Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_old_logo.png){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_logo_(cropped).png){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
,_Bangladesh._(35477337502).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Notified of Copyright Infringement by a Wikimedia staff member Garborator (talk) 03:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per source "© 2021 City of Edmonton. All rights reserved.". --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhinav619 (talk • contribs) 2016-06-01T13:32:18 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Probable copyvio - Has shutterstock watermark Mbrickn (talk) 06:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Old information CorneliaSupera (talk) 07:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:22, 16 October 2021 UTC: <some errors in this version> --Krdbot 01:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Old informations CorneliaSupera (talk) 07:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:22, 16 October 2021 UTC: <some errors in this version> --Krdbot 01:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The cited source is ©2021 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved. Requesting immediate deletion rather than letting the license issue time out since the user has now copied this copyvio image to English Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 23:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Explicit at 00:13, 17 October 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: cited source https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/egerton-ryerson-statue-caledonia-land-back-lane-1.6059513 is ©2021 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved. Requesting immediate deletion rather than waiting for license issue to time out since user has copied image to English Wikipedia --Krdbot 07:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Image found on https://bollyy.com/malayali-maverick-jayasurya-speaks-to-subhash-k-jha-on-sloshing-his-way-through-another-stunning-performance-in-sunny/, unlikely the work of the uploader Yeeno (talk) 07:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete This qualifies for speedy deletion under copyright grounds -- DaxServer (talk) 07:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 12:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
(This nom. is for the redirect page, NOT for the file it redirects to). I requested for a few of my files - which i uploaded with the wrong title by mistake - to be moved without redirects, but redirects were left likely due to perm. restrictions. I have more of Ryzom's environmental concept art, and I want to upload it starting here to fill the gaps in the numbering. Keeping this as a redirect is not necessary as no projects used this file and the page is empty with no significant history, and incorrect as the file is not part of the environmental concept art batch. YuriNikolai (talk) 22:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:41, 17 October 2021 UTC: CSD G2 (unused and implausible, or broken redirect) --Krdbot 13:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
delete ora SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 12:34, 17 October 2021 UTC: COM:SELFIE. --Krdbot 20:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
delete foto SantoPennestri3 (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 12:34, 17 October 2021 UTC: COM:SELFIE. --Krdbot 20:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The source page says Copyright © "All rights reserved". Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Foto non originale SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<foto non autorizzata dal propietario>}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 07:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<foto protetta da copyright non autorizzata >}} Joe83023dwq (talk) 08:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
delete imm SantoPennestri3 (talk) 13:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<foto non autorizzata dal propietario>}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<foto protetta da copyright non autorizzata >}} Joe83023dwq (talk) 08:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
likely both vandalism and a copyvio. File name is nonsense, the description is just "lol" and since this user is a serial sockpupetter on en.wp, it's hard to trust that this is indeed their own work, or that they intend to make positive contributions here. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know what silly game this person is playing, but they've admitted on the talk page that it is not their own work and they got in from a book, so I've nominated it for speedy deletion based on that. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
delete foto SantoPennestri3 (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
<foto non autorizzata dal propietario> SantoPennestri3 (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, Santopennestri4 uploaded this image and claimed it as own work 3 months ago. How can you say now "non autorizzata dal propietario"? --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, it:Santo Pennestrì was 10 times deleted due to promotion. Taivo (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
delete foto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santopennestri4 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021102110009992 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<delete photo>}} Santopennestri4 (talk) 09:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Why? --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<VOGLIO ELIMINARE LA FOTO CHE HO PUBBLICATO>}} Santopennestri4 (talk) 15:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Based on Google Translate, Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Deletion does not revoke the licence. Once you have published the image you created yourself (or on behalf of the author), you cannot revoke the licence, even if deleted. Anyone can still freely use your image, as long they follow the licence conditions.
