Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/11/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
![2 File:MUTCD "To" plate. White background.svg](#File:MUTCD_"To"_plate._White_background.svg){kind=link}
卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
卫星图_2021年-labeled.jpg){kind=link}
卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
_卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
,_Henryk_Sienkiewicz_(Nathan,_1934).JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![132 File:"Egersund" derives from the Old Norse name for the strait between Eigerøya and the mainland, which was called Eikundarsund.jpg](#File:"Egersund"_derives_from_the_Old_Norse_name_for_the_strait_between_Eigerøya_and_the_mainland,_which_was_called_Eikundarsund.jpg){kind=link}
![144 File:"The Quebe Sisters" Headshot.jpg](#File:"The_Quebe_Sisters"_Headshot.jpg){kind=link}
![150 File:Urinating in the "high squat" position.jpg](#File:Urinating_in_the_"high_squat"_position.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade_(TA).png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)_(Regular_Units).png){kind=link}
_Division_Structure.png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Saint_Mary_of_Magdala_statue.jpg){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_The_Resurrection.JPG){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_St._John_the_Baptist.JPG){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_Madonna_&_Christ_icon.JPG){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_Christ.JPG){kind=link}
The following text has been removed. Perfektsionist (talk) 00:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I was wrong, can someone cancel this? Perfektsionist (talk) 00:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept Nomination withdrawn by nominator. (In use user picture.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
I just uploaded this file. I don't think i used the correct copyright licence, given this is technically a traffic control device. Ltgrxr (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
![04:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/22#c-Ltgrxr-2016-01-02T04:50:00.000Z-File:MUTCD_"To"_plate._White_background.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Not a reason to delete -- I corrected the license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
![12:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/22#c-Jameslwoodward-2016-01-09T12:15:00.000Z-File:MUTCD_"To"_plate._White_background.svg){kind=link}
Duplicates File:To plate.svg which is 10 years older than this file. –Fredddie™ 00:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unused dupe. (Requested by uploader within an hour of uploading - I would have honored the first request, per prompt uploader request.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
No practical usage, uploaded by a very novice user that has been blocked for numerous creations of stubs on eswiki. MexTDT (talk) 01:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted as copyright violation; reverse image search shows multiple earlier uses of image online. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Google Satellite copyvio Enyavar (talk) 03:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC) https://goo.gl/maps/rcvModDzksjooBRi6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haifei Jia17 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4-labeled.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4-labeled.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Google Satellite copyvio Enyavar (talk) 03:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC) https://goo.gl/maps/rcvModDzksjooBRi6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haifei Jia17 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
卫星图_2021年-labeled.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
卫星图_2021年-labeled.jpg){kind=link}
%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Google Satellite copyvio Enyavar (talk) 03:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC) https://goo.gl/maps/rcvModDzksjooBRi6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haifei Jia17 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
_%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E5%8D%AB%E6%98%9F%E5%9B%BE_2021%E5%B9%B4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Google Satellite copyvio Enyavar (talk) 03:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC) https://goo.gl/maps/rcvModDzksjooBRi6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haifei Jia17 (talk • contribs) 04:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
_卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
_卫星图_2021年.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Not own work ( Source: http://www.bta.bg/en/c/DF/id/2491254 ) Vaishakh1234 (talk) 05:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not own work (Source: https://dariknews.bg/v-snimki/koj-koj-e-v-sluzhebniia-kabinet-ianev-snimki-23913 ) Vaishakh1234 (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ferret as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: False license claim, not public domain. Pre-1978 US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unsupported license claim; lacking info to determine if original has fallen out of US copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ferret as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: False license claim, not public domain. Pre-1978 US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim unsupported by source. (Yes, there exists a possibility of being out-of-copyright if US copyright formalities of the time were not followed, but source site lacks info needed to make such determination; UPI (United Press International) photo, large corporation in the business of making money from photo copyrights, so should not assume PD without verifiable information. Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. ) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ferret as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: False license claim. Pre-1978 US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim. Lacking info needed to determine US pre-1978 status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused image, questionable licensing. A still from some anime CzarJobKhaya (talk) 16:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Claimed free license unsupported by source website. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Per result of Commons:Deletion_requests/MasterChef_logos SanAnMan (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bunnyakshaypaul (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Infrogmation. --Achim55 (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Unclear from the source if it actually is PD by way of being pre-1926. No year stated anywhere on the card itself or on the source website. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 08:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept; license changed to {{PD-US no notice}}. (Exact date of postcard uncertain, but certainly no later than early 1960s (when ZIP Code went into effect). Back of card shown at source, confirming no notice, as required for US copyright registration at the time.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
not own work, cropped picture taken from https://www.vaticannews.va/content/dam/vaticannews/agenzie/images/srv/2021/10/17/2021-10-17-ordinazione-episcopale/1634458280358.JPG/_jcr_content/renditions/cq5dam.thumbnail.cropped.1500.844.jpeg Almàr23 (talk) 09:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Blatant copyright violation, false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
not own work, cropped picture taken from https://www.vaticannews.va/content/dam/vaticannews/agenzie/images/srv/2021/10/17/2021-10-17-ordinazione-episcopale/1634458280358.JPG/_jcr_content/renditions/cq5dam.thumbnail.cropped.1500.844.jpeg Almàr23 (talk) 09:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful CC license- This screenshot is non-free on English Wikipedia w:File:MacOS Big Sur Desktop.png and may contain copyright design elements such as the backdrop art and icon deisigns. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The image at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Metallic microlattice.jpg and attributed to : "Dan Little from HRL Laboratories, LLC ", No additional information at Commons suggests it under a CC license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license, w:File:Ma Barker.jpg is non-free and no additional information is provided at commons to confirm a CC license ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doutbful license - w:File:European Young Conservatives logo.png is non-free. Non trival owing to the swallow element. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license - w:File:Jenseits der Stille.jpg is treated as non-free film poster art, and the film advertised is recent (1996). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license,This is a non-trival logo w:File:Logo of the Lithuanian Party of Regions.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license - w:File:Thin Lizzy - Renegade.jpg is non-free ( as album coverart) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
source file from EnWiki [1] is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abulfaz_Elchibey.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: fair use not permitted Denniss (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted image from enwiki [2] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This image was deleted several times: 9 April 2013 [3], 24 October 2015, 27 March 2017 [4] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Abulfaz_Elchibey.jpg){kind=link}
ReDeleted False license claim (image is clearly not more than 70 years old) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim - Movie poster artwork. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license - w:File:Menudo members.jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Le Gouffre noir (W pustyni i w puszczy - In Desert and Wilderness), Henryk Sienkiewicz (Nathan, 1934).JPG
[edit],_Henryk_Sienkiewicz_(Nathan,_1934).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Henryk_Sienkiewicz_(Nathan,_1934).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Sir Lothar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted cover by Maurice Toussaint, see: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Toussaint#Ouvrages_illustr%C3%A9s Yann (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Bad permissions, problem editor uploading images with wrong perms is wasting everyone's time HouseOfChange (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. (Uploader given 2 week block for continued copyright violations. More of the same after the block expires may result in indefinite block. ) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license - w:File:LegoUniverse.png is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 19:08, 22 November 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 02:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Failed Flickr review. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:04, 23 November 2021 UTC: Images by Marco Verch can be speedied --Krdbot 02:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Watermarked mind map that does not appear to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NOTHOST junk as meatpuppetry/school project. --Эlcobbola talk 13:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal picture with no educational use. Out of project scope. BRP ever 00:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lovenstar musica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo with no educational use. Out of project scope and likely an attempt to promote the topic.
