Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Toyosato_Akane_with_beer.jpg){kind=link}
![113 File:Фрегат "Надежда". В.Косов 60х50 х.м. 2015 г.jpg](#File:Фрегат_"Надежда"._В.Косов_60х50_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
Taehyang_on_mv_the_shadow_like_me.jpg){kind=link}
![131 File:Фрагмент картины Миротворец."Барк Крузенштерн". В.Косов 60х100 х.м. 2015 г.jpg](#File:Фрагмент_картины_Миротворец."Барк_Крузенштерн"._В.Косов_60х100_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![159 File:Фрегат "Паллада" В.Косов 60х100 х.м.2016 г.jpg](#File:Фрегат_"Паллада"_В.Косов_60х100_х.м.2016_г.jpg){kind=link}
![160 File:Фрегат "Мир" В.Косов 35х60 х.м. 2015 г.jpg](#File:Фрегат_"Мир"_В.Косов_35х60_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
![161 File:Фрагмент картины Ледокол "Ямал". Караван.В.Косов 80х120 холст, масло 2014 г.jpg](#File:Фрагмент_картины_Ледокол_"Ямал"._Караван.В.Косов_80х120_холст,_масло_2014_г.jpg){kind=link}
![162 File:"Суперджет 100". Над Шереметьево. В.Косов х.м. 80х60, 2015 г.jpg](#File:"Суперджет_100"._Над_Шереметьево._В.Косов_х.м._80х60,_2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
,_Achladeri_Forest,_Lesvos,_Greece,_16.04.2015_(18101113971).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
made it as a joke Akj203 (talk) 03:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This image is not own work and not free image. There is AFP watermark in the lower right corner. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- So I
Support 
Speedy delete. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 02:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept - licensing seems legitimate; in use in substantial number of projects in multiple languages, therefore in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 05:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Per COM:SCOPE the file needs to meet the following; 1. Must be a media file, 2. Must be of an allowable free file format, 3. Must be freely licensed or public domain, 4. Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose, and 5 Must not contain only excluded educational content, content better suited to Wikipedia for example.- Going through that list of requirements, the nominated item is a media file that is in an allowable format. It is in the public domain. It is of realistically useful educational purpose it is being used for realistically useful for an educational purpose because it is being used consistent with COM:INUSE. And it does not contain any of the excluded educational content.--RockerballAustralia (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Vandalism ! Nammed by a sock puppet : Special:CentralAuth/ThomasFan707. --Hyméros-(talk) 10:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per above; license appears legitimate; in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Hafizman (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This is not OSM, but Google Maps; thus a copyvio Enyavar (talk) 09:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This is not OSM, but Google Maps; thus a copyvio Enyavar (talk) 09:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Хайкал (talk) 09:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Google Maps screenshot: Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
obvious copyvio from here Icodense 10:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Use of non-free image in the edit [1] this one Librero2109 (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
penis map - graphic content Enyavar (talk) 12:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Prank/troll OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
the self proclaimed creators of File:Fdsfdsfdsdfs.png - out of scope, commons is no webspace provider Enyavar (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This image is not own work, and not free image. Source: [2] Ox1997cow (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- So I Support Speedy delete. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Local "hacker" logo, no educational purpose, it's often used just for vandalizing wikipedia Tukang Patrol (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Revolutionary Youth Foundation (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Photo by Ilta-Sanomat press photographer Juhani Niiranen, uploaded by user with previous copyright violations. Kotivalo (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Copyviol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by H-stt as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: drawing is a derivate of a famous photograph by en:Annie Leibovitz, as shown here.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion because of the fundamental importance of the case. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The original photograph is certainly the most iconic image of Louise Bourgeois. It was taken by Annie Leibovitz for her book "Women" which combined images by her with essays by en:Susan Sonntag. "Our" drawing is obviously derivative of this famous photograph and thus sadly a copyvio. The drawing was published by a Arturo Espinosa from Spain on Flickr under a free license and transferred to commons without regard to the history of the depicted image. Yes, Arturo's drawing style is distinct and has its own strong expression. But no, it still is a derivate and therefore a copyvio. --h-stt !? 16:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Clear DW of Leibovitz photo; Flickr user does not have authority to license derivative work of copyrighted original. (Too bad, was in use in multiple projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Expired Map due to the Brexit and Croatia and Doubtful Own Claim and Violating COM:NOTHOST. ThomasFan707 (talk) 10:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- No sense. Even expired, the map is historical. By the way, TomasFan707's a sockpuppet, already blocked on en.wp (Special:CentralAuth/ThomasFan707) and under investigation in fr.wp too.--Hyméros-(talk) 15:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I pinged Yann before about this as he was the one that added the original block. These DR's are wasting everyone's time. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
File:The android application system WebView is a component of the Android operating system.jpg
[edit]
Przesłałem go przez pomyłkę Kammuu 87 (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Lion logo is from English Premier League site, https://www.premierleague.com/ FDW777 (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Wrong Image Sonne23a (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 02:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flag of a Fictional Country and Doubtful Own Claim. ThomasFan707 (talk) 02:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 02:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 02:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE. This user seems to be spamming the deletion request log with erroneous/frivolous deletion requests, all with the same flimsy rationale. χ (talk) 11:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Oppose I took inspiration from this book cover, I didn't create it from scratch.--Carnby (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)- Oppose the flag is a faithful reproduction of an already existing - although from a fantastic novel - flag. Veverve (talk) 06:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 05:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Another vandalism of ThomasFan707 --Hyméros-(talk) 17:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
re-uploaded - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Jurvetson 2014.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 19:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I reuploaded it. Asa took this photo for me in 2014, but I own it for any use so I could upload it to Flickr, under CC-BY-2.0. This photo was on my article for several years, until less than a month ago when it was noticed that the license on Flickr was accidentally changed from CC-BY-2.0. As you can see from the Flickr source link https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/14711700622/ now that I've fixed the license back to CC-BY-2.0 there should be no issue having this image on Wikipedia. I have hundreds of images from my Flickr on Wikipedia under this license: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Jurvetson&title=Special:Search Jurvetson (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: CC-BY 2.0
Confirmed. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. -- User: Perhelion 02:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr account no longer allows commercial or derivative reuse, and hasn't since around July 2018. Reference discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Inspirati4n and my note at Template talk:Cc-zero-SpaceX. Per our precautionary principle, since SpaceX has refused to reply to queries about the situation, it is questionable whether photos from the SpaceX Flickr page posted after July 2018 are permissible on Commons. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- FlickreviewR review the image at the moment of the upload and confirmed that they were under cc-zero. CC licenses are non revocable so the image still is in cc-zero despite that SpaceX changed the license on Flickr, whether they like it or not.--BugWarp (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're right, of course. I admit I failed to notice the tag. Closing. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: self-closing. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not uploaders work, see TinEye GeorgHH • talk 19:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Farachia does not exist ; fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Copyvio. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Kenneth Lim". OTRS permission from Kenneth Lim needed. MKFI (talk) 10:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage at en.wp without any other edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, COM:INUSE. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyvio. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trần Đông Minh (đạo diễn) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 18:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aspirants Worker (talk · contribs)
[edit]All claimed as own work but the photos have no meaningful exif and are probably off the web. And the logos are complex and need OTRS or proof of PD to keep
- File:Lokpal-logo.png
- File:Lokpal logo official.jpg
- File:M A Ganpathy ips.webp
- File:IPS-Rakesh-Asthana-delhi police commissioner.jpg
- File:T.V. Somnathan official;.jpg
- File:CVC official logo.jpg
- File:Ncst official logo.jpg
- File:National commission for backward classes.jpg
- File:NCSC official logo.jpg
- File:NCW OFFICIAL LOGO.png
- File:NVDA official logo.jpg
- File:MPPEB official logo.png
- File:National Commission for Child Protection Rights logo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Professional/official photos, unlikely to be own work as claimed and the logo is complex thus needs OTRS to keep
- File:Pandapotan Kasmin Simanjuntak.png
- File:Monang Sitorus.png