- However, the image was used on article on Italian Wikipedia, which was deleted 10 times as promotional page, so the image may be deleted anyways as promotional upload, outside COM:SCOPE. --Stylez995 (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<vorrei eliminare la mia foto di quale non dispongo più l'autorizzazione>} Santopennestri4 (talk) 14:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<vorrei eliminare la mia foto di quale non dispongo più l'autorizzazione>} Joeserien39 (talk) 14:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, it:Santo Pennestrì was 10 times deleted due to promotion. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CorneliaSupera as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <some errors in the infographic> No need for deletion. You can upload a new version over this one. Yann (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope, used for spam on Wikidata Jianhui67 T★C 03:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage Gampe (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecasarilly zoomed version of this file. Doesn't have any educatonal value. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:ADVERT Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Kim Hye Ryeon is a graphic designer from West Bengal, India. Her real name is Aditi Singh Chouhan. She was born on 23rd June 2006. She is in class 9. She is well know for working in The Language Burea.png
[edit]
COM:ADVERT Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Tarukardo
[edit]- File:Taru Kardo management.jpg
- File:Musician Tk.jpg
- File:Taru.k.jpg
- File:TaruKardo.jpg
- File:Taru Kardo Artist from Itanagar city.jpg
- File:Taru kardo.jpg
- File:Taru Kardo spends his last day at hometown with his bff.jpg
- File:Pura Tanyung, Kardo's bff.jpg
- File:Taru Kardo is 13 year old Musical Artist from Itanagar city.jpg
- File:Taru Kardo.jpg
all unused selfies/advertisement --Nutshinou Talk! 11:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
poor quality, unlocatable, no educational value Joschi71 (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 12:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
user has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. there are two of these (1 square, 1 wide). it is pretty blatant advertising. Snackmurat (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
user has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. there are two of these (1 square, 1 wide). it is pretty blatant advertising. Snackmurat (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 14:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 14:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ElObservadorDeMarketing (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in sandbox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yanamala2425 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berta.ongoing (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Procedural close, Files already deleted by Ellin Beltz. - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berta.ongoing (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imtiazul chy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Ryan Van Wagenen is one of the Top Modern Art Auction Promoter.jpg
- File:Ryan Van Wagenen is one of the Modern Art Auction Promoter.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: not notable trade mark. Mys_721tx (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: Used for personal Free webspace in English wikipedia Enyavar (talk) 23:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: Used for personal Free webspace in English wikipedia Enyavar (talk) 23:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope: Used for personal Free webspace in English wikipedia Enyavar (talk) 23:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
no possible educational use, given how several elements are wrong Enyavar (talk) 23:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
very small without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ajmtransportstuff (talk) 19:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 20:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Judging by the EXIF this file seems to be a copyright violation by the user of a single purpose account. Mihai (talk) 20:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work". Low resolution copy of an image that has different author and license information and can be found here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ewarwoowar/2115486148
-Rio65trio (talk) 21:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by سعد احمد محمد (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 17:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
mag nicht mehr Boy-ndh (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
mag nicht mehr Boy-ndh (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
mag nicht mehr Boy-ndh (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per file page. --Krd 11:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Though in low resolution, A formal PR picture and taken from a book, as mentioned in the file's details. In an edit in He.Wikipedia, the name of the photographer was mentioned. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Старая версия Львов 64-66 (talk) 01:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Logo. Claimed to be below COM:TOO, please discuss. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Hussam copyright 181.203.113.94 02:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Please tell me how you’d like me to prove it’s my photo and that I am Jade Foreman. I only made this account so I could edit Jay’s page and delete the awful photo someone keeps putting up of him. It’s bad for business… he looks like a demon in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForemanFan36 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination as the person says they are Jay Foreman's wife (though there is no proof). Sahaib3005 (talk) 12:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that this is own work (see lack of EXIF date etc.). Whilst I can't find an uncropped version online, given that the account is new, the creation date was set to a year before the exact upload date, I absolutely feel there's not enough evidence that this is an own work. Ed6767 (talk) 03:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Currently walking photo owner (or someone connected to them) through OTRS. Enterprisey (talk) 08:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Another Logopedia logo from Fandom without credit for the actual original source; also virtually unusable on the default white skins on any page due to the yellow shading. Nate • (chatter) 03:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Togo. Per en:West African Development Bank, the architectural work here was incepted in 1980 and designed by Durand, Menard, and Thiebault. As the Togolese FOP doesn't extend to photographic copies of copyrighted public artworks like architecture (only audiovisual or broadcasting copies allowed), COM:VRT permission from the architects is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Hotel 2 Fevrier Lomé
[edit]According to fr:Hôtel 2 Février Lomé, the building was completed in 1980. There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Togo, and COM:VRT permission from the architects is still required. Togolese FOP only allows reproductions of works through broadcasting or audiovisual works, not photos (even incidental inclusion is only allowed through audiovisual or broadcasting works, not photos).