- File:Lovenstar this is it.jpg
- File:Lovenstar just it.jpg
- File:Lovenstar music.png
- File:Lovenstar this is me.jpg
- File:Lovenstar musique.jpg
- File:Lovenstar hip hop.jpg
- File:Lovenstar singer.jpg
- File:Lovenstarmusic.jpg
- File:Lovenstar music.jpg
- File:Lovenstar pop.png
- File:Lovenstar life.png
- File:Lovenstar what is love.png
- File:Lovenstar album.png
- File:Lovenstar honest love.png
- File:Lovenstar musica.png
- File:Lovenstar life is alone fight.png
- File:Lovenstar never givup.png
- File:Lovenstar.png
BRP ever 00:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 01:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Serves no educational purpose except advertisement. Outside project scope. BRP ever 06:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Octarexinc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files with no educational use. Likely promotion/spam.
BRP ever 08:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Files outside commons' scope as they have no educational use. Spam/advertisment.
BRP ever 12:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fumeurstech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files hold no educational value and are outside the project's scope. They are uploaded to promote/advertise the company/group.
- File:Syed Ayyan.jpg
- File:C.E.O of Fumeurs Tech.jpg
- File:Sheikh Hamza Farhan.jpg
- File:Fumeurs Tech - Enhancing the Future.png
- File:Maimoon Maaz.jpg
- File:Maimoon Hashmi.jpg
BRP ever 12:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
unusual personal photo. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Borzu - arjmand.jpg
- File:Amir - karbalaei - zade.jpg
- File:Hooman - haji - abdollahi.jpg
- File:Bizhan - banafshe - khah.jpg
- File:Amir mahdi julee 35th fajr.jpg
- File:Azita - hajian.jpg
- File:Hamid - reza - naeimi.jpg
- File:Haj - qasem.jpg
- File:Mehraveeeee.jpg
- File:Mohsen - ghasabian.jpg
- File:Abdonaser - hemati.jpg
- File:Manoochehr - mohamadi.jpg
- File:Hosein - samsami.jpg
- File:Bijan - ranjbar.jpg
- File:Alireza - zakani.jpg
- File:Masood - ferasati.jpg
- File:Rana - azadi - var.jpg
- File:Ehsan - javanmard.jpg
- File:غلامرضا - حیدری - ابهری.jpg
- File:Behnam.tashakkor.png
- File:Aliram - nooraei.png
- File:Pooria -- poorsorkh.jpg
- File:Borzoo - arjmand.jpg
- File:محمدرضا -- علیمردانی.jpg
- File:Rahim -- noroozi 2.jpg
- File:Rahim -- noroozi.jpg
- File:Mehdi - soltani.jpg
- File:مهتاب کرامتی و نگار اسکندرفر.jpg
- File:آتیلا پسیانی و فاطمه معتمدآریا.jpg
- File:مهدی سلطانی و ابوالفضل پورعرب.jpg
- File:Sara monjezi & arzhang amirfazli.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Secondary school Arabic language test. Unused with no likely encyclopedic purpose, out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be uploaded by subject, but clearly taken by a professional photographer. Needs evidence that photographer released image under a free licence submitted to COM:VRT. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, blatant copyviol ([5]) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, blatant copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
fictional map of the Himyarite-British Kingdom. Not in Himyar, not in Britain. Enyavar (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license - Works on IMDB.com are not necessarily CC licensed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Querying own work claim - Photo attributed to :"Courtesy of Milton Shain" at source givin in w:File:Photo of Irma Stern.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by -jkb- as Speedy (speedy) Kelson (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand why this picture has been requested to be deleted. Which rule is behind this request? Kelson (talk) 10:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
So simply have a look at the photo. We have enough photos of Bernard Cerquiglini; this is downright insulting because of the missing teeth. -jkb- (talk) 10:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep The missing teeth are not an "insult" or "personal attack"; they are reality. The file is in use. Brianjd (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Same here, this is here a personal feeling which has nothing to do with a rule of commons. That said, I will replace this picture in WPES because indeed we can do better with on of the other pictures. Kelson (talk) 13:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment Text moved from file description:
- this picture without teeths is a personal attack, -jkb- (talk) 21:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Brianjd (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept No reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No indication that this is licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0 --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted Unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
experiments, no usage, out of scope, jokes Gampe (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; apparent private joke/troll -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Image [6] from a 1962 film. Certainly plagiarism, as there is no evidence that the uploader "Enrique Jose Boutto Romero" is a pseudonym of director and producer Roger Corman. Certainly copyfraud, as there is no evidence that the uploader ever owned the copyright. Possible copyvio, as it is possible that the film or the image could be public domain, although evidence for it would be required and there is no indication of it in the wikipedia article. Even if the film happened to be public domain, better versions could then be found and this very small copyfraud version would not be useful. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, part of series of blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, part of series of blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, part of series of blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, part of series of blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, part of series of blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted part of string of blatant copyright violations -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Part of a bulk upload of images for newly created stubs (all deleted) by same user on eswiki. Not likely to be "own work" MexTDT (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, part of series of blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
This is the logo for EU Ecolabel, registered trademark. ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
All rights reserved. OECD grants you the right to use one copy of this Program for your personal use only. Unauthorised reproduction, lending, hiring, transmission or distribution of any data or software is prohibited. You must treat the Program and associated materials and any elements thereof like any other copyrighted material. ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted uploaded under false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Insufficient copyright information. Listing the source as "Pinterest" for an image from allegedly 1961 gives no indication if this meets the fair use or creative commons requirements. FyzixFighter (talk) 18:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Missing a valid source. Not unknown author, it is signed. False licensing. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unsupported license on unsourced image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Insufficient copyright and attribution. Appears to be a slightly modified (added a halo) of the recent painting by Clemens Maria Fuchs (see [7]). FyzixFighter (talk) 18:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Modern work; uploader lacks authority to grant license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
fictional flag of a made-up micronation. The only "Frangolandia" I can find, is a supermarket chain. Enyavar (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 20:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
GoogleMaps copyvio. (yes, it comes from the official NYC Mesh website; but that one uses the proprietary GoogleMap which is not free to show in Wikimedia projects) Enyavar (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
GoogleEarth copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
GoogleEarth copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a copyrighted website https://augur.net/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
fictional map of the Himyarite-British Kingdom. Not in Himyar, not in Britain. Enyavar (talk) 23:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; unused, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Google maps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 23:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Has photographer's name in lower right corner- not same as uploader Downtowngal (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader's other uploads also nominated for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 11:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 15:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Way too large margin, orphaned/probably replaced by better version. Leyo 13:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. File:Polyethylene furanoate.svg is the replacement. DMacks (talk) 05:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no need to keep this file as we have a better replacement. Wostr (talk) 15:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Really poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 13:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The enwiki article makes it clear that it's always a two-carbon linker between the carbonyls, whereas this image has it as a generic structure of arbitrary length (and to someone who doesn't know much about "R" groups, it might appear as a single atom). DMacks (talk) 05:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete very poor quality, there is no use for this image. Wostr (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 01:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 01:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
无法确定该作品是PD-old-auto-expired shizhao (talk) 01:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete -- Great Brightstar (talk) 11:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Zero educational value Kotofey2016 (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep Seems to be the only image we have with a front view of a fully clothed (and without lifting a skirt) person urinating. Brianjd (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 22:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Found here before upload - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=267541711408963&set=pb.100044594072177.-2207520000..&type=3 - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:JRT Headshot 2021.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021112210010084. --Ww2censor (talk) 21:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm unclear as to why this image is being flagged. It's an image of me that was taken by Nalani Williams. This image is on all of my social media, including my Facebook Fan Page which you've noted. I was unclear how to credit her for the photo, so it was listed as my own work. Which it is, since I commissioned Miss Williams to take the photo. It's a very simple (and common) error that in no way warrants removal of this photo.
- What I don't understand is why you won't believe me, the person for whom this Wikipedia page was created, yet a simple e-mail from Miss Williams is enough to convince you that she took the photo. How can you verify this is even me? Am I to provide my I.D., home address, etc.? This process is patently absurd and more than a little insulting, to be perfectly blunt. Jrtcomedyinc (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 11:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
wrong document Renkweb (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader request, unused, uncat since April -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agência Certa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most are screenshots, the others are taken off the web.
