unfree buildings of no-FOP countries to be hosted there.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


More image files

More files, previously under Category:Gare de Limoges-Bénédictins. Same reason as the 1st nomination: no commercial freedom of panorama in France, and the artist died in 1978 (will not be in public domain until January 1, 2049. The architectural work in these images is intentional and not accessory.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find the rightholders of the architect and ask them for permission to publish the photos. --Poudou99 (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Poudou99: if possible also include the enwiki local file en:File:LimogesStationTower.jpg so that it can also now be hosted here with VRTS permission. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Poudou99: . Je me demandais si un jour cette décision interviendrait (malheureusement). Pour ce qui est des ayants-droit, peut-être voir par le biais de Pascal Plas qui a écrit une biographie de Gonthier ? Je ne sais pas si vous avez des pistes... --LucasD (talk) 11:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@LucasD: . Comme suggéré par @Yann (dans le bistro-FR), j'ai pris contact avec l'office de tourisme de Limoges. Ils ont été très surpris de la question. J'ai d'autres pistes (que je ne nommerai pas ici). En faisant des recherches web, j'ai vu le livre de Pascal Plas. Cela semble intéressant, c'est une piste à exploiter. Quoi qu'il en soit, c'est fou le nombre d'organismes ou institutions français qui publient des photos de la gare sans indiquer la moindre mention relative aux droits. --Poudou99 (talk) 12:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translate of the input by Poudou99: As suggested by @Yann (A) (in the bistro-FR), I contacted the Limoges tourist office. They were very surprised at the question. I have other tracks (which I will not name here). While doing web research, I saw Pascal Plas's book. It sounds interesting, it is an avenue to be exploited. Anyway, it's crazy the number of French organizations or institutions that publish photos of the station without indicating the slightest mention of rights. _ trans by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, cet exemple montre bien pourquoi l'absence de liberté de panorama en France est un non-sens. Je parierais que les ayants-droits eux-mêmes ne le savent pas. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translate of Yann's input: Yes, this example clearly shows why the lack of freedom of panorama in France is nonsense. I would bet that the rights holders themselves don't know. _ trans. by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann and Poudou99: I have to admit that I am not pleased with the French FOP, limited to uses that are non-commercial. Yet various Internet activities (like commercial vlogs on YouTube, travel portals, and even several netizens' activities on social media) might fall under either commercial or semi-commercial. When will French FOP rules be made modernized is an unanswerable question, however. Even works where thousands use everyday cannot be freely depicted — most infamously one regarding Millau Viaduct, whose management is an exclusive beneficiary of Architect Norman Foster's exclusive rights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
beneficiary of Architect Norman Foster's exclusive rights
ça me révolte ! ils n'ont pas été payés et certainement grassement pour faire leur boulot ? il leur en faut encore ?
on leur fait pourtant de la publicité gratuite et ça ne leur suffit pas !! Emmmeuge (talk) 10:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translate of Emmmeuge's input: that revolts me ! they weren't paid and certainly handsomely to do their job? they still need some? yet we give them free publicity and that is not enough for them !! _ Google Translation conducted by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 19:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is clearly a copyright violation and not the uploader's own work. It comes from Suchatvee.org (The second image in the website) with no licensing information ---ILikelargeFries (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom. The actual image https://www.suchatvee.org/wp-content/themes/mayor-bkk/assets/images/aye-know-suchatvee2-1-1.png is forbidden direct access, but must be accessed from the above linked page, which is protected by CloudFlare.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Polarlys. --Jianhui67 TC 11:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal CV; mostly plain text with no educational value. Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Bcxfu75k (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Politicsbuff202 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the file is derived from Federico_Maria_Butera_ritratto.png for which we've a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} VRT permission. Ruthven (msg) 08:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sofia.zamboli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Evidence that the copyright holder has agreed to the Creative Commons license must be submitted via COM:VRT.