- File:Hôtel du 2 février à Lomé.jpg
- File:Hôtel du 2 février à Lomé 2.jpg
- File:Hôtel du 2 Février in Lomé.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
This image is watermarked in a way that is promotional (website for the artist is highly visible in several places of the image). Sevey13 (talk) 04:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Doing some more research, the image appears to be a collage of other images, and it is unclear if the artist has the rights to include those in their work. Sevey13 (talk) 20:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_old_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_old_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
_old_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_old_logo.png){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo_(cropped).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo_(cropped).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo_(cropped).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo_(cropped).png){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
I have just read COM:TOO UK, which means this is copyrighted. I will replace it with a non free image. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Images from social media, no evidence of a free license.
- File:Tibor Geczy Bassist.jpg
- File:Tibor Geczy Amor's Arrows Live.jpg
- File:Milan Živković live at SRF.jpg
- File:Tibor Geczy Live show.jpg
- File:Current Membership Of Amor's Arrows.jpg
- File:Milan Žika Živković Live show.jpg
- File:Jasmina Živković Live show.jpg
- File:Dalibor Geczy Live Show Amor's Arrows.jpg
- File:Mladen Todić Live show.jpg
- File:Mladen Živković Live show.jpg
- File:Dalibor Geczy Live Shows.jpg
- File:Dalibor Geczy Live Show.jpg
- File:Amor's Arrows Live band Show.jpg
- File:Amor's Arrows Live Show Garaza.jpg
- File:Amor's Arrows (First Membership).jpg
- File:Amor's Arrows band.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
User page created by another user. Mys_721tx (talk) 22:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
All ALLi logos are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. A notice to that effect has been added to the logo download page on the ALLi website: https://www.allianceindependentauthors.org/alli-logos-leaflets-campaign-badges/ --Avantman42 (⧼Talkpaagelinktext⧽) 10:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I’ll remove the deletion nomination Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Excellent, thank you. --Avantman42 (talk) 17:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per COM:DR: Withdrawn by nominator with no opposition. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:31, 24 October 2021 UTC: No permission since 16 October 2021: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiud4Ug2UsgmY4YtMv6_1W-WOT3TX5IJwwstapmSR4GItEN1MuHK8DwIchrNIbvbh0XCiILeDfAlzy7zY4jPEYRRdjgYAMuBLOUqSGhxk-5G20825JaQVpDPolwPPcyOi-sAP0IIsttADSYXRyyclS0mywwAMsQKm_1gFFobaytpj5tpiejvZoWvkPha_15C4_1qhm90ww8EjFwQxWekB2M0eutnnoIzR0VL5KbPdhsnITwMU3w6QIE1LHmwss2KCCezC2Uj911SF6fKxw1rgVoMXJaNpSRwaZA_139sOnACcMLXKEx5rUrAszRvXUFfQrN8_1grcyih4BbawTzJMD-3sF_1Vt6FlNooQ --Krdbot 13:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zlatyu Boyadzhiev Exposition
[edit]No COM:FOP in Bulgaria. Subject paintings are by en:Zlatyo Boyadzhiev who died in 1976. Won't be public domain in Bulgaria until 2047 (1976+71).
- File:Georgi Karaslavov, pic. Z.Boyadjiev.jpg
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 1.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 10.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 11.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 3.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 4.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 5.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 6.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 7.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 8.JPG
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 9.JPG
Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and undelete in 2047.. --Elly (talk) 13:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zlatyu Boyadzhiev Exposition
[edit]Copyrighted paintings and derivative works of an exhibition. As Zlatyu Boyadzhiev died in 1976 the paintings will be in PD in 2047, so they can be undeleted then..