- File:João Bóllico, Passo Fundo RS.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, via Agência Certa na Expodireto Cotrijal, em 2020.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, grava passagem em Cruz Alta, na Romaria de Nossa Senhora de Fátima. Milhares de fiéis acompanham a procissão.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, durante reportagem para o Jornal do Almoço, em Não-Me-Toque.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, durante entrada para o Globo Esporte RS.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, durante entrada para o Globo Esporte RS.png
- File:João Bóllico, durante entrada para o BDRG.png
- File:João Bóllico durante entrevista com o Governador do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul Eduardo Leite (PSDB).jpg
- File:João Bóllico, durante entrada para ao vivo para o Bom Dia Rio Grande, pela RBS TV.png
- File:João Bóllico fala sobre a suspensão da vacinação contra a Covid-19 no Bom Dia Rio Grande.png
- File:Bom Dia Rio Grande, da RBS TV aborda chegada do frio no Rio Grande do Sul com repórter João Bóllico.png
- File:João, apresentando evento cultural.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, em Santa Bárbara do Sul, pela RBS TV.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, durante o Bom Dia Rio Grande, da RBS TV.jpg
- File:João Bóllico, Agência Certa 2019.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adrenalinquarrysmm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published on their FB page https://www.facebook.com/aqjump/?locale2=tr_TR - I think we need OTRS
- File:Editedswing6.jpg
- File:Editedswing8.jpg
- File:JTM00624.jpg
- File:JTM09927.jpg
- File:JTM09497.jpg
- File:JTM09730.jpg
- File:JTM09551.jpg
- File:JTM00377-Edit.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Logo - The Heart.png
- File:The Curves.png
- File:The Plant.png
- File:OPLY V2 200518.svg
- File:ReimagineME V2 200518.svg
- File:ReimagineME V1 200518.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dhnomade1990 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams, trivial logo, map. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MAPA ATS.png
- File:Kenworth1111.jpg
- File:Triple111.jpg
- File:Double Turnpike1111.png
- File:Double Rocky Mountain 1111.jpg
- File:BITREN1111.jpg
- File:Doble STAA1111.jpg
- File:Individual 1111.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghimotcaiten (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Quần đảo Trường Sa.png
- File:Quần đảo Hoàng Sa.png
- File:QuanDaoHoangSa.png
- File:HoangSa.png
- File:Côn Đảo.png
- File:Đảo Phú Quốc.png
- File:Biển Đông.png
- File:Trường Sa.png
- File:Hoàng Sa.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manish9893 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Rajyasabha Seats July 2020.jpg.png
- File:Rajyasabha Seat distribution July 2020.jpg
- File:Indian Upper House - July 2020.jpg
- File:17th Loksabha NDA UPA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manish9893 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart/diagram of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:UP vidhan parishad - January 2021.jpg
- File:Rajya Sabha Seats January-2021.jpg
- File:BJP Loksabha seats all time.png
- File:BJP Loksabha Vote percent all time.png
- File:BJP Rajyasabha seats all time.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Bking.png
- File:Bqueen.png
- File:Brook.png
- File:Wqueen.png
- File:Bpawnup.png
- File:Bknight.png
- File:Bpawn.png
- File:Bbishop.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio (Satellite); see watermarks Enyavar (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-educational content, also no source information for used images in this montage. GeorgHH • talk 22:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; OOS badly photoshopped personal insult/joke/troll image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
unused fantasy map of a China that occupied Mongolia Enyavar (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
it is a small, blurry jpeg that i have replaced with an SVG. Eman235 (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, unused, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
เนื่องจากเป็น ไร้สาระ UFOINDY (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I google translated the message and got"because it is nonsense." Not a compelling argument. This is an historical lamp made by a well known designer. The image was missing from the Wiki article until I added it. Ew3234 (talk) 00:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep @Ew3234 The phrase "because it is nonsense" and similar phrases often turn up as deletion rationales. Ironically, these phrases are themselves nonsense. Apparently, they are generated by some Android app. Brianjd (talk) 05:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; personal photo by non-contributor -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:"Egersund" derives from the Old Norse name for the strait between Eigerøya and the mainland, which was called Eikundarsund.jpg
[edit]
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by রবিউল ইসলাম ভূঁইয়া (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xvision007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Xvision has uploaded a number of logos, and these seem like they might be too creative to be without copyright
- File:BOL Ent.png
- File:BBC Cbeebies.png
- File:Baby First.png
- File:B4U Plus.png
- File:B4U Movies.png
- File:B4U Music.png
- File:Awaz News.png
- File:Ary Zindagi.png
- File:ARY Qtv.png
- File:Ary Digital.png
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Duplicado Madamebiblio (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Duplicado Madamebiblio (talk) 18:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
![19:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/22#c-Sahaib3005-2021-11-22T19:17:00.000Z-File:"The_Quebe_Sisters"_Headshot.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![03:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/22#c-Minorax-2021-12-09T03:40:00.000Z-File:"The_Quebe_Sisters"_Headshot.jpg){kind=link}
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Zero educational value Kotofey2016 (talk) 20:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Reasonable quality; categories demonstrate that subject is in scope. Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Zero educational value Kotofey2016 (talk) 20:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Reasonable quality; categories demonstrate that subject is in scope. Also, I think this is the only image we have of a woman squatting against a wall to urinate. Brianjd (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Zero educational value Kotofey2016 (talk) 20:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete Low resolution. Brianjd (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Zero educational value Kotofey2016 (talk) 20:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
![20:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/22#c-Kotofey2016-2021-11-22T20:33:00.000Z-File:Urinating_in_the_"high_squat"_position.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - Image is on the small side but it's not unusable by any means, Currently in Category:Nude or partially nude women urinating and Category:Standing urination which is enough keep. IMHO in scope too. –Davey2010Talk 20:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 Definitely in scope, but low resolution. Does it show anything interesting that the other images don't? Brianjd (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- It shows a woman urinating in the woods and the rest in the 2 cats don't - not interesting to me but could be to someone else, The first category only has 25 images and the last only has 10 and as far as I can see this is only image we have of this setting. –Davey2010Talk 13:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 Actually, I moved the image to Squatting urination. But all these categories are small anyway. Brianjd (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Brianjd I knew there was something wrong after I replied - that was it!, forgot to look in the category you added it too, Apologies for that, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC),
- @Davey2010 Actually, I moved the image to Squatting urination. But all these categories are small anyway. Brianjd (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- It shows a woman urinating in the woods and the rest in the 2 cats don't - not interesting to me but could be to someone else, The first category only has 25 images and the last only has 10 and as far as I can see this is only image we have of this setting. –Davey2010Talk 13:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 Definitely in scope, but low resolution. Does it show anything interesting that the other images don't? Brianjd (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above discussion. Brianjd (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Davey2010. The low resolution should have prompted us to look into its copyright status. Normally I would. Brianjd (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Didym. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/22#c-Minorax-2021-12-09T03:37:00.000Z-File:Urinating_in_the_"high_squat"_position.jpg){kind=link}
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely derivative work of video game promotional material. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Either a GoogleMaps copyvio (by looks), or copyvio of the HERE group (see lower right copymark, they're is Google's business partner) Enyavar (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal content only, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 21:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
fictional flag for a finnish-occupied nation in resurrected Soviet Kola peninsula Enyavar (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
the underlying maps appears to be GoogleMaps, which would be a copyvio here on commons. Enyavar (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
basemap is copyright by NAVTEQ Enyavar (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
According to their English Wikipedia user page, the uploader does not have permission to use the photo for promotional purposes. This is incompatible with the CC-BY-SA license under which the uploader uploaded the document, as well as any more permissive license, as the terms of the license to the uploader prohibit certain types of commercial use. This file, therefore, is not a free cultural work and should be deleted. Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- "the uploader does not have permission to use the photo for promotional purposes"
- May I ask if a Wikipedia entry is considered a promotional article? TracyHoang (talk) 10:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @TracyHoang Per Commons:Licensing, files must be free to use for all purposes. Also, Commons has other sister projects besides Wikipedia. Brianjd (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I explained the situation to the author and he granted me permission to use this photo for all purposes. TracyHoang (talk) 04:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Neutral @TracyHoang: Expect the file to be deleted anyway; it can be undeleted when you provide evidence of permission; see COM:VRT. Of course, this assumes there are no other problems with the file, such as COM:SCOPE and it being a COM:DW of book covers. Brianjd (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I explained the situation to the author and he granted me permission to use this photo for all purposes. TracyHoang (talk) 04:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @TracyHoang Per Commons:Licensing, files must be free to use for all purposes. Also, Commons has other sister projects besides Wikipedia. Brianjd (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: It appears permissions still haven't been provided. If permissions are sent to COM:VRT then we can undelete. At this time, we cannot keep this photograph on Commons due to copyright. --Missvain (talk) 18:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license - Publicity still or newsmedia image - w:File:Don Revie and Billy Bremner.jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
These images are copyvios (microchip), COM:Derivative works student id, web page, school image, document (pictures-of-pictures). I also suspect that the draft articles these are used in are either hoaxes or student pranks.