- File:Tonny Simanjuntak, SE.jpg
- File:Ir. Poltak Sitorus.jpg
- File:Ir. Darwin Siagian.jpg
- File:Ir. Hulman Sitorus.jpg
- File:Lambang Kabupaten Toba.png
- File:Liberty Pasaribu.jpg
- File:Poltak Sitorus.jpg
- File:Sahala Tampubolon.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Kombes (pol) Drs. Titus Uly.jpg
- File:Kombes Pol Y.jacki Uly.jpg
- File:Irjen Pol Y.Jacki Uly.jpg
- File:Nicky Uly.jpg
_Drs._Titus_Uly.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not delete these files — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicky Uly (talk • contribs) 17:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Not own work as claimed
- File:L.V.Uly-Tanya.jpg
- File:Irjen Pol.Y.Jacki Uly.jpg
- File:Kombes.Pol Titus Uly.jpg
- File:Irjenpol Jacki Uly.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
this is a wiki-page, downloaded as PDF and uploaded to commons. Notability of person is questionable. this file has no education usage, used only to support re-creation of article. Drakosh (talk) 12:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olade john (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Classic deriek 22.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 21.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 20.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 19.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 18.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 16.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 17.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 15.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 13.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 14.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 12.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 11.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 10.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 09.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 08.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 07.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 06.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 04.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 05.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 02.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 01.jpg
- File:Classic deriek 03.jpg
Orizan (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olade john (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope
- File:Classic Deriek.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek meeting with friends.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 07.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 05.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 06.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 04.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 02.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 01.jpg
- File:Classic Deriek 03.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 14:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
possible derivative of non-free content. Pakistani government works are copyrighted for 50 years, and it's unclear how old this pin is FASTILY 01:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope for Commons. Used only for advertising on English Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 01:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of Surukivi by Finnish sculptor Kauko Kortelainen, born 1933. Not in PD yet, no Freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 03:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
The edit history still shows the name of the subject in the picture, please delete the history of the wikipedia page "hogtie" in which there is an entry of the renaming in effect Saboisheres (talk) 03:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for file deletion. --Krd 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
it contains a compromising picture of an individual who does not wish for the picture to be public Saboisheres (talk) 07:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I would prefer to keep this file, if only because there is an unfortunate gender bias in BDSM media, both here and in w:Bondage positions and methods. Nevertheless, this file is not currently in use, and I expect it to be courtesy deleted. Brianjd (talk) 05:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- There is a link on the bottom of the page which includes the name of the subject, unfortunately this page shows up on google when searching for said name, so the link needs to be deleted ASAP please Saboisheres (talk) 08:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
There is a link on the bottom of the page which includes the name of the subject, unfortunately this page shows up on google when searching for said name, so the link needs to be deleted ASAP please. Sorry for asking multiple times but there needs to be a removal of this post to the name on the bottom of the screen, I'm afraid to list it again because it shows up on search engines like google right now and needs to be deleted, as soon as possible, thanks!!! Saboisheres (talk) 10:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, no metadata, not used, out of scope. Also potential privacy issues. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom - Uploaded by someone who doesn't apparently understand what Commons is or what it's used for, –Davey2010Talk 17:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot, test upload, unclear license Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Bad quality and no educational value. Velma (talk) 06:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Kein info 195.37.108.143 07:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: In use, source given. --Achim (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but at least the 3 included photographies are "graphic works" and thereby not covered by the UK's freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree. --bjh21 (talk) 09:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Peter Macdonough Wood died in 1982 per: [3]. Therefore no way it is in PD 'cos of author's age, as claimed. Masur (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete not PD per Masur. Llwyld (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:ADVERT, the file is nothing but advertising for a non-notable service and is therefore out of scope. The truthfulness of the promises made in the ad can also be questioned. 46.132.188.137 10:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, nothing to discuss. --Achim (talk) 18:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Nagoya Castle
[edit]- File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 35.jpg
- File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 36.jpg
- File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 37.jpg
- File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 38.jpg
See COM:DW. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Advertsing, out of project scope Fl.schmitt (talk) 14:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Advertising, out of project scope Fl.schmitt (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Useless selfie Tukang Patrol (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, dubious uploader, garbage title and description. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan
[edit]
- Probable copyright violation. In a news report dated before the upload here.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nation-world/worlds-tallest-idol-of-goddess-durga-built-in-kolkata/deshapriya-park/slideshow/49503385.cms]
- Probable copyright violation, very small image without camera metadata, probably from a webpage.
- Copyright violation. Has 'amritsartemplaes.in' warermark at the lower right. There is a crop on the amritsartemples.in website.[10] Widely available online.
- Copyright violation.On TripAdvisor attributed to a different photographer (photo 4 of 91).[11]
- Copyright violation. Includes watermark '©www.IndiTales.com' at bottom right. On their website dated before the upload here.[12]
- Probable copyright violation. Has Facebook metadata, in a Facebook post that is dated before the upload here.[13]
- Risk of copyright violation. Small images without camera metadata.
- Probable copyright violation, in a Tweet dated before the upload here.[14]
- Copyright violation. On Flickr attributed to a different photographer.[17]
- Probable copyright violation, posted to Facebook before upload to Commons.[18]
- Probable copyright violation, in webpage archived before the upload here.[19]
- Probable copyright violation. Already nominated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glenview Illinois Hanumanji Moorti.jpg. No freedom of panorama in the USA. Small image without camera metadata. Appears to be one of only two US photos by an uploader whose other photos are mostly of locations in India.
- Copyright violation. Watermark at lower right of the touchmeworld website, where this image appeared, dated before the upload here.[20] Widely available online, TinEye shows multiple earlier examples.
- Scaled-down duplicate of File:Saraswati Sarasvati Swan Sculpture.jpg. Redundant and incorrect attribution.
- Probable copyright violation, already nominated for FoP issue. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanuman Statue of Hockessin.jpg In a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[21]
- Probable copyright violation, in a blog post dated before the upload to Commons.[22]
- Possible copyright violation. May be a still from a YouTube video.[23]
- Scaled-down duplicate of File:SHRI BHAKTHA ANJANEYAR.jpg (and I suspect that may also be a copyright violation). Redundant and incorrect attribution.
- Probable copyright violation, crop of a photo on Flickr (note the bird to the left of the statue).[24]
- Probable copyright violation, posted to Facebook before upload to Commons.[25]
- Probable copyright violation, in a webpage archived before the upload to Commons.[26]
- Risk of copyright violation. Small image without camera metadata. Black bands at the side suggest this is from a website.
- Scaled-down duplicate of File:Largest HanumanJi at Phillaur.JPG. Redundant and incorrect attribution.
- Probable copyright violation, on Tripadvisor where it is attributed to a different photographer and was uploaded before its upload to Commons.[29]
- Probable copyright violation, in a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[30]
- Already nominated for FoP issue in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ardhaniswara Statue South Africa.jpg. Probable copyright violation, in a blog posted before the upload to Commons.[31]
- Already nominated for FoP issue in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chatsworth Hanuman Statue.jpg. Probable copyright violation, in a blog posted before the upload to Commons.[32]
- Probable copyright violation. In a tweet dated before the upload to Commons.[33]
- Copyright violation. Shuttstock watermark at bottom. On Shutterstock attributed to a different photographer.[34]
- Probable copyright violation. In a tweet dated before the upload to Commons.[35]
- Scaled-down duplicate of File:Hanuman Idol at Tapkeshwar Temple..jpg. Redundant and incorrect attribution.