- File:Liana Daskalova (cropped).jpg
- File:Slatju-Bojadschiew-Galerie Plowdiw.jpg
- File:Stoyan & Liana Daskalovi.jpg
- File:Stoyan Daskalov (cropped).jpg
- File:Зл.Бояджиев 2.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elly (talk) 13:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license (and unused) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted license claim not supported -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unlikely that Flickr uploader is actual copyright holder; apparent false license on Flickr. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:40, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:40, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination because I didn’t note the PD-US tag. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed Nomination withdrawn -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
File:The return of Christopher Columbus;his audience before King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella..jpg
[edit]
additional text P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 10:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
File:The return of Christopher Columbus;his audience before King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella..jpg
[edit]
It is from Archives 74.72.242.97 16:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep: PD-old-100. --Achim (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, PD-old. --Wdwd (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
File:The return of Christopher Columbus;his audience before King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella..jpg
[edit]
Painting of small resolution with heavy watermark, not used. We have much better here: File:Eugène delacroix, il ritorno di cristoforo colombo, 1839 (cropped).jpg. Useless, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I agree Delete --Sailko (talk) 07:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Commons now has multiple better versions; this one of dubious usefulness due to huge watermarks over PD work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Narvik in Norway does not have/use a flag. Google hits for "flagget til Narvik" are 0, and "Narviks flagg" are 2. Narvik municipality's own flag page bears no trace of this supposed flag. Someone made this up by sticking the coat-of-arms onto a rectangle - the former coat-of-arms, actually. Geschichte (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; should also apply to File:Narvik.png -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It seems that somehow this flag was in use: here we can see it on the building of Narvik City Council in 2007: https://web.archive.org/web/20070612035517/http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/arkinord/details.php?image_id=696&template=big Apparently it is not in use anymore and has to be deleted from the articles; but not from Commons. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence for the claimed CC license at the source-site. Photographer is said to be unknown, original photographer should be pre-1946. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: must be in PD according to COM:BiH. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Photo copyright Rameshe999 (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, no usage Gampe (talk) 05:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Low-quality image with no educational use. Delete. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; low TOO in UK. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Logo of a car factory. Can't be own and free. Bilderling (talk) 11:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
The Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) has a new logo which has been uploaded on 17 August 2016 to Wikipedia and this version has now been superseded. Also, this logo should not have been added to Wikimedia because it is a company logo and the license that was selected is invalid since it is not permissible to adapt the work. It was originally uploaded by an intern at the NIA. For these reasons the NIA are nominating this file for deletion. DanPowney (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Commons hosts old and outdated files also to show history. But the license is really wrong. I suspect {{PD-textlogo}}. Taivo (talk) 06:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
The Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) has a new logo which has been uploaded on 17 August 2016 to Wikipedia and this version has now been superseded. Also, this logo should not have been added to Wikimedia because it is a company logo and the license that was selected is invalid since it is not permissible to adapt the work. It was originally uploaded by an intern at the NIA. For these reasons the NIA are nominating this file for deletion. DanPowney (talk) 09:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Commons hosts old and outdated files also to show history. But the license is really wrong. I suspect {{PD-textlogo}}. Taivo (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- I used to own the copyright of this picture as it was designed for my company (that I own). Therefore I believe I can put it in public domain. What do you think please ? Thanks. Rc1959 (talk) 07:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - see COM:VRT. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is too simple for a copyright even in the UK. In cases for text only logos that the courts ruled copyrightable in the UK, they were for text only logos with unique fonts. See for example: en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg --RAN (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 12:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Website copyright. Rameshe999 (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Copyvio. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook and not own work? See metadata (FBMD). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. IMO, this fanart image is clearly a rather close derivative of this original promo image.-- Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete—Yeah. If it's an official promo art, then it would be copyvio. — BriefEdits (talk) 20:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a smaller duplicate of File:Unveiling of memorial to Raoul Wallenberg.jpg. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no metadata, and https://www.tumgir.com/tag/Chris%20Stokes Yann (talk) 22:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Indeed, the portrait of the artist is taken from her website where it is distributed under the free licence. However, no authorship is provided for this picture, neither here in Commons nor there at the source site. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
,_Bangladesh._(35477337502).jpg){kind=link}
,_Bangladesh._(35477337502).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Owner of the vehicle does not want the photo in public domain. Shot was originally taken by me. Shadman al Samee (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
,_Bangladesh._(35477337502).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
,_Bangladesh._(35477337502).jpg){kind=link}
,_Bangladesh._(35477337502).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Owner of the vehicle does not want the photo in public domain. Photographer requested for deletion previously, As a uploader, I am requesting again. Afifa Afrin (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment License plates not readable. No faces visible. What is the concern? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
I made this image 13 years ago back in my admin days, when (as I recall) I was called a "copyright nazi", and I embraced it, and I made an image to embrace it (and even defended it back then). Times have changed. Since then there seems to have been a resurgence in actual Nazis, and I've also learned something else: it doesn't matter if you shit on someone's floor "ironically", or just do a shit on the floor for no reason at all. "Ironic" swastikas aren't really any less bad than heartfelt swastikas. And, as this file is in use in only limited places where something else would certainly be better suited to it, I think that this could be safely deleted. Thank you. Lewis Collard! (talk). 01:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Support deletion per author/nominator. Never useful for article space; no longer useful for discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- But what about the alternative version proposed by User:Chaddy? Maybe we'd better delete only swastika version? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- The alternative version doesn't seem much better, in that it has the Awesome Face in the centre of a flag intended to echo that of Nazi Germany...so I'm not totally sure that's any better. Lewis Collard! (talk). 01:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- The alternative version with the emoji was originally from John Aplessed.
