Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![63 File:"Don't play what's there, play what's not there" - Miles Davis (Explored) - Flickr - sara biljana (off).jpg](#File:"Don't_play_what's_there,_play_what's_not_there"_-_Miles_Davis_(Explored)_-_Flickr_-_sara_biljana_(off).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2002_logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Chema Fernández Escuer (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have just deleted two of this user's uploads as proven copyvios, so it may be time to reexamine all of their uploads. Most of them have no EXIF metadata.
- File:Alcalde de Bagüés.jpg
- File:Chon Castiello y Alberto Pérez.jpg
- File:Chon Castiello.jpg
- File:Alberto Pérez Petroch.png
- File:Bagüés (vista aérea).jpg
- File:Vista de la Iglesia Románica.jpg
- File:Camarín de la Virgen de la Paruela (Bagüés).jpg
- File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Paruela (interior).jpg
- File:Retablo de la Ermita de la Paruela.jpg
- File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Paruela (Bagüés).jpg
- File:Calle de Gerardo Ponz Pérez.jpg
- File:Parque Natural de la Fuente Vieja (Bagüés).jpg
- File:Plaza del Pueblo (Bagüés).jpg
- File:Vista aérea de Bagüés.jpg
- File:Calle del Reloj con plaza de la Ermita (Bagüés).jpg
- File:Iglesia Románica de Bagüés.jpg
- File:GRAN VÍA RAMÓN Y CAJAL (ZARAGOZA).jpg
- File:Rascacielos nuevo TORRE ZARAGOZA.jpg
- File:Monasterio de Piedra parque natural.jpg
- File:La Seo de San Salvador.jpg
- File:Zaragoza-destino-in.jpg
- File:Zaragoza Ciudad.jpg
- File:Ana Guerra Morales.jpg
- File:Iglesia de San Julián y Santa Basilisa.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment Some of them may be own work, like those with Samsung SM-A505FN metadata; I'm just including them for reference. @Chema Fernández Escuer: Which of these photos did you actually take? Which camera(s) or smartphone(s) did you use to take them? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all - Images are a complete mish mash of EXIF data or lack of EXIF data. File:Zaragoza-destino-in.jpg is a stock photo from Shiutterstock. File:Monasterio de Piedra parque natural.jpg looks to be copied from Facebook. File:Rascacielos nuevo TORRE ZARAGOZA.jpg is an artists rendering of a skyscraper copied from here. Maybe some of these are own work but with everything being uploaded with the claim of own work, unless the uploader can state credibly which are indeed own work, then they all must go. -- Whpq (talk) 13:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Whpq. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chema Fernández Escuer (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Likely not own works: several images taken from FB as per EXIF data, File:Jorge Azcón y Sara Fernández.jpg found here, File:Pregón de las Fiestas del Pilar 2019.jpg found here. Unreliable uploader.
- File:Jorge Azcón 2020 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jorge Azcón y Sara Fernández.jpg
- File:Joteros Bagüés.jpg
- File:Comida Popular Fiestas de Bagüés.jpg
- File:Tractor Romería de la Paruela.jpg
- File:Pregón de las Fiestas del Pilar 2019.jpg
- File:Fiestas de la Paruela.jpg
- File:Romería a la Virgen de la Paruela.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja MrsMantunku (talk) 09:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Çünkü İnternetten rastgele fotoğraf Cagilceliksan (talk) 11:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- (translation: Because a random photo from the Internet)
- Reason not true, own photograph, compare camera details and date with other photos in Category:Photographs by User:Bjs/Segnitz. --Bjs (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Duplicate|EPP Western Balkans Summit, 5 October 2021, Ljubljana - 51552801142.jpg}} Bakir123 (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Duplicate|EPP Western Balkans Summit, 5 October 2021, Ljubljana - 51552801732.jpg}} Bakir123 (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
owner of photograph does not own copyright to the depicted work GiAbTankred (talk) 11:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:28, 9 October 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: copyrighted work of art; no FOP in Kaz. --Krdbot 02:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
own work????? Xocolatl (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted blatant false claims CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
No quería subir esta imagen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carminallb (talk • contribs) 19:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
request by uploader
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
It is really doubtful whether this is really "own work", cf. 1 or 2 Mosbatho (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy delete, published in a news report dated before the upload here. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your remark and attention. Uploaded a new version of the photo - a similar photo with metadata. There are also many other photos of this helicopter that have not been published anywhere before, if there is a question of authenticity.--DoroshenkoE (talk) 19:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. New version is much larger resolution c/w full EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I saw this photo in his Facebook page. 181.203.75.9 14:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation; not all works of the Indian government are automatically licenced under the GODL. The source page for this picture clearly states that media on the page is freely licenced "for the purposes of non-commercial research, private study and for criticism, review and news reporting provided that the material is appropriately attributed." (read statement). The source page does not state anywhere that the media is GODL, and I believe the non-commercial licence means that this is unusable on Commons. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk) 03:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 04:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bangtaiconlan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, likely promotion.
- File:Hệ thống băng tải Intech chất lượng cao.jpg
- File:Hệ thống băng tải Intech Việt Nam.jpg
- File:Băng tải công nghiệp Intech chất lượng quốc tế.jpg
- File:Băng tải Intech Việt Nam.jpg
- File:Băng tải công nghiệp tại Intech Việt Nam.jpg
⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 03:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope and likely promotion.
- File:MAY TRON XK.jpg
- File:May tron be tong - concrete mixer - cement mixer Tam Sanh.jpg
- File:Xe rua nhua co nen trang.jpg
- File:Xeruasat.jpg
⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 03:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DaoPhiNtech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope and likely promotion. See description: "Bộ lưu điện ups Makelsan 2/3KVA với thiết kế tối ưu cho các loại tải công suất nhỏ để bảo vệ và duy trì nguồn điện sạch cho tải nhằm nâng cao chất lượng, hiệu quả sử dụng của các thiết bị tải". (Translate to en (by Google): Makelsan 2/3KVA UPS with optimized design for small capacity loads to protect and maintain clean power for the load to improve the quality and efficiency of the load equipment.)
