Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 16th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ams (114529735).jpeg

[edit]

fukkkkkkk 2A01:B747:11E:344:2169:78D9:FA2A:AF99 02:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 07:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beluai 2nd Assembly.svg

[edit]

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby Kirigaya profile.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|1=I uploaded it for the first time.Therefore, I uploaded it by mistake.Please delete it.}} 夏の夜にコーヒーを (talk) 12:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BobbyKirigaya profile.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|1=I uploaded it for the first time.Therefore, I uploaded it by mistake.Please delete it.}} 夏の夜にコーヒーを (talk) 12:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rouven Lotz vor dem Emil Schumacher Museum..jpg

[edit]

Versehentlich fertiggestellt. Ich wollte hier nur einen Test mit dem Bild machen und habe keine Erlaubnis des Fotografen/Urhebers zur Verwendung. Ich bitte den Umstand zu entschuldigen und das Bild zu löschen. Sheng-Yuan (talk) 17:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Assisi roccamaggiore.jpg

[edit]

Because it is Nonsense BurhanzaiNoorzai (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image4-visualdeformation.jpg

[edit]

This photo has been used for vandalism on English Wikipedia. The title and description is inappropriate and I can't see the photo having any value or potential use. Liz (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 06:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Azaras 2021-09-09 2123Z.jpg

[edit]

Unsourced OR upload from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Azaras 2021-09-10 2424Z.jpg

[edit]

Unsourced OR upload from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BRYCE FINAL 2018-07-16 07-16-38 Moment - Copy.jpg

[edit]

Clearly a fake image. Figures from two separate images superimposed on the same background. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NathanLane-StateTheatreEaston-Dabour-028 - Copy - Copy (3) - Copy - Copy.jpg

[edit]

Fraudulent image. Clearly (and badly) photoshopped to add logo to background. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P-9P1-MGY-5CJ - Copy.jpg

[edit]

Badly photoshopped to add logo of non-existent show in the background. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georgiou with van Straten.png

[edit]

Delete obviously manipulated photo. No useful purpose. Binksternet (talk) 18:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Look carefully at her hair on the sides of her face. Looks like the Cookie Monster took bites out of the sides. Also, his shirt is poorly edited by his left shoulder. And just below his belt on his right hip you can see poor blending between him and her. --Rsjaffe (talk) 18:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it's either a hoax or a very bad job by the junior Photoshop intern. Both individuals in the pic appear to have been shot against another background, then pasted here. Possibly (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rudd.png

[edit]

Obvious manipulation of background for promotion. Not useful for any purpose. Binksternet (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2018 Vandervoort.jpg

[edit]

Photoshopped, a hoax Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I have to agree that it appears to be fabricated. it's quite a good job, but if you look at the right hand side edges of his body, it becomes clear. Their shoes also do not seem to sink into the shag carpet.Possibly (talk) 20:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Allstedt, St. Johannes Baptist (24).jpg

[edit]

schlechte Bildqualität Wanda Tiga (talk) 07:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Albersroda, St. Magnus (06).jpg

[edit]

schlechte Bildqualität Wanda Tiga (talk) 07:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Makam Sultan Babullah.jpg

[edit]

Beschreibung und Kategorie fehlt Wanda Tiga (talk) 07:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:深圳机场塔台.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: FEHLT Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Allstedt, St. Johannes Baptist (27).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: Fehlerhaft, unvollständig BESCHREIBUNG: Fehlerhaft, unvollständig Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wynwood, Miami, US (3).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miami Design District, Miami, US (2).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pemandangan Kota Soreang.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:USU A sign.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bal Harbour, Miami, US.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bal Harbour, Miami, US (2).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Holy Trinity Church 43 Morgan Street E3 5AA.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gates and Boundary Wall, Tower Hamlets Cemetery Park E3 4PX.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boundary Wall To Tower Hamlets Cemetery E3 4NA.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boundary Wall Tower Hamlets Cemetery.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tomb of Ellen Llewellyn.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Verstehe ich nicht. I see. Ich sehe Beschriebung/Description = Tomb of Ellen Llewellyn

Koennen Sie mir bitte helfen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjamesberglen (talk • contribs) 10:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A fairy tale.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ural-375 Vojske Srbije 3.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ural-375 Vojske Srbije 4.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ural-375 Vojske Srbije 5.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ural-375 Vojske Srbije.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FAP-2026.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raketni sistem M-77 Oganj 2.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paseo Bravo Nicolás Bravo (cropped).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a valid reason to delete a photograph. --Luisalvaz (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paseo Bravo Independencia (cropped).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a valid reason to delete a pfotograph. --Luisalvaz (talk) 16:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juan Cruz Sol.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehl 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mural Juan Cruz Sol.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I Google translated the message and it says "LABEL: missing". If there is no reasoning to delete, then, we should close this.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:23 Rhondda Grove E3 5AP.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Freon 134a refrigerant for car AC 001 (cropped).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Siecino zachodniopomorskie Polska 2021.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bierzwnica kościół Zachodniopomorskie Polska.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kohlerhutte nahe Hengstberg Gleichen Gottingen-Northeimer Wald-001.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep no reason for deletion. --Mosbatho (talk) 10:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know that missing coordinates are tedious. The Wikimedia Commons App I started to use allows upload without coordinates, maybe to facilitate upload. Years ago I always added coordinates to the uploaded photos, unfortunately, I do not find where to add them here. These are the coordinates to the photo: 51.51162/10.07130. Sipalius (talk) 21:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kohlerhutte nahe Hengstberg Gleichen Gottingen-Northeimer Wald-002.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehl 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Infotafel Alte Niedeck01.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Infotafel Alte Niedeck02 Detail Karte.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wegweiserstein auf dem Kronenberg ehemals Burgstelle Alte Niedeck.jpg

[edit]

KOORDINATEN:fehlt unscharfes Bild 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clearly given, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. Use {{Location possible}}. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:А.Я. Школьник на открытии фестиваля Бумеранг.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clearly given, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. Use {{Location possible}} if the coord. are missing. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:А.В.Джеус на открытии фестиваля Бумеранг.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clearly given, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alu tomato diye parse machher patla jhol.jpg

[edit]

BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clear, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:محطة جار د ميتز ڤيل.jpg

[edit]

schlechte Bildqualität Wanda Tiga (talk) 07:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Makam Sultan Babullah 2.jpg

[edit]

es ist nur ein Detail kein vollständiges Bild Wanda Tiga (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Julio Prestes de Albuquerque

[edit]

the Julio Prestes category already exists — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axônios (talk • contribs) 01:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Dani Carvajal

[edit]

Duplicated category. Already existing one {{Category:Daniel Carjaval}} Seen here. --Brgesto (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cartoon of girl.png

[edit]

Uploaded and used solely for vandalism. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 08:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PBB Kids 3.png

[edit]

Used only for Vandalism. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:360° Wikimania 2017 Hackerthon photo.jpg

[edit]