- This Swastika symbolises the downfall of civilisation and the greatest crime against humanity at all. In Germany it's usage is illegal (except for educational, scientific and some artistic uses). We Germans associate very strong emotions with it. It is unacceptable to use the Swastika for such jokes like this one. -- Chaddy (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- By the way: Today in Germany we commemorate the Reichspogromnacht (November 9th 1938), the prelude of the Holocaust. -- Chaddy (talk) 11:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I know how you feel, though… I understand your point of view, but I don't think it is inappropriate to use this symbol to refer to the strong concept of "copyright paranoia". It may not be necessary to have it in the Wikimedia Commons. But at least I don't see much point in deleting it. It has been found to have been released into the sea of the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 119.170.125.95 (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites.
For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Footer marked as "video grab", which means this is not a work from VOA 219.78.191.184 08:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Would it change anything if the Copyright holder is OK with the placement of the logo on wikipedia? Nuretok (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- En:Wikipedia allows limited "fair use" of copyrighted material. Not allowed here at Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Picture of copyrighted commercial Caehlla2357 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
This is not {{PD-text}} at all. It is an in depth 121 page report, not "Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface or basic handwriting". Even the picture on the first page could be protected. The permission section says "Report published publicly by the Michigan Department of Civil Rights without any copyright claims - agencies documents are available via FOIA and not generally disputed as being copyright protected.", however this is not a correct rationale because works are automatically protected by copyright and FOIA does not release a work into the public domain. Dylsss (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
1940 publication, was there a notice or renewal for this? (Aside: The photos in this cat are of ancient art, so do we apply the rule about 2d reproduction here?)
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (17572331524).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (17574342833).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (17574344913).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007074168).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007087548).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007089578).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007119468).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007131558).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007231240).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007255730).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18008761969).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18008764279).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18191321862).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18191370792).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18194939745).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18194980965).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (IA ancientsealsofne34marti).pdf
- File:Image from page 19 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 21 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 25 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 29 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 33 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 35 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 39 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 41 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 43 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 45 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Image from page 50 of "Ancient seals of the Near East" (1940).jpg
- File:Inarus and possible Greek generals as prisonners, seized by Artaxerxes I.jpg
- File:Inarus portrait.jpg
- File:Inarus, killed by Artaxerxes I.jpg
_(17572331524).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17574342833).jpg){kind=link}
_(17574344913).jpg){kind=link}
_(18007074168).jpg){kind=link}
_(18007087548).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(18007089578).jpg){kind=link}
_(18007119468).jpg){kind=link}
_(18007131558).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(18007231240).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(18007255730).jpg){kind=link}
_(18008761969).jpg){kind=link}
_(18008764279).jpg){kind=link}
_(18191321862).jpg){kind=link}
_(18191370792).jpg){kind=link}
_(18194939745).jpg){kind=link}
_(18194980965).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @ShakespeareFan00: The images are provided on Flickr "The Commons" [1] with the label "No known copyright restrictions", and the book is freely available at Archives.org [2]. The copyright is held by the "Fields Museum of National History, 1940" [3]. Copyright renewal does not appear in The Copyright Renewal Database. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 12:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks... Given that some IA sourced items proved to have incomplete meta-data, I hope you can appreciate the caution. ShakespeareFan00 (talk)
- Comment Even if the book was indeed found to still be copyrighted, it looks like this may still be acceptable under PD-scan, as it is a faithful reproduction of the original. See here and here for details. However, we do not have to worry about this issue in this case since there was no evidence of copyright renewal. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep, change license tag to PD-US-not renewed: See above comment by पाटलिपुत्र. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Published in the US in 1940 with no copyright notice, per full scan of book at archive.org. --dave pape (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope text images that are duplicated in scan...