- Risk of copyright violation, on government website.[39]
- Probable copyright violation. Watermark at bottom right corner. In an archive of a website made before the upload to Commons.[40]
- Copyright violation. Published in a newspaper report before upload to Commons, attributed to a different photographer.[41]
- Probable copyright violation. Widely available online (compare the heads at the bottom). TinEye identifies this as a re-upload of the deleted file File:God shankar.jpg.
- Copyright violation, watermark at lower middle with a copyright declaration.
- Probable copyright violation. In an archive of a website made before the upload to Commons.[42]
- Copyright violation, on Flickr attributed to a different photographer and uploaded before the upload to Commons.[43]
- Copyright violation, still from a YouTube video.[46]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Copyright violation. santabanta.com watermarks at upper and lower right.[49] Widely available online.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Copyright violation, crop of an image posted to Flickr before upload here, attributed to a different photographer.[52]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_followed_in_Indian_subcontinent.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Probable copyright violation, map posted to Reddit before upload to Commons.[57]
- Probable copyright violation. In a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[61] Widey available online.
- Probable copyright violation, posted to Facebook before upload to Commons.[62]
I have nominated all of the photographs uploaded by this user, and one map. For most of the files I have identified positive evidence of a copyright violation – this reinforces the case for the deletion of the other files. I have not nominated a few files that only have text or simple diagrams, although these may have issues of project scope. --Verbcatcher (talk) 21:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reverse image search shows that is has been used before so it seems like copyright violation. However, i am unfamiliar with this IP so I am nominating just in case. BriefEdits (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
The image is original research, which includes the lengthy summary on the page. It is not a depiction of multiple rail track gauges actually used in an operating railway in Afghanistan or anywhere else. I sought advice from a colleague who is a railway civil engineer, who said that four gauges were only seen in factories where rolling stock was built to a variety of gauges -- not on operating railways, where 3 gauges historically had been the maximum. He stated that it appeared to be a theoretical concept (shown by the rail on the far left and "G0 ... too small") about how many rails would be needed to be placed for four gauges. Some editors have asked the originator to avoid speculation -- see for example w:Talk:Rail transport in Afghanistan but there was no response. Likewise there has been no response to my notification on the Talk page 3 weeks ago that I would be recommending deletion. SCHolar44 (talk) 00:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, but give it a new name reflecting its use in locomotive and rollingstock manufacturing plants. Peter Horn (talk) 13:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisdg05iN9NlzSPN8FsgSQxDvQknL3lHtkrNTS9dunmsoov4awQr8B26uOH-_1Z7FN9y7yqHQ41GXI19HwPZC1cv9crLHyMCx8oHnJGF0uB8K76_1CHThTOjbIZWl6HBKAzbQqgGAZ_1Dlq8-k1r12Vkug7rRBGASFp0DPfY0WbEsb3jEdiCJBFcNaQ-6GS8x2iW99ApdkQkoInddnl2Q5aUFl5g57_1viQcmtrRQXwNs6oicVqtAM-0ISXCKkt2kwMuO92fwMhCbW9JQaKOl-6HUcVauvXcvLvONKlaVl_1wIQkniGsWUu2wNgwOZWxPS1Df3oR7u8eUu5HsJLPK8ma041ErZ_1plTQ. Uploaded in 2015, claims "I took this in at a photoshoot in the 90s." Needs discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- The Google search matches are only significant when they predate the upload of this file to Commons in 2015. TinEye shows several that do, including a blog posting dated 2011.[66] Because of this we probably need license validation by the Volunteer Response Team. The image was used in a 2019 album cover,[67] but this is not conclusive because the album post-dates the upload here and the photo is not attributed on the album cover. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:TOYS. BriefEdits (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Questionable whether this image can be used for educational purposes. So far it does not find any use. So, it should be out of scope. Mosbatho (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused and out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
No meta data of the image, maybe a copyvio and small Reda Kerbouche (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, image from FB. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
No meta data of the image, maybe a copyvio and small Reda Kerbouche (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
No meta data of the image, maybe a copyvio and small, and maybe we have not the authorization form the person in the photo Reda Kerbouche (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
No image on this file. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Page with no valid content (#G1). --Wdwd (talk) 11:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: picture credited to WWE.com on a Bleacher Report article published the year before the photograph has been uploaded https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2668447-wwe-no-mercy-2016-best-possible-finish-for-each-contest CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: certainly coming from the WWE to have a photographs directly on the ring, also, it is present on a blog with an article published the year before the picture was uploaded https://supermarcey.com/2016/09/12/wrestling-backlash-ppv-2016-review/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: picture taken from the ramp and published a few days before it was uploaded in a better quality on this website https://arabic.sport360.com/article/%d9%85%d8%ae%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%b3%d8%a8%d9%88%d8%b1%d8%aa-360/479695/%d8%aa%d9%88%d9%82%d8%b9%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d9%85%d8%ac%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86%d8%a9-%d9%82%d8%af-%d8%aa%d8%ad%d8%af%d8%ab-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%b1%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%84-%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%a8%d9%84-2017 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Watermark indicates this is not an original work Ytoyoda (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious CC-BY-SA claim, probably a copyright violation. Also is most likely copyrighted due to muddled Philippine copyright law on TOO and logos, and it NOT being a government agency. Sennecaster (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chlod (say hi!) 17:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: the website this photograph come from indicates "Courtesy Skullcandy" and there is no indiation of Creative Commons CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because this map showns false boundaries, namely, the border of the Teutonic Order is shown in this map as pretty much identical to the East Prussian region (which it wasn't) and also forgets the Livonian Order. Finally, the map has a historically inaccurate label, namely "Russo-Lithuanian State". No serious scholars refer to the Lithuanian state in such a manner. Cukrakalnis (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is not the task of the project to reflect "only correct documents". --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This obviously is a copyrighted work without valid free license. Serge Obolensky was born in 1890 and died in 1978. While Pierre Bregy was born in 1898 (source of his birth year), so he is even younger. It is not supported by any source that 70 years had already passed since Pierre Bregy's death. Uploader of this file clearly picked a random license template without providing any evidence that it is valid for this file. Anyway, I think it is safe to assume that both Serge Obolensky and Pierre Bregy have equal copyrights to this file/book. Since one of the authors (Serge Obolensky) of this file/book died only 43 years ago, the {{PD-old}} license tag will be valid for this file only after 27 years (so in 2048). -- Pofka (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
If the author is known, we need to know when he died. Yann (talk) 18:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann Considering the co-author who was born eight years before Pierre Brégy still lived to 1978, it is safe to assume that he lived to a similar time. I have found a person named Pierre, who was born in Brégy exactly in 1898 and who died in 1979, and considering that his birth place was just below 600 people, it is a pretty certain guess, that this is indeed the person concerned. So, 70 years have definitely NOT passed since the death date of whichever author.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's a different person. Brégy here is the name of a town, not a family name. BTW where did you find the authors' birthdate? Yann (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann I found the birthdate of Pierre Brégy here and Serge Obolensky here. The problem with Pierre Brégy is that him being an obscure author means that not a lot is known about him. My rationale for picking this as a possible person, is because there is a possibility that Pierre Brégy was an alias (1st name and birthdate is the same, but the 2nd name he changed into his birthplace village). Unfortunately, this is speculation, but it is the best available suggestion there is on the material available online.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's useful. There is another Serge Obolensky with different dates, but in all cases, these make this file under a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your time and patience, Best --Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Here is a database of all people who died in France after 1970, based on birth and death municipality records. There is no match for Serge Obolensky born in 1890 or 1901, and for Pierre Brégy born in 1898. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Serge Obolensky born in 1890 in Russia and died in USA in 1978, so him not being registered in France makes sense.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also, Pierre Brégy, who would have been born in 1898, doesn't even appear. Him not being in official records, but having written a book raises some questions.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is probably a confusion between 2 people called Serge Obolensky: LoC and VIAF give the dates 1901-1992 for the author of language courses. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is such a possibility, but regardless, whichever death date is the correct one for the co-author of this book, this file is in copyrighted 'territory'.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cukrakalnis: Pierre Brégy is the pseudonym of Kyriak Stameroff, who died on February 18th, 1944, according to this newspaper. Yann (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what a find! I have no clue how you even came about that. My speculation is definitely brushed aside considering the findings you presented, although I was right about this being an alias. It definitely mentions all of the books that are ascribed to this person, so it is without a doubt him. But even then, considering there were two authors of the book, and one of them died in the late 1970s or 1990s, doesn't this still raise issues?--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- In a book about history, you cannot assume that the author of the book is the author of the maps ; even less that the authors of the books are both the authors of the maps...