King of ♥ 02:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except one DM. — Racconish💬 12:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edit summaries state: ploaded a work by Joshua Franzos from the photographer shared it with me directly with UploadWizard and photo credit: Joshua Franzos, courtesy of the Pittsburgh Foundation. So this is not a work by the uploader, and requires a permission ticket. MarioGom (talk) 18:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for flagging. I'm new at this and didn't realize I needed to submit formal permission from the copyright holder. Permission is pending VRT approval. Roundhouse Rabbit (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unable to find VRT ticket. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder Till Budde 191.125.53.32 00:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyright holder is established in metadata. --Royalbroil 03:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This photo is from https://www.uaefa.ae/en/profile/40238, on which is written: All rights reserved 2021. JopkeB (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Royalbroil 04:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted file; taken from a copyrighted website under the address http://www.laor.org.il/?categoryId=49963 TheStriker (talk) 17:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No evidence of permission/own work. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visibly poor quality, confusing (looks more like “gay crossing guard pride” than “anti-LGBT”) and used exclusively by bigoted users on Azerbaijani Wikipedia Dronebogus (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per the reasons Golden mentioned (as well as the nomination statement). –MJLTalk 20:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Dublicate Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of which other file? --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:DE-ST 15-0-91-060 Thiessen COA.png this is the better File --Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per GerritR and billinghurst at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wappen Brehna.png and Doc Taxon at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wappen Etingen.png.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not the same drawing. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Ollemarkeagle (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of which other file? --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
this is the better File --Ollemarkeagle (talk) 12:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's different, not better. Rauenstein (talk) 13:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No, the coat of arms isn't duplicate, it are different file types due to history. Its usage may still be possible, so this deletion request doesn't agree to COM:Scope, the coat of arms is within project scope. No valid reason for deletion. Doc Taxon (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nacio el 18 de Agosto de 1989. Quién es este Gil? 191.125.53.32 01:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from [6] (one month prior to its upload here). --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, outside Commons:Project scope Calistemon (talk) 15:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This people is not to recognize, but the photo is helpfull to see the relations of size. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 22:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: with the right category, it's definitely in scope. --Rosenzweig τ 12:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are not Gagauz but Tatar. See the Cyrillic text below, it says Sabantui, a Tatar holiday. Beshogur (talk) 20:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason for deletion. I'd be more worried about copyvio since source doesnt say its CC. Borysk5 (talk) 20:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Whether it is a copyvio or not, my reason stands valid. Beshogur (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't see a CC license (as claimed) at the source for the image. --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been much reproduced online, but tineye finds nothing that predates the picture here. However, there are no camera details.
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
The picture is widely used. My question to the experts here who close this type of discussion is "Should it be?". There must, surely, be a genuinely free alternative. Timtrent (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears to be by Marc Piasecki. Guest arrival photos courtesy of Getty, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es trabajo propio ni es usuario 191.125.53.32 01:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 2014 191.125.53.32 01:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, found here in 2016 https://www.rfi.fr/es/cultura/20161101-el-chileno-boris-quercia-la-novela-policial-habla-de-las-fracturas-de-la-sociedad. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es trabajo propio 191.125.53.32 01:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Professional photo without exif, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By looking at the earlier version of the file and the lackness of the EXIF data, it's probably scanned from a magazine. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the copy right has been corrected.Caravaneternity (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This photo was first shared on Instagram with his own consent and by his friends. As a result, there is no copyright issue.Dyakozaman (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's why it's a violation. Thanks for clarifying :) Nanahuatl (talk) 09:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nanahuatl I am so sorry my friend, but I believe there is no problem with this photo. Thanks, Dyakozaman (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; clear flickrwashing. Sharing on Insta doesn't make it free. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of copyrighted trophy 219.77.176.112 03:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC) ?Qué significa DW? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.24.107 (talk) 00:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of copyrighted trophy 219.77.176.112 03:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be the cover photo for this YouTube video: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IXeBT12elTs/maxresdefault.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DIXeBT12elTs&h=720&w=1280&tbnid=X5lENxBljaSHbM&q=class+317&tbnh=168&tbnw=300&usg=AI4_-kSme2wdMzVWlgppb71XY_rwzpmwMQ&vet=1&docid=E7LgJ6bxwnKWFM&itg=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flame 1324 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has marked several web photos that are clearly not theirs as "own work". These photos come in multiple file formats and resolutions, and also unlikely to be their own work. Should be deleted per COM:PCP.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own upload, duplicate - Kwamikagami (talk) 09:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artworks from 1962/1968; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The ambo is by Ernst Wirtl (died 2014), so that image can be restored in 2085, the tapestry is from 1962 and by Ortrud Diepen-Spatz (born in Greifswald in 1913 accd. to [7], born as Ortrud von Moellendorff accd. to [8], lived 1913–1999), so the two "Taufkapelle" images can be restored in 2070. I couldn't find out who did the baptismal font, which is from the period 1939 to 1944. Since it's only seen in an image that also has the tapestry, the restoration year for that image remains 2070. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the uploader of the file. The subjects of the picture are some of my acquaintances. One of them has requested the deletion of the picture. While I am the copyright holder and released it for reuse, I would appreciate it if it could be deleted at their request. Thanks MarcGarver (talk) 22:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. COM:NOTHOST--GerritR (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Ticket:2021122110006777, the owner of the vehicle has requested for the images to be removed; Ankry responded by blurring the license plates. There was disagreement at Special:PermaLink/616056696#Redacting of number plate and deleting the other versions over whether this request should be granted, so I am opening this DR to determine whether the previous versions of the images should be revision-deleted. King of ♥ 20:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral Davey wanted me to comment. On the one side, license plate is not private or sensitive information, because it is obligatory to show license plate in traffic. License plate cannot violate anybody's privacy. On the other side, license plate is not so important for the photos and if the car owner bothered to send VRT request to remove it, then I'm OK with courtesy deleting it. Taivo (talk) 20:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Un-revdel - I can agree to a certain extent that the licence plate isn't important however IMHO there's not really any valid reason to hide neither - The photograph wasn't taken on a driveway or outside their house and no personal information is included within the image so IMHO it should be included.
At the very least half of the registration (H868) should be included to sort of show how it looks but at the same time still respecting the owners request.
IMHO the whole thing should remain but I can settle with half. –Davey2010Talk 21:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want it deleted! I just want it restore just so I can blank the number plate myself! It was in a public place, where any cars at, I refuse for this to be deleted, even if the owner of the car insisted, it does not break any UK privacy laws whatsoever. Edit: Sorry I panicked and thought the whole image was proposed to be deleted. It would be great if it was un-revdel and restore the original picture. If we can't come to that conclusion then please restore it so I can do the edit myself.--Vauxford (talk) 22:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, I mean without sounding nasty if you don't want your rare vehicle photographed then don't take it out and certainly don't take it to car events. –Davey2010Talk 23:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Can we be sure that it was the car owner and not a troll? I have had so called owners try to do the same in the past (cars located in public spaces, not private locations [e.g. homes]) but only to find out it was trolls. Even then as Taivo states, number/license plates are not private. I think it should be un-rev del and it should be left to the uploader if they wish to block the plate. Bidgee (talk) 22:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • You can only rely for VRT users experience in this matter. In my opinion, this request is from the actual car owner and I see no reason why we should reject revision deletion per courtesy. The image does not seem to be used in a context where the license number matters (well it does not seem to be used at all) nor the license number seems to me the main or meaningfull subject of the image. The fact that the car was presented on a public show is for courtesy deletion irrelevant. My opinion is still  Delete. Ankry (talk) 19:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: The car owner has asked for deletion of something which we know is not of importance. If it is not a big deal, then why should the owner's request be rejected? Is there any valid reason for this? Keeping the files only because and they don't violate anybody's privacy does not seem fair enough to my eyes. --Mhhossein talk 17:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment Mhhossein Ankry I'm a bit confused. Are you voting for the entire image to be deleted or the revision? If you voting for the former, I'm 100% against that, that car was photographed in a public space at a car show! Just because the apparent owner personally requested it to be removed, doesn't mean it should be fulfilled. If he that concerned he shouldn't of took the car to the show in the first place! --Vauxford (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually suggesting to remove the revisions containing the plate number. --Mhhossein talk 15:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Vauxford: --Mhhossein talk 15:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mhhossein Sorry if I came across as defensive, just making sure. Now that the revisions are unhidden, I can make properly blank the plates out myself. So it's fine if the original revision ended up deleted. Thank you Davey2010 for your revision of the image. Vauxford (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Revdel all versions showing any of the number plate. It is irresponsible to make it easy for criminals to escape justice in this way. Any publication of a UK car with its valid number plate legible could lead to serious problems for the owner of the car. In the UK criminals use cloned number plates when committing crimes to avoid being traced via ANPR, and the legitimate owner of the plate may be arrested, fined or otherwise seriously inconvenienced until they can prove they were not involved in the crime. They will then have the inconvenience and expense of re-registering their car to get another plate. See here & here for a recent example of criminals using cloned plates. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @DeFacto, I disagree that it's irresponsible, Any criminal can clone any vehicle without Commons' help - At the end of the day we're a media repository site and so what people chose to do with the images here is up to them - I would indeed hope there's nothing illegally done with these but we will never know. So IMHO whilst a valid concern it's not entirely relevant here as such. –Davey2010Talk 21:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @DeFacto If that the case, then 25% of my photos should be revdel as well. It stupid, most of my uploads showing the plates are classic cars that been taken to show after show for years and will end up on many websites and social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Flickr etc. Like I said, if the owner is that bothered of their car being on the Internet then they shouldn't take it to public shows in the first place. Vauxford (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vauxford, each publication of a car with it's number plate showing adds to the probability of something bad being done with that information. Why keep the photos with the legible plates when you've already uploaded photos with the plates disguised? We only need to delete the revisions with the legible plates. -- DeFacto (talk). 00:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Is there a Commons policy that states license/number plates must be blanked? Bidgee (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Davey2010, would you upload photos of people's credit cards? There is no need to keep the photos with the number plate showing when the same photos are available with it blurred or blanked or disguised in some other way. -- DeFacto (talk). 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Credit cards are not the same as license/number plates. Bidgee (talk) 00:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @DeFacto That is a terrible comparison! If you got someone credit card/debit card, yes you can buy stuff online using it. A number plate, unless you're the police you cannot get any form of personal info from it. I demonstrated this in a previous DR. The average joe wouldn't have the machine or resources to clone plates so the chances of that ever happening is next to nothing. Vauxford (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vauxford, you don't need a machine to get a number plate made, just the will. As a last resort you can get them in 24 hours from the net. And with someone else's number plate you can park anywhere you want, use toll roads and bridges free of charge, break the speed limit anywhere and by as much as you want, jump red lights with impunity, rob people, rob banks, run people over, ... And the owner of the plate will be the one that gets all the hassle.