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (17572331524).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007087548).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007131558).jpg
- File:Ancient seals of the Near East (1940) (18007231240).jpg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from book covers. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- It is not so simple. The book cover is of The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. The cover pictured is mostly created by the writer himself, the publishers additions in cover design are insignificant. Saint-Exupéry perished in 1944. His works are free worldwide except France where the heirs of persons killed in action enjoy 30 years copyright extension (i.e. in France Saint-Exupéry's works are copyrighted till 2044). However, this picture was created in Mexico. Both un Mexico and in the United States the picture from the book cover is in PD. It seems to me, we can keep it. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Book cover county of origin is France. Mexico has 100 years term of copyrights protection. Book covers are not needed to illustrate article about person. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nanahuatl as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: considering the other uploads of the user and the lackness EXIF data, copyvio No source, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete For some reason, various users uploaded various images related with Category:Bingöl Province during 2021. All of them don't have any EXIF data, taken from some Faceobok groups. This one has those suspicions as well.--Nanahuatl (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nanahuatl as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: considering the other uploads of the user and the lackness EXIF data, copyvio No source, used, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete For some reason, various users uploaded various images related with Category:Bingöl Province during 2021. All of them don't have any EXIF data, taken from some Faceobok groups. This one has those suspicions as well.--Nanahuatl (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nanahuatl as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: considering the other uploads of the user and the lackness EXIF data, copyvio No source, used, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete For some reason, various users uploaded various images related with Category:Bingöl Province during 2021. All of them don't have any EXIF data, taken from some Faceobok groups. This one has those suspicions as well.--Nanahuatl (talk) 06:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hariboneagle927 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and the building is under copyright. File has since been transferred to the English Wikipedia mainspace. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The image focuses on the building at the center-bottom too much. Needs commercial license from the architect of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is Japanese delivery tag. The tag contains personal name, address, phone numbers. To protect personal information, this image should be removed. Netora (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as out of project scope without clear educational use. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
This sculpture is in the United States. According to an article on the English Wikipedia, the sculpture was made in 1988. Freedom of Panorama in the United States only applies to buildings. I suggest that this file be deleted. --Rockfang (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, sadly, per nom. Very cool sculpture. /Writes letter to congressman about getting FOP changed. Jujutacular T · C 18:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. High usage, saddens me. ZooFari 00:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
1988 sculpture in Minneapolis, MN, US, no FOP in USA unfortunately. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Searching the records here I noted that there was no registration of this work. According to {{PD-US-1978-89}} and Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US, simple public exhibition no longer constituted publication (as it did in 1977 and before). However, I noted that a press photo of the sculpture was published in in 1988. Note that there are no copyright notices on either side of the released press photo. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Amazing find, IronGargoyle. Noting that the outcome of this one could potentially affect previously deleted files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Spoonbridge and Cherry. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 21:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per IronGargoyle. (May wish to file undeletion request for discussion) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted public art in the United States that does not grant Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted sculptures and monuments. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Spoonbridge and Cherry and the discussion at this failed undeletion request. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I doubt being included in a widely-distributed photo counts as a "publication", as per Elcobbola's arguments at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-12#Photos of Spoonbridge and Cherry. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, and unclear copyright status. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
copie de https://podcast.ausha.co/un-bol-d-air/37-loury-lag-explorateur-dechaine Habertix (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
extrait d'une photo déjà publiée sur https://www.louryexplorer.com/presentation Habertix (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.165.72 22:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.165.72 22:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no larger nor earlier versions seen in reverse image searches. (Mapcarta has a copy credited to this file on Commons.) Image has been on Commons since 2016. In use in multiple projects. I think something better than lack of EXIF is needed for this to be labeled as "possible copyvio". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep Web resolution and atypical aspect ratio is automatically suspect even back in 2016. That said I don't see enough for a delete here, even under COM:PRP. 69.174.144.79 02:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: transmission code in EXIF data, meaning this is not an original file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 06:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: just text font, likely below TOO even in UK, but non-notable company, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: just plain text. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