- the author of the map could be (and probably is) a third person, about whom we have no information at all, except, perhaps, the cyrillic initials that can be read in the bottom right "ΔΛ" (DL)... 4 of the 5 maps in this book have this same signature...
- however, I agree that it cannot reasoneably be assumed that a page of a book published in 1939 is in the Public Domain according to the 70 years post death rule, unless it is provable that the author died during war, or shortly after... --Hsarrazin (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The initials can also be read as cyrillic "АЛ" (AL), but they do not fit the two known authors of the book anyway. Consequently, the maps signed with these initials can be considered as works of an unknown author, passed into the public domain 70 years after publication.--Yellow Horror (talk) 08:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what a find! I have no clue how you even came about that. My speculation is definitely brushed aside considering the findings you presented, although I was right about this being an alias. It definitely mentions all of the books that are ascribed to this person, so it is without a doubt him. But even then, considering there were two authors of the book, and one of them died in the late 1970s or 1990s, doesn't this still raise issues?--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cukrakalnis: Pierre Brégy is the pseudonym of Kyriak Stameroff, who died on February 18th, 1944, according to this newspaper. Yann (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is such a possibility, but regardless, whichever death date is the correct one for the co-author of this book, this file is in copyrighted 'territory'.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is probably a confusion between 2 people called Serge Obolensky: LoC and VIAF give the dates 1901-1992 for the author of language courses. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also, Pierre Brégy, who would have been born in 1898, doesn't even appear. Him not being in official records, but having written a book raises some questions.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Serge Obolensky born in 1890 in Russia and died in USA in 1978, so him not being registered in France makes sense.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Here is a database of all people who died in France after 1970, based on birth and death municipality records. There is no match for Serge Obolensky born in 1890 or 1901, and for Pierre Brégy born in 1898. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your time and patience, Best --Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's useful. There is another Serge Obolensky with different dates, but in all cases, these make this file under a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann I found the birthdate of Pierre Brégy here and Serge Obolensky here. The problem with Pierre Brégy is that him being an obscure author means that not a lot is known about him. My rationale for picking this as a possible person, is because there is a possibility that Pierre Brégy was an alias (1st name and birthdate is the same, but the 2nd name he changed into his birthplace village). Unfortunately, this is speculation, but it is the best available suggestion there is on the material available online.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's a different person. Brégy here is the name of a town, not a family name. BTW where did you find the authors' birthdate? Yann (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion above and linked discussion on Wiksource. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zhang Daqian
[edit]Images of calligraphy and paintings by Zhang Daqian who dies in 1983. In both China and Taiwan, calligraphy is protected (COM:TOO China, COM:TOO Taiwan) and copyright duration is life + 50 years.
- File:Golden Horse Awards inscribed board by Zhang Daqian 20131120.jpg
- File:HK WC Grand Hyatt Hotel 保利拍賣 Poly Auction exhibit Apr-2013 張大千 Zhang Daqian chinese writing 上款 his friend 李仲乾 signs Lot 381.JPG
- File:HK WC Grand Hyatt Hotel 保利拍賣 Poly Auction exhibit Apr-2013 張大千 Zhang Daqian Lot 0326 1975年作 策杖觀瀑圖 鏡框 設色紙本 羅代永.JPG
Wcam (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment the last one is a painting, so a clear copyvio... I'm not sure about the TOO regarding calligraphy in Hong Kong. Storkk (talk) 13:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hong Kong is where the auction took place and should not be considered as the work's country of origin. Regarding File:Golden Horse Awards inscribed board by Zhang Daqian 20131120.jpg, the exhibition took place in Taipei [68], and the writing "金馬獎" refers to en:Golden Horse Awards, a film festival and awards in Taiwan. It is beyond reasonable doubt that the country of origin for this work is Taiwan. --Wcam (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zhang Daqian
[edit]Same as above. Not PD until 2034.
Wcam (talk) 20:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
After a number of revisions its finally done. Time for a fresh link. RevDanielElisAxelrod (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Test page/G1. --Wdwd (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
It's a book cover. Copyrighted on flyleaf at the source, which is dated 2019 and contains references from 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. DrKay (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, the text on the cover is too simple to create a copyright, if the coat of arms is public domain then the book cover is public domain. The coat of arms is for an Italian family and is dated 1913. COM:Italy gives the basic copyright limit as 'life + 70 years'. 1913 is too recent to assume public domain, unless we can determine the date of death of the designer of the arms. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
similar to images found on web (https://www.instagram.com/p/B3w_Yc7nDH-/); no proof of authorship give Joeyconnick (talk) 03:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
_Toyosato_Akane_with_beer.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Toyosato_Akane_with_beer.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP Japan does not allow 2-d work in the public to be reproduced for commercial purposes, therefore failing COM:SCOPE. Also fails COM:DM Japan. BriefEdits (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
_Toyosato_Akane_with_beer.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
_Toyosato_Akane_with_beer.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be licence-washing. FunkMonk (talk) 00:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 11:19, 14 October 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:CrawleyCreatures-2x1RaptorProsthetic3.jpg --Krdbot 14:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Theenimy (talk) 08:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by AntiCompositeNumber. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by AntiCompositeNumber. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
All the files of this category should be deleted, for the following rationale:
Due to a mistake while using Lingua Libre, all these files are named with the wrong language code and Qid (they are not in fra but in shu (Q56497)). The speaker recorded all these pronunciation afterwards with Lingua Libre, which means that the names are already taken, and these files are "duplicates" with the new ones.