- File:Col. lino cosico school..jpg
- File:Judge cosico.jpg
- File:Jodeon microchip.jpg
- File:Director of entity.jpg
- File:Jerwin caliwagan cosico.jpg
MKFI (talk) 11:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution images, most without EXIF data and some derivative works. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Slymshady Nigerian Hypeman.jpg
- File:Slymshady and dj SlimV.jpg
- File:Slymshady performing at an event.jpg
- File:Slymshady.jpg
- File:Slymshady performing.jpg
- File:How To Write About Nigeria Book Cover.png
- File:Benneth Nwankwo portrait.jpg
- File:Benneth NWANKWO at This Is My Story's Premiere .jpg
- File:Benneth Nwankwo.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 20:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
obvious screenshot. No camera details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
Timtrent (talk) 08:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
- File:Ebelechukwu Veronica Obiano -01.jpg
- File:Ugoccie -01.jpg
- File:Slymshady.jpg
- File:Benneth Nwankwo.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022032610002751 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 06:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and no OTRS for 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a low quality image that has no possible use. Honestly, I cannot tell what its purpose is. Susmuffin (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Redirect from move. Not needed, no incoming links - FlightTime (open channel) 05:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Trabajo realizado por Jorge Luengo, con derecho de autor. Usurpación de identidad por el usuario Ferchuu2929, que no es el autor de la imagen. Madamebiblio (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Trabajo realizado por Jorge Luengo, con derecho de autor. Usurpación de identidad por el usuario Ferchuu2929, que no es el autor de la imagen. Madamebiblio (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Only used in a rejected sandbox on en WP. Low resolution only. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted poor quality unused personal photo by non contributor from 2012 -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Above TOO in Slovenia, and the circle is a non-free symbol(I could not type that URL as it is already on the blacklist). Stang★ 09:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio. The source of the circle diagram is https://www.vectorstock.com/royalty-free-vector/enso-japanese-zen-circle-brush-vector-21751674 . --SCP-2000 10:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above and false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:44, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work - w:File:Bamberbridgefc.png is non-free, and the shield contains non-trival elements (which are not necessarily conventional heraldic emblems) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doubtful own work claim - Organizational logo -w:File:AS Vita Club (logo).png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
ReDeleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Account with no useful activity. Gikü (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; personal photo by non-contributor. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
This or the version is was derived from need to be deleted. I think this is a better version of the original file. Victuallers (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers, re: a better version, are you thinking of File:Nina Turner crop light and color corrected.jpg? I made that as a derivative work of the nominated file—I’m not sure what the rules are for preserving a file in a chain of authorship like that. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that we could have dozens of different versions in slightly better lighting. I think you should be bolder and load your improved version over the other image as an improved version. Cannot see anyone wanting the proveious version after seeing yours and if they insisted well ... its still there as an old version. Victuallers (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers See Commons:Don't be bold and Commons:Overwriting existing files. Also note that File:Nina Turner crop light and color corrected.jpg is in use in three articles across two Wikipedias. Why mess with this? Brianjd (talk) 11:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that we could have dozens of different versions in slightly better lighting. I think you should be bolder and load your improved version over the other image as an improved version. Cannot see anyone wanting the proveious version after seeing yours and if they insisted well ... its still there as an old version. Victuallers (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per my reply above and to preserve attribution per Innisfree987. Brianjd (talk) 11:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up but I was proposing that the old file was deleted, not the one in use. Victuallers (talk) 12:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers We should keep the existing in-use file, instead of overwriting this one, to avoid creating problems for other projects. But when we keep the derivative as a separate file, we need to keep the original too, to preserve attribution information. Brianjd (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thx for yr patience. I can see that, I think the real point is that IMO if you find an image on commons that is just poor...and if by a small crop or contrast adjustment then it can be so improved that no one would consider using the original then it should be a new version that overwrites the poor version, not a new file. If I have misunderstood then that is fine. I wouldnt consider this "bold", but bolder then creating a new version. Have I misunderstood? Victuallers (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- This makes sense to me—thanks @Victuallers, in truth I learned the Derivative Toolforge tool first and only recently noticed the direct upload option, and so far I’ve only used it on files I personally added. But it makes a lot of sense to avoid having duplicates of lesser quality floating around creating confusion. Especially when the file history would always be there if someone had a strong preference against the change. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thx for yr patience. I can see that, I think the real point is that IMO if you find an image on commons that is just poor...and if by a small crop or contrast adjustment then it can be so improved that no one would consider using the original then it should be a new version that overwrites the poor version, not a new file. If I have misunderstood then that is fine. I wouldnt consider this "bold", but bolder then creating a new version. Have I misunderstood? Victuallers (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers We should keep the existing in-use file, instead of overwriting this one, to avoid creating problems for other projects. But when we keep the derivative as a separate file, we need to keep the original too, to preserve attribution information. Brianjd (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up but I was proposing that the old file was deleted, not the one in use. Victuallers (talk) 12:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:52, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://mobile.twitter.com/gladiadoresfutb/status/1317968021705662465?lang=ar-x-fm, requires COM:VRT ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of "own work" as this photo was widely known and used many years ago (this person died at 2009) Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This file isn't my work. I uploaded the file incorrectly. I'm sorry for disturbing. This file must be deleted. Source:[8]Atabeg00 (talk) 12:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
![[8]](https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fayl:B%C9%99xtiyar_Vahabzad%C9%99.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a copyright violation; all rights reserved as mentioned in footer of source website. 2406:7400:70:E7FD:0:0:0:1 17:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted COM:CV, Claimed license unsupported by source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
fictional flag of a made-up micronation. The only "Frangolandia" I can find, is a supermarket chain. Enyavar (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
fictional map of a made-up micronation. The only "Frangolandia" I can find, is a supermarket chain. Enyavar (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Fictional map of a duplicate peloponnes island being a nation. Enyavar (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS troll or personal fantasy map. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Denn es ist Unsinn Simmmox (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS personal photo by non-contributor. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Manhai is a serial copyright abuser, nothing added by him to Flickr can be trusted to be free of copyright Mztourist (talk) 04:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Manhai is a serial copyright abuser, nothing uploaded by him to Flickr can be assumed to be free of copyright Mztourist (talk) 04:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Claimed own work; has large watermark from "LIFE" magazine. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Same exact painting already on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thomas_Mickell_Burnham_-_Stevens_Thomson_Mason_-_57.268_-_Detroit_Institute_of_Arts.jpg RoundSquare (talk) 04:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly an official photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HarrySullivan1968 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted derivative works since they include screenshots of Facebook per COM:SS
- File:Michael Sukkars Deleted Facebook pages-05.png
- File:Michael Sukkars Deleted Facebook pages when the Car Parks Rorts scandal broke-03.png
- File:Michael Sukkars Deleted Facebook pages when the Car Parks Rorts scandal broke-01.png
- File:Department of Infrastructure Deleted Pages-04.png
Twotwofourtysix (talk) 10:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work w:File:H10Protest.gif is non-free - However, given the likely original date this photo was taken, research to determine the original image source is advised. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Raw text only Headlock0225 (talk) 11:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Mein Urhberrecht. 2003:DE:7730:B315:3087:7FAD:7C2E:5618 14:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Mein Urhberrecht. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TKPERS (talk • contribs) 09:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Mein Urhberrecht. TKPERS (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Bitte entfernen, bin damit einverstanden mein Bild, es wird missbraucht. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TKPERS (talk • contribs) 09:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are not revokable. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EmiiCalle28 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be from two different photographers. One has metadata crediting Claudio Mandica, the other is the subject's Twitter profile pic.