PD tags of C-SPAN does not apply to congressional committee hearing's images 203.145.95.151 07:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as from a committee hearing per the instructions in the PD-CSPAN template. 69.174.144.79 03:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:03, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found online prior to upload here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo without description, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Pure publicity. The photo is somewhat blurred and it is not clear which building is the office of IVR. Wouter (talk) 09:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pablo el ciclista as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: It is not and probably will not be used. Yann (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann! I requested the deletion of the file because I find it of no further interest, as it is not in use anywhere. Furthermore, the user Herby has informed me that some of my images will be deleted. I have therefore selected the images that are really of no interest for WikiCommons. Pablo el ciclista (talk) 15:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Pablo el ciclista: Well, it doesn't work that way. Once the file is uploaded to Commons, it can't be removed without a valid reason. "It is not and probably will not be used." is not one of them, specially when they could be used, like this one. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann Okay. Understood! I'm sorry if I've caused any complications. But can I know which of my pictures Herby has marked for deletion? I wrote to him, but I didn't get a reply. Because as it is, all my pictures can be used. Even My Pc.jpg. Because I designed it as a demonstration image for an article on 3d software. Pablo el ciclista (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Herby's message is just a warning. No image was put for deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann Okay, Thank you very much! Pablo el ciclista (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Herby's message is just a warning. No image was put for deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann Okay. Understood! I'm sorry if I've caused any complications. But can I know which of my pictures Herby has marked for deletion? I wrote to him, but I didn't get a reply. Because as it is, all my pictures can be used. Even My Pc.jpg. Because I designed it as a demonstration image for an article on 3d software. Pablo el ciclista (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Pablo el ciclista: Well, it doesn't work that way. Once the file is uploaded to Commons, it can't be removed without a valid reason. "It is not and probably will not be used." is not one of them, specially when they could be used, like this one. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Ramiz Altijani? 181.203.125.33 16:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be not the user's own work, but rather it is a selection of images from this site: https://app.streamlinehq.com/illustrations/illustrations-multicolor/lgbt . Streamline has some limitations on usage of these illustrations: https://intercom.help/streamlinehq/en/articles/5354376-streamline-free-license Brainy J (talk) 20:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 86.212.165.72 22:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader with many previous DR's. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:03, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; very strict TOO in Austria copyright law. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Infrogmation at 17:55, 5 December 2021 UTC: per del req. --Krdbot 19:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by Lizabethverse
[edit]- File:2017 King.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170519105603/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/KINGBS
- File:2017 Wheatley.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170519105051/http://house.utah.gov/rep/WHEATMA
- File:2017 Weight.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170129100558/http://house.utah.gov/rep/WEIGHE
- File:2017 Poulson.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170519105006/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/POULSMH
- File:2017 Kwan.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170519105607/http://house.utah.gov/rep/KWANK
- File:2017 Hollins.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170426024347/http://house.utah.gov/rep/HOLLIS
- File:2017 Duckworth edited.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170519105528/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/DUCKWS
- File:2017 Hemingway.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170426020852/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/HEMINLN
- File:RCH 2017-2018.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170513012223/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/CHAVER
- File:2017 Briscoe.jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170128231348/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/BRISCJK
- File:2017 Arent (2).jpg - https://web.archive.org/web/20170314112645/http://house.utah.gov:80/rep/ARENTPM
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Uploads by Lizabethverse (talk · contribs). Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm these files are their own work. Portrait photos of members of the Utah House of Representatives, seemingly taken from their profile pages as above. The website is Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved. Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 09:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; google images (a large portion of these pictures are of better quality and published before being on commons) Nutshinou Talk! 09:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
same as Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Top_secret.jpg Nutshinou Talk! 10:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Temporarily undeleted as per [4]. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=621393767#File:Top_secret.png){kind=link}