    On the other hand, if the images with plates showing are revdel'd that will keep everyone happy. What's the problem with that? -- DeFacto (talk). 15:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @DeFacto I have no problem with the DR now because I blanked the number plate properly. It just I find your views of number plate irrational. Yes, the stuff you say could happen but the chances of actually happening is extremely low. Even if it does happen, the Commons holds no responsibility. Vauxford (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blanked then numberplate on both images which I'm satisfied with and hopefully should satisfied the involved users and the car owner. --Vauxford (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vauxford: But the older versions are still showing the plate number. --Mhhossein talk 04:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mhhossein I know, I'm just waiting until an admin close the DR. --Vauxford (talk) 04:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Revdel nonblanked number plates which contain the complete original plate number. I don't see any educational value in keeping the plate, so no reason to deny the owner's request. -M.nelson (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@M.nelson: On the contrary. Between 1963 and 1999 British number plates have had a alpha-character to denote the year of registration of the vehicle. Since 2000, two numeric characters have been used. The car in question is an "H-Reg" car, so it was registerd between August 1990 and July 1991. (See en:Vehicle_registration_plates_of_the_United_Kingdom). I would therefore advocate mixing the characters on the registraion plate up or replacing some of the characters with other characters, keeping the "H" and thereby creating an annonymous, but valid "H" registration. A note should be left to this effect. where it is and leaving a note to this effect in the vehicle description. The UK Government website allows anybody to check the status of anby car that is currently regsitered, so the editor can check whether or not the "new" number-plate is genuinely fictitious. Martinvl (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thank you. I don't oppose trimming the number or mixing portions of the plate number up, so have updated my comment to specifically recommend revdel'ing the "complete" plate number (within reason - I don't think erasing or changing a single character would be sufficient). -M.nelson (talk) 17:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Martinvl, you say "The car in question is an "H-Reg" car, so it was registerd between August 1990 and July 1991", that's not necessarily true. A car can be given any available registration that doesn't suggest it's newer than it really is. So an available "H" plate can be used on any car first registered on or after 1 August 1990 (see here under 'Eligability'). -- DeFacto (talk). 00:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DeFacto: Technically you are correct, so to clarify my position, if a numberplate is "annonymised", the year letter or year numbers should be retained if they are the default year-characters for the depicted vehicle. Martinvl (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is true, you can look it up on both the DVLA here, and the exact date here. As you can see, the car was registered on 13th August 1990. Vauxford (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the files, hid all versions which show the license plate number. --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.ac-versailles.fr/article/la-rectrice-121476 No proof for CC licence GeorgHHtalk   22:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad light quality, non-educational Ecritures (talk) 22:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fairly good night photo of a geolocated (!!!) defensive moat in Padua, of obvious educational value - no valid motive for deletion. Darwin Ahoy! 02:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.lejdd.fr/International/exclusif-chakib-benmoussa-lambassadeur-du-maroc-en-france-mon-pays-na-pas-espionne-le-president-macron-4059383 No proof for CC licence GeorgHHtalk   22:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (bigger size is at [9]). --Rosenzweig τ 13:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of copyrighted trophy 219.77.176.112 03:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 07:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the creator nor the creation/publication date. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any proof? Who has the copyrights? When did it get published?--Nanahuatl (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, photo from around 1930 without info on publishing or author. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo can be undeleted (about) 121 years after 1930 so in 2071 .. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by আফতাবুজ্জামান as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo of a political party. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. On the guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/ Bangladesh it is not described whether this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality too show which images are not copyrighted. Therefore it must be assumed this logo is copyrighted. Consequently, it must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://edusaint.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/jharkhand.jpg. 2008 upload, should be discussed. The provided evidence is later than the Commons copy. King of ♥ 02:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per king of hearts, online photo has same size and uploaded in 2019. --Ellywa (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://soccerank.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/VivarDorado.jpg. 2015 upload, should be discussed. The provided evidence is later than the Commons copy. King of ♥ 02:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per KingofHearts. External link cannot be reached but I have no reason to doubt the consclusion of King of Hearts. --Ellywa (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous image content. Mirana Gavami also uploaded a correct image (File:Toracic vertebra (genel).tif) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmarchn (talk • contribs) 09:44, 20 December 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, of no educational use, not used on the projects and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 20:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp

[edit]

All files in the category Category:Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp are tagged with {{CC-zero}}. These images were never released and the archive doesn't hold the rights to these images (see also this topic). I'm afraid we have to delete all 2300 files in this category. --Multichill (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (1) There was a Commons discussion about this collection exactly one year ago. The intermediate result was that we had to research the unclear copyright situation about some parts of this collection and ask the archive NHA to react. It was convenient that User:Martsniez was at that time working at this archive.
(2) A glance at this collection makes clear the collection holds three kinds of images. (a) Old prints, drawings and maps, mostly 18th & 19th century (public domain); (b) Old photographs (made before 1950) (public domain); (c) modern photographs, after 1950. Unclear copyright situation, even though the NHA archive tells us: "Auteursrecht: Nee". ("Copyright: No"). This situation, with different kind of images, makes it clear that it wouldn't be clever to remove the entire collection, because hundreds of images in the public domain would then also be deleted. Some examples (all in use in Wikipedia):
  • Category A: Map 1830s (PD)
    Category A: Map 1830s (PD)
  • Category A: Drawing 1840s (PD)
    Category A: Drawing 1840s (PD)
  • Category B: Photo 1890s (PD)
    Category B: Photo 1890s (PD)
  • (3) Apparently User:Martsniez isn't working at the NHA archives anymore. I am willing to contact the NHA director in January 2022 to address the copyright question of the aforementioned category (c), and I hope the result will be as good as the recently released 1,9 million photographs by the NHA archive, of which 10,000 photographs have already been uploaded to Commons.
    (4) User:Multichill is of course right that the metadata at the archive regarding copyright is in many cases incomplete or incorrect. I think we should rather try to adjust that than deleting images on a large scale. Vysotsky (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep but we need to change the licenses to PD . And we should create a category for all material that was created after 1950 and nominate or request extra information which material was created by the municipality. --Hannolans (talk) 03:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    @Vysotsky and Hannolans: Good to hear that someone wants to spend time on this. Much better than having to delete all files. I created {{Noord-Hollands Archief-only metadata CC0}} with tracking category Category:Images from Noord-Hollands Archief with incorrect CC0 license from Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp. Multichill (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Ah fijn. Vraag. Is het toevallig al mogelijk dit met openrefine aan te pakken? van alle foto's met een bepaalde datum de information inladen, filteren, licentie zoeken en vervangen en wegschrijven? Of is er een andere manier om van een hele categorie de licentie in bulk aan te passen? --Hannolans (talk) 22:55, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Ik snap de workflow overigens niet, de category 'Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp' moet toch juist behouden blijven en we moeten alle foto's van na 1950 in een aparte onderliggende categorie doen 'Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp na 1950' en deze categorie voorleggen aan het archief lijkt me voor toestemming. De rest van het materiaal zouden we moeten doorlopen. --Hannolans (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess it's best to wait till after the talks with Noord-Hollands Archief (so as not to spend extra time on moving files to and from categories). Vysotsky (talk) 23:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Multichill: Please stop moving files to that newly created category, to avoid extra work. Vysotsky (talk) 23:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Last week, User:MrNostalgic and I had a meeting at Noord-Hollands Archief. We talked to three staff members of Noord-Hollands Archief, and things became more clear. One: the number of digitized photographs from the Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer is currently 16.428 (at the website of NHA). There are indeed three kinds of images regarding copyright, as stated above: (1) old maps etc, (2) photographs made prior to 1950, and (3) photographs made after 1950. (1 and 2 are no problem re copyright; 3 probably is.) Most photos seem to have a good copyright indication now at NHA. Proposed solution: Mr.Nostalgic and I will manually check all ca. 2300 photos now in Commons, and propose all photographs for deletion that do not have a correct license. Vysotsky (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