COM:FOP Canada. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am not sure that a lack of Canadian FOP would apply here as any public works captured in this image are clearly incidental to the picture. I am not familiar with Canadian copyright law on this matter, perhaps now is a good time to become familiar, but I can say that in my experience of South African law on the matter (which I am well acquainted with) has a Fair Dealing provision that gives exception for works that might be captured in other works (such as the 360 picture here) that are incidental to the image. South Africa and Canada share a very similar legislative history on many issues having inherited so much of our legislation from the United Kingdom such as Copyright law so it is not unreasonable to expect similarities to exist here as well. Since it is clear that the focus of the work in question (360 image) are the participants at Wikimania it would seem like an excessive application of copyright coverage should such an exception for incidental works (like the facades of buildings which I assume is the supposed copyright issue in question here) exist.--Discott (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiLoverFan1007 Out of curiosity, what exactly is the supposed FOP infringement here? Is it the facades of the buildings in the background?--Discott (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PBB Kids 6.png

[edit]

Fake Image. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FileUssrportal2.png

[edit]

Delete per COM:SCOPE. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep INUSE Andy Dingley (talk) 09:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Video defect.png

[edit]

Darkness. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 07:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep INUSE and relevant. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo del Instituto Tecnologico de China.svg

[edit]

It is not a Simple Logo and Doubtful Own Claim. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 08:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There is no "own claim" here. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ruiz 1.jpg

[edit]

Dark Image. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 08:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo – Parti communiste français (2018).svg

[edit]

Not a simple logo and Doubtful own claim. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 10:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep False nomination. There is no "own claim" here. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo igem ITTG.svg

[edit]

Not a simple logo and doubtful own claim: Bad SVG Image. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep False nomination, there is no "own claim" here. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Australia.svg

[edit]

Superseded by File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 10:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use and different image. --Achim (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Achim.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Achim55. Bidgee (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per Achim. SHB2000 (talk) 06:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Wait no. Where's the Commonwealth star for File:Flag of Australia.svg? That current file is not the Australian flag. SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The two files have different colours of blue. Flag of Australia.svg uses 280C, which seems be correct according to w:Flag of Australia while Flag of Australia (converted).svg uses a darker blue, but has the Commonwealth star. Ground Zero (talk) 00:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:SHB2000: Looks like a SVG code issue when converted into PNG for thumbnails but it is there in the SVG file. Bidgee (talk) 01:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. Makes sense. In that case, then  Keep SHB2000 (talk) 01:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Although the Commonwealth star is still not appearing in pages like this. SHB2000 (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Flag of Australia.svg just needa to be reverted to the 2013 version when the Commonwealth star displayed, but the file is protected (so a sysop or higher needs to do this). Bidgee (talk) 01:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WikiLoverFan1007, who do you think "Superseded by x" is a deletion rationale for a flag image? You realize a country can historically have many versions of their flag, right, and that we would want images of every historical flag of every country? So could you clarify the reason you'd propose to delete a file that's in wide use around the Wikisphere, rather than just starting a discussion on the talk pages of these two files about how they can best be used? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WLF1007 appears to now have been blocked as a VOA by Yann. SHB2000 (talk) 10:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Two Statues Gugulethu Seven Memorial.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP South Africa. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 13:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LegalPictureOfTheLouvreAndThePyramid.jpg

[edit]

Although there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, This picture is showing the Louvre Pyramid resembling the Gizah Pyramid. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 15:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tegljač FAP-3040.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Andrej Danković (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ND REDIRECTED THE OTHER. --JuTa 02:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flesiot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three of this user's uploads have been deleted as proven copyvios. The rest of the images have wildly inconsistent metadata and do not seem to be the work of one person. They should be deleted per COM:PRP absent a plausible explanation and/or evidence of own work.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia fan 1.jpg

[edit]

Useless image, attempt at xwiki disruption by an LTA sock already blocked at enwiki. JavaHurricane 03:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; copyright violation. --Ahmadtalk 14:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rastāxiz-e kalamāt-kadkani.jpg

[edit]

تکراری است. Parpak (talk) 03:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It was, as User:Parpak pointed out, a duplicate of File:Rastāxiz-e kalamāt.jpg, but I deleted both of them because they were copyright violations. Please note that fair use is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. --Ahmadtalk 14:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bernardii.png

[edit]

Swiped from Pinterest via Google. Sumanuil (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 14:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marcela-terremoto-foro.jpg

[edit]

Low quality, blurry image of a person. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kapil lamsal.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ketan Pandey.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kevinabct.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KUMARESAN.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lingom felix.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lirico callejero .jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marollie 48h.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matteo da piccolo.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Md Nayan Hossain.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Md. Ibrahim Islam Picture.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yomamadarius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion, out of project scope. No contributions to any wm project. Commons is neither your personal free web host nor a vehicle to promote your career.

Achim (talk) 19:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kingdom of Bir Tawil.jpg

[edit]

Hoax nation; see w:Bir Tawil#Claims. I don't see how the flag of an entirely unrecognised micronation has any educational purpose. Uploaded for and only used in speedily deleted English Wikipedia article w:en:Kingdom of Bir Tawil. Tol | talk | contribs 18:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EasterCross.jpg

[edit]

Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G7}} KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is used. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G11 The image appears to have a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." The white rectangles are all the pages of the copyrighted book. If you download the image and zoom into the top left corner, you can see the copyright notice.}} G11 The image appears to have a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." The white rectangles are all the pages of the copyrighted book. If you download the image and zoom into the top left corner, you can see the copyright notice.} HamRadioOperator73 (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CrossSunset.jpg

[edit]

Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G7}} KetefHinnomFan (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is used. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|G11 The image appears to have the text of a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." If you download the image and zoom into the top of it, you can see the copyright notice.}} G11 The image appears to have the text of a copyrighted book embedded in it. The book is "Reading the Psalms with Luther." If you download the image and zoom into the top of it, you can see the copyright notice HamRadioOperator73 (talk) 23:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:New Saint Gabriel the Archangel Parish Church (J. P. Rizal Street, San Gabriel, New Site, Santa Maria, Bulacan)

[edit]

Contemporary church ("new" St. Gabriel the Archangel Parish Church) that is post-Dec. 1972 but built to resemble an old building. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and architect's permission for use of commercial license over images of his work is still required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Katarungan Village - Daang Hari Road

[edit]

Redundant to those at Category:Daang Hari Road. A few useful ones have been moved there, while some others moved to Category:Jeepneys in Las Piñas.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chairman Abimael Guzman "Gonzalo" of the Communist Party of Peru (PCP).jpg

[edit]

Not Own Work. Image taken from internet Librero2109 (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Nominator is requested to show proof of the existence of the original image this specific image has been taken from before the publishing date. Red1922 (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
https://tineye.com/search/e56b73b7d34fe7e5e709d814e72910ec2e281dee --Nutshinou Talk! 21:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is a different picture. The picture published here was created through modification and not directly extracted from it. The change is observable. Red1922 (talk) 10:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The image is just this one [1] with the used of an AI upscale the image. So not own work.