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:PRP. Uploader known for copyvios; the filename doesn't inspire me confidence that this is the uploader's own work either. pandakekok9 15:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered; false claim, as in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, per above; inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
The 'French Infantry Command' is not a thing Coldstreamer20 (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep INUSE and no valid reason for deletion. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. In use in multiple projects. Inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Who is Arthur Discretion, and do you plan on requesting deletion again in a few months when your request is shot down again? It looks to me like you are requesting the deletion of every image you uploaded. Why do you think that's fine to do? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use on en.wikipedia. Can you give a substantive reason why it would serve the cause of knowledge to delete this diagram? Also, why are you nominating it again after having given another non-explanatory reason (see above) in January that was shot down? Will you nominate it for deletion again early next year? -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade_(TA).png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade_(TA).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade_(TA).png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade_(TA).png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade_(TA).png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use. w:Alaska Defense Command -- Mjchael (talk) 01:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, per above, in use, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unless some specific reason why the nominator calls it "dubious" is offered. Reverse image search shows others credits to Manfredo Ferrari. who uploaded it to Wikimedia. This has been very prominent in Wikimedia since 2014, with no previous allegation of being "dubious". EXIF is from Manfredo Ferrari. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Infrog. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep dubious nomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:11, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Disagree strongly. (Allegation based on what? Doing reverse image searches can be helpful when wondering about images.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:11, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks dubious. Veverve (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Dubious why? Show me an earlier example of publication of this photo, on line or in print, credited to some other photographer, or some other substantial evidence, and I'll agree with you. At present I see nothing "dubious". Photo by Manfredo Ferrari who from all I can see kindly shared it to Wikimedia in 2014 - it has been on here prominently since without previous allegations of being "dubious". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- We do not know where this picture was taken, and I have doubt any average person would have access to a cardinal in the Vatican with proper lighting to take a picture of him.
- Also, there are artifacts on the picture (white dots). Where are they from? Veverve (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- The white dots are dust on the scanner &/or photo print. A common minor problem when making digital copies of film photographs. [9] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- "I have doubt any average person have access to a cardinal in the Vatican". Yes, likely not just some random tourist, but rather someone with a certain degree of access. Manfredo Ferrari is described as a "Vaticanist" here in this book. (Thanks, Google websearch.) Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of an email. Text can have copyright. Sreejith K (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Ophelia0224
[edit]- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 01.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 02.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 03.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 04.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 05.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 06.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 07.jpg
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 08.jpg
- File:Grand Duchess Anastasia of Russia's granddaughter, refered to by Grand Duchess Anastasia as Grand Duchess Michele, with mother JoAnna Marie Wozney Ford and siblings. Copyright reserved and protected by law..jpg
Most likely out of scope, personal family photographs --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 19:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Instead of debating scope, let's delete them on copyright grounds. I'm pretty sure a set of historical photos depicting the uploader, among others, is not an "own work" from the day before upload. Also, File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 07.jpg has a load of garbage in the file description, added by the uploader, including:
- All photos copyrighted and protected by law by Michele Mary Ford. See Users page for email information.
- And the last file's entire description is:
- Copyright reserved and protected by law.
- File:Anastasia Nikolaevna survived, with Granddaughter Michele Mary Ford coming forward with evidence. 07.jpg is attributed to "Marcel Coenders", unlike the other files in the set, which are attributed to "Michele M. Ford". Brianjd (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Most photos cannot be the own work of the uploader as claimed. Various photographers. Most amateur. Some professional. Both rationales above are reasons for deletion. Possible copyvios and out of scope. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- We usually have the uploader release as PD-heirs or one of the CC-heirs license for non-studio family snaps. --RAN (talk) 03:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
2020 Unsplash upload (https://unsplash.com/photos/smgTvepind4). Per {{Unsplash}}, "media published on Unsplash from 5 June 2017 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons". IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:Flickr washing. Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alejandro Biondini.png. File apparently coming from the same Flickr account and uploaded by the same Commons user that the ones in that deletion request. Frodar (talk) 21:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
I highly doubt that the uploader had the right to release this image under the license given that it is used elsewhere online. Aoba47 (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Mustapha El Habib sobre un puente 191.116.35.119 02:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope unless it can be shown to be a useful image of specific notable place. Unused user photo of self on unidentified bridge, unidentified country. Uncat since 2019. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:WEBHOST. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: "countries where OUR products are used", as of 2016. Sure. Enyavar (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep unless the current use can be shown to be illegitimate. Brianjd (talk) 05:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I must admit I didn't check for a change that it was actually in use. Badly made maps like this are still a pointless illustration for any topic, but since the company needs it for legitimate advertisement, it may remain. --Enyavar (talk) 07:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This image is in use in an article. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Extremely unlikely that a 1961 work has a modern CC-zero license. (Other uploads by this user also had false licenses.) It's possible that the work may be {{PD-US-not renewed}} or {{PD-US-no notice}}, but proof of those would be needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Having looked through the renewal database to add in the data to Wikidata, I have never seen a renewal for a school yearbook. There was no aftermarket to justify the expense, unlike big city newspapers and magazines that would constantly repackage their archives into new works. --RAN (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! ;) Kellykma71 (talk) 06:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. The quality is cruddy though. Would be great to have a better version. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Unknown map (may be old version of Yandex or somthing else). — Redboston 04:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If it's unknown, how come it is in use? If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The description indicates that the map was used on map.volgadmin.ru. There is no information that this mai is PD. — Redboston 19:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
DW; reverse image search finds the photo of Assange being held is copyrighted Jack Taylor/Getty Images. However could be cropped or photoshopped to remove DW poster, to just illustrate the person, as Paolo Barnard has articles about him in multiple Wikipedias. (Note: Was categorized as an image Julian Assange only; I have recategorized the image.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a poor scan and not an original work. Veverve (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Poor quality, currently in use. Are their alternatives? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: in any case, the design is probably copyrighted. And it does not change the fact that the image I nominated for deletion is not an own work. Veverve (talk) 09:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Despite the painful quality, this student union was founded in 1961. I'm concerned about copyright. We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
image update 143Tony (talk) 07:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting personal graphic - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
image update 143Tony (talk) 07:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doutful simple work claim, Elements behind shield are non-trival w:File:UNIONE DI CENTRO (2009).jpg is considered non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- I didn't find it among the registered trademarks on the Italian Patent and Trademark Office website. So I thought it wasn't a registered trademark like w:File:Unione di Centro.svg. Maybe { {PD-ineligible} } would be a better license? --Ippolitus nut (talk) 11:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Doesn't meet COM:TOO. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Jean-Pol GRANDMONT is not the author of this work, it is simply pd-old Goesseln (talk) 10:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Je suis bien l'auteur de cette photographie. Pour s'en convaincre, il suffit de consulte le fichier EXIF de celle-ci et constater qu'elle a été prise pendant la période où ce document a été exposé au Musée du Grand Hornu lors de l'exposition 'L'Homme, le Dragon et la Mort. La Gloire de saint Georges - Exposition (2015-2016)' figurant sous le lien suivant :
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:L%27Homme,_le_Dragon_et_la_Mort._La_Gloire_de_saint_Georges_-_Exposition_(2015-2016)?uselang= Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: All one needed to do was change the credit. I'm also going to go remove a license. No clue why there are two or three there. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays.--Missvain (talk) 16:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Nepal. Maybe the photo violates text author's copyright. Who is author of the text and when (s)he died? When the text was published? Taivo (talk) 10:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gampe as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: experiments, out of scope, no usage This does not seem like a valid rationale for a speedy deletion. Brianjd (talk) 11:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, please see uploading history of this User --Gampe (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Gampe I did see their history of uploading supposedly out of scope files; that is not an argument that this file is out of scope. This file's subject is clearly in scope, so what makes the file out of scope? Its quality? Its resolution? Its similarity to other files? Brianjd (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd Hi. It seems to me that this uploader chose the wrong project. I advised him to turn to some amateur erotic website. Or it is a provocative account according to its history. We have enough quality images on this topic, this one does not bring anything new. Btw see Commons:Nudity. Gampe (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Gampe I did see their history of uploading supposedly out of scope files; that is not an argument that this file is out of scope. This file's subject is clearly in scope, so what makes the file out of scope? Its quality? Its resolution? Its similarity to other files? Brianjd (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: For godsake please let me know when there is nudity when you nominate something. We have plenty images of this specific subject. Feeling charitable, courtesy deletion. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be copyvio/deriv without appropriate attribution. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh Name me 12:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- also file:Manila-Acapulco Galleon (cropped).jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Philippines. Here we have 1998 sculpture and text, so they are both copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