Best — WikiLucas (🖋️) 19:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not in use Ol'Shariv (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: in scope; being in use is not mandatory for Commons files. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept Free licensed and in scope. No reason to request deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious licensing as it's quite unlikely that the uploader (who claims this as own work) has any ownership of this image. The lack of a source URL in this case may have been an attempt to conceal how it's the property of someone else. SNUGGUMS (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Everyone loading an image as a noob makes the same mistakes and makes themselves the author, so we fix them, and don't assume nefarious reasons. Even if unpublished it would be PD. --RAN (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Closing as Kept; license has been corrected. Better source info would be good to have, but seems PD in any case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely that uploader created trophies depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I'd like to show the three yellow counties as separate areas, and will be uploading another version. Criticalthinker (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright issue LklAndy (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright issue LklAndy (talk) 08:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Mashup with Google Maps Background - thus, copyright violation. Please consider using OSM instead? Enyavar (talk) 08:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Google maps screenshot (usually a copyvio), how is this supposed to be authorised and licensed? Enyavar (talk) 09:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
![10:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-Kosov_vladimir_09071967-2021-09-28T10:44:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Надежда"._В.Косов_60х50_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted per Uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
![14:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-Infrogmation-2021-10-25T14:44:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Надежда"._В.Косов_60х50_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
This is cc-by-nc-nd on Flickr, but maybe it's also {{PD-Art}}? Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Photo not free licensed; no indication stained glass window it shows is old enough to be PD (looks fairly modern) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Imagen taken form internet Librero2109 (talk) 11:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please delete the redirect, it has the wrong name. - FakirNL (talk) 08:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please delete the redirect, it has the wrong name. - FakirNL (talk) 08:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please delete the redirect, it has the wrong name. - FakirNL (talk) 08:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Helsinki X Sibelius Monument
[edit]
Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402) is the main subject of the photo (and not architecture) and the photo thus not covered by FOP in Finland. There is no indication of permission from the copyright owner. --LPfi (talk) 12:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Neither of those files are also used locally as well and per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 00:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work as tagged. Work of the Moroccan postal service. I can't see an exemption for postage stamps from the 70 years after authors death copyright that applies in Morocco Dumelow (talk) 13:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Ich glaube, das darf man nicht hochladen. Das war ein Versehen. Sciencia58 (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC) Sciencia58 (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Ich bitte um sofortige Löschung ohne Diskussion. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear admins, this was an error, I ask for quick deletion. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The YouTube video is not marked CC, the media file is a suspected but not clear copyright violation. Tychou12 (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 14:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Taehyang_on_mv_the_shadow_like_me.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Taehyang_on_mv_the_shadow_like_me.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is li kely part of a video/copyrighted Orizan (talk) 14:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Taehyang_on_mv_the_shadow_like_me.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Taehyang_on_mv_the_shadow_like_me.jpg){kind=link}
Useless and purposeless text snipped without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from book cover. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Cropped version centered on person uploaded, Kept; original upload with DW book cover Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/search?sa=G&hl=pt_BR&q=juliana+paiva&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&tbs=simg:CAESmQIJAOoViPzZAZsajQILEKjU2AQaAghDDAsQsIynCBo7CjkIBBIUxSK-L_1ci4x-aKeoaki3xJOQm-wcaG-S3LZ9lWseR4kosIiB_1Uy6GVG2ZjQelsZSobSAFMAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgSDdf4ADAsQne3BCRqhAQogCg1waWN0dXJlIGZyYW1l2qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wNnozN18KIAoMb3JhbCBoeWdpZW5l2qWI9gMMCgovbS8wM2gwMWJzChgKBWV2ZW502qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wODFwa2oKJQoSY29zbWV0aWMgZGVudGlzdHJ52qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wM3J6OHYKGgoHZWFycmluZ9qliPYDCwoJL20vMDFyNTQ2DA&fir=HQ85kKLFGzOcaM%252Cw2JWdn3rfbmURM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kRft6-oayxnPX2JVvTTR8A7Pmzc7A&ved=2ahUKEwi8psDCx6LzAhUeE7kGHUU2Dm0Q9QF6BAgaEAE&biw=1360&bih=625&dpr=1#imgrc=HQ85kKLFGzOcaM O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, unlikely to be own work. Description "reprodução: @juulianapaiva no instagram" indicates an Instagram source. Declared author 'jupaivaspace' does not match the uploader's name. A crop has previously been published online.[69] Verbcatcher (talk) 17:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete From https://www.instagram.com/p/CRcH0Ufnr8i/ Ytoyoda (talk) 12:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced collage. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced photos. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 06:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal artwork. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
shows name of subject, exposing private information Saboisheres (talk) 03:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Name of subject has no value here, and has already been redacted from enwiki history. Brianjd (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- The name of the subject still shows up on google search and links to this image, this image needs to be removed completely from the website ASAP PLEASE Saboisheres (talk) 08:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- There is already an image on commons with the exact image here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hogtied_with_rope.jpg, please remove this image as it is redundant and contains personally identifiable information Saboisheres (talk) 09:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a redundant image; it is a redirect. Brianjd (talk) 09:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, by Yann today. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
No CC license. Screenshot on youtube. The video feed is not CC copyright. The file is a screenshot from the licensed video. YR-MASTER (talk) 00:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose OP is simply trolling or being disruptive. Image is already reviewed. For context, there is a ongoing edit war happening on w:en:Taeyeon hence I suspect and assumed, this is related. — Paper9oll 01:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose But where is the evidence. In fact, you don't really have a license for this photo. I suspect you are in cahoots. The wiki should be free and honest, all I've broken is the edit war. But you cannot cancel my request without substantiating the evidence. And they are not there, because there is no license. I will write in requests to administrators if you do not take fair measures and do not post a neutral photo that does not violate copyright. YR-MASTER (talk) 01:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @YR-MASTER I have added the archived source and the license is there as specified, it has since been changed to more restrictive licensing. Creative Commons licensing are non-revocable. — Paper9oll 01:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Paper9oll: Wayback Archive and trusted reviewer confirmed license. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No CC license. Screenshot on youtube. The video feed is not CC copyright. The file is a screenshot from the licensed video. YR-MASTER (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Oppose OP is simply trolling or being disruptive. Image is already reviewed. For context, there is a ongoing edit war happening on w:en:Taeyeon hence I suspect and assumed, this is related. — Paper9oll 01:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Wayback Archive and trusted reviewer confirmed license at time of upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Dubious license claim. From 1988 book, no reason why it would be cc-by-sa-4.0. Person showed died in 1931 so 1988 is not the actual date of photo, but as person shown died in 1931 not old enough to be established as PD without more information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Author Sharakhmedov Khamdam, permission required ВоскобойниковВ (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder in the metadata; need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Significant reproduction of w:Grande Arche; there is no commercial FOP in France Caehlla2357 (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, looks like thumbnail screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as nominator did not provide evidence. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I transferred it from English Wikipedia and I don't think 3 colour flag can be tagged as copyvio since the design is too simple and should be tagged as public domain. *angys* (talk) 09:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:*angys*, PD-shape. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of usage of flag, potentially fake. District council website also does not show the flag. EmpAhmadK (talk) 14:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Sadads (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject in this photo. Requires COM:VRT permission from the original photographer. ✗plicit 07:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhinav0000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has been uploading copyrighted images under CC-BY license. I haven't been able to find the source for this, but have tagged others as copyvio. Bringing here to delete until provenance is proved.