Deleted Copyviol; false claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toronto Police methods of work.jpg

[edit]

Uploaded and used solely for vandalism. Sumanuil (talk) 05:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Copyright violation: uses screenshots from a copyrighted YouTube video. --Stylez995 (talk) 07:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC) (Edit: shortened sentence. --Stylez995 (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC))[reply]
Support Uploader was engaged in a repetitive vandalism of an English wikipedia page. CaffeinAddict (talk) 21:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Windows Update running on Windows RT.png

[edit]

This is a screenshot of non-free software. 괭이는냥이 (talk) 06:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soviet trucks meme .jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation: main parts of this collage consists of FAMILY GUY comic parts. FAMILY GUY is a copyrighted TV comic series. Mosbatho (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emulator of HP-41CX on iPhone 6s (cropped).jpg

[edit]

erroneous double upload Pittigrilli (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mass Effect logo (2).png

[edit]

Copyright/trademark owned logo. Uploader is not copyright holder. Uploader/Logo can't be released under CC-BY-SA. Originally tagged for Speedy deletion but reverted by User:Billinghurst. Filing manually. -82.23.20.168 11:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Redundant to File:Logo of Mass Effect.png. Deleted and redirected. --clpo13(talk) 17:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MaMoMa.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 12:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 17:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sep17 Woman of the Day.png

[edit]

Dubious - can you work out the source of this image Victuallers (talk) 12:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you work out the source of this image? No? How about I tell you that its from en:wiki screenshots.. can you work it out now. If is said that there is insufficient information to do this. Moreover the lack of information is so tremendous that this image and by implications hundreds more banners about leading women should be deleted. It is discussed here and on the talkpage linked within the Village Pump discussion. Victuallers (talk) 12:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Provisional Delete The page as it stands should be deleted as it does not meet our requirements. However, there is a fairly simple fix that can be applied. I will first explain my justification for supporting the deletion and then propose a solution.
  1. The current image incorporates text from unspecified Wikipedia articles. We don't know which Wikipedia articles were included, which version of Wikipedia they are from (English Wikipedia is not the only Wikipedia including English text) or which version of the articles were used. The claim of "Own work" together with the Creative Commons licence is therefore Commons:License laundering as it fails to address attribution of the creator of the text, as required by en:Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content. Attribution can be provided by a hyperlink to the Wikipedia article, a hyperlink to a stable mirror of the article that is available for free and holds attribution details or a list of the contributors to the article. None of these three options have been used here.
  2. The current image includes an embedded image of a woman with no indication of the source, its copyright status or any terms of redistribution. In this case I was able to identify it as File:Vera Bogdanovskaia.png, which is in the public domain. While this particular example is fine to include, it does add additional work for Commons users and other users of the file to track down the source file to see if the source file supports reuse under the proposed licence. For other examples uploaded by Victuallers that rely on other source images, there may be cases where the new licence does not match with the terms of the source. A simple link to the source image would resolve the problem.
The solution to point 1 would be to include a statement similar to the following: "This image includes text published in the [English] Wikipedia article [insert article name and link] as it appeared at [insert date and time] (UTC). A permanent link to the version of the article included in the image is provided here [insert permanent link to version of the article]."
The solution to point 2 would be to use {{Derived from}} to link to the source image. Ideally, the uploader would have checked that the new licence is compatible with the source licence but, as a minimum, the link allows other Commons users to confirm that the correct licence has been used and either fix the new licence or delete the new file if the source image has an incompatible licence. For cases where a fair use image has been used, all derivative works will probably be deleted from Commons.
Should something similar to my proposed solutions be implemented, my deletion argument can be discounted. From Hill To Shore (talk) 19:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Laundering" is unnecessary and pejorative. The images were assembled by me, with my choice of colouring, layout and angle. It is normal to credit the creator of any new work and then note the contributors (as is done by noting that these are en:wiki screenshots). There is no problem with improving the sourcing in future but there are 600 or more similar images .... as From @Hill To Shore: notes (s)he was easily able to identify the image as File:Vera Bogdanovskaia.png as it the image on the page for en:Vera Bogdanovskaia.png. Its license will be compatible with commons because that is where the image comes from. The date is unimportant as it has been in the PD for some time. (There have been examples where a "fair use" image was on a screenshot and they have been removed.) Hundreds of Wikimedians have checked these images in the last three years. To expect 600 or so images to be re-edited to include information that is implicitly present already is an unreasonable (and some say very labour intensive) request. I am willing to include this information in the future as I have been creating new versions of 40 or 50 of these in the last few months, but this can be requested without the threat of removing these images which are used daily on Twitter and the Women in Red project. The images I have made have been included in other works (e.g. where they were presented at Wikimania presentations - without any comment). Victuallers (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Victuallers: I provided a link to the page at Commons:License laundering. I did not choose the phrase but that is the correct page that explains the type of situation. If you dislike the phrase that editors have chosen, you can always seek consensus to change it. Disliking the phrase does not invalidate the concept it is trying to describe though.
Writing "en:wiki screenshots" is not sufficient as it is not one of the three options in en:Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content. The requirements of that page are fairly basic, so are simple to implement (they don't include the option of "let a user 10 or more years from now try to conduct detective work to find a page that may have been renamed, moved or deleted"; a link will point them to the article, the redirect or the deletion log). In terms of it being too much work, by the time you have completed all of your arguments on this case as to why you don't need to do it, you will have used up more time than it would have taken you to add the link to the 600 images you mention (with all the discussions on your talk page, the village pump and here, you have probably already passed that point). You also don't have to do the work alone; a request for assistance at the village pump or a wikiproject may generate some volunteers to help you.
For derivative works, you need to credit the source authors in some way. You have applied your "sample" case (as you termed it on the village pump) to a derivative work incorporating a PD image, so there are no terms to inherit from that front. However, you do have more complex examples for images released under other licences. It is a basic expectation of Commons that you identify the sources of your derivative works and you are just creating more work for other volunteers to clean up after you. Again, if you ask for help, you will not have to do all of this yourself. However, I for one am not going to assist if you are not accepting of the principle; there is no point in trying to save your images if you are just going to revert the changes later.
My suggested format is not set in stone; it is just one of several methods that could be chosen to meet the requirements. Discussions are continuing at the village pump thread you linked above, so you may want to engage with the discussion if you want your views represented.
As a final note, I have removed the "delete in 7 days" tag from this current image as you have contested the deletion. However, as the series of images were all tagged on 11 September you should probably look at initiating a centralised discussion for the other images (and removing the tags) or they will hit the deletion point tomorrow. @Andel: As the nominator, you may want to comment on that. From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@From Hill To Shore: Laundering may not be your choice of title but it is still pejorative and you can choose to not use it and use other words. Andel tells me that (s)he will help with fixing these image licences, as I will, as they are improved. "if you are just going to revert the changes later" What??? I have no intention of reverting the images after they have been improved ... why would you think that I would? The laundering accusation may be accidental but this assumption that I would revert the good work of others is uncalled for and assumes bad faith on my part. I have asked for help here in clarifying and fixing the situation. If the community decide to allow the deletion to continue despite my good faith offer to help then so be it. I cannot improve my commitment to this project without giving up other tasks such as eating. If they share the bad faith assumption that my objective is (your words) "creating more work for other volunteers" and I am "just going to revert the changes later" then they should delete the images I donated to the project, and give me a site ban. Hyperbole aside, I would like some advice about how I can propose the deletion of every image in [the Category of WIR Banners] as there is no point IMO of just keeping some of the images. I understand that you think that to add a link to the 600 images you mention is an easy task but Andel thinks it a "very labour intensive task" and I agree and I do not know how to do this quickly. If I did then I would not be struggling with his/her request. Victuallers (talk) 12:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Victuallers: Please do not selectively quote what I have said and then accuse me of assuming bad faith. The full sentence was, "I for one am not going to assist if you are not accepting of the principle; there is no point in trying to save your images if you are just going to revert the changes later." The key part of the sentence there is, "if you are not accepting of the principle." If you don't accept the proposed change then we will be heading to an edit war. It is best to discuss first and agree the principle before engaging in conflict. There is no insinuation of bad faith there, so please don't read more into it. If you and Andel have agreed on a solution then it would be useful to link to it. We can then end this unnecessary confrontation. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Selective? Yes I left out the accusation that I was "just going to revert the changes later". This is not intended to be a confrontation, but a deletion request. There are no principals, that I am aware of, that I am not accepting. I am asking for advice. I do not know how to initiate a centralised discussion, as you suggest, apart from posting at the village pump. I am presuming that a deletion request for all the images is the best way to put all these points in one place where the community or interested admins can decide, but maybe you know of a better solution. Victuallers (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is best if I end my participation in this discussion. I have been trying to be helpful but you have been reading things into my replies that aren't there and accusing me of assuming bad faith. If you are going to interpret everything I say in the worst possible way, then it is better if I say nothing further. Happy editing. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: I've improved the sourcing to what I think is an acceptable standard. --bjh21 (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: sourcing and licensing improved per bjh21. --clpo13(talk) 17:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Larry Elder.png