    @Vysotsky, Multichill, Hannolans, and Mr.Nostalgic: The deletion template is today still present on these 26 files:

    1. File:Plattegrond van Badhoevedorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 14919.JPG‎
    2. File:Opening van het 'nieuwe' station in Hoofddorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 03062.JPG
    3. File:Brug over de Ringvaart bij Weteringbrug, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 14679.JPG
    4. File:Woningen 475a en 477 aan de Leimuiderdijk, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 09924.JPG
    5. File:Lingeriezaak van Van Gelderen in winkelcentrum Sloterweg in Badhoevedorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 06594.JPG
    6. File:Boerderij aan de Sloterweg 349, Badhoevedorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 14382.JPG
    7. File:De Reintjeshoeve aan de Sloterweg, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 06516.JPG
    8. File:Nederlands-hervormde kerk in Badhoevedorp (Immanuëlkerk), Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 06749.JPG
    9. File:Beeldhouwwerkje aan het Dr, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 07650.JPG
    10. File:'t Kabel 39 , buurtschap bij Nieuw-Vennep, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 07603.JPG
    11. File:Eendenkooi Stokman, Kromme Spieringweg 355, Vijfhuizen, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 09041.JPG
    12. File:Sportcomplex en zwembad De Sporthoeve in Badhoevedorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 13861.JPG
    13. File:Rijnlanderweg 1031, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 10495.JPG
    14. File:Luchtopname van hoeve Mentz tijdens Cebeco met z'n proefveldjes, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 13275.JPG
    15. File:Kruisweg met parallelweg, juni 1961, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 03604.JPG
    16. File:Boerderij De Winter, Weteringweg 17, Leimuiderbrug, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 14440.JPG
    17. File:Tekening van twee ruiters te paard en een hond met daaronder een gedicht in het Engels van mr, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 15118.JPG Clearly in PD, dated 1842, Ellywa (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    18. File:Nieuwbouw Raadhuis, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 11343.JPG
    19. File:Portret van burgemeester Aad van Dulst van Haarlemmermeer, ambtsperiode-1986-1993, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 11877.JPG
    20. File:Sportcomplex en zwembad De Sporthoeve in Badhoevedorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 13873.JPG
    21. File:Uitbreidingsplan in onderdeelen Hillegommerbuurt, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 15132.JPG
    22. File:Kaart met vaarroutes over het Haarlemmermeer, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 15110.JPG
    23. File:Boerderij Mentz, Kruisweg 1405, Hoofddorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 14534.JPG
    24. File:'t Grutje (Freinet)Kon, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 04523.JPG
    25. File:Bus van Centraal Nederland rijdend op de busbaan door Liesbos, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 05669.JPG
    26. File:Boerderij aan de Rijnlanderweg 1185, Nieuw Vennep, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 14623.JPG
    27. File:Huizen in buurtschap, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 07600.JPG

    Could you please indicate the status of these files, in order to finalize this Deletion request? Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    I will indicate the status of all these 26 files within a week. Vysotsky (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I checked the first 4 images. Photo 1 & 2 can be kept (I adjusted link & license); photo 3 & 4 can be deleted. I won't remove the deletion requests, unless I'm allowed to do that (as license reviewer on Commons). Can the nomination for deletion for the complete collection be removed, as every single photo will be checked seperately? -- Vysotsky (talk) 23:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Fyi: Usually the Deletion requests are closed by one of the admins. I am working on old requests and now landed on December 2021. As long as the delete template is on the file, they keep listed on this category: Category:Deletion requests December 2021.
    An efficient way to go ahead is to include a file which can be kept between these marks: <s>...</s>. I did this for photo 1 & 2 (and 17). When the list is finalized, please ping me and I will delete all files that are not striked out. There is no need for you to remove the templates from the filepages that can be kept, for an admin this is an easy task. Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    ✓ Done To my best knowledge no. 21 (Hillegommerbuurt) should have been kept too (as PD-old-70-expired) because it's an official municipal map, so the architect can't claim copyright. I will write to the NH Archief about this. So 6 keep, 1 doubt (now also crossed out for the time being), 20 to be deleted. @Ellywa: -- Vysotsky (talk) 11:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination and per sorting out by User:Vysotsky (thanks for your fast action). Deleted 20, kept 7. --Ellywa (talk) 19:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Kept Category can be kept, as many images can be kept, which is still to be sorted out. Ellywa (talk) 21:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by User:LiAdrianPerkasa