—SpacemanSpiff 07:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Is not public domain. Also can't be used commercially Dajasj (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- supprt deletion copyright violation. Shadow4dark (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicated picture of File:Paseo Escuela de Wikicronistas - Escúllar 20210915 09.jpg —Ismael Olea (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Since this is a living person according to [70], clippings like this can't be used. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
blurry, many better files San Giorgio Maggiore seen from the Punta della Dogana (Venice) Oursana (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry many better files San Giorgio Maggiore seen from the Punta della Dogana (Venice) Oursana (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Text snipped without any use for project, unused since six years. Fl.schmitt (talk) 14:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Photo of another photo - unless central photo can be shown to be free licensed, should at least be blurred, if not whole image deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Lechitic Church Slavonic chronic of Pomeranian Serbs Wolin2.jpg
- File:Żywopis Sirbskiej Pomorskiej Ziemie last page.jpg
Another hoax by User:Kriestofvo Nysian. According to the library link this book is something completely different from what it's claimed to be. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Erotic painting from user with 1 edit, from deleted article about "modern" painter. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 22:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Why was this even approved in the first place? The centre figure should be the statue which the photo should show complete with the inscription. Some random guy is standing right in the way of it which defeats the purpose of this photo being featured on any articles. VTCS (talk) 23:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed the file from w:en:Catholic Church in Canada, where I thought its use was inappropriate, and I have uploaded a crop as File:Statue of Mary at St Michaels Cathedral Toronto.jpg. I do not now object to deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but murals fall into category "graphic works", which are regrettably not covered by the UK's freedom-of-panorama exception. If they are considered to be above threshold of originality, a permission by the painter/artist is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Same problem with:
- File:Tennents Brewery, Glasgow (geograph 4302456).jpg
- File:John Street puppets mural (geograph 4861666).jpg
- File:Big cat, Maryhill (geograph 5570874).jpg
- File:Strathclyde University Wonderwall (geograph 4271741).jpg
- File:Strathclyde University Wonderwall (geograph 4272485).jpg
- File:Strathclyde University Wonderwall (geograph 4272467).jpg
- File:Demolition site, Muirhouse Crescent (geograph 2237597).jpg
- File:Under the M8 Kingston Bridge (geograph 2905308).jpg
- File:Maryhill Road - Glasgow (geograph 4643112).jpg
- File:"The Model Boat" Mural, Purdon Street (geograph 5876180).jpg
- File:2014 Commonwealth Games murals, Partick (geograph 3678383).jpg
- File:Mural art by the River Kelvin (geograph 3189667).jpg
- File:Graffiti style murals at Eastvale Place (geograph 5858376).jpg
- File:SWG3, Eastvale Place (geograph 5858356).jpg
- File:Graffiti style murals at Eastvale Place (geograph 5858371).jpg
- File:The Barras Pirate (geograph 5438421).jpg
- File:Site of First Hampden Park at Hampden Bowling Club (Watson).jpg
- File:Site of First Hampden Park at Hampden Bowling Club (Campbell).jpg
- File:Aberdeen Wall Art.jpg
- File:Invergordon railway station 2017, 7246.jpg
- File:Ibrox Stadium (geograph 5756485).jpg
- File:Ibrox Stadium (geograph 5756481).jpg
- File:Mural at Tennents Wellpark Brewery, Duke Street, Glasgow (geograph 3963443).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I have added {{Delete}} templates to these additional images and notified their uploaders. --bjh21 (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Seems to be a problematic file. Was tagged by Bluemask as "missing permission" as it bears the photographer credit "Carlito Scholz", during the time it was titled "File:Rizal Monument.jpg" (different from the current decent image by TheCoffee). A look on its history indicates it was transferred from enwiki, and on the file logs there it reveals that it was uploaded by Yournecs (probably Yournecs~commonswiki (talk · contribs), but it was soon deleted there because of the same deletion reason (no permission). See also w:User talk:Yournecs#Image permission problem with Image:Rizal_Monument.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Info I just nominated for deletion too a widely-used file uploaded by the same uploader: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue of Dr. Jose Rizal at the Luneta Park, Philippines.png. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Same as her twitter photo - https://twitter.com/iraideia/photo - i think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrefowles (talk · contribs)
[edit]File:Andre Fowles.jpg EXIF shows "Author Michael Condran Copyright holder mausfilms inc.". OTRS permission from mausfilms needed. The second file is a variant of the first.
MKFI (talk) 10:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
![10:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-Kosov_vladimir_09071967-2021-09-28T10:44:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Паллада"_В.Косов_60х100_х.м.2016_г.jpg){kind=link}
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
![13:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-Kosov_vladimir_09071967-2021-10-31T13:45:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Паллада"_В.Косов_60х100_х.м.2016_г.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal artwork. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![00:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-P199-2021-11-16T00:11:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Паллада"_В.Косов_60х100_х.м.2016_г.jpg){kind=link}
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
![10:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-Kosov_vladimir_09071967-2021-09-28T10:45:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Мир"_В.Косов_35х60_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
![13:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-Kosov_vladimir_09071967-2021-10-31T13:43:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Мир"_В.Косов_35х60_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal artwork. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![00:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/28#c-P199-2021-11-16T00:11:00.000Z-File:Фрегат_"Мир"_В.Косов_35х60_х.м._2015_г.jpg){kind=link}
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal artwork. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
не соответствует политике размещения на страницах Википедии Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal artwork. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader's claim to be the author is dubious; image is most likely a copyright violation Sangdeboeuf (talk) 11:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France. The sculpture in the front is copyrighted. The building behind it is also copyrighted. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The photo is likely not Lejanomd (talk · contribs)'s self-photographed image. Too small resolution and no metadata. Furthermore, the old version of the image shows a white letterbox running across the bottom, indicating this must have come from somewhere else. This is the only contribution of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Books cover. Autorization needed.
- File:Gouverner les conduites.jpg
- File:Le designl objet dans l usage.jpg
- File:Lac onsommation engagee 2nd.jpg
- File:Lac onsommation engagee 2ned.jpg
- File:Ethical Consumption.jpg
- File:Le biais comportementaliste.jpg
- File:Juger pour échanger.jpg
- File:Consommation Engagée1.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright information in small below the picture: (C) Microsoft and Navteq - hence copyvio Enyavar (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:37, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright information in small below the picture: (C) Microsoft and Navteq - hence copyvio Enyavar (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:37, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Krüper's Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi), Achladeri Forest, Lesvos, Greece, 16.04.2015 (18101113971).jpg
[edit],_Achladeri_Forest,_Lesvos,_Greece,_16.04.2015_(18101113971).jpg){kind=link}
,_Achladeri_Forest,_Lesvos,_Greece,_16.04.2015_(18101113971).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exact duplicate (imported on Sep 2021) of the file: File:Krüper's Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi), Achladeri Forest, Lesvos, Greece, 16.04.2015 (2).jpg (imported in 2015) Totodu74 (talk) 12:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
,_Achladeri_Forest,_Lesvos,_Greece,_16.04.2015_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, cant be cc Victorgrigas (talk) 13:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment claimed license certainly false. If someone wishes to check copyright registration/renewal for 3 September 1965 New York Journal American newspaper, might be out of copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
uploaded by blocked sock; appears to be a selfie by the celebrity not "own work" by a third person Bri (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Link given is not the original source. No proof of release under a free license. CentreLeftRight ✉ 17:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Belarus does not acknowlege Freedom of Panorama and the airport's architecture - which is protected - is much too visible. 2001:A61:3A6F:2301:B9ED:FA5F:BE92:AFF 20:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
The licence of the photo was confirmed in the earlier deletion request, but the copyright of the underlying work was not considered. The monument is clearly the main subject (and not architecture) and thus not covered by Finnish FoP. LPfi (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The designer Eila Hiltunen died in 2003. --Fundacja Nomos (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
L'artiste dont c'est le portrait, Baptiste-Florian MARLE-OUVRARD, demande la suppression de cette image. 2A01:CB18:81DB:E800:811C:ECE3:75D1:E0E9 14:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don’t know why Mr. Marle-Ouvrard requests that this photo be deleted. I took it on July 22, 2012, just after his organ recital at Cucuron. I asked him to pose for me, which he willingly did. I do not remember for certain if I asked him if I intended it for his Wikipedia page. Likely I did, for I knew at the time that the German Wikipedia, unlike the French one, had an article on him. I uploaded my picture on the Commons on July 23, 2012, and used it in the German Wikipedia on the same day. It is still there. Until today I did not know there is now a page on him in the French Wikipedia. I see it was created on April 5, 2015, by "Manastirile", who used my picture. (Strictly speaking, "Manastirile" created this French Wikipedia article in four steps, from 15:31 till 15:41 and the picture in his third step, at 15:36.) My picture stayed in the French Wikipedia article until September 24, 2021, when "Phponcon" (doubtless Mr. Philippe Ponçon) replaced it by a more recent (December 24, 2016) VeraUndritzPhotography one from Mr. Marle-Ouvrard’s personal collection, justifying this replacement by writing "modification [sic, Polla ta deina] de la photo de Baptiste-Florian MARLE-OUVRARD, avec son accord". — Conclusion: The presence of my photo on WikimediaCommons is legitimate. It was taken with Mr. Marle-Ouvrard's explicit permission on the occasion of a public performance. There cannot be a problem of privacy. Apart from Mr. Marle-Ouvrard's preference for another picture in the French Wikipedia article on him, there seems to be no reason to delete my picture of Mr. Marle-Ouvrard from the Commons. Polla ta deina (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per comment above, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
because can not upload in edit wikipedia page G M LONE HISTORY (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment That is not a reason for deletion. Is it within project scope? Someone who can read Arabic may wish to take a look. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: should be in wiki-markup, but in use currently. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
False license and authorship claims. Looks like it may well be PD-Old, but information needed to establish true source and license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Subject of photo requests deletion of this image. Per edit to file: "Please remove this photo. I have not approved the use of this photo for my Wikipedia bio. Jodi Benson" Johnj1995 (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion because several close alternatives are available. Redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]The mosque was completed in 1978 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2055.