[edit]

It's a screenshot of a youtube video with no clearly articulated public domain rights Mary Samsonite (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Literally read the caption. "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)." Not a hard concept.Pennsylvania2 (talk) 02:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --clpo13(talk) 18:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charles-Michel de Bourbon (Naundorff) duc de Bourgogne.jpg

[edit]

Personal image taken in a private setting and posted without consent - Considering legal action, Disinformation campaign, the person in the image is not Charles-Michel de Bourbon 212.123.14.1 07:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this request. I got no answer from the uploader. and 2 VRT (ex-OTRS) tickets exist linked to this request (2021082310005871 and 2021091610004508). Zetud (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:06756jfSan Gabriel Santa Maria Bulacan Farm Municipal Roadfvf 31.jpg

[edit]

COM:Derivative work. Image shows an informational board with an underlying image of the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:09327jfLuneta Hotel Philippines Ermita Manilafvf 05.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of an illustrated tarpaulin. Missing COM:VRT correspondence for licensing permission from the graphics artists of this tarpaulin. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Another Angle (106646605).jpg

[edit]

I am requesting the deletion of two similar images from Commons of which this is one.
In both cases, the lighthouse is not the focus of these pictures. It is the young lady who is the subject and likely a romantic interest of the photographer. It may not be a selfie image of the photographer but it is reasonable to call it a “selfie of the photographer’s girlfriend”.
The photographer did not intend to have these 2006 images uploaded into Commons. In 2018 these images were taken from the photographer’s Flikr account by a bot named FlickreviewR 2, managed by User:Zhuyifei1999, an editor no longer active at Commons.
The technical quality of both images is mediocre – poor lighting, underexposed, blue cast, tilted, somewhat sharp but not crispy, with decent resolution considering it was taken with a Canon point-and-shoot in 2006.
There are at least a dozen images of the West Point Lighthouse at Category:West Point Lighthouse of much better quality than these two. These casual snapshots will not be missed.
Both images are the personal pictures of the photographer, to be shared with friends and family but IMHO should never have been uploaded into Commons.
I recommend deletion of both images.
GRDN711 (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, quality is not very bad, girlfriend is almost not noticeable (I did not notice her at all, until she was specifically mentioned). We have only 2 photos about the lighthouse in snow. If we will get better photos about the lighthouse in snow, then we can delete the file. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:West Point Lighthouse (106646603).jpg

[edit]

I am requesting the deletion of two similar images from Commons of which this is one.
In both cases, the lighthouse is not the focus of these pictures. It is the young lady who is the subject and likely a romantic interest of the photographer. It may not be a selfie image of the photographer but it is reasonable to call it a “selfie of the photographer’s girlfriend”.
The photographer did not intend to have these 2006 images uploaded into Commons. In 2018 these images were taken from the photographer’s Flikr account by a bot named FlickreviewR 2, managed by User:Zhuyifei1999, an editor no longer active at Commons.
The technical quality of both images is mediocre – poor lighting, underexposed, blue cast, tilted, somewhat sharp but not crispy, with decent resolution considering it was taken with a Canon point-and-shoot in 2006.
There are at least a dozen images of the West Point Lighthouse at Category:West Point Lighthouse of much better quality than these two. These casual snapshots will not be missed.
Both images are the personal pictures of the photographer, to be shared with friends and family but IMHO should never have been uploaded into Commons.
I recommend deletion of both images.
GRDN711 (talk) 17:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment (a) The problem with deleting images of such vintage (ok, it's only three years) is that we do not know who has relied on them (as opposed to Flickr versions) and is using them elsewhere, (b) low quality is not considered a reason for deletion unless it's irretrievably bad, (c) these are the only images of the lighthouse in snow, (d) the lighthouse is much more noticeable than the girlfriend (as lighhouses should be). Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Hello @Rodhullandemu: Thank you for your thoughtful comments.
(a) I ran a Global usage query for both images and not surprising, neither are used anywhere in Wiki. As for outside of Wiki use, Commons does not track this but I really doubt it.
(b) Low quality is just one of several factors supporting removal. The biggest issue, IMHO, is that, while sharing these personal images with family and friends, the photographer did not take steps to upload these images into Commons for perpetuity. A Commons bot took these images because the copyright allowed, not because the photographer requested an upload to illustrate the lighthouse.
(c) I am sure that, in time, much better images of the lighthouse in snow will be uploaded. In the meantime, there are at least a dozen others of better quality, created in warm sunshine, that are of better quality, that will serve Wiki needs.
(d) The lighthouse is more noticeable because it is bigger… However, the girlfriend is identifiable (from Fickr, she now appears to be the photographer’s wife and they have two children). Did either the photographer or girlfriend make this choice in 2006 when they just took a couple of personal photos?
I don’t try to get the images of others removed as it is generally too much hassle. I have enough problems just managing my own images 😊. However, for all the reasons above (somewhat selfie images; inteneded for personal use; not uploaded by photographer; identifiable person; low quality). I recommend removal of these two images. Commons now has 77,000,000 images and is growing exponentially. They will not be missed. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, quality is not very bad, girlfriend is almost not noticeable (I did not notice her at all, if she were not specifically mentioned). We have only 2 photos about the lighthouse in snow. If we will get better photos about the lighthouse in snow, then we can delete the file. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nelliwinne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all of these images seem to be copied "somewhere from the internet" and are not licensed properly.

Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree

Whatever copied from the internet are already marked as copied. Others are our work and we have original images with us. Funny to see that even my image File:Nelliwinne.jpg also marked to delete. Do I need to copy my own face from the internet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelliwinne (talk • contribs) 17:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have excluded the self-portrait, but do not believe that e.g. File:Angampora weapon Yashtiya.jpg is really made by you. If it is, why did you remove all metadata?
The other images marked as "somewhere from the internet" are clear copyvios in any case. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 08:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  • @Nelliwinne: Take responsibility for your own uploads, and make sure that your claims are accurate and honest. You should certainly mark for speedy deletion any of your "somewhere on the internet" images unless you can specifically demonstrate that the original copyright holder shares them under a free license. You have apparently uploaded a blatant copyright violation with false claims (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tamattama top side.jpg) which tends to give less credibility to your claims in general. I note that File:Phoca thumb l sri lanka currency note 1000 1.jpg is stated to be your own work (did you actually design the banknote for the Government of Sri Lanka?) and licensed under cc-by-sa-3.0 with you as the copyright holder - even more unlikely that the Government of Sri Lanka would be the license holder of their own banknotes, and contradicting Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Sri_Lanka#Currency. Unless the major problems with the uploads by this user can be promptly remedied,  Delete for all under precautionary principle. -- 15:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete We cannot simply accept files that are "sourced from the internet", and the onus of proving that the works of others are under free licenses is on the uploader. With File:Tamattama top side.jpg already identified as a clear copyright violation that was reported to the VRT, we have to assume that such disregard for copyright and licensing also affects the other uploads. Keeping these files puts people who want to use these works at legal risk. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo retouching + high retouch + background removal + photo resizing + photoshop editing.jpg

[edit]

Copyright (c) 2021 biplob390/fiverr. Ooligan (talk) 03:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo retouching + high retouch + background removal + photo resizing + photoshop editing.jpg

[edit]

Appears to be self-promotion or business promotion/ out of scope Ooligan (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 08:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Post 5.jpg

[edit]

Metadata area states, "Copyright (c) 2021 biplob390/fiverr. No use without permission." / self promo Ooligan (talk) 03:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also due to advertising. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Post 4.jpg

[edit]

"Copyright (c) 2021 biplob390/fiverr. No use without permission."/ see hidden cat "Photoshop art by Dunlandstore" - not this User Ooligan (talk) 03:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also due to advertising. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:央视新址 CCTV Tower and moving lights - panoramio (1).jpg

[edit]

The better version is File:央视新址 CCTV Tower and moving lights - panoramio.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 13:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4 asfasf.jpg

[edit]

No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MissAriArtAnimeFreckles.jpv.jpg

[edit]

out of scope picture of google images. probably not own work -- Nutshinou Talk! 20:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and possibly COM:SS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"City of Cumilla,Beautiful me, my room july 2021 jpg.jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE, out of scope -- Nutshinou Talk! 20:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sujith k sreenivas.jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE, out of scope, used on userpage of non contributing user -- Nutshinou Talk! 20:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Ahed Sarker, City of Cumilla, Bangladesh in 2018 by friend Noyon" jpg.jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE, out of scope -- Nutshinou Talk! 20:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AT-T radar 3.jpg

[edit]

Bildfehler Wanda Tiga (talk) 20:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; corrupted. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Askhug4.jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE, used on trash draft article about self that will never make it to mainspace (and has been abandonned 4 months ago) Nutshinou Talk! 20:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaike Levi 2009 2.jpg

[edit]

A formal PR picture of an Israeli singer and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:,iukroyj7u7.jpg

[edit]

not own work (tineye -- Nutshinou Talk! 21:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Download (4).png

[edit]

picture from google maps: [2] -- Nutshinou Talk! 22:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:अवधेश सिंह कवि - लेखक.JPG

[edit]

COM:SELFIE -- Nutshinou Talk! 22:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Awadhesh Singh .jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE -- Nutshinou Talk! 22:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poet Awadhesh Singh .jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE -- Nutshinou Talk! 22:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Awadhesh Singh Poet.jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE -- Nutshinou Talk! 22:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sobrock-album-art.jpg

[edit]

The album cover is still copyrighted and in fair use by Columbia Records and the creator of the artwork. It should be deleted due to copyright infringement. Rheathesecond (talk) 22:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mexico city map.png

[edit]

duplicate of File:Map of Mexico City WDL2967.png, but lacking all further information. currently unused.

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My face.jpg

[edit]

Personal, unused image. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 10:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My face.jpg

[edit]

COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 21:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brandon-riley-1.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE and doubtful if it will pass COM:EDUSE. Image of a non-notable individual. Only upload by Projektgeist (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christian Arrieta.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:Scope. Likely a personal photo by contributor Christian arrieta (talk · contribs), who hasn't contributed other files (only this one). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camera Marbun.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal COM:WEBHOSTing and only contribution by Herianto Marbun (talk · contribs) who is blocked on all wiki sites. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ETV LIVE Broadcasted News.png

[edit]

just because the EBC is state-owned does not mean its content is in the public domain/free Ue3lman (talk) 03:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Bogus claim by LTA sock. --Эlcobbola talk 01:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gig photo 7.jpg

[edit]

Metadata area states, "Copyright (c) 2021 biplob390/fiverr. No use without permission." Ooligan (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonio M. Sasaki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antony Turiello.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antsad-dalis-1.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YellowISlol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Setm4edit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam, not CC-BY-SA, I see no valid reason to keep these files

stanglavine msg 16:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Search Engine Optimization Expert Mohammad Fazla Rabbi.jpg

[edit]

Selfie only used in empty article (besides infobox) about self-- Nutshinou Talk! 16:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BebeStymimolo.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: no educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zantugamer.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: no educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 16:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taylorengstrom91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Marianne Aulie, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taylorengstrom91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these images seem questionable. Low resolution and no exif-data and a majority of the images are pictures of artwork where there's no evidence the original artist provided a release.

TommyG (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All images seem to have been uploaded to Flickr by "Ty Henriksen" (https://www.flickr.com/people/181792432@N03). A quick check of their other Flickr files reveals e.g. [3], which is credited André Galli on https://kunstforum.as/2010/01/galleri-bjarne-melgaard/. - 4ing (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 23:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Igbo warriors.jpg

[edit]

Source does not indicate license, property of the MAA Cambridge. Ukabia (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: photographer (Northcote W. Thomas) died in 1936. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by L.schartner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of these are marked "copyright viennacontemporary" right in the file name. They're by three different cameras, two Canons, one Pentax, one Nikon. The third one at least is a posed professional photo - I'm going to bet by Elsa Okazaki, since here is a photo of the same subject in the same clothes: https://www.artribune.com/professioni-e-professionisti/mercato/2016/10/vienna-contemporary-la-contemporanea-intervista-christina-stenbrecher-pfandt/attachment/christina-steinbrecher-pfandt-c-viennacontemporary-elsa-okazaki/ If L. Schartner is a representative of Okazaki or ViennaContemporary they should write as much to COMMONS:OTRS. Otherwise we're going to have to assume they're not.