    [edit]

    User is a LTA in IDWIKI; creating files of edited official photos with bogus source.--Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 15:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    User has created a sock and uploaded the following files:

    User has created yet another sock and uploaded the following files:

    --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 13:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't really care about its fate, but maybe one may look at category:fictional flags >> 99 % can be deleted with the reason "out of scope", too. Happy holidays --Mateus2019 (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Some fictional flags are in scope: when they are used in a Wikimedia project, when they are mentioned in a book, a magazine, a film, a TV program, a video game, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:" - it seems dubious to me that uploader is copyright holder of this logo. Maybe it manage to qualify as PD-shape? But in this case this seems dubious. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by 4hadrhmn (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    No permission for any. Taken from facebook and without license for the logos as well.

    Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This image contains metadata suggestive of not being own work of uploader, eg. transmission data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    We need a permission for a free license from Link2004. The license at the source comes from Meow, who is not the sole author.

    Yann (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    So you administrators don’t give me time to let the artist send an email and now you want to delete all as soon as possible?  🐱💬 02:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    This will be open for at least a week, and possibly much longer, as there is always a huge backlog. Yann (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah basically any Commons deletion request that isn’t completely uncontroversial takes friggin months to complete. There’s absolutely no rush here. Dronebogus (talk) 11:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. Still no VRT. Undelete if ever received. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Bad quality, not used, non notable person, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, non-notable person. --P 1 9 9   01:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Possibly copyrighted work: the photographs seems to have been published in a magazine (see inset) Ecritures (talk) 22:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Photographs of 2d artworks dont carry any additional copyrights. Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs.  Keep Borysk5 (talk) 16:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: per User:Borysk5. --P 1 9 9   01:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not used Таллархо (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    This is no valid reason for deletion.--GerritR (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I, as the author of the photo, want to delete it. Currently, the grave no longer looks like this, it has been changed Таллархо (talk) 16:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused image of unidentified grave. --P 1 9 9   01:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyright violation, logo of a British media company, TOO in the UK is very low FASTILY 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    It’s actually a logo of a Mexican media company, which no longer has any connection to the U.K.-based company of the same name other than the licensing of the name. Tvcameraop (talk) 09:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I initially tagged as {{Npd}} but the uploader removed it without explanation. The photo was published in 1955 so the copyright has not expired and the uploader has not provided any evidence of the permission. The uploader should contact the copyright owner to verify the license through COM:VRT. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    "the uploader removed it without explanation"
    That's a lie, we discussed it on my talk page...
    "the uploader has not provided any evidence of the permission"
    • I am the owner of the photograph.
    • The author (the photograph) is unknown despite the research and requests I made.
    But user Ytoyoda is aware of all this, as I told him on my talk page, yet he never quoted me an official policy to motivate his actions.
    Arflhn (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Arflhn It says the author is unknown and you credited Collection Ludwig Dupas, so it's unclear how you are the owner of the photograph. It's not evident how a photograph published in 1955 with an unknown author came to be licensed under a Creative Commons license. COM:LICENSING says "The information given on the description page should be sufficient to allow others to verify the license status," and you haven't given other users any way to verify that the information is correct. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem is absolutely not there. I just forgot to fill in the permission box otherwise you wouldn't even have stopped on the photo.
    "so it's unclear how you are the owner of the photograph."
    source = Collection Ludwig Dupas.
    How is that not clear ...? My door is open if you want to come and check it, I'll offer you the coffee.
    If you want to offer me a better license, don't hesitate. In the meantime, the Commons; Licensing is not violated, the author being unknown and myself being the owner of the document, I make it available on Commons under the CC license.
    Arflhn (talk) 16:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Arflhn Are you "Ludwig Dupas"? If that's the case, it's not explained anywhere that I can see. Either way, how did Ludwig Dupas come to own the rights to the photo? The description says the photograph was bought at a flea market, but there's no explanation on how the copyright was acquired. If the photographer is unknown and there's no information on who originally owned the rights, then a transfer of rights would be impossible. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    "Are you "Ludwig Dupas"? If that's the case, it's not explained anywhere"
    Again, if you had done your job you would have asked me at first.
    Arflhn (talk) 04:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: The photo was published in 1955. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France, an anonymous photo will be in PD 70 years after the publication date. So this photo is now still copyrighted and must be deleted. It can be undeleted 71 years after 1955, in 2026. .. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, the author of this statue is not known, so this might be copyrighted. Because there is not FOP in Italy per COM:FOP Italy, this photo has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, the author of this statue is not known, so this might be copyrighted. Because there is not FOP in Italy per COM:FOP Italy, this photo has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyright status cannot be determined as publication history is lacking Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo can be undeleted 121 years after 1921 so in 2042 .. --Ellywa (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyright status cannot be determined as no publication history has been provided Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Keep. This is a postcard from 1912, as is obvious from the low picture quality. In addition, on the postcard it is written in Greek: "Το νέον αντιτορπιλικόν μας Ιεραξ" which translates to "Our new anti-mine ship Ierax". The use of the adjective "new" means the ship's picture was taken in 1912 or close to that year. Dr.K. (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment The image linked as the source contains some information that may be helpful in determining the publication history. "Greek destroyer IERAX. Post card of 1912. National Historic Museum, Athens, Greece" --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. That's excellent information. It verifies that the publication date is 1912. Dr.K. (talk) 07:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: The photo was published in 1912. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Greece, an anonymous photo will be in PD 70 years after the publication date. So this photo is now in PD and can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I see no evidence of stated license - where this work was released under this license? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