There is not indication that this file is Creative Commons. There are no links that say its CC anywhere in the file description. The RFA website says copyright at the bottom of every page. GuyWithATelescope (talk) 13:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- The following files by this user also probably aren't Creative Commons: File:RFA One Starship.jpg, File:RFA employees.jpg, File:RFA One.png. The RFA Logo he uploaded is probably fine because Template:PD-textlogo fits as the license. GuyWithATelescope (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I am not completely sure about the proper way to insert images into Wikimedia and the license applying in this case. However, these images are made publicly available by RFA and non-commercially sharing these is allowed, especially when credit is given. Wikihero1977 (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunatly, any image is copyrighted unless otherwise noted as e.g. Creative Commons. So you can't just use any images you find on the Internet. The images you uploaded are copyright violations since the author of the image didn't release them under a free license. Wikimedia Commons only allows images under free licenses and there must be a proof that the image has the license (for example if the website says Creative Commons next to the image). For more information check out Commons:Licensing. GuyWithATelescope (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- I am not completely sure about the proper way to insert images into Wikimedia and the license applying in this case. However, these images are made publicly available by RFA and non-commercially sharing these is allowed, especially when credit is given. Wikihero1977 (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Presumed copyvio. Better to be safe than sorry. If users with to nominate other images, feel free. We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
File:General Masquerad-Arrangören med stab. Fritz von Dardel, 1845 - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0037327.jpg
[edit]
Low res copy of later upload https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%27General_Masquerad-Arrangören_med_stab%27._Carl_Fred._Piper,_Dardel,_Ehrnman,_O._Björnstjerna_-_Nordiska_museet_-_NMA.0037327.jpg from same source Ambrosiani (talk) 13:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- also file:Xaver Lehmann.jpg
de:Fabian Beringer and de:Xaver Lehmann were both deleted, depicted persons are not mentioned in en.wiki. Seems like the photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Promo photo - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
This seal [according to UDEL style guides, that's the seal not the logo] looks like it's copyrighted and it is unused anyway. Unless the seal is old enough to be out of copyright, it needs to be deleted Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Segundo o site https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/University-Delaware os logos então em domínio público, esse é ó modelo mais novo do logo da Universidade, saudações Jssj2015 (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If it is outdated, add that it shows as of 2018 (or whatever date). Commons documents historical as well as current situations. If it was in scope when uploaded, it still is. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per comment - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Question Admins, do you think this user should be blocked for repeatedly nominating all the images they uploaded for deletion for no good reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment FYI, they're indefinitely blocked on Wikipedia. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- If outdated, add dates when it was accurate to the description. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)_(Regular_Units).png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)_(Regular_Units).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)_(Regular_Units).png){kind=link}
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)_(Regular_Units).png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)_(Regular_Units).png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
_Division_Structure.png){kind=link}
_Division_Structure.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
_Division_Structure.png){kind=link}
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
_Division_Structure.png){kind=link}
_Division_Structure.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade.png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade.png){kind=link}
- what have they been superseded by? A better image or a different military hierarchy. --RAN (talk) 03:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
_Infantry_Brigade.png){kind=link}
_Infantry_Brigade.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "Old, not needed" doesn't necessarily mean it's not historical in nature or educational in value still. We keep graphics and images that document historical information. If we're missing something, you're welcome to renominate this image with better explanation or under a different police-based rationale. Also please consider the mass nomination tool. Thank you and happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy kept, closed as kept last month; no new reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Lucien Lévy-Dhurmer died in 1953, copyriht violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:9474:5CAC:A1AA:4A2D 16:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lucien Lévy-Dhurmer died in 1953, copyriht violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:9474:5CAC:A1AA:4A2D 16:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
I am the owner of the file and I was the one who wrote thisin2013. I need to remove this file because some informations were incorrect and also for privacyand securit concerns. Mimage have been used to scrupulous activities in the internet 49.145.195.102 17:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
wronginformaton. owner requests privacyand security 49.145.195.102 17:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not used, no useful categories, apparently OOS. (Only upload by user, who has been inactive since 2013.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Edward Hughes - Travelling on the Liverpool ^ Manchester Railway, A Train of Waggons with Goods and A Train of Carri - B1993.30.130 - Yale Center for British Art.jpg
[edit]
Due to a bot glitch this item has been added with the incorrect artist name in the title. If you could delete it I will re-add it withe correct details. Thanks. Rob Lowe - Smartify (talk) 17:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep @Rob Lowe - Smartify No need to delete - simply request a rename. Brianjd (talk) 11:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR is not for renamining. Please visit COMMONS:RENAME. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Old publishing and false information Nilskaufmann75 (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional image of non-notables - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for statues in Finland. No evidence that the sculptor (Eino Koistinen) died more than 70 years ago. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
How Roland Lescure can be the author of this photo, of which he is the subject? It's not a selfie. tyseria (d) 20:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alzinous as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: violació dels drets d'autor No copy on thr Net. Why is this a copyvio? Yann (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- The image does not have the authorization of the author. It is linked to a school project (Dolors Vaqué) and the student who has published it has recognized that he is not the author of the image. It seems that Dolors Vaqué herself has ceded the photograph, although she is not the author, but the corresponding authorization has not been formalized. --Alzinous (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- OK, and who is the author? Yann (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do not know. I only know that it is not Xiao Ting Zhou. I have advised them to ask the real photographer for authorisation, but it seems they have not done so. Alzinous (talk) 00:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- OK, and who is the author? Yann (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Presumed Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
_-_Saint_Mary_of_Magdala_statue.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Saint_Mary_of_Magdala_statue.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Nheyob as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <potential copyright violation> Yann (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per US law we can't house contemporary works without permission - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Holy Resurrection Melkite Catholic Church (Columbus, Ohio) - iconostasis, The Resurrection.JPG
[edit]_-_iconostasis,_The_Resurrection.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_The_Resurrection.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Nheyob as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <potential copyright violation> Yann (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: US copyright law won't allow us to house these modern works without permission - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Holy Resurrection Melkite Catholic Church (Columbus, Ohio) - iconostasis, St. John the Baptist.JPG
[edit]_-_iconostasis,_St._John_the_Baptist.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_St._John_the_Baptist.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Nheyob as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <potential copyright violation> Yann (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: US copyright law won't allow us to house these modern works without permission - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Holy Resurrection Melkite Catholic Church (Columbus, Ohio) - iconostasis, Madonna & Christ icon.JPG
[edit]_-_iconostasis,_Madonna_%26_Christ_icon.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_Madonna_%26_Christ_icon.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Nheyob as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <potential copyright violation> Yann (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: US copyright law won't allow us to house these modern works without permission - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
_-_iconostasis,_Christ.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_iconostasis,_Christ.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Nheyob as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <potential copyright violation> Yann (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative. No evidence of permission. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: US copyright law won't allow us to house these modern works without permission - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: artist unknown. Provenance: published in Svenskt konstnärslexikon vol 5 (1967), probably drawn from life (Sandquist died in 1955). There's no way to know if this image's copyright has expired. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Logo King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have drawn the logo myself digitally, from the original real life logo, so really no need to delete it without a reason.