GRuban (talk) 00:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Text for Digitask Project.pdf

[edit]

for minor corrections in it Arzu Yılmazz (talk) 02:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chinese Type 15 light tank image-2.jpg

[edit]

Missing evidence of source's terms of use supporting licence declaration (Commons:Essential information). RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 03:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BNS Madhumati (P911).jpg

[edit]

Missing evidence of source's terms of use supporting licence declaration (Commons:Essential information). RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/copyright says that UN works can only be reproduced with express permission. I don't see any evidence of such permission here. pandakekok9 06:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manöver an Bord der Ensdorf image-5.jpg

[edit]

Missing evidence of source's terms of use supporting licence declaration (Commons:Essential information). RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Ethan He (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four different cameras from a short timespan. Unverifiable {{Own}} claim.

Mys_721tx (talk) 04:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. One camera data reveals other author name, hence unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mattic 001.jpg

[edit]

no permission no source Hoyanova (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Galaxy Z Fold 3.jpg

[edit]

The licenz of One UI on this pic, does not allow use on Commons. Conan174 (talk) 06:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 2 older versions per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Galaxy Z Fold 3.jpg

[edit]

I don't want to reveal this image anymore. Hajoon0102 💬 02:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: same as previous. — Racconish 💬 11:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20210911 121203dupli.jpg

[edit]

wrongly described Deeps593 (talk) 07:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BBB3 Edit @iisodynamic.jpg

[edit]

Available on the web, no metadata found, see twitter first appeared on 15/12/2020, Photoshop and upload as own work. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also these files:-

Thanks--C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GeneNY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright Art Levin studios per exif, needs OTRS from artist as well

Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mp1233: Please can you get the permission sent via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever VRT permission has been received. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:အစင်ဆရာတော်ဘဒ္ဒန္တတိလောက.jpg

[edit]

COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 08:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC) This is the photo of well kown Buddhist monk as well as religious leader of Theravada Buddhism in the case of Meditation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaung myat htoo lwin (talk • contribs) 08:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC) This photo has owned.Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaung myat htoo lwin (talk • contribs) 08:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ruines de la tour de Cesson.jpg

[edit]

Wrong CC licence Alhio (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akranesvollur.jpg

[edit]

Deleted: per nomination. 2nd one is a stock image all over the internet. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Süleyman Karadeniz.webp

[edit]

It's not clear that this image can be licensed under the specified license Simeon (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, fails [{COM:LR]]. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by اسلام حسن مصطفى البردان (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 10:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vorhaut schlaffer Penis.jpg

[edit]

recent upload of low quality penis image Denniss (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammad Mohammadian.jpg

[edit]

outside of scope? Lexy iris (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lexy iris, please don't delete this photo Arenasky (talk) 08:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: (C) at source. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammad Mohammadian.jpg

[edit]

Same photo is published in a bunch of sites, besides being obviously heavily photoshopped, while original one is easy to find e.g. at https://mubi.com/cast/mohammad-mohammadian (also with larger resolution there), thus "own work" claim is doubtful. Tatewaki (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:作家時代の竹内勇太郎の顔写真.jpg

[edit]

No valid permission Malvoört (talk) 10:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yutaro Takeuchi.jpg

[edit]

No valid permission Malvoört (talk) 10:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ISKCON Nepal.png

[edit]

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logotresdedos.png

[edit]

es:Tres Dedos was twice deleted due to non-notability. Probably its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ProfilePictureMatthewDiMarcantonio.jpg

[edit]

Uploader is apparently the subject, photographer unknown. Widely published, OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 12:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Misericordia 2.jpg

[edit]

Text on the plaque is unreadable, File:Palazzo della Misericordia di Gonfienti-targa 2.jpg is a better version of the picture Naioli (talk) 12:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hudsonleogrande.jpg

[edit]

File EXIF shows "Author Nick Silvia Images". OTRS permission from Nick Silvia needed. MKFI (talk) 12:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FlatTalkIco.png

[edit]

Author/User request Paper9oll (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. Numerous alternatives available in its category. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UICO.png

[edit]

User/Author request Paper9oll (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FlatUserIco.png

[edit]

User/Author request Paper9oll (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Collage of awards.png

[edit]

Collage of images from unknown sources and unknown licensing. MKFI (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2009 05 19 Frühlingserwachen 006 (48687341016).jpg

[edit]

Unscharfes Bild, keine sinnvolle Nutzung denkbar. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:אורי שמיר צילום- אריאל בשור.jpg

[edit]

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:פורטרט אגון שילה. דיו על נייר.jpg

[edit]

Artwork of a living artist mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:פורטרט איינשטיין. עפרון על נייר.jpg

[edit]

Artwork of a living artist mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:פורטרט יוהן סבסטיאן באך. דיו על נייר.jpg

[edit]

Artwork of a living artist mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:פורטרט סוקרטס. דיו על נייר.jpg

[edit]

Artwork of a living artist mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:פורטרט קפקא. דיו על נייר.jpg

[edit]

Artwork of a living artist mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Du Val ca 1670 - Barry Laurence - seccio.jpg

[edit]

I upload this file, but the name of file is not correct. It sholud be: Duval (1677), Imperii Romani Iuventus, detalle. Userkum (talk) 13:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I have just renamed it as suggested above. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Madonna 04.jpg

[edit]

Blurry and File:Madonna 16.jpg is a better version of the same subject Naioli (talk) 13:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aniie Leibovitz.jpg

[edit]

Not uploaders work. See TinEye GeorgHH • talk   13:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Razmik Papikyan sportsman.jpg

[edit]

File metadata suggests this is a screenshot, not an original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Jungle Bride" ad from, The Film Daily, Jul-Dec 1932 (page 1078 crop).jpg

[edit]

Duplicate, my mistake- thanks Ooligan (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1 zUEbr51skDG4EJB0ft5S0w.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paolo.marraffa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, probably from the Internet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad SDG icons

[edit]

Bad quality versions of Sustainable Development Goals icons, with wrong license, replaced by new files in SVG uploaded by myself in Category:Sustainable Development Goals icons

Ferdi2005[Mail] 12:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paolo.marraffa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cliff Haemmerle.jpg

[edit]

This appears to be a derivative work, an image taken of an image seemingly on a screen/monitor. Therefore, the author and source of the original image is required so that the copyright status can be verified. mattbr 14:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antonmiranchuk.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indrekbachman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyright status.

Estopedist1 (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jose Yulo Portrait.jpg

[edit]

All Rights Reserved on Flickr. I don't know if {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} applies. Stefan2 (talk) 15:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:R Lopez Murphy.jpg

[edit]

Plagio from https://www.republicanosunidos.com.ar/pages/referentes/lopez-murphy.html MinervaAustral (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Borís Skósyrev vistiendo uniforme de la Wehrmacht.jpg

[edit]

Not own work. Based on the logo in the right, this image probably came from https://www.rhein-zeitung.de/ —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 18:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Кандидаты Умного голосования в Госдуму.pdf

[edit]

Copyright violation 83.220.239.77 18:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused text doc, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sabyinyo Volcano.jpg

[edit]

Low resolution copy of an image posted online as far back as 2013 and later in 2014. Both sources give no attribution, but do not indicate free license. The file uploaded here was originally named Download (2).jpg, which suggests this may not be the original work of the uploader. --Animalparty (talk) 18:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John o'Groats (1980) - geograph.org.uk- 863084.jpg

[edit]