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal TMnr 20018358.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee TMnr 20018349.jpg
- File:Eid ul-Fitr Family Istiqlal Mosque Jakarta.JPG
- File:Eid ul-Fitr morning Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (1).jpg - Keep but needs cropping JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- File:Istiqlal Mosque banner.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Front of Al Fattah Gate.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Jakarta.jpg
- File:Istiqlal mosque.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque; 2007.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-02a.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-03a.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal 2016 Bennylin 01.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal dan Kemayoran - panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal.jpg
- File:Mesjid Istiqlal.jpg
- File:Mosque Of Freedom.jpg
- File:Mosque-IMG 3537.JPG
- File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg - Keep but revdel. The rest images: Delete JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I object to this proposal to delete this image, because it's shared for non-commercial and educational purposes and the freedom of panorama in Indonesia acknowledges this. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.148.91.183 (talk) 14:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @85.148.91.183: Non-commerical use was not accepted on Commons. Please read Commons:Licensing for further info. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg was cropped. --Taterian (talk) 00:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
On hold Due to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque. --Liuxxinyu970226 (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)- I propose to nuke all pictures of buildings in Indonesia, until each uploader of said subject can proof that they have read our Commons:Licensing and provides the exact building completion date, the name and date of death of their architects, before they upload; and fully understand the copyright crime they committed if they didn't do so. Bennylin (yes?) 13:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also this. Why does this even need to be discussed again and again and again and again and again? Just get done with them already. Bennylin (yes?)
- @Bennylin: perhaps these uploaders thought Commons can host educational-only content. Well that doesn't comply with COM:L#Acceptable licenses. Fortunately this is a building, and half (not all) can be moved to enwiki under restricted tag FoP-USonly. Not all because enwiki is not supposed to imitate Commons as it is not a repository in the first place (the reason why it has only three or four Burj Khalifa images). But recourse to enwiki is not indefinite: enwiki disallows images of copyrighted sculptures unless a few of them shall be uploaded and complying with enwiki's fair use guidelines. For these files, Delete all (except 2 images) as forum now archived at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area. Consensus remains: no Commons-acceptable or commercial FOP in Indonesia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- The two images are File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (1).jpg and File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg, which may be COM:De minimis. But File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (1).jpg may need to be cropped so that most of the upper half of the mosque will be gone for good, to focus more on the people. The new question: is the cropped image removing a copyrighted building still useful or not? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: If buildings are off-limit, how about people like here: File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg? --Taterian (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: taking photos and publishing them under commercial licensing is different from touring by dignitaries. Both are different things. And the main aim of the image is the persons depicted, not the building which is not the main focus (plus the façade is not wholly shown). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Thank you for your note. Does it mean that the image in question stays, or I need to remove background completely? --Taterian (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: the image is fine for me. The focus is on the people and not the mosque which is now in the background. However, since I noticed a while ago that this is a cropped version, the previous versions must be revision deleted (revdel), while leaving the current cropped version intact. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Thank you for your answer, regarding deleting the previous versions, yes, I know, this is a common practice. --Taterian (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: the image is fine for me. The focus is on the people and not the mosque which is now in the background. However, since I noticed a while ago that this is a cropped version, the previous versions must be revision deleted (revdel), while leaving the current cropped version intact. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Thank you for your note. Does it mean that the image in question stays, or I need to remove background completely? --Taterian (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Taterian: taking photos and publishing them under commercial licensing is different from touring by dignitaries. Both are different things. And the main aim of the image is the persons depicted, not the building which is not the main focus (plus the façade is not wholly shown). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: If buildings are off-limit, how about people like here: File:Touring the Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the First Lady and Grand Imam Ali Mustafa Yaqub, November 10, 2010.jpg? --Taterian (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No COM:FOP Indonesia. Agree with keep but revdel of the last one. -M.nelson (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]More files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]Incomplete list and deletion. Please finish what you've started. We shall not stop the purge until there's no more Istiqlal images in Commons. And I hope we have some capable admin that will delete these files as soon as possible, not waiting 6 months like the request above. Bennylin (yes?) 12:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Are you really deleting an entire category of files? You should probbaly review the files more carefully then. For example, the reasoning you gave for the mass deletions was that "there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia". Which is true. However, I'd argue that a lot of the files aren't panorama's. For example, File:Mihrab of Istiqlal Mosque, Jakarta Indonesia.jpg doesn't show a panorama, this includes other files such as File:Wudu Istiqlal Mosque.JPG and File:Istiqlal Mosque Wudhu (Ablution).JPG. Cheers, The man from Gianyar (talk) 14:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Reasoning as per OP:
- The mosque was completed in 1978 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2055.
- File:Ruangan utama Masjid Istiqlal Juni 2021.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020666, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020667, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020674, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20020684, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Henk van Rinsum, 1980.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20023588, Dia, 'Schoolkinderen bij de Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Jaap de Jonge, 02-1993 - 03-1993.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20023596, Dia, 'De Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Jaap de Jonge, 02-1993 - 03-1993.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw en de kathedraal TMnr 20025717.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Gezicht vanaf het Nationaal Monument (Monas) richting Lapangan Banteng TMnr 20025716.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Het hoofdpostkantoor met op de achtergrond de Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw TMnr 20018028.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Istiqlal 20025716-20025717 merged.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Schoolkinderen bij de Istiqlal moskee TMnr 20018350.jpg
- File:Eid ul-Fitr prayer Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Fountain Istiqlal Mosque Monas background.JPG
- File:Fountain Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Minaret.JPG
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-03.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal - Panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid Istiqlal 2.jpg
- File:Mesjid agung di lihat dari monas - panoramio.jpg
- File:Muslim girls at Istiqlal Mosque jakarta.png
- File:Prasasti Peresmian Masjid Istiqlal tahun 1978-Pintu-As-Salaam.jpg
- File:Ruang 66 BP4 Pusat.jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Pays Tribute to Islamic Faith During Visit to Istiqlal Mosque (12555626943).jpg
- File:View to the northeast from Monas.jpg
- File:Stamps of Indonesia, 082-08.jpg
_richting_Lapangan_Banteng_TMnr_20025716.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
More files in Category:Interior of Istiqlal Mosque
[edit]- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-06.jpg
- File:Barack Obama and Michelle Obama at the Istiqlal Mosque, Jakarta, Indonesia, Nov. 10, 2010.jpg
- File:Bedug at Istiqlal Mosque.jpg
- File:Collectie NMvWereldculturen, TM-20023594, Dia, 'Interieur van de Istiqlal moskee', fotograaf Paul Romijn, 02-1993 - 03-1993.jpg
- File:Eid ul-Fitr prayer Istiqlal Mosque women section.JPG
- File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (2).jpg
- File:Istiqlal Interior.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 1.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 2.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 3.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 4.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Eid ul Fitr Jamaah 5.JPG
- File:Istiqlal Mosque interior.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Minbar (cropped).jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Minbar.jpg
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Reciting Al Quran.JPG
- Voted to be kept by Yann.