- IMO, this may be below any ToO, at least in USA. Any way, it would be quite easy to recreate it. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Temporary undeletion has enabled us to find better replacements, using a real declassified top secret. As far as Dutch Wiktionary is concerned there are no objections against deletion, although I personally agree with @Yann: --MarcoSwart (talk) 12:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- IMO, this may be below any ToO, at least in USA. Any way, it would be quite easy to recreate it. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. imho this is above threshold, due to the "damaged look" of the stamp. It is not purely colored red. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep simple text font, no or very little creativity here, even by UK standards IMO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No way is this over the threshold of originality. It's literally just the companies name, which is pretty generic btw, and nothing else. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Too simple for copyright. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverstoß, keine Genehmigung durch den Urheber ersichtlich. axel (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, as it doesn’t seem that dubious now. Though it is still a bit dubious since this was uploaded by a new user. Sahaib3005 (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 15:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep simple text font, no or very little creativity here, even by UK standards IMO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep simple text logo without creation level ({{PD-textlogo|simple}}-licence)--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 23:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Plain text in a standard font. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO UK. Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, UK company, logo likely meets the UK TOO. 69.174.144.79 03:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very doubtful to be own work. Каракорум (talk) 14:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. the uploader is clearly a friendly Wikimedia-editing Russian Jihadi (sarcasm) Dronebogus (talk) 14:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Yes, Austria has a very low threshold of originality, but this one is so simple that it should be below the TOO even by Austrian standards. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- why dubious? He was member of my family. I am owner of the original picture. --HHE99 (talk) 11:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: owning a print of a photograph does not mean you are the author or copyright holder (you could be for other reasons). I don't see any plausible reason given why the uploader should be a rights holder for this photo, and it can't be in the PD yet if it is from 1962, so I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. It can be restored in 2083 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran Rohalamin (talk) 07:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BalintGoldenstein as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Aufgrund massiver Anfeindungen durch dieses politische Kunstwerk bitte ich darum, das Bild zu löschen! Vielen Dank! --BalintGoldenstein (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC) Yann (talk) 15:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If still necessary after 6 months, please write an e-mail to COM:VRT. --Rosenzweig τ 01:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
The UK has a very low threshold of orignality, so dashcam footage is likely copyrighted. Yeeno (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep I do believe that this is not at all original and is a work without a human author. However, I must admit that "sweat of the brow" doctrine, which is accepted in UK may be a stronger argument for this work to be copyrighted. The question is: Is setting up a camera for monitoring enough work to warrant copyright protection? I believe that it might not be, but perhaps somebody more knowledgeable will correct me. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The selection of the footage is likely creative, as a minimum matter. The entire template {{PD-CCTV}} is based on a ridiculous premise and I don't see why it should have survived its DR. 69.174.144.79 03:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, regardless. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: After looking at the two court decisions linked from COM:Austria, the requirement for logos to be protected in Austria seems to be a "new idea" or some "original arrangement", if only letters in two fonts combined in some novel way. I don't think three letters, same font, partially on top of each other, different colors (like this logo) is a new idea nor is it a particularly original arrangement. --Rosenzweig τ 14:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Austria has a low threshold of originality and this is above threshold imho. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Newer and official Version of Logo: GKB-Logo_2020.svg Idee8786 (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep There is no Commons:Deletion policy motive to support this request, let alone Superseded which is not the case since both files are not the same and they are both vector. 
Rename so that the filename shows year of use. --Webfil (talk) 13:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: What Webfil said. --Missvain (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Austria has a low threshold of originality and this is above threshold imho. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted per COM:TOO Austria. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- The company is the uploader and will be requested to send a mail to the OTRS team. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 18:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Otherwise there are only characters and so its not a copyvio. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 18:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. TOO is low in Austria. Per nomination. @Akrasflavours: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image(s) on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image(s) can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- If File:Blue Microphones.png is below COM:TOO, this one is too. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- If File:Blue Microphones.png is below COM:TOO, this one is too. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope}}=={{int:filedesc
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Isn't this image suitable as stock-image of people having a meal outdoors? -- Túrelio (talk) 21:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Turelio. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
no author and no permission cited Victuallers (talk) 22:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Brainy J as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not Nitin531's own work, it is by an artist named Rafael Serra. See https://www.instagram.com/p/ByNxSO7hOuJ/ and https://abduzeedo.com/typography-lettering-series-rafael-serra . COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep per COM:TOO as I don't see how this can be over the threshold of originality. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Rafael Serra is an artist designing typography. It would appear to me his work is copyrighted due to the original design and design effort. They are not just letters. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