Redundant with the original, File:John o'Groats (1980) - geograph.org.uk - 863084.jpg. The only difference between them is the tiny sketch of a whale (at least, I think it's a whale) at the bottom of the picture. The whale is not of any realistic educational use. bjh21 (talk) 21:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ex libris H J van Beek, Maastricht (Pam Ruter, na 1929).jpg

[edit]

Author died in 1998. Tekstman (talk) 21:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:O.oyunerdene

[edit]

Text is too small to be readable, both pictures are only used on a spam userpage by uploader. --Nutshinou Talk! 21:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luis Fernando Camacho.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Bedivere as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo was not taken off the video (whose resolution is not quite as detailed as this photograph) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:E621 (website) logo.png

[edit]

I believe this logo may be over COM:Threshold of originality. There is certainly no proof for CC license. MKFI (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 20:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miranda_(TV_series)_title.png

[edit]

This is apparently British, so maybe it is too complex per COM:TOO#UK? Stefan4 (talk) 15:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miranda (TV series) title.png

[edit]

Previously deemed to be too complex for the (low) threshold of originality for works created in the United Kingdom, see the previous deletion request. mattbr 13:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Một ngôi đền Phật giáo Navayana với chân dung của Ambedkar và cuốn sách Đức Phật và Giáo pháp của Ngài . Bức ảnh nhân sự kiện của Ngày Dhammachakra Pravartan lần thứ 50 ..jpg

[edit]

copy of File:Buddha Shrine with Ambedkar (244910903).jpg DHN (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chùa Răng Phật.jpg

[edit]

copy of File:Buddha Tooth Relic Temple and Museum.JPG DHN (talk) 00:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:R20200908 EsraLimbacher Cuvée 064.jpg

[edit]

without permission, this file cannot be used. see https://esra-limbacher.de, this is an official photo of the politician from his own website. copyright is likely. Bror Jace (talk) 20:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. MIssing COM:EVID of COM:Permission. PLease contact COM:VRT if you are the copyright owner. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chiesa-s-francesco.jpg

[edit]

non è l'immagine corretta, mi scuso Armellini74 (talk) 06:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Armellini74: Non capisco in cosa non sia corretta, se ha un titolo errato si chieda di rinominarla.--Threecharlie (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: e comunque serve l'autorizzazione del fotografo (da8325 negli EXIF). Ruthven (msg) 12:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gregor Schmalzried.jpg

[edit]
Please prove that you are allowed to publish under a CC license. Rogi (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jean-baker-miller.jpg

[edit]

This image is taken from a biography at Changing the Face of Medicine by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Was the image taken by a government employee and therefore is Template:PD-USGov-HHS-NIH applicable? It is not clear if it was taken for the project or if the image was provided and therefore copyright is held by others. mattbr 07:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:“Passatempo Mexicano” por Theubet de Beauchamp (1825).jpg

[edit]

painting is by Theubet de Beauchamp, not by Author Nortekman http://miniaturasmilitaresalfonscanovas.blogspot.com/2014/09/mexico-entre-1810-y-1827-n-4-por.html J De cinema (talk) 22:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magico 2021-09-05 0955Z.jpg

[edit]

Unsouced OR upload from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magico 2021-09-07 0021Z.jpg

[edit]

Unsourced OR Upload from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magico 2021-09-04 0929Z.jpg

[edit]

Unsourced OR upload from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only download for my sister. My sister, Anna Shuza, is a meteorologist, but she studies extratropical cyclones, and has 119 names for it (extratropical cyclones in the southeast pacific) and names ancillary policies such as for tropical cyclones, as long as they have winds of more than 30 knots. We don't want to tell this list of names to the world, just personal research. I'm a chemist, but my sister is a meteorologist. We only do personal research, we haven't sent out any warning messages. List: Ann, Magico, Azaras, Malkin, Maragae,... but my sister only does research and publishes to a few friends she knows on Zalo.--113.22.86.120 01:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Worldview image[reply]

IP sock, this is unsorced and original research without reliable source this your own based own analysis HurricaneEdgar 01:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and out of scope because it is not educational useful, original research, per [[COM:SCOPE}}. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magico 2021-09-06 1245Z.jpg

[edit]

unsourced OR from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and out of scope because it is not educational useful, original research, per [[COM:SCOPE}}. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ann 2021-09-02 0120Z.jpg

[edit]

Unsouce OR upload from the sock HurricaneEdgar 00:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and out of scope because it is not educational useful, original research, per [[COM:SCOPE}}. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rochdale pioneers group photograph.jpg

[edit]

Doutbful own work claim, for photo which is clearly from the late 19th century. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per COM:REDUNDANT. Photo is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shelley Official.jpg

[edit]

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly a publicity image / official portrait for a politician. Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 22:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wynwood, Miami, US (4).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, photo is showing copyrighted advertisement,which cannot be considered de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wynwood, Miami, US (2).jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, photo is showing copyrighted advertisement,which cannot be considered de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВДЦ Орленок, Студгородок.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 08:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, photo is showing copyrighted advertisement,which cannot be considered de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Орленок, ведущий фестиваля Бумеранг.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely no reason for deletion given: authorship is clearly given, licensing is ok, quality/useability is ok. Use {{Location possible}} if the coord. are missing. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no reason to think this photo is a copyright violation. Image is in use on the projects, so image is in Scope. --Ellywa (talk) 22:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Андрей Арчаков на МосФильмФест.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Highly pixelated photo, probably taken from another source and therefore copyright violation. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Открытие МосФильмФест.jpg

[edit]

BESCHRIFTUNG: fehlt BESCHREIBUNG: fehlt KOORDINATEN:fehlt KATEGORIEN:fehlt 

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no reason to think this photo is a copyright violation. Image is in use on the projects, so image is in Scope. --Ellywa (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Buildings (417373702).jpg

[edit]

Views of "Tours de la Défense" (recent buildings). There is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the architecs is required for publication of this photo Poudou99 (talk) 11:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. There is no commercial FOP, and licensing permission from the architects of these two most prominent buildings is required. De minimis cannot be invoked as the buildings are too prominent to be incidental or accesory. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inspiration4 crew photo

[edit]

These files are all based on File:Inspiration4 Crew Photo.jpg, which was taken from the SpaceX Twitter account. The VTRS permission of CC0 only ever applied to files from the SpaceX website (And only to their image gallery pages? Hard to remember) and to their Flickr page. This image is not published on their website, and SpaceX changed their Flickr permissions years ago. Template:CC-zero-SpaceX essentially became useless in mid-2018, and it never applied to files from their Twitter account that I recall.