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS mặt bên ups 2kva.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS 2kva makelsan lionX Ntech.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS 2kva lionX makelsan.jpg
- File:Bo-luu-dien-ups-ntech-group.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS với các tùy chọn.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS mặt sau ảnh thật.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS mặt sau của ups 2kva và 3kva.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS mặt trước ups 2kva và 3kva.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS 2kva phần mặt trước.jpg
- File:Sách hướng dẫn sử dụng bộ lưu điện UPS.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS mặt sau của ups.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS 2kva kèm CD.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS 2kva mặt trước.jpg
- File:Bộ lưu điện UPS.jpg
⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 04:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Delete, non-free book cover.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Changed from speedy delete to regular delete as the uploader's username matches the author of the book. However, the cover artwork includes an image that is on Alamy without a free license and attributed to a different photographer.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Taken by Yoye Lapogian. No link to license or permission. – GeMet [talk] 12:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a defunct website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture is under copyright on a commercial website https://www.misskatecuttables.com/products/boy/t-rex CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Budapest, Hungary (51563664777).jpg vip (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
lower-res duplicate version of File:Budapest SPOT 1022.jpg vip (talk) 13:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
an ambiguous image with poor definition and no obvious educative or exemplar value Richard Avery (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as nom. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete poor quality image of uncertain subject - I can't see any educational value. Llwyld (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:Assemblée az.jpg
- File:Elie Godet micro.jpg
- File:Photoconférencedepresseduprésidentdelarépubliqueliegodet.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Old informations 2A01:CB05:8419:8900:958D:63C8:69D8:E960 19:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Old version CorneliaSupera (talk) 08:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate content 2A01:CB05:8419:8900:3587:ABC0:EB24:5E5 20:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- duplicate content 2A01:CB05:8419:8900:BDA6:C26B:AB19:DA25 08:24, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Old informations 2A01:CB05:8419:8900:958D:63C8:69D8:E960 19:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- old version CorneliaSupera (talk) 08:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- old version CorneliaSupera (talk) 08:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate content 2A01:CB05:8419:8900:BDA6:C26B:AB19:DA25 08:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- old informations CorneliaSupera (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
old informations CorneliaSupera (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- old version CorneliaSupera (talk) 08:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Hamed Allahyari 181.203.114.211 00:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Unclear nomination, no valid reason given for deletion. However, Delete because the uploader's username matches the name of the subject but this does not appear to be a selfie, so the license is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This could be a selfie, but as per COM:WEBHOST. --Yann (talk) 08:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Hamed Alahyari 181.203.114.211 00:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Unclear nomination, no valid reason given for deletion. However, Delete because the uploader's username matches the name of the subject but this does not appear to be a selfie, so the license is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Verbcatcher. --Yann (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
intentional duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sam_2021-09-26_1625Z.jpg FleurDeOdile (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete – Not only is it an obvious duplicate, but it's very low resolution compared to the original image. LightandDark2000 (talk) 19:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also no reason to have a PNG version. --Yann (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Images are all from the same web site and are tagged as CC BY-SA 4.0, but the site's disclaimer page states "Images on site are copyright free for media purpose" with a footer indicating "Copyright © 2021 - Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust. All Rights Reserved."
- File:Garden of Bhendi Bazzar Area.jpg
- File:Old state of Bhendi Bazar.jpg
- File:SBUT Current building top view.jpg
- File:SBUT getting Award for a smart city.jpg
Whpq (talk) 01:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Both the images seems like screengrabs from porn vidoes.
Sreejith K (talk) 01:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Can be found on many websites such as https://www.phillytrib.com/otis-boykin-invented-an-improved-electrical-resistor/article_f73aeede-4d70-5ea2-90c6-4d8b7b93e3e1.html Eviolite (talk) 02:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Probably screenshots from some video.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own works: look like video screengrabs (see especially File:Tanolifh.jpg which is clearly cropped from somewhere else). Numerous previous DR's, unreliable uploader.
- File:Tomb of Suba Khan Tanoli W.jpg
- File:Tomb of Suba Khan Tanoli 3.jpg
- File:AmbFort.jpg
- File:Tanolifh.jpg
- File:Suba.42.jpg
- File:Suba.22.jpg
- File:Suba.32.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File:Tanolifh.jpg because it is a low resolution crop from of an image that was published in a news report before the upload here.[3]. The last three look like video stills, but they might be stills from the uploader's own video. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and Verbcatcher. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope - a selfie evidently uploaded as a joke based on the file name and description Spizaetus (talk) 04:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- It is being used in Wikidata.Allforrous (talk) 15:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Used. --Yann (talk) 09:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
this file is too large for the article i want to change this image Varjiliya (talk) 05:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Varjiliya: if you a referring to the use of this picture in a Wikipedia article you should control the size of the picture using the Wikipedia image syntax, see w:en:Help:Pictures or its equivalent in your the Wikipedia language edition that you are editing.
- Also, you should not overwrite a file with an unrelated file, as you did for this file, see Commons:Overwriting existing files.
- File:పేడాడ పరమేశ్వరరావు ఉపన్యాసం.jpg is a scaled-down duplicate of this file which should be deleted. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Reverted to earlier version. This one has metadata. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
The uploader has just 5 edits and claims that this photo is his own work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, unlikely to be own work. TinEye shows numerous earlier versions online, including one where this picture is included in an archive that was made before the file was uploaded to Commons.[4] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
The uploader has just 5 edits and claims that this photo is his own work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, has a watermark which does not match the uploader's username. Also TinEye shows multiple earlier versions on the web, and this is a very small image. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope & pretty sure it's a screenshot of Sims 3, a copyrighted game Spicy (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Tini zabytykh predkiv (1965, UKR poster by Heorhiy Yakutovych).jpg RogueRickC137 (talk) 06:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, requested by uploader shortly after upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
متناقض بودن منبع عکس Esigh (talk) 08:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Illustrator is Kay Rasmus Nielsen (March 12, 1886 – June 21, 1957) who is Danish, and working in the Denmark at the date of publication.
Applying a 70 pma term, means that the illustrations are not out of copyright in Europe, and hence the files should not necessarily be hosted on Commons.
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - color plate at frontispiece.jpg
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - color plate at page 063.jpg
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - color plate at page 206.jpg
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - color plate at page 255.jpg
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 057.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 203.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 219.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 229.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 249.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 261.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - decorative initial at page 271.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - Nielsen illustration at page ix.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - Nielsen illustration at title page.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - plate at page 223.png
- File:Hansel and Gretel and other stories - plate at page 263.png
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: What's important is the date and place of first publication, not the nationality of the author. Published in New York, USA, in 1921, so OK for Commons. Also these are in the public domain in countries using the rule of shorter term. License changed. --Yann (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Illustrator is Kay Rasmus Nielsen (March 12, 1886 – June 21, 1957) who is Danish, and working in the Denmark at the date of publication.
Applying a 70 pma term, means that the illustrations are not out of copyright in Europe, and hence the files should not necessarily be hosted on Commons.
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - decorative initial at page 167.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - decorative intial at page 203.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - Nielsen color plate facing page 168.jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - Nielsen illustration at list of same.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - Nielsen illustration at page 011.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - Nielsen illustration at page 017.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - Nielsen illustration at page 167.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - Nielsen illustration at page 203.png
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14566370460).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14566391880).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14566402478).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14566412848).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14566608537).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14566610367).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14730061676).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14730073076).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14730078996).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14730083836).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14750718204).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14750728914).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14750740914).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14750742064).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14752758432).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14752764522).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14753049125).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14753069145).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14753071705).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14772920093).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14772923603).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (1922) (14772931233).jpg
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - old tales from the North (IA eastofsunwestofm00asbj).pdf
- File:Princesses of whiteland.jpg
_(14566370460).jpg){kind=link}
_(14566391880).jpg){kind=link}
_(14566402478).jpg){kind=link}
_(14566412848).jpg){kind=link}
_(14566608537).jpg){kind=link}
_(14566610367).jpg){kind=link}
_(14730061676).jpg){kind=link}
_(14730073076).jpg){kind=link}
_(14730078996).jpg){kind=link}
_(14730083836).jpg){kind=link}
_(14750718204).jpg){kind=link}
_(14750728914).jpg){kind=link}
_(14750740914).jpg){kind=link}
_(14750742064).jpg){kind=link}
_(14752758432).jpg){kind=link}
_(14752764522).jpg){kind=link}
_(14753049125).jpg){kind=link}
_(14753069145).jpg){kind=link}
_(14753071705).jpg){kind=link}
_(14772920093).jpg){kind=link}
_(14772923603).jpg){kind=link}
_(14772931233).jpg){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: What's important is the date and place of first publication, not the nationality of the author. Published in New York, USA, in 1922, so OK for Commons. Also these are in the public domain in countries using the rule of shorter term. License changed. --Yann (talk) 09:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Illustrator is Kay Rasmus Nielsen (March 12, 1886 – June 21, 1957) who is Danish, and working in the United Kingdom at the date of publication.