- File:Istiqlal Mosque Wudhu (Ablution).JPG
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-01.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-01a.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-04.jpg
- File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-05.jpg
- File:Jamaah Solat Ied Istiqlal.jpg
- File:Mihrab of Istiqlal Mosque, Jakarta Indonesia.jpg
- File:Roof of Grand Domed Prayer Hall in Istiqlal Mosque (12555508735).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Applauded After Banging Gong at Istiqlal Mosque (12555507775).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Bids Farewell to Female Students at Istiqlal Mosque (12555993344).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Signs Guest Book at Istiqlal Mosque (12555626353).jpg
- File:Wudu Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
@Bennylin: are you trying to make a point here? I clicked some of the images and none of them contain a deletion template and quite a few of them don't even include the mosque. In the current state this whole section should just be closed. Multichill (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just in the nick of time. I've only recently know about VisualFileChange to make a mass deletion request. Please check the files again. Thanks. Bennylin (yes?) 20:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Bennylin: before this you were just being pointy, but just tagging blanketly all the images in a category for deletion without checking is clearly disruptive. Multichill (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Bennylin: Please review the files more carefully. Files like File:Istiqlal Mosque Reciting Al Quran.JPG should be OK. The subject here is the people, not the architecture. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think we in Commons should rather err on the side of deletion. I'm just nominating files on the category, with the same deletion criteria as per nom. You may vote to keep, crop, or other things for the files you think should stay, but for every files with potential of breaking the law, there should be at least someone who would vote/vouch for it to be kept. Shouldn't the admin act more promptly on these matter? You pick one or two examples, but there are dozens on my list that are clearly infringing the rights of the architect. I don't know what to make of your hesitation. Bennylin (yes?) 09:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- We got a notice at Wikivoyage that File:WV banner Indonesian phrasebook - Mosque.jpg had been nominated for deletion. I don't see it anywhere on this page. If it's not nominated for deletion, revert the deletion notice from its page. If it is nominated for deletion, you had better state that plainly and give us time to upload it locally, but the focus of that banner is the people within the space, not really the architecture except to provide a sense of place and an appropriate setting for a phrasebook (not actually currently the Indonesian phrasebook but the Sundanese phrasebook). It's a little irritating to have Wikivoyage pagebanners nominated for deletion just because they're in some category or other, but if you all really decide to delete this pagebanner, we'll host it locally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks! Bennylin (yes?) 09:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Info the designer of the mosque was architect Fredrich Silaban who died in 1984 as per [71]. Thus, 1984+70 years+1 year (to complete the calendar) = January 1, 2055 (day on which this Silaban artwork falls in public domain). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep
[edit]- Mosque is not the subject
- File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Het_hoofdpostkantoor_met_op_de_achtergrond_de_Istiqlal_moskee_in_aanbouw_TMnr_20018028.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Gezicht_vanaf_het_Nationaal_Monument_(Monas)_richting_Lapangan_Banteng_TMnr_20025716.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw en de kathedraal TMnr 20025717.jpg
- File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Istiqlal 20025716-20025717 merged.jpg
- File:Fountain_Istiqlal_Mosque_Monas_background.JPG
- File:Fountain Istiqlal Mosque.JPG
- File:Stamps of Indonesia, 082-08.jpg
- Lidewij (talk) 10:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- also
- File:Secretary Kerry Pays Tribute to Islamic Faith During Visit to Istiqlal Mosque (12555626943).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Applauded After Banging Gong at Istiqlal Mosque (12555507775).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Bids Farewell to Female Students at Istiqlal Mosque (12555993344).jpg
- File:Secretary Kerry Signs Guest Book at Istiqlal Mosque (12555626353).jpg
- File:Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the Istiqlal Masjid in Jakarta (2).jpg
- File:Bedug at Istiqlal Mosque.jpg
- Lidewij (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- If the claim is that the architectural design of the mosque is protected by copyright, then the infringing image would have to at least show that. Many of these (look at File:Secretary Kerry Applauded After Banging Gong at Istiqlal Mosque (12555507775).jpg, File:Secretary Kerry Bids Farewell to Female Students at Istiqlal Mosque (12555993344).jpg) are clearly de minimis and don't show anything of the architectural design.
- Then images such as File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Het hoofdpostkantoor met op de achtergrond de Istiqlal moskee in aanbouw TMnr 20018028.jpg might record the construction of the mosque, but again they don't infringe upon the design. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep everything that isn’t solely of the building itself (i.e. everything where there are people or other buildings prominently featured). Indiscriminate bad faith nomination. The quality images should be transferred to Wikipedia so they can still be used. Stop wasting people’s time. Dronebogus (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept various images: DM, or no copyrightable elements visibel. Stamp is PD-IDGov. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as nominator did not provide evidence. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: insufficent reason for deletion. Not found using TinEye or Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation of the depicted sculpture. In the Indonesian embassy in Washington DC, unclear which law applies, but there is no applicable freedom of panorama in either jurisdiction, see COM:FOP Indonesia and COM:FOP US. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Also delete the scaled-down version File:Embassy of Indonesia Saraswati Statue.jpg, already nominated in Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sculpture of Saraswati at the Embassy of Indonesia, Washington, D.C.jpg, another photo of the same sculpture. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation of the depicted sculpture. In the Indonesian embassy in Washington DC, unclear which law applies, but there is no applicable freedom of panorama in either jurisdiction, see COM:FOP Indonesia and COM:FOP US. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saraswati Sarasvati Swan Sculpture.jpg, another photo of the same sculpture. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Whoops, I guess you're right. Delete as necessary, no argument from me, but a hearty middle finger to the insane copyright laws of both nations. —diff (talk) 22:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Missing license for performance/recording. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source given on Youtube does not show a free licence. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
커먼스 저작권 정책에 위배됨. Comoelto (talk) 02:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Source website, https://www.assembly.go.kr/assm/userMain/main.do is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
커먼스 저작권 정책에 위배됨. Comoelto (talk) 02:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, source website is not available. Deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as nominator did not provide evidence. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unless it can be shown to be PD in source country; I much doubt that the uploader is the actual copyright holder. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. And per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was Kamon's previous Kamon, which symbolized Matsuda of the Matsuda family, and this file is a Kamon that no longer exists when it is not used. Gameposo (talk) 11:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep. Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per remark. --Ellywa (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This file is not Gamon. The basic colors are black and white. But this gamon doesn't exist and this file doesn't symbolize anything. It is a file that is considered to be deleted and is confirmed as a PD's own file. I request to delete the file. The color should be black and white. Gameposo (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