- In addition to that, the real life logo is not under any copyright that would prohibit its use. TzPGZ (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @TzPGZ: Can you supply evidence that copyright of the original logo is expired in Croatia, its country of origin? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Shortly after the 12 minute marker for the source video, there's a notice reading "All Rights Reserved (c) Mother Films 2013." https://vimeo.com/61663627 I'm also not sure where on Vimeo the purported license is shown. Nick Moreau (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- On the Vimeo video description, click "more" then "license". It does indeed show CC BY 3.0. Added to the clear "all rights reserved" in the film credits, and we seem to have two contradictory licenses. Were this a high value image I might suggest trying more extensive research, but as this image is unused I think we should just go by the precautionary principle and Delete -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
While the video may have been uploaded as Creative Commons -- I'm not sure where on the page I'd find that confirmation -- it's very unlikely that it is free licensed. The video ends with a logo for BBC. https://vimeo.com/174004379 Nick Moreau (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment the CC BY 3.0 license can be seen by clicking "More" on the vimeo page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Confirmed license - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Next time please tell us that there is nudity. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The description mentions a "coloured version". Thus, this "own work" seems to be just a "black-and-whitened version" ! TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 23:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; pd in 2056; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Logo. Pre-1978 US logo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept Logo not used since 1945, has no copyright notice (and unlikely any renewals would have been filed); has trade mark notice which seems sufficient in this case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Herrarna lära mista sina hvita jackor. Löjtnant Adam Reuterskjöld. Fritz von Dardel - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0037322.jpg
[edit]
low res copy of later upload https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%27Herrarna_lära_mista_sina_hvita_jackor%27._Löjtnant_Adam_Reuterskjöld_._Akvarell_av_Fritz_von_Dardel_-_Nordiska_museet_-_NMA.0037322.jpg from same source Ambrosiani (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ambrosiani - The nominated image is in use. Please replace it with the replacement image and then I can delete. Thank you! Missvain (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: thx for pointing that out. Done! Ambrosiani (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Ambrosiani - Thank you! Missvain (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: thx for pointing that out. Done! Ambrosiani (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Maps from the "Strukturatlas Augsburg"
[edit]- file:Augsburg Stadtbezirk 2 Innenstadt.png
- file:Augsburg Stadtbezirk 24 Hochzoll-Nord.png
- file:Augsburg Stadtbezirk 3 Bahnhofsviertel.png
- file:Augsburger Stadtbezirke.jpg
- file:Karte Augsburg – Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png
- file:Planungsraeume antonsvierte.png
- file:Planungsraeume baerenkeller.png
- file:Planungsraeume bergheim.png
- file:Planungsraeume firnhaberau.png
- file:Planungsraeume goeggingen.png
- file:Planungsraeume hammerschmie.png
- file:Planungsraeume haunstettens.png
- file:Planungsraeume hochfeld.png
- file:Planungsraeume hochzoll.png
- file:Planungsraeume innenstadt.png
- file:Planungsraeume inningen.png
- file:Planungsraeume kriegshaber.png
- file:Planungsraeume lechhausen.png
- file:Planungsraeume oberhausen.png
- file:Planungsraeume pfersee.png
- file:Planungsraueme spickelherre.png
- file:Planungsraueme universitaet.png
All underlying maps are taken from the "Strukturatlas" (structural atlas) of the city of Augsburg. On page 4 of the document, which is available online here, the following protective note is listed:
All rights reserved.
In particular, the transfer, translation, reproduction or storage of this publication or parts thereof in electronic systems for commercial purposes is not permitted without the express permission of the publisher.
Reprints (including excerpts) are only permitted if the source is acknowledged.
In every single case copyright is infringed and plagiarism is passed off as the author's own work. All files listed above are therefore not usable for Wikipedia.
--BrightPurple (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- The simple locator maps show quite different outlines for most of the Stadtbezirke and they are quite generalized compared to the PDF. So this is definitely an "own work". And Karte Augsburg – Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png has got some information that is not in the PDF, e.g. that little edge in the southeastern edge of area 12, or a completely different shape of the boundary between 24 and 25. So the PDF cannot be the only source. In fact, the vector data is OSM, only the numbers are taken from https://www.daz-augsburg.de/augsburger-strukturatlas-2011-erschienen/. So where is the copyvio? NNW 08:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Even if the data were provided by OSM, this would have to be indicated. OSM also requires a reference to the source. In the present cases, however, it is unanimously pretended that these are "own works".
- It is in the nature of plagiarisms that they are of a lower quality than the original in terms of detail. To speak of a "generalisation" is nothing more than an easily transparent whitewash. To derive from this the claim to an "own work" is downright absurd. Equally grotesque is the assumption that one can create "own works" by adding a few little things to the plagiarism or leaving them out.
- The argument that the file "Karte Augsburg - Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png" shows a "completely different shape of the boundary between 24 and 25" is incorrect. Compared to the original, the plagiarism was merely rotated counterclockwise by 1.4° and slightly distorted. An absolute congruence between the two versions can be easily achieved. Furthermore, an arbitrary and thus intentionally false depiction of a boundary course would be inadmissible according to our guidelines.
- Just look at the details in the inner city area. The similarity of the "simple locator maps" with the one from the PDF is so striking that there can be no doubt about the authorship of the "Amt für Statistik und Stadtforschung".
- Not a single uploader respects the protective note from the PDF. Only [[de:user:Chumwa]] admits having taken the data for his File from the "Strukturatlas Augsburg", but also fails to meet the requirements of the protection notice, according to which reprinting (even in extracts) is only permitted if the source is acknowledged. --BrightPurple (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Even if the data were provided by OSM, this would have to be indicated: You obviously haven't read the description page of Karte Augsburg – Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png: source: own work using OpenStreetMap data. Own work: yes, because not all data was used and the parts which were used haven't got the same attribution anymore. The numbers 1 to 42 aren't protected data. This discussion is nonsense. NNW 09:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Where should one's own creative achievement be recognisable in all these cases. The mere tracing / copying always constitutes an infringement of copyright if it is published. BrightPurple (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- P.S. It would be helpful if it could be explained how the mapped data could be taken over other than by tracing. BrightPurple (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- For Karte Augsburg – Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png there is definitely no "infringement of copyright". It's OSM data which can be reused. It is recoloured and some numbers are added which cannot be protected. Furthermore this map as a unique and completely different style to the PDF map. And for all the other locator maps there are clear differences between them and the PDF boundaries (further examples: in the PDF between 3 and 5 a more or less straight line, not so in the locator maps; in the PDF 1 between 2 and 9, not so in the locator maps where they touch; the meeting point of 3, 11 and 13 completely different in the PDF compared to the locator maps etc. Yes, they all are similar – because they show the same thing. But they are not simply copied from each other. NNW 10:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have the impression that the reference to the OSM map is a pure misdirection. In any case, there is no link to the map section used. Likewise, there is no information about the underlying map layer. Neither the "Standard", "CyclOSM", "Radfahrerkarte", "Verkehrskarte", "ÖPNVKarte" nor the "Humanitär" layers provide data that offer added value compared to the map of the Amt für Statistik und Stadtforschung. Which of these OSM maps, for example, reveals details of the city centre layout as shown on page 17 of the PDF?