Applying a 70 pma term, means that the illustrations are not out of copyright in Europe, and hence the files should not necessarily be hosted on Commons.
- File:East of the sun and west of the moon - title page.png
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 1.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 2.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 3.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 4.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 5.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 6.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 7.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 8.jpg
- File:Illustration by Kay Nielsen 9.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - and flitted away as far as they could from the castle.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - and then she lay on a little green patch.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - cover.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - EOTSWOTM (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - EOTSWOTM.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - one's own children are always the prettiest.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - PRINCE LINDWORM.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - she held tight to the white bear.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - She saw the Lindworm for the first time.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - soria moria castle (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - soria moria castle (3).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - soria moria castle - he took a long long farewell of the Princess.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - soria moria castle - on that island stands a church in that church is a well in that well swims a duck.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - soria moria castle.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - tell me the way then she said.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the blue belt (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - The Blue Belt 1.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - The blue belt.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the husband who was to mind the house.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the lad in the bear's skin and the King of Arabia's daughter.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the lad who went to the north wind.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the lassie and her godmother (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the lassie and her godmother - and then he coaxed her down and took her home.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - east of the sun and west of the moon - THE LASSIE AND HER GODMOTHER - He too saw the image in the water.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the lassie and her godmother - here are your children I am the Virgin Mary.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - The lassie and her godmother - She coud not help setting the door a lttle ajar.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the lassie and her godmother.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - The north wind goes over the sea.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the princess on the glass hill.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the six brothers riding out to woo.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three billy-goats gruff.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses in the blue montain - as soon as they tugged at the rope the Captain and the Lietenant pulled up the princesses.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses in the blue mountain (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses in the blue mountain - no sooner had he whistled than he heard a whizzing ad a whirring from all quarters.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses in the blue mountain.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses in the blue mountain.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses of whiteland (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses of whiteland - so the man gae him a pair of snow-shoes.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses of whiteland - the King went into the Castle and at first his Queen didnt know him.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses of whiteland - youll come to three princesses whom you will see standing in the earth up to their necks.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses of whiteland.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three prinesses in the blue mountain - just as they bent down to take the rose a big dense snow-drift came.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the wdow's son.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the widow's son - and this time she whisked off the wig and there lay the lad so lovely.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the widow's son - but still the Horse begged him to look behind him.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the widow's son- the Lad in the Battle.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the widow's son.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - the widows's son.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - Tpage.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun and west of the moon - well mind and hold tight by my shaggy coat.jpg
- File:Kay Nielsen - East of the sun west of the moon - cover.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament - East of the sun and west of the moon - preface.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament - East of the sun and west of the moon - Prince Lindworm.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament - East of the sun and west of the moon - the blue belt.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament - East of the sun and west of the moon - the three billy-goats gruff.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament -East of the sun and west of the moon - one's own children are always prettiest.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament -East of the sun and west of the moon - Prince Lindworm (2).png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament -East of the sun and west of the moon - Prince Lindworm.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament -East of the sun and west of the moon - soria moria castle.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament -East of the sun and west of the moon - the lad who went to the north wind.png
- File:Kay Nielsen - end of chapter ornament -East of the sun and west of the moon - the three princesses in the blue mountain (3).png
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
comment: @ShakespeareFan00: please centralise the discussion for these files with the reproductions that I recently created from a 1921 edition for wikisource. cygnis insignis 09:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The edition as stated (1914) was published in the U.S., where it is in the public domain. Per Commons policy, this qualifies, in the first instance, as a U.S. work; thus, it is in the public domain in the country of origin (the U.S.), and may thus be hosted on Commons. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: What's important is the date and place of first publication, not the nationality of the author. Published in New York, USA, in 1914, so OK for Commons. Also these are in the public domain in countries using the rule of shorter term. License changed. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability.
- File:Fwetgqa.svg
- File:نشانوارهٔ تلاشیار.svg
- File:Rgf;porug.svg
- File:345w3h4i.svg
- File:Dgsfgsrt.png
- File:Asset 2.svg
- File:White screen.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Private snapshop of a minor; completly out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
identical duplicate of File:Planeta Estacionamiento (8465318056).jpg, to turn into a redirect Nutshinou Talk! 19:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of some sort of chat; likely copyvio (not "own work") and out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photograph; out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KidHQGamer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal/promotional photographs.
- File:Breakfast time with Samuel Boakye - Bempah.jpg
- File:Samuel Boakye - Bempah (DJ Mixer and Beat Artist).png
- File:Samuel Boakye - Bempah.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
File:"Don't play what's there, play what's not there" - Miles Davis (Explored) - Flickr - sara biljana (off).jpg
[edit]_-_Flickr_-_sara_biljana_(off).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_sara_biljana_(off).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills Headlock0225 (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolás Felipe García Vásquez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 09:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The pictured person wishes deletion. Drache-vom-Grill (talk) 11:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Poor quality, not useful. --Yann (talk) 19:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This image is fake and this building is not Jundi-shapur. Generally, no building is remaind from the ancient Jundi-shapur. Mmojtabaa (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Used many times. --Yann (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
As an IP user found out (see file tp) this depicts Dolbadarn Castle, so it might have been uploaded to fawiki as a hoax. It is a greyscaled small version of this photo, so we have neither a free license nor a permission. Achim55 (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Even though this file may or may not be in the Public Domain in the United States, there is no proof that it the user's own work. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- An example of a lack of source is that, while the description says that the image was made in May 2021, the subject of the photograph (William Utermohlen) died in 2007. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
It is possibly not an own work. The file has the name of enestremenu.com web (now redirected to elcanton.org), that has the non-free license CC-BY-NC-SA. Although this, I have not find the file in that web. FogueraC (talk) 12:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: film billboard of a film not in the encyclopedia CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file is not Anatoliy Golitsyn at all, it's the former British prime minister Harold Wilson ! See File:Sir Harold Wilson, British labor leader, meets with Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, right, at the Pentagon.jpg rob1bureau (talk) 13:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Hoax or complete screwup; either way the file is not identified correctly and is not used. -- Whpq (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: blatant hoax. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Scanned material, most probably from some newspaper. Dubious if really own work. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
My own work (for me) means that I have the original and I have the responsibility of using it as I can want. If any newspaper can prove that has the same image, let me know. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 13:22, 9 October 2021, (UTC)
And nobody is judged only with personal opinions without proves. This is your opinion and of course you can have it. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 13:51 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Incompatible License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 [5][6] --PM3 (talk) 13:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
See also note on Template talk:DLR-License. --PM3 (talk) 13:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Incompatible license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 [7]. See also note on Template talk:DLR-License. --PM3 (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
cropped version of File:Amsterdam SPOT 1011.jpg vip (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file is an image released by Bz-Boys official on October 25, 2019. It can be presumed that it is not the uploader's own work. (Twitter @bz_boys Post) Tychou12 (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Xunta de Galicia
[edit]The use of these symbols is regulated by the "Decreto 409/2009, do 5 de novembro" of 2009 [8] whose article 3.1 says that the use of them without explicit consent is forbidden. By no means these images are "own work" as claimed, or have a Creative Commons license. In addition to that, they could be above the threeshold of originality for works from Spain.