     Keep as {{PD-simple}}, right?Jonteemil (talk) 22:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe? Not entirely sure. (I would retag it if I would be convinced that it is below TOO, though I probably should mention TOO in my nomination) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. According to https://eda.europa.eu/Disclaimer-Legal the material is copyrighted and imho this is not a simple design. --Ellywa (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:" - it seems dubious to me that uploader is copyright holder of logo of European Foundation of Human Rights. Maybe it qualifies as PD-shape or something? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, the possible source website, https://en.efhr.eu/, states "All rights reserved". Therefore this logo is not freely licenced and must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "Own work"? 2021? Nope. Xocolatl (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Photo made in 1927 in Soviet Union [10]. en:Copyright_law_of_the_Soviet_Union#Copyright_Act_of_1925 Public domain,  Keep. Borysk5 (talk) 17:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo can be undeleted 121 years after 1927 so in 2048 .. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Appears to be a non free image - no release available with fair use file already in play FOX 52 (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    LOGO has no Copyright or Copyright Expired. Swapnil1101 (talk) 07:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination, source website from India shows a copyright sign, https://crpf.gov.in/index-hi.htm, so this logo has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Even though the page this image comes from is marked with the Creative Commons Attribution icon (COM:WHERE#Tistory), I don't trust that the Tistory user is the source of these images. If you look carefully on the page, you'll see the 4th image from the top has a "playdb.co.kr" watermark. I don't read Korean but http://www.playdb.co.kr/ seems to be a large commercial play review site, while the Tistory user site seems to be someone's personal blog. I looked elsewhere on the Tistory user site, and found another playdb.co.kr watermarked image just a few posts away 2nd image from the top. This page another few posts away has an image with a different watermark .. something2DAY. I don't think the Tistory user owns these images. GRuban (talk) 22:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Ganz sicher kein "eigenes Werk" GerritR (talk) 23:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Hmm, das stimmt soweit. Als Mitglied und damaliger Vorsitzender der Novesia Bonn habe ich es einfach in meine Hände genommen, unser Wappen mal hochzuladen. Ich kann auf jeden Fall garantieren, dass wer auch immer meiner Bundesbrüder die Datei ursprünglich erstellt hat, derjenige nicht kommen wird und rechtlichen Anspruch darauf erheben wird. Eventuell gibt es eine andere Lösung, als dass ich es als mein persönliches "eigenes Werk" hochlade? Ich bin mir sicher, dass wenn der ursprüngliche Ersteller der Datei ausfindig gemacht werden könnte, dass er zustimmen würde, dass die Datei in die Gemeinfreiheit gehören würde.
    Bin hier für Vorschläge offen, wie wir das am besten regeln könnten, eine Löschung der Datei wäre natürlich schade und meiner Meinung sinnfrei. Chris-schannes (talk) 07:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Das Problem haben auch andere Verbindungswappen. Ganz gut gelöst ist es mein ich hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arminenwappen3.jpg --GerritR (talk) 09:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. Per nomination. @Chris-schannes: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]