- But let us leave for a moment the debate about the file "Map Augsburg - Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png" and turn first to the perhaps easier-to-decide, less complexly designed maps. For none of these comparatively simple maps is reference made to an OSM map; they are all more or less identical to the map of municipal office.
- If the boundaries are so different, it raises the question of whether the structural atlas from 2020 or the WM maps, some of which are 14 years old, are flawed. Apart from that, the coincidence is so striking that this cannot be wiped away so easily and the question still arises as to where the underlying data come from (the uploaders are unlikely to have mapped it themselves).
- Incidentally, I repeat my reproach that all maps have been rotated by a few degrees compared to the original and somewhat distorted (presumably to create a difference to the original). This is one of the simplest exercises with a suitable graphics programme. Hopefully it is not necessary to point this out, but turning and distorting does not create a work of its own. This should sufficiently explain many of the small differences in the representation in the boundary lines (apart from factual changes due to time). BrightPurple (talk) 11:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- You listed Map Augsburg - Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png for deletion, so don't be surprised that I talk about it. All these boundaries can be found easily in OSM, e.g. Georgs- und Kreuzviertel (4) or Lechhausen-Ost (26). Neither of the listed files can be produced by a simple rotation of the PDF map. The boundaries are not distorted, they simply look different and you are not able to tell where they come from. You just claim that they are taken from the PDF and I definitely doubt it. I don't know which source the locator maps have (perhaps a personal data base) but you don't either.
- The uploaders are unlikely to have mapped it themselves. Really? Does anyone drawing a map of the world has to sail the seven seas or launch a satellite for images? That is not the way maps are made. Of course other sources are taken (and it would be great if they were listed) but it isn't a copyvio automatically that way. It is important that the new map is a work on its own. And it is in this case. To be honest, you show so much lack of knowledge about making maps and map data like OSM that I doubt that you are familiar with cartography. So how come that you want to decide that this is a copyvio or not? NNW 12:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- You should try not to get personal and deny me certain skills. That doesn't show good style and speaks for itself. I can understand that people are fighting tooth and nail against deletion, because it could lead to a rattail of deletion requests with a comparable starting point - especially for map material. So far, I have only read self-serving declarations, which moreover come from someone who does not belong to the circle of uploaders addressed here. All these so-called authors have so far kept a low profile. But it doesn't help to bury one's head in the sand, and in the long run only resolute actions against the theft of intellectual property can prevent damage to WP. BrightPurple (talk) 12:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Rights of geodata is a very special topic and it is senseless to discuss it with anybody who seems to know nothing. I only know what you have written here and this doesn't give me confidence in your concern to prevent damage to WP. I'm off now. NNW 13:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oh God! Vorgive me! He's off now!
- And silly me, I already thought we could get back to a factual discussion if we let the debate about the file "Map Augsburg - Planungsräume und Stadtbezirke.png" rest for the meantime. But a serious discussion should probably not be held at all. It is true that there is no one-hundred-percent proof that the other files in question are derivations from the structural atlas, but some things speak for it:
- strikingly large correspondence with the map of the PDF
- almost the same dimensions as the original
- minimalist style of the representation with only few colours.
- information provided by the user Chumwa, who admits having taken the data from the "Strukturatlas Augsburg".
- But what in life is one hundred percent? Of course, these are only indications. For me, they are conclusive enough to justify the request for deletion. Especially because I'm not used to shut my trousers with pincers. In practice, the creation of a raster graphic using the OSM data would involve a barely credible effort. After all, it is not as if the various neighbourhood boundaries could be displayed side by side without any attachment. Presumably, using this data, even the creation of a vector-bassed SVG file would be much easier than laboriously transferring it into PNG format.
- That this discussion is nonsense, as user NNW snidely remarked right at the beginning, can be seen that way, especially if you have an opinion from the start. In general, the hurdles in this system are so high that it is almost impossible for the uninitiated to report a possible copyright infringement and have it consistently dealt with. If the community is not willing to vigorously protect copyright, one might as well do without sham events. Under German law, this abuse cannot be punished anyway. BrightPurple (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oh God! Vorgive me! He's off now!
┌─────────────────────┘
Well, it seems there is a certain unwillingness here to enforce copyright even in cases of doubt. As long as the mere claim is sufficient to have created an "own work", it will be difficult or even impossible to help authors obtain their rights, despite all the circumstantial evidence. Therefore, I would like to take a different approach than the one followed so far:
- District or city boundaries are determined by administrative acts and are not of natural origin.
- It should be indisputable that the determination of district boundaries is in the hands of the municipal planning office.
- Furthermore, it is clear that this implementation is done on the basis of data collected by the Geodata Office of the City of Augsburg.
- This makes it clear in this case that any data is based on surveys by the "Geodatenamt der Stadt Augsburg" or the "Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung".
The terms of use provided by both authorities are inconsistent with the licence terms granted herein. See: "List of Fees of the Geodata Office of the City of Augsburg" and here : "Usage Information of the LDBV Bavaria"
--BrightPurple (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- I also refer to the official policy on evidence, according to which uploaders must prove that there is no problem with their uploaded files. A simple claim and attribution as "own work", as in most cases of the files addressed here, is not sufficient.
- --BrightPurple (talk) 13:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The new maps are not directly taken from the Strukturatlas, and so copyright infringement could only exist if there was plagiarism of content which is protected by copyright. The government does not own the district boundaries, even if they are made by government acts; the outlines of the districts are not copyrightable, especially so if they are official. It does not matter whether the data used as the basis of the maps was taken from OSM or Strukturatlas. Obviously, two maps displaying the same region, especially when indicating political boundaries, will have a “strikingly large correspondence”: for example, any map of Arkansas counties will use substantially the same outline map, even if the details are different. The choice of scale is limited by the location depicted; any map of the districts of Augsburg would have a similar scale. I may mention that the fact that the new maps and the Strukturatlas maps have different, though slightly different, scales indicated that the maps were likely not directly copied. BrightPurple, you claim that one other reason to believe the new maps to be copies is the new maps’ “minimalist style of the representation”: what do you mean by this? Many of the new maps (nominated here) are locator maps, which generally have few colors so that the relevant geographical unit may be more easily located. Indeed, a large portion of map-making, especially with the advent of digital mapping technologies, has become more technical effort than artistic skill. As a result of this, many maps will display only minimal creativity. The Strukturatlas maps would have a claim to copyright as a collection, but, as it appears that the maps display various geographic information on a basic outline of a political map, there is no claim to copyright in the form of the map itself. The threshold-of-originality listing for Germany states: “Only those features of a utilitarian article that are not entirely dictated by the technical function can justify copyright protection.” It seems that your claim of copyright infringement is based on the copying of the scale and outline map of Augsburg districts; however, both are required elements in a map of Augsburg districts, so neither can be the basis of a claim of copyright in the maps. Given this, there is no substantive claim of infringement, and the works, (which no one doubts were created by the user in question,) are thus original works, not subject to the copyright- or use-based restrictions of the Strukturatlas. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: while these graphics may require a certain effort to make, the end result is still rather simple. The boundaries used by the files are apparently the same as those in the "Strukturatlas"; no surprise here, but they cannot be protected. I don't see any copyvios or "plagiarism" here. --Rosenzweig τ 12:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Logo. Pre-1978 US logo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This file is claimed to be {{PD-textlogo}}, but I don't concur that this rather detailed drawing of a tiger is a logo with only simple geometric forms. I don't see any evidence or research that this was published without a notice, was not renewed or similar, so I'll delete it per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete , the user 'Nnkrkrhhdi' did personal research and said the photo is not related to Respect for the Aged Day (敬老の日), although it was taken on the same day and the Flickr uploader Shuichi Aizawa added the description "敬老の日". Since it's believed to be unrelated the photo should be deleted. - Artanisen (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If necessary, please have the file renamed and correct the image descriptions. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