- File:Escudo de la Xunta de Galicia.svg
- File:Logotipo de la Xunta de Galicia.svg
- File:Xunta Galicia.gif
-sasha- (talk) 14:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep These works are in the public domain according to Spanish Royal Act 1/1996, on April 12, about Intellectual Property, article 13: Template:PD-SpanishGov/en. One2 (talk) 09:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think that article applies to the images, only to the text of the document. -sasha- (talk) 14:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
I've been reading 1/1996 Royal Act article 13 and i don't know how to interpretate that, maybe when it refers to "projects" does refer to logos and another thing, but in another way, the 2009 decreto is clear about the usage of the images, i don't know what is preferent to apply, the exact law terms... It would be great if the user who uploaded this files is able to explain us what criteria and considerations did he take to upload this files. Sincerely yours, Fewasser ;-)Tell me!!
- I feel like logo reproduction would be restricted for reasons other than copyright, that is, protected as a trademark. One2 (talk) 20:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Mr. Debapriya Hore (talk) 14:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: User's request. --Yann (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - this is a stock image of a model associated with the "Giga Chad" online meme. This is not an own work image and copyright will belong to the photographer. Only usage of this image has been vandalism of en:Lucius Artorius Castus. 192.76.8.66 14:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality image with few features to make it a useful exemplar. Richard Avery (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: in the absence of details of the spider or the context, it is of doubtful value. Llwyld (talk) 03:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
While the Flickr image is licensed (and, per Bridgeman does not need to be) the underlying photo has no license and is certainly still under copyright protection. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This plaque was created after 1918. That is too recent to assume that its creator has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The plaque is PD-ineligible: mainly a list of names and dates. --Yann (talk) 19:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: No mark allowed C.C Tychou12 (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Dispatch does not authorize C.C, and this image is cropped with the original logo watermark. Because the original web page has expired, the image searched by google is used for comparison. (searched by google) Tychou12 (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo for abusing article Lesless (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
nochmal hochladen ThomasMerseny (talk) 15:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
I wanna upload it again, wrong description ThomasMerseny (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thomas, du kannst die Dateiseite bearbeiten oder auch die Datei umbenennen lassen. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Renamed. --Yann (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
very low resolution variant of File:Cnn oh.jpg; unused Enyavar (talk) 15:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: own work? https://tineye.com/search/925448244cbf5840bc423e66500fdc3887bde277?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 Not a blatant copy of the linked results, https://www.instagram.com/p/BGJ9bgKA1nY/ is the likely source of those. Still unlikely to be own work as claimed. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Unlikely to be free. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This deletion request also involves the cropped version: File:Christian Roger Okemba - 2019 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I found this picture on the VOA website, which said it was taken by one of their journalists in 2019 (so it was supposed to be free, as per {{PD-USGov-VOA}}).
But, as user:Remitamine pointed out[9], a higher res version of this picture was published in 2018 on the website vox.cg.
Considering the false date, and the fact that a VOX microphone is visible on this picture, I don't think it is owned by VOA, and so isn't free after all. Titlutin (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not a photo of Barry Dempster, it is Don McKay. Killick (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Killick: You're right! This is a misnamed file and it is Don McKay. I will rename the file. Thank you for the correction // sikander { talk } 🦖 02:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Renamed. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
@PBWilliams claims to be the author of this logo. However, on English language Wikipedia, PBWilliams created an article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Ventriloquism_Day) in which they display the logo, and state that "The logo was designed by graphic artist John Garvin." Unless PBWilliams is a pseudonym for Gavin, or PBWilliams has proof that Gavin assigned him the copyright, this is a copyright violation. Note that:
- I left a message on PBWilliams' talk page, but they've only ever made one contribution to Commons.
- The English language article has been deleted, and will require an admin to verify my quote.
- There's also reference to Montivagus Productions as the source. That seems to be a production company that includes credit for "I'm No Dummy", but I don't see the relation to the logo. Traveling Man (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Private snapshop of a minor; completly out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 17:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Belgium has been independent from the Netherlands since 1831. Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 17:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cher ami,
Au risque de vous outrager, je me dois de vous faire remarquer que vous vous trompez lourdement. Ce diagramme n’est nullement fantaisiste, en tous cas beaucoup moins que votre argumentaire visiblement. Le Benelux est une union économique et politique formée en 1944. À ce titre, cette dernière dispose d’une assemblée interparlementaire officiellement reconnue, au même titre que le Conseil nordique par exemple. Ladite assemblée est également connue sous le nom de Parlement du Benelux. Chaque parlement national y désigne des délégués. Si votre curiosité vous pousse à effectuer quelques recherches sur Wikipedia, vous verrez que cette institution dispose d’un article sur les versions francophone, néerlandophone et anglophone. Vous saurez aussi que les députés s’organisent en groupes politiques, ce qui est justement l’objet de mon diagramme.
En espérant vous avoir éclairé, Votre dévoué Nederbel
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a my personal picture that I myself uploaded many years ago. I was ignorant and unaware of privacy etc. Please allow deleting this file. It is of no use on wikimedia. Thanks. Vsinha91 (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope anyway. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Mashup of free data (more prominent) with underlying GoogleMaps data which is copyrighted. Enyavar (talk) 17:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry photo and I don't see why or how this could be used on any Wikimedia projects. Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 18:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
1.jpg){kind=link}
Very low quality image, highly likely to be a copyright violation (a screenshot off a Youtube video). Bishibitsu (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Very bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo that probably doesn't meet COM:TOO and is unlikely be to own work. I couldn't find a copy of it on any website. Uploaded as a part of a promotional draft on enwiki. Perryprog (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- also file:Ashish kumar menhdawal.jpg
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is not a selfie as claimed. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
_2002_logo.png){kind=link}
_2002_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Copyvio Yann (talk) 20:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
_2002_logo.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Used, PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
_2002_logo.png){kind=link}
I saw this framed photograph on a wall. 191.126.57.67 23:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete unless the uploader is the artist and/or designer of the catalogue cover the copyright probably belongs to the originating company or their designer. We require clarity on the copyright status of this image otherwise PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, because of a risk of copyright violation, on the web at https://www.raycon-international.com/en/thomas-ebrahim/. No proof that our version was uploaded after this, but this is probable because our version was uploaded within the last two weeks. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:LR--6616 (15129384563).jpg: no real educational use —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Clearly not own works but COM:DW and photos of extant photos; all missing essential info and permission.