— Huntster (t @ c) 06:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that makes sense and I would conditionally support deletion in that case if everything above is correct. However, it may be helpful if the template was edited to make this clear. There isn't anything on the template itself that says it's depreciated, and OTRS isn't accessible to most users. Rainclaw7 (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this file is deleted, this image would serve as a good substitute. It is from their website and is therefore covered by the original OTRS ticket. There are also individual crew images on the SpaceX launches page that are likely better quality then the current crew images. Rainclaw7 (talk) 13:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I actually need to get an OTRS member to verify what exactly is covered under the ticket, because it might not apply to the entire SpaceX.com website. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I pinged VRT. DMacks (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, DMacks, I got distracted. Shiny Object Syndrome. — Huntster (t @ c) 16:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Any consensus here? I want to avoid the Isaacman image being used in an eventual crew portrait montage from Polaris Dawn and then, deleted. Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also add the answer here: Hi, @DMacks. The ticket covers "all media located on the Flickr account at https://www.flickr.com/photos/spacexphotos/ as well as the descriptions that accompany those files." On march 22 2020, a VRT agent contact them because some of the files in the Flick account were tagged CCBYNCND and request re-confirmation, but we've never received an answer. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, there is no separate OTRS ticket concerning SpaceX.com, then? (concerning potential replacement images for these, from SpaceX.com) -- 64.229.90.53 02:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've found several, but all related to specific files. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and this conclusion. The permission on VRT is only valid for the Flickr account. Media copied from the twitter account ore the website of SpaceX are not released with a free licence. Therefore the images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabrice Del Dongo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Greece.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Greece. --Ellywa (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:André Ferrand.jpg

[edit]

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. An alternative crop was published at [4] in 2010. Potentially not own work as claimed. mattbr 15:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Upload is from 2017. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 09:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20171028龍劭華.jpg

[edit]

The permission of use for the image is not clear that the "Bureau of Cultural Affairs, Kaohsiung City Government" does not include the "Government Website Open Information Announcement" on its official website but only the Kaohsiung City Government's one does. Some bureaux of that Government such as the Land Administration Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government and the Public Works Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government clearly post a Government Website Open Information Announcement, indicating that the public can use part of the copyrighted contents with permission. To the nominator's best knowledge, the "Bureau of Cultural Affairs, Kaohsiung City Government" is not equal to the Kaohsiung City Government and as seen on the former's website, there is only a copyright statement. Because the permission of use is vague, this file should be deleted. Elmond (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Per the copyright statement 【政府網站資料開放宣告】 ...... 為利各界廣為利用網站資料高雄市政府文化局網站上刊載之所有資料與素材 ...... in the privacy policy page, the photo is licensed under GWOIA . SCP-2000 14:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the website https://www.khcc.gov.tw/ is not available to check the licence, but on basis of the remark of SCP-2000 decided to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 10:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Card. Michael Czerny S.J. by the migrants sculpture Angels Unawares.jpg

[edit]

The sculpture was completed in 2019 by Timothy Schmalz (1969–). Vatican freedom of panorama is followed by Italian FOP as per COM:FOP Vatican, but unfortunately Italy has no FOP whatsoever. This means Vatican has no FOP too. COM:VRT permission from the artist for commercial release of the artwork's license is required. Cannot be COM:De minimis as the sculpture was intentional (similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abuela Coca Atomium.JPG case). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Made a redirect to the cropped version. --Ellywa (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minhvule/Minhvule226

[edit]

These images does not seem to be own work but from a photo collection: "Trong bộ ảnh mới nhất, Duy Khánh khiến fan bất ngờ bởi sự "lột xác" với ngoại hình cool ngầu." ("In his latest photo collection, Duy Khánh surprised his fan by "moulting" into a cool outlook."). I could not find any evidence that the uploader (known copyvio abuser, see their talk page) has any relation to the actor (or his company, etc), so the license is inappropriate. Unnamed UserName me 16:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: An user who attempted to add these images into the actor's article on vi.wiki was blocked for (re)uploading similar non-free images and false claiming to be own work. Unnamed UserName me 15:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. --Ellywa (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flore laurentienne au festival Santa Teresa 2021.png

[edit]

Photo taken against the will of the subject in potentially a non-public context kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 18:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And how do you know this? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, forgot to mention OTRS ticket 2021091510011976. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 10:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Canada and OTRS ticket. Also, the author has not replied to the deletion request to explain if and how he got consent. NoFWDaddress (d) 19:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark of NoFWDaddress. --Ellywa (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Geen woning, geen kroning, NG-1980-42-2.jpg

[edit]

No public domain, creation date is 1980. Tekstman (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file is marked CC0 as the Rijksmuseum source. If they own copyright, that is a valid license -- public domain by decree of copyright owner, not normal expiration. Is there a reason that license is invalid? Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. In theory, J.B. Kist, who gave the poster to Rijksmuseum, could have been the author, but this seems unlikely. So therefore decided to deleted the file. Somebody could contact Rijksmuseum to check. --Ellywa (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BogislawX.1650.Kopie.JPG

[edit]

Not PD-Old. The painting's author is Lilli Hoeffke and the date of creation is 1980. Paelius discussion 21:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. --Ellywa (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La baronnie de Clervaux les Vaudains Vol1.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1ère de couverture. Artwork seems to be medieval, is the design below COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per COM:TOO France, the level of originality required for copyright protection is low in this country. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jeton d'un Restaurant Universitaire en Tunisie.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted work per metadata King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gabriel Garza logo.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by ItsJustdancefan as no permission (No permission since). Surely below COM:TOO in the US. However, I have no idea what this is. There are some Google hits for "Gabriel Garza" but there's no Wikipedia article. There's User:MinionsFan1998/Gingo Animation where strangely, all the named shows link to other things. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. According to the uploader "This is the best 90's cartoon ever, i think it was made in MS Paint Animate.". Imho it is of no educational value and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. Not in use on the projects, so it should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1879 Specimen of Desmodium tweedyi Collected by Frank Tweedy, NYBG.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Howdy.carabao as no permission (No permission since) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Many things to discuss here: Regarding the work itself, it seems like the printed text on the bottom right is from 1890, so that's OK. For the arrangement, it depends on whether they were just trying to preserve the plant in a scientifically accurate manner or exhibited any creativity in doing so. The logo on the left is COM:DM and can be cropped if necessary. As for the modern reproduction, the question is whether it is flat enough to fall under COM:ART or COM:SCAN. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion imho. Flat enough for not being 3D photo. --Ellywa (talk) 16:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1928年8月4日，蒋介石在孙中山墓前祭奠。.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as no permission (No permission since). From Bettmann Archive, should be discussed whether this is a US or Chinese work. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Normally Gettyimage has images that are better quality, but they don't necessary are the creators for those images. -紫阅 20210919 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 紫阅 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Nobody took the trouble to discuss if the origin is Chinese or US, so deleted per COM:PRP. Source Getty images is copyrighted anyway. --Ellywa (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1931年，蒋中正在上海.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as no permission (No permission since). From Underwood Archives, should be discussed whether this is a US or Chinese work. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Nobody took the trouble to discuss if the origin is Chinese or US, so deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 16:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:孙中山逝世后，北京碧云寺祭堂外的挽联。（徐宗懋圖文館彩色复原）.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as no permission (No permission since). Is this a modern photo or from 1925? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a modern colorizing work base on a BW photo from 1925. We can find the original online. -紫阅20210919 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 紫阅 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In that case the coloring would be copyrightable. I propose to convert it back to B&W and keep it under {{PD-China}} and {{PD-1996}}. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Nobody took the trouble to convert to B/W, so deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Docs.mail.ru.jpg

[edit]

Claimed date of this Soviet-era photograph is 1960. Unsure if it is in PD or not either in Russia ({{PD-Russia}} or in the U.S. (potential eligibility for COM:URAA). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Nobody took the trouble to discuss the copyright status, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/16&oldid=645584692"