- File:Paeng Nepomuceno receives his United States Bowling (USBC) Gold Level Coach trophy from USBC chief operating officer Neil Stremmel in Arlington, Texas in 2013.jpg
- File:Some of Paeng Nepomuceno’s US magazine cover story appearances from 1976 to 2000.jpg
- File:Nepomuceno being awarded with the IOC (International Olympic Committee) Presidents Trophy in 1999, Medal of Merit in 1984, Philippine Legion of Honor in 1999, Order of Lakandula in 2008 and Presidential Citations in 1988, 1992 & 1996.jpg
- File:Nepomuceno being honored by Five Philippine Presidents with the Presidential Medal of Merit in 1984, Philippine Legion of Honor in 1999, Order of Lakandula in 2008 and Presidential Citations in 1988, 1992 & 1996.jpg
- File:Nepomuceno at the Entrance of the International Bowling Hall of Fame and Museum, Arlington, Texas in 2010.jpg
- File:Nepomuceno receives from Bernard Gibbons his World Bowling Hall of Fame plaque in a ceremony in Johannesburg, South Africa in 1993Image.jpg
- File:Nepomuceno at the Entrance of the International Bowling Hall of Fame and Museum, Arlington, Texas.jpg
- File:Nepomuceno being awarded the IOC Presidents Trophy.png
- File:Paeng Nepomuceno with his 4 Guinness World Records.jpg
_Gold_Level_Coach_trophy_from_USBC_chief_operating_officer_Neil_Stremmel_in_Arlington,_Texas_in_2013.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Presidents_Trophy_in_1999,_Medal_of_Merit_in_1984,_Philippine_Legion_of_Honor_in_1999,_Order_of_Lakandula_in_2008_and_Presidential_Citations_in_1988,_1992_%26_1996.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The very page linked as the source of the photograph does not contain a Creative Commons license. Rather, the footer of the page contains a copyright notice. Unless this was uploaded by the copyright owner, this should be deleted as its claim of having a CC-SA-4.0 license is apparently false. Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I have permissions from the organization [Aga Khan University] to upload this photo. They can also verify by sending an official email from communications@aku.edu LL70 (talk) 06:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- @LL70: , please arrange for someone in the university with sufficient authority to confirm the license of this photo by email to the Volunteer Response Team, see VRT. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, after VRTS-permission is received and accepted, the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo appearing in Flickr centers on John Oliver's quote and a screenshot of him in his talk show. If quote is important to keep in Commons, then the screenshot should be blackened out. I don't know whether the quote has any value, especially without the screenshot. George Ho (talk) 06:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image contains (supposingly) copyrighted artwork CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 11:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The images are probably by NASA. Yann (talk) 19:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yann, why would you think the "living Mars" version is by NASA? There's every reason to believe it was produced in-house by SpaceX. Without certainty, our precautionary principles apply. Thus, this is a Delete. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Huntster: SpaceX never sent a spacecraft to Mars (yet). This is probably taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter), or by Hubble, or by the Rosetta spacecraft, or by the Viking 1 orbiter. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Which might explain the natural Mars image, though it could just as easily be a digital render. Your theory still doesn't explain the living Mars image. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Huntster: SpaceX never sent a spacecraft to Mars (yet). This is probably taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter), or by Hubble, or by the Rosetta spacecraft, or by the Viking 1 orbiter. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yann, why would you think the "living Mars" version is by NASA? There's every reason to believe it was produced in-house by SpaceX. Without certainty, our precautionary principles apply. Thus, this is a
Deleted DW by Flickr photographer. No source for derivative images which are the main focus of the photo much less any confirmed free license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation https://physicsphorphun.com/uploads/1/2/2/5/122590908/the_ptd.jpg from https://physicsphorphun.com/research.html Eviolite (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have full permission from the author and owner of all of these images to use them in the creation of this Wikipedia article. Please do not delete them, this is a work in progress and we are new at this. All copyright statuses will be corrected before the page is submitted for approval and publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMueller248 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have updated the licensing information to PD-self, please do not delete this image! JMueller248 (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- @JMueller248: If you didn't create the original image yourself, you can't claim it's "PD-self". If this was a misunderstanding, then that's fine since copyright laws can be tricky; it is, however, the kind of misunderstanding that can seriously affect the rights of copyright holders and thus some form of more formal verification is needed. So, if you did create this image yourself, the fact that it's been previously published means that you should follow the advice given in COM:VRT#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT? Be advised though that by uploading this file to Commons, you're basically giving permission to anyone in the world to download it and use it in anyway they want. They could start putting this photo on merchandise (e.g. T-shirts and coffee mugs) and then start selling that online, or otherwise use the files in ways you many you may not approve, and you won't really be able to stop them. You can still retain copyright over the image depending on the type of copyright license you choose, but others will be able to re-use the file as they want as long as they comply with the terms of the license. If there are any problems, you'll be expected to resolve them yourself. So, make sure this is what you really want to do. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have updated the licensing information to PD-self, please do not delete this image! JMueller248 (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: unless this can be VRT verified. The uploader first claims they received the consent of the copyright holder to use the image in the creation of a Wikipedia; they then claim that the file is "PD-self". These two statements are contradictory since you cannot claim license a file as "PD-self" if you didn't create it. Even if the uploader personally received the copyright holder's intent to use the photo, that's insufficient for Commons' purposes. What Commons' needs is the copyright holder's COM:CONSENT to allow anyone anywhere in the world to download this file at anytime for any purpose (including commercial and derivative reasons). If the copyright holder wants to allow that, then great; if not, then Commons can't keep this file. There's no way for Commons to accept a file that tries to restrict its reuse to "Wikipedia only", "educational purposes" only, or "non-commercial purposes" only per COM:L. The uploader should contact the copyright holder (an example of how to do this can be found in COM:EMAIL) and gain their consent in accordance with Commons' licensing requirements. They should also make sure to explain to the copyright holder that once they do this, they can't really change their mind later on. Finally, just going to add that the file seems to originally come from this research paper. The file that was uploaded is slightly different since it's colorized and laid out a bit differently, but copyright on the original work would seem held by the author of that paper Russ Hanush. This is the same person who wrote the blog where the file uploaded to Commons can be found; so, it's fair to assume that Hanush also created to colorized version as well. So, unless the uploader and Hanush are the same person, this needs to be deleted per COM:NETCOPYVIO and COM:PCP if it can't be VRT verified. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted no evidence of claimed license permission offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: all other uploads by this user have been deleted as copyvios. Unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Вячеслав Бабияк (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
unused and apperently not useful Wickey (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
it copies and it's not the editor's job, there's an owner who isn't Vitor de Deus https://www.google.com/search?q=Bandeira+de+Pilar+do+Sul&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiOipblvb7zAhW0qZUCHY3jBxkQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1360&bih=625&dpr=1#imgrc=tu_L8HjRBlwCkM J De cinema (talk) 23:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- This claims to be the emblem of Pilar do Sul, presumably the Brazilian municipality w:pt:Pilar do Sul. It is similar but not identical to File:Brasão Pilar do Sul.jpg and File:Bandeira Pilar do Sul.jpg. The municipal government's website has the same emblem as the other two files.[10] Neither Google images nor TinEye find any matches for this image, so this version may be have been fabricated by the uploader (who has named themself as the author). If this is a accurate representation of a version of the emblem then it is acceptable and should be tagged with {{PD-BrazilGov}}. If it is a fake then it should be deleted as a misleading image. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brasão de Armas (Atualizado).png Verbcatcher (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted Dubious variation, dubious license claim; unused-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Possiple Copyright violation (low resolution and watermark) / mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung (niedrige Auflösung und Wassermarke) Naronnas (talk) 10:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Palpung Europe Stadtinstitut 3002 Purkersdorf.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021110810006348. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Palpung Europe Stadtinstitut 3002 Purkersdorf.jpg” under ticket:2021110910004741. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Permission received and accepted. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Palpung Europe The European Seat of H. H. Chamgon Kenting Tai Situpa under the direction of Chöje Lama Palmo.jpg
[edit]
Possiple Copyright violation (low resolution and watermark) / mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung (niedrige Auflösung und Wassermarke) Naronnas (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Palpung Europe The European Seat of H. H. Chamgon Kenting Tai Situpa under the direction of Chöje Lama Palmo.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021110810006348. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Palpung Europe The European Seat of H. H. Chamgon Kenting Tai Situpa under the direction of Chöje Lama Palmo.jpg” under ticket:2021110910004741. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Permission received and accepted. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Possiple Copyright violation (See meta data and watermark) / mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung (siehe Meta-Daten und und Wassermarke) Naronnas (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Palpung Europe Klausurinstitut 3921 Siebenhöf.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021110810006348. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Palpung Europe Klausurinstitut 3921 Siebenhöf.jpg” under ticket:2021110910004741. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Permission received and accepted. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
This monument remembers the w:MV Bukoba sinking tragedy in 1996. Most likely this 3D work was erected after that year (and its sculptor may be still alive or not yet dead for more than 50 years). Unfortunately, Tanzanian FOP is only valid for audiovisual works (video clips, videos, TV programs/broadcasting, and movies), not photographs. COM:VRT correspondence of permission from the sculptor (or his heirs if he is already deceased) is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Accepting as correct COM:FOP Tanzania, then this is a delete: It's an architectural work in Tanzania and is not video. 69.174.144.79 01:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
According to [11], the monument was designed by the scientists from Stone Age Institute, and was incepted in 2019. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Tanzania for photos of recent artworks, and COM:VRT correspondence of commercial licensing permission from the designers is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Accepting as correct COM:FOP Tanzania, then this is a delete: It's a public work of art in Tanzania and is not video. 69.174.144.79 01:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The monument remembers the w:1998 United States embassy bombings. The event was in 1998, which means this 3D work was unveiled after. Sculptor is most likely either alive or not yet dead for more than 50 years. Unfortunately, Tanzania has no freedom of panorama for photos of copyrighted public artworks, and licensing permission from the side of the sculptor is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Accepting as correct COM:FOP Tanzania, then this is a delete: It's a public work of art in Tanzania and is not video. 69.174.144.79 01:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Games Workshop logo
[edit]
Logo of the British company Games Workshop. The threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The text itself is stylised, including distinctive individual letters (such as the triangular A, pointed M, and extended and angled cut of P), compressed letters with distinctive overlapping (the A and M), embossing (in a different colour to the letters) which considers a light source to the left and slightly above horizontal / shadowing, and black outlining. It is therefore likely to be eligible for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK) due to its originality, making the files ineligible to be hosted on Commons (using {{PD-textlogo}}) as the logo must in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work (see Commons:Licensing). Please note that w:en:File:Games Workshop logo.svg is already marked that it should not be moved to Commons due to its copyright status in its source country. mattbr 09:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- It would appear this should be deleted. It is not public domain and shouldn't be in the commons. It should be only be uploaded to a wiki as fair use only. Correct me if I'm wrong. Leitmotiv (talk) 22:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. Clearly has creative elements, and I believe this would not be PD in the United States either. It sometimes seems like any file consisting of words, no matter how stylized, gets called a textlogo on here. This needs to change. 69.174.144.79 01:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
We do not have dates for any of these banners. They appear to be from the 20th and 21st centuries and are therefore too recent to be out of copyright. We cannot keep them on Commons unless it can be proven either (A) that they predate 1901 or (B) that their creator died more than 70 years ago.
- File:Banniere Rosaire Crucifixion verso.jpg
- File:Banniere Rosaire Crucifixion.jpg
- File:Banniere Sacre-Coeur-de-Jesus-Bourges 2016.jpg
- File:Patronne-du-Berry-protegez-la-jeunesse.jpg
- File:Sainte-Solange patronne-du-Berry.jpg
- File:Saint-Louis-de-Gonzague-processional-banner.jpg
- File:BasiliqueNDdE processional-banner-paroisse.jpg
- File:Notre-Dame-des-enfants Chateauneuf-sur-Cher.jpg
- File:BasiliqueNDdE processional-banner.jpg
- File:Banniere-procession-Sainte Solange-878.jpg
- File:Banniere-pelerinage-Notre-Dame-des-Enfants.jpg
- File:Processional-banner-02-of-Notre-Dame-des-Enfants.jpg
- File:Processional-banner-of-Notre-Dame-des-Enfants.jpg
- File:Banniere-Vierge-Marie-mains-jointes.jpg
- File:Banniere-Vierge-Marie-anges.jpg
- File:Banniere-JHS-eglise-jussy-champagne.jpg
- File:Banniere-Saint-Louis-de-Gonzague.jpg
- File:Banniere-Jésus-enfant-benissez-nous.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 Bienheureux Bolsikov.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 St Abdon et St Sennen.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 Ste Claudine Thévenet et Bhse Dina Bélanger.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 Saint Genou et Saint Génitour.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 Sainte Sara.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 Saint Austregisile verso.jpg
- File:Banniere 2000 Saint Austregisile.jpg
- File:Bannière des 32 religieuses martyres d'Orange 1794-1994.jpg
- File:Bannière en l'honneur de Notre-dame de la Nativité @ Gerbécourt.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment File:Banniere Rosaire Crucifixion verso.jpg should be OK: only a few words. Yann (talk) 19:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
All of the works listed here appear to be 20th century and therefore too recent to assume they are out of copyright.
- File:Grand concert anges musiciens peinture voute cathedrale Saint Julien Le Mans.jpg
- File:Les saints d'Alsace Collégiale Saint-Martin Transept Nord.jpg
- File:Plan Abbaye Saint-Antoine @ Saint-Laurent-en-Royans.jpg
- File:Jerry DIT Do it Together.png
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Recent French church. The images infringe on the architect's copyright.
- File:Chapelle Saint-Paul de Bourges vue de dos.jpg
- File:Église Saint-Jean de Bourges Patrimoine XXème siècle.jpg
- File:Église Saint-Jean de Bourges.jpg
- File:Chapelle Saint-Paul de Bourges entrée.jpg
- File:Chapelle Saint-Paul de Bourges.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Hajoon0102 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: There is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, per COM:FOP UAE. The Burj Khalifa is still copyrighted. Also derivatives (such as lego models) are copyrighted. Reason: the building was completed in 2008. That's correct, but this is not a reason for speedy deletion and the photo is used in multiple projects, so I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 18:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No, it's general view of place. So this photo applies de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Even if we consider Burj Khalifa de minimis, the buildings in foreground in my opinion are not. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: No buildings are specifically in focus in this image. Accordingly, other buildings apply de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- The building does not need to be in focus for being main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: See also this deletion discussion. Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, overall panorama is free, but this photo is not a panorama, but photo of copyrighted buildings. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: No, it's a cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do not think so. The closer of the request must decide, who is right. In my opinion main object of the photo is 3 buildings in foreground, not cityscape. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: So, let's leave the judgment to administrators. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do not think so. The closer of the request must decide, who is right. In my opinion main object of the photo is 3 buildings in foreground, not cityscape. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: No, it's a cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, overall panorama is free, but this photo is not a panorama, but photo of copyrighted buildings. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: See also this deletion discussion. Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- The building does not need to be in focus for being main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: No buildings are specifically in focus in this image. Accordingly, other buildings apply de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep General skylines. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with Taivo. The buildings in the foreground are too prominently featured to make this a panorama image. --De728631 (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There's no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in Japan per COM:FOP Japan.
- File:Hakone 083 musé du petit prince.JPG
- File:Hakone 121 musé du petit prince.JPG
- File:Hakone 122 musé du petit prince.JPG
- File:Hakone 129 musé du petit prince.JPG
- File:Hakone 149 musé du petit prince.JPG
- File:Le petit prince.png
- File:Lepetitprince.jpg
- File:Little Prince's Rose.jpg
- File:The B 612 Asteroid, Hakone, Japan.jpg
- File:The B 612 Asteroid.jpg
- File:The Fox.jpg
— Rhododendrites talk | 22:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
From Wikipedia's own article related to Freedom of Panorama in Japan:
Japan The copyright law of Japan provides for a limited freedom of panorama for outdoor artistic works and full freedom of panorama for buildings. Article 46 of the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of May 6, 1970, as amended 2020) allows for exploitations of reproductions of artistic works "permanently installed in an outdoor location" and architectural works for any purposes, but with four exceptions to which this freedom does not apply, one of which – at (iv) – is when the reproduction of an artistic work is made "for the purpose of selling copies of it, or selling those copies."[58]
As Wikipedia does not sell any images, this discussion of deleting images of exterior artworks is moot. I fail to understand why User:Rhododendrites has decided that an axe should be taken to such images.
- @Harryzilber: it's that for the purpose of selling copies of it, or selling those copies - images on Commons must be usable for any purpose. We do not accept licenses -- even otherwise free licenses -- if they do not allow for commercial use. Everything you see on Commons, all Wikipedia text, nearly all media on Wikipedia, etc. can be used for any purpose, commercial or noncommercial. The only things that are exempt are the files uploaded directly to Wikipedia (not Commons) and meet the criteria at w:WP:NFCC — Rhododendrites talk | 23:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. @Harryzilber: per Commons' house rules and policy on licensing (COM:Licensing): Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use justifications. Media licensed exclusively under non-commercial only licenses are not accepted either. All files here must be freely reusable in commercial media, without restrictions imposed by the artists or by the national laws. Transfer to English Wikipedia is of no use, because enwiki only follows U.S. law (hence U.S. FOP for buildings only) and is not supposed to host numerous images of unfree artwork of no commercial FOP countries (unless one or two images will be transferred and converted to fair use). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SyntaxTerror as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The file seems to have been copied directly from a copyrighted source (© 2021 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Nature.).|source=https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-019-0719-5/figures/10
This file is licenced unter a compatible creative Commons licence:
https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-019-0719-5#rightslink
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Balkanique (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. The article from which this image comes is CC-BY 4.0, and there is no indication in the article that the images are copyrighted by someone else and being used as fair use within the article. 69.174.144.79 01:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 16:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Photographs of artworks in Category:Church of Inmaculada, Ourense
[edit]- Murals
- File:Iglesia Inmaculada Montealegre (capilla mayor).jpg
- File:Iglesia Inmaculada Montealegre, Ourense (capilla mayor).jpg
- File:Iglesia Inmaculada Montealegre, Ourense (tribuna).jpg
- File:Parroquia Inmaculada de Montealegre altar (1).jpg
- File:Parroquia Montealegre altar (Ourense).jpg
- File:Iglesia Inmaculada Montealegre, Ourense (pila bautismal).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Sculpture
- File:Iglesia Inmaculada Montealegre, Ourense (tallas) (2).png
- File:Iglesia Inmaculada Montealegre, Ourense (tallas).png
- File:Inmaculada Mobtealegre Ourense (nave epístola).jpg
- File:Inmaculada Montealegre Ourense (nave evangelio).jpg
- File:Inmaculada Montealegre Ourense (Sagrado Corazón).jpg
- File:Inmaculada Montealegre Ourense (San Antonio).jpg
- File:Inmaculada Montealegre Ourense (San José).jpg
- File:Inmaculada Montealegre Ourense (Santa Rita).jpg
_(2).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These files are in Category:Church of Inmaculada, Ourense.
These photographs are of artworks in the Church of the Inmaculada, in Ourense, Spain. The church was built in or after 1958 (see w:es:Parroquia de la Inmaculada de Montealegre), so we should assume that the artworks date from 1958 or later and are unlikely to be public domain. Freedom of panorama does not apply to artworks inside buildings in Spain, see COM:FOP Spain. We need evidence of permission from the creators of these artworks, or from their heirs.
The dating of the murals is clear. The dating of the sculpture is less certain as these could have been made before the church was built, or they might be casts of older originals. Their design is traditional and could be 19th century. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lette (Coesfeld)
[edit]Contemporary artworks, I'm afraid we cannot keep it on Commons unless a permission by the artist is obtained.
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 01.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 02.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 03.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.04.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.05.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.06.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.07.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.08.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst 09.jpg
- File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst 10.jpg
A.Savin 00:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Ich denke, wenn in einem Museum (wie dies hier geschehen ist) auf mehrfache Nachfrage von Seiten des Personals ausdrücklich darauf hingewiesen wird, dass das Fotografieren im Inneren des Hauses und in der Ausstellung ausdrücklich erlaubt sei, sollte diese Frage für den Fotografierenden damit eindeutig geklärt sein. Das Museum, das die Arbeiten des Künstlers ausstellt und auf dessen Wunsch hin der Öffentlichkeit auf Dauer präsentiert, sollte damit auch das Recht an der Veröffentlichung inne haben. Also somit entscheiden dürfen, ob das Ablichten und Nutzen hier erlaubt ist oder nicht! Die besten Grüße an Dich, Userkollege A. Savin. --Horst70 (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
I think if a museum (as it happened here) particularly mentions that photography inside the house and in the exhibition rooms is expressly allowed, when the museum staff confirms it, there is no copyright rules for the photographer. The museum, which exhibits the artist works and presents them to the public on a permanent basis at his request, should thus also have the right to publish them. So you can decide whether the photographing and use of it should be allowed here or not! Best regards to you, user colleague A. Savin. --Horst70 (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the museum doesn't hold the copyright, the artist does.
- The artists give the museum or whoever owns the object the right to exhibit the artwork, and the museum or owner can chose to let people take photographs or not.
- Taking photographs or copying artwork is fine for private use, but it's illegal to publish these copies and use them in any given way (such as profit).
- Wikimedia Commons cannot host such copyrighted copies because files hosted here specifically have to be freely licensed for any type of use.
- Some artworks can be published when they are exposed in the public domain on a permanent basis and the country has freedom of panorama laws. That is not the case for museums. If you want that to change then petition people in your country and convince your legislators to make it so :)
- --Trougnouf (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Horst J. Meuter: photography and publication are different. The fact that the museum allows you and all visitors to photograph anything does not mean you or the visitors are allowed to publish your images of artistic works under commercial licensing. Commons requires files to be freely reusable even in commercial media (postcards, ads, commercial vlogs etc.). Copyright remains with the artist; the museum only holds physical ownership but they are not the creators of the work they own.
- @Trougnouf: I don't think there will be any more changes to German freedom of panorama. They are the purported origin of the legal right, yet they have numerous rules for their FOP, as outlined at COM:FOP Germany. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Info Horst J. Meuter replied on my talk page roughly two weeks ago: "Hello, dear JWilz12345, Thank you very much for your report. I can now get back to you with a new piece of information. The museum contacted me again: they want to ask the artists if they would like to give permission. I will get back to you when I get some feedback. Best regards." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, permission must be supplied for files to be undeleted. — Racconish 💬 12:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor Петро Головчак, architect Богдан Гром’як. — Микола Василечко (talk) 17:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- See same reguest;
- See also explanation.
And also files from category:
- File:2017 Тернопіль (204).jpg
- File:61-101-0195 Ternopil SAM 8843.jpg
- File:P1410204 бульвар Тараса Шевченка, 9.jpg
- File:Tepnopil Chevchenka 9.JPG
- File:Будинок на Бульварі Шевченка, 9 у Тернополі.jpg
- File:Бульвар Тараса Шевченка (м.Тернопіль), 9.jpg
- File:Бульвар Тараса Шевченка, 9.jpg
- File:Бульвар Шевченка, 9 у Тернополі.JPG
- File:Бульвар Шевченка, 9. Місто Тернопіль.JPG
- File:Житловий будинок на бульварі Т. Шевченка 9.JPG
- File:Житловий будинок, бульвар Тараса Шевченка, 9.jpg
- File:Моя Тернопільщина Місто651.jpg
- File:Тернопіль (68).JPG
- File:Тернопіль, бульвар Тараса Шевченка 9, Житловий будинок.jpg
- File:Тернопіль, Житловий будинок (мур.), бульвар Тараса Шевченка 9.jpg
- File:Тернопіль - Центр Евростудій ТНЕУ - panoramio (7).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни, село Залісся.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1976. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probable copyright violation, the style of the painting appears too modern to be public domain so we need either a reliable attribution or permission from the artist or their heirs. Freedom of panorama in Spain does not apply inside buildings, see COM:FOP Spain. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Interior of St. Marien (Hagen)
[edit]Modern stained glass windows which are copyrighted. There is no Freedom of Panorama in churches in Germany per COM:FOP Germany. So these images are derivative works of copyrighted artwork and cannot be kept on Commons with a free license. You can try to follow the procedure VRT to obtain permission from the artist.
- Hier sind die (nur teilweise abgebildeten) Fenster nur Beiwerk. Der Hochaltar kann nicht fotografiert werden, ohne im Hintergrund Teile der Fenster zu haben. Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 18:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hier sind die (nur teilweise abgebildeten) Fenster nur Beiwerk. Der Hochaltar kann nicht fotografiert werden, ohne im Hintergrund Teile der Fenster zu haben.
- Auch hier sind Fenster nur Beiwerk. Sie sind auf dem Foto zudem kaum zu erkennen. Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 18:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Auch hier sind Fenster nur Beiwerk. Sie sind auf dem Foto zudem kaum zu erkennen.
- File:St. Marien Innen 5.JPG
- File:St. Marien Innen 6.jpg
- File:St. Marien Innen 9.jpg
- File:St. Marien Innen Fenster Die apokalyptische Frau.jpg
- File:St. Marien Innen Fenster J.J. Degenhardt.jpg
- File:St. Marien Innen Fenster Johanna von Staufen.jpg
- File:St. Marien Innen Fenster Lammers.jpg
- File:St. Marien Innen Madonna.jpg
Elly (talk) 17:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Could you please say who the artist is, if (s)he is still alive or else when (s)he died? That would make processing this DR quite a bit easier. Thank you. --Rosenzweig τ 14:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: . The windows are clearly very modern. After some additional searching it appears from this document that the glass windows are designed by Egbert Lammers (window 1-14 and 17), Hermann Gottfried (windows 15, 16), Nikolaus Bette (18,19). If I have the correct artists - I am not an expert in this - de:Egbert Lammers, died 1996. de:Hermann Gottfried died 2015, de:Nikolaus Bette, alive. Elly (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination, kept two as the windows appear to be Beiwerk (de mininis) there. The deleted files can be restored in 2086 (File:St. Marien Innen Fenster Die apokalyptische Frau.jpg, by Hermann Gottfried), 70 years pma (File:St. Marien Innen Fenster J.J. Degenhardt.jpg and File:St. Marien Innen Fenster Johanna von Staufen.jpg, both by Nikolaus Bette) and in 2067 (the remaining ones by Egbert Lammers). --Rosenzweig τ 19:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SyntaxTerror as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The file seems to have been copied directly from a copyrighted source (© 2021 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Nature.).|source=https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-019-0719-5/figures/8
This image was licensed under a suitable Creative Commons licence, therefore doesn't have to be deleted:
https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-019-0719-5#rightslink
Rights and permissions Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Balkanique (talk) 07:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per above. The article from which this image comes is CC-BY 4.0, and there is no indication in the article that the images are copyrighted by someone else and being used as fair use within the article. 69.174.144.79 01:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Correct licencing on the linked article. --Ellywa (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is not Stanley Donwood in the photo. The correct photo is on his English Wiki page. Here is another photo from that meeting with fans to compare flickr.com/photos/61177188@N04/5571082484/ 178.66.131.146 08:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Photo of no educational value, another person. Not in scope, per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This icon may be PD-Old. However, its style suggests that it is late 20th century. We cannot keep it with evidence that is predates 1901. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Risk of copyright violation. The declared author Zarateman does not match the uploader's username. The artwork was made by Mateo de Prado and Bernardo Cabrera in 1656 (see w:es:Retablo de la Conversión de San Pablo (Catedral de Orense)), so presumably Zarateman is the photographer. This may be User:Zarateman, but their user page does not indicate that they are the same person as the uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation of the stained glass, which looks modern and is too prominent to be ignored as de minimis. Freedom of panorama does not apply inside buildings in Spain, see COM:FOP Spain. This could be cropped to show only the central statue, providing that the statue is sufficiently old to be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Also delete this near-duplicate:
- Verbcatcher (talk) 21:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it copies and it's not the editor's job, there's an owner who isn't Vitor de Deus https://www.google.com/search?q=Bandeira+de+Pilar+do+Sul&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiOipblvb7zAhW0qZUCHY3jBxkQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1360&bih=625&dpr=1#imgrc=tu_L8HjRBlwCkM J De cinema (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- See the related discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandeira de Pilar do Sul.png
- Verbcatcher (talk) 00:